JPH0979069A - Vaporized fuel processing device for internal combustion engine - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To rationalize air-fuel ratio correction relating to a change of operating condition, by taking a change of purge gas flow amount into account, and learning purge concentration so that true concentration can be calculated. SOLUTION: In S35, a gain learning initial value INGALP is stored in all regions. In S32, whether KDUTY (duty correction coefficient) is 1.0 or not is decided, in S36, PRATE (actual purge rate) is compared with GPRATE (learning permission calculation purge rate), in S37, EVPTR (target purge rate) is compared with GEVPTR (learning permission target purge rate), and when all of conditions are satisfied, in S38, a new gain GNEW is calculated from a deviation eα (=100%-EVALPH) of an air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount α and the actual purge rate. In S39, a gain learning value is retrieved. In S40, a learning table value in a region corresponding to the latest purge gas flow amount equivalent area is updated. In S41, S42, a learning value of learning table in the other region is limited to an upper/lower value.

Description

Detailed Description of the Invention

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to an internal combustion system which adsorbs vaporized fuel generated in a fuel supply system of an engine such as a fuel tank and then purges the vaporized fuel together with air into an intake system such as an intake passage. The present invention relates to an evaporated fuel processing device for an engine.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, in order to process evaporated fuel generated in a fuel supply system of an engine such as a fuel tank, the evaporated fuel is discharged into an intake passage and burned. In this case, the evaporated fuel is discharged to the intake passage by the amount determined by the negative pressure applied to the inflow port at the end of the evaporated fuel discharge line regardless of the amount of the evaporated fuel generated.

Therefore, the air-fuel ratio set in accordance with the operating state will fluctuate as the concentration of the evaporated fuel changes.
The combustion state may be unstable. In consideration of such problems, it is possible to supply the evaporated fuel under a predetermined operating condition.
The deviation of the air-fuel ratio feedback control signal with respect to nothing is detected, and based on this detected deviation, the change that affects the air-fuel ratio of the evaporated fuel is detected, and based on this deviation, it corresponds to the non-supply when the evaporated fuel is supplied. There has been proposed a technique in which the correction of the air-fuel ratio is controlled (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 63-4163).
No. 2).

Specifically, by the respective air-fuel ratio feedback correction amounts when the barge valve is opened / closed,
Specifies the deviation. Then, based on this deviation and the evaporated fuel purge (release) amount, the air-fuel ratio correction amount corresponding to each operating state of the evaporated fuel release region, that is, for example, the engine speed is the operating state defined by the load. It is calculated and stored in the storage unit. Based on this air-fuel ratio correction amount, the map data of the correction amount of the evaporated fuel release defined in advance in relation to the engine speed and the load is rewritten over the entire operating region.

That is, in the conventional technique, the purge concentration (concentration of the evaporated fuel in the purge gas is based on the ratio between the deviation of the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount and the purge rate (ratio of the purge gas flow rate to the intake air flow rate). ) Is calculated,
This concentration is stored and held as a learning value, and this stored and held value is reflected in the air-fuel ratio control.

[0006]

By the way, the evaporated fuel in the purge gas is divided into a separated portion from the canister and an evaporated portion from the fuel tank (a floating portion which is not adsorbed in the canister). Among them, the amount separated from the canister is sucked into the engine at a concentration substantially proportional to the adsorbed amount of the canister with respect to the purge gas flow rate. Therefore, the purge concentration is maintained substantially constant with respect to changes in the purge gas flow rate.

On the other hand, the evaporated amount from the fuel tank is determined by the fuel temperature, the fuel volatility, the remaining amount of fuel, etc., and is sucked as a fixed amount irrespective of the purge gas flow rate. Therefore, the purge concentration is a value inversely proportional to the purge gas flow rate. Becomes The purge concentration needs to be considered by combining the amount separated from these canisters and the amount evaporated from the fuel tank, but the purge concentration is a value that changes depending on the flow rate of the purge gas, and the purge concentration is simply learned as in the conventional technique. The true concentration cannot be calculated only by doing.

Therefore, in such conventional control,
There is a problem that the learning result differs depending on the difference in the operating conditions, and the air-fuel ratio correction becomes insufficient or excessive due to the change in the operating conditions. Therefore, an object of the present invention is to make it possible to calculate the true concentration by learning the purge concentration in consideration of the change in the purge gas flow rate, and to optimize the air-fuel ratio correction with respect to the change in operating conditions. .

[0009]

Therefore, the invention according to claim 1 is, as shown in FIG. 1, an operating condition detecting means for detecting an operating condition of the engine, and an operation of the engine output from the detecting means. Evaporative fuel for an internal combustion engine equipped with means for receiving a condition signal to determine a purge ON / OFF condition and a device for opening a purge valve under the purge ON condition to introduce a purge gas from a canister into an engine intake system based on the determination result. In the processing device, the air-fuel ratio detection means for detecting the air-fuel ratio of the air-fuel mixture supplied to the engine, and the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount from the output of the air-fuel ratio detection means so that the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount falls within a predetermined range. Based on the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount calculating means for calculating and the purge ON / OFF condition determination result, the purge ON condition is stored in the learning table of the memory. Fuel supply amount calculating means for calculating a fuel supply amount using an in-learned value, the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount, and a basic fuel supply amount according to operating conditions, and fuel supply means for supplying the fuel supply amount to an engine intake system. A purge rate detecting means for detecting a purge rate as a ratio of a purge gas flow rate to an intake air flow rate; a purge gas flow rate detecting means for detecting the purge gas flow rate; and an evaporative fuel purge presence / absence based on the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount. Air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount deviation calculation means for calculating a deviation of the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount relative to nothing, gain calculation means for calculating a gain based on the deviation of the purge rate and the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount, and the gain calculation means The gain calculated by the above is used as the gain learning value for the purge gas flow rate, and the learning table of the memory is used. Configured to include a gain learning value updating means for allocating a table, a.

According to a second aspect of the present invention, the gain learning value updating means for each purge gas flow rate of the learning table of the memory for assigning the gain learning value based on the purge gas flow rate detected by the purge gas flow rate detecting means. A region determining means for determining a region is included, and the gain calculated by the gain calculating means is assigned to a region for each purge gas flow rate in the learning table of the memory determined by the region determining means.

In the invention according to claim 1, for example, as in the invention according to claim 2, a RAM is allocated for each purge gas flow rate region and a gain (air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount deviation / purge rate) is designated. It is stored in the RAM as a learned value of the purge gas flow rate region. in this way,
As a result of assigning a gain to the purge gas flow rate and reflecting this gain in the air-fuel ratio control, normally, the fuel vapor drawn into the engine is the sum of the two types of vapor from the canister and the fuel tank. Change, it is possible to prevent differences in learning results due to differences in operating conditions under conditions where the purge gas concentration is not constant, and to avoid insufficient or excessive air-fuel ratio correction due to changes in operating conditions. It is possible to improve the property.

According to the third aspect of the present invention, a region obtained by dividing the purge gas flow rate by an exponential function is set as the region for each purge gas flow rate in the learning table of the memory for assigning the learning value. In the invention according to claim 3,
An area obtained by dividing the purge gas flow rate by an exponential function is set as an area of the learning table of the memory for assigning the learning value, the area is determined based on the purge gas flow rate, and the gain is assigned to the determined area.

Therefore, for example, by allocating the learning region (purge gas flow amount region) by a multiple of 2 or the like, the purge concentration obtained in inverse proportion to the purge gas flow amount can be easily assigned. That is, the learning value becomes a constant value or an inversely proportional value depending on the purge gas flow rate, and there is a difference in the learning value for each region. It is possible to deal with it, and more detailed learning value update is possible.

According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, the area determining means determines the outside of the area, and the limit value outside the area determined by the area determining means is calculated based on the learning value within the area. The limit value calculating means and the outside-area learning value limiting means for limiting the learning value outside the area based on the limit value calculated by the limit value calculating means are included.

According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, the limit value calculating means is configured so that, in a region where the purge gas flow rate is larger than the present region,
In the region where the purge gas flow rate is smaller than the learning value in the current region and slightly larger than the learning value in the current region, a value slightly larger than the learning value in the current region in inverse proportion to the purge region is set as the maximum limit value. It was calculated.

According to a sixth aspect of the present invention, the limit value calculating means is configured so that, in a region where the purge gas flow rate is larger than the present region,
As a minimum limit value, a value that is slightly smaller than the learning value of the current area and that is inversely reduced from the purge area, and a value that is slightly smaller than the learning value of the current area in the area where the purge gas flow rate is smaller than the current area. It was calculated.

According to a seventh aspect of the present invention, the limit value calculating means is configured so that, in a region where the purge gas flow rate is larger than the present region,
In the region where the purge gas flow rate is smaller than the learning value in the current region and slightly larger than the learning value in the current region, a value slightly larger than the learning value in the current region in inverse proportion to the purge region is set as the maximum limit value. In the region where the purge gas flow rate is calculated and is larger than the current region, a value slightly smaller than the learning value in the current region and reduced in inverse proportion to the purge region is used. A value slightly smaller than the learning value of the area is calculated as the minimum limit value.

In the invention described in claims 1 to 3,
Learning can be done only at a specific purge gas flow rate. For this reason, in the region where there are few opportunities for learning, the density learned when the region is first passed cannot be used, and the effect of learning control is small. Therefore, it is advisable to estimate the learning value of another region from the learning value of a specific region, update the gain learning value of the other region, and reflect this gain learning value in the air-fuel ratio control.

In this way, the learning value outside the region is limited,
By estimating the learning value of the other area of the current area and updating this density, the density learned when passing through the area for the first time can be used even in the area where there are few opportunities to learn, and the learning control effect is enhanced. The air-fuel ratio controllability can be further improved. Also, if the limit value is set according to the characteristics of the purged portion of the canister and the evaporated portion of the fuel tank,
The learning speed and accuracy can be greatly improved.

[0020]

Embodiments of the present invention will be described below in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. In FIG. 2, the engine 1
In the first intake passage 12, the intake air amount Qa is interlocked with an air flow meter (not shown) and an accelerator pedal (not shown) that detect an intake air flow rate Qa introduced through an air cleaner (not shown).
A throttle valve 14 for controlling the above is provided, and a downstream manifold portion 15 is provided with an electromagnetic fuel injection valve 16 as a fuel supply means for each cylinder.

The fuel injection valve 16 is a micro computer.
From the control unit 17 with built-in data
The valve is driven by the loose signal to inject and supply fuel. Exhaustion
In the air passage 18, the exhaust acid
The air-fuel ratio of the intake mixture is detected by detecting the elementary concentration.
Air-fuel ratio sensor (hereinafter referred to as O ₂With sensor
19) is provided.

A crank angle sensor 20 is built in the distributor 13, and a crank unit angle signal output from the crank angle sensor 20 in synchronization with engine rotation is counted for a certain period of time or a crank reference. The engine rotation speed Ne is detected by measuring the cycle of the angular signal. Further, a water temperature sensor 21 that detects the cooling water temperature TW is provided.

On the other hand, the evaporated fuel accumulated in the upper space of the fuel tank 26 is guided to the canister 23 through the evaporated fuel passage 22 while the engine 11 is stopped, and is temporarily held by the adsorbent 27 such as activated carbon in the canister 23. Is adsorbed on. The space above the canister 23 communicates with a purge port 12 </ b> A formed downstream of the throttle valve 14 in the intake passage 12 via a purge passage 24. The purge passage 24 is provided with a purge valve 25, which is electrically controlled by the control unit 17, and a purge cut valve 28.

The purge valve 14 is a step motor type valve and controls the purge amount. That is, the opening and closing of the purge valve 25 is controlled so that the purge amount becomes a purge amount according to the intake air amount of the engine 1. For example, when the engine 1 has a low load and a low rotation, the intake air amount is small, so the opening degree is controlled to a small opening. Since the intake air amount is large at the time of high load and high rotation, it is controlled to a large opening.

The purge cut valve 28 is ON / O.
The FF valve is a valve for cutting purge, and is closed when the throttle valve 14 is fully closed, and is opened when the throttle valve 14 is open. In the above structure, the sensors including the air flow meter and the crank angle sensor 20 for detecting the operating state of the engine 11, the O ₂ sensor 19 for detecting the operating air-fuel ratio of the engine 11, and the fuel injection valve as the fuel supply device 16 and whether or not it is in the air-fuel ratio feedback control range based on signals from the sensors, and when it is determined that it is in this control range, the fuel injection is performed so that the actual air-fuel ratio matches the target air-fuel ratio. An air-fuel ratio feedback control system is composed of an air-fuel ratio feedback control means, which is installed in the control unit 17 by software and controls the fuel injected from the valve 16.

On the other hand, for the air-fuel ratio feedback control system, the canister 23, the purge passage 24, the purge valve 25, the purge cut valve 28, and the opening degree of the purge valve 25 are calculated based on the engine operating state. , This is the purge valve 2
The evaporative fuel purging device is constituted by the purge control means, which is installed in the control unit 17 by software, and which commands the control unit 5 to command.

Here, prior to the description of the control contents in the embodiment of the present invention based on the flow chart, description will be given based on the block diagrams of FIGS. 3 and 4. In block 1 (abbreviated as B1 in the figure; the same applies hereinafter), the purge valve flow passage area is obtained, and in block 2, the purge cut valve area is obtained. The purge valve passage area is a value obtained by referring to the purge valve passage area table TAPV from the step position monitor value EVSTPM of the step motor.

In the block 3, since the purge valve 25 and the purge cut valve 28 are provided in series, the smaller area is selected and set as the purge flow path area AP. In block 4, the actual purge rate PRATE (inlet purge rate) is calculated from the purge channel area AP and the total channel area AA (PRATE = AP / AA). On the other hand, in block 5, the average of the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount α during purging is calculated. In this case, the weighted average value EVALPH of α is obtained, but the initial value is 100%, the weighted average is not performed during the open loop and the clamp, and the old data is retained.

Further, in block 6, the average of the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount α during the purge cut is calculated (1
00% or weighted average). Then, in block 7, a deviation eα of the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount α is calculated (for example, eα = 100% -EVALPH). In block 8, a new gain G is calculated from the deviation eα of the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount α calculated in block 7 and the actual purge rate PRATE calculated in block 4 (G
= Eα / PRATE).

Here, the learning value of the gain G (gain learning value) GALPR is assigned to the learning table TGALPR of the block 10 for the region (purge gas flow rate). Then, the gain learning value GA in block 11
LPR search is performed by purging gas flow rate equivalent area QPAGE
(AP / KPB, where KPB is the differential pressure correction rate), and the above table is referred to with interpolation calculation.

In updating the gain learning value GALPR during purging, the learning table TGALPR is backed up by a battery, and when it is not backed up at the time of starting, and when the starting water temperature TWINT <TWGAC.
In the case of (gain learning value initialization water temperature), the gain learning initial value INGALP is stored in all areas. The update condition of the learning value during purging is when all of the following conditions are satisfied. (A) KDUTY (duty correction coefficient) = 1.0 (b) PRATE (actual purge rate) ≥ GPRATE (learning permission calculation purge rate) (c) EVPTR (target purge rate) ≥ GEVPTR (learning permission target purge rate) ( d) It is the first time after P is added by the air-fuel ratio feedback control while (a) to (c) are established.

Gain learning value GALPR during the purge
When the update condition is satisfied, the learning table value GTBL of the region corresponding to the latest purge gas flow rate equivalent area QPAGE determined in the block is updated in block 9 by the following formula. GTBL = GNEW × X + GTBL _n-1 (1-X) where, NEW is a newly calculated gain, GTBL _n-1 is an old learning table value, and X is a weighted average coefficient.

After updating the learning table value GTBL of the above area, the learning value of the learning table TGALPR of the other area determined in block 12 is limited to the upper and lower values calculated by the following equation (estimated learning). Update: see block 13). However, TGALPR ≦ GALMAX (maximum gain learning value). In this case, the upper limit values are C and D in FIG. 12, and are set to D (= new GTBL × ULSUI [estimated learning upper limit limiter gain]) in a region larger than the current region by QPAGE.

In addition, C is set in an area smaller than the current area by QPAGE, and doubled by D every time the area is lowered by 1 from the current area.
It will be doubled again. The lower limit limit values are A and B in FIG. 12, and are set to A (= new GTBL × LLSUI [estimated learning lower limit limiter gain]) in an area smaller than the current area by QPAGE.

Also, in the area larger than the current area by QPAGE, it is set to B, and 1/2 is dropped from the current area by one half of A.
Double, and halve again. In block 14, the purge concentration predicted value PFR is calculated from the PRATE calculated in block 4 and the GALPR searched in block 11 (PFR = PRATE × GAL).
PR).

In block 15, a weighted average is calculated in order to perform the smoothing process (approximates the diffusion of purge gas in the intake manifold) to the predicted purge concentration PFR. That is, the purge concentration smoothing value PFRD is calculated by the following equation. PFRD = PFR × PDMANI + PFRD _n-1 (1-
PDMANI) where PDMANI is a weighted average coefficient.

In block 18, the in-cylinder intake purge concentration PFRC is annealed in block 15 with respect to the purge concentration predicted value PFR, and block 17
The dead time for shortening the delay of the amount of air filled in the intake manifold at is obtained. That is, PFRC is PFRD before NDLYPR (the number of purge concentration delay cycles) times (PFRC = PFRD).
_n-NDLYPR ) In this case, _n in PFRD _n-NDLYPR is about acceleration / deceleration (Tp per air-fuel ratio feedback control job)
(Basic fuel injection pulse width) rate of change (new Tp / old Tp)
Is determined according to.

Therefore, in block 16, the degree of acceleration / deceleration is judged, in block 17, PFRD _n-NDLYPR is determined, and in block, the cylinder intake purge concentration PFRC.
Is calculated. At block 19, the purge concentration change integrated value SPFRC is calculated by the following equation. SPFRC = SPFRC _n-1 + (PFRC-PFRC
_n-1 ) However, SPFRC _n-1 (previously obtained value) is set so as to decrease by 1 bit at every purge concentration integrated value reduction index number, and the purge concentration change amount is integrated while decreasing. To go.

Further, PFRC _n-1 is the value obtained last time. Here, the latest air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount α is
Assuming that the correction calculation value one time before is αO, it can be obtained by the following formula by I minutes, P minutes, and an evaporation α shift correction amount EALSFT described later (see block 22). α = αO ± I ± P + EALSFT In this case, if all of the following additional conditions (a) to (c) are satisfied, the α shift additional condition is satisfied, and α is corrected by the correction formula for α described above. (A) | EALSFT | ≧ ALSON where ALSON is an α shift addition determination α value. (B) The air-fuel ratio feedback control is not in open loop or clamp (except during α change). (C) Neither of the air flow meter and the throttle sensor is under NG determination in fail-safe control.

When the above-mentioned additional condition is judged (see block 21), when the α shift additional condition is satisfied, and when the conditions (b) and (c) in the additional condition are not satisfied, the purge after calculating EALSFT is performed. Concentration change integrated value SPFR
Setting C = 0 to prepare for the next change in the purge rate. The above-mentioned evaporation α shift correction amount EALSFT is obtained by the following equation (see block 20).

EALSFT = −SPFRC × GALSFT (±) where GALSFT is an α shift reflection gain. still,
The maximum value of | EALSFT | is limited to EALMAX (α shift correction amount upper limit value). When the above additional condition is not satisfied, EALSFT = 0.

Then, in block 23, the upper and lower limits of the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount α are limited, and the fuel injection pulse width Ti
Leads to the calculation of. Next, the operation based on this configuration will be described. 5 and 6 are flowcharts for explaining the air-fuel ratio feedback control job executed once per engine revolution.

In this flowchart, step 1
(In the figure, abbreviated as S1. The same applies hereinafter), it is determined whether or not the air-fuel ratio feedback control (F / B) condition is satisfied. If it is not the air-fuel ratio feedback control condition, the routine proceeds to step 2, where the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount α is 1
The previous correction calculation value αO is changed toward 100%, the process proceeds to step 3, and if αO is being changed, the changing flag is set and the process proceeds to step 4.

On the other hand, if it is the air-fuel ratio feedback control condition, the routine proceeds to step 5, where it is judged whether or not it is the clamp condition of the air-fuel ratio feedback control, and if it is the clamp condition, the routine proceeds to step 2 and thereafter. If it is not the clamp condition, the process proceeds to step 6 and the O ₂ sensor output O ₂ is compared with the slice level S / L. If O ₂ <S / L, it is judged in step 7 that O ₂ ≧ S / L. For example, go to step 8 respectively.

In step 7, it is determined whether or not the O ₂ sensor output O ₂ is the same as the previous value, and if it is changed, in step 9, the correction before the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount α is performed once. The calculated value αO is obtained by adding P to the previous value αO _n-1 (αO = αO _n-1 + P), and the process proceeds to the learning value update routine in step 10, and the α shift amount calculation routine in step 4 is executed. move on.

The learning value update routine and the α shift amount calculation routine will be described later. If it is determined in step 7 that the O ₂ sensor output O ₂ is the same as the previous value, then in step 11, the correction calculation value αO one time before the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount α is set to the previous value. αO
obtained by adding the I component to _{n-1 (αO = αO n} -1 + I), the process proceeds to α shift amount calculation routine of step 4.

Also in step 8, it is judged whether or not the O ₂ sensor output O ₂ is the same as the previous value, and if it is changed, in step 12, the correction before the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount α is performed once. Calculated value αO from the previous value αO _n-1 to P
It is obtained by subtracting the amount (αO = αO _{n- 1} −P), and the process proceeds to the learning value updating routine of step 13 and proceeds to the α shift amount calculating routine of step 4.

When it is determined in step 8 that the O ₂ sensor output O ₂ is the same as the previous value, in step 14,
The correction calculation value α one time before the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount α
O is also obtained by subtracting I from the previous value αO _n-1 (α
O = αO _n-1 −I), and proceed to the α shift amount calculation routine in step 4. The subsequent step 15 and subsequent steps are steps related to the α shift determination, and in step 15, it is determined whether or not the air-fuel ratio feedback control (F / B) condition is satisfied.

If it is not the air-fuel ratio feedback control condition, the routine proceeds to step 16. If it is the air-fuel ratio feedback control condition, the routine proceeds to step 17, where it is judged whether it is the clamp condition of the air-fuel ratio feedback control. If it is not the clamp condition, the routine proceeds to step 18, and if it is the clamp condition, the routine proceeds to step 19. move on. In step 19, αO
Is being changed, that is, whether the αO changing flag is set or not. It is determined that the αO changing flag is set and αO is not 100%. Then, the process proceeds to step 20, and if it is determined that the αO changing flag is not set and αO is 100%, the process proceeds to step 16.

In step 20, the maximum α shift amount (1
00-αO)% is set, and the process proceeds to step 18. In step 18, failsafe control is performed to determine whether the air flow meter and the throttle sensor are OK,
If OK, the process proceeds to step 21, and if NG, the process proceeds to step 16.

In step 21, | EALSFT | ≧ ALSON as an α shift addition condition is judged (however,
EALSFT = -SPFRC * GALSFT). ｜ EA
It is determined that LSFT | ≧ ALSON, and the evaporation α shift correction amount EALSFT is the α shift addition determination α value ALSON.
When the above is reached, the routine proceeds to step 22, where the evaporation α shift correction amount EALSFT is calculated. However, | EALSF
The maximum value of T | is EALMAX (α shift correction amount upper limit value)
Is limited to

At step 23, the upper limit of the α shift amount is set to 1
In step 24, the purge concentration change integrated value SPFRC after calculation of EALSFT is set to 0 in step 24 to prepare for the next change in purge rate, and the process proceeds to step 26. On the other hand, in step 16 after step 15 and step 18, EA
After the LSFT calculation, the purge concentration change integrated value SPFRC is set to 0 to prepare for the next change in the purge rate.
At 5, the evaporation α shift correction amount EALSFT is reset to 0, and the routine proceeds to step 26.

At step 26, α shift correction is executed. That is, the latest air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount α
Is obtained by adding the evaporation α shift correction amount EALSFT to the correction calculation value αO (= αO _n-1 ± I ± P) obtained one time before (α
= ΑO + EALSFT). In step 27, the deviation eα of the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount α is calculated (e
α = 100% −EVALPH) weighted average value E of α
Ask for VALPH.

Next, the learning value update routine in steps 10 and 13 of the flowcharts of FIGS. 5 and 6 will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG. In step 31, it is determined whether or not the update of the learning value is the first after the start, and if it is not the first, the process proceeds to step 32, and if it is the first, the process proceeds to step 33.

At step 33, the learning table TGAL
The PR determines whether or not the battery is backed up. If the battery is backed up, the process proceeds to step 34. If not, the process proceeds to step 35. Step 3
In 4, the start-up water temperature TWINT is compared with the gain learning value initialization water temperature TWGAC. If TWINT <TWGAC, the process proceeds to step 35, and if TWINT ≧ TWGAC, the process proceeds to step 32.

In step 35, the gain learning initial value INGALP is stored in all areas. Step 3
In 2, step 36 and step 37, the update condition of the learning value during purging is determined. That is, in step 32, it is determined whether KDUTY (duty correction coefficient) is 1.0, and in step 36, PRATE
(Actual purge rate) is compared with GPRATE (learning permission calculation purge rate). In step 37, EVPTR (target purge rate) is compared with GEVPTR (learning permission target purge rate), and KDUTY (duty correction coefficient) = 1.
0, PRATE (actual purge rate) ≧ GPRATE (learning permission calculation purge rate), EVPTR (target purge rate) ≧ GE
When all VPTR (learning permission target purge rate) is satisfied,
It is determined that the update condition of the gain learning value GALPR during purging is satisfied, and the process proceeds to step 38. If any of the above conditions is not satisfied, the learning value updating condition is not satisfied and the flow is ended.

At step 38, the deviation eα (= 100% -EVALPH) of the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount α,
A new gain GNEW is calculated from the actual purge rate PRATE (GNEW = eα / PRATE). Where the gain G
The learning value (gain learning value) GALPR is assigned to the learning table TGALPR for the region (purge gas flow rate), and in step 39, the gain learning value GALPR.
Search for PR. That is, the area equivalent to the purge gas flow rate QP
According to AGE (AP / KPB, where KPB is a differential pressure correction rate), the gain learning value GALPR is referred by referring to the table with interpolation calculation.

Then, in step 40, as shown in FIGS.
As has been clarified in the explanation of the block diagram of the above, the learning table value GTBL of the region corresponding to the latest purge gas flow rate equivalent area QPAGE is updated [GTBL = GNEW ×
X + GTBL _n-1 (1-X)] After updating the learning table value GTBL of the above area, in steps 41 and 42, the learning values of the learning table TGALPR in other areas are limited to upper and lower values.

Regarding the upper and lower limits of the learning value,
This is as described in the description of the block diagrams of FIGS. 3 and 4. Next, the shift amount calculation routine in step 4 of the flowcharts of FIGS. 3 and 4 will be described based on the flowchart of FIG. In step 51, delay processing of the purge cut valve is executed, and step 52
Then, it is determined whether or not the purge cut is being performed by the purge cut valve.

If the purge cut is not in progress, step 53.
Next, select the smaller flow passage area from the purge valve flow passage area (the value obtained by referring to the table from the step position monitor value EVSTPM of the step motor) and the purge cut valve flow passage area, and set this as the purge flow passage. The area is AP. If the purge is being cut, the routine proceeds to step 54, where the purge flow path area AP is set to zero.

In step 55, the actual purge rate PRAT is calculated from the purge channel area AP and the total channel area AA.
Calculate E (inlet purge rate) (PRATE = AP / A
A). In the next step 56, the purge gas flow rate equivalent area QPAGE is calculated (= AP / KPB
KPB is the differential pressure correction rate). It is the value that is compared.

In step 57, the learning table T
Area equivalent to purge gas flow rate QPA with reference to GALPR
The gain learning value GALPR is searched based on GE. In step 58, the PRA calculated in step
The purge concentration predicted value PFR is calculated from TE and GALPR retrieved in step (PFR = PRAT
E × GALPR).

In step 59, a weighted average is calculated in order to perform the smoothing process (approximates the diffusion of purge gas in the intake manifold) to the predicted purge concentration PFR. That is, the purge concentration smoothing value PFRD is calculated by the following equation. PFRD = PFR × PDMANI + PFRD _n-1 (1-
PDMANI) where PDMANI is a weighted average coefficient.

In step 60 and step 61, the cylinder intake purge purge concentration PFRC is given a dead time for smoothing the predicted purge concentration predicted value PFR and shortening the delay of the amount of air filled in the intake manifold. And ask. That is, PFRC is PFRD before NDLYPR (number of purge concentration delay cycles) (PFF).
RC = PFRD _n-NDLYPR ) In this case, _n in PFRD _n-NDLYPR is about acceleration / deceleration (Tp per air-fuel ratio feedback control job)
(Basic fuel injection pulse width) rate of change (new Tp / old Tp)
Is determined according to.

At step 62, the purge concentration change integrated value SPFRC is obtained by the following equation. SPFRC = SPFRC _n-1 + (PFRC-PFRC
_n-1 ) However, SPFRC _n-1 (previously obtained value) is set so as to decrease by 1 bit at every purge concentration integrated value reduction index number, and the purge concentration change amount is integrated while decreasing. To go. Further, PFRC _n-1 is the value obtained last time.

FIG. 9 is a flow chart for explaining the calculation function of the fuel injection pulse width Ti given to the fuel injection valve 16. In step 71, variables indicating the basic operating state (for example, intake air amount Qa and engine rotation speed). Ne) and constant K
Basic fuel injection pulse width Tp [= (Q
a / Ne) × K] is a correction amount Co based on other operating variables.
ef, the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount α obtained by the flowcharts of FIGS. 5 and 6, and the air-fuel ratio learning value αm,
The fuel injection pulse width Ti is obtained according to the following equation by correcting the invalid injection pulse width with the voltage correction coefficient Ts.

Ti = Tp × Coef × (α + αm) + Ts In step 72, the fuel injection pulse width Ti obtained by the step calculation is set in the output register. Next, the operation and effect of the invention according to claims 1 to 7 will be described based on the configuration of the embodiment described above.

First, according to the first aspect of the present invention, the gain is calculated based on the purge rate and the deviation of the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount with and without the evaporated fuel purge.
This gain is assigned to the learning table in the memory as a gain learning value for the purge gas flow rate. In this case, according to the first aspect of the present invention, for example, as shown in FIG. 10, a RAM is allocated for each purge gas flow rate region and the purge concentration is stored in the RAM as a learning value of the designated purge gas flow rate region.

As described above, as a result of allocating the purge concentration to the purge gas flow rate and reflecting this purge concentration in the air-fuel ratio control, normally, there are two types of fuel vapor drawn into the engine from the canister and the fuel tank. Is the sum of the vapors, and the purge gas concentration is not constant due to the change of the purge gas flow rate.
It is possible to prevent different learning results due to different driving conditions,
It is possible to improve the controllability of the air-fuel ratio, such as insufficient or excessive correction of the air-fuel ratio due to changes in operating conditions.

According to the third aspect of the present invention, an area obtained by dividing the purge gas flow rate by an exponential function is set as an area of the learning table of the memory for assigning the learning value, and the area is determined based on the purge gas flow rate, Assign the gain to the determined area. For example, as shown in FIG. 11, by assigning the learning region (purge gas flow rate region) by a multiple of 2, the purge concentration obtained in inverse proportion to the purge gas flow rate can be easily assigned.

That is, the learning value becomes a constant value or an inversely proportional value depending on the purge gas flow rate, and the learning value varies depending on the region, but as a result of giving the region of the purge gas flow rate as an index,
With the smallest number of grids, it is possible to deal with the difference in the learning value for each area, and more detailed learning value update is possible. By the way, in the invention described in claims 1 to 3, learning can be performed only at a specific purge gas flow rate. For this reason, in the region where there are few opportunities for learning, the density learned when the region is first passed cannot be used, and the effect of learning control is small.

Therefore, it is advisable to estimate the learning value of another region from the learning value of a specific region, update the concentration of the other region, and reflect this concentration in the air-fuel ratio control. Therefore, in the invention according to claim 4, the limit value outside the region determined based on the learned value within the region of the learning table of the memory is calculated, and the learning value outside the region is calculated based on the calculated limit value. To limit.

When calculating the concrete limit value, a value that is slightly larger than the learning value in the current region is used in the region where the purge gas flow rate is larger than the current region, and a current region is learned in the region where the purge gas flow amount is smaller than the current region. A value slightly larger than the value that is inversely proportional to the purge region is calculated as the maximum limit value (the invention according to claim 5). In a region where the purge gas flow rate is larger than the current region, a value that is slightly smaller than the learning value in the current region and reduced in inverse proportion to the purge region is set. A value slightly smaller than the learned value is calculated as the minimum limit value (the invention according to claim 6).

Alternatively, both the maximum limit value and the minimum limit value may be set (the invention according to claim 7). More specifically, the lower limit value is set by limiting the lower limit value so that the purge gas flow rate region lower than the current learning region does not fall below a predetermined ratio of the new learning value by the current learning (A in FIG. 12). . In the purge gas flow rate region higher than the current learning region, the lower limit value is set in inverse proportion to the ratio of the air amount to the current learning region (B in FIG. 12).

On the contrary, in setting the upper limit value, the upper limit value is set to be larger as the purge gas flow rate region becomes lower than the current learning region (C in FIG. 12), and the current learning is performed in the purge gas flow amount region higher than the current learning region. The upper limit value is limited and set so that it does not exceed a predetermined ratio of the new learning value according to (D in FIG. 12). In this way, by limiting the learning value outside the region, estimating the learning value of the other region of the current region, and updating this density, even in the region where learning is rare, The learned concentration can be used, the learning control effect is enhanced, and the air-fuel ratio controllability can be further improved.

Further, if the limit value is set in accordance with the characteristics of the canister purge amount and the fuel tank evaporation amount, the learning speed, accuracy, etc. can be greatly increased. Here, FIG. 13 is a diagram for explaining the effect of the embodiment of the present invention, and shows the relationship between each variable, the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount α, and the air-fuel ratio A / F at the time of purge cut and at the time of releasing the purge cut. There is.

As is clear from this figure, in the prior art in which the control of the present invention is not executed, since the shift amount of the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount is not added, α shown by the dotted line in the figure
However, the air-fuel ratio A / F becomes as shown by the dotted line in the figure, and the air-fuel ratio correction becomes insufficient or excessive. However, according to the control of the present invention, the shift amount of the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount is appropriately added, The change in α is shown by the solid line in the figure, and
/ F becomes like the solid line in the figure, and the air-fuel ratio controllability can be improved without causing insufficient or excessive air-fuel ratio correction.

[0078]

As described above, according to the first aspect of the present invention, the gain is assigned to the purge gas flow rate, and the learned value of this gain is reflected in the air-fuel ratio control. The fuel vapor is the sum of the two types of vapor from the canister and the fuel tank, and the learning result differs depending on the operating condition under the situation where the purge gas concentration is not constant due to the change of the purge gas flow rate. Therefore, the controllability of the air-fuel ratio can be improved by preventing the air-fuel ratio correction from being insufficient or excessive due to changes in operating conditions.

According to the second aspect of the present invention, for example, a RAM is allocated for each purge gas flow rate region, and a gain (air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount deviation / purge rate) is stored in the RAM as a learning value of the designated purge gas flow rate region. Can be made. According to the invention of claim 3, a region obtained by dividing the purge gas flow rate by an exponential function is set as a region of the learning table of the memory for assigning the learning value, the region is determined based on the purge gas flow rate, and the gain is calculated. Since the areas are assigned to the determined areas, the difference in the learning value for each area can be dealt with with the smallest number of grids, and the learning value can be updated more finely.

According to the fourth aspect of the present invention, the limit value outside the region determined based on the learned value within the region of the learning table of the memory is calculated, and the learning outside the region is calculated based on the calculated limit value. Since the value is limited, the concentration learned when passing through the region for the first time can be used even in the region where there is little opportunity to learn, the learning control effect is enhanced, and the air-fuel ratio controllability can be further improved. Further, if the limit value is set according to the characteristics of the purged portion of the canister and the evaporated portion of the fuel tank, the learning speed, accuracy, etc. can be greatly increased.

According to the inventions of claims 5 to 7, the limit value of the invention of claim 4 can be effectively set.

[Brief description of drawings]

FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram of an invention according to claim 1.

FIG. 2 is a common system diagram of an embodiment of the invention according to claims 1 to 7.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing the content of control in the embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing the contents of control in the embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating an air-fuel ratio feedback control job.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating an air-fuel ratio feedback control job.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing a learning value update routine.

FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing a shift amount calculation routine.

FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating a fuel injection pulse width calculation function.

FIG. 10 is a diagram showing a table of a memory for explaining the control method of the invention according to claims 1 and 2.

FIG. 11 is a diagram showing a table of a memory for explaining the control method of the invention according to claim 3;

FIG. 12 is a diagram showing a table of a memory for explaining the control method of the invention according to claims 4 to 7.

FIG. 13 is a diagram for explaining the effect of the embodiment of the present invention, and is a diagram showing the relationship between each variable, the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount α, and the air-fuel ratio A / F at the time of purging cut and its cancellation.

[Explanation of symbols]

11 engine 12 intake passage 16 fuel injection valve 17 control unit 18 exhaust passage 19 O ₂ sensor 20 crank angle sensor 23 canister 24 purge passage 25 purge valve

Claims (7)

[Claims] 1. An operating condition detecting means for detecting an operating condition of an engine, a means for judging an ON / OFF condition of a purge in response to an engine operating condition signal outputted from the detecting means, and a purging operation based on the judgment result. In an evaporative fuel treatment system for an internal combustion engine, comprising an apparatus for opening a purge valve under an ON condition and introducing a purge gas from a canister into an engine intake system, an air-fuel ratio detecting means for detecting an air-fuel ratio of an air-fuel mixture supplied to the engine. , An air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount calculating means for calculating an air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount from the output of the air-fuel ratio detecting means so that the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount falls within a predetermined range, and a purge ON / OFF condition determination result. Based on the purge ON condition, the gain learning value stored in the learning table of the memory, the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount, and the operating condition A fuel supply amount calculation means for calculating the fuel supply amount using the present fuel supply amount, a fuel supply means for supplying the fuel supply amount to the engine intake system, and a purge rate as a ratio of the purge gas flow rate to the intake air flow rate are detected. Purge rate detecting means for detecting the purge gas flow rate, and purge gas flow rate detecting means for detecting the purge gas flow rate, based on the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount, an air-fuel ratio feedback correction for calculating a deviation of the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount with and without evaporative fuel purge Amount deviation calculating means, a gain calculating means for calculating a gain based on the deviation of the purge rate and the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount, and a gain calculated by the gain calculating means as a gain learning value for the purge gas flow rate in the memory. A gain learning value updating means to be assigned to the learning table, and Fuel vapor treatment system for an internal combustion engine characterized by and. 2. The area determination for determining the area for each purge gas flow rate in the learning table of the memory for assigning the gain learning value based on the purge gas flow rate detected by the purge gas flow rate detection means. 2. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: means for allocating the gain calculated by the gain calculating means to a region for each purge gas flow rate of the learning table of the memory determined by the region determining means. An evaporated fuel processing device for an internal combustion engine as described above. 3. The evaporation of an internal combustion engine according to claim 2, wherein an area obtained by dividing the purge gas flow rate by an exponential function is set as an area for each purge gas flow rate in a learning table of a memory for assigning a learning value. Fuel processor. 4. A limit value calculating means configured to determine the outside of the area by the area determining means, and to calculate a limit value outside the area determined by the area determining means based on a learning value within the area, 4. The internal combustion engine according to claim 2, further comprising: an out-of-region learning value limiting unit that limits an out-of-region learning value based on the limit value calculated by the limit value calculating unit. Evaporative fuel processor. 5. The limit value calculating means, when the purge gas flow rate is larger than the current area, a value that is slightly larger than the learning value of the current area, and the learning value of the current area when the purge gas flow rate is smaller than the current area. 5. The evaporative fuel treatment system for an internal combustion engine according to claim 4, wherein a value that is slightly larger than a value that is inversely proportional to the purge region is calculated as the maximum limit value. 6. In the region where the purge gas flow rate is larger than the current region, the limit value calculating means sets a value slightly smaller than the learning value of the current region, which is inversely proportional to the purge region, to a value smaller than the current region. 5. The evaporative fuel treatment system for an internal combustion engine according to claim 4, wherein in a region where the purge gas flow rate is small, a value that is slightly smaller than the learned value in the current region is calculated as the minimum limit value. 7. The limit value calculating means, when the purge gas flow rate is larger than the current area, a value that is slightly larger than the learning value of the current area, and the learning value of the current area when the purge gas flow rate is smaller than the current area. A value that is slightly larger than the value that is inversely proportional to the purge area is calculated as the maximum limit value, and in the area where the purge gas flow rate is larger than the current area, it is inversely proportional to the purge area than the learned value in the current area. 5. A value that is slightly smaller than the reduced value is calculated as a minimum limit value that is slightly smaller than the learned value of the current region in a region where the purge gas flow rate is smaller than the current region. Evaporative fuel processing system for internal combustion engine.