JPS63103374A - Document processor - Google Patents

Abstract

PURPOSE:To immediately correct the improper words/phrases into proper ones by warning acoustically or optically the input of described improper words/ phrases. CONSTITUTION:When the character information is inputted from a keyboard 2, a CPU 6 displays the character information at a display part 3 in accordance with the control procedure of a ROM 7. Then the character information inputted from the keyboard 2 is stored in a RAM 8. In a register mode where a register key 2a of the keyboard 2 is pushed, a flag bit is set up at the position corresponding to the character information to be registered. Then an alarm is produced from a warning part 5 when it is detected that the improper character information is supplied based on the flag bit.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [Field of Industrial Application] The present invention relates to a document processing device having a function of issuing a warning.

[Prior Art] For example, in a word processor (hereinafter referred to as a word processor) as a conventional document processing device, sentences are created by inputting character information by pressing keys on which hiragana, katakana, alphabets, numbers, etc. are displayed. Then, the input character information is converted to a mixed meaning of kanji and kana.

By performing document processing using such a word processor, character information input from the keyboard is completed as a document containing a mixture of kanji and kana.

However, even if, for example, the okurikana is changed or the operator inputs inappropriate character information, conventional document processing devices have the disadvantage that the inappropriate character information is written directly into the document. .

(Points to be solved by the invention) For example, if you enter "..." using a word processor, the word processor will automatically write "..." in kana and kanji based on the dictionary installed in the word processor. However, if the Japanese language council decides to change the usage of okurikana from ``do'' to ``do'', for example, the dictionary installed in the word processor described above must be rebuilt. Since such changes are usually determined for a large number of okurigana, it takes a lot of time and effort to rebuild the dictionary installed in a word processor, and there is a problem of delays in response. Ta.

In addition, when a patent office etc. prepares a specification for a patent application or utility model registration application, for example, in the specification of the patent application, one invention is ...'', etc. The statement "The present invention..." is clearly a typographical error.

However, most of the work involved in drafting specifications is patent applications, and in rare cases where a utility model registration application is filed, it is difficult to register a utility model because the user is constantly exposed to sentences such as "The present invention..." In the application specification, there is a risk of accidentally writing "the present invention..." by mistake.

Conventional word processors have difficulty in quickly responding to the above-mentioned change in the sending and writing of character information, and also do not have a function to prevent erroneous human input of character information.

[Means for solving problems]

In the present invention, for example, a dictionary installed in a word processor converts "...will be done" into "...will be done" and "...will be done" will be translated into "...will be done".
When converting to ``Okona'', the human power of ``Okona'' is registered in advance. If there is actual human effort to ``do...'' or ``...will be done,'' a warning will be issued with an audible alarm or a blinking text display, alerting the word processor operator. It is an encouragement.

Therefore, by making adjustments, the operator can create a document using the kanji for "to do..." or "to be done" that is different from the one in the dictionary installed in the word processor, making it easier to overlook misconversions. Prevented. Furthermore, in the present invention,
For example, when creating a specification for a utility model registration application, you can register the character information of "invention" in advance, and when creating the document, "
If you inadvertently typed ``This invention is...'' instead of inputting ``This invention is...'', the system detects that the registered character information ``Invention'' was entered manually. You can also issue a warning.

The word processor operator notices the erroneous input by this warning and can correct the input of "The present invention is..." to "The present invention is...".

Therefore, the sentence 51j processing device of the present invention includes an input means for manually inputting character information, a document processing means for performing document processing using the character information inputted manually from the input means, and a document processing means for performing document processing using the character information inputted manually from the input means. a command means for commanding registration of information; a storage means for storing that the command means has instructed registration of character information; and character information corresponding to the storage in the storage means is inputted from the input means during document processing. The device is configured to have a warning means for issuing a predetermined warning when it is detected.

〔Example) The content of the present invention will be explained using examples.

FIG. 1 is an external perspective view showing a document processing apparatus according to the present invention.

In FIG. 1, 1 is the main body of the document processing device, 2 is a keyboard for inputting character information, 2a is a registration key for registering input character information, and 3 is a liquid crystal display for displaying input character information. 3a is an optical warning area in the display section, 4 is a printer section for documenting manually input character information, and 5 is a warning section for issuing a phonetic warning.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an electric circuit according to the present invention.

In FIG. 2, members denoted by the same reference numerals as in FIG. 1 are the same as in FIG. And 6 is CPU (central processing unit),
7 is ROM (read, memory, memory), 8 is RAM
(random, access, memory). First, press down the registration key 2a of the keyboard 2 to lock it in the registration mode.Next, when character information is input from the keyboard 2 in FIG. to be displayed.

On the other hand, character information input from keyboard 2 is stored in RAM
Store in 8. As mentioned above, since the registration key 2a is in the registration mode, the character information to be registered is "
"Okona", "Hatsumei", "Kouan", etc. are stored, and flag bits "1" are set in the positions corresponding to "Okona" and "Hatsumei", respectively, according to the registration procedure described above. In "Kouan", it is "0".

In other words, in RAM8, "Okona" and "Hatsumei"
The character information of is now registered.

? FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the control state of the CPU 6 shown in FIG.

In FIG. 4, character information is input in step S1.

If the input character information is, for example, "Hatsumei J" and the registration key 2a is pressed down, the determination of "Document creation mode" in step S2 is No, so the process moves to step S3, and the determination of "registration mode" is made. When the answer is NO, error processing in step s4 is executed, and when it is YES, registration is executed in step S5.

That is, by this step S5, the flag bit corresponding to "Hatsumei" in FIG. 3 is set to "1".

Next, when the registration key 2a is pushed back to release the lock, the registration key 2a is in a non-registration state and enters the normal document creation mode. Returning to step S1, if the next character information to be input is "Kouan", the determination result in step S2 is rYESJ, so a document is created in step S6. Next, the process moves to step S7, where it is determined whether the input character has been registered, and since the flag bit corresponding to "Kouan" in FIG. 3 is "0", that is, the determination is rNOJ, step S1 Return to However, if the character information entered manually in step S1 of the document creation mode is "Hatsumei" instead of "Kouan" as described above, it is determined in step S7 that "Hatsumei" in FIG. Since the flag bit corresponding to is "1", that is, the determination is rYEsJ, the process moves to step S8 and a warning is executed. When the warning is executed in step S8, the warning area 3a of the display unit 3 is blinked in FIGS. 1 and 2, and the warning unit 5 can issue an acoustic warning. Alternatively, a warning may be issued using only one of 3a and 5.

In the above explanation, the words and phrases that must not be written in the document to be created were explained as, for example, "invention," but the same applies to the word "do" mentioned above, and the words that can be registered include commonly used hiragana, Of course, it covers all character information such as katakana, shallow learning, alphabets, and numbers.

The key is to register in advance words and phrases that must not be included in the document to be created, and to notify the operator if the previously registered words are entered inadvertently while creating the document. This system provides an acoustic or optical warning.

(Effects of the Invention) As explained above, in the present invention, the word processor operator can easily notice that he or she has inputted an inappropriate word or phrase using an acoustic or optical warning, so he or she can immediately take appropriate action. This has the effect of making it possible to correct words and phrases.

Examples of cases where this may be the case include cases where it is necessary to perform kana or kanji conversion that is different from the dictionary installed in the word processor, cases where there is character information that is likely to be input incorrectly, etc.

[Brief explanation of the drawing]

Fig. 1 is an external perspective view of a document processing device according to the present invention, Fig. 2 is a block diagram of an electric circuit according to the great invention, Fig. 3 is an explanatory diagram showing the contents of the RAM, and Fig. 4 is a control of the CPU. It is a flowchart which shows a state. 1 ----------1 document processing system body, 2 -------
---Keyboard, 2 a ----1 registration key, 3 ------1 display section, 3 a ---1--warning area, 4 ----------Printer Part, 5 ---------1 Warning part, 6-1--------CPU. 7 ---------- ROM, 8 ---------- RAM.

Claims (2)

[Claims] (1) An input means for inputting character information, a document processing means for performing document processing using the character information input from the input means, a command means for instructing registration of the character information input from the input means, and the command. a storage means for storing that the character information has been registered by the means; and a warning means for issuing a predetermined warning when it is detected that the character information corresponding to the storage in the storage means has been inputted from the input means during document processing. A document processing device comprising: (2) The document processing device according to claim 1, wherein the warning means issues at least one of an acoustic warning and an optical warning.