NZ242291A - Isolated antifungal bacteria, fungicidal compositions - Google Patents

Isolated antifungal bacteria, fungicidal compositions

Info

Publication number
NZ242291A
NZ242291A NZ242291A NZ24229192A NZ242291A NZ 242291 A NZ242291 A NZ 242291A NZ 242291 A NZ242291 A NZ 242291A NZ 24229192 A NZ24229192 A NZ 24229192A NZ 242291 A NZ242291 A NZ 242291A
Authority
NZ
New Zealand
Prior art keywords
plant
antifungal
antifungal agent
strain ncib
fungus
Prior art date
Application number
NZ242291A
Inventor
Annabel Renwick
Keith Adrian Powell
Richard Ewen Campbell
Original Assignee
Ici Plc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ici Plc filed Critical Ici Plc
Publication of NZ242291A publication Critical patent/NZ242291A/en

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01NPRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
    • A01N63/00Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing microorganisms, viruses, microbial fungi, animals or substances produced by, or obtained from, microorganisms, viruses, microbial fungi or animals, e.g. enzymes or fermentates
    • A01N63/20Bacteria; Substances produced thereby or obtained therefrom
    • A01N63/27Pseudomonas
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N1/00Microorganisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving microorganisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a microorganism; Culture media therefor
    • C12N1/20Bacteria; Culture media therefor
    • C12N1/205Bacterial isolates
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12RINDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES C12C - C12Q, RELATING TO MICROORGANISMS
    • C12R2001/00Microorganisms ; Processes using microorganisms
    • C12R2001/01Bacteria or Actinomycetales ; using bacteria or Actinomycetales
    • C12R2001/38Pseudomonas
    • C12R2001/39Pseudomonas fluorescens

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Virology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Tropical Medicine & Parasitology (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
  • Pest Control & Pesticides (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Dentistry (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
  • Medicines Containing Material From Animals Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Pretreatment Of Seeds And Plants (AREA)

Description

<div id="description" class="application article clearfix"> <p lang="en" class="printTableText">New Zealand Paient Spedficaiion for Paient Number £42291 <br><br> LUii j. 3,h-:r\Z-. : <br><br> A&lt;p*&lt;?olp.i!,c&gt;q.-. v^&lt;S)i <br><br> Public P.O. J <br><br> 6 AUG 1993 <br><br> rsrn <br><br> S1W f^v ;. ' ''. <br><br> u <br><br> 2422 <br><br> NEW ZEALAND PATENTS ACT, 1953 <br><br> No.: <br><br> Date: <br><br> COMPLETE SPECIFICATION ANTIFUNGAL MICRO-ORGANISM <br><br> We, IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES PLC, a British company, of Imperial Chemical House, Millbank, London SW1P 3JF, England, <br><br> hereby declare the invention for which we pray that a patent may be granted to us, and the method by which it is to be performed, to be particularly described in and by the following statement:- <br><br> -1- <br><br> (followed by page 1A) <br><br> PS36296 <br><br> 1A. o /. <br><br> ANTIFUNGAL MICRO-ORGANISM <br><br> This invention relates to an agricultural plant protection product. More specifically, the invention relates to an antifungal micro-organism, in particular to a novel strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens, and the uses thereof for the protection of plants against fungal attack. <br><br> Certain strains of the micro-organism Pseudomonas fluorescens are known to be useful agricultural fungicides. The antifungal activity varies greatly amongst the innumerable strains of the micro-organism. Agriculturally useful strains are those which possess useful levels of activity against specific target fungi. One such target is the group of fungi which are associated with the disease known as "damping-off" which is particularly troublesome in certain crops and under particular climatic conditions. Use of Biological Control Agents (BCAs) or biopesticides to control disease may be more effective or more preferable to the use of standard chemical control agents. <br><br> An object of the present invention is to provide an agriculturally useful fungicide. <br><br> According to the present invention there is provided a novel strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens Biovar I, deposited at The National Collection of Industrial and Marine Bacteria under the Accession Number NCIB 40189 on 1st September 1989. <br><br> The invention also comprises an antifungal agricultural composition containing Pseudomonas fluorescens Biovar I, strain NCIB 40189 as active ingredient in admixture with a carrier composition <br><br> 2 <br><br> PS36296 <br><br> acceptable in agricultural practice. Examples of the types of agricultural formulations which may be employed are seed coatings compositions, liquid for root or soil drenching and granular or powder 5 compositions. The base materials for these are well known in the art. <br><br> Additionally, the invention provides a method of protecting crop plants from fungal infection comprising applying to the plants, the roots or 10 seeds thereof or the growing medium for the plant a fungicidaliy effective dosage of the said Pseudomonas fluorescens Biovar I, strain NCIB 40189. The treatment may be effected by application of a preparation containing organisms 15 of the strain of this invention. <br><br> The antifungal micro-organism of this invent ion is particularly effective against fungal infections associated with "damping-off" disease, such as fungi of the genera Rhizoctonia, Pythium, 20 Fusarium. It is also active against <br><br> Gaeuntannomyces graminis which causes take-all di sease. <br><br> The strain of this invention (NCIB 40189) was isolated from volunteer wheat roots collected from 25 plants grown at Chiseldon, Swindon, Wiltshire, <br><br> United Kingdom. It was deposited at The National Collections of Industrial and Marine Bacteria (23 St Machar Drive, Aberdeen, Scotland, AB2 1RY) <br><br> under the terms of the Budapest Treaty on 1st 30 September 1989. <br><br> There now follows a description of the isolation, characterisation and screening of the bacterial isolate with examples of its activity against several fungi which infect crop plants. <br><br> PS36296 <br><br> ISOLATION OF THE MICRO-ORGANISM <br><br> The bacterium was isolated from volunteer wheat roots dug from a field at a farm known as Dravcott Farm, Chiseldon, Swindon, Wiltshire, 5 United Kingdom. <br><br> The roots were washed to remove all adhering soil and placed in sterile distilled water in a flask containing glass beads. The roots were shaken with the glass beads for 15 minutes and the 10 washings then plated cut on to Kings B agar (Proteose Peptone No.3, 20g; glycerol 10ml; potassium sulphate, i.5g; magnesium sulphate heptahvdrate, 1 .5 g; technical agar, 12g; and, one litre of distilled water at pH 7.2 and including 15 cycloneximiae 75 micrograms/ml; Chloromycetin 12.5 micrograms/ml; and ampicillin 50 micrograms/ml) at 10:1 and 10:3 dilutions. The plates were incubated for three days at 20°C. <br><br> The bacterium was taken at random from the 20 agar plate ana sub-cultured on to 1/10 tryptic soya broth agar (TSA) (3g tryptic soya broth; 15g agar; one litre water). The bacterium was maintained an 1/10 TSA ana stored at 4°C until requi red. <br><br> 25 <br><br> CHARACTERISATION OF THE MICRO-ORGANISM <br><br> The morphological characteristics of Pseudomona s f luo rescer.s strain NCIB 40189 were determined by the National Collection of 30 Industrial and Marine Bacteria and are shown in Table 1 below. <br><br> PS36296 <br><br> TABLE 1 <br><br> Morphology of P fluorescens strain NCIB 40189 <br><br> Cell Morphology: Gram negative rods 5 Fluorescence : +ve <br><br> RAPID TEST (APT) <br><br> Nitrate reduction Indole production <br><br> Acid from glucose (+) <br><br> 10 Arginine denvdrolase + <br><br> Urease <br><br> Aesculin hydrolysis <br><br> Gelatin hydrolysis + <br><br> g-Galactosidase 15 Glucose assimilation + <br><br> Arabinose assimilation + <br><br> Mannose assimilation + <br><br> Mannitol assimilation + <br><br> N-acetylglucosamine assimilation + 20 Maltose assimilation - <br><br> Gluconate assimilation + <br><br> Caprate assimilation + <br><br> Adipate assimilation <br><br> Malate assimilation + <br><br> 25 Citrate assimilation + <br><br> Phenylacetate assimilation Cytochrome oxidase + <br><br> Pyocyanin - <br><br> Fluorescence + <br><br> 30 Gas Glucose <br><br> Acid Glucose PNS + <br><br> ONPG <br><br> Nitrate to nitrite <br><br> Nitrate to nitrogen - <br><br> PS36296 <br><br> Residual nitrogen + <br><br> DNAase <br><br> CSV:- <br><br> Acetate + <br><br> 5 Trehalose + <br><br> meso-Inositoi Adonitol <br><br> Butyrate + <br><br> Propylene glycci <br><br> 10 Gel Stab 20°C + <br><br> Gel Plate + <br><br> Casein (+ ) <br><br> Starch - <br><br> Lecith egg - <br><br> 15 Lipase egg -H2S (TSI) <br><br> Tween 8 0 + <br><br> Urease + <br><br> Phenylalanine deaminase -20 Growth factor required Penicillin G <br><br> Streptomycin + <br><br> Chloramphenicol + <br><br> Tetracycline + 25 Novobiocin <br><br> Polymyxin B + <br><br> Levan + <br><br> (Tests are described in: R E Buchanan, N E Gibbons <br><br> 30 (eds), 1974, Beraey's Manual of Determinative <br><br> Bacteriology, 8th ed; S T Cowan, K J Steel, 1974, Manual for Identification of Medical Bacteria). <br><br> PS36296 <br><br> 242291 <br><br> PRIMARY SOIL PETRI-DISH SCREEN <br><br> Pseudomonas fluorescens strain NCIB 40189 was tested for activity against Pythium ultimum, using a petri-dish soil screen. <br><br> 5 Petri-dishes (5cm) were filled with 10ml of potato dextrose agar (PDA). Agar plugs (5mm) from a 7 day old culture of Pythium ultimum grown at 20°C were placed centrally on to the PDA. The plates were incubated for 5 days at 20°C during 10 which the P ultimum colonised the plate. Minster Mendip Loam was autoclaved at 120°C for 60 minutes. To this sterile wheatgerm was added (1% w/w) and mixed well. Approximately 8g of soil was placed into each Petri dish to cover the Pythium 15 lawn. <br><br> The following treatments were used (2 ml applied per petri-dish): <br><br> 1) Pseudomonas fluorescens strain NCIB 40189 (culture grown in 1/10 tryptic scya broth <br><br> 20 (TSB) for 48 h at 12 °C); <br><br> 2) METALAXYL (100 ppm AI); <br><br> 3) CONTROL: 1/10 TSB alone. <br><br> Duplicate plates were prepared, and incubated for 4 days at 10°C. <br><br> 25 Results are shown in Table 2 below. Activity was scored on a scale of zero to 3. A score of zero meant there was considerable growth of Pythium; a score of 3 meant there was no mycelial growth in the dish. <br><br> •4 <br><br> PS36296 <br><br> / <br><br> TABLE 2 <br><br> Activity of NCIB 40189 against P ultimum <br><br> TREATMENT ACTIVITY SCORE <br><br> 5 <br><br> NCIB 40189 3 <br><br> Metalaxyl 3 <br><br> Control 0 <br><br> 10 The results show that strain NCIB 40189 <br><br> inhibited fungal growth in the soil. Its activity is comparable to Metaiaxvl, a standard chemical fungi ci de. <br><br> IB <br><br> SECONDARY POT SCREENING <br><br> The effectiveness of Pseudomonas fluorescens strain NCIB 40189 was further tested against Pythium ultimum and Rhizoctonia solani. Results 20 show that strain NCIB 40189 has activity against P ultimum and R solani under glasshouse conditions. <br><br> ACTIVITY AGAINST P ULTIMUM: <br><br> Cultures of P ultimum were raised on PDA 25 plates for 7 days at 20°C. A mixture of 200g of silver sand, 5g cornmeal, 4g Bemax wheatgerm and 40ml water was autoclaved at 120°C for 20 minutes then placed in a flask and inoculated with 1/4 of a plate of Pvthiurn. The flasks were incubated at 30 20°C for 7 days, then the contents of each flask was mixed with fine sand to a final weight of 300g. One flask of Pvthium was mixed with 8 litres of Mendip Minster Loam to give a standard dilution (X). This was further diluted with clean <br><br> PS36296 <br><br> n <br><br> Mendip loam to give a dilution of X/16 used in the tests. <br><br> Tests were carried out in pots (3 inches diameter), filled to 3/4 with infested soil. Five 5 peas were sown in each pot and covered with clean soil . <br><br> The following treatments were used (35 ml added as a drench to each pot): <br><br> 1) Pseudomonas fluorescens strain NCIB 40189 10 (culture grown in 1/10 tryptic soya broth <br><br> (TSB) for 48 h at 20 °C) ; <br><br> 2) METALAXYL (0.1-5.0 ppm AI); <br><br> 3) CONTROL: 1/10 TSB alone. <br><br> Five replicates we re prepared for each 15 treatment. <br><br> Pea plants were grown for 14 days at 15°C, ana seedling emergence was monitored weekly. The plants were watered daily: particular care was taken to ensure that the soil was kept moist 20 during the tests as the disease incites damping-off under cool, damp conditions. <br><br> Results are shown in Table 3 below. <br><br> PS36296 <br><br> 9 _ „ _ <br><br> TABLE 3 <br><br> Effect of strain NCIB 40189 on establishment of peas in the presence of P ultimum <br><br> TREATMENT <br><br> Percentage (%) emergence of peas in pots with P ultimum present <br><br> 10 <br><br> 15 <br><br> NCIB 40189 Metalaxvl 0 .1 ppm <br><br> 0 . 5 ppm <br><br> 1 . 0 ppm 5 . 0 ppm Control <br><br> 76 <br><br> 64 84 84 96 28 <br><br> Results for strain NCIB 40189 and for the untreated control show that application of the Pseudomonas fluorescens strain allows 2 0 significantly more pea plants to emerge. Activity of strain NCIB 40189 is comparable with that of the chemical fungicide Metalaxvl at the disease levels expressed. <br><br> 25 <br><br> ACTIVITY AGAINST R SOLANI: <br><br> Cultures of R solani were raised on PDA plates for 7 days at 20°C. A mixture of 200g of silver 30 sand, 4g Bemax wheatgerm and 40ml water was autoclaved at 120°C for 20 minutes then placed in a flask and inoculated with 1/4 of a plate of Rhi zoctonia. The flasks were incubated at 20°C for 7 days, then the contents of each flask was <br><br> PS36296 <br><br> 0 LI <br><br> C "T £» ! <br><br> mixed with fine sand to a final weight of 300g. Three quarters of a flask of Rhi zoctoni a inoculum was mixed with 6 litres of Mendip Minster Loam to give a standard dilution (Y). This was further 5 diluted with clean Mendip loam to give a dilution of Y/8 used in the tests. <br><br> Tests were carried out in pots (3 inches diameter), filled to 3/4 with infested soil. Five peas were sown in each pot and covered with clean 10 soil. <br><br> The following treatments were used (35 ml added as a drench to each pot): <br><br> 1) Pseudomonas fluorescens strain NCIB 40189 (culture grown in 1/10 tryptic soya broth <br><br> 15 (TSB ) for 48 h at 20 °C); <br><br> 2) PENCYCURON (Monceren at 10 or 100 ppm AI) ; <br><br> 3) DISEASED CONTROL: 1/10 TSB alone; <br><br> 4) HEALTHY CONTROL: 1/10 TSB alone on soil not infested with Rhizoctonia. <br><br> 20 Five replicates were prepared for each treatment. <br><br> Pea plants were grown for 14 days at 24°C, and seedling emergence was monitored weekly. The plants were watered daily. <br><br> 25 Results are shown in Table 4 below. <br><br> n./ <br><br> L. <br><br> PS36296 <br><br> 242291 <br><br> 5 <br><br> TABLE 4 <br><br> Effect of strain NCIB 40189 on establishment of peas in the presence of R solani <br><br> TREATMENT Percentage (%) emergence of peas <br><br> NCIB 40189 38 Monceren <br><br> 10 10 ppm 40 <br><br> 100 ppm 50 <br><br> Diseased control 20 <br><br> Healthy control 92 <br><br> 15 <br><br> Application of the Pseudomonas fluorescens strain NCIB 40189 allows significantly more pea plants to emerge when compared to the diseased control. In fact, application of strain NCIB 20 40189 allows pea establishment at a level comparable to the healthy control (treatment without R solani). Activity of the BCA also appears to be higher than that of the chemical fungicide Monceren. <br><br> 25 <br><br> PROTECTION AGAINST PLANT DISEASE: FURTHER TESTS <br><br> Pseudomonas flue rescens strain NCIB 40189 was further tested for its activity against Rhi zoctoni a 30 solani and its ability to protect pea plants from disease. <br><br> The trial was carried out in rectangular trays (165mm x 95mm), half-filled with infested soil (prepared according to the method described in the <br><br> PS 3 6 296 <br><br> previous section). Twenty-five peas were sown in each tray ana covered with clean soil. <br><br> The BCA (strain NCIB 40189) and Control treatments were as follows: <br><br> 1) DRENCH <br><br> 2) GRANULES <br><br> 100 ml bacterial suspension (10 cells/ml) added to each tray; 10 g pre-formed granules added to each tray; <br><br> granules (types A, B, C) carrying 10 bacterial cells were inoculated at a maximum capacity of BCA concentrate: 4.5xlOi(^ cells/g; 3) UNTREATED 100 mi water added as a drench to each tray as a control. 15 Three replicates we re prepared for each treatment. <br><br> Pea plants were grown for 7 to 14 days at 24°C. The plants were watered daily and seedling emergence was monitored weekly. <br><br> 20 Test results were collated from all experiments and are shown in Table 5 below. <br><br> PS36296 <br><br> 13 _ <br><br> ,&lt;~v f <br><br> TABLE 5 <br><br> Activity of strain NCIB 40189 against R solani <br><br> TREATMENT Mean percentage emergence (%) of peas 5 from R solani infested compost <br><br> Drench 73 <br><br> Granule A 65 <br><br> Granule B 74 <br><br> 10 Granule C 66 <br><br> Untreated 31 <br><br> Application of strain NCIB 40189 significantly increased the percentage emergence of the plants 15 when compared to the untreated control. There is no statistically significant difference between results obtained with the drench or granule BCA treatments. <br><br> 20 <br><br> FIELD TRIALS <br><br> Pseudomonas fluorescens strain NCIB 40189 was used in field trials as a biological control agent (BCA) against "damping-off" disease in peas and 25 maize. Field trials of strain NCIB 40189 have been conducted on its potential for inhibiting Pythium and Fusarium spp. Results were compared to standard chemical treatments, and are reported below. In summary, these results show that 30 disease caused by Pythium ultimum or Fusarium solani is reduced by application of strain NCIB 40189 to a level comparable with that obtained by standard chemical treatment. <br><br> PS36296 <br><br> EFFICACY AGAINST PYTHIUM: <br><br> Trials were conducted in France using peas as the test crop. Pathogen was added at various rates as wheat grain inoculum, prepared as 5 follows. Batches of wheat seed (1 Kg) were soaked in water overnight, drained and autoclaved at 121°C. Fungal spores which remained viable were allowed to germinate and grow for two days before the seed was re-autoclaved at 121°C. A 7 day old 10 plate of Pythium ultimum (grown on potato dextrose agar at 20°C) was added to the wheat seed and allowed to grow for 10 days, shaken to redistribute the myceiia, and left for a further 11 day growth period. The inoculum was then ready 15 for use within the next 14 days. <br><br> Strain NCIB 40189 was applied as a gum/peat formulation (10' cell/seed). APRON (Trade Mark) was used as a chemical control, applied at a rate of 30g AI/lOOKg seed. Two types of plant control 20 were used: untreated pea seed, and blank pea seed (which had undergone seed treatment without addition of BCA or chemical). <br><br> Results are shown in Table 6 below. "Number emerged" refers to the mean number of plants which 25 emerged 22 days after sowing from 200 seeds on a strip 5 metres long. The letters appearing after the numbers "emerged" indicate statistical significance: there is no significant difference at the 5 % probability level between entries with a 30 letter in common. <br><br> PS36296 <br><br> 15 <br><br> TABLE 6 <br><br> Field activity of NCIB 40189 against P ultimum: emergence of pea plants <br><br> 5 TREATMENT <br><br> 10 <br><br> NCIB 40189 APRON Untreated Blank <br><br> 15 <br><br> The first column in Table 6 shows results for the control experiment where tests were conducted in normal field soil, without any added pathogen. <br><br> 20 The absence of pathogen in the soil allowed normal plant growth. There is no real significant difference between treatments, indicating the addition of strain NCIB 40189 had no phytotoxic effect. <br><br> 25 The other figures in Table 6 give the results for two test treatments at different pathogen rates. The presence of pathogen in the soil decreased the number of plants emerging from untreated or blank seed when compared to the <br><br> 30 control experiment. This shows disease was present and was adversely affecting plant growth. However, the presence of strain NCIB 40189 significantly increases the number of plants emerging in the presence of the pathogen. <br><br> NUMBER EMERGED WHEN P ULTIMUM ADDED AT THE FOLLOWING RATES (g inoculum per metre row): 0 100 200 <br><br> 180.25 AB 153.00 CDG 134.50 FGH <br><br> 171.50 AC 169.50 ACE 157.25 BCDF <br><br> 172.50 AC 130.25 GHI 111.25 I <br><br> 176.00 AC 144.34 DEH 119.00 HI <br><br> 16 <br><br> EFFICACY AGAINST FUSARIUM: <br><br> Field trials were carried out in the USA (Mississippi), using maize as the test crop. Pathogen (F solani) was added at various rates as 5 wheat grain inoculum, prepared as described above. <br><br> Strain NCIB 40189 was applied as a gum/peat n <br><br> formulation (10' cell/seed). The chemical control was CAPTAN (Trade Mark), used as a seed treatment at the recommended rate. Untreated seed was used 10 as the plant control. <br><br> Results are shown in Table 7 below. Emergence is quoted as percentage (%) of plants 15 days after sowing. The letters appearing after the percentage emerged indicate statistical 15 significance. There is no significant difference at the 5% probability level between entries with a letter in common. <br><br> TABLE 7 <br><br> 20 Field activity of NCIB 40189 against F solani: <br><br> emergence of maize plants <br><br> TREATMENT PERCENTAGE (%) EMERGED WHEN F SOLANI ADDED AT THE FOLLOWING RATES 25 (g inoculum per metre row): <br><br> 0 10 <br><br> NCIB 40189 65.208 C 74.583 AC <br><br> CAPTAN 69.583 BC 69.375 BC <br><br> 30 Untreated 65.833 C 51.250 D <br><br> The first column of Table 7 shows results for the control trials where no test pathogen was added. The absence of pathogen in the soil <br><br></p> </div>

Claims (1)

  1. <div id="claims" class="application article clearfix printTableText"> <p lang="en"> PS36296<br><br> 17 f% B<br><br> allowed normal plant growth. There is no real significant difference between treatments, indicating the addition of strain NCIB 40189 had no phytotoxic effect.<br><br> The presence of pathogen, Fusarium solani, in the soil decreased the number of plants emerging from untreated seed when compared to the control experiment. This shows disease was present and was adversely affecting plant growth. However, the presence of strain NCIB 40189 significantly increases the percentage of plants emerging in the presence of the pathogen. in fact, treatment with strain NCIB 40189 improved plant performance so that the percentage emerging was not significantly different from the percentage emerging in the absence of pathogen.<br><br> 18<br><br> PS36296<br><br> 10<br><br> r? 6J t<br><br> C i<br><br> WHAT WE CLAIM IS:<br><br> 1. An antifungal agent comprising the micro-organism Pseudomonas fluorescens, a culture of which was deposited on 1st September 1989 under the terms of the Budapest Treaty with the National Collection of Industrial and Marine Bacteria Limited, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, under the Accession Number 40189.<br><br> 2. An antifungal agricultural composition containing as active ingredient an antifungal agent as claimed in claim 1, in admixture with a carrier composition acceptable in agricultural practice.<br><br> 3. A method of inhibiting fungal attack on a plant, comprising applying an effective dose of an antifungal agent as claimed in claim 1 to the locus of a plant or seed.<br><br> 4. A method as claimed in claim 3 where the antifungal agent is applied to a plant.<br><br> E. A method as claimed in claim 3 where the antifungal 25 agent is applied to a seed prior to sowing.<br><br> 6. A method as claimed in claim 3 where the antifungal agent is applied to a growing medium in which a plant is arowina or is to be arown.<br><br> 15<br><br> 20<br><br> 30<br><br> •<br><br> t * A \»<br><br> A method as claimed in claim 3 where the fungus is//<br><br> th &lt;\<br><br> from the aenus Rhizoctonia. |, « * ft<br><br> !■" yW J<br><br> PS36296<br><br> 19<br><br> f* s<br><br> 8. A method as claimed in claim 3 where the fungus is from the genus Pythium.<br><br> 9. A method as claimed in claim 3 where the fungus is from the genus Fusarium.<br><br> 10. A method as claimed in claim 3 where the fungus is C-aeumannomyces arami ni s .<br><br> 11 . An antifungal agent as defined in claim 1 substantially as herein described.<br><br> 12. An antifungal agricultural composition as defined in claim 2 substantially as herein described with reference to any example thereof.<br><br> 13. A method as defined in claim 3 substantially as herein described with reference to any example thereof.<br><br> PLC<br><br> By ikzflhc'r nuthorisotl Ayc;.t<br><br> </p> </div>
NZ242291A 1991-04-11 1992-04-09 Isolated antifungal bacteria, fungicidal compositions NZ242291A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB919107678A GB9107678D0 (en) 1991-04-11 1991-04-11 Antifungal micro-organism

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
NZ242291A true NZ242291A (en) 1993-08-26

Family

ID=10693067

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
NZ242291A NZ242291A (en) 1991-04-11 1992-04-09 Isolated antifungal bacteria, fungicidal compositions

Country Status (13)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0579635A1 (en)
JP (1) JPH06506345A (en)
AU (1) AU656369B2 (en)
BG (1) BG61654B1 (en)
CA (1) CA2107098A1 (en)
CZ (1) CZ280653B6 (en)
FI (1) FI934441A0 (en)
GB (1) GB9107678D0 (en)
HU (1) HUT67770A (en)
NO (1) NO933623D0 (en)
NZ (1) NZ242291A (en)
RU (1) RU2104645C1 (en)
WO (1) WO1992018613A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB9207352D0 (en) * 1992-04-03 1992-05-13 Ici Plc Method to control fungal disease
FI95598C (en) * 1994-01-31 1996-02-26 Kemira Agro Oy Microorganism for biological control of plant diseases
FI97148C (en) * 1994-07-14 1996-10-25 Lahden Polttimo Ab Oy Process for the treatment of plants to improve the quality properties of seeds
EP1021954B1 (en) * 1998-12-24 2002-10-02 Gabriele Dr. Berg Strains of rhizobacteria for use against phytopathogenic soil fungi and methods of use thereof
BR0009629A (en) 2000-12-08 2002-08-20 Embrapa - Empresa Brasileira De Pesquisa Agropecua Biocontrol of plant diseases caused by fusarium species with new isolates of bacillus megaterium and pantoea agglomerans
HU230555B1 (en) * 2001-08-13 2016-12-28 Biofil Kft. Environment-friend micro-organism produce and producing thereof
EP2236037A1 (en) * 2009-03-30 2010-10-06 Technische Universität Graz Fungicide preparation
MD508Z (en) * 2012-01-06 2012-12-31 Институт Генетики, Физиологии И Защиты Растений Академии Наук Молдовы Process for presowing treatment of grape seeds
US9877486B2 (en) 2014-01-31 2018-01-30 AgBiome, Inc. Methods of growing plants using modified biological control agents
CN106170207B (en) * 2014-01-31 2019-12-27 农业生物群落股份有限公司 Modified biological control agents and uses thereof

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4456684A (en) * 1982-09-08 1984-06-26 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture Method for screening bacteria and application thereof for field control of diseases caused by Gaeumannomyces graminis
US4647533A (en) * 1984-09-14 1987-03-03 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture Method for screening bacteria and application thereof for field control of Pythium spp. on small grain crops
IL87322A0 (en) * 1988-08-02 1989-01-31 Univ Ramot Method of controlling foliar diseases caused by fungal pathogens with fungicidal bacteria and novel pure cultures of fungicidal bacteria
US4996049A (en) * 1988-12-19 1991-02-26 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Biological control of corn seed rot and seedling blight

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
NO933623L (en) 1993-10-08
HUT67770A (en) 1995-04-28
WO1992018613A1 (en) 1992-10-29
AU656369B2 (en) 1995-02-02
FI934441A (en) 1993-10-08
FI934441A0 (en) 1993-10-08
AU1531592A (en) 1992-11-17
RU2104645C1 (en) 1998-02-20
EP0579635A1 (en) 1994-01-26
BG61654B1 (en) 1998-02-27
JPH06506345A (en) 1994-07-21
CZ210693A3 (en) 1994-04-13
HU9302694D0 (en) 1994-01-28
CZ280653B6 (en) 1996-03-13
NO933623D0 (en) 1993-10-08
CA2107098A1 (en) 1992-10-12
GB9107678D0 (en) 1991-05-29
BG98144A (en) 1994-06-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JPS63273470A (en) Microorganism strain having antibacterial activity
CZ287510B6 (en) Preparation and method of controlling diseases of plants
AU656369B2 (en) Antifungal micro-organism
US5208159A (en) Antibacterial, anti-nematode and/or plant-cell activating composition, and chitinolytic microorganisms for producing the same
AU2004284329B2 (en) Fungus capable of controlling poaceous plant disease damage, and utilizing the same, controlling agent, method of controlling and biomaterial
HU220838B1 (en) Microorganisms for biological control of plant diseases
WO1999016859A1 (en) Microbial agricultural chemical
US20060029576A1 (en) Biological control of pythium disease in crops
KR100521744B1 (en) Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6 and Plant Diseases Control and Drought Damage Reduction Method using The Same
JP3132195B2 (en) New microorganism and plant disease control agent
JPH06135811A (en) Controlling agent against plant disease and injury
TW201938787A (en) Streptomyces misionesis KHY26, cultivation method for increasing KHY26 and use for controlling plant pathogens
KR20060039021A (en) Controlling agent and controlling method for diesease damage on brassicaceous plants
WO2000000032A1 (en) Novel biocontrol agents
WO1995017820A1 (en) Disease control agent for useful gramineous plants and control method
JP3641492B2 (en) Soil disease control materials
Elkot et al. Biocontrol of Fusarium dampingoff of pea by certain bacterial antagonists
KR0151504B1 (en) Disease control agent for useful gramineous plants and control method
JP2742137B2 (en) Disease control agent and control method for useful plants of Gramineae
EP0633724A1 (en) Method to control fungal disease
JPH101407A (en) Agent for controlling gramineous crop and its control
JPH0912416A (en) Agent for controlling blight of useful plant of family gramineae and controlling method
JPH0912418A (en) Blight controlling agent for useful plant of family gramineae using weed pathogen and controlling method
WO1995017820A9 (en)
MXPA96002967A (en) Microorganisms for biological control of plant diseases