JPH11308756A - System protection relay device - Google Patents

System protection relay device

Info

Publication number
JPH11308756A
JPH11308756A JP10126678A JP12667898A JPH11308756A JP H11308756 A JPH11308756 A JP H11308756A JP 10126678 A JP10126678 A JP 10126678A JP 12667898 A JP12667898 A JP 12667898A JP H11308756 A JPH11308756 A JP H11308756A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
protection
value
calculated
operation amount
absolute value
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP10126678A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3808624B2 (en
Inventor
Masao Hori
政夫 堀
Noriyoshi Suga
紀善 須賀
Kuniyasu Inamura
國康 稲村
Hiroshi Nishida
宏 西田
Masato Okazaki
正人 岡崎
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toshiba Corp
Toshiba System Technology Corp
Original Assignee
Toshiba Corp
Toshiba System Technology Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Toshiba Corp, Toshiba System Technology Corp filed Critical Toshiba Corp
Priority to JP12667898A priority Critical patent/JP3808624B2/en
Priority to KR1019990013847A priority patent/KR19990083313A/en
Priority to US09/294,392 priority patent/US6222711B1/en
Priority to DE69943254T priority patent/DE69943254D1/en
Priority to EP99107890A priority patent/EP0952654B1/en
Priority to CN99105674A priority patent/CN1090401C/en
Publication of JPH11308756A publication Critical patent/JPH11308756A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3808624B2 publication Critical patent/JP3808624B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02HEMERGENCY PROTECTIVE CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS
    • H02H7/00Emergency protective circuit arrangements specially adapted for specific types of electric machines or apparatus or for sectionalised protection of cable or line systems, and effecting automatic switching in the event of an undesired change from normal working conditions
    • H02H7/26Sectionalised protection of cable or line systems, e.g. for disconnecting a section on which a short-circuit, earth fault, or arc discharge has occured
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02HEMERGENCY PROTECTIVE CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS
    • H02H3/00Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection
    • H02H3/26Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection responsive to difference between voltages or between currents; responsive to phase angle between voltages or between currents
    • H02H3/265Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection responsive to difference between voltages or between currents; responsive to phase angle between voltages or between currents responsive to phase angle between voltages or between currents
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02HEMERGENCY PROTECTIVE CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS
    • H02H7/00Emergency protective circuit arrangements specially adapted for specific types of electric machines or apparatus or for sectionalised protection of cable or line systems, and effecting automatic switching in the event of an undesired change from normal working conditions
    • H02H7/005Emergency protective circuit arrangements specially adapted for specific types of electric machines or apparatus or for sectionalised protection of cable or line systems, and effecting automatic switching in the event of an undesired change from normal working conditions for remote controlled apparatus; for lines connecting such apparatus

Landscapes

  • Emergency Protection Circuit Devices (AREA)

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To select and break the fault bus of a plurality of protection regions, without using relays for split protection. SOLUTION: Current data from all the current transformers that are connected to a bus with a plurality of protection regions of a power system are sampled at a specific time interval, digital data are obtained through a data acquisition means 11, the digital data are used for determining the internal/ external fault of a region including a plurality of protective regions according to a ratio differential operation by an operation means 12 for collective protection, at the same time the amount of operation being calculated individually for a plurality of protection regions by a fault bus judgment means 13 and the amount of operation which is calculated by an operation means 12 for collective protection are used for discriminating a protection region where an fault is, occuring, and a broken bus is determined from the determining result of the operation means for batch protection and that of the fault bus determining means at a breaking bus determining means 14.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、電力系統の系統保
護継電装置に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a system protection relay for a power system.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】従来、電力系統の母線の複数の保護領域
に対する保護を行なう場合、これら複数の保護領域を包
含した領域に対して内部・外部事故判定を行なう一括保
護用継電器と、各保護領域毎について内部・外部事故判
定を行なう複数の分割保護用継電器を個別に設け、これ
らの出力の組み合わせにより、複数の保護領域の中の事
故発生母線の選択,遮断を行なっていた。
2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, when protecting a plurality of protection areas of a bus of an electric power system, a collective protection relay for judging internal / external accidents in an area including the plurality of protection areas, and each protection area In each case, a plurality of divided protection relays for judging internal / external accidents are individually provided, and the combination of these outputs is used to select and shut off an accident generating bus in a plurality of protection areas.

【0003】[0003]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】上記構成においては、
複数の保護領域を有する母線の保護に2台以上の保護継
電器が必要であった。本発明は上記課題を解決するため
になされたものであり、分割保護用継電器を使用しない
簡易な構成で複数の保護領域の中の事故発生母線の選
択,遮断を行なうことの可能な系統保護継電装置を提供
することを目的としている。
In the above configuration,
Two or more protective relays were required to protect a bus having a plurality of protected areas. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention has been made to solve the above-mentioned problem, and has a simple configuration without using a split protection relay, and a system protection relay capable of selecting and shutting down an accident-occurring bus in a plurality of protection areas with a simple configuration. It is intended to provide an electric device.

【0004】[0004]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明の[請求項1]に
係る系統保護継電装置は、電力系統の電気量を所定の時
間間隔でサンプリングした後、これらのサンプリングデ
ータを用いて複数の保護領域(区間)における事故の発
生を識別して判定を行なう系統保護継電装置において、
前記サンプリングデータを用いて動作量及び抑制量を算
出し、所定の比率差動演算により前記複数の保護領域
(区間)を包含する保護領域の内部・外部事故の区別を
行なう第1の演算手段と、前記複数の保護領域個別に動
作量を算出すると共に、ここで算出した動作量の絶対値
の何れかが、前記第1の演算手段において算出した動作
量の絶対値に所定の係数を掛けた値よりも大きい場合、
その条件を成立させ個別の保護領域内部に事故が発生し
ていることを検出する第2の演算手段とを備えた。
According to a first aspect of the present invention, a system protection relay device according to a first aspect of the present invention samples a quantity of electricity of a power system at predetermined time intervals, and then uses the sampled data to generate a plurality of data. In a system protection relay that identifies and determines the occurrence of an accident in a protection area (section),
First operation means for calculating an operation amount and a suppression amount using the sampling data, and performing a predetermined ratio differential operation to discriminate between inside and outside accidents of the protection area including the plurality of protection areas (sections); Calculating an operation amount for each of the plurality of protected areas, and multiplying the absolute value of the operation amount calculated by the first calculating means by a predetermined coefficient. If greater than the value,
A second calculating means for satisfying the condition and detecting that an accident has occurred in each of the protected areas.

【0005】本発明の[請求項1]に係る系統保護継電
装置は、電力系統の複数の保護領域を持つ母線に接続さ
れる変流器からの電流データを所定の時間間隔でサンプ
リングしてディジタルデータを得、このディジタルデー
タを用いて比率差動演算により複数の保護領域を包含し
た領域の内部・外部事故判定を行なう一括保護用の演算
手段の判定結果を得る。これに対し、各保護領域個別に
動作量を算出し、これらの動作量(IdAにて代表)と
一括保護用の演算手段の判定に使用した動作量(Id)
との間に所定の関係、例えば|IdA|≧K1・|Id
|(K1は所定の係数)が成立するとき、IdAなる動
作量を得た保護領域に事故が発生していることを判別す
る事故母線判定手段の判定結果を得る。一括保護用の演
算手段の判定結果に事故母線判定手段の判定結果を加味
し、遮断母線の判定を行なうことにより、簡易な構成で
複数の保護領域を持つ系統を保護する系統保護継電装置
を提供できる。
A system protection relay according to claim 1 of the present invention samples current data from a current transformer connected to a bus having a plurality of protection areas of a power system at predetermined time intervals. The digital data is obtained, and the digital data is used to obtain a judgment result of a collective protection operation means for judging internal / external accidents in an area including a plurality of protection areas by ratio differential operation. On the other hand, the amount of operation is calculated for each protection area individually, and the amount of operation (represented by IdA) and the amount of operation (Id) used for determining the arithmetic means for collective protection are calculated.
, For example, | IdA | ≧ K1 · | Id
When | (K1 is a predetermined coefficient) is satisfied, the judgment result of the accident bus judging means for judging that an accident has occurred in the protection area having obtained the operation amount of IdA is obtained. A system protection relay device that protects a system having a plurality of protection areas with a simple configuration by performing a determination of an interrupting bus in consideration of the determination result of the accident bus determination unit in addition to the determination result of the arithmetic unit for collective protection. Can be provided.

【0006】本発明の[請求項2]に係る系統保護継電
装置は、[請求項1]において、第1の演算手段におい
て算出した動作量と、保護領域個別に算出した動作量と
の差分の絶対値が、前記第1の演算手段において算出し
た動作量の絶対値に所定の係数を掛けた値よりも小さい
場合、その差分の絶対値を得た保護領域の内部に事故が
発生していることを検出する第2の演算手段を備えた。
According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a system protection relay device according to the first aspect, wherein a difference between the operation amount calculated by the first calculating means and the operation amount calculated individually for each protection area is provided. Is smaller than a value obtained by multiplying the absolute value of the operation amount calculated by the first calculating means by a predetermined coefficient, an accident occurs in the protected area where the absolute value of the difference is obtained. Second calculating means for detecting the presence.

【0007】本発明の[請求項3]に係る系統保護継電
装置は、[請求項1]において、複数の保護領域個別に
算出した動作量と前記第1の演算手段において算出した
動作量との間に、以下に示すa,bの条件が共に成立し
たことにより、当該保護領域の内部に事故が発生してい
ることを検出する第2の演算手段を備えた。 a.保護領域個別に算出した動作量の絶対値の何れか
が、第1の演算手段において算出した動作量の絶対値に
所定の係数を掛けた値よりも大きい。 b.保護領域個別に算出した動作量の内、a条件が成立
した保護領域の動作量と、第1の演算手段において算出
した動作量の位相差が所定の角度よりも小さい。
According to a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided a system protection relay device according to the first aspect, wherein the operation amount calculated for each of the plurality of protection areas and the operation amount calculated by the first calculating means are different from each other. In the meantime, there is provided a second calculating means for detecting that an accident has occurred inside the protection area when both of the following conditions a and b are satisfied. a. One of the absolute values of the operation amounts calculated individually for the protection areas is larger than a value obtained by multiplying the absolute value of the operation amount calculated by the first calculating means by a predetermined coefficient. b. The phase difference between the operation amount of the protection region where the condition a is satisfied and the operation amount calculated by the first calculation means is smaller than a predetermined angle among the operation amounts calculated individually for the protection regions.

【0008】本発明の[請求項4]に係る系統保護継電
装置は、[請求項3]において、a条件に代えて以下に
示すc条件であるようにした。 c.保護領域個別に算出した動作量の絶対値の何れか
が、第1の演算手段において算出した動作量の絶対値に
所定の係数(1未満の係数)を掛けた値よりも大きく、
かつ、第1の演算手段において算出した動作量の絶対値
に所定の係数(1以上の係数)を掛けた値よりも小さ
い。
[0008] In the system protection relay device according to claim 4 of the present invention, in claim 3, the condition c described below is used instead of the condition a. c. Any one of the absolute values of the operation amounts calculated individually for the protection areas is larger than a value obtained by multiplying the absolute value of the operation amount calculated by the first calculating means by a predetermined coefficient (a coefficient less than 1),
In addition, the value is smaller than a value obtained by multiplying the absolute value of the operation amount calculated by the first calculating means by a predetermined coefficient (one or more coefficients).

【0009】本発明の[請求項5]に係る系統保護継電
装置は、[請求項1]又は[請求項3]又は[請求項
4]において、第1の演算手段において算出した動作量
の絶対値が、以下のdに示す値であるようにした。 d.第1の演算手段において算出した動作量の絶対値と
第1の演算手段の判定のために予め設定した所定の動作
感度値の何れか大きい値。
The system protection relay according to claim 5 of the present invention provides the system protection relay according to claim 1, claim 3, or claim 4, wherein the amount of operation calculated by the first arithmetic means is defined as: The absolute value was set to the value shown in d below. d. Either the absolute value of the motion amount calculated by the first calculating means or a predetermined motion sensitivity value set in advance for determination by the first calculating means, whichever is larger.

【0010】本発明の[請求項6]に係る系統保護継電
装置は、[請求項1]又は[請求項3]又は[請求項
4]において、第1の演算手段において算出した動作量
の絶対値が、以下のeに示す値であるようにした。 e.第1の演算手段において算出した動作量の絶対値に
対し、第1の演算手段の判定のために予め設定した所定
の動作感度値を加えた値。
The system protection relay according to claim 6 of the present invention is the system protection relay according to claim 1, claim 3 or claim 4, wherein the operation amount calculated by the first arithmetic means is calculated by the first arithmetic means. The absolute value was set to the value shown in e below. e. A value obtained by adding a predetermined operation sensitivity value set in advance for determination by the first arithmetic unit to the absolute value of the operation amount calculated by the first arithmetic unit.

【0011】本発明の[請求項7]に係る系統保護継電
装置は、[請求項2]において、第1の演算手段におい
て算出した動作量と保護領域個別に算出した何れかの動
作量との差分の絶対値が、前記第1の演算手段において
算出した動作量の絶対値に所定の係数を掛けた値よりも
小さくすると共に、かつ、この条件の成立した保護領域
個別に算出した動作量が、第1の演算手段の判定のため
に予め設定した動作感度値に所定の値(1以下の値)を
掛けた値よりも大きいことにより、当該領域の内部に事
故が発生していることを検出する第2の演算手段を備え
た。
According to a seventh aspect of the present invention, there is provided a system protection relay device according to the second aspect, wherein the operation amount calculated by the first calculating means and any one of the operation amounts calculated individually for the protection area. Is smaller than a value obtained by multiplying the absolute value of the amount of operation calculated by the first calculating means by a predetermined coefficient, and the amount of operation calculated individually for each protection area where this condition is satisfied. Is larger than a value obtained by multiplying a predetermined value (a value equal to or less than 1) by an operation sensitivity value set in advance for the determination by the first arithmetic means, and an accident has occurred in the area. Is provided.

【0012】本発明の[請求項8]に係る系統保護継電
装置は、[請求項1]において、複数の保護領域個別に
算出した動作量と第1の演算手段において算出した動作
量との間に、以下に示すf,gの条件が共に成立したこ
とにより、当該保護領域の内部に事故が発生しているこ
とを検出する第2の演算手段を備えた。 f.保護領域個別に算出した動作量の絶対値の何れか
が、第1の演算手段において算出した動作量の絶対値と
第1の演算手段の演算結果の判定のために予め設定した
動作感度値の何れか大きい値に所定の係数を掛けた値よ
りも大きい。 g.第1の演算手段において算出した動作量と、保護領
域個別に算出した何れかの動作量との差の絶対値が、第
1の演算手段において算出した動作量の絶対値に所定の
係数を掛けた値よりも小さい。
[0012] In the system protection relay device according to claim 8 of the present invention, in claim 1, the operation amount calculated for each of the plurality of protection areas and the operation amount calculated by the first calculating means are different. In the meantime, there is provided a second calculating means for detecting that an accident has occurred inside the protection area when both of the following conditions f and g are satisfied. f. Any one of the absolute values of the operation amounts calculated individually for the protection areas is the difference between the absolute value of the operation amount calculated by the first operation unit and the operation sensitivity value set in advance for the determination of the operation result of the first operation unit. It is larger than a value obtained by multiplying a larger value by a predetermined coefficient. g. The absolute value of the difference between the movement amount calculated by the first calculation means and any movement amount calculated individually for the protection area is obtained by multiplying the absolute value of the movement amount calculated by the first calculation means by a predetermined coefficient. Less than

【0013】本発明の[請求項9]に係る系統保護継電
装置は、電力系統の電気量を所定の時間間隔でサンプリ
ングした後、これらのサンプリングデータを用いて2つ
の保護領域(区間)に対して事故検出判定を行なう系統
保護継電装置において、前記サンプリングデータを用い
て動作量及び抑制量を算出し、所定の比率差動演算によ
り前記2つの保護領域(区間)を包含する保護領域の内
部・外部事故の区別を行なう第1の演算手段と、前記2
つの保護領域個別に動作量を算出し、算出した動作量の
絶対値の一方が、前記第1の演算手段において算出した
動作量の絶対値に所定の係数を掛けた値よりも小さい場
合、他方の保護領域内部に事故が発生していることを検
出する第2の演算手段を備えた。
[0013] The system protection relay device according to claim 9 of the present invention samples electric quantities of the electric power system at predetermined time intervals, and then uses these sampled data to form two protection areas (sections). On the other hand, in a system protection relay device for performing accident detection determination, an operation amount and a suppression amount are calculated using the sampling data, and a protection ratio of the protection region including the two protection regions (sections) is calculated by a predetermined ratio differential operation. First calculating means for distinguishing between internal and external accidents;
The operation amount is calculated for each of the two protection areas, and if one of the calculated absolute values of the operation amounts is smaller than a value obtained by multiplying the absolute value of the operation amount calculated by the first calculating means by a predetermined coefficient, the other And a second calculating means for detecting that an accident has occurred inside the protection area.

【0014】本発明の[請求項10]に係る系統保護継
電装置は、[請求項9]において、2つの保護領域個別
に算出した動作量の絶対値の一方が、前記第1の演算手
段において算出した動作量の絶対値に所定の値を掛けた
値よりも大きくすると共に、かつ、他方の保護領域にお
いて算出した動作量の絶対値が、第1の演算手段におい
て算出した動作量の絶対値に所定の値を掛けた値よりも
小さい場合、第1の演算手段において算出した動作量よ
りも大きい側の動作量を得た保護領域内部に事故が発生
していることを検出する第2の演算手段を備えた。
According to a tenth aspect of the present invention, in the system protection relay device according to the ninth aspect, one of the absolute values of the operation amounts calculated separately for the two protection areas is determined by the first computing means. Is larger than a value obtained by multiplying the absolute value of the operation amount calculated in the above by a predetermined value, and the absolute value of the operation amount calculated in the other protection area is the absolute value of the operation amount calculated by the first calculating means. If the value is smaller than a value obtained by multiplying the value by a predetermined value, it is detected that an accident has occurred in the protection area in which the operation amount on the side larger than the operation amount calculated by the first calculation means is obtained. Calculation means.

【0015】[0015]

【発明の実施の形態】図1は本発明の実施の形態を示す
ブロック構成図である。図1において、母線保護継電装
置10は、複数の保護領域を持つ母線に接続された変流器
からの電流を所定の時間間隔でサンプリングしてディジ
タルデータを得るデータ取得手段11と、前記ディジタル
データを用いて所定の比率作動演算により複数の保護領
域を包含した領域の内部・外部事故判定を行なう一括保
護用演算手段12と、前記複数の保護領域個別に動作量を
算出し、算出した動作量と一括保護用の演算手段におい
て算出した動作量とを用いて、事故母線判定を行なう事
故母線判定手段13と、一括保護用演算手段12の内部・外
部事故判定出力と事故母線判定手段13の事故母線判定出
力より遮断母線判定出力を得る遮断母線判定手段14とか
らなる。
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 1, a bus protection relay device 10 comprises a data acquisition means 11 for sampling current from a current transformer connected to a bus having a plurality of protection areas at predetermined time intervals to obtain digital data, Collective protection calculating means 12 for determining an inside / outside accident of an area including a plurality of protection areas by a predetermined ratio operation calculation using data, and calculating the operation amounts individually for the plurality of protection areas, and the calculated operation Using the amount and the operation amount calculated by the collective protection arithmetic means, an accident bus determination means 13 for performing an accident bus determination, and an internal / external accident determination output of the collective protection arithmetic means 12 and an accident bus determination means 13 And a cut-off bus determination means 14 for obtaining a cut-off bus determination output from the accident bus determination output.

【0016】一括保護用演算手段12においては、前記複
数の保護領域を包含する領域の母線に接続されるn回線
分の変流器からの電流を用いて、(1) 式による動作量及
び(2) 式による抑制量を算出し、これらの算出量の所定
の関係式が成立した場合に動作信号を出力する。
The operation means 12 for collective protection uses the currents from the current transformers for n lines connected to the buses of the area including the plurality of protection areas, and calculates the operation amount according to the equation (1) and ( 2) The suppression amount is calculated by the expression, and an operation signal is output when a predetermined relational expression of these calculated amounts is established.

【0017】[0017]

【数1】 Id(=i1+i2+……+in) ………………(1) Ir(=|i1|+|i2|+……+|in|) ……(2) (1) Id (= i1 + i2 +... + In) (1) Ir (= | i1 | + | i2 | +... + | In |) (2)

【0018】事故母線判定を行なう事故母線判定手段13
においては、前記複数の保護領域に対し個別の領域を識
別するために、例えば各回線の断路器条件を取り込む。
断路器条件による保護領域の識別は公知の手段によるも
のであるため説明は省略する。図2は複数の保護領域を
持つ母線の1構成例である。
Accident bus judging means 13 for judging an accident bus
In order to identify individual areas for the plurality of protection areas, for example, a disconnector condition of each line is fetched.
The identification of the protection area based on the disconnector condition is performed by a known means, and thus the description is omitted. FIG. 2 shows an example of a configuration of a bus having a plurality of protection areas.

【0019】母線は遮断器CB0を挟んで母線BA及び
母線BBに分割されている。保護領域は母線BA側のA
領域及び母線BB側のB領域の2つの保護領域に区分さ
れる。このとき事故母線判定手段13では、各々の保護領
域についての動作量IdA及びIdBを算出し、所定の
演算に従い事故母線の判別を行なう。
The bus is divided into a bus BA and a bus BB with the circuit breaker CB0 interposed therebetween. The protection area is A on the bus BA side.
The area is divided into two protection areas: an area and a B area on the side of the bus BB. At this time, the accident bus judging means 13 calculates the operation amounts IdA and IdB for each of the protection areas, and judges the accident bus according to a predetermined calculation.

【0020】ここで、事故時に発生する動作量(差動電
流)の特徴について、2つの保護領域を持つ母線に流れ
る事故電流を示した図3を例に説明する。図3におい
て、母線は遮断器CB0を挟んで母線BA及び母線BB
に分割されており、母線BAには送電線L1,L3、母
線BBには送電線L2,L4が接続されている。
Here, the feature of the operation amount (differential current) generated at the time of an accident will be described with reference to FIG. 3 showing an example of an accident current flowing through a bus having two protection regions. In FIG. 3, the bus is a bus BA and a bus BB with the circuit breaker CB0 interposed therebetween.
The transmission lines L1 and L3 are connected to the bus BA, and the transmission lines L2 and L4 are connected to the bus BB.

【0021】送電線L1,L2,L3,L4には遮断器
CB1,CB2,CB3,CB4及び変流器CT1,C
T2,CT3,CT4が、遮断器CB0の両端には変流
器CTA,CTBが設置されている。各CTに流れる電
流をi1,i2,i3,i4,iTA,iTBとする
と、一括保護用演算手段12において算出する差動電流I
d及び保護領域個別に算出する差動電流IdA及びId
Bは、(3) ,(4) ,(5)式となる。
Circuit breakers CB1, CB2, CB3, CB4 and current transformers CT1, C2 are connected to the transmission lines L1, L2, L3, L4.
T2, CT3, and CT4 are provided, and current transformers CTA and CTB are provided at both ends of the circuit breaker CB0. Assuming that the current flowing through each CT is i1, i2, i3, i4, iTA, iTB, the differential current I
d and differential currents IdA and Id calculated individually for the protection area
B is given by equations (3), (4) and (5).

【0022】[0022]

【数2】 Id=i1+i2+i3+i4 ………………(3) IdA=i1+i3+iTA ………………(4) IdB=i2+i4+iTB ………………(5) Id = i1 + i2 + i3 + i4 (3) IdA = i1 + i3 + iTA (4) IdB = i2 + i4 + iTB (5)

【0023】ここで母線BAの内部に事故が発生する
と、送電線L2,L4からの電流は遮断器CB0を介し
て母線BAに流れ込む。このときの事故電流をIF,遮
断器CB0を通過する電流をITとすると、キルヒホッ
フの法則より各電流間には(6),(7) 式の関係が成り立
ち、この関係から(3) ,(4) ,(5) 式を整理すると、
(8) ,(9) ,(10)式が得られる。
If an accident occurs inside the bus BA, the current from the transmission lines L2 and L4 flows into the bus BA via the circuit breaker CB0. Assuming that the fault current at this time is IF and the current passing through the circuit breaker CB0 is IT, the relationships of equations (6) and (7) are established between the currents according to Kirchhoff's law. When rearranging equations 4) and (5),
Equations (8), (9) and (10) are obtained.

【0024】[0024]

【数3】 IT=iTA=−iTB=i2+i4 ……………(6) IF=i1+i3+iTA ……………(7) Id=IF ……………………………(8) IdA=IF ……………………………(9) IdB=0 ……………………………(10)## EQU00003 ## IT = iTA = -iTB = i2 + i4 (6) IF = i1 + i3 + iTA (7) Id = IF... (8) IdA = IF .................. (9) IdB = 0 ........................ (10)

【0025】以上に示したように、母線の内部に事故が
発生した場合、2つの領域を包含する領域において発生
する差動電流は、母線内部の2つの保護領域の中で事故
が発生した保護領域において発生する差動電流と同一量
になる。
As described above, when an accident occurs inside the bus, the differential current generated in the region including the two regions is reduced by the protection current in the two protection regions inside the bus. The amount is the same as the differential current generated in the region.

【0026】従って、一括保護用演算手段12において算
出した動作量Idに対し、事故母線判定手段13において
保護領域個別に算出した2つの動作量(IdA又はId
B)を各々比較し、両者の間に所定の関係が成立するこ
とを確認することにより、事故母線(2つの領域の何れ
かの領域か)の判定が可能となる。
Therefore, the operation amount Id calculated by the collective protection operation means 12 is compared with the two operation amounts (IdA or Id
By comparing B) and confirming that a predetermined relationship is established between the two, it is possible to determine the accident bus (any one of the two areas).

【0027】次に特性原理図を用いて事故母線判定手段
13の演算原理について説明する。図4〜図7は一括保護
用演算手段12において算出した動作量(Id)と、事故
母線判定手段13において複数の保護領域個別に算出した
動作量(事故母線側の動作量:IdA)との関係を示し
た特性原理ベクトル図である。
Next, an accident bus determination means using the characteristic principle diagram
The thirteen operation principles will be described. 4 to 7 show the relationship between the operation amount (Id) calculated by the collective protection operation unit 12 and the operation amount (operation amount on the accident bus side: IdA) individually calculated for a plurality of protection areas by the accident bus determination unit 13. FIG. 4 is a characteristic principle vector diagram showing a relationship.

【0028】図4は第1の実施の形態を示し、Idの絶
対値とIdAの絶対値を比較し、事故発生領域を判別す
る方式を示している。A領域において事故が発生した場
合、IdAとIdは原理的には同一量となる。これに対
し誤差分を考慮しても、IdAはIdに近い値をとるこ
とから、Idの絶対値とIdAの絶対値も略同一の値と
考えて良い。なお、図4〜図7内の説明では、A領域の
意味は「図2に示す母線におけるA領域」、又は「動作
量IdAを得る保護領域」である。
FIG. 4 shows the first embodiment, in which the absolute value of Id and the absolute value of IdA are compared to determine the accident occurrence area. If an accident occurs in the area A, IdA and Id are in principle the same amount. On the other hand, even if the error is taken into consideration, IdA takes a value close to Id, so that the absolute value of Id and the absolute value of IdA may be considered to be substantially the same value. In the description in FIGS. 4 to 7, the area A means “area A in the bus shown in FIG. 2” or “protected area for obtaining the operation amount IdA”.

【0029】これを利用し、IdAの絶対値とIdの絶
対値との間に(11)式なる関係が成立した場合、動作量I
dAを算出したA領域に事故が発生したことを判別す
る。又、B領域に事故が発生した場合にも同様に(12)式
なる関係が成立した場合、動作量IdBを算出したB領
域に事故が発生したことを判別する。
Using this, if the relationship represented by the equation (11) is established between the absolute value of IdA and the absolute value of Id, the operation amount I
It is determined that an accident has occurred in the area A for which dA has been calculated. Similarly, when the relationship expressed by the equation (12) is established when an accident occurs in the B region, it is determined that the accident has occurred in the B region for which the operation amount IdB has been calculated.

【0030】[0030]

【数4】 |IdA|≧K1・|Id| ………………(11) (K1は1以下の係数) |IdB|≧K1・|Id| ………………(12) (K1は所定の係数)| IdA | ≧ K1 · | Id | (11) (K1 is a coefficient of 1 or less) | IdB | ≧ K1 · | Id | (12) (K1 Is a predetermined coefficient)

【0031】図5は第2の実施の形態を示し、IdAと
Idの差分の絶対値|IdA−Id|を算出した後にI
dの絶対値との比較を行ない、事故発生領域を判別する
方式を示している。A領域において事故が発生した場
合、IdAとIdはベクトル的にも同一の値となる。
FIG. 5 shows the second embodiment, in which after calculating the absolute value | IdA-Id | of the difference between IdA and Id, I
This shows a method of comparing the absolute value of d with the absolute value of d to determine an accident occurrence area. When an accident occurs in the area A, IdA and Id have the same vector value.

【0032】従って、IdAとIdの差分は誤差ベクト
ルに相当し、A領域での事故時には大きな値とはなり得
ない。このことから、IdAとIdの差分の絶対値とI
dの絶対値との値に(13)式の関係が成立した場合、動作
量IdAを算出したA領域に事故が発生したことを判別
する。
Therefore, the difference between IdA and Id corresponds to an error vector, and cannot be a large value in the event of an accident in the region A. From this, the absolute value of the difference between IdA and Id and I
When the relationship between the absolute value of d and the value of Expression (13) is established, it is determined that an accident has occurred in the region A where the operation amount IdA has been calculated.

【0033】[0033]

【数5】 |IdA−Id|≦K2・|Id| ………(13) (K2は1以下の係数)| IdA−Id | ≦ K2 · | Id | (13) (K2 is a coefficient of 1 or less)

【0034】図6は第3の実施の形態を示し、図4の特
性原理ベクトル図にIdとIdAの位相比較を加えた方
式である。先にも述べたように、A領域で事故が発生し
た場合、IdAとIdはベクトル的に同一量となること
から、スカラー量に加え位相も略同一であると言える。
このことから、(11)式の成立に加え、更に(14)式の関係
が成立した場合、動作量IdAを算出したA領域に事故
が発生したことを判別する。
FIG. 6 shows the third embodiment, which is a system in which the phase comparison of Id and IdA is added to the characteristic principle vector diagram of FIG. As described above, when an accident occurs in the region A, since IdA and Id have the same amount in vector, it can be said that the phase is substantially the same as the scalar amount.
From this, when the relationship of the expression (14) is established in addition to the establishment of the expression (11), it is determined that an accident has occurred in the region A where the operation amount IdA has been calculated.

【0035】[0035]

【数6】 |IdIdA|≦α ………………………(14) (αは所定の位相角)[6] | Id ∧ IdA | ≦ α ........................... (14) (α is a predetermined phase angle)

【0036】図7は第4の実施の形態を示し、Idの絶
対値とIdAの絶対値との関係を示す(11)式に対し、更
にIdAの絶対値に上限を与える条件を加えたものであ
る。A領域で事故が発生した場合、IdAとIdは略同
一の値となることから、IdAの絶対値がIdの絶対値
を大きく越えることはない。このことから、IdAの絶
対値とIdの絶対値との間に(15)式の関係が成立し、更
に(14)式が成立した場合に動作量IdAを算出したA領
域に事故が発生したことを判別する。
FIG. 7 shows a fourth embodiment in which the condition for giving an upper limit to the absolute value of IdA is added to the equation (11) showing the relationship between the absolute value of Id and the absolute value of IdA. It is. When an accident occurs in the region A, since IdA and Id have substantially the same value, the absolute value of IdA does not greatly exceed the absolute value of Id. From this, the relationship of the formula (15) is established between the absolute value of IdA and the absolute value of Id, and when the formula (14) is satisfied, an accident occurs in the region A where the operation amount IdA is calculated. Is determined.

【0037】[0037]

【数7】 K1・|Id|≦|IdA|≦K3・|Id| ………(15) (K1は1以下の係数,K3は1以上の係数)K1 · | Id | ≦ | IdA | ≦ K3 · | Id | (15) (K1 is a coefficient of 1 or less, K3 is a coefficient of 1 or more)

【0038】ここで、事故発生時の動作量の絶対値は、
少なくとも一括保護用の演算手段において内部・外部事
故判定を行なうために予め設定した感度値(KTAP)
よりも大きくなるはずである。従って、A領域において
事故が発生した場合のIdAの絶対値も、この感度値よ
りも大きくなると言える。
Here, the absolute value of the operation amount at the time of occurrence of an accident is
Sensitivity value (KTAP) set in advance for performing internal / external accident determination in at least the protection means
Should be larger than Therefore, it can be said that the absolute value of IdA when an accident occurs in the region A is larger than this sensitivity value.

【0039】このことから、IdAとIdの絶対値の間
の関係式(11)に、動作量の下限値としてこの感度値(K
TAP)を考慮し、(16)式とすることにより、平常時は
動作量の小さい事故初期段階での過渡的な誤応動を防止
できる。又、(16)式の条件は(14)式とのAND条件とし
て設定し、事故母線判定が可能であるほか、(15)式と組
み合わせて(17)式として事故母線判定を行なうこともで
きる。
From this, in the relational expression (11) between the absolute values of IdA and Id, the sensitivity value (K
TAP) is considered and the formula (16) is used, so that it is possible to prevent a transient erroneous operation at the initial stage of an accident with a small operation amount in normal times. Further, the condition of the expression (16) is set as an AND condition with the expression (14), so that the accident bus determination can be performed.In addition, the accident bus determination can be performed as the expression (17) in combination with the expression (15). .

【0040】[0040]

【数8】 |IdA|≧K1・max{|Id|,KTAP} ………(16) なお、max{A,B}はA,Bの中で何れか大きい値
を示す。 K1・(max{|Id|,KTAP}≦|IdA|≦K3・|Id| ………………………………(17) (K1は1以下の係数,K3は1以上の係数)
| IdA | ≧ K1 · max {| Id |, KTAP} (16) Note that max {A, B} indicates a larger value among A and B. K1 · (max {| Id |, KTAP} ≦ | IdA | ≦ K3 · | Id | (17) (K1 is a coefficient of 1 or less, and K3 is a coefficient of 1 or more. )

【0041】同様に、動作量の下限値を設定するために
感度値を用いて、(18)式とする方式も効果的である。小
電流領域での誤検出防止のために、動作量IdAの下限
値として、感度値(KTAP)に所定の係数を乗じたも
のを設定し、(19)式とする方法がある。この(19)式は(1
3)式とのANDとして設定することにより、事故母線判
定が可能となる。又、上記判定式において、(13)式と(1
6)式をAND条件として設定することにより、より確実
な事故母線判定を行なうことができる。
Similarly, it is also effective to use the sensitivity value to set the lower limit value of the operation amount and to use the sensitivity value as equation (18). In order to prevent erroneous detection in a small current region, there is a method of setting a value obtained by multiplying a sensitivity value (KTAP) by a predetermined coefficient as a lower limit value of the operation amount IdA, and using the expression (19). This equation (19) becomes (1
By setting an AND with the expression 3), it is possible to determine the accident bus. Further, in the above determination formula, the formula (13) and (1
By setting the expression 6) as an AND condition, a more reliable accident bus determination can be performed.

【0042】[0042]

【数9】 |IdA|≧K1・(|Id|+KTAP) ………(18) |IdA|≧K4・KTAP ………………(19) (K4は1以下の係数)| IdA | ≧ K1 · (| Id | + KTAP) (18) | IdA | ≧ K4 · KTAP (19) (K4 is a coefficient of 1 or less)

【0043】次に、保護領域を2つに限定した場合につ
いて考える。2つの保護領域A,Bの中のA領域におい
て事故が発生した場合、前述のようにA領域の動作量が
一括保護用の演算手段の動作量Idと同一量となるが、
この時のB領域の動作量IdBは発生しない(誤差分の
みとなる)。
Next, consider the case where the number of protected areas is limited to two. When an accident occurs in the area A of the two protection areas A and B, the operation amount of the area A is the same as the operation amount Id of the operation means for collective protection as described above.
At this time, the operation amount IdB in the B region does not occur (only the error amount).

【0044】このことから、A領域において事故が発生
したことを検出することの条件として、IdBの絶対値
とIdの絶対値との間に(20)式が成立していることを考
慮する。しかしながら、(20)式の判定のみではA領域,
B領域共に事故が発生していない場合に、他方の領域に
事故が発生していることを判別するため、何れかの領域
に事故が発生していることを条件に加える必要がある。
Accordingly, as a condition for detecting the occurrence of an accident in the region A, it is considered that the expression (20) is established between the absolute value of IdB and the absolute value of Id. However, the region A is obtained only by the judgment of the expression (20).
When no accident has occurred in both areas B, it is necessary to add a condition that an accident has occurred in any one of the areas in order to determine that an accident has occurred in the other area.

【0045】この条件として、A領域の動作量IdAの
絶対値とIdの絶対値を用いた(11)式の条件を加え、(2
0)式と同時に条件が成立した場合にA領域に事故が発生
していることを判別する。同様にB領域に事故が発生し
ている条件は(21)式及び(22)式の両条件の成立をもって
判別する。
As this condition, the condition of the equation (11) using the absolute value of the operation amount IdA and the absolute value of Id in the region A is added, and (2)
When the condition is satisfied at the same time as equation (0), it is determined that an accident has occurred in the area A. Similarly, the condition in which an accident has occurred in the area B is determined based on the satisfaction of both conditions of the equations (21) and (22).

【0046】[0046]

【数10】 |IdB|≦K5・|Id| …………(20) (K5は1以下の係数) |IdA|≦K5・|Id| …………(21) |IdB|≦K1・|Id| …………(22)| IdB | ≦ K5 · | Id | (20) (K5 is a coefficient of 1 or less) | IdA | ≦ K5 · | Id | (21) | IdB | ≦ K1 · | Id | ............ (22)

【0047】遮断母線判定手段14では、一括保護用の演
算手段12からの内部・外部事故判定出力と事故母線判定
手段13の判定結果を組み合わせ、遮断母線の判定を行な
う。例えば、一括保護用の演算手段が内部事故判定を行
ない、事故母線判定手段がA領域の事故判定を出力した
場合、A領域の母線に接続される回線に対する遮断出力
を起動する。遮断母線判定手段の判定は一括の第1表に
従って行なわれ、これにより、事故発生領域(事故母線
接続回線)の遮断起動が行なわれる。
The shutoff bus judging means 14 judges the shutoff bus by combining the internal / external accident judgment output from the collective protection calculating means 12 with the judgment result of the accident bus judging means 13. For example, when the operation means for collective protection makes an internal accident judgment and the accident bus judging means outputs an accident judgment in the area A, a cut-off output for the line connected to the bus in the area A is activated. The determination by the shutoff bus determining means is performed according to the collective Table 1, whereby the start of shutoff of the accident occurrence area (the accident bus connection line) is performed.

【0048】上記した実施の形態における説明では母線
系統を例としたが、これに限定されるものではない。要
は、差動演算原理による保護が適用される複数の保護領
域からなる構成を有する系統であれば、同様な効果を得
ることができる。
In the above description of the embodiment, the bus system is taken as an example, but the present invention is not limited to this. In short, the same effect can be obtained if the system has a configuration including a plurality of protection areas to which protection based on the differential operation principle is applied.

【0049】[0049]

【表1】 [Table 1]

【0050】[0050]

【発明の効果】以上説明したように、本発明によれば複
数の保護領域を包含した領域に対して内部・外部事故判
定を行なう一括保護用継電器において、判定用に算出し
た動作量と、前記複数の保護領域個別に算出した動作量
を用いて、事故が発生している保護領域を判別すること
ができる事故系統判定機能を追加したため、分割保護用
継電器を使用しない簡易な構成で複数の保護領域の中の
事故発生母線の選択,遮断を行なうことができる系統保
護継電装置を提供できる。
As described above, according to the present invention, in a collective protection relay for performing an internal / external accident judgment for an area including a plurality of protection areas, the operation amount calculated for the judgment and An accident system determination function has been added that can determine the protection area in which an accident has occurred using the operation amounts calculated separately for multiple protection areas. It is possible to provide a system protection relay device that can select and cut off an accident-occurring bus in an area.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】本発明による系統保護継電装置の実施の形態を
示す機能ブロック構成図。
FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram showing an embodiment of a system protection relay device according to the present invention.

【図2】複数の保護領域を持つ母線の構成例。FIG. 2 is a configuration example of a bus having a plurality of protection areas.

【図3】本発明の実施の形態を説明するための保護系統
図。
FIG. 3 is a protection system diagram for explaining the embodiment of the present invention.

【図4】第1の実施の形態を示す特性原理図。FIG. 4 is a characteristic principle diagram showing the first embodiment.

【図5】第2の実施の形態を示す特性原理図。FIG. 5 is a characteristic principle diagram showing a second embodiment.

【図6】第3の実施の形態を示す特性原理図。FIG. 6 is a characteristic principle diagram showing a third embodiment.

【図7】第4の実施の形態を示す特性原理図。FIG. 7 is a characteristic principle diagram showing a fourth embodiment.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

10 母線保護継電装置 11 データ取得手段 12 一括保護用演算手段 13 事故母線判定手段 14 遮断母線判定手段 10 Bus protection relay 11 Data acquisition means 12 Computing means for collective protection 13 Accident bus judgment means 14 Interruption bus judgment means

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 稲村 國康 東京都府中市東芝町1番地 株式会社東芝 府中工場内 (72)発明者 西田 宏 東京都港区芝浦一丁目1番1号 株式会社 東芝本社事務所内 (72)発明者 岡崎 正人 東京都府中市晴見町二丁目24番地の1 東 芝システムテクノロジー株式会社内 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────続 き Continued on the front page (72) Inventor Kuniyasu Inamura 1 Toshiba-cho, Fuchu-shi, Tokyo Inside the Toshiba Fuchu Plant (72) Inventor Hiroshi Nishida 1-1-1, Shibaura, Minato-ku, Tokyo Toshiba Corporation In the head office (72) Inventor Masato Okazaki 2-24-24 Harumicho, Fuchu-shi, Tokyo Toshiba System Technology Corporation

Claims (10)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 電力系統の電気量を所定の時間間隔でサ
ンプリングした後、これらのサンプリングデータを用い
て複数の保護領域(区間)における事故の発生を識別し
て判定を行なう系統保護継電装置において、前記サンプ
リングデータを用いて動作量及び抑制量を算出し、所定
の比率差動演算により前記複数の保護領域(区間)を包
含する保護領域の内部・外部事故の区別を行なう第1の
演算手段と、前記複数の保護領域個別に動作量を算出す
ると共に、ここで算出した動作量の絶対値の何れかが、
前記第1の演算手段において算出した動作量の絶対値に
所定の係数を掛けた値よりも大きい場合、その条件を成
立させた個別の保護領域内部に事故が発生していること
を検出する第2の演算手段とを備えたことを特徴とした
系統保護継電装置。
1. A system protection relay device that samples an amount of electricity in a power system at predetermined time intervals, and identifies and determines the occurrence of an accident in a plurality of protection areas (sections) using the sampled data. A first operation for calculating an operation amount and a suppression amount using the sampling data, and performing a predetermined ratio differential operation to discriminate between inside and outside accidents of the protection area including the plurality of protection areas (sections). Means, while calculating the operation amount individually for the plurality of protection areas, any one of the absolute values of the operation amount calculated here,
If the absolute value of the amount of operation calculated by the first arithmetic means is larger than a value obtained by multiplying the absolute value by a predetermined coefficient, it is determined that an accident has occurred within the individual protection area satisfying the condition. A system protection relay device comprising: a second calculating means.
【請求項2】 請求項1記載の系統保護継電装置におい
て、第1の演算手段において算出した動作量と、保護領
域個別に算出した動作量との差分の絶対値が、前記第1
の演算手段において算出した動作量の絶対値に所定の係
数を掛けた値よりも小さい場合、その差分の絶対値を得
た保護領域の内部に事故が発生していることを検出する
第2の演算手段を備えたことを特徴とした系統保護継電
装置。
2. The system protection relay device according to claim 1, wherein an absolute value of a difference between the operation amount calculated by the first calculation means and the operation amount calculated for each protection area is equal to the first value.
If the absolute value of the operation amount calculated by the calculation means is smaller than a value obtained by multiplying the absolute value by a predetermined coefficient, a second detection is performed to detect that an accident has occurred inside the protection area from which the absolute value of the difference has been obtained. A system protection relay comprising a calculating means.
【請求項3】 請求項1記載の系統保護継電装置におい
て、複数の保護領域個別に算出した動作量と前記第1の
演算手段において算出した動作量との間に、以下に示す
a,bの条件が共に成立したことにより、当該保護領域
の内部に事故が発生していることを検出する第2の演算
手段を備えたことを特徴とした系統保護継電装置。 a.保護領域個別に算出した動作量の絶対値の何れか
が、第1の演算手段において算出した動作量の絶対値に
所定の係数を掛けた値よりも大きい。 b.保護領域個別に算出した動作量の内、a条件が成立
した保護領域の動作量と、第1の演算手段において算出
した動作量の位相差が所定の角度よりも小さい。
3. The system protection relay device according to claim 1, wherein a and b shown below are set between the operation amounts calculated individually for the plurality of protection areas and the operation amounts calculated by the first calculating means. The system protection relay device comprises a second calculating means for detecting that an accident has occurred inside the protection area when both of the conditions are satisfied. a. One of the absolute values of the operation amounts calculated individually for the protection areas is larger than a value obtained by multiplying the absolute value of the operation amount calculated by the first calculating means by a predetermined coefficient. b. The phase difference between the operation amount of the protection region where the condition a is satisfied and the operation amount calculated by the first calculation means is smaller than a predetermined angle among the operation amounts calculated individually for the protection regions.
【請求項4】 請求項3記載の系統保護継電装置におい
て、a条件に代えて以下に示すc条件であることを特徴
とした系統保護継電装置。 c.保護領域個別に算出した動作量の絶対値の何れか
が、第1の演算手段において算出した動作量の絶対値に
所定の係数(1未満の係数)を掛けた値よりも大きく、
かつ、第1の演算手段において算出した動作量の絶対値
に所定の係数(1以上の係数)を掛けた値よりも小さ
い。
4. The system protection relay device according to claim 3, wherein the following condition c is used instead of condition a. c. Any one of the absolute values of the operation amounts calculated individually for the protection areas is larger than a value obtained by multiplying the absolute value of the operation amount calculated by the first calculating means by a predetermined coefficient (a coefficient less than 1),
In addition, the value is smaller than a value obtained by multiplying the absolute value of the operation amount calculated by the first calculating means by a predetermined coefficient (one or more coefficients).
【請求項5】 請求項1又は請求項3又は請求項4記載
の系統保護継電装置において、第1の演算手段において
算出した動作量の絶対値が、以下のdに示す値であるこ
とを特徴とした系統保護継電装置。 d.第1の演算手段において算出した動作量の絶対値と
第1の演算手段の判定のために予め設定した所定の動作
感度値の何れか大きい値。
5. The system protection relay according to claim 1, wherein the absolute value of the operation amount calculated by the first calculating means is a value represented by the following d. Characteristic system protection relay. d. Either the absolute value of the motion amount calculated by the first calculating means or a predetermined motion sensitivity value set in advance for determination by the first calculating means, whichever is larger.
【請求項6】 請求項1又は請求項3又は請求項4記載
の系統保護継電装置において、前記第1の演算手段にお
いて算出した動作量の絶対値が、以下のeに示す値であ
ることを特徴とした系統保護継電装置。 e.第1の演算手段において算出した動作量の絶対値に
対し、第1の演算手段の判定のために予め設定した所定
の動作感度値を加えた値。
6. The system protection relay according to claim 1, wherein the absolute value of the operation amount calculated by the first calculating means is a value represented by the following e. A system protection relay device characterized by the following. e. A value obtained by adding a predetermined operation sensitivity value set in advance for determination by the first arithmetic unit to the absolute value of the operation amount calculated by the first arithmetic unit.
【請求項7】 請求項2記載の系統保護継電装置におい
て、第1の演算手段において算出した動作量と保護領域
個別に算出した何れかの動作量との差分の絶対値が、前
記第1の演算手段において算出した動作量の絶対値に所
定の係数を掛けた値よりも小さくすると共に、かつ、こ
の条件の成立した保護領域個別に算出した動作量が、第
1の演算手段の判定のために予め設定した動作感度値に
所定の値(1以下の値)を掛けた値よりも大きいことに
より、当該領域の内部に事故が発生していることを検出
する第2の演算手段を備えたことを特徴とした系統保護
継電装置。
7. The system protection relay device according to claim 2, wherein an absolute value of a difference between the operation amount calculated by the first calculation unit and any operation amount calculated individually for the protection area is equal to the first value. Is smaller than the value obtained by multiplying the absolute value of the amount of operation calculated by the calculating means by a predetermined coefficient, and the amount of operation calculated individually for each protection area satisfying this condition is determined by the first calculating means. For this reason, a second arithmetic means is provided for detecting that an accident has occurred inside the area by setting the value to be larger than a value obtained by multiplying a predetermined value (a value equal to or less than 1) by a preset operation sensitivity value. System protection relay device characterized by the following.
【請求項8】 請求項1記載の系統保護継電装置におい
て、複数の保護領域個別に算出した動作量と第1の演算
手段において算出した動作量との間に、以下に示すf,
gの条件が共に成立したことにより、当該保護領域の内
部に事故が発生していることを検出する第2の演算手段
を備えたことを特徴とした系統保護継電装置。 f.保護領域個別に算出した動作量の絶対値の何れか
が、第1の演算手段において算出した動作量の絶対値と
第1の演算手段の演算結果の判定のために予め設定した
動作感度値の何れか大きい値に所定の係数を掛けた値よ
りも大きい。 g.第1の演算手段において算出した動作量と、保護領
域個別に算出した何れかの動作量との差の絶対値が、第
1の演算手段において算出した動作量の絶対値に所定の
係数を掛けた値よりも小さい。
8. The system protection relay device according to claim 1, wherein f, f and f shown below are between an operation amount calculated for each of the plurality of protection areas and an operation amount calculated by the first calculation means.
A system protection relay device comprising: a second calculating means for detecting that an accident has occurred inside the protection area when both of the conditions of g are satisfied. f. Any one of the absolute values of the operation amounts calculated individually for the protection areas is the difference between the absolute value of the operation amount calculated by the first operation unit and the operation sensitivity value set in advance for the determination of the operation result of the first operation unit. It is larger than a value obtained by multiplying a larger value by a predetermined coefficient. g. The absolute value of the difference between the movement amount calculated by the first calculation means and any movement amount calculated individually for the protection area is obtained by multiplying the absolute value of the movement amount calculated by the first calculation means by a predetermined coefficient. Less than
【請求項9】 電力系統の電気量を所定の時間間隔でサ
ンプリングした後、これらのサンプリングデータを用い
て2つの保護領域(区間)に対して事故検出判定を行な
う系統保護継電装置において、前記サンプリングデータ
を用いて動作量及び抑制量を算出し、所定の比率差動演
算により前記2つの保護領域(区間)を包含する保護領
域の内部・外部事故の区別を行なう第1の演算手段と、
前記2つの保護領域個別に動作量を算出し、算出した動
作量の絶対値の一方が、前記第1の演算手段において算
出した動作量の絶対値に所定の係数を掛けた値よりも小
さい場合、他方の保護領域内部に事故が発生しているこ
とを検出する第2の演算手段を備えたことを特徴とした
系統保護継電装置。
9. A system protection relay device, which samples electric quantities of a power system at predetermined time intervals, and performs an accident detection determination on two protection areas (sections) using the sampled data. First calculating means for calculating an operation amount and a suppression amount using the sampling data, and performing a predetermined ratio differential operation to discriminate between inside and outside accidents of the protection area including the two protection areas (sections);
A case where one of the absolute values of the calculated amount of operation is calculated by multiplying the absolute value of the amount of operation calculated by the first calculating means by a predetermined coefficient, And a second calculating means for detecting that an accident has occurred inside the other protection area.
【請求項10】 請求項9記載の系統保護継電装置にお
いて、2つの保護領域個別に算出した動作量の絶対値の
一方が、前記第1の演算手段において算出した動作量の
絶対値に所定の値を掛けた値よりも大きくすると共に、
かつ、他方の保護領域において算出した動作量の絶対値
が、第1の演算手段において算出した動作量の絶対値に
所定の値を掛けた値よりも小さい場合、第1の演算手段
において算出した動作量よりも大きい側の動作量を得た
保護領域内部に事故が発生していることを検出する第2
の演算手段を備えたことを特徴とした系統保護継電装
置。
10. The system protection relay device according to claim 9, wherein one of the absolute values of the operation amounts calculated separately for the two protection areas is set to the absolute value of the operation amount calculated by the first calculating means. Greater than the product of
When the absolute value of the operation amount calculated in the other protection area is smaller than a value obtained by multiplying the absolute value of the operation amount calculated by the first arithmetic unit by a predetermined value, the calculation is performed by the first arithmetic unit. A second method for detecting that an accident has occurred inside the protection area that has obtained an operation amount larger than the operation amount
A system protection relay device comprising:
JP12667898A 1998-04-21 1998-04-21 System protection relay device Expired - Lifetime JP3808624B2 (en)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP12667898A JP3808624B2 (en) 1998-04-21 1998-04-21 System protection relay device
KR1019990013847A KR19990083313A (en) 1998-04-21 1999-04-19 System protection relay equipment
US09/294,392 US6222711B1 (en) 1998-04-21 1999-04-20 Bus-bar protection relay equipment
DE69943254T DE69943254D1 (en) 1998-04-21 1999-04-21 Protection relay for busbar system
EP99107890A EP0952654B1 (en) 1998-04-21 1999-04-21 Bus-bar protective relay apparatus
CN99105674A CN1090401C (en) 1998-04-21 1999-04-21 System protection relay device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP12667898A JP3808624B2 (en) 1998-04-21 1998-04-21 System protection relay device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH11308756A true JPH11308756A (en) 1999-11-05
JP3808624B2 JP3808624B2 (en) 2006-08-16

Family

ID=14941159

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP12667898A Expired - Lifetime JP3808624B2 (en) 1998-04-21 1998-04-21 System protection relay device

Country Status (3)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3808624B2 (en)
KR (1) KR19990083313A (en)
CN (1) CN1090401C (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105119248A (en) * 2015-10-08 2015-12-02 南京南瑞继保电气有限公司 Centralized bus-bar protection extension access capability method and device
CN105762772A (en) * 2016-05-04 2016-07-13 国电南瑞科技股份有限公司 Method for identifying bus differential area
CN105870887A (en) * 2016-05-04 2016-08-17 国电南瑞科技股份有限公司 Method for recognizing bus differential area on basis of switching of two current transformers in same bus-tie circuit breaker
CN107196275A (en) * 2017-06-19 2017-09-22 中国南方电网有限责任公司 A kind of method for examining bus differential protection secondary circuit with electric transmission in short-term

Families Citing this family (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR100413196B1 (en) * 1999-12-07 2003-12-31 한국전력공사 Switching apparatus for electrical power plant and transforming site
US6658360B1 (en) * 2000-06-09 2003-12-02 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Software-controlled evaluation of fault currents for protection and monitoring systems
KR100465944B1 (en) * 2000-10-06 2005-01-13 가부시끼가이샤 도시바 Digital protective relay
BRPI0312625A2 (en) * 2002-07-12 2017-05-02 Mcgraw-Edison Company mains protection system
CN100388580C (en) * 2004-02-13 2008-05-14 浙江大学 Three-phase integrated brake device for preventing multiple-branch voltage transformer differential protection unwanted operation
ATE523938T1 (en) * 2006-06-29 2011-09-15 Abb Technology Ltd DISTANCE PROTECTION METHOD AND DISTANCE PROTECTION RELAYS
CN101609979B (en) * 2009-07-24 2011-08-31 南京南瑞继保电气有限公司 Object-oriented bus protection setting method
JP5951237B2 (en) * 2011-11-21 2016-07-13 株式会社東芝 DC feeder protection relay device
US10393810B2 (en) 2012-06-06 2019-08-27 Abb Schweiz Ag Method for identifying the fault by current differential protection and device thereof
CN103280776B (en) * 2013-05-20 2015-10-28 南京国电南自电网自动化有限公司 A kind of method preventing differential protection incorrect operation
CN108028529B (en) * 2015-09-18 2019-12-20 施瓦哲工程实验有限公司 Time domain line protection for power transmission systems
CN109980595B (en) * 2019-05-07 2021-10-08 华北电力大学(保定) Method for determining fault clearing time of flexible direct-current power grid under bipolar short circuit

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0828934B2 (en) * 1984-07-31 1996-03-21 株式会社東芝 Protection control device
CN1006511B (en) * 1985-11-07 1990-01-17 株式会社东芝 Information data output arrangement for electric power system
JP2652184B2 (en) * 1988-02-01 1997-09-10 三菱電機株式会社 Digital protection relay
JPH0681417B2 (en) * 1988-12-16 1994-10-12 三菱電機株式会社 Digital bus protection relay
JPH0771378B2 (en) * 1990-02-28 1995-07-31 三菱電機株式会社 Failure zone detector
JPH0654439A (en) * 1992-07-30 1994-02-25 Toshiba Corp Digital type transformer protection relay device

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105119248A (en) * 2015-10-08 2015-12-02 南京南瑞继保电气有限公司 Centralized bus-bar protection extension access capability method and device
CN105762772A (en) * 2016-05-04 2016-07-13 国电南瑞科技股份有限公司 Method for identifying bus differential area
CN105870887A (en) * 2016-05-04 2016-08-17 国电南瑞科技股份有限公司 Method for recognizing bus differential area on basis of switching of two current transformers in same bus-tie circuit breaker
CN107196275A (en) * 2017-06-19 2017-09-22 中国南方电网有限责任公司 A kind of method for examining bus differential protection secondary circuit with electric transmission in short-term

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3808624B2 (en) 2006-08-16
CN1090401C (en) 2002-09-04
CN1233099A (en) 1999-10-27
KR19990083313A (en) 1999-11-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JPH11308756A (en) System protection relay device
AU2006218736B2 (en) An apparatus and method for detecting the loss of a current transformer connection coupling a current differential relay to an element of a power system
KR100246203B1 (en) A control system and method for high impedance ground fault of power line in a power system
US6839210B2 (en) Bus total overcurrent system for a protective relay
Eissa et al. A novel digital distance relaying technique for transmission line protection
JP3284589B2 (en) Transmission line protection method and protection relay device
CN106526429B (en) A kind of ground fault line selecting method with error correction
JP2004080839A (en) Ground direction relay and ground direction relay device
EP2328249B1 (en) Reclosing method for electrical power transmission line
JP2009005565A (en) Distribution line accident zone selecting and blocking device and distribution line accident zone selecting and blocking method
JP3832700B2 (en) Busbar protection relay device
JP2957187B2 (en) Secondary circuit disconnection detector for instrument transformer
JP3829614B2 (en) Digital type protective relay device
JP3792893B2 (en) Busbar protection relay device
US6101075A (en) System for improving protective relay coordination with other protective elements in power system
US6154687A (en) Modified cosine filters
JP4836663B2 (en) Loop system protection device and method
JP2010183745A (en) Short-circuit protector
JP3210810B2 (en) Protective relay device and its analog part failure determination method
JPS5857059B2 (en) Distribution line short circuit protection method
JPH0837730A (en) Bus protective relay
JPS6022772Y2 (en) Digital protective relay device
JPH0583844A (en) Distance relay unit
JP2007312582A (en) Device and method for protecting loop system
JPH11205996A (en) Breaker control and protective relay device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20040827

A711 Notification of change in applicant

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A712

Effective date: 20050126

A711 Notification of change in applicant

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A712

Effective date: 20050727

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20050808

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20050727

A711 Notification of change in applicant

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A711

Effective date: 20050727

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20060104

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20060106

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20060217

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20060510

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20060518

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

S111 Request for change of ownership or part of ownership

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313115

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090526

Year of fee payment: 3

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090526

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100526

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110526

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110526

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120526

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120526

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130526

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130526

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140526

Year of fee payment: 8

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term