KR100716753B1 - System of determining a priority of a partner of a technical cooperation - Google Patents

Abstract

A technical cooperation partner prioritization system is disclosed based on patent information, import scale information and technology transaction case information. The company-specific data extraction unit extracts patent application number data, import scale data, and technology transaction case data from each of patent information, import scale information, and technology transaction case information corresponding to the parts and materials. The ranking cooperative partner extracting unit extracts the technical cooperative partner types by rank based on the position number of patent application data, income scale data and technology transaction case data. The cooperation partner priority notification unit notifies the technical cooperation partner selection request unit of the technical cooperation partner type by rank. As a result, by prioritizing the technical cooperation partners by the number of applications, the amount of imports, and the technical transaction cases, the technical cooperation partners can be prioritized, so that those who want the technical cooperation partners can be guided in a more favorable direction.

Technical Cooperation, Partners, Application Count, Revenue Size, Technical Transactions

Description

Technical cooperation partner prioritization system {SYSTEM OF DETERMINING A PRIORITY OF A PARTNER OF A TECHNICAL COOPERATION}

1 is a block diagram illustrating a technology cooperation type selection system.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a technical cooperation type selection unit illustrated in FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a conceptual diagram of selecting technology-introduced component materials and investment-induced component materials by positioning market & industrial capability and R & D capability data shown in FIG. 2.

FIG. 4 is a conceptual diagram of selecting a jointly developed part material and a transferable part material by positioning the technology capability and R & D capability data shown in FIG. 2.

5 is a conceptual diagram illustrating a technology cooperation type procedure to be selected.

6 is a flowchart for explaining a method for selecting a technology cooperation type.

7A to 7E are diagrams for explaining an example of a technology cooperation type selection questionnaire.

8 is a table for explaining an example of ratings corresponding to each of the business & industry capability, R & D capability, and technology capability by parts and materials.

9 is a flowchart for explaining step S500 shown in FIG. 6 in more detail.

10 is a flowchart for explaining step S510 shown in FIG. 9 in more detail.

FIG. 11 is a graph illustrating an example of classification of investment-induced and technology-induced part materials positioned by FIG. 10.

12 is a flowchart for explaining step S520 shown in FIG. 9 in more detail.

FIG. 13 is a graph illustrating an example of classification of R & D center type and greenfield part materials positioned by FIG.

14 is a flowchart for explaining step S530 shown in FIG. 9 in more detail.

FIG. 15 is a graph illustrating an example of classification of joint R & D and technology transfer part materials positioned by FIG. 14.

16 is a block diagram illustrating a technology cooperation partner prioritization system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

17 is a block diagram illustrating in detail the technical cooperation partner priority determining unit of FIG. 16.

18 is a flowchart illustrating a method for determining technology cooperation partner priority according to an embodiment of the present invention.

19 is a view for explaining an example of the positioning step shown in FIG. 18.

FIG. 20 is a flowchart illustrating a multi-entry company extraction step of FIG. 18 in more detail.

Fig. 21 shows an example of a keyword creating sheet provided to the technical expert in the component material field.

FIG. 22 is a flow chart illustrating the multi-number company extraction step of FIG.

FIG. 23 shows an example of domestic importer and foreign supplier information of a plain shaft bearing; FIG.

24A to 24C are diagrams showing an example of the import status of each component material.

FIG. 25 is a flowchart illustrating a multi-technology transaction example company extraction step of FIG. 19 in more detail.

FIG. 26 is a flow chart illustrating the technical cooperation partner type determination step of FIG. 19 in more detail.

27A to 27D are diagrams illustrating examples in which businesses are positioned on respective coordinates shown in FIG. 26.

<Description of the symbols for the main parts of the drawings>

100: request for selection of technology cooperation type 200: request for selection of technology cooperation type

210: evaluation data storage unit 220: positioning unit

230: Extraction type of technical cooperation 300: Expert system

400: relevant company system part 600: technical cooperation partner selection request part

610: expert system unit 620: patent information provider

630: import and export statistics data provider 640: technology transaction case data provider

700: cooperation partner priority determination unit 710: data extraction unit by company

720: data storage unit for each company 730: positioning unit

740: cooperation partner extraction unit by ranking 750: cooperation partner storage unit by ranking

760: Cooperation partner priority notice

The present invention relates to a technology cooperation partner prioritization system, and more particularly, to a technology cooperation partner prioritization method and a system for performing the same based on patent information, import scale information, and technology transaction case information.

In general, technical cooperation is a series of inter-organizational activities in which companies complement and share technical know-how and resources with other external organizations for technological innovation. The types of technical cooperation can be classified into domestic technical cooperation versus international technical cooperation, intergovernmental technical cooperation versus private technical cooperation, and bilateral technical cooperation versus multilateral technical cooperation.

The above-mentioned technical cooperation can benefit from the government's support policies to supplement the limited capacity and resources held by the enterprise, to reduce the cost of technology acquisition, to secure the size of the workforce to conduct research properly, and to promote business cooperation. It is done to enjoy.

Therefore, the technical problem of the present invention has been made in view of this point, the object of the present invention is to provide a technology cooperation method in a more favorable direction for companies who want a technology cooperation partner based on patent information, import scale information and technology transaction case information. To provide a technical cooperation partner prioritization system.

delete

In order to realize the above object of the present invention, a technology cooperation partner prioritization system according to an embodiment includes a company-specific data extraction unit, a positioning unit, a ranking cooperation partner extraction unit, and a cooperation partner priority notification unit. The company data extracting unit is requested to determine the technical cooperation partner priority corresponding to the parts materials from the external technology cooperation partner selection request unit, the patent information, import scale information and technology transaction case information corresponding to the parts materials From each, patent application data, import scale data and technology transaction case data are extracted for each company. The positioning unit positions the patent application number data, income scale data, and technology transaction case data on coordinates. The rank-specific cooperation partner extracting unit extracts a rank-specific technical cooperation partner type based on the positioned data. The cooperation partner priority notification unit notifies the technical cooperation partner selection request unit of the technical cooperation partner type according to the ranking.

delete

For example, the rank-specific cooperative partner extracting unit determines a multi-application company, a company having a relatively small income scale, and a company having a relatively large number of transaction cases as the first-ranked technology cooperation partner. The rank-specific cooperative partner extracting unit determines a multi-application company, a company having a relatively large amount of income, and a company having a relatively large number of transaction cases as the second-ranked technology cooperation partner. The ranking cooperation partner extracting unit for each ranking determines companies having a relatively high number of applications, a relatively small amount of imports, and a relatively small number of technical transaction cases as third-tier technology cooperation partners. The ranking cooperation partner extracting unit for each ranking determines companies having a relatively small number of applications, a relatively large amount of imports, and a relatively small number of technical transaction cases as fourth ranking technology cooperation partners.

The technical cooperation partner priority determination system may further include a data storage unit for each company that stores the extracted patent application number data, income scale data, and technology transaction case data.

The technical cooperation partner priority determining system further includes a ranking cooperation partner storage unit for storing the extracted ranking technical cooperation partner types.

For example, the data extracting unit for each company includes an application number extraction module for each company, an import scale extraction module for each company, and a technology transaction case extraction module for each company. The application number extracting module for each company extracts patent application number data for each company from patent information corresponding to the component materials. The import scale extraction module for each company extracts import scale data for each company from the import scale information corresponding to the parts and materials. The technology transaction case extraction module for each company extracts technology transaction case data for each company from each technology transaction case information corresponding to the parts materials.

According to such a technology cooperation partner prioritization system, the technology cooperation partners can be selected by positioning the companies by the number of applications, the amount of income, and the cases of technology transactions on the coordinates, and by determining the priority of the technology cooperation partners on the positioned coordinates. Desired vendors can lead in a more favorable direction.

Hereinafter, with reference to the accompanying drawings, it will be described in detail the present invention.

1 is a block diagram illustrating a technology cooperation type selection system.

Referring to FIG. 1, the technology cooperation type selection system includes a technology cooperation type selection request unit 100, a technology cooperation type selection unit 200, an expert system unit 300, a technology market information DB 400, and a related company system unit. 500.

The technical cooperation type selection requesting unit 100 provides the technical cooperation type selection part material list to the technical cooperation type selection part 200, and in response, the technology of each of the technical cooperation type selection part materials Receive a type of cooperation.

In the present embodiment, for convenience of description, 37 parts materials will be described below as parts of the technology cooperation type selection target material.

The target parts and materials for selecting the type of technical cooperation can be determined by various standards and methods according to the purpose and purpose of technical cooperation. For example, it can be determined in various ways according to its purpose, such as 100 core parts and materials for each of the 10 next-generation growth engines and 50 medium-term parts for medium-term development to improve trade with Japan through improving technological competitiveness. The selection of parts and materials to be selected for this type of technology cooperation is generally decided based on the quantitative information analyzed based on technology and market information and the qualitative analysis results by experts in each field. It is okay. In this example, the top 100 parts materials are imported from the items registered in the import statistics database of the Korea Customs Service, and then analyzed by the expert committee for the cause of import, domestic and foreign import and export companies, import scale, technology level, etc. The selected parts and materials were selected for the cooperation type.

The technical cooperation type selection unit 200 prepares an evaluation questionnaire including an evaluation item for evaluating the selected target component material and provides it to the expert system unit 300. The questionnaire constitutes an evaluation item suitable for the purpose of selecting a cooperation type, and in this embodiment, a questionnaire is prepared by reflecting technology, R & D, manpower, market, industry, domestic capability, technology level, and ripple effect.

The expert system 300 writes an evaluation opinion on the questionnaire by using various kinds of information stored in the technical market information DB 400 and provides the technical cooperation type selection unit 200. Evaluation of the questionnaire in the expert system unit 300 may be evaluated by experts selected by the target parts and materials connected to the expert system unit 300 through a network, or by using an e-mail system. . Alternatively, the evaluations in writing can be collected separately and entered into the system.

The technical cooperation type selection unit 200 scores the target parts and materials by using the result data of the questionnaire evaluated by the expert system unit 300 and analyzes them again to select types of technical cooperation, and then the technical cooperation. The type selection request unit 100 is provided.

The selected types of technology cooperation include greenfield type and R & D center type as investment promotion type, and joint R & D type and technology transfer type as examples of technology introduction type. The green field type is, for example, a type of technical cooperation such as plant attraction. The R & D center type is a type of technical cooperation that can be achieved by maintaining an R & D center without attracting factories. The joint R & D type is a type of technical cooperation for conducting joint research with foreign companies with a high level of technology. The technology transfer type is a type of technology cooperation in which a technology possessed by a high-level foreign company is transferred to develop and secure the technology on its own.

In FIG. 1, the technical cooperation type selection requesting unit 100 selects 37 technical cooperation target parts and then provides the selected component material list to the technical cooperation type selection unit 200, but the technical cooperation target The selection of the parts and materials list may be performed by the technical cooperation type selection unit 200.

As the questionnaire created by the technical cooperation type selection unit 200 is provided, the expert system unit 300 fills in predetermined answers in the blanks included in the questionnaire, and the written questionnaire forms the technical cooperation type selection unit ( 200).

The technical market information DB 400 stores technical information and market information of each component and various statistical data corresponding thereto, and the technical cooperation type selection requesting unit 100, the technical cooperation type selecting unit 200, or the like. The information is provided at the request of the expert system unit 300. The technical information includes technical manpower information of a manufacturer who manufactures each component, technical trend prospective information corresponding to each component, and technical classification information of each component. The technical classification information includes competition technology information of each component material, alternative technology information of each component material, and the like. The market information includes domestic and international market size information of each parts, main producers of each parts, information on the market share of each parts, supply and demand relations of components of each parts, and cost structure information of each parts. Include.

The relevant enterprise system unit 500 is provided with the technical cooperation type data for a specific component material provided by the technical cooperation type selection request unit 100. Accordingly, the operator side proceeds to the green field type, R & D center type, joint research and development type, technology transfer type, etc., based on the corresponding technical cooperation type data. In this regard, a technology cooperation strategy for specific parts and materials will be established.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a technology cooperation type selection unit illustrated in FIG. 1. FIG. 3 is a conceptual diagram of selecting technology-introduced component materials and investment-induced component materials by positioning the market & industry capability and R & D capability data shown in FIG. 2. FIG. 4 is a conceptual diagram of selecting a jointly developed part material and a transferable part material by positioning the technology capability and R & D capability data shown in FIG. 2.

Referring to FIG. 2, the technical cooperation type selecting unit 200 includes an evaluation data storage unit 210, a positioning unit 220, and a technical cooperation type extracting unit 230.

The evaluation data storage unit 210 includes a market & industry capability evaluation data storage unit 212, an R & D capability evaluation data storage unit 214, and a technology capability evaluation data storage unit 216, and evaluation result data of a questionnaire. Score it.

Specifically, the market & industry capability evaluation data storage unit 212 includes the import scale of the corresponding component material, the use of the component material, the national competitiveness of the applied product of the component material, regulatory or obstacles, the domestic market growth potential and raw material supply system. , And assessment data corresponding to domestic competence are scored and stored. In the process of scoring, the evaluation data for some items may not be scored. In this case, the results of the evaluation items are difficult to quantify by score, there is a possibility of overlap in scoring, or the results of a particular evaluation item are supported. For example, or in cases that are not related to the evaluation. This is because when the evaluation questionnaire is prepared in order to increase the reliability of the evaluation result, more items than the items to be actually used are reflected in the questionnaire.

There are various methods of scoring the evaluation result data, such as 5-point scale, 1--5 scale, upper and lower, excellent (good) -normal-low (not good), but in the present embodiment, if excellent or good 1, 0 for normal, -1 for lower or less than normal levels. These scoring criteria are applied to both R & D competency evaluation and technology competency evaluation.

The R & D capability evaluation data storage unit 214 stores evaluation data corresponding to the degree of possession of skilled workers, the supply of skilled workers, related personnel, and R & D infrastructure.

The technical capability evaluation data storage unit 216 stores evaluation data corresponding to the level of domestic technology possessed, technology gap with developed countries, core technology possessed, insufficient technology, and technology ripple effect.

The positioning unit 220 includes a market & industry capability, R & D capability and technology capability positioning module 222, a market & industry capability and R & D capability positioning module 224, and a technology capability and R & D capability positioning module 226, Using the scores stored in the evaluation data storage unit 210 is positioned on the coordinate for each component material to be selected for technical cooperation type.

Specifically, as shown in FIG. 3, the market & industry capability, R & D capability, and technology capability positioning module 222 sets the X and Y axes as the market & industry capability evaluation score and the R & D capability evaluation score, respectively. Position the result on XY coordinates.

In the present embodiment, when the discrimination ability is low, such as the case where the technical capability is generally estimated to be low in consideration of the possession of core technology and the technology gap compared to the developed countries, it is not applied to the classification of investment type and technology introduction type. In this regard, it is used as a criterion to distinguish the cases of joint R & D and technology transfer among technology-induced parts and materials.

The market & industry competency evaluation score is calculated by averaging each of the scores for domestic industrial competitiveness, parts and materials related regulations and obstacles, domestic market's growth potential, and raw material supply / demand capability. The average of the scores may be weighted average or arithmetic average, but the same criteria as the evaluation of other competencies such as R & D competency or technical competency should be applied. The R & D capability evaluation data is calculated by averaging scores of the degree of possession and supply of skilled workers included in the questionnaire, the degree of manpower related to the parts and materials, and items of the R & D infrastructure. The technical competency evaluation data is calculated by averaging scores of items of skill level, technology gap, and possessed skills compared to developed countries included in the questionnaire.

As shown in FIG. 3, the market & industry capability and R & D capability positioning module 224 sets the X and Y axes as the market & industry capability evaluation score and the R & D capability evaluation score, respectively, and sets the result on XY coordinates. Position.

As shown in FIG. 4, the technical capability and R & D capability positioning module 226 sets the X and Y axes as the technical capability evaluation data and the R & D capability evaluation data, respectively, and positions the result on the X-Y coordinate.

The technology cooperation type extraction unit 230 is a technology introduction type extraction unit 231, investment attraction type extraction unit 232, R & D center type extraction unit 233, green field extraction unit 234, joint R & D extraction unit 235 and the technology transfer extraction unit 236.

In detail, the technology introduction type extractor 231 positions the parts and materials having a relatively low market & industry evaluation score on the XY coordinates positioned by the market & industry capability, R & D capability, and technology capability positioning module 222. Part materials corresponding to the defined areas are extracted and classified as technology-introduced part materials. That is, as shown in FIG. 3, component materials positioned on the second and third quadrants of the X-Y coordinate are classified as technology-introduced component materials.

The investment attraction extracting unit 232 is located in an area where a component material having a relatively high market & industry evaluation score is positioned on an XY coordinate positioned by the market & industry capability, R & D capability, and technology capability positioning module 222. Corresponding component materials are extracted and classified as investment-induced component materials. That is, as shown in FIG. 3, the component materials positioned on the first and fourth quadrants of the X-Y coordinates are classified as investment-induced component materials.

The R & D center type extractor 233 has a relatively high market & industrial evaluation score position and a relatively high R & D evaluation score position on the XY coordinates positioned by the market & industry capability and R & D capability positioning module 224. Parts materials corresponding to the positioned area are extracted and classified into R & D center type parts materials. That is, as shown in FIG. 3, the component materials positioned on the first quadrant of the X-Y coordinate are classified as R & D center component materials.

The green field extractor 234 extracts the parts and materials corresponding to the region where the relatively low R & D evaluation score is positioned on the XY coordinates positioned by the market & industrial capability and R & D capability positioning module 224. Classified as component parts and materials. That is, as shown in FIG. 3, the component materials positioned on the quadrant of the X-Y coordinates are classified as greenfield component materials.

The joint R & D extraction unit 235 extracts the parts and materials corresponding to the region where the relatively low technical competency evaluation score is positioned on the XY coordinates positioned by the technical capability and R & D capability positioning module 226. Classified as a part material. That is, as shown in FIG. 4, the component materials positioned on the second and third quadrants of the X-Y coordinates are classified as joint R & D component materials.

The technology transfer type extractor 236 extracts parts and materials corresponding to an area where a relatively high technology competency evaluation score is positioned on the XY coordinates positioned by the technology capability and R & D capability positioning module 226. Classified as a part material. That is, as shown in FIG. 4, the component materials positioned on the first and fourth quadrants of the X-Y coordinates are classified as technology transferable component materials.

The procedure of selecting the type of technical cooperation described above will be briefly described with reference to FIG. 5.

5 is a conceptual diagram illustrating a technology cooperation type procedure to be selected.

Referring to Figure 5, for example, in determining the type of technical cooperation based on the results of the question for each of the 37 component materials, each of the 36 component materials, each of the investment-induced components and technology-introduced components Classify primarily into materials.

Subsequently, each of the investment-type component materials classified as primary components is again classified into green-field component materials and R & D center component materials. In parallel with this, each of the technology-introduced component materials classified as primary is again classified into joint R & D component materials and technology transfer component materials.

The investment-induced parts and materials are parts and materials that have a competitive edge in R & D or market while the domestic industry related to the parts and materials has a market competitiveness.

The distinction between the R & D center type and the green field type is preferably determined in consideration of the R & D capability such as skilled R & D personnel and infrastructure, the competitiveness of the domestic industry and market related to the application of parts and materials, and the market (import) scale. . In addition, it may be determined by taking into account other environmental factors such as regulations and laws.

For example, relatively high R & D capacities are categorized as investment attraction in the form of R & D centers (R & D capacities representing assessments of skilled personnel and related infrastructure are important factors in determining whether to attract R & D centers). On the other hand, relatively low R & D capacity is classified as attracting greenfield investment.

If the market size (import) of parts materials classified as green field type is less than a certain level, it is desirable to exclude them from investment promotion type. This is because, in the case of the green field type, if the relevant market size is below a certain level, it is difficult to expect the profitability of the business.

On the other hand, the technology-introduced component materials are parts materials in which it is difficult to secure technology with only domestic capability in a short period of time due to lack of original technology and weak technology base, and these include component materials except investment promotion type.

Since the joint R & D type has no technical skills at all, it is difficult to access the technology with its own capabilities, and thus it can be said to be a type of technical cooperation under the premise of securing technology through joint R & D with technology holders. In other words, this type of cooperation is a situation where it is difficult to expect to secure technology through technology development because there is no technology possessed, whether core or peripheral technology.

The pure technology transfer type may be applied to the case where the technology can be secured based on the existing technology if only the technology is provided because it possesses some technical capabilities, although not at a high level with respect to the corresponding component material. For example, they may have some competing technologies or some technical capabilities but no core technical competencies.

Through this series of processes, we finally select the type of technical cooperation for each of the 37 parts and materials.

In this case, if the discrimination is evaluated as low as overall, considering the technology capability evaluation result, considering the possession of core technology and technology gap compared to developed countries, it is not applicable to the classification of investment type and technology introduction type. Instead, it is used as a criterion for distinguishing cases of joint R & D and technology transfer among technology-introduced tasks.

6 is a flowchart for explaining a method for selecting a technology cooperation type. 7A to 7E are diagrams for explaining an example of the technology cooperation type selection questionnaire shown in FIG. 6. 8 is a table for explaining an example of ratings corresponding to each of the business & industry capability, R & D capability, and technology capability by parts and materials.

Referring to FIG. 6, a questionnaire including market & industrial capability, R & D capability, and technology capability is performed by conducting prior studies related to foreign investment and technology cooperation as basic data for preparing a questionnaire for selecting a technology cooperation type. 7E.) (Step S100).

For example, as a preliminary study for creating a questionnaire, research and analysis of domestic and international data related to foreign investment attraction, technology acquisition, and technical cooperation are carried out to identify key evaluation items necessary for the selection of technology cooperation and to write a questionnaire. Can conduct prior research. The preceding studies include investment maintenance related prior studies, technology selection related prior studies, and the like.

In addition, based on the study of domestic and foreign priorities related to foreign investment and technical cooperation, a questionnaire for selecting the type of technical cooperation is prepared centering on items such as market & industry, R & D, and technology capability.

Subsequently, the questionnaire created in step S100 is provided to the expert or expert group (step S200).

Then, it is checked whether the questionnaire written from the experts or expert groups is received (step S300), and as the questionnaire written from the experts or expert groups is received, the questionnaire for the pre-selected parts and materials is evaluated ( Step S400). In particular, pre-selected parts and materials can be evaluated on their own, or questionnaires can be evaluated using a second expert or group of experts.

For example, in the step S400, business & industry capability evaluation data, R & D capability evaluation data, and technology capability evaluation data for each component material are as shown in FIG. 8.

Subsequently, an analysis is performed based on the questionnaire evaluation result to position the capability of each component and classify the type of technical cooperation based on the capability of the positioned material component (step S500). The above-mentioned types of technology cooperation can be classified as investment promotion type such as green field type or R & D center type, or can be classified as technology introduction type such as joint R & D type or technology transfer type.

9 is a flowchart for explaining step S500 shown in FIG. 6 in more detail.

Referring to Figure 9, based on the market & industry and R & D capability evaluation data is classified into investment-induced component materials and technology-introduced component materials (step S510).

Subsequently, the component materials classified as investment-induced type are classified into R & D center type component materials and green field type component materials, respectively (step S520).

Subsequently, the component materials classified as technology introduction types are classified into joint R & D component materials and technology introduction component materials, respectively (step S530).

10 is a flowchart for explaining step S510 shown in FIG. 9 in more detail. FIG. 11 is a graph illustrating an example of classification of investment-induced and technology-induced part materials positioned by FIG. 10.

10 and 11, following step S400, a rating (or evaluation data) corresponding to the market & industry capability and a rating corresponding to the R & D capability are respectively positioned on the X coordinate and the Y coordinate (step S511). For example, if the ratings of the 37 component materials are positioned on the X-Y coordinates based on the market & industrial capability and R & D capability, they are shown in FIG. 11.

In step S511, it is checked whether there are component materials positioned on the positive X coordinate positioned (step S512). If there are component materials positioned on the positive X coordinate in step S512, the corresponding component materials are classified as investment-induced component materials (step S513).

When there are no component materials positioned on the positive X coordinate in step S512 and after step S513, it is checked whether or not there are component materials positioned on the negative X coordinate (step S514). If there are component materials positioned on the negative X coordinate in step S514, the corresponding component materials are classified into technology-introduced component materials (step S515), and the feedback is returned to step S520.

Through this process, 19 parts and materials with medium and higher business and industry ratings are classified as investment-induced parts and 18 parts and materials with median and lower are classified as technology-induced parts and materials.

12 is a flowchart for explaining step S520 shown in FIG. 9 in more detail. FIG. 13 is a graph illustrating an example of classification of R & D center type and greenfield part materials positioned by FIG.

12 and 13, it is checked whether the parts are positioned on a relatively large Y coordinate (step S521), and when the parts are checked to be positioned on a relatively large Y coordinate, the R & D center is checked. It is classified into a type (step S522). For example, 19 component materials classified as investment type are positioned as shown in FIG. 13 based on R & D capability. In the case of five parts, which have the highest R & D capability among the above 19 parts, the R & D center is the most desirable type of cooperation.

On the other hand, it is checked whether the component materials are positioned on the relatively small Y coordinate (step S523), and if it is checked that the component materials are positioned on the relatively small Y coordinate, it is classified as a green field type (step S524). ). For example, investment in greenfield-type investments is desirable for eight component materials with low R & D capabilities.

Then, it is checked whether the part materials are positioned in the middle region of the Y coordinate (step S525), and if the part materials are positioned in the middle region of the Y coordinate, it is checked whether the market size of the corresponding component material is large ( Step S526).

If it is checked in step S526 that the market size of the part material is relatively small, the part material is classified into a green field type (step S527). Meanwhile, in order to attract greenfield investment, the size of the market that is expected to be secured by investment should be premised. Therefore, out of the eight parts, four parts with small domestic imports are excluded. The four component materials excluded above are classified as technology-introduced.

If it is checked in step S526 that the market size of the component material is relatively large, the component material is classified into an R & D center type (step S528).

Through this process, 10 parts materials are classified into R & D center type and 5 parts materials into green field type.

14 is a flowchart for explaining step S530 shown in FIG. 9 in more detail. FIG. 15 is a graph illustrating an example of classification of joint R & D and technology transfer part materials positioned by FIG. 14.

14 and 15, the rating corresponding to the technical capability and the rating corresponding to the R & D capability are respectively positioned on the X-axis and the Y-axis (step S531). For example, among the 18 investment-induced types classified as the first technology-induced parts materials, the ratings of 22 parts materials plus four reclassified as technology-introduced types are given on the coordinates of the technical capacity and R & D capability as the XY axis. Positioning appears as shown in FIG. 15.

Then, it is checked whether the components are positioned in the positive X-axis region (step S532), and if it is checked that the components are positioned in the positive X-axis region, it is classified as technology transfer type (step S533). ).

Subsequently, it is checked whether the parts are positioned in the negative X-axis area (step S534), and if the parts are checked to be positioned in the negative X-axis area, it is classified as a joint development type (step S535). .

Subsequently, it is checked whether the technical capability is medium and the R & D capability is low (step S536), and if it is checked that the technical capability is medium and the R & D capability is low, it is classified as a joint development type (step S537). For example, two component materials with medium technical capability may show differences in R & D capabilities. Therefore, if the R & D capability is low, the ability to carry out its own R & D is lower than that of the high R & D capability, so it is classified as a joint R & D component material.

Subsequently, by checking whether the technical capability is medium and the R & D capability is large (step S538), if the technical capability is medium and the R & D capability is checked as large, it is classified as technology transfer type (step S539).

Through this process, there are 13 joint R & D part materials and 9 technology transfer part materials among 22 technology introduction part materials.

As described above, in determining the types of technology cooperation, as shown in FIGS. 3 to 5 and 9 to 15, first, the technology introduction type and the investment promotion type are distinguished on a two-dimensional coordinate plane of XY; Again, the process consists of four stages: joint R & D, technology transfer, R & D center, and greenfield.

However, this process can also be applied on the three-dimensional coordinate plane of X-Y-Z. When applied on the above three-dimensional coordinate plane, the overall cooperative type determination process can be simplified.

As described above, the market & industry capability, R & D capability and technical capability data extracted from a plurality of component materials from questionnaires, technical market information and statistical data are positioned, thereby responding to the corresponding component materials requiring technical cooperation. It is possible to select whether to proceed with R & D center type, green field type, joint R & D type, or technology introduction type.

16 is a block diagram illustrating a technology cooperation partner prioritization system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 16, the technology cooperation partner priority determination system according to an embodiment of the present invention may include a technology cooperation partner selection request unit 600, an expert system unit 610, a patent information provider 620, and import / export statistical data. The provider 630 includes a technology transaction case data provider 640 and a cooperative partner priority determiner 700.

The technical cooperation partner selection request unit 600 requests the technical cooperation partner priority from the cooperation partner priority determination unit 700 via a network. The technical cooperation partner selection request unit 600 may be a general private company, may be a state-owned enterprise, or may be a government agency.

The cooperation partner priority determining unit 700 provides the expert system unit 610 with a keyword creation sheet corresponding to the characteristic of the corresponding component material as the priority of the technical cooperation partner corresponding to the specific component material is requested. As a sheet filled with keywords is provided from the expert system unit 610, the patent information provider 620 is accessed via a network to search for related patents related to a specific component material and analyze patent information.

The priority of the technical cooperation partner for each component material according to the present embodiment is to strengthen the technical competitiveness. Therefore, it is preferable that foreign companies having technical skills in the field are selected first.

In addition, the cooperation partner priority determining unit 700 is a technology of the component material among the companies shown in the import and export statistical data provided by the import and export statistics data providing unit 630 and the companies extracted through the patent information research and analysis Select companies that are checked to ensure sufficient The check on securing technology is based on the results of technical review by technical experts in the parts and materials field.

The cooperation partner priority determining unit 700 examines and analyzes the technology transaction case data providing unit 640, for example, the technology transaction case of AUS Consulting Co., Ltd. in the United States, By looking at the characteristics together, it is possible not only to reflect the technical contract-related matters in advance when reflecting the technical cooperation detailed strategy, but also to use it as a basic data to cope with the expected situation related to the technical fee in the future cooperation process. do.

Meanwhile, the cooperative partner priority determining unit 700 examines and analyzes the Internet homepage, company analysis data, and recent annual report of companies selected as technology cooperation partners, and the strategies related to technology cooperation of these companies. By discovering and providing information, this guide can be used to formulate detailed plans for future technical cooperation.

Meanwhile, the parts and materials are evaluated and scored by market & industry capability, R & D capability and technical capability by market & industry data, R & D data and technical data obtained from questionnaire, technical market information and statistical data. At this time. The evaluated and scored parts are positioned on coordinates and classified into investment attraction and technology introduction, respectively. The parts materials classified as the investment promotion type are classified into the R & D center type and the green field type based on the R & D capability evaluation result and the market & industry capability evaluation result, and the parts materials classified as the technology introduction type are evaluated by the technology capability. Based on the results and the results of R & D competency evaluation, they are classified into joint R & D type and technology introduction type.

Here, the component materials classified as the R & D center type are positioned in the relatively high R & D capability area, and the component materials classified as the greenfield type are positioned in the relatively low R & D capability area. In addition, the component materials classified as the joint R & D type are positioned in the relatively low technical competence area, and the component materials classified as the technical introduction type are positioned in the relatively high technical competence area.

17 is a block diagram illustrating in detail the technical cooperation partner priority determining unit of FIG. 16.

16 and 17, the cooperative partner priority determining unit 700 according to an embodiment of the present invention may include a company-specific data extractor 710, a company-specific data storage 720, a positioning unit 730, and a ranking. Star cooperation partner extracting unit 740, the ranking cooperation partner storage unit 750 and the cooperation partner priority notification unit 760.

The company-specific data extraction unit 710 includes a company-specific application number extraction module 712, a company-specific import scale extraction module 714, and a company-specific technology transaction case extraction module 716. The company-specific data extraction unit 710 is requested to determine the technical cooperation partner priority corresponding to the component materials from the technical cooperation partner selection request unit 600, the patent information corresponding to the component materials, import scale information Patent application number data, import scale data, and technology transaction case data are extracted from each company and technology transaction case information, respectively.

In detail, the application number extraction module 712 for each company extracts patent application number data for each company from the patent information corresponding to the component materials as the determination of the technical cooperation partner priority is requested.

The import scale extraction module 714 for each company extracts import scale data for each company from the import scale information corresponding to the component materials as the determination of the technical cooperation partner priority is requested.

The technology transaction case extraction module 716 for each company extracts technology transaction case data for each company from each technology transaction case information corresponding to the parts materials as the determination of the technical cooperation partner priority is requested.

The company-specific data storage unit 720 includes a company-specific multi-application data DB 722, a company-specific import statistics data DB 724, and a company-specific technology transaction case data DB 726. The company-specific data storage unit 720 stores the extracted patent application number data, income scale data, and technology transaction case data.

Specifically, the company-specific multi-application data DB 722 stores the patent application number data extracted by the company-specific application number extraction module 712.

The income statistics data DB 724 for each company stores income scale data extracted by the income scale extraction module 714 for each company.

The technology transaction case data DB 726 for each company stores technology transaction case data extracted by the technology transaction case extraction module 716 for each company.

The positioning unit 730 is the patent application number data, import scale data and technology transactions stored in the multi-application data DB 722 for each company, the import statistics data DB 724 for each company and the technology transaction case data DB 726 for each company Position the case data on the coordinates.

For example, the X-axis is defined as the import scale data, the Y-axis is defined as the application data, the Y-axis is defined as the technology transaction case data, and the patent application data and the import scale are defined on the defined three-dimensional coordinates. Position data and technical transaction case data on coordinates. Accordingly, the patent application number data, income scale data and technology transaction case data are positioned in a total of eight areas, for example.

The ranking cooperation partner extracting unit 740 is a first rank cooperation partner extraction module 742, a second rank cooperation partner extraction module 744, a third rank cooperation partner extraction module 746 and a fourth rank cooperation partner extraction module 748 It includes. The ranking cooperation partner extracting unit 740 extracts the technical cooperation partner type by ranking based on the positioned data, and provides the extracted ranking technical cooperation partner type to the ranking cooperation partner storage unit 750. .

For example, the first rank cooperative partner extraction module 742 ranks the first company (s) mapped to the first area having a large number of applications, a relatively small amount of income, and a large number of technical transaction cases. Extracted as a technical cooperation partner, and provides the extracted first-ranked technical cooperation partner information to the ranking cooperation partner storage unit 750.

The second-ranked cooperative partner extraction module 744 extracts, as a second-ranked technical cooperative partner, a company (s) mapped to a second area having a large number of applications, a relatively large amount of income, and a large number of technical transaction cases. Then, the extracted second rank technical cooperation partner information is provided to the ranking partner cooperation storage unit 750.

The third-ranked cooperative partner extraction module 746 selects the third-party cooperative partner that corresponds to the third area that has a relatively high number of applications, a relatively small amount of income, and relatively few technical transaction cases. And extracts the extracted third-ranked technical cooperation partner information to the ranking cooperation partner storage unit 750.

The fourth-ranked cooperative partner extraction module 748 may be selected as the fourth-ranked technical cooperative partner by the corresponding company (s) mapped to the fourth area having a large number of applications, a relatively large amount of income, and a relatively small number of technical transaction cases. The extracted fourth rank technical cooperation partner information is provided to the ranking partner cooperation storage unit 750.

The ranking cooperation partner storage unit 750 is the first rank cooperation partner storage DB (752), the second rank cooperation partner storage DB (754), the third rank cooperation partner storage DB (756) and the fourth rank cooperation partner storage DB (758). It includes, and stores the extracted ranking technical cooperation partner type. Each of the first to fourth rank cooperative partner storage DBs 752, 754, 756, and 758 stores first to fourth rank cooperative partner information, respectively.

The cooperative partner priority notification unit 760 may include the first rank cooperative partner storage DB 752, the second rank cooperative partner storage DB 754, the third rank cooperative partner storage DB 756, and the fourth rank cooperative partner storage DB 758. The technical cooperation partner selection request unit 600 for each ranking stored in each of the ranks is notified to the technical cooperation partner selection request unit 600.

18 is a flowchart illustrating a method for determining technology cooperation partner priority according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 18, first, multi-application companies are selected through a patent research for each component material (step S100). Specifically, after creating Korean and English keywords that can express the characteristics of each part material well, search for databases that store patent information, and remove less relevant data through primary filtering. Subsequently, the relevant valid patent data is extracted through the second filtering process of the technical experts in the parts and materials field on the first filtered data. Subsequently, the candidates for cooperation are selected based on the companies with a lot of extracted valid data.

Subsequent to the step S100, a large number of import companies are selected through a survey of the import scale for each part material (step S200). Specifically, the list of import companies from the import and export size data by parts and materials is organized, and it is selected as a candidate group for selecting a partner for cooperation based on import and export information. The import and export scale data for each component material may be provided by the Korea Customs Service, for example.

Following the step S200, a multi-technology transaction case company is selected through a technical transaction case study for each part material (step S300).

Subsequent to step S300, a positioning operation as shown in FIG. 22 is performed for companies by application count, import size, and technology transaction case (step S400).

19 is a view for explaining an example of the positioning step shown in FIG. 18.

As shown in FIG. 19, the X-axis is defined as the income scale, the Y-axis is defined as the number of applications, and the Y-axis is defined as a technology transaction case. Accordingly, a total of eight regions are defined on the three-dimensional coordinates.

Returning to the description of FIG. 18, the technical cooperation partner type is determined based on the company data positioned in step S400 (step S500). For example, as shown in FIG. 19, a company (s) positioned in the first area having a relatively high number of applications, a relatively small amount of income, and a relatively high number of technical transaction cases is selected as a first-tier technical cooperation partner. Determine by type. In addition, as shown in FIG. 19, the company (s) positioned in the second area having a large number of applications, a relatively large amount of income, and a large number of technical transaction cases are determined as the second-ranked technology cooperation partner type. do. In addition, as shown in FIG. 19, a company (s) positioned in a third area having a relatively high number of applications, a relatively small amount of imports, and a relatively small number of technical transaction cases are referred to as a third-tier technology cooperation partner type. Decide In addition, as shown in FIG. 19, the company (s) positioned in the fourth area having a relatively high number of applications, a relatively large amount of income, and a relatively small number of technical transaction cases are determined as the fourth-ranked technology cooperation partner type. do.

In the above embodiment, it has been described to position the company information by the number of applications, the amount of import and the technology transaction case, and determine the priority of the technical cooperation partner based on the position of the company data.

However, those skilled in the art may determine the priority of the technical cooperation partner based on the company information by the number of applications and the import size even if the technical transaction case information does not exist.

For example, a partner partner company is selected through a comparison between a partner partner group company for cooperation based on the patent information selected in step S100 and a partner partner group company for cooperation according to the amount of income selected in step S200.

That is, a partner company is selected by comparing the candidate list selected from the analysis of patent information and the company list selected from the import / export size data. When selecting a company, it is preferable to exclude a company that does not appear on the patent list but appears on the import and export list. This is because companies that appear only on the import and export lists include companies with an offer character.

Among the technologies possessed by the candidate partners for cooperation, the top three to five companies are selected as the partner companies based on the number of technologies (patents) with high technical relevance as a result of expert evaluation.

On the other hand, companies that have highly relevant technologies but are not selected for cooperation will be selected as candidate companies. Particularly, some of the technologies possessed by the unselected companies in the technology cooperation partner candidate group have been selected as important interest patents by component materials. In other words, companies that have not been selected for three or five companies in each component material may have some of the relevant important technologies, so it is necessary to secure data on them.

This is because these candidate companies are considered to be an alternative if they are not able to pursue the cooperation project with the companies that were first presented when establishing detailed cooperation plans.

FIG. 20 is a flowchart for explaining the multi-entry company selection step of FIG. 19 in more detail. Fig. 21 shows an example of a keyword creating sheet provided to the technical expert in the component material field.

17, 20, and 21, the cooperative partner priority determining unit 700 selects a keyword (step S110). Specifically, key keywords (Korean and English) that best represent the characteristics of the parts are selected by technical experts in the field of parts and materials.

As an example, as shown in FIG. 21, a keyword creating sheet is provided to a technical expert in the field of a part material field, and a list of the prepared keywords is provided.

Subsequently, the company-specific application number extracting module 712 performs a series of patent search operations for extracting related patent data by searching the Korean, US, and Japanese patent databases using the keywords selected in step S110 (step S120). ).

Subsequently, the company-specific application number extraction module 712 removes noise by performing a first filtering operation on the patent search result data retrieved in step S120 (step S130).

Subsequently, the company-specific application number extracting module 712 performs the second filtering operation by providing the first filtered patent search data to a group of experts in the component material technology field again (step S140). Valid patent data is finally selected by the above-described second filtering operation. In the screening process, it is desirable to evaluate the related strengths and strengths as well as check the presence or absence.

Subsequently, the company-specific application number extracting module 712 extracts related patents (step S150), and selects a candidate group for cooperation based on the related patents (step S160). Specifically, the list of technology holding companies from the relevant patent list is summarized, and a list of candidate companies for technology cooperation subjects is selected for each component material. Companies with a large number of related patents in the above list are considered to have high technology and it is desirable to rank the companies in the order of the number of patents.

FIG. 22 is a flowchart illustrating the multi-stage supplier selection step of FIG. 18 in more detail. FIG. 23 shows an example of domestic importer and foreign supplier information of a plain shaft bearing; FIG. 24A to 24C are diagrams showing an example of the import status of each component material.

18 to 24C, the import scale extraction module 714 for each company requests the import and export size data for each component material from the Korea Customs Service (step S210). For example, the import scale extraction module 714 for each company may be provided with import and export data for each component by accessing the Korea Customs Service site (http://www.customs.go.kr/).

Subsequently, the import scale extraction module 714 for each company checks whether the import and export scale data is received (step S220), and if it is checked that the import and export scale data is not received, feeds back to the step S210 and checks the receipt of the import and export scale data. In this case, the list of import companies and the import scale by parts and materials is extracted from the import and export scale data (step S230). Accordingly, the list of import companies and the import scale for each extracted component material may be obtained, for example, as shown in FIG. 26.

Subsequently, the import scale extraction module 714 for each company selects a technology cooperation partner selection candidate group from the extracted data (step S240). Accordingly, a data sheet corresponding to the technical cooperation partner selection candidate group as shown in FIGS. 27A to 27C can be obtained. The data sheet corresponding to the technical cooperation partner selection candidate group is stored in the company-specific import statistics data DB 724.

For example, as shown in FIG. 24A, the annual import status and recent year of major importers and major suppliers, together with the third (HS code, Harmonized System Code) of the component material, plain shaft bearings. The data sheet including the status of income by region is stored in the company-specific import statistics data DB 724.

In addition, as shown in Figure 24b, including the HS code of the pneumatic / gas valve (pneumatic / gas valve) as a component material, including the annual import status of the major importers and major suppliers and the recent import region by region The data sheet to be stored is stored in the company-specific import statistics data DB 724.

In addition, as shown in FIG. 24C, the data sheet including the HS code of the pressure gauge, which is a component material, and the annual import status of the major importers and the major suppliers and the regional import status of the recent year are described above. The company-specific import statistics data is stored in the DB 724.

FIG. 25 is a flowchart illustrating a multi-technology transaction example company selection step of FIG. 18 in more detail.

18 to 25, the technology transaction case extraction module 716 for each company requests the technology transaction case data providing unit 640 for technology transaction status information for each component company (step S310).

Subsequently, the technology transaction case extraction module 716 for each company checks whether or not the corresponding technology transaction status information is received (step S320), and if it is checked that the technology transaction status information is not received, feeds back to the step S310, and technology transaction status information. If it is checked by the reception of the technical data for each technical field for each year is extracted (step S330).

Subsequently, the technology transaction case extraction module 716 for each company selects candidate candidate groups corresponding to the technology cooperation partners from the extracted technology transaction status data, and stores the selected company candidate groups in the technology transaction case data DB 726 for each company. (Step S340).

Then, the candidate candidate group corresponding to the technology cooperation partner, in particular, the candidate group selected as the greenfield type cooperation type, the candidate type selected as the R & D center type cooperation type, and the joint R & D type cooperation type by the multi-technology transaction example company selection step described above. An example of selecting each of the candidate companies selected as the candidate companies and the candidate candidate companies selected as the technology transfer cooperation type will be described in more detail.

In the present embodiment, 252 cases are investigated as examples of technical transactions corresponding to four technical fields, that is, electrical & electronics, chemical, automotive, and clamp / fastener / valve technologies. It became. In particular, it was difficult to find a case that directly corresponded to the 37 component material names corresponding to the present embodiment.

As a result, a total of 34 cases were investigated in the field of electrical and electronic technology, a total of 85 cases were investigated in the field of chemical mood, a total of 104 cases were investigated in the field of automobile related mood, and a total of 29 cases in the field of clamp / fastener / valve technology. It was investigated.

By analyzing and arranging the technical transaction cases for each technical field, it is possible to obtain technical transaction status data by year and technology field as shown in Table 1 below.

TABLE 1

Technical field 1981 ~ 1985 1986 ~ 1990 1991 to 1995 1996-2000 2001 ~ 2005 Sum Clamp and others 2 4 7 14 2 29 car 3 7 10 60 23 103 chemistry 2 4 15 56 7 84 Electric 0 3 8 18 5 34 Sum 7 18 40 148 37 250

As shown in Table 1 above, the number of technology transactions in each of the four technology sectors increased steadily until 2000, and in particular, it was confirmed that 1996-2000 was the most frequent time of technology transactions.

In addition, the number of technology transactions decreased from 2001 to 2005. However, this data alone does not indicate that technical transactions have decreased during the same period. Because, due to the nature of technical transactions, transaction information is generally provided with a certain time difference rather than being collected in real time, it is more preferable to understand that the figure is low because there is a limit of the number of data secured so far.

On the other hand, if you summarize the technical contract type, as shown in Table 2 below can obtain the current status data according to the technical contract type.

TABLE 2

Technical field Exclusive Non-Exclusive Sum Clamp and others 10 (34.5%) 19 (75.5%) 29 car 29 (27.9%) 75 (72.1%) 104 chemistry 22 (25.9%) 63 (74.1%) 85 Electric 6 (17.6%) 28 (82.4%) 34 Sum 67 (26.6%) 185 (73.4%) 252

In the case of Exclusive License in Table 2 above, the numbers include cases in which regional restrictions or additional conditions are included.

As shown in Table 2 above, for example, when looking at the contract types of a total of 252 cases, the case of granting an exclusive license was slightly different for each of the four technical fields. It can be seen in the range of 30%, and 70 ~ 80% of non-exclusive license.

In addition, the clamp / fastener / valve technology sector is found to have a high proportion of monopoly licenses, but relatively low for electrical and electronic components.

On the other hand, the structure of paying the technical fees in the technical contract cases are summarized in Table 3 below.

TABLE 3

Technical field Down payment + technical fee Technical fee Sum Clamp and others 7 (24.1%) 22 (65.9%) 29 car 30 (28.8%) 74 (61.2%) 104 chemistry 28 (32.9%) 57 (67.1%) 85 Electric 13 (38.2%) 21 (61.8%) 34 Sum 78 (31.0%) 174 (69.0%) 252

As shown in Table 3 above, in the case of technical contracts, the payment of the technical fee is largely divided into two types of "upfront fee (initial payment) + technical fee" and "technical fee". It was confirmed that there is no lump sum payment.

In addition, although the difference was somewhat different depending on the technical field, the form of advance payment + technology fee is approximately 25-35%, the electric and electronic technology field has the highest advance fee + technology fee type (38.2%), and the lowest in the clamp / fastener / valve technology area. (24.1%).

The above-mentioned down payment scale is summarized in Table 4 below for each technical field. In particular, in the case of a technical contract in the form of paying down payment, Table 4 summarizes the amount of down payment paid in five cases of $ 100,000, $ 500,000, $ 1 million, $ 10 million, and $ 10 million. It was.

TABLE 4

Technical field ~ $ 100,000 $ 10- $ 500,000 50 ~ 1 million dollars $ 100- $ 10 million More than $ 10 million Unpublished Sum Clamp and others 3 2 - - - 2 7 car 6 10 5 7 2 - 30 chemistry 11 8 3 6 - - 28 Electric 3 5 3 2 - - 13 Sum 23 25 11 15 2 2 78

Referring to Table 4, it can be seen that among the 78 contracts in which the down payment was paid, 59 cases with advance payments of less than $ 1 million accounted for 75.6% of the total, and even more than $ 1 million exist. . More than $ 10 million is an example of a contract between Samsung Group in Korea and Nissan Motor in Japan ($ 19 million in advance) and a contract ($ 80 million) between Ssangyong Motor in Korea and Mercedes-Benz in Germany.

On the other hand, the technical fee rate may be set at a fixed rate during the contract period or may be linked with a range. Therefore, the present embodiment will be described separately in two cases, the lower limit and the upper limit.

The case where the above-mentioned technical rates have a lower limit is summarized as shown in Table 5 below, and the above case where the above mentioned technical rates have an upper limit as shown in Table 6 below.

TABLE 5

Technical field 5% less than 5 to 10% over 10 Sum Clamp and others 18 (62.1%) 11 (37.9%) - 29 car 83 (79.8%) 19 (18.3%) 2 (1.9%) 104 chemistry 66 (77.6%) 16 (18.8%) 3 (3.5%) 85 Electric 28 (82.4%) 4 (11.8%) 2 (5.9%) 34 Sum 195 (77.4%) 50 (19.8%) 7 (2.8%) 252

TABLE 6

Technical field 5% less than 5 to 10% over 10 Sum Clamp and others 16 (55.2%) 11 (37.9%) 2 (6.9%) 29 car 72 (69.2%) 30 (28.8%) 2 (1.9%) 104 chemistry 60 (70.6%) 22 (25.9%) 3 (3.5%) 85 Electric 28 (82.4%) 4 (11.8%) 2 (5.9%) 34 Sum 176 (69.8%) 67 (26.6%) 9 (3.6%) 252

As shown in Table 5 above, in the case of the technical fee rate of the lower limit region, 5% or less occupies 77.4% of the total, and 10% or more may be characterized as about 2.8% of the total. In the field of electrical and electronics, it can be seen that more than 10% of technical fees are set in comparison with the automobile or chemical fields.

On the other hand, as shown in Table 6, compared to the case of the lower limit, the ratio of the lower rate of 5% or less in the case of the upper limit is reduced, it can be seen that the proportion of the rate of more than 5% increased.

Table 7 below shows the list of companies selected as the greenfield type cooperation type according to the partner priority decision of each part material. Particularly, Table 7 shows only the seventh material A7 and the nineth material A9 of the 37 component materials shown in FIG. 8 for convenience of description.

TABLE 7

No. Part Material Name country Partner Name 7 A7 Japan AISIN AW United States of America BROG WARNER Japan Jaco 9 A9 Japan Liquid crystal preparation Japan Chico United States of America MERCK ... ... ... ...

Referring to Table 7 above, Part No. 7 (A7), which is selected as the Greenfield type of cooperation, is Japan's Ashin Aidyu Co., Ltd. as the first place for technical cooperation partners, and Brog Warner, USA as the second place, and 3 As a ranking, you can see that Japan's Jakosa was selected.

In addition, the No. 9 material (A9), which was selected as the greenfield type of cooperation, is Japan's Liquid Crystal Preparation Company as the first place for technical cooperation partners, Chicosa of Iribon as the second place, and Merck of the United States as the third place. You can see that each company was selected.

Table 8 below shows the list of companies selected as R & D center-type cooperation types according to the partner priority decision of each component material. In particular, in Table 8, for convenience of description, only the 10th material A10 and the 14th material A14 of the 37 parts materials shown in FIG. 8 are shown.

No. Part Material Name country Partner Name 10 A10 Japan Bando Kiko Japan Central Glass 14 A14 Japan MISSUI CHEMICALS Japan CENTRAL GLASS Japan PIONICS United States of America Air products and chemicals ... ... ... ...

Referring to Table 8 above, Part No. 10 (A10) selected as the R & D center type cooperation type was selected as Kiko of Peninsula in Japan as the first rank of technical cooperation partner and Central Glass in Japan as the second rank. You can check it.

Part 14 (A14), which was selected as the R & D center type cooperation type, was Japan's Missi Chemical as the number one technology partner, Japan's Central Glass as the second position, Japan's Pioneer as the third position, and As the fourth ranking, we can see that each of US Air Products & Chemicals has been selected.

Table 9 below shows the list of companies selected as the joint R & D type of cooperation according to the above-mentioned partner priority decision by component material. In particular, in Table 9, for convenience of description, only the second component material A2 and the third component material A3 of the 37 component materials illustrated in FIG. 8 are shown.

No. Part Material Name country Partner Name 2 A2 Japan Keihin seiki Japan NIPPON SOKEN United States of America Allied Signal France ASCO Joucomatic 3 A3 Japan OMRON Japan Matsushita Electric United States of America Dresser Industries United States of America Scan Instruments ... ... ... ...

Referring to Table 9 above, Part No. 2 (A2) selected as a joint R & D type of cooperation is Japan's Cain Seki as the first rank of technical cooperation partners, Nippon Soken of Japan as the second rank, and United States as the third rank. The allied signal of, and France's ESCO Zukomatic were selected as the 4th rank.

In addition, Part 3 (A3), selected as a joint R & D type, is Japan's Omron as the number one technology partner, Japan's Matsushita Electric as the second position, American dresser industry as the third position, and As the fourth ranking, we can see that each of the US Scan Instruments has been selected.

Table 10 below shows the list of companies selected as the technology transfer type cooperation type according to the partner priority decision of each part material. In particular, in Table 10, for convenience of description, only the seventh material A7 and the nineth material A9 of the 37 component materials shown in FIG. 8 are shown.

No. Part Material Name country Partner Name 7 A7 Japan Mitsubishi Heavy Japan TAIHO KOGYO United States of America Seagate Technology Japan Minebea 9 A9 Japan DAICEL CHEM IND Japan Takata (TAKATA) United States of America Morton International United States of America Oie (OEA) ... ... ... ...

Referring to Table 10 above, Part No. 7 (A7), which was selected as a technology transfer type, was ranked by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries in Japan as the number one technology partner, by Taiho Kogyo in Japan as the second position, and the United States as the third rank in the United States. Seagate Technology of Japan, and Minneabia of Japan were selected as the fourth place.

In addition, the No. 9 material (A9), selected as the technology transfer type of cooperation, is Japan's Daicel Chemistry as the No. 1 technology partner, Takata in Japan as the No. 2, and Modern International in the USA as the No. 3 As the fourth ranking, it can be confirmed that each of the US Oie was selected.

FIG. 26 is a flow chart illustrating the technical cooperation partner type determination step of FIG. 19 in more detail. 27A to 27D are diagrams illustrating examples in which businesses are positioned on respective coordinates shown in FIG. 26.

Referring to FIG. 26 to FIG. 27D, it is checked whether a company mapped to the first region (shown in FIG. 30A), which has a relatively high number of applications, a relatively small import size, and a large number of technical transaction cases. (Step S510).

If it is checked in the step S510 that there is a company mapped to the first area, the corresponding company (s) mapped to the first area is determined as the first rank technical cooperation partner (step S515).

When it is checked in the step S510 that there is no company mapped to the first area, or after step S515, a relatively large number of applications, a relatively large amount of imports, and a large number of technical transaction cases exist. It is checked whether there is a business mapped to the second region (shown in FIG. 30B) (step S520).

If it is checked in step S520 that there is a company mapped to the second area, the corresponding company (s) mapped to the second area is determined as the second rank technical cooperation partner (step S525).

When it is checked in the step S520 that there is no company mapped to the second area or after step S525, the number of applications is relatively large, the amount of import is small, and the number of technical transaction cases is relatively small. It is checked whether there is a business mapped to the third area (shown in FIG. 30C) (step S530).

If it is checked in the step S530 that there is a company mapped to the third area, the corresponding company (s) mapped to the third area is determined as the third rank technical cooperation partner (step S535).

If it is checked in the step S530 that there is no company mapped to the third area or after step S535, a relatively large number of applications, a relatively large import scale, and a relatively small technical transaction case It is checked whether there is a business mapped to the four areas (shown in FIG. 30D) (step S540).

If it is checked in step S540 that there is a company mapped to the fourth area, the corresponding company (s) mapped to the fourth area is determined as the fourth rank technical cooperation partner (step S545).

As described above, multi-entry firms are selected through investigation of patent information corresponding to parts materials, companies by import scale, companies are examined by technology transaction cases, and then by application count, import scale, and technology. By positioning vendors on a case by case basis, technology co-operation partners can be prioritized on position coordinates.

In particular, multi-applicants, firms with relatively small income scales, and firms with relatively many trade cases were selected as the first-tier technical cooperation partners, multi-applicants, firms with relatively large income scales and relatively many transactions. The company with the case is selected as the second-tier technical cooperation partner.

Therefore, companies that want technology co-operation partners are provided with the priority of technology co-operation partners, so that they can be guided in a way that is more advantageous to them when acquiring technology. For example, a company with a relatively large number of applications has a relatively strong technology holding strength, so that it is possible to obtain higher technology by establishing a technical cooperation partner with the company. In addition, companies with relatively small imports do not have production bases or distributors in Korea, so they can lead the relationship establishment more actively as a technical cooperation partner. In addition, companies with relatively many cases of technology trading have a strong desire for technology transfer for the technology, and thus can lead to establishing a relationship as a technology cooperation partner.

Although described above with reference to the embodiments, those skilled in the art can be variously modified and changed within the scope of the invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention described in the claims below. I can understand.

Claims (19)

delete delete delete delete delete delete delete delete delete delete delete The number of patent applications from each of the patent information, import scale information, and technology transaction case information corresponding to the parts materials was requested as the decision of the technical cooperation partner priority corresponding to the parts materials was requested from an external technical cooperation partner selection request unit. A company-specific data extraction unit for extracting data, income scale data, and technology transaction case data by company; A positioning unit for positioning the patent application data, import scale data, and technology transaction case data on a coordinate; A ranking cooperation partner extracting unit for extracting ranking technical cooperation partner types based on the positioned data; And And a cooperation partner priority notification unit for notifying the technical cooperation partner selection request unit of the technical cooperation partner type according to the ranking. The method of claim 12, wherein the ranking partner cooperation extracting unit, A technical cooperation partner prioritization system, characterized in that a multi-entry company, a company with a relatively small income scale, and a company with a relatively large number of transactions are determined as the first-tier technology cooperation partner. The method of claim 12, wherein the ranking partner cooperation extracting unit, A technical cooperation partner prioritization system characterized by determining a multi-affiliate company, a company with a relatively large amount of income, and a company with a relatively large number of transactions as a second-tier technology cooperation partner. The method of claim 12, wherein the ranking partner cooperation extracting unit, A technical cooperation partner prioritization system, characterized in that a company with a large number of applications, a relatively small amount of income, and a relatively small number of technical transaction cases are determined as a third-tier technical cooperation partner. The method of claim 12, wherein the ranking partner cooperation extracting unit, A technical cooperation partner prioritization system, characterized in that a company with a small number of applications, a relatively large amount of income, and a relatively small number of technical transaction cases are determined as a fourth-tier technical cooperation partner. The system of claim 12, further comprising a data storage unit for each company that stores the extracted patent application data, income scale data, and technology transaction case data. 13. The system of claim 12, further comprising a rank cooperation partner storage unit for storing the extracted rank technical cooperation partner types. The method of claim 12, wherein the company-specific data extraction unit A company-specific application number extraction module for extracting patent application number data for each company from patent information corresponding to the component materials; An import scale extraction module for each company for extracting import scale data for each company from the import scale information corresponding to the parts materials; And And a technology transaction case extraction module for each company extracting technology transaction case data for each company from each of the technology transaction case information corresponding to the parts and materials.

Images