JP7206694B2 - Information processing device and information processing program - Google Patents

Description

The present invention relates to an information processing device and an information processing program.

In Patent Document 1, the task is to support the prediction of project risks related to communication between project stakeholders, and the terminals and servers of the project stakeholders are present on the network, and the server has a caller identifier and the date and time of the call. is stored for each message, and the arithmetic processing unit stores communication information related to the message in the communication information storage unit when any terminal transmits a message. Further, it is disclosed that analysis information representing the number of message transmissions by project participants in chronological order is output for each project participant based on the accumulated information in the communication information accumulation unit.

In Patent Document 2, the task is to support prediction of project risks related to communication between project stakeholders, and the server stores information including the sender identifier, the date and time of transmission, the recipient identifier, and the date of reception for each message. When any terminal transmits a message, the arithmetic processing unit stores the communication information related to the message in the communication information storage unit, and the communication information storage unit It is disclosed that analysis information representing the number of message transmissions of project stakeholders in chronological order is output for each project stakeholder based on the accumulated information of the department.

Patent Document 3 discloses intention determination means for determining the intention of utterances contained in text sentences related to a project based on the relationship between predetermined text expressions and intentions; extraction condition storage means for storing a risk sentence extraction condition consisting of a plurality of utterance intentions and topic appearance patterns; The intention determined by the intention determination means and the topic determined by the topic determination means are collated with the risk sentence extraction conditions stored in the extraction condition storage means, and the intention and topic matching the risk sentence extraction conditions are compared. utterance identification means for identifying utterances corresponding to the topic as risk utterances.

In Patent Document 4, the distribution of topics is analyzed using the degree of similarity of utterance content as an index, and the task is to track the transition of a specific topic. graph), the task structure analysis unit generates a task list for each user based on the user information registered for the task, and the profile similarity determination unit calculates the similarity of profiles (contents of remarks) between users. Then, the distance calculation unit calculates the task distance of the shortest route followed by referring to the task map, and the similarity aggregation unit aggregates the distribution of similarity for each distance (number of users with similar comments and average values) and analyzes It is disclosed that the result output unit outputs this.

JP 2004-054606 A Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2004-127140 Japanese Patent No. 5212604 JP 2007-072549 A

Risks may arise in the progress of a project involving a group of users consisting of multiple users. In particular, the symptoms appear in the communication related to the project and the progress of the project. Other projects may have resolved the same risks. However, it is difficult to make use of the knowledge.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is an object of the present invention to provide an information processing apparatus and an information processing program capable of judging risks in the progress of a project from communication information and progress information and notifying other projects as collaboration partner candidates.

The gist of the present invention for achieving this object lies in the following inventions. The "claims" below are the claims as originally filed.
According to the invention of claim 1, in a first project in which a first user group consisting of a plurality of users participates, communication information related to the first project and progress information indicating the progress of the first project. a determination means for determining whether or not there is a risk in the progress of the first project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the acquisition means; and the determination means that there is a risk. if determined, at least one or more users of said first group of users collaborate on a second project in which a second group of users different from at least one of said first group of users participates It is an information processing apparatus having notification means for notifying as a partner candidate.

The invention according to claim 2 further comprises a second acquiring means for acquiring communication information related to the project other than the first project and progress information indicating the progress of the other project. 2. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said notification means selects said second project from said communication information and said progress information acquired by said second acquisition means.

In the invention according to claim 3, the determination means determines whether or not there is a risk in the progress of the other project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the second acquisition means, and the notification means 3. The information processing apparatus according to claim 2, wherein in the items determined to have risk in said first project, another project determined to have no risk is selected as said second project.

In the invention according to claim 4, the notification means, in the item judged to have a risk of the first project, sends another project judged to have a risk in the past and judged to have no risk at present to the second project. 4. The information processing apparatus according to claim 3, which is selected as a project of.

In the invention of claim 5, the determination means determines whether or not there is a risk in the progress of the other project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the second acquisition means, and the notification means 3. The information processing apparatus according to claim 2, wherein another project determined to have a risk in an item different from the item determined to have a risk in the first project is selected as the second project. .

According to the invention of claim 6, the notification means selects, as the second project, another project judged to have risk among the items judged to have no risk of the first project. It is an information processing apparatus described.

According to the seventh aspect of the invention, there is provided a computer which, in a first project in which a first user group consisting of a plurality of users participates, displays communication information related to the first project and the progress of the first project. acquisition means for acquiring progress information indicated by the progress information; determination means for determining whether or not there is a risk in the progress of the first project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the acquisition means; is determined to be present, a second user group in which at least one or more different users of the first user group participate in at least one or more users of the first user group This is an information processing program for functioning as notification means for notifying a project as a collaboration partner candidate.

According to the information processing apparatus of claim 1, risks in the progress of a project can be determined from communication information and progress information, and other projects can be notified as collaboration partner candidates.

According to the information processing apparatus of claim 2, collaboration partner candidates can be selected from communication information and progress information of other projects.

According to the information processing apparatus of claim 3, in the item judged to be risky in the first project, another project judged to be risk-free can be selected as a candidate for a collaboration partner.

According to the information processing apparatus of claim 4, in the item judged to be at risk of the first project, another project that was judged to be at risk in the past, but is currently judged to be at no risk, is a collaboration partner. Can be selected as a candidate.

According to the information processing apparatus of claim 5, it is possible to select, as a collaboration partner candidate, another project determined to be at risk for an item different from the item determined to be at risk for the first project.

According to the information processing apparatus of claim 6, in the item judged to have no risk of the first project, another project judged to have a risk can be selected as a collaboration partner candidate.

According to the information processing program of claim 7, risks in project progress can be determined from communication information and progress information, and other projects can be notified as collaboration partner candidates.

2 is a conceptual module configuration diagram of a configuration example of the present embodiment; FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram showing a system configuration example using this embodiment; FIG. 6 is a flow chart showing an example of processing according to the present embodiment; 6 is a flow chart showing an example of processing according to the present embodiment; FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram showing an example data structure of a skill information table; 6 is a flow chart showing an example of processing according to the present embodiment; 6 is a flow chart showing an example of processing according to the present embodiment; 6 is a flow chart showing an example of processing according to the present embodiment; FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of processing according to the present embodiment; FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram showing an example data structure of a project management table; 6 is a flow chart showing an example of processing according to the present embodiment; FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram showing an example data structure of a project management table; 1 is a block diagram showing a hardware configuration example of a computer that implements the embodiment; FIG.

An example of a preferred embodiment for realizing the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.
FIG. 1 shows a conceptual module configuration diagram of a configuration example of this embodiment.
A module generally refers to a component such as software (computer program) or hardware that can be logically separated. Therefore, modules in this embodiment refer not only to modules in a computer program, but also to modules in a hardware configuration. Therefore, the present embodiment provides a computer program for functioning as those modules (a program for causing the computer to execute each procedure, a program for causing the computer to function as each means, a program for causing the computer to function as each function). It also serves as an explanation of the program, system and method for realizing However, for the convenience of explanation, the terms "stored", "stored", and equivalent terms are used, but when the embodiment is a computer program, these terms are stored in a storage device or stored in a storage device. It means to control to store in the device. Also, modules may correspond to functions one-to-one. may consist of multiple programs. Also, multiple modules may be executed by one computer, and one module may be executed by multiple computers by computers in a distributed or parallel environment. Note that one module may include other modules. Further, hereinafter, "connection" is used not only for physical connection but also for logical connection (data transfer, instruction, reference relationship between data, login, etc.). The term "predetermined" means that it is determined before the target process, and not only before the process according to the present embodiment starts, but also after the process according to the present embodiment starts. Also, if it is before the target process, it is used including the meaning that it is determined according to the situation/state at that time or according to the situation/state up to that time. When there are a plurality of "predetermined values", they may be different values, or two or more values (including, of course, all values) may be the same. Also, the description "if A, do B" is used in the sense of "judge whether it is A, and if it is judged to be A, do B". However, this excludes the case where it is not necessary to judge whether or not it is A. In addition, when things are listed like "A, B, C", etc., unless otherwise specified, it is an exemplary list, and includes cases where only one of them is selected (for example, only A).
In addition, a system or device is configured by connecting a plurality of computers, hardware, devices, etc. by communication means such as a network (including one-to-one correspondence communication connection), or a single computer, hardware, device The case where it is realized by etc. is also included. The terms "apparatus" and "system" are used interchangeably. Of course, "system" does not include what is merely a social "mechanism" (social system) that is an artificial arrangement.
In addition, for each process performed by each module or for each process when multiple processes are performed within a module, the target information is read from the storage device, and after the processing is performed, the processing result is written to the storage device. be. Therefore, the description of reading from the storage device before processing and writing to the storage device after processing may be omitted. The storage device here may include a hard disk, a RAM (Random Access Memory), an external storage medium, a storage device via a communication line, a register in a CPU (Central Processing Unit), and the like.

The information processing apparatus 100 according to the present embodiment manages the progress of a project, and as shown in the example of FIG. , a notification module 120 .
Here, a project is defined as a task for achieving some goal by a specific deadline (hereinafter also referred to as delivery date) by a group of users. For example, there are product development projects for developing new products. A project has activity phases, such as planning, design, development, testing, and maintenance.

Acquisition (A) module 105 is connected to risk determination module 115 and project (A) management device 150A. Acquisition (A) module 105 obtains, from project (A) management apparatus 150A, communication information related to project (A) in which a first user group consisting of a plurality of users participates, and communication information related to the project (A). Acquire progress information indicating the progress of project (A).
As "communication information", for example, the date and time when communication was performed (year, month, day, hour, minute, second, less than a second, or a combination thereof), the user who performed the communication, the communication Specifically, viewing emails, posts, messages, documents, etc. exchanged between users who are participants in the project, reporting to the project management device (e.g., progress, defect discovery rate etc.) etc.
"Progress information" includes activity phases in the project. For example, there are the start date, time limit, progress status, etc. of the TODO in the project.

Acquisition (B) module 110 is connected to risk determination module 115, project (B) management device 150B, and project (C) management device 150C. Acquisition (B) module 110 acquires communication information related to other projects other than project (A) from project (B) management device 150B, project (C) management device 150C, etc. Get progress information indicating progress.

The risk determination module 115 is connected to the acquisition (A) module 105 , the acquisition (B) module 110 and the notification module 120 . The risk determination module 115 determines whether there is a risk in the progress of the project (A) from the communication information and progress information acquired by the acquisition (A) module 105 . In other words, the risk determination module 115 determines the actualization of the risk. This determination is performed periodically, for example. Specifically, the presence or absence of risk may be determined according to rules prepared for each activity phase. The rule will be described later as a manifestation rule shown in the example of FIG.
Also, the risk determination module 115 may determine the presence or absence of risks in the progress of other projects from the communication information and progress information acquired by the acquisition (B) module 110 .

The proposal processing module 125 searches for proposed projects. In other words, when the risk determination module 115 determines that there is a risk, the proposal processing module 125, for at least one user in the first user group, at least one user in the first user group other projects (for example, project (B), project (C), etc.) in which a second group of users different from each other participate are selected as collaboration partner candidates.
A single user can participate in multiple projects. Therefore, there may be a user participating in both project (A) and another project. However, there may be users who participate in other projects but do not participate in project (A), and there is a possibility that those users will resolve risks in project (A). Therefore, "other projects that are candidates for collaboration partners" are "projects in which a second group of users, at least one of whom is different from the first group of users, participates." Of course, if there are no users participating in project (A) and no users participating in other projects (if there are no duplicate users in project (A) and other projects) , when users participating in project (A) and users participating in other projects are all different). In this case, since there is a high possibility that other projects have know-how that project (A) does not possess, they may be suitable as collaboration partners.

The proposal processing module 125 also selects a project as a collaboration partner candidate from the communication information and progress information acquired by the acquisition (B) module 110 .
Then, the proposal processing module 125 may select other projects that have been determined to have no risk in the items determined to have risk in project (A) as projects that are candidates for collaboration partners. Here, the “items” may include rules used by the risk determination module 115 for risk determination. In other words, the project (A) is judged to have a risk according to the rule X, but the project (B) is judged to have no risk according to the rule X. Note that other projects may be judged to have no risk at present, or may have been judged to have risk in the past.
Furthermore, specifically, the proposal processing module 125 selects other projects that have been determined to be at risk in the past and are currently determined to be at no risk in the project (A) that have been determined to be at risk. It may be selected as a candidate project. Since the project selected here has solved the risk generated in the same item, it means that the project (A) has the knowledge of risk solution.
More specifically, the proposal processing module 125 selects other projects in which risks similar to those of project (A) occur in the same activity phase as the activity phase in which the risks of project (A) occur as candidates for collaboration partners. may be proposed as a project. As a result, project (A) can utilize the knowledge of other projects to achieve better solutions with less man-hours. As a process for selecting projects that are candidates for collaboration partners, in addition to selecting other projects in the same activity phase in which risks similar to those of project (A) have materialized, the following selections are made: It may be processed.

In addition, the proposal processing module 125 selects other projects judged to have risks in items different from the items judged to have risks for the project (A) by the risk judgment module 115 as projects that are candidates for collaboration partners. You may make it This makes it possible to select a project that has aspects different from project (A). Furthermore, it is preferable that the other project is judged to have no risk for the same item as the item judged to have risk for project (A).
Then, the proposal processing module 125 selects other projects judged to have risks among the items judged to have no risks in the first project by the risk judgment module 115 as projects that are candidates for collaboration partners. good too.

The notification module 120 has a proposal processing module 125 and is connected to the risk determination module 115 and the project (A) user terminal 170A. When the risk determination module 115 determines that there is a risk in the project (A), the notification module 120 sends at least one or more users of the first user group (the user terminal 170A in charge of the project (A) or the project (A) ) the user who is the user of the user terminal 170A in charge) is notified of the project selected by the proposal processing module 125 as a collaboration partner candidate. Here, the notification includes, for example, e-mail, chat, electronic bulletin board, notification using social media, push notification, and telephone call by automatic voice response. Do it.

The project (A) management device 150A has a project (A) activity information storage module 155A and is connected to the acquisition (A) module 105 of the information processing device 100 . The project (A) management device 150A stores activity information of project (A). The activity information includes at least communication information and progress information schedule, and may also store assignments, deliverables, and the like.
The project (B) management device 150B has a project (B) activity information storage module 155B and is connected to the acquisition (B) module 110 of the information processing device 100 . The project (B) management device 150B stores activity information of the project (B).
The project (C) management device 150C has a project (C) activity information storage module 155C and is connected to the acquisition (B) module 110 of the information processing device 100 . The project (C) management device 150C stores project (C) activity information.
Although project (B) and project (C) are illustrated as projects other than project (A), there may be three or more projects, or one project.

Project (A) user terminal 170A is connected to notification module 120 of information processing apparatus 100 . The project (A) user terminal 170A is used by a user participating in the project (A) (for example, the leader of the project (A)) and has a communication function. For example, PC (Personal Computer, notebook PC, tablet terminal, etc.), mobile terminal (mobile phone including smartphone, etc.), wearable terminal (wristband type (bracelet type), wristwatch type, worn on the head Glasses type), etc.

FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram showing a system configuration example using this embodiment.
Information processing device 100, project (A) management device 150A, project (B) management device 150B, project (C) management device 150C, all project management device 250, user terminal 270A, user terminal 270B, user terminal 270C, user terminal 270D , a user terminal 270E, a user terminal 270F, a user terminal 270G, a user terminal 270H, a user terminal 270I, a user terminal 270J, and a user terminal 270K are connected via a communication line 290, respectively. The communication line 290 may be wireless, wired, or a combination thereof, and may be, for example, the Internet, an intranet, etc. as a communication infrastructure. Also, the functions of the information processing device 100, the project management device 150, and the all project management device 250 may be implemented as a cloud service.

The total project management device 250 has a project phase information storage module 255 , a risk manifestation rule storage module 260 and a manifested risk list storage module 265 . The all project management device 250 performs definition processing and management of each project.
The project phase information storage module 255 stores project information of each project (information constituting a project) and activity phase information (information on activity phases that each project can take). The leader of each project inputs project information and activity phase information.
The risk manifestation rule storage module 260 stores risk manifestation rules for each project. For example, the risk determination module 115 determines risks according to the manifestation rules stored in the risk manifestation rule storage module 260 . The leader of each project enters the manifestation rules.
As manifestation rules, for example, corresponding to activity phases, defined in communication information, specifically, there are the following.
(1) Planning phase (a) More than xx percentage of members do not participate in communication (do not speak).
(b) The reply rate to comments is lower than xx%. Alternatively, the time lag until a reply is longer than xx hours.
(2) Design phase (a) There are more than xx percentages of members who have not viewed the decisions (deliverables).
(b) The number of times the deliverable is modified after the design phase ends is greater than xx times.
(3) Development phase (a) Not started and completed on schedule.
(b) Failure to assign personnel to action items.
(4) Test phase (a) There is no downward trend in the defect discovery rate.
(5) Maintenance Phase (a) The average response time to inquiries is xx or longer.
(b) The number of defect reports is greater than xx times.

The materialized risk list storage module 265 stores a list of materialized risks for each project. It stores the results determined by the risk determination module 115 . Memorize risks in past projects (projects past due) and current projects. The acquisition (B) module 110 may acquire risks in other projects from the actualized risk list storage module 265 . In that case, the risk determination module 115 does not need to determine the presence or absence of risks in the progress of other projects.

A project (A) leader 272A, a project member 272B, a project member 272C, and a project member 272D participate in the project (A) 210A.
A project member 272D, a project member 272E, a project (B) leader 272F, a project member 272G, and a project member 272H participate in the project (B) 210B.
A project member 272H, a project (C) leader 272I, a project member 272J, and a project member 272K participate in the project (C) 210C.
Project member 272D participates in both project (A) 210A and project (B) 210B, and project member 272H participates in both project (B) 210B and project (C) 210C. Thus, multiple users participate in each project, and one user may participate in multiple projects.

In this example, a project (A) 210A in which a first user group consisting of a plurality of users participates, and a project in which a second user group consisting of users different from the first user group participates. (B) 210B and the like.
For example, in the project (A) 210A, when it is detected that a risk has occurred from the communication information and progress information of the project 210A, projects that are candidates for collaboration partners are specified. Here, detection means detecting (manifesting) potential risks.
Projects that are candidates for collaboration partners are projects that can cooperate to solve and reduce the risks. The information processing apparatus 100 proposes collaboration for both projects. The information processing apparatus 100 aims to create new ideas and breakthroughs by proposing projects with different aspects.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing an example of processing according to this embodiment.
The processing from step S302 to step S306 corresponds to project definition work. Processing from step S308 to step S314 is processing for proposing a project to be a collaboration partner.

In step S302, the leader inputs project information.
At step S304, the leader selects a phase.
In step S306, the leader selects, adds, edits, and deletes the risk manifestation rule. For example, the risk manifestation rule may be shared by all projects, and the risk manifestation rule may be specified only by inputting the phase. Also, the leader may select the manifestation rule for each project. Note that the processing of step S306 may be optional.

In step S308, activity information such as schedules, progress, issues, communication content, and deliverables is stored by detecting utilization of the web system or the like by project members. For example, the web system here is a system for managing a project, and may detect and accumulate operations on a web page for project management as log information.

In step S310, the risk manifestation rule is determined according to the current phase, and if "risk exists", the process proceeds to step S312, and if "no risk", the process ends (step S399).
For example, if it is a test phase, the actualization rule: "There is no decreasing trend in the defect discovery rate" is determined. Here, (number of defects/number of tests) may be used as the defect discovery rate. For example, the rate of decrease in defect discovery rate is obtained between immediately after the shift to the test phase and now (during the test phase). Then, it is estimated whether the criteria can be achieved by the end of the test. As this estimation, a predetermined formula may be applied to determine whether or not the criteria can be achieved by the time the test is completed. The calculation formula may be determined using past statistical values, or may be a linear formula determined by the defect discovery rate immediately after the shift to the test phase and at the current time.
Also, for risks that have already materialized, we will judge the actualization rules and monitor whether improvements can be seen. If it improves, remove it from latent risk. If worse, the threshold used in step S312 may be lowered to suggest further improvement.

In step S312, it is determined whether or not the proposal score of other projects with the same actualized risk (or had in the past) is equal to or higher than the threshold. The process proceeds to step S314, and if "not equal to or greater than the threshold", the process ends (step S399). The same actualized risk corresponds to the case where it is determined that there is a risk when the same rule is applied in the same phase.
In step S314, another project in the previous step is proposed as a collaboration project to the target project. For example, the leaders of both projects may be notified. Also, if other projects are active, add up the two-way proposal scores and select the other project with the highest total value, so that projects that benefit from each other are evaluated more highly. good too.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing an example of processing according to this embodiment. This shows a specific example of processing in step S312 of the flowchart shown in the example of FIG. That is, the proposal score is the number of different skills.
In step S402, the skill information table of the target project is acquired. For example, the skill information table 500 is acquired. FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram showing an example data structure of the skill information table 500. As shown in FIG. FIG. 5(a) is an explanatory diagram showing an example data structure of the skill information table 500A in the target project (A). The skill information table 500A has a skill column 510A and a skill evaluation value column 520A. The skill column 510A stores skills. The skill evaluation value column 520A stores the evaluation value of the skill (average value of skill evaluation values of users participating in project (A), etc.).

In step S404, skill information tables of other projects are acquired. For example, as skill information tables for other projects, skill information table 500B for project (B) as shown in the example of FIG. 5B and skill information table 500B for project (C) as shown in the example of FIG. There is a table 500C. The skill information table 500B and the skill information table 500C have the same data structure as the skill information table 500A.
The "other project" here has the same materialized risk as the target project, but may be another project that has resolved the materialized risk.
Further, the "other project" may be another project that is determined to have a risk in an item different from the item determined to have a risk in the target project. Furthermore, among the items determined to be risk-free in the target project, other projects determined to have risk may be used. In other words, even if a different risk arises, by sharing the know-how with each other, both parties will be able to resolve the risk. For example, different activity trends for the same phase may result in different risks. Specifically, in the design phase, there are different risks between a project with active communication but a small amount of deliverables (project (A)) and a project with the opposite trend (project (B)). The possibility is high, and by sharing the know-how with each other, it is expected that the latent risks on both sides will be resolved. In project (A), risks arise due to "cannot find decisions and their backgrounds" and "many man-hours are required for explanations and information deployment", but in project (B), "sales and If there is a risk due to "there is no function that can be used" or "sales are unsatisfactory", know-how can be provided for items that do not have a risk, which is advantageous for both parties (so-called win-win relationship) .

In step S406, the number of skill items that differ between the two is calculated. In other words, this is to select a project having skills different from those of the target project (A). In the example of FIG. 5, the skill information table 500B has "1" because "C#" on the fourth line is different, and the skill information table 500C has "customer orientation" on the first line and "proposal" on the second line. "Ability" is different, so it is "2".

In step S408, it is determined whether or not "the number of different skill items≧threshold A", and if "the number of different skill items≧threshold A", the process proceeds to step S410; otherwise, the process proceeds to step S412. For example, when the threshold A is set to "2", the skill information table 500C satisfies the condition of step S408 in the above example. That is, project (C) has a higher proposal score. In this case, it is said that projects with different skills possessed are effective as projects to be collaboration partners, and opinions from different viewpoints lead to breakthrough measures.
In step S410, it is included in the collaboration project list. In the example above, project (C) would be placed in the collaboration projects list.
In step S412, it is determined whether or not there is a project to be compared, and if there is, the process returns to step S404, otherwise the process ends (step S499).

FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing an example of processing according to this embodiment. This shows a specific example of processing in step S312 of the flowchart shown in the example of FIG. That is, it shows another processing example of the flowchart shown in the example of FIG. Processes other than steps S606 and S608 are the same as those in the flowchart shown in the example of FIG.
In step S602, the skill information table of the target project is obtained.
In step S604, skill information tables of other projects are obtained.

In step S606, the number of skill items that are the same between the two and have a higher skill evaluation value in the target project is calculated. The calculated number of skill items is used as the proposal score in the example of FIG.
In step S608, it is determined whether or not "the number of skill items calculated in the previous step≧threshold B". If so, the process proceeds to step S612.

In step S610, it is included in the collaboration project list. In other words, although the skill evaluation value is low, the risk has been resolved in the project, so there is a high possibility that the project has the know-how to resolve the risk.
In step S612, it is determined whether or not there is a project to be compared, and if there is, the process returns to step S604, otherwise the process ends (step S699).

FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing an example of processing according to this embodiment. This shows a specific example of processing in step S312 of the flowchart shown in the example of FIG. That is, it shows another processing example of the flowchart shown in the example of FIG. Processes other than steps S706 and S708 are the same as those in the flowchart shown in the example of FIG.
In step S702, the skill information table of the target project is obtained.
In step S704, skill information tables of other projects are obtained.

In step S706, the value of (the number of skill items with a higher skill evaluation value in the target project)/(the number of skill items with a lower skill evaluation value in the target project) for the same skill items between the two is calculated. . This calculated value is used as the proposal score in the example of FIG.
In step S708, it is determined whether or not "the ratio calculated in the previous step≧threshold C". If "the ratio calculated in the previous step≧threshold C", the process proceeds to step S710; otherwise, step S712. proceed to

In step S710, it is included in the collaboration project list.
In step S712, it is determined whether or not there is a project to be compared, and if there is, the process returns to step S704, otherwise the process ends (step S799).

FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing an example of processing according to this embodiment. This shows a specific example of processing in step S312 of the flowchart shown in the example of FIG.
In step S802, the risks of the target project are extracted.
In step S804, past risks of other projects that have achieved their targets on time are extracted.
It should be noted that the "other project" here may be another project determined to have a risk in an item different from the item determined to have a risk in the target project. Furthermore, among the items determined to be risk-free in the target project, other projects determined to have risk may be used. In other words, even if a different risk arises, by sharing the know-how with each other, both parties will be able to resolve the risk. The reason is the same as step S404 in the flowchart shown in the example of FIG.

In step S806, it is determined whether or not the same risks as those of the target project have been extracted. If the risks have been extracted, the process proceeds to step S808;
In step S808, it is determined whether or not the risks occurred at the same time in terms of schedule. Here, "at the same time" may simply mean that the phase is the same, or that the phase is the same and the rate of progress within that phase (specifically, the number of days elapsed within that phase/ duration of the phase) may be similar. Note that the similarity here means that the difference between the two progress rates is within a predetermined value.

In step S810, it is included in the collaboration project list.
In step S812, it is determined whether or not there is a project to be compared, and if there is, the process returns to step S804, otherwise the process ends (step S899).

FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of processing according to this embodiment.
A defect discovery rate graph 900A shown in the example of FIG. 9A is a graph showing the relationship between the elapsed time and the defect discovery rate of the target project (A).
From the defect discovery rate transition 910A, there is a high possibility that the defect discovery rate will not sufficiently decrease by the delivery date 930A.
Whether or not there is a risk is determined by setting a threshold for the number of days to achieve the predicted target, and the following calculation formula is used.
Defect discovery rate = number of defects / number of test cases Average reduction points for defect discovery rate = (current defect discovery rate - target defect discovery rate) / number of days elapsed Predicted target achievement days = number of elapsed days + (current defect discovery rate - target defect discovery rate)/average reduction point of defect discovery rate Then, it is determined that there is a risk when "the estimated number of days to achieve the target exceeds the delivery date of 930A".
In addition, the risk manifestation determination process may not be performed until the failure discovery rate stabilizes. For example, instead of making a proposal based on the measurement results on the first day for a test that takes three months, a grace period of two weeks or one month should be provided.

A fault discovery rate graph 900B shown in the example of FIG. 9B is for project (B), and a fault discovery rate graph 900C shown in the example of FIG. 9C is for project (C).
Project (C) should have a higher proposal score than project (B). In other words, it can be inferred that an appropriate response has been made to the actualized risk, and the provision of know-how for solving the problem can be expected.
Those with proposal scores equal to or greater than a threshold may be proposed. Furthermore, the project with the highest proposal score may be proposed.
The proposal score is obtained by using the "average reduction point of defect discovery rate" from the time the risk becomes apparent to the delivery date. The following calculation formula is used.
Average reduction points for defect discovery rate = (Defect discovery rate at risk manifestation - Defect discovery rate at time of delivery) / Elapsed days from risk manifestation to delivery date However, this is limited to projects that satisfy the following conditions.
- Achieving the target on time.
・Risks have materialized.

The project management table 1000 may be used to perform the processing of the flowchart shown in the example of FIG.
FIG. 10 is an explanatory diagram showing an example data structure of the project management table 1000. As shown in FIG. The project management table 1000 has a project ID column 1010, a schedule column 1020, a goal column 1030, a goal achievement flag 1040, a risk type column 1050, a risk occurrence date and time column 1060, and a risk factor item column 1070. The schedule column 1020 is . The project ID column 1010 stores information (project ID: IDentification) for uniquely identifying a project in this embodiment. The schedule column 1020 stores the schedule of the project. The start date and time column 1022 stores the start date and time of the project. The delivery date and time 1024 stores the delivery date and time of the project. Note that the start date/time column 1022 and the delivery date/time 1024 may be prepared for each activity phase. The goal column 1030 stores goals. For example, it may be completed by the delivery date. The goal achievement flag 1040 stores information (flag) indicating whether or not the goal has been achieved. The risk type column 1050 stores the type of risk that occurred in the project (which may be the rule that determined the risk). The risk occurrence date and time column 1060 stores the date and time of occurrence of the risk. The risk factor item column 1070 stores the risk factor item. The defect discovery rate column 1072 stores the defect discovery rate.

FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing an example of processing according to this embodiment. This shows a specific example of processing in step S314 of the flowchart shown in the example of FIG. In other words, it is an example of an algorithm for determining which of the members in the proposed project to introduce.
In step S1102, members of the target project are extracted. For example, extract from the project management table 1200 . FIG. 12 is an explanatory diagram showing an example data structure of the project management table 1200. As shown in FIG. The project management table 1200 has a user ID column 1210, a number of projects column 1220, a project ID column 1230, a position column 1240, and a phase column 1250 in charge. The user ID column 1210 stores information (user ID) for uniquely identifying the user in this embodiment. The number of projects column 1220 stores the number of projects in which the user participates. A combination of project ID field 1230 and job title field 1240 follows as many as the number in project number field 1220 . The project ID column 1230 stores project IDs. The post column 1240 stores roles (posts) within the project, such as leaders, general members, etc., held by the user in the project. The assigned phase column 1250 stores the phase assigned to the user.

In step S1104, members of the proposed project are extracted. Similarly, it can be extracted from the project management table 1200 .
In step S1106, it is determined whether or not the members of the target project and the members of the project to be proposed are the same members.
In step S1108, it is determined whether or not the risk of the target project is involved, and if so, the process proceeds to step S1110, otherwise the process proceeds to step S1112. Specifically, it can be determined by referring to the assigned phase column 1250 of the project management table 1200 and determining whether or not it corresponds to a phase in which a risk has occurred (occurred).
In step S1110, the leader of the proposed project is introduced.
At step S1112, the member (the member determined to be the same member at step S1106) is introduced.

Note that in order to calculate the proposal score of the other project when summing the proposal scores for both directions of the project and selecting the other project with the higher total value, the relationship of the projects in the above calculation of the proposal score is reversed. should be In other words, the proposal score can be calculated with the "target project" as the "other project" and the "other project" as the "target project".

As shown in FIG. 13, the hardware configuration of the computer on which the program according to the present embodiment is executed is a general computer, specifically a personal computer, a computer that can serve as a server, and the like. That is, as a specific example, a CPU 1301 is used as a processing unit (calculating unit), and a RAM 1302, ROM 1303, and HD 1304 are used as storage devices. As the HD 1304, for example, a hard disk, an SSD (Solid State Drive) which is a flash memory, or the like may be used. A CPU 1301 that executes programs such as the acquisition (A) module 105, the acquisition (B) module 110, the risk determination module 115, the notification module 120, the proposal processing module 125, etc., the RAM 1302 that stores the programs and data, and the computer is started. A ROM 1303 storing programs and the like for doing so, an HD 1304 serving as an auxiliary storage device for storing the skill information table 500, the project management table 1000, the project management table 1200, etc., a keyboard, a mouse, a touch screen, a microphone, a camera ( a receiving device 1306 that receives data based on user's operation (including motion, voice, line of sight, etc.), an output device 1305 such as a CRT, a liquid crystal display, a speaker, etc., and a network interface card. and a bus 1308 for connecting them to exchange data. A plurality of these computers may be connected to each other via a network.

Of the above-described embodiments, with respect to the computer program, a computer program, which is software, is loaded into the system of this hardware configuration, and the software and hardware resources cooperate to perform the above-described embodiment. is realized.
Note that the hardware configuration shown in FIG. 13 shows one configuration example, and the present embodiment is not limited to the configuration shown in FIG. I wish I had. For example, some modules may be configured with dedicated hardware (for example, Application Specific Integrated Circuit: ASIC), etc., and some modules are in an external system and connected via a communication line. Further, a plurality of systems shown in FIG. 13 may be connected to each other by communication lines so as to cooperate with each other. In addition to personal computers, mobile information communication devices (including mobile phones, smartphones, mobile devices, wearable computers, etc.), information appliances, robots, copiers, faxes, scanners, printers, multifunction devices (scanners, printers, It may be incorporated in an image processing apparatus having two or more functions such as a copier, a facsimile machine, or the like.

The program described above may be stored in a recording medium and provided, or the program may be provided by communication means. In that case, for example, the program described above may be regarded as an invention of "a computer-readable recording medium on which the program is recorded."
"Program-recorded computer-readable recording medium" refers to a computer-readable recording medium recording a program, which is used for program installation, execution, program distribution, and the like.
As a recording medium, for example, a digital versatile disc (DVD), which is a standard established by the DVD Forum, "DVD-R, DVD-RW, DVD-RAM, etc." Standard "DVD + R, DVD + RW, etc.", compact disc (CD), read-only memory (CD-ROM), CD recordable (CD-R), CD rewritable (CD-RW), Blu-ray disc ( Blu-ray (registered trademark) Disc), magneto-optical disk (MO), flexible disk (FD), magnetic tape, hard disk, read-only memory (ROM), electrically erasable and rewritable read-only memory (EEPROM (registered trademark) )), flash memory, random access memory (RAM), SD (Secure Digital) memory card, and the like.
Then, the whole or part of the program may be recorded on the recording medium and stored or distributed. Also, by communication, for example, a wired network used for a local area network (LAN), a metropolitan area network (MAN), a wide area network (WAN), the Internet, an intranet, an extranet, etc., or a wireless communication. It may be transmitted using a transmission medium such as a network or a combination thereof, or may be carried on a carrier wave.
Furthermore, the program may be part or all of another program, or may be recorded on a recording medium together with a separate program. Moreover, it may be divided and recorded on a plurality of recording media. Also, it may be recorded in any form, such as compression or encryption, as long as it can be restored.

100... Information processing device 105... Acquisition (A) module 110... Acquisition (B) module 115... Risk determination module 120... Notification module 125... Proposal processing module 150... Project management device 155... Project activity information storage module 170A... Project (A) ) Responsible user terminal 210 Project 250 Management device for all projects 255 Project phase information storage module 260 Risk manifestation rule storage module 265 Risk manifestation list storage module 270 User terminal 290 Communication line

Claims (12)

Acquisition means for acquiring communication information related to the first project and progress information indicating the progress of the first project in a first project in which a first user group composed of a plurality of users participates;
determination means for determining whether there is a risk in the progress of the first project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the acquisition means;
When it is determined that there is a risk by the determination means, a second user group in which at least one or more people in the first user group are different from at least one or more users in the first user group notification means for notifying the participating second project as a collaboration partner candidate ;
Second acquisition means for acquiring communication information related to the project other than the first project and progress information indicating the progress of the project.
has
the notification means selects the second project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the second acquisition means;
The determination means determines whether or not there is a risk in the progress of the other project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the second acquisition means,
The notification means selects, as the second project, another project that is determined to be risk-free among the items determined to be risky in the first project.
Information processing equipment. The notification means selects, as the second project, another project that has been determined to have a risk in the past and is currently determined to have no risk in the items that have been determined to have a risk in the first project.
The information processing device according to claim 1 . Acquisition means for acquiring communication information related to the first project and progress information indicating the progress of the first project in a first project in which a first user group composed of a plurality of users participates;
determination means for determining whether there is a risk in the progress of the first project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the acquisition means;
When it is determined that there is a risk by the determination means, a second user group in which at least one or more people in the first user group are different from at least one or more users in the first user group notification means for notifying the participating second project as a collaboration partner candidate ;
Second acquisition means for acquiring communication information related to the project other than the first project and progress information indicating the progress of the project.
has
the notification means selects the second project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the second acquisition means;
The determination means determines whether or not there is a risk in the progress of the other project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the second acquisition means,
The notification means selects, as the second project, another project that has been determined to have a risk in the past and is currently determined to have no risk in the items that have been determined to have a risk in the first project.
Information processing device having The notification means selects, as the second project, another project that is determined to be risk-free among the items determined to be risky in the first project.
The information processing apparatus according to claim 3 . Acquisition means for acquiring communication information related to the first project and progress information indicating the progress of the first project in a first project in which a first user group composed of a plurality of users participates;
determination means for determining whether there is a risk in the progress of the first project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the acquisition means;
When it is determined that there is a risk by the determination means, a second user group in which at least one or more people in the first user group are different from at least one or more users in the first user group notification means for notifying the participating second project as a collaboration partner candidate ;
Second acquisition means for acquiring communication information related to the project other than the first project and progress information indicating the progress of the project.
has
the notification means selects the second project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the second acquisition means;
The determination means determines whether or not there is a risk in the progress of the other project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the second acquisition means,
The notification means selects, as the second project, another project determined to be at risk in an item different from the item determined to be at risk of the first project.
Information processing equipment. The notification means selects, as the second project, another project determined to have a risk among the items determined to have no risk in the first project.
The information processing device according to claim 5 . Acquisition means for acquiring communication information related to the first project and progress information indicating the progress of the first project in a first project in which a first user group composed of a plurality of users participates;
determination means for determining whether there is a risk in the progress of the first project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the acquisition means;
When it is determined that there is a risk by the determination means, a second user group in which at least one or more people in the first user group are different from at least one or more users in the first user group notification means for notifying the participating second project as a collaboration partner candidate ;
Second acquisition means for acquiring communication information related to the project other than the first project and progress information indicating the progress of the project.
has
the notification means selects the second project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the second acquisition means;
The determination means determines whether or not there is a risk in the progress of the other project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the second acquisition means,
The notification means selects, as the second project, another project determined to have a risk among the items determined to have no risk in the first project.
Information processing equipment. The notification means selects, as the second project, another project determined to be at risk in an item different from the item determined to be at risk of the first project.
The information processing apparatus according to claim 7 . the computer,
Acquisition means for acquiring communication information related to the first project and progress information indicating the progress of the first project in a first project in which a first user group composed of a plurality of users participates;
determination means for determining whether there is a risk in the progress of the first project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the acquisition means;
When it is determined that there is a risk by the determination means, a second user group in which at least one or more people in the first user group are different from at least one or more users in the first user group notification means for notifying the participating second project as a collaboration partner candidate ;
Second acquisition means for acquiring communication information related to the project other than the first project and progress information indicating the progress of the project.
function as
the notification means selects the second project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the second acquisition means;
The determination means determines whether or not there is a risk in the progress of the other project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the second acquisition means,
The notification means selects, as the second project, another project that is determined to be risk-free among the items determined to be risky in the first project.
Information processing program. Acquisition means for acquiring communication information related to the first project and progress information indicating the progress of the first project in a first project in which a first user group composed of a plurality of users participates;
determination means for determining whether there is a risk in the progress of the first project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the acquisition means;
When it is determined that there is a risk by the determination means, a second user group in which at least one or more people in the first user group are different from at least one or more users in the first user group notification means for notifying the participating second project as a collaboration partner candidate ;
Second acquisition means for acquiring communication information related to the project other than the first project and progress information indicating the progress of the project.
function as
the notification means selects the second project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the second acquisition means;
The determination means determines whether or not there is a risk in the progress of the other project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the second acquisition means,
The notification means selects, as the second project, another project that has been determined to have a risk in the past and is currently determined to have no risk in the items that have been determined to have a risk in the first project.
Information processing program. Acquisition means for acquiring communication information related to the first project and progress information indicating the progress of the first project in a first project in which a first user group composed of a plurality of users participates;
determination means for determining whether there is a risk in the progress of the first project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the acquisition means;
When it is determined that there is a risk by the determination means, a second user group in which at least one or more people in the first user group are different from at least one or more users in the first user group notification means for notifying the participating second project as a collaboration partner candidate ;
Second acquisition means for acquiring communication information related to the project other than the first project and progress information indicating the progress of the project.
function as
the notification means selects the second project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the second acquisition means;
The determination means determines whether or not there is a risk in the progress of the other project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the second acquisition means,
The notification means selects, as the second project, another project determined to be at risk in an item different from the item determined to be at risk of the first project.
Information processing program. Acquisition means for acquiring communication information related to the first project and progress information indicating the progress of the first project in a first project in which a first user group composed of a plurality of users participates;
determination means for determining whether there is a risk in the progress of the first project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the acquisition means;
When it is determined that there is a risk by the determination means, a second user group in which at least one or more people in the first user group are different from at least one or more users in the first user group notification means for notifying the participating second project as a collaboration partner candidate ;
Second acquisition means for acquiring communication information related to the project other than the first project and progress information indicating the progress of the project.
function as
the notification means selects the second project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the second acquisition means;
The determination means determines whether or not there is a risk in the progress of the other project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the second acquisition means,
The notification means selects, as the second project, another project determined to have a risk among the items determined to have no risk in the first project.
Information processing program.

Images