KR20100020012A - Putting-on article for wig - Google Patents

Abstract

A wig placed on the head of a person who is to wear the wig is caused to be able to be easily put on without fail by merely pressing the wig lightly against the head. Fitting properties of the wig are also improved to prevent the wig from giving a pain when put on or off or during long-term wear. Many monofilaments (22) are disposed on a first side of a base sheet (21) so as to project therefrom and be capable of being entangled with the hair of a wig wearer. A pressure-sensitive adhesive layer (23) for bonding to the back side of a wig base is formed by coating fluid application on a second side of the base sheet (21). Each monofilament (22) is constituted of a stem part (22a) rising up from the base sheet (21) and a head part (22b) which swells out at the end of the stem part (22a). When the wig is to be fixed to the head (22b) of a person, the monofilaments (22) are bent by an external pressing force and entangled with one another, and the hair of the person is entangled with the stem parts (22a) and head parts (22b) of the monofilaments (22). The wig is fixed to the head while maintaining the entangled state.

Description

Wig fittings {PUTTING-ON ARTICLE FOR WIG}

TECHNICAL FIELD This invention sticks to the back surface of the base of the wig which planted hairs, such as artificial hair and human hair, and relates to the fitting for wig for attaching a wig easily and reliably to the head of a wearer.

As a fitting for attaching head ornaments such as a wig, a hat, and a hair band to the head of the wearer, a metal or synthetic resin upholstery is firmly attached to the back side of the base of the wig, and the inverted mouth is flipped over to attach the wig. The hair of the child is inserted by the comb of the fitting hole (Patent Document 1), or as a non-slip tape on the back side of the hair band, such as the male sheet of the cotton fastener which protrudes a number of monofilaments onto the base sheet. Consists of a constitution (patent document 2), a head ornament such as a wig or a hat, and a band-shaped member that elastically surrounds the head, and the band-shaped member and the head ornament are attached to each other by a surface fastener or a hook. It is known to be able to detach | desorb using a means (patent document 3).

However, in Patent Literature 1 using a flipping pin, a certain amount of finger force is required to reverse the flipping pin, and an elderly person whose finger strength is weak or a finger that does not move freely freely detach the wig on their own. Couldn't. In addition, there is a defect that the inserted thread is pulled out and the pain is felt in order for the fitting tool to be fitted into the hair. In Patent Literature 2, which uses a male sheet of a cotton fastener for fixing a hair band, a length, thickness, placement density, etc. of a preferable protrusion is described as a male sheet. However, this design has a monofilament that penetrates the hair like a comb. It is only used to prevent light head ornaments such as hair bands from slipping off the hair. Therefore, the fixing force is weak and technically insufficient for use as a fitting for the wig.

In Patent Literature 3, which combines a head ornament and a band-shaped member, because a band-shaped member is interposed between the head of the wig wearer and the back surface of the wig base, the wig is not excited by the head of the wearer. Wearing a wig may be known around. In addition, when a cotton fastener is used as the attaching means, the thickness of both the male sheet and the female sheet is interposed between the wig base and the head of the wig attacher to increase the thickness. There is a problem to lose. In addition, since the strip-shaped member has elasticity like a hair band and is attached to the head of the wig wearer, when the elastic force is weak, the wig is easily peeled off. It becomes difficult to attach.

Patent Document 1: Korean Utility Model Registration No. 1414157

Patent Document 2: Korean Utility Model Registration Publication No. 2591881

Patent Document 3: Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication Pyeongseong 11-286821

[Problem to Solve Invention]

The present invention has been made in the background of this situation, and its purpose is to simply press down lightly from the top of the wig placed on the head of the wig wearer, so that the wig can be easily and reliably attached to the wig. In addition to providing excellent wigs, the fittings for wigs that do not cause any pain during detachment or long-term use are inexpensively provided.

[Means for solving the problem]

In order to solve the above problems, the mounting device for the wig of the present invention includes a plurality of monofilaments which protrude on the first side of the base sheet and the base sheet and have a shaft portion and a head portion bulging at the tip of the shaft portion to stand up from the base sheet; And a pressure-sensitive adhesive layer applied to the second side of the base sheet and attached to the back side of the base of the wig, whereby a plurality of monofilaments are entangled with the wig wearer's hair when the wig is mounted, and entangled with each other. The state is maintained by the latching load.

In the present invention, a coating having a larger coefficient of friction than the material of the monofilament itself may be applied to the surface of the monofilament. In addition, the pull load when the wig fitting is removed from the head of the wig wearer is 0.29 N (30 gf) or more and 0.98 N (100 gf) or the bending load near the tip of the monofilament is 1.91 N (195 gf). The flexural load of the root portion of the monofilament should be 3.73 N (380 gf) or more and 8.14 N (830 gf) or less, or the batch density of the monofilament should be 50 / cm ² or more and 120 pieces / It is better to use cm ² or less. In addition, the present invention, the height of the shaft portion of the monofilament to 3mm or more and 6mm or less, or the diameter of the shaft portion of the monofilament to 0.1mm or more and 0.5mm or less, or the diameter of the head portion of the monofilament to 0.2mm or more and 1mm or less It is desirable to.

The wearing tool for wigs of this invention is stuck to the back surface of a wig base using the adhesive layer apply | coated to the 2nd side surface of a base sheet, and a monofilament protrudes to the head side. When the wig is placed on the head of the wearer and lightly pushed from above, the wig wearer's hair and the monofilament merge with each other in the direction in which the monofilament is inserted. The monofilament is bent in a U-shape or a J-shape or the like in a direction substantially parallel to the base sheet or in the direction of the base sheet, and entangled with the letter of the wearer. In this entanglement, the head of the monofilament's shaft portion and the head that swells at its tip end are entangled with each other while interlocking the letters of the wearer between the shaft portion and the head portion of the other monofilament, and try to maintain the jammed state. The entanglement between the monofilament and the hair is maintained by the load, that is, the locking load, and the wig is fixed to the head of the wig wearer.

In addition, by monolithically installing the monofilament on the base sheet or by applying a film having a higher friction coefficient to the surface of the monofilament than the material of the monofilament, the monofilaments are more entangled with each other and the entanglement becomes loose. Falling out is the best. For example, in the case where the gas sheet is nylon and the monofilament is polypropylene, the fixing force can be improved by increasing the frictional force by applying an elastomer solution having a higher friction coefficient to the monofilament and forming a film. At that time, the thickness of the film covering the surface of the monofilament is preferably 10 μm or less, and when the thickness exceeds 10 μm, the thickness of the film of the shaft portion and the head of the shaft becomes too thick, so that the gap between the monofilaments becomes narrow. It is not preferable because the hairs do not penetrate between the monofilaments, and the hairs are pushed down to the head of the shaft, making it difficult to get entangled with the hairs. As the elastomer solution, for example, a pellet of a styrene thermoplastic elastomer, specifically a 5 wt% solution obtained by dissolving the brand name Quintech QTCSL-125 manufactured by Japan Xeon Co., Ltd. in toluene can be applied to the monofilament.

The monofilament of the wig mounting tool has a certain degree of flexibility because it is entangled with the hair of the wig wearer, and this flexibility makes the shaft portion of the monofilament bend moderately and the monofilament of the head that swells at the tip thereof is different. It is entangled with the shaft and the head of the cross, and the entangled state is maintained while entangled the letters between them. Therefore, the monofilament of the fitting for the wig needs moderate flexibility, and if the flexibility is low, the monofilament may not bend, which may damage the scalp, and when the flexibility of the monofilament is too high, it is more than necessary. Since the hairs are pulled out when they are entangled with the hairs, and the wigs are peeled off, the monofilament needs appropriate flexibility.

The qualitative characteristics of the fitting for the wig discovered by the present inventors are as follows.

(1) When monofilaments are irregularly arranged, the monofilament is easily U-shaped and J-shaped when the monofilament is in contact with the hair and the scalp, and the monofilaments are And the monofilament and the hair tend to be entangled, and the pulling load and the fixed load tend to be high. When this is arranged in alignment, there is only one pattern in which the monofilaments and the monofilament and the hair are entangled with each other, and the entanglement is easy to be released from each other. In contrast to returning to the shape of the child (original state), when arranged irregularly, there are several patterns in which the monofilaments and the monofilaments and the hair are intertwined with each other. It is thought that it is excellent compared with the time arrange | positioned and can hold | maintain the state which entangles with each other for a long time.

(2) A thicker shaft portion tends to have a higher flexural load (harder), and a thinner shaft portion tends to have a lower flexural load (softer). In addition, when the diameter of a shaft part becomes thin, when using repeatedly, shaft parts may become entangled or folded, and there exists a tendency for a pull-out load to become low (durability fall).

(3) When the height of the shaft portion is high, the bending load tends to be low and tends to be entangled with the hair, but the wig is likely to float from the head portion. If the height of the shaft portion is low, there is a tendency that the bending load becomes high and it becomes difficult to get entangled with the hair. In addition, the height for entanglement with the letter is insufficient, and it is easy to be unable to entangle each other sufficiently.

(4) When the diameter of the head of the shaft is increased, the holding force of the entangled state of the hair is improved, but the surface of the fitting for the wig is closer to the surface state, and it becomes difficult to enter the gap of the hair. If the diameter of the head of the shaft is small, it is easy to enter the gap of the hair, but if it is too small, the entangled state cannot be maintained.

(5) If the arrangement density of monofilament is high and the diameter of the shaft head is large, it will not be able to dig into the gap of the hair, and it will be difficult to get entangled with the hair. If the arrangement density of the monofilament is high and the diameter of the shaft head is small, it tends to enter the gap of the hairs and excessively entangle with the hairs. When the arrangement density of monofilament is low, it cannot hold | maintain even if it is entangled with a hair, and there exists a tendency for a pulling load to become low.

(6) When the bending load is low (soft), it tends to be entangled with the monofilament and the hair. If the flexural load is high (hard), it tends to be entangled with monofilaments and hairs.

[Effects of the Invention]

The wig mounting tool of the present invention has a structure in which a plurality of monofilaments having a predetermined shape, flexibility, dimensions, and the like are protruded into the body sheet, and is operated by lightly pressing the wig placed on the head of the wig wearer from above. The wig can be securely attached to the head of the wig wearer. Therefore, it is suitable for use by the elderly who are weak in the force of the finger or the person who does not move the finger freely. In addition, since the head of the wearer can be mounted without lifting, the fit is excellent, and there is no pain in detachment or long-term use.

1 is a perspective view of a fitting for a wig showing an embodiment of the present invention.

Fig. 2 is a front view of the fitting for wig showing an embodiment of the present invention.

It is a back view of the wig which attached the mounting tool for wigs which shows embodiment of this invention.

4 is an explanatory diagram of a state in which a wig is attached using a wig mounting tool showing an embodiment of the present invention.

Fig. 5 is a state of wig attachment showing an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 6 is an enlarged view of FIG. 5 showing an embodiment of the present invention. FIG.

7 is a view for explaining the experimental method of flexibility of the present invention.

8 is a view for explaining a test method of the pull of the present invention.

9 is a view for explaining a test method of the pull of the present invention.

[Description of the code]

20: wig mounting hole

21: gas sheet

22: monofilament

22a: shaft portion of the monofilament 22

22b: head of monofilament 22

23: adhesive layer

24: release paper

25: mother

26: wig

27: wig base

30: fitter

31: Letter of the wearer 30

EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION Hereinafter, the best form of the fitting for wigs concerning this invention is demonstrated based on FIGS. 1 is a perspective view of the mounting device for the wig, Figure 2 is a front view of the mounting device for the wig, Figure 3 is a rear view of the wig attached to the mounting device for the wig, Figure 4 is a wig using the mounting device for the wig 5 is an explanatory view of the attached state, FIG. 5 is an enlarged view of FIG.

As shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, the fitting hole 20 for the wig is, for example, on the first side surface of the nylon body sheet 21 cut into a rectangle of 1.5 cm x 3.5 cm and a thickness of 0.5 mm. A plurality of monofilaments 22 are irregularly planted at a density of 50 or more and 120 or less per square centimeter, and the adhesive layer 23 is applied to the second side surface of the base sheet 21 as well. The release paper 24 is stuck to the outer surface of the adhesion layer 23.

As shown in detail in the enlarged portion A of FIG. 2, the monofilament 22 is a synthetic resin homogeneous or heterogeneous to the base sheet 21, and has a diameter of 0.1 mm or more that stands on the first side of the base sheet 21. Consists of a shaft portion 22a of 0.5 mm or less and a length of 3 mm or more and 6 mm or less, and a head portion 22b of 0.2 mm or more and 1 mm or less in diameter, which bulges in an umbrella shape at the tip of the shaft portion 22a. Indicates. The entire monofilament 22 is formed of, for example, polypropylene, and an elastomer solution having a larger coefficient of friction than polypropylene is applied to the surface thereof.

The bending load near the tip of the shaft portion 22a of the monofilament 22 is preferably in the range of 1.91 N (195 gf) or more and 6.08 N (620 gf) or less, and preferably 2.96 N (302 gf) or more and 5.51 N (562 gf) or less It is more preferable to set it as the range, and it is more preferable to set it as the range of 4.01N (409gf) or more and 4.94N (504gf) or less. Similarly, the flexural load of the root portion is preferably in the range of 3.73 N (380 gf) or more and 8.14 N (830 gf) or less, and more preferably in the range of 4.78 N (488 gf) or more and 7.82 N (798 gf) or less. It is more preferable to set it as the range of 5.84 N (596 gf) or more and 7.51 N (766 gf) or less. The monofilament 22 is entangled with the hair 31 of the wig wearer 30 by this bending load set on the shaft portion 22a and the head portion 22b having a diameter larger than that of the 22a. .

As shown in FIG. 3, the wig mounting tool 20 configured as described above has a release paper 24 on the outer circumference of the back surface of the wig base 27 constituting the wig 26 together with the hair 25. Using the adhesive layer 23 which removed this, several pieces are stuck at substantially equal intervals. As shown in Fig. 4, the wig 26 having the wig mounting tool 20 attached thereto covers the monofilament 22 to the head of the wearer 30 at the desired location of the head. Then press the wig 26 lightly from the outside.

As shown in FIG. 5, the monofilament 22 of the wig mounting tool 20 protruding toward the head side from the outer circumference of the back surface of the wig base 27, the wig 26 is attached to the head of the wearer 30. By inserting on the part, the hair 31 and the monofilament 22 are deeply inserted into each other by digging into the hair 31 of the wearer 30 and pressing the wig 26 lightly from the outside. . And, this insertion becomes deeper, and when the hair 31 comes into contact with the base sheet 21 of the wig base 27 or the wig mounting hole 20, it falls down laterally than the monofilament 22. In addition, each of the monofilaments 22 is in a direction substantially parallel to the base sheet 21 or the base sheet 21 while contacting or entangled with the scalp or the hair 31 or the other monofilament 22 of the wearer 30. It is bent in a U shape or a J shape so as to return to the () direction.

As shown in FIG. 6, the monofilament 22 that is bent and deformed in the direction of the base sheet 21 has a shaft portion 22a and a head portion 22b that swells at the distal end thereof. They are randomly entangled with each other while sandwiching the letters 31 of the wearer 30 between the shaft portion 22a and the head portion 22b. In particular, the head portion 22b larger than the outer diameter of the shaft portion 22a is entangled with the shaft portion 22a and the head portion 22b while being intertwined with the other monofilament 22, and thus caught. The entangled state is maintained by the load which tries to maintain a state, and the wig 26 is fixed to the head part of the wig wearer 30.

Thus, the fixed load acting on the wig mounting hole 20 fixed to the head of the wig wearer 30 is preferably in the range of 1.27 N (130 gf) or more and 1.96 N (200 gf) or less, More preferably, the range is 1.39 N (142 gf) or more and 1.82 N (186 gf) or less, and more preferably 1.50 N (153 gf) or more and 1.68 N (171 gf) or less. If the fixed load is less than 1.27 N (130 gf), the entanglement between the wig mounting tool 20 and the hair is not sufficiently entangled and easily shifts in the horizontal direction. In addition, if the fixed load exceeds 1.96 N (200 gf), since the pull load exceeds 0.98 N (100 gf), it is not preferable because it is difficult for the elderly who have weak fingers or who does not move freely. not.

When the wig 26 fixed to the head of the wig wearer 30 is removed in this manner, the pull load acting on the wig mounting hole 20 is not less than 0.29 N (30 gf) and 0.98 N (100 gf). ) Is preferably in the range of 0.46 N (47 gf) or more and 0.89 N (91 gf) or less, and more preferably in the range of 0.63 N (64 gf) or more and 0.79 N (81 gf) or less. Do. By setting the pulling load in this range, the peeling can be easily carried out even for use by the elderly who are weak in the force of the finger or the person whose finger does not move freely.

EXAMPLE

The four examples and the comparative examples of 9 were produced about the fitting tool 20 for wigs, and the experiment which attaches and detaches the wig 26 to the wearer's head was performed using these. The test method is to evaluate the practicality of the wig 26 by actually attaching and detaching the wig 26, and the flexibility of the monofilament 22 itself and the pull load of the wig mounting hole 20 when the wig 26 is removed. Was measured by a tester. Here, the pulling load corresponds to the vertical fixing force, that is, the locking load, generated by the entanglement between the monofilaments 22 of the mounting tool 20 for the wig and the hooking of the wig wearer. In addition, the fixed force in the horizontal direction caused by the intertwining of the monofilaments 22 of the mounting holes 20 for wigs and the locking of the wig wearers is taken as a fixed load. 7 to 9 show an experimental method by a tester, among which Figs. 7 (a) and (b) show an experimental method for flexibility of the monofilament 22, and Figs. 8 and 9 show mannequins. The test method of the pull load at the time of peeling off and removing the wig mounting hole 20 of the monofilament 22 using each is shown.

(Examples 1 and 2)

The following conditions were set as the fitting tool 20 for wigs used for Example 1.

Base sheet 5: Synthetic resin, 1.5cm x 3.5cm rectangular, 0.5mm thick

Arrangement method of monofilament 22: irregularly arranged

Film state of monofilament 22: Yes (10 μm)

Diameter of shaft portion 22a of monofilament 22: 0.3mm

Height of shaft portion 22a of monofilament 22: 4 mm

Diameter of the head portion 22b of the monofilament 22: 0.5 mm

Batch density of monofilament (22): 80 pieces / cm ²

The wig attachment tool 20 used for Example 2 was the same as Example 1 except having arrange | positioned the monofilament 22 in alignment.

(Comparative Examples 1 to 4)

The wig attachment hole 20 used for the comparative example 1 has the diameter of the shaft part 22a of the monofilament 22 0.6mm, the height of the shaft part 22a of the monofilament 22 2mm, and the monofilament 22 The diameter of the head portion 22b was 1.1 mm, the arrangement density of the monofilament 22 was 40 / cm ² , and the monofilament 22 having a slightly low flexibility was arranged in the same manner as in Example 1.

The wig attachment hole 20 used for the comparative example 2 is 0.08 mm in diameter of the shaft part 22a of the monofilament 22, 7 mm in height of the shaft part 22a of the monofilament 22, and monofilament 22. The diameter of the head portion 22b was 0.1 mm, the arrangement density of the monofilament 22 was 130 / cm ² , and the highly flexible monofilament 22 was disposed in the same manner as in Example 1.

The wig attachment tool 20 used for the comparative example 3 was made the same as the comparative example 1 except having made the arrangement density of the monofilament 22 into 130 pieces / cm <^2> .

The wig attachment tool 20 used for the comparative example 4 was made the same as the comparative example 2 except having made the arrangement density of the monofilament 22 into 40 pieces / cm <^2> .

(Examples 3 and 4)

The wig attachment tool 20 used in Example 3 was the same as Example 1 except having no coating.

The wig attachment tool 20 used in Example 4 was the same as that of Example 2 except having no coating.

(Comparative Examples 5 to 9)

The fitting tool 20 for the wig used for the comparative example 5 was made the same as the comparative example 1 except having no coating.

The wig attachment tool 20 used for the comparative example 6 was made the same as the comparative example 2 except having no coating.

The wig attachment tool 20 used for the comparative example 7 was made the same as the comparative example 3 except having no coating.

The wig attachment tool 20 used for the comparative example 8 was made the same as the comparative example 4 except having made no film.

The wig attachment tool 20 used for the comparative example 9 was made the same as Example 1 except having made the film 15 micrometers.

Table 1 shows a list of the conditions of Examples 1 to 4 and Comparative Examples 1 to 9.

As the flexibility of the monofilament 22, the flexural load near the tip and the thin flexural load near the root were measured. As shown in Fig. 7 (a) and (b), in the test method, a pressure plate 9 is placed on each test piece with the monofilament 22 facing upwards, and the pressure is applied to the tester 10 from above. The load when the monofilament 22 was wheeled was measured. 7 (a) shows the case where the root portion of the head portion 22b of the tip of the shaft portion 22a of the monofilament 22 is bent, and FIG. 7 (b) shows the root portion of the shaft portion 22a of the monofilament 22. The case where the vicinity was bent is shown, respectively. The tester used was as follows.

Tester: Digital Force Gauge (DFG-1K) manufactured by Sympo High School

Pressure plate: 1.3 g of synthetic resin

As a result of the experiment, as shown in Table 1, in Example 1 of the present invention, the load that the root portion of the head portion 22b at the tip of the shaft portion 22a of the monofilament 22 is bent is 4.01N (409gf), and the mono The load that the curved portion of the filament 22 to the root of the base end of the shaft portion 22a was 5.84 N (596 gf). Example 1 showed the best result in achieving the subject of this invention. In addition, in Example 2 of this invention, the load which the root part of the head part 22b of the front end of the shaft part 22a of the monofilament 22 bends is 4.94 N (504 gf), and the shaft part 22a of the monofilament 22 is carried out. The load at the root of the root was 7.51 N (766 gf). Example 2 showed the favorable result in achieving the subject of this invention.

For Examples 1 and 2, in Comparative Example 1, the monofilament 22 is less flexible than that of Examples 1 and 2, that is, harder, and the tip of the shaft portion 22a of the monofilament 22 is The load at which the root portion of the head 22b was bent was 6.19 N (632 gf), and the load at the root portion of the shaft portion 22a of the monofilament 22 was 8.26 N (843 gf). The rigidity of the monofilament 22 is so high that when the monofilament 22 contacts the scalp of the wig wearer, the monofilament 22 may not bend sufficiently to damage the scalp, and the monofilament 22 may There was a problem that the hair was not sufficiently entangled with each other and a predetermined fixing force could not be obtained. This is because the bending load is high, i.e., rigid, because the diameter of the shaft portion is high and the height is low.

In Comparative Example 2, the monofilament 22 is more flexible and smoother than that of Examples 1 and 2, and the load that the root portion of the head portion 22b of the tip of the shaft portion 22a of the monofilament 22 is curved is It was 1.9 N (194 gf), and the load that bent to the root portion near the base end of the shaft portion 22a of the monofilament 22 was 3.71 N (379 gf). The monofilament 22 was too soft and entangled with the hairs more than necessary, and the pull load became high when the wig was peeled off and could not be easily peeled off. This is because the flexural load is low, that is, because the diameter of the shaft portion is thin and the height is high.

In Comparative Example 3, when the monofilament 22 placement density in Comparative Example 1 was increased, the load at which the root portion of the head 22b at the tip of the shaft portion 22a of the monofilament 22 was bent was 7.16 N (731 gf). ) And the load at which the root portion near the base end of the shaft portion 22a of the monofilament 22 was bent was 9.25 N (944 gf). Since the flexibility was lower than that of the comparative example 1, that is, it was hard, the preferable result was not obtained.

In Comparative Example 4, as a result of lowering the placement density of the monofilament 22 in Comparative Example 2, the load at which the root portion of the head 22b at the tip of the shaft portion 22a of the monofilament 22 was bent was 1.56 N ( 159 gf), and the load that the root portion of the shaft portion 22a of the monofilament 22 was rooted to was 3.37 N (344 gf). Since the flexibility is higher than that of Comparative Example 2, that is, it is soft, preferable results were not obtained.

The experimental results for the presence or absence of a film and the effect of the thickness on each load are shown in Table 1. In contrast to Examples 1 and 2 with the coating and Comparative Examples 1 to 4 with the coating and Examples 3 and 4 without the coating and Comparative Examples 5 to 8, the following results were obtained.

(1) Although both monofilaments were irregularly arrange | positioned with respect to Examples 1 and 3, since Example 1 has a film, higher fixing force was obtained.

(2) Since the monofilaments are arranged in alignment with respect to Examples 2 and 4, the fixing force is inferior to that of the irregular arrangement of Examples 1 and 3, but the fixed load is 1.37 N (140 gf in Example 2). In addition, in Example 4, the fixed load became 1.28 N (131 gf), and sufficient fixing force was obtained.

(3) Since the height of the shaft portion is low and the placement density is low with respect to Comparative Examples 1 and 5, the monofilament is less likely to be entangled and the peeling load is not more than 0.29 N (30 gf) even when the film is attached, Since the fixed load was also lower than 1.27 N (130 gf), sufficient fixing force could not be obtained.

(4) As compared with Comparative Examples 2 and 6, the diameter of the shaft portion is thin and the placement density is high, so that the monofilament is easily entangled with the hair, and the pulling load becomes 0.98 N (100 gf) or more, Strength was needed. In addition, since the height of the shaft portion is high, the monofilament floats from the hair with time, and the mounting tool is easily moved in the horizontal direction in synchronization with the movement of the hair, so the fixed load is 1.27 N (130 gf) or less. It was not possible to obtain a sufficient fixing force.

In Comparative Example 9, Example 1 had a film of 10 µm, whereas Comparative Example 9 had a film of 15 µm. Therefore, the friction coefficient became large, and the pull load became 0.98 N (100 gf) or more, and a strong force was required when removing the mounting opening. In addition, since the film attached to the shaft portion and the head of the shaft becomes too thick, the gap of each monofilament is narrowed, so that the hairs do not penetrate between the monofilaments at the time of mounting, and the hair is pressed down to the head of the shaft. It became hard to get entangled with nanny by thing.

Preferred rankings in the examples were as follows.

1.Example 1 "Monofilament is irregularly arranged and has a film"

2. Example 3 'Monofilament is irregularly arranged, no film'

3. Example 2 Arranged and arranged monofilament, with film

4. Example 4 Arranged and arranged monofilament, no coating

As a result of this measurement, the bending load at the tip of the monofilament of the wig mounting tool is preferably in the range of 1.91 N (195 gf) or more and 6.08 N (620 gf) or less, and preferably 2.96 N (302 gf) or more and 5.51 N (562 gf) or less It is more preferable to set it as the range of, and it turned out that it is more preferable to set it as the range of 4.01N (409gf) or more and 4.94N (504gf) or less. Similarly, the flexural load of the root portion is preferably in the range of 3.73 N (380 gf) or more and 8.14 N (830 gf) or less, and more preferably in the range of 4.78 N (488 gf) or more and 7.82 N (798 gf) or less. , It was found that it is more preferable to set the range of 5.84 N (596 gf) or more and 7.51 N (766 gf) or less.

Next, the pull load of the mounting tool 20 for wigs was measured. As shown in FIG. 8 and FIG. 9, the test method includes a test piece having a monofilament 22 having different heights, shaft diameters, diameters and shapes of heads, flexibility, and placement density. (14) to entangle the monofilament (22) to the hair (14) to connect the tester (10) to these in the vertical direction, and to pull the tester (10) in the vertical direction at a speed of 2 cm / sec to 3 cm / sec. It operated and measured the maximum load in between until the test piece completely detached from the hair. This measurement was performed 5 times each, and the average value was calculated | required. Next, the fixed load of the fitting tool 20 for wigs was measured. The test method of the fixed load is the same as the measurement of the pulling load except that the tester is connected to the test piece in the horizontal direction and the traction operation is performed in the horizontal direction.

As shown in Table 1, the experimental results show that, in Example 1 of the present invention, the pull load is 0.79 N (81 gf), which is the best result for achieving the object of the present invention. In addition, in Example 2 of the present invention, the pull load is 0.63 N (64 gf), and the pull load is lower than that in Example 1 because the monofilaments are aligned and arranged, but a good result is achieved in achieving the object of the present invention. Indicated. In addition, as shown in Table 1, in Example 1 with the coating of the solution, the pulling load was 0.79 N (81 gf) and the fixed load was 1.68 N (171 gf). In addition, Example 3 without the coating had a pull-off load of 0.74 N (75 gf), a fixed load of 1.50 N (l53 gf), a pull-off load of 0.05 N (6 gf), and a fixed load of 0.18 N ( 18 gf). Thus, by applying the solution to form a film on the monofilament, it is possible to obtain a better pull load and a range of fixed heavy loads in order to achieve the object of the present invention.

For Examples 1 and 2, in Comparative Example 1, Comparative Example 3 and Comparative Example 4, the pull loads were 0.28 N (29 gf), 0.19 N (19 gf) and 0.21 N (21 gf), respectively. Lower than Example 1 and Example 2. On the other hand, in Comparative Example 6, the pulling load was 0.99 N (101 gf), which was higher than that of Example 1 and Example 2.

From the above results, when the pull load applied to the fitting opening 20 for the wig when the wig is removed from the hair (hair) 14 is 0.28 N (29 gf), the hair (hair) 14 and the monofilament 22 The entanglement with and is inadequate, and a wig becomes easy to shift from a head part. On the contrary, when the pull load on the wig mounting hole 20 becomes 0.99 N (101 gf) or more, the fixing force of the wig is too strong, and it is difficult to remove and remove the wig from a person with a weak finger force or a person who does not move freely. It was. Moreover, it turns out that the hair | bristle hair (hair) 14 is also loaded more than necessary, and when it exceeds 0.99N (101gf) of pull-out loads, it is not practical.

From these results, it is preferable that the drag load acting on the wig mounting tool 20 when the wig is detached from the head of the wig wearer is in the range of 0.29 N (30 gf) or more and 0.98 N (100 gf) or less, It turned out that it is more preferable to set it as the range of 0.46 N (47 gf) or more and 0.89 N (91 gf) or less, and it is more preferable to set it as the range of 0.63 N (64 gf) or more and 0.79 N (81 gf) or less.

The batch density of the monofilament 22 of the fitting for a wig is preferably in the range of 50 / cm ² or more and 120 / cm ² or less. For example, the batch density of the monofilament 22 exceeds 120 pieces / cm ² , and in the case of 130 pieces / cm ² , the monofilaments 22 are densely arranged so that the spacing of the monofilaments 22 one by one. It is not preferable because it becomes impossible to dig into the hair of the wig wearer by narrowing, and the fixing force becomes weak. On the contrary if the arrangement density of the monofilaments 22 is 50 / cm 40 out of less than ² / cm ^2, the number of monofilaments so low, the wig attached character alphabet is discarded exit the monofilament 22 It is not preferable because the fixing force becomes weak. Therefore, the batch density of the monofilament 22 is preferably in the range of 50 pieces / cm ² or more and 120 pieces / cm ² or less.

The height of the shaft portion 22a of the monofilament 22 is preferably in the range of 3 mm or more and 6 mm or less. For example, when the height of the monofilament 22 is more than 6 mm and 7 mm, the monofilament 22 is hard to adhere to the hairs and the head part, and a large gap is formed between them, so that the wig is the head part. It may be in a floating state, and the wearing of the wig may be exposed. On the contrary, in the case of 2 mm in which the length of the shaft portion 22a of the monofilament 22 is less than 3 mm, the length that can be entangled with the hair is insufficient, so that it cannot be entangled with each other sufficiently, and it becomes difficult to obtain a predetermined fixing force.

The diameter of the shaft portion 22a of the monofilament 22 is preferably in the range of 0.1 mm or more and 0.5 mm or less. For example, when the diameter of the shaft portion 22a of the monofilament 22 exceeds 0.5 mm and is 0.6 mm, the rigidity of the monofilament 22 becomes high and difficult to bend, making it difficult to fully engage with the hair of the wig wearer. . On the contrary, in the case of 0.08 mm in which the diameter of the shaft part 22a of the monofilament 22 is less than 0.1 mm, since it becomes about the same as 0.08 mm of the thickness of the general hair of Japanese, it becomes entangled with a hair more than necessary, and removes a wig, When peeling off, a peeling load becomes high, a hair is pulled out, and it may be accompanied by a pain, and it is unpreferable.

If the diameter of the shaft portion 22a is less than 0.1 mm, the shaft portion 22a may be folded due to prolonged use, the shaft portions may be entangled with each other, and the pull-out load may be lowered, so that a predetermined fixing force may not be obtained. Not. In order to verify this, the pulling test was repeated 100 times using Example 1, Comparative Example 1 and Comparative Example 2, and the load before the experiment and the data after the experiment after repeating 100 times were compared. The results are shown in Table 2.

As shown in Table 2, in Example 1, only a very small change was recognized from 0.79 N (81 gf) to 0.76 N (78 gf) before the experiment, and the durability was a good result. On the other hand, in Comparative Example 2, since the diameter of the shaft portion 22a and the height of the shaft portion 22a are high from 1.20 N (122 gf) to 0.17 N (17 gf), the shafts are entangled with each other, resulting in an extreme change. Was recognized, and the durability fell significantly. In contrast, Comparative Example 1 ranged from 0.28 N (29 gf) to 0.27 N (28 gf), and because the diameter and the height of the shaft portion 22a were small, only a small change was recognized. In other words, since the entanglement with the mother hair is insufficient, it cannot be practically used as described above. Therefore, since the diameter and height of the shaft part 22a affect durability, it is necessary to make it the predetermined diameter and height.

According to the present invention, an elderly person who is weak in his / her finger strength is able to be securely attached to the head by simply pressing the wig placed on the head of the wig wearer from above, and also does not require a strong force even when peeled off. It is also possible to provide a wig fitting suitable for use by persons whose fingers do not move freely.

Claims (8)

A wig mounting tool for attaching to a head of a wig wearer including a wig base, A base sheet, A plurality of monofilaments protruding from the first side of the base sheet and having a shaft portion protruding from the base sheet and a head portion expanded at the tip of the shaft portion; It is applied to the second side of the base sheet and provided with an adhesive layer for sticking to the back surface of the wig base, Thus, the plurality of monofilaments are entangled with the hair of the wig wearer when the wig is mounted, and the entanglement state of the wig is maintained by the holding load. The wig mounting tool according to claim 1, further comprising a coating applied to the surfaces of the plurality of monofilaments and having a coefficient of friction greater than that of the plurality of monofilaments. The wig for a wig according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the pull load at the time of peeling the plurality of monofilaments from the hair of the wig wearer is in the range of 0.29 N (30 gf) or more and 0.98 N (100 gf) or less. Fittings. The flexural load in the vicinity of the tip of the plurality of monofilaments is smaller than the flexural load in the vicinity of the root, and at least 1.91 N (195 gf) and 6.08 N (620gf) in the vicinity of the tip. A fitting for a wig, which is in the following range and is in the range of 3.73 N (380 gf) or more and 8.14 N (830 gf) or less in the root region. The mounting tool for a wig according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the batch density of the plurality of monofilaments is in the range of 50 / cm ² or more and 120 / cm ² or less. The length of the said shaft part is a range of 3 mm or more and 6 mm or less, The wearing tool for wigs in any one of Claims 1-5 characterized by the above-mentioned. The wig attachment tool according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein a diameter of the shaft portion is in a range of 0.1 mm or more and 0.5 mm or less. 8. The wig attachment tool according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein a diameter of the bulged head is in a range of 0.2 mm or more and 1 mm or less.

Images