KR20150018219A

KR20150018219A - Odering management system for User

Info

Publication number: KR20150018219A
Application number: KR1020130094858A
Authority: KR
Inventors: 유승훈; 이근홍; 이종수
Original assignee: 주식회사 에스에이치글로벌; 유승훈
Priority date: 2013-08-09
Filing date: 2013-08-09
Publication date: 2015-02-23

Abstract

The present invention relates to a user order management system, and more particularly, to a system and method for effectively managing a plurality of bidders participating in a competitive bidding, as well as providing fair and transparent competitive bidding, So that it is possible to improve the ease of management.

Description

[0001] Odering management system for User [

The present invention relates to a user order management system, and more particularly, to a fair and transparent competitive bidding of a plurality of bidders and to accurately calculate the investment cost of a manufacturing facility of a product, To a user order management system.

In general, a manufacturer of a finished product (for example, a car) (hereinafter referred to as a "finished product manufacturer") manufactures a part of components (parts) constituting individual components of a finished product, (Hereinafter referred to as "parts manufacturer"), and then assembled and assembled to complete the final finished product. Here, the finished product is a finished product (for example, automobile) as well as a finished product (for example, an automobile interior material manufacturer that makes up a car) (Interior) is also a concept belonging to the finished product.

The selection of parts suppliers of finished goods makers is based on the trust relations established through the ordinary trade act. However, it is not a problem if a component company belonging to the finished product company is singular, but when there are a large number of component companies related to one component, it is required to efficiently manage the parts supplier, and a system Is urgently needed.

If there is a large number of parts suppliers, after the final product maker discloses about the manufacturing of the parts, the related parts maker can present the appropriate bid for a certain period of time, and the final winning bidder can be selected. , The bidding competition selection method can not exclude the possibility of collusion among related parts makers, and there is a problem that it is impossible to exclude the irregularities of related parties of the finished product makers that lead the bidding (acts of receiving bribes between parts suppliers and related parties).

On the other hand, a plurality of equipments for manufacturing the corresponding components internally, such as a finished product maker or a component maker, may be intensively installed in one factory, but the factories are dispersed all over the country, Facilities may also be dispersed at each plant.

If a sales department or an overseas division of a manufacturer plans to manufacture a certain component, accurate information of the manufacturing facilities is required, and it is necessary to calculate the investment cost of the manufacturing facility using the facilities. Traditionally, in such cases, And the calculation of the manufacturing facility investment cost is also inaccurate, resulting in a considerable difference from the actual estimated quotation.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention has been made in order to solve the above-mentioned technical problems, and it is an object of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus for facilitating selection and management of facilities by accurately and transparently calculating the investment cost of a manufacturing facility of a product, And to provide a user order management system.

The user order management system according to the present invention includes a bid management item for posting an RFQ (Request for Quotation) and receiving a quotation from a plurality of bidders, and a bidding management item for analyzing quotations of a plurality of bidders received in the bidding management item A unit price management item that manages unit prices of products and other products that are required for the business content subject to the RFQ and a plurality of bidders who are authorized to receive estimates for the bidding management item And a manager item that gives the authority to receive a quotation to the bid management item, and compares the standard price set by the bid price management item with the quotation of a plurality of bidders received in the bid management item The target cost is calculated and posted to the bidding management item, and the business ability of the plurality of bidders calculated in the business management item Score and consider the end of the quote from a number of third-party bids received after viewing the target cost management posted on the auction items to be provided to select the final bidder.

Here, the bidding management item includes: an RFQ publishing step of posting the RFQ on the network; and a step of, when the business contents are posted by the RFQ publishing step, A quote inquiry step of inquiring the contents of the quote registered by the quote receiving and registering step and the contents of the quotation registered by the first quote accepting and registering step and the step of establishing a standard cost for establishing the standard cost of the product related to the business contents after the quote inquiring step A target cost establishing step of establishing a target cost by comparing the quotation content registered in the first quotation accepting and registering step and the standard cost, and a target cost setting step of setting the target cost, And the target cost is posted according to the target cost publishing step, the plurality of bidders are finalized After reviewing the final quote information registered by the second registration phase and estimates received and the second step estimates received and registered to present their estimates include vendor selection phase to select the final bidder.

Here, the RFQ publishing step may be a step of posting the plurality of bidders to perform the first quote receiving and registration step for a predetermined period.

Further, the plurality of bidders are authorized to receive and register the contents of each estimate in the first order receiving and registering step and the second order receiving and registering step in the manager item, And the access may be set to be disallowed in steps other than the registration step and the secondary quotation reception and registration step.

In addition, the step of establishing the standard resource may be a step of calculating the difference between the estimated contents of the plurality of bidders accepted by the first quotation accepting and registering step and the established standard cost.

The target cost establishing step may be a step of comparing the target cost of the RFQ before the RFQ, and may be a step of storing and retrieving the history of the target cost for each RFQ.

In addition, the above-mentioned company selection step compares the contents of the initial quotation of a bidder presented at the first quotation reception and registration step with the contents of the final quotation of the bidder presented at the registration and registration stage of the second quotation So that the Nego ratio can be automatically calculated.

Also, the company selection step may determine whether the plurality of bidders are collocated by comparing the log records of the plurality of bidders checked in the manager item.

In addition, the company selection step may include comparing the log records of the plurality of bidders with the results of the receiving and registering of the first quotation and the execution of the second quotation receiving and registering step of different bidders having the same IP address If found, it can be determined as collusion.

Also, the unit price management item is divided into a material unit price management, a unit price management, and a processing unit price management, and the material unit price management is performed by inputting and viewing the unit price for each material group, .

In addition, the unit price management item is classified into a material unit price management, a common unit price management, and a processing unit price management. The unit price management for the common unit can be entered by referring to the unit price for each unit, .

In addition, the unit price management item is divided into a material unit price management, a unit price management, and a processing unit price management. The processing unit price management is capable of inputting and displaying the unit price for each processing, .

In addition, a facility history management item that manages facility status of plants disposed in a plurality of areas, and a manufacturing facility that calculates and reports an investment cost of manufacturing facilities required for product production to a factory having the facility by referring to the facility history management item It may further include a review request item.

In addition, the facility history management item may be an item for recording and inquiring the facility history booklet listing a plurality of facilities provided at the respective factories.

In addition, the facility history management item includes an application completed product of a product produced by the facilities, a facility manufacturer making the facilities, a quotation price required for manufacturing the facilities, a factory where the facilities are installed, etc. A quote content inquiry menu capable of inquiring the specifications of the facilities, a photograph image retrieval menu having an image of the installations of the facilities with respect to each factory, and a document recording various data that can be grasped through the quote content inquiry menu And may include an attachment menu that can be attached.

In addition, the manufacturing facility review request item includes a review request menu for initiating a review request for a related facility by a user who has been granted some access authority, and a review request menu for, when the review request is started, A manufacturing facility investment cost review menu for reviewing the manufacturing facility investment cost for each review request specification input by a user who has been given; a manufacturing facility investment cost review menu for reviewing the manufacturing facility investment cost, Facility investment report menu.

In addition, the review request menu may include review information including an associated project name, a required ratio, and product information, and the review menu of the manufacturing facility investment cost may include a review menu And the manufacturing facility investment report is calculated by applying the facility standard cost stored in the facility history management item based on the information on the manufacturing facility investment report item, Can be returned.

The preferred embodiment of the user order management system according to the present invention can monitor competitive bidding processes of a plurality of bidders and thus has the effect of making transparent and fair competitive bidding.

In addition, the preferred embodiment of the user order management system according to the present invention has the effect of increasing the efficiency of business management by evaluating and managing the abilities of a plurality of bidders from time to time.

In addition, it has the effect of improving the economical efficiency of making efficient ordering compared with the target cost established based on the quotation contents proposed by a plurality of bidders and the standard cost.

Meanwhile, a preferred embodiment of the user order management system according to the present invention is to calculate the manufacturing facility investment cost requested from the sales department or the overseas business department from the facility history information accumulated so as to be automatically calculated, The time required for the calculation can be shortened.

FIG. 1 is a conceptual diagram for helping an understanding of a user order management system according to the present invention,
2A to 6B are a part of an image on the web to which the user order management system according to the present invention is applied.

Hereinafter, a preferred embodiment of a user order management system according to the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.

FIG. 1 is a conceptual diagram for helping an understanding of a user order management system according to the present invention, and FIGS. 2a to 6b are part of an image on the web to which a user order management system according to the present invention is applied.

A preferred embodiment of the user order management system according to the present invention can be understood as one of network systems that are generally connected to a network and made available to a user to which a plurality of access rights are granted.

More specifically, a user who has been granted a plurality of access rights includes a manager having a management authority to manage access rights to all Web pages to which the user order management system according to the present invention is applied and access rights of other users And a guest user other than the administrator may be allowed to access only a part of the web page but not all of the web page by the administrator and configured to allow input and modification of certain information within the range allowed by the administrator.

Particularly, in the case of the applicant of the present invention, the user who manufactures the parts of the automobile or the articles related to the automobile runs the business. The user registered in the user order management system according to the present invention specifically manages web pages And the user who has almost all the privileges granted to the web page means the employee of the user company and the guest user can be a number of auto parts manufacturers who have been given predetermined authority by the manager have. However, this is merely an example, and thus the scope of the present invention should not be limited or misinterpreted.

A preferred embodiment of the user order management system according to the present invention may be initiated by receiving a quotation from a plurality of bidders interested in posting an RFQ (Request for Quotation).

That is, when an administrator wishes to manufacture a certain component (component), he or she must select one of a plurality of component manufacturers that manufacture the component, and when selecting a company as a competitive bidding method, It is possible to start by providing information to a plurality of bidders to know by posting them in a known format to the user order management system according to the present invention.

More specifically, a preferred embodiment of the user order management system according to the present invention includes a bid management item 10 for posting an RFQ and receiving a quotation from a plurality of bidders, (20) to manage the price of the products that are consumed for the business contents (meaning the contents of which components to be manufactured) and the products other than the products to be subjected to the RFQ in order to analyze the quotations of the plurality of the bidder A business management item 30 for evaluating the business capabilities of a plurality of bidders who are authorized to receive a quotation in the bid management item 10 and a right to receive a quotation in the bid management item 10 And an administrator item 40 for granting administrator information.

Here, the bid management item 10 receives a first estimate content when a business content is posted by the RFQ publishing step (S10) of publishing an RFQ on the network and the RFQ publishing step (S10) A quote inquiry step S12 for inquiring the contents of the quote registered by the primary quote accepting and registering step S11 and an inquiry inquiry step S12 for inquiring the contents of the quotation registered by the primary quote accepting and registering step S11, (S13) of establishing a standard cost price of a product related to the content of a post-project, and a target cost setting step (S11) of establishing a target cost by comparing the estimated price and the standard price registered by the first estimate acceptance and registration step (S11) (S15) for posting a target cost established by the target cost establishing step (S14), and a target cost posting step (S15) 2 to present estimates After reviewing the estimates received and registered Step (S16), and the second estimate Reception and registration steps (S16) final quote information registered by may include the supplier selection process to select the final bidder (S17).

That is, according to the bid management item 10 according to the present invention, competitive bidding is initiated by posting business contents so that a plurality of bidders can view the web page connected to the network in a known format. Here, as shown in FIG. 2B, it is desirable that the RFQ publication should be conducted by allowing a bidder participating in a predetermined period to participate in the first quote receiving and registering step S11 Do. Such an RFQ publication history may be stored so that related parties can refer to the same competitive bidding in the future, and can be configured to manage the inquiry history by specifying the inquiry period and inputting it.

The primary quotation accepting and registering step S11 is a step in which each bidder logs in the web page through the user ID given by the manager and then, as the quotation corresponding to the business contents, as shown in Fig. 2C, (Refer to reference numerals "I" and " II " in Fig. 1).

On the other hand, a plurality of bidders who have been given the user ID by the manager are informed by the RFQ publishing step (S10) for the above-mentioned first quotation reception and registration step (S11) and the second quotation reception and registration step (S16) It is only necessary to inquire the user target cost published in the posted business content and target cost publication step (S15), and only the right to register the estimation result by each corresponding step is received. Preferably set.

In this manner, even if the execution of the first order acceptance and registration step S11 is completed by a plurality of bidders during a predetermined period or during the period, the manager can confirm the number of the registered persons by the first order acceptance and registration step S11 A quote inquiry step (S12) in which the quote contents proposed by the bidders of the company can be inquired as shown in FIG. 2D.

In the estimation inquiry step (S12), it is possible to simply look up the quotation orders and the quotation amounts presented by each participating bidders in tabular form. Here, since only the manager can access the estimate inquiry step (S12), other bidders can induce fair competitive bidding as access is not permitted.

On the other hand, after the inquiry inquiry step S12, a standard cost setting step S13 for establishing a standard cost item is performed from the unit price management item 20 managed by dividing it into the material unit price, the unit price, and the processing unit price of the product corresponding to the business contents (Refer to reference numeral " III " in Fig. 1).

However, when the reference cost of the product corresponding to the business contents is inquired instead of going through a separate step, the standard cost establishment step (S13), as shown in FIG. 2E, And can be configured to be viewed by the administrator in the form of comparable comparison tables.

What can be inquired by the manager in the standard resource setting step S13 is that it is managed by the business management item 30 as well as the material unit price, the unit price and the processing unit price of the product classified by the unit price management item 20 described above The evaluation scores and grades of the respective bidders can be confirmed in a single comparison table so that the manager can sufficiently refer to the target cost in the succeeding target cost setting step S14 through the standard cost setting step S13.

The target cost setting step (S14) is a step of establishing the target cost of the finished product supplier in conjunction with the standard price of the bid quotation of the plurality of bidders established in the RFQ corresponding to the business contents and the standard cost setting step (S13).

In particular, the target cost setting step (S14), after reviewing the RFQ histories of the corresponding products, establishes the most reasonable and desirable current target costs, thereby reducing the burden of presenting quotation contents of a plurality of bidders, It is possible to provide an advantage of being able to sufficiently reflect fluctuating prices and to make rationality.

The RFQ histories linked in the target cost establishing step S14 can be achieved by inquiring all the previous RFQ histories posted by the RFQ posting step S10. Therefore, the manager can establish reasonable and desirable target cost by comparing the target costs of each corresponding standard cost price.

After the target cost establishment step S14 performed in this manner, a target cost publication step S15 is performed in which a predetermined period is specified and a plurality of bidders are posted to be viewable. When the target cost of the finished goods company is posted according to the target cost publication step S15, referring to FIG. 2F, it is determined whether a plurality of bidders should make an additional bid, and the second estimate acceptance and registration step (S16) (refer to reference numeral " IV "in Fig. 1).

At this time, a plurality of bidders can indicate in the remarks column whether or not the business content condition posted by the RFQ publishing step (S10) is satisfied. In addition, a plurality of bidders may receive the initial quotation from the first quotation accepting and registering step (S11) and the final quotation from the second quotation accepting and registering step (S16) through the second quotation accepting and registering step (S16) It is possible to inquire the NEGO rate automatically calculated by the difference between the NEGO rates. By referring to the calculated NEGO ratio and repeating the step of receiving and registering the second estimate (S16), it is possible to present a final estimate that can be bid. However, it is preferable that this process is provided so that a plurality of bidders can not cross each other and exchange information. This is to prevent the collusion that the purpose of the competitive bidding is fading in advance.

On the other hand, the bid management item 10 may further include a company selection step (S17) for selecting a final winning company after reviewing the final quotation registered in the second quote accepting and registering step (S16) .

The company selection step (S17) is a step of selecting the business ability of a plurality of bidders evaluated based on the business management item (30), as well as the final estimation contents finally registered by the second order receiving and registration step (S16) (See reference numeral "V" in Fig. 1).

Referring to FIG. 2G, the company selection step (S17) is a step in which a plurality of bidders submit a final quotation, a first quote received in the second quote accepting and registering step (S16) , The NEGO rate due to the difference between the final estimate price and the initial estimate price, the feasibility schedule of the content of the project, and the evaluation score of the company are all displayed, and the evaluation score of the bidder is sufficiently reflected So that the most reasonable and fair company selection can be made (see reference numeral " V " in Fig. 1).

3A, in the preferred embodiment of the user ordering system according to the present invention, the unit price management item 20 is a unit price management item, It is an item that can be input and managed for the product, and can be inquired by unit price, unit price, and unit price of processing by unit price inquiry.

Particularly, as shown in FIG. 3B, the material unit price management is performed by arranging the material group codes, the material codes, the material names, and the standards for each material so as to be mutually identified, and dividing the start date and end date for giving the unit price To make it possible to manage all the materials related to the products of the finished product manufacturers.

Also, as shown in FIG. 3C, the unit price management of the fixed unit is performed by identifying the unit price by assigning a nominal rate code and a nominal rate, and by dividing the start date and the ending date into periods, Management and inquiry.

In addition, as shown in FIG. 3D, the machining unit price is managed by identifying the unit price by assigning a machining rate code and a machining rate name to the machining unit price. So that the unit price for each process can be managed and inquired.

As described above, the following advantages can be secured by managing the material unit price, the unit price of the worker unit, and the processing unit cost management. That is, when the competitor bids are led by the bidders through the bidding management item 10, a plurality of bidders can receive the initial quotation content and the unit price management item 20 presented through the first order acceptance and registration step S11, (S13) and the target cost establishment step (S14) can be efficiently determined based on each material unit price management, the unit price management, and the processing unit price management which are collected and managed by the customer. In addition to being applied to the bid management item 10 described above, it is needless to say that the unit price trend of the related market can be easily grasped by reflecting the unit price of the unit price at any time.

Meanwhile, as shown in FIG. 4A, the business management item 30 is divided into a company status, a company evaluation (regular / on-time), evaluation information, and an evaluation level, . As for the companies, those companies that are expected to order the production of future products due to mutual agreement between the finished product companies and the parts suppliers, should be included so that the companies that are not actually related to the current bid item management can perform the business evaluation at any time .

As shown in FIG. 4B, the company status is managed so as to be identifiable by assigning a vendor code, a business name, a business number, a telephone number, a contactable address, and a fax number to each corresponding company.

Also, as shown in FIG. 4C, the vendor evaluation may be performed by a plurality of evaluation items, and evaluation scores in consideration of the business environment, technology, 10) to improve the ability of a number of bidders to participate in.

Here, the company evaluation is given more detailed evaluation items according to the management environment, technical ability, and ability to respond, and each point is graded, and the total score of each pointed item is automatically calculated, . It is a matter of course that the company evaluation can be made by updating additional evaluation items that are deemed desirable, not limited to the above.

As shown in FIG. 4 (d), the evaluation information is a part where each company's detailed evaluation items evaluated by the company evaluation (by management status, technology, and capability) can be viewed. It is a part that can be evaluated collectively by assigning evaluation rating to each company evaluated through.

In a preferred embodiment of the user order management system according to the present invention, not only is it possible to manage the parts suppliers that receive the product orders from the finished product suppliers through the system, but also to make the most appropriate and simple By collecting information, it is possible to induce more competitive bidding.

In particular, in a preferred embodiment of the user order management system according to the present invention, an administrator item 40 for checking an IP address on the network by a manager is provided to exclude the possibility of collusion from a plurality of bidders. . This is an item closely related to the above-mentioned company selection step (S17). In the company selection step (S17), a plurality of bidders' log-in records checked by the manager item (40) Is also a step that can be judged.

6A, the administrator item 40 can be classified into rights code management, rights management, user management, department management, material management, log management, and announcement management, and in particular, As described above, the system connection history can be stored and retrieved, but the address (IP address) and connection time used on the web can be inquired.

As a result of collating the log records of a plurality of bidders, it is known that collision is performed when a first bid acceptance and registration step (S11) and a second bid acceptance and registration step (S16) of a different bidder having the same IP address are found It is possible to establish a basis for estimating collusion on the network.

Hereinafter, a preferred embodiment of the user order management system according to the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. However, the embodiment of the user order management system according to the present invention is not limited to the above-described preferred embodiment. That is, in the case of the user order management system according to the preferred embodiment, the business contents related to the selection of the competitive bidding type company and the product ordering between the finished product manufacturer and the component manufacturer are mainly applied. However, It is not limited.

1, in addition to the respective items of the above-described preferred embodiment, another embodiment of the user order management system according to the present invention is a system for managing facility status of a factory disposed in a plurality of areas, (60) requesting to calculate and report the manufacturing facility investment cost required for product production to the factory having the facility by referring to the management item (50) and the facility history management item (50) have.

Such facility history management item 50 is an item for recording and inquiring the facility history bookmarked list of a plurality of facilities provided in each factory.

That is, as shown in FIG. 5A, the equipment history management item 50 is provided with a facility history library capable of inputting and inquiring the history of each facility, and the facility history library 50 includes, as shown in FIGS. 5B and 5C, In the same way, the equipment codes of each facility, the name of the finished product of the products produced by each facility, the equipment manufacturer that manufactures the equipment, the application point of the equipment, the date of completion of the development, the estimate price required to manufacture the equipment, and the NEGO Factory, and other facilities, an inquiry menu of the quote contents, an image of the installation of each facility of each facility, and a document that records various data that can be grasped through the quote content inquiry menu And may include an attachment menu that can be attached.

On the other hand, the manufacturing facility review request item (60) includes a review request menu for initiating a review request for a related facility by a user who has been granted partial access authority, and a review request menu A manufacturing facility investment cost review menu for reviewing the manufacturing facility investment cost for each review request specification input by a user who has been given and a manufacturing facility investment report for returning a review of the manufacturing facility investment cost to the user who has been granted some access authority . &Lt; / RTI >

A user who initiates a request for review through the Manufacturing Facility Review Request Item (60) may be one of the employees of the finished goods business or the employees of the overseas business, who has been granted some access authorization as described above, There is a need to review the manufacturing facility investment cost in advance to proceed with the related project.

More specifically, in the review request menu, the review information including the name of the related project, the requested CAPA rate, and the product information can be input. The review of the manufacturing facility investment cost menu includes the review information input in the review request menu The manufacturing facility investment cost is calculated by applying the facility standard cost stored in the facility history management item (50) as a standard, and the manufacturing facility investment report menu is used to return the manufacturing facility investment cost and necessary equipment information calculated through the menu As shown in FIG.

Conventionally, when a certain project is carried out by the departments of the sales department and overseas business department, the information about the related facilities is collected to directly calculate the investment cost of the manufacturing facility, or after requesting to review the investment cost of the manufacturing facility, We conducted the project by trusting the investment cost of the manufacturing facility without objectivity and fairness. However, such a calculation of the manufacturing facility investment cost leads to a problem that the budgets should be newly formed during the project due to the lack of objective data, which often exceeds the initial investment cost, resulting in the problem of delay of the project and the problem of not meeting the due date have.

Another embodiment of the user ordering system according to the present invention is a system for managing the systematic and objective data through the equipment history book of the facility history management item 50 in order to solve the problems of the related art, If there is a request to review the manufacturing facility investment cost, it is possible to objectively calculate the final manufacturing facility investment cost based on the data recorded in the facility history register.

In particular, it is noted that not only the manufacturing facility investment cost calculated according to the current review request, but also the manufacturing facility investment cost and the negotiation cost calculated beforehand are recorded in the facility history book, so that it can be positively referred to the present review request Of course, by allowing factories that have facilities to be replicated on the same network, they can create very rapid benefits in gathering information.

Embodiments of a user ordering system according to the present invention have been described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. It should be noted, however, that the embodiments of the present invention are not necessarily limited to the above-described embodiments, and that various modifications and equivalents may be made by those skilled in the art. Will be taken for granted. Therefore, it is to be understood that the true scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims.

10: Bid management item 20: Unit price management item
30: Business Management Item 40: Manager Item
50: Equipment history management item 60: Manufacturing equipment review request item
S10: RFQ publishing step S11: receiving and registering the first quotation
S12: Quotation inquiry step S13: Standard cost establishment step
S14: Target Cost Establishment Step S15: Target Cost Publication Step
S16: Receipt and registration of the second estimate S17: Selection stage

Claims

A bid management item for posting an RFQ (Request for Quotation) and receiving a quotation from a plurality of bidders;
A unit price management item for managing unit prices of products and other products consumed in the business contents to be subjected to the RFQ in order to analyze quotations of a plurality of bidders accepted in the bid management item;
A business management item for evaluating business capabilities of a plurality of bidders authorized to receive a quotation in the bidding management item;
And an administrator item that authorizes the bid management item to receive a quotation,
The target cost is calculated by comparing the quotation of a plurality of bidders received in the bidding management item with the standard cost established by the unit price management item, and then posted on the bidding management item, and a plurality of bidders And a final cost estimate from a plurality of bidders received after inquiring the business cost evaluation score of the bidding management item and the target cost posted in the bidding management item.

The method according to claim 1,
The bid management item includes:
An RFQ publishing step of posting the RFQ on the network;
A first order receiving and registering step in which, when the business contents are posted by the RFQ publishing step, the plurality of bidders receive and register the first order quotation contents;
A quote inquiry step of inquiring the manager about the quotation registered by the primary quote receiving and registering step;
Establishing a standard cost for a product related to the business content after the inquiry inquiry step;
A target cost establishing step of establishing a target cost by comparing the quotation registered in the first quotation accepting and registering step and the standard cost;
A target cost posting step of posting the target cost established by the target cost establishing step;
A second quote receiving and registering step in which, when the target cost is posted by the target cost posting step, the plurality of bidders submit final quotation contents;
A user selection step of selecting a final winning bidder after reviewing the final quotation registered by the second quote accepting and registering step.

The method of claim 2,
Wherein the RFQ publishing step is a step of posting the plurality of bidders to perform the first quotation accepting and registering step for a predetermined period.

The method of claim 2,
Wherein the plurality of bidders are authorized to receive and register respective estimates in the first order acceptance and registration step and the second order acceptance and registration step in the manager item, And the access is prohibited in steps other than the step of accepting and registering the second quote.

The method of claim 2,
In the standardization step,
Wherein the user order management system is capable of calculating the difference between the quotation contents of the plurality of bidders and the established standard price received through the first quotation reception and registration step.

The method of claim 2,
The target cost setting step includes:
Wherein the step of comparing the target cost of the RFQ before the RFQ and the history of the target cost of each RFQ is a step of storing and inquiring.

The method of claim 2,
In the vendor selection step,
The Nego Ratio is calculated by comparing the initial quotation of a bidder submitted at the first quotation acceptance and registration stage with the final quotation of the bidder submitted at the second quotation acceptance and registration stage. A user order management system capable of automatic calculation.

The method of claim 2,
In the vendor selection step,
Wherein a plurality of bidders are checked in the log entry of the plurality of bidders, and the plurality of bidders are collated.

The method of claim 8,
In the vendor selection step,
As a result of collating the log records of the plurality of bidders, when the execution of the first quotation receiving and registering step and the execution of the second quotation receiving and registering step of the different bidders having the same IP address are found, Order Management System.

The method according to claim 1,
The unit price management items are classified into material unit price management, unit price management and processing unit price management,
The above-mentioned material unit price management is a user order management system capable of inputting unit price for each material group and inquiring, and managing the standard material unit price per viewpoint.

The method according to claim 1,
The unit price management items are classified into material unit price management, unit price management and processing unit price management,
The above-mentioned unit price management is a user order management system capable of inputting unit price for each employee and inquiring, and managing the unit price of standard labor for each time point.

The method according to claim 1,
The unit price management items are classified into material unit price management, unit price management and processing unit price management,
The above-mentioned processing unit price management is a user order management system which can input and inquire the unit price per processing, and can perform standard processing unit price management by time.

The method according to claim 1,
A facility history management item for managing the facility status of the factories disposed in a plurality of areas;
Further comprising a manufacturing facility review request item for calculating and reporting a manufacturing facility investment cost required for product production to a factory having the facility with reference to the facility history management item.

14. The method of claim 13,
The facility history management item includes:
A user order management system, which records and inquires the facility history booklet listing a plurality of facilities provided in each factory.

15. The method of claim 14,
The facility history management item includes:
A manufacturer of the equipment for manufacturing the equipment, a quotation for the manufacture of the equipment, a factory where the equipment is installed, and other specifications of the equipment A quote inquiry menu;
A photo image retrieval menu with images of the installations of the facilities installed in each factory;
And an attached file menu for attaching a document in which various data that can be grasped through the inquiry contents inquiry menu is recorded.

14. The method of claim 13,
The manufacturing facility review request item includes:
A review request menu for initiating a review request for a related facility by a user who has been granted some access authority;
A manufacturing facility investment cost review menu for, when the review request is started through the review request menu, examining the manufacturing facility investment cost according to the review request specification input by the user who has been given the access authority;
And a manufacturing facility investment report menu for returning the manufacturing facility investment cost reviewed in the manufacturing facility investment ratio review menu to the user who has been granted the partial access authority.

18. The method of claim 16,
In the review request menu, review information including an associated project name, a requested capa (CAPA), and product information can be input,
The manufacturing facility investment ratio examination menu may be configured to review the manufacturing facility investment cost by applying a facility standard cost stored in the facility history management item based on the review information entered in the review request menu,
Wherein the manufacturing facility investment report menu is capable of returning the manufacturing facility investment cost and necessary facility information calculated through the manufacturing facility investment ratio review menu.