KR20200141247A - Apparatus and method for performing personnel evaluation of a worker - Google Patents

Abstract

An embodiment of the present invention relates to a method for performing personnel evaluation on an employee in charge. The method, which is performed by a server, includes: (a) a step of receiving a work generation request for classifying a work as one of a process, a project, and an event based on preset conditions and designating an evaluator evaluating the result of the work and at least one employee in charge of the work; (b) a step of providing an employee-in-charge terminal with a preset number of evaluation cards, with which a first employee in charge can evaluate the work abilities of second employees in charge, when a preset evaluation time point is reached; (c) a step of receiving that the evaluation card for evaluating the work abilities of the second employees in charge has been consumed from a first employee-in-charge terminal and receiving an evaluation score with respect to each work from an evaluator terminal; and (d) a step of calculating a primary evaluation score of each employee in charge based on the evaluation card and calculating a work weight with respect to the primary evaluation score of each employee in charge based on the evaluation score from the evaluator terminal to calculate a secondary evaluation score. The work weight is to weight a plus or minus multiple with respect to the primary evaluation score corresponding to the evaluation score.

Description

Apparatus and method for performing personnel evaluation of business managers {APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING PERSONNEL EVALUATION OF A WORKER}

The present invention relates to a system for evaluating personnel in charge of persons in charge of performing work in a company.

Personnel evaluation refers to the process of systematically judging the strengths and values of organizational members' abilities, attitudes, and job-related performance in light of predetermined goals or standards. In addition, according to the results, the organization can be identified as an objective basis for making decisions such as selection, classification, placement, promotion, and salary increase for members of the organization.

In the conventional personnel evaluation, a business is established every year or quarter, assigned a key performance indicator (KPI) for each team or individual according to the business plan, and a supervisor or employee evaluates the performance of other employees at the end of the business performance. .

However, there is a limitation in that it is difficult to establish a simple and flexible evaluation system because real-time coaching and feedback is difficult when the period of performing a task is prolonged, and the evaluation process used in the past is complicated. In addition, most of the evaluations are carried out primarily, or it is difficult to guarantee fairness depending on the closeness between employees, which has a problem that acceptance is low.

The present invention is to solve the problems of the prior art described above, and the present invention can set at least one evaluation time point according to the type of work. In addition, at each evaluation point, the business managers perform the first evaluation by giving and receiving evaluation cards for each other's work performance, and the second evaluation using the results of the first evaluation and the evaluation of the work performance of business managers performed by the evaluator. The purpose of this is to establish a personnel evaluation system that has flexibility and fairness for evaluation, which was a limitation of the existing personnel evaluation system.

However, the technical problem to be achieved by the present embodiment is not limited to the technical problem as described above, and other technical problems may exist.

As a technical means for achieving the above-described technical problem, in a method of performing personnel evaluation of a person in charge of a task, performed by a server according to an embodiment of the present invention, (a) a task is processed based on a preset condition , Receiving a task creation request classified as one of a project and an event, and designating at least one person in charge of the task and an evaluator who evaluates the result of the task; (b) when a predetermined evaluation time is reached, providing a predetermined number of evaluation cards through which the first job manager can evaluate the job capabilities of other second job managers to the job manager terminals; (c) receiving from the first task manager terminal that the evaluation card for evaluating the work ability of the other second task staff has been consumed, and receiving an evaluation score for each task from the evaluator terminal; And (d) calculating the primary evaluation score of each business person based on the evaluation card, and calculating the work weight for the primary evaluation score of each business person in charge based on the evaluation score from the evaluator terminal to calculate the secondary evaluation score. Including the step of calculating, the task weight may mean a weight for weighting a positive or negative multiple of the primary evaluation score corresponding to the evaluation score.

In addition, a project is a task in which a task is carried out with a predetermined target and execution period of the task through a plurality of task managers, and a process is a task in which the order of the task is set in advance, and events do not respond to the process and project. It can mean a job that doesn't.

In addition, the process may additionally designate information on a plurality of evaluation points, and receive an evaluation score for each task at every plurality of evaluation points from the evaluator terminal.

In addition, upon receiving information from the evaluator terminal that delegating one of the person in charge to the evaluator as an evaluator, the position of the user of the evaluator terminal may be changed to a job manager, and the position of the job manager designated as the evaluator may be changed to the evaluator.

In addition, in step (b), upon receiving a request to view work information conducted by the second person in charge from the first person in charge terminal, the first task person in charge terminal provides the right to view the work information of the second person in charge. 1 Allows the terminal in charge of business to grant an evaluation card only to the work information of the second person in charge of the task that has been viewed, and the task information includes at least one of the personal information of the second person in charge of the second task or information on the previously performed task. I can.

In addition, step (d) includes the steps of: (d1) confirming that the at least one terminal in charge of the first task has read the task information of the second person in charge of the task; (d2) receiving that the terminals in charge of the first task have given the evaluation card to the person in charge of the second task; And (d3) summing the number of evaluation cards given by the second person in charge of the first task at least one person in charge of the first task, and calculating a first evaluation score based on the total sum of the evaluation cards. have.

In addition, in step (d1), a request to view any one of a plurality of work information included in a process or project is received from the terminal in charge of the first task, and the task information page corresponding to the task information is transferred to the terminal in charge of the first task. In step (d2), the evaluation card may be given to the second business manager through the business information page received from the server by the first business manager terminal.

In addition, when the user of the first business manager terminal completes the evaluation of the second business manager, the number of evaluation cards given to the first business manager can be subtracted once.

In addition, when the evaluation time is over, even if all of the evaluation cards assigned to the business manager are not exhausted, the remaining evaluation cards can be removed from the business manager.

In addition, step (d) can calculate the second evaluation score by multiplying the first evaluation score and the work weight.

In addition, after step (d), an evaluation score table for comparing the second evaluation score is generated based on the second evaluation score calculated for each of at least one person in charge of the job, and a preset method is used based on the evaluation score table. At least one of absolute evaluation or relative evaluation may be performed.

In addition, in the device for performing personnel evaluation of the business person in charge, a memory in which a program providing a method of performing the personnel evaluation of the business person in charge is stored and a method of executing the program stored in the memory are provided. Including a processor, the processor receives a task creation request that classifies the task into one of a process, a project, and an event based on a preset condition, and at least one person in charge of the task performing the task and an evaluator who evaluates the result of the task Is designated, and when a preset evaluation point is reached, an evaluation card capable of evaluating the work capabilities of other second business managers by the first business manager is provided to the business manager terminal as much as a preset number, and from the first business manager terminal 2 Receiving that the evaluation card for evaluating the work ability of the business person in charge is consumed, receiving the evaluation score for each task from the evaluator terminal, and calculating the primary evaluation score of each person in charge based on the evaluation card, It includes the step of calculating a second evaluation score by calculating a work weight for the first evaluation score of each person in charge of each task based on the evaluation score from the evaluator terminal, and the task weight is for the first evaluation score corresponding to the evaluation score. It may be a device that means a weight for weighting a positive or negative multiple.

In addition, it may be a computer-readable storage medium in which a program for performing the method of performing the personnel evaluation of the business person in charge of claim 1 is recorded.

In the present invention, it is possible to set at least one evaluation time point according to the type of work. In addition, at each evaluation point, the business managers perform the first evaluation by giving and receiving evaluation cards for each other's work performance, and the second evaluation using the results of the first evaluation and the evaluation of the work performance of business managers performed by the evaluator. Through this, it is possible to establish a personnel evaluation system that has flexibility and fairness for evaluation, which was a limitation of the existing personnel evaluation system.

1 is a diagram showing the configuration of a system for performing personnel evaluation of a person in charge of a business according to an embodiment of the present invention.
2 is a diagram showing the configuration of a server according to an embodiment of the present invention.
3 is a flowchart illustrating a method of performing a personnel evaluation of a person in charge of a task performed by a server according to an embodiment of the present invention.
4 is an operation flowchart illustrating a process in which a person in charge of a task evaluates another person in charge of a task according to an embodiment of the present invention.
5 is a diagram illustrating an example of an interface of an application that performs personnel evaluation of a person in charge of a business according to an embodiment of the present invention.
6 and 7 are diagrams illustrating an example of an interface for assigning an evaluation card according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings so that those of ordinary skill in the art can easily implement the present invention. However, the present invention may be implemented in various different forms and is not limited to the embodiments described herein. In the drawings, parts irrelevant to the description are omitted in order to clearly describe the present invention, and similar reference numerals are assigned to similar parts throughout the specification.

Throughout the specification, when a part is said to be "connected" to another part, this includes not only "directly connected" but also "electrically connected" with another element interposed therebetween. . In addition, when a part "includes" a certain component, it means that other components may be further included rather than excluding other components unless specifically stated to the contrary.

The following examples are detailed descriptions to aid understanding of the present invention, and do not limit the scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the invention of the same scope performing the same function as the present invention will also belong to the scope of the present invention.

In the present specification, the server 100 refers to a device that performs personnel evaluation of a person in charge of work.

1 is a diagram showing the configuration of a system for performing personnel evaluation of a person in charge of a business according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 1, a system 1 for performing personnel evaluation of a business person in charge according to an embodiment of the present invention is composed of a server 100, at least one business person in charge terminal 200, and an evaluator terminal 300. Although not shown in the drawing, each device is interconnected through a communication network.

In the present invention, the server 100 divides a task to be performed by an organization, a company, or an organization into one of a process, a project, and an event according to a preset condition, receives a request to create a task, and a task person in charge who performs the task Evaluators can be designated.

Here, the business person in charge means at least one or more employees who perform the job, and the evaluator may be an employee for evaluating the result of the job.

In addition, when a predetermined evaluation time comes, the server 100 provides an evaluation card for evaluating the job capabilities of other second job managers by the first job manager to each job manager terminal 200 as many as a preset number.

In addition, the person in charge of the first task uses the evaluation card to evaluate the work capabilities of other second task personnel, and the server 100 calculates the first evaluation score through the evaluation cards given to each other.

In this case, the evaluation card is a kind of electronic money used by the person in charge as a score for evaluating the work performed by the other party. In addition, by providing a limited number of evaluation cards as much as a preset number, it induces the person in charge of work to be cautious when evaluating others.

As a further embodiment, when it is determined that the specific business person in charge of the task is low enough to evaluate others or the ability of the task analysis, the number of evaluation cards may be further limited or the evaluation card may not be provided so that evaluation cannot be performed.

Finally, the server 100 receives the evaluation score for each task performed by the person in charge from the evaluator terminal 300, and finally the second evaluation score through the first evaluation score and the evaluation score of the evaluator terminal 300 Will yield.

Through such a complex evaluation step, the fairness of the job evaluation of the business managers is enhanced and objective comparison is possible.

In the present invention, the work manager terminal 200 refers to a terminal used by business managers who directly perform a task, and the evaluator terminal 300 may be a terminal used by an evaluator who evaluates the work performed by the business person in charge. have.

At least one person in charge and evaluator may exist in plural, and generally, the number of evaluators is less than the number of evaluators, and an employee with a higher position among the job managers is designated as the evaluator.

If the server 100 receives information from the evaluator terminal 300 indicating that one of the person in charge is delegated to the evaluator, the user position of the evaluator terminal 300 is changed to the job manager, and The job title is changed to an evaluator.

As the job title is changed by the server 100, the functions of the present invention that can be used by the corresponding employee are also changed.

The work manager terminal 200 and the evaluator terminal 300 display the data provided from the server 100 through an application that performs personnel evaluation of the work manager.

At this time, the application that performs the personnel evaluation of the business person in charge is an application embedded in the business person in charge terminal 200 and the evaluator terminal 300, or is downloaded from the application distribution server and installed in the work person in charge terminal 200 and the evaluator terminal 300. It can be an application.

In addition, the task manager terminal 200 and the evaluator terminal 300 refer to communication terminals that can use a terminal application in a wired or wireless communication environment. Here, the work manager terminal 200 and the evaluator terminal 300 may be a user's portable terminal. In FIG. 1, the task manager terminal 200 and the evaluator terminal 300 are shown as a smart phone, which is a kind of portable terminal, but the spirit of the present invention is not limited thereto, and the terminal application can be mounted as described above. The number of terminals can be borrowed without limitation.

To explain this in more detail, the task manager terminal 200 and the evaluator terminal 300 are handheld computing devices (e.g., PDAs, email clients, etc.), any form of mobile phone, or other types of computing or communication platforms. It may include any form, but the present invention is not limited thereto.

On the other hand, the communication network serves to connect the server 100 and the task manager terminal 200 and the evaluator terminal 300. That is, the communication network refers to a communication network that provides an access path so that the work manager terminal 200 and the evaluator terminal 300 can transmit and receive data after accessing the server 100. Communication networks are wired networks such as LANs (Local Area Networks), WANs (Wide Area Networks), MANs (Metropolitan Area Networks), ISDNs (Integrated Service Digital Networks), and wireless networks such as wireless LANs, CDMA, Bluetooth, and satellite communications. However, the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto.

2 is a diagram showing the configuration of the server 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 2, a server 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention includes a communication module 110, a memory 120, a processor 130, and a database 140.

In detail, the communication module 110 provides a communication interface necessary to provide a transmission/reception signal between the server 100, the work manager terminal 200, and the evaluator terminal 300 in the form of packet data in connection with a communication network. Further, the communication module 110 may serve to receive a data request from the work manager terminal 200 and the evaluator terminal 300 and transmit data as a response thereto.

Here, the communication module 110 may be a device including hardware and software necessary for transmitting and receiving a signal such as a control signal or a data signal through a wired or wireless connection with another network device.

In the memory 120, a program for performing personnel evaluation of a person in charge of the business is recorded. In addition, it performs a function of temporarily or permanently storing data processed by the processor 130. Here, the memory 120 may include a magnetic storage medium or a flash storage medium, but the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto.

The processor 130 is a kind of central processing unit and controls the entire process of performing personnel evaluation of a person in charge of the business. Each step performed by the processor 130 will be described later with reference to FIGS. 3 and 4.

Here, the processor 130 may include all types of devices capable of processing data, such as a processor. Here, the'processor' may refer to a data processing device embedded in hardware having a circuit physically structured to perform a function represented by a code or instruction included in a program. As an example of a data processing device built into the hardware as described above, a microprocessor, a central processing unit (CPU), a processor core, a multiprocessor, and an application-specific integrated (ASIC) circuit) and processing devices such as field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), but the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto.

The database 140 may store overall data on work. Here, the overall data on the work refers to the work performed by the person in charge and the evaluator.

At this time, when a task is created and stored in the database 140, the task is classified into one of a process, a project, and an event, and a person in charge of the task and an evaluator may be designated and stored, and the result of the evaluation performed at the time of the evaluation may be stored. .

Although not shown in FIG. 2, data on work may be stored in a physically or conceptually separate database (not shown).

3 is a flowchart illustrating a method of performing personnel evaluation of a person in charge of a task performed by the server 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 3, the server 100 receives a task creation request, and receives a task manager and an evaluator to perform the task (S310).

To explain this in detail, the server 100 may refer to a terminal that performs a task (this may mean a terminal to be designated as either the task manager terminal 200 or the evaluator terminal 300) based on a preset condition. You will receive a request to create a task that is classified as one of a process, a project, and an event.

At this time, the task creation request is a request for identifying whether it is a process, a project, or an event for a task previously stored in the server 100, or a task for requesting creation by classifying the type of task while uploading data on the task together. I can.

In addition, in the division of tasks, a project is a task in which a task is carried out with a predetermined target and execution period of the task through a plurality of the above task managers, and the process may be a task in which a task progress order is previously set. . In the case of events, it can mean tasks that do not respond to processes and projects.

In addition, when the type of task is determined, the server 100 designates a task manager who will perform the task and an evaluator who evaluates the result of the task.

When a preset evaluation time is reached, the server 100 provides a preset number of evaluation cards to the task manager terminal 200 (S320).

In this case, the preset evaluation time may mean a preset period during which the business managers perform evaluation on the tasks that have been performed so far.

As a further embodiment, before the evaluation time approaches, the server 100 may provide a reminder function that informs the task manager terminal 200 that the evaluation time is approaching. Through this, when there are many tasks that need to be evaluated, it is possible to provide an environment in which business managers can comfortably evaluate the work of others while carrying out their own work.

If the task is a process, the server 100 additionally designates information on a plurality of evaluation points in step S310, and receives an evaluation score for each task at every plurality of evaluation points from the evaluator terminal 300. Is done.

This is because work designated as a process generally proceeds for a long period of time, so it is difficult to fairly evaluate business managers with only one evaluation, and it is difficult to synthesize them as the work continues for a long time.

Conversely, if the task is a project, only one evaluation is performed at the end of the project. This is because projects are often conducted in a relatively short period of time, contrary to the process. Accordingly, as an additional embodiment, when the project execution period is longer than a preset period, a plurality of evaluation points may be designated as in the process.

In the case of an event, evaluation is not generally performed, but an evaluation point is created after the event work is finished, such as a project, and evaluation can be conducted.

Limiting the number of evaluation cards that can evaluate other business managers to the business manager is a matter of fairness as described above, but the number of evaluation cards can be applied in various ways depending on the number of facilitators and the size of the job. I can.

As a further embodiment, the evaluation card may be added with a function that the first task manager delegates to another second task manager, and the administrator terminal 300 provides the evaluation card to the specific task manager terminal 200 or provides the evaluation card. You can also use it to perform your own evaluation.

Next, the server 100 recognizes that the first task manager terminal 200 has given the evaluation card to another second task manager (S330), and the first evaluation score based on the evaluation card assigned to each task manager Is calculated (S340).

At this time, the process of evaluating the person in charge of the task through the evaluation card, which proceeded through the steps S330 and S340, will be described again with reference to FIG. 4 to be described later.

Finally, the server 100 calculates a second evaluation score based on the first evaluation score and the evaluation score received from the evaluator terminal 300 (S350).

In step S350, the server 100 additionally receives an evaluation score to the evaluator terminal 300.

At this time, the evaluation score received from the evaluator terminal 300 refers to data obtained by evaluating the work performed by the evaluator. Accordingly, the evaluation score received from the evaluator terminal 300 is received in at least one or more plurality to correspond to each task manager.

The server 100 calculates a task weight corresponding to the evaluation score received from the evaluator terminal 300, and calculates a secondary evaluation score through this.

In this case, the task weight means a weight for weighting a positive or negative multiple of the primary evaluation score corresponding to the evaluation score.

In addition, in step S350, the second evaluation score is calculated by multiplying the first evaluation score and the work weight.

A method of calculating the secondary evaluation score performed in step S350 will be described through an example as follows.

The server 100 assumes that the evaluation score that the evaluator can give for a task is 1 to 5 points, and the corresponding task weight is 0% for 1 point, 50% for 2 points, 100% for 3 points, and 4 points. The points are 150% and 5 points are 200%, respectively. After that, if the person in charge of business A obtains 10 evaluation cards and the person in charge obtains 4 points, the first evaluation score is 10 points and multiplies by 150% of the work weight, and finally, the second evaluation score gets 6 points. Is done. Based on these two evaluations, scores for a plurality of business managers are calculated, and the calculated scores can be compared objectively.

Therefore, based on the secondary evaluation scores calculated for each of at least one person in charge of the business, the server 100 may generate an evaluation score table for comparing the secondary evaluation scores, and a preset score is set based on the evaluation score table. You can compare business managers by selecting at least either absolute or relative evaluation of the method.

4 is an operation flowchart illustrating a process in which a person in charge of a task evaluates another person in charge of a task according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 4, in order for a business person in charge to evaluate another person in charge, the server 100 provides a work information page corresponding to the second person in charge to the first person in charge terminal 200 (S410).

Before step (S410), when the server 100 receives a request to view the work information conducted by the second person in charge from the first person in charge terminal 200, the server 100 2 Provides the right to read the work information of the person in charge.

In addition, the server 100 may allow the first task manager terminal 200 to grant an evaluation card only to the task information of the second task person who is the target of reading the task information. This is to prevent the person in charge of performing the evaluation without actually checking the work performed by the other person in charge.

In this case, the job information may include at least one of personal information of the second job manager or information on previously performed jobs, and may be provided to the first job manager through a job information page.

Therefore, before step S410, the server 100 receives an input for any one of a plurality of work information included in the process or project from the first work manager terminal 200, and the first work manager terminal 200 It means that the task information page corresponding to the task information selected by) is provided to the first task manager terminal 200.

When a job information page is provided to the first job manager terminal 200, the server 100 receives that the first job manager terminal 200 has given the evaluation card to the second job manager (S420).

At this time, the first task manager terminal 200 grants the evaluation card previously provided through the task information page received from the server 100 to another second task manager.

In addition, when the user of the first task manager terminal 200 completes the evaluation of the second task manager, the number of evaluation cards assigned to the first task manager is subtracted once, thereby limiting the number of evaluations.

If the evaluation time is over, even if all of the evaluation cards assigned to the business manager are not exhausted, the remaining evaluation cards are removed from the business manager, preventing them from being used in the next evaluation. This is to prevent arbitrarily manipulating the evaluation card from attempting to manipulate the primary evaluation score at a specific evaluation point.

Finally, the first evaluation score is calculated by summing the number of evaluation cards assigned to each business person in charge (S430).

As a further embodiment, the primary evaluation score may be calculated by applying an additional weight according to the number of evaluation cards acquired by each task manager or whether there is a special task performed by a specific task person alone. For example, if the primary evaluation score is greater than or equal to a preset value, or if the first person in charge of the task force has been on frequent business trips, a weight of about 50% is additionally applied when calculating the first evaluation score. It can also give an advantage to the primary score.

5 is a diagram illustrating an example of an interface of an application that performs personnel evaluation of a person in charge of a business according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 5, a task classification interface 510, a task list 520, and a task information page 530 can be checked.

The task classification interface 510 refers to a large classification of tasks that can be selected through the task manager terminal 200 or the evaluator terminal 300, including processes and projects.

The task list 520 means a list of tasks included under the task classification interface 510. Accordingly, the person in charge of the task can check the tasks performed or to be performed by himself or another person in charge of the task list 520.

For example, when the task manager terminal 200 inputs "project" in the task classification interface 510, a list of tasks belonging to the "project" that is currently in progress or has been completed is provided.

In this case, as an additional embodiment, in the case of a task that has been completed or an evaluation point is approaching, it is possible to provide an effect of notifying the user by marking it as an icon in the task list 520.

The task information page 530 may be an interface that helps a task manager or an evaluator to check, including detailed information on a task selected by the user from the task list 520.

In addition to information on the task, the task information page 530 may additionally provide information such as a progress rate, a list of task managers, and evaluators, and may have various forms depending on the nature of the task or the status of an interface to be implemented.

6 and 7 are diagrams illustrating an example of an interface for assigning an evaluation card according to an embodiment of the present invention.

6 may be an evaluation card providing interface 540.

Through the evaluation card providing interface 540, the evaluator can check or limit the number of evaluation cards to be given to the person in charge of the business, and conversely, the business person in charge can check the number of evaluation cards that are given to him or remain. In addition, the business manager may hide the number of evaluation cards he or she has from other business managers.

As a further embodiment, the evaluation card providing interface 540 is activated only based on the evaluation time point, so that the user does not accidentally make an error of entering the evaluation card providing interface 540 during a period other than the evaluation time point. .

7 is an evaluation card grant interface 550 included in the work information page 530.

Through the evaluation card assignment interface 550, the person in charge of the task can perform an evaluation on the task performed by another person in charge of the task.

When there are a plurality of business managers, an evaluation card may be given to each individual in charge of the business, and as an additional embodiment, an evaluation card may be assigned to an ongoing or completed business to perform evaluation.

An embodiment of the present invention may also be implemented in the form of a recording medium including instructions executable by a computer, such as a program module executed by a computer. Computer-readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by a computer, and includes both volatile and nonvolatile media, removable and non-removable media. Further, the computer-readable medium may include a computer storage medium. Computer storage media includes both volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data.

Although the methods and systems of the present invention have been described in connection with specific embodiments, some or all of their components or operations may be implemented using a computer system having a general-purpose hardware architecture.

The above description of the present invention is for illustrative purposes only, and those of ordinary skill in the art to which the present invention pertains will be able to understand that other specific forms can be easily modified without changing the technical spirit or essential features of the present invention will be. Therefore, it should be understood that the embodiments described above are illustrative in all respects and not limiting. For example, each component described as a single type may be implemented in a distributed manner, and similarly, components described as being distributed may also be implemented in a combined form.

The scope of the present invention is indicated by the claims to be described later rather than the detailed description, and all changes or modified forms derived from the meaning and scope of the claims and their equivalent concepts should be interpreted as being included in the scope of the present invention. do.

1: A system that conducts personnel evaluation of business manager
100: server
200: task manager terminal
300: evaluator terminal

Claims (13)

In the method of performing personnel evaluation of the person in charge of the business, performed by a server,
(a) Receiving a task creation request that classifies a task into one of a process, project, and event based on preset conditions, and designating at least one person in charge of the task and an evaluator who evaluates the result of the task ;
(b) when a predetermined evaluation time is reached, providing a predetermined number of evaluation cards through which the first job manager can evaluate the job capabilities of other second job managers to the job manager terminals;
(c) receiving from a first task manager terminal that the evaluation card for evaluating the work ability of the other second task staff has been consumed, and receiving an evaluation score for each task from the evaluator terminal; And
(d) Calculate the primary evaluation score of each person in charge based on the evaluation card, and calculate the task weight for the primary evaluation score of each person in charge of each task based on the evaluation score from the evaluator terminal for secondary evaluation Including the step of calculating a score,
The task weight means a weight for weighting a plus or negative multiple of the primary evaluation score corresponding to the evaluation score. The method of claim 1,
The project is a task in which a task is carried out with a predetermined target and execution period of the task through a plurality of the task managers, and the process is a task in which the procedure of the task is set in advance, and the event is the process and project That means a task that does not respond to, how to perform a personnel evaluation of the person in charge of the task. The method of claim 2,
The process further designates information on a plurality of evaluation points, and receives an evaluation score for each task at each of the plurality of evaluation points from the evaluator terminal. The method of claim 1,
Upon receiving information from the evaluator terminal that delegating one of the business managers to the evaluator, the position of the user of the evaluator terminal is changed to the job manager, and the position of the job manager designated as the evaluator is changed to the evaluator To change, how to conduct a personnel assessment of the person in charge. The method of claim 1,
Step (b)
Upon receiving a request to view the work information conducted by the second work manager from the first work manager terminal, the first work manager provides the authority to view the work information of the second work manager to the terminal, and the first work Allows the person in charge terminal to grant the evaluation card only to the work information of the second person in charge of the second task that has been viewed
The task information is to include at least one of personal information of the second person in charge of the second task or information on previously performed tasks, the method of performing a personnel evaluation of the person in charge of the task. The method of claim 5,
Step (d)
(d1) confirming that at least one terminal in charge of the first task has read the task information of the second person in charge of the task;
(d2) receiving that the first task manager terminals have given the evaluation card to the second task manager; And
(d3) adding up the number of evaluation cards given by at least one person in charge of the first job by the second job manager, and calculating the first evaluation score based on the total sum of the evaluation cards;
That includes, how to perform a personnel evaluation of the business person in charge. The method of claim 6,
The step (d1) is
Receiving a request to view any one of a plurality of work information included in the process or project from the first task manager terminal, and provides a task information page corresponding to the task information to the first task manager terminal,
The step (d2) is
The method of performing the personnel evaluation of the business manager, wherein the first business manager terminal grants the evaluation card to the second business manager through the business information page received from the server. The method of claim 6,
When the user of the first business manager terminal completes the evaluation of the second business manager, the number of the evaluation cards granted to the first business manager is deducted once. . The method of claim 7,
When the evaluation time is over, even if all of the evaluation cards assigned to the business manager are not exhausted, the evaluation card remaining to the business manager is removed. The method of claim 6,
Step (d)
To calculate the second evaluation score by multiplying the first evaluation score and the work weight, the method of performing the personnel evaluation of the business person in charge. The method of claim 1,
After step (d) above
Generate an evaluation score table for comparing the secondary evaluation scores, based on the secondary evaluation scores calculated for each of at least one person in charge of the task,
The method of performing at least one of an absolute evaluation or a relative evaluation of a preset method based on the evaluation score table. In the device for performing personnel evaluation of the person in charge of the business,
A memory in which a program that provides a way to conduct personnel evaluation of business managers is stored, and
Including a processor that provides a method of executing a program stored in the memory to perform personnel evaluation of the person in charge of the business,
The processor receives a task creation request that classifies a task into one of a process, a project, and an event based on a preset condition, and designates at least one person in charge of the task to perform the task and an evaluator who evaluates the result of the task, When a preset evaluation time is reached, the first business manager provides an evaluation card for evaluating the work capabilities of other second business managers to a preset number of business manager terminals, and the other second business manager from the first business manager terminal Receiving that they have consumed the evaluation card for evaluating their work ability, receiving the evaluation score for each task from the evaluator terminal, calculating the primary evaluation score of each task manager based on the evaluation card, and the And calculating a second evaluation score by calculating a task weight for the primary evaluation score of each person in charge of each task based on the evaluation score from the evaluator terminal, wherein the task weight corresponds to the first evaluation score. A device for performing personnel evaluation of a person in charge of work, which means a weight for weighting a positive or negative multiple of the evaluation score. A computer-readable storage medium in which a program for performing the method of performing the personnel evaluation of the person in charge of the business according to claim 1 is recorded.

Images