242343
Priority Date(s): . W. •
Complete Specification Filed: W'vfo'
Ctass: J5cfc.f.a/ce//
.Sote.Kaff/jcR-.
FEB TO
Publication Date: ...........
P.O. Journal, No: . ...'^TTT
NEW ZEALAND PATENTS ACT, 1953
No.: Date:
COMPLETE SPECIFICATIO WASHING PROCESS
We, UNILEVER PLC, a company organised under the laws of Great Britain, of Unilever House, Blackfriars, London EC4, Great Britain,
hereby declare the invention for which we pray that a patent may be granted to us, and the method by which it is to be performed, to be particularly described in and by the following statement:-
- 1 -(followed by page la)
* ;242 343 ;t<x ;5 The present invention relates to a washing process and to a device for controlling the dosing of detergent product in said process. More in particular, it relates to an industrial washing process in which a wash load is treated with a detergent product in a tunnel washing machine. Such 10 machines are widely used for industrial fabric washing. ;In the washing process of the above mentioned kind the soiled load is gradually moved from one end of the tunnel to the other end, and thereby it is contacted with a wash 15 liquor which is an aqueous dilution of a detergent product. It is important that the concentration of the detergent product in the wash liquor is sufficiently high to achieve a good cleaning result. On the other hand, overdosing of detergent product should be avoided for cost reasons. ;20 ;A number of different methods have been described for controlling the dosing of detergent product in tunnel washing machines. For example, it is known to continuously measure the conductivity of the wash liquor by means of 25 electrodes, and to maintain the conductivity at a pre-set level by controlled addition of detergent product. It is thereby assumed that the conductivity of the wash liquor is completely determined by the amount of the detergent product. However, certain types of soil such as urin are 30 known to contribute to the conductivity, so that this assumption is not always warranted. Furthermore, the dosing time of the detergent product is often too long when using conductivity control, due to poor mixing near the electrodes. As a consequence, an overdosing of detergent 35 product may occur resulting in a far from optimal use of the detergent product. ;242 343 ;2 C 7272 (R) ;It is also possible to simply add a fixed amount of detergent product in every wash cycle, or a constant amount per unit of time. These methods are not very effective in providing a constant washing result, particularly in case of 5 unstable process conditions such as fluctuating water pressure, wash load or pump delivery rate. ;It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved washing process. It is a further object to provide 10 a device for controlling the process. ;We have now found that one or more of these objects may be achieved by the process of the invention for washing in an industrial washing machine, whereby a property of the wash 15 liquor is measured which is dependent on the concentration of detergent product therein, and detergent product is added to the wash liquor, dependent on said property. The process of the invention is characterized in that the wash cycle comprises a first period (t,) in which product is added 20 during a fixed time period to obtain a high concentration in the wash liquor or until the measured property reaches a high set point where it is maintained by gradually adding detergent product, and a second period (t2) in which s'aid property is kept at a low set point. ;25 ;During the first period (t.,) the detergent product is preferably added until the measured property reaches a high set point where it is maintained during at most 4 seconds by gradually adding detergent product. The first time period 30 (t1) preferably comprises 8-20% of the total wash cycle time, whereas the second time period (t2) effectively comprises 45-80% of the total wash cycle time. ;It will be understood that the length of the first time period is related to the dosing rate of detergent product 35 during that period and the height of the higher set point ;(sph) • ;10 ;15 ;242 343 ;3 C 7272 (R) ;It is desirable that during the first time period (t,) ;75-99%by weight and during the second time period (t2) 1-25% by weight of the total detergent product to be used is added into the washing machine. ;Preferably, the wash cycle comprises a lag period (tf) ;preceding the first period, in which no detergent product is added. The lag period (tf) preferably comprises 4-10% of the total wash cycle time. ;It is especially preferred that the wash cycle comprises a last period (tt) after the second period, in which no detergent product is added. This last period preferably comprises 8-25% of the total wash cycle time ;The measured property of the wash liquor is preferably the electrical conductivity. ;According to another aspect of the invention, there is 20 provided a device for controlling the dosing of detergent product to the above process. ;The invention will now be further explained by means of the accompanying drawing, in which Figure 1 depicts the conduc-25 tivity versus time profile in an industrial tunnel washer during one complete wash cycle, whereby the process of the invention is carried out. ;The figure relates to a process whereby the conductivity is 3 0 measured as the relevant property of the wash liquor. It will be understood, however, that instead of or in addition to the conductivity also other properties may be measured such as the pH, the redox potential or the presence of one or more specific chemical compounds such as for example 35 peracetic acid. ;242 34 ;4 C 7272 (R) ;Instead of keeping the conductivity of the wash liquor constant over the entire wash cycle, the process of the invention provides a first period (t,) in which detergent product is added until the measured conductivity reaches a 5 high set point (sph) . Subsequently, the conductivity is kept at the high set point for a short period of time by addition of small amounts of further detergent product. During this first period the concentration of detergent product in the wash liquor is higher than strictly necessary, but this has 10 a beneficial effect on the cleaning process. ;After the first period, the addition of detergent product is stopped and the conductivity begins to drop. As soon as the conductivity of the wash liquor reaches the lower set point 15 (spt) , the conductivity is again kept constant at that level by controlled addition of detergent product. This is continued during the second period (t2) . The end of this second period may coincide with the end of the wash cycle, but preferably it ends somewhat earlier. In that case the ad-20 dition of detergent product is stopped and the conductivity is allowed to drop below the lower set point (spt) during the remainder of the wash cycle, the period (tt) . This saves detergent product which would otherwise not have any significant effect on the cleaning process. ;25 ;30 ;In the depicted situation, the wash cycle begins with a lag period (tf) in which no detergent product is added. This again saves detergent product which would otherwise have a negligable effect on the whole of the washing process. ;The process of the invention makes it possible to control the addition of detergent product to the wash liquor in such a way that optimal cleaning results are obtained. The overdosing during the first period (t,) proved to be especially 35 effective in obtaining an optimal, economical use of detergent product. ;2 A 2 3 4 3 ;5 C 7272 (R) ;The choice of the set points spL and sph can suitably be made as follows. First, the washing process is carried out in the conventional way, maintaining the conductivity at a suitable average level during the whole wash cycle. This average 5 level is dependent on a number of factors such as degree of soiling, type of fabrics, etc. It can be easily determined by means of experiments. ;A value of about 20-70%, preferably 40-60% of this average 10 conductivity level is then set to be the lower set point ;(sp() . Subsequently, a higher set point (sph) is chosen which corresponds to a conductivity level being at least 10%, but preferably 25%, or even 50% or more above the average level when carrying out the washing process in the conventional 15 way. ;The present invention also provides a device for controlling the dosing of detergent product to the above described process. The device suitably comprises one or more inputs 20 for measuring a property of the wash liquor, for example the conductivity, one or more outputs for actuating some dosing equipment for the detergent product, a number of timers and a microcomputer capable of storing and executing a program. ;25 The invention is further illustrated by the following non- ;limiting examples, by which the positive effects of a "peak-dosage" followed by a considerably lower dosage applied during an industral washing process are clearly shown. ;30 ;Example 1, A ;Several test fabrics were treated in a Senking tunnel-type pl9-20 industrial washing machine having a wash cycle time of 118 seconds, and washing efficiencies were measured . 35 The used test fabrics are AS8 (street soil), Kwyove (fatty soil), and Vekoprop (chocolate milk). ;More information on these test fabrics can be found in memo ;242343 ;6 ;C 7272 (R) ;84021—H from I.R. TNO,Delft, Netherlands ( with regard to Kwyove and Vekoprop) and product information dated february 1991 from Centre for Testmaterials, Vlaardingen, Netherlands ( with regard to AS8). ;5 ;The experiments for example 1 were carried out according to the process of the present invention including a "peak-dosage" of detergent product. The "peak dosage" was applied 5 seconds after the start of the wash cycle. During the 10 "peak dosage" time period which lasted 18 seconds 97% by weight of the total detergent product used was dosed into the washing machine; the rest was subsequently added during time period (t2) of 70 seconds. ;15 On the other hand, during the experiments for comparative example A an average dosage rate of detergent product over the complete wash cycle was applied. ;Fot both types of experiments, an equal total quantity of detergent product of 750 ml was used. ;20 ;The following equation was used for determining the washing efficiencies: ;VR9 ;washing efficiency (%) * 100%
wherein:
Rg = reflection of the soiled fabric Rw = reflection of the washed fabric
(using 460 nm light)
ii
II
II
Ro = reflection of clean/unsoiled fabric(
II
II
" )
whereby: R0
86
Rg (AS8) =40.0
Rg (Kwyove) = 4.0 Rg (Vekoprop)= 30.4
40.0
242 34
C 7272 (R)
Using this washing efficiency equation, the following wash efficiency results were obtained:
Test fabric Example 1 Example A
AS8 74.1 ± 1.8% 69.8 ± 1.8?
Kwyove 76.2 ± 2.9% 69.1+2.93
Vekoprop 84.4 ± 2.3% 79.1 ± 2.3?
It can be seen that the washing process according to the 10 invention resulted in significantly better washing efficiencies than the comparative process wherein an average dosage rate of detergent product was applied.