JPH05346926A - Method and device for production planning - Google Patents

Method and device for production planning

Info

Publication number
JPH05346926A
JPH05346926A JP15459292A JP15459292A JPH05346926A JP H05346926 A JPH05346926 A JP H05346926A JP 15459292 A JP15459292 A JP 15459292A JP 15459292 A JP15459292 A JP 15459292A JP H05346926 A JPH05346926 A JP H05346926A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
recommended
rule
constraint condition
lot
placement
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP15459292A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Minoru Kono
稔 河野
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toshiba Corp
Original Assignee
Toshiba Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Toshiba Corp filed Critical Toshiba Corp
Priority to JP15459292A priority Critical patent/JPH05346926A/en
Publication of JPH05346926A publication Critical patent/JPH05346926A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/30Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing

Landscapes

  • General Factory Administration (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE:To obtain an optimum schedule result by making the arrangement of objects of planned arrangement meet inhibitory restriction conditions and recommendatory restriction conditions by using simple constitution and planning the arrangement of the objects of planned arrangement according to priority corresponding to the importance of the recommendatory restriction conditions. CONSTITUTION:This production planning device is provided with a file 2 which contains the inhibitory restriction conditions and recommendatory restriction conditions, an inference means 10 for an inhibition rule which finds the allocatable period of the objects of the planned arrangement according to the inhibitory restriction conditions and arranges the objects of planned arrangement in the increasing order of allocation tolerance obtained from the allocatable period. and an inference means 20 for a recommendation rule which sets priority for the recommendatory restriction conditions and corrects the arrangement on the basis of the arrangement of the objects of planned arrangement obtained by an inference means for inhibitory restrictions according to the priority of the recommendatory restriction conditions so that the conditions are satisfied.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、計画型エキスパートシ
ステムを用いて生産計画立案,ジョブショップスケジュ
ーリング等を作成するときに利用される生産計画作成方
法およびその作成装置に係わり、特に制約条件ルールの
制約内容を有効に生かしつつ最適なスケジュール結果を
得る生産計画作成方法およびその作成装置に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a production plan creating method and its creating apparatus used when creating a production plan, a job shop scheduling, etc. using a planning type expert system, and particularly to a constraint condition rule. The present invention relates to a production plan creating method and an creating apparatus for obtaining an optimum schedule result while effectively utilizing the constraint contents.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】従来、計画型エキスパートシステムを用
いて計画配置対象物,つまりロットの生産計画を立てる
ための配置をスケジューリングする場合、各ロットの着
手可能日と納期、前後工程との制約条件、関連する他の
ロットとの制約条件等々の禁止的制約条件を考慮しつつ
各ロットの割り付け可能期間を決定した後、割付余裕度
(割付可能期間と割付要求期間との比)の一番小さいも
のから順に割付可能範囲内で順次配置計画を立ててい
る。
2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, when scheduling an object to be planned and arranged, that is, an arrangement for making a production plan for a lot using a planning-type expert system, a startable date and delivery date of each lot, constraint conditions between preceding and following processes, The smallest allocation allowance (ratio between the allocatable period and the allotment required period) after deciding the allocatable period of each lot, while taking into account forbidden constraints such as constraints with other related lots. Starting with, the allocation plan is set up sequentially within the assignable range.

【0003】さらに、ロットの中には、計画期間内に配
置可能なエリアがあるにも拘らず、禁止的制約条件と配
置順序との関係から配置不可能な場合が出てくるが、こ
のときには一旦計画した他のロット配置を未配置状態に
し、割付可能期間の計算を再度実施し、当該未配置状態
にしたロットから順に再度配置を行い、全てのロットが
計画期間内に入るようにスケジューリングを行ってい
る。
Further, although there is an area in the lot that can be placed within the planning period, there are cases where the lot cannot be placed due to the relationship between the forbidden constraint condition and the placement order. Once the other planned lots are placed in the unassigned state, the allocatable period is calculated again, and the lots placed in the unassigned state are placed again in order, and scheduling is performed so that all lots fall within the planned period. Is going.

【0004】以下、具体例をもって説明すると、2台の
機械である1M/C,2M/Cに部品1,部品2,部品
3,部品4を配置して加工するとき、「計画期間内で同
時刻に同じ部品を割付けてはならない」という制約条件
があったとき、当該制約条件を考慮しつつ図3(a)に
示すような部品配置計画を立てれば、同時刻に同じ部品
が重なることはなく、以上のような制約条件を十分に満
足させることが可能である。
In the following, a concrete example will be explained. When arranging parts 1, parts 2, parts 3, and parts 4 on two machines, 1M / C and 2M / C, and processing them, "the same within the plan period If there is a constraint condition that "the same component should not be assigned at the same time", if the component placement plan as shown in Fig. 3A is made while considering the constraint condition, the same component will not overlap at the same time. However, it is possible to sufficiently satisfy the above constraint conditions.

【0005】[0005]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】従って、以上のような
生産計画作成方法は、各ロットが計画期間内に納めるこ
とを主目的とし、そのために制約条件は専ら禁止的制約
条件を満足させることが可能であるが、実際の生産計画
にあっては種々の要求があり、例えば「計画期間内で同
時刻に同じ部品を割付けてはならない」という制約条件
の他に、「各部品間において同じ型や色のものは出来る
だけ連続して配置するのが望ましい」という条件を要求
する場合もある。
Therefore, the above-mentioned production planning method has the main purpose of ensuring that each lot is delivered within the planning period. Therefore, the constraint condition may satisfy the prohibited constraint condition exclusively. Although it is possible, there are various requirements in the actual production plan. For example, in addition to the constraint condition that "the same parts should not be assigned at the same time within the planning period," In some cases, it is desirable to arrange the color and the color in a continuous manner as much as possible. "

【0006】しかし、従来の生産計画作成方法において
は、専ら禁止的制約条件を満足させるものであり、以上
述べた要望である「各部品間において同じ型や色のもの
は出来るだけ連続して配置するのが望ましい」という条
件を満足させることが難しく、その結果、満足したスケ
ジュールル結果を得ることが出来なかった。
However, in the conventional production planning method, the prohibitive constraint conditions are exclusively satisfied, and the above-mentioned request "the same mold or color is arranged continuously among the parts as much as possible". It was difficult to satisfy the condition that "it is desirable to do", and as a result, it was not possible to obtain a satisfactory scheduled result.

【0007】本発明は上記実情に鑑みてなされたもの
で、禁止的制約条件の他、推奨的制約条件を満足するよ
うに計画配置対象物を配置し、最適なスケジュール結果
を得る生産計画作成方法を提供することを目的とする。
The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and is a method for producing a production plan, in which planned placement objects are placed so as to satisfy the recommended constraint conditions in addition to the forbidden constraint conditions and obtain an optimum schedule result. The purpose is to provide.

【0008】また、本発明の他の目的は、計画配置対象
物の配置について簡単な構成を用いて禁止的制約条件と
推奨的制約条件とを満足させ得、かつ、推奨的制約条件
の重要度に応じた優先度に従って計画配置対象物の配置
を立てることにより、最適なスケジュール結果を得る生
産計画作成装置を提供することにある。
Another object of the present invention is to satisfy the forbidden constraint condition and the recommended constraint condition by using a simple configuration for the arrangement of the planned layout object, and the importance level of the recommended constraint condition. The object of the present invention is to provide a production plan creation device that obtains an optimum schedule result by arranging the objects to be planned and arranged according to the priority according to.

【0009】[0009]

【課題を解決するための手段】請求項1に対応する発明
は、上記課題を解決するために、生産計画を定める制約
条件ルールを禁止的制約条件と推奨的制約条件とに分
け、計画配置対象物が前記禁止的制約条件を満足するよ
うに配置した後、この配置結果をもとに前記推奨的制約
条件を満足するように前記計画配置対象物の配置修正を
行う生産計画作成方法である。
In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the invention according to claim 1 divides a constraint condition rule for defining a production plan into a prohibition constraint condition and a recommended constraint condition, and a plan arrangement target. In the production plan creating method, the objects are arranged so as to satisfy the prohibition constraint condition, and then the arrangement of the planned arrangement object is corrected so as to satisfy the recommended constraint condition based on the arrangement result.

【0010】請求項2に対応する発明は、生産計画を定
める制約条件ルールを禁止的制約条件と推奨的制約条件
とに分けて記憶するルールデータベースファイルと、前
記禁止的制約条件に基づいて計画配置対象物の割付可能
期間を求めるとともに、この割付可能期間を用いて得ら
れた割付余裕度の小さい順番に前記計画配置対象物を順
次配置する禁止ルール用推論手段と、前記推奨的制約条
件に優先度を設定し、前記禁止ルール用推論手段によっ
て得られた前記計画配置対象物の配置をもとに前記推奨
的制約条件の優先度順に従って満足するように前記計画
配置対象物の配置修正を行う推奨ルール用推論手段とを
設けた生産計画作成装置である。
According to the second aspect of the invention, a rule database file for storing a constraint condition rule defining a production plan by dividing it into forbidden constraint conditions and recommended constraint conditions, and a plan arrangement based on the forbidden constraint conditions. In addition to determining the allocatable period of the target object, the inference means for the prohibition rule that sequentially arranges the planned allocation target objects in the order of the allocation margin obtained using this allocatable period and the recommended constraint condition are given priority. Degree is set, and based on the placement of the planned placement object obtained by the prohibition rule inference means, the placement of the planned placement object is corrected so as to be satisfied in accordance with the priority order of the recommended constraint conditions. This is a production plan creation device provided with inference means for recommended rules.

【0011】[0011]

【作用】従って、請求項1に対応する発明は以上のよう
な手段を講じたことにより、計画配置対象物について禁
止的制約条件を満足させることにより計画期間内に適切
に配置できるものの、同時に作業能率その他の条件を考
慮しつつ推奨的制約条件を満足させるようにすれば同時
に望ましい配置計画を構築でき、最適なスケジュールを
立てることができる。
Therefore, in the invention corresponding to claim 1, by taking the above-mentioned means, it is possible to appropriately arrange the objects within the planning period by satisfying the forbidden constraint condition for the objects to be planned, but at the same time, the work can be performed simultaneously. If the recommended constraints are satisfied while considering the efficiency and other conditions, a desirable placement plan can be constructed at the same time, and an optimal schedule can be established.

【0012】次に、請求項2に対応する発明は、一定の
禁止的制約条件の下に計画配置対象物の割付可能期間、
さらに割付可能期間から割付余裕度を求めた後、割付余
裕度の小さい順番から配置するので、計画配置対象物を
計画期間内に適正に配置させることができる。しかも、
禁止的制約条件を満足するように得られた計画配置対象
物の配置をもとに、前記推奨的制約条件の優先度順をで
きるだけ満足するように配置修正を加えるので、ユーザ
の要望を十分に満足できる配置計画を立てることができ
る。
[0012] Next, the invention according to claim 2 is, for a period during which the allocation object of the planned arrangement can be allocated under a certain forbidden constraint condition,
Further, after the allocation allowance is calculated from the allocatable period, the allocation targets are arranged in the ascending order of the allocation allowance, so that the planned arrangement target objects can be properly arranged within the planning period. Moreover,
Based on the placement of the planned placement objects that have been obtained so as to satisfy the forbidden constraint conditions, the layout modification is performed so as to satisfy the priority order of the recommended constraint conditions as much as possible, so that the user's request is sufficiently satisfied. Can make a satisfactory placement plan.

【0013】[0013]

【実施例】以下、本発明方法の一実施例について説明す
る。
EXAMPLE An example of the method of the present invention will be described below.

【0014】通常、計画型エキスパ−トシステムを用い
て各ロットの割付を行う場合、各ロットについて制約条
件ルールを適用しながら割付を行うが、このスケジュー
リング時の制約条件ルールとして禁止的制約条件と推奨
的制約条件が存在する計画問題については、禁止的制約
条件と推奨的制約条件とに分け、禁止的制約条件を満足
する推論を実行してロットの配置を決定し、しかる後、
このロット配置をもとに、推奨的制約条件を考慮しつつ
配置を修正するものある。ここで、禁止的制約条件とは
例えば各ロットの着手可能日と納期、前後工程との制約
条件、関連する他のロットとの制約条件その他種々の禁
止すべきルールであって、主として各ロットが計画期間
内に入るように配置するためのルールを意味する。
Usually, when allocating each lot using the planned type export system, allocation is performed while applying the constraint condition rule to each lot. For planning problems that have recommended constraints, divide them into forbidden constraints and recommended constraints, execute inference that satisfies the forbidden constraints, and determine lot placement.
Based on this lot allocation, the allocation is modified while considering the recommended constraint conditions. Here, the prohibitive constraint conditions are, for example, the startable date and delivery date of each lot, the constraint conditions with the preceding and following processes, the constraint conditions with other related lots, and various other rules to be prohibited, and each lot is mainly prohibited. It means a rule to arrange so that it enters within the planning period.

【0015】一方、推奨的制約条件ルールとは、作業能
率,作業環境等の観点から極力「こうした方が望まし
い」という場合に定めるルールであって、ユーザの意向
を十分に生かしつつ各ロットについて配置するルールを
意味する。従って、この推奨的制約条件の場合にはユー
ザの要望をとりいれて優先度に設定し適用することが可
能である。このとき、推奨的制約条件に優先度を持たせ
れば、その優先度順に従って可能な限り満足する順序に
従って推論し、ロットの割付を行うことになる。
On the other hand, the recommended constraint condition rule is a rule determined when "this is preferable" from the viewpoint of work efficiency, work environment, etc., and is arranged for each lot while fully utilizing the user's intention. Means the rule to do. Therefore, in the case of this recommended constraint condition, it is possible to set the priority by applying the user's request and apply it. At this time, if the recommended constraints are given priority, lots will be assigned according to the order of priority and the inference is made.

【0016】従って、以上のような実施例の方法によれ
ば、各ロットについて禁止的制約条件を満足させた後、
推奨的制約条件を満足させるべき優先度順に推論を実行
しながら配置するので、同時に両方の制約条件を満足さ
せることが可能であり、ユーザの種々の要望を入れなが
ら生産計画を立てることが可能である。次に、本発明に
係わる生産計画作成装置の実施例について図面を参照し
て説明する。
Therefore, according to the method of the above embodiment, after satisfying the prohibition constraint condition for each lot,
Since it is arranged while executing inference in the order of priority that should satisfy the recommended constraint conditions, it is possible to satisfy both constraint conditions at the same time, and it is possible to make a production plan while incorporating various user requests. is there. Next, an embodiment of the production plan creating apparatus according to the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

【0017】図1は本発明装置の一実施例を示す機能ブ
ロック図である。この装置は、生産計画のスケジュール
を組むために必要な各ロット情報例えば着手可能日,納
期,ロットNO等が格納されている入力データファイル
1と、エキスパートシステムの推論方法を適用させるた
めの禁止的制約条件ルールと推奨的制約条件ルールとが
格納されるルールデータベースファイル2と、入力デー
タファイル1に格納されているロット情報についてルー
ルデータベースファイル2のルールを適用して推論を実
行して各ロットの配置計画を作成する推論部とで構成さ
れている。
FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram showing an embodiment of the device of the present invention. This device has an input data file 1 in which each lot information necessary for making a schedule of a production plan, such as an available start date, a delivery date, and a lot number, is stored, and a prohibition constraint for applying an inference method of an expert system. The rule database file 2 in which the condition rules and the recommended constraint condition rules are stored, and the rules in the rule database file 2 are applied to the lot information stored in the input data file 1 to perform inference to arrange each lot. It consists of an inference section that creates a plan.

【0018】この推論部は、制約条件のうち禁止的制約
条件のもとに推論を実行する禁止ルール用推論手段10
と推奨的制約条件のもとに推論を実行する推奨ルール用
推論手段20とに分けられている。
The inference unit executes the inference based on the prohibition constraint condition among the constraint conditions, and the inference means 10 for the prohibition rule.
And recommended rule inference means 20 for executing inference under recommended constraint conditions.

【0019】そのうち、禁止ルール用推論手段10は、
各ファイル1,2から生産計画上必要な全部のロット情
報と少なくとも禁止的制約条件ルールとを読込んでワー
キングメモリ(図示せず)等に記憶するデータ読込み手
段11、このデータ読込み手段11で読込んだロット情
報の中から各配置対象ロットごとにロット着手可能日,
納期,前後のロットに関する制約条件、関連する他のロ
ットとの制約条件等の禁止的制約条件を考慮しつつロッ
ト単位の割付可能期間を決定する割付可能期間決定手段
12、割付可能期間と割付要求期間との比から割付余裕
度を求めるとともに、この割付余裕度と各ロットのもつ
配置その他の優先度とを考慮しつつロットの仮割付順を
決定する割付順決定手段13が設けられている。
The prohibition rule inference means 10 is
Data reading means 11 for reading all lot information necessary for production planning and at least prohibitive constraint condition rules from each of the files 1 and 2 and storing them in a working memory (not shown). From the lot information, lot start date for each placement target lot,
Allocatable period determining means 12 for deciding the allocatable period for each lot while taking into account forbidden constraint conditions such as delivery date, constraint conditions relating to lots before and after, and constraint conditions with other related lots, allocatable period and allocatable request Allocation order determination means 13 is provided for determining the allocation allowance from the ratio with the period and for determining the temporary allocation order of the lots in consideration of the allocation allowance and the priority of each lot and the other priorities.

【0020】また、この割付順決定手段13によって割
付順に仮割付けされたロットが実際に割付可能か否か,
つまり再割付けが必要か否かを判定する再配置判定手段
14、この再配置判定手段14において再割付けが必要
なしと判定したとき割付候補選択,つまり仮割付された
ロット情報を選択して時系的にバッフアメモリに格納す
る割付候補選択手段15、再割付けが必要であると判定
したとき、当該再割付ロット情報に基づいて既に仮割付
されたロット情報の中から再割付けすべきロット情報を
選択する再割付候補選択手段16、これら選択手段1
5,16で選択された割付候補として上がったロット情
報を用いて本割付けし、ここで割付け不可能な場合には
再度割付可能期間決定手段12に送り、割付けが完了し
た場合にはロット配置ファイル17に割付する割付手段
18等が設けられている。なお、割付け不可能な場合、
割付順決定手段13にて優先度を変えるなどして再度仮
の割付順を決定する。
Whether the lots provisionally allocated in the allocation order by the allocation order determining means 13 can be actually allocated,
That is, the reallocation determining means 14 for determining whether or not the reallocation is necessary, and when the reallocation determining means 14 determines that the reallocation is not necessary, the allocation candidate is selected, that is, the temporarily allocated lot information is selected and the time series is selected. When it is determined that reassignment is necessary, the allocation candidate selection means 15 that is stored in the buffer memory, selects lot information to be reassigned from the lot information that has already been provisionally assigned based on the reassigned lot information. Reassignment candidate selection means 16 and these selection means 1
The real allocation is performed using the lot information selected as the allocation candidates selected in 5 and 16, and if the allocation is impossible here, the allocation is again sent to the allocation possible period determining means 12, and when the allocation is completed, the lot allocation file Allocation means 18 for allocating to 17 is provided. If assignment is not possible,
The temporary allocation order is determined again by changing the priority by the allocation order determination means 13.

【0021】一方、推奨ルール用推論手段20において
は、ロット配置ファイル17の配置結果と推奨的制約条
件ルールとを読込むデータ読込み手段21、ロット配置
ファイル17の配置結果である割付可能ロットについて
優先度の高い推奨的制約条件ルールから順次推論を実行
して配置を決定する推奨的ルール配置手段22、この配
置手段22によって決定された配置に従ってロット配置
ファイル17に割付けする割付手段23が設けられてい
る。次に、以上のように構成された装置の動作について
図2を参照しながら説明する。
On the other hand, in the recommended rule inference means 20, the data reading means 21 for reading the placement result of the lot placement file 17 and the recommended constraint condition rule, and the assignable lot which is the placement result of the lot placement file 17 has priority. Recommended rule placement means 22 for sequentially performing inference from highly recommended recommendation rule rules to determine placement, and assignment means 23 for assigning to the lot placement file 17 according to the placement determined by this placement means 22 are provided. There is. Next, the operation of the apparatus configured as described above will be described with reference to FIG.

【0022】先ず、禁止ルール用推論手段10における
データ読込み手段11は、各ファイル1,2から全部の
ロット情報や禁止的制約条件ルールなどのデータを取り
込んで図示されていないが計算機上のワーキングメモリ
にセットする(ST1)。しかる後、割込可能期間決定
手段12では、ロット情報の中から配置対象ロットにつ
いて着手可能日,納期の他、前後のロットに関する制約
条件や他のロットの関係する制約条件等の禁止的制約条
件ルールを適用しながらロット単位ごとの割付可能期間
を決定する(ST2)。つまり、この割付可能期間の決
定は、個別的にはそのロットの着手可能日,納期から一
義的に決定できるが、ここでは全ロット情報を総合的に
判断しながら決定する。
First, the data reading means 11 in the prohibition rule inference means 10 fetches data such as all lot information and prohibition constraint rule from each of the files 1 and 2, but a working memory on a computer, though not shown. (ST1). Thereafter, the interruptable period determination means 12 prohibits constraint conditions such as the possible date to start the placement target lot from the lot information, the delivery date, the constraint conditions for the preceding and subsequent lots, and the constraint conditions related to other lots. The applicable period for each lot is determined while applying the rule (ST2). In other words, the allocatable period can be individually determined uniquely from the date when the lot can be started and the delivery date, but here, the allot information is comprehensively determined.

【0023】その後、割付順決定手段13にてどのロッ
トから先に配置するかの仮割付順を決定する。つまり、
ロット単位の割付要求期間(リードタイム)と割付可能
期間との比(割付余裕度)と、ロット毎にもっている配
置優先度とを考慮しながら仮のロット配置順を決定する
(ST3)。
After that, the allocation order determining means 13 determines the temporary allocation order of which lot is to be arranged first. That is,
The provisional lot placement order is determined in consideration of the ratio (assignment allowance) of the assignment request period (lead time) and the assignable period for each lot and the placement priority of each lot (ST3).

【0024】しかして、以上のようにして仮のロット配
置順序を決定したならば、再配置判定手段14では、そ
の決定された仮のロット配置順序が実際の割付けの際に
適切に割付け可能か否かを判定する(ST4)。ここ
で、割付可能と判定したとき、割付候補選択手段15に
て仮割付されたロット情報を選択して時系的にバッフア
メモリに格納する(ST5)。逆に割付不能と判定した
とき、再割付候補選択手段16では、当該再割付ロット
情報に基づいて既に仮割付されたロット情報の中から再
割付けすべきロット情報(交換ロット情報または割込み
ロット情報)を選択する(ST6)。
If the tentative lot placement order is determined as described above, the relocation determining means 14 can appropriately assign the determined tentative lot placement order in the actual assignment. It is determined whether or not (ST4). When it is determined that the allocation is possible, the allocation candidate selection means 15 selects the temporarily allocated lot information and temporally stores it in the buffer memory (ST5). On the contrary, when it is determined that allocation is impossible, the re-allocation candidate selection means 16 selects lot information (replacement lot information or interrupt lot information) to be re-allocated from the lot information that has already been provisionally allocated based on the re-allocation lot information. Is selected (ST6).

【0025】ここで、割付手段18は、選択手段15,
16で選択された割付候補のロット情報を用いて本割付
けをし、ここで割付け不可能な場合には再度割付可能期
間決定手段12に送り、一方、割付けが完了した場合に
はロット配置ファイル17の配置エリアに割付けする
(ST7)。しかる後、全ロットの配置が終了したか否
かを判定し(ST8)、終了していなければST2に戻
って同様の処理を繰り返し実行する。
Here, the allocating means 18 comprises the selecting means 15,
The real allocation is performed using the lot information of the allocation candidate selected in 16, and if the allocation is not possible, the allocation is again sent to the allocatable period determining means 12. On the other hand, when the allocation is completed, the lot allocation file 17 Are allocated to the arrangement area (ST7). Then, it is determined whether or not the arrangement of all lots is completed (ST8), and if not completed, the process returns to ST2 and the same process is repeatedly executed.

【0026】従って、以上のような禁止ルール用推論手
段10を用いて部品1から部品4を2台の機械1M/
C、2M/Cに配置しようとした場合、禁止的制約条件
として、「1M/Cと2M/Cに同時に同じ部品を割付
けてはならない」というルールが適用されているので、
図3(a)のようなロット配置で割付けることになる。
何んとなれば、各機械の間には同時に同じ部品が割付ら
れておらず、しかも各部品とも工程1終了後に工程2が
連続して割付けられており、禁止的制約条件を十分に満
足しているためである。
Therefore, by using the prohibition rule inference means 10 as described above, the parts 1 to 4 are connected to two machines 1M /
When arranging C and 2M / C, the rule that "the same component cannot be assigned to 1M / C and 2M / C at the same time" is applied as a prohibitive constraint condition.
The lots will be allocated in a lot arrangement as shown in FIG.
What happens is that the same parts are not assigned to each machine at the same time, and step 2 is assigned to each part in succession after the end of step 1, which satisfies the prohibitive constraint conditions sufficiently. This is because

【0027】しかし、このような部品配置の場合、各部
品1〜4にはそれぞれ製品情報(型,色)をもっている
が、この製品情報相互間において「各部品の中で同じ
型,色の部品はできるだけ連続して配置することが望ま
しい」という推奨的制約条件を有すると考えたとき、禁
止的制約条件のみでは満足されないことになる。なぜな
らば、型が連続していないためである。
However, in the case of such a component arrangement, each of the components 1 to 4 has product information (model, color). It is desirable to arrange the elements as consecutively as possible. ”Therefore, the prohibitive constraint condition alone cannot be satisfied. This is because the molds are not continuous.

【0028】そこで、本発明装置では、推奨ルール用推
論手段20を設け、できる限り推奨的制約条件を満足す
るように図2のステップST9以降の処理を行うことに
ある。
Therefore, the device of the present invention is provided with the inference means 20 for the recommended rule and performs the processing after step ST9 in FIG. 2 so as to satisfy the recommended constraint condition as much as possible.

【0029】すなわち、ステップST9においてロット
配置ファイル17のロット配置データとルールデータベ
ースファイル2の推奨的制約条件ルールとを読込んだ
後、この推奨的制約条件ルールの優先度に従って割付可
能ロットの選択を行う(ST10)。そして、選択され
た割付可能ロットはロット配置ファイル17その他のメ
モリの配置エリアに仮に配置する(ST11)。
That is, after reading the lot arrangement data of the lot arrangement file 17 and the recommended constraint condition rule of the rule database file 2 in step ST9, the assignable lot is selected according to the priority of this recommended constraint condition rule. Perform (ST10). Then, the selected allocatable lot is provisionally placed in the lot placement file 17 and other placement areas of the memory (ST11).

【0030】しかる後、ステップST12において仮配
置した割付可能ロットがより優先度の高い前回の推奨ル
ールを満足しているか否かを判定し、満足している場合
にはその仮配置を正しい配置と判断し、仮配置から本配
置エリアに移す(ST13)。ここで、前回の推奨ルー
ルを満たしていない場合、本配置処理をスキップする。
更に、次のステップST14において全ロットについて
推奨ルールによる配置が行われたか否かを判断し(ST
14)、未だロットが残っている場合にはステップST
10に戻って同様の処理を繰り返し実行し、一方、全ロ
ットにおける推奨ルールの配置判定が行われている場合
には終了する。その結果、この時点において本配置エリ
アに格納されているのが、最終スケジュール結果とな
る。
Thereafter, in step ST12, it is determined whether or not the allocatable lot temporarily allocated is satisfied with the previous recommended rule of higher priority, and if it is satisfied, the temporary allocation is regarded as the correct arrangement. It is determined and the temporary placement is moved to the main placement area (ST13). Here, if the previous recommended rule is not satisfied, this placement process is skipped.
Further, in the next step ST14, it is determined whether or not the placement according to the recommended rule has been performed for all lots (ST
14) If there are still lots left, step ST
The procedure returns to 10 and the same processing is repeatedly executed. On the other hand, when the placement determination of the recommended rules for all lots is performed, the processing ends. As a result, the final schedule result is stored in the main arrangement area at this point.

【0031】従って、推奨ルール用推論手段20では、
禁止的制約条件を満足するような配置結果を得た後、こ
の配置結果について推奨ルールの優先度に従ってルール
適用を行って割付可能ロットの選択を行いつつ推奨的制
約条件を満足するようにしたので、推奨的制約条件とし
て例えば「各部品で同じ製品情報のものはできるだけ連
続させる」というルールに対し、第1優先度として“型
A”(部品1−1,部品3−1)、“型B”(部品4−
1,部品2−1)を連続させ、次の優先度として“色
赤”(部品3−1,部品4−1)を連続させる配置を行
うことにより、図3(b)のような配置構成とすること
ができる。なお、“色白”については、連続させると他
の条件(型または色)が崩れて優先度の高い推奨的制約
条件を満足させることが出来なくなるので、連続させら
れないことになる。
Therefore, in the recommended rule inference means 20,
After obtaining the placement result that satisfies the prohibition constraint condition, the rule is applied to this placement result according to the priority of the recommended rule to select the assignable lots and satisfy the recommended constraint condition. As a recommended constraint condition, for example, a rule that “each part has the same product information as consecutive as possible” is used, the first priority is “type A” (part 1-1, part 3-1), and “type B”. "(Part 4-
1, the component 2-1) is made continuous, and as the next priority, “color red” (component 3-1 and component 4-1) is made continuous so that the arrangement configuration as shown in FIG. Can be It should be noted that the “color white” cannot be made continuous because other conditions (type or color) are destroyed when it is made continuous and the recommended constraint condition having a high priority cannot be satisfied.

【0032】従って、以上のような実施例の構成によれ
ば、制約条件ルールを禁止的制約条件と推奨的制約条件
とに分けてファイルに格納する一方、推論部を禁止ルー
ル用推論手段10と推奨ルール用推論手段20とに分け
る。そして、禁止ルール用推論手段10では、各種の禁
止的制約条件を考慮しつつロット単位で割付可能期間を
計算し、割付余裕度を求める。そして、この割付余裕度
とロット上の配置優先度とを考えながら各ロットを割付
けていくが、この状態では期間的な計画を満たす可能性
があるが、推奨的制約条件を満足することが難しい。
Therefore, according to the configuration of the above-described embodiment, the constraint condition rule is divided into the prohibited constraint condition and the recommended constraint condition and stored in the file, while the inference unit is used as the forbidden rule inference means 10. It is divided into the recommended rule inference means 20. Then, the prohibition rule inference means 10 calculates the allocatable period in lot units while taking into consideration various forbidden constraint conditions, and obtains the allocation allowance. Then, each lot is allocated while considering the allocation allowance and the allocation priority on the lot. In this state, there is a possibility that the temporal plan will be satisfied, but it is difficult to satisfy the recommended constraint conditions. ..

【0033】そこで、優先度をもつ推奨的制約条件を設
け、その優先度順に望ましい配置で割付けを行うことに
より、ユーザの要求を十分に満足させることができ、ひ
いては作業能率や作業環境等を十分に配慮した生産計画
を立てることが可能となる。また、禁止的制約条件の配
置結果を踏まえつつ推奨的制約条件を適用するが、各推
論手段10,20は個別にルールを用いて推論を実行す
るので、非常に簡単なプログラムを用いて良好な配置結
果を得ることができる。
Therefore, by providing a recommended constraint condition having a priority and allocating in a desirable arrangement in the order of the priority, it is possible to sufficiently satisfy the user's request, and, by extension, work efficiency and work environment are sufficient. It is possible to make a production plan that takes into consideration. Further, although the recommended constraint conditions are applied based on the placement result of the forbidden constraint conditions, each inference means 10 and 20 individually perform inference using rules, so that a very simple program can be used to achieve good results. The placement result can be obtained.

【0034】なお、上記実施例では、各ロットの生産計
画に際し、禁止ルール用推論手段10では主として計画
期間内に納まるように禁止的制約条件を適用してロット
配置を考え、一方、推奨ルール用推論手段20では、以
上の配置結果を踏まえつつ可能なかぎり望ましい優先度
順の推奨的制約条件を適用してロットの配置を行うよう
にしたが、同様の考えは他の種々の生産計画に有効に利
用できるものである。また、推奨的制約条件には優先度
を設けずに適用してもよい。その他、本発明はその要旨
を逸脱しない範囲で種々変形して実施できる。
In the above embodiment, in the production planning of each lot, the prohibition rule inference means 10 considers the lot arrangement by applying the prohibition constraint condition so that the inferencing means 10 mainly falls within the plan period. In the inference means 20, the lot allocation is performed by applying the recommended constraint conditions in the preferred priority order as much as possible in consideration of the above allocation result, but the same idea is effective for other various production plans. It can be used for. Further, the recommended constraint condition may be applied without setting the priority. Besides, the present invention can be variously modified and implemented without departing from the scope of the invention.

【0035】[0035]

【発明の効果】以上説明したように本発明によれば、次
のような種々の効果を奏する。
As described above, according to the present invention, the following various effects are exhibited.

【0036】先ず、請求項1の発明は、禁止的制約条件
の他、推奨的制約条件を満足するように計画配置対象物
を配置でき、柔軟、かつ、最適なスケジュール結果を得
ることができる。
First, according to the invention of claim 1, the planned placement object can be placed so as to satisfy the recommended constraint condition in addition to the prohibited constraint condition, and the flexible and optimum schedule result can be obtained.

【0037】請求項2の発明は、計画配置対象物の配置
について簡単な構成を用いて禁止的制約条件と推奨的制
約条件とを十分に満足させることが可能であり、しかも
推奨的制約条件の重要度に応じた優先度に従って計画配
置対象物の配置計画を立てることにより、最適なスケジ
ュール結果を実現できる。
According to the second aspect of the present invention, it is possible to sufficiently satisfy both the forbidden constraint condition and the recommended constraint condition by using a simple structure for the layout of the planned layout object, and the recommended constraint condition is satisfied. An optimal schedule result can be realized by making a placement plan of planned placement objects according to the priority according to the importance.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

【図1】 本発明に係わる生産計画作成装置の一実施例
を示す機能ブロック図。
FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram showing an embodiment of a production plan creation device according to the present invention.

【図2】 図1の装置の動作を説明するフローチャー
ト。
FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating the operation of the apparatus shown in FIG.

【図3】 本発明装置を用いた時のロット配置の一例を
示す図。
FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of lot arrangement when the device of the present invention is used.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1…入力データファイル、2…ルールデーベースファイ
ル、10…禁止ルール用推論手段、12…割付可能期間
決定手段、13…割付順決定手段、14…再配置判定手
段、15…割付候補選択手段、16…再割付候補選択手
段、17…ロット配置ファイル、20…推奨ルール用推
論手段、22…推奨的ルール配置手段、23…割付手
段。
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Input data file, 2 ... Rule database file, 10 ... Prohibition rule inference means, 12 ... Allocation period determination means, 13 ... Allocation order determination means, 14 ... Relocation determination means, 15 ... Allocation candidate selection means, 16 ... Reassignment candidate selection means, 17 ... Lot placement file, 20 ... Recommended rule inference means, 22 ... Recommended rule placement means, 23 ... Allocation means.

Claims (2)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 生産計画を定める制約条件ルールを禁止
的制約条件と推奨的制約条件とに分け、計画配置対象物
が前記禁止的制約条件を満足するように配置した後、こ
の配置結果をもとに前記推奨的制約条件を満足するよう
に前記計画配置対象物の配置修正を行うことを特徴とす
る生産計画作成方法。
1. A constraint condition rule that defines a production plan is divided into a prohibition constraint condition and a recommended constraint condition, and the objects to be planned are arranged so as to satisfy the prohibition constraint condition. In addition, the production plan creation method is characterized in that the layout of the planned layout object is corrected so as to satisfy the recommended constraint condition.
【請求項2】 生産計画を定める制約条件ルールを禁止
的制約条件と推奨的制約条件とに分けて記憶するルール
データベースファイルと、 前記禁止的制約条件に基づいて計画配置対象物の割付可
能期間を求めるとともに、この割付可能期間を用いて得
られた割付余裕度の小さい順番に前記計画配置対象物を
順次配置する禁止ルール用推論手段と、 前記推奨的制約条件に優先度を設定し、前記禁止制約用
推論手段によって得られた前記計画配置対象物の配置を
もとに前記推奨的制約条件の優先度順に従って満足する
ように前記計画配置対象物の配置修正を行う推奨ルール
用推論手段とを備えたことを特徴とする生産計画作成装
置。
2. A rule database file for storing constraint conditions rules for defining a production plan, which are divided into forbidden constraint conditions and recommended constraint conditions, and an allocatable period of a plan placement target object based on the prohibited constraint conditions. The inference means for the prohibition rule that sequentially obtains the planned placement objects in the ascending order of allocation allowance obtained using this allocatable period, and sets the priority for the recommended constraint condition A recommended rule inference means for modifying the layout of the planned placement objects so as to be satisfied in accordance with the priority order of the recommended constraint conditions based on the placement of the planned placement objects obtained by the constraint reasoning means. A production planning device characterized by being provided.
JP15459292A 1992-06-15 1992-06-15 Method and device for production planning Pending JPH05346926A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP15459292A JPH05346926A (en) 1992-06-15 1992-06-15 Method and device for production planning

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP15459292A JPH05346926A (en) 1992-06-15 1992-06-15 Method and device for production planning

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH05346926A true JPH05346926A (en) 1993-12-27

Family

ID=15587564

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP15459292A Pending JPH05346926A (en) 1992-06-15 1992-06-15 Method and device for production planning

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH05346926A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH10291143A (en) * 1997-04-21 1998-11-04 Calsonic Corp Optimization system for production plan
JP2005148940A (en) * 2003-11-12 2005-06-09 Kawasaki Microelectronics Kk Scheduling device

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH10291143A (en) * 1997-04-21 1998-11-04 Calsonic Corp Optimization system for production plan
JP2005148940A (en) * 2003-11-12 2005-06-09 Kawasaki Microelectronics Kk Scheduling device

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4896269A (en) Job shop scheduling and production method and apparatus
JPH03116237A (en) Knowledge processing method
JP2001034324A (en) Method and device for preparing schedule for repeated production line and recording medium with repeated production line schedule preparing program recorded thereon
JPH05346926A (en) Method and device for production planning
JPH06203037A (en) Device and method for devising production planning
JPH11232332A (en) Method for operating scheduling in production line
JPH0425350A (en) Preparation device for schedule of production process
JP2000040099A (en) Device and method for preparing schedule, selecting method for job and recording medium recording software of schedule preparation
JP2705649B2 (en) Work assignment method
JP2000079542A (en) Production plan forming system
JP2005182685A (en) Production planning method and program
JPH09282373A (en) Schedule control method
JP3114149B2 (en) Schedule automatic creation processing method
JP2002073142A (en) Production schedule generating device and recording medium with recorded production schedule generating program of production schedule generating device
JPH11353365A (en) Method and device for managing process
JPH06282446A (en) Job schedule generating method
JPH07244692A (en) Method and device for production process scheduling
JP2000067111A (en) Scheduling device and ordered production planning system
JPH0991353A (en) Device and method for production planning
JPH08157072A (en) Cargo handling plan preparing device
JP2023173748A (en) Production planning method
JP7082530B2 (en) Scheduling device, scheduling method and program
JP3102422B2 (en) Production planning system, production planning method, and recording medium recording production planning program
JP2709010B2 (en) Reasoning method for scheduling
JPH0728892A (en) Method and device for generating schedule