KR100491687B1 - A recipe for simultaneously remove hazardous gases and producing method of the same - Google Patents

Abstract

Hazardous gas remover which mixes different compounds with aging solution of active ingredient extract obtained from licorice, barley and acorn to buffer or remove the toxicity of chemicals and remove harmful gas with other compounds. A manufacturing method is disclosed. The noxious gas removal agent prepared by the noxious gas production method is a mature solution of the active ingredient extract obtained from licorice, barley and acorn, distilled water, water heated with zeolite, and treated with charcoal, glacial acetic acid, chromium nitrate, copper sulfate, It is characterized by being manufactured by mixing copper nitrate, hydrogen peroxide and sodium bicarbonate, it is possible to remove harmful gases and odors at a low price and excellent performance

Description

Hazardous gas remover and its manufacturing method {A RECIPE FOR SIMULTANEOUSLY REMOVE HAZARDOUS GASES AND PRODUCING METHOD OF THE SAME}

The present invention relates to a noxious gas removal agent and a method for manufacturing the same, and more particularly, by mixing other compounds in the aging solution of the active ingredient extract obtained from each licorice, barley and acorn to buffer the toxicity of the chemical to the aging extract of the vegetable or The present invention relates to a noxious gas scavenger and a method for preparing the same, which can remove noxious gases.

As the living environment of human beings improves, we are pursuing a better living environment and a work environment. In order to realize this, we are putting a lot of technology and capital into the environment improvement business. In other words, various types of harmful gases were generated from the expansion of the economic scale, which in turn caused serious environmental pollution problems with the limitation of treatment capacity. Interest in hydrogen sulfide, mercaptans, amines, and other odorous substances has been amplified, and these odorous substances have been identified by R. Monbleff and Amoore's research. Has characteristics.

First, it has high volatility, high vapor pressure, and is easily soluble in organic solvents. Second, in general, the odor of nonmetallic compounds is more severe than metals. Third, nitrogen or sulfur compounds are included. Fourth, compounds with similar chemical structures cannot be completely the same odor, and substances of the same series have a higher molecular weight, resulting in stronger odors.

In general, the odor sensation is generated from various kinds of odorous substances in a small amount, so that a characteristic smell is perceived together with discomfort or aversion as a comprehensive perception of olfactory stimulation. These odors can greatly affect the respiratory, circulatory, digestive, mental and endocrine systems.

As such, since harmful gases in the atmosphere are extremely harmful to humans, various techniques for removing such harmful gases are known in the art, and examples thereof include biodeodorization, adsorption, catalytic oxidation, condensation, and concealment. The treatment methods such as law have been proposed, and most of them have been criticized for being inefficient in terms of performance degradation and operation cost.

And most of the odor remover shows a temporary performance because it uses a temporary concealment agent rather than a complete decomposition of the target gas, there is a possibility that can cause a secondary pollution odor.

Therefore, there has been a continuous need for a noxious gas remover that is superior in performance and safety than the existing noxious gas remover.

Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to solve the above problems, by mixing other compounds for the removal of organic gas in vegetable extract aging liquid to remove harmful gases and odors at low cost and excellent performance To provide a harmful gas removing agent and a method of manufacturing the same.

Another object of the present invention is to provide a noxious gas removal agent and a method for manufacturing the same, which can effectively remove noxious gases or severe odors that may occur in industry, home, hospital, or livestock.

In order to achieve the above object, the noxious gas removal agent according to the present invention is a mature solution of the active ingredient extract obtained from licorice, barley and acorn, distilled water, water heated with zeolite, treated with charcoal, glacial acetic acid, nitric acid It is characterized in that it is prepared by mixing chromium, copper sulfate, copper nitrate, hydrogen and sodium bicarbonate.

At this time, the component ratio of the toxic gas remover is 7.8 ~ 37% by weight of distilled water, 26-30% by weight of water heated with zeolite, 9-15% by weight of the aging liquid of the active ingredient extract obtained from acorns, the active ingredient extract of licorice 9-15% by weight of aging solution, 5-8% by weight of hydrogen peroxide, 5-10% by weight of the active ingredient extract obtained from barley, 4.942-6% by weight of copper sulfate, 3-5% by weight of copper nitrate, purified by treatment with charcoal It is preferable that they are 1-3 weight% of glacial acetic acid, 0.05-0.1 weight% of sodium bicarbonate, and 0.008-0.1 weight% of chromium nitrate.

In addition, the method for producing a noxious gas remover comprises the steps of extracting and ripening the active ingredient from licorice; Extracting and aging an active ingredient from barley; Extracting and aging an active ingredient from acorns; Heating the water with zeolite to prepare water of an anionic component; Treating glacial acetic acid with charcoal to prepare purified glacial acetic acid; And a step of mixing the purified glacial acetic acid, chromium nitrate, copper sulfate, copper nitrate, hydrogen peroxide and sodium bicarbonate by treating with the active ingredient extract of each of the aged licorice, barley and acorn, and heat treating with zeolite and treating with water and charcoal as an anion component. It includes.

Hereinafter, the harmful gas removing agent and the manufacturing method thereof according to the present invention will be described in detail.

The toxic gas remover according to the present invention is to remove toxic gases and odors generated in industries, homes, hospitals, or livestock, and is a vegetable extract aging liquid, water and glacial acetic acid, which are separately treated according to the purpose, and many other compounds. It is manufactured by mixing.

Looking at the process for producing such a toxic gas remover, the method for producing a toxic gas remover according to the present invention after extracting the active ingredient of the vegetable from each of licorice, barley and acorn, and then the extracts are aged in the ambient temperature air. Then, zeolite is put in water and heated to prepare water containing an anion component, and purified glacial acetic acid prepared by putting char in glacial acetic acid. Mixing the heat-treated water with distilled water and zeolite to the aging solution of the vegetable extract, and at the same time a process of mixing chromium nitrate, copper sulfate, copper nitrate, purified glacial acetic acid, hydrogen peroxide and sodium bicarbonate.

When explaining the harmful gas removing agent according to the present invention in more detail as follows.

(1) Extraction of Active Ingredients from Licorice

Licorice and water are put in a pressure extractor at a ratio of 1:20 to 30 by weight, and heated at a temperature of 150 to 250 ° C. for 90 to 180 minutes to maintain a pressure of about 2 atm. The extracted solution is left to cool at room temperature. When the ratio is increased or decreased in the above conditions, or the temperature, pressure, and time are out of the suggested temperature, the effective extractive component is changed and the performance of the noxious gas scavenger is deteriorated.

(2) Extracting Active Ingredients from Barley

Barley is used for the outer barley, the outer barley is heated to about 250 ℃ for 15 minutes to pre-treat the first, barley and water in a ratio of 1: 20 to 30 by weight ratio into a pressure extractor, at a temperature of 150 to 250 ℃ Maintain a pressure of about 2 atm while heating for 60 to 100 minutes. The extracted solution is left to cool at room temperature. When the ratio is increased or decreased in the above conditions, or the temperature, pressure, and time are out of the suggested temperature, the effective extractive component is changed and the performance of the noxious gas scavenger is deteriorated.

(3) extracting active ingredients from acorns

Acorns are crushed into acorn powder, acorn tree and acorn leaves in a powder state and then immersed in methyl alcohol and left at room temperature for 10 days or more to proceed with the extraction and ripening of the active ingredient at the same time. Solids are separated from the resultant to prepare a maturing solution which is a methyl alcohol solution containing the active ingredient of acorns. The active ingredient extract was found to have a difference in the harmful gas removal performance according to the ripening period, the optimum ripening period was more than 10 days showed the best performance for removing harmful gases.

(4) Ripening step of active ingredient extracts

Licorice active ingredient extract and barley active ingredient extract extracted as described above (1) and (2) were aged at room temperature (25 to 30 degrees) for 10 days or more. The active ingredient extract was found to have a difference in the harmful gas removal performance according to the ripening period, the optimum ripening period was more than 10 days showed the best performance for removing harmful gases.

(5) preparing an anionic component of water which is heat treated with zeolite The zeolite is placed in a pressure vessel at a weight ratio of 1: 10 to water and heated at a temperature of 150 to 250 ° C. for 60 to 120 minutes, Maintain a pressure of about 2 atm. The water treated by the above method is allowed to stand at room temperature until it cools completely. The reason for heating the zeolite in the water is to increase the anion component in the water to obtain the water of the anion component to be used in the toxic gas remover.

(6) preparing purified glacial acetic acid by treatment with charcoal;

Charcoal is impregnated with glacial acetic acid in a ratio of 1: 10 by weight ratio and stored for 10 days. This uses commercially available commercial glacial acetic acid because it is uneconomical to use high-purity reagent grade glacial acetic acid, which needs to remove impurities contained in industrial glacial acetic acid. Therefore, impurities can be removed and purified by impregnating charcoal in glacial acetic acid.

(7) mixing step

The distilled water and zeolite heated water are mixed with the aging solution of the vegetable active ingredient extract, and simultaneously purified glacial acetic acid, hydrogen peroxide and sodium bicarbonate are treated with chromium nitrate, copper sulfate, copper nitrate, and charcoal.

Hazardous gas removal agent can be prepared by such a manufacturing method, and most preferably, it has a compounding ratio as follows.

That is, 7.8-37% by weight of distilled water, 26-30% by weight of water heated with zeolite, 9-15% by weight of the active ingredient extract obtained from acorns, 9-15% by weight of the active ingredient extract obtained from licorice. , 5-8% by weight of hydrogen peroxide, 5-10% by weight of the active ingredient extract obtained from barley, 4.942-6% by weight of copper sulfate, 3-5% by weight of copper nitrate, 1-3% by weight of glacial acetic acid purified by treatment with charcoal It is most preferable to prepare a noxious gas scavenger by blending at a ratio of 0.05 to 0.1 wt% sodium bicarbonate and 0.008 to 0.1 wt% chromium nitrate.

The following is a performance test for harmful gases and odors of acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, hydrogen sulfide, methyl mercaptan, methyl sulfide, methyl sulfide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, ammonia and trimethylamine using the toxic gas remover prepared in the above formulation ratio. And the results are shown in the following tables.

The experimental apparatus for the performance test of the harmful gas removing agent of the present invention can be represented by a gas injection unit, a reaction unit and a measuring unit. Gas injection unit reduced the maximum experimental error by using a flow meter (flowmeter-Metheson: E1-3A101-V / E200) to inject a constant amount of gas. The reaction part was made of pyrex (glass having high heat resistance and chemical durability) which is not reactive with the reaction gas. The measuring unit was quantitatively performed by using a gas chromatograph (GC; HP5890) and a gas detector (Gastech.), Which is a simple measuring device that can read the concentration of the gas to be measured to a degree of discoloration as a principle of neutralization titration method. . In the case of the detector tube, the measurement concentration range is classified according to the model number.

<Performance test results of harmful gas remover>

(1) acetaldehyde

① Test equipment: Detector tube collector (GASTEC CO), gas chromatograph (HP 58900 / FID)

② Test Method

I. About 10 liters of high purity (99.9%) nitrogen gas is injected into a 10 liters Pyrex reactor.

II. The acetaldehyde solution (99%) is placed in the reactor to an initial concentration value (700-800 ppm) using a vaporizer.

III. Set the initial concentration using the detector tube collector and gas chromatograph.

Ⅳ. 20 ml of the noxious gas remover is injected into the reactor using a syringe, and then stirred to mix well with acetaldehyde gas.

Ⅴ. After a certain time, the residual acetaldehyde concentration is measured by using a detector tube collector and a gas chromatograph.

Acetaldehyde Removal Results Test Items Minutes Result value (ppm) % Removal Reference Acetaldehyde (CH ₃ CHO) Initial concentration 750 0 Detector NO. 92L 5 62.5 91.6 Detector NO. 92L 10 5 99.3 Detector NO. 91L Initial concentration 750 0 5 7.5 99 Gas Chromatograph 10 0 100

Table 1 shows the results of measuring the acetaldehyde concentration over time using a detector tube and a gas chromatograph to obtain reliable verification of the removal rate. In addition, the type of detector tube is different because the concentration range that can be measured for each detector tube is different.

The removal rate for this acetaldehyde is shown in FIG. 1.

(2) formaldehyde

① Test equipment: Detector tube collector (GASTEC CO), gas chromatograph (HP5890 / FID)

② Test Method

I. About 10 liters of high purity (99.9%) nitrogen gas is injected into the 10 liter pyrex reactor.

II. Formaldehyde solution (35-38%) is added to the reactor to the initial concentration value (400-500 ppm) using a vaporizer.

III. Set the initial concentration using the detector tube collector and gas chromatograph.

Ⅳ. 20 ml of the noxious gas scavenger is injected into the reactor using a syringe, followed by stirring to mix well with formaldehyde gas.

Ⅴ. After a certain time, formaldehyde gas residual concentration is measured using a detector tube collector and a gas chromatograph.

Formaldehyde Removal Test Result Test Items Minutes Result value (ppm) % Removal Reference Formaldehyde (HCHO) 0 450 0 Detection tube NO. 93L 5 One 99.8 Detector NO. 91L 10 0 100 Detector NO. 91L 0 450 0 5 20.7 95.4 Gas Chromatograph 10 12.2 97.3

Table 2 shows the results of measuring formaldehyde concentration over time using detector tubes and gas chromatographs for reliable verification of removal rates. In addition, the type of detector tube is different because the concentration range that can be measured for each detector tube is different.

The removal rate for this formaldehyde is shown in FIG. 2.

(3) hydrogen sulfide

① Test equipment: Detector tube collector (GASTEC CO), gas chromatograph (CP3800 / PEPD)

② Test Method

I. Inject 10ℓ of high purity (99.9%) nitrogen gas into 10ℓ pyrex reactor.

II. Hydrogen sulfide gas (99.99%) is used to place the reactor in an initial concentration value (1000 to 1300 ppm).

III. Set the initial concentration using the detector tube collector and gas chromatograph.

Ⅳ. 20 ml of the noxious gas remover is injected into the reactor using a syringe, and then stirred to mix well with hydrogen sulfide gas.

Ⅴ. After a certain time, the residual acetaldehyde concentration is measured using a detector tube collector and a gas chromatograph.

Hydrogen sulfide removal result Test Items Minutes Result value (ppm) % Removal Reference Hydrogen sulfide (H ₂ S) 0 1200 0 Detection tube NO. 4HM 5 2 99.8 Detection tube NO. 4LL 10 0 100 Detection tube NO. 4LL 0 1200 0 5 0 100 Gas Chromatograph 10 0 100

Table 3 shows the results of measuring the hydrogen sulfide concentration over time using a detector tube and gas chromatograph to obtain reliable verification of the removal rate. In addition, the type of detector tube is different because the concentration range that can be measured for each detector tube is different.

The removal rate for this hydrogen sulfide is shown in FIG. 3.

(4) methylmercaptan

① Test equipment: Detector tube collector (GASTEC CO), gas chromatograph (CP3000 / PFPD)

② Test Method

I. Inject 10ℓ of high purity (99.9%) nitrogen gas into 10ℓ pyrex reactor.

II. Methyl mercaptan (99.99%) is used to place the reactor in the initial concentration value (100-200 ppm).

III. Set the initial concentration using the detector tube collector and gas chromatograph.

Ⅳ. 20 ml of the noxious gas remover is injected into the reactor using a syringe, followed by stirring to mix well with methylmercaptan gas.

Ⅴ. After a certain time, the residual concentration of methyl mercaptan is measured using a detector tube extractor and a gas chromatograph.

Methyl mercaptan removal test result Test Items Minutes Result value (ppm) % Removal Reference Hydrogen sulfide (H ₂ S) 0 140 0 Detection tube NO. 71 5 60 57.1 Detection tube NO. 71 10 20 85.7 Detection tube NO. 71 20 4 97.1 Detection tube NO. 71 0 140 0 5 46.2 67 Gas Chromatograph 10 6.58 95.3 20 0 100

Table 4 shows the results of measuring the concentration of methylmercaptan over time using a detection tube and a gas chromatograph in order to obtain reliable verification of the removal rate.

The removal rate for this methylmercaptan is shown in FIG. 4.

(5) methyl sulfide

① Test Equipment: Gas Chromatograph (CP3800 / PFPD)

② Test Method

I. Inject 10 l of high purity (99.9%) nitrogen gas into a 10 l pyrex reactor.

II. Methyl sulfide solution (99.9%) is used to place the reactor in the initial concentration value (100-200 ppm).

III. Initial concentration is set using gas chromatograph.

Ⅳ. 20 ml of the noxious gas remover is injected into the reactor using a syringe, and then stirred to mix well with methyl sulfide gas.

Ⅴ. After a certain time, the residual concentration of methyl sulfide gas is measured using a gas chromatograph.

Results of Methyl Sulfide Removal Test Test Items Minutes Result value (ppm) % Removal Reference Methyl sulfide (CH ₃ ) ₂ S 0 200 0 20 149 25.3 40 105 47.2 Gas Chromatograph 60 41.2 79.4 120 16.2 91.9 150 2 99

Table 5 shows the results of measuring methyl sulfide concentration over time using gas chromatograph to obtain reliable verification of the removal rate.

The removal rate for such methyl sulfide is shown in FIG. 5.

(6) methyl disulfide

① Test Equipment: Gas Chromatograph (CP3800 / PFPD)

② Test Method

I. Inject 10ℓ of high purity (99.9%) nitrogen gas into 10ℓ pyrex reactor.

II. Methyl disulfide gas (99.9%) is used to place the reactor at an initial concentration value (100-200 ppm).

III. Initial concentration is set using gas chromatograph.

Ⅳ. 20 ml of the noxious gas remover is injected into the reactor using a syringe, and then stirred to mix well with methyl disulfide gas.

Ⅴ. After a certain time, the residual concentration of methyl disulfide gas is measured using a gas chromatograph.

Results of Methyl Disulfide Removal Test Test Items Minutes Result value (ppm) % Removal Reference Methyl disulfide (CH ₃ ) ₂ S ₂ 0 200 0 Gas Chromatograph 10 126.6 37.7 20 107.2 46.4 40 75.4 62.3 60 30.2 84.9 120 15 92.5 150 0.8 99.6

Table 6 shows the results of measuring the methyl disulfide concentration over time using gas chromatography to obtain reliable verification of the removal rate.

The removal rate for such methyl disulfide is shown in FIG. 6.

(7) nitrogen dioxide

① Test equipment: Detector tube collector (GASTEC CO)

② Test Method

I. Inject 10ℓ of high purity (99.9%) nitrogen gas into 10ℓ pyrex reactor.

II. Nitrogen dioxide gas (99.9%) was used to place the reactor in the initial concentration value (100-200 ppm).

III. Set the initial concentration using a detector tube collector.

Ⅳ. 20 ml of the noxious gas remover is injected into the reactor using a syringe, and then stirred to mix well with nitrogen dioxide gas.

Ⅴ. After a certain time, the residual concentration of nitrogen dioxide gas is measured using a detector tube extractor.

Nitrogen dioxide removal result Test Items Minutes Result value (ppm) % Removal Reference Nitrogen Dioxide (NO ₂ ) 0 60 0 Detector No. 10 5 5 91.7 Detector No. 10 10 One 98.3 Detection tube NO.9L

Table 7 shows the results of measuring nitrogen dioxide over time using detector tubes for reliable verification of removal rates. In addition, the type of detector tube is different because the concentration range that can be measured for each detector tube is different.

This removal rate for nitrogen dioxide is shown in FIG. 7.

(8) sulfur dioxide

① Test equipment: Detector tube collector (GASTEC CO), gas chromatograph (cp3800 / PFPD)

② Test Method

I. Inject 10ℓ of high purity (99.9%) nitrogen gas into 10ℓ pyrex reactor.

II. Sulfur dioxide gas (99.99%) is used to place the reactor at an initial concentration value (500-700 ppm).

III. Initial concentration is set using gas chromatograph.

Ⅳ. 20 ml of the noxious gas remover is injected into the reactor using a syringe, and then stirred to mix well with sulfur dioxide gas.

Ⅴ. After a certain time, the residual concentration of sulfur dioxide gas is measured using a gas chromatograph.

Sulfur dioxide removal test results Test Items Minutes Result value (ppm) % Removal Reference Sulfur dioxide (SO ₂ ) 0 600 0 Detection tube NO. 5M 5 38 93.7 Detection tube NO. 5L 10 10 98.3 Detection tube NO. 5La 0 600 0 5 24 99.6 Gas Chromatograph 10 6 99.9

Table 8 shows the results of measuring sulfur dioxide over time using detector tubes and gas chromatographs for reliable verification of removal rates. In addition, the type of detector tube is different because the concentration range that can be measured for each detector tube is different.

The removal rate for this sulfur dioxide is shown in FIG. 8.

(9) ammonia

① Test equipment: Detector tube collector (GASTEC CO)

② Test Method

I. Inject 10ℓ of high purity (99.9%) nitrogen gas into 10ℓ pyrex reactor.

II. Ammonia water (35%) is added to the reactor to an initial concentration value (400 to 500 ppm) using a vaporizer.

III. Set the initial concentration using a detector tube collector.

Ⅳ. 20 ml of the noxious gas remover is injected into the reactor using a syringe, and then stirred to mix well with ammonia gas.

Ⅴ. After a certain time, the residual concentration of ammonia gas is measured using a gas chromatograph.

Ammonia Removal Test Result Test Items Minutes Result value (ppm) % Removal Reference Ammonia (NH ₃ ) 0 460 0 Detection pipe NO.3M 5 One 91.7 Detection tube NO.3L

Table 9 shows the results of the measurement of ammonia concentration over time using a detection tube. In addition, the type of detector tube is different because the concentration range that can be measured for each detector tube is different.

This removal rate for ammonia is shown in FIG. 9.

(10) trimethylamine

① Test equipment: Detector tube collector (GASTEC CO), gas chromatograph (HP5890 / NPD)

② Test Method

I. Inject 10ℓ of high purity (99.9%) nitrogen gas into 10ℓ pyrex reactor.

II. Trimethylamine solution (35-38%) is placed in the reactor to an initial concentration value (500-700 ppm) using a vaporizer.

III. Set the initial concentration using the detector tube collector and gas chromatograph.

Ⅳ. 20 ml of the noxious gas remover is injected into the reactor using a syringe, and then stirred to mix well with trimethylamine gas.

Ⅴ. After a certain time, the residual concentration of trimethylamine gas is measured using a detector tube extractor and a gas chromatograph.

Trimethylamine Removal Result Test Items Minutes Result value (ppm) % Removal Reference Trimethylamine (CH ₃ ) ₃ N 0 550 0 Detection pipe NO.3M 10 One 99.8 Detection pipe NO.180 0 550 0 Gas Chromatograph 10 0 100

Table 10 shows the results of measuring trimethylamine concentration using a detector tube and a gas chromatograph to obtain reliable verification of the removal rate. In addition, the type of detector tube is different because the concentration range that can be measured for each detector tube is different.

The removal rate for this trimethylamine is shown in FIG. 10.

As mentioned above, according to the harmful gas removing agent and the method for producing the same according to the present invention, by mixing other compounds for the removal of organic gas in the aging liquid of the vegetable extract can greatly alleviate the toxicity of the chemical itself, as a whole It is possible to obtain a harmful gas remover having a low price and excellent performance and to remove various harmful gases and odors through the harmful gas remover.

Another object of the present invention is to effectively remove the harmful gas or severe odor that may occur in industry, home, hospital, or livestock.

On the other hand, while the above has been described with reference to the preferred embodiments of the present invention, those skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention described in the claims below It will be understood that modifications and changes can be made.

1 is a graph showing the removal rate of acetaldehyde removed by the toxic gas remover according to the present invention.

Figure 2 is a graph showing the removal rate of formaldehyde removed by the toxic gas remover according to the present invention.

Figure 3 is a graph showing the removal rate of hydrogen sulfide removed by the toxic gas remover according to the present invention.

Figure 4 is a graph showing the removal rate of methyl mercaptan removed by the toxic gas remover according to the present invention.

5 is a graph showing the removal rate of methyl sulfide removed by the toxic gas remover according to the present invention.

6 is a graph showing the removal rate of methyl disulfide removed by the noxious gas removing agent according to the present invention.

7 is a graph showing the removal rate of nitrogen dioxide removed by the toxic gas remover according to the present invention.

8 is a graph showing the removal rate of sulfur dioxide removed by the noxious gas removing agent according to the present invention.

9 is a graph showing the removal rate of ammonia removed by the toxic gas remover according to the present invention.

10 is a graph showing the removal rate of trimethylamine removed by the noxious gas removing agent according to the present invention.

Claims (8)

(delete). 7.8 to 37% by weight of distilled water, 26 to 30% by weight of water heated with zeolite, 9 to 15% by weight of active ingredient extract from acorn, 9 to 15% by weight of active ingredient extract from licorice, hydrogen peroxide 5-8% by weight, 5-10% by weight of the active ingredient extract obtained from barley, 4.942-6% by weight of copper sulfate, 3-5% by weight of copper nitrate, 1-3% by weight of glacial acetic acid purified by charcoal, bicarbonate A noxious gas scavenger, characterized in that it is prepared by mixing the respective component ratios corresponding to 0.05 to 0.1% by weight of sodium and 0.008 to 0.1% by weight of chromium nitrate. Extracting and aging an active ingredient from licorice; Extracting and aging an active ingredient from barley; Extracting and aging an active ingredient from acorns; Putting zeolite in water and heating to prepare water of anionic component; Preparing purified glacial acetic acid by putting charcoal in glacial acetic acid; And A step of mixing the purified glacial acetic acid, chromium nitrate, copper sulfate, copper nitrate, hydrogen peroxide and sodium bicarbonate by treating with the active ingredient extract of each of the aged licorice, barley and acorn, heat treated with distilled water and zeolite, and treated with charcoal Method for producing a harmful gas remover, characterized in that. According to claim 3, Extracting and ripening the active ingredient from the licorice, Licorice and water are put in a pressure extractor at a ratio of 1:20 to 30 by weight, and heated at a temperature of 150 to 250 ° C. for 90 to 180 minutes, maintaining a pressure of 2 atm, and the extracted liquid is cooled completely at room temperature. Method of producing a noxious gas removal agent comprising the step of aging for 10 days or more at room temperature, atmospheric pressure and the extraction step to leave until the extraction step. According to claim 3, The step of extracting and aging the active ingredient from the barley, The barley is first heated by heating it at about 250 ° C. for 15 minutes, and the barley and water are put in a pressure extractor at a ratio of 1:20 to 30 by weight, and heated at a temperature of 150 to 250 ° C. for 60 to 100 minutes. Maintaining a pressure of 2 atm, the extracted liquid is an extraction step of leaving the coolant at room temperature until fully cooled, and a method for producing a harmful gas remover comprising the step of aging the resulting extract at room temperature, atmospheric pressure for 10 days or more. The method of claim 3, wherein the extracting and aging of the active ingredient from the acorns, A method of producing a noxious gas remover comprising the step of extracting and ripening at the same time by crushing the acorns, acorns and acorn leaves in a powder state and then immersed in methyl alcohol for 10 days or more. The method of claim 3, wherein the zeolite is added to the water and heated to prepare an anionic component of water. Zeolite and water in a ratio of 1 to 10 by weight ratio in a pressure vessel, while heating for 60 to 120 minutes at a temperature of 150 ~ 250 ℃, maintaining a pressure of 2 atm, and left to cool at room temperature until Method for producing a noxious gas remover comprising the. According to claim 3, wherein the step of preparing a purified glacial acetic acid treated with glacial acetic acid, Method of producing a noxious gas remover comprising the step of impregnating the charcoal in glacial acetic acid in a weight ratio of 1: 10 and storing for 10 days.