JPH0789698B2 - Reclosing method - Google Patents

Reclosing method

Info

Publication number
JPH0789698B2
JPH0789698B2 JP58039063A JP3906383A JPH0789698B2 JP H0789698 B2 JPH0789698 B2 JP H0789698B2 JP 58039063 A JP58039063 A JP 58039063A JP 3906383 A JP3906383 A JP 3906383A JP H0789698 B2 JPH0789698 B2 JP H0789698B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
line
interconnection
phase
condition
circuit
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP58039063A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS59165911A (en
Inventor
孝幸 横山
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toshiba Corp
Original Assignee
Toshiba Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Toshiba Corp filed Critical Toshiba Corp
Priority to JP58039063A priority Critical patent/JPH0789698B2/en
Publication of JPS59165911A publication Critical patent/JPS59165911A/en
Publication of JPH0789698B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0789698B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Emergency Protection Circuit Devices (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 〔発明の技術分野〕 本発明は、送電線保護におけるしや断器及び断路器の情
報により系統の連系確認を行なう再閉路方式の改良に関
する。
Description: TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to an improvement in a reclosing method for confirming interconnection of a system based on information on a breaker, a disconnector and a disconnector in transmission line protection.

〔発明の技術的背景とその問題点〕[Technical background of the invention and its problems]

送電線に故障が発生した場合、系統からその送電線を切
離し、故障除去を行なうが、送電線の事故は非継続性の
事故が大部分であるから、故障電流をしや断した後、ア
ーク消滅時間経過後、再び送電線を系統に併入して送電
を再開する自動再閉路方式は系統の過渡安定度を向上さ
せるための有効な手段である。周知の如く系統の再閉路
は事故しや断した送電線の両端の電源が同期運転してい
ることを必要条件としている。そして系統の同期運転の
有無は、高速の再閉路が要求される場合あるいは平行2
回線送電線等で多相再閉路を行なう場合には連系確認に
よつて判定される。
When a fault occurs in a power transmission line, the power transmission line is disconnected from the system and the fault is removed.However, most of the faults in the transmission line are discontinuous. The automatic reclosing method, in which a power transmission line is inserted into the system again and power transmission is restarted after the disappearance time is an effective means for improving the transient stability of the system. As is well known, the reclosing of the system requires that the power supplies at both ends of the transmission line that has been accidentally or disconnected have been operating synchronously. The presence or absence of synchronous operation of the system depends on whether parallel reclosing is required at high speed or parallel 2
When multi-phase reclosing is performed on a circuit transmission line, etc., it is determined by checking the interconnection.

連系確認を行う方法としては、従来より潮流検出継電器
による方法と、しや断器情報による方法が実施されてい
る。前者の方法は、自回線,隣回線の各相に潮流検出継
電器を設置し、潮流の有無により連系の有無を判定する
もので、自端の継電器のみにより連系確認を実施できる
利点があるが、潮流検出継電器は線路の充電々流による
誤動作を避けるため、ある程度整定値を高くしなければ
ならない。したがつて、この整定値以下の潮流では、連
系無しと誤判定される恐れがあり、確実な連系確認が期
待できない。一方、後者の方法は、しや断器の開閉状態
をパレツト条件により検出し、保護区間の自端及び相手
端ともにしや断器閉にて連系有りと判定する方法で、保
護区間の各端子のしや断器情報を伝送する必要があるた
め、送受信信号は増えるが、伝送手段が容易に使用でき
る場合には、潮流の有無に関係なく連系確認を行なうこ
とが可能である。
As a method for confirming the interconnection, a method using a tidal current detection relay and a method based on information on a broken wire or a broken wire have been conventionally practiced. The former method installs a power flow detection relay on each phase of its own line and adjacent line, and determines the presence or absence of interconnection based on the presence or absence of tidal current, which has the advantage of being able to perform interconnection confirmation using only the relay at its own end. However, the power flow detection relay must have a high settling value to some extent in order to avoid malfunction due to the charging current of the line. Therefore, if the power flow is less than the set value, there is a risk that it may be erroneously determined that there is no interconnection, and reliable interconnection confirmation cannot be expected. On the other hand, the latter method is a method of detecting the open / closed state of the breaker or the breaker under the pallet condition, and determining that there is interconnection between the self-end and the other end of the protection section by closing the breaker or the breaker. Since it is necessary to transmit the terminal mark and disconnection information, the number of transmitted / received signals increases, but if the transmission means can be easily used, interconnection confirmation can be performed regardless of the presence or absence of tidal current.

第1図の平行2回線送電線を例にとつて多相再閉路方式
を適用した場合の従来のしや断器情報による連系確認方
式を説明する。
Taking the parallel two-line power transmission line of FIG. 1 as an example, a conventional grid connection confirmation method based on the disconnection information and disconnection information in the case where the polyphase reclosing method is applied will be described.

電気所A,B,Cはそれぞれ平行2回線相電線1−1及び1
−2により接続されており、3端子系統を構成してい
る。各電気所と平行2回線送電所の接続部分にはしや断
器2a1,2b1,2c1及び2a2,2b2,2c2が設置されている。今、
系統に内部故障が発生してしや断器2a1,2b1,2c1及び2
a2,2b2,2c2のうち事故相に関連したしや断器が引外され
たとすると、この場合、各電気所間の連系は送電線1−
1及び1−2の健全相により保たれるが健全相数が連系
条件を満足すれば、再閉路が実施される。通常、連系条
件は両回線を合計して健全相が2相残り又は3相残りで
成立と判定される。
Electric power stations A, B, C are parallel 2-line phase electric wires 1-1 and 1 respectively.
-2 and are connected to each other to form a three-terminal system. The breakers 2a 1 , 2b 1 , 2c 1 and 2a 2 , 2b 2 , 2c 2 are installed at the connection between each electric station and the parallel two-line power transmission station. now,
An internal fault has occurred in the system or the disconnector 2a 1 , 2b 1 , 2c 1 and 2
a 2, 2b 2, when 2c to related accident phase of 2 or disconnection device is to have been tripped, this case, interconnection between the electrical plant transmission lines 1-
It is maintained by the sound phases 1 and 1-2, but if the number of sound phases satisfies the interconnection condition, reclosing is performed. Normally, the interconnection condition is determined to be established when the two phases are totaled and the sound phase remains with two phases remaining or three phases remaining.

ところで、一般に電気所は、運用操作により、系統から
切離して休止する場合があり、休止操作はしや断器
「開」又は断路器「開」にて行なわれるため、しや断器
の開・閉情報のみでは休止端か否かを特定することがで
きない。そこで、電気所が休止の場合には休止端から送
られるしや断器情報の何如にかかわらず各端子と休止端
子とのしや断器情報による連系確認を無効にするよう連
系確認回路を制御する必要がある。
By the way, in general, an electric power plant may be disconnected from the system and put to rest due to operational operations.Because the shut-down operation is performed by opening or disconnecting the switch or opening it, It is not possible to specify whether or not the end is the rest end only by the closed information. Therefore, when the electric station is idle, the grid connection check circuit disables the grid connection between each terminal and the break terminal and the grid break information regardless of the break information sent from the break edge. Need to control.

第2図及び第3図は従来の多相再閉路における連系確認
方式を示す論理回路である。第2図は説明を簡単にする
ため、第1図の電気所Aの1号線1−1におけるA端と
B端間の連系確認方式を示したものである。1号線R相
連系信号3R1は電気所A,Bの1号線しや断器2a1,2b1のR
相が閉じている時、R相連系有と判定して“1"になる。
2号線R相連系信号3R2は電気所A,Bの2号線しや断器2a
2,2b2のR相が閉じている時、R相連系有と判定して
“1"になる。
2 and 3 are logic circuits showing a conventional interconnection confirmation method in a polyphase reclosing circuit. FIG. 2 shows a system for confirming the interconnection between the A end and the B end on Line 1-1 of the electric station A in FIG. 1 for the sake of simplicity. Line 1 R-phase interconnection signal 3R 1 is the R of line 1 of electrical stations A and B and disconnector 2a 1 , 2b 1 .
When the phase is closed, it is determined that there is R-phase interconnection and it becomes "1".
Line 2 R-phase interconnection signal 3R 2 is the 2nd line of electrical substation A, B and breaker 2a
When the 2 and 2b 2 R-phases are closed, it is determined that there is an R-phase interconnection, and it becomes "1".

以下同様にS相及びT相の連系の有無が判定される。な
お3S1及び3T1はそれぞれ1号線S相及びT相の連系信
号、3S2及び3T2はそれぞれ2号線S相及びT相の連系信
号を示す。各相の連系信号は、オア回路4R,4S,4Tにそれ
ぞれ導入して各相毎に1,2号線のオア条件をとる。次
に、連系条件判定回路5によつて、電気所A,B間の多相
再閉路連系条件が成立しているか否かを判定して、連系
条件判定出力6をアンド回路7に導入する。アンド回路
7の一方の入力8は後述するB端1号線休止信号で、電
気所Bの1号線が運用状態の時には、B端1号線休止信
号8は休止端検出せず“0"となつているため、ノツト回
路9の出力は“1"でアンド回路7の出力10は、連系条件
判定出力6がそのまま出力される。一方、電気所Bの一
号線が休止の場合には、B端1号線休止信号8が“1"に
なるため、アンド回路7はロツクされ、A,B間連系信号1
0は“0"に制御されるので、電気所A−B間の1号線連
系は無しと判定される。ところで、B端1号線休止信号
8は、第3図に示すB端に設置した休止端検出回路にお
いて、B端1号線のしや断器2b1の各相のパレツト条件1
1R,11S,11Tが3相とも“開”となつたことをアンド回路
12で検出した場合か断路器条件13が「開」となつた場合
に、オア回路14により、B端1号線休止と判定して“1"
になる。
Similarly, the presence or absence of S-phase and T-phase interconnection is determined. Note that 3S 1 and 3T 1 indicate interconnection signals of Line 1 S-phase and T-phase, respectively, and 3S 2 and 3T 2 indicate interconnection signals of Line 2 S-phase and T-phase, respectively. The interconnection signal of each phase is introduced into each of the OR circuits 4R, 4S, 4T and the OR condition of Lines 1 and 2 is taken for each phase. Next, the interconnection condition determination circuit 5 determines whether or not the multiphase reclosed interconnection condition between the electric stations A and B is satisfied, and the interconnection condition determination output 6 is output to the AND circuit 7. Introduce. One input 8 of the AND circuit 7 is a B-line No. 1 quiescent signal, which will be described later. Therefore, the output of the not circuit 9 is "1", and the output 10 of the AND circuit 7 is the interconnection condition determination output 6 as it is. On the other hand, when the No. 1 line of the electric station B is inactive, the No. 1 circuit No. 1 stop signal 8 becomes “1”, and the AND circuit 7 is locked, so that the A, B interconnection signal 1
Since 0 is controlled to “0”, it is determined that there is no Line 1 interconnection between electric stations A and B. By the way, the pause signal 8 at the B-end 1 line is the pallet condition 1 for each phase of the B-end 1 line and the breaker 2b 1 in the pause end detection circuit installed at the B end shown in FIG.
AND circuit that 1R, 11S and 11T are all "open"
When it is detected by 12 or when the disconnecting switch condition 13 is "open", the OR circuit 14 judges that the B terminal Line 1 is inactive and "1"
become.

以上の連系確認方式は、第1図の電気所Aの1号線のA
端とB端間について説明したものであるが、電気所Aの
1号線のA端とC端間や2号線のA端とB端間およびA
端とC端間についても同様の方式で連系確認が行われ
る。
The above interconnection confirmation method is based on Line 1 A of electric station A in Fig. 1.
The explanation was made between the end and the B end, but between the A end and the C end of Line 1 of the electric station A, the A end and the B end of Line 2 and A.
Connection confirmation is also performed between the end and the C end in the same manner.

今、第1図の平行2回線送電線において、B端1号線休
止15b1でかつC端1号線休止15c1の時、すなわち第4図
図示の系統条件のとき1号線に内部故障f1が発生したと
する。なお第4図において、第1図と同一の部分には同
一番号を付して説明する。
Now, in parallel 2-circuit transmission line of FIG. 1, when the B-end No.1 rest 15b 1 a and C-terminal No.1 rest 15c 1, i.e. the internal fault f 1 in line 1 when the system conditions Figure 4 illustrates Suppose that it has occurred. Note that in FIG. 4, the same parts as those in FIG.

電気所Aの1号線1−1は故障除去のため、しや断器2a
1の故障相が引外される。多相再閉路を実施する場合、
再閉路条件として送電線2回線合計で健全相が2相残
り、又は3相残りのいづれかの条件が選択され、連系条
件の確認を行なうが第4図に示すケースでは、第2図の
A−B間の連系確認回路において、2号線連系信号3R2,
3S2,3T2が連系有で“1"になるため、連系条件が2相残
り又は3相残りのいづれに選択されていても、条件は成
立し、その判定出力6は“1"になる。またA−C間の連
系も、上記と同様に成立する。しかしながら、B端1号
線15b1及びC端1号線15c1は休止のため、第3図の休止
端検出回路が休止を検出してB端1号線休止信号8は
“1"となり、同様にC端1号線休止信号も“1"になる。
このためA端連系確認回路では連系条件が成立している
にもかかわらず、B端1号線の休止信号により連系判定
出力6をアンド回路7でロックするためA−B間連系無
しに制御され、同様にA−C間も連系無しに制御される
ため、A端1号線は再閉路を実施できない。
Line 1 1-1 of electric power station A is for breaking faults, and is broken 2a
Fault phase 1 is tripped. When performing polyphase reclosing,
As the reclosing condition, either the condition of remaining two phases or the condition of remaining three phases in the total of two transmission lines is selected, and the interconnection condition is confirmed. In the case shown in FIG. 4, in the case shown in FIG. -In the interconnection confirmation circuit between B, Line 2 interconnection signal 3R 2 ,
Since 3S 2 and 3T 2 have “1” with interconnection, the condition is satisfied and the judgment output 6 is “1” regardless of whether the interconnection condition is 2 phase remaining or 3 phase remaining. become. Also, the interconnection between A and C is established in the same manner as above. However, since the B-end 1 line 15b 1 and the C-end 1 line 15c 1 are paused, the pause-end detection circuit in FIG. 3 detects the pause, and the B-end 1 line pause signal 8 becomes "1". The stop signal for Terminal 1 also becomes "1".
Therefore, although the interconnection condition is satisfied in the A-end interconnection confirmation circuit, the interconnection determination output 6 is locked by the AND circuit 7 by the pause signal of the B-end Line 1 so that there is no A-B interconnection. Since it is controlled to the same way, and similarly between A and C is also controlled without interconnection, the A-route No. 1 line cannot be closed again.

次に、第1図の平行2回線送電線において、B端1号線
休止15b1でかつC端2号線休止15c2の時、すなわち第5
図図示の系統条件のとき1号線に内部故障f2が発生した
とする。電気所A及び電気所Cの1号線しや断器2a1,2c
1は故障除去のため故障相が引外される。このとき第2
図のA端1号線A−B間連系確認回路は、2号線により
3相連系が維持されているため、連系判定出力6は“1"
となるが、B端1号線休止15b1によりA−B間連系無し
に制御される。一方、A−C間連系確認回路は、1号線
は事故しゃ断し、2号線はC端休止で連系がないため連
系条件として、2相残りの条件を選択した場合は、1相
故障時には、1号線の条件のみでA−C間の連系条件が
成立するが、2相以上の故障ではA−C間連系無しとな
る。また、連系条件として3相残りを選択した場合は、
すべての故障においてA−C間連系無しとなり、再閉路
は実施できない。
Next, in the parallel two-line power transmission line of FIG. 1, when the B terminal No. 1 line stop 15b 1 and the C terminal No. 2 line stop 15c 2 are the 5th line,
Under the system conditions shown in the figure, it is assumed that internal fault f 2 occurs on Line 1. Line 1 breakers 2a 1 and 2c at electric station A and electric station C
In case of 1 the fault phase is tripped for fault elimination. At this time the second
In the diagram, the A-B line A-B interconnection confirmation circuit at the A end of the figure maintains the 3-phase interconnection by Line 2, so the interconnection judgment output 6 is "1".
It becomes a is controlled in the communication system without inter A-B by B end No.1 rest 15b 1. On the other hand, in the A-C interconnection confirmation circuit, Line 1 has an accident cutoff, and Line 2 has a C-terminal pause and there is no interconnection. At times, the condition of interconnection between A and C is satisfied only by the condition of Line 1, but there is no interconnection between A and C when there is a failure of two or more phases. Also, when 3 phase remaining is selected as the interconnection condition,
In all failures, there is no A-C interconnection and reclosing cannot be performed.

以上説明したように、第4図及び第5図のケースでは、
電気所A−B間は、2号線により連系がとれているにも
かかわらず、休止端からの休止信号によつて連系条件が
強制的に不成立に制御され、再閉路可能な条件でも、再
閉路が阻止されることになる。そして、一旦、線路が系
統から脱落すると、その復旧操作は容易ではなく、かな
りの復旧時間を要するので、再閉路可能な場合には、極
力再閉路させることが重要である。前記第4図の系統条
件では、1号線のB端,C端がともに休止のため再閉路で
きなくても、特に供給障害は起こさないが、送電線を常
時充電しておき、B端またはC端のしや断器閉操作のみ
で、系統に併入できる状態としておくのは運用上非常に
有利である。
As explained above, in the cases of FIG. 4 and FIG.
Despite the fact that the interconnection between the electric stations A and B is established by Line 2, even under the condition that the interconnection condition is forcibly controlled to be unsatisfied by the pause signal from the pause end and reclosing is possible, The reclosing will be blocked. Then, once the line is disconnected from the system, the recovery operation is not easy and requires a considerable recovery time. Therefore, it is important to reclose the line if possible. In the system condition of FIG. 4, even if the B end and C end of Line 1 are both inactive and cannot be reclosed, no supply failure will occur, but the transmission line is always charged and the B end or C end is charged. It is very advantageous from the operational point of view that the system can be connected to the system only by closing the end and disconnecting it.

〔発明の目的〕[Object of the Invention]

本発明は、上記従来のしや断器情報による連系確認の欠
点を除去するもので、その目的は、休子端のある系統に
おいても確実に連系確認が行なうようにした系統の再閉
路方式を提供するにある。
The present invention eliminates the drawbacks of the above-mentioned conventional grid connection confirmation by disconnection information and disconnection information, and its purpose is to reclose the grid so that the grid connection can be surely confirmed even in a system with a rest end. To provide the scheme.

〔発明の概要〕[Outline of Invention]

上記目的を達成するために、本発明の再閉路方式は、各
相毎に自回線の相手端が休止でなく、かつ自端の遮断器
および断路器と、相手端の遮断器および断路器がすべて
「閉」のとき当該相を健全と判定する第1の手段と、さ
らに同様に判定した各相毎の他回線の健全相を判定する
第2の手段と、前記自回線の判定出力と前記他回線の判
定出力とをそれぞれ同名の相毎に論理和を得る第3の手
段と、この論理和出力数によって系統の連系の有無を判
定する第4の手段とから構成したものである。
In order to achieve the above-mentioned object, the reclosing circuit of the present invention is such that, for each phase, the other end of the own line is not idle, and the own circuit breaker and disconnector and the other end circuit breaker and disconnector are When all are “closed”, the first means for judging the relevant phase as sound, the second means for judging the sound phase of the other line for each phase as judged in the same manner, the judgment output of the own line and the above It comprises a third means for obtaining a logical sum of the determination outputs of the other lines for each phase having the same name, and a fourth means for determining the presence or absence of interconnection of the system by the number of outputs of the logical addition.

〔発明の実施例〕Example of Invention

本発明の一実施例を図面を参照して説明する。 An embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

第7図は説明を簡単にするために、第1図に示す3端子
系統において、電気所Aの1号線における電気所A−B
間に本発明に係る連系確認方式を適用した場合の論理回
路であり、第2図の論理回路と同一箇所には同一符号を
附して説明する。なお、他の電気所間の連系確認方式は
電気所Aの1号線における電気所A−B間に連系確認方
式と同様に構成できるので、その説明は省略する。1号
線R相連系信号3R1は、電気所A,Bの1号線しや断器2a1,
2b1のR相が閉じている時、R相連系有と判定して“1"
になる。2号線R相連系信号3R22は電気所A,Bの2号線
しや断器2a1,2b2のR相が閉じていること及びB端2号
線が休止でないことのアンド条件が成立したとき2号線
R相連系有と判定して“1"になる。以下、同様にS相及
びT相の連系の有無がS相連系信号3S1,3S22及びT相連
系信号3T1,3T22によつて判定される。なお、3S1及び3T1
はそれぞれ1号線S相及びT相の連系信号、3S22及び3T
22はそれぞれ2号線S相及びT相の連系信号を示す。1
号線の各相連系信号3R1,3S1,3T1はアンド回路17R,17S,1
7Tにそれぞれ導入され、B端1号線休止信号8をノツト
回路9により反転させた信号とアンド条件を取つた後、
そのアンド条件出力3R11,3S11,3T11がオア回路4R,4S,4T
に導入される。また、アンド条件出力3R11,3S11,3T11
1号線の各相連系信号として2号線に渡される。
In order to simplify the explanation, FIG. 7 shows an electric station A-B in line 1 of the electric station A in the three-terminal system shown in FIG.
It is a logic circuit when the interconnection confirmation method according to the present invention is applied between them, and the same parts as those of the logic circuit of FIG. Since the interconnection confirmation method between other electric stations can be configured in the same way as the interconnection confirmation method between the electric stations A and B on the No. 1 line of the electricity station A, the description thereof will be omitted. Line 1 R-phase connection signal 3R 1 is connected to electrical stations A and B on Line 1 and disconnector 2a 1 ,
When the R phase of 2b 1 is closed, it is determined that there is an R phase connection and "1"
become. When the AND condition is satisfied that the R-phase interconnection signal 3R 22 of Line 2 is at Line 2 of the electrical stations A and B, the R-phase of the breakers 2a 1 and 2b 2 is closed, and that the B-end Line 2 is not at rest. Line 2 is judged to have R-phase interconnection and becomes "1". Similarly, the presence / absence of S-phase and T-phase interconnection is determined based on the S-phase interconnection signals 3S 1 and 3S 22 and the T-phase interconnection signals 3T 1 and 3T 22 . Note that 3S 1 and 3T 1
Line 1 S-phase and T-phase interconnection signals, 3S 22 and 3T, respectively
Reference numerals 22 respectively indicate S-phase and T-phase interconnection signals of Line 2. 1
Signals 3R 1 , 3S 1 , 3T 1 for each phase of the line are AND circuits 17R, 17S, 1
After being introduced into 7T, and the AND condition with the signal obtained by inverting the terminal B line 1 pause signal 8 by the not circuit 9,
The AND condition output 3R 11 , 3S 11 , 3T 11 is OR circuit 4R, 4S, 4T
Will be introduced to. Also, the AND condition outputs 3R 11 , 3S 11 , and 3T 11 are passed to Line 2 as each phase interconnection signal of Line 1.

一方、アンド条件出力3R11,3S11,3T11と同様に構成した
2号線の各相連系信号3R22,3S22,3T22は直接オア回路4
R,4S,4Tに導入し、1号線連系信号3R1,3S1,3T1と休止信
号8の反転信号とのアンド条件出力3R11,3S11,3T11と各
相毎にオア条件を取つた後、連系条件判定回路5によつ
て電気所A−B間の連系条件が成立しているか否かを判
定して、その結果をA−B間連系信号10として出力する
ものである。
On the other hand, AND condition output 3R 11, 3S 11, 3T 11 phase interconnection signal line 2 was configured in the same manner as 3R 22, 3S 22, 3T 22 is directly OR circuit 4
Introduced to R, 4S, 4T, AND condition output of Route 1 interconnection signals 3R 1 , 3S 1 , 3T 1 and inversion signal of pause signal 8 3R 11 , 3S 11 , 3T 11 and OR condition for each phase After that, the interconnection condition determination circuit 5 determines whether or not the interconnection condition between the electric stations A and B is satisfied, and outputs the result as an A-B interconnection signal 10. Is.

次に、本発明による再閉路方式の作用について説明す
る。
Next, the operation of the reclosing method according to the present invention will be described.

第4図に示す端子系統において、電気所B,Cの1号線が
休止中に内部故障f1が発生した場合、電気所AのA−B
間連系確認は、B端1号線休止信号8により、1号線の
各相連系信号3R1,3S1,3T1がロツクされるが、2号線の
各相連系信号3R22,3S22,3T22が3相連系有で連系条件が
成立するため、A−B間連系信号10が“1"となつて、A
端は連系有で再閉路が実施される。A−C間連系につい
ても同様にしてA端は再閉路が実施される。
In the terminal system shown in FIG. 4, if an internal fault f 1 occurs while Line 1 of the electric power stations B and C is at rest, A-B of the electric power station A
For inter-connection confirmation, each phase interconnection signal 3R 1 , 3S 1 , 3T 1 of line 1 is locked by the B line 1 line pause signal 8, but each phase interconnection signal 3R 22 , 3S 22 , 3T of line 2 is locked. Since 22 has three-phase interconnection and the interconnection condition is satisfied, the A-B interconnection signal 10 becomes "1" and A
The end is interconnected and reclosing is performed. Similarly, for the A-C interconnection, reclosing is performed at the A end.

また、第5図に示す3端子系統において、電気所Bの1
号線及び電気所Cの2号線が休止中に1号線に内部故障
f2が発生した場合、電気所AにおけるA−B間連系確認
は、2号線の各相連系信号3R22,3S22,3T22により3相連
系で連系条件が成立するため、A端の再閉路は実施され
る。A−C間連系確認は、C端2号線休止により、2号
線各相連系信号が3相とも連系無しになるため、1号線
の健全相のみ連系有となる。したがつて、連系条件が2
相残りの場合には、2相以上の故障で、3相残りの場合
にはすべての故障時にA−C間連系なしと判定し、適切
な再閉路条件の選択が可能となる。
In addition, in the three-terminal system shown in FIG.
Internal failure of Line 1 and Line 2 of Electric Power Station C during suspension of operation
When f 2 occurs, the confirmation of the interconnection between A and B at the electric station A is made because the interconnection condition for the three-phase interconnection is established by each phase interconnection signal 3R 22 , 3S 22 , 3T 22 on Line 2 The reclosing of is performed. As for the confirmation of the interconnection between A and C, since the interconnection signal of each phase of Line 2 is not interconnected for all three phases due to the suspension of Line 2 at the C end, only the healthy phase of Line 1 is interconnected. Therefore, the interconnection condition is 2
In the case of remaining phases, it is determined that there is no A-C interconnection when there are two or more phases of failures and in the case of all three phases that there are remaining failures, it is possible to select an appropriate reclosing condition.

さらに、第6図に示す3端子系統において、すなわち第
5図の3端子系統と同様に電気所Bの1号線及び電気所
Cの2号線が休止中に2号線に内部故障f3が発生した場
合、A−B間は1号線休止でかつ2号線事故により連系
無しとなる。一方、A−C間連系確認はC端2号線休止
により2号線各相連系信号が3相とも連系無しとなるた
め、1号線の健全相のみ連系有となる。したがつて、前
記第5図の場合と同様に連系条件が2相残りの場合に
は、2相以上の故障で、3相残りの場合にはすべての故
障時にA−C間連系なしと判定し、適切な再閉路条件の
選択が可能となる。
Further, in the three-terminal system shown in FIG. 6, that is, as in the three-terminal system of FIG. 5, an internal failure f 3 occurred in Line 2 while Line 1 of Electric Power Station B and Line 2 of Electric Power Station C were at rest. In this case, line 1 will be suspended between A and B and there will be no interconnection due to a line 2 accident. On the other hand, in the confirmation of the interconnection between A and C, since the interconnection signal of each phase of Line 2 is not interconnected for all three phases due to the suspension of Line 2 at the C end, only the healthy phase of Line 1 is interconnected. Therefore, as in the case of FIG. 5, when the interconnection condition is two-phase remaining, there is a failure of two or more phases, and when there are three-phase remaining, there is no A-C interconnection at all failures. Therefore, it becomes possible to select an appropriate reclosing condition.

〔発明の効果〕〔The invention's effect〕

以上説明したように、本発明によれば、再閉路における
しゃ断器情報による連系確認において、休止端子がある
場合には休止端子のある回線のみ当該休止端子とのしゃ
断器情報による連系確認を無効にして残りの回線及び端
子との間で連系を確認するようにしたため、適切な連系
確認を行い、可能な限り再閉路を実施して系統故障時の
迅速な事故復旧を可能とした再閉路方式を提供すること
ができる。
As described above, according to the present invention, in the interconnection confirmation by the circuit breaker information in the reclosing circuit, if there is a pause terminal, only the line having the pause terminal can confirm the interconnection by the breaker information with the pause terminal. Since it was disabled and the interconnection was confirmed with the remaining lines and terminals, proper interconnection confirmation was performed and reclosing was performed as much as possible to enable quick accident recovery in the event of a system failure. A reclosing method can be provided.

【図面の簡単な説明】 第1図は、平行2回線送電線の3端子系統図、第2図
は、従来のしや断器情報による連系確認方式の回路図、
第3図は休止端検出の回路図、第4図乃至第6図は、そ
れぞれ異なる内部故障と休止端がある3端子系統図、第
7図は本発明の一実施例を示す回路図である。 1−1,1−2……送電線、 2a1,2a2,2b1,2b2,2c1,2c2……しや断器、 3R1,3R2,3S1,3S2,3T1,3T2……各相連系信号、 3R11,3R22,3S11,3S22,3T11,3T22……各相連系信号、 4R,4S,4T,14……オア回路、 7,12,17R,17S,17T……アンド回路、 5……連系条件判定回路、 6……連系条件判定出力、 8……休止信号、 9……ノツト回路、 10……連系信号出力、 15b1,15c1,15c2……休止端、 f1,f2,f3……内部故障。
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a three-terminal system diagram of a parallel two-line power transmission line, and FIG. 2 is a circuit diagram of a conventional interconnection confirmation system based on information on a breaker or a breaker.
FIG. 3 is a circuit diagram for detecting an idle end, FIGS. 4 to 6 are three-terminal system diagrams each having a different internal fault and an idle end, and FIG. 7 is a circuit diagram showing an embodiment of the present invention. . 1-1, 1-2 ... Transmission line, 2a 1 , 2a 2 , 2b 1 , 2 , b 2 , 2c 1 , 2c 2 ... Shiya breaker, 3R 1 , 3R 2 , 3S 1 , 3S 2 , 3T 1 , 3T 2 ...... Each phase interconnection signal, 3R 11 , 3, R 22 , 3S 11 , 3S 22 ,, 3T 11 , 3T 22 ...... Each phase interconnection signal, 4R, 4S, 4T, 14 ...... OR circuit, 7,12, 17R, 17S, 17T …… AND circuit, 5 …… interconnection condition judgment circuit, 6 …… interconnection condition judgment output, 8 …… pause signal, 9 …… not circuit, 10 …… interconnection signal output, 15b 1 , 15c 1 , 15c 2 ...... rest edge, f 1 , f 2 , f 3 ...... Internal failure.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】2回線送電線における故障除去後の送電線
の健全相数によって系統連系の有無を判定して再閉路条
件とする再閉路方式において、各相毎に設けられ、自回
線の相手端が休止でなく、かつ当該相の自回線の自端の
遮断器および断路器と前記当該相の相手端の遮断器およ
び断路器のすべてが「閉」のとき、当該相を健全相と判
定する第1の手段と、他回線の各相について前記第1の
手段と同様の手段で各相毎の他回線の健全相の判定を行
う第2の手段と、この第2の手段の他回線の健全相の判
定出力と前記第1の手段の自回線の判定出力とを用い、
それぞれ同名の相毎に論理和を得る第3の手段と、前記
第3の手段の論理和出力数によって系統の連系の有無を
判定する第4の手段を具備することを特徴とする再閉路
方式。
Claim: What is claimed is: 1. In a reclosing method, which determines the presence or absence of grid interconnection based on the number of healthy phases of the transmission line after fault elimination in a two-line transmission line and sets the condition as a reclosing condition. If the other end is not at rest and all the circuit breakers and disconnectors at the own end of the relevant phase of the relevant phase and the other end circuit breakers and disconnectors of the relevant phase are "closed", the relevant phase is regarded as a sound phase. The first means for judging, the second means for judging the sound phase of the other line for each phase by the same means as the first means for each phase of the other line, and the other means of the second means. Using the judgment output of the sound phase of the line and the judgment output of the own line of the first means,
A reclosing circuit comprising: third means for obtaining a logical sum for each phase having the same name; and fourth means for determining the presence or absence of interconnection of the system based on the number of outputs of the logical sum of the third means. method.
JP58039063A 1983-03-11 1983-03-11 Reclosing method Expired - Lifetime JPH0789698B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP58039063A JPH0789698B2 (en) 1983-03-11 1983-03-11 Reclosing method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP58039063A JPH0789698B2 (en) 1983-03-11 1983-03-11 Reclosing method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS59165911A JPS59165911A (en) 1984-09-19
JPH0789698B2 true JPH0789698B2 (en) 1995-09-27

Family

ID=12542669

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP58039063A Expired - Lifetime JPH0789698B2 (en) 1983-03-11 1983-03-11 Reclosing method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH0789698B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5006291B2 (en) * 2008-09-16 2012-08-22 株式会社東芝 Multi-terminal power line protection relay device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS59165911A (en) 1984-09-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JPH0789698B2 (en) Reclosing method
JP2008259327A (en) Reclosing method
CN110932244B (en) Relay protection method for no-switching of all-station protection outlet pressure plates of transformer substation
Roberts et al. Trip and restore distribution circuits at transmission speeds
KR19990083046A (en) Bus protection system for spot network type electric power receiving in stallation
JP3328365B2 (en) Islanding detection device
CN110504682B (en) High-voltage direct-current system alternating current bus splitting operation tripping control method and device
JP4540621B2 (en) Line selection relay device with electrical premises protection function and line selection relay system with electrical premises protection function
JP2799065B2 (en) Reclosing method of current differential protection relay
JP2005094897A (en) Single operation prevention device
JPH0245419B2 (en)
JPH0327716A (en) Method and apparatus for reclosing of transmission system
JP3403752B2 (en) Islanding detection device
JPH03150018A (en) Reclosing system for high resistance grounded transmission system
JPS62110432A (en) Protective relay
CN117856175A (en) Centralized and in-situ interconversion feeder automation processing method and system
CN116093895A (en) Bus protection CT disconnection reopening method and system based on multi-interval information fusion
JPH0236727A (en) High speed separation/recovery system of distribution line fault
JPS61189120A (en) Protective relay
JPS6251053B2 (en)
JPH0833186A (en) Reclosing system
JPH05207645A (en) Faulty section deciding system for current differential protective relay
JPH06105451A (en) Line protection relay device
Bailey et al. Static-digital overcurrent relays permit enhanced protection
Crosby Philadelphia AC network—Operating results