KR102027483B1 - Apparatus and method for weapon assignment and computer recordable medium storing computer program thereof - Google Patents

Abstract

A method for assigning weapons according to one embodiment of the present invention is provided assign the weapons performed by an apparatus for assigning the weapons, and comprises: a step of assigning one or more targets for each of a plurality of weapons within the same barrage; a step of identifying the intersection between two-dimensional shooting lines for an armed trajectory of each of a plurality of weapons to which the target is assigned, and comparing the altitude at the intersection of the plurality of weapons corresponding to the crossed plurality of shooting lines to determine the interference of the armed trajectory; and a step of assigning a firing order to the plurality of weapons based on the determined interference.

Description

A computer-readable recording medium having an arming allocation device, a method, and a program for performing the method.

The present invention relates to an arming assignment apparatus, a method, and a computer-readable recording medium having recorded thereon a program for performing the method, and more particularly, to an arming assignment and a target for performing an arming assignment to an armed target. A computer readable recording medium having recorded thereon a program.

In order to quickly overpower multiple targets early in the war, an effective shooting plan must be in place to fire as many weapons as possible within a short time. In particular, in an environment where multiple targets are operated on multiple targets, it is very important to develop a shooting plan without mutual interference between different weapons in order to effectively defeat multiple targets in a short time and to utilize them in the operation. Do. Here, armed means various kinds of firearms capable of carrying out a battle.

Conventionally, by controlling the firing interval for a plurality of weapons included in the same shooting group to avoid interference such as collision between the armed.

However, since the weapons were fired sequentially, it took a long time before all of them were fired.

Republic of Korea Patent Publication No. 10-1492830 (registered February 4, 2015)

An embodiment of the present invention is to determine the altitude of the armed at the intersection between the two-dimensional shooting line, arming allocation device, method and method for performing the arming assignment according to whether the interference between the armed locus determined based on the altitude of the armed A computer readable recording medium having recorded thereon a program for performing the above is provided.

However, the problem to be solved by the present invention is not limited to the above-mentioned, it is not mentioned but includes the purpose that can be clearly understood by those skilled in the art from the following description. can do.

Arming allocation method according to an embodiment of the present invention, the arming allocation method performed by the arming allocation apparatus, the step of assigning at least one target for each of a plurality of armed in the same shooting group; Identify the intersection point between two-dimensional shooting lines for the armed trajectories of each of the plurality of armed targets to which the target is assigned, and compare the altitudes at the intersections of the plurality of armed guns corresponding to the crossed plurality of shooting lines. Determining interference of the trajectory; And assigning a firing order to the plurality of weapons based on the determined interference.

The determining of the interference may include: generating the two-dimensional shooting line by projecting a three-dimensional armed trajectory of the plurality of armed arms onto a two-dimensional plane; Confirming the presence of the intersection between the shooting lines on the two-dimensional plane; And determining that there is interference due to the intersection between the armed trajectories when the difference in the altitudes at the intersection points of the plurality of armed lines corresponding to the crossed plurality of shooting lines is less than or equal to the collision risk distance.

In addition, the collision risk distance may be determined based on a maximum deviation from an armed trajectory of each of the plurality of armed arms corresponding to the crossed plurality of firing lines.

In addition, the step of assigning the firing order, the arming that does not occur the interference among the plurality of armed at the same time and the armed involved in the interference among the plurality of armed to give the firing order so as to fire at different times. can do.

Arming allocation apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention, an information input unit for receiving information on a plurality of targets and a plurality of targets included in the same shooting group; A control unit for assigning a firing order to the plurality of weapons; And an output unit for outputting information on the firing order given by the control unit, wherein the control unit allocates one or more targets among the plurality of targets for each of the plurality of weapons, and the plurality of targets to which the targets are assigned. Determine intersections between two-dimensional firing lines for each armed trajectory, compare altitudes at the intersections of the plurality of armed arms corresponding to the crossed plurality of firing lines, and determine the interference of the armed trajectories, The firing order is assigned to the plurality of weapons based on the identified interference.

The control unit may generate the two-dimensional shooting line by projecting the three-dimensional arming trajectories of the plurality of weapons on a two-dimensional plane, and confirm the existence of the intersection point between the shooting lines on the two-dimensional plane, If the difference in altitude at the intersection of the plurality of armed lines corresponding to the crossed plurality of shooting lines is less than or equal to the collision risk distance, it may be determined that there is interference due to the intersection between the armed trajectories.

In addition, the collision risk distance may be determined based on a maximum deviation from an armed trajectory of each of the plurality of armed arms corresponding to the crossed plurality of firing lines.

In addition, the step of assigning the firing order, the arming that does not occur the interference among the plurality of armed at the same time and the armed involved in the interference among the plurality of armed to give the firing order so as to fire at different times. can do.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, arming assignment is performed to maximize the number of armed weapons that can be fired simultaneously while excluding interference between the armed trajectories for a plurality of weapons and targets within the same shooting group.

Therefore, since the entire armed weapon can be fired within the shortest time, the shooting time of the shooting force is shortened compared with the prior art, thereby providing an effect of providing a fast operation reaction time.

Effects obtained in the present invention are not limited to the above-mentioned effects, and other effects not mentioned above may be clearly understood by those skilled in the art from the following description. will be.

1 is a block diagram illustrating an apparatus for allocating an arm according to an embodiment of the present invention.
2 is a flowchart illustrating an arming allocation method according to an embodiment of the present invention.
3 is a flowchart illustrating a method for determining interference between armed loci according to an embodiment of the present invention.
4 is a diagram illustrating an arming allocation process according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Advantages and features of the present invention and methods for achieving them will be apparent with reference to the embodiments described below in detail with the accompanying drawings. However, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed below, but can be implemented in various forms, only the embodiments are to make the disclosure of the present invention complete, and those skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains. It is provided to fully inform the scope of the invention, and the scope of the invention is defined only by the claims.

In describing the embodiments of the present invention, detailed descriptions of well-known functions or configurations will be omitted unless they are actually necessary in describing the embodiments of the present invention. In addition, terms to be described below are terms defined in consideration of functions in the embodiments of the present invention, which may vary according to intentions or customs of users and operators. Therefore, the definition should be made based on the contents throughout the specification.

Used below '… Wealth, The term 'herein' refers to a unit for processing at least one function or operation, which may be implemented by hardware or software, or a combination of hardware and software.

1 is a block diagram of an arming allocation apparatus 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 1, the arming allocation apparatus 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention includes an information input unit 110, a control unit 120, and an output unit 130, and the control unit 120 includes a target allocating unit ( 121, the interference determiner 122, and the interference exclusion unit 123 may be included.

The information input unit 110 may receive information on a plurality of weapons and information on a plurality of targets included in the same shooting group. Here, the shooting force may mean an armed set capable of firing only one armed at a specific time. Multiple armed forces can form one armed force, and multiple armed forces can form one firearm. One arm can shoot at two or more targets simultaneously.

The output unit 130 may output information on the firing order of the plurality of weapons given by the controller 120.

The controller 120 may assign a firing order for the plurality of weapons based on the information on the plurality of weapons and the information on the plurality of targets received through the information input unit 110.

The target allocator 121 of the controller 120 may allocate one or more targets among the plurality of targets for each of the plurality of weapons. For example, the target allocating unit 121 may allocate as many targets as the number of available weapons from the target located at the leftmost of the targets in the range based on the specific shooting group.

The interference determiner 122 analyzes each armed trajectory of the plurality of armed targets to determine the interference according to the intersection between the trajectories. For example, the interference determining unit 122 may generate a two-dimensional shooting line by projecting three-dimensional armed trajectories of the plurality of armed arms on a two-dimensional plane, and if the intersection points between the shooting lines exist on the two-dimensional plane, the trajectory. It may be determined that there is a possibility of interference due to crossover. Finally, the interference determination unit 122 may determine that interference of the armed trajectory may exist based on the altitude of the armed arm at the intersection between the shooting lines.

The interference exclusion unit 123 may assign a firing order to the plurality of weapons according to the interference determined by the interference determination unit 122. The interference excluding unit 123 according to the embodiment of the present invention does not participate in the interference among the plurality of weapons, that is, two or more weapons that do not generate interference have the same firing order, and the two involved in the interference among the plurality of weapons The above-described arming can eliminate the interference by causing the firing order to have a time difference. For example, the interference exclusion unit 123 may assign the same firing order to all the weapons not involved in the interference among the plurality of weapons, and may give the fastest firing order. In addition, the interference exclusion unit 123 may assign the firing order to any one of the armed persons not involved in the interference and the armed persons involved in the interference. In addition, the interference exclusion unit 123 may assign a firing order so that as many shots as possible without interference based on the number of targets assigned to each arm for two or more armed weapons involved in the interference among the plurality of arms. Can be.

2 is a flowchart illustrating an arming allocation method performed by an arming allocation apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 3 is a method for determining interference between arming trajectories performed by an arming allocation apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention. 4 is a flowchart illustrating an arming allocation process according to an embodiment of the present invention.

2, the arming allocation method according to an embodiment of the present invention includes the step (S210) of assigning one or more targets for each of a plurality of armed in the same shooting group.

Next, in the arming allocation method according to an embodiment of the present invention, each three-dimensional armed trajectory is projected onto a two-dimensional plane for a plurality of armed targets, respectively, to generate a two-dimensional shooting line (S220). And determining the presence of the armed locus interference based on the altitude of the armed arm at the intersection between the shooting lines (S230).

3 shows a detailed flowchart of step S230.

First, the interference determination method between the armed trajectories according to an embodiment of the present invention can check the altitude at the intersection of the plurality of armed corresponding to the plurality of crossed shooting lines (S231). Then, the interference determination method between the armed locus according to an embodiment of the present invention can determine whether the altitude difference of the plurality of armed at the intersection is less than the collision risk distance (S232). If the altitude difference between the plurality of weapons exceeds the collision risk distance, the interference determination method between the armed trajectories according to an embodiment of the present invention may determine that there is no interference between the armed trajectories corresponding to the crossed shooting lines. (S233). On the other hand, if the altitude difference between the plurality of weapons is less than the collision risk distance, the interference determination method between the armed locus according to an embodiment of the present invention may determine that there is interference between the armed locus corresponding to the crossed shooting line (S234). ).

Finally, the arming allocation method according to an embodiment of the present invention may include a step (S240) of assigning a firing order to a plurality of armed by excluding interference between the armed trajectories. Specifically, the arming allocation method according to an embodiment of the present invention gives a plurality of armed according to the determined interference order of firing, two or more armed arm does not participate in the interference, that is, the interference does not occur The firing order is the same, and two or more armings involved in the interference among the plurality of armings may cause the firing order to be timed. For example, among the plurality of weapons, all weapons not involved in the interference can be given the same firing order, and the fastest firing order can be given. The firing order can be given to any one of a plurality of armed weapons not involved in the interference and armed ones involved in the interference. It is also possible to assign a firing order based on the number of targets assigned to each of the two or more weapons involved in the interference among the plurality of weapons.

Hereinafter, the arming allocation method performed by the arming allocation apparatus 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to FIGS. 2 to 4.

First, the information input unit 110 of the weapon allocation device 100 receives information on a plurality of weapons and information on a plurality of targets included in the same shooting group, and controls the received information to the controller of the weapon allocation device 100. Can be passed to 120. For example, as shown in FIG. 4, coordinates of a plurality of armed forces included in the first armed arm 311, the second armed arm 312, and the third armed arm 313 included in one shooting arm 310. Information and coordinate information of a plurality of targets included in the target group 320 may be input.

Next, the target allocating unit 121 of the control unit 120 may allocate one or more targets for each of a plurality of weapons in the same shooting group. The target assignment process by the target assignment unit 121 will be described with reference to Equations 1 to 5 below.

First, the target allocator 121 may calculate a distance between the armed target and the target.

When the total number of targets is T _Nm in the Earth Centered Earth Fixed (ECEF), the target allocator 121 may represent the positions of all targets in a matrix as shown in Equation (1).

Here, the position matrix T of all targets has a size (T _Nm × 3), t _ix is the x-coordinate of the i-th target, t _iy is the y-coordinate of the i-th target, and t _iz is the z-coordinate of the i-th target. Can mean. Accordingly, the position of the i-th target may be represented by vi = [t _ix, t _iy, t _{iz] which} is the i-th row vector of the entire target position matrix T.

이며, 전체 무장의 위치는 수학식 2와 같은 행렬 L로 나타낼 수 있다.If more than one armed arm makes up one armed arm and the total number of armed armies is B _Nm , then the available armed arm of the _b armed arm g _b is L _gb , the total number of armed armed forces is

The total arming position can be represented by the matrix L shown in Equation 2.

Here, the position matrix L of the whole armed arm has the size (L _Nm × 3), l _jx is the x-coordinate of the j-th armed, l _jy is the y-coordinate of the j-th armed, and l _jz is the z-coordinate of the j-th armed It means. Accordingly, the position of the j th arm can be represented by w _j = [l _jx , l _jy , l _jz ], which is the j th row vector of the position matrix L of the entire armed position.

In addition, the target allocator 121 may calculate the distance d _{ti, lj} between the i th target and the j th arm to calculate the distance between the target and the arm, as shown in Equation 3 below.

In addition, the target allocating unit 121 may sequentially allocate the targets as many targets as possible from the armed army as a reference (S210). For example, the target allocating unit 121 may include a target allocated to the first armed army 311 included in the specific firing group 310 illustrated in FIG. 4 from the target located at the leftmost of the targets included in the target group 320 within the range. You can assign as many targets as you can. In the next rank, the armed forces are assigned targets that are located within the armed range of the targets to which the previous armed forces have not been assigned. For example, the second armed army 312 should be assigned a target located within the armed range d _range of the unarmed targets to which the first armed army 311 is not assigned, and the target group set X to which the b-th armed arm g _b is assigned. _gb may be represented as in Equation 4.

Here, N _gb (N _gb ≤ L _gb ) means the number of targets that the b-th armed group g _b can shoot, and t` <sub>gb, i</sub> means the target to which the b-th armed group g <sub>b</sub> is assigned the i-th target. In addition, d <sub>t`gb, igb</sub> b is assigned to the second armed group _b to g of the i-th target t` <sub>gb, i-th</sub> and b-1 b <sub>b</sub> g military armed second arm from the group stands for the distance, the first arm between the group The set of the target group X` _gb-1 can be expressed as shown in Equation 5.

Next, the interference determination unit 122 may determine the interference due to the intersection between the trajectories by analyzing the respective armed trajectories of the plurality of armed targets. For example, as illustrated in FIG. 4, a three-dimensional armed trajectory of a plurality of armed arms included in the armed forces 311, 312, and 313 in the shooting arm 310 is projected onto a two-dimensional plane, respectively, and a two-dimensional shooting line is respectively. (Indicated by “arrows” in FIG. 4), and when intersection points 331 and 332 between the firing lines exist on the two-dimensional plane, it may be determined that there is a possibility of interference due to the intersection between the trajectories. There is (S230). Here, if the intersection point does not exist in the two-dimensional plane can be proved by the projection theory that the intersection point does not exist in the three-dimensional space, the possibility of the intersection between the three-dimensional armed trajectories can be seen as the result of the cross-dimensional analysis between two-dimensional shooting line. That is, when three different points A (x, y, z) and B (x`, y`, z`) exist, the respective points A (x, y, z) and B (x`, y The result of projecting `, z` on a two-dimensional plane is the same as points A (x, y) and B (x`, y`).

A (x, y) ≠ B (x`, y`), that is, no intersection in the two-dimensional plane may mean that there is no interference between the armed trajectories in the three-dimensional space. On the other hand, if A (x, y) = B (x`, y`), i.e., intersections exist in the two-dimensional plane, there is a possibility that interference between the armed trajectories may exist according to the z and z` coordinates.

Therefore, it is possible to determine the possibility of interference between the armed trajectories in the three-dimensional space by analyzing the occurrence of intersection between the shooting lines of the two-dimensional plane.

Here, the interference determination unit 122 may assume the case of firing all armed at the same time, and checks whether the interference between the armed by calculating the intersection between the shooting line of all armed assignments belonging to different armed forces.

Assuming that the i th target is assigned to the j th arm, the shooting line headed from the j th arm to the i th target may be expressed as Equation 6.

Equation 6 may be represented by a matrix as shown in Equation 7 below.

The i th target is assigned to the j th armed l _j of armed arm g _b (t _i ∈X _gb ), and the o th target is assigned _to the m th armed l _m of armed _c g armed _c ( _to ∈X _gc Assuming that the intersection point C between the two shooting lines is expressed as Equation (8).

Here, the range of the x coordinate and the y coordinate where the intersection point C is generated is expressed by Equation 9 below. Equation 9 represents the range between the armed target and the target to which it is assigned, and the intersection point outside this range is not considered because it is outside the armed track.

When the condition of Equation 10 is satisfied, cross verification and interference between the armed trajectories occur and the intersection point C exists.

When the intersection point C exists, the interference determining unit 122 may determine that there is a possibility of interference between the armed loci corresponding to the shooting line intersected at the intersection point. Therefore, the interference determining unit 122 may finally determine whether the armed locus is interference based on the altitude of the armed at the intersection.

First, the interference determination unit 122 may check the altitude at the intersection of the plurality of armed corresponding to the plurality of crossed shooting lines (S231). Then, the interference determination unit 122 may compare the altitude of the plurality of armed at the intersection (S232). For example, the interference determination unit 122 may compare the altitude l _jz of the two armed l _j and the altitude l _mz of l _m corresponding to the crossing fire lines.

According to the comparison result, the interference determiner 122 may identify a target included in the interference target set I _gb of the b th armed group g _b according to Equation 11.

Where d _TH is the collision risk distance and can be determined as the sum of the maximum deviation d _{dev, lj} that the armed l _j can move out of the armed trajectory and the maximum deviation d _{dev, lm that} the armed l _m can move out of the armed trajectory. have.

Referring to Equation 11, the interference determination unit 122 may determine whether the difference between the altitude l _jz of the two armed l _j and the altitude l _mz of l _m is located within the collision risk distance d _TH . If the altitude difference between the plurality of weapons exceeds the collision risk distance, the interference determining unit 122 may determine that there is no interference between the armed loci corresponding to the crossed shooting line (S233). On the other hand, if the altitude difference between the plurality of weapons is less than the collision risk distance, the interference determination unit 122 may determine that there is interference between the armed trajectories corresponding to the crossed shooting line (S234).

If it is determined that the interference, the interference determination unit 122 provides the interference information of the armed locus to the interference exclusion unit 123, the interference exclusion unit 123 is capable of simultaneously firing by eliminating the interference between the armed locus The number can be maximized. To this end, the interference exclusion unit 123 may compare the number of targets causing interference of the armed forces in which mutual interference occurs, and may give priority to the armed forces having a greater number of interference targets (S240).

Here, the interference exclusion unit 123 may give the same firing order to all the weapons not involved in the interference among the plurality of weapons, and any one of the weapons not involved in the interference and the weapons involved in the interference. The order of firing may be assigned to the weapons of the same, and the firing order may be assigned based on the number of targets assigned to each of the two or more weapons involved in the interference among the plurality of weapons. For example, as illustrated in FIG. 4, the interference exclusion unit 123 has two interference targets of the second armed arm 312 and one interference target number of the third armed arm 313. It is possible to give the second armed army 312 a relatively higher priority than 313.

When the target set causing the interference of the b-th armed group g _b is I _gb , the number of interference targets of the b-th armed group g _b may be represented as n (I _gb ). If the b-th armed forces g _b and b + 1-th armed forces g _{b +} if occurred, interference between _1, b-th arm groups can interfere with the sign of g _b n (I _gb) and b + 1-th armed forces g _{b + The} armed force to proceed with interference exclusion can be determined by comparing the interference target number n (I _{gb + 1} ) of ₁ . if b is less than a second armed group g _b interference can target n (I _gb) is b + 1 th number of interference target of armed forces g _{b + 1} n (I _{gb + 1)} of the interference elimination of b-th armed forces g _b Proceed. The firing target set Z _gb of the b-th armed force g _b is expressed by Equation 12.

By repeating the process of Equation 12 for all the armed assignments, it is possible to perform shooting to maximize the number of simultaneous fired arms without mutual interference between the armed trajectories.

For example, when there are intersection points 331 and 332 between two-dimensional shooting lines as illustrated in FIG. 4, if it is determined that interference between armed loci exists based on the altitude of the armed arm at the intersection point, Through the first armed 311, the second armed 312 and the second armed 313b included in the third armed forces 313 can be given a priority firing order (K _Nm = 1) In addition, the first arming 313a included in the third armed forces 313 may be given a firing order (K _Nm = 2) of the next rank.

As such, the control unit 120 assigns a firing order for the plurality of weapons based on the information on the plurality of weapons and the information on the plurality of targets received through the information input unit 110, and the output unit 130 controls the control unit 120. Information on the firing order of the plurality of weapons given by 120 is output. For example, the output unit 130 may output information about the firing order of the plurality of weapons in a form that can be recognized by an armed operator or in a form of computer readable data that can be read by a launcher that handles armed firing. Can be.

On the other hand, if the arming allocating device 100 according to the embodiment of the present invention and the shooting device for processing the shooting of the arming interlock, the shooting device prioritizes according to the firing order given by the arming allocating device 100. Shooting can be processed for the armed having, the armed slotter device 100 can determine the firing order of the next rank by checking whether there are no remaining targets in all armed forces after the shooting is processed by the shooting device.

For this purpose, after the shooting is processed by the shooting apparatus 100, the arming allocation apparatus 100 may check whether there are no residual targets in all armed forces as shown in Equation (13).

Here, R _gb means the residual target set of the b th armed group g _b , which can be expressed by Equation 14.

Armed assignment unit 100, if b th armed forces g _b to then remaining target is left there to reset the b-th armed forces g _b is allocated to receive a target group set X _gb as shown in Equation 15, the above-described step S230 and step S240 can be performed again.

As described above, according to one embodiment of the present invention, the arming assignment is performed to maximize the number of armed weapons that can be fired simultaneously while excluding interference between the armed trajectories for a plurality of armed targets and targets within the same shooting group.

Therefore, since the entire armed weapon can be fired within the shortest time, the shooting time required for the firing force is shortened as compared with the prior art, thereby providing a fast operational response time.

Combinations of each block of the block diagrams and respective steps of the flowcharts attached to the present invention may be performed by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be mounted on a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing equipment such that instructions executed through the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing equipment may not be included in each block or flowchart of the block diagram. It will create means for performing the functions described in each step. These computer program instructions may be stored on a computer usable or computer readable recording medium that can be directed to a computer or other programmable data processing equipment to implement functionality in a particular manner, so that the computer program instructions are computer readable or computer readable. Instructions stored on the recording medium may produce an article of manufacture containing instruction means for performing the functions described in each block of the block diagram or in each step of the flowchart. Computer program instructions may also be mounted on a computer or other programmable data processing equipment, such that a series of operating steps may be performed on the computer or other programmable data processing equipment to create a computer-implemented process to create a computer or other programmable data. Instructions that perform processing equipment may also provide steps for performing the functions described in each block of the block diagram and in each step of the flowchart.

In addition, each block or step may represent a portion of a module, segment or code that includes one or more executable instructions for executing a specified logical function (s). It should also be noted that in some alternative embodiments, the functions noted in the blocks or steps may occur out of order. For example, the two blocks or steps shown in succession may in fact be executed substantially concurrently or the blocks or steps may sometimes be performed in the reverse order, depending on the functionality involved.

The above description is merely illustrative of the technical idea of the present invention, and those skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains may make various modifications and changes without departing from the essential characteristics of the present invention. Therefore, the embodiments disclosed in the present invention are not intended to limit the technical idea of the present invention but to describe the present invention, and the scope of the technical idea of the present invention is not limited by these embodiments. The scope of protection of the present invention should be interpreted by the following claims, and all technical ideas within the scope equivalent thereto should be construed as being included in the scope of the present invention.

100: armed allocation device 110: information input unit
120: control unit 121: target allocation unit
122: interference determination unit 123: interference exclusion unit
130: output unit

Claims (9)

An arming allocation method performed by an armed allocation device,
Assigning one or more targets for each of a plurality of weapons within the same barrage;
Identify the intersection point between two-dimensional shooting lines for the armed trajectories of each of the plurality of armed targets to which the target is assigned, and compare the altitudes at the intersections of the plurality of armed guns corresponding to the crossed plurality of shooting lines. Determining interference of the trajectory; And
Assigning a firing order to the plurality of weapons based on the determined interference;
Arming assignment method. The method of claim 1,
Determining the interference,
Generating a two-dimensional shooting line by projecting a three-dimensional armed trajectory of the plurality of armed arms onto a two-dimensional plane;
Confirming the presence of the intersection between the shooting lines on the two-dimensional plane; And
And determining that there is interference due to the intersection between the armed trajectories when the difference in the altitudes at the intersection points of the plurality of armed lines corresponding to the crossed plurality of shooting lines is less than or equal to the collision risk distance.
Arming assignment method. The method of claim 2,
The collision risk distance is,
Determined based on a maximum deviation from the armed trajectory of each of the plurality of armed arms corresponding to the plurality of crossed shooting lines.
Arming assignment method. The method of claim 1,
The step of assigning the firing order,
Among the plurality of weapons, the weapons which do not generate the interference are simultaneously fired, and the weapons involved in the interference among the plurality of weapons are assigned the firing order such that they are fired at different times.
Arming assignment method. An information input unit for receiving information on a plurality of weapons and information on a plurality of targets included in the same shooting force,
A control unit for assigning a firing order to the plurality of weapons;
It includes an output unit for outputting information on the firing order given by the control unit,
The control unit,
Assigning one or more targets among the plurality of targets for each of the plurality of weapons, identifying an intersection point between two-dimensional shooting lines for the armed trajectories of each of the plurality of armed targets to which the targets are assigned; Comparing the altitudes at the intersections of the plurality of weapons corresponding to and determining the interference of the armed trajectory, and assigning a firing order to the plurality of weapons based on the determined interference.
Armed Assignment Unit. The method of claim 5,
The control unit,
The two-dimensional shooting line is generated by projecting a three-dimensional armed trajectory of the plurality of armed arms onto a two-dimensional plane,
Check the existence of the intersection between the shooting lines on the two-dimensional plane,
If the difference in the altitude at the intersection of the plurality of armed to correspond to the plurality of crossed shooting line is less than the collision risk distance, it is determined that there is interference due to the intersection between the armed trajectory
Armed Assignment Unit. The method of claim 6,
The collision risk distance is,
Determined based on a maximum deviation from the armed trajectory of each of the plurality of armed arms corresponding to the plurality of crossed shooting lines.
Armed Assignment Unit. The method of claim 5,
The control unit,
Among the plurality of weapons, the weapons which do not generate the interference are simultaneously fired, and the weapons involved in the interference among the plurality of weapons are assigned the firing order such that they are fired at different times.
Armed Assignment Unit. A computer-readable recording medium having recorded thereon a program comprising instructions for performing each step according to the method of any one of claims 1 to 4.

Images