NZ237966A - Packaging horticultural produce: separated two-layer wrapping with inner vapour-pervious, moisture-impervious layer - Google Patents

Description

9 3 7^66 L f •• Priorilw Oate<8):. A. I it.', 'j. ft.

Compete Specification Filed: Clcv.i: (G).X'f;£P.-Zf. k.i,..(\i>.■}P.L;).(\ VAiku.

PubUcBtlofJ Dele: "" £ 5 jijN i992 P.',j. N'o: J.4A.7.

No." Date.

NEW ZEAl.AND PATKNTS ACT, 1953 CONDENSATION k control h horticultural packagins commonwealthscientific act. AgstraHa Australian Company, of 1A Limesx '■w' u-^v, we ptay that a patent may hereby declare the invention lor ™ , perforraed, and the method by which « b= granted „ *T ^ itM,nl„t: . to be particularly desert- (followed by page la) lo- CONDENSATION CONTROL IN HORTICULTURAL PACKAGING Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a packaging material and to a method of packaging horticultural produce. The 5 packaging material and method of packing of the present Invention enables a substantial reduction in the amount of water condensation on the packed produce to be achieved. Background of the Invention liners holding horticultural produce presents a serious problem in transport and storage. The plastic liners and bags are necessary in that they prevent excessive loss of water from produce. Ideally, the relative humidity inside the packaging is kept high, so that little water is lost 15 from the produce and it keeps fresh and turgid. This means that the vapour pressure of the water within the pack is maintained close to the equilibrium vapour pressure of water over the produce. temperature than its surrounds in the store. In addition, the produce (fruit, vegetables, cut flowers, potted ornamentals etc.) is living and therefore produces heat as a result of metabolic activity. These two factors result in the temperature of the produce tending to be higher 25 than that of the inside surface of the packing material. This in turn means that the vapour pressure of water over the produce will often exceed the saturation vapour pressure of water at the cooler inside surface of the packing material, where this occurs, water will condense 30 on the inside surface of the packing material.

Droplets of condensed water tend to coalesce, and collect in corners and at the bottom of the package. As a result, produce in such positions will be wetted. Where wetting occurs, gas exchange between the fruit tissue and 35 the surrounding ~ ' Jed. Salts and Condensation of water within plastic bags and box Produce when packed is usually at a higher 2 nutrients such as sugars and amino acids will also leak from the produce into the water. This resulting extract encourages the growth of microorganisms, which will further consume the oxygen which is already in restricted 5 supply to the respiring produce. Some of these microorganisms are likely to invade the produce and cause rots. As a direct result of fungal growth, and as a secondary response of the plant tissue to infection, the gas ethylene is likely to be evolved. This gas, even at 10 concentrations less than 1 microlitre per litre has a generally deleterious effect on the storage life of many horticultural commodities and can cause off-flavours. Off-flavours may also be produced directly by microorganisms. In addition, contact of a number of 15 fruits such as grapes, plums and blueberries with water results in a loss of bloom from the fruit. This in turn leads to a lower market price for the fruit.

Due to the problems resulting from condensation wetting of horticultural produce, the full benefits of 20 high humidity in packages are not able to be realised. Typically, commodities are not wrapped completely or are wrapped with a water - permeable cover so as to lessen the risk of condensation occurring. This results in part or all of the produce losing excessive amounts of water. 25 Such water stress reduces the life of the commodity and its quality.

One means of avoiding, to some extent, the difficulty of condensate forming within the package is to use a packaging material vhich has some permeability to water 30 vapour. Examples of such packaging material are disclosed in Australian patent specification No. 38079/89 , GB1369992 and US 4079152. It is disclosed in US 4079152 and GB 1369992 that a desiccant, preferably within a pouch, is included in the packaging material to absorb any excess condensate. Such packaging, however, does not allow the C i E /v U * O , r. V "t-'\ \ * 6 Hay 19^;, 3 full benefits of high humidity in packages to be achieved. Summary of the Present Invention In a first aspect the present invention consists in a packaging material for use in packing horticultural 5 produce the packing material comprising a first sheet which is freely permeable to water vapour but resistant to capillary transfer of liquid water, and a second sheet which is impermeable to water vapour and liquid water, the first and second sheets being spaced apart from one 10 another.

In a second aspect the present invention consists in a packaging material comprising a first sheet which is freely permeable to water vapour but resistant to capillary transfer of liquid water, and a second sheet 15 which is impermeable to water vapour and liquid water, the first and second sheets being connected at a number of points over the surface in a manner such that space exists between the first and second sheets.

In a third aspect the present invention consists in a 20 method of packing horticultural produce comprising the steps of:- (i) wrapping the produce in a first sheet, the first sheet being freely permeable to water vapour but resistant to capillary transfer of liquid water; and 25 (ii) wrapping the wrapped produce with a second sheet, the second sheet being impermeable to water vapour and liquid water, the wrapping being such that a space exists between the first and second sheets. In a preferred embodiment of this aspect of the 30 present invention the first and second steps are carried out simultaneously by means of the first sheet and the second sheet being connected at a number of points over the surface of the sheets.

The first sheet is typically composed of hydrophobic polymers such as polyethylene or polypropylene or polymers If which have been rendered hydrophobic by special treatments such as, silicone coating. Such polymers can be made in the form of fibres that can be used to fabricate sheet material. The resulting sheet material may be non-woven 5 or woven. The essential characteristic is that the sheet is freely permeable vapour but resistant to the capillary transfer of liquid water. This resistance to capillary transfer of liquid water is achieved due to the non-wettable (hydrophobic) nature of the sheet material.

A number of such sheet materials that resist the passage of free water but are permeable to water vapour are made by Du Pont from polyethylene under the trade name "TYVEC". A sheet material having similar properties but made from polypropylene fibres is sold by Kimberley Clark under the trade mark "EVOLUTION". At present it is preferred that the first sheet is made from polypropylene fibres, and is preferably the material "EVOLUTION" sold by Kimberley Clark. grades ranging from 16 grams per sq. metre of fabric to 80 grams per sq. metre of fabric, however, it is presently preferred that the first sheet has a weight of 24 grams per sq. metre of material. number of materials which are impervious to liquid water and water vapour. At present, however, it is preferred that the second sheet comprises a film of polyethylene.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention the first and second sheets are connected at the number of 30 points by point welding.

In a further preferred embodiment of the present invention a desiccant is provided within, and partly fills, the space between the first and second sheets.

This desiccant may be any of a number of such materials '35-—_well known in the art, however, it is presently preferred The "EVOLUTION" material is made in a number of The second sheet material may be composed of any 0 Chat the desiccant has some humidity buffering capabilities.

A material having such humidity buffering capabilities may be produced by mixing a water-swellable, 5 water -insoluble polymer with a mixture of (1) a non-volatile hydrophilic liquid and (2) water, the polymer being swellable by the mixture. By adjusting the relative portions of (1) and (2) the humidity buffering capabilities of the formulation can be adjusted. The 10 water-swellable polymer may be any of a large number of such materials such as "TERRA-SORB", "AGROSOKE", "IGETAGEL" , "SUPER - SORB", "SUPER-SLURPER" and "ALCOSORB". It is presently preferred that the water-swellable polymer is "ALCOSORB AB3S", made by Allied Colloids. It is also 15 preferred that the non-volatile hydrophilic liquid is glycerol. Details regarding humidity buffer formulations can be found in W091/00316 in the name of the present applicant.

In a further preferred embodiment of the present 20 invention the desiccant is contained in a woven or non-woven cloth which is freely permeable to water vapour and liquid water (hydrophilic cloth).

Detailed Description of the Invention In order that the nature of the present invention may 25 be more clearly understood, preferred forms thereof will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings and following examples.

Figure 1 shows schematically the diffusion of water vapour in prior art packing of horticultural produce. In 30 Figure 1, the produce 10 is at a mean temperature higher than that of the storage environment. Living produce has a high water potential and therefore in such a closed environment is surrounded by a relative humidity very close to saturation. Under such condit^ns, the water 35 vapour pressure depends on the temperature. ""There is, / 5 /' 9 j therefore, a net diffusion of water symbolised by the arrows in Figure 1 down the gradient of water vapour pressure. This gradient corresponds to the temperature gradient between the produce 10 and the moisture barrier 5 11. At 11, water condenses as soon as saturation vapour pressure is exceeded. This condensation wets the commodity by physical contact.

Figure 2 shows schematically the diffusion of water vapour using the packing material and method of the 10 present invention. As shown in Figure 2 there is a net diffusion of water, symbolised by the arrows, down the gradient of water vapour pressure from the produce 10 through first sheet 12 to second sheet 14. As the first sheet 12 is permeable to water vapour the passage of water 15 vapour from the produce 10 and subsequent condensation on second sheet 14 is not impeded by first sheet 12. In addition, as shown in Figure 2, the first sheet 12 is connected to second sheet 14 at a number of points indicated generally as 16, leaving space 18 between the 20 first sheet 12 and the second sheet 14. Provided within space 18 is desiccant 20.

Figure 3 illustrates schematically the resistance of the first sheet to the passage of liquid water. Due to its hydrophobicity first sheet 12 is not easily wetted by 25 water, and any condensate will therefore be prevented from wetting the produce 10.

If the second sheet 14 is made of a hydrophobic plastic such as polyethylene, droplets rather than a continuous film of water will be formed. Such droplets 30 tend to coalesce and dribble down the walls of any package made of the packing material to the base of the package, where they can. if desired, be absorbed by capillary action in a desiccant 20. At no point can the liquid water pass back to the produce 10. because it is repelled bv the hydrophobic nature of the first sheet 12. Once the condensed water is absorbed by the 35 desiccant 20. ■ , t v V. '*<2? ■* " \ *6hA: < ■ 1 - its surface area for re-evaporation will be reduced and its vapour pressure will be reduced below that of pure water. The extent to which this reduction occurs can be controlled by using a humidity buffer as the desiccant.

If the external temperature now rises to be temporarily above that of the produce, the likelihood that condensed water can return as vapour to recondense on the cold produce is reduced if such a desiccant is used.

Figures 4 to 6 show results which demonstrate the 10 effectiveness of the packing material and method of packing of the present invention in preventing condensate from wetting packaged produce. These figures contrast the amount of produce wetting using the packing material and method of the present invention with that of the prior 15 art.

In all cases, produce at a temperature of 20°C was hermetically sealed in a bag of low-density polyethylene and the whole pack was then cooled to a temperature of 1°C. This bag of low density polyethylene constituted 20 the second sheet in the method of the present invention. The amount of water on the produce was then determined by wiping the produce with a weighed paper tissue and subtracting its dry weight from the weight following wiping. The amount of water on the packing material was 25 determined by weighing it before and after drying in an oven at 70°C.

In each of these experiments the second sheet comprised a sheet of spun polypropylene having a weight of 24g/m2.

Figure A shows the results of cooling plums over 23 hours within a sealed polyethylene bag. After cooling, the bags were agitated to redistribute the water. In the prior art packing method (A), the distribution of the recovered condensate was 53% on th^gj^ruit surface and 47% 35 on the surface of the polyethylene bag.^^Tn^the method of 7 > 6 the present invention (B), only 2% was on the fruit whilst 98% remained on the packing material.

Figure 5 shows the results of a similar test, in which nectarines were cooled for 46 hours. In the packing 5 method of the prior art (A), the distribution of the recovered condensate was 73% on the fruit surface and 27% on the surface of the polyethylene bag. using the method of the present invention (B) only 1% was on the fruit whilst 99% remained on the packing material. 10 Figure 6 shows the results of cooling cabbage under the same conditions, except the time was increased to 144 hours. In the prior art packing method (A), there was 361 of the condensate on the surface of the cabbage and 64% on the surface of the packing material. Using the method of 15 the present invention (B), only 2% was on the cabbage whilst 98% remained on the packing material.

As can be readily seen from these results, the packing material and packing method of the present invention results in a substantial reduction in the amount 20 of wetting of packed produce.

It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that numerous variations and/or modifications may be made to the invention as shown in the specific embodiments without departing from the scope of the 25 invention as broadly described. The present embodiments are, therefore, to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive.

V 6 ^1992 ~r

Claims (12)

9 WHAT/K\T C. \'1.' IS gLAIM3:-

1. A packaging material Eor use in packing horticultural produce, the packaging material comprising a first sheet which is freely permeable to water vapour but resistant to capillary transfer of liquid water; and a second sheet which is impermeable to water vapour and liquid water, the first and second sheets being spaced apart from one another .

2. A packaging material as claimed in claim 1 in which the first and second sheets are connected at a number of points over their surface in a manner such that a space exists between the first and second sheets.

3. A packaging material as claimed in claim 2 in which the first and second sheets are connected by point welding.

4. A packaging material as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3 in which a desiccant is provided within, and partly fills, the space between the first and second sheets.

5. A packaging material as claimed in claim 4 in which the desiccant is a humidity buffer formulation comprising a water•swellable, water■insoluble polymer and a mixture of (i) a non-volatile hydrophilic liquid and <ii) water; the polymer being swellable by the mixture.

6. A method of packing horticultural produce comprising steps of: - (i) wrapping the produce in a first sheet, the first sheet being freely permeable to water vapour but resistant to capillary transfer of liquid water.; and (ii) wrapping the wrapped produce within a second sheet, the second sheet being impermeable to water vapour and liquid water, the wrapping being such that a space exists between the first and second sheets.

7. A method as claimed in claim 5 in which the first and second steps are carried out simultaneously by means of the first sheet and the second sheet be ing,. connected at a number of points over the surface of the sheets such that / 2 "7 * T , >■ "* .•:? w / c' 4J 'J - 10 - a space exists between the first and second sheets.

8. A method as claimed in claim 7 in which the first and second sheets are connected at a number of points by point welding.

9. A method as claimed in any one of claims 6 to 8 in which a desiccant is provided in, and partly fills, the space between the first and second sheets.

10. A method as claimed in claim 9 in which the desiccant is a humidity buffer formulation, the formulation comprising a water•swellable, water - insoluble polymer and a mixture of (i) a non-volatile hydrophilic liquid and (ii) water; the polymer being swellable by the mixture

11. A packaging material for use in packing horticultural produce when constructed, arranged and operable substantially as herein described with reference to figures 2 to 6 of the accompanying drawings.

12. A method of packing horticultural produce when performed substantially as herein described with reference to figures 2 to 6 of the accompanying drawings. DATED THIS blV- DAY OF A.J. PARK & SON