JPH09215179A - Method for deciding limitation of load on line - Google Patents

Method for deciding limitation of load on line

Info

Publication number
JPH09215179A
JPH09215179A JP8044201A JP4420196A JPH09215179A JP H09215179 A JPH09215179 A JP H09215179A JP 8044201 A JP8044201 A JP 8044201A JP 4420196 A JP4420196 A JP 4420196A JP H09215179 A JPH09215179 A JP H09215179A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
temperature
electric line
time
level
load
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP8044201A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3129181B2 (en
Inventor
Keiichiro Takada
啓一郎 高田
Yoshibumi Minowa
義文 蓑輪
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nissin Electric Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Nissin Electric Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nissin Electric Co Ltd filed Critical Nissin Electric Co Ltd
Priority to JP08044201A priority Critical patent/JP3129181B2/en
Publication of JPH09215179A publication Critical patent/JPH09215179A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3129181B2 publication Critical patent/JP3129181B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)
  • Emergency Protection Circuit Devices (AREA)

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To control the conduction current on a line just to a maximum level within thermal limit while taking account of weather conditions by delivering a feeder interruption command when a predicted temperature of the line after a predetermined time later is increasing over a decision level or when an estipated temperature exceeds the decision level for a predetermined time or longer continuously. SOLUTION: When a temperature θn+j1 of a line after a predetermined time later predicted while taking account of weather conditions has increasing trend and a decision is made that the highest allowable temperature θL is reached surely (decision of event 2), or when a decision is made that a temperature θn . of the line estimated while taking account of weather conditions has exceeded a dangerous level θH for a predetermined time or longer (decision of event 1), a feeder interruption command is delivered by determining that the load must be limited with no delay through a so-called predictive decision method. According to the method, the conduction current on a line can be limited just to a maximum level within thermal limit.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、とくに架空送電線
等のより線構造の電線路の熱的限界に基づく負荷制限の
必要性の有無を判定する電線路の負荷制限判定方法に関
する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to an electric line load limit determination method for determining whether or not there is a need for load limit based on the thermal limit of an electric line having a stranded wire structure such as an overhead transmission line.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】従来、この種電線路においては、電線温
度そのものを検出してその熱的限界を直接把握すること
ができないため、一般に、電線路の通電電流を検出し、
この通電電流の大小に基づいて負荷制限の必要性の有無
を判定し、この判定の結果により例えば送電線の各負荷
フィーダへの給電を選択的に遮断し、負荷制限を実施し
ている。
2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, in this kind of electric line, since it is not possible to detect the electric wire temperature itself and directly grasp the thermal limit thereof, in general, the energizing current of the electric line is detected,
Whether or not there is a need for load limitation is determined based on the magnitude of the energizing current, and the result of this determination selectively cuts off the power supply to each load feeder of the transmission line to implement the load limitation.

【0003】この場合、電線温度が通電電流及び気温,
日射等の気象条件によって変化し、例えば通電電流が同
じであっても夏季と冬季とでは送電可能な電流量(通電
電流量)が異なるため、一定の電流値を基準にして負荷
制限の必要性の有無を判定するのみでは、基準の電流値
が過酷な夏季を想定して設定された場合、冬季には限界
に達するかなり前の電流量で負荷制限が作用し、電線路
の有効利用が図れない不都合がある。
In this case, the temperature of the electric wire is
It is necessary to limit the load based on a certain current value because the amount of current that can be transmitted (the amount of current flowing) varies depending on the weather conditions such as solar radiation, for example, even when the current is the same, the amount of current that can be transmitted is different in summer and winter. If the reference current value is set assuming a harsh summer, the load limit will be applied at a current amount well before reaching the limit in winter, and effective use of the electric line can be achieved only by determining the presence or absence of There is no inconvenience.

【0004】一方、本出願の出願人は、特願平7−67
09号の出願の願書に添付の明細書,図面に記載のよう
に、通電電流及び気象条件を考慮してこの種電線路の電
線温度を推定する電線路の温度監視方法を既に発明し、
出願している。
On the other hand, the applicant of the present application filed Japanese Patent Application No. 7-67.
As described in the specification and drawings attached to the application for No. 09 application, the temperature monitoring method of the electric line has already been invented to estimate the electric wire temperature of this kind of electric line in consideration of the energizing current and the meteorological condition,
I am applying.

【0005】この既出願の温度監視方法においては、監
視対象の電線路(以下監視線路という)の通電電流から
監視線路の電線内部温度の推定値を演算して求め、気
温,日射強度等の周囲の気象条件から監視線路の電線表
面温度の推定値を演算して求め、両推定値の差から監視
線路の電線内部と電線表面との温度差を求め、監視線路
の電線表面温度の気温に前記温度差を加算して監視線路
の温度を求める。
In the temperature monitoring method of the above-mentioned application, the estimated value of the internal temperature of the electric wire of the monitoring line is calculated from the energization current of the electric line to be monitored (hereinafter referred to as the monitoring line), and the surrounding temperature such as temperature and insolation intensity is calculated. The calculated value of the wire surface temperature of the monitoring line is calculated from the meteorological conditions, and the temperature difference between the inside and the wire surface of the monitoring line is calculated from the difference between the two estimated values. The temperature difference is calculated by adding the temperature difference.

【0006】この場合、過電流に伴う異常過熱が発生す
ると、電線内部の発生熱量が電線表面の発生熱量より大
きくなり、電線表面温度の設定値に前記温度差を加算し
た温度からその電線温度が実測することなく推定して求
まる。
In this case, when abnormal overheating due to overcurrent occurs, the amount of heat generated inside the electric wire becomes larger than the amount of heat generated on the electric wire surface, and the electric wire temperature is changed from the temperature obtained by adding the temperature difference to the set value of the electric wire surface temperature. It can be estimated without actual measurement.

【0007】そして、電線温度が電線路の通電電流及び
気象条件を考慮して推定されるため、監視線路の温度が
気象条件を考慮して監視される。
Since the electric wire temperature is estimated in consideration of the current flowing through the electric line and the weather condition, the temperature of the monitoring line is monitored in consideration of the weather condition.

【0008】[0008]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】前記従来のこの種電線
路の負荷制限判定方法の場合、前記既出願の温度監視方
法により気象条件を考慮して電線温度を推定したとして
も、電線路の現在の温度を推定するのみであるため、電
線温度が実際に負荷制限が必要な温度以上になってから
でなければ負荷制限の必要ありと判定されず、その逆の
判定についても同様であり、判定の遅れが生じ、この結
果、負荷制限の過不足が頻繁にくり返されていわゆる制
御のハンチング現象等を招来する問題点がある。
In the case of the conventional load limiting determination method for this kind of electric line, even if the electric wire temperature is estimated in consideration of the weather condition by the temperature monitoring method of the above-mentioned application, the present condition of the electric line is Since only the temperature of the wire is estimated, it is not judged that the load must be restricted until the wire temperature actually exceeds the temperature at which the load must be restricted, and vice versa. Is caused, and as a result, the excess or deficiency of the load limitation is frequently repeated, which causes a so-called control hunting phenomenon.

【0009】しかも、判定の基準レベルの設定が容易で
なく、このレベルを低く設定すれば負荷制限は確実に行
えるが、電線路に実際に許容される限界容量の電流を通
流して送電等を行うことができない問題点もある。
Moreover, it is not easy to set the reference level for judgment, and if this level is set low, the load can be surely limited, but the electric current of the limit capacity actually allowed is passed through the electric line to transmit power. There are some problems that cannot be implemented.

【0010】本発明は、電線路の通電電流を気象条件を
考慮して熱的限界から許容される最大電流に過不足なく
制御し得るように、負荷制限の必要性の有無を遅れなく
判定することを課題とする。
According to the present invention, whether or not there is a need for load limitation is determined without delay so that the current flowing through the electric line can be controlled from the thermal limit to the maximum allowable current without deficiency in consideration of weather conditions. This is an issue.

【0011】[0011]

【課題を解決するための手段】前記の課題を解決するた
めに、本発明の電線路の負荷制限判定方法においては、
電線路の負荷制限の判定レベルを電線路の最高許容温度
より高い危険温度に設定し、周期的に電線路の現在の通
電電流及び気象の状態から電線路の現在の温度を推定す
るとともに一定時間後の温度を予測し、一定時間後の予
測温度が複数回連続的に上昇傾向で判定レベル以上にな
るとき又は前記電線路の推定温度が所定時間以上連続的
に判定レベル以上になったときに、電線路の負荷制限の
必要ありと判定してフィーダ遮断指令を出力する。
In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, in the load-limit judging method of the electric line of the present invention,
The judgment level for load limitation of the electric line is set to a dangerous temperature higher than the maximum allowable temperature of the electric line, and the current temperature of the electric line is periodically estimated from the current flowing current of the electric line and the meteorological condition, and a fixed time is also set. When the temperature after is predicted, and the predicted temperature after a certain period of time has risen above the judgment level in a continuous trend of multiple times, or when the estimated temperature of the electric line continuously exceeds the judgment level for a predetermined time or longer , It determines that the load on the electric line needs to be limited and outputs a feeder cutoff command.

【0012】したがって、電線路の気象条件を考慮した
一定時間後の予測温度が連続的に上昇傾向を示し、この
ままでは確実に危険温度に達すると判定されたとき、又
は、気象条件を考慮した電線路の推定温度が一定時間以
上危険温度以上になっていると判定されたときに、いわ
ゆる予測的な判定手法で遅れなく負荷制限の必要がある
と判定されてフィーダ遮断指令が出力されて電線路の通
電電流が過不足なく制限される。
Therefore, the predicted temperature after a certain period of time in consideration of the weather conditions of the electric line shows a continuous upward trend, and when it is determined that the dangerous temperature will be reached without fail, or when the electric wire in consideration of the weather conditions is taken into consideration. When it is judged that the estimated temperature of the road is higher than the dangerous temperature for a certain period of time or more, it is judged by a so-called predictive judgment method that there is a need for load limitation without delay, and a feeder cutoff command is output and the electric line The energizing current is limited to the proper amount.

【0013】また、判定精度をさらに向上するときは、
電線路の負荷制限の第1段判定レベルを電線路の短時間
使用最高許容温度に設定し、電線路の負荷制限の第2段
判定レベルを短時間使用最高許容温度より高い危険温度
に設定し、周期的に電線路の現在の通電電流及び気象の
状態から電線路の現在の温度を推定するとともに一定時
間後の温度を予測し、一定時間後の予測温度が複数回連
続的に上昇傾向で第2段判定レベル以上になるとき,電
線路の推定温度が第1の所定時間以上連続的に第2段判
定レベル以上になったとき又は電線路の推定温度が第1
の所定時間より長い第2の所定時間以上連続的に第1段
判定レベル以上になったときに、電線路の負荷制限の必
要ありと判定してフィーダ遮断指令を出力する。
To further improve the determination accuracy,
Set the 1st stage judgment level of the load limit of the electric line to the maximum allowable short-time use temperature of the electric line, and set the 2nd stage judgment level of the load limit of the electric line to a dangerous temperature higher than the maximum allowable temperature for short time use. , The current temperature of the electric line is estimated periodically from the current flowing current of the electric line and the weather condition, and the temperature after a certain time is predicted, and the predicted temperature after the certain time is continuously increasing several times. When the estimated temperature of the electric line becomes equal to or higher than the second stage determination level, when the estimated temperature of the electric line continuously becomes equal to or higher than the second stage determination level for a first predetermined time or longer,
When the first stage judgment level is continuously exceeded for the second predetermined time longer than the predetermined time, it is determined that the load limitation of the electric line is necessary and the feeder cutoff command is output.

【0014】したがって、この場合は負荷制限の必要性
の有無の判定が、電線路の短時間使用最高許容温度に設
定された第1段判定レベルと、このレベルより高い電線
路の危険温度に設定された第2段判定レベルとの2段の
判定レベルを設けて行われる。
Therefore, in this case, whether or not there is a need for load limitation is determined by setting the first stage determination level set to the maximum allowable short-time use temperature of the electric line and the dangerous temperature of the electric line higher than this level. The determination is performed by providing two determination levels including the determined second determination level.

【0015】そして、この2段の判定により、電線路の
気象条件を考慮した一定時間後の予測温度が連続的に上
昇傾向を示し、このままでは確実に危険温度に達すると
判定されるとき,気象条件を考慮した電線路の推定温度
が第1の所定時間以上危険温度以上になっていると判定
されたときは勿論、さらには、気象条件を考慮した電線
路の推定温度が第2の所定時間以上短時間使用最高許容
温度になってやがて危険温度に達するおそれがあるとき
にも、負荷制限の必要性があると判断され、いわゆる予
測的な判定手法で遅れなく、しかも、極めて精度よく、
負荷制限の必要性の有無を判定してフィーダ遮断指令が
出力され、電線路の通電電流が過不足なく制限される。
The two-stage judgment shows that the predicted temperature after a certain period of time in consideration of the weather condition of the electric line shows a continuous upward trend, and if it is judged that the dangerous temperature will be certainly reached as it is, the weather condition Not only when it is determined that the estimated temperature of the electric line in consideration of the condition is equal to or higher than the dangerous temperature for the first predetermined time or more, and further, the estimated temperature of the electric line in consideration of the weather condition is the second predetermined time. Even if the maximum allowable temperature for a short time is reached and the dangerous temperature may be reached soon, it is determined that there is a need to limit the load, the so-called predictive determination method does not delay, and extremely accurately,
A feeder cutoff command is output by determining whether or not there is a need to limit the load, and the current flowing through the electric line is limited without excess or deficiency.

【0016】[0016]

【発明の実施の形態】本発明の実施の1形態について、
図1ないし図4を参照して説明する。まず、通電電流及
び気象条件を考慮した電線路の温度(電線温度)の推定
及び予測について説明する。
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION Regarding one embodiment of the present invention,
Description will be made with reference to FIGS. 1 to 4. First, the estimation and prediction of the temperature of the electric line (electric wire temperature) in consideration of the energizing current and the weather conditions will be described.

【0017】この電線温度の推定及び予測は、現在の電
線温度をつぎに説明するように推定し、さらに、現在の
事象(電流,日射,気温等)が一定時間J1経過するま
で継続するとして予測するものである。
The estimation and prediction of the electric wire temperature is performed by estimating the present electric wire temperature as described below, and further presuming that the present event (current, solar radiation, temperature, etc.) continues until a predetermined time J1 elapses. To do.

【0018】 現在温度の推定 一般に、単位時間dtに物体内に発生する熱量(発生熱
量)は、物体温度を単位温度dθだけ上昇させる熱量と
外部に放出される熱量との和になり、物体の温度の時間
変化は、単位時間内に物体内で発生する熱量(発生熱
量)Q〔KW〕,物体の熱容量C〔KW秒/℃〕及び熱
放散係数H〔KW/℃〕をパラメータとし、温度をθ
〔℃〕,経過時間をt〔秒〕とすれば、つぎの数1の熱
移動式〈1〉で示される。
Estimation of Current Temperature In general, the amount of heat generated in an object in a unit time dt (generated heat amount) is the sum of the amount of heat that raises the object temperature by the unit temperature dθ and the amount of heat released to the outside, and The time change of temperature is performed by using the heat quantity (heat quantity) Q [KW] generated in the object within a unit time, the heat capacity C [KW seconds / ° C] of the object and the heat dissipation coefficient H [KW / ° C] as parameters. Θ
When the temperature is [° C.] and the elapsed time is t [seconds], the heat transfer equation <1> of the following equation 1 is given.

【0019】[0019]

【数1】 Q・dt=C・dθ+H・θ・dt …〈1〉[Equation 1] Q · dt = C · dθ + H · θ · dt (1)

【0020】そして、熱移動式〈1〉は、Q/H=θma
x とすれば、一般解θがつぎの数2の式〈2〉で示され
る。
The heat transfer formula <1> is Q / H = θma
If x, the general solution θ is expressed by the following equation <2>.

【0021】[0021]

【数2】 θ=θmax ・{1−exp(−t/T)} …〈2〉## EQU00002 ## .theta. =. Theta.max .multidot. {1-exp (-t / T)} ... <2>

【0022】この式〈2〉からも明らかなように、物体
の温度θはその上昇飽和温度θmax(=Q/H),時定
数T(=C/H)を定数とする関数式にしたがい時間t
に対して指数関数的に変化する。
As is clear from the equation <2>, the temperature θ of the object is determined by a functional equation in which the rising saturation temperature θmax (= Q / H) and the time constant T (= C / H) are constants. t
Changes exponentially with respect to.

【0023】そして、より線構造の電線路の電線温度も
その熱量変化により、式〈2〉の指数関数特性にしたが
って一定の時定数で変化し、その電線温度は式〈2〉の
温度θについての簡単な指数関数式の温度演算から推定
することができる。
The electric wire temperature of the stranded wire electric line also changes with a constant time constant in accordance with the exponential function characteristic of the expression <2> due to the change in the amount of heat, and the electric wire temperature with respect to the temperature θ of the expression <2>. It can be estimated from the temperature calculation of the simple exponential function of.

【0024】この場合、通電電流に基づく電線温度の変
化と気象条件に基づく電線温度の変化とを個別に予測し
て加算合成すれば、通電電流及び気象条件を考慮した現
在の電線温度の推定が行える。
In this case, if the change in the wire temperature based on the energizing current and the change in the wire temperature based on the weather conditions are individually predicted and added together, the current wire temperature can be estimated in consideration of the energizing current and the weather conditions. You can do it.

【0025】そして、通電電流に基づく電線温度は、つ
ぎの数3の指数関数式〈3〉の演算により推定すること
ができる。
Then, the electric wire temperature based on the energized current can be estimated by the calculation of the following exponential function expression <3>.

【0026】[0026]

【数3】 θin={Δθimax(In/Imax)k−θin-1}・[1−exp{−(tn−tn-1 )/Ti}]+θin-1=(Δθi−θin-1)・{1−exp(−Δt/Ti)}+ θin-1 …〈3〉 式中のtn,tn-1,…はつぎの各値である。 tn,tn-1:n回目(今回),n-1回目(前回)の演算
時刻[分] Δt:演算(サンプリング・制御)の時間間隔(=tn
−tn-1) θin,θin-1:時刻tn,tn-1の推定温度[℃] In:時刻tnの電流センサの検出値(計測線路電流値)
[A] Imax :通電電流の基準値(公称許容電流値)[A] Δθimax:Imaxにおける飽和温度上昇値[℃] Ti:通電電流変化による温度変化時定数 k:電流換算指数
Equation 3] θin = {Δθimax (In / Imax ) k -θi n-1} · [1-exp {- (t n -t n-1) / Ti}] + θi n-1 = (Δθi-θi n -1) · {1-exp ( -Δt / Ti)} + θi n-1 ... <3> tn in the formula, tn -1, ... a respective value of Hatsugi. t n , t n-1 : n-th (current), n-1 (previous) computation time [minutes] Δt: computation (sampling / control) time interval (= t n
-T n-1) θi n, θi n-1: the time t n, t n-1 of the estimated temperature [° C.] an In: Detection value of the current sensor at time t n (measured line current value)
[A] Imax: Reference value of energizing current (nominal allowable current value) [A] Δθimax: Saturation temperature rise value at Imax [° C] Ti: Time constant of temperature change due to energizing current change k: Current conversion index

【0027】なお、式中の(In/Imax)のべき指数k
は電流換算指数で、電線路の場合はほぼ2である。
The exponent k of (In / Imax) in the formula
Is the current conversion index, which is almost 2 for electric lines.

【0028】また、前記既出願においてはΔθmax ,θ
inを熱量として電線温度を求めているが、温度と熱量と
が比例関係にあるため、この熱量の演算式は実質的には
指数関数式〈3〉と同じである。
Further, in the above-mentioned application, Δθmax, θ
Although the electric wire temperature is obtained with in as the amount of heat, since the temperature and the amount of heat are in a proportional relationship, the calculation formula for this amount of heat is substantially the same as the exponential function formula <3>.

【0029】つぎに、気象条件として気温と日射強度と
を考慮する場合、気温,日射強度に基づく電線温度θa
n,θsnは指数関数式〈3〉と同様のつぎの数4,数5
の指数関数式〈4〉,〈5〉の演算により推定すること
ができる。
Next, when temperature and solar radiation intensity are considered as meteorological conditions, the wire temperature θa based on the temperature and solar radiation intensity
n and θsn are the same as in Exponential formula <3>
It can be estimated by the calculation of exponential function equations <4> and <5>.

【0030】[0030]

【数4】 θan=(An−θan-1)・{1−exp(−Δt/Ta)}+θan-1 …〈4〉## EQU00004 ## .theta.an = (An-.theta.an -1 ) .multidot. {1-exp (-. DELTA.t / Ta)} +. Theta.an -1 ... <4>

【0031】[0031]

【数5】 θsn=(Δθsmax・Sn−θsn-1)・[1−exp{−(tn−tn-1)/Ts } ]+θsn-1=(Δθs−θsn-1)・{1−exp(−Δt/Ts)}+θsn-1 …〈5〉 両指数関数式〈4〉,〈5〉のθan-1,θsn-1,…はつ
ぎの各値である。 θan,θan-1:時刻tn,tn-1の気温に基づく推定温
度[℃] San,San-1:時刻tn,tn-1の日射に基づく推定温
度[℃] An:時刻tnの計測温度[℃] Sn:時刻tnの計測日射強度[KW/m2 ] Δθsmax :日射強度飽和温度上昇値 Ta:気温変化による温度変化時定数 Ts:日射強度変化による温度変化時定数
Equation 5] θsn = (Δθsmax · Sn-θs n-1) · [1-exp {- (t n -t n-1) / Ts}] + θs n-1 = (Δθs-θs n-1) · {1-exp (-Δt / Ts )} + θs n-1 ... <5> both exponential formula <4> is a θan -1, θsn -1, ... the values of Hatsugi of <5>. θan, θan −1 : Estimated temperature [° C] based on air temperature at times tn and tn −1 San, San −1 : Estimated temperature [° C] based on solar radiation at times tn and tn −1 An: Measured temperature at time tn [ ℃] Sn: Measured solar radiation intensity at time tn [KW / m 2 ] Δθsmax: Solar radiation intensity saturation temperature rise value Ta: Temperature change time constant due to temperature change Ts: Temperature change time constant due to solar radiation intensity change

【0032】そして、つぎの数6の推定演算式〈6〉に
より各電線温度θin,θan,θsnを加算すると、通電電
流及び気象条件を考慮した時刻tnの電線温度(推定温
度)θnが求まる。
Then, by adding the respective wire temperatures θin, θan, and θsn by the following equation (6), the wire temperature (estimated temperature) θn at time tn in consideration of the energizing current and the weather condition is obtained.

【0033】[0033]

【数6】θn=θin+θan+θsn …〈6〉[Equation 6] θn = θin + θan + θsn… <6>

【0034】一定時間後の温度予測 現在(時刻tn)から例えば1〜数分程度の一定時間J
1後の時刻tn+J1 の通電電流,気温,日射強度それぞ
れに基づく電線温度(予測温度)θi(n+J1),θa
(n+J1),θs(n+J1)は、指数関数式〈3〉のパラメータ
Δθimax,(In/Imax )2 ,Ti及び指数関数式
〈4〉,〈5〉のパラメータAn,Ta,ΔSmax ・S
n,Tsを現在の値に固定し、式中のtnをtn+J1
tn-1をtn-1+ J1として予測することができる。
Prediction of temperature after a certain time From the present time (time tn), for example, a certain time J of about 1 to several minutes
Wire temperature (predicted temperature) θi (n + J1) , θa based on the energizing current, temperature, and solar radiation intensity at time tn + J1 after 1
(n + J1) , θs (n + J1) are parameters Δθimax, (In / Imax) 2 , Ti of the exponential function formula <3> and parameters An, Ta, ΔSmax of the exponential function formulas <4>, <5>.・ S
Fixing n and Ts to the current values, tn in the formula is tn + J1 ,
We can predict tn- 1 as tn -1 + J1 .

【0035】さらに、予測温度θi(n+J1),θ
(n+J1),θs(n+J1)を推定演算式〈6〉のθin,θa
n,θsnに代入すれば、通電電流及び気象条件を考慮し
た一定時間J1後の予測温度θn+J1 を求めることがで
きる。
Further, the predicted temperatures θi (n + J1) , θ
a (n + J1) and θs (n + J1) are estimated θin and θa of the calculation formula <6>
By substituting for n and θ sn, it is possible to obtain the predicted temperature θ n + J1 after the fixed time J1 in consideration of the energization current and the weather condition.

【0036】そして、設定された時間間隔(例えば0.
5分)で式〈3〉〜〈6〉の演算をくり返し、時々刻々
の現在の推定温度及びそれから一定時間後の予測温度を
求める。
Then, the set time interval (for example, 0.
5 minutes), the calculations of the equations <3> to <6> are repeated, and the current estimated temperature at every moment and the predicted temperature after a fixed time from that are obtained.

【0037】つぎに、推定,予測された電線温度に基づ
く負荷制限の必要性の有無の判定について説明する。
Next, determination of whether or not there is a need for load limitation based on the estimated and predicted wire temperature will be described.

【0038】この実施形態においては、高精度の判定を
行うため、負荷制限の判定レベルとして第1段判定レベ
ル,第2段判定レベルを設定し、つぎに説明する2段判
定により負荷制限の必要性の有無を判定する。
In this embodiment, in order to make a highly accurate judgment, the first stage judgment level and the second stage judgment level are set as the load limit judgment levels, and the load limit is required by the two-stage judgment described below. Determine the presence or absence of sex.

【0039】そして、電線路が送電線路の場合、第1段
判定レベルは送電線路の短時間使用最高許容温度(短時
間使用レベル)θL に設定し、第2段判定レベルは第1
段判定レベルより高温の危険温度θH に設定する。
When the electric line is a transmission line, the first stage determination level is set to the maximum allowable short-time use temperature (short-time use level) θ L of the transmission line, and the second stage determination level is the first level.
Set to a dangerous temperature θ H that is higher than the stage judgment level.

【0040】さらに、負荷制限の必要ありと判定する条
件として、つぎに説明する第1,第2,第3の主条件及
び副条件を設定する。
Further, as conditions for determining that the load limitation is necessary, first, second, and third main conditions and sub-conditions described below are set.

【0041】第2段判定レベル(危険温度θH )を判
定基準とする即遮断用の第1,第2の主条件 (i)第1の主条件(事象1の判定条件) この条件は、時刻tn-2,tn-1,tnの連続3回の推
定温度をθn-2,θn-1,θnとし、それぞれの一定時
間J1後の予測温度をθn-2+J1 ,θn-1+J1,θn
+J1 とすると、この連続した3回の予測温度θ
-2+J1 ,θn-1+J1 ,θn+J1 が図2に示すように、
上昇傾向(θn-2+J1 <θn-1+J1 <θn+J1 )を示
し、かつ、いずれも第2段判定レベル(危険温度θH
以上になることである。
First and second main conditions for immediate shutoff using the second stage judgment level (dangerous temperature θ H ) as a judgment criterion (i) First main condition (judgment condition for event 1) This condition is Estimated temperatures at times tn -2 , tn -1 , and tn three times in succession are θn -2 , θn -1 , and θn, and predicted temperatures after respective constant times J1 are θn -2 + J1 and θn -1 + J1. , Θn
Assuming + J1 , this three consecutive predicted temperatures θ
n −2 + J1 , θn −1 + J1 and θn + J1 are as shown in FIG.
An upward trend (θn -2 + J1 <θn -1 + J1 <θn + J1 ) is shown, and both are in the second stage judgment level (hazardous temperature θ H ).
That is all.

【0042】(ii)第2の主条件(事象1の判定条件を
バックアップする条件) この条件は、図3に示すように例えば時刻txに推定温
度が第2段判定レベルに上昇し、その後も推定温度が第
2段判定レベル以上に保たれ、時刻txから例えば1〜
数分程度の一定時間J2が経過した後の時刻tn-2(T
1n-2時間後),tn-1(T1n-1時間後),tn(T1n
時間後)の連続3回の推定温度θn-2,θn-1,θnが
いずれも第2段判定レベル以上になることであり、換言
すると、第2段判定レベル(危険温度θH )以上の状態
が第1の所定時間,すなわち一定時間J2以上継続する
ことである。
(Ii) Second main condition (condition for backing up the judgment condition of event 1) As shown in FIG. 3, this condition is such that the estimated temperature rises to the second-step judgment level at time tx, for example, and thereafter. The estimated temperature is maintained at or above the second-stage determination level, and from time tx, for example, 1 to
Time tn -2 (T after the lapse of a certain time J2 of about several minutes)
1n -2 hours later), tn -1 (T1n -1 hour later), tn (T1n
After three hours, the estimated temperatures θn −2 , θn −1 , and θn for all three times are equal to or higher than the second-stage determination level, in other words, equal to or higher than the second-stage determination level (dangerous temperature θ H ). That is, the state continues for a first predetermined time, that is, a predetermined time J2 or more.

【0043】なお、この場合はその間の推定温度が上昇
傾向を示すことは条件でなく、図3のように途中で下降
傾向を示しても危険温度θH 以上であれば条件に該当す
る。
Incidentally, in this case is not a condition is to show the estimated temperature rise between them, corresponding to the condition as long as the way downward trend indicates danger temperature theta H or more as in Figure 3.

【0044】 第1段判定レベル(最高許容温度
θL )を判定基準とする第3の主条件(事象2の判定条
件) この条件は、第1,第2の主条件の場合より余裕がある
状態での制限条件であり、図4に示すように例えば時刻
tyに推定温度が第1段判定レベル(最高許容温度
θL )に上昇し、その後推定温度が第1段判定レベル以
上に保たれ、時刻tyから前記一定時間J2より長い第
2の所定時間としての一定時間J3が経過した後の時刻
tn-2(T2n-2時間後),tn-1(T2n-1時間後),
tn(T2n時間後)の連続3回の推定温度θn-2,θ
-1,θnがいずれも第1段判定レベル以上になること
であり、換言すると、第1段判定レベル(最高許容温度
θL )以上の状態が一定時間J3以上継続することであ
る。
Third Main Condition Using Judgment Level of 1st Stage (Maximum Allowable Temperature θ L ) (Judgment Condition of Event 2) This condition has a margin more than the case of the first and second main conditions. As shown in FIG. 4, the estimated temperature rises to the first stage determination level (maximum allowable temperature θ L ) and then the estimated temperature is maintained at the first stage determination level or higher as shown in FIG. , Time tn -2 (T2n -2 hours later), tn -1 (T2n -1 hour later), after a lapse of a predetermined time J3 as a second predetermined time longer than the predetermined time J2 from the time ty.
Estimated temperatures θn -2 , θ three times consecutively after tn (after T2n time)
Both n −1 and θn are equal to or higher than the first stage determination level, in other words, the state of the first stage determination level (maximum allowable temperature θ L ) or higher continues for a certain time J3 or longer.

【0045】 過大な通電電流を判定基準とする副条
件(電流非常値の判定条件) この条件は、電線路の時刻tn(現在)の通電電流In
が非常値Im・βmax以上になることである。
Sub-Condition Based on Excessive Energizing Current (Evaluation Condition for Current Emergency Value) This condition is the energizing current In at the time tn (current) of the electric line.
Is an emergency value Im · βmax or more.

【0046】なお、Imは電線種別基準電流値であり、
βmax は電線路の電流最低保証係数βmin より大きい電
線非常値係数であり、いずれも電線路に固有の定数値で
ある。
Im is a reference current value for each wire,
βmax is a wire emergency value coefficient larger than the minimum current guarantee coefficient βmin of the electric line, and both are constant values specific to the electric line.

【0047】そして、この副条件は、冬季等の気温が低
く日射強度も弱い状況下では前記の電線路の一定時間J
1後の予測温度が低くなり、予測温度,推定温度のみか
ら判定すると、電線路の許容電流をはるかに超える過大
な電流が流れるようになっても負荷制限が行われない事
態が生じるおそれがあるため、この事態を回避すべく設
けられたものである。
This sub-condition is that the above-mentioned constant time J of the above-mentioned electric line is set in a situation such as winter when the temperature is low and the solar radiation intensity is weak.
The predicted temperature after 1 becomes low, and if the judgment is made only from the predicted temperature and the estimated temperature, there is a possibility that load limiting may not be performed even if an excessive current far exceeding the allowable current of the electric line flows. Therefore, it is provided to avoid this situation.

【0048】つぎに、この判定方法の実施構成につき、
図1を参照して説明する。図1においては、温度判定部
1により前記第1,第2,第3の主条件に基づく判定及
びつぎの第1,第2のリセットの判定を行う。
Next, regarding the implementation structure of this determination method,
This will be described with reference to FIG. In FIG. 1, the temperature determination unit 1 performs the determination based on the first, second, and third main conditions and the determination of the next first and second resets.

【0049】(i)第1のリセット このリセットは第1,第2の主条件に基づく負荷制限を
解除するものであり、その条件は、一度は予測温度が第
2段判定レベル(危険温度θH )に上昇しても、その
後、時刻tnにおける一定時間J1後の予測温度θn
+J1 が第2段判定レベルより低くなることである。
(I) First Reset This reset is to release the load limitation based on the first and second main conditions. The condition is that the predicted temperature is once the second stage judgment level (danger temperature θ Even if the temperature rises to H ), the predicted temperature θn after a certain time J1 at the time tn
+ J1 is lower than the second-stage judgment level.

【0050】そして、このリセット条件を満足すれば現
在(tn)から一定時間J1経過したときに、負荷制限
することなく、電線温度が確実に危険温度θH より低く
なると予測されるため、第1,第2の主条件の判定出力
をリセットし、無駄な負荷制限を防止する。
If the reset condition is satisfied, it is predicted that the electric wire temperature will certainly be lower than the dangerous temperature θ H without load limitation when a certain time J1 has passed from the present (tn). , Reset the judgment output of the second main condition to prevent useless load limitation.

【0051】(2)第2のリセット このリセットは第3の主条件に基づく負荷制限を解除す
るものであり、その条件は、一度は推定温度が第1段判
定レベル(最高許容温度θL )に上昇しても、その後、
時刻tnにおける一定時間J1後の予測温度θn+J1
いずれも第1段判定レベルより低くなることである。
(2) Second reset This reset is to release the load limitation based on the third main condition. The condition is that the estimated temperature is once the first stage judgment level (maximum allowable temperature θ L ). Even after rising to
This means that the predicted temperature θn + J1 after the constant time J1 at the time tn becomes lower than the first-stage determination level.

【0052】そして、このリセット条件を満足すれば、
現在(tn)から一定時間J1経過したときに、負荷制
限することなく電線温度が確実に最高許容温度θL より
低くなると予測されるため、第3の主条件の判定出力を
リセットし、無駄な負荷制限を防止する。
If this reset condition is satisfied,
When a certain time J1 has elapsed from the current time (tn), it is predicted that the wire temperature will certainly be lower than the maximum allowable temperature θ L without load limitation, so the judgment output of the third main condition is reset and wasteful. Prevent load shedding.

【0053】そして、第1,第2,第3の主条件に該当
すれば、温度判定部1のアンドゲート2,3,4それぞ
れから負荷制限の必要ありを示す論理1(以下“1”と
いう)の判定信号を出力し、第1,第2のリセットに該
当すれば、温度判定部1から“1”のリセット信号を出
力する。また、電流判定部5により前記の副条件に基づ
く判定及びつぎの第3のリセットの判定を行う。
Then, if the first, second, and third main conditions are satisfied, a logical 1 (hereinafter referred to as "1") indicating that load limitation is required from each of the AND gates 2, 3, and 4 of the temperature determination unit 1. ) Is output, and if it corresponds to the first and second resets, the temperature determination unit 1 outputs a reset signal of "1". Further, the current determination unit 5 performs the determination based on the sub-condition and the determination of the next third reset.

【0054】この第3のリセットは副条件に基づく負荷
制限を解除するものであり、その条件は、通電電流In
の1.1倍(In・1.1)がIm・βmax より小さくな
り、通電電流Inが非常値より十分小さくなることであ
る。
This third reset is to release the load limitation based on the sub-condition, and the condition is that the conduction current In
Is 1.1 times (In · 1.1) smaller than Im · βmax, and the conduction current In is sufficiently smaller than the emergency value.

【0055】そして、副条件,第3のリセットに該当す
れば、電流判定部5からアンドゲート2〜4の判定信号
と同様の“1”の判定信号,第1,第2のリセット条件
のリセット信号と同様の“1”のリセット信号をそれぞ
れ出力する。
If the sub-condition, the third reset, is satisfied, the current judgment unit 5 resets the judgment signal of "1", which is the same as the judgment signals of the AND gates 2 to 4, and the first and second reset conditions. The reset signal of "1" similar to the signal is output.

【0056】さらに、各判定信号及びリセット信号は制
限指令部6に供給され、アンドゲート2,3の判定信号
はオアゲート7を介して信号保持部8にラッチされ、第
1のリセット条件のリセット信号により信号保持部8が
リセットされるまで信号保持部8を介して出力用のオア
ゲート9に与えられる。
Further, each judgment signal and the reset signal are supplied to the limit command section 6, the judgment signals of the AND gates 2 and 3 are latched in the signal holding section 8 via the OR gate 7, and the reset signal of the first reset condition is set. The signal is supplied to the output OR gate 9 via the signal holding unit 8 until the signal holding unit 8 is reset.

【0057】同様に、アンドゲート4の判定信号は信号
保持部10にラッチされ、第2のリセット条件のリセッ
ト信号により信号保持部10がリセットされるまで信号
保持部10を介してオアゲート9に与えられる。
Similarly, the judgment signal of the AND gate 4 is latched by the signal holding unit 10 and given to the OR gate 9 via the signal holding unit 10 until the signal holding unit 10 is reset by the reset signal of the second reset condition. To be

【0058】また、電流判定部5の判定信号は信号保持
部11にラッチされ、電流判定部5のリセット信号によ
り信号保持部11がリセットされるまで信号保持部11
を介してオアゲート9に与えられる。
The determination signal of the current determination unit 5 is latched by the signal holding unit 11, and the signal holding unit 11 is reset until the signal holding unit 11 is reset by the reset signal of the current determination unit 5.
Is given to the OR gate 9.

【0059】したがって、制限指令部6のオアゲート9
は、各主条件又は副条件のいずれかを満足し、負荷制限
の必要があると予測されるときに、リセット信号で解除
されるまで“1”のフィーダ遮断指令を出力する。
Therefore, the OR gate 9 of the limit command unit 6
Outputs the feeder cutoff command of "1" until it is canceled by the reset signal when it is predicted that the load limitation is required, when either the main condition or the sub condition is satisfied.

【0060】この遮断指令に基づき、負荷制御回路12
が系統の各負荷フィーダを設定された順序等にしたがっ
て順に遮断する。
Based on this cutoff command, the load control circuit 12
Shuts off each load feeder of the system in order according to the set order.

【0061】したがって、この実施形態の場合は、一定
時間後の予測温度に基づき、第1の主条件の判定により
負荷フィーダの即遮断が必要になる第2段判定レベル
(危険温度θH )を基準にして負荷制限の必要性の有無
が予測的に判定され、通電電流が急増して短時間内に確
実に危険温度に達するときの判定の遅れが防止される。
Therefore, in the case of this embodiment, the second stage determination level (dangerous temperature θ H ) at which the load feeder needs to be immediately shut off by the determination of the first main condition based on the predicted temperature after a fixed time. Whether or not the load limitation is necessary is predictively determined based on the reference, and a delay in the determination when the energized current rapidly increases to reach the dangerous temperature within a short time is prevented.

【0062】このとき、電線路の温度が気象条件を加味
して正確に推定,予測され、しかも、予測温度が上昇傾
向で3回,すなわち複数回連続して第2段判定レベル以
上になるときにのみ負荷制限の必要ありと判定するた
め、過渡変動,外乱等による変動を排除して精度の高い
判定が行える。
At this time, when the temperature of the electric line is accurately estimated and predicted in consideration of meteorological conditions, and the predicted temperature tends to increase three times, that is, a plurality of times consecutively exceeds the second-stage judgment level. Since it is determined that the load limitation is necessary only in the above case, fluctuations due to transient fluctuations, disturbances, etc. can be eliminated and highly accurate judgment can be performed.

【0063】また、推定温度(現在の温度)が一定時間
以上継続して第2段判定レベル以上になり、既に危険温
度に達しているときは、第2の主条件の判定により直ち
に負荷制限の必要があると判定される。
When the estimated temperature (current temperature) continuously reaches the second-stage judgment level for a certain period of time or longer and has already reached the dangerous temperature, the load is immediately limited by the judgment of the second main condition. It is judged necessary.

【0064】さらに、推定温度が一定時間以上継続して
第1段判定レベル(最高許容温度θL )以上になり、や
がては危険温度に達するおそれがあるときには、第3の
主条件の判定により負荷制限の必要ありと判定されるた
め、いわゆる2段判定よりさらに一層精度の高い予測判
定が行える。
Furthermore, when the estimated temperature continues to be above the first stage judgment level (maximum allowable temperature θ L ) for a certain period of time or longer and eventually reaches a dangerous temperature, the load is determined by the judgment of the third main condition. Since it is determined that the restriction is necessary, the prediction determination can be performed with higher accuracy than the so-called two-step determination.

【0065】なお、第2,第3の主条件の判定において
も推定温度が複数回(3回)連続して第1,第2段判定
レベル以上になることを条件とするため、過渡変動や外
乱等の影響を排除できるのは勿論である。
In the judgment of the second and third main conditions, the condition is that the estimated temperature is higher than or equal to the judgment levels of the first and second stages a plurality of times (three times) in succession. Of course, it is possible to eliminate the influence of disturbance and the like.

【0066】そのため、第1,第2段判定レベルを基準
とするいわゆる2段判定により、従来は行われていなか
った予測的な判定も行って負荷制限の必要性の有無の判
定が遅れなく正確に行え、この判定に基づき過不足なく
負荷フィーダを遮断し、電線路の通電電流量をその温度
が気象条件を考慮して許容される最大温度になるように
制限することができる。
Therefore, the so-called two-step judgment based on the first and second-step judgment levels is used to make a predictive judgment which has not been conventionally made, thereby making it possible to accurately judge whether there is a need for load limitation without delay. Based on this determination, the load feeder can be shut off without excess or deficiency, and the amount of current flowing through the electric line can be limited so that the temperature becomes the maximum temperature allowed in consideration of weather conditions.

【0067】しかも、通電電流量が異常に大きくなる
と、副条件の判定によっても負荷制限の必要があると判
定されて負荷フィーダが遮断されるため、判定及び制御
の精度が一層向上する。
Moreover, when the amount of the energized current becomes abnormally large, the load feeder is shut off because it is determined that the load limitation is necessary even by the determination of the sub-condition, so that the accuracy of determination and control is further improved.

【0068】ところで、判定等の簡略化等を図る場合
は、即遮断の条件である第2段判定レベル(危険温度θ
H )に基づく第1,第2の主条件の判定のみを行って負
荷制限の有,無を判定するようにしてもよい。
By the way, in order to simplify the judgment, etc., the second stage judgment level (the dangerous temperature θ
It is also possible to determine whether the load limitation is present or absent by performing only the determination of the first and second main conditions based on H ).

【0069】また、電線温度の推定は例えば前記既出願
と同様の手法で行ってもよく、このとき、気象条件とし
て風の影響を加味すれば、さらに精度の高い推定が行え
る。さらに、第1段判定レベル,第2段判定レベル及び
各一定時間等は電線路等に応じて設定すればよい。
Further, the wire temperature may be estimated by the same method as that of the above-mentioned application. At this time, if the influence of wind is added as a weather condition, the estimation can be performed with higher accuracy. Further, the first stage determination level, the second stage determination level, each fixed time period, etc. may be set according to the electric line or the like.

【0070】[0070]

【発明の効果】本発明は、以下に記載する効果を奏す
る。まず、請求項1の場合は、電線路の気象条件を考慮
した一定時間後の予測温度が連続的に上昇傾向を示し、
このままでは確実に危険温度に達すると判定されたと
き、又は気象条件を考慮した電線路の推定温度が一定時
間以上危険温度以上になっていると判定されたときに、
いわゆる予測的な判定手法で遅れなく負荷制限の必要が
あると判定してフィーダ遮断指令を出力することがで
き、電線路の通電電流を、熱的限界内の最大容量に過不
足なく制限することができる。
The present invention has the following effects. First, in the case of claim 1, the predicted temperature after a certain time in consideration of the weather conditions of the electric line shows a continuous rising tendency,
If it is determined that the dangerous temperature will be reached without fail as it is, or if it is determined that the estimated temperature of the electric line in consideration of weather conditions has been above the dangerous temperature for a certain period of time,
A so-called predictive determination method can be used to output a feeder cutoff command when it is determined that the load must be limited without delay, and the conduction current of the electrical line must be limited to the maximum capacity within the thermal limit without excess or deficiency. You can

【0071】また、請求項2の場合は、負荷制限の必要
性の有無の判定が電線路の短時間使用最高許容温度に設
定された第1段判定レベルとこのレベルより高い電線路
の危険温度に設定された第2段判定レベルとの2段の判
定レベルを設けて行われる。
According to the second aspect of the present invention, whether or not it is necessary to limit the load is determined by the first stage judgment level set to the maximum allowable short-time use temperature of the electric line and the dangerous temperature of the electric line higher than this level. The determination is performed by providing two determination levels with the second determination level set to.

【0072】そしてこの2段の判定により電線路の気象
条件を考慮した一定時間後の予測温度が連続的に上昇傾
向を示し、このままでは確実に危険温度に達すると判定
されたとき,気象条件を考慮した電線路の推定温度が第
1の所定時間以上危険温度以上になっていると判定され
たときは勿論、さらには、気象条件を考慮した電線温度
の推定温度が第2の所定時間以上短時間使用最高許容温
度になってやがて危険温度に達するおそれがあるときに
も、負荷制限の必要があると判断し、予測的な判定手法
で遅れなく、しかも、極めて精度よく、負荷制限の必要
性の有無を判定してフィーダ遮断指令を出力することが
でき、電線路の通電電流を一層精度よく過不足なく制限
することができる。
The two-stage judgment shows that the predicted temperature after a certain period of time in consideration of the weather conditions of the electric line shows a continuous upward trend, and if it is judged that the dangerous temperature will be certainly reached as it is, the weather conditions will be changed. Not only when it is determined that the estimated temperature of the considered electric line is equal to or higher than the dangerous temperature for the first predetermined time or longer, and further, the estimated temperature of the electric wire temperature in consideration of the weather condition is short for the second predetermined time or longer. Even when the maximum allowable temperature for time use is reached and the dangerous temperature may be reached soon, it is determined that load limitation is necessary, and the predictive determination method does not delay and extremely accurate load reduction is necessary. It is possible to output the feeder cutoff command by determining the presence or absence of the current, and it is possible to more accurately limit the current flowing through the electric line without excess or deficiency.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】本発明の実施の1形態のブロック図である。FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an embodiment of the present invention.

【図2】図1の第1の主条件の判定説明用の電線温度の
時間変化の説明図である。
FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram of the change over time of the electric wire temperature for explaining the determination of the first main condition of FIG.

【図3】図1の第2の主条件の判定説明用の電線温度の
時間変化の説明図である。
FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram of the change over time of the electric wire temperature for explaining the determination of the second main condition of FIG. 1.

【図4】図1の第3の主条件の判定説明用の電線温度の
時間変化の説明図である。
FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram of the change over time of the electric wire temperature for explaining the determination of the third main condition of FIG. 1.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

θn-2,θn-1,θn 推定温度 θn-2+J1 ,θn-1+J1 ,θn+J1 予測温度 θL 第1段判定レベル(最高許容温度) θH 第2段判定レベル(危険温度)θn −2 , θn −1 , θn Estimated temperature θn −2 + J1 , θn −1 + J1 , θn + J1 Predicted temperature θ L 1st stage judgment level (maximum allowable temperature) θ H 2nd stage judgment level (hazardous temperature )

Claims (2)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 電線路の負荷制限の判定レベルを前記電
線路の最高許容温度より高い危険温度に設定し、 周期的に前記電線路の現在の通電電流及び気象の状態か
ら前記電線路の現在の温度を推定するとともに一定時間
後の温度を予測し、 前記一定時間後の予測温度が複数回連続的に上昇傾向で
前記判定レベル以上になるとき又は前記電線路の推定温
度が所定時間以上連続的に前記判定レベル以上になった
ときに、前記電線路の負荷制限の必要ありと判定してフ
ィーダ遮断指令を出力することを特徴とする電線路の負
荷制限判定方法。
1. A judgment level of load limitation of an electric line is set to a dangerous temperature higher than a maximum allowable temperature of the electric line, and the current of the electric line is periodically determined from a current flowing current and a weather condition of the electric line. When the temperature predicted for a certain period of time is predicted and the predicted temperature after the certain period of time becomes higher than or equal to the determination level with a tendency to continuously increase for a plurality of times, or the estimated temperature of the electric line continues for a predetermined period of time or more. The load limit determination method for an electric line, which is characterized in that it is determined that the load limit of the electric line is required and a feeder cutoff command is output when the load level exceeds the determination level.
【請求項2】 電線路の負荷制限の第1段判定レベルを
前記電線路の短時間使用最高許容温度に設定し、 前記電線路の負荷制限の第2段判定レベルを前記短時間
使用最高許容温度より高い危険温度に設定し、 周期的に前記電線路の現在の通電電流及び気象の状態か
ら前記電線路の現在の温度を推定するとともに一定時間
後の温度を予測し、 前記一定時間後の予測温度が複数回連続的に上昇傾向で
前記第2段判定レベル以上になるとき,前記電線路の推
定温度が第1の所定時間以上連続的に前記第2段判定レ
ベル以上になったとき又は前記電線路の推定温度が前記
第1の所定時間より長い第2の所定時間以上連続的に前
記第1段判定レベル以上になったときに、前記電線路の
負荷制限の必要ありと判定してフィーダ遮断指令を出力
することを特徴とする電線路の負荷制限判定方法。
2. A first stage judgment level of load limitation of an electric line is set to a maximum allowable short-time use temperature of the electric line, and a second stage judgment level of load limitation of the electric line is set to the maximum short-time use allowable temperature. Set a dangerous temperature higher than the temperature, periodically estimate the current temperature of the electric line from the current flowing current and weather conditions of the electric line, and predict the temperature after a certain time, When the predicted temperature continuously rises a plurality of times and becomes equal to or higher than the second stage determination level, or when the estimated temperature of the electric line continuously becomes equal to or higher than the second stage determination level for a first predetermined time or more, or When the estimated temperature of the electric line continuously becomes equal to or higher than the first stage judgment level for a second predetermined time longer than the first predetermined time, it is determined that the load limitation of the electric line is necessary. It is special to output the feeder cutoff command. The method of determining the load limit of the electric line to be collected.
JP08044201A 1996-02-05 1996-02-05 How to determine load limit of electric line Expired - Fee Related JP3129181B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP08044201A JP3129181B2 (en) 1996-02-05 1996-02-05 How to determine load limit of electric line

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP08044201A JP3129181B2 (en) 1996-02-05 1996-02-05 How to determine load limit of electric line

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH09215179A true JPH09215179A (en) 1997-08-15
JP3129181B2 JP3129181B2 (en) 2001-01-29

Family

ID=12684961

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP08044201A Expired - Fee Related JP3129181B2 (en) 1996-02-05 1996-02-05 How to determine load limit of electric line

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3129181B2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR19990016760A (en) * 1997-08-19 1999-03-15 윤종용 Logic power protection devices
CN110061495A (en) * 2019-04-24 2019-07-26 广西电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院 A kind of recognition methods based on the electric system core network for cutting constraint
CN115127143A (en) * 2022-06-30 2022-09-30 美智光电科技股份有限公司 Operation control method and device, controller, heating equipment and storage medium

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102039712B (en) * 2010-11-02 2013-01-09 中科恒达石墨股份有限公司 Method for manufacturing graphite foil capable of heat conduction and electricity conduction

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR19990016760A (en) * 1997-08-19 1999-03-15 윤종용 Logic power protection devices
CN110061495A (en) * 2019-04-24 2019-07-26 广西电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院 A kind of recognition methods based on the electric system core network for cutting constraint
CN110061495B (en) * 2019-04-24 2022-08-16 广西电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院 Method for identifying core network of power system based on cut constraint
CN115127143A (en) * 2022-06-30 2022-09-30 美智光电科技股份有限公司 Operation control method and device, controller, heating equipment and storage medium
CN115127143B (en) * 2022-06-30 2023-08-25 美智光电科技股份有限公司 Operation control method, device, controller, heating equipment and storage medium

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3129181B2 (en) 2001-01-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4222044A (en) Early ice-warning device
JP5377362B2 (en) Load circuit protection device
US20060050768A1 (en) Method and protective circuit for monitoring the temperature of electric motors cooled by a coolant
WO2013161364A1 (en) Protection device for electricity supply circuit
US4793553A (en) Infrared thermostat control
US20060171662A1 (en) Control apparatus and method of operating same
JPH09215179A (en) Method for deciding limitation of load on line
US6727821B2 (en) Apparatus and method for predicting an overload trip for an electrical power transformer
JP2013229964A (en) Protection apparatus for current flowing circuit
JP3127768B2 (en) Monitoring method of electric wire temperature
EP1234486B1 (en) Control of heating arrangement with multiple sensors
JP3129182B2 (en) Electric line monitoring and control method
JP2002238147A (en) Temperature calculation type overload protective relay
US7123457B2 (en) System for transitioning to the trip threshold for the start condition thermal model for a motor protection relay
KR102114709B1 (en) Energy-saving smart freeze protection system
CN108370151B (en) Power supply control device
JP5684871B2 (en) Load circuit protection device
CN112054465B (en) OPGW ice melting system
JP3132378B2 (en) Estimation method of electric line temperature
JP3127767B2 (en) Monitoring method of electric wire temperature
JPH0836433A (en) System control method
JPH0284011A (en) Temperature protection for power converter
CN116565802B (en) PTC control method and device based on power tube protection
WO2023074070A1 (en) Vehicle control device
JP2991107B2 (en) Method of determining temperature and solar radiation intensity for weather monitoring

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081117

Year of fee payment: 8

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees