JPH04256853A - Strength testing method after reaction of coke - Google Patents

Strength testing method after reaction of coke

Info

Publication number
JPH04256853A
JPH04256853A JP1865291A JP1865291A JPH04256853A JP H04256853 A JPH04256853 A JP H04256853A JP 1865291 A JP1865291 A JP 1865291A JP 1865291 A JP1865291 A JP 1865291A JP H04256853 A JPH04256853 A JP H04256853A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
coke
sample
test
reaction
strength
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
JP1865291A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Takashi Arima
孝 有馬
Toru Nishi
徹 西
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Priority to JP1865291A priority Critical patent/JPH04256853A/en
Publication of JPH04256853A publication Critical patent/JPH04256853A/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE:To obtain the strength testing method after the reaction of coke characterized by high testing accuracy and high representativeness of a sample under test. CONSTITUTION:The testing accuracy can be improved by setting the particle size of a sample under test at 15mm or less and/or shortening the reaction time to less than 2 hours and more than 0.5 hour. When the amount of the sample of lump coke is set at 20kg or less, the testing accuracy can be further improved. When the range of the particle size of the sample under test us set at 3mm or more, the yield of the samples is improved, and the representativeness of the sample under test can be enhanced.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】[Detailed description of the invention]

【0001】0001

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、冶金用コークスの品質
管理指数のひとつである反応後強度の試験方法に関する
ものである。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method for testing post-reaction strength, which is one of the quality control indices for metallurgical coke.

【0002】0002

【従来の技術】冶金用コークスの反応後強度の試験方法
としては、特公昭49−16165号公報および燃料協
会発行のコークス・サーキュラー第23巻第2号82頁
〜87頁(昭和49年発行)に記載されている方法があ
る。この試験方法は、■サンプリングされた塊コークス
を縮分して10kgの試料を得、■この10kgの試料
を粉砕・篩分して19〜21mmの試料を得、■この1
9〜21mmの試料を200gに縮分して供試試料とし
、■この供試試料を二酸化炭素ガスと2時間反応させた
後強度を測定する、という4工程からなっている。
[Prior Art] Methods for testing the post-reaction strength of metallurgical coke include Japanese Patent Publication No. 16165/1972 and Coke Circular, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 82-87 (published in 1972) published by Japan Fuel Association. There is a method described in This test method consists of: (1) reducing the sampled lump coke to obtain a 10 kg sample; (2) crushing and sieving this 10 kg sample to obtain a 19-21 mm sample;
The process consists of four steps: a sample of 9 to 21 mm is reduced to 200 g to prepare a test sample, and (1) this test sample is reacted with carbon dioxide gas for 2 hours, and then the strength is measured.

【0003】この方法により測定されるコークスの反応
後強度は、我国のみならず諸外国においても、重要なコ
ークスの品質管理指数のひとつとして広く用いられてい
る。
The post-reaction strength of coke measured by this method is widely used as one of the important coke quality control indices not only in Japan but also in other countries.

【0004】0004

【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかし、この方法はコ
ークスの冷間強度などの他の品質管理指数と比べると試
験のばらつきがやや大きく、試験精度の一層の向上が望
まれる。
[Problems to be Solved by the Invention] However, compared to other quality control indices such as the cold strength of coke, this method has somewhat larger test variations, and further improvement in test accuracy is desired.

【0005】また、この方法では、サンプリングされた
塊コークスを粉砕・篩分して19〜21mmの粒度範囲
のコークスを得、これを試験に用いているが、19〜2
1mmの粒度範囲のコークスの収率が15〜20%と低
いため、この試料が元の塊コークス全体の品質を代表し
ているかどうかという代表性がやや低いという問題があ
る。
In addition, in this method, the sampled lump coke is crushed and sieved to obtain coke with a particle size range of 19 to 21 mm, which is used in the test.
Since the yield of coke in the 1 mm particle size range is low at 15-20%, there is a problem that the representativeness of this sample is rather low as to whether it is representative of the quality of the original lump coke as a whole.

【0006】[0006]

【問題点を解決するための手段、作用】本発明は、コー
クスの反応後強度の試験精度を改善するために、供試粒
度の平均値を15mm以下とし、および/または反応時
間2時間未満0.5時間以上とする方法を採用する。ま
た、さらに試験精度を改善するために、20kg以上の
塊コークスを粉砕・篩分け・縮分して供試試料を得る方
法を採用する。
[Means and effects for solving the problem] In order to improve the accuracy of testing the strength of coke after reaction, the present invention sets the average value of the sample particle size to 15 mm or less, and/or the reaction time is less than 2 hours. .Adopt a method that requires at least 5 hours. In addition, in order to further improve the test accuracy, a method is adopted in which a test sample is obtained by crushing, sieving, and reducing 20 kg or more of lump coke.

【0007】また本発明は、供試試料の元の塊コークス
全体の品質に対する代表性を向上させるために、供試粒
度の範囲を3mm以上とする方法を採用する。
[0007] Furthermore, the present invention employs a method in which the particle size range of the test sample is set to 3 mm or more in order to improve the representativeness of the test sample with respect to the overall quality of the original lump coke.

【0008】本発明者は、従来の反応後強度の試験方法
の各工程の試験誤差について検討した結果、19〜21
mmの試料を200gに縮分する工程の試験誤差が非常
に大きいことを見いだした。また、この原因は、19〜
21mmの各コークス粒子の反応後強度の範囲が非常に
広い範囲に分布しているため、200gに縮分して40
個程度の粒子数とすると縮分精度が悪くなることにある
ことを見いだした。
[0008] As a result of examining the test errors in each step of the conventional post-reaction strength testing method, the inventor found that 19 to 21
It was found that the test error in the process of reducing a mm sample to 200 g was extremely large. Also, this cause is from 19 to
Since the range of strength after reaction of each 21 mm coke particle is distributed over a very wide range, it is reduced to 200 g.
It was found that if the number of particles is set to about 1, the reduction accuracy deteriorates.

【0009】この問題を解決するには、供試試料の粒子
数を増加させればよいが、供試試料重量200gを増加
させると試験装置を大型化せねばならず、また試験のた
めの二酸化炭素ガス量が増加して試験費用も増加する。 そこで試料の粒度を縮小することにより、供試試料重量
は200g一定で粒子数を増加させ縮分精度を向上させ
る方法を発明した。供試試料数は供試試料粒度のほぼ3
乗に反比例するので、供試試料粒度としては15mm以
下で十分である。ただし、コークスの塊としての強度を
測定するという見地から、供試試料粒度は最低5mm以
上は必要である。
[0009] To solve this problem, it is possible to increase the number of particles in the test sample, but if the weight of the test sample is increased by 200 g, the test equipment must be increased in size, and the amount of carbon dioxide required for the test must be increased. The amount of carbon gas increases and the test cost also increases. Therefore, we invented a method to increase the number of particles while keeping the weight of the sample constant at 200 g by reducing the particle size of the sample to improve the reduction accuracy. The number of test samples is approximately 3 of the sample particle size.
Since it is inversely proportional to the second power, it is sufficient that the sample particle size is 15 mm or less. However, from the standpoint of measuring the strength of coke lumps, the sample particle size must be at least 5 mm or more.

【0010】さらに、従来法では2時間となっている二
酸化炭素との反応時間を短縮すると試験誤差が低減し、
かつ試料間の差は変化しないため試料間の差の検出力が
向上することを見いだした。ただし、反応初期の試料温
度の低下の補償などを考慮すると、最低0.5時間の反
応時間は必要である。
Furthermore, by shortening the reaction time with carbon dioxide, which is 2 hours in the conventional method, test errors can be reduced.
We also found that the ability to detect differences between samples is improved because the differences between samples do not change. However, in consideration of compensation for the drop in sample temperature at the initial stage of the reaction, a minimum reaction time of 0.5 hours is required.

【0011】このように、供試粒度の平均値を15mm
以下とし、および/または反応時間2時間未満0.5時
間以上とする方法により、試験誤差が低減する。しかし
、試験全体の誤差分散は全工程の誤差分散の和であるの
で、他の工程の誤差が大きいと全体の試験誤差の低減効
果は小さくなる。本発明者は、サンプリングされた塊コ
ークスを縮分して10kgの試料を得る工程が試験誤差
が大きいことを見いだした。塊コークスの10kgへの
縮分はJIS  K  2151のコークスの回転強度
試験方法のドライ法においても採用されている。しかし
、反応後強度の試験の場合は各塊コークス粒子の反応後
強度の範囲が非常に広い範囲に分布しているため、試料
重量10kgでは粒子数が100個前後と少く縮分精度
が低いことが判明した。この問題を解決するためには、
塊コークス試料を20kg以上、塊コークスの粒度が大
きい場合にも対応するために好ましくは30kg以上と
ればよいことが判明した。
[0011] In this way, the average value of the sample particle size was set to 15 mm.
The test error is reduced by the following method and/or the reaction time is less than 2 hours and 0.5 hours or more. However, since the error variance of the entire test is the sum of the error variances of all processes, if the errors of other processes are large, the effect of reducing the overall test error becomes small. The inventor found that the process of reducing sampled lump coke to obtain a 10 kg sample had a large test error. The reduction of lump coke to 10 kg is also adopted in the dry method of the coke rolling strength test method of JIS K 2151. However, in the case of post-reaction strength tests, the range of post-reaction strength of each lump coke particle is distributed over a very wide range, so for a sample weight of 10 kg, the number of particles is small, around 100, and the reduction accuracy is low. There was found. To solve this problem,
It has been found that it is sufficient to take a lump coke sample of 20 kg or more, preferably 30 kg or more in order to cope with the case where the particle size of the lump coke is large.

【0012】従来の反応後強度の試験方法において供試
試料粒度の範囲が2mmとされているのは、試料粒度に
より比表面積が異なり反応率が異なることから、反応率
のばらつきが大きくなるのを防止するためである。しか
し、本発明者は、供試試料粒度を変更すると反応率は確
かに変化するが反応後強度は実質的に変化しないことを
見いだした。このことから、供試試料粒度の範囲を3m
m以上にするという反応後強度の試験方法を考案した。 この方法によると、供試試料の収率が高くなるため供試
試料の代表性が改善される。しかも反応後強度の試験精
度は低下しない。
[0012] The reason why the particle size range of the test sample is set to 2 mm in the conventional test method for post-reaction strength is to prevent large variations in the reaction rate, since the specific surface area and reaction rate vary depending on the sample particle size. This is to prevent this. However, the inventors have found that although the reaction rate does change when the sample particle size is changed, the post-reaction strength does not substantially change. From this, the range of sample particle size was set at 3 m.
We have devised a method for testing the post-reaction strength to ensure that the strength is at least m. According to this method, the representativeness of the test sample is improved because the yield of the test sample is increased. Furthermore, the accuracy of testing strength after reaction does not decrease.

【0013】[0013]

【実施例】実施例1 コークス炉の1日分のコークスからサンプリングされた
大口試料250kgから縮分して10kgの試料を5個
とり、これらを用いてそれぞれ表1に示すような方法で
反応後強度を測定した。反応後強度の測定はいずれも2
回ずつ行った。このような試験を30日間繰返して実施
した。その結果について一元配置の分散分析を行い、反
応後強度の試験誤差を算出した。表1に示すように、試
験方法2〜5の本発明の方法の場合はいずれも試験方法
1の従来法に比べて試験誤差が大幅に改善された。
[Example] Example 1 Five samples of 10 kg were taken by reduction from a large sample of 250 kg sampled from one day's worth of coke from a coke oven, and each sample was reacted using the method shown in Table 1. The strength was measured. Both measurements of post-reaction strength are carried out at 2
I went there once. Such a test was repeated for 30 days. One-way analysis of variance was performed on the results to calculate the test error of the post-reaction strength. As shown in Table 1, in all cases of the methods of the present invention (Test Methods 2 to 5), the test errors were significantly improved compared to the conventional method (Test Method 1).

【0014】また、この結果から、次に示す式で定義さ
れる、異なるコークス試料間の差の検出力を表すSN比
を算出した。表1に示すように、本発明の方法の場合は
いずれも従来法に比べてSN比が大幅に改善された。
[0014] Furthermore, from this result, an SN ratio, which is defined by the following formula and represents the ability to detect differences between different coke samples, was calculated. As shown in Table 1, in all cases of the method of the present invention, the SN ratio was significantly improved compared to the conventional method.

【0015】 SN比[dB]=10×log10(試料間分散/誤差
分散) 表1の試験方法5においては、本発明の方法により供試
試料の粒度範囲を4mmに拡大しているため粉砕・篩分
け後の収率が高くなり試料の代表性が向上している。
[0015] SN ratio [dB] = 10 × log10 (variance between samples / error variance) In test method 5 of Table 1, the particle size range of the test sample is expanded to 4 mm by the method of the present invention, so that pulverization and The yield after sieving is high and the representativeness of the sample is improved.

【0016】[0016]

【表1】[Table 1]

【0017】実施例2 コークス炉の1日分のコークスからサンプリングされた
大口試料250kgから縮分してそれぞれ10kgと5
0kgの試料をとった。いずれも、粉砕・篩分けして8
〜12mmに調整し、それぞれ、縮分して200gの試
料をとり二酸化炭素と1時間反応させて反応後強度を測
定した。反応後強度の測定はいずれも2回行った。
Example 2 A large sample of 250 kg sampled from one day's worth of coke from a coke oven was reduced to 10 kg and 5 kg, respectively.
A sample of 0 kg was taken. Both are crushed and sieved to 8
The thickness was adjusted to ~12 mm, and 200 g of each sample was reduced and reacted with carbon dioxide for 1 hour, and the strength after the reaction was measured. The strength after the reaction was measured twice.

【0018】このような試験を30日間繰返して実施し
た。その結果について一元配置の分散分析を行い、反応
後強度の試験誤差を算出したところ表2に示すように、
従来法の10kgの試料を用いた場合の誤差分散は1.
71であったのに対し、本発明の方法である50kgの
試料を用いた場合の誤差分散は0.91となり大幅に改
善された。
[0018] Such a test was repeated for 30 days. A one-way analysis of variance was performed on the results, and the test error of the post-reaction strength was calculated, as shown in Table 2.
The error variance when using a 10 kg sample using the conventional method is 1.
71, whereas the error variance when using the method of the present invention using a 50 kg sample was 0.91, which was significantly improved.

【0019】[0019]

【表2】[Table 2]

【0020】[0020]

【発明の効果】本発明により、コークスの反応後強度試
験の精度と検出力が大幅に向上する。これにより、コー
クスの品質管理のための原料石炭の配合の変更やコーク
ス炉の操業変更がより適切に行えるようになり、高価な
石炭の節減およびコークス炉加熱用ガスの節減が達成で
き、その経済的な効果は大きい。
[Effects of the Invention] According to the present invention, the accuracy and detection power of the post-reaction strength test of coke are greatly improved. This makes it possible to more appropriately change the blend of coking coal for quality control of coke and change the operation of coke ovens, thereby reducing the use of expensive coal and gas for heating coke ovens. The effect is large.

【0021】また、コークス品質管理の精度が向上する
結果、高炉操業が安定化し、コークス比の低下および溶
銑品質の安定化によるコスト低下が可能になる。
[0021] Furthermore, as a result of improving the accuracy of coke quality control, blast furnace operation becomes stable, and costs can be reduced by lowering the coke ratio and stabilizing the quality of hot metal.

Claims (4)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】  供試試料粒度の平均値を15mm以下
とすること、および/または反応時間2時間未満0.5
時間以上とすることを特徴とするコークスの反応後強度
の試験方法。
Claim 1: The average particle size of the test sample is 15 mm or less, and/or the reaction time is less than 2 hours.
A method for testing the post-reaction strength of coke, characterized in that the test method is performed for a period of time or more.
【請求項2】  供試試料粒度の範囲を3mm以上とす
る請求項1記載のコークスの反応後強度の試験方法。
2. The method for testing the post-reaction strength of coke according to claim 1, wherein the sample particle size range is 3 mm or more.
【請求項3】  20kg以上の塊コークスを粉砕・篩
分け、縮分して供試試料を得る請求項1記載のコークス
の反応後強度の試験方法。
3. The method for testing the post-reaction strength of coke according to claim 1, wherein a test sample is obtained by crushing, sieving, and reducing lump coke weighing 20 kg or more.
【請求項4】  20kg以上の塊コークスを粉砕・篩
分け・縮分して供試試料を得る請求項2記載のコークス
の反応後強度の試験方法。
4. The method for testing the post-reaction strength of coke according to claim 2, wherein the test sample is obtained by crushing, sieving, and reducing lump coke weighing 20 kg or more.
JP1865291A 1991-02-12 1991-02-12 Strength testing method after reaction of coke Withdrawn JPH04256853A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP1865291A JPH04256853A (en) 1991-02-12 1991-02-12 Strength testing method after reaction of coke

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP1865291A JPH04256853A (en) 1991-02-12 1991-02-12 Strength testing method after reaction of coke

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH04256853A true JPH04256853A (en) 1992-09-11

Family

ID=11977550

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP1865291A Withdrawn JPH04256853A (en) 1991-02-12 1991-02-12 Strength testing method after reaction of coke

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH04256853A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103692681A (en) * 2013-12-13 2014-04-02 上虞市宏兴机械仪器制造有限公司 Coke ball forming machine
CN105842065A (en) * 2015-01-12 2016-08-10 宝山钢铁股份有限公司 Method for evaluating after-reaction strength of metallurgical coke
JP2020015856A (en) * 2018-07-26 2020-01-30 日本製鉄株式会社 Management method of coke strength

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103692681A (en) * 2013-12-13 2014-04-02 上虞市宏兴机械仪器制造有限公司 Coke ball forming machine
CN105842065A (en) * 2015-01-12 2016-08-10 宝山钢铁股份有限公司 Method for evaluating after-reaction strength of metallurgical coke
CN105842065B (en) * 2015-01-12 2019-03-05 宝山钢铁股份有限公司 The evaluation method of smelter coke post reaction strength
JP2020015856A (en) * 2018-07-26 2020-01-30 日本製鉄株式会社 Management method of coke strength

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN108931549A (en) A kind of coking coal coking behavior method of determination and evaluation
Kanbara et al. Dissection of Blast Furnaces and Their Inside State Report on the Dissection of Blast Furnaces-1
JPH04256853A (en) Strength testing method after reaction of coke
CN103868815B (en) Coke is in the evaluation method of upper blast furnace degradation
JPS6232248B2 (en)
CN113189085A (en) Method for measuring Mg activity coefficient of Mg-containing blast furnace slag
Schaefer et al. Determination of oxygen-to-uranium ratios in hypo-and hyperstoichiometric uranium dioxide and tungsten-uranium dioxide
Sebastian et al. Coke Reactivity Determination by a Modified Ignition Point Method
EP4400562A1 (en) Method for estimating code strength after reaction and method for manufacturing coke
CN113962152A (en) Method for calculating reactivity and post-reaction strength of alkali-rich coke in high-titanium blast furnace
CN115728172A (en) Method for measuring reducibility of iron ore
US4643977A (en) Process for assessing coke micro-reactivity
CN110736714A (en) method for rapidly determining content of free carbon in casting powder
CN117470721B (en) Method for measuring and evaluating high-temperature degradation strength and granularity degradation behavior of metallurgical coke
JPH0155313B2 (en)
GB2154318A (en) Coal carbonisation test
CN112574767A (en) Determination method for stably improving core process of coking coal thermal state performance detection precision
JPH07126645A (en) Method for heating and baking coke in coke bucket
JP2668486B2 (en) Blast furnace operation method using hydrogen gas utilization rate
CN111795904A (en) Method for improving measurement accuracy of carbon content in online burning fly ash
CN117310086A (en) Method for correcting carbon potential by using three-gas analyzer
CN117705752A (en) Method for detecting carbon and sulfur in vanadium-carbon alloy
JPH02216455A (en) Method for measuring coke strength
JP3742525B2 (en) Adjustment method of chlorine concentration in coke
Commission of the European Communities Directorate-General Energy et al. High Temperature Stability of Coke in Relation to its Bulk Permeability

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A300 Application deemed to be withdrawn because no request for examination was validly filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A300

Effective date: 19980514