JPH10250581A - Train operation arrangement device - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To generate a plurality of operation arrangement schemes in one lot by generating the operation arrangement schemes to be implemented, so as to change a train schedule on a work area, and transmitting the schemes to an operation monitor system, together with each proposal timing. SOLUTION: Predicted schedule data is generated on the basis of schedule data changed via an operation arrangement scheme, without any distinguishment between operation arrangement automatically made according to an operation arrangement scheme generation rule base 7, and operation arrangement manually made, and judgement is made about each proposal timing of operation arrangement schemes stored in operation arrangement scheme data 13. Then, the result of the judgement is sent to a train operation monitor system. In addition, operation arrangements automatically made or manually made by an instructor are prepared in one lot for the same and latest train schedule in one work area, and predicated schedule for a plurality of the operation arrangements are displayed. As a result, the automatically proposed operation schedule and the manual operation schedule are coordinated with each other, thereby allowing an efficient instruction work.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a train operation control device for monitoring train operation and generating a train operation control plan.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art FIG.
FIG. 1 is a functional configuration diagram of a conventional train operation rearranging device shown in Japanese Patent Application Publication No. H10-209,004. In the figure, reference numeral 1 denotes planned timetable data storing a train operation plan, 2 denotes actual timetable data storing actual operation results based on the planned timetable data 1, 3 denotes planned timetable data 1 and actual timetable data Based on 2,
This is prediction timetable data that stores a prediction of train operation after the current time. Reference numeral 4 denotes a train operation monitoring unit that detects disturbances in train operation based on the operation monitoring rule base 5, and 6 generates an operation adjustment plan based on the operation adjustment plan generation rule base 7 when train operation is disturbed. A traffic rescheduling plan generator 8 is a proposal timing judging unit that determines a proposed timing of the generated traffic rescheduling plan, and 9 is a display unit that displays the proposed traffic rescheduling plan and its timing.

In such a conventional train operation control device, a train operation monitoring unit 4 detects a train operation disturbance from the planned schedule data 1 and the actual schedule data 2, and proposes an operation control according to the operation monitoring rule base 5. Is determined, and if necessary, the traffic rescheduling plan generator 6 is started. The traffic rescheduling plan generator 6 generates the traffic rescheduling plan in accordance with the traffic rescheduling plan generation rule base 7 while creating the predicted schedule data 3. The suggestion timing determination unit 8 determines a suggestion timing based on the execution station of the generated traffic rescheduling plan, outputs the determined content to the display unit 9, and displays the corresponding portion of the train schedule in the operation monitoring system. change. If the supervisor manually performs the traffic rescheduling, the traffic rescheduling plan is directly operated separately from the traffic rescheduling plan generated by the traffic rescheduling plan generator 6 according to the traffic rescheduling plan generation rule base 7. The train schedule is changed from the input terminal of the monitoring system.

[0004]

In the conventional train operation control device as described above, the schedule is changed every time the device generates a traffic control plan. Therefore, it is necessary to control the operation at a plurality of locations due to one factor. In such a case, it was difficult to control the traffic in a lump, and it was difficult to grasp the operation after the traffic control. In addition, when a supervisor performs manual rescheduling, he / she does not follow the traffic rescheduling plan generation rule base but performs the rescheduling separately based on the experience of the supervisor. It was inconsistent with the plan, and it was not possible to carry out smooth order work.

The present invention has been made to solve the above-mentioned problems, and a first object of the present invention is to provide a train operation control device capable of generating a plurality of operation control plans at once. A second object of the present invention is to provide a train operation control device that can match the operation control plan proposed by the device with the manual operation control plan.

[0006]

In a train operation control device according to the present invention, a train operation monitoring system that monitors the operation of a train and controls the route of the train on the basis of a train schedule is provided by a train operation monitoring system. Means for receiving and storing timetables (planned timetables) in the work area, means for receiving realtime timetables that record the arrival and departure results of each train station, and judging the necessity of operation reconciliation based on the planned timetable and the actual timetable If you need to reschedule,
Means for generating and storing all necessary traffic control plans in accordance with the traffic control plan generation rule base; means for changing the schedule on the work area according to the generated traffic control plan; It is provided with a means for judging each proposal timing and a means for transmitting the stored traffic rescheduling plan and the proposal timing to the operation monitoring system.

Further, there is provided means for manually inputting a traffic control plan.

Further, the means for generating a traffic adjustment plan in accordance with the traffic adjustment plan generation rule base is activated periodically, and operates only when the schedule is not being changed due to manual traffic adjustment.

[0009] In addition, the operation of each train is performed so as to satisfy predetermined running conditions such as a minimum operation interval between trains and a stop time at each station with respect to the planned schedule on the work area changed by the traffic control plan. It is provided with means for creating an adjusted prediction diagram.

[0010] Further, there is provided means for calculating an evaluation value such as total delay time from the created prediction diagram.

[0011]

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

Embodiment 1 FIG. FIG. 1 shows a train operation control device according to an embodiment of the present invention.
3, and 6 to 9 are the same as or equivalent to the conventional one shown in FIG. Reference numeral 10 denotes a plan diagram receiving unit that receives a currently used train diagram (planned diagram) transmitted from the train operation monitoring device connected to the present device and change data applied to the planned diagram. It is stored in diamond data 1. Reference numeral 11 denotes a result diagram receiving unit for receiving the result diagram indicating the arrival / departure time of the train transmitted from the train operation monitoring device, and stores the result diagram data 2 in the result diagram data. Reference numeral 12 denotes work schedule data which is a work area for changing the contents of the schedule diagram according to the drive schedule generated by the traffic schedule generation unit 6. Reference numeral 13 denotes driving schedule data in which the driving schedule generated by the driving schedule generation unit 6 is stored, and reference numeral 14 denotes an input unit for a supervisor to instruct driving scheduling. Reference numeral 15 denotes a traffic regulation proposal transmitting unit that transmits the traffic regulation proposal data to be implemented and the time when the proposal is made to the train operation monitoring device. Reference numeral 16 denotes a manual schedule change unit for manually inputting a traffic schedule, and the schedule data on the work schedule data 12 is changed according to the input traffic schedule. Reference numeral 17 denotes a driving schedule in consideration of running conditions such as a minimum driving interval between trains and a stop time of each station from the work schedule data 12 changed by the driving schedule proposed by the traffic scheduling plan generating unit 6 and the manual schedule changing unit 16. This is a prediction diagram creation unit that predicts all train operations after sorting.

The operation of the train control system thus constructed will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG. First, in response to an instruction for traffic rescheduling from the input unit 14 (S1), the traffic rescheduling plan generator 6 temporarily copies the contents of the schedule data 1 received from the train operation monitoring system to the work diagram data 13 (S2). Reserved as a work area for changing the schedule according to the traffic control plan. Then, from the scheduled timetable data on the work timetable data 12 and the actual timetable data 2 from the operation monitoring system, the train operation from the current time to a certain time ahead is predicted to create predicted timetable data, and the predicted timetable data 3 is generated. It is stored (S3). If traffic rescheduling is required according to the traffic rescheduling plan generation rule base 7 (YES in S4), all necessary traffic rescheduling plans are generated and stored in the traffic rescheduling plan data 13 (S5). Then, the corresponding parts of the scheduled timetable data on the work timetable data 12 are changed collectively according to the driving schedule (S6). For example, when a passing train is waiting at a certain station and there is a train scheduled to depart after the passing train passes, if the passing train is greatly delayed, the train is departed without waiting for the passing train It needs to be organized. In this case, the departure order of the station is changed, but at the same time, a similar change occurs at the station after that. The plurality of operation scheduling plans are generated and stored at one time, and the planned schedule data on the work schedule data 12 is changed in a lump.

The predicted timetable creating unit 17 adjusts the changed timetable data on the work timetable data 12 so as to satisfy the running conditions such as the minimum operation time interval between each train and each station stop time. Predict the operation of all trains after sorting. The prediction diagram is configured by the arrival time and departure time of each train. For example, in the example in which the departure order is changed as described above, the operation interval with the preceding train, the stop time specified for the station, the minimum time until the succeeding train can enter after the preceding train leaves the station. The departure time and arrival time of each train are determined so as to satisfy various conditions such as minutes. The created prediction diagram is stored in the prediction diagram data 3 and output to the display unit 9 (S7). Also,
The applied traffic adjustment plan data is also output to the display unit 9. The proposal timing decision unit 8 collectively reads the traffic regulation proposal data from the traffic regulation proposal data 13, determines the proposal timing based on the respective contents (S 8), and transmits the traffic regulation proposal data and the proposal timing to the traffic regulation proposal. The information is transmitted to the train operation monitoring device through the unit 15 (S9). On the train operation monitoring device side, the actual train schedule is changed according to the received traffic rescheduling plan and the timing, and the train is controlled based on the changed train schedule. Further, the train operation monitoring device transmits the latest train schedule to the change schedule receiving unit 10 of the train operation control device, so that the planned schedule data on the work area 12 is always updated to the latest schedule.

On the other hand, although not described in the flowchart of FIG. 2, the commander constantly monitors the driving schedule and the prediction schedule generated by the driving schedule generating unit 6 from the output content of the display unit 9, When it is determined that manual operation rescheduling is necessary, the contents are input from the manual timetable changing unit 16. The inputted traffic rescheduling plan is stored in the traffic rescheduling plan data 13 in the same manner as in S5 and S6 described above, and the corresponding part of the planned schedule on the work diagram data 12 is changed according to the contents. The above-mentioned S7 to S9 are based on the schedule data changed by the traffic control plan without distinguishing between the traffic control automatically performed according to the traffic control plan generation rule base 7 and the manual traffic control. It generates predicted timetable data, determines the proposed timing of each of the traffic control proposals stored in the traffic control proposal data 13, and transmits it to the train operation monitoring system. As described above, the traffic control proposed automatically according to the traffic control plan generation rule base and the manual traffic control by the dispatcher are collectively performed for the same and latest train schedule in one work area. The schedule is displayed when a plurality of traffic rescheduling operations are performed, so that the automatically proposed traffic rescheduling and manual traffic rescheduling can be coordinated and efficient command work can be performed. .

Embodiment 2 As described in the first embodiment, the traffic control automatically performed according to the traffic control plan generation rule base performed by the traffic control plan generation unit 6 and the manual traffic control are performed on the same work area. Since the planned schedule is changed, there is a risk that both parties will change the planned schedule at the same time. Therefore, the first embodiment
Then, S2 to S2 in response to an instruction for traffic control from the input unit 14
Although the process of S9 is performed, the process is performed at a fixed cycle. However, when the scheduled timetable on the work schedule data 12 is being changed due to manual trafficking, a series of manual trafficking is performed. Is set to wait until the processing of is completed. This eliminates confusion such as overlapping of the traffic arrangements.

Embodiment 3 Note that, in the first embodiment, the description has been given of the case where the prediction schedule after the traffic rescheduling is created. However, if the evaluation value such as the total delay time is calculated from the predicted timetable, the effect of the traffic rescheduling is obvious at a glance. Becomes Also, based on the evaluation value, the work schedule data 1
By performing trial and error of the traffic control in Step 2 and finding a traffic control plan with an optimum evaluation value and storing it in the traffic control plan data 13, more advanced command work can be performed.

[0017]

Since the present invention is configured as described above, it has the following effects.

The train schedule in use is received from the train operation monitoring system and stored in the work area, and it is determined from the train schedule on the work area and the actual schedule that the train rescheduling is necessary according to the traffic rescheduling plan generation rule base. In this case, the traffic control plan to be executed is generated, the train schedule on the work area is changed, and the generated traffic control plan is transmitted to the operation monitoring system together with each proposal timing. In addition, a plurality of necessary traffic control can be executed collectively.

Further, since the traffic rescheduling plan can be manually input and the train schedule on the same work area as the traffic rescheduling according to the traffic rescheduling plan generation rule base is changed, consistency between the two can be obtained. .

In addition, when the traffic scheduling plan is generated in accordance with the traffic scheduling plan generation rule base, it is performed only when the scheduled schedule is not being changed by manual driving scheduling, so that there is no possibility that the both are duplicated.

In addition, since the prediction schedule is created when the traffic rescheduling plan is generated, the effect of the traffic rescheduling becomes clear at a glance.

Further, since the evaluation value such as the total delay time is calculated from the created prediction diagram, the most effective driving arrangement can be obtained by trial and error.

[Brief description of the drawings]

FIG. 1 is a functional configuration diagram illustrating a train operation control device according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating a flow of a process performed by the train operation control device of FIG. 11;

FIG. 3 is a functional configuration diagram showing a conventional train operation control device.

[Explanation of symbols]

1 Plan timetable data, 2 Actual timetable data, 3 Forecast timetable data, 6 Traffic control plan generation unit, 7 Traffic control plan generation rule base, 8 Proposal timing judgment unit, 9 Display unit, 10 Plan timetable reception unit, 11 Result timetable reception Section, 12 work schedule data, 13 operation schedule proposal data, 14 input section, 15 operation schedule proposal transmission section, 16 manual schedule change section, 17 prediction schedule creation section.

Claims (5)

[Claims] 1. A train operation monitoring system that monitors the operation of a train and controls the route of the train based on a train schedule,
Means for receiving and storing train schedules in use (planned schedules) in the work area, means for receiving actual schedules indicating the arrival and departure results of each station of the train in real time, Means for judging the necessity / unnecessity, as a result of the judgment, when traffic rescheduling is required, means for generating and storing all necessary traffic rescheduling plans according to the traffic rescheduling plan generation rule base, generated traffic rescheduling Means for changing the schedule on the work area according to the plan, means for judging each proposed timing of the stored traffic rescheduling plan, and transmitting the stored traffic rescheduling plan and the proposed timing to the operation monitoring system. A train operation control device characterized by comprising means for performing. 2. The system according to claim 1, further comprising means for manually inputting a traffic rescheduling plan, wherein the input traffic rescheduling plan is stored together with a traffic rescheduling plan generated according to a traffic rescheduling plan generation rule base. A train operation control device as described. 3. The means for generating a traffic control plan in accordance with the traffic control plan generation rule base is periodically activated, and operates only when the schedule is not being changed due to manual traffic control. The train operation control device according to 1 or 2. 4. The operation of each train is performed so as to satisfy predetermined running conditions such as a minimum operation interval between trains and each station stop time with respect to a planned schedule on the work area changed by the traffic control plan. The train operation control device according to any one of claims 1 to 3, further comprising means for creating an adjusted prediction diagram. 5. The train operation rearranging apparatus according to claim 4, further comprising means for calculating an evaluation value such as a total delay time and the like from the created prediction diagram.