JP2020034963A - Information processing apparatus and information processing program - Google Patents

Abstract

To provide an information processing apparatus capable of determining a risk in a progress of a project from communication information and progress information, and notifying another project as a candidate of a collaboration partner.SOLUTION: Acquisition means of an information processing apparatus acquires, in a first project participated by a first user group composed of a plurality of users, communication information related to the first project and progress information indicating a progress of the first project. Determination means determines whether or not there is a risk in the progress of the first project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the acquisition means. When the determination means determines that there is a risk, notification means notifies at least one or more users of the first user group of a second project participated by a second user group having at least one or more users different from the first user group, as a candidate of a collaboration partner.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

  The present invention relates to an information processing device and an information processing program.

  Patent Literature 1 has an object to support prediction of a project risk related to communication between project persons, and a terminal and a server of the project persons exist on a network, and the server includes a caller identifier and a transmission date and time. A communication information storage unit and an arithmetic processing unit in which information including a message is stored for each message, and when any terminal sends a message, the arithmetic processing unit stores communication information about the message in the communication information storage unit. In addition, it is disclosed that, based on information stored in a communication information storage unit, analysis information indicating the number of message transmissions of a project related person in time series is output for each project related person.

  Patent Literature 2 has an object to support prediction of a project risk related to communication between project stakeholders, and a server stores information including a sender identifier, a transmission date and time, a receiver identifier and a reception date for each message. A communication information storage unit and an arithmetic processing unit stored in the communication information storage unit. When one of the terminals sends a message, the arithmetic processing unit stores communication information related to the message in the communication information storage unit, and stores the communication information in the communication information storage unit. It is disclosed that, based on accumulated information of a section, analysis information indicating the number of message transmissions of project related persons in a time series is output for each project related person.

  Patent Literature 3 discloses an intention determining unit that determines an intention of a statement included in a text sentence related to a project based on a relationship between a predetermined text expression and an intention, a predetermined text expression and a topic. A topic determination unit that determines a topic of a utterance included in the text sentence based on a relationship with the text sentence; an extraction condition storage unit in which a risk sentence extraction condition including a plurality of intentions of the utterance and an appearance pattern of the topic is stored; The intention determined by the intention determining unit and the topic determined by the topic determining unit are compared with the risk sentence extraction condition stored in the extraction condition storage unit, and the intention and the intention that match the risk sentence extraction condition are compared. There is disclosed a statement specifying means for specifying a statement corresponding to a topic as a risk statement.

  Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2004-157,086 discloses a method of analyzing the distribution of topics using the similarity of statement contents as an index, and tracking the transition of a specific topic. The statement content analysis unit analyzes the statements and analyzes a user profile ( Graph), the task structure analysis unit generates a task list for each user based on the registered user information of the task, and the profile similarity determination unit calculates the similarity of the profile (speech content) between users Then, the distance calculation unit calculates the task distance of the shortest route to be followed by referring to the task map, and the similarity counting unit counts and analyzes the distribution of the similarity (the number of similar speaking users and the average value) for each distance. It is disclosed that the result output unit outputs this.

JP-A-2004-054606 JP-A-2004-127140 Japanese Patent No. 522604 JP 2007-072549 A

A risk may occur in the progress of a project involving a group of users composed of a plurality of users. In particular, the signs appear in the communication concerning the project and the progress of the project. In other projects, the same risk may be solved. However, it is difficult to make use of that knowledge.
An object of the present invention is to provide an information processing apparatus and an information processing program that can determine a risk in the progress of a project from communication information and progress information, and notify another project as a candidate for a collaboration partner.

The gist of the present invention to achieve this object lies in the inventions in the following items.
According to the first aspect of the present invention, in a first project in which a first user group composed of a plurality of users participates, communication information related to the first project and progress information indicating the progress of the first project Acquisition means for acquiring the information, the communication information and the progress information acquired by the acquisition means, a determination means for determining whether there is a risk in the progress of the first project, and a determination that there is a risk by the determination means. If determined, at least one or more users of the first user group collaborate on a second project in which a second user group different from at least one of the first user groups participates. This is an information processing apparatus having a notification unit for notifying as a partner candidate.

  The invention according to claim 2 further comprises a second acquisition unit for acquiring, in a project other than the first project, communication information on the other project and progress information indicating the progress of the other project. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the notifying unit selects the second project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the second acquiring unit.

  The invention according to claim 3, wherein the determination unit determines whether there is a risk in the progress of the another project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the second acquisition unit, and the notification unit 3. The information processing apparatus according to claim 2, wherein, in the items of the first project determined to be at risk, another project determined to have no risk is selected as the second project.

  The invention according to claim 4 is characterized in that the notifying means sets, for the items determined to be at risk in the first project, other projects determined to be at risk in the past and currently determined to be at no risk to the second project. 4. The information processing apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the information processing apparatus is selected as a project.

  The invention according to claim 5, wherein the determining means determines whether there is a risk in the progress of the other project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the second acquiring means, and the notifying means 3. The information processing apparatus according to claim 2, wherein, in an item different from the item of the first project determined to be at risk, another project determined to be at risk is selected as the second project. .

  The invention according to claim 6, wherein the notifying means selects, as the second project, another project determined to be at risk in the item of the first project determined to be without risk. An information processing apparatus as described in the above.

  According to a seventh aspect of the present invention, in a first project in which a first user group composed of a plurality of users participates, communication information on the first project and progress of the first project are stored in a computer. Acquisition means for acquiring the progress information indicated by the acquisition means; judgment means for judging whether or not there is a risk in the progress of the first project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the acquisition means; Is determined to be present, a second user group in which at least one or more of the first user group participates in at least one or more users of the first user group. Information processing program to function as a notification means to notify a project as a candidate for collaboration partner It is a non.

  According to the information processing apparatus of the first aspect, it is possible to determine a risk in the progress of the project from the communication information and the progress information, and to notify another project as a candidate for a collaboration partner.

  According to the information processing apparatus of the second aspect, it is possible to select a candidate for a collaboration partner from communication information and progress information of another project.

  According to the information processing apparatus of the third aspect, in the item of the first project determined to be at risk, another project determined to have no risk can be selected as a candidate for a collaboration partner.

  According to the information processing apparatus of the fourth aspect, in the item of the first project that is determined to be at risk, other projects that have been determined to be at risk in the past, but are currently determined to be at no risk are assigned to the collaboration partner. Can be selected as a candidate.

  According to the information processing apparatus of the fifth aspect, in an item different from the item of the first project determined to be at risk, another project determined to be at risk can be selected as a candidate for a collaboration partner.

  According to the information processing device of the sixth aspect, in the item of the first project determined to be without risk, another project determined to be at risk can be selected as a candidate for a collaboration partner.

  According to the information processing program of the seventh aspect, it is possible to determine a risk in the progress of the project from the communication information and the progress information, and to notify another project as a candidate for a collaboration partner.

FIG. 2 is a conceptual module configuration diagram illustrating a configuration example according to the present embodiment. FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a system configuration using the present embodiment. 5 is a flowchart illustrating a processing example according to the exemplary embodiment; 5 is a flowchart illustrating a processing example according to the exemplary embodiment; It is explanatory drawing which shows the example of a data structure of a skill information table. 5 is a flowchart illustrating a processing example according to the exemplary embodiment; 5 is a flowchart illustrating a processing example according to the exemplary embodiment; 5 is a flowchart illustrating a processing example according to the exemplary embodiment; FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram illustrating a processing example according to the exemplary embodiment; FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a data structure of a project management table. 5 is a flowchart illustrating a processing example according to the exemplary embodiment; FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a data structure of a project management table. FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an example of a hardware configuration of a computer that implements the exemplary embodiment.

Hereinafter, an example of a preferred embodiment for realizing the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
FIG. 1 is a conceptual module configuration diagram of a configuration example according to the present embodiment.
Note that a module generally refers to a component such as software (computer program) and hardware that can be logically separated. Therefore, the module in the present embodiment indicates not only a module in a computer program but also a module in a hardware configuration. Therefore, the present embodiment is directed to a computer program (program for causing a computer to execute each procedure, a program for causing a computer to function as each means, And a description of the system and method. However, for the sake of explanation, the words “store”, “store”, and equivalent words are used. However, when the embodiment is a computer program, these words are stored in a storage device or stored. This means that control is performed so as to be stored in the device. Also, the modules may correspond to the functions one-to-one, but in implementation, one module may be configured with one program, a plurality of modules may be configured with one program, and conversely, one module may be configured. May be composed of a plurality of programs. Further, a plurality of modules may be executed by one computer, or one module may be executed by a plurality of computers in a distributed or parallel environment. Note that one module may include another module. Hereinafter, the term “connection” is used not only for a physical connection but also for a logical connection (data transmission / reception, instruction, reference relationship between data, login, etc.). "Predetermined" means that the process is determined before the process of interest, not only before the process according to the present embodiment starts, but also after the process according to the present embodiment starts. Also, before the target processing, it is used in accordance with the situation / state at that time or with the intention of being determined according to the situation / state up to that time. When there are a plurality of “predetermined values”, the values may be different from each other, or two or more values (including all values, of course) may be the same. In addition, the expression “if it is A, do B” is used to mean “determine whether or not it is A, and if it is A, do B”. However, this does not apply to cases where it is not necessary to determine whether or not it is A. Further, when an object is enumerated such as “A, B, C” or the like, the enumeration is an example unless otherwise specified, and includes a case where only one of them is selected (for example, only A).
In addition, a system or a device is configured by connecting a plurality of computers, hardware, devices, and the like by communication means such as a network (including one-to-one communication connection), and also includes one computer, hardware, and device. Etc. are also included. “Apparatus” and “system” are used as terms having the same meaning. Needless to say, the “system” does not include anything that is merely a social “mechanism” (social system) that is an artificial arrangement.
In addition, for each process performed by each module or when a plurality of processes are performed in a module, target information is read from a storage device, and after performing the process, a processing result is written to the storage device. is there. Therefore, the description of reading from the storage device before processing and writing to the storage device after processing may be omitted. Note that the storage device here may include a hard disk, a RAM (Random Access Memory), an external storage medium, a storage device via a communication line, a register in a CPU (Central Processing Unit), and the like.

The information processing apparatus 100 according to the present embodiment manages the progress of a project. As shown in the example of FIG. 1, an acquisition (A) module 105, an acquisition (B) module 110, and a risk determination module 115 , A notification module 120.
Here, a project refers to an operation for achieving a certain goal by a specific deadline (hereinafter, also referred to as a delivery date) by a group composed of a plurality of users. For example, there is a product development project for developing a new product. The project has an activity phase, for example, an activity phase such as planning, design, development, test, and maintenance.

The acquisition (A) module 105 is connected to the risk determination module 115 and the project (A) management device 150A. The acquisition (A) module 105 transmits, from the project (A) management device 150A, communication information related to the project (A) in the project (A) in which the first user group including a plurality of users participates, and Acquire progress information indicating the progress of the project (A).
The “communication information” includes, for example, the date and time when communication was performed (year, month, day, hour, minute, second, seconds or less, or a combination thereof), the user who performed the communication, and the communication Specifically, there are e-mails, posts, messages, documents, etc., exchanged between users who are participants in the project, and reports to the project management device (for example, progress, defect detection rate). Registration).
The “progress information” includes the activity phase in the project. For example, there are a start date and time, a deadline, and a progress status of the project at the TODO or the like.

  The acquisition (B) module 110 is connected to the risk determination module 115, the project (B) management device 150B, and the project (C) management device 150C. The acquisition (B) module 110 receives, from the project (B) management device 150B, the project (C) management device 150C, etc., communication information on another project and information on the other project in a project other than the project (A). Obtain progress information indicating progress.

The risk determination module 115 is connected to the acquisition (A) module 105, the acquisition (B) module 110, and the notification module 120. The risk determination module 115 determines whether there is a risk in the progress of the project (A) from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the acquisition (A) module 105. That is, the risk determination module 115 determines whether the risk has been revealed. This determination is performed, for example, periodically. Specifically, the determination of the presence or absence of risk may be performed according to rules (rules) prepared for each activity phase. The rule will be described later as a manifestation rule shown in the example of FIG.
The risk determination module 115 may determine whether there is a risk in the progress of another project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the acquisition (B) module 110.

The proposal processing module 125 searches for a proposal target project. That is, when the risk determination module 115 determines that there is a risk, the proposal processing module 125 provides at least one or more users of the first user group to at least one or more users of the first user group. Select another project (for example, project (B), project (C), etc.) in which a second user group different from the above participates as a candidate for collaboration partner.
A single user can participate in multiple projects. Therefore, some users may be participating in both project (A) and other projects. However, there may be a user who is participating in another project but not participating in the project (A), and the user may solve a risk in the project (A). Therefore, “another project that is a candidate for collaboration partner” is “a project in which a second user group in which at least one of the first user groups is different” participates. Of course, when there is no user participating in the project (A) and no user participating in another project (when there is no overlapping user in the project (A) and another project) , The users who are participating in the project (A) and the users who are participating in other projects are all different). In this case, there is a high possibility that another project has know-how not owned by the project (A), and thus the project (A) may be suitable as a collaboration partner.

Further, the proposal processing module 125 selects a project as a collaboration partner candidate from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the acquisition (B) module 110.
Then, the proposal processing module 125 may select another project determined as having no risk in the item determined to be at risk in the project (A) as a project that is a candidate for a collaboration partner. Here, the “item” may include a rule used by the risk determination module 115 for determining a risk. That is, in the project (A), it is determined that there is a risk by the rule X, but in the project (B), it is determined that there is no risk by the rule X. It should be noted that other projects may be determined to have no risk at present, and may be determined to have risk in the past.
Further, specifically, the proposal processing module 125 assigns another project that has been determined to have a risk in the past and has been determined to be no risk to the project (A) to the collaboration partner in the item determined to be at risk in the project (A). You may make it select as a candidate project. Since the project selected here has solved the risk that occurred in the same item, the project (A) has knowledge of risk solving.
More specifically, the proposal processing module 125 determines, in the same activity phase as the activity phase in which the risk of the project (A) has occurred, another project in which the same risk as that of the project (A) has occurred, as a candidate for a collaboration partner. May be proposed as a project. As a result, the project (A) can achieve a better solution with low man-hours by utilizing the knowledge of other projects. As a process of selecting a project to be a candidate for a collaboration partner, in addition to selecting another project in which the same risk as the risk of the project (A) has become apparent in the same activity phase, the following selection process is also performed. Processing may be performed.

In addition, the proposal processing module 125 selects another project determined to have a risk as a project that is a candidate for a collaboration partner in an item different from the item determined to have a risk of the project (A) by the risk determination module 115. You may make it. As a result, a project having an aspect different from that of the project (A) can be selected. In addition, it is preferable that the same item as the item determined as having a risk in the project (A) is another project determined as having no risk.
Then, the proposal processing module 125 selects another project determined as having a risk from the items determined as having no risk in the first project by the risk determination module 115 as a project that is a candidate for a collaboration partner. Is also good.

  The notification module 120 has a proposal processing module 125, and is connected to the risk determination module 115 and the user terminal 170A in charge of the project (A). When the risk determination module 115 determines that there is a risk in the project (A), the notification module 120 outputs at least one or more users of the first user group (the user terminal 170A in charge of the project (A) or the project (A). ) The user selected by the user terminal 170A) is notified of the project selected by the proposal processing module 125 as a candidate for a collaboration partner. Here, the notification includes, for example, an e-mail, a chat, an electronic bulletin board, a notification using social media, a push notification, and a telephone call using an automatic voice response. As the telephone call, for example, using Lync (registered trademark) or the like Just do it.

The project (A) management device 150A has a project (A) activity information storage module 155A, and is connected to the acquisition (A) module 105 of the information processing device 100. The project (A) management device 150A stores activity information of the project (A). The activity information may include at least communication information and a progress information schedule, and may further store issues, deliverables, and the like.
The project (B) management device 150B has a project (B) activity information storage module 155B, and is connected to the acquisition (B) module 110 of the information processing device 100. The project (B) management device 150B stores the activity information of the project (B).
The project (C) management device 150C has a project (C) activity information storage module 155C, and is connected to the acquisition (B) module 110 of the information processing device 100. The project (C) management device 150C stores the activity information of the project (C).
In addition, although the project (B) and the project (C) are illustrated as other projects other than the project (A), the project may be three or more projects or one project.

  The user terminal 170 </ b> A in charge of the project (A) is connected to the notification module 120 of the information processing device 100. The user terminal 170A in charge of the project (A) is used by users participating in the project (A) (for example, the leader of the project (A)) and has a communication function. For example, a PC (Personal Computer, a notebook PC, a tablet terminal, or the like), a mobile terminal (a mobile phone including a smartphone, etc.), a wearable terminal (a wristband type (bracelet type), a wristwatch type, or a head-mounted type) Glasses)).

FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram showing a system configuration example using the present embodiment.
Information processing device 100, project (A) management device 150A, project (B) management device 150B, project (C) management device 150C, all project management device 250, user terminal 270A, user terminal 270B, user terminal 270C, user terminal 270D , The user terminal 270E, the user terminal 270F, the user terminal 270G, the user terminal 270H, the user terminal 270I, the user terminal 270J, and the user terminal 270K are connected via a communication line 290. The communication line 290 may be wireless, wired, or a combination thereof, and may be, for example, the Internet or an intranet as a communication infrastructure. The functions of the information processing device 100, the project management device 150, and the entire project management device 250 may be realized as a cloud service.

The entire project management device 250 includes a project phase information storage module 255, a risk manifestation rule storage module 260, and a manifestation risk list storage module 265. The all project management device 250 performs definition processing and management of each project.
The project phase information storage module 255 stores project information (information constituting a project) of each project and activity phase information (information on an activity phase that each project can take). The leader of each project inputs project information and activity phase information.
The risk manifestation rule storage module 260 stores a risk manifestation rule for each project. For example, the risk determination module 115 determines a risk according to the manifestation rules stored in the risk manifestation rule storage module 260. The leader of each project enters the manifestation rules.
For example, the manifestation rule is defined in the communication information corresponding to the activity phase, and specifically includes the following.
(1) Planning phase (a) There are xx or more members who have not participated in communication (no comments).
(B) The reply rate to the comment is lower than xx%. Alternatively, the time lag until the reply is greater than xx hours.
(2) Design phase (a) There are xx or more members who have not browsed for the decision items (deliverables).
(B) The number of times the product is modified after the end of the design phase is greater than xx times.
(3) Development phase (a) Started and completed as scheduled.
(B) Personnel cannot be assigned to action items.
(4) Test phase (a) The defect detection rate does not tend to decrease.
(5) Maintenance phase (a) The average response time to the inquiry is xx or more.
(B) The number of defect reports is greater than xx.

  The actualization risk list storage module 265 stores a list of actualization risks of each project. The result determined by the risk determination module 115 is stored. It remembers the risks of past projects (projects with overdue dates) and current projects. The acquisition (B) module 110 may acquire a risk in another project from the exposed risk list storage module 265. In this case, the risk determination module 115 does not need to perform the process of determining whether there is a risk in the progress of another project.

A project (A) leader 272A, a project member 272B, a project member 272C, and a project member 272D participate in the project (A) 210A.
The project (B) 210B includes a project member 272D, a project member 272E, a project (B) leader 272F, a project member 272G, and a project member 272H.
A project member 272H, a project (C) leader 272I, a project member 272J, and a project member 272K participate in the project (C) 210C.
The project member 272D participates in both the project (A) 210A and the project (B) 210B, and the project member 272H participates in both the project (B) 210B and the project (C) 210C. Thus, a plurality of users participate in each project, and one user may participate in a plurality of projects.

In this example, a project (A) 210A in which a first user group composed of a plurality of users participates, and a project in which a second user group composed of users different from the first user group participate (B) 210B and the like.
For example, in the project (A) 210A, when it is detected that a risk has occurred from the communication information and the progress information of the project 210A, a project that is a candidate for a collaboration partner is specified. Here, the detection is to detect (emerge) a potential risk.
In addition, a project that is a candidate for a collaboration partner is a project that can cooperate to solve and reduce the risk. The information processing device 100 proposes a collaboration for both projects. The information processing apparatus 100 aims at emergence of a new idea and a breakthrough by proposing a project having a different aspect.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a processing example according to the present embodiment.
The processing from step S302 to step S306 corresponds to a project definition operation. The processing from step S308 to step S314 is processing for proposing a project to be a collaboration partner.

In step S302, the leader inputs project information.
In step S304, the leader selects a phase.
In step S306, the leader selects, adds, edits, deletes, and the like the risk manifestation rules. For example, the risk manifestation rule is shared by all the projects, and the risk manifestation rule may be specified only by inputting the phase. Further, the leader may select a manifestation rule for each project. Note that the process of step S306 may be optional.

  In step S308, activity information such as a schedule, progress, issues, communication contents, and deliverables is stored by detecting utilization of a web system or the like by project members. For example, here, the web system is a system that performs project management, and an operation on a project management Web page may be detected and accumulated as log information.

In step S310, a risk manifestation rule is determined according to the current phase. If “risk exists”, the process proceeds to step S312, and if “risk does not exist”, the process ends (step S399).
For example, in the test phase, a determination is made as to the actualization rule: “the failure detection rate has no tendency to decrease”. Here, (number of defects / number of tests) may be used as the defect detection rate. For example, the decrease rate of the defect detection rate is obtained immediately after the shift to the test phase and now (during the test phase). Then, it is estimated whether the criteria can be achieved by the time the test is completed. This estimation may be applied to a predetermined calculation formula to determine whether the criteria can be achieved by the time the test is completed. The calculation formula may be a formula determined using past statistical values, or may be a linear formula determined immediately after the transition to the test phase and based on the current defect detection rate.
In addition, for the risks that have already been revealed, judgment of the revealed rules is performed, and whether or not improvement is observed is monitored. If improved, exclude from potential risk. If it has deteriorated, the threshold used in step S312 may be lowered to propose further improvement.

In step S312, it is determined whether or not the proposed score is equal to or greater than a threshold value among other projects having the same actualization risk (or having had in the past). The process proceeds to step S314, and if “not greater than or equal to the threshold”, the process ends (step S399). The same actualization risk corresponds to a case where it is determined that there is a risk when the same phase is applied and the same rule is applied.
In step S314, for the target project, another project in the previous step is proposed as a collaboration project. For example, the notification may be sent to the leaders of both projects. Also, if other projects are active, the projects that benefit from each other will be valued better by summing the proposal scores for both projects and selecting the other project with the higher total. Is also good.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating a processing example according to the present embodiment. FIG. 4 shows a specific processing example of step S312 of the flowchart shown in the example of FIG. In other words, the proposed scores have different numbers of skills.
In step S402, a skill information table of the target project is obtained. For example, a skill information table 500 is acquired. FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the data structure of the skill information table 500. FIG. 5A is an explanatory diagram illustrating a data structure example of the skill information table 500A in the target project (A). The skill information table 500A has a skill column 510A and a skill evaluation value column 520A. The skill column 510A stores skills. The skill evaluation value column 520A stores the evaluation value of the skill (the average value of the skill evaluation values of the users participating in the project (A)).

In step S404, a skill information table of another project is obtained. For example, as a skill information table of another project, a skill information table 500B in the project (B) as shown in the example of FIG. 5B, and a skill information table in the project (C) as shown in the example of FIG. 5C. There is a table 500C. The skill information table 500B and the skill information table 500C have the same data structure as the skill information table 500A.
Note that the “other project” has the same actualization risk as the target project, but may be another project that has solved the actualization risk.
Further, the “other project” may be another project that is determined to have a risk in an item different from the item that is determined to have a risk of the target project. Furthermore, the item determined as having no risk in the target project may be another project determined as having risk. In other words, when different risks occur, sharing the know-how with each other enables the two sides to solve the risks. For example, different risks may occur due to different activity trends for the same phase. Specifically, in the design phase, there are different risks between a project in which communication is active but the amount of deliverables is small (project (A)) and a project (project (B)) that has the opposite tendency to that (project (B)). It is highly probable that sharing the know-how with each other will solve both potential risks. In project (A), risks are caused by "missing decisions and their background" and "many man-hours are required for explanations and information development". In project (B), risks are generated. If there is a risk due to "there is no function" or "sales are not good", know-how can be provided for items that do not have a risk, and both have advantages (so-called win-win relationship). .

  In step S406, the number of skill items different between the two is calculated. In other words, this is for selecting a project that has a different skill from the target project (A). In the example of FIG. 5, the skill information table 500B is “1” because “C $” in the fourth row is different, and the skill information table 500C is “customer-oriented” in the first row and “suggestion” in the second row. "2" because the "abilities" are different.

In step S408, it is determined whether or not “the number of different skill items ≧ the threshold value A”. If “the number of different skill items ≧ the threshold value A”, the process proceeds to step S410. Otherwise, the process proceeds to step S412. For example, when the threshold A is “2”, the skill information table 500C satisfies the condition of step S408 in the above-described example. That is, the proposal score of the project (C) is higher. In this case, projects possessing different skills are considered to be effective as projects to collaborate with, and opinions from different viewpoints will lead to a breakthrough.
In step S410, it is included in the collaboration project list. In the above example, project (C) would be included in the collaboration project list.
In step S412, it is determined whether there is a project to be compared. If yes, the process returns to step S404; otherwise, the process ends (step S499).

FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating a processing example according to the present embodiment. FIG. 4 shows a specific processing example of step S312 of the flowchart shown in the example of FIG. That is, it shows another processing example of the flowchart shown in the example of FIG. The processing other than steps S606 and S608 is the same processing as the flowchart shown in the example of FIG.
In step S602, a skill information table of the target project is obtained.
In step S604, a skill information table of another project is obtained.

In step S606, the number of skill items that have the same skill item and have the higher skill evaluation value for the target project is calculated. The calculated number of skill items is used as the proposed score in the example of FIG.
In step S608, it is determined whether or not “the number of skill items calculated in the previous step ≧ threshold B”. If “the number of skill items calculated in the previous step ≧ threshold B”, the process proceeds to step S610. In this case, the process proceeds to step S612.

In step S610, it is included in the collaboration project list. In other words, despite the low skill evaluation value, since the project has solved the risk, it is highly likely that the project has the know-how to solve the risk.
In step S612, it is determined whether there is a project to be compared. If yes, the process returns to step S604; otherwise, the process ends (step S699).

FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating a processing example according to the present embodiment. FIG. 4 shows a specific processing example of step S312 of the flowchart shown in the example of FIG. That is, it shows another processing example of the flowchart shown in the example of FIG. Processing other than steps S706 and S708 is the same processing as the flowchart shown in the example of FIG.
In step S702, a skill information table of the target project is obtained.
In step S704, a skill information table of another project is obtained.

In step S706, a value of (the number of skill items having the higher skill evaluation value in the target project) / (the number of skill items having the lower skill evaluation value in the target project) is calculated as the same skill item between the two. . The calculated value is used as the proposal score in the example of FIG.
In step S708, it is determined whether or not “ratio calculated in previous step ≧ threshold C”. If “ratio calculated in previous step ≧ threshold C”, the process proceeds to step S710, otherwise, step S712 is performed. Proceed to.

In step S710, it is included in the collaboration project list.
In step S712, it is determined whether there is a project to be compared. If yes, the process returns to step S704; otherwise, the process ends (step S799).

FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating a processing example according to the present embodiment. FIG. 4 shows a specific processing example of step S312 of the flowchart shown in the example of FIG.
In step S802, the risk of the target project is extracted.
In step S804, past risks of other projects that have achieved the target in the delivery date are extracted.
Note that, here, “another project” may be another project that is determined to have a risk in an item that is different from the item that is determined to have a risk of the target project. Furthermore, the item determined as having no risk in the target project may be another project determined as having risk. In other words, when different risks occur, sharing the know-how with each other enables the two sides to solve the risks. This is the same reason as step S404 in the flowchart shown in the example of FIG.

In step S806, it is determined whether or not the same risk as that of the target project has been extracted. If the risk has been extracted, the process proceeds to step S808; otherwise, the process proceeds to step S812.
In step S808, it is determined whether the risk occurrence is at the same time on the schedule. If it is the same time, the process proceeds to step S810; otherwise, the process proceeds to step S812. Here, the “same time” may simply mean that the phases are the same, or the phases are the same, and the elapsed ratio within the phase (specifically, the number of days elapsed in the phase / The period of the phase) may be similar. Here, the similarity means that the difference between the elapsed ratios of the two is within a predetermined value.

In step S810, it is included in the collaboration project list.
In step S812, it is determined whether there is a project to be compared. If yes, the process returns to step S804; otherwise, the process ends (step S899).

FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram illustrating a processing example according to the present embodiment.
The defect detection rate graph 900A shown in the example of FIG. 9A is a graph showing the relationship between the time lapse of the target project (A) and the defect detection rate.
Since there is a high possibility that the defect detection rate will not be sufficiently reduced by the delivery date 930A from the defect detection rate transition 910A, it is determined that there is a risk at 920A at present.
It should be noted that whether or not there is a risk is determined by setting a threshold value for the number of days to achieve the predicted target, and the following calculation formula is used.
Defect detection rate = number of defects / number of test cases Average reduction point of defect detection rate = (current defect detection rate-target defect detection rate) / elapsed days Predicted target achievement days = elapsed days + (current defect detection rate- (Target defect detection rate) / average reduction point of defect detection rate Then, it is determined that there is a risk when “the predicted target achievement days exceeds the delivery date 930A”.
In addition, during the period until the defect detection rate becomes stable, the process of determining whether the risk has been realized may not be performed. For example, instead of proposing with a measurement result on the first day for a test that takes three months, a grace period of about one month may be provided for two weeks.

The defect finding rate graph 900B shown in the example of FIG. 9B is for the project (B), and the defect finding rate graph 900C shown in the example of FIG. 9C is for the project (C).
The project (C) has a higher proposal score than the project (B). In other words, it can be inferred that the actualized risks have been appropriately dealt with, and it is expected that know-how will be provided for solving the risks.
A proposal whose proposal score is equal to or more than a threshold may be proposed. Further, a project having the highest proposal score may be proposed.
The proposed score is obtained using the “average reduction point of the defect detection rate” from the time when the risk becomes apparent until the delivery date. The following calculation formula is used.
Average reduction point of defect detection rate = (defect detection rate at risk manifestation-defect discovery rate at delivery date) / days elapsed from risk manifestation to delivery date However, only projects that satisfy the following conditions are limited.
・ Target has been achieved on delivery date.
・ Risks have become apparent.

The project management table 1000 may be used to perform the processing of the flowchart shown in the example of FIG.
FIG. 10 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the data structure of the project management table 1000. The project management table 1000 has a project ID column 1010, a schedule column 1020, a target column 1030, a target achievement flag 1040, a risk type column 1050, a risk occurrence date and time column 1060, and a risk factor item column 1070. , A start date / time column 1022, and a delivery date / time 1024, and the risk factor item column 1070 has a defect detection rate column 1072 and the like. The project ID column 1010 stores information (project ID: IDentification) for uniquely identifying a project in the present embodiment. The schedule column 1020 stores the schedule of the project. The start date and time column 1022 stores the start date and time of the project. The delivery date / time 1024 stores the delivery date / time of the project. The start date / time column 1022 and the delivery date / time 1024 may be prepared for each activity phase. The goal column 1030 stores a goal. For example, it may be completed by the delivery date. The goal achievement flag 1040 stores information (flag) indicating whether or not the goal has been achieved. The risk type column 1050 stores the type of risk that has occurred in the project (it may be a rule for determining the risk). The risk occurrence date and time column 1060 stores the date and time when the risk occurred. The risk factor item column 1070 stores the risk factor item. The defect detection rate column 1072 stores a defect detection rate.

FIG. 11 is a flowchart illustrating a processing example according to the present embodiment. FIG. 4 shows a specific processing example of step S314 of the flowchart shown in the example of FIG. In other words, this is an example of an algorithm for determining who to introduce the members in the proposed project.
In step S1102, members of the target project are extracted. For example, it is extracted from the project management table 1200. FIG. 12 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the data structure of the project management table 1200. The project management table 1200 has a user ID column 1210, a project number column 1220, a project ID column 1230, a position column 1240, and a responsible phase column 1250. The user ID column 1210 stores information (user ID) for uniquely identifying a user in the present embodiment. The project number column 1220 stores the number of projects in which the user participates. A combination of the project ID column 1230 and the post column 1240 follows the number in the project number column 1220. The project ID column 1230 stores a project ID. The position column 1240 stores roles (posts) in the project such as leaders and general members of the user in the project. The assigned phase column 1250 stores the assigned phase of the user.

In step S1104, members of the proposed project are extracted. Similarly, it may be extracted from the project management table 1200.
In step S1106, it is determined whether the target project member and the proposed project member have the same member. If so, the process proceeds to step S1108; otherwise, the process proceeds to step S1110.
In step S1108, it is determined whether or not it is involved in the risk of the target project. If it is involved, the process proceeds to step S1110; otherwise, the process proceeds to step S1112. Specifically, referring to the assigned phase column 1250 of the project management table 1200, it can be determined whether or not the phase corresponds to the phase in which the risk has occurred (occurred).
In step S1110, the leader of the proposed project is introduced.
In step S1112, the member (the member determined to be the same member in step S1106) is introduced.

  In addition, in order to calculate the proposal score of another project in the case of selecting another project having a higher total value by summing the proposal scores in both directions of the project, the relationship between the projects in the calculation of the proposal score described above is reversed. What should I do? In other words, the proposed score may be calculated by regarding “target project” as “other project” and “other project” as “target project”.

  The hardware configuration of a computer that executes the program according to the present embodiment is a general computer as illustrated in FIG. 13, and specifically, a personal computer, a computer that can be a server, or the like. That is, as a specific example, a CPU 1301 is used as a processing unit (arithmetic unit), and a RAM 1302, a ROM 1303, and an HD 1304 are used as storage devices. For example, a hard disk, a solid state drive (SSD) which is a flash memory, or the like may be used as the HD 1304. A CPU 1301 for executing programs such as an acquisition (A) module 105, an acquisition (B) module 110, a risk determination module 115, a notification module 120, and a proposal processing module 125; a RAM 1302 for storing the programs and data; 1303 that stores programs for performing the operations, an HD 1304 that is an auxiliary storage device that stores the skill information table 500, the project management table 1000, the project management table 1200, and the like, a keyboard, a mouse, a touch screen, a microphone, and a camera ( A receiving device 1306 for receiving data based on a user's operation (including a line of sight detection camera or the like) (including an operation, a voice, a line of sight, etc.) and an output device 130 such as a CRT, a liquid crystal display, and a speaker When a communication line interface 1307 for connecting to a communication network such as a network interface card, and, and a bus 1308 for exchanging data by connecting them. A plurality of these computers may be connected to each other by a network.

Of the above-described embodiments, those using a computer program cause a system having the present hardware configuration to read a computer program which is software, and the software and hardware resources cooperate to implement the above-described embodiment. Is realized.
Note that the hardware configuration shown in FIG. 13 shows one configuration example, and the present embodiment is not limited to the configuration shown in FIG. 13 but has a configuration capable of executing the modules described in this embodiment. I just need. For example, some modules may be constituted by dedicated hardware (for example, an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) or the like), and some modules may be in an external system and connected by a communication line. Alternatively, a plurality of the systems shown in FIG. 13 may be connected to each other by a communication line and operate in cooperation with each other. In particular, in addition to personal computers, portable information communication devices (including mobile phones, smartphones, mobile devices, wearable computers, etc.), information appliances, robots, copiers, fax machines, scanners, printers, and multifunction devices (scanners, printers, An image processing apparatus having at least two functions such as a copying machine and a facsimile) may be incorporated.

The above-described program may be provided by being stored in a recording medium, or the program may be provided by a communication unit. In this case, for example, the above-described program may be regarded as an invention of a “computer-readable recording medium on which the program is recorded”.
The “computer-readable recording medium on which the program is recorded” refers to a computer-readable recording medium on which the program is recorded, which is used for installing, executing, and distributing the program.
The recording medium is, for example, a digital versatile disk (DVD), which is a standard defined by the DVD Forum, such as "DVD-R, DVD-RW, DVD-RAM, etc.", and DVD + RW. Blu-ray discs such as "DVD + R, DVD + RW, etc." which are standards, compact discs (CDs), such as read-only memory (CD-ROM), CD recordable (CD-R), CD rewritable (CD-RW), etc. Blu-ray (registered trademark) Disc), magneto-optical disk (MO), flexible disk (FD), magnetic tape, hard disk, read-only memory (ROM), electrically erasable and rewritable read-only memory (EEPROM (registered trademark) )), Flash memory, random access memory (RAM) , SD (Secure Digital) memory card, and the like.
The whole or a part of the program may be recorded on the recording medium and stored or distributed. Further, the communication may be, for example, a wired network used for a local area network (LAN), a metropolitan area network (MAN), a wide area network (WAN), the Internet, an intranet, an extranet, or a wireless communication. The data may be transmitted using a transmission medium such as a network or a combination thereof, or may be transmitted on a carrier wave.
Further, the above program may be a part or all of another program, or may be recorded on a recording medium together with a separate program. Further, the program may be divided and recorded on a plurality of recording media. Also, the program may be recorded in any form as long as it can be restored, such as compression or encryption.

100 Information processing device 105 Acquisition (A) module 110 Acquisition (B) module 115 Risk assessment module 120 Notification module 125 Proposal processing module 150 Project management device 155 Project activity information storage module 170A Project (A) ) User terminal in charge 210: Project 250: All project management device 255: Project phase information storage module 260: Risk manifestation rule storage module 265: Revealed risk list storage module 270: User terminal 290: Communication line

Claims (7)

In a first project in which a first user group composed of a plurality of users participates, communication means relating to the first project, and acquisition means for acquiring progress information indicating the progress of the first project;
Determining means for determining whether there is a risk in the progress of the first project from the communication information and the progress information obtained by the obtaining means;
When the determination unit determines that there is a risk, a second user group in which at least one or more of the first user group is different from at least one or more users of the first user group. An information processing apparatus having a notification unit for notifying a second project to participate as a candidate for a collaboration partner. In another project other than the first project, a second acquisition unit for acquiring communication information about the other project and progress information indicating the progress of the other project,
The notifying unit selects the second project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the second acquiring unit;
The information processing device according to claim 1. The determining unit determines whether there is a risk in the progress of the other project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the second acquiring unit,
The notifying means selects, as the second project, another project determined as having no risk in the item determined as having risk in the first project;
The information processing device according to claim 2. The notifying means selects, as the second project, another project that has been determined to have a risk in the past and has been determined to be no risk at present in an item of the first project that has been determined to have a risk.
The information processing device according to claim 3. The determining unit determines whether there is a risk in the progress of the other project from the communication information and the progress information acquired by the second acquiring unit,
The notifying means selects another project determined as having a risk as the second project in an item different from the item determined to be at risk in the first project,
The information processing device according to claim 2. The notifying means selects, as the second project, another project determined to be at risk in the item determined to be without risk of the first project,
The information processing device according to claim 5. Computer
In a first project in which a first user group composed of a plurality of users participates, communication means relating to the first project, and acquisition means for acquiring progress information indicating the progress of the first project;
Determining means for determining whether there is a risk in the progress of the first project from the communication information and the progress information obtained by the obtaining means;
When the determination unit determines that there is a risk, a second user group in which at least one or more of the first user group is different from at least one or more users of the first user group. An information processing program for functioning as a notification means for notifying a participating second project as a candidate for a collaboration partner.

Images