JPH06101005B2 - Machining process plan creation device for individual production - Google Patents

Machining process plan creation device for individual production

Info

Publication number
JPH06101005B2
JPH06101005B2 JP25738184A JP25738184A JPH06101005B2 JP H06101005 B2 JPH06101005 B2 JP H06101005B2 JP 25738184 A JP25738184 A JP 25738184A JP 25738184 A JP25738184 A JP 25738184A JP H06101005 B2 JPH06101005 B2 JP H06101005B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
product
date
information
machining process
days
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP25738184A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS61136161A (en
Inventor
弘章 杉原
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Original Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mitsubishi Electric Corp filed Critical Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Priority to JP25738184A priority Critical patent/JPH06101005B2/en
Publication of JPS61136161A publication Critical patent/JPS61136161A/en
Publication of JPH06101005B2 publication Critical patent/JPH06101005B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/02Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/30Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 〔産業上の利用分野〕 この発明は、個別生産すなわち一品ごとに異なる品種の
製品を、一部共通の加工工程を含んで製造するための加
工工程計画作成装置において、各工程における作業順序
を、工程情報を基に決定する加工工程計画作成装置に関
するものである。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [Industrial field of application] The present invention relates to a manufacturing process plan creating apparatus for manufacturing individually manufactured products, that is, products of different types for each product, including some common processing processes, The present invention relates to a machining process plan creation device that determines a work order in each process based on process information.

〔従来の技術〕[Conventional technology]

従来、仕事の計画立案には幾つかの方法が提案されてき
た。そのなかでも、個別生産においては、第5図に示さ
れるようなPERTと呼ばれる手法がよく使用されてきた方
法の1つであり、例えば講談社株式会社から昭和40年4
月18日に発行されたブルーバックスB−35「計画の科
学」に示されている。
Traditionally, several methods have been proposed for planning work. Among them, in individual production, a method called PERT as shown in Fig. 5 is one of the methods often used. For example, from Kodansha Co., Ltd.
It is shown in Blue Bucks B-35, "The Science of Planning," published on the 18th of March.

図において、21は用紙、22はこの用紙21上に書かれた矢
印、23はこの矢印22の両端に示す丸であり、丸23と矢印
22の組合わせで仕事の全体計画を表現して用紙21上に書
いていた。
In the figure, 21 is a sheet of paper, 22 is an arrow written on the sheet of paper 21, 23 is a circle shown at both ends of the arrow 22, and a circle 23 and an arrow
I expressed the whole work plan with 22 combinations and wrote it on the paper 21.

次に第5図に示した従来の計画立案の作成の仕方を説明
する。まず、仕事の計画立案を行う場合、仕事の内容を
時系列的に分析し、図示のように作業ユニットごとにa,
b,・・・jと分解し、作業ユニットを矢印22で、作業ユ
ニットと作業ユニットの結合点を丸23で書き、分解した
作業ユニットを互いに関連付けながら仕事の全体計画を
表現していた。
Next, a method of creating the conventional plan shown in FIG. 5 will be described. First, when planning a job, the contents of the job are analyzed in a time series, and a, a
The work unit is disassembled as b, ... j, the work unit is represented by an arrow 22, and the connecting point of the work unit and the work unit is represented by a circle 23, and the disassembled work units are associated with each other to represent the overall work plan.

〔発明が解決しようとする問題点〕[Problems to be solved by the invention]

第5図に示したPERTを用いた従来の計画立案手法は、ブ
ルーバックスの「計画の科学」によると、元々ミサイル
の開発計画のために生まれたものであり、ダムやビルの
建設などに用いられて力を発揮している。このようにPE
RTは単一の大きな目標の実現に対して非常に有効な手法
であるが、一品ものの製品複数個の製造が、異なる時期
に着手され、異なる時期に完了しなければならない個別
生産の製造工場では、条件が異なるという問題があっ
た。換言すると、各工程が有限な機械、人、時間などの
資源で構成されているため、ある製品の製造は必ず他の
製品の製造に影響を与え、PERTだけではこの影響を考慮
した複数個の製品の工程計画が非常に立て難いという問
題点があった。
According to Blueback's "Science of Planning", the conventional planning method using PERT shown in Fig. 5 was originally created for the missile development plan, and is used for the construction of dams and buildings. Being able to exert its power. PE like this
RT is a very effective method for achieving a single major goal, but in an individually-manufactured manufacturing factory where the production of multiple products of one product is undertaken at different times and must be completed at different times. There was a problem that the conditions were different. In other words, each process is composed of limited resources such as machines, people, and time, so the manufacturing of one product always affects the manufacturing of other products. There was a problem that the process plan of the product was very difficult to make.

さらに、従来のように、ビルの建設や新製品の開発など
のプロジェクトをこのネットワークで表す場合、例えば
株式会社オーム社から昭和41年5月25日に発行された
「電子計算機ハンドブック」のP.6−49〜6−55に記載
されているように、各工程の所要時間は、通常、日の単
位で表されるので、所要時間(所要日数)をもとに計算
される最早時刻、最遅時刻も、通常、日数や年月日で表
されるのに対し、例えば金型などの加工組立工場におい
て、1つの金型の加工を1つのプロジェクトとみなし
て、このプロジェクトをネットワークで表すと、従来と
は異なり、各工程の所要時間は、通常、例えば1時間30
分などと、時分単位で表されてしまい、従来のように、
この所要時間だけを用いて、最早時刻、最遅時刻を計算
すると、最早時刻、最遅時刻も、時分あるいは年月日時
分で表されることになり、現状とはかけはなれて、一日
に複数工程をつぎつぎと処理するような結果となってし
まい、実状を表現しきれないという問題点があった。
Furthermore, when representing projects such as building construction and new product development with this network as in the past, for example, P. of "Electronic Computer Handbook" issued on May 25, 1966 by Ohmsha Co., Ltd. As described in 6-49 to 6-55, the required time for each process is usually expressed in units of days, so the earliest time and maximum time calculated based on the required time (number of days required) The late time is also usually represented by the number of days or years, but when processing one die in a processing and assembly plant such as a die is regarded as one project, and this project is represented by a network. Unlike the conventional method, the time required for each process is usually 1 hour 30
Minutes, etc. are expressed in units of hours and minutes.
If the earliest and latest times are calculated using only this required time, the earliest and latest times will also be expressed in hours and minutes or year / month / day / hour / minute. However, there is a problem that the actual situation cannot be fully expressed because the result is that a plurality of processes are processed one after another.

したがって、生産する際に、生産に従事する生産技術者
が余裕日数の少ない製品を優先して製造しようとして
も、1工程の所要時間が例えば1時間30分などのように
短い加工組立工場では、PERTなどの手法がそのままでは
適用できず、ひいては余裕日数の計算が正しくできない
ため、余裕日数の少ない製品の部品を優先することがで
きないという問題点があった。
Therefore, at the time of production, even if a production engineer engaged in production prefers to produce a product with few spare days, in a processing and assembly plant where the time required for one process is short, such as 1 hour and 30 minutes, There is a problem in that methods such as PERT cannot be applied as they are and the calculation of the number of spare days cannot be performed correctly, so that it is not possible to prioritize the parts of the product with a small number of spare days.

また、納期までの日数だけで余裕を判断しようとして
も、後工程の多さ、少なさ、及び後工程の所要時間など
によってかならずしも余裕を表しきれないので、余裕日
数を正しく表すことができないという問題点があった。
In addition, even if you try to judge the margin only by the number of days until the delivery date, you cannot always express the margin due to the large number of post-processes, the small number of post-processes, the time required for the post-process, etc. There was a point.

その上、従来のPERTでは、工程の所要時間は、一つの工
程が開始され、次の工程に移行するまでの時間であり、
その中には滞在時間も含まれるので、例えば通常の加工
組立工場でよくみかけられる次工程翌日渡しの場合、あ
る工程での所要時間のうち、実際に加工など直接的な作
業に要する時間はその内容からほぼ正確に予測でき、何
時間何分と表現できるが、やむなく発生する待ち時間は
ある日の何時ごろ加工されるかによって決まるため、あ
らかじめ何時間何分とは表現できないという問題点があ
った。
Moreover, in the conventional PERT, the time required for a process is the time from the start of one process to the transition to the next process,
Since it includes the stay time, for example, in the case of the next process next day delivery that is often seen in normal processing and assembly plants, the time required for direct work such as processing is the time required for a certain process. Although it can be predicted almost accurately from the content and can be expressed as hours and minutes, the unavoidable waiting time is determined by the time of processing on a certain day, so there is a problem that it cannot be expressed in advance as hours and minutes. It was

また、従来のPERTでは、例えば通常の加工組立工場でよ
く見かけられるように、複数の工程をつぎつぎと同じ日
に処理しなければならない場合についても、うまく表現
できないという問題点もあった。
Further, the conventional PERT also has a problem that it cannot be expressed well even when a plurality of processes have to be processed on the same day as the next, as is often seen in a normal processing and assembling factory.

加えて、1つ1つの製品の部品構成、加工手順、加工時
間などは、図5に一例が示されるようなその製品に固有
のRERT図と呼ばれる従来の計画立案の説明図で表現さ
れ、さらにそれぞれの製品に対応するPERT図に対してそ
れぞれの製造着手日と製造完了指示日が与えられている
とき、従来のPERT手法では1枚のPERT図、すなわち1つ
の製品だけをとりあげ、その1つののPERT図についてし
か工程に関する計画をたてて処理することができず、幾
つかの製品が有限な共有資源のもとでお互いに影響を与
えながら部品の加工を進めるような系の日程計画は処理
できないという問題点もあった。
In addition, the component configuration, processing procedure, processing time, etc. of each product are expressed in a conventional planning explanatory diagram called a RERT diagram unique to the product as shown in FIG. When each manufacturing start date and manufacturing completion instruction date are given to the PERT diagram corresponding to each product, the conventional PERT method picks up one PERT diagram, that is, one product, and It is possible to plan and process only the PERT diagram of, and some products have a schedule plan for a system in which parts are processed while mutually affecting each other under limited shared resources. There was also the problem that it could not be processed.

この発明は、このような問題点を解決するためになされ
たもので、一品ものの複数個の製品の各部品が、有限な
資源で構成される各工程をまわって製造されるとき、互
いに与える影響をも考慮して、かつ1つの工程での加工
時間(所要時間)が例えば1時間30分などと短い場合も
実状に沿った形で処理でき、全製品が各々の製造完了指
示日までに製造完了となることを目指した加工工程計画
作成装置を提供することを目的とする。
The present invention has been made to solve such a problem, and when each part of a plurality of products of one product is manufactured by going through each process constituted by finite resources, they have an influence on each other. In consideration of the above, and even if the processing time (required time) in one process is as short as 1 hour and 30 minutes, etc., it can be processed according to the actual situation, and all products will be manufactured by each manufacturing completion instruction date. It is an object of the present invention to provide a machining process plan creation device aiming at completion.

この発明は、また、有限な機械、人、時間などの資源を
共有する1つの工場で、複数の製品がおのおののPERT図
と、互いに独立した製造着手日、製造完了指示日とが与
えられ、共有する有限な資源を用いて加工されようとし
ているとき、工程ごとに着手可能なかつ急ぐ部品、すな
わちおのおのの製品単独のPERT図で計算した例えば最遅
着手日までの日数の最も少ない部品から加工するような
工程計画をたて、全ての製品が各々の製造完了指示日ま
でに製造完了となることを目指した加工工程計画作成装
置を提供することを目的とする。
The present invention is also a factory that shares limited resources such as machines, people, and time, and is given a PERT diagram for each of a plurality of products, and a manufacturing start date and a manufacturing completion instruction date that are independent of each other. When it is going to be processed using the shared finite resources, the parts that can be started and rushed for each process, that is, the parts that have the least number of days until the latest start date calculated by the PERT diagram of each product alone are processed. It is an object of the present invention to provide a processing process plan creation device aiming at completion of manufacturing of all products by each manufacturing completion instruction date by making such a process plan.

〔課題を解決するための手段〕[Means for Solving the Problems]

この発明に係る個別生産における加工工程計画作成装置
は、或る品種の製品の部品構成と、各部品の加工工程情
報すなわち加工工程順、工程ごとの加工時間、滞在日数
及びネットワーク情報とを入力する第1の手段と、その
品種の製品の製造着手指示日及び製造完了指示日を入力
する第2の手段と、工場の稼働予定日及び各稼働予定日
の稼働時間を入力する第3の手段と、上記第1の手段な
いし上記第3の手段によって入力された情報によって、
その製品だけを作る場合のその製品の全ての部品の全て
の工程の最早着手日及び最遅着手日を算出する第4の手
段と、毎日、製造中の製品についてどの製品のどの部品
のどの工程に着手して、どの工程が完了したかを入力す
る第5の手段と、工場で製造中の全ての製品について、
前記加工工程情報のうちの、現在、加工に着手できる加
工工程情報を抽出する第6の手段と、この第6の手段で
抽出された加工工程情報を、各工程ごとに上記第3の手
段で得られた工場稼働予定日に割り振るとき、上記第4
の手段で得られた最遅着手日までの工場稼働日数すなわ
ち余裕日数の少ない部品から、上記第3の手段で得られ
たその日の稼働時間内で割り振る加工工程計画を算出す
る第7の手段と、割り振った加工工程情報の後工程を調
べ、前記ネットワーク情報を考慮して着手可能かどうか
を判断し着手可能になる時刻を算出する第8の手段と、
計画上の時間軸を進め、前記第6の手段ないし前記第8
の手段を反復する第9の手段とを備えたものである。
The machining process plan creation apparatus in the individual production according to the present invention inputs the component structure of a product of a certain type, the machining process information of each component, that is, the machining process order, the machining time for each process, the number of stay days, and the network information. A first means, a second means for inputting a manufacturing start instruction date and a manufacturing completion instruction date for a product of the variety, and a third means for inputting a planned operation date of the factory and an operation time of each expected operation date. , The information input by the first means or the third means,
The fourth means for calculating the earliest start date and the latest start date of all the processes of all the parts of the product when making only that product, and which process of which part of which product of which product is being manufactured every day 5th means to enter which process has been completed and all the products being manufactured at the factory.
Of the machining process information, a sixth means for extracting the machining process information that can be processed at present and the machining process information extracted by the sixth means are processed by the third means for each process. When allocating the obtained factory operation date, the above 4th
The seventh means for calculating a machining process plan to be allocated within the operating time of the day obtained by the above-mentioned third means from the parts having a small number of days of factory operation until the latest start date obtained by Eighth means for examining a post-process of the allocated machining process information, determining whether or not the process can be started in consideration of the network information, and calculating a time at which the process can be started.
By advancing the planned time axis, the sixth means to the eighth means
And a ninth means for repeating the above-mentioned means.

〔作用〕[Action]

この発明においては、複数製品の各部品の各工程の中
で、工程ごとに着手可能な部品を選び出し、余裕日数の
少ないものから早く着手するように加工工程計画を立て
る。
In the present invention, among the respective processes of the parts of the plurality of products, the parts which can be started for each process are selected, and the machining process plan is established so that the process having the few spare days can be started quickly.

また、所要時間ではなく、新たに設けた滞在日数で最早
日、最遅日の計算を行うので、例えばある工程の同じ作
業でも次工程へは翌日渡しとする場合は、滞在日数(滞
留日数)を1日とし、次工程へは当日渡しとする場合
は、滞在日数(滞留日数)を0日とすることによって実
状をそのまま表現でき、実状に沿った形で最早日、最遅
日の計算が可能となった。
In addition, since the earliest and latest days are calculated based on the newly set number of stays instead of the required time, for example, when the same work of a certain process is passed to the next process on the next day, the number of stays (the number of stays) If 1 day is set and the next process is delivered on the same day, the actual situation can be expressed as it is by setting the number of stay days (residence days) to 0 days, and the earliest and latest days can be calculated according to the actual situation. It has become possible.

〔実施例〕〔Example〕

以下、この発明の一実施例を図について説明する。 An embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.

第2図は工場の構成を示す概念図であり、図において1
は工場の加工現場、2a,2b,・・・2jは加工現場1を構成
する各工程、3は加工現場1に隣接する工程計画管理部
門であり、第2図では製品Aを構成する部品01,02及び0
3が各工程を渡って加工される様子が矢線4で示されて
いる。これら以外にも図示しない他の製品の多くの部品
が各工程を渡っている。
FIG. 2 is a conceptual diagram showing the structure of the factory.
2a, 2b, ... 2j are each process that constitutes the machining site 1, 3 is a process plan management department adjacent to the machining site 1, and in FIG. , 02 and 0
An arrow 4 shows how 3 is processed through each process. In addition to these, many parts of other products not shown in the figure extend through each process.

第1図は、加工現場1の加工の流れを工程計画管理部門
3でコントロールするために加工工程計画を立てるため
の処理フローであり、製品一つずつについて各部品の各
工程ごとに最早着手日、最遅着手日を算出し、既に製造
着手している製品については実績入力を行い、未完成の
製品全部についての加工工程計画を立てる様子を示して
いる。中間情報及び加工工程計画情報は記憶装置11に貯
えられる。
FIG. 1 is a processing flow for making a machining process plan in order to control the machining flow at the machining site 1 by the process plan management department 3, and the earliest start date for each process of each part for each product. , The latest start date is calculated, the results are input for products that have already started manufacturing, and a processing process plan for all unfinished products is shown. The intermediate information and the machining process plan information are stored in the storage device 11.

第3図は、工程計画管理部門3の主要部をなす情報処理
装置10の一例を示す構成図であり、入出力装置13を介し
て入力された情報は中央処理装置12で処理された後記憶
装置11に貯えられる。また、記憶装置11に貯えられた情
報を基にして、中央処理装置12で算出された工場全体の
加工工程計画情報などは、記憶装置11に貯えられるほ
か、必要に応じて出力装置14から出力される。
FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing an example of an information processing device 10 which is a main part of the process plan management department 3, in which the information input through the input / output device 13 is processed by the central processing unit 12 and then stored. Stored in device 11. Further, based on the information stored in the storage device 11, the machining process plan information for the entire factory calculated by the central processing unit 12 is stored in the storage device 11 and is output from the output device 14 as necessary. To be done.

第4図は第2図に例示した製品Aに関する各部品の加工
工程情報を示す表であり、これらは第3図に入出力装置
13を介して記憶装置11に入力される。
FIG. 4 is a table showing processing step information of each part regarding the product A illustrated in FIG. 2, and these are shown in FIG.
It is input to the storage device 11 via 13.

次に、これらにより、工場全体の加工工程計画を立てる
場合の手順を第1図について説明する。
Next, with reference to FIG. 1, a procedure for making a machining process plan for the entire factory will be described.

一例として、既に幾つかの製品について、その各々の部
品の幾つかの工程が着手されていたり完了していたりす
る状態で、新たに第2図及び第4図に示された製品Aに
ついて製造指令が来たとき、工場全体の加工工程計画を
立てる場合、新たに着手しなければならない製品Aにつ
いては、製品Aの部品構成及び第4図に示した加工工程
情報すなわち工程順、加工時間、滞在日数、ネットワー
ク情報であるFROMおよびTOを入力し(ステップS1)、製
品Aの製造着手指示日及び製造完了指示日を入力する
(ステップS2)。
As an example, for some products, the manufacturing instructions for the product A newly shown in FIGS. 2 and 4 have already been started or completed for some steps of respective parts. When a process plan for the entire factory is to be created, for the product A that must be newly started, the parts configuration of the product A and the process step information shown in FIG. 4, that is, process order, process time, stay The number of days, FROM and TO, which are network information, are input (step S1), and the manufacturing start instruction date and the production completion instruction date of the product A are input (step S2).

そして、予め工場の稼働計画が決まったときなどに入力
済みで(ステップS3)、記憶装置11に記憶させてある工
場稼働予定日及び稼働時間などの情報とともに、各工程
ごとの最早着手日及び最遅着手日を算出する(ステップ
S4)。
Then, when the factory operation plan is decided in advance (step S3), along with information such as the planned factory operation date and operation time stored in the storage device 11, the earliest start date and maximum operation date for each process are set. Calculate the late start date (step
S4).

既に着手している製品については、着手する前に同様の
算出を行い、工程着手、工程完了などの実績入力が行わ
れ(ステップS5)、この情報も含めて記憶装置11に記
憶、保持される。
For products that have already started, the same calculation is performed before starting, and the actual results such as process start and process completion are input (step S5), and this information is also stored and held in the storage device 11. .

このような情報が揃ったうえで、工場全体の加工工程計
画を立てることになる。その手法としては、例えば明日
からの計画を立てる場合、今日までの工程着手、工程完
了などの実績の入力を全て行なった後、計画上の日付を
明日にし(ステップS6)、1つの工程に関し、その日に
着手可能な全ての部品を選びだす(ステップS7)。そし
て余裕日数の少ない部品からその日の稼働時間の範囲内
で、その工程の作業として割り振る(ステップS8)。こ
れを全ての工程について行う。
After gathering such information, a process plan for the entire factory will be established. As a method, for example, in the case of making a plan from tomorrow, after entering all the results such as process start up to today and process completion, set the date on the plan tomorrow (step S6), regarding one process, Select all the parts that can be started on that day (step S7). Then, the parts having a small number of spare days are allocated as the work of the process within the operating hours of the day (step S8). This is performed for all steps.

次に、割り振ったこれらの作業が全て計画どおり終了す
るものとして、割り振りについては、直後の工程を調
べ、条件が整えば直後の工程を滞在日数だけたってから
着手可能としたうえで(ステップS9)、計画上の日付を
1日進め(ステップS10)、全期間について済んでいな
ければ同じ作業を繰り返すが(ステップS7〜S10)、済
んでいるならば終了とする。
Next, assuming that all of the allocated work will be completed as planned, regarding the allocation, the process immediately after will be examined, and if the conditions are met, it will be possible to start the process immediately after the number of stay days (step S9) Then, the date on the plan is advanced by one day (step S10), and the same work is repeated if it is not completed for the entire period (steps S7 to S10), but if it is completed, it is ended.

このようにして、既に着手している製品と、新たに着手
しようとする製品Aとを含めた全ての製品についての加
工工程計画ができあがり、その結果は、例えば出力装置
14によって出力され、各工程に示される。
In this way, processing process plans are completed for all products including the product already started and the product A to be newly started, and the result is, for example, output device.
Output by 14 and shown at each step.

ここでは或る部品の或る工程における滞在日数は第4図
に示したような形で加工工程情報の一部として与えられ
る場合について述べたが、加工工程情報の一部として与
えられる加工時間から一定の算出式によって滞在日数を
算出してもよい。第4図(A)の例1では、ネットワー
ク情報として全ての要素作業にFROM,TOを与える例を示
したが、ネットワーク構成を一意的に示すことができる
なら第4図(B)の例2のような方法やその他の方法で
もさしつかえない。
Here, the case where the number of stay days of a certain part in a certain process is given as a part of the machining process information in the form as shown in FIG. 4 is described. However, from the machining time given as a part of the machining process information, The stay days may be calculated by a fixed calculation formula. In Example 1 of FIG. 4 (A), FROM and TO are given to all elemental works as network information, but if the network configuration can be uniquely shown, Example 2 of FIG. 4 (B) You can use other methods such as.

〔発明の効果〕〔The invention's effect〕

以上のように、この発明によれば、一品ものの複数個の
製品の各部品が各工程をまわって製造されるとき、所要
時間でなく、滞在日数を用いて最早日、最遅日(日時で
もよい)を計算し、かつこれを用いて余裕日数を算出
し、各工程における余裕日数及び稼働時間を基に稼働日
順に割り振って加工工程計画を立てるので、各部品の各
工程が互いに与える影響をも考慮してかつカンでなく理
論的に、余裕日数の少ない製品の部品を優先して加工す
るように考慮して、全製品が各々の製造完了指示日まで
に製造完了となることを目指した加工工程計画を立て、
製造現場に示すことによってスムーズな製造が行え、工
程確保を目指すことができるという効果がある。
As described above, according to the present invention, when each part of a plurality of products of one product is manufactured by going through each process, the earliest day, the latest day (even the date and time) is calculated by using the stay days instead of the required time. ) Is calculated, and the number of spare days is calculated using this, and the machining process plan is created by allocating in order of working days based on the number of spare days and operating time in each process. In consideration of the above, and theoretically, not just the can, the production of all products was completed by the respective instructed completion dates, in consideration of prioritizing the processing of parts of products with few spare days. Make a process plan,
By showing it to the manufacturing site, there is an effect that smooth manufacturing can be performed and that the process can be secured.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

第1図はこの発明の一実施例を示す処理フロー図、第2
図は工場の構成を示す概念図、第3図は情報処理装置の
一例を示すブロック図、第4図(A),(B)は製品A
に関する各部品の加工工程情報の表を示す図、第5図は
製品Aに関する従来の計画立案の説明図である。 1……加工現場、2a,2b,2c,2d,2e,2f,2g,2h,2i,2j……
工程、3……工程計画管理部門、4……矢線、10……情
報処理装置、11……記憶装置、12……中央処理装置、13
……入出力装置、14……出力装置。 なお、各図中、同一符号は同一又は相当部分を示す。
FIG. 1 is a processing flow chart showing an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG.
The figure is a conceptual diagram showing the configuration of the factory, FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing an example of the information processing apparatus, and FIGS. 4 (A) and 4 (B) are products A.
FIG. 5 is a diagram showing a table of machining process information of each part regarding FIG. 5, and FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram of conventional planning regarding the product A. 1 …… Processing site, 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 2e, 2f, 2g, 2h, 2i, 2j ……
Process, 3 ... Process plan management department, 4 ... Arrow, 10 ... Information processing device, 11 ... Storage device, 12 ... Central processing unit, 13
...... Input / output device, 14 …… Output device. In each figure, the same reference numerals indicate the same or corresponding parts.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】一品ごとに異なる品種の製品を、一部共通
の加工工程を含んで製造するための加工工程計画作成装
置において、 或る品種の製品の部品構成と、各部品の加工工程情報す
なわち加工工程順、工程ごとの加工時間、滞在日数及び
ネットワーク情報とを入力する第1の手段と、 その品種の製品の製造着手指示日及び製造完了指示日を
入力する第2の手段と、 工場の稼働予定日及び各稼働予定日の稼働時間を入力す
る第3の手段と、 上記第1の手段ないし上記第3の手段によって入力され
た情報によって、その製品だけを作る場合のその製品の
全ての部品の全ての工程の最早着手日及び最遅着手日を
算出する第4の手段と、 毎日、製造中の製品についてどの製品のどの部品のどの
工程に着手して、どの工程が完了したかを入力する第5
の手段と、 工場で製造中の全ての製品について、前記加工工程情報
のうちの、作業当日に加工に着手できる加工工程情報を
抽出する第6の手段と、 この第6の手段で抽出された加工工程情報を、各工程ご
とに上記第3の手段で得られた工場稼働予定日に割り振
るとき、上記第4の手段で得られた最遅着手日までの工
場稼働日数すなわち余裕日数の少ない部品から、上記第
3の手段で得られたその日の稼働時間内で割り振る加工
工程計画を算出する第7の手段と、 割り振った加工工程情報の後工程を調べ、前記ネットワ
ーク情報を考慮して着手可能かどうかを判断し着手可能
になる時刻を算出する第8の手段と、 計画上の期日を進め、前記第6の手段ないし前記第8の
手段を加工工程計画作成期間の日数分反復処理させる第
9の手段と、 を備え、 工場全体で製造中の全製品が各々の製造完了指示日まで
に製造完了となることを目指した加工工程計画を作成す
ることを特徴とする個別生産における加工工程計画作成
装置。
1. A machining process plan creating apparatus for manufacturing a product of a different product type for each product, including a part of a common processing process, and a part configuration of a product of a certain product type, and processing process information of each part. That is, the first means for inputting the order of processing steps, the processing time for each step, the number of stay days, and network information, the second means for inputting the manufacturing start instruction date and the manufacturing completion instruction date of the product of the product type, and the factory All the products in the case where only the product is made by the third means for inputting the scheduled operation date and the operating time of each scheduled operation date and the information input by the first means to the third means. Fourth means for calculating the earliest start date and the latest start date of all the processes of parts, and which process of each product, which part of which product has been started, and which process has been completed every day Enter
Means, a sixth means for extracting processing step information, which can be processed on the day of work, from the processing step information for all products being manufactured in the factory, and the sixth means. When allocating the machining process information for each process to the factory operation scheduled date obtained by the third means, the parts having a small number of factory operation days up to the latest start date obtained by the fourth means, that is, a part having a small number of spare days From the above, the seventh means for calculating the machining process plan to be allocated within the operating time of the day obtained by the above-mentioned third means and the post-process of the allocated machining process information can be examined, and the network information can be taken into consideration to start the operation. Eighth means for judging whether or not it is possible to start a time, and advancing a planned date, and repeating the sixth means to the eighth means for the number of days of the machining process plan preparation period. 9 means, For example, processing steps planning apparatus in the individual production, characterized in that all products in the production in the whole plant to create a machining process plan aimed at the production completed by the respective manufacturing complete indication date.
JP25738184A 1984-12-07 1984-12-07 Machining process plan creation device for individual production Expired - Lifetime JPH06101005B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP25738184A JPH06101005B2 (en) 1984-12-07 1984-12-07 Machining process plan creation device for individual production

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP25738184A JPH06101005B2 (en) 1984-12-07 1984-12-07 Machining process plan creation device for individual production

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS61136161A JPS61136161A (en) 1986-06-24
JPH06101005B2 true JPH06101005B2 (en) 1994-12-12

Family

ID=17305595

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP25738184A Expired - Lifetime JPH06101005B2 (en) 1984-12-07 1984-12-07 Machining process plan creation device for individual production

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH06101005B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS6357159A (en) * 1986-08-28 1988-03-11 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Work sequence indication system
JPS63298665A (en) * 1987-05-29 1988-12-06 Kanebo Ltd Production planning device
US4887218A (en) * 1987-12-01 1989-12-12 International Business Machines Corporation Automated production release system
JPH02310703A (en) * 1989-05-26 1990-12-26 Chugoku Nippon Denki Software Kk Process managing device
JP2001338022A (en) * 2000-05-25 2001-12-07 Fuji Photo Film Co Ltd Print schedule planning method and print schedule planning system and print schedule planning program storage medium

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
「電子計算機ハンドブック」(株)オーム社,昭和41年5月25日発行,P.6−47〜6−59

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS61136161A (en) 1986-06-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JPH09153090A (en) Method and device for forming working process production plan
US4994980A (en) Automatic machining scheduling method based on an expert system
JPH06101005B2 (en) Machining process plan creation device for individual production
JPS58201105A (en) Process controlling system
JP2811827B2 (en) Production scheduling device
Yi et al. Network creation and development for repetitive-unit projects
JPH0373257A (en) Production scheduling device
JP4658525B2 (en) Production planning program
JP2002055710A (en) Process chart editing system
JPH01121155A (en) Production scheduling system
JP3334415B2 (en) Production control device
JPH07182420A (en) Production planning device
JPH02310703A (en) Process managing device
Arakawa et al. A Simulation‐based Production Scheduling Method for Minimizing the Due‐date‐deviation
JPH08221479A (en) Job shop plant scheduler
JP2527266B2 (en) Scheduling method in knowledge-based system
Ulgen Effects of job file and study parameters on the performance of a dynamic job shop.
Hyötyläinen et al. Constructing skill-based FMS–a new approach to design and implementation
Dimitrov et al. Master data extraction and adaptation based on collected production data in manufacturing execution systems
CN111027840A (en) Automatic scheduling method for teams and groups in garment factory
JP2953223B2 (en) Scheduling planning equipment
Steinberger Expert systems for minimum scope estimating in the process industries
CN117608244A (en) Construction method and system of structured numerical control program linked list
Schultz-Wild Work Design and Work Organization in Flexible Manufacturing Systems
JP2004126709A (en) Method and device for scheduling manufacturing process, and manufacturing method of product