JPS59165911A - Reclosing system - Google Patents

Reclosing system

Info

Publication number
JPS59165911A
JPS59165911A JP58039063A JP3906383A JPS59165911A JP S59165911 A JPS59165911 A JP S59165911A JP 58039063 A JP58039063 A JP 58039063A JP 3906383 A JP3906383 A JP 3906383A JP S59165911 A JPS59165911 A JP S59165911A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
line
interconnection
phase
circuit
condition
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP58039063A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH0789698B2 (en
Inventor
孝幸 横山
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toshiba Corp
Original Assignee
Toshiba Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Toshiba Corp filed Critical Toshiba Corp
Priority to JP58039063A priority Critical patent/JPH0789698B2/en
Publication of JPS59165911A publication Critical patent/JPS59165911A/en
Publication of JPH0789698B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0789698B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Emergency Protection Circuit Devices (AREA)

Abstract

(57)【要約】本公報は電子出願前の出願データであるた
め要約のデータは記録されません。
(57) [Summary] This bulletin contains application data before electronic filing, so abstract data is not recorded.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 〔発明の技術分野〕 不発明は、送猷線保護におけるしゃ断器及び新路器の情
報によや系統の連系確認を行なう44閉路方式の裳良に
関する。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [Technical Field of the Invention] The invention relates to the improvement of a 44-circuit system for checking the interconnection of a system based on information on circuit breakers and new circuits in live line protection.

〔発明の技術的背景とその問題点〕[Technical background of the invention and its problems]

送電線に故障が発生した場合、系統からその送電線を切
離し、故障除去を行なうが、送電線の事故は非継続性の
事故が大部分であるから、故障電流をしゃ断した後、ア
ーク消滅時間経過後、再び送電線を系統に併入して送電
を再開する自動再開路方式は系統の過渡安定度を向上さ
せるだめの有効な手段である。周知の如く系統の再閉路
は事故しゃ断した送電線の両端の゛岨源が同期運転して
いることを必要条件としている。そして系統の同期運転
の有無は、高速の再閉路が要求される場合あるいは平行
2凹成送電線等で多相再開路を行なう場合(二は連系確
認(二よって判定される。
When a fault occurs in a power transmission line, the power line is disconnected from the grid and the fault is removed. However, since most transmission line faults are discontinuous, the arc extinguishment time is determined after the fault current is cut off. After a period of time has elapsed, the automatic rerouting method, in which the transmission line is rejoined to the grid and power transmission resumes, is an effective means of improving the transient stability of the grid. As is well known, the re-closing of a power system requires that the power sources at both ends of the power transmission line that was cut off due to an accident operate synchronously. The presence or absence of synchronized operation of the grid is determined when high-speed re-closing is required or when multi-phase re-circuiting is performed using a parallel two-concave power transmission line (2 is grid interconnection confirmation (2).

連系確認を行う方法としては、従来より1iiA流検出
継嘔器による方法と、しゃ断器情@(二よる方法が実施
さオシている。前者の方法は、自回m、+s回線の各相
(二潮流検出継電器を設置し、潮流の有無(二よシ連系
の有無を判定するもので、自端の継′峨器のみによυ連
系確認を実施できる利点があるが、潮流検出継電器は線
路の充電々流(二よる誤動作を避けるため、ある程度整
定値を高くしなければならない。したがって、この整定
値以下の潮流では、遵系無しと誤判定される恐れがあシ
、確実な連系確認が期待できない。一方、後者の方法は
、しや断器の開閉状態をパレット条件にょ9検出し、保
a区間の自端及び相手端ともにしゃ断器閉にて連系有p
と判定する方法で、保護区間の各端子のしゃ断器情報を
伝送する必要があるため、送受信信号は増えるが、伝送
手段が容易に使用できる場合(二は、潮流の有無に関係
なく連系確認を行なうことが可能である。
Conventionally, two methods have been used to perform grid connection confirmation: a method using a 1iiA flow detection relay device and a method using a breaker information @ (2). (A two-way current detection relay is installed to determine the presence or absence of power flow (the presence or absence of two-way interconnection), which has the advantage of being able to confirm υ interconnection only with the relay at its own end. Relays must be set to a certain high value in order to avoid malfunctions due to line charging current (2).Therefore, if the current is less than this setting value, there is a risk that it will be mistakenly judged as non-compliant, so it is necessary to Confirmation of grid connection cannot be expected.On the other hand, the latter method detects the open/closed state of the breaker according to pallet conditions, and determines whether the breaker is connected at both the own end and the other end of the protection section with the breaker closed.
Since it is necessary to transmit the breaker information of each terminal in the protected area, the number of transmitted and received signals will increase, but if the transmission means can be easily used It is possible to do this.

第1図の平行2回線送電線を例にとって多相再閉路方式
を適用した場合の従来のしゃ断器情報による連系確認方
式を説明する。
Taking the parallel two-circuit power transmission line in FIG. 1 as an example, a conventional interconnection confirmation method using breaker information will be described when a polyphase reclosing method is applied.

′電気所A、B、Cはそれぞれ平行2回線送電線1−1
及び1−2により接続でれており、3端子系統を構成し
ている。各電気所と平行2回線送電所の接続部分にはし
ゃ断器2a112b1+ 2cl及び2a2+ 2b2
+ 2c2が設置されている。今、系統に内部故障が発
生してしゃ断器2a□、 2bI、 2cl及び2az
 、 2b2 + 2c2のうち事故相(二関連したし
ゃ断器が引外されたとすると、この場合、各電気所間の
連糸は送電線1−1及び1−2の健全相(二よシ保たれ
るが健全相数が連系条件を満足すれば、再閉路が実施さ
れる。通常、連系条件は両回線を合計して健全相が2相
残シ又は3相残シで成立と判定される。
'Electrical stations A, B, and C each have parallel two-circuit transmission lines 1-1.
and 1-2, forming a three-terminal system. Breakers 2a112b1+ 2cl and 2a2+ 2b2 are installed at the connection between each electric station and the parallel two-line power transmission station.
+2c2 is installed. Now, an internal failure has occurred in the grid, and circuit breakers 2a□, 2bI, 2cl, and 2az
, 2b2 + 2c2, if the breaker associated with the fault phase (2 However, if the number of healthy phases satisfies the interconnection condition, reclosing is carried out.Usually, the interconnection condition is determined to be satisfied when the number of healthy phases is 2 or 3 phases remaining by summing both circuits. Ru.

ところで、一般(−電気所は、運用操作(二より、系統
から切離して休止する場合があp、休止操作はしゃ断器
「開」又は断路器「開」(二て行なわれるため、しゃ断
器の開・開情報のみでは休止端か否かを特定することが
できない。そこで、′電気所が休止の場合(二は休止端
から送られるしゃ断器情報の何如にかかわらず各端子と
休止端子とのしゃ断器情報(−よる連系確認を無効にす
るよう連系確認回路を制御する必要がある。
By the way, in general (-), electrical stations may be disconnected from the grid and shut down due to operational operations (2). It is not possible to specify whether the terminal is at rest or not from only the open/open information.Therefore, if the electrical station is at rest (2), regardless of the breaker information sent from the at-rest end, it is impossible to specify whether the terminal is at rest or not. It is necessary to control the grid connection confirmation circuit to disable the grid connection confirmation based on the breaker information (-).

第2図及び第3図は従来の多相再閉路(二おける連系確
認方式を示す論理回路である。第2図は説明を簡単にす
るため、第1図の電気所Aの1分線1−1(二おけるA
端とB端間の連系確認方式を示したものである。1分線
R相連系信号3R工は電気所A、Bの1号線しゃ断器2
a、 I 2b、のR相が閉じている時、R相連系有と
判定して°゛1′′になる。2分線R相連系信号3R2
は電気所A、Hの2号線しや断器2a2 + 2b2の
R相が閉じている時、R相連系有と判定して1″′(二
なる。
Figures 2 and 3 are logic circuits showing the conventional polyphase reclosing (two-way interconnection confirmation method). Figure 2 shows the 1-segment line of electrical station A in Figure 1 to simplify the explanation. 1-1 (A in two places
This shows the grid connection confirmation method between the end and the B end. 1 minute line R interconnection signal 3R construction is line 1 circuit breaker 2 of electrical station A and B
When the R phase of a, I 2b, is closed, it is determined that the R phase is connected and becomes °゛1''. Bisector line R interconnection signal 3R2
When the R phase of line 2 line disconnectors 2a2 + 2b2 of electrical stations A and H is closed, it is determined that the R phase is connected and the result is 1'' (2).

以下同様にS相及びT相の連系の有無が判定される。な
お3S+及び3T+はそれぞれ1号紛S相及びT相の連
系信号、3S2及び3T2はそれぞれ2号#S相及びT
相の連系信号を示す。各相の連系信号は、オア回路4R
、4S、  4Tf−それぞれ導入して各相毎に1,2
号線のオア条件をとる。次(二、連系条件判定回路5(
二よって、−気所A、B間の多相再1゛1路述系条件が
成立しているか否かを判定して、連系条件判定出力6を
アンド回路7に導入する。アンド回路7の一方の入力8
は後述するB端1号腺体上信号で、電気所Bの1号線が
連用状態の時には、B端1号級休止信号8は休止端検出
せず”0′″となっているため、ノット回路9の出力は
61”でアンド回路7の出力10は、連系条件判定出力
6がその一!ま出力される。一方、電気所Bの一分線が
休止の場合(二は、B端1分線休止信号8が°’1”i
二なるため、アンド回路7はロックされ、A、B開運系
1ぎ号10は0″(二制御されるので、電気所A −8
間の1分線連系は無しと判定される。ところで、B端1
分線休止信号8は、第3図(二示すB端(−設置した休
止端検出回路(二おいて、B端1号勝のしゃ断器2bl
の各相のパレット条件11R、IIS 、 IITが3
相ともパ開”となったことをアンド回路12て検出した
場合か断路器条件13が[開]となった場合(ミオア回
路14(二より、B端1分線休止と441足して1”(
二なる。
Thereafter, the presence or absence of interconnection of the S phase and T phase is determined in the same manner. Note that 3S+ and 3T+ are the interconnection signals of No. 1 S phase and T phase, respectively, and 3S2 and 3T2 are the interconnection signals of No. 2 S phase and T phase, respectively.
Indicates the phase interconnection signal. The interconnection signal of each phase is OR circuit 4R
, 4S, 4Tf - 1,2 for each phase by introducing them respectively.
Take the or condition of the line. Next (2. Grid connection condition determination circuit 5 (
2. Therefore, it is determined whether the polyphase recirculation condition between the points A and B is satisfied or not, and the interconnection condition determination output 6 is input to the AND circuit 7. One input 8 of AND circuit 7
is the No. 1 gland body signal at the B end, which will be described later. When the No. 1 line at the electrical station B is in continuous use, the B end No. 1 class stop signal 8 does not detect the rest end and is set to "0'", so there is no knot. The output of the circuit 9 is 61", and the output 10 of the AND circuit 7 is the grid connection condition judgment output 6. On the other hand, when the branch line of electric station B is inactive (the second is 1 minute line stop signal 8 is °'1”i
2, the AND circuit 7 is locked, and the A and B good luck system 1 gear 10 is 0'' (2 is controlled, so the electric station A-8
It is determined that there is no 1-segment line interconnection between them. By the way, B end 1
The branch line stop signal 8 is transmitted from the B end shown in Figure 3 (2) to the installed break end detection circuit
Pallet conditions for each phase of 11R, IIS, IIT are 3
If the AND circuit 12 detects that both phases are open, or if the disconnector condition 13 is open (MIOR circuit 14) (
Two.

今、第1図の平行2回線送電線(二おいて、B端1分線
休止15b1でかつC端1分線休止15clの時、すな
わち第4図図示の系統条件のとき1号線(=内部故障f
lが発生したとする。なお弗4図において、第1図と同
一の部分には同一番号を付して説明する。
Now, when the parallel two-circuit power transmission line (2) in Figure 1 is suspended for 1 minute at the B end and 15 cl is suspended for 1 minute at the C end, that is, under the system conditions shown in Figure 4, line 1 (= internal Failure f
Suppose that l occurs. In Figure 4, the same parts as in Figure 1 are given the same numbers and will be explained.

電気所Aの1分線1−1は故障除去のため、しゃ断器2
a1の故障相が引外される。多相再閉路を実施する場合
、再閉路条件として送電線2回線合計で健全相が2相残
シ、又は3相残りのいづれかの条件が選択され、連系条
件の確認を行なうが第4図に示すケースでは、第2図の
A−8間の連系確認回路において、2分線連系信号3R
2−382、3T2が連系有で°l”になるため、連系
条件が2相残シ又は3相残シのいづれに選択されていて
も、条件は成立し、その判定出力6はN I I+にな
る。またA−0間の連系も、上記と同様に成立する。し
かしながら、B端1号腺15b1及びC端1分線15c
1は休止のため、第3図の休止端検出回路が休止を検出
してB端1分線休止信号8はl”となジ、同様(二C端
1分線体止信号も”1”iニなってA端に伝送される。
The 1-segment line 1-1 at electrical station A is connected to circuit breaker 2 to eliminate faults.
The faulty phase of a1 is tripped. When performing multiphase reclosing, the reclosing condition is either 2 remaining healthy phases or 3 remaining healthy phases in the total of 2 transmission lines, and the interconnection conditions are checked, as shown in Figure 4. In the case shown in Figure 2, in the grid connection confirmation circuit between A-8, the bisector line connection signal 3R
2-382, 3T2 becomes °l" with grid connection, so regardless of whether the grid connection condition is selected as 2-phase remaining or 3-phase remaining, the condition is met and the judgment output 6 is N. I I+.Also, the interconnection between A-0 is established in the same way as above.However, the B end No. 1 gland 15b1 and the C end 1 minute line 15c
1 is a pause, so the pause end detection circuit in FIG. i and is transmitted to the A end.

このため、A端遵系確認回路では連系条件が成立してい
る(二もがかわらず、B端1分線及びC端1号組の休止
信号によυ連系判定出力6をアンド回路7でロックする
ためA−B聞達系及びA−6間連系ともに連系無しi二
制御されて、A端1号籾は再閉路を実施できない。
Therefore, the grid connection condition is satisfied in the A-end grid compliance confirmation circuit (both are unchanged, and the υ grid-connection judgment output 6 is ANDed by the halt signal of the B-end 1-segment line and the C-end No. 1 group). 7, both the A-B communication system and the A-6 connection are controlled without connection, and the A-end No. 1 paddy cannot be reclosed.

次(二、第1図の平行2回線送′屯線(二おいて、B端
1分線休止15b1でかっC端2分線休止15c2の時
、すなわち第5図図示の系統条件のとき1号線(=内部
故障f2が発生したとする。電気所A及び電気所Cの1
号線しゃ断器2a、 、 2c4は故障除去のため故障
相が引外される。このとき第2図のA端1分線A−B間
違系確認回路は、2号線によシ3相連系が維持されてい
るため、連系判定出力6はIll”″となるが、B端1
分線休止15b1+=よ、!Ill A−B間連系無し
に制御される。一方、1号線は事故しゃ断し、2号線は
C端体止であるからA−C間違系確認は、連系無しとな
る。したがって、連系条件として、2相残フの条件を選
択した場合は、1相故障時(−は、1号線の条件のみで
連系条件が成立するが、2相以上の故障ではA−C間連
系無しとなる。また、連系条件として3相残シを選択し
た場合は、すべての故障においてA−C間連系無しとな
り、再閉路は実施できない。
Next (2. Parallel two-line transmission line in Figure 1 (2) When the B end is 1 minute line pause 15b1 and the C end is 2 minute line pause 15c2, that is, when the system condition shown in Figure 5 is 1 line (= Suppose that an internal failure f2 has occurred. 1 of electric station A and electric station C)
The faulty phase of the line breakers 2a, 2c4 is tripped to remove the fault. At this time, the A-end 1-segment line A-B incorrect system confirmation circuit in Fig. 2 maintains the 3-phase interconnection with Line 2, so the interconnection judgment output 6 becomes Ill'', but B Edge 1
Separate line pause 15b1+=Yo! Ill Controlled without interconnection between A and B. On the other hand, Line 1 has been cut off due to an accident, and Line 2 has its C end closed, so if the A-C incorrect system is confirmed, there will be no interconnection. Therefore, if you select the condition of two phases remaining as the interconnection condition, when one phase fails (- means the interconnection condition is satisfied only under the condition of line 1, but if there is a failure of two or more phases, A-C There will be no interconnection between them.Furthermore, if three-phase remaining is selected as the interconnection condition, there will be no interconnection between A and C in all failures, and re-closing cannot be performed.

以上説明したよう4二、第4図及び第5図のケースでは
、電気所A−B間は、2号@il二よ)連系がとれてい
る(二もかかわらず、休止端からの休止信号(二よって
連系条件が強制的(=不成立(二制御され、再閉路可能
な場合でも、再開路が阻止されることになる。そして、
一旦、線路が系統から脱落すると、その復旧操作は容易
ではなく、かなpの復旧時IH」を要するので、再閉路
可能な場合(=は、極力再閉路させることが重侠である
。前記第4図の系統条件では、1号級のB端、C端がと
も(二体止のため再閉路できなくても、特(二供給障害
は起こさないが、送電線を常時充電しておき、B端また
はC端のしゃ断器閉操作のみで、系統(二併入できる状
態として2くのは運用上非常(−有利である。
As explained above, in the cases shown in Figures 42, 4, and 5, there is a connection between electrical station A and B (No. 2@il2) (despite the fact that the Even if the signal (2) indicates that the interconnection condition is forced (= not established (2) and the re-closing is possible, the re-closing will be prevented. And,
Once a line has fallen out of the system, it is not easy to restore it, and requires IH at the time of restoration, so if it is possible to reclose it (=, it is important to reclose it as much as possible. Under the system conditions in Figure 4, both the B and C ends of Class 1 are connected (even if the circuit cannot be reclosed due to the two-body stop, it does not cause a supply failure, but the power transmission line is always charged, It is extremely advantageous in terms of operation to be able to connect two systems in parallel by simply closing the breaker at the B or C end.

〔発明の目的〕[Purpose of the invention]

本発明は、上記従来のしゃ断器情報による連系確認の欠
点を除去するもので、その目的は、体子端のある系統に
おいても確実(二連系確認が行なうようにしだ系仇の再
開路方式を提供するにある。
The present invention eliminates the drawbacks of the above-mentioned conventional grid connection confirmation using breaker information, and its purpose is to ensure reliable grid connection confirmation even in systems where there are two terminals (to ensure that the connection is confirmed at the other end of the system). There is a method to provide.

〔発明の概要〕[Summary of the invention]

不発明は、上記目的を達成するため(二、自端のしゃ断
器及び新路器と、相手端のしゃ断器及び断路器が、丁べ
て「閉」のとき連系ありと判定して再閉路条件とする再
閉路方式(−おいて、相手端口休止端子が生じたとき当
該休止端子のしゃ断器情報を除外し、残9の端子との間
で連系条件の確認を行うよ′)にしたものである。
The non-invention is to achieve the above purpose (2. When the breaker and new circuit switch at the own end and the breaker and disconnector at the other end are both "closed", it is determined that there is interconnection and In the re-closing method as the closing condition (-, when an idle terminal at the other end occurs, exclude the breaker information of the idle terminal and check the interconnection conditions with the remaining 9 terminals). This is what I did.

〔発明の実施例〕[Embodiments of the invention]

本発明の一実施例を図面を参照して説明する。 An embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

第7図は説明を簡単(ニするために、第1図(二示す3
端子系統(二おいて、電気所Aの1号線における電気所
A−B間(二本発明(二係る連系確認方式を適用した場
合の論理回路であり、第2図の論理回路と同一箇所(二
は同一符号を附して説明する。なお、他の電気所間の連
系確認方式は前記電気所A−B間の連系確認方式と同様
(−構成できるので、その説明は省略する。1分線R相
連系信号3R,は、電気所A、Bの1号線しや@器2a
1,2b、のR相が閉じている時、R@遵連系と判定し
て“1″′(二なる。
Figure 7 is used to simplify the explanation.
Terminal system (2) Between electrical station A and B on line 1 of electrical station A (2) This is a logic circuit when the interconnection confirmation method according to the present invention (2) is applied, and is the same location as the logic circuit in Figure 2. (2 will be explained with the same reference numerals.The method for checking interconnection between other electric stations is the same as the method for checking interconnection between electric stations A and B (-), so the explanation will be omitted because it can be configured. .1 minute line R phase interconnection signal 3R, is line 1 shiya @ equipment 2a of electrical stations A and B.
When the R phases of 1 and 2b are closed, it is determined that R@Zen is connected and "1"' (2).

2傍線R相連系信号3R22は電気所A、Bの2号線し
ゃ断器2a2t 2b2のR相か閉じていること及びB
端2分線が休止でないことのアンド条件が成立したとき
2対線R相連系有と判定して1”(=なる。
2 side line R phase interconnection signal 3R22 indicates that the R phase of line 2 circuit breakers 2a2t and 2b2 of electrical stations A and B are closed and B
When the AND condition that the end bisecting line is not at rest is satisfied, it is determined that the two-pair line R is interconnected, and becomes 1'' (=.

以下、同様(二S相及びT相の連系の有無がS相違系信
号3S1,3822及びT相違系信号3Tt 、 3T
22 (=よって判定される。なお、381及び3’L
はそれぞれ1力線S相及びT相の連系信号、3S22及
び3T22はそれぞれ2分線S相及びT相の連系信号を
示す。
Hereinafter, similarly (the presence or absence of interconnection of the two S phase and T phase is the S difference system signal 3S1, 3822 and the T difference system signal 3Tt, 3T
22 (= determined accordingly. In addition, 381 and 3'L
3S22 and 3T22 indicate interconnection signals of the 1-force line S phase and T phase, respectively, and 3S22 and 3T22 indicate interconnection signals of the bisecting line S phase and T phase, respectively.

1号線の各相違系信号3R+ 、 3S+ 、 3T+
はアンド回路17R、17S 、 17T f二それぞ
れ導入され、B端1分線休止信号8をノット回路9にょ
逆反転させた信号とアンド条件を取った後、そのアンド
条件出力3Rn + 3Su + 3Tn カオ7回路
4R,4S、 4’ll:導入される。また、アンド条
件出力3Ru 、 3Sn 、 3T1□は1号線の各
相違系信号として2号線に渡される。
Line 1's different signals 3R+, 3S+, 3T+
The AND circuits 17R, 17S, and 17Tf are respectively introduced, and after taking the AND condition with a signal obtained by inverting the B end 1-segment line pause signal 8 into the NOT circuit 9, the AND condition output 3Rn + 3Su + 3Tn Kao 7 circuits 4R, 4S, 4'll: Introduced. Further, the AND condition outputs 3Ru, 3Sn, and 3T1□ are passed to line 2 as respective different signals of line 1.

一方、2号Sの各相違系信号3R22,3S22 、3
T22は直接オア回路4R,4S、4Tに導入し、1分
線連系信号3R+ 、3S+ 、3’r+と体上信号8
の反転信号とのアンド条件出力3R,□、3s1□、3
T1□と各相毎にオア条件を取った後、連系条件判定回
路5によって電気所A−B間の連系条件が成立している
が否かを判定して、その結果をA−B聞達系信号1oと
して出力するものである。
On the other hand, each different system signal 3R22, 3S22, 3 of No. 2 S
T22 is directly introduced into the OR circuits 4R, 4S, and 4T, and the 1-segment line interconnection signals 3R+, 3S+, 3'r+ and the body signal 8
AND condition output with the inverted signal of 3R, □, 3s1□, 3
After taking the OR condition for T1□ and each phase, the interconnection condition determination circuit 5 determines whether the interconnection condition between electrical stations A and B is satisfied or not, and the result is determined between A and B. It is output as a listening system signal 1o.

次に、本発明による再閉路方式の作用について説明する
Next, the operation of the reclosing method according to the present invention will be explained.

第4図(′″−示す端子系統(二おいて、電気所B、C
の1号線が休止中(=内部故障f1が発生した場合、電
気所AのA−’B間聞達確認は、B端1号綜休止信号8
によシ、1号線の各相違系信号3R,、3S、 。
Figure 4 ('''-terminal system shown)
Line 1 is out of service (=If an internal failure f1 occurs, confirmation of communication between A and 'B at electric station A is made by sending the B end No. 1 line outage signal 8.
Different signals 3R, 3S, on Line 1.

3T、がロックされるが、2号線の各相違系信号3R2
23S22 、3T22が3相連系有で連系条件が成立
するため、A−B間違系信号10が1”となって、A端
は連系有で再閉路が実施される。A−0間連系について
も同様(二してAgsは再閉路が実施される。
3T, is locked, but each different system signal 3R2 of line 2
Since 23S22 and 3T22 are 3-phase interconnected and the interconnection condition is satisfied, the A-B incorrect system signal 10 becomes 1'', and the A terminal is interconnected and reclosed. Between A and 0. The same goes for grid interconnection (Secondly, Ags is reclosed.

また、第5図(−示す3端子系統(−おいて、電気所B
の1号線及び電気所Cの2号線が休止中(二1号線(1
内部故障f2が発生した場合、電気所A(−おけるA−
B関連系確認は、2号線の各相違系信号3R22、38
22、3T22 i二より3相連系で連系条件が成立す
るため、A端の再閉路は実施される。l−0間連系確認
は、C端2分線休止により、2分線各相連系信号が3相
とも連系無しになるため、1号線の健全相のみ連系有と
なる。したがって、連系条件が2相残りの場合には、2
相以上の故障で、3相残シの場合(−はすべての故障時
(二A−C間連系なしと判定し、適切な再閉路条件の選
択が可能となる。
In addition, Fig. 5 (3-terminal system shown in -)
Line 1 and Line 2 of Electrical Station C are suspended (Line 21 (1)
If an internal failure f2 occurs, the electrical station A (A- at -
B-related system confirmation is for each different system signal 3R22, 38 of Line 2.
22, 3T22 i Since the interconnection conditions are established for two- to three-phase interconnection, the A-terminal re-closing is performed. When checking the connection between l and 0, due to the suspension of the C-end 2-segment line, the 2-segment line each phase interconnection signal will be disconnected for all 3 phases, so only the healthy phase of line 1 will be interconnected. Therefore, if the interconnection condition is 2 phases remaining, 2
If there is a failure in one phase or more, and three phases remain (- means all failures (it is determined that there is no interconnection between two A and C), it is possible to select an appropriate reclosing condition.

さらに、第6図に示す3端子系統C二おいて、すなわち
第5図の3端子系統と同様に電気所Bの1号勝及び電気
所Cの2号勝が休止中に2号線に内部故障f3が発生し
た場合、A−B間は1力線休止でかつ2対線事故により
連系無しとなる。一方、A−0間連系確認はC端2分線
休止にょシ2号超各相違系信号が3相とも連系無しとな
るため、1号線の健全相のみ連系有となる。したがって
、前記第5図の場合と同様に連系条件が2箱残りの一合
には、2相以上の故障で、3相残りの一合にはずべての
故障時にA−0間連系なしと判定し、適切な再閉路条件
の選択が゛可能となる。
Furthermore, in the 3-terminal system C2 shown in Figure 6, similar to the 3-terminal system in Figure 5, there was an internal failure in Line 2 while the No. 1 wire of electric station B and the No. 2 wire of electric station C were out of service. When f3 occurs, one line of force is suspended between A and B, and there is no interconnection due to a two-pair line fault. On the other hand, when checking the A-0 interconnection, since the C end 2-segment line is out of service, all three phases of the different system signals over No. 2 are not interconnected, so only the healthy phase of Line 1 is interconnected. Therefore, as in the case of Fig. 5 above, the interconnection condition is that in the case of the remaining 2 boxes, there is a failure of 2 or more phases, and in the case of the remaining 3 phases, in the case of a failure in all cases, A-0 interconnection is required. It is determined that there is no such condition, and it becomes possible to select an appropriate reclosing condition.

〔発明の効果〕〔Effect of the invention〕

不発明によれば、再開路におけるしゃ断器情報による連
系確認において、休止端子がある場合(二は当該休止端
子のしゃ断器情報のみ連系確認から除外して、残シの端
子との間で連系を確認するようにしたため、適切な連系
確認を行ない、可能な限シ再開路を実施して系統故障時
の迅速な事故復旧を可能とした再閉路方式を提供するこ
とができる。
According to the invention, when there is a dormant terminal in the grid connection confirmation based on the breaker information on the restarted circuit (secondly, only the breaker information of the dormant terminal is excluded from the grid connection confirmation, and the connection with the remaining terminal is Since grid interconnection is confirmed, it is possible to provide a re-closing method that enables quick accident recovery in the event of a grid failure by appropriately confirming grid interconnection and recirculating as much as possible.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of drawings]

第1図は、平行2回線送電縁の3S4子系統図、第2図
は、従来のしゃ断器情報による連系確認方式の回路図、
第3図は休止端検出の回路図、第4図乃至第6図は、そ
れぞれ異なる内部故障と休止端がある3端子系統図、第
7図は本発明の一実施例を示す回路図である。 1−1.1−2・・・送岨線、 2a+ 12a2+ 2bl 、 2b2 + 2c4
12c2 +++しゃ断器、3R1、3貫、3St 、
3S2.3T; 、3T2・・・各相違系信号、3R1
11gR2□、 3S1+ 、 3S2□+ 3Tst
 + 3T2□・・・各相違系信号、4L 4S、 4
T、 14・・・オア回路、7 、12.17R、17
S、 17T・・・アンド回路、5・・・連系条件判定
回路、 6・・・連系条件判定出力、 8・・・休止信号、 9・・・ノット回路、 10・・・連系信号出力、 15bl 、 15c1 、15c2・−・休止端、f
l、f2.f3・・・内部故障。 (8733)  代理人 弁理士 猪 股 祥 晃(Q
士力S1名)第3図 ・・・寺四′7,7 第4図 第5図
Figure 1 is a 3S4 subsystem diagram of a parallel two-line transmission edge, Figure 2 is a circuit diagram of a conventional grid connection confirmation method using breaker information,
FIG. 3 is a circuit diagram for detecting a dead end, FIGS. 4 to 6 are three-terminal system diagrams with different internal failures and dead ends, and FIG. 7 is a circuit diagram showing an embodiment of the present invention. . 1-1.1-2...Fuken line, 2a+ 12a2+ 2bl, 2b2 + 2c4
12c2 +++ breaker, 3R1, 3 pieces, 3St,
3S2.3T; , 3T2...each different signal, 3R1
11gR2□, 3S1+, 3S2□+ 3Tst
+ 3T2□...Each different signal, 4L 4S, 4
T, 14...OR circuit, 7, 12.17R, 17
S, 17T...AND circuit, 5...Grid connection condition judgment circuit, 6...Grid connection condition judgment output, 8...Stop signal, 9...NOT circuit, 10...Grid connection signal Output, 15bl, 15c1, 15c2 --- Pausing end, f
l, f2. f3...Internal failure. (8733) Agent Patent Attorney Yoshiaki Inomata (Q
Shiriki S1 person) Figure 3...Tera 4'7,7 Figure 4 Figure 5

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] (1)  自端のしゃ断器及び断路器と、相手端のしゃ
断器及び新路器がすべて「閉」のとき連系あシと判定し
て再閉路条件とする再閉路方式において、相手端(−休
止端子が生じたとき当該休止端子のしゃ断器情報を除外
し、残ジの端子との間で連系条件の確認を行うようにし
たことを特徴とする再閉路方式。
(1) In the re-closing method, when the breaker and disconnector at the own end and the breaker and new circuit switch at the other end are all "closed", it is determined that the connection is connected and the re-closing condition is set. - A re-closing method characterized in that when a dormant terminal occurs, the breaker information of the dormant terminal is excluded and the interconnection conditions are checked with the remaining terminals.
JP58039063A 1983-03-11 1983-03-11 Reclosing method Expired - Lifetime JPH0789698B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP58039063A JPH0789698B2 (en) 1983-03-11 1983-03-11 Reclosing method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP58039063A JPH0789698B2 (en) 1983-03-11 1983-03-11 Reclosing method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS59165911A true JPS59165911A (en) 1984-09-19
JPH0789698B2 JPH0789698B2 (en) 1995-09-27

Family

ID=12542669

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP58039063A Expired - Lifetime JPH0789698B2 (en) 1983-03-11 1983-03-11 Reclosing method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH0789698B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009017780A (en) * 2008-09-16 2009-01-22 Toshiba Corp Multiple-terminal power line protective relay device

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009017780A (en) * 2008-09-16 2009-01-22 Toshiba Corp Multiple-terminal power line protective relay device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH0789698B2 (en) 1995-09-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR100347488B1 (en) Positive electrode fire extinguishing system of distribution line
CN111856213B (en) Fault positioning method for ring network operation
JP3085007B2 (en) Distribution electrode downsizing system and method thereof
JPS59165911A (en) Reclosing system
CN114062973B (en) In-situ feeder automation reverse locking application method
JP3328365B2 (en) Islanding detection device
CN114614451B (en) Remote backup protection method, protection device and hierarchical relay protection system for station domain layer
JPH0245419B2 (en)
JPH0236727A (en) High speed separation/recovery system of distribution line fault
JPS60121914A (en) Current difference protecting relaying unit
JP2892104B2 (en) Automatic power system restoration device
SU1050035A1 (en) High-voltage distributing device
JPH071982B2 (en) Loop protection relay system
JPS639233Y2 (en)
JP2507363B2 (en) Busbar protection relay
JPS6223222Y2 (en)
SU904094A1 (en) Substation with switches of load
JPH01170325A (en) Spot network system
JPH0125298B2 (en)
JPS63242130A (en) Power system changing apparatus
JPS6135115A (en) Defect protecting device of switch
JPS5926175B2 (en) Power plant external power supply receiving circuit
JPS58130727A (en) Control system for dc multiterminal transmission system
JPS61189120A (en) Protective relay
JPH0559648B2 (en)