KR20170022623A - Apparatus for determining work order - Google Patents

Apparatus for determining work order Download PDF

Info

Publication number
KR20170022623A
KR20170022623A KR1020150117859A KR20150117859A KR20170022623A KR 20170022623 A KR20170022623 A KR 20170022623A KR 1020150117859 A KR1020150117859 A KR 1020150117859A KR 20150117859 A KR20150117859 A KR 20150117859A KR 20170022623 A KR20170022623 A KR 20170022623A
Authority
KR
South Korea
Prior art keywords
members
data
neural network
input
artificial neural
Prior art date
Application number
KR1020150117859A
Other languages
Korean (ko)
Other versions
KR101792702B1 (en
Inventor
박인하
김호구
박정서
홍지수
Original Assignee
삼성중공업 주식회사
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 삼성중공업 주식회사 filed Critical 삼성중공업 주식회사
Priority to KR1020150117859A priority Critical patent/KR101792702B1/en
Publication of KR20170022623A publication Critical patent/KR20170022623A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of KR101792702B1 publication Critical patent/KR101792702B1/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/04—Manufacturing
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0631—Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
    • G06Q10/06312—Adjustment or analysis of established resource schedule, e.g. resource or task levelling, or dynamic rescheduling
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0633—Workflow analysis
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/30—Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to a task ranking apparatus. An apparatus for determining a task according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention includes an input unit for receiving data related to a plurality of members; A processing unit for determining a job order of the plurality of members using data on the plurality of input members; And an output unit for outputting a job order of the determined plurality of members, wherein the processing unit is configured to: reflect a weight on data relating to the plurality of members, calculate the weight with the set function, You can decide.

Description

{APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING WORK ORDER}

The present invention relates to a task ranking apparatus.

A large number of pipelines are installed in the structure during the drying of a ship or offshore plant. It is difficult to install these pipes in a single operation because the number of pipes installed in the structure is large. Therefore, shipyards are installing piping in a prescribed order of operation over a certain period of time, and the work order of the piping is now determined by the operator.

However, there are many and various variables to consider in determining the work order of the piping, and there is a problem that it takes a lot of time for the person to decide and decide. Also, even if it is determined by a person, the work order is undesirable and the situation often changes during work progress.

It is an object of the present invention to provide a work order determination apparatus capable of shortening a time required for determining a work order by allowing a computer to determine a work order of a member including a pipe.

It is an object of the present invention to provide a task ranking determining apparatus capable of minimizing the occurrence of a situation in which a work order is changed during work progress by determining an optimal task ranking by utilizing information on existing members whose work has been completed .

An apparatus for determining a task according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention includes an input unit for receiving data related to a plurality of members; A processing unit for determining a job order of the plurality of members using data on the plurality of input members; And an output unit for outputting a job order of the determined plurality of members, wherein the processing unit is configured to: reflect a weight on data relating to the plurality of members, calculate the weight with the set function, You can decide.

Wherein the input unit comprises: data regarding a specification of the plurality of members; Data as to whether or not to secure parts for fastening the plurality of members; Data regarding locations where the plurality of members are installed; Data on the type of work for installing the plurality of members; Data regarding a schedule of installation of the plurality of members; And data regarding an inspection schedule for the plurality of members; At least one of them can be inputted.

The apparatus for ranking work includes: a storage unit for storing data regarding a member having completed a job and a job ranking of the member having completed the job; And a learning executing unit that adjusts the weight by using data regarding a member having completed the job stored in the storing unit and a job ranking of the member having completed the job.

According to the embodiment of the present invention, the time required for determining the task ranking can be shortened by automatically determining the task ranking of the member by the computer.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, by using information on existing members in determining the work order of the members, it is possible to improve the work efficiency by providing the optimum work rank to the worker.

1 is an exemplary block diagram of a task ranking apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention.
2 is a diagram schematically showing a configuration of an artificial neural network according to an embodiment of the present invention.
3 to 6 are exemplary diagrams for explaining member-related data applied as an input factor to an artificial neural network according to an embodiment of the present invention.
7 is an exemplary flowchart of a method of determining a task ranking according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 8 is an exemplary flow chart illustrating the process of applying data to members of an artificial neural network to obtain a task ranking of members according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings attached hereto.

1 is an exemplary block diagram of a task ranking apparatus 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention.

As shown in FIG. 1, the task ranking apparatus 100 may include an input unit 110, a processing unit 120, and an output unit 130. The input unit 110 may receive data relating to a plurality of members. The processing unit 120 may apply the data on the members to the artificial neural network to obtain the task ranking of the members. The output unit 130 may output the job order of the members.

According to one embodiment, the input unit 110 may be an input interface that invokes data and provides the data to the processing unit 120.

For example, the input unit 110 may include a communication module that accesses a server storing data, retrieves data from the server, and provides the data to the processing unit 120.

In another example, the input unit 110 may retrieve data from the storage device provided in the task ranking apparatus 100 and provide the data to the processing unit 120.

The processing unit 120 is a processing unit that processes input data, and may include, for example, a CPU, a core, a processor, and the like, but is not limited thereto. The processing unit 120 performs a process of determining a job ranking of the members based on data on the members by invoking and executing a program previously prepared to determine the job ranking of the members according to the embodiment of the present invention can do. The program may be stored in a storage device provided in the task ranking apparatus 100, but is not limited thereto.

The output unit 130 may be an output unit that outputs data and outputs result data obtained by the data processing of the processing unit 120. [

For example, the output unit 130 may include a communication module that transmits data output from the processing unit 120 to another apparatus via a network.

In another example, the output unit 130 may send the data output from the processing unit 120 to a storage device provided in the task ranking apparatus 100 and store the data.

As another example, the output unit 130 may display data output from the processing unit 120 to a user by displaying the data on a display device such as a display.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, the processing unit 120 can apply the data on the members to the artificial neural network to obtain the task ranking of the members.

2 is a diagram schematically showing a configuration of an artificial neural network 200 according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 2, the task ranking apparatus 100 applies data on members to an artificial neural network 200 configured in advance and processes data according to a function set in the artificial neural network 200 The work order of the members can be obtained.

The artificial neural network 200 is configured such that a plurality of nodes (O in Fig. 2) are organically connected, and each node corresponds to an artificial neuron. An arrow displayed between nodes indicates that data output from one node is provided as input to another node.

2, each node of the input layer is connected by arrows to each node of the hidden layer, and each node of the hidden layer is connected by arrows to each node of the output layer. However, the node configuration of FIG. 2 is an exemplary embodiment, The artificial neural network 200 may have a different structure.

The artificial neural network 200 may be defined by a predetermined function, and the function may be described by an input parameter applied to the artificial neural network 200.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, the members whose job ranking is determined by the artificial neural network 200 may include piping. The piping includes a pipe through which a fluid flows, and a plurality of pipes are fastened to each other and installed in a structure (for example, a block of a ship or an offshore plant), thereby conducting a design process.

However, the members for which the job ranking is determined by the embodiment of the present invention are not limited to the pipes, but encompass various articles to be subjected to the work.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, the input unit may be configured such that the data regarding the members include a specification of the members, a securing of parts for securing the members, a position where the members are installed, And data regarding the inspection schedule for the members.

This data is applied to the artificial neural network 200 as an input factor and is calculated according to a function set in the artificial neural network 200 to be used for determining the task ranking of the members.

3 to 6 are exemplary diagrams for explaining member-related data applied as an input factor to the artificial neural network 200 according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 3, the member-related data applied as an input factor to the artificial neural network 200 may include the specifications of the members.

For example, when the member is a pipe, the specifications of the members may include the length L1, L2 of the pipe, the diameter D1, or both the length and the diameter, but are not limited to the size of the member It can contain all numerical values. In addition, the specifications of the members may include the weight of the members, and may include materials of the members according to the embodiment.

In the case of the non-numeric data such as the material of the members, the numerical value is indexed for each material, and a numerical value corresponding to the material can be input to the artificial neural network 200. [

For example, when the material of the members is a set of steel, copper, and aluminum, and the steel, copper, and aluminum are indexed with values of '1', '2', and '3', respectively, '1' is input to the artificial neural network 200 as a material of the member, and when the material of the second member is aluminum, '3' is input to the artificial neural network 200 as a material of the member, If it is copper, '2' may be input to the artificial neural network 200 as a material of the member.

Next, the member-related data that is applied to the artificial neural network 200 as an input factor may include whether or not to secure parts for fastening members.

Referring to FIG. 3, a flange 203, which is a connecting part, is required to connect the first pipe 201 and the second pipe 202. The first and second pipes 201 and 202, which are applied as input factors to the artificial neural network 200, Data on the second piping 201, 202 may be used to determine whether the flange 203 is to be secured.

As with the material of the member described above, whether or not securing the parts for securing the members is also non-numeric data. Therefore, numerical values different from each other for securing and unconfirmed parts are indexed so that numerical values corresponding thereto, Can be input to the controller 200.

For example, when the flange 203 is secured, '1' is input to the artificial neural network 200, and '-1' is input when the flange 203 is not secured. However, the numerical value indexed into the non-numeric data is not limited thereto, and may be variously set according to the configuration of the artificial neural network 200 and the function set therein.

Next, the member-related data, which is applied as an input factor to the artificial neural network 200, may include locations where members are installed.

Referring to FIG. 4, in the design process of installing the pipes 204 and 205 in the block 210 like the shipyard, the piping is installed on the upper side of the upper pipe 204 installed on the upper side with respect to the bottom of the block, And a lower pipe 205.

In this case, in order to determine the work order of the piping 204, 205 according to the embodiment of the present invention, the location where the piping 204, 205 is installed as an input factor in the artificial neural network 200 may be applied .

Likewise, since the positions where the members are installed are also non-numeric data that are not represented by numerical values, numerical values different from each other are indexed for each installation position, and numerical values corresponding to the installation positions can be input to the artificial neural network 200. [

For example, when the pipeline 204 is installed on the upper side of the floor in the block 210, '1' is input to the artificial neural network 200, and when the pipeline 204 is installed on the lower side of the floor, '-1' can be input. Similarly, the numerical value indexed at the installation position is not limited thereto, and may be variously set according to the configuration of the artificial neural network 200 and the function set therein.

Next, the member-related data, which is applied as an input factor to the artificial neural network 200, may include the type of work for installing the members.

If the pipeline is installed in the shipyard, the installation process may be included in the sub-process for a relatively small-scale structure, the mid-scale process for a medium-scale structure, and the control process for a large- It is possible.

In order to determine the operation order of the members according to an embodiment of the present invention, a type of operation (for example, a small-sized, a small-sized, and a matching process) in which members are installed as input factors in the artificial neural network 200 may be applied.

In this case, since the type of work is non-numeric data, different numerical values are indexed for each work, and a numerical value corresponding to the work can be input to the artificial neural network 200. [

For example, when a work for installing a member corresponds to a sub-process, '1' is input to the artificial neural network 200, '2' is input to the artificial neural network 200 , And '3' may be input to the artificial neural network 200 when the verification process is performed. However, the numerical values indexed in each process are not limited thereto, and may be variously set according to the configuration of the artificial neural network 200 and the function set therein.

Next, the member-related data, which is applied to the artificial neural network 200 as an input factor, may include data on the installation schedule of the members.

In the production of the structure, the members installed in the structure may be scheduled in advance for the installation schedule of the members on the production schedule of the structure. In this case, the embodiment of the present invention can apply the installation schedule data as an input factor to the artificial neural network 200 to consider the installation schedule when determining the operation order of the members.

However, according to the embodiment, when factors other than the installation schedule are applied as input factors when determining the work order of the members, the members may not necessarily be operated in the order of installation schedule. All input factors applied to the input unit 200 are calculated according to a preset function to determine the operation order of the members.

5, when determining the work order of the members 1 to 3 through the artificial neural network 200 according to the embodiment of the present invention, Data on the schedule can be applied.

For example, the installation schedule related data that is applied to the artificial neural network 200 as an input factor may be data indicating a posterior relationship of installation schedule of the members. For example, as shown in FIG. 5, when the installation is scheduled in the order of members 2, 3, and 1 among members 1 to 3, installation of members 1 to 3 applied as input factors to the artificial neural network 200 The schedule related data may be '3', '1' and '2', respectively (ie, the order of installation date).

As another example, the installation schedule related data applied as an input factor to the artificial neural network 200 may be the time from the reference date to the installation scheduled date of each member. For example, as shown in FIG. 5, when the time from the reference date to the installation scheduled date of members 1 to 3 is 14 days, 7 days, and 10 days, respectively, the members 1 to 3 applied as input factors to the artificial neural network 200, 3 may be '14', '7' and '10', respectively (that is, the period remaining until the installation date).

Here, the reference date may be a date for determining the operation order of the members according to the embodiment of the present invention, but is not limited thereto.

Next, the member-related data, which is applied to the artificial neural network 200 as an input factor, may include data on the inspection schedule for the members.

When the members are installed in the structure, the inspections are carried out on the installed members, and the inspection schedule may be predetermined in the structure production schedule. In this case, the embodiment of the present invention can apply the data on the inspection schedule as an input factor to the artificial neural network 200 to determine the operation order of the members in consideration of the inspection schedule.

Referring to FIG. 6, when determining the operation order of the members 1 to 3 through the artificial neural network 200 according to the embodiment of the present invention, Data on the schedule can be applied.

For example, the test schedule related data that is applied to the artificial neural network 200 as an input factor may be data indicating a posterior relationship of the inspection schedule of the members. For example, as shown in FIG. 6, when the inspection is scheduled in the order of members 2, 1 and 3 among the members 1 to 3, inspection of members 1 to 3 applied as input factors to the artificial neural network 200 The schedule related data may be '2', '1' and '3', respectively (i.e.

As another example, the inspection schedule related data to be applied as an input factor to the artificial neural network 200 may be the time from the reference date to the inspection scheduled date of each member. For example, as shown in Fig. 6, when the time from the reference date to the inspection scheduled date of members 1 to 3 is 15 days, 8 days, and 18 days, the member 1 to 3 applied as the input factors to the artificial neural network 200, 3 may be '15', '8', and '18', respectively (ie, the period remaining until the due date of the test).

Likewise, the reference date may be, but is not limited to, the day of determining the job order of the members according to embodiments of the present invention.

When the inspection schedule of the members is considered in determining the work order of the members, even if the installation date of the member is earlier than the installation date of the other member, if the inspection scheduled date of the one member is later than the inspection scheduled date of the other member, In the embodiment of the present invention, the job ranking of the one member may be determined to be subordinate to the job ranking of the other member.

As described above, the task ranking apparatus 100 according to the embodiment of the present invention can apply the data related to the members to the artificial neural network 200 as input factors and obtain the task ranking of the members based on the data .

According to an embodiment of the present invention, the processing unit 120 applies data on the members to the artificial neural network 200 as an input factor, reflects a weight on the input factors, To calculate a score for each member, and determine a job ranking of the members according to the score.

For example, the processing unit 120 may calculate a score for a corresponding member by adding weighting factors W to N input factors of a member as shown in the following equation, and adding the weighted input factors.

NET = Input factor 1 × W 1 + Input factor 2 × W 2 + ... + Input factor N × W N

Then, the operation order of the members may be determined in the order of the scores based on the score calculated for each of the plurality of members to which the data is input in the artificial neural network 200. For example, the higher the score of a member, the higher the job ranking of the member may be determined, but the opposite may be possible according to the embodiment.

In addition, the task ranking apparatus 100 according to the embodiment of the present invention can learn the optimal task ranking for the members by learning the artificial neural network 200 based on information about the existing members that have been completed have.

According to this embodiment, the task ranking apparatus 100 may further include a storage unit 140 and a learning execution unit 150.

The storage unit 140 may store data on existing members that have completed the job and a job ranking of the existing members. The learning execution unit 150 may learn the artificial neural network 200 to update the weight W based on the data on the existing members and the work order of the existing members.

In other words, in this embodiment, the learning execution unit 150 can learn the artificial neural network 200 through a machine learning algorithm based on data on existing existing members and the operation order of the existing members In this case, the weight W applied to the input parameter may be updated according to the learning.

According to this embodiment, the weight W applied to each input factor is updated based on the information on the existing members, so that an optimal task ranking for the members can be obtained. Here, the optimal task ranking, Means a job ranking that can minimize changes in the work order of members.

FIG. 7 is an exemplary flow diagram of a method 300 of determining a task in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

The task ranking method 300 may be executed by the task ranking apparatus 100 according to the embodiment of the present invention to determine the task ranking of the members.

As shown in FIG. 7, the method 300 for determining a work order includes inputting data on the members (S310), applying data on the members to the artificial neural network 200 (S320), and outputting the job ranking of the members (S330).

According to one embodiment, the members may include, but are not limited to, piping through which the fluid flows.

According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the step of inputting data on the members (S310) may include a step of determining whether or not the members are required to be installed, Data on the installation schedule of the members, and data on the inspection schedule for the members.

FIG. 8 is an exemplary flowchart for explaining a process (S320) of acquiring a job ranking of members by applying data relating to members to an artificial neural network 200 according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 8, applying data on the members to the artificial neural network 200 to obtain a task ranking of the members (S320) may include applying data on the members to the artificial neural network 200 as input factors A step S322 of calculating a score for each member by reflecting a weight W to an input parameter and calculating the weight W according to a function set in the artificial neural network 200, (Step S323).

In addition, according to an embodiment of the present invention, the method 300 for determining a work order further includes a step S305 of learning an artificial neural network 200 based on data on existing members and a task ranking of existing members .

In this case, as shown in FIG. 7, the step of learning the artificial neural network 200 (S305) may be performed before the data of the members is received and the task ranking of the members is determined based on the received data.

The task ranking method 300 may be implemented as a program for execution on a computer and stored in a computer-readable recording medium. The computer-readable recording medium includes all kinds of storage devices in which data that can be read by a computer system is stored. Examples of the computer-readable recording medium include ROM, RAM, CD-ROM, magnetic tape, floppy disk, optical data storage, and the like. In addition, the task ranking method 300 may be implemented as a computer program stored on a medium for execution in association with the computer.

While the present invention has been described with reference to the exemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed exemplary embodiments. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that various modifications may be made to the embodiments described above. The scope of the present invention is defined only by the interpretation of the appended claims.

100: Task ranking device
110: input unit
120:
130:
140:
150:

Claims (3)

An input unit for receiving data on a plurality of members;
A processing unit for determining a job order of the plurality of members using data on the plurality of input members; And
And an output unit outputting a task ranking of the determined plurality of members,
Wherein the processing unit comprises:
Wherein the weighting factor is reflected in the data on the plurality of members, and the weighting factor is calculated with the set function, and the task ranking is determined according to the calculated value. The method according to claim 1,
Wherein the input unit comprises:
Data on specifications of the plurality of members;
Data as to whether or not to secure parts for fastening the plurality of members;
Data regarding locations where the plurality of members are installed;
Data on the type of work for installing the plurality of members;
Data regarding a schedule of installation of the plurality of members; And
Data regarding an inspection schedule for the plurality of members;
The apparatus comprising: 3. The method of claim 2,
A storage unit for storing data related to the completed work and the work order of the completed work; And
A learning executing unit configured to adjust the weight by using data regarding a member having completed the job stored in the storage unit and a job ranking of the member having completed the job;
Further comprising: means for determining a priority of the task.
KR1020150117859A 2015-08-21 2015-08-21 Apparatus for determining work order KR101792702B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020150117859A KR101792702B1 (en) 2015-08-21 2015-08-21 Apparatus for determining work order

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020150117859A KR101792702B1 (en) 2015-08-21 2015-08-21 Apparatus for determining work order

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
KR20170022623A true KR20170022623A (en) 2017-03-02
KR101792702B1 KR101792702B1 (en) 2017-11-02

Family

ID=58427018

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
KR1020150117859A KR101792702B1 (en) 2015-08-21 2015-08-21 Apparatus for determining work order

Country Status (1)

Country Link
KR (1) KR101792702B1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20190073969A (en) * 2017-12-19 2019-06-27 삼성중공업 주식회사 Deign system of drill ship and method of the same
KR20200030889A (en) * 2018-09-13 2020-03-23 삼성중공업 주식회사 Apparatus for designing offshore construction

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR102086079B1 (en) * 2018-10-02 2020-03-06 (주)오픈웍스 Movable Apparatus of Security Managment and Drivig Method Thereof

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR100413733B1 (en) * 2003-03-06 2004-01-03 Kstec Co Ltd Method for scheduling work on discontinuous manufacturing process

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20190073969A (en) * 2017-12-19 2019-06-27 삼성중공업 주식회사 Deign system of drill ship and method of the same
KR20200030889A (en) * 2018-09-13 2020-03-23 삼성중공업 주식회사 Apparatus for designing offshore construction

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR101792702B1 (en) 2017-11-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR101792702B1 (en) Apparatus for determining work order
NO20180628A1 (en) Digital twin and decision support for low or unmanned facilities
Saada et al. Finite element model updating approach to damage identification in beams using particle swarm optimization
MX2012006530A (en) Design method for subsea equipment subject to hydrogen induced stress cracking.
US20160117594A1 (en) Method and system for developing a virtual sensor for determining a parameter in a distributed network
Meruane Online sequential extreme learning machine for vibration-based damage assessment using transmissibility data
US11611531B2 (en) Systems and methods for resolving double address faults during the commissioning of a connected system
JP2016194736A (en) Project execution planning support method, project execution planning support program, and project execution planning support system
WO2016025223A1 (en) Cloud computing system and method for advanced process control
CN107710154A (en) Computer implemented method for processing data object variable
Moslått et al. A digital twin for lift planning with offshore heave compensated cranes
CN110489334A (en) A kind of system integration and test test processing method and device
EP3180667B1 (en) System and method for advanced process control
KR20180123060A (en) Configuration management system for large-scale capital projects
AU2018344386A1 (en) Method for determining the geometry of a defect and for determining a load limit
Islam et al. Development of a software maintenance cost estimation model: 4th GL perspective
JP7212292B2 (en) LEARNING DEVICE, LEARNING METHOD AND LEARNING PROGRAM
US11846933B2 (en) Apparatus, system and method for developing industrial process solutions using artificial intelligence
US20100030732A1 (en) System and method to create process reference maps from links described in a business process model
WO2019103773A1 (en) Automatically identifying alternative functional capabilities of designed artifacts
US20160042480A1 (en) Generation of cost estimates for offshore structure designs
JP7103374B2 (en) Asset management equipment, asset management methods and programs
JP5983286B2 (en) Operation plan determination device, operation plan determination method, program, and recording medium
WO2020057104A1 (en) Method and device for application development
Davidz et al. Linking Reliability Analysis to the Model-Based Ecosystem

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A201 Request for examination
E902 Notification of reason for refusal
E90F Notification of reason for final refusal
E701 Decision to grant or registration of patent right
GRNT Written decision to grant