JPWO2012121390A1 - Materials for nuclear equipment, heat transfer tubes for steam generators, steam generators and nuclear power plants - Google Patents

Materials for nuclear equipment, heat transfer tubes for steam generators, steam generators and nuclear power plants Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JPWO2012121390A1
JPWO2012121390A1 JP2013503632A JP2013503632A JPWO2012121390A1 JP WO2012121390 A1 JPWO2012121390 A1 JP WO2012121390A1 JP 2013503632 A JP2013503632 A JP 2013503632A JP 2013503632 A JP2013503632 A JP 2013503632A JP WO2012121390 A1 JPWO2012121390 A1 JP WO2012121390A1
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
test
heat transfer
content
steam generator
less
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2013503632A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP5675958B2 (en
Inventor
貴治 前口
貴治 前口
孝文 廣
孝文 廣
重満 大塚
重満 大塚
横山 裕
裕 横山
英仁 三牧
英仁 三牧
俊介 清水
俊介 清水
庄司 木ノ村
庄司 木ノ村
岡田 浩一
浩一 岡田
神崎 学
学 神崎
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hokkaido Electric Power Co Inc
Kansai Electric Power Co Inc
Kyushu Electric Power Co Inc
Japan Atomic Power Co Ltd
Shikoku Electric Power Co Inc
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Hokkaido Electric Power Co Inc
Kansai Electric Power Co Inc
Kyushu Electric Power Co Inc
Japan Atomic Power Co Ltd
Shikoku Electric Power Co Inc
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd
Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hokkaido Electric Power Co Inc, Kansai Electric Power Co Inc, Kyushu Electric Power Co Inc, Japan Atomic Power Co Ltd, Shikoku Electric Power Co Inc, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd, Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corp filed Critical Hokkaido Electric Power Co Inc
Priority to JP2013503632A priority Critical patent/JP5675958B2/en
Publication of JPWO2012121390A1 publication Critical patent/JPWO2012121390A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5675958B2 publication Critical patent/JP5675958B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C30/00Alloys containing less than 50% by weight of each constituent
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C19/00Alloys based on nickel or cobalt
    • C22C19/03Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel
    • C22C19/05Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C19/00Alloys based on nickel or cobalt
    • C22C19/03Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel
    • C22C19/05Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium
    • C22C19/051Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium and Mo or W
    • C22C19/053Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium and Mo or W with the maximum Cr content being at least 30% but less than 40%
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C19/00Alloys based on nickel or cobalt
    • C22C19/03Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel
    • C22C19/05Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium
    • C22C19/051Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium and Mo or W
    • C22C19/055Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium and Mo or W with the maximum Cr content being at least 20% but less than 30%
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C19/00Alloys based on nickel or cobalt
    • C22C19/03Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel
    • C22C19/05Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium
    • C22C19/058Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium without Mo and W
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/001Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing N
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/02Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing silicon
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/04Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing manganese
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/06Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing aluminium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/42Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with copper
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/44Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with molybdenum or tungsten
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/48Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with niobium or tantalum
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/50Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with titanium or zirconium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/52Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with cobalt
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22FCHANGING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF NON-FERROUS METALS AND NON-FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C22F1/00Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22FCHANGING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF NON-FERROUS METALS AND NON-FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C22F1/00Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working
    • C22F1/10Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working of nickel or cobalt or alloys based thereon
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F22STEAM GENERATION
    • F22BMETHODS OF STEAM GENERATION; STEAM BOILERS
    • F22B1/00Methods of steam generation characterised by form of heating method
    • F22B1/02Methods of steam generation characterised by form of heating method by exploitation of the heat content of hot heat carriers
    • F22B1/023Methods of steam generation characterised by form of heating method by exploitation of the heat content of hot heat carriers with heating tubes, for nuclear reactors as far as they are not classified, according to a specified heating fluid, in another group
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F22STEAM GENERATION
    • F22BMETHODS OF STEAM GENERATION; STEAM BOILERS
    • F22B37/00Component parts or details of steam boilers
    • F22B37/02Component parts or details of steam boilers applicable to more than one kind or type of steam boiler
    • F22B37/10Water tubes; Accessories therefor
    • F22B37/107Protection of water tubes
    • GPHYSICS
    • G21NUCLEAR PHYSICS; NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
    • G21DNUCLEAR POWER PLANT
    • G21D1/00Details of nuclear power plant
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E30/00Energy generation of nuclear origin

Abstract

この原子力機器用材料は、質量%で、Cr:34〜38%、Ni:44〜56%、C:0.015〜0.025%、Si:0%超、0.5%以下、Mn:0.05〜0.5%、S:0.003%以下、P:0.015%以下、N:0.05%以下、Ti:0.5%以下、Al:0.05〜0.5%を含有し、残部がFe及び不可避的不純物からなる。この蒸気発生器用伝熱管は、前記原子力機器用材料を有する。この蒸気発生器は、前記蒸気発生器用伝熱管を具備する。この原子力プラントは、前記蒸気発生器を具備する。This material for nuclear equipment is in mass%, Cr: 34 to 38%, Ni: 44 to 56%, C: 0.015 to 0.025%, Si: more than 0%, 0.5% or less, Mn: 0.05 to 0.5%, S: 0.003% or less, P: 0.015% or less, N: 0.05% or less, Ti: 0.5% or less, Al: 0.05 to 0.5 %, With the balance being Fe and inevitable impurities. This heat generator tube for a steam generator has the nuclear equipment material. The steam generator includes the heat transfer tube for the steam generator. This nuclear power plant includes the steam generator.

Description

本発明は、原子力機器用材料、蒸気発生器用伝熱管、蒸気発生器及び原子力プラントに関するものであり、特に、加圧水型軽水炉(PWR)で使用される熱交換器の材料として好適な、伝熱特性、耐食性及び薄肉加工性に優れた原子力機器用材料と、この原子力機器用材料を用いた蒸気発生器用伝熱管、この蒸気発生器用伝熱管を用いた蒸気発生器、及び、この蒸気発生器を用いた原子力プラントに関するものである。
本願は、2011年3月10日に、日本に出願された特願2011−053445号に基づき優先権を主張し、その内容をここに援用する。
The present invention relates to a material for nuclear equipment, a heat transfer tube for a steam generator, a steam generator, and a nuclear power plant, and particularly suitable for a heat exchanger material used in a pressurized water reactor (PWR). , Materials for nuclear equipment excellent in corrosion resistance and thin wall workability, heat transfer tubes for steam generators using the materials for nuclear equipment, steam generators using the heat transfer tubes for steam generators, and use of this steam generator It was related to the nuclear plant that had been.
This application claims priority on March 10, 2011 based on Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-053445 for which it applied to Japan, and uses the content for it here.

一般に、原子力発電所において加圧水型軽水炉に用いられる蒸気発生器(SG)用の伝熱管は、最高温度が300℃以上になるような高温水環境で使用される。このような高温水環境下において用いられる伝熱管は、残留応力等の存在下で応力腐食割れ(SCC)が生じるおそれがあることから、蒸気発生器用伝熱管の材料には、耐腐食性に優れた材料を採用することが、安全性等の観点から必須となる。   Generally, a heat transfer tube for a steam generator (SG) used for a pressurized water reactor in a nuclear power plant is used in a high-temperature water environment where the maximum temperature is 300 ° C. or higher. Since heat transfer tubes used in such a high temperature water environment may cause stress corrosion cracking (SCC) in the presence of residual stress, etc., the heat transfer tube materials for steam generators have excellent corrosion resistance. It is essential from the viewpoint of safety and the like to adopt a new material.

従来、上述のような蒸気発生器用伝熱管の材料としては、旧来のNCF600(TT600合金)及びその代替材であり、一次系水中における応力腐食割れ(PWSCC)に対して優れた耐久性を備えた特殊熱処理GNCF690(TT690合金)が使用されている。このTT690合金は、実機(加圧水型軽水炉)においても、また、加速環境における数万時間にわたるPWSCC試験においても、これまでに割れの発生が確認されていないものである。このため、TT690合金を蒸気発生器用伝熱管の材料に適用することにより、PWSCCに起因して伝熱管が損傷するという問題は根絶されたものと考えられている。また、加圧水型軽水炉の蒸気発生器用伝熱管の二次系環境においても、現状では、TT690合金を使用した実機プラントにおける腐食損傷等の問題は顕在化していない。   Conventionally, as a material for the heat transfer tube for the steam generator as described above, it is a conventional NCF600 (TT600 alloy) and its substitute, and has excellent durability against stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC) in primary water. Special heat treatment GNCF690 (TT690 alloy) is used. This TT690 alloy has not been confirmed to be cracked so far, either in an actual machine (pressurized water reactor) or in a PWSCC test for tens of thousands of hours in an accelerated environment. For this reason, it is considered that the problem that the heat transfer tube is damaged due to PWSCC has been eradicated by applying TT690 alloy to the material of the heat transfer tube for the steam generator. Further, even in the secondary system environment of the heat transfer tube for the steam generator of the pressurized water reactor, at present, problems such as corrosion damage in an actual plant using the TT690 alloy have not become apparent.

しかしながら、蒸気発生器用伝熱管の二次系環境における水質環境は、蒸気発生器用伝熱管と、これを支持する管支持板との隙間のように、イオンの濃縮が生じやすい狭隘部において、pH=9以上のアルカリ環境となる可能性が完全には否定できない。本発明者等による実験的な調査では、濃縮の程度を著しく高めたアルカリ環境下においては、TT690合金にも粒界腐食割れ(IGA)感受性が認められることが明らかとなっている。この環境は、現在の加圧水型軽水炉の温度環境においてはTT690合金の健全性に影響を及ぼすものではないが、より高い冷却水温度条件下において設計寿命を80年程度に延ばすことが求められている次世代の軽水炉では、IGA感受性のより低い材料を使用することが必要となってくる。   However, the water quality environment in the secondary system environment of the steam generator heat transfer tube is such that the pH = in a narrow part where ion concentration is likely to occur, such as a gap between the steam generator heat transfer tube and the tube support plate supporting the steam generator heat transfer tube. The possibility of becoming an alkaline environment of 9 or more cannot be completely denied. Experimental investigations by the present inventors have revealed that TT690 alloy is also susceptible to intergranular corrosion cracking (IGA) in an alkaline environment where the degree of concentration is significantly increased. This environment does not affect the soundness of the TT690 alloy in the current temperature environment of pressurized water reactors, but it is required to extend the design life to about 80 years under higher cooling water temperature conditions. In the next generation of light water reactors, it will be necessary to use materials that are less sensitive to IGA.

蒸気発生器用伝熱管の粒界腐食を抑制する方法として、材料中の成分組成設計を適正化する方法が知られている。例えば、Ni基合金(Ni−Cr−Fe合金)においてCr量を高めた材料を採用することにより、軽水炉の一次系及び二次系における伝熱管の応力腐食割れ感受性と粒界腐食感受性を低下させることができ、耐腐食性が向上する。しかしながら、材料中のCr量が高すぎると熱伝導率及び塑性加工性が低下するため、所望の伝熱特性が得られず、また、機械的性質の低下や、細径薄肉の蒸気発生器伝熱管の製造自体が困難になるという問題がある。   As a method of suppressing intergranular corrosion of a heat transfer tube for a steam generator, a method of optimizing the component composition design in the material is known. For example, by adopting a material with an increased Cr content in a Ni-based alloy (Ni—Cr—Fe alloy), the stress corrosion cracking susceptibility and intergranular corrosion susceptibility of heat transfer tubes in the primary and secondary systems of light water reactors are reduced. Can improve the corrosion resistance. However, if the amount of Cr in the material is too high, the thermal conductivity and plastic workability are lowered, so that the desired heat transfer characteristics cannot be obtained, the mechanical properties are deteriorated, and the steam generator transmission with a small diameter and thin wall is not achieved. There is a problem that the manufacture of the heat tube itself becomes difficult.

加圧水型軽水炉において用いる蒸気発生器用伝熱管を製造する際の加工性を向上させるため、伝熱管材料として、Cr量の高いNi−Cr−Fe合金にCa、Mgを添加し、不純物中のB、O、N、Sの含有量を少量に制限することが提案されている(特許文献1を参照)。特許文献1によれば、このような成分の制限により、塑性加工性が向上するとされている。しかしながら、特許文献1に記載の成分組成を有する材料を伝熱管に用いた場合、加工性は向上するものの、Cr量が適正範囲でないため、Cr量が多くなり過ぎた場合に伝熱特性が低下するという問題や、Cr量が多くなりすぎた場合に機械的性質が低下するという問題がある。   In order to improve the workability when producing a heat transfer tube for a steam generator used in a pressurized water reactor, Ca and Mg are added to a Ni—Cr—Fe alloy having a high Cr content as a heat transfer tube material, and B in impurities, It has been proposed to limit the contents of O, N, and S to a small amount (see Patent Document 1). According to Patent Document 1, it is said that plastic workability is improved by the limitation of such components. However, when the material having the component composition described in Patent Document 1 is used for the heat transfer tube, the workability is improved, but the amount of Cr is not in an appropriate range, so that the heat transfer characteristics are deteriorated when the amount of Cr is excessive. And there is a problem that the mechanical properties are lowered when the Cr amount is too large.

特許第2834982号公報Japanese Patent No. 2834982

本発明は上記課題に鑑みてなされたものであり、特に、加圧水型軽水炉に用いられる蒸気発生器用伝熱管に好適な、耐食性及び加工性に優れた原子力機器用材料、蒸気発生器用伝熱管、蒸気発生器及び原子力プラントを提供することを目的とする。   The present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and is particularly suitable for a heat generator tube for a steam generator used in a pressurized water reactor, excellent in corrosion resistance and workability, a material for nuclear equipment, a heat generator tube for a steam generator, steam It aims to provide a generator and a nuclear power plant.

本発明者等は上記課題を解決するために鋭意検討を行った。即ち、原子力機器用材料において、成分組成中のCr量の増加に伴い、加圧水型軽水炉一次系の水中における耐食性が顕著に向上することを確認したうえで、このCrの増量に伴って生じる課題について検討した。その結果、まず、アルカリ環境中におけるIGA感受性の観点からは、Niが44%以上、Crが34%以上含有されていれば、従来のTT600合金やTT690合金を上回る性能(即ち、TT690合金を下回るIGA感受性)を示すことを知見した。一方、Cr量が過大となることで、金属組織中に有害な金属間化合物相が出現し、機械的性質が劣化するという課題がある。
このような課題に対し、本発明者等は、合金中におけるCr量及びNi量を適正範囲に制限するとともに、熱処理条件を適正化することにより、機械的特性を劣化させること無く、IGA感受性を抑制できることを見出し、本発明を完成させた。
The present inventors have intensively studied to solve the above problems. In other words, in nuclear power equipment materials, as the amount of Cr in the component composition increases, it is confirmed that the corrosion resistance in the water of the primary system of pressurized water light water reactor is remarkably improved. investigated. As a result, first, from the viewpoint of IGA sensitivity in an alkaline environment, if Ni is contained at 44% or more and Cr is contained at 34% or more, the performance exceeds conventional TT600 alloy and TT690 alloy (that is, lower than TT690 alloy). It was found to show (IGA sensitivity). On the other hand, when the amount of Cr is excessive, a harmful intermetallic compound phase appears in the metal structure, and there is a problem that mechanical properties deteriorate.
In response to such problems, the present inventors limit the amount of Cr and Ni in the alloy to appropriate ranges and optimize the heat treatment conditions, thereby reducing the IGA sensitivity without deteriorating mechanical properties. The present invention has been completed by finding out that it can be suppressed.

即ち、本発明に係る原子力機器用材料は、質量%で、Cr:34〜38%、Ni:44〜56%、C:0.015〜0.025%、Si:0%超、0.5%以下、Mn:0.05〜0.5%、S:0.003%以下、P:0.015%以下、N:0.05%以下、Ti:0.5%以下、Al:0.05〜0.5%をそれぞれ含有し、残部がFe及び不可避的不純物からなる組成とされたことを特徴とする。   That is, the nuclear equipment material according to the present invention is in mass%, Cr: 34 to 38%, Ni: 44 to 56%, C: 0.015 to 0.025%, Si: more than 0%, 0.5 %: Mn: 0.05 to 0.5%, S: 0.003% or less, P: 0.015% or less, N: 0.05% or less, Ti: 0.5% or less, Al: 0. It is characterized by containing 0.5 to 0.5% each, and the balance being composed of Fe and inevitable impurities.

また、本発明に係る原子力機器用材料は、上記組成の原子力機器用材料に対し、1050〜1150℃の温度で30min以下の熱処理を施した後、水冷又は空冷を行い、さらに、680〜750℃の温度で20hr以下の熱処理を行った後に空冷する方法によって製造することができる。   Further, the nuclear equipment material according to the present invention is subjected to a heat treatment for 30 minutes or less at a temperature of 1050 to 1150 ° C. with respect to the nuclear equipment material having the above composition, followed by water cooling or air cooling, and further 680 to 750 ° C. It can manufacture by the method of air-cooling, after performing the heat processing for 20 hours or less at this temperature.

係る構成の原子力機器用材料によれば、特に、合金中におけるCr及びNiの含有量を上記範囲に限定し、より好ましくは、熱処理条件を適正化することにより、機械的特性、加工性を損なうこと無く、IGA感受性を抑制できる作用が得られる。   According to the material for nuclear equipment having such a configuration, in particular, the Cr and Ni contents in the alloy are limited to the above ranges, and more preferably, the heat treatment conditions are optimized to impair mechanical properties and workability. The effect | action which can suppress IGA sensitivity is acquired without this.

また、本発明に係る蒸気発生器用伝熱管は、上記の原子力機器用材料を有することを特徴とする。
係る構成の蒸気発生器用伝熱管によれば、上記の本発明に係る原子力機器用材料が用いられたものなので、高い熱伝導率を有するとともに、IGA感受性が抑制され、耐食性に優れたものとなる。
Moreover, the heat exchanger tube for steam generators according to the present invention has the above-mentioned material for nuclear equipment.
According to the heat transfer tube for a steam generator having such a configuration, since the material for nuclear equipment according to the present invention is used, it has high thermal conductivity, suppresses IGA sensitivity, and has excellent corrosion resistance. .

また、本発明に係る蒸気発生器は、上記の蒸気発生器用伝熱管を具備することを特徴とする。
係る構成の蒸気発生器によれば、上記の本発明に係る蒸気発生器用伝熱管が用いられたものなので、高い熱伝導率を有するとともに、IGA感受性が抑制され、耐食性に優れたものとなる。
In addition, a steam generator according to the present invention includes the above-described heat transfer tube for a steam generator.
According to the steam generator having such a configuration, since the heat transfer tube for a steam generator according to the present invention is used, it has high thermal conductivity, IGA sensitivity is suppressed, and the corrosion resistance is excellent.

また、本発明に係る原子力プラントは、上記の蒸気発生器を具備することを特徴とする。
係る構成の原子力プラントによれば、上記の本発明に係る蒸気発生器を備えてなるものなので、熱伝導性、並びに、耐食性に優れたものとなる。
Moreover, the nuclear power plant which concerns on this invention comprises said steam generator.
According to the nuclear power plant having such a configuration, since the steam generator according to the present invention is provided, the thermal conductivity and the corrosion resistance are excellent.

本発明の伝熱特性、耐食性及び薄肉加工性に優れた原子力機器用材料によれば、成分組成を適正な範囲に制御し、さらに、熱処理条件を適正化することにより、加圧水型軽水炉の二次系側で生じうる高温のアルカリ環境下におけるIGA感受性が抑制され、優れた耐SCC性を確保でき、耐食性に優れたものとなる。また、十分な機械的特性、加工性を確保できることから、蒸気発生器用伝熱管を細径薄肉管として製造することも可能であり、伝熱特性が高められるとともに、生産性が向上する。従って、本発明によって得られる原子力機器用材料を、原子力発電所の加圧水型軽水炉における一次系側と二次系側両方に接する蒸気発生器用伝熱管に適用することにより、加圧水型軽水炉において必要な全ての特性を兼ね備えた蒸気発生器用伝熱管を実現することができる。   According to the nuclear equipment material excellent in heat transfer characteristics, corrosion resistance and thin wall processability of the present invention, by controlling the component composition to an appropriate range and further optimizing the heat treatment conditions, the secondary of the pressurized water reactor is IGA sensitivity in a high-temperature alkaline environment that can occur on the system side is suppressed, excellent SCC resistance can be ensured, and corrosion resistance is excellent. In addition, since sufficient mechanical characteristics and workability can be ensured, it is also possible to manufacture the steam generator heat transfer tube as a thin-walled thin tube, which improves the heat transfer characteristics and productivity. Therefore, by applying the nuclear equipment material obtained by the present invention to the steam generator heat transfer tube in contact with both the primary system side and the secondary system side in the pressurized water reactor of the nuclear power plant, all necessary in the pressurized water reactor It is possible to realize a heat transfer tube for a steam generator that has the above characteristics.

Crの含有量と、加圧水型軽水炉の一次系側及び二次系側を模擬した環境下における腐食減量との関係を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the relationship between Cr content and the corrosion weight loss in the environment which simulated the primary system side and secondary system side of a pressurized water reactor. Cr及びNiの含有量と、低ひずみ速度引張試験における粒界破面率との関係を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the relationship between content of Cr and Ni, and the grain-boundary fracture surface rate in a low strain rate tensile test. (a)は、Crの含有量が35%である場合の、オーステナイト単相状態からの時間−温度−相変態曲線を示すグラフであり、(b)は、Crの含有量が40%である場合の、オーステナイト単相状態からの時間−温度−相変態曲線を示すグラフである。(A) is a graph which shows the time-temperature-phase transformation curve from an austenite single phase state in case Cr content is 35%, (b) is Cr content is 40%. It is a graph which shows the time-temperature-phase transformation curve from the austenite single phase state in the case. Crの含有量と、耐食性向上に寄与するM23炭化物及び機械的性質を低下させるσ相の析出時間との関係を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the relationship between content of Cr, and the precipitation time of the σ phase which reduces M 23 C 6 carbide contributing to improvement of corrosion resistance and mechanical properties.

以下、本発明に係る伝熱特性及び耐食性に優れた、原子力機器用材料、蒸気発生器用伝熱管、蒸気発生器及び原子力プラントについて、図面を適宜参照しながら詳しく説明する。
図1〜図4は、本発明に係る原子力機器用材料の実施の形態を説明する模式図であり、図1は、Crの含有量と加圧水型軽水炉の一次系及び二次系を模擬した環境下における腐食減量との関係を示すグラフである。図2は、Cr及びNiの含有量と低ひずみ速度引張試験における粒界破面率との関係を示すグラフである。また、図3(a)は、Crの含有量が35%である場合の、オーステナイト単相状態からの時間−温度−相変態曲線を示すグラフである。図3(b)は、Crの含有量が40%である場合の、オーステナイト単相状態からの時間−温度−相変態曲線を示すグラフである。また、図4は、Crの含有量と、耐食性向上に寄与するM23炭化物及び機械的性質を低下させるσ相の析出時間との関係を示すグラフである。
Hereinafter, materials for nuclear equipment, heat generator tubes for steam generators, steam generators, and nuclear power plants excellent in heat transfer characteristics and corrosion resistance according to the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings as appropriate.
1 to 4 are schematic diagrams for explaining an embodiment of a material for nuclear equipment according to the present invention. FIG. 1 is an environment simulating a Cr content and a primary system and a secondary system of a pressurized water reactor. It is a graph which shows the relationship with the corrosion weight loss below. FIG. 2 is a graph showing the relationship between the content of Cr and Ni and the grain boundary fracture surface ratio in a low strain rate tensile test. Moreover, Fig.3 (a) is a graph which shows the time-temperature-phase transformation curve from an austenite single phase state in case content of Cr is 35%. FIG. 3B is a graph showing a time-temperature-phase transformation curve from the austenite single-phase state when the Cr content is 40%. FIG. 4 is a graph showing the relationship between the Cr content and the precipitation time of the M 23 C 6 carbide that contributes to the improvement of corrosion resistance and the σ phase that reduces the mechanical properties.

本発明に係る原子力機器用材料は、例えば、原子力発電所の加圧水型軽水炉(PWR)における一次系又は二次系の環境の両方に接する蒸気発生器(SG)用の伝熱管の材料として適用されるものである。このようなPWR用途においては、蒸気発生器用伝熱管は300℃以上の高温となり、蒸気発生器用伝熱管と管支持板との隙間においてアルカリ濃縮が生じ、蒸気発生器用伝熱管がpH=9以上の弱アルカリの水質環境に曝されるおそれがある。このため、アルカリ環境下における粒界腐食割れ(IGA)感受性が抑制されて耐食性に優れ、さらに、高い塑性加工性を確保しながら、優れた伝熱特性が得られる原子力機器用材料が要求されるようになっている。   The material for nuclear equipment according to the present invention is applied, for example, as a material for a heat transfer tube for a steam generator (SG) in contact with both primary and secondary environments in a pressurized water reactor (PWR) of a nuclear power plant. Is. In such PWR applications, the steam generator heat transfer tube is at a high temperature of 300 ° C. or higher, alkali concentration occurs in the gap between the steam generator heat transfer tube and the tube support plate, and the steam generator heat transfer tube has a pH of 9 or more. There is a risk of exposure to a weakly alkaline water environment. For this reason, the material for nuclear equipment which is excellent in corrosion resistance by suppressing intergranular corrosion cracking (IGA) in an alkaline environment and has excellent heat transfer characteristics while ensuring high plastic workability is required. It is like that.

上述のような要求を実現するため、本発明の原子力機器用材料は、質量%で、Cr:34〜38%、Ni:44〜56%、C:0.015〜0.025%、Si:0%超、0.5%以下、Mn:0.05〜0.5%、S:0.003%以下、P:0.015%以下、N:0.05%以下、Ti:0.5%以下、Al:0.05〜0.5%をそれぞれ含有し、残部がFe及び不可避的不純物からなる組成とされている。また、上記組成の原子力機器用材料に対し、1050〜1150℃の温度で30min以下の熱処理を施した後、水冷又は空冷を行い、さらに、680〜750℃の温度で20hr以下の熱処理を行った後に空冷する方法によって製造されることが、より好ましい。このように、特に、Cr及びNiの含有量を上記範囲に限定し、より好ましくは、熱処理条件を適正化することにより、十分な機械的特性、加工性を確保しながら、IGA感受性を抑制できるという作用が得られる。   In order to realize the above-described requirements, the nuclear equipment material of the present invention is in mass%, Cr: 34-38%, Ni: 44-56%, C: 0.015-0.025%, Si: More than 0%, 0.5% or less, Mn: 0.05 to 0.5%, S: 0.003% or less, P: 0.015% or less, N: 0.05% or less, Ti: 0.5 % Or less, Al: 0.05 to 0.5%, respectively, with the balance being Fe and inevitable impurities. In addition, the material for nuclear equipment having the above composition was subjected to a heat treatment at a temperature of 1050 to 1150 ° C. for 30 minutes or less, followed by water cooling or air cooling, and further a heat treatment at a temperature of 680 to 750 ° C. for 20 hours or less. More preferably, it is produced by a method of air cooling later. Thus, in particular, by limiting the content of Cr and Ni to the above range, and more preferably by optimizing the heat treatment conditions, it is possible to suppress IGA sensitivity while ensuring sufficient mechanical properties and workability. The effect is obtained.

以下、本発明に係る原子力機器用材料における合金成分組成に関し、各元素の規定理由について詳述する。なお、以下の説明において含有量を示す「%」は、特に指定が無い限り「質量%」を表すものとする。   Hereinafter, regarding the alloy component composition in the nuclear equipment material according to the present invention, the reasons for defining each element will be described in detail. In the following description, “%” indicating the content represents “% by mass” unless otherwise specified.

「Cr:クロム」34〜38%
Crは、耐SCC性を維持するために必要不可欠な元素であり、緻密な酸化物皮膜が有する保護作用により、耐SCC性、耐孔食性を著しく向上させる効果が得られる。Crの含有量が少なすぎると、十分な保護皮膜が得られないことから、耐食性(耐IGA性や耐SCC性)が低下する。このため耐食性の観点からは、Cr含有量は極力高くすることが望ましいが、Crの含有量が多すぎると、塑性加工性(熱間加工性)、熱伝導率、溶接性がいずれも低下する。本発明者等は、Crの含有量が34%以上では、原子力機器用材料として必要な耐食性が確保されることを見出した。また、本発明は上述した熱処理を行うことで完成するが、本発明者等は、Crの含有量が38%超では、この熱処理の過程において、機械的性質を低下させる脆化相が出現することを見出した。そのため、伝熱特性、耐食性、加工性及び機械的性質の全てを満足する領域として、Crの含有量を34〜38%の範囲に規定した。Cr含有量は、好ましくは35〜36%である。
"Cr: Chrome" 34-38%
Cr is an indispensable element for maintaining the SCC resistance, and the effect of remarkably improving the SCC resistance and pitting corrosion resistance is obtained by the protective action of the dense oxide film. When there is too little content of Cr, since sufficient protective film cannot be obtained, corrosion resistance (IGA resistance and SCC resistance) will fall. For this reason, from the viewpoint of corrosion resistance, it is desirable to increase the Cr content as much as possible. However, if the Cr content is too high, the plastic workability (hot workability), thermal conductivity, and weldability all decrease. . The present inventors have found that when the Cr content is 34% or more, the corrosion resistance necessary as a nuclear equipment material is secured. In addition, the present invention is completed by performing the above-described heat treatment, but the present inventors have found that when the Cr content exceeds 38%, an embrittled phase that deteriorates mechanical properties appears in the course of this heat treatment. I found out. Therefore, the Cr content is specified in the range of 34 to 38% as a region satisfying all of the heat transfer characteristics, corrosion resistance, workability, and mechanical properties. The Cr content is preferably 35 to 36%.

「Ni:ニッケル」44〜56%
Niは、一般的に耐食性を向上させるのに有効な元素であり、特に、耐酸性、並びに、塩化物イオンを含有する高温水中における耐SCC性を向上させる効果が得られる。Niの含有量が少なすぎると、このような耐食性向上効果が得られない。本発明者等は、Niが44%以上であれば、原子力機器用材料として必要な耐食性が確保されることを見出し、その含有量を44〜56%の範囲に規定した。このNiの上限値:56%については、耐食性や熱伝導率の観点から規定されるものではなく、他の元素の含有量を考慮して定めたものである。
"Ni: Nickel" 44-56%
Ni is an element that is generally effective for improving the corrosion resistance. In particular, the effect of improving the acid resistance and the SCC resistance in high-temperature water containing chloride ions is obtained. If the Ni content is too small, such a corrosion resistance improving effect cannot be obtained. The present inventors have found that when Ni is 44% or more, the corrosion resistance required as a material for nuclear equipment is ensured, and the content is specified in the range of 44 to 56%. The upper limit of Ni: 56% is not defined from the viewpoint of corrosion resistance and thermal conductivity, but is determined in consideration of the content of other elements.

「Fe:鉄」(残部)
Feは、本発明の原子力機器用材料をなす合金において、熱間加工性を向上させる作用を有するが、その含有量は特に限定されるものではない。しかしながら、ニッケル基合金の場合、6%を超えてFeを含有すると、塩化物イオンを含む環境下における耐孔食性や、弱アルカリ環境下における耐隙間腐食性が低下することがある。一方、現在のPWRの環境においては、二次系水への海水混入が生じることは無く、塩化物イオンを含む環境下での耐食性については、それほど重視されない。このため、本発明では、Feについては、熱伝導率や溶接性(固液共存温度域)、IGA感受性、熱間加工性等を評価したうえで、他の元素を添加した合金中における残部としている。
"Fe: Iron" (remainder)
Fe has an effect of improving hot workability in the alloy constituting the material for nuclear equipment of the present invention, but its content is not particularly limited. However, in the case of a nickel-base alloy, when Fe exceeds 6%, pitting corrosion resistance under an environment containing chloride ions and crevice corrosion resistance under a weak alkaline environment may be lowered. On the other hand, in the current PWR environment, seawater is not mixed into the secondary water, and the corrosion resistance in an environment containing chloride ions is not so important. For this reason, in this invention, about Fe, after evaluating heat conductivity, weldability (solid-liquid coexistence temperature range), IGA sensitivity, hot workability, etc., as the remainder in the alloy which added other elements Yes.

「C:炭素」0.015〜0.025%
粒界に整合析出するM23炭化物(Mは主としてCrである)は、耐PWSCC性向上に有効であることが明らかになっており、M23炭化物の形成に必要なCは、耐PWSCC性の観点で必要な元素である。M23炭化物析出による耐食性向上効果を得るためには、0.015%以上のCを含有させることが必要である。
一方、Cの含有量が過大である場合には、M23以外の炭化物となって現れ、これはM23炭化物の析出状態を耐食性の観点で好ましくない状態とするため、このような場合に耐PWSCC性が低下する場合がある。そのため、Cの含有量の上限を適切に規定する必要がある。
"C: Carbon" 0.015-0.025%
It has been clarified that M 23 C 6 carbide (M is mainly Cr) that is coherently precipitated at the grain boundaries is effective in improving the PWSCC resistance, and C necessary for the formation of M 23 C 6 carbide is: This element is necessary from the viewpoint of PWSCC resistance. In order to obtain the effect of improving corrosion resistance due to M 23 C 6 carbide precipitation, it is necessary to contain 0.015% or more of C.
On the other hand, when the content of C is excessive, it appears as a carbide other than M 23 C 6 , which makes the precipitation state of M 23 C 6 carbide an undesirable state from the viewpoint of corrosion resistance. In some cases, the PWSCC resistance may decrease. Therefore, it is necessary to appropriately define the upper limit of the C content.

本発明者等は、以上の内容を考慮しながら、1050〜1150℃の温度で以下の熱処理において、Cが完全固溶して不要な炭化物が形成されない含有量を計算状態図の手法によって導出し、Cの含有量を0.015〜0.025%の範囲に規定した。   In consideration of the above contents, the present inventors derived the content by which C is completely dissolved and no unnecessary carbide is formed in the following heat treatment at a temperature of 1050 to 1150 ° C. by the method of the calculation state diagram. , C content is specified in the range of 0.015-0.025%.

「Si:ケイ素」0%超、0.5%以下
Siは、製鋼時の脱酸剤として有効な元素であり、所定量以上で含有させることが必要である。また、Siは、熱間加工時の粒界割れを減少させ、熱間加工性を向上させる効果がある。しかしながら、Siの含有量が0.5%を超えると、合金の溶接性や清浄度を低下させることから、これを上限とすることが好ましい。一方、Siの含有量が少なすぎると、脱酸効果が不十分となるので、その下限を0.05%とすることが好ましい。
“Si: silicon” more than 0% and 0.5% or less Si is an element effective as a deoxidizer during steelmaking, and it is necessary to contain it in a predetermined amount or more. Si also has the effect of reducing intergranular cracking during hot working and improving hot workability. However, if the Si content exceeds 0.5%, the weldability and cleanliness of the alloy are reduced, so this is preferably the upper limit. On the other hand, if the Si content is too small, the deoxidation effect becomes insufficient, so the lower limit is preferably made 0.05%.

ここで、酸化性の高いSiは、Crよりも優先的に酸化皮膜を形成するが、Si系の酸化皮膜が形成された場合には、Crの酸化皮膜による保護性が低下する。
上記理由により、本発明においては、Siに関し、脱酸時に混入させる以上には積極的な添加を行わず、その含有量を0%超、0.5%以下の範囲に制限する。
Here, Si having high oxidizability forms an oxide film preferentially over Cr. However, when a Si-based oxide film is formed, the protection by the Cr oxide film is reduced.
For the above reason, in the present invention, Si is not added more actively than mixing at the time of deoxidation, and its content is limited to a range of more than 0% and 0.5% or less.

「Mn:マンガン」0.05〜0.5%
Mnは、Siと同様、脱酸剤として作用する元素であり、所定量以上で含有させることが必要である。また、Mnは、熱間加工時の粒界割れを減少させ、熱間加工性を向上させる効果がある。しかしながら、Mnの含有量が0.5%を超えると、合金の溶接性や清浄度を低下させることから、これを上限とすることが好ましい。一方、Mnの含有量が少なすぎると、脱酸効果が不十分となるので、その下限を0.05%とすることが好ましい。このため、本発明においては、Mnに関し、脱酸時に混入させる以上には積極的な添加を行わず、特別な意図が無い限り、その含有量を0.05〜0.5%の範囲に制限する。
"Mn: Manganese" 0.05-0.5%
Mn, like Si, is an element that acts as a deoxidizer and must be contained in a predetermined amount or more. Moreover, Mn has the effect of reducing the grain boundary cracking during hot working and improving hot workability. However, if the Mn content exceeds 0.5%, the weldability and cleanliness of the alloy are lowered, so this is preferably made the upper limit. On the other hand, if the content of Mn is too small, the deoxidation effect becomes insufficient, so the lower limit is preferably made 0.05%. For this reason, in the present invention, Mn is not actively added beyond mixing during deoxidation, and the content is limited to a range of 0.05 to 0.5% unless there is a special intention. To do.

「S:硫黄」0.01%以下
Sは、通常の製造工程において銑鉄等から不可避的に混入する不可避的不純物である。Sは、塑性加工性(熱間加工性)を低下させる有害な不純物元素であることから、その含有量を0.01%以下に抑制することが好ましい。
“S: Sulfur” 0.01% or less S is an unavoidable impurity inevitably mixed from pig iron and the like in a normal manufacturing process. Since S is a harmful impurity element that lowers the plastic workability (hot workability), its content is preferably suppressed to 0.01% or less.

「P:リン」0.015%以下
Pは、Sと同様、通常の製造工程において銑鉄等から不可避的に混入する不可避的不純物である。Pは粒界偏析し易いという特性があり、偏析によって熱鋭敏化を伴わないSCCを生じさせる。Pが合金中に完全に固溶していれば、耐食性に対して大きな影響は認められないものの、P量が増加すると孔食感受性が大きくなる。
このように、Pを含有することによる有益な作用は期待できないことから、P量は0.015%以下に抑制することが好ましい。
“P: Phosphorus” 0.015% or less P, like S, is an unavoidable impurity inevitably mixed from pig iron and the like in a normal manufacturing process. P has a characteristic that it easily segregates at the grain boundaries, and the segregation causes SCC without thermal sensitization. If P is completely dissolved in the alloy, no significant effect on corrosion resistance is observed, but as the amount of P increases, pitting corrosion sensitivity increases.
Thus, since the beneficial effect by containing P cannot be expected, the P content is preferably suppressed to 0.015% or less.

「N:窒素」0.05%以下
Nは、Cの拡散速度を遅らせることにより、ニッケル基合金における粒界炭化物の析出を遅延させる作用を有するため、耐PWSCC性を低下させる可能性がある。また、Nは、一般的な耐SCC性に対しては有害であることが知られており、また、熱間加工性を確保する観点からも含有量を抑制することが必要である。Nは強度を増大させ、また、フェライト相の生成を抑制してオーステナイト相を安定させる元素としても重要であるが、熱間加工性と耐SCC性の観点から、0.05%以下に抑制することが必要である。
以上により、本発明では、Nの含有量を、強度、熱間加工性及び耐SCC性を確保する観点から、上限を0.05%に制限した。N含有量は、好ましくは、0.001〜0.03%であり、更に好ましくは0.001〜0.01%である。
“N: Nitrogen” 0.05% or less N has a function of delaying the precipitation of grain boundary carbides in the nickel-base alloy by delaying the diffusion rate of C, and thus may reduce the PWSCC resistance. Further, N is known to be harmful to general SCC resistance, and it is necessary to suppress the content from the viewpoint of ensuring hot workability. N is important as an element that increases the strength and stabilizes the austenite phase by suppressing the formation of the ferrite phase, but it is suppressed to 0.05% or less from the viewpoint of hot workability and SCC resistance. It is necessary.
As described above, in the present invention, the upper limit of the N content is limited to 0.05% from the viewpoint of securing strength, hot workability, and SCC resistance. The N content is preferably 0.001 to 0.03%, and more preferably 0.001 to 0.01%.

「Ti:チタン」0.5%以下
Tiは、Nと結合してTiN又はTi(C,N)となることにより固溶Nを減少させることで、熱間加工性を改善するのに有効な元素である。通常、このような効果を得るには、Tiの含有量をNの含有量の5倍以上とする必要がある。一方、Ti量が0.5%を超えると、その効果が飽和することから、上限を0.5%とした。
“Ti: Titanium” 0.5% or less Ti is effective in improving hot workability by reducing solid solution N by combining with N to become TiN or Ti (C, N). It is an element. Usually, in order to obtain such an effect, the Ti content needs to be 5 times or more the N content. On the other hand, if the amount of Ti exceeds 0.5%, the effect is saturated, so the upper limit was made 0.5%.

「Al:アルミニウム」0.05〜0.5%
Alは、Si、Mnと同様、脱酸剤として有効な元素であるが、その含有量が0.5%を超えると合金の清浄度を低下させるため、この量を上限とすることが好ましい。しかしながら、Alの含有量が少なすぎると脱酸効果が不十分となり、熱間加工性の低下を招くので、その下限を0.05%とすることが好ましい。このようなAlを脱酸剤として添加することで、合金中の酸素が低減されることにより、間接的に耐食性を改善することができる。
上記理由により、本発明では、Alの含有量を0.05〜0.5%の範囲に規定する。
"Al: Aluminum" 0.05-0.5%
Al, like Si and Mn, is an element that is effective as a deoxidizer, but if its content exceeds 0.5%, the cleanliness of the alloy is lowered, so this amount is preferably made the upper limit. However, if the Al content is too small, the deoxidation effect becomes insufficient and the hot workability is lowered, so the lower limit is preferably 0.05%. By adding such Al as a deoxidizer, the corrosion resistance can be indirectly improved by reducing oxygen in the alloy.
For the above reasons, in the present invention, the content of Al is specified in the range of 0.05 to 0.5%.

「熱処理条件」
本発明の原子力機器用材料は、上記成分組成とされた合金に対し、1050〜1150℃の温度で30min以下の熱処理(加熱)を施した後、水冷又は空冷を行い、さらに、680〜750℃の温度で20hr以下の熱処理を行った後に空冷する方法によって製造されることが、より好ましい。
以下に、本発明で規定する熱処理の各条件について詳述する。
"Heat treatment conditions"
The material for nuclear equipment of the present invention is subjected to a heat treatment (heating) for 30 minutes or less at a temperature of 1050 to 1150 ° C. with respect to the alloy having the above component composition, followed by water cooling or air cooling, and further 680 to 750 ° C. It is more preferable to manufacture by the method of air-cooling after performing the heat processing for 20 hours or less at this temperature.
Below, each condition of the heat processing prescribed | regulated by this invention is explained in full detail.

まず、高強度を保持しながら、高い耐PWSCC性を保持させるため、上記成分組成とされた合金に対し、1050〜1150℃の温度で、30min以下の時間で加熱した後、水冷又は空冷によって冷却する溶体化処理を行う。
この溶体化処理における加熱温度は、1050〜1150℃の温度範囲とすることが好ましい。溶体化処理における加熱温度が1050℃未満であると、Cが十分に固溶しないために上記効果が得られにくくなる。また、溶体化処理における加熱温度が1150℃を超えても、上記効果は飽和し、さらに結晶粒の粗大化によって材料強度が低下するため、原子力機器用材料として適さなくなる。
また、溶体化処理における加熱時間は30min以下とすることが好ましい。この加熱時間を超えても、上記効果は飽和する。
First, in order to maintain high PWSCC resistance while maintaining high strength, the alloy having the above component composition is heated at a temperature of 1050 to 1150 ° C. for 30 minutes or less, and then cooled by water cooling or air cooling. A solution treatment is performed.
The heating temperature in the solution treatment is preferably in the temperature range of 1050 to 1150 ° C. When the heating temperature in the solution treatment is less than 1050 ° C., C is not sufficiently dissolved, so that the above effect is hardly obtained. Moreover, even if the heating temperature in the solution treatment exceeds 1150 ° C., the above effects are saturated, and the material strength is reduced due to the coarsening of crystal grains, so that it is not suitable as a material for nuclear equipment.
Further, the heating time in the solution treatment is preferably 30 min or less. Even if this heating time is exceeded, the above effect is saturated.

なお、溶体化処理における水冷又は空冷手段を用いた冷却処理は、従来公知の装置等を用いて行うことができるが、この際の冷却速度は、通常の空冷条件よりも高い冷却速度、即ち、加速冷却の条件とすることが、強度や耐食性の保持の観点からより好ましい。   The cooling treatment using water cooling or air cooling means in the solution treatment can be performed using a conventionally known apparatus or the like, but the cooling rate at this time is higher than the normal air cooling conditions, that is, The accelerated cooling condition is more preferable from the viewpoint of maintaining strength and corrosion resistance.

次いで、680〜750℃の温度で、20hr以下の時間で加熱した後、空冷する時効処理を行う。
この時効処理における加熱温度は、680〜750℃の温度範囲とすることが好ましい。時効処理における加熱温度が680℃未満であると、耐食性の向上に必要なM23炭化物の析出に長時間を要するようになり、時効熱処理の効果を得ることが難しくなる。また、時効処理における加熱温度が750℃を超えても、その効果は飽和する。
また、時効処理における加熱時間は20hr以下とすることが必要である。この加熱時間が20hrを超えても、上記効果は飽和し、さらにCr含有量が高い上記組成の合金ではσ相等の脆化相が析出して機械的特性が低下する。また、時効処理における加熱時間の下限は、少なくとも7hr以上とすることが望ましい。
Next, an aging treatment is performed by heating at a temperature of 680 to 750 ° C. for 20 hours or less and then air cooling.
The heating temperature in this aging treatment is preferably in the temperature range of 680 to 750 ° C. When the heating temperature in the aging treatment is less than 680 ° C., it takes a long time to precipitate M 23 C 6 carbide necessary for improving the corrosion resistance, and it becomes difficult to obtain the effect of the aging heat treatment. Moreover, even if the heating temperature in an aging treatment exceeds 750 degreeC, the effect is saturated.
Moreover, the heating time in an aging treatment needs to be 20 hr or less. Even when the heating time exceeds 20 hours, the above effect is saturated, and in the alloy having the above composition having a high Cr content, an embrittlement phase such as a σ phase is precipitated and the mechanical properties are deteriorated. Moreover, it is desirable that the lower limit of the heating time in the aging treatment is at least 7 hours.

一方で、上述の熱処理の効果はCr含有量の影響を受ける。図4は、1100℃で熱処理を行った本発明に係る合金において、700℃での熱処理中におけるM23炭化物とσ相の析出時間の関係をCrの含有量に対して示すグラフである。Cr含有量が増加すると、σ相が析出する時間が短時間側へ移行し、M23炭化物が析出する時間が長時間側へ移行するため、耐食性の向上に必要なM23炭化物を析出させ、かつσ相等の脆化相を析出させないようにするには、Cr含有量を38%以下に制御しておくことが必要である。On the other hand, the effect of the above heat treatment is affected by the Cr content. FIG. 4 is a graph showing the relationship between the precipitation time of M 23 C 6 carbide and σ phase during the heat treatment at 700 ° C. with respect to the Cr content in the alloy according to the present invention heat-treated at 1100 ° C. . When the Cr content is increased, the time for precipitation of the σ phase shifts to the short time side, and the time for precipitation of M 23 C 6 carbide shifts to the long time side, so that M 23 C 6 carbide necessary for improving corrosion resistance. It is necessary to control the Cr content to 38% or less in order to cause precipitation of slag and not to cause embrittlement phase such as σ phase.

本発明においては、上述のように、Cr及びNiの含有量を適正範囲に限定し、より好ましくは、熱処理条件を上記の如く適正化することにより、十分な機械的特性、加工性を確保しながら、IGA感受性を抑制できるという作用が得られる。   In the present invention, as described above, the content of Cr and Ni is limited to an appropriate range, and more preferably, the heat treatment conditions are optimized as described above to ensure sufficient mechanical properties and workability. However, the effect | action that IGA sensitivity can be suppressed is acquired.

「Cr、Ni含有量と、耐食性及び機械的特性との関係」
本発明の原子力機器用材料においては、上述したように、Crの含有量を34〜38%の範囲に規定するとともに、Niの含有量を44〜56%の範囲に規定している。本発明では、特に、Cr及びNiの含有量を上記範囲で適正に制御し、さらに、この合金に対する熱処理条件を上記条件で適正化することにより、十分な機械的特性、加工性を確保しながら、IGA感受性を抑制でき、PWRの二次系において好適な伝熱管材料が得られるものである。
“Relationship between Cr and Ni content, corrosion resistance and mechanical properties”
In the nuclear equipment material of the present invention, as described above, the Cr content is specified in the range of 34 to 38%, and the Ni content is specified in the range of 44 to 56%. In the present invention, in particular, the Cr and Ni contents are appropriately controlled within the above range, and further, heat treatment conditions for this alloy are optimized under the above conditions, while ensuring sufficient mechanical properties and workability. Therefore, the IGA sensitivity can be suppressed, and a heat transfer tube material suitable for the secondary system of PWR can be obtained.

また、下記表1に、後述の実施例において詳述する、評価試験用の供試材の成分組成一覧を示す。   In addition, Table 1 below shows a list of component compositions of test materials for evaluation tests, which will be described in detail in Examples described later.

Figure 2012121390
Figure 2012121390

図1(a)、(b)のグラフに、それぞれCrの含有量と加圧水型軽水炉の一次系及び二次系を模擬した環境下における腐食減量との関係を示す(条件については後述の全面腐食感受性確認試験を参照)。図1(a)、(b)中に示すように、合金中のCr含有量を増やすほど、PWR一次系及び二次系の環境中における耐食性が顕著に向上することが確認できる(表1中の供試材a、b参照)。   The graphs of FIGS. 1 (a) and 1 (b) show the relationship between the Cr content and the corrosion weight loss in an environment simulating the primary and secondary systems of a pressurized water reactor (relating to the overall corrosion described below) See Sensitivity Confirmation Test). As shown in FIGS. 1 (a) and 1 (b), it can be confirmed that as the Cr content in the alloy is increased, the corrosion resistance in the PWR primary and secondary environments is significantly improved (in Table 1). Specimens a and b).

また、図2のグラフに、Cr及びNiの含有量と低ひずみ速度引張試験(SSRT試験)における粒界破面率との関係を示す。図2に示すように、Niが44%以上、Crが34%以上含有されていれば、アルカリ環境中におけるIGA耐食性が抑制され、従来のTT690合金を上回る耐食性が得られることが明らかである(表1中の供試材a、b参照)。   Moreover, the relationship between the content of Cr and Ni and the grain boundary fracture surface rate in a low strain rate tensile test (SSRT test) is shown in the graph of FIG. As shown in FIG. 2, it is clear that if Ni is contained at 44% or more and Cr is contained at 34% or more, IGA corrosion resistance in an alkaline environment is suppressed, and corrosion resistance higher than that of a conventional TT690 alloy is obtained ( (See specimens a and b in Table 1).

Cr量が増大するのに伴い、金属組織中に有害な金属間化合物相が出現し、機械的性質が劣化するおそれがある。図3のグラフは、供試材aの成分を対象としてCr含有量を変化させながら、1100℃での熱処理後に700℃で保持した場合に、耐食性を向上させるM23炭化物と機械的性質を劣化させるσ相の生成する時間を評価した結果を示している。As the amount of Cr increases, a harmful intermetallic compound phase appears in the metal structure, and the mechanical properties may deteriorate. The graph of FIG. 3 shows the M 23 C 6 carbide and mechanical properties that improve the corrosion resistance when held at 700 ° C. after heat treatment at 1100 ° C. while changing the Cr content for the component of the specimen a. The results of evaluating the time for generating the sigma phase that degrades the slag are shown.

図3(a)に示すように、Cr含有量が本発明の規定範囲内である35%の場合には、脆化相であるσ相とη相の析出が生じ、析出のノーズは、σ相については780℃で約50時間となり、数時間の熱処理を行っても脆化相の析出は顕著とはならず、機械的特性に影響が生じることはないと考えられる。   As shown in FIG. 3A, when the Cr content is 35%, which is within the specified range of the present invention, precipitation of σ phase and η phase, which are embrittlement phases, occurs, and the nose of precipitation is σ The phase is about 50 hours at 780 ° C., and even when heat treatment is performed for several hours, the precipitation of the embrittled phase does not become significant, and it is considered that the mechanical properties are not affected.

一方、図3(b)に示すように、Cr含有量が本発明の規定範囲を外れる40%に増大した場合には、熱処理温度として想定される700℃付近でのσ相の析出は短時間側へ移行し、一次系水中での耐食性の向上に寄与するM23炭化物と近い析出時間となっており、熱処理後に脆化相が残留する可能性があることが分かる。このように、本発明者等は鋭意検討を繰り返し、Cr含有量を適宜変化させた場合について同様の評価を行い、Cr量の上限を38%とした。On the other hand, as shown in FIG. 3B, when the Cr content increases to 40% outside the specified range of the present invention, the precipitation of the σ phase near 700 ° C., which is assumed as the heat treatment temperature, takes a short time. It can be seen that there is a possibility that an embrittled phase may remain after the heat treatment because the precipitation time is close to that of M 23 C 6 carbide that contributes to the improvement of corrosion resistance in primary water. Thus, the present inventors repeated intensive studies and made the same evaluation when the Cr content was appropriately changed, and the upper limit of the Cr content was 38%.

図3(a)に示すように、耐食性の向上に必要なM23炭化物を析出させるには、680℃においては20hr程度、750℃においては2hr程度の時効熱処理を行うことが必要である。このような検討を行うことにより、時効熱処理の時間を20hr以下と定めた。As shown in FIG. 3A, in order to precipitate M 23 C 6 carbide necessary for improving the corrosion resistance, it is necessary to perform an aging heat treatment at about 680 ° C. for about 20 hours and at 750 ° C. for about 2 hours. . By conducting such a study, the time for aging heat treatment was set to 20 hours or less.

また、下記表2に、Crの含有量と耐孔食性の指標である孔食電位を示す。
表2に示すように、Cr含有量が本発明の規定範囲内である場合には、従来のTT690合金に比べて高い孔食電位を示し、耐孔食性に優れていることがわかる(表2中の供試材a、b参照)。
Table 2 below shows the pitting corrosion potential, which is an index of Cr content and pitting corrosion resistance.
As shown in Table 2, when the Cr content is within the specified range of the present invention, the pitting corrosion potential is higher than that of the conventional TT690 alloy, and the pitting corrosion resistance is excellent (Table 2). (Refer to specimens a and b).

Figure 2012121390
Figure 2012121390

上記各表及び各図を参照した説明により、特に、Crの含有量を34〜38%、Niの含有量を44〜56%の範囲に規定するとともに、この合金に対する熱処理条件を、上述の如く適正化することにより、PWRの二次系において求められる機械的特性、加工性及び耐食性の全ての特性が優れた伝熱管用材料が得られることが明らかである。   According to the description with reference to the above tables and figures, in particular, the Cr content is specified in the range of 34 to 38%, the Ni content in the range of 44 to 56%, and the heat treatment conditions for this alloy are as described above. By optimizing, it is clear that a heat transfer tube material having excellent mechanical properties, workability and corrosion resistance required in the secondary system of PWR can be obtained.

以上説明したように、本発明に係る耐食性及び加工性に優れた原子力機器用材料によれば、成分組成を適正な範囲に制御し、且つ、熱処理条件を適正化することにより、高温のアルカリ環境下におけるIGA感受性が抑制され、優れた耐SCC性を確保でき、耐食性に優れたものとなる。また、十分な機械的特性、加工性を確保できることから、蒸気発生器用伝熱管を細径薄肉管として製造することも可能であり、伝熱特性が高められるとともに、生産性が向上する。従って、本発明によって得られる原子力機器用材料を、原子力発電所の加圧水型軽水炉において一次系又は二次系に用いられる蒸気発生器用伝熱管に適用することにより、加圧水型軽水炉において必要な全ての特性を兼ね備えた蒸気発生器用伝熱管を実現することができる。   As described above, according to the nuclear equipment material excellent in corrosion resistance and workability according to the present invention, by controlling the component composition within an appropriate range and optimizing the heat treatment conditions, a high-temperature alkaline environment is achieved. Underlying IGA sensitivity is suppressed, excellent SCC resistance can be ensured, and corrosion resistance is excellent. In addition, since sufficient mechanical characteristics and workability can be ensured, it is also possible to manufacture the steam generator heat transfer tube as a thin-walled thin tube, which improves the heat transfer characteristics and productivity. Therefore, by applying the material for nuclear equipment obtained by the present invention to the heat transfer tube for the steam generator used for the primary system or the secondary system in the pressurized water light water reactor of the nuclear power plant, all the characteristics required in the pressurized water light water reactor are obtained. It is possible to realize a heat transfer tube for a steam generator that combines the above.

また、本発明に係る蒸気発生器用伝熱管は、上述した本発明に係る原子力機器用材料が用いられてなるものである。本発明の蒸気発生器用伝熱管によれば、上記原子力機器用材料が用いられたものなので、高い熱伝導率を有するとともに、IGA感受性が抑制され、耐食性に優れたものとなる。   Moreover, the heat transfer tube for a steam generator according to the present invention uses the above-described material for nuclear equipment according to the present invention. According to the heat transfer tube for a steam generator of the present invention, since the material for nuclear equipment is used, it has high thermal conductivity, suppresses IGA sensitivity, and has excellent corrosion resistance.

また、本発明に係る蒸気発生器は、上述した本発明に係る蒸気発生器用伝熱管が用いられてなるものである。本発明の蒸気発生器によれば、上記蒸気発生器用伝熱管が用いられたものなので、高い熱伝導率を有するとともに、IGA感受性が抑制され、耐食性に優れたものとなる。   Moreover, the steam generator according to the present invention uses the steam generator heat transfer tube according to the present invention described above. According to the steam generator of the present invention, since the heat transfer tube for the steam generator is used, it has high thermal conductivity, IGA sensitivity is suppressed, and the corrosion resistance is excellent.

また、本発明に係る原子力プラントは、上述した本発明に係る蒸気発生器が備えられてなるものである。本発明の原子力プラントによれば、上記蒸気発生器を備えてなるものなので、熱伝導性、並びに、耐食性に優れたものとなる。   Moreover, the nuclear power plant which concerns on this invention is equipped with the steam generator which concerns on this invention mentioned above. According to the nuclear power plant of the present invention, since it comprises the steam generator, it has excellent thermal conductivity and corrosion resistance.

以下、実施例を示して、耐食性及び加工性に優れた原子力機器用材を更に詳しく説明するが、本発明はこの実施例に限定されるものでは無い。   Hereinafter, although an Example is shown and the nuclear equipment material excellent in corrosion resistance and workability is demonstrated in more detail, this invention is not limited to this Example.

[供試材の製造]
本実施例では、まず、上記した表1に示す化学成分組成の合金を真空溶解法で溶製した後、熱間鍛造、熱間圧延及び冷間圧延を施すことで厚さ14mm及び5mmの板材(供試材)に仕上げた。
次いで、この板材に対し、1100℃の温度での熱処理を施した後、水冷することで溶体化処理を行った。
次いで、さらに、700℃の温度で15hrの熱処理を施した後、放冷することで時効処理を行った。
そして、これらの各供試材から、以下に説明するような各種特性を評価するための試験片を採取した。
[Manufacture of test materials]
In this example, first, an alloy having the chemical composition shown in Table 1 is melted by a vacuum melting method, and then hot forging, hot rolling, and cold rolling are performed to obtain plate materials having a thickness of 14 mm and 5 mm. Finished in (sample material).
Next, the plate material was subjected to a heat treatment at a temperature of 1100 ° C. and then subjected to a solution treatment by water cooling.
Next, after further heat treatment for 15 hours at a temperature of 700 ° C., an aging treatment was performed by allowing to cool.
And from each of these specimens, test pieces for evaluating various properties as described below were collected.

[評価試験項目]
上記手順によって作製した供試材について、以下に説明するような項目の各種評価試験を実施した。
[Evaluation test items]
The test materials prepared by the above procedure were subjected to various evaluation tests for items as described below.

「全面腐食感受性確認試験」
本実施例では、各供試材の加圧水型軽水炉の一次系及び二次系を模擬した環境下(アルカリ環境下)における全面腐食感受性を確認した。
まず、各供試材から、45mm×95mm×2mmの試験片を採取した。
"Full-scale corrosion susceptibility confirmation test"
In this example, the overall corrosion susceptibility of each test material in an environment (alkaline environment) simulating the primary system and secondary system of a pressurized water reactor was confirmed.
First, 45 mm × 95 mm × 2 mm test pieces were collected from each test material.

次に、採取した試験片を循環式腐食試験装置の内部において水中に浸漬させ、一次系及び二次系環境条件で3000hr以上の浸漬を行った。そして、浸漬前及び浸漬後(脱スケール後)の各試験片の質量測定を行うことで減量分を算出し、全面腐食量のデータを得た。この際、脱スケール処理を行うにあたり、試験片と同一材料で製作したブランク試験片についても同じ処理を行い、その減量分を測定することで、脱スケール処理による試験片母材の減量分を補正した。   Next, the collected test piece was immersed in water inside the circulating corrosion test apparatus, and was immersed for 3000 hr or more under primary and secondary environmental conditions. Then, the weight loss was calculated by measuring the mass of each test piece before immersion and after immersion (after descaling), and data on the overall corrosion amount was obtained. At this time, when performing the descaling process, the same process is applied to the blank test piece made of the same material as the test piece, and the amount of weight reduction is measured, thereby correcting the weight loss of the test piece base material due to the descaling process. did.

図1(a)のグラフに示すように、Cr含有量が34〜38%の範囲内とされた、本発明に係る供試材a、bは、他の供試材に比べて腐食減量が0.005〜0.011(mg/cm・3050hr)と顕著に少なく、PWR一次系の水中における耐食性が顕著に向上することが明らかである。
これに対し、Crの含有量が適正でない、比較例c〜j、並びに従来例k、mは、腐食減量が、それぞれ0.008〜0.136(mg/cm・3050hr)、0.012〜0.325(mg/cm・3050hr)と、耐食性に劣ることがわかる。
As shown in the graph of FIG. 1 (a), the specimens a and b according to the present invention, in which the Cr content is within the range of 34 to 38%, have a corrosion weight loss compared to other specimens. It is apparent that the corrosion resistance in water of the PWR primary system is remarkably improved with 0.005 to 0.011 (mg / cm 2 · 3050 hr).
On the other hand, the comparative examples c to j and the conventional examples k and m in which the Cr content is not appropriate have a corrosion weight loss of 0.008 to 0.136 (mg / cm 2 · 3050 hr) and 0.012 respectively. It is understood that the corrosion resistance is inferior to ˜0.325 (mg / cm 2 · 3050 hr).

また、図1(b)のグラフに示すように、Cr含有量が34〜38%の範囲内とされた、本発明に係る供試材a、bは、他の供試材に比べて腐食減量が0.010〜0.014(mg/cm・3010hr)と顕著に少なく、PWR二次系の水中における耐食性が顕著に向上することが明らかである。
これに対し、Crの含有量が適正でない、比較例c〜j、並びに従来例k、mは、腐食減量が、それぞれ0.024〜0.071(mg/cm・3010hr)、0.026〜0.114(mg/cm・3010hr)であり、耐食性に劣ることがわかる。
In addition, as shown in the graph of FIG. 1B, the specimens a and b according to the present invention in which the Cr content is in the range of 34 to 38% are more corrosive than other specimens. It is clear that the weight loss is remarkably as small as 0.010 to 0.014 (mg / cm 2 · 3010 hr), and the corrosion resistance of PWR secondary system in water is significantly improved.
On the other hand, the comparative examples c to j and the conventional examples k and m in which the Cr content is not appropriate have a corrosion weight loss of 0.024 to 0.071 (mg / cm 2 · 3010 hr) and 0.026, respectively. It is -0.114 (mg / cm < 2 > 3010hr), and it turns out that it is inferior to corrosion resistance.

「一次系水中応力腐食割れ(PWSCC)試験(浸漬試験)」
本実施例では、各供試材のPWRの一次系を模擬した環境下における耐SCC性を評価した。
まず、各供試材から逆U曲げ応力腐食割れ試験片を採取した後、実際の使用環境よりも温度を上昇させて、加速試験が可能な360℃のPWR一次系環境の水中に浸漬させた。そして、所定時間毎に試験片の目視確認を行い、PWSCCの発生の有無を調べた(各供試材ともn=4)。
下記表3に、PWR一次系を模擬した水中において、3050hrまで試験片を浸漬させたPWSCC試験の結果を示す。
"Primary underwater stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC) test (immersion test)"
In this example, the SCC resistance in an environment simulating the primary system of PWR of each test material was evaluated.
First, after collecting a reverse U bending stress corrosion cracking test piece from each test material, the temperature was raised from the actual usage environment and immersed in water of a PWR primary system environment of 360 ° C. capable of an acceleration test. . And the test piece was visually confirmed every predetermined time and the presence or absence of generation | occurrence | production of PWSCC was investigated (each test material is n = 4).
Table 3 below shows the results of a PWSCC test in which a test piece was immersed for up to 3050 hr in water simulating a PWR primary system.

Figure 2012121390
Figure 2012121390

表3に示すように、本発明で規定された条件の範囲内で製造された供試材a、bは、3050hrに及ぶ浸漬試験において全く割れが発生せず、耐PWSCC性に優れていることが明らかとなった。また、TT690合金についても、3050hrに及ぶ浸漬試験において割れが発生しなかったことから、本発明に係る供試材a、bは、少なくともTT690合金と同様の耐PWSCC性を備えていることがわかる。なお、Cr含有量が20%以上である比較例の供試材c〜j及び従来例の供試材kについても割れは発生しなかった。
なお、従来例である供試材mは、約2500hrまでの間に、全ての試験片に割れが認められた。
As shown in Table 3, the specimens a and b produced within the range defined by the present invention are free from cracks in the immersion test for 3050 hours and have excellent PWSCC resistance. Became clear. In addition, since no cracking occurred in the TT690 alloy in the immersion test for 3050 hr, it can be seen that the specimens a and b according to the present invention have at least the same PWSCC resistance as the TT690 alloy. . In addition, the crack did not generate | occur | produce also about the test material cj of the comparative example whose Cr content is 20% or more, and the test material k of a prior art example.
In addition, the test material m, which is a conventional example, was found to have cracks in all the test pieces up to about 2500 hr.

「孔食感受性試験」
本実施例では、PWRの二次系水中に不純物が混入した場合を想定し、塩化物を含む高温水環境において孔食電位計測を実施し、供試材の孔食感受性を比較評価した。
孔食感受性試験においては、まず、各供試材から、直径10mm、高さ7mmの円板状の孔食電位測定試験片を採取した。
"Pitting corrosion sensitivity test"
In this example, assuming that impurities were mixed in the secondary water of PWR, pitting potential measurement was performed in a high-temperature water environment containing chloride, and the pitting corrosion sensitivity of the test materials was compared and evaluated.
In the pitting corrosion sensitivity test, a disk-shaped pitting potential measurement test piece having a diameter of 10 mm and a height of 7 mm was first collected from each test material.

次に、採取した試験片を、循環式の高温電気化学測定試験装置の槽内に浸漬することにより、孔食感受性を評価した。この際、試験装置の循環系統に電位測定セル(電極槽)を設置し、圧力平衡型外部照合電極(Ag/AgCl)を照合電極に用いるとともに、白金電極を対極として用い、試料電極である各試験片の孔食電位を測定した。また、計測した電位を温度補正するため、電極槽内の温度を熱電対で計測した。また、電位の掃引及び電流値の計測は、ポテンショスタットを用いて行った。試験温度は300℃、試験溶液は0.1Mの塩化ナトリウム水溶液であり、pHは5.6である。電位掃引速度は25mV/minとして計測を行った。   Next, the pitting corrosion sensitivity was evaluated by immersing the collected test piece in a tank of a circulating high-temperature electrochemical measurement test apparatus. At this time, a potential measurement cell (electrode tank) is installed in the circulation system of the test apparatus, and a pressure balanced external reference electrode (Ag / AgCl) is used as a reference electrode, and a platinum electrode is used as a counter electrode. The pitting potential of the test piece was measured. Moreover, in order to correct the measured potential with temperature, the temperature in the electrode chamber was measured with a thermocouple. The potential sweep and the current value were measured using a potentiostat. The test temperature is 300 ° C., the test solution is a 0.1 M sodium chloride aqueous solution, and the pH is 5.6. The measurement was performed at a potential sweep rate of 25 mV / min.

表2に示すように、Cr含有量が本発明の規定範囲内である供試材a、bは、従来公知の材料である供試材kとm(TT690合金とTT600合金)に比べて高い孔食電位を示し、耐孔食性に優れていることが明らかである。   As shown in Table 2, specimen materials a and b having a Cr content within the specified range of the present invention are higher than specimens k and m (TT690 alloy and TT600 alloy), which are conventionally known materials. It shows pitting corrosion potential and is clearly excellent in pitting corrosion resistance.

「二次系環境での粒界腐食割れ(IGA)感受性確認試験(SSRT試験)」
本実施例では、PWRの二次系環境における供試材のIGA感受性を評価するため、二次系酸性模擬環境及び二次系アルカリ性模擬環境条件で低ひずみ速度引張試験(SSRT試験:Slow Strain Rate Technique)を行い、IGA感受性を比較評価した。
IGA感受性確認試験においては、まず、各供試材から厚さ2mm、試験部の幅4mmである平板型のSSRT用単軸引張試験片を採取した。
"Intergranular corrosion cracking (IGA) susceptibility confirmation test (SSRT test) in secondary environment"
In this example, in order to evaluate the IGA sensitivity of the test material in the secondary environment of PWR, a low strain rate tensile test (SSRT test: Slow Strain Rate) was performed under the secondary acidic simulated environment and secondary alkaline simulated environment conditions. (Technique) was performed and IGA sensitivity was compared and evaluated.
In the IGA susceptibility confirmation test, a flat plate-type uniaxial tensile specimen for SSRT having a thickness of 2 mm and a width of the test portion of 4 mm was first collected from each test material.

次に、採取した試験片を、SSRT試験装置内に設置し、SSRT試験を実施した。試験条件は、試験溶液が10%水酸化ナトリウム水溶液(pH 11.5)、温度300℃、電位は+100mV vs Ec、ひずみ速度8.3×10−7−1である。試験片への定電位の付与にはポテンショスタットを用いた。Next, the collected test piece was installed in an SSRT test apparatus, and an SSRT test was performed. The test conditions are a 10% aqueous sodium hydroxide solution (pH 11.5), a temperature of 300 ° C., a potential of +100 mV vs Ec, and a strain rate of 8.3 × 10 −7 s −1 . A potentiostat was used to apply a constant potential to the test piece.

また、粒界破面率(%)は、SSRT試験が完了した試験片を用い、次式{(試験環境に影響を受けた破面の面積/全破面の面積)×100(%)}で求めた。   In addition, the grain boundary fracture surface ratio (%) is determined by the following formula {(area of fracture surface affected by test environment / area of total fracture surface) × 100 (%)} I asked for it.

図2のグラフに示すように、Cr量が34〜38%、Ni量が44〜56%とされた、本発明に係る供試材a、bは、粒界破面率がそれぞれ15、23%と、アルカリ環境中におけるIGA耐食性が抑制されていることがわかる。これにより、従来公知の供試材k(TT690合金)を上回る耐食性が得られることが明らかである。
これに対し、従来公知の供試材k(TT690合金)(粒界破面率:27%)、供試材m(TT600合金)(粒界破面率:32%)並びに、Cr、Niの含有量が本発明の規定範囲外とされた供試材g(粒界破面率:35%)は、耐食性に劣ることがわかる。
As shown in the graph of FIG. 2, the specimens a and b according to the present invention, in which the Cr amount is 34 to 38% and the Ni amount is 44 to 56%, have a grain boundary fracture surface ratio of 15 and 23, respectively. It can be seen that IGA corrosion resistance in an alkaline environment is suppressed. Thereby, it is clear that the corrosion resistance exceeding the conventionally known test material k (TT690 alloy) can be obtained.
On the other hand, conventionally known test material k (TT690 alloy) (intergranular fracture surface rate: 27%), test material m (TT600 alloy) (intergranular fracture surface rate: 32%) and Cr, Ni It can be seen that the sample material g (grain boundary fracture surface ratio: 35%) whose content is outside the specified range of the present invention is inferior in corrosion resistance.

「加工性評価試験」
本実施例では、各供試材に関し、以下の条件及び手順により、熱間加工による押出成形を行う工程、並びに、冷間加工によって細径管を製造する工程における加工性をそれぞれ評価した。一般的に、伝熱管を製造する際の塑性加工としては、熱間加工(押出成形)による素管製造、それに続く冷間加工による最終仕上げが挙げられる。本実施例においては、熱間加工性をグリーブル試験の結果によって評価し、冷間加工性を引張試験の結果によって評価し、実機サイズの伝熱管の製造が可能であるか否かを判定した。
"Processability evaluation test"
In this example, the workability in each of the test materials was evaluated in the process of performing extrusion molding by hot working and the process of manufacturing a small diameter tube by cold working according to the following conditions and procedures. In general, the plastic working in producing a heat transfer tube includes the production of a raw tube by hot working (extrusion molding), and subsequent final finishing by cold working. In this example, the hot workability was evaluated based on the result of the greeble test, and the cold workability was evaluated based on the result of the tensile test, and it was determined whether or not a heat transfer tube of an actual machine size could be manufactured.

(グリーブル試験:熱間加工)
本実施例では、グリーブル試験を行うに際し、当該試験で得られる評価項目から熱間加工性を以下の基準で評価した。
(1)熱間延性:実機のSG伝熱管の、熱間加工の温度域での絞りの大きさが、熱間延性、特に形状や表面品質の大きさに対応する。即ち、絞りが大きいほど熱間加工性が良好である。
(2)ゼロ延性温度:伸びが0(実用上、20%以下と定義)となる温度である。即ち、ゼロ延性温度が高いほど粒界での部分溶融が生じにくく、熱間加工性が良好である。
(3)変形抵抗:実機のSG伝熱管の、熱間加工の温度域での引張強さの大きさが、熱間加工時の変形抵抗に対応する。即ち、変形抵抗が低いほど熱間加工性が良好である。
(Gleeble test: hot working)
In this example, when performing the greeble test, the hot workability was evaluated according to the following criteria from the evaluation items obtained in the test.
(1) Hot ductility: The size of the SG heat transfer tube of the actual machine in the hot working temperature range corresponds to the hot ductility, particularly the shape and the surface quality. That is, the hot workability is better as the drawing is larger.
(2) Zero ductility temperature: a temperature at which elongation becomes 0 (practically defined as 20% or less). That is, as the zero ductility temperature is higher, partial melting at the grain boundary is less likely to occur, and hot workability is better.
(3) Deformation resistance: The magnitude of the tensile strength in the temperature range of hot working of the SG heat transfer tube of the actual machine corresponds to the deformation resistance during hot working. That is, the lower the deformation resistance, the better the hot workability.

加工性評価試験にあたっては、まず、各供試材から、平行部φ10mmの丸棒引張試験片を採取した。
グリーブル試験のヒートパターンとしては、1250℃以上でゼロ延性温度を評価する試験においては、試験温度まで3分で昇温して3分間保持するパターンの後、引張試験を行った。また、1250℃未満の熱間延性を評価する試験においては、1250℃まで3分で昇温して3分間保持するパターンの後、下記表4に示す試験温度(900℃、1000℃、1100℃)まで100℃/minで降温させ、試験温度到達後に、直ちに引張試験を行った。
なお、引張試験におけるひずみ速度は10/sとした。そして、引張試験の後、試験片の外観観察と破断部の外径測定を行い、破断絞りを求めるとともに、最大荷重より引張強さを求め、変形抵抗(対TT690合金)を算出した。
In the workability evaluation test, first, a round bar tensile test piece having a parallel part φ10 mm was collected from each test material.
As a heat pattern for the greeble test, in a test for evaluating the zero ductility temperature at 1250 ° C. or higher, a tensile test was performed after a pattern in which the temperature was raised to the test temperature in 3 minutes and held for 3 minutes. Moreover, in the test which evaluates hot ductility below 1250 degreeC, after the pattern which heats up to 1250 degreeC in 3 minutes and hold | maintains for 3 minutes, the test temperature (900 degreeC, 1000 degreeC, 1100 degreeC shown in following Table 4) ) Until the test temperature was reached, and a tensile test was immediately conducted.
The strain rate in the tensile test was 10 / s. Then, after the tensile test, the appearance of the test piece was observed and the outer diameter of the fractured portion was measured to determine the fracture drawing, the tensile strength was determined from the maximum load, and the deformation resistance (vs. TT690 alloy) was calculated.

また、熱間加工の評価については、以下に示すように、従来公知の供試材k(TT690合金)を基準として「A」(Good)、「B」(Fair)、「C」(Bad)で判定し、各結果の一覧を下記表4に示した。
(1)A:供試材kと同等以上(供試材kと同様の条件で熱間加工可)
(2)B:供試材kに比べてやや劣る(製造条件を検討すれば熱間加工は可能)
(3)C:供試材kよりも劣る(熱間加工は困難と判断)
ここで、一般に、熱間加工における疵の発生は、絞りが50〜60%を下回ると生じるとされている。また、熱間で製造する温度域で加工性が良好であるかどうかが重要であるので、決して絞りの下限値を比較するものではない。本実施例における熱間加工性は、これらの点を考慮して判定した。
As for the hot working evaluation, as shown below, “A” (Good), “B” (Fair), “C” (Bad) based on a conventionally known test material k (TT690 alloy). The results are listed in Table 4 below.
(1) A: At least equivalent to the specimen k (hot workable under the same conditions as the specimen k)
(2) B: Slightly inferior to the test material k (hot working is possible if manufacturing conditions are examined)
(3) C: Inferior to the specimen k (determined that hot working is difficult)
Here, it is generally assumed that generation of wrinkles in hot working occurs when the drawing is less than 50 to 60%. In addition, since it is important whether or not the workability is good in the temperature range where it is produced hot, the lower limit value of the drawing is never compared. The hot workability in this example was determined in consideration of these points.

(引張試験:冷間加工)
さらに、各供試材の引張試験を行い、上記同様に変形抵抗(対TT690合金)を算出することで、冷間加工性を評価し、結果を下記表4に示した。
なお、冷間加工性の評価についても、以下に示すように、従来のTT690合金を基準として「A」(Good)、「C」(Bad)で判定し、各結果の一覧を下記表4に示した。
(1)A:供試材kと同等以上(供試材kと同様の条件で冷間加工可)
(2)C:供試材kよりも劣る(冷間加工は困難と判断)
(Tensile test: Cold working)
Furthermore, the tensile test of each test material was performed, and the cold resistance was evaluated by calculating the deformation resistance (vs. TT690 alloy) in the same manner as described above.
In addition, as shown below, the evaluation of cold workability was also determined by “A” (Good) and “C” (Bad) based on the conventional TT690 alloy, and a list of each result is shown in Table 4 below. Indicated.
(1) A: At least equivalent to the specimen k (cold working is possible under the same conditions as the specimen k)
(2) C: Inferior to the test material k (determined that cold working is difficult)

そして、上記各結果を基に製管可否の総合評価を「A(製管可能)」、「C(製管不可)」で判定し、この結果を下記表4の右欄に示した。   And based on each said result, comprehensive evaluation of the pipe production possibility was determined by "A (pipe production possibility)" and "C (pipe production impossible)", and this result was shown in the right column of the following Table 4.

Figure 2012121390
Figure 2012121390

表4に示すように、本発明に係る供試材a、bは、熱間加工性(熱間延性、ゼロ延性、変形抵抗)、冷間加工性(引張強度)の何れもが「A」の判定であり、総合評価も「A(製管可能)」となり、塑性加工性に優れていることが明らかとなった。   As shown in Table 4, the specimens a and b according to the present invention are both “A” for hot workability (hot ductility, zero ductility, deformation resistance) and cold workability (tensile strength). The overall evaluation was “A (pipe can be made)”, and it was revealed that the plastic workability was excellent.

これに対し、本発明で規定する範囲外の条件で製造された比較例である供試材h、jは、何れも熱間延性と冷間加工性に劣るものとなり、総合評価が「C(製管不可)」となり、塑性加工性に劣ることがわかる。
また、本発明で規定する範囲外の条件とされた比較例である供試材c、d、iは、総合評価では「A」であるものの、熱間延性に関しては何れも「B」の評価であり、蒸気発生器用伝熱管の製造は十分に可能であるが、塑性加工性が相対的に低い材料なっている。
また、本発明で規定する範囲外の条件とされた比較例である供試材c、d、eについては、加工性の総合評価は「A」であるものの、Cr、Niの何れかの含有量が本発明の規定範囲外であるため、耐食性等の点で劣るものであり、この点については、従来公知の供試材k(TT690合金)についても同様である。
In contrast, the test materials h and j, which are comparative examples manufactured under conditions outside the range defined in the present invention, are both inferior in hot ductility and cold workability, and the overall evaluation is “C ( It is understood that the plastic workability is inferior.
In addition, the test materials c, d, and i, which are comparative examples set as conditions outside the range specified in the present invention, are “A” in the comprehensive evaluation, but all are evaluated as “B” with respect to hot ductility. The production of the heat transfer tube for the steam generator is sufficiently possible, but the material is relatively low in plastic workability.
In addition, for the test materials c, d, and e, which are comparative examples set as conditions outside the range specified in the present invention, the comprehensive evaluation of workability is “A”, but the inclusion of either Cr or Ni Since the amount is outside the specified range of the present invention, it is inferior in terms of corrosion resistance and the like, and this is the same for the conventionally known test material k (TT690 alloy).

以上説明した各評価試験の結果より、本発明に係る原子力機器用材料が、耐食性及び加工性に優れていることが明らかとなった。従って、本発明の原子力機器用材料を、原子力発電所の加圧水型軽水炉における蒸気発生器用伝熱管に適用することにより、加圧水型軽水炉において必要な全ての特性を兼ね備えた蒸気発生器用伝熱管を実現できることが明らかである。   From the results of the evaluation tests described above, it became clear that the nuclear equipment material according to the present invention is excellent in corrosion resistance and workability. Therefore, by applying the material for nuclear equipment of the present invention to the heat transfer tube for the steam generator in the pressurized water light water reactor of the nuclear power plant, it is possible to realize the heat transfer tube for the steam generator having all the characteristics required for the pressurized water light water reactor. Is clear.

本発明の一態様に係る原子力機器用材料は、耐食性及び加工性に優れるため、原子力発電所の加圧水型軽水炉における蒸気発生器用伝熱管に適用できる。   Since the material for nuclear equipment according to one embodiment of the present invention is excellent in corrosion resistance and workability, it can be applied to a heat transfer tube for a steam generator in a pressurized water reactor of a nuclear power plant.

Claims (5)

質量%で、Cr:34〜38%、Ni:44〜56%、C:0.015〜0.025%、Si:0%超、0.5%以下、Mn:0.05〜0.5%、S:0.003%以下、P:0.015%以下、N:0.05%以下、Ti:0.5%以下、Al:0.05〜0.5%をそれぞれ含有し、残部がFe及び不可避的不純物からなる組成を有することを特徴とする原子力機器用材料。   In mass%, Cr: 34 to 38%, Ni: 44 to 56%, C: 0.015 to 0.025%, Si: more than 0%, 0.5% or less, Mn: 0.05 to 0.5 %, S: 0.003% or less, P: 0.015% or less, N: 0.05% or less, Ti: 0.5% or less, Al: 0.05 to 0.5%, and the balance Has a composition comprising Fe and inevitable impurities. 請求項1に記載の原子力機器用材料に対し、1050〜1150℃の温度で30min以下の熱処理を施した後、水冷又は空冷を行い、さらに、680〜750℃の温度で20hr以下の熱処理を行った後に空冷してなることを特徴とする原子力機器用材料。   The nuclear equipment material according to claim 1 is subjected to a heat treatment at a temperature of 1050 to 1150 ° C. for 30 minutes or less, then water-cooled or air-cooled, and further a heat treatment at a temperature of 680 to 750 ° C. for 20 hours or less. A material for nuclear equipment characterized by being air-cooled after. 請求項1又は2に記載の原子力機器用材料を有することを特徴とする蒸気発生器用伝熱管。   A heat transfer tube for a steam generator, comprising the nuclear equipment material according to claim 1. 請求項3に記載の蒸気発生器用伝熱管を具備することを特徴とする蒸気発生器。   A steam generator comprising the heat transfer tube for a steam generator according to claim 3. 請求項4に記載の蒸気発生器を具備することを特徴とする原子力プラント。   A nuclear power plant comprising the steam generator according to claim 4.
JP2013503632A 2011-03-10 2012-03-09 Heat generator tube for steam generator, steam generator and nuclear power plant Active JP5675958B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2013503632A JP5675958B2 (en) 2011-03-10 2012-03-09 Heat generator tube for steam generator, steam generator and nuclear power plant

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2011053445 2011-03-10
JP2011053445 2011-03-10
JP2013503632A JP5675958B2 (en) 2011-03-10 2012-03-09 Heat generator tube for steam generator, steam generator and nuclear power plant
PCT/JP2012/056178 WO2012121390A1 (en) 2011-03-10 2012-03-09 Material for nuclear power device, heat transfer tube for steam generator, steam generator, and nuclear power plant

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPWO2012121390A1 true JPWO2012121390A1 (en) 2014-07-17
JP5675958B2 JP5675958B2 (en) 2015-02-25

Family

ID=46798341

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2013503632A Active JP5675958B2 (en) 2011-03-10 2012-03-09 Heat generator tube for steam generator, steam generator and nuclear power plant

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5675958B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2012121390A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10760147B2 (en) 2013-06-07 2020-09-01 Korea Atomic Energy Research Insitute Ordered alloy 690 with improved thermal conductivity
KR101624736B1 (en) 2013-06-07 2016-05-27 한국원자력연구원 Manufacturing method of ordered alloy 690 with improved thermal conductivity and ordered alloy 690 manufactured using the method thereof
CN107709587B (en) * 2015-06-26 2019-07-26 日本制铁株式会社 Atomic energy Ni base alloy pipe
ES2898763T3 (en) 2017-06-08 2022-03-08 Nippon Steel Corp Nuclear Grade Ni-Based Alloy Tube

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS58177444A (en) * 1982-04-12 1983-10-18 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Heat treatment of ni-cr alloy
JPS58177445A (en) * 1982-04-12 1983-10-18 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Heat treatment of ni-cr alloy
JPS60245773A (en) * 1984-05-18 1985-12-05 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Manufacture of highly corrosion resistant ni base alloy
JP2834982B2 (en) * 1993-09-03 1998-12-14 住友金属工業株式会社 Alloy with excellent hot workability and corrosion resistance in high temperature water
JP3140319B2 (en) * 1995-02-28 2001-03-05 住友金属工業株式会社 Heat treatment method for Ni-base alloy with excellent corrosion resistance

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP5675958B2 (en) 2015-02-25
WO2012121390A1 (en) 2012-09-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN103352175B (en) A kind of control nitrogen austenitic stainless steel and manufacture method thereof
WO2018151222A1 (en) Ni-BASED HEAT-RESISTANT ALLOY AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
KR20050044557A (en) Super-austenitic stainless steel
WO2011155296A1 (en) Austenitic stainless steel tube having excellent steam oxidation resistance, and method for producing same
JP2009068079A (en) Steel tube with excellent steam oxidation resistance
JP5675958B2 (en) Heat generator tube for steam generator, steam generator and nuclear power plant
JP3976003B2 (en) Nickel-based alloy and method for producing the same
EP2835443B1 (en) Cr-containing austenitic alloy
CN110484836A (en) A kind of hafnium zirconium titanium molybdenum enhancing austenitic stainless steel and preparation method thereof
JP5459633B1 (en) Austenitic alloy tube
JP5675957B2 (en) Heat generator tube for steam generator, steam generator and nuclear power plant
JP3966136B2 (en) Stainless steel pipe for line pipe with excellent corrosion resistance
JP4059156B2 (en) Stainless steel for nuclear power
JP2010133024A (en) Austenitic high purity iron alloy having excellent high temperature property
JP4062188B2 (en) Stainless steel for nuclear power and manufacturing method thereof
KR20180073879A (en) Austenitic stainless steel having excellent hot workability and corrosion resistance and method of manufacturing the same
JPS5819741B2 (en) Austenitic stainless steel with excellent stress corrosion cracking resistance and weldability in high-temperature pure water
JP3973456B2 (en) Austenitic stainless steel with excellent high temperature salt damage corrosion resistance
JP2004091816A (en) Nickel-based alloy, heat treatment method for nickel-based alloy, and member for nuclear power with the use of nickel-based alloy
JP5992189B2 (en) Stainless steel excellent in high temperature lactic acid corrosion resistance and method of use
JP4783840B2 (en) Final heat treatment method for Ni-base alloy with excellent PWSCC resistance and Ni-base alloy
JPS5817823B2 (en) Heat treatment method for Ni-based alloy containing Cr
JPH02115350A (en) Stainless steel excellent in seawater corrosion resistance
JP2002194466A (en) Nickel based alloy clad steel and its production method
JP5493060B2 (en) Austenitic high-purity iron alloy

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20140819

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20141020

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20141021

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20141125

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20141224

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5675958

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250