JP7315391B2 - Repair plan creation system - Google Patents

Description

The present invention relates to a repair plan creation system when a disaster occurs.

Systems are known that are useful for evacuating residents, repairing damaged buildings, and the like in the event of a disaster. For example, there has been proposed a display system that collects latitude and longitude information of a current position and disaster information representing a disaster situation at that position using a mobile terminal, and displays a point specified by the latitude and longitude information and disaster information associated with the point on a map (see Patent Document 1).

JP-A-2004-240827

The above display system is certainly useful for grasping the damage situation because it is possible to grasp the damage situation of the building by selecting the damaged building on the map.

However, in order to make a repair plan for damaged buildings, it is necessary to select buildings one by one while looking at a screen displaying a map, check the damage situation of each building, and then grasp what kind of repairs are necessary. If all of the damaged buildings in the affected area are covered by this, it will not be possible to plan repairs quickly and efficiently, and the repair of damaged buildings will be delayed.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a system for creating a repair plan in the event of a disaster, which can quickly and efficiently formulate and implement a repair plan for damaged buildings in a disaster-stricken area.

In order to solve the above problems, the first invention is a repair plan creation system in the event of a disaster,
storage means for storing estimated damage information determined for each part of a building and classified into damage contents in the event that the building is damaged and the degree of damage for each of the damage contents in a state of being associated with the number of days required for repair for each degree of damage;
when a disaster occurs, collecting means for collecting damage situation information including the damaged part and the contents and degree of damage of the assumed damage information for each damaged building from a terminal owned by the user;
repair plan creation means for extracting damaged buildings having a common damaged part from the damage status information collected by the collection means, grasping the number of repair days for each of the extracted damaged buildings based on the number of repair days associated with the estimated damage information, and creating a repair plan table combining the damaged buildings with repair days having less than one day as continuous repair targets;
characterized by comprising

According to the first invention, among the damaged buildings having a common damaged part (for example, "roof"), a repair plan table is created in which the damaged buildings whose number of repair days is less than one day are combined so as to be continuously repaired. If the building is repaired according to this repair plan table, when the repair work for a predetermined damaged building is completed in less than one day, the repair work can be started in another damaged building assumed to include repair days of less than one day. As a result, the repair plan for the damaged building can be quickly and efficiently formulated and implemented since the time after the repair is completed in less than one day will not be wasted.

In the present invention, the number of repair days in which repair work is less than one day includes not only cases in which the entire repair work is completed in less than one day, but also cases in which less than one day of repair work is required in addition to one or several days of repair work. In addition, one day means the time (e.g., eight hours) assumed as repair work time per day, and less than one day means less than the assumed time.

In a second aspect of the invention, the repair plan table creation means extracts the damaged buildings having the common damaged parts, classifies the extracted damaged buildings into predetermined areas, and then creates a repair plan.

According to the second invention, since the repair plan table is classified for each predetermined area, it is possible to assign a repairer located near the predetermined area in charge, or to shorten the moving distance when the repair work is completed in less than one day and moved to the next damaged building. Thereby, repair work can be performed more efficiently.

In the third invention, the number of repair days associated with the assumed damage information is set in units of half a day,
The repair plan table preparation means prepares the repair plan by combining damaged buildings in which the number of repair days for the predetermined damaged portion is half a day.

If the number of repair days associated with the expected damage information is set too finely, such as by 30 minutes or one hour, it becomes difficult to deal with unexpected events at the repair site. In this respect, according to the third invention, since the number of repair days associated with the assumed damage information is set in relatively loose units of half a day, flexible work at the repair site is inhibited, and the possibility of not proceeding as planned can be reduced.

Note that half a day means half the time based on the time (e.g., 8 hours) assumed as working hours per day.

In the fourth aspect of the invention, the storage means stores the assumed damage information in association with repair urgency levels graded into a plurality of levels for each degree of damage,
The repair plan table creating means is characterized in that the damaged buildings with a high degree of repair urgency are arranged so as to be repaired preferentially, and in the case of combining the damaged buildings with repair days less than one day, the damaged buildings with the same level of repair urgency are combined.

According to the fourth invention, by carrying out repairs in accordance with the repair plan table, the repairs are carried out in the order of the degree of urgency of the repairs, so that the difficult living situation can be quickly improved, and the escape life can be quickly realized.

In the fifth invention, the storage means stores the number of days required for emergency measures in association with each degree of damage,
extracting the damaged buildings having a common damaged part from the damage status information collected by the collecting means; further extracting the damaged buildings having a high degree of repair urgency from the extracted damaged buildings; determining the number of days for emergency measures for each of the extracted damaged buildings having a high degree of repair urgency based on the number of days for emergency measures associated with the estimated damage information; and table creation means.

According to the fifth invention, only damaged buildings with a high degree of repair urgency are extracted, and among damaged buildings having common damaged parts (for example, "roofs"), an initial response plan table is created in which damaged buildings with emergency days of less than one day are combined so as to be continuously repaired. By implementing emergency measures according to this initial response plan, it is possible to save time and implement emergency measures by giving priority to only damaged buildings with a high degree of urgency for repair. As a result, it is possible to improve the difficult living conditions at an early stage, and to realize an early escape from life as an evacuee.

In the sixth aspect of the invention, the assumed damage information classifies the contents and degree of damage for each part of the external structure provided on the premises of the building,
The storage means is characterized in that the number of repair days required for repair is associated with each degree of damage to the outside structure and stored therein.

According to the sixth invention, not only the part of the building body but also the external structure is similarly subject to creation of the repair plan table, and the repair plan for repairing the external structure damaged by the disaster can be quickly and efficiently made and implemented.

A block diagram showing a repair plan creation system. A table showing a list of assumed damage conditions for each part of the building. The flowchart which shows a disaster information collection process. 4 is a flowchart showing repair plan creation processing; A table showing a damage status list. A table showing a damage classification list. A table showing a repair schedule.

An embodiment of a system for creating a repair plan in the event of a disaster embodying the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. The repair planning system of this embodiment creates a repair plan for a house as a building.

First, the system configuration of the repair plan creation system of this embodiment will be described. As shown in FIG. 1, a repair plan creation system 10 includes a repair plan creation server 11 that manages the entire system, and one or more portable terminals 12 for collecting disaster situation information. The repair plan creation server 11 and the mobile terminal 12 are connected via the Internet network N.

The repair plan creation server 11 is installed, for example, in a house construction company or the like. On the other hand, the mobile terminal 12 is used by an employee or the like of the company in which the repair plan creation server 11 is installed, and is carried by the employee or the like. The mobile terminal 12 is brought by the employee or the like when a disaster strikes and the employee or the like visits the disaster area to confirm the disaster situation. The mobile terminal 12 may be a terminal dedicated to this system, or may be a commercially available smart phone, tablet terminal, or the like. In the latter case, the system can be accessed by installing an application for the system on the terminal and activating the application.

The repair plan creation server 11 includes a storage section 21 , a program processing section 22 , a communication section 23 and a display section 24 .

The storage unit 21 has a storage area necessary for executing the processing of this system, and stores various information necessary for executing the processing. The details will be described later. The program processing unit 22 is a microcomputer composed of a CPU, a memory, etc., and creates a repair plan table L3 (see FIG. 7, which will be described later) by executing a processing program using information stored in the storage unit 21. The communication unit 23 connects the program processing unit 22 to the Internet network N and transmits/receives information to/from the mobile terminal 12 . The display unit 24 is a liquid crystal display or the like, and displays the damage situation list L1, the damage classification list L2, the repair plan table L3, etc. created by the program processing unit 22 on the screen according to the operator's input operation.

Further explaining the configuration of the storage unit 21 , the storage unit 21 includes a program storage unit 31 , an assumed damage information database 32 , a customer information database 33 , and a damage information storage unit 34 . Note that the storage unit 21 corresponds to storage means.

The program storage unit 31 stores a processing program for executing repair plan creation processing in this system.

As shown in FIG. 2, in the expected damage information database 32, for each part of the building and the part of the external structure provided on the premises of the building, the contents of damage assumed when the part is damaged and the degree of damage assumed for each content of damage are classified and registered as expected damage information. Further, for each degree of damage in the assumed damage information, each degree of repair urgency and the estimated number of days required to repair the damage are associated and registered. It should be noted that the term "repair" as used herein does not refer to an emergency measure, but means to carry out until the device is restored to its original state.

The list shown in FIG. 2 is an example of damage information for each part. The degree of damage and the degree of repair urgency can be categorized in any number, but here they are divided into three stages (large, medium and small for damage, and A, B, and C for urgency). Among A to C indicating the degree of urgency, A indicates the highest degree of urgency. If the unit of the assumed number of days is also less than one day, it can be arbitrarily set in units of one hour or in units of several hours, but here it is set in units of half a day. The term "one day" as used herein means a period of time (e.g., 8 hours) assumed as repair work hours in a day, and the term "half day" means half of that time based on the work hours in a day.

In the "roof" portion shown in Fig. 2(a), a building with a tiled roof is assumed, and the damage is first classified into three categories: "roof collapse," "spattered roof tiles," and "cracked tiles." Regarding "collapse of the roof", the degree of damage is "large" when the roof collapses completely, the degree of damage is "medium" when the roof collapses on two sides, and the degree of damage is "small" when the roof collapses on one side. "Scattered roof tiles" and "cracked roof tiles" are classified into "large", "medium", and "small" according to the number of scattered or broken roof tiles. When roof tiles are damaged, it is associated with rain leakage, so the degree of urgency is relatively high. In the case of "roof collapse," all damage levels are set, and in the case of "spattered roof tiles" and "cracked tiles," when the damage level is "large," the degree of urgency is set to A, the highest of the three levels. Other damage levels are set to B, which indicates a medium level of urgency.

In the portion of the "outer wall" shown in Fig. 2(b), the details of the damage are first classified into three categories: "sinking (exterior material replacement required)", "sinking (exterior material replacement not required)", and "minor damage/chipping". As for the "cavement" that requires the replacement of exterior materials, the degree of damage is "large" if the building is "entirely caved in", "medium" if it is "both sides caved in", and "small" if it is "one side caved in". The degree of damage from "cavities" and "minor scratches/chips" that are unnecessary until the exterior materials are replaced is classified into "large," "medium," and "small," depending on the number of exterior materials that have collapsed or have minor scratches or chips. If the outer wall is damaged, it will lead to the intrusion of rainwater and outside air, so the degree of urgency is relatively high. In the case of "cavement" that requires replacement of exterior materials, the degree of damage is "all", and in the case of "cavement" or "minor damage / chipping" that does not require replacement of exterior materials, the degree of damage is "severe". Other damage levels are set to B, which indicates a medium level of urgency.

In the "interior" part shown in Fig. 2(c), a two-story building is assumed, and the damage content is first classified into three categories: "flooding above the floor", "flooding below the floor", and "wall board cracks". Regarding "flooding above the floor", the degree of damage is "large" when the water reaches the second floor of the building, the degree of damage is "medium" when the water reaches the first floor of the building, and the degree of damage is "small" when the water reaches 1m above the floor. The degree of damage caused by "underfloor flooding" and "wallboard cracks" is classified into "large", "medium", and "small" according to the number of flooded locations and the number of cracked wallboards. If the interior is damaged, it is difficult to live in a building that has flooded above the floor, so the degree of urgency is high for all damage levels, and is set to A, which is the highest among the three levels. In the case of subfloor flooding and cracks in wall boards, the flooding may affect the building frame, and if the cracks are left unattended, the degree of crack damage may increase.

In the "outside structure" shown in Fig. 2(d), the damage content is first classified into three categories: "carport/cycleport roof scattering", "concrete block damage", and "fence collapse", and the degree of damage is classified into three categories: large, medium, and small. Regarding "carport/cycleport roof scattering", the degree of damage is "large" when all roof panels are damaged or lost, the degree of damage is "medium" when only about "five" roof panels are left, and the degree of damage is "small" when less than that. The degree of damage for "breakage of concrete blocks" is classified into "large", "medium", and "small" according to the length of the damaged part, and the degree of damage for "fence collapse" is classified according to the number of fallen fences. Unlike the damage to the building itself, when the external structure is damaged, it does not directly affect living in the building itself. Therefore, the degree of urgency is relatively low, and the degree of urgency is set to C, which is the lowest among the three levels, for all damage levels.

Returning to the description of the components of the storage unit 21, as shown in FIG. 1, the customer information database 33 of the storage unit 21 is contracted by the construction company in which the repair plan creation server 11 is installed, and customer information of houses built in the past is registered. Information included in the customer information includes, for example, address, name, family composition, contact information such as telephone number, delivery date, and the like. When damage status information is collected by the portable terminal 12 and transmitted from the portable terminal 12 and received by the repair plan preparation server 11, the information is sequentially stored in the damage information storage unit 34 each time it is received.

Next, returning to FIG. 1 , in the repair plan creation system 10 , the mobile terminal 12 includes a storage section 41 , a program processing section 42 , a communication section 43 , a display section 44 , an input section 45 and a camera section 46 .

The storage unit 41 has a storage area necessary for executing processing for collecting damage status information of individual buildings in the disaster area, and stores programs necessary for executing processing. For example, if the mobile terminal 12 is a dedicated terminal for this system, a program for collecting disaster situation information is stored. If the mobile terminal 12 is a commercially available smart phone, tablet terminal, or the like, an application for collecting disaster situation information is stored. Further, the same expected damage information as the expected damage information registered in the expected damage information database 32 of the repair plan creation server 11 is registered in the storage unit 41 .

The program processing unit 42 is a microcomputer configured by a CPU, a memory, and the like, and collects disaster situation information by executing a processing program using information and the like stored in the storage unit 41 . The communication unit 43 connects the program processing unit 42 to the Internet network N and exchanges information with the repair plan creation server 11 .

The display unit 44 is a liquid crystal display or the like, and displays various screens for collecting disaster situation information. The input unit 45 is, for example, an input button displayed on the display unit 44, and is used to input the disaster situation information about the damaged building. The camera unit 46 has a function of capturing still images or moving images, and stores captured image data in a predetermined data format in the storage unit 41 .

The process of creating a building repair plan in the event of a disaster using the repair plan creating system 10 having the above configuration will be described with reference to FIGS. 3 and 4. FIG.

First, a disaster situation information collection process for collecting disaster situation information executed by the mobile terminal 12 will be described. When a disaster occurs, the person in charge of information collection enters the affected area while carrying the mobile terminal 12, and starts the processing program of the mobile terminal 12, which is executed by the program processing unit 42.

As shown in FIG. 3, in step S11, customer information registered in the storage unit 21 of the repair plan creation server 11 is obtained. In the subsequent step S12, the display section 24 displays a building selection screen for selecting one specific building (customer) for which disaster status information is to be collected from among the acquired customer information. When a specific building is selected from the selection screen by the operator's selection input operation, the building is specified as a collection target of the disaster situation information.

Subsequently, in step S13, the assumed damage information is acquired from the storage unit 41, and a damage selection screen is displayed on the display unit 44 for selecting which damaged part, damage content, and degree of damage in the assumed damage information correspond to the building targeted for information collection. When the operator selects the damaged part, the contents of damage, and the degree of damage by a selection input operation based on visual confirmation, the selected information is registered in the storage unit 41 as disaster information in association with the building being selected. At this time, the damage condition of the building is photographed by the camera section 46 and the photographed image data is also stored in the storage section 41 .

In step S14, the building for which damage information has been selected, the damage information, and the damage situation image are transmitted to the repair plan creation server 11 as the damage situation information for the selected building.

In the subsequent step S15, it is determined whether or not there is another building registered as customer information in the disaster area. If there is any other, the determination is affirmative, the process returns to step S12, the building from which damage information is to be collected is specified again, and the collection of damage information is continued. On the other hand, if there are no other buildings, and damage information has been collected for all buildings that are located in the disaster area and are registered as customer information, the determination is denied and the process ends.

Next, the repair plan creation win, which is executed by the repair plan creation server 11 and creates a repair plan, will be described. This process is executed by the program processing unit 22 of the repair plan creation server 11 when a disaster occurs.

As shown in FIG. 4, at step S21, the damage status information for each damaged building transmitted from the portable terminal 12 is collected. This step S21 corresponds to the collection means. In the subsequent step S22, based on the customer information acquired from the customer information database 33, it is determined whether or not damage information collection using the portable terminal 12 has been completed for all the customers' buildings living in the disaster area. If it has not been completed yet, deny the judgment and continue collecting the damage information. On the other hand, if completed, the determination is affirmative, and the process proceeds to the next step S23.

In step S23, the damage status information (buildings and their damage information, etc.) collected by the portable terminal 12 is aggregated, and based on the damage status information, the degree of urgency and repair days associated with the assumed damage information, and the customer information, a damage status list L1 is created and displayed on the display unit 24. As shown in FIG. 5, the damage status list L1 is a list of customer buildings in the disaster area, customer information (delivery date, etc.), address of the building, damaged part, damage details, degree of damage, degree of urgency, repair days, and damage status image. As for the damage situation image, as shown in the figure, the characters "photograph" may be linked to the screen displaying the image data.

In the subsequent step S24, a damage classification list L2 is created based on the created damage status list L1. The damage classification list L2 is a list obtained by extracting only the damaged buildings having the same address and the same damaged part from the damage status list L1 and arranging them so that the damaged buildings with a high degree of urgency are preferentially targeted for repair. FIG. 6 shows an example of extracting buildings whose address is in Ward A and whose damaged part is the roof.

The criteria for judging that the addresses are in the same area are arbitrary. For example, if it is an ordinance-designated city, it can be based on the administrative district, and for other municipalities, it can be based on the municipality or a district divided within the municipality.

In the subsequent step S25, it is determined whether or not there are a plurality of damaged buildings including repair days of half a day in the created damage classification list L2. If the damaged building does not exist or there is only one, the determination is denied, and the process proceeds to step S26, where the damage classification list L2 is directly used as the repair plan table L3. The repair plan table L3 is displayed on the display unit 24 based on the operator's input operation, and the process ends. On the other hand, if there are a plurality of damaged buildings whose number of repair days is half a day, the determination is affirmative, and the process proceeds to the next step S27.

In step S27, as shown in FIG. 6, two damaged buildings including half a day of repair days among the buildings shown in the damage classification list L2 are combined so as to be continuously subject to repair, and a repair plan table L3 reflecting the combination is created. For example, FIG. 7 shows an example in which a repair plan table L3 is created based on the damage classification list L2 for "section A: roof" shown in FIG. Here, at the stage of the damage classification list L2, the number of days required to repair "Mr. A's residence" whose urgency level is A is "3.5", and the number of days to repair "Ms. C's residence" is "5.5" days. Also, the number of repair days for "Mr. E's residence" whose urgency level is B is "3.5" days, and the number of repair days for "Ms. G's residence" is "3.5" days, which are a combination of both.

When combining, damaged buildings having the same level of urgency are combined. Therefore, in the example of FIG. 7, both "A's mansion" whose urgency level is A and "E's mansion" whose urgency level is B both include half a day as repair days, but the two have different levels of urgency, so damaged buildings with different levels are not combined.

After that, the repair plan table L3 is displayed on the display unit 24, and the process ends. It should be noted that the processing from step S23 to step S27 corresponds to the repair plan table creating means.

In this way, by combining buildings in the same area with repair days including half a day so as to be continuously repaired, when a repairer carries out repairs, half a day can be used as time for repair without wasting it. The repairer can repair the damaged building quickly and efficiently by sequentially carrying out repairs according to this repair plan.

As described in detail above, according to the repair plan creating system 10 of this embodiment, the following effects can be obtained.

(1) A repair plan table L3 is created in which damaged buildings having a common damaged part (for example, "roof", "outer wall", "interior", "external structure", etc.) are combined so that the damaged buildings whose number of repair days is half a day are consecutively targeted for repair. If the building is repaired according to the repair plan table L3, when the repair work for a predetermined damaged building is completed in half a day, the repair work can be started in another damaged building assumed to include half a day of repair days. As a result, the repair plan for the damaged building can be made and implemented quickly and efficiently because the time after the repair is completed in half a day will not be wasted.

(2) After extracting damaged buildings having common damaged parts, the extracted damaged buildings are classified by predetermined area, and then a repair plan table L3 is created. Therefore, it is possible to assign a repairer located near the predetermined area in charge, or to shorten the moving distance when the repair work is completed in half a day and the building is moved to the next damaged building. Thereby, repair work can be performed more efficiently.

(3) If the number of repair days associated with the expected damage information is set too finely, such as in units of 30 minutes or one hour, it becomes difficult to deal with unexpected events at the repair site. In this regard, since the number of repair days associated with the estimated damage information is set in relatively loose units of half a day, flexible work at the repair site is inhibited, and the possibility of not proceeding as planned can be reduced.

(4) The repair plan table L3 is arranged so that damaged buildings with higher repair urgency levels are repaired earlier than damaged buildings with lower repair urgency levels, and when combining damaged buildings with repair days of half a day, damaged buildings with the same level of repair urgency level are combined. By carrying out repairs according to this repair plan table L3, the repairs are carried out in the order of repair urgency, so that the difficult living situation can be quickly improved, and early escape from evacuation life can be realized.

(5) A repair plan table L3 is created not only for the parts of the building body such as the "roof", "outer wall", and "inner wall", but also for the outer structure. As a result, it is possible to quickly and efficiently make and implement a repair plan for repairing external structures damaged by disasters.

The repair plan creation system of the present invention is not limited to the repair plan creation system 10 of the above embodiment, and may be implemented as follows.

(a) In the repair plan creation system 10 of the above embodiment, when the damage information collection using the mobile terminal 12 is completed for all the customers' buildings living in the disaster area, the repair plan creation process proceeds. When a disaster occurs, there are cases where entry into the affected area is restricted immediately after the occurrence, and there are cases where the affected area extends over a large number of municipalities. In such cases, waiting for damage information to be collected for all customers' buildings may result in delays in repairs. Therefore, for example, a period of several days to a week may be set, and when the period of time elapses, the repair plan table L3 may be repeatedly created for the building for which damage information has been collected.

(b) In the repair plan creation system 10 of the above embodiment, the number of repair days is associated with the estimated damage information, and the repair plan table L3 for repairing the damaged portion of the damaged building is created. In addition to this, the number of days required for emergency measures may be associated with each degree of damage, and an initial response plan similar to the repair plan may be created for damaged buildings with high repair urgency. For example, if the damaged part is a "roof" or an "outer wall", the temporary measure may be to attach a blue sheet or wooden plywood to the damaged part. Also, if the damaged part is the "interior", sludge removal, washing, sterilization, etc. can be considered.

In this case, damaged buildings having a common damaged part ("roof", "outer wall", "inner wall", etc.) are extracted from the damaged buildings whose damage status information has been collected by the portable terminal 12, and damaged buildings with a high degree of repair urgency are further extracted from the extracted damaged buildings. Next, for the extracted damaged buildings with high repair urgency, the number of days for emergency measures is determined based on the number of days for emergency measures associated with the estimated damage information, and the damaged buildings with less than one day for emergency measures are combined so as to be subject to continuous emergency measures, and an initial response plan is created.

By implementing emergency measures according to this initial response plan, it is possible to save time and implement emergency measures by giving priority to only damaged buildings with a high degree of urgency for repair. As a result, it is possible to improve the difficult living conditions at an early stage, and to realize an early escape from life as an evacuee. Since the above-described processing for creating the initial response plan table is executed by the program processing section 22 of the repair plan creation server 11, the program processing section 22 corresponds to the initial response plan table creating means.

(c) In the repair plan creation system 10 of the above-described embodiment, when combining damaged buildings including repair days of half a day at the stage of the damage classification list L2, the only condition is that the urgency levels are the same. Alternatively, after classifying addresses more finely, various combination conditions may be set, such as combining damaged buildings located in the same town or within the same school district, or combining damaged buildings with a high degree of damage. Thereby, the efficiency of repair can be further improved.

(d) In the repair plan creation system 10 of the above embodiment, the mobile terminal 12 is assumed to be carried by an employee or the like of the company in which the repair plan creation server 11 is installed. By collecting the disaster situation information from the portable terminal 12 owned by the resident, the information can be collected more quickly.

(e) The repair plan creation system 10 of the above embodiment creates a repair plan table L3 for a house as a building. A system that creates a repair plan table L3 for buildings other than residences, such as residences and shops, shops, and buildings, may also be used.

(f) The repair plan creation system 10 of the above embodiment is assumed to be used by a housing construction company, and creates a repair plan table L3 for a building of a customer of the company. Alternatively, it may be a system that prepares a repair plan for all buildings in the disaster area.

10 Repair plan creation system 11 Repair plan creation server (collection means, repair plan table creation means, initial response plan table creation means) 12 Mobile terminal 21 Storage unit (storage means)

Claims (6)

storage means for storing estimated damage information determined for each part of a building and classified into damage contents in the event that the building is damaged and the degree of damage for each of the damage contents in a state of being associated with the number of days required for repair for each degree of damage;
when a disaster occurs, collecting means for collecting damage situation information including the damaged part and the contents and degree of damage of the assumed damage information for each damaged building from a terminal owned by the user;
repair plan creation means for extracting damaged buildings having a common damaged part from the damage status information collected by the collection means, grasping the number of repair days for each of the extracted damaged buildings based on the number of repair days associated with the estimated damage information, and creating a repair plan table combining the damaged buildings with repair days having less than one day as continuous repair targets;
A repair plan creation system comprising: 2. The repair plan creation system according to claim 1, wherein said repair plan creation means extracts said damaged buildings having said common damaged parts, classifies said extracted damaged buildings by predetermined areas, and then creates a repair plan. The number of repair days associated with the assumed damage information is determined in units of half a day,
3. The repair plan creation system according to claim 1, wherein said repair plan creation means creates said repair plan by combining damaged buildings having half a day to repair said predetermined damaged portion. The storage means stores the assumed damage information in association with repair urgency levels graded into a plurality of levels for each degree of damage,
4. The repair plan creation system according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the repair plan creation means arranges the damaged buildings so that the damaged buildings with the highest repair urgency are preferentially targeted for repair, and when combining the damaged buildings with repair days less than one day, the damaged buildings with the same level of repair urgency are combined. The storage means stores the number of days required for emergency measures in association with each degree of damage,
extracting the damaged buildings having a common damaged part from the damage status information collected by the collecting means; further extracting the damaged buildings having a high degree of repair urgency from the extracted damaged buildings; determining the number of days for emergency measures for each of the extracted damaged buildings having a high degree of repair urgency based on the number of days for emergency measures associated with the estimated damage information; a tabulation means;
The repair plan creation system according to any one of claims 1 to 4, further comprising: In the assumed damage information, the details and degree of damage are classified for each part of the external structure provided on the premises of the building,
6. The repair plan creation system according to claim 1, wherein said storage means stores a state in which repair days required for repair are associated with each degree of damage to said external structure.

Images