KR102046072B1 - Method, apparatus and computer-readable medium for diagonostic assessment of old building - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention relates to a fire risk diagnosis evaluation method of an old building. According to an embodiment of the present invention, the method comprises: an image data receiving step of receiving image data of at least one facility part photographed by a photographing means provided in a site terminal located at a site in order to grasp a state of the facility part provided in the building to be evaluated at a manager terminal; an evaluation interface providing step of providing, in order to evaluate the fire risk of the building from the image data of the at least one facility part, an evaluation interface capable of inputting evaluation scores for each component part to a manager terminal; and a report generation step of generating a result report for the fire risk diagnosis evaluation of the building for aggregating score data for each facility part inputted in the evaluation interface.

Description

METHOD, APPARATUS AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM FOR DIAGONOSTIC ASSESSMENT OF OLD BUILDING}

The present invention relates to a fire risk diagnosis evaluation method of an aging building. Specifically, the manager terminal receives image data of equipment parts provided in the evaluation target building from the field terminal, and the image data of the equipment parts described above in the manager terminal. By providing an evaluation interface for the diagnosis and evaluation of the fire risk from the fire, it relates to the fire risk diagnosis evaluation method of the old building which can diagnose and evaluate the fire risk of the old building.

In general, a fire burns buildings and physical assets, resulting in economic loss, as well as a lot of human damage. Therefore, various fire fighting facilities are installed in a building such as a building to prepare for a fire situation.

On the other hand, in order to check whether there are any more fire-fighting facilities, they visit the building that is subject to regular evaluation once or twice a year at the local fire department according to the basic laws of the Firefighting Act and the Act on the Maintenance and Safety Management of Fire-fighting Facilities. The firefighting facilities have been managed by hand-checking the firefighting facilities installed in the building.

However, such inspection and management methods are not properly performed due to considerable manpower and cost incurring problems, and the inspection contents are written by hand, and the time required for inspection is excessive. As such, only a few parts of the facility parts provided in the building were limited to the level of inspecting the fire risk, and there was a limit to securing the actual fire stability.

On the other hand, as a prior art related to the technology for minimizing the scale of fire damage of such buildings, such as Korea Patent Registration No. 10-1527725 (fire fighting facility management system and its management method) to monitor the occurrence of fire, when a fire accident occurs Disclosed is a technique for enabling a quick response.

However, many prior arts, including the above-described prior art, only detect active fire accidents, and operate only a fire fighting facility in a building to cope with a fire accident.

In other words. It has been pointed out that research on the technology of preventing fires in advance by diagnosing and evaluating the fire risks of various equipment parts in the building in advance has been relatively neglected. The emergence of new fire hazards has led to the need for more systematic fire risk diagnosis and evaluation methods for various equipment components in buildings.

Accordingly, the present invention systematically reduces the risk of fire of an old building even though the evaluating subject is not dispatched to the site where the building to be evaluated is located through the reception of image data of the equipment parts provided in the building to be evaluated from the site terminal. The first object of the present invention is to provide a method for evaluating the fire risk of an aged building that can be diagnosed and evaluated.

In addition, the present invention provides a quantitative assessment of fire risk diagnosis in an aging building, and automatically generates a result report to easily identify the fire suppression performance vulnerable elements of the building to be evaluated to enhance the fire safety performance of the building. The second purpose is to do so.

In order to achieve the above object, according to an embodiment of the present invention, the fire risk diagnosis evaluation method of the old building implemented in the manager terminal including at least one processor and at least one memory for storing instructions executable by the processor, An image data receiving step of receiving image data of at least one equipment part photographed by a photographing means provided in a site terminal located at a site in order to grasp the state of the equipment part provided in the building to be evaluated at the manager terminal. ; In order to evaluate the fire risk of the building from the image data for one or more equipment parts, providing an evaluation interface for providing an evaluation interface capable of inputting the evaluation score for each equipment part to the manager terminal; And a report generation step of generating a result report for the fire risk diagnosis evaluation of the building by synthesizing the score data for each component part input to the evaluation interface.

The above-described image data receiving step loads a design drawing of a building to be evaluated from a database, and transmits image data of one or more equipment parts included in the building received at the field terminal to an installation point of corresponding equipment parts on the design drawing. It is preferable to provide the mapping to the manager terminal.

The above-mentioned result report includes a blueprint of the building loaded from the database, and preferably, on the blueprint, a point at which equipment parts classified as high risk according to the fire risk diagnosis and evaluation result are located by the identification means.

In the above-described image data receiving step, in receiving an image of the equipment part photographed from the photographing means of the field terminal, as the image data of the equipment part to be evaluated, receiving two or more image data photographed from different angles. It is preferable.

In the above-described evaluation interface providing step, the manager terminal further provides an installation time image of the equipment parts provided in the building as reference image data, and the reference image data and the equipment parts photographed from the field terminal at the time of evaluating the fire risk diagnosis of the building. It is preferable to perform a diagnostic evaluation of the fire risk according to the aging of the equipment parts of the building by comparing the image data.

In the above-described evaluation interface, a score is set in the order of the highest risk in the event of a fire in the building for each equipment part, and the score applied to the score input from the manager terminal is calculated as the final score data to evaluate the fire risk for each equipment part. It is desirable to have a diagnostic evaluation performed.

The report generation step may include providing a report form corresponding to the analysis result among the one or more evaluation report forms previously stored in a database to the manager terminal and evaluating the fire risk diagnosis of the building among the score data input to the evaluation interface. It is advisable to automatically generate a report on the fire risk assessment of the building by extracting the result data to be described in the results report.

A report file transmission step of converting the generated result report into a report file of a preset format after performing the above report generation step, and transmitting the converted report file to a transmission target set in the manager terminal; It features.

On the other hand, the fire risk diagnostic evaluation device of an old building including at least one processor and at least one memory for storing instructions that can be executed by the processor, in the manager terminal, to grasp the state of the equipment parts provided in the building to be evaluated An image data receiving unit for receiving image data of one or more equipment parts photographed through photographing means provided in a field terminal positioned at a site; An evaluation interface providing unit configured to provide an evaluation interface capable of inputting evaluation scores for each component part to a manager terminal in order to evaluate a fire risk of the building from image data of at least one component part; And a report generation unit for generating a result report for the fire risk diagnosis evaluation of the building by synthesizing the score data for each component part input to the evaluation interface.

On the other hand, as a computer-readable recording medium, the computer-readable recording medium stores instructions for causing a computing device to perform the following steps, which are: at the administrator terminal, in the building to be evaluated. An image data receiving step of receiving image data of at least one facility part photographed by a photographing means provided in a field terminal located at a site in order to determine a state of the installed facility part; In order to evaluate the fire risk of the building from the image data for one or more equipment parts, providing an evaluation interface for providing an evaluation interface capable of inputting the evaluation score for each equipment part to the manager terminal; And a report generation step of generating a result report for the fire risk diagnosis evaluation of the building by synthesizing the score data for each component part input to the evaluation interface.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, through the reception of the image data on the equipment parts provided in the building to be evaluated from the site terminal, even if the evaluation subject is not dispatched to the site where the building to be directly evaluated evaluation is systematically aged Since it is possible to diagnose and evaluate the fire risk of a building, there is an effect of efficiently utilizing manpower and time resources required for the evaluation.

In addition, according to an embodiment of the present invention, to provide a quantitative assessment of the fire risk diagnosis in aging buildings, and to automatically generate a result report for this to intuitively grasp the weak elements of fire suppression performance of the building to be evaluated. By providing the data, the fire safety performance of the building can be enhanced.

In addition, according to an embodiment of the present invention, based on the site evaluation, it is possible to examine the suitability of the various fire-fighting facilities, disaster prevention facilities, etc. provided in the building to be evaluated, thereby ensuring the reliability of the fire risk diagnosis evaluation It can work.

1 and 2 is a flow chart of the fire risk diagnosis evaluation method of the deteriorated building according to an embodiment of the present invention.
3 is a block diagram of a fire risk diagnosis evaluation apparatus of the deteriorated building according to an embodiment of the present invention.
4 is an example in which the fire risk diagnosis evaluation is performed through the evaluation interface provided to the manager terminal in the image data of the equipment components received from the field terminal according to an embodiment of the present invention.
5 is an example of a fire risk diagnosis evaluation result report according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6 is an example in which image data of facility parts received from a field terminal is mapped to a blueprint of a building and provided to a manager terminal according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
Figure 7 is an example in which the location of the equipment parts classified as high risk group located on the design of the building according to an embodiment of the present invention by the identification means.
8 is an example of an internal configuration of a computing device according to an embodiment of the present invention.

In the following, various embodiments and / or aspects are now disclosed with reference to the drawings. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of one or more aspects. However, it will also be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art that this aspect (s) may be practiced without these specific details. The following description and the annexed drawings set forth in detail certain illustrative aspects of the one or more aspects. However, these aspects are exemplary and some of the various methods in the principles of the various aspects may be used and the descriptions described are intended to include all such aspects and their equivalents.

As used herein, “an embodiment”, “an example”, “aspect”, “an example”, and the like, may not be construed that any aspect or design described is better or advantageous than other aspects or designs. .

In addition, the terms "comprises" and / or "comprising" mean that such features and / or components are present, but exclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, components, and / or groups thereof. It should be understood that it does not.

In addition, terms including ordinal numbers such as first and second may be used to describe various components, but the components are not limited by the terms. The terms are used only for the purpose of distinguishing one component from another. For example, without departing from the scope of the present invention, the first component may be referred to as the second component, and similarly, the second component may also be referred to as the first component. The term and / or includes a combination of a plurality of related items or any item of a plurality of related items.

In addition, in the embodiments of the present invention, unless otherwise defined, all terms used herein including technical or scientific terms are generally understood by those skilled in the art to which the present invention belongs. It has the same meaning. Terms such as those defined in the commonly used dictionaries should be interpreted as having meanings consistent with the meanings in the context of the related art, and ideally or excessively formal meanings are not defined clearly in the embodiments of the present invention. Not interpreted as

The present invention provides an evaluation interface in which a manager terminal receives image data of equipment parts provided in an evaluation target building from a site terminal, and performs diagnosis and evaluation of a fire risk from the image data of the equipment parts described above in the manager terminal. The present invention relates to a fire risk diagnosis evaluation method of an old building which can diagnose and evaluate a fire risk of an old building by providing an image data of equipment parts provided in a building to be evaluated from a field terminal. The first objective is to provide a method for evaluating the fire risk of old buildings, which can systematically diagnose and evaluate the fire risk of old buildings, even if the evaluator is not dispatched to the site where the building subject to the evaluation is located. Quantification in old building Provide a fire risk assessment measures, and for this to automatically generate the resulting report identified to facilitate fire suppression performance vulnerable elements of buildings are assessed a second purpose as to strengthen the building of fire safety performance.

Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings in order to achieve the above object. Referring to FIG. 1, in FIG. 1, a fire risk diagnosis of a deteriorated building according to an embodiment of the present invention is provided. A flowchart of the evaluation method is shown.

First, the fire risk diagnosis evaluation method of an aged building includes one or more photographing means (for example, a camera) photographed by an on-site terminal in order to grasp the state of equipment parts provided in the building to be evaluated by the manager terminal. An image data receiving step S10 of receiving image data for the equipment part may be performed.

In this case, the above-mentioned field terminal is dispatched to the site where the building to be evaluated is located, may be a terminal of the dispatcher to grasp the equipment parts provided in the above-described building, or may be a terminal of a building manager located at the site. It can be understood, preferably a smart phone, a tablet PC, etc. may be used, but in addition to any one of the CCTV, thermal imaging camera, sensor installed for the monitoring of the equipment components installed in the building to be evaluated can be used. .

That is, the image data received from the field terminal to the manager terminal in step S10 is the image data of the state of the equipment components using at least one of the portable terminal of the site inspector, CCTV, thermal imaging camera, sensor located in the field It can be understood that is received, according to the present invention, image data directly photographed by the photographing means provided in the portable terminal including the smart phone of the sage manager located in the field can be used, of course, Since the image data photographed through the CCTV, thermal imaging camera and sensor installed for the purpose of monitoring is configured to be received by the manager terminal, it is possible to minimize the manpower required for the fire risk diagnosis evaluation.

On the other hand, the above-described administrator terminal, it can be understood that the terminal does not exist in the field, for example, it will be understood that it is understood that the administrator's PC or the like installed in a diagnostic evaluation institution or the like.

The plant parts referred to in the present invention are large categories and can be understood as evaluating at least one of the followings: building fire protection, fire protection equipment, evacuation design, building fire protection structure, smoke control and smoke control compartments, and fire protection facilities. Furnace is the above-mentioned building fire protection equipment, fire resistance performance evaluation of the vertical opening, fire protection compartment evaluation by area, external finishing material evaluation, internal finishing material evaluation, fire protection partition penetration of the air conditioning equipment duct, fire resistance performance evaluation of the corridor wall, composite use The assessment, lease area or residential household (including rooms) may include one or more of a fire compartment assessment and an incident protection class assessment.

At this time, according to an embodiment of the present invention, as the above-described fire-fighting equipment, may include one or more of sprinkler equipment system evaluation, fire alarm equipment evaluation, automatic fire detection equipment evaluation, indoor fire hydrant evaluation, evacuation route emergency lighting equipment evaluation. have.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, the evacuation design facility may include at least one or more of evacuation capacity evaluation, maximum evacuation walking distance evaluation, and the evaluation of the length of the dead end corridor. May include one or more of an evaluation of the adequacy between the fire resistance performance and the height of the building, the evaluation of the fire resistance performance of the main structural units and the adequacy of the floor area of the building.

In addition, according to an embodiment of the present invention, the smoke control facility and the smoke control compartment, may include one or more of the smoke control evaluation and the smoke control compartment evaluation, the emergency lift control evaluation may be included as a fire fighting facility.

That is, in step S10 of the present invention by photographing the state of the above-described equipment parts using a camera or the like provided to the field terminal, by sending the state information for each equipment component photographed to the manager terminal as image data, It can be understood that it is possible to perform a function that allows the diagnostic evaluation of each of the installed equipment parts to be made remotely, thereby making it possible to efficiently use the manpower and time consumed in the fire risk diagnostic evaluation.

On the other hand, as a more preferred embodiment for the above-described step S10, in receiving the image of the equipment parts photographed from the photographing means of the field terminal described above, the field terminal, the image data of the equipment parts to be evaluated to each other It is preferable to take two or more image data photographed from different angles and transmit the same to the manager terminal.

That is, in performing the diagnostic evaluation from the image data, the fire diagnosis evaluation is not performed only with one piece of image data photographed in one direction based on the area in which the equipment part is installed, but a plurality of images photographed in the direction of multiple angles. By allowing the data to be received at the manager terminal, even if the evaluator does not exist directly at the site where the equipment parts are installed, there is an effect that a fire diagnosis evaluation with improved reliability can be performed.

At this time, it is preferable that the above-described directions of the multiple angles are any one of up, down, left, right, and oblique directions based on the point where the facility parts are installed.

On the other hand, as another embodiment of the above-described step S10, the above-described step S10 loads the design of the building to be evaluated from the database, and for one or more equipment parts provided in the building received at the above-mentioned field terminal The image data may be mapped to installation points of corresponding equipment parts on the schematic and provided to the manager terminal.

In this case, the above-described database may be understood as a means in which the blueprint uploaded from the owner of the building is stored and managed. The above-described blueprint includes a construction method of a building, types and grades of construction materials, fire fighting facilities, disaster prevention facilities, and the like. It can be understood that the design including the installation area of the.

That is, in the above-described embodiment, the image data of the equipment parts photographed at the field terminal is mapped to the installation point corresponding to the image data photographed on the design map, and provided to the manager terminal by mapping the corresponding image data to the fire of the equipment parts provided in the building. It is effective for the manager who performs the risk diagnosis evaluation to intuitively grasp the installation status of the facility parts of the whole building.

On the other hand, the image data of the equipment parts can be processed to a predetermined size according to the size of the design drawings and mapped on the design drawings, and the manager implements the fire of the equipment parts by implementing the image enlarged at a preset magnification according to the selection input of the manager terminal. It is desirable to facilitate the risk diagnostic assessment.

On the other hand, after performing the above-described step S10, in order to evaluate the fire risk of the building from the image data for one or more equipment parts received in step S10 provides an evaluation interface capable of inputting the evaluation score for each equipment part to the manager terminal An evaluation interface providing step S20 may be performed.

Meanwhile, the evaluation interface provided in step S20 may be understood as an evaluation interface capable of inputting a score for the fire risk diagnosis evaluation on the image data received from the field terminal to the manager terminal, and accordingly, a conventional manager (checker) Visiting directly to, there is an effect that the ease of evaluation is improved compared to the manual risk assessment evaluation in the form of a questionnaire.

In addition, the above-described evaluation interface may be further provided with guide content according to the evaluation criteria in order to more systematically evaluate the fire risk diagnosis of the manager. In this case, the above-described guide content is a guide for the predetermined evaluation criteria, It is desirable to understand that performing the function of suggesting the score data corresponding to the state of.

That is, in the present invention, by providing the guide content for the evaluation criteria, it is effective for the administrator to objectively carry out a fire risk diagnosis evaluation on the equipment parts, and accordingly to the aging building that ensures objectivity, reliability and systematicity There is an effect that a fire risk diagnostic assessment can be performed.

In addition, in the above-described evaluation interface, evaluation criteria may be provided for each facility part, and a predetermined score weight is assigned to each facility part in the order of high risk in case of fire in the building, and the score applied to the score input from the manager terminal may be used. The final score data can be used to ensure that a fire risk diagnostic assessment for each part of the installation is performed.

That is, as an example for explaining the above-described embodiment in more detail, for each item of equipment to be evaluated, for example, 40% for building fire protection, 30% for fire protection, 15% for evacuation design, It can be understood that the weights are set in order of importance of fire accident prevention, such as 10%, smoke control facilities and smoke control compartments, 3%, and firefighting facilities 2%. Fire risk diagnostic assessments can be performed.

In this case, as another embodiment of the above-described step S20, the evaluation interface provided to the manager terminal may further provide, as reference image data, an installation time image of the facility parts provided in the building, and thus the manager may provide the reference image data. By comparing the image data of the equipment parts taken from the field terminal at the time of the evaluation of the fire risk diagnosis of the building, it is possible to perform a diagnostic evaluation of the fire risk according to the aging of the building equipment parts.

As a more specific embodiment of this, when the administrator wants to perform a fire risk diagnosis evaluation for the sprinkler facility system, it is possible to determine the aging degree by comparing the image data of the sprinkler received from the field terminal with the reference image data. In this case, more preferably, the evaluation score may be calculated by converting the area, which is determined to be aging based on the total 100% of the equipment parts, into a percentage, and the present invention is not limited thereto.

On the other hand, after performing the above-described step S20, the report generation step (S30) of generating a result report for the fire risk diagnosis evaluation of the building by combining the score data for each component part input to the evaluation interface provided in the step S20 Can be.

In this case, in the above-described step S30, the reference score may be set according to the suitability for the fire risk diagnosis evaluation for each facility component, and accordingly, it is determined whether the final score data calculated meets the reference score, The results of the analysis on the diagnostic assessment can be derived.

In addition, each of the equipment parts can be given a rating according to the fire risk according to the calculated score, the lower the number of ratings can be classified as safe from fire risk, the higher the number of ratings can be classified as vulnerable to fire risk.

In addition, in step S30, the evaluation report form corresponding to the analysis result among the one or more evaluation report forms previously stored in the database is provided to the manager terminal, and the result report for the fire risk diagnosis evaluation of the building among the score data input to the evaluation interface. By extracting the result data to be described in, it is possible to automatically generate a result report for the fire risk diagnosis assessment of the building.

As an example, the above-described database may store an evaluation report form, an evaluation rejection report form, an evaluation rejection report form, and a result probation report form in the database, and each evaluation report form may have a preset format corresponding thereto. You can have a report item form.

That is, for example, an evaluation failure report form is provided, and an item related to non-compliance and supplementary measures is provided, and the result data according to the analysis result is matched to a lower item of the item, thereby automatically generating a report. Therefore, managers can perform facility evaluation by hand on the conventionally printed printed matter, analyze the evaluation results, and perform a batch of tasks through a single evaluation interface, without having to spend extra time generating reports. This improves work efficiency and significantly reduces the time and manpower required from conducting an assessment to reporting an assessment.

At this time, the above-described result report, but to include the schematic of the building loaded in the step S10 above, on the design point, the location of the equipment parts classified as a high risk group according to the fire risk diagnosis evaluation results may be displayed by the identification means. In addition, the above-mentioned identification means may be understood to be displayed to distinguish high-risk equipment parts by at least one of a color and an icon object.

In other words, through the result report, it is possible to intuitively grasp the area where the high-risk equipment parts are installed among the equipment parts provided in the building to be evaluated at a glance, and furthermore, the equipments vulnerable to fire are concentrated. Easily grasp the area, there is an effect that can enhance the fire safety performance of the building.

On the other hand, in the above-described embodiment, the present invention may further provide an editing interface capable of editing the fire safety performance evaluation report automatically generated in the manager terminal through the evaluation interface, but the present invention is not limited thereto.

As another embodiment of the present invention, referring to FIG. 2, after performing the above-described step S30, the generated result report is converted into a report file having a preset format, and the converted report file is set by the manager terminal. A report file sending step S40 may be further performed to be sent to the subject.

By performing the above-described step S40, the result report of the fire risk diagnosis evaluation for each equipment part included in the building evaluated by the manager terminal is converted to have a format of, for example, pdf, xlsx, ppt, docx, and the like. It may be understood that the transmission target set in the above is to be transmitted through the network. In this case, the above-described transmission target may be understood as a national administrative agency terminal or a senior administrator terminal of a company to which the administrator belongs.

That is, according to the present invention, the step S40 is further included, and through the one evaluation interface provided to the terminal of the manager, the fire risk diagnosis evaluation of the equipment parts associated with the various fires provided in the building to be evaluated in the field terminal Simultaneously performed remotely through the received image data, it is possible to derive an effect that can be performed collectively up to report generation and evaluation result reporting.

Overall, according to an embodiment of the present invention, even if the evaluation subject is not directly dispatched to the site where the building to be evaluated is located through the reception of image data on the equipment parts provided in the building to be evaluated from the field terminal. Systematic diagnosis and evaluation of the fire risk of deteriorated buildings is possible, which makes it possible to efficiently use manpower and time resources required for evaluation.

In addition, according to an embodiment of the present invention, to provide a quantitative assessment of the fire risk diagnosis in aging buildings, and to automatically generate a result report for this to intuitively grasp the weak elements of fire suppression performance of the building to be evaluated. By providing the data, the fire safety performance of the building can be enhanced.

In addition, according to an embodiment of the present invention, based on the site evaluation, it is possible to examine the suitability of the various fire-fighting facilities, disaster prevention facilities, etc. provided in the building to be evaluated, thereby ensuring the reliability of the fire risk diagnosis evaluation It can work.

Although the embodiments have been described with reference to the limited embodiments and the drawings as described above, various modifications and variations are possible to those skilled in the art from the above description.

On the other hand, Figure 3 is a block diagram of the fire risk diagnosis evaluation apparatus 10 of the deteriorated building according to an embodiment of the present invention, unnecessary description overlapping with the description of Figures 1 and 2 mentioned above in the following description Description of the embodiments will be omitted.

The fire risk diagnosis evaluation apparatus 10 of an aged building including at least one processor and at least one memory for storing instructions executable by the processor may include an image data receiver 11, It may be configured to include an evaluation interface providing unit 12, a report generation unit 13 and a report file transmission unit (14).

At this time, the above-described image data receiving unit 11, the manager terminal 20, photographed through the photographing means provided in the field terminal 30 in order to grasp the state of the equipment components provided in the building to be evaluated It performs a function of receiving image data for the above equipment parts.

As a result, the above-described image data receiver 11 may be understood as being capable of performing all the functions performed in step S10 of FIG. 1, and by performing the function of the above-described image data receiver 11. Through the reception of image data on equipment parts provided in the building to be evaluated from 30), even if the evaluator is not dispatched to the site where the building to be evaluated is located, the diagnosis and evaluation of the fire risk of the old building is systematically performed. Because of this, the manpower and time resources required for evaluation can be effectively used.

In addition, the above-described evaluation interface providing unit 12. In order to evaluate the fire risk of the building from the image data of the one or more equipment parts received by the function of the image data receiver 11 described above, an evaluation interface capable of inputting evaluation scores for each equipment part to the manager terminal 20 is provided. Perform the function provided.

That is, it will be understood that the above-described evaluation interface providing unit 12 can perform all the functions performed in step S20 of FIG. 1, and provides the evaluation interface to the manager terminal 20 to quantify the quantitative score data for each equipment part. By inputting the fire risk diagnosis evaluation, a conventional manager (checker) directly visits the site, thereby improving the ease of evaluation as compared with the manual fire risk diagnosis evaluation in the form of a questionnaire.

In addition, the report generation unit 13 performs a function of generating a result report for the fire risk diagnosis evaluation of the building by synthesizing the score data for each component part input to the evaluation interface.

That is, the report generation unit 13 may be understood to be capable of performing all the functions performed in the above-described step S30 of FIG. 1, and may be written on a conventionally printed printed matter by performing the function of the report generation unit 13 described above. It is possible to carry out work evaluation through one evaluation interface, without having to invest in facility evaluation, analyze the evaluation results, and invest a separate time to generate a report. There is an effect that can significantly reduce the time and manpower required to report the evaluation.

In addition, the report file transmitter 14 described above converts the result report generated by the report generator 13 described above into a report file of a preset format, and transmits the converted report file set by the manager terminal 20. A function to be transmitted to the target 40 can be performed.

That is, as a result, it can be understood that the above-described report file transmitter 14 can perform all the functions performed in step S40 of FIG. 2, and is provided to the manager terminal 20 by the report file transmitter 14. Through the evaluation interface of the remote inspection of the equipment parts provided in the building to be evaluated, and at the same time there is an effect that can be performed collectively to report the evaluation results.

On the other hand, the field terminal 30 referred to in the present invention, preferably, a smart phone, a tablet PC, etc. may be used, but in addition to the CCTV, thermal imaging camera, installed for the monitoring of the components installed in the building to be evaluated It will be understood that any one of the sensors may be used, and the above-described manager terminal 20 is most preferably a personal computer is most preferably used, in addition to the communication device capable of performing the functions of the present invention Wireless / wireless telephones, tablet PCs, laptops, smartphones, personal digital assistants, and mobile communication terminals. One can be used.

Although the embodiments have been described with reference to the limited embodiments and the drawings as described above, various modifications and variations are possible to those skilled in the art from the above description.

4 illustrates an example in which a fire risk diagnosis evaluation is performed through an evaluation interface provided with an image terminal of equipment parts received from an on-site terminal according to an embodiment of the present invention. Description of unnecessary embodiments overlapping with the description of FIGS. 1 to 3 will be omitted.

4 illustrates an example in which a fire risk diagnosis evaluation is performed on a sprinkler provided in an evaluation target building received from a site terminal through an evaluation interface in a manager terminal.

As illustrated in FIG. 100, in order to perform a fire risk diagnosis evaluation of facility parts, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, reference image data provided by an administrator may be further provided as reference image data of an installation time point image of facility parts provided in a building. By comparing the image data of the equipment parts photographed from the field terminal at the time of the fire risk diagnosis evaluation of the building and the building, it is possible to determine the aging degree of the equipment parts, the diagnostic evaluation of the fire risk can be performed.

In this case, it is preferable that the image data of the equipment parts photographed at the field terminal and received by the manager terminal receive at least two image data photographed at different angles, which is used to perform diagnostic evaluation from the image data. By receiving a plurality of image data photographed in the direction to the manager terminal, even if the evaluator does not exist directly on the site where the equipment parts are installed, the fire diagnosis evaluation with improved reliability is performed to ensure the reliability of the fire risk assessment It can be understood.

On the other hand, the fire risk diagnosis evaluation means of the equipment parts through the evaluation interface provided to the manager terminal, it is preferable to input the numerical data, the numerical value by the predetermined evaluation criteria through the input means of the manager terminal.

In this case, the input of the score data may be understood as the score data inputted by the manager through an input means (for example, at least one of a keyboard, a touch pad, a mouse, and a microphone) on the display of the manager terminal. Although the score is classified by 1 to 10 points, in addition to the corresponding embodiment, any quantified score data system can be used by modifying and changing as much as possible.

Meanwhile, in this case, the weight data of the equipment parts input by the manager through the evaluation interface may be understood to be assigned to a predetermined weight for each equipment part and calculated as final score data, but the present invention is not limited thereto.

That is, according to an embodiment of the present invention, even if the evaluation subject is not dispatched to the site where the building to be evaluated directly located through the reception of the image data on the equipment parts provided in the building to be evaluated from the site terminal systematically This makes it possible to diagnose and evaluate the fire risk of old buildings, so that the manpower and time resources required for the evaluation can be effectively used. In addition, it is possible to provide a quantitative fire risk diagnosis evaluation method for old buildings. It can be effective.

Although the embodiments have been described with reference to the limited embodiments and the drawings as described above, various modifications and variations are possible to those skilled in the art from the above description.

5 illustrates an example of a fire risk diagnosis evaluation result report according to an embodiment of the present invention.

In the following description of FIG. 5, descriptions of unnecessary embodiments overlapping with the description of FIGS. 1 to 4 will be omitted.

Referring to the screen 1000 illustrated in FIG. 5, after the fire risk diagnosis evaluation is performed through the evaluation interface provided to the manager terminal, a fire risk diagnosis evaluation result report may be generated based on the result data obtained through the evaluation interface.

On the other hand, the above-mentioned fire risk diagnosis evaluation result report may include the information of the building to be evaluated, the evaluation result information, evaluation details of each item item, comprehensive opinion information and the like.

At this time, the information of the above-mentioned evaluation target building is transmitted to the external administrative agency server, and the building information corresponding to the location information is transmitted based on the location information provided by the field terminal, and the information issued by requesting the grant of the building account book is automatically filled in. It can be understood that the above-described evaluation result information is received by the administrator through a means for the diagnosis of the fire risk of the various equipment components provided in the building through the evaluation interface provided to the manager terminal, through the input means of the manager terminal It can be understood that the evaluation result information derived by synthesizing the obtained score data is extracted and described.

On the other hand, the evaluation interface described above is provided for each item of equipment and the overall average reference score, it is possible to derive the evaluation results, such as passing the evaluation, failing evaluation and suspension of results according to whether or not the criteria score is satisfied, and accordingly more systematic retirement It is effective to establish a fire risk diagnosis and evaluation system for buildings.

On the other hand, the above-described detailed information for each component part may be described by extracting the details of the score data input from the manager terminal for each component, the comprehensive opinion information will be provided with an evaluation opinion written on the basis of the diagnostic evaluation results It can be understood that it can.

That is, according to one embodiment of the present invention, the administrator does not need to generate a report by investing additional time such as performing equipment evaluation by hand on the conventionally printed printed matter and analyzing the evaluation result. Through this, it is possible to perform tasks in a batch, thereby improving work efficiency and significantly reducing the time and manpower required from performing evaluation to reporting of evaluation.

Meanwhile, although not shown in FIG. 5, the above-described result report may include a blueprint of a building loaded from a database. In this case, a point at which equipment parts classified as high risk groups are located on the blueprint according to a fire risk diagnosis and evaluation result. The identification means may be displayed, thereby allowing a user who receives the result report to intuitively grasp at a glance the area where the equipment parts with high fire risk are installed among the equipment parts included in the building to be evaluated. An effect can be derived and a more detailed description thereof will be described later.

Although the embodiments have been described with reference to the limited embodiments and the drawings as described above, various modifications and variations are possible to those skilled in the art from the above description.

FIG. 6 is a view illustrating an example in which image data of facility parts received from an on-site terminal is mapped to a blueprint of a building and provided to a manager terminal according to an embodiment of the present invention. Description of unnecessary embodiments that are redundant with the description of the above embodiments will be omitted.

Referring to 1100 of FIG. 6, an example in which image data of equipment parts received by a manager terminal by an on-site terminal is mapped to an installation point of equipment components on a blueprint is shown on a design drawing of an evaluation target building loaded from a database.

In this case, the above-described database may be understood as a means in which the blueprint uploaded from the owner of the building is stored and managed. The above-described blueprint includes a construction method of a building, types and grades of construction materials, fire fighting facilities, disaster prevention facilities, and the like. It can be understood that the design including the installation area of the.

In addition, the image data photographed by the photographing means provided in the field terminal received by the manager terminal and mapped onto the blueprint may be reduced and mapped to a preset size according to the size of the blueprint, and may be mapped according to a selection input of the manager terminal. It will be appreciated that the manager may be prepared to easily perform a fire risk diagnosis evaluation of the equipment parts by implementing the image enlarged at a preset magnification.

That is, according to the present invention, by providing the manager terminal by mapping the corresponding image data to the installation point corresponding to the image data photographed on the blueprint, the image data of the equipment component photographed at the site terminal, It is effective for the manager who carries out the fire risk diagnosis evaluation to intuitively grasp the installation status of the overall building equipment parts.

On the other hand, in the embodiment of Figure 6, for the sake of easier understanding, although the form of the blueprint is shown in the form of 2D, it may be implemented as a 3D three-dimensional design, the present invention is not limited thereto.

Although the embodiments have been described with reference to the limited embodiments and the drawings as described above, various modifications and variations are possible to those skilled in the art from the above description.

FIG. 7 illustrates an example in which a point where facility parts classified as a high risk group are located on a blueprint of a building according to an embodiment of the present invention is indicated by an identification means, and FIGS. 1 to 6 mentioned above in the following description. Description of unnecessary embodiments overlapping with the description of will be omitted.

1200 of FIG. 7 is classified into a high risk group according to the result of the above-described fire risk diagnosis evaluation after the fire risk diagnosis evaluation is performed by the administrator through the evaluation interface from the image data for one or more equipment parts received at the field terminal. It can be understood that this is an example in which the point where the equipment part is located is indicated by the identification means on the schematic and included in the result report.

In this case, in 1200, the shaded parts of the equipment parts classified as a high risk group are displayed with color shading so as to be distinguished from other areas. Various identification means such as an icon object including a symbol may be used.

That is, referring to the screen shown in 1200 as an example, it can be seen that as a result of a fire risk diagnosis evaluation, dead end corridors and fire compartments are classified as high-risk equipment parts.

On the other hand, the manager may determine the above-mentioned evaluation criteria in the determination criteria determined as a high risk group of the fire risk diagnosis evaluation results for the above-described equipment parts.

As an example, in the case of a dead end corridor, when the length of the dead end corridor is 10 m or less, the first grade, which is the safest grade, when the length of the dead end corridor is 10 m or more and 20 m or less, the second grade, and the length of the dead end corridor Cases exceeding 20m can be classified as a high risk group by classifying them into class 3.

As another embodiment, in the case of a fire compartment, when there is a failure of the automatic opening and closing device of the fire door, it may be determined that the fire compartment is defective and classified as a high risk group.

That is, in the above-described embodiment, the evaluation criteria of the facility parts were briefly described based on an example of a dead end corridor and a fire compartment, but the evaluation parts quantified for each facility part are provided in the facility parts provided in the building. It can be appreciated that a systematic fire risk assessment can be made possible through the evaluation interface from the manager.

As a result, in the present invention, the result report attaches a blueprint showing the area of the equipment parts of the building to be evaluated, and identifies the points where the equipment parts classified as high risk groups are installed as vulnerable to fire accidents on the attached building design drawings. By displaying and providing by means, the user who receives the result report can intuitively grasp the area in which the equipment parts with high fire risk are installed among the equipment parts provided in the building under evaluation at a glance. In addition, it is easy to grasp the area where the equipment parts vulnerable to fire are concentrated, and there is an effect of strengthening the fire safety performance of the building.

Although the embodiments have been described with reference to the limited embodiments and the drawings as described above, various modifications and variations are possible to those skilled in the art from the above description.

FIG. 8 illustrates an example of an internal configuration of a computing device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. In the following description, a description of unnecessary embodiments overlapping with the description of FIGS. 1 to 4 will be omitted. Shall be.

As shown in FIG. 8, the computing device 10000 includes at least one processor 1100, a memory 11200, a peripheral interface 11300, an input / output subsystem ( I / O subsystem 11400, power circuit 11500, and communication circuit 11600 at least. In this case, the computing device 10000 may correspond to a user terminal A connected to the tactile interface device A or the computing device B described above.

The memory 11200 may include, for example, high-speed random access memory, magnetic disk, SRAM, DRAM, ROM, flash memory, or nonvolatile memory. have. The memory 11200 may include a software module, an instruction set, or other various data necessary for the operation of the computing device 10000.

In this case, accessing the memory 11200 from another component such as the processor 11100 or the peripheral device interface 11300 may be controlled by the processor 11100.

The peripheral interface 11300 may couple an input and / or output peripheral of the computing device 10000 to the processor 11100 and the memory 11200. The processor 11100 may execute a software module or an instruction set stored in the memory 11200 to perform various functions and process data for the computing device 10000.

Input / output subsystem 11400 may couple various input / output peripherals to peripheral interface 11300. For example, the input / output subsystem 11400 may include a controller for coupling a peripheral device such as a monitor or keyboard, a mouse, a printer, or a touch screen or a sensor, as necessary, to the peripheral interface 11300. According to another aspect, the input / output peripherals may be coupled to the peripheral interface 11300 without passing through the input / output subsystem 11400.

The power circuit 11500 may supply power to all or part of the components of the terminal. For example, power circuit 11500 may include a power management system, one or more power sources such as batteries or alternating current (AC), charging systems, power failure detection circuits, power converters or inverters, power status indicators or power sources. It can include any other components for creation, management, distribution.

The communication circuit 11600 may enable communication with another computing device using at least one external port.

Alternatively, as described above, the communication circuit 11600 may include an RF circuit to transmit and receive an RF signal, also known as an electromagnetic signal, to enable communication with other computing devices.

8 is only an example of the computing device 10000, and the computing device 11000 may include some components shown in FIG. 8, or may include additional components not shown in FIG. 8, or may include two components. It may have a configuration or arrangement that combines two or more components. For example, the computing device for a communication terminal in a mobile environment may further include a touch screen or a sensor, in addition to the components shown in FIG. 8, and various communication schemes (WiFi, 3G, LTE) in the communication circuit 1160. , Bluetooth, NFC, Zigbee, etc.) may include a circuit for RF communication. Components that may be included in computing device 10000 may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination of both hardware and software, including integrated circuits specialized for one or more signal processing or applications.

Methods according to an embodiment of the present invention may be implemented in the form of program instructions that may be executed by various computing devices, and may be recorded in a computer readable medium. In particular, the program according to the present embodiment may be configured as a PC-based program or an application dedicated to a mobile terminal. An application to which the present invention is applied may be installed in a user terminal through a file provided by a file distribution system. For example, the file distribution system may include a file transmitter (not shown) for transmitting the file at the request of the user terminal.

The apparatus described above may be implemented as a hardware component, a software component, and / or a combination of hardware components and software components. For example, the devices and components described in the embodiments are, for example, processors, controllers, arithmetic logic units (ALUs), digital signal processors, microcomputers, field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), It may be implemented using one or more general purpose or special purpose computers, such as a programmable logic unit (PLU), microprocessor, or any other device capable of executing and responding to instructions. The processing device may execute an operating system (OS) and one or more software applications running on the operating system. The processing device may also access, store, manipulate, process, and generate data in response to the execution of the software. For the convenience of understanding, the processing apparatus may be described as one being used, but one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the processing apparatus includes a plurality of processing elements and / or a plurality of types of processing elements. It can be seen that it may include. For example, the processing device may include a plurality of processors or one processor and one controller. In addition, other processing configurations are possible, such as parallel processors.

The software may include a computer program, code, instructions, or a combination of one or more of these, and configure the processing device to operate as desired, or process it independently or in combination. You can command the device. Software and / or data may be any type of machine, component, physical device, virtual equipment, computer storage medium or device in order to be interpreted by or to provide instructions or data to the processing device. It may be embodied permanently or temporarily. The software may be distributed over networked computing devices so that they are stored or executed in a distributed manner. Software and data may be stored on one or more computer readable recording media.

Method according to the embodiment is implemented in the form of program instructions that can be executed by various computer means may be recorded on a computer readable medium. The computer readable medium may include program instructions, data files, data structures, etc. alone or in combination. Program instructions recorded on the media may be those specially designed and constructed for the purposes of the present disclosure, or they may be of the kind well-known and available to those having skill in the computer software arts. Examples of computer-readable recording media include magnetic media such as hard disks, floppy disks, and magnetic tape, optical media such as CD-ROMs, DVDs, and magnetic disks, such as floppy disks. Magneto-optical media, and hardware devices specifically configured to store and execute program instructions, such as ROM, RAM, flash memory, and the like. Examples of program instructions include not only machine code generated by a compiler, but also high-level language code that can be executed by a computer using an interpreter or the like. The hardware device described above may be configured to operate as one or more software modules to perform the operations of the embodiments, and vice versa.

Although the embodiments have been described with reference to the limited embodiments and the drawings as described above, various modifications and variations are possible to those skilled in the art from the above description. For example, the described techniques may be performed in a different order than the described method, and / or components of the described systems, structures, devices, circuits, etc. may be combined or combined in a different form than the described method, or other components. Or even if replaced or substituted by equivalents, an appropriate result can be achieved. Therefore, other implementations, other embodiments, and equivalents to the claims also fall within the scope of the claims that follow.

Claims (10)

In the fire risk diagnosis evaluation method of the old building implemented in the manager terminal including at least one processor and at least one memory for storing instructions executable by the processor,
Receiving image data for receiving the image data for one or more equipment parts photographed through the photographing means provided in the site terminal located in the field in order to grasp the state of the equipment parts provided in the building to be evaluated in the manager terminal step;
An evaluation interface providing an evaluation interface capable of inputting an evaluation score for each component part to the manager terminal in order to evaluate a fire risk of the building from image data of the at least one component part; And
A report generation step of generating a result report for the fire risk diagnosis evaluation of the building by synthesizing the score data for each of the facility parts input to the evaluation interface;
The evaluation interface providing step,
Further providing the installation time image of the equipment parts provided in the building to the manager terminal as reference image data, wherein the reference image data and the image data of the equipment parts photographed from the field terminal at the time of the fire risk diagnosis evaluation of the building Compare and compare the fire risk according to the aging of the equipment parts of the building,
The image receiving step,
Receive image data of one or more equipment parts photographed from a photographing means installed in the building for monitoring of the equipment parts, load a design drawing of the building to be evaluated from a database, and determine the corresponding equipment parts on the design drawing. The image data is mapped to an installation point and provided to the manager terminal performing a fire risk assessment of the building,
The evaluation interface,
Guide content for suggesting score data corresponding to the state of the equipment parts according to a predetermined evaluation criteria is included, and a predetermined weight is given in order of high risk in case of fire of the building for each of the equipment parts. By calculating the score applied to the score to the input score as the final score data to perform a fire risk diagnosis evaluation for each equipment part,
The report generation step,
Providing a report form corresponding to an analysis result among one or more evaluation report forms previously stored in a database to the manager terminal;
By sending the building information corresponding to the location information of the field terminal to an external administrative agency server to request building account book of the building, the information issued for the building is automatically written in the result report.
As a result data to be described in the result report for the fire risk diagnosis evaluation of the building among the score data input to the evaluation interface, the final risk data for each facility part is compared with the reference score data set for each facility part to evaluate the fire risk diagnosis. Determine the suitability for the, so that the result report for the fire risk diagnosis evaluation of the building is automatically generated,
After performing the report generation step,
And converting the generated result report into a report file having a predetermined format, and transmitting the converted report file from the manager terminal to a higher manager terminal which is a transmission target. Fire risk diagnosis evaluation method of old building.
delete The method of claim 1,
In the result report,
A blueprint of the building loaded from the database is included, and the fire risk of the deteriorated building is characterized in that a point on which the equipment parts classified as a high risk group according to the fire risk diagnosis evaluation result is indicated by an identification means. Diagnostic evaluation method.
The method of claim 1,
The image data receiving step,
Receiving an image of the equipment part photographed from the photographing means of the field terminal, as the image data of the equipment part to be evaluated, receiving at least two image data photographed from different angles Fire risk diagnosis evaluation method of old building.
delete delete delete delete An apparatus for evaluating fire risk of an old building comprising at least one processor and at least one memory storing instructions executable by the processor, the apparatus comprising:
An image data receiving unit for receiving image data of at least one facility part photographed by a photographing means provided in a site terminal located at a site in order to grasp the state of the facility part provided in the building to be evaluated;
An evaluation interface providing unit for providing an evaluation interface capable of inputting an evaluation score for each component part to the manager terminal in order to evaluate a fire risk of the building from the image data of the one or more component parts; And
And a report generation unit for generating a result report for the fire risk diagnosis evaluation of the building by synthesizing the score data for each of the facility parts input to the evaluation interface.
The evaluation interface providing unit,
Further providing the installation time image of the equipment parts provided in the building to the manager terminal as reference image data, wherein the reference image data and the image data of the equipment parts photographed from the field terminal at the time of the fire risk diagnosis evaluation of the building Compare and compare the fire risk according to the aging of the equipment parts of the building,
The image receiving unit,
Receive image data of one or more equipment parts photographed from a photographing means installed in the building for monitoring of the equipment parts, load a design drawing of the building to be evaluated from a database, and determine the corresponding equipment parts on the design drawing. The image data is mapped to an installation point and provided to the manager terminal performing a fire risk assessment of the building,
The evaluation interface,
Guide content for suggesting score data corresponding to the state of the facility parts according to a predetermined evaluation criteria is included, and the preset weight is given to the facility parts in order of high risk in case of fire of the building, The score to which the weight is applied to the input score is calculated as the final score data,
The report generation unit,
Providing a report form corresponding to an analysis result among one or more evaluation report forms previously stored in a database to the manager terminal;
By sending the building information corresponding to the location information of the field terminal to an external administrative agency server to request building account book of the building, the information issued for the building is automatically written in the result report.
As a result data to be described in the result report for the fire risk diagnosis evaluation of the building among the score data input to the evaluation interface, the final risk data for each facility part is compared with the reference score data set for each facility part to evaluate the fire risk diagnosis. Determine the suitability for the, so that the result report for the fire risk diagnosis evaluation of the building is automatically generated,
And a report file transmitter for converting the result report generated by the report generator into a report file of a preset format and transmitting the converted report file from the manager terminal to a higher manager terminal to which a transmission target is transmitted. Fire risk diagnosis evaluation device of aging building characterized by
As a computer-readable recording medium,
The computer-readable recording medium stores instructions for causing a computing device to perform the following steps, the steps:
An image data receiving step of receiving image data of at least one equipment part photographed by a photographing means provided in a site terminal located at a site in order to grasp the state of the equipment part provided in the building to be evaluated at the manager terminal. ;
An evaluation interface providing an evaluation interface capable of inputting an evaluation score for each component part to the manager terminal in order to evaluate a fire risk of the building from the image data of the one or more component parts; And
A report generation step of generating a result report for the fire risk diagnosis evaluation of the building by synthesizing the score data for each of the facility parts input to the evaluation interface;
The evaluation interface providing step,
Further providing the installation time image of the equipment parts provided in the building to the manager terminal as reference image data, wherein the reference image data and the image data of the equipment parts photographed from the field terminal at the time of the fire risk diagnosis evaluation of the building Compare and compare the fire risk according to the aging of the equipment parts of the building,
The image receiving step,
Receive image data of one or more equipment parts photographed from a photographing means installed in the building for monitoring of the equipment parts, load a design drawing of the building to be evaluated from a database, and determine the corresponding equipment parts on the design drawing. The image data is mapped to an installation point and provided to the manager terminal performing a fire risk assessment of the building,
The evaluation interface,
Guide content for suggesting score data corresponding to the state of the facility parts according to a predetermined evaluation criteria is included, and the preset weight is given to the facility parts in order of high risk in case of fire of the building, By calculating the score applied to the score to the input score as the final score data to perform a fire risk diagnosis evaluation for each equipment part,
The report generation step,
Providing a report form corresponding to an analysis result among one or more evaluation report forms previously stored in a database to the manager terminal;
By sending the building information corresponding to the location information of the field terminal to an external administrative agency server to request building account book of the building, the information issued for the building is automatically written in the result report.
As a result data to be described in the result report for the fire risk diagnosis evaluation of the building among the score data input to the evaluation interface, the final risk data for each facility part is compared with the reference score data set for each facility part to evaluate the fire risk diagnosis. Determine the suitability for the, so that the result report for the fire risk diagnosis evaluation of the building is automatically generated,
After performing the report generation step,
And converting the generated result report into a report file having a predetermined format, and transmitting the converted report file from the manager terminal to a higher manager terminal which is a transmission target. Computer-readable recording medium.

Images