KR20130042139A - Group learning process system - Google Patents

Group learning process system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
KR20130042139A
KR20130042139A KR1020110106269A KR20110106269A KR20130042139A KR 20130042139 A KR20130042139 A KR 20130042139A KR 1020110106269 A KR1020110106269 A KR 1020110106269A KR 20110106269 A KR20110106269 A KR 20110106269A KR 20130042139 A KR20130042139 A KR 20130042139A
Authority
KR
South Korea
Prior art keywords
group
learning
grade
unit
learner
Prior art date
Application number
KR1020110106269A
Other languages
Korean (ko)
Inventor
양승주
Original Assignee
주식회사 알지교육
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 주식회사 알지교육 filed Critical 주식회사 알지교육
Priority to KR1020110106269A priority Critical patent/KR20130042139A/en
Publication of KR20130042139A publication Critical patent/KR20130042139A/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/02—Agriculture; Fishing; Forestry; Mining
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
    • G09B7/02—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student
    • G09B7/04—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student characterised by modifying the teaching programme in response to a wrong answer, e.g. repeating the question, supplying a further explanation
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
    • G09B7/06—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the multiple-choice answer-type, i.e. where a given question is provided with a series of answers and a choice has to be made from the answers
    • G09B7/07—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the multiple-choice answer-type, i.e. where a given question is provided with a series of answers and a choice has to be made from the answers providing for individual presentation of questions to a plurality of student stations
    • G09B7/073—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the multiple-choice answer-type, i.e. where a given question is provided with a series of answers and a choice has to be made from the answers providing for individual presentation of questions to a plurality of student stations all student stations being capable of presenting the same questions simultaneously

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Educational Technology (AREA)
  • Marine Sciences & Fisheries (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Animal Husbandry (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE: A learning system which processing the learning for each group by automatically determining a learner group is provided to help an institute, which operates online lectures, to create profits. CONSTITUTION: A test evaluation unit comprises a test questionnaire based on learning data stored in a learning data database and processes a test result by using the test questionnaire(S100). A group start level determination unit determines a group start level of a leaner based on scores tested by the test evaluation unit(S200). A learning data providing unit provides the learning data corresponding to progress, which is determined by a progress determination unit, to the leaner(S400). A group evaluation schedule computation unit computes an evaluation schedule by managing a group learning schedule(S500). [Reference numerals] (AA) Start; (BB) End; (S100) Test result processing step; (S200) Group start grade determining step; (S300) Progress section determining step; (S400) Learning data providing step; (S500) Group evaluation schedule computation step; (S600) Group grade control test step; (S700) Group grade automatic determining step;

Description

A learning system that automatically determines learner groups and proceeds learning by group.

The present invention relates to a learning system for automatically determining a learner group to proceed with learning by group, and more specifically, to test a learner to determine a start group, determine a progress unit corresponding to the start group, and present it to the learner. , Manage the study schedule and test according to the assessment schedule to automatically determine group promotion, group lower, and group retention based on the test results, or if the total score, including the weighted score of the student's problem, exceeds the group grade upward score. The present invention relates to a learning system that automatically determines a learner group characterized by automatically adjusting the level upwards and proceeds learning by group.

Conventional online education systems are designed with a focus on effectively delivering lecture contents from instructor to learner, and neglect aspects of delivering learner's satisfaction and understanding to lecturer. Is one of the problems with the online education system, which connects many instructors and students.

Depending on the system, sometimes a test is performed to evaluate the student's comprehension of the lecture. Post-learning or supplementary learning that is based on the test result is left to the learner, and it is difficult to get help from the online education system.

Another problem with the conventional system is that learners who listen to online lectures are more likely to be bored than offline education, and less concentrated than offline lectures.

To improve this, the prior art tests learner's comprehension and provides supplementary learning materials according to the learner's level according to the test result.If the comprehension of the lecture is not understood even after supplementary learning, the instructor and the student have one-to-one remote communication through separate channels. Although it is to promote the lecture, when the level of learners is improved than the present, there is a disadvantage that individualized learning is impossible because no means for determining the lesson plan or progress unit is disclosed.

On the other hand, because the concentration of students is not considered because the achievements of the learners are not considered, the system was not provided to increase the participation rate.

Korea Patent 0772183

Therefore, the present invention has been proposed in view of the problems of the prior art as described above. The first object of the present invention is to test a learner to determine a start group, determine a progress unit corresponding to the start group, and present it to the learner. It manages the learning schedule and tests it according to the evaluation schedule to automatically determine group promotion, group lower group and group maintenance based on the test results.

The second object of the present invention is to generate a class stop event and send the class reminder message to the corresponding learner when the class progress rate is less than the set progress rate even after half the lecture period for taking the learning material corresponding to the determined group progress unit. To do that.

The third object of the present invention is to calculate the average academic progress rate, average score, average solve time of the learners belonging to the group to convert to a point score to provide a discount or a product granted by the point score to improve the learner's academic efficiency It is.

Learning system for automatically determining the learner group according to an embodiment of the present invention to proceed learning by group,

It consists of a group-based learning management management server 100, the configuration is based on the learning material database 105 for storing and managing learning materials for each of the classified areas, grades, and based on the learning data stored in the learning material database A diagnostic test evaluation unit 110 for constructing a questionnaire, testing a learner using the constructed questionnaire, and processing test results, a group information database 115 for storing and managing group information according to difficulty scores, and the diagnosis A group start grade determiner 120 that determines a learner's group start grade based on a score for each difficulty level of the questionnaire with reference to the score tested by the test evaluator, and the group start grade determined by the group start grade determiner. The group progress unit determining unit 125 for determining a matching unit of progress, and the progress unit determined by the group progress unit determining unit. Learning material presentation unit 130 for extracting the learning material to be received from the learning material database to present to the learner, and group evaluation schedule calculation unit 135 for calculating the weekly evaluation schedule by managing the learning schedule for each group, and for each group When the evaluation schedule is calculated by the evaluation schedule calculation unit, a grade control questionnaire is constructed for each group based on the training material stored in the study material database, and the test result is tested by testing the group grade of the learners using the configured grade control questionnaire for each group. The group grade control test evaluation unit 140 to process and obtain the results tested by the group grade control test evaluation unit to automatically determine the learner's group promotion, group lower, group maintenance according to predetermined group grade information And a group grade automatic determiner 145, and a central controller 150 for controlling data flow.

Learning system for automatically determining the learner group according to the present invention having the above configuration and action to perform the learning by group,

Test the learner to determine the start group, determine the progress unit that matches the start group, present it to the learner, manage the study schedule, test it according to the evaluation schedule, and automate group promotion, group lower, and group maintenance according to the test results. By deciding on this, all online classes will be automatically managed.

In addition, even if half of the lecture period for taking the learning materials corresponding to the determined group progress unit has elapsed, when the lecture progress rate is less than the set progress achievement rate, a lecture stop event is generated and a reminder message is sent to the corresponding learner. It will provide the effect of encouraging lecture progress on schedule.

In addition, by calculating the average academic progress rate, average score, average solve time of the learners belonging to the group to convert the points into points scores by providing discounts or products that are given by the point scores to improve the academic efficiency of the learners and online lectures It will also contribute to monetization of the operating company.

1 is an overall configuration diagram of a learning system for automatically determining a learner group according to an embodiment of the present invention and learning by group.
2 is a block diagram of a custom learning management server for each group of a learning system that automatically determines a learner group according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention and performs learning for each group.
3 is another configuration diagram of a group-based customized learning management server of a learning system that automatically determines a learner group according to an embodiment of the present invention and proceeds learning by group.
4 is another configuration diagram of a group-based customized learning management server of a learning system for automatically determining a learner group and progressing learning by group according to an embodiment of the present invention.
5 is a flowchart illustrating a learning method of automatically determining a learner group and performing learning for each group according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

The learning system for automatically determining the learner group according to the present invention for achieving the above object and learning by group,

In the learning system that the learner client 200 and the group-specific learning management server automatically determine the learner group formed by being linked through a network, and proceeds learning by group,

The group-specific learning management server 100,

Learning data database 105 for storing and managing the classified data for each area and grade, and

A diagnostic test evaluation unit 110 for constructing a test questionnaire based on the learning material stored in the learning material database and testing the learner using the configured questionnaire to process the test result;

A group information database 115 for storing and managing group information according to a score for each difficulty level;

A group start grade determiner 120 for determining a learner's group start grade according to a score for each difficulty level of the questionnaire with reference to the score tested by the diagnostic test evaluator;

A group progress unit determining unit 125 for determining a progress unit corresponding to the group start class determined by the group start class determining unit;

A learning material presentation unit 130 for extracting a learning material corresponding to the progress unit determined by the group progression unit determination unit from the learning material database and presenting it to the learner;

And a group evaluation schedule calculation unit 135 for managing a group learning schedule to calculate a weekly evaluation schedule,

When the evaluation schedule is calculated by the evaluation schedule calculation unit for each group, a grade control questionnaire is configured for each group based on the training data stored in the study data database, and the group grade of the learner is tested using the configured grade control questionnaire for each group. Group grade adjustment test evaluation unit 140 for processing the test results,

A group grade automatic determination unit 145 for automatically obtaining a group upgrade, group lower grade, and group maintenance of a learner according to predetermined group grade information by acquiring a result tested by the group grade adjustment test evaluation unit;

It characterized in that it comprises a central control unit 150 for controlling the data flow.

Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.

Prior to this, terms and words used in the present specification and claims should not be construed as limited to ordinary or dictionary terms, and the inventor should appropriately interpret the concepts of the terms appropriately It should be interpreted in accordance with the meaning and concept consistent with the technical idea of the present invention based on the principle that it can be defined.

Therefore, the embodiments described in the specification and the drawings shown in the drawings are only one of the most preferred embodiments of the present invention and do not represent all of the technical idea of the present invention, various modifications that can be replaced at the time of the present application It should be understood that there may be equivalents and variations.

1 is an overall configuration diagram of a learning system for automatically determining a learner group according to an embodiment of the present invention and learning by group.

As shown in FIG. 1, the learning system for automatically determining a learner group of the present invention to perform learning for each group is configured such that the learner client 200 and the group-specific learning management server 100 are connected through a network. Will be.

In addition, if the instructor client is separately configured and the grade maintenance decision is made four times, the instructor client and the network for class counseling are additionally configured.

2 is a block diagram of a custom learning management server for each group of a learning system that automatically determines a learner group according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention and performs learning for each group.

As shown in Figure 2, the group-specific learning management server 100,

Learning data database 105 for storing and managing the classified data for each area and grade, and

A diagnostic test evaluation unit 110 for constructing a test questionnaire based on the learning material stored in the learning material database and testing the learner using the configured questionnaire to process the test result;

A group information database 115 for storing and managing group information according to a score for each difficulty level;

A group start grade determiner 120 for determining a learner's group start grade according to a score for each difficulty level of the questionnaire with reference to the score tested by the diagnostic test evaluator;

A group progress unit determining unit 125 for determining a progress unit corresponding to the group start class determined by the group start class determining unit;

A learning material presentation unit 130 for extracting a learning material corresponding to the progress unit determined by the group progression unit determination unit from the learning material database and presenting it to the learner;

And a group evaluation schedule calculation unit 135 for managing a group learning schedule to calculate a weekly evaluation schedule,

When the evaluation schedule is calculated by the evaluation schedule calculation unit for each group, a grade control questionnaire is configured for each group based on the training data stored in the study data database, and the group grade of the learner is tested using the configured grade control questionnaire for each group. Group grade adjustment test evaluation unit 140 for processing the test results,

A group grade automatic determination unit 145 for automatically obtaining a group upgrade, group lower grade, and group maintenance of a learner according to predetermined group grade information by acquiring a result tested by the group grade adjustment test evaluation unit;

It comprises a central control unit 150 for controlling the data flow.

In detail, the learning material database 105 stores and manages learning materials for each classified area and grade.

Mathematics, for example, can store classified learning materials such as numbers and operations (basic computing), figures (thinking), measurement (understanding), probability and statistics (reasoning), regularity and problem solving (creativity), and so on. The five categories are to store the learning materials for each grade.

In this case, the learning data database includes lectures classified into at least one category among subjects, difficulty levels, progress levels, and types, and stores lecture information classified into one or more categories by group.

In addition, it may be produced using video content and various images to help the understanding or concentration of the lecture.

The diagnostic test evaluation unit 110 constructs a test questionnaire based on the learning material stored in the learning material database, and tests the learner using the configured questionnaire to transmit the test result to the group start grade determination unit 120. .

The student's grade is referred to, and the level of learning is determined to determine the group level to which the student belongs.

The grade of the group that starts learning according to the learning level by progress unit is called the group grade. For example, it may be 1st grade, 2nd grade, 3rd grade, ... or upper, intermediate, and lower grade.

The group setting of the belonging group as described above does not mean all units, but is configured to determine the group grade starting by giving a difficulty to the subdivided type by subdividing by each type corresponding to each unit.

The group information database stores and manages group information according to difficulty scores.

For example, grades 1 to 4 are group grades that perform conceptual principle learning, and the difficulty levels of each grade and grade are different.

In addition, grades 5 to 8 are group grades that improve students' performance and preparation for school tests, and also have different levels of difficulty for each grade and grade.

In addition, grades 9 to 12 are grades for deep learning and competition or Olympiad, which also differ in each grade and grade.

The score corresponding to the group grade information is managed according to the difficulty, and it is natural that the grade information according to the score for each difficulty level can be changed.

The group start grade determiner 120 determines the learner's group start grade according to the difficulty level of the questionnaire with reference to the score tested by the diagnostic test evaluation unit. For example, if the difficulty level of the questionnaire is different, If you set the score corresponding to 80 or more, if the score is less than 80, the group start grade of the learner is determined as medium, or the questionnaire with difficulty is set to the learner to set the group start grade to medium if the score is above a predetermined score. will be.

The reason for assigning a starting grade by designating a group as in the present invention is to enable a company operating the system to efficiently perform the management of learners, and to allow the learners to intuitively know whether the starting grade is a higher grade or a lower grade. This is to induce continuous learning so that the level can be adjusted upward by providing motivation.

In addition, while the grades can be freely adjusted according to individual learning outcomes, the evaluation is performed for each group to provide a separate reward to the group having high academic achievement and academic efficiency, so that the concentration of the study can be enhanced.

The group progress unit determination unit 125 determines the progress unit corresponding to the group start grade determined by the group start grade determination unit, and the progress unit determines the progress unit for each grade group and progresses from the progress unit desired by the learner. If necessary, the progress unit may be determined by extracting a problem for determining a separate progress unit, and if necessary, the progress unit may be determined according to a school class meeting the current learner's date.

However, since the learning progresses for each group, it is preferable to proceed from the predetermined progress unit.

The learning material presentation unit 130 extracts the learning material corresponding to the progress unit determined by the group progress unit determination unit from the learning material database and presents it to the learner.

The group evaluation schedule calculation unit 135 calculates a weekly evaluation schedule by managing the learning schedule for each group, and may proceed to 4 weeks for each unit or decrease or increase the week according to the group grade level.

Evaluation schedules can usually be flexibly set according to academic progress, either on Saturday or Sunday.

When the evaluation schedule is calculated by the evaluation schedule calculation unit for each group, the group grade control test evaluation unit 140 constructs a grade control questionnaire for each group based on the learning data stored in the learning material database, and a problem of constructing a questionnaire for each grade The difficulty level will be set differently.

In addition, the test results are processed by testing the group grade of the learner using the configured group grade questionnaire.

The automatic group grade determination unit 145 obtains the results tested by the group grade adjustment test evaluation unit and automatically determines the group upgrade, group lower grade, and group maintenance of the learner according to predetermined group grade information.

For example, when the weekend evaluation correctness rate is less than 70 points, the group grade to which the current learner belongs is lowered, and when the weekend evaluation correct rate exceeds 80 points, the group grade to which the current learner belongs is raised.

In addition, the incorrect answer of the progress learning problem can be solved 9 times the basic repeatedly, the question of the weekend assessment questions are mainly questions of the progress learning incorrect answer.

On the other hand, the group grade adjustment test evaluation unit determines the group promotion, group lower, and group maintenance according to the solving time, average score, correct answer rate. The average score and the percentage of correct answers are calculated and determined according to a predetermined reference table.

In other words, if the score exceeds 1 in (Study Time / Limit Time), the score calculated as Score = Average Score + Correct Answer Rate will be upgraded if the score is above the predetermined score. If the score is less than the predetermined score is determined to maintain.

The grade control contrast table is preset by the administrator who operates the system.

The average score means the average score of the weekly progress learning, the average score of the result of repeated learning for a certain period of time means the level of learning ability.

The percentage of correct answers is the number of times you score 100 points in your progress.

In other words, it means the number of times you scored 100 points during the five-day progression of the week.

The most important factor in adjusting the grade in the system is the solving time to check the learner's concentration.

The group grade control test evaluation unit may drop the group grade to which the current learner belongs when the weekend evaluation correct answer rate is less than 70 points, and raise the group grade to which the current learner belongs when the weekend evaluation correct rate exceeds 80 points.

In other words, the group grade adjustment test period is set to one week, and the group grade is adjusted every week, and the evaluation is performed on the weekend. If the weekend evaluation correct rate is less than 70 points, the current group grade is lowered, and the weekend evaluation correct rate is If it exceeds 80 points, the current group grade is raised, and the current group grade is maintained from 70 to 80 points.

Since the above-described grade down, grade maintenance, and grade up are set by the administrator, the reference score may be changed.

On the other hand, if the lecture progress is less than 30% after 50% of the course period for taking the learning materials corresponding to the progress unit determined by the Group Progress Unit Decision Unit, a lecture stop event is generated and a reminder is given to the corresponding student. It can be configured to further include a dunning message generating unit for transmitting.

In other words, if the progress unit is set to one week, and the course duration is less than 30% even after three days, the class will generate a stop event and send a reminder message to the learner.

This will help prepare students for the case of forgetting and not attending, and encourage them to attend.

In addition, if a dunning message is sent and there is no change in the progress of the lecture after about a day or two, the group grade is adjusted downward.

In addition, the system of the present invention can be configured to include a monthly analysis information database for storing and managing learning history management and learning management evaluation information for each month.

In other words, it manages the learning history and stores whether the course is faithfully carried out, whether or not to maintain the progress and score for the group upgrade, it is possible to perform continuous learning monitoring of the learners.

In addition, the monthly analysis information database stores and manages the learner's personal information and desired learning information, the personal information means the name, date of birth, phone number, parent mobile phone number, learner's mobile phone number, address, membership, end date, etc. The desired learning matters mean the school, the progress cycle, the number of questions of the desired progress, the desired grade day of the week, and the current group grade.

The progress cycle can be selected weekly. The number of questions is the number of questions per day. You can select 30, 40, or 60 questions that are suitable for one-time problem solving. To make it possible.

In addition, the system of the present invention, if the group maintenance decision by the group grade automatic determination unit is four times, taking the learner's personal information and test scores and only the wrong answer problem is sent to the instructor client to take the course consultation It is configured to further include a consultation unit.

In other words, if the current group grade is maintained for 4 weeks when performing the weekend evaluation, the student's personal information (name, contact, address, school, etc.) is judged to be poorly understood by the unit. Extract only the weekly test scores and incorrect questions and send them to the instructor client who manages the students to conduct lecture counseling by the instructor or to perform one-on-one lectures with the instructor. It will allow you to proceed.

3 is another configuration diagram of a group-based customized learning management server of a learning system that automatically determines a learner group according to an embodiment of the present invention and proceeds learning by group.

As shown in FIG. 3, the system of the present invention further includes a weight problem extracting unit 160 that extracts a specific problem to which weight is assigned from the learning material database 105 in the test questionnaire for adjusting the grade. .

That is, the problem that the learner fits may be presented with a combination of a specific problem having a weighted difficulty and a general problem suitable for the group grade.

At this time, if a specific problem with difficulty is matched, weight is given, and when the total score including the weighted score exceeds the group grade up score, the grade is automatically adjusted upward.

4 is another configuration diagram of a group-based customized learning management server of a learning system for automatically determining a learner group and progressing learning by group according to an embodiment of the present invention.

As shown in FIG. 4, the system of the present invention includes a group average calculation unit 170 for calculating an average academic progress rate, an average score, and an average learning time of learners belonging to a group;

Point score calculation unit 180 for calculating a point score according to the average academic progress rate, average score, average solve time, and

The point information benefit information DB 190 for storing discount benefit information or product information granted for each point score is additionally configured.

The group average calculation unit 170 calculates an average academic progress rate, an average score, and an average solving time of learners belonging to a group. For example, the academic progress rate of one learner belonging to one group is 50%, and the academic work of two learners is calculated. If the progress rate is 50%, the average academic progress rate is 50%.

In this case, the point score calculation unit 180 calculates a point score according to an average academic progress rate, an average score, and an average working time. For example, when the average academic progress rate is 50%, the point score is 500,000 points. In the benefit information DB for each point score 190 stores the discount information or product information given for each point score, the 500,000 points of benefit is a discount of 10% DC in the monthly tuition Will be given.

If this configuration is provided, it is possible to provide a discount or a product that is given for each point score, thereby providing the effect of improving the learning efficiency of the learner and contributing to the profit generation of the company that operates the online lecture.

5 is a flowchart illustrating a learning method of automatically determining a learner group and performing learning for each group according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

As shown in FIG. 5, the learning method of automatically determining a learner group according to the present invention and proceeding learning for each group includes:

A test result processing step (S100) of which the diagnostic test evaluation unit 110 constructs a questionnaire for test based on the learning material stored in the learning material database, and tests the learner using the configured questionnaire to process the test result;

A group start grade determination step (S200) of determining a group start grade of a learner according to a score for each difficulty level of the questionnaire with reference to the score tested by the diagnostic test evaluation unit;

A progress unit determination step of determining, by the group progress unit determination unit 125, an progress unit corresponding to the group start grade determined by the group start grade determination unit (S300);

Learning material presentation unit 130 extracts the learning material corresponding to the progress unit determined by the group progress unit determination unit from the learning material database to present to the learner (S400);

A group evaluation schedule calculation step of calculating a group evaluation schedule by the group evaluation schedule calculating unit 135 to manage the group learning schedule (S500);

When the group grade control test evaluation unit 140 calculates the evaluation schedule by the group evaluation schedule calculation unit, a grade control questionnaire for each group is configured based on the learning data stored in the study data database, and the grade control questionnaire for each group is configured. A group grade adjustment test step of processing a test result by testing a group grade of the learner using the step S600;

The group grade automatic determination unit 145 obtains the results tested by the group grade adjustment test evaluation unit and automatically determines the group upgrade, group lower grade, and group maintenance of the learner according to predetermined group grade information. (S700); made.

Specifically, the diagnostic test evaluation unit 110 configures a test questionnaire based on the learning material stored in the learning material database, tests the learner using the configured questionnaire, and processes the test result (S100). The start grade determination unit 120 determines the group start grade of the learner according to the score for each difficulty level of the questionnaire with reference to the score tested by the diagnostic test evaluation unit (S200).

Thereafter, the group progress unit determination unit 125 determines the progress unit corresponding to the group start grade determined by the group start grade determination unit (S300), and the learning material presentation unit 130 determines the progress determined by the group progress unit determination unit. The learning material corresponding to the unit is extracted from the learning material database and presented to the learner (S400).

Thereafter, the group evaluation schedule calculation unit 135 manages the group learning schedule to calculate the weekly evaluation schedule (S500), and the group grade adjustment test evaluation unit 140 calculates the evaluation schedule by the group evaluation schedule calculation unit. Then, the grade control questionnaire is configured for each group based on the learning material stored in the learning material database, and the test result is processed by testing the group grade of the learner using the configured grade adjustment questionnaire for each group (S600).

Subsequently, the group grade automatic determination unit 145 obtains the results tested by the group grade adjustment test evaluation unit to automatically determine the learner's group promotion, group lower grade, and group maintenance according to predetermined group grade information (S700). Will be.

The learner progresses through the learning materials, and the group evaluation schedule calculation department manages the learner's learning schedule to calculate the weekly evaluation schedule, which calculates the weekly evaluation schedule, and usually performs the evaluation on the weekend. If necessary, the assessment may be performed on the day set by the learner.

The present invention described above is not limited to the detailed description, use examples, and drawings of the above-described invention, and those skilled in the art may vary within the scope without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention described in the claims below. Of course, modifications and variations are also included within the scope of the present invention.

100: customized learning management server for each group
105: Learning Materials Database
110: diagnostic test evaluation unit
115: group information database
120: group start grade determination unit
125: group progress unit determination unit
130: learning material presentation unit
135: Calculation of group evaluation schedule
140: Group Rating Control Test Evaluation Department
145: group grade automatic determination unit
150: central control unit
200: learner client

Claims (9)

In the learning system that the learner client 200 and the group-specific learning management server automatically determine the learner group formed by being linked through a network, and proceeds learning by group,
The group-specific learning management server 100,
Learning data database 105 for storing and managing the classified data for each area and grade, and
A diagnostic test evaluation unit 110 for constructing a test questionnaire based on the learning material stored in the learning material database and testing the learner using the configured questionnaire to process the test result;
A group information database 115 for storing and managing group information according to a score for each difficulty level;
A group start grade determiner 120 for determining a learner's group start grade according to a score for each difficulty level of the questionnaire with reference to the score tested by the diagnostic test evaluator;
A group progress unit determining unit 125 for determining a progress unit corresponding to the group start class determined by the group start class determining unit;
A learning material presentation unit 130 for extracting a learning material corresponding to the progress unit determined by the group progression unit determination unit from the learning material database and presenting it to the learner;
And a group evaluation schedule calculation unit 135 for managing a group learning schedule to calculate a weekly evaluation schedule,
When the evaluation schedule is calculated by the evaluation schedule calculation unit for each group, a grade control questionnaire is configured for each group based on the training data stored in the study data database, and the group grade of the learner is tested using the configured grade control questionnaire for each group. Group grade adjustment test evaluation unit 140 for processing the test results,
A group grade automatic determination unit 145 for automatically obtaining a group upgrade, group lower grade, and group maintenance of a learner according to predetermined group grade information by acquiring a result tested by the group grade adjustment test evaluation unit;
Learning system for automatically determining the learner group to proceed to the learning by group, characterized in that it comprises a central control unit 150 for controlling the data flow. The method of claim 1,
The group grade adjustment test evaluation unit,
If the weekend evaluation rate is less than 70 points, the group grade to which the current learner falls is lowered, and if the weekend evaluation rate is above 80, the learner group is automatically determined to raise the group grade to which the current learner belongs. Ongoing learning system. The method of claim 1,
By the group progress unit determination unit,
If the lecture progress is less than 30% even after the course period for taking the learning materials corresponding to the determined progress unit is less than 30%, the lecture reminder generator further generates a lecture stop event and sends a reminder message to the corresponding learner. Learning system for automatically determining the learner group, characterized in that is configured to proceed by learning by group. The method of claim 1,
The group grade adjustment test evaluation unit,
A learning system that automatically determines a group of learners, characterized in that only a wrong answer question is asked during a progress study when a weekend evaluation question is asked. The method of claim 1,
When the group maintenance decision by the group grade automatic decision unit is four times, the class counseling execution unit for extracting only the personal information, test scores and incorrect questions of the learner and sent to the instructor client to perform the class consultation Learning system for automatically determining the learner group characterized in that the configuration is configured to proceed learning by group. The method of claim 1,
The progress learning is a learning system for automatically determining the learner group characterized in that the progress of the fourth week of each unit to proceed learning by group. The method of claim 1,
The group grade adjustment test evaluation unit,
A learning system that automatically determines a group of learners to determine group advancement, group lower rank, and group retention based on the solving time, average score, and correct answer rate. The method of claim 1,
The test questionnaire for adjusting the grade additionally includes a weighted problem extracting unit 160 which extracts a specific weighted problem from the learning material database 105, and the total score including the weighted score of the problem that the learner fits is the group grade upward score. Learning system that automatically determines the learner group characterized in that the automatic adjustment to the upward level when exceeding the learning progress for each group. The method of claim 1,
A group average calculator 170 for calculating an average academic progress rate, an average score, and an average learning time of learners belonging to the group;
Point score calculation unit 180 for calculating a point score according to the average academic progress rate, average score, average solve time, and
A learning system for automatically determining a learner group, which further comprises a point information benefit information DB 190 for storing point benefit information or product information granted for each point score, and proceeds learning for each group.
KR1020110106269A 2011-10-18 2011-10-18 Group learning process system KR20130042139A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020110106269A KR20130042139A (en) 2011-10-18 2011-10-18 Group learning process system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020110106269A KR20130042139A (en) 2011-10-18 2011-10-18 Group learning process system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
KR20130042139A true KR20130042139A (en) 2013-04-26

Family

ID=48440915

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
KR1020110106269A KR20130042139A (en) 2011-10-18 2011-10-18 Group learning process system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
KR (1) KR20130042139A (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109670999A (en) * 2018-12-29 2019-04-23 重庆工商职业学院 Overturn classroom instruction management system
KR102130006B1 (en) * 2019-06-24 2020-07-03 경기도 오산시 System for managing leaner type personalized class and method thereof
KR102173961B1 (en) * 2019-05-10 2020-11-04 김류문 Operating method of competition platform and participating method of competition
KR102382036B1 (en) * 2021-07-16 2022-04-04 주식회사 마커룸 Apparatus of providing problem for online learning using crawlign and machine learning algorithm

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109670999A (en) * 2018-12-29 2019-04-23 重庆工商职业学院 Overturn classroom instruction management system
KR102173961B1 (en) * 2019-05-10 2020-11-04 김류문 Operating method of competition platform and participating method of competition
KR102130006B1 (en) * 2019-06-24 2020-07-03 경기도 오산시 System for managing leaner type personalized class and method thereof
KR102382036B1 (en) * 2021-07-16 2022-04-04 주식회사 마커룸 Apparatus of providing problem for online learning using crawlign and machine learning algorithm

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Amin et al. Parental communication increases student learning motivation in elementary schools
KR101471052B1 (en) Repetition Learning system and its method
KR20130042138A (en) Individual incorrect concentration learning system
KR20130042139A (en) Group learning process system
López-Fernández et al. Motivation of computer science engineering students: Analysis and recommendations
Malik et al. The competency-based training model for vocational high school teachers from electrical expertise programs
CN111507692A (en) Learning plan generation method and device
Galaleldin et al. Team formation in engineering design courses
van Blankenstein et al. Immediate and delayed effects of a modeling example on the application of principles of good feedback practice: A quasi-experimental study
Rockoff Evaluation report on the School of One i3 expansion
JP2020003690A (en) Learning support device, method, and computer program
Montesur Coping With the Challenges in Teaching Mapeh Subjects Among Non-Specialized Teachers of District 4 in Laguna
bin Zainuddin et al. Personalised Learning Analytics: Promoting Student’s Achievement and Enhancing Instructor’s Intervention in Self-regulated Meaningful Learning
Wardhani et al. The Evaluation of Character Education Strengthening Program Based on Kemataraman Culture at Elementary School in Kulon Progo Regency
Williams Self-regulation and feedback in an educational statistics course
Swasti et al. BEHAVIOR CHANGE WITH OPERANT CONDITIONING AND CLASSICAL CONDITIONING IN EDUCATION AND TRAINING TOEFL ONLINE STUDENTS UPN" VETERAN" EAST JAVA
Weijers et al. “Feel free to ask”: Nudging to promote asking questions in the online classroom
Duma et al. Curve-based e-learning efficiency grading
KR101251628B1 (en) Service providing method for learning management based on life engineering
Sumbilon et al. Teaching Strategies, Parental Involvement, TVL Learners’ Self-Efficacy and Performance in Modular Distance Learning
Dekawati et al. The Effects of Climate and Work Motivation on Junior High School Teachers' Work Performance in the Losari Sub-District of Brebes Regency
van Geel et al. Implementation and effects of a schoolwide data-based decision making intervention: a large-scale study
Sene et al. Teachers’ Perceptions of Curriculum Changes in the Sumba, Timor, and Flores Regions
Minshew Special Education Enrollment and Graduation Trends in Texas
Forberg The Effects of Self-Efficacy on the Accuracy of Self-Assessments

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A201 Request for examination
E902 Notification of reason for refusal
E601 Decision to refuse application