JPH02118735A - System for deciding and processing input telegram of computer system - Google Patents

Abstract

PURPOSE:To reduce the number of unnecessary operating times and to reduce the load of a whole system by first-out-processing an 'error' compared to an 'alarm' when the 'alarm' and the 'error' are mixed in the check result of an input telegram. CONSTITUTION:A memory 1 storing the input telegram, a processor 2 checking the stored telegram and a supervisory device 3 displaying the check result are provided. The processor 2 performing checking discriminates the 'alarm' which can be processed by the assent of an operator and the 'error' which cannot perform the processing as the result of the check, temporarily stores the decision result of the 'alarm' and the 'error', and performs first-out display of the decision result of the 'error' in the supervisory device 3 irrespective of a processing order. Namely, the unnecessary operating times can be reduced and the load of the whole system can be reduced by always performing a first- out processing on the error processing when an alarm processing and an error processing are mixed in the input telegram.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [Industrial Field of Application] The present invention relates to a processing method that always processes errors in input messages in advance in a computer system that performs processing based on input messages.

〔overview〕

In the input message judgment processing method of a computer system that performs processing based on input messages, the present invention always changes "error" to "warning" when "warning" and "error" are mixed in the inspection results of input message. By performing processing ahead of time, the number of unnecessary operations by the operator is reduced, the load on the entire system including lines is reduced, and the complexity of considering the inspection order when creating a program is eliminated. It is.

[Conventional technology]

Conventionally, this type of judgment processing method has been either to notify the operator as soon as the event occurs, regardless of whether it is a "warning" or "error," or to change the order of inspection after checking for "error." [Problem to be solved by the invention] In the conventional judgment processing method described above, problems are detected in the order of "warning" and "error" in the input message. If an error occurs, the meaning of the warning is first explained to the operator, and the operator waits for confirmation. Once confirmation is obtained, processing continues; however, if an error occurs after that, processing is stopped. is the procedure to be terminated. This has the drawback of forcing the operator to perform unnecessary operations and placing an extra load on the entire system including the line.

In addition, as another conventional method, there is a method that can compensate for the above-mentioned drawbacks by strictly observing the test order, such as testing for "errors" and then testing for "warnings."
This method has the disadvantage that program creation is complicated and extra inspection processing must be performed.

The present invention aims to eliminate these drawbacks, and provides a processing method that reduces the number of unnecessary operations by the operator, reduces the load on the entire system including the line, and does not impose restrictions on program creation. With the goal.

[Means for solving problems]

The present invention provides an input message for a computer system including means for temporarily storing an input message, means for performing a plurality of tests on the message stored in this means, and a monitoring device for displaying the inspection results of this means. In the determination processing method, the means for performing the above-mentioned inspection includes means for determining whether the result of the inspection is a "warning" that can be processed with the operator's consent, or an "error" that cannot be processed, and the above-mentioned "warning" and " The present invention is characterized by comprising means for temporarily storing the determination result of "error" and means for displaying the determination result of "error" in advance on the monitoring device regardless of the processing order.

[Effect]

When processing a "warning", the data is memorized and inspection processing continues, and if an "error" occurs later,
After notifying the operator of the meaning, the process ends. Further, if all inspection processing is completed without any "errors" and a "warning" state is stored, the "warning" processing is performed.

As a result, the number of unnecessary operations by the operator can be reduced, the load on the entire system including lines can be reduced, and the complexity of creating a program in consideration of the test order can be eliminated.

〔Example〕

Next, embodiments of the present invention will be described based on the drawings.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the configuration of an embodiment of the present invention.

The embodiment of the present invention includes a memory 1 for temporarily storing an input message;
The processor 2 that performs the test includes a processor 2 that performs a plurality of tests on the message stored in the memory 1, and a monitoring device 3 that displays the test results of the processor 2.
As a result of the inspection, it includes means for determining whether a "warning" can be processed with the consent of the operator or an "error" that cannot be processed, a means for temporarily storing the determination results of "warning" and "error", and "error". means for displaying the determination result of "" on the monitoring device 3 in advance regardless of the processing order.

The operation of the embodiment of the present invention configured as described above will be explained. FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing the flow of processing in the embodiment of the present invention.

When performing a warning process in the input message determination process, if no warning process has been performed before, the information is saved in the warning area and the process continues. If the inspection process ends without detecting any "errors", a warning process is performed based on the information in the warning area.

In order to provide a concrete explanation, a case will be described in which there are four inspection processes for a certain type of input message as shown in FIG. These inspection processes are named Check 1 to Check 4. Here, check 1 and check 4 are "warning" tests, and check 2 and check 3 are "error" tests. Let's consider what kind of operation to perform when there are various input messages under these conditions.

As a first example, as shown in FIG. 4, there is a case where an input message violates only check 1. In this case, check 1 is determined to be a "warning", information to that effect is stored in the warning area, and processes from check 2 to check 4 are performed normally. After that, as the final process, it is determined whether there is a previous "warning".

In this case, a "warning" is determined in check 1, and since that information is stored, an appropriate "warning" process is performed.

Next, as a second example, as shown in FIG. 5, let us consider the case where an input message violates only check 2. In this case, check 1 is determined to be normal, but the next check 2 is determined to be "error." Then, "error" processing is performed, and the inspection processing ends at that point.

As a third example, as shown in FIG. 6, there is a case where an input message is contrary to check 1 and check 2.

In this case, check 1 is determined to be a "warning", and information to that effect is stored in the warning area. However, in the next check 2, an "error" is detected. Then, "error" processing is performed, and the inspection processing ends.

As a fourth example, as shown in FIG. 7, there is a case where an input message is contrary to check 3 and check 4.

In this case, an "error" is detected in check 3, and the "error" is immediately processed, and the inspection process ends. In this way, if an "error" is detected before a "warning", no subsequent inspection processing is performed.

Finally, as a fifth example, check 1 as shown in Figure 8.
Let us consider the case of an input message that violates Check 4. In this case, check 1 is determined to be a "warning", and information to that effect is stored in the warning area. Checks 2 and 3 are determined to be normal, and the next check 4 is also determined to be a "warning". However, since "warning" information is already stored, no processing is performed on the warning area.

After that, as the final process, it is determined whether there is a previous "warning". In this case, check 1 is determined as a "warning",
Since that information is stored, a corresponding "warning" process will be performed. That is, even if there are multiple "warnings", the first information is stored, so the "warning" processing will be performed.

〔Effect of the invention〕

As explained above, according to the present invention, when warning processing and error processing are mixed in an input message, the error processing is always processed first, thereby reducing the number of unnecessary operations by the operator and reducing the number of lines. The load on the entire system can be reduced, and furthermore, there is no need to set restrictions such as creating a program in consideration of the inspection order.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing the flow of an example of input message determination processing in the embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 4, FIG. 5, FIG. 6, FIG. 7, and FIG. 8 are flowcharts showing the processing flow of cases given as operational examples in the embodiment of the present invention.

■...Memory, 2...Processor, 3...Monitoring device.

patent application agent

Claims (1)

[Scope of Claims] 1. Means (1) for temporarily storing an input message; means (2) for performing multiple tests on the message stored in this means; and monitoring for displaying the test results of this means. In the input message judgment processing method of the computer system equipped with the device (3), the means for performing the above inspection includes a "warning" which can be processed with the consent of the operator and a "warning" which cannot be processed as a result of the inspection.
means for temporarily storing the results of the "warning" and "error" determinations, and means for displaying the "error" determination results on the monitoring device in advance regardless of the processing order. An input message determination processing method for a computer system, characterized by comprising: