KR20230069529A - Work management system that evaluates workers through quantification of work and workplace activities - Google Patents

Abstract

A method for evaluating work diligence based on work quantification, performed by a server, according to one embodiment of the present invention, comprises: a step (a) receiving work information generated through a work management interface to a first user terminal; a step (b) providing the work information to a second user terminal and having a predicted work time contained in the work information selected; and a step (c) of producing a work evaluation score of the first user terminal based on result information of the work practically performed by the first user terminal when work completion information is received from the first user terminal. The work management interface is an interface for generating the work information, and the work information contains choice alternatives including a title and detailed information for a work performed by a user of the first user terminal, and a predicted work time required for performing the work. In addition, the present invention provides a work interface capable of managing works determined through the step (a) and the step (b) and an interface capable of managing a work progress status of teammates. The interface provides a report on a progress status of the work or various communication places for a specific work. Moreover, when works determined through the step (a) and the step (b) are performed, an interface capable of measuring time is further provided, wherein a current state of an employee is displayed through the interface, and the measured time is converted into an experience value, and the performance can be managed through integrated information and statistics information on the work.

Description

Work management system that evaluates workers through quantification of work and workplace activities {WORK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM THAT EVALUATES WORKERS THROUGH QUANTIFICATION OF WORK AND WORKPLACE ACTIVITIES}

The present invention is intended to evaluate workers performing tasks at work and the like. Specifically, the purpose is to evaluate the working state of the worker by receiving task performance time for work information generated by a worker of a user terminal from another user terminal and calculating task evaluation information when the task is completed.

In the case of a conventional work evaluation system, a method in which the evaluator directly checks the worker and the work performed by the worker and then evaluates the work performance of the worker is used. However, the evaluator has a problem that the evaluation is not fair because subjective methods are used, such as directly supervising workers performing their tasks or checking reports on the results.

In addition, in evaluating work, the conventional system has a limitation in that it can be evaluated only when workers, including workplaces, are working in the field of view of the evaluator.

In addition, in most cases, only subjective evaluation information is provided to workers regarding evaluation results. This is a situation that does not help workers to have a higher level of work or contributes greatly to motivation for work performance.

In order to solve the above problems, an object of the present invention is to implement a system for evaluating the worker's attendance by calculating the worker's work status as a quantified number.

Specifically, it is possible to quantify the work result based on the work information created by the worker and create a report about it. It can be a tool to manage what is going on.

In addition, while a worker who goes to work for work stays in the office, the time for various states such as "meeting, break, meal and work" can be tracked, and through this data, the worker's work performance can be managed. do.

At this time, by implementing the report in a gamified form, it is possible to present a result that can be easily and motivating the user who checks the report.

In addition, other workers can decide how much time is required for the work created by the worker, so that the evaluation can be fair in performing the work.

In the method for evaluating time and attendance based on quantification of work performed by a server according to an embodiment of the present invention for achieving the above technical problem, (a) generated through a task management interface to a first user terminal Receiving the business information; (b) providing work information to a second user terminal and receiving selection of expected work hours included in the work information; And (c) upon receiving the task completion information from the first user terminal, based on the result information of the task actually performed by the first user terminal, calculating a task evaluation score of the first user terminal; The management interface is an interface for generating work information, and the work information may include a title of a task to be performed by the user of the first user terminal, detailed information, and an option for expected work time required to perform the task.

In addition, step (a) searches for other work information having a predetermined similarity or higher as the title of the work information, and selects an option of the expected work time based on the actual work time required to perform the other work information calculated as a result of the search. can recommend

In addition, before step (b), grouping may be performed by selecting a second user terminal to attend a task corresponding to the work information by any one of the first user terminal or the manager terminal.

In addition, prior to step (c), task log information corresponding to a task is received from a plurality of second user terminals, a task list for an ongoing task is generated, and the task list is shared with a plurality of second user terminals. The list includes tasks performed by the user of the second user terminal, tasks to be performed in the future, and priorities for tasks, and the manager terminal may provide a modification function for the priorities.

In addition, in step (b), the expected business hours selected the most from the plurality of second user terminals may be selected through the options of the expected business hours included in the business information.

In addition, after step (b), the manager terminal evaluates the selected expected business hours, requests modification of the expected business hours to the first user terminal according to the evaluation result, and receives the modification of the expected business hours option from the first user terminal. , step (b) can be performed again.

In addition, in step (c), actual work hours may be calculated based on the time at which the work completion information is received, matched with information of any one of the first user terminal and the second user terminal participating in the work, and stored.

In addition, the actual work hours are calculated based on the current state information set by the first user terminal and the second user terminal, and when the current state information corresponds to the actual work situation, the current state information is set to determine the duration of the actual work time. can be calculated in time.

Also, the current state information may be shared with other user terminals in real time.

In addition, the first user terminal and the second user terminal calculate statistical information having a preset format based on each current status information set during the actual working situation and the duration of the set current status information, and provide statistical information. It may be provided as one of a first user terminal, a second user terminal, and a worker terminal.

In step (c), weights may be generated based on the difference between expected work hours and actual work hours, and work evaluation scores may be calculated based on the weights.

In addition, step (c) receives a chat log generated during the work period from the chat application used by the first user terminal and the second user terminal together, and the number of chats from the chat log, the amount of chat text, and the absence At least one of the amount of time can be used to create a weight, and a task evaluation score can be calculated based on the weight.

In addition, before step (c), the server interworks with the time and attendance management server to receive the user's time and attendance information corresponding to the first user terminal, and in step (c), weights are generated based on the time and attendance information, and tasks are performed based on the weights. An evaluation score is calculated, but the attendance information may include information about whether the user is at work and the commuting time.

In addition, after step (c), a job evaluation report for evaluating the job ability of the user of the first user terminal is generated based on the job evaluation score, and the job evaluation report includes the identifier, job title information, and job evaluation score of the first user terminal. , working hours and in-house benefits.

In addition, the job evaluation score and working hours are displayed in the form of expressing the target value to be achieved for a predetermined period and the achieved value together, and when the job evaluation score and working hours reach the target value, the position information is updated. It can be provided as an interface in the form of gamification.

In addition, before step (c), a real-time image is received from the first user terminal, and step (c) recognizes at least one of the face, body, clothes, etc. of the user of the first user terminal from the real-time image data, and the real-time video The task evaluation score may be calculated based on the weight by generating a weight based on the number of times the user of the first user terminal already recognized has deviated from the real-time video.

In addition, before step (c), real-time screen information of the terminal is received from the first user terminal, and step (c) detects the number of executions of a preset program from the screen information, and weights the value based on the number of executions of the preset program. can be created to calculate the task evaluation score based on the weight.

In addition, the apparatus for evaluating quantification-based time and attendance of work includes a memory in which a program for evaluating quantification-based time and attendance of work is stored, and a processor that executes the program stored in the memory to evaluate quantification-based time and attendance of work. Receives task information generated through the task management interface to one user terminal, provides task information to a second user terminal, selects an expected work time included in the task information, and receives task completion information from the first user terminal If, based on the comparison result of the actual work time and the expected work time and the result information of the work, the work evaluation score of the first user terminal is calculated, the work management interface is an interface for generating work information, and the work information is the user It may be a device that includes options for a title of a task to be performed by the user of the terminal, detailed information, and an expected work time required to perform the task.

In addition, it may be a computer readable storage medium on which a program for performing the method of evaluating work quantification-based attendance according to claim 1 is recorded.

In addition, the user terminal or the manager terminal may share or manage various information obtained in the course of work, such as performance and tasks of the work.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, a system for evaluating the worker's attendance by calculating the worker's work status as a quantified number is implemented.

Specifically, based on the work information created by the worker, the result of the work is quantified and a report is generated.

In addition, for leaders who manage workers, it can be a means to manage how team members handle their work or whether the performance of their work is well managed.

In addition, while a worker who goes to work for work stays in the office, the time for various states such as "meeting, break, meal and work" can be tracked, and through this data, the worker's work performance can be managed. do.

At this time, the report is implemented in various forms such as a gamified form or an existing formal chart or statistics, thereby presenting results that can be easily and motivated to the user who checks the report.

In addition, other workers can decide how much time is required for the work created by the worker, so that the evaluation can be fair in performing the work.

Accordingly, companies using the technology of the present invention can link collaboration tools used in various tasks into one, and can check the status of tasks without moving a separate application, thereby increasing work efficiency.

1 is a diagram showing the configuration of a system for evaluating time and attendance based on quantification of tasks according to an embodiment of the present invention.
2 is a diagram showing the configuration of a server according to an embodiment of the present invention.
3 is an operational flowchart illustrating a process of evaluating time and attendance based on quantification of tasks according to an embodiment of the present invention.
4 is a diagram showing the configuration of work information implemented in the form of a work card according to an embodiment of the present invention as an example.
5 is a diagram showing the configuration of a job evaluation report according to an embodiment of the present invention as an example.
6 is a diagram showing the configuration of a task list according to an embodiment of the present invention as an example.
7 and 8 are diagrams showing the configuration of a tool for measuring work time according to an embodiment of the present invention as an example.

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail so that those skilled in the art can easily practice the present invention with reference to the accompanying drawings. However, the present invention may be embodied in many different forms and is not limited to the embodiments described herein. And in order to clearly explain the present invention in the drawings, parts irrelevant to the description are omitted, and similar reference numerals are attached to similar parts throughout the specification.

Throughout the specification, when a part is said to be "connected" to another part, this includes not only the case where it is "directly connected" but also the case where it is "electrically connected" with another element interposed therebetween. . In addition, when a part "includes" a certain component, this means that it may further include other components, not excluding other components, unless otherwise stated, and one or more other characteristics. However, it should be understood that it does not preclude the possibility of existence or addition of numbers, steps, operations, components, parts, or combinations thereof.

The following examples are detailed descriptions for better understanding of the present invention, and do not limit the scope of the present invention. Therefore, inventions of the same scope that perform the same functions as the present invention will also fall within the scope of the present invention.

1 is a diagram showing the configuration of a system for evaluating time and attendance based on quantification of tasks according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 1 , a system for evaluating attendance includes a server 100 and a plurality of user terminals 200 . At this time, each device may be interconnected wired or wirelessly through a communication network.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, the server 100 transmits a business management interface from the first user terminal 200 and receives business information.

At this time, the task management interface refers to an interface provided by the server 100 to the user terminal 200 to generate task information.

In addition, the task information refers to information including a title of a task to be performed by the user of the first user terminal 200, detailed information, and an option for an expected task time required to perform the task. That is, it refers to a task that the user of the first user terminal 200 will perform in the future, and in this specification, task information is implemented in a form of a card and presented to the user.

Next, the server 100 provides work information to the second user terminal 200 and selects an expected work time included in the work information.

Through this, the user of the first user terminal 200 can determine an appropriate time required for a task to be performed.

At this time, the second user terminal 200 is a terminal different from the first user terminal 200, and must be a terminal possessed by a user with minimal knowledge about business information. That is, it may correspond to a terminal of a user who participates in a task (or project) corresponding to the task information or does not participate in the task but belongs to the same company (or belonging).

Finally, when the server 100 receives task completion information from the first user terminal 200, the first user terminal 200 ) is characterized in that it calculates the work evaluation score.

In this case, the task evaluation score corresponds to information for quantifying an index for evaluating tasks performed by the user of the first user terminal 200 .

According to an embodiment of the present invention, the server 100 transmits a business management interface to the first user terminal 200 and receives business information therefor.

In addition, the server 100 provides the received task information to the second user terminal 200 or, according to the task completion information received from the first user terminal 200, the first user terminal 200 actually performs It is characterized by calculating a task evaluation score for the task.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, the user terminal 200 may include a first user terminal 200 and at least one or more second user terminals 200 .

First, the first user terminal 200 may receive a task management interface from the server 100 to generate task information and receive a task evaluation score for the performed task. In addition, at least one second user terminal 200 may exist to receive work information from the server 100 and select expected work hours for the work.

In this case, the application for evaluating the quantification-based time and attendance of work may be an application built in the user terminal 200 or an application downloaded from an application distribution server and installed in the user terminal 200 .

Meanwhile, the user terminal 200 refers to a communication terminal capable of using a terminal application in a wired/wireless communication environment. Here, the user terminal 200 may be a user's portable terminal. In FIG. 1, the user terminal 200 is shown as a smart phone, which is a kind of portable terminal, but the spirit of the present invention is not limited thereto, and as described above, there is no limitation for terminals capable of loading terminal applications. can be borrowed

More specifically, user terminal 200 may include any type of handheld computing device (eg, PDA, email client, etc.), cell phone, or other type of computing or communication platform. However, the present invention is not limited thereto.

On the other hand, the communication network means a communication network that provides an access path so that the user terminal 200 can transmit and receive data after accessing the server 100 (this can be borrowed in the opposite case). Communication networks include, for example, wired networks such as LANs (Local Area Networks), WANs (Wide Area Networks), MANs (Metropolitan Area Networks), and ISDNs (Integrated Service Digital Networks), wireless LANs, wireless networks such as CDMA, Bluetooth, and satellite communication. However, the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto.

2 is a diagram showing the configuration of the server 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 2 , a server 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention includes a communication module 110, a memory 120, a processor 130, and a database 140.

In detail, the communication module 110 provides a communication interface necessary to provide a transmission/reception signal between the server 100 and the user terminal 200 in the form of packet data in conjunction with a communication network. Furthermore, the communication module 110 may serve to receive a data request from the user terminal 200 and transmit data as a response thereto.

Here, the communication module 110 may be a device including hardware and software necessary for transmitting and receiving a signal such as a control signal or a data signal with another network device through a wired or wireless connection.

The memory 120 stores a program for evaluating time and attendance based on quantification of work. Also, it performs a function of temporarily or permanently storing data processed by the processor 130 . Here, the memory 120 may include magnetic storage media or flash storage media, but the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto.

The processor 130, as a kind of central processing unit, controls the entire process of evaluating time and attendance based on quantification of tasks. Each step performed by the processor 130 will be described later with reference to FIG. 3 .

Here, the processor 130 may include all types of devices capable of processing data, such as a processor. Here, a 'processor' may refer to a data processing device embedded in hardware having a physically structured circuit to perform functions expressed by codes or instructions included in a program, for example. As an example of such a data processing device built into hardware, a microprocessor, a central processing unit (CPU), a processor core, a multiprocessor, an application-specific integrated (ASIC) circuit), field programmable gate array (FPGA), etc., but the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto.

The database 140 may store owner information and business information of each user terminal 200 and the corresponding terminal.

Although not shown in FIG. 2, some of the data on the user terminal 200 and the owner information and business information of the corresponding terminal may be stored in a database (not shown) physically or conceptually separated from the database 140. .

3 is an operational flowchart illustrating a process of evaluating time and attendance based on quantification of tasks according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 3 , the server 100 receives business information from the first user terminal 200 (S110).

Specifically, in step S110, the server 100 provides a task management interface to the first user terminal 200 that wants to generate task information. Thereafter, when the first user terminal 200 generates business information through the business management interface, the server 100 receives it.

At this time, as an optional embodiment, the server 100 may search for other existing work information having a predetermined similarity or higher based on the title (text) of the work information received from the first user terminal 200 . Thereafter, the server 100 may recommend options for expected business hours based on actual business hours registered in other existing business information calculated as a result of the search. For example, when the title of the work information received from the first user terminal 200 is “recruitment of a developer”, the server 100 searches for other work information having text similar to “recruitment of a developer” or a word with a similar meaning. And, among other job information, other job information such as "recruitment of programmers" and "employment of development personnel" can be searched. In this case, it may be recommended as an expected work time to the first user terminal 200 by referring to the required time of other searched work information. Through this, even if the user of the first user terminal 200 performs a specific task for the first time, it is possible to generate an option by identifying an expected work time. Furthermore, the expected working hours may be recommended by referring to the careers of the workers listed as participating in the work. For example, in the case of the previously registered "recruitment of development personnel" job, worker A who performed the job had 10 years of experience and worker B had 5 years of experience, and in the case of the job of "recruiting programmers", the worker who performed the job Assume that C has 7 years of experience and worker D has 6 years of experience. On the other hand, if the experience of the worker registered in the work information requested by the first user terminal 200 is 3 years and 2 years, respectively, in consideration of this difference in experience, it takes a little longer than the required time registered in the existing work information. The time may be calculated and recommended to the first user terminal 200 . For example, if the time required for "recruitment of development personnel" and "recruitment of programmer" were 1 month and 1.5 months, respectively, the time required for recommendation to the first user terminal 200 is calculated based on experience, such as 2 to 2.5 months. value can be recommended.

In addition, the work information may be provided in the form of a kind of work card as shown in FIG. 4 .

Referring to FIG. 4, the work card is typically divided into four areas to display information.

First, the first area 310 of the work card displays information such as a title corresponding to the work information, a creator (this corresponds to the user of the first user terminal 200), a manager, a creation date and a schedule.

Second, in the second area 320 of the task card, detailed information about the task may be written. For example, a simple process for a task or a summary of the roles of each user participating in the task is provided.

Thirdly, an option of expected working hours may be provided in the third area 330 of the work card. The first user terminal 200 that generated the work information generates the option of expected business hours, but the second user terminal 200 selects the time. In addition, if necessary, the second user terminal 200 may directly propose an expected work time through an operation button provided in the third area 330 of the work card.

At this time, as an additional embodiment, the second user terminal 200 to participate in the corresponding task may be recruited through the second area 320 of the task card. If the second user terminal 200 participates in the corresponding task, a method of activating the third area 330 of the task card may be applied.

Finally, information that was not previously included in each area may be inserted into the fourth area 340 of the work card. For example, in FIG. 4, options for the importance of tasks are presented. In addition, information on tasks not shown on the drawing may be freely included.

Next, the server 100 provides work information to the second user terminal 200 and selects expected work hours (S120).

As an additional embodiment, when the first user terminal 200 selects a second user terminal to perform work together through work information, the server 100 recognizes this and provides work information to the second user terminal 200. will do

In addition, the server 100 selects the most selected expected business hours from the plurality of second user terminals 200 through the expected business hours options as the time for the corresponding business to proceed.

As another optional embodiment, after step S120, the manager terminal may evaluate the selected expected business hours. At this time, according to the evaluation result, the server 100 or the manager terminal may request modification of the expected business hours to the first user terminal 200 . If the request is accepted, the server 100 receives the work information in which the option of expected business hours is modified from the first user terminal 200 and repeatedly performs step S120. That is, from the manager's point of view, if the worker's work hours are judged to be unreasonable, the employer is requested to correct them.

Finally, when the server 100 receives the task completion information from the first user terminal 200, it calculates the task evaluation score of the first user terminal 200 (S130).

Specifically, when receiving task completion information from the first user terminal 200, the server 100 determines the task evaluation score of the first user terminal 200 based on the result information of the task actually performed by the first user terminal. will yield

At this time, the server 100 typically calculates the work evaluation score through the following three methods.

In the first method, the server 100 calculates the actual work time based on the time at which the work completion information is received, and the information of any one of the first user terminal 200 and the second user terminal 200 participating in the work Match each one and save.

Thereafter, the server 100 generates weights based on the difference between expected work hours and actual work hours, and calculates work evaluation scores based on the weights. For example, if the actual work time is shorter than the expected work time selected through work information, it means that the work was completed quickly, and a (+) weight is applied. Conversely, if the actual work time is longer than the expected work time, it can be judged that the work was processed slowly, so the score is evaluated by applying a (-) weight or a decimal point weight between 0 and 1.

In the second method, the server 100 receives a chat log generated during the period in which the work is in progress, from the chatting application used by the first user terminal 200 and the second user terminal 200 together. Thereafter, the server 100 generates weights using at least one of the number of chats, the amount of chatting texts, and the amount of absence time from the chat log, and calculates a task evaluation score based on the weights. For example, if the amount of text related to work is large during work hours, (+) weight is reversed, or if the amount of text related to unnecessary conversation is large, (-) weight or a decimal point weight between 0 and 1 is applied.

Lastly, the server 100 interlocks with the attendance management server in advance to receive the user's attendance information corresponding to the first user terminal 200 .

At this time, the attendance information refers to information including information about whether the user is at work and the commuting time.

Therefore, the server 100 determines whether the user went to work or left work at the correct time based on the attendance information, and generates a weight value for the user to calculate a task evaluation score. For example, a (-) weight value or a decimal point weight value between 0 and 1 is created by the number of times the user is late and reflected in the task evaluation score.

As an additional embodiment, the server 100 may receive any one of real-time image data and location information from the first user terminal 200 . Based on this, the server 100 determines whether the user of the first user terminal 200 is at a preset work place based on real-time image data or location information. That is, if the user frequently leaves the work place, this can be reflected in the work evaluation score.

As another additional embodiment, the server 100 may receive real-time image data from the first user terminal. Based on this, the server 100 recognizes at least one of the face, body, and clothes of the user of the first user terminal 200 from the real-time image. Thereafter, the server 100 generates a weight based on the number of times that the user of the first user terminal 200 pre-recognized in the real-time video deviated from the real-time video. For example, the first user terminal 200 corresponds to a laptop computer, and real-time images are captured through a camera of the laptop computer when a user drives a program related to work. At this time, the server 100 recognizes the user who has performed the current task through the user's face, body shape (body), or clothing type (color) in the real-time image. If the user faithfully performs work during working hours, only the user is captured in the real-time video. However, when the user leaves the seat not to work, the server 100 calculates the weight required to calculate the work evaluation score according to the number of times the user leaves the seat or how much time has passed since the user leaves the seat. do. On the other hand, when a second user other than the first user recognized in the real-time image is captured, the server 100 recognizes the second user's face, body shape (body) or clothing type (color), and It is compared with the recognized characteristics of the first user. If the first user and the second user have a preset similarity or higher, it is determined that they are the same person and the number of times they leave their seat is deducted. Conversely, when it is determined that they are different persons, the server 100 may apply a penalty to the first user terminal 200 to calculate the work evaluation score by determining that the first user has left the seat during work.

As another additional embodiment, the server 100 may receive real-time screen information of the terminal through the first user terminal 200 . Through this, the server 100 may detect the number of executions of a preset program from screen information and generate a weight based on the number of executions of a preset program. For example, by monitoring the screen of the first user terminal 200 by the server 100, it is possible to monitor the number of executions of KakaoTalk or mobile games executed during working hours.

Meanwhile, among the above-mentioned additional embodiments, the technique of receiving and using real-time video or screen information from the first user terminal 200 requires user consent in advance. In addition, the server 100 summarizes whether or not the user leaves the seat or the number of executions of the preset program, etc., and transmits the information to the first user terminal 200, and provides feedback on the reason for actually leaving the seat and the execution of the preset program (i.e., You can also receive feedback on whether or not misconduct actually occurred.

Meanwhile, after step S130, the server 100 may generate a job evaluation report for evaluating the job performance of the user of the first user terminal 200 based on the job evaluation score.

In this case, the job evaluation report includes at least one of the identifier of the first user terminal 200, position information, job evaluation scores, working hours, and in-house benefits, and may be used as an index capable of evaluating the user.

In addition, as shown in FIG. 5, the job evaluation report may be displayed in a form in which job evaluation scores and working hours are expressed together with target values to be achieved for each predetermined period and achieved values.

That is, the job evaluation report may be provided as a gamification-type interface that updates position information when job evaluation scores and working hours achieve target values.

Referring to FIG. 5, the identifier of the first user terminal 200 (which may correspond to user information) and position information are provided in the first area 410 of the report, so that it is possible to determine who the report belongs to. be able to

In the second area 420 of the report, working hours and accumulated work evaluation scores for determining how long the user has worked for the corresponding company (or affiliated company) may be displayed.

In the third area 430 of the report, work evaluation scores to be achieved for a predetermined period or target values of working hours and achieved values may be displayed together and provided. For example, it may be displayed by borrowing an EXP system widely used in conventional games.

In the fourth area 430 of the report, company benefits that can be obtained by the user may be displayed as a concept of “skill” used in a conventional game. In addition, as an optional embodiment, the fourth area 430 of the report may also include job evaluation scores that achieve target values or additional benefits according to working hours.

6 is a diagram showing the configuration of a task list according to an embodiment of the present invention as an example.

Prior to describing FIG. 6 , the task management interface may generate a task list for the generated task information and share it with users performing the same task.

Therefore, prior to creating the task list, the server 100 selects the second user terminal 200 to attend the task corresponding to the task information by either the first user terminal 200 or the manager terminal to perform grouping. will perform

Thereafter, the server 100 receives task log information corresponding to tasks from the plurality of second user terminals 200, generates a task list for ongoing tasks, and sends the task list to the plurality of second user terminals 200. will be shared with

At this time, the task list includes tasks performed by the user of the second user terminal 200, tasks to be performed in the future, and priorities for the tasks, and the manager terminal provides a modification function for the priorities.

Referring now to FIG. 6 , it is composed of a first area 510 of the task list displaying user information and a second area 520 of the task list displaying user work contents.

Specifically, information of a user who is present to perform a task corresponding to the task information is displayed in the first area 510 of the task list. For example, the user's name (ID), photo, attendance status, business status, information about the department to which the user belongs or a team to which the user temporarily belongs may be displayed.

Next, tasks already performed by the user and tasks to be performed in the future are displayed in the second area 520 of the task list. At this time, each task may be displayed together with the completed time, the time to be completed, and the priority of the task.

Therefore, as a further embodiment, a reminder function for each time may be provided to induce the user not to miss a corresponding task.

Through the above functions, it is possible to smoothly manage tasks calculated by agile processes or planning poker. In addition, work sharing among team members temporarily organized to perform the same task becomes smooth.

In addition, in the case of the leader who leads the work, it is possible to perform auxiliary tasks such as checking the task list of what team members will do, identifying task performance, and correcting individual workload.

In addition, through the reminder function, it is possible to check events occurring in the organization at a specific time.

7 and 8 are diagrams showing the configuration of a tool for measuring work time according to an embodiment of the present invention as an example.

Prior to describing a tool for measuring work time, the present invention performs evaluation according to the user's actual work time.

At this time, the actual work time should be calculated only for the time when the user actually performed the work. Accordingly, the work tool to be described with reference to FIG. 7 is intended to help the server 100 calculate the actual work time by setting the user's status.

Therefore, the actual working time is calculated based on the current state information set by the first user terminal 200 and the second user terminal 200 through the work tool. At this time, if the current state information corresponds to the actual work situation, the current state information is set and the duration is calculated as the actual work time.

For example, FIG. 7 is an example of a time tracking tool. In the first area 610 of the time tracking tool, there is a setting tab for a user to set his/her status. At this time, the state selectable by the user includes various tasks that can be performed in the company, such as 'commuting', 'resting', 'meal', and 'work'.

Tasks to be performed by the user may be briefly displayed in the second area 620 of the time tracking tool. As an additional embodiment, when a specific event such as the start or end time of a user's task is set in advance in the second area 620 of the time tracking tool, a reminder may be provided to the user based on the set time. there is.

In the third area 630 of the time tracking tool, a tab for searching for tasks to be performed by a user or organization is provided, and the user searches for tasks to be performed in the second area 620 of the time tracking tool. You can perform tasks such as uploading .

As an optional embodiment, the current state information selected by the user may be shared with other user terminals 200 in real time to help other users understand what this user is currently doing.

In addition, as another optional embodiment, the time tracking tool may calculate statistics in real time, as shown in FIG. 8 , based on data tracking users of user terminals belonging to the same organization (or company). Specifically, the time tracking tool calculates statistical information having a preset format based on the current state information of each of the first user terminal and the second user terminal during actual working conditions and the duration of the set current state information. In addition, the time tracking tool provides the calculated statistical information to any one of the first user terminal, the second user terminal, and the worker terminal. Through this, the worker or manager can refer to the statistical information generated by the time tracking tool and use it as an index to determine how much work he or the worker has performed within the team to which he or she belongs. At this time, the statistical information may be provided in the form of text, tables, graphs, and images, and may also be provided in the form of a file that can be opened through an external program (eg, Excel) if necessary.

The above description of the present invention is for illustrative purposes, and those skilled in the art can understand that it can be easily modified into other specific forms without changing the technical spirit or essential features of the present invention. will be. Therefore, the embodiments described above should be understood as illustrative in all respects and not limiting. For example, each component described as a single type may be implemented in a distributed manner, and similarly, components described as distributed may be implemented in a combined form.

The scope of the present invention is indicated by the following claims rather than the detailed description above, and all changes or modifications derived from the meaning and scope of the claims and equivalent concepts should be construed as being included in the scope of the present invention. do.

100: server
200: user terminal, first user terminal, second user terminal

Claims (19)

A method for evaluating time and attendance based on quantification of work performed by a server,
(a) receiving task information generated through a task management interface to a first user terminal;
(b) providing the work information to a second user terminal, and selecting an expected work time included in the work information; and
(c) calculating a task evaluation score of the first user terminal based on result information of a task actually performed by the first user terminal when task completion information is received from the first user terminal; and ,
The task management interface is an interface for generating the task information;
A method for evaluating time and attendance based on quantification of work, wherein the work information includes a title of a task to be performed by the user of the first user terminal, detailed information, and an option for the expected work time required to perform the task. . According to claim 1,
The step (a) is
Searching for other work information having a predetermined similarity or higher with the title of the work information, and recommending an option of the expected work time based on the actual work time consumed by the other work information calculated as a result of the search, A method for evaluating time and attendance based on quantification of work. In the first,
The step (b) is
The method of evaluating time and attendance based on quantification of work, wherein either the first user terminal or the manager terminal selects the second user terminal to attend the task corresponding to the work information and performs grouping. According to claim 3
Before step (c),
Receiving work log information corresponding to the work from a plurality of the second user terminals, generating a work list for work in progress, and sharing the work list with a plurality of second user terminals,
The task list includes tasks performed by the user of the second user terminal, tasks to be performed in the future, and priorities for the tasks, and the priority is that a modification function is provided by the manager terminal. A method for evaluating time and attendance based on quantification of According to claim 1,
The step (b) is
The method of evaluating time and attendance based on quantification of work, wherein the expected work time selected the most from the plurality of second user terminals is selected through the options of the expected work time included in the work information. According to claim 5,
After step (b) above
Evaluate the expected business hours for which the manager terminal is selected;
According to the evaluation result, the first user terminal requests modification of the expected business hours;
The method of evaluating time and attendance based on quantification of work, wherein the step (b) is re-performed after receiving a correction for the expected work time option from the first user terminal. According to claim 1,
The step (c) is
Based on the time at which the task completion information is received, the actual work time is calculated, matched with information of any one of the first user terminal and the second user terminal participating in the work, and stored, based on quantification of work. How to evaluate. According to claim 7,
The actual working time is calculated based on the current state information set by the first user terminal and the second user terminal, and when the current state information corresponds to the actual working situation, the current state information is set and the duration time A method of evaluating time and attendance based on quantification of work, which is calculated with the actual work time. According to claim 8,
The method of evaluating time and attendance based on quantification of work, wherein the current state information is shared with other user terminals in real time. According to claim 8,
The first user terminal and the second user terminal calculate statistical information having a preset format based on each of the current status information set during the actual working situation and the duration of the set current status information, and the statistics A method for evaluating time and attendance based on quantification of work, wherein information is provided to any one of the first user terminal, the second user terminal, and the worker terminal. According to claim 7,
The step (c) is
A method for evaluating time and attendance based on quantification of work, wherein a weight is generated based on a difference between the expected work time and actual work time, and the task evaluation score is calculated based on the weight. According to claim 1,
The step (c) is
The first user terminal and the second user terminal from the chat application used together, receiving a chat log generated during the period of work,
A method for evaluating time and attendance based on quantification of work, wherein a weight is generated using at least one of the number of chats, the amount of chatting text, and the amount of absence time from the chat log, and the task evaluation score is calculated based on the weight. . According to claim 1,
Before step (c) above
The server interworks with a time and attendance management server to receive time and attendance information of a user corresponding to the first user terminal;
The step (c) is
Creating a weight based on the attendance information and calculating the task evaluation score based on the weight,
The method of evaluating time and attendance based on quantification of work, wherein the attendance information includes information on whether or not the user attends work and a commuting time. According to claim 1,
After step (c) above
Based on the work evaluation score, generating a work evaluation report for evaluating the work ability of the user of the first user terminal;
Wherein the work evaluation report includes at least one of an identifier of the first user terminal, position information, the work evaluation score, working hours, and in-house benefits. 15. The method of claim 14,
The work evaluation score and working hours are displayed in a form expressing the target value to be achieved for a predetermined period and the achieved value together, and when the work evaluation score and working time achieve the target value, the position information is updated A method of evaluating time and attendance based on quantification of work, which is provided as a gamification-type interface. According to claim 1,
Before step (c) above
Receiving real-time image data from the first user terminal;
The step (c) is
Recognizing at least one face, body, clothes, etc. of the user of the first user terminal from the real-time video, and based on the number of times the user of the first user terminal already recognized in the real-time video deviated from the real-time video A method for evaluating time and attendance based on quantification of work, wherein weights are generated and the task evaluation score is calculated based on the weights. According to claim 1,
Before step (c) above
Receiving real-time screen information of a terminal from the first user terminal;
The step (c) is
Evaluating time and attendance based on quantification of work, wherein the number of executions of a preset program is detected from the screen information, weights are generated based on the number of executions of the preset program, and the task evaluation score is calculated based on the weights. How to. In the device for evaluating time and attendance based on quantification of work,
A memory in which a program for evaluating the quantification-based attendance of the task is stored; and
A processor executing a program stored in the memory to evaluate the quantification-based time and attendance of the task;
The processor receives work information generated through a work management interface to a first user terminal, provides the work information to a second user terminal, selects an expected work time included in the work information, and selects the first user terminal. Upon receiving task completion information from the terminal, a task evaluation score of the first user terminal is calculated based on the comparison result of the actual work time and the expected work time and the task result information, and the task management interface displays the task information is an interface for generating, and the task information includes a title for a task to be performed by the user of the user terminal, detailed information, and an option for the expected task time required to perform the task, quantification of the task A device that evaluates based attendance. A computer-readable storage medium having a program recorded thereon for performing the method of evaluating work quantification-based attendance according to claim 1.

Images