JP7206246B2 - Program and information processing method - Google Patents

Description

The present invention relates to a program and an information processing method to be executed by an information processing apparatus.

In general, when an automobile causes an accident, an emergency call is made to various areas, and various data are stored to grasp the circumstances of the accident. After that, for the payment of insurance claims, the insurance company contracted by each party evaluates the percentage of negligence based on the testimony of the parties and witnesses and stored data.

For example, in Patent Document 1, an emergency notification device mounted on an accident vehicle is configured with a GPS receiver, a gyro, a vehicle speed sensor, a collision sensor, and a public mobile phone (radio). In addition to calculating , vehicle speed information is accumulated every time the vehicle speed changes or at regular time intervals, and when an accident occurs, the site position information and the vehicle speed information are transmitted to the emergency center by data communication. . The above-mentioned emergency center is equipped with a means for superimposing the received on-site position and travel trajectory on a map. It will be displayed overlaid on the map.

Patent Document 2 discloses a drive recorder device system including a drive recorder device mounted on a vehicle and a vehicle management center that collects data from the drive recorder device via a communication line. In Patent Document 2, a vehicle equipped with a road-to-vehicle communication device that performs wireless communication with a roadside device that is installed at an intersection with a traffic light or the like and acquires lighting information of the traffic signal is equipped with a drive recorder device to perform road-to-vehicle communication. By recording the lighting information as driving history data in the data recording unit of the drive recorder device based on the fact that the lighting information is received by the machine, it is possible to clarify the fault ratio of the driver of the vehicle involved in the traffic accident. It is considered possible.

Patent Literature 3 discloses an insurance company system that receives reports of automobile accidents between automobiles, including the percentage of fault of the insured. Patent Literature 3 describes that a person in charge of an insurance company may calculate and input the percentage of fault in an accident by referring to a case database, a judicial precedent database, or the like.

In Patent Document 4, accident type analysis data is created from image information of an accident recorded by a digital video camera, and the data is compared with a database of past negligence ratio judicial precedents using a computer to determine the negligence ratio. A digital video camera percentage fault evaluation system for performing evaluation is disclosed. In Patent Document 4, a basic fault ratio is determined based on accident type analysis data and various data related to past fault ratio judicial precedents (collision opponent data, accident site road structure data, etc.), and correction element data Techniques are disclosed for determining a percent fault assessment based on .

JP-A-2000-285377 Japanese Patent No. 5533626 Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2011-204116 Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2001-347972

Automobile accidents are caused by a complex combination of many factors, so it is necessary to understand the circumstances of the accident based on objective facts and to determine whether the accident is covered by insurance. In addition, it is necessary to determine the percentage of negligence based on past cases and judicial precedents based on objectively confirmed circumstances of the accident. Therefore, even if the system grasps the accident situation or automatically judges the percentage of fault based on the accident situation, the basis for grasping the accident situation (accident factors, evidence, etc.) is appropriate. It is important to objectively grasp whether or not

The present invention has been made in view of the circumstances described above, and provides a program and an information processing method that enable objective and easy confirmation of the cause of an automobile accident by visualizing the circumstances of the accident. With the goal.

A program, which is one aspect of the present invention, receives a plurality of data used to determine an accident situation in an information processing device, and determines an accident situation (items illustrated in FIG. 5) based on the plurality of data. display control of a judgment screen including a first display area for displaying the judgment item and the judgment result and a second display area for displaying the evidence data for the judgment item having the evidence data for the judgment result on the display device; a process of receiving a command based on a user's operation with respect to a predetermined determination result in one display area, and performing display control to display evidence data for the predetermined determination result in the second display area based on the command; It is to be executed.

The program performs display control to display a still image of a portion of the moving image in association with the determination item when the evidence data includes a moving image captured by an imaging device mounted on a vehicle. may be further executed by the information processing apparatus.

The program receives a second command based on a user's operation on a predetermined still image within the second display area, and displays a reproduction screen for reproducing a moving image for the predetermined still image based on the second command. The information processing device may further execute a process of controlling the display so as to control the display.

In the above program, the moving image may differ according to the determination item.

In the above program, a portion related to the determination result may be highlighted in the moving image.

The program receives a third command based on a user's operation on the item indicating the contact point when the determination item includes an item indicating the contact point of the own vehicle at the time of collision, The information processing device may further execute a process of superimposing the vehicle on the display, displaying the front of the vehicle in the 12 o'clock direction of the clock, and displaying the contact point on the vehicle. good.

The above program provides, on the determination screen, a third display area for displaying a basic percentage of negligence determined by using the plurality of data, past judicial data, and standardized data based on judicial precedent, Display control is performed to include predetermined UI parts related to display, a fourth instruction based on user operation on the predetermined UI parts is received, and based on the fourth instruction, the judgment used to determine the basic percentage of fault The information processing device may further execute a process of performing display control to display data.

The program further causes the information processing device to perform display control so that the determination screen includes a fourth display area for displaying map data describing the accident situation determined based on the plurality of data. You can let it run.

The program may receive a fifth command based on a user operation to correct the determination result, and cause the information processing device to further execute a process of reflecting the correction of the determination result based on the fifth command. .

An information processing method, which is another aspect of the present invention, receives a plurality of data used for judging an accident situation, and displays a plurality of judgment items and a judgment result for judging an accident situation based on the plurality of data. display control on a display device of a determination screen including a first display area and a second display area for displaying the evidence data in a determination item having evidence data for the determination result, and for a predetermined determination result in the first display area A command based on a user's operation is received, and based on the command, display control is performed so that evidence data for the predetermined judgment result is displayed in the second display area.

ADVANTAGE OF THE INVENTION According to this invention, the user can objectively and easily confirm the basis of the judgment of the accident situation in a motor vehicle accident.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS It is a figure which shows schematic structure of the accident handling system which concerns on embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows schematic structure of the accident detection server which concerns on embodiment of this invention. It is a figure showing a schematic structure of an accident situation grasp server concerning an embodiment of the present invention. It is a figure which shows schematic structure of the fault ratio determination server which concerns on embodiment of this invention. 4 is a table exemplifying master data storing items necessary for determination of the percentage of negligence; 2 is a diagram showing a schematic configuration of an operator terminal shown in FIG. 1; FIG. It is a flowchart which shows operation|movement of the accident detection server which concerns on embodiment of this invention. It is a schematic diagram which illustrates the driving condition detailed screen displayed on an operator terminal. It is a schematic diagram which illustrates the driving condition detailed screen displayed on an operator terminal. It is a schematic diagram which illustrates the accident situation screen displayed on an operator terminal. It is a flowchart which shows operation|movement of the fault ratio determination server which concerns on embodiment of this invention. It is a schematic diagram which illustrates the fault ratio determination screen displayed on an operator terminal. It is a schematic diagram which illustrates the driving information detailed screen displayed on an operator terminal. It is a schematic diagram which illustrates the precedent information display screen displayed on an operator terminal. FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram illustrating a determination report display screen displayed on an operator terminal;

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. The same reference numerals are given to the same elements, and overlapping explanations are omitted.

Embodiment (1) Configuration of Embodiment FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a schematic configuration of an accident handling system according to an embodiment of the present invention. The accident processing system 1 according to this embodiment is intended for use in a non-life insurance company that sells automobile insurance. As shown in FIG. 1 , the accident processing system 1 includes an accident detection server 10 , an accident situation comprehension server 20 , a fault rate determination server 30 , and an operator terminal 40 . The accident detection server 10, the accident situation comprehension server 20, the fault rate determination server 30, and the operator terminal 40 are connected via a communication network N. Although only one operator terminal 40 is shown in FIG. 1, a plurality of operator terminals 40 may be provided. 1, one accident detection server 10, one accident situation grasping server 20, and one fault rate determination server 30 are shown, but these servers may be configured by one piece of hardware, Each server may be composed of multiple pieces of hardware. Operators may also be referred to as users.

The communication network N includes a communication network in which the accident detection server 10, the accident situation understanding server 20, the fault rate determination server 30, and the operator terminal 40 can exchange information with each other. The communication network N is, for example, the Internet, LAN, leased line, telephone line, corporate network, mobile communication network, Bluetooth (registered trademark), WiFi (registered trademark) (Wireless Fidelity), other communication lines, and combinations thereof. etc., and it does not matter whether it is wired or wireless.

Each of the accident detection server 10, the accident situation comprehension server 20, and the fault ratio determination server 30 is configured by, for example, a computer with a high arithmetic processing capability, and cooperates with other servers and the operator terminal 40 by executing a predetermined program. Then, after an automobile accident occurs, it realizes a server function that processes information related to accident processing such as reporting of the accident, comprehension of the situation of the accident, and determination of the percentage of fault. Here, a car accident includes contact between a car and other objects, such as cars, bicycles, motorcycles, people, animals, telephone poles, walls, and the like.

FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a schematic configuration of the accident detection server 10. As shown in FIG. The accident detection server 10 is an information processing device that acquires various data from devices such as automobiles, detects the occurrence of an accident based on the acquired data, and issues a necessary report. Note that the accident detection server 10 does not necessarily need to acquire various data from a plurality of vehicles, and may acquire various data from a device of at least one vehicle.

Here, devices such as automobiles include sensors such as a calendar that detects date and time, a speed sensor that detects running speed, an acceleration sensor that detects acceleration, a GPS sensor that detects position, communication functions, voice recording functions, and video recording functions. functions, sensors for measuring millimeter waves, infrared rays, etc., and functions for detecting the operation and movement of other automotive equipment, and acquires information at any time from various sensors. Devices such as automobiles use communication functions to collect information (hereinafter referred to as device data) acquired by each sensor at any time or when an abnormal situation such as a change in acceleration exceeding a predetermined value occurs. Send to detection server 10 .

As shown in FIG. 2 , the accident detection server 10 has a communication interface 11 , a storage section 12 and a processor 13 .

The communication interface 11 is a hardware module for connecting the accident detection server 10 to the communication network N and communicating with other terminals on the communication network N. FIG. The communication interface 11 is, for example, a modulator/demodulator such as an ISDN modem, ADSL modem, cable modem, optical modem, or soft modem.

The storage unit 12 is, for example, a logical device provided by a storage area of a physical device made up of a computer-readable recording medium such as a disk drive or semiconductor memory (ROM, RAM, etc.). The storage unit 12 may be constructed by mapping multiple physical devices to one logical device, or may be constructed by mapping one physical device to multiple logical devices. The storage unit 12 stores various programs including an operating system program and a driver program, and various data used during execution of these programs. Specifically, the storage unit 12 stores various programs P10 to be executed by the processor 13 and device data D10 obtained from devices.

The processor 13 is composed of an arithmetic logic operation unit (such as a CPU) that processes arithmetic operations, logical operations, bit operations, etc., and various registers. centrally controls each part of the Various registers are, for example, program counters, data registers, instruction registers, general-purpose registers, and the like. Further, the processor 13 executes the program P10 to realize an accident detection function of detecting the occurrence of an accident and making a necessary report. Functional units implemented by the processor 13 executing the program P10 include a device difference correction unit 131, an accident detection unit 132, and an accident reporting unit 133. FIG.

The device difference correction unit 131 corrects device data received from each device. Here, the device data transmitted from each device has individual characteristics (sensor characteristics, differences in data formats, etc.). Therefore, the device difference correction unit 131 corrects the received device data to data that can be input to the algorithm executed by the accident detection unit 132 .

The accident detection unit 132 detects an accident by detecting features at the time of the accident from the device data received from the device using an algorithm constructed based on past accident data and device data.

When the accident detection unit 132 detects an accident, the accident reporting unit 133 notifies the operator terminal 40 of information indicating that there is a high possibility that an accident has occurred via the communication network N, and causes an alert to be displayed.

FIG. 3 is a diagram showing a schematic configuration of the accident situation comprehension server 20. As shown in FIG. The accident situation comprehension server 20 is an information processing device that assists in comprehending the accident situation by acquiring necessary information from various systems and visualizing the accident when an accident occurs.

The accident situation comprehension server 20 acquires device data from the device that caused the accident, and also acquires the following information.
(a) Road information such as sign information and speed limit information: Acquired from the road information system 102 operated by a private company.
(b) Video data captured by a drive recorder: Acquire video data captured by a drive recorder installed in the device of the party involved in the accident. The video data may be obtained directly from the device of the party involved in the accident, or may be obtained from the drive recorder device system 103 operated by a private service provider. Further, video data captured by a drive recorder installed in a device that was driving around the accident site at the time of the accident may be obtained from the drive recorder device system 103 .
(c) Map information: Acquired from the map information system 104 operated by a private company.
(d) Weather information: Acquired from the weather information system 105 operated by a private or public institution.
(e) Contact history information: Acquire past contact history from claim service system 106 when the party to the accident is the policyholder of the company's insurance.

As shown in FIG. 3 , the accident situation comprehension server 20 includes a communication interface 21 , a storage section 22 and a processor 23 . The hardware configurations of the communication interface 21, storage unit 22, and processor 23 are the same as those of the communication interface 11, storage unit 12, and processor 13 described above.

The storage unit 22 stores various programs P20 to be executed by the processor 23, device data D21 acquired from each device, road information D22 acquired from the road information system 102, and images acquired from the drive recorder device system 103. Data D23, map information D24 obtained from the map information system 104, weather information D25 obtained from the weather information system 105, contact history D26 obtained from the damage service system 106, and data analyzed by the processor 23 to be described later. The host vehicle behavior data D27 and the opponent vehicle/surrounding environment data D28 are stored.

By executing the program P20, the processor 23 analyzes and visualizes the circumstances of the accident based on the acquired various information, and implements a function of assisting in understanding the circumstances of the accident. Functional units implemented by the processor 23 executing the program P20 include an own vehicle driving behavior grasping unit 231 , an opponent vehicle/surrounding environment grasping unit 235 , and a display control unit 239 .

The own vehicle driving behavior grasping unit 231 grasps information about the driving behavior of the own vehicle at the time of occurrence of the accident based on the acquired various data, and stores the grasped information as the own vehicle behavior data D27. As a specific example, the self-vehicle driving behavior grasping unit 231 acquires road information D22 and map By also referring to the information D24, the weather information D25, and the contact history D26, the accident situation such as the driving trajectory and speed information of the own vehicle is grasped. The own vehicle driving behavior grasping unit 231 includes a driving locus extracting unit 232 , an acceleration waveform generating unit 233 and a map data matching unit 234 .

The driving locus extraction unit 232 extracts the driving locus of the own vehicle based on the device data D21 acquired from the own vehicle. Based on the device data D21, the acceleration waveform generator 233 visualizes the acceleration waveform data of the vehicle as a graph, thereby specifying the behavior of the vehicle, the location of the impact, and the like. The map data matching unit 234 performs matching processing of the driving trajectory extracted by the driving trajectory extraction unit 232 with the road information D22 and the map information D24 around the accident occurrence point, and displays the driving trajectory by superimposing it. visualize.

The partner vehicle/surrounding environment grasping unit 235 grasps information about the driving behavior of the partner vehicle and information about the surrounding environment based on the acquired various data, and stores the grasped information as the partner vehicle/surrounding environment data D28. As a specific example, the opponent vehicle/surrounding environment grasping unit 235 performs object recognition processing, depth measurement processing, and the like on image data captured by the own vehicle among the image data D23, and compares the image data with the own vehicle behavior data. to estimate the speed of the other vehicle. Further, the opponent vehicle/surrounding environment grasping unit 235 acquires information such as the signal state at the time of the accident from the video data D23. The opponent vehicle/surrounding environment grasping unit 235 includes a driving locus extracting unit 236 , an acceleration waveform generating unit 237 , and a map data matching unit 238 . The operations of these units are the same as those in the own vehicle driving behavior grasping unit 231 described above.

The display control unit 239 displays the driving behavior of the own vehicle grasped by the own vehicle driving behavior grasping unit 231, the driving behavior of the opponent vehicle grasped by the opponent vehicle/surrounding environment grasping unit 235, and the surrounding environment on the operator terminal 40. Perform display control for visualizing and displaying.

FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a schematic configuration of the fault rate determination server 30. As shown in FIG. The fault ratio determination server 30 is an information processing device that acquires the host vehicle behavior data D27 and the opponent vehicle/surrounding environment data D28 stored by the accident situation comprehension server 20, and determines the fault ratio based on the acquired data. be.

As shown in FIG. 4 , the percentage-of-fault determination server 30 includes a communication interface 31 , a storage unit 32 , and a processor 33 . The hardware configurations of the communication interface 31, storage unit 32, and processor 23 are the same as those of the communication interface 11, storage unit 12, and processor 13 described above.

The storage unit 32 stores various programs P30 to be executed by the processor 33, judicial precedent data D31 used to determine the percentage of fault, and past case data D32. The judicial precedent data D31 is based on judicial precedent-based standards for the percentage of negligence, such as the "Criteria for Accreditation of Negligence Rate in Civil Traffic Lawsuits" (referred to as "Hanrei Times (registered trademark)") published by Hanrei Times Co., Ltd. It is a database. In addition, the past case data D32 is a database of fault ratios in past cases.

By executing the program P30, the processor 33 implements a function of judging the percentage of fault based on the host vehicle behavior data D27 and the opponent vehicle/surrounding environment data D28. Functional units implemented by the processor 33 executing the program P30 include a precedent information acquisition unit 331 , a fault determination unit 332 , and a display control unit 333 .

The judicial precedent information acquisition unit 331 collates the subject vehicle behavior data D27 and the opponent vehicle/surrounding environment data D28 with the judicial precedent data D31, and identifies the corresponding judicial precedent (accident classification). The fault determination unit 332 determines the basic fault ratio based on the judicial precedent specified by the judicial precedent information acquisition unit 331, and determines the basic fault ratio in accordance with a command based on the user operation performed on the operator terminal 40. fix it.

The display control unit 333 performs control for displaying on the operator terminal 40 the fault ratio determination screen including the determination result of the fault determination unit 332 . The display control section 333 includes an unconfirmed item alert display section 334 and a reference presentation section 335 .

The unconfirmed item alert display section 334 displays items that are necessary for judging the percentage of fault or that may affect the judgment of the percentage of fault (hereinafter referred to as judgment items) and that have not been checked by the operator. In some cases, display control is performed to call attention. FIG. 5 is a table exemplifying master data storing determination items. The master data shown in FIG. 5 stores determination items by categories such as host vehicle behavior, road conditions, accident conditions, and opponent vehicle behavior. Each determination item is associated with a data source of information related to the determination item (for example, device data such as acceleration information and GPS information, map information, video data captured by a drive recorder, etc.).

The reference document presenting unit 335 performs display control for causing the operator to refer to documents such as judicial precedents and past cases that correspond to (or have a similar situation to) the accident. As described above, according to the fault-proportion determination server 30, it is possible to determine the fault-proportion with high efficiency and fairness based on various data acquired when an accident occurs. Further, according to the fault rate determination server 30, the grounds for determining the fault rate are visualized, so the operator can efficiently and easily determine the grounds for the fault rate determination.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing a schematic configuration of the operator terminal 40. As shown in FIG. The operator terminal 40 is a terminal used by an operator who receives an accident report or processes insurance or the like, and is composed of a personal computer (PC), a notebook PC, a tablet terminal, or the like.

As shown in FIG. 6 , the operator terminal 40 is an information processing device that includes a communication interface 41 , a display section 42 , an operation input section 43 , an output section 44 , a storage section 45 and a processor 46 . In this embodiment, the operator terminal 40 is used as a display device for displaying a predetermined screen based on the information received from the accident situation comprehension server 20 and the fault rate determination server 30. It is used as an operation input device for inputting requests, commands, etc. to the fault ratio determination server 30 .

The communication interface 41 is a hardware module for connecting the operator terminal 40 to the communication network N and communicating with other terminals on the communication network N. FIG. The communication interface 41 is, for example, a modulator/demodulator such as an ISDN modem, ADSL modem, cable modem, optical modem, or soft modem.

The display unit 42 is configured by, for example, a liquid crystal display.
The operation input unit 43 is an input device such as a keyboard, various operation buttons, a touch panel provided in the display unit 42, and a pointing device such as a mouse.
The output unit 44 is an output device such as a printer.

The storage unit 45 is, for example, a logical device provided by a storage area of a physical device. A physical device is, for example, a computer-readable recording medium such as a disk drive or semiconductor memory (ROM, RAM, etc.). The storage unit 45 may be constructed by mapping multiple physical devices to one logical device, or may be constructed by mapping one physical device to multiple logical devices. Also, the storage unit 45 may be a USB memory, an SD (registered trademark) card, or the like.

The storage unit 45 stores an operating system program, a driver program, various data, and the like. More specifically, the storage unit 45 communicates with the accident situation comprehension server 20 and the fault ratio determination server 30 by causing the processor 46 to execute the information, and displays the information transmitted from these servers in a predetermined format on the display unit 42. A program P40 to be displayed is stored.

The processor 46 is composed of an arithmetic logic operation unit (such as a CPU) that processes arithmetic operations, logical operations, bit operations, etc., and various registers, and executes various programs stored in the storage unit 45 to operate the operator terminal 40. It controls each part centrally. Various registers are, for example, program counters, data registers, instruction registers, general-purpose registers, and the like. The functional units implemented by the processor 46 executing the program P40 include a display control unit 461 that causes the display unit 42 to display the information transmitted from the accident situation grasping server 20 and the fault rate determination server 30 in a predetermined format. include.

In addition, when the user performs an operation using the operation input unit 43, the processor 46 outputs a command corresponding to the user operation to each unit of the operator terminal 40 to execute processing. Further, the processor 46, while the operator terminal 40 is accessing the accident situation comprehension server 20 or the fault rate determination server 30, responds to the screen transmitted from the accident situation comprehension server 20 or the fault rate determination server 30. When an operation is performed, a signal representing a command corresponding to the user's operation is transmitted to the accident situation comprehension server 20 or the fault rate determination server 30 to request execution of the command.

(2) Operation of Embodiment FIG. 7 is a flow chart showing the operation of the accident detection server 10 .
When an accident occurs and device data is transmitted from the device, the accident detection server 10 acquires the device data (step S10) and analyzes the acquired device data to perform accident detection processing (step S11, FIG. 1).

When the accident detection server 10 determines that an accident has occurred (step S12: Yes), it notifies the operator terminal 40 of the accident (step S13). On the other hand, if the accident detection server 10 determines that no accident has occurred (step S12: No), the process ends.

When an accident is reported, the accident situation understanding server 20 collects various types of information related to the accident, such as device data, road information, video data, map information, weather information, contact history information, etc., sent from the device involved in the accident. (step S14, see FIG. 2). Subsequently, the accident situation comprehension server 20 analyzes the accident based on the acquired information (step S15). Then, the accident situation comprehension server 20 saves the analysis result (step S16).

The analysis results stored in the accident situation comprehension server 20 are transmitted to the operator terminal 40 upon request from the operator terminal 40 and displayed in a predetermined format. The operator can display, on the operator terminal 40, the information about the accident in which the policyholder is a party, for example, by searching with the insurance policy number or by transitioning from another system having the policyholder information.

8 and 9 are schematic diagrams illustrating screens displayed on the operator terminal 40. FIG. Among them, FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram illustrating the driving situation detail screen. FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram exemplifying a driving situation detail screen.

The travel information detail screen M1 shown in FIG. 8 includes a user information display area m10 in which information about the policyholder of the insurance is displayed, an accident location display area m11 in which information indicating the location of the accident is displayed, and a driving information of the own vehicle. An image display area m12 in which an image captured by a recorder is displayed, a trajectory display area m13 in which the driving trajectory of the own vehicle is displayed, and an impact information display area m14 in which the acceleration detected by the acceleration sensor is displayed as a waveform graph. , a fault ratio determination support button m15, and a driving information display area m16 for displaying the driving information of the driver. The impact information display area m14 is provided with an input point display area that indicates the input point of the impact to the own vehicle. In the input point display area, the own vehicle is superimposed on the clock so that the 12 o'clock direction of the clock is in front of the own vehicle, and the impact input direction (that is, the contact point of the opponent vehicle) is marked. be. As a result, in the insurance industry, the direction of the impact can be easily grasped visually using the input location display area because the expression of the direction of the time is used by assuming the location of the impact input as a clock.

When a predetermined user operation (for example, a pointing operation using a mouse) is performed on the trajectory display area m13, a new tab or window is opened to display the travel information detail screen M2 shown in FIG.

The travel information detail screen M2 shown in FIG. 9 is provided with an enlarged trajectory display area m21.

When a predetermined user operation (for example, pointing operation to the vicinity of the accident occurrence point) is performed on the trajectory display area m21, a new tab or window is opened to display the accident situation screen M3 shown in FIG.

The accident situation screen M3 shown in FIG. 10 is provided with an animation display area m31 for explaining the accident situation by animation and a text display area m32 for explaining the accident situation by text. Further, when a predetermined user operation is performed on a print button (not shown) in the accident situation screen M3, the output unit 44 can generate a hard copy of the accident situation screen M3.

FIG. 11 is a flow chart showing the operation of the fault rate determination server 30. As shown in FIG. When the operator terminal 40 inputs a signal instructing determination of the percentage of fault for a specific accident, the percentage-of-fault determination server 30 acquires basic information for determination (step S20). Here, the basic determination information is the information acquired regarding the accident among the information regarding each determination item shown in FIG. Further, the fault ratio determination server 30 acquires precedent information based on the acquired determination basic information (step S21).

Subsequently, the fault ratio determination server 30 performs the fault ratio determination process for the accident by referring to the judicial precedent information for the basic information for determination (step S22). Then, the determination result is transmitted to the operator terminal 40, and control is performed to display the determination screen in a predetermined format (step S23).

12 to 15 are schematic diagrams illustrating screens displayed on the operator terminal 40. FIG. Among them, FIG. 12 is a schematic diagram illustrating the fault ratio determination screen. FIG. 13 is a schematic diagram illustrating a travel information detail screen. FIG. 14 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of a precedent information display screen. FIG. 15 is a schematic diagram illustrating a judgment report display screen.

The fault ratio determination screen M5 shown in FIG. 12 includes an animation display area m51 for explaining the situation of the accident by animation, a basic information display area m52 for displaying basic information of the person who caused the accident, and a screen for determining the fault ratio. Judgment information display column m53 that displays a diagram (application diagram) of the accident situation in judicial information (for example, "Hanrei Times (registered trademark)", judgment display column m55 that displays the fault ratio and the correction factor for the fault ratio, A judgment item display field m56 in which items (judgment items) to be considered in the judgment of the percentage of negligence are displayed, a detailed display field m59 of the judgment item, a print button (not shown), a case document display button m70, and similar cases Among these, the judgment information display column m53, the case details display column m54, and the correction element column of the judgment display column m55 include the 12 displays at least a judgment item display column m56 and a judgment item detailed display column m59, thereby making it possible to objectively and easily judge the accident situation. For example, when the operator operates (clicks, etc.) a confirmation button m57 in the judgment item display column m56, the detailed display corresponding to the item is displayed in the detailed display column m59. Further, when the user operates (clicks, etc.) a detail display button m60 in the detail display field m59, objective evidence data of the determination item, such as a moving image captured by a drive recorder, is displayed. be.

Each row of correction elements in the determination display field m55 can be selected by a predetermined user operation using the operation input unit 43 (for example, pointing operation using a mouse). When a row of selection elements is selected, the percent fault will reflect the percent fault adjustment for that selected row. For example, when the basic fault ratio is "A0:B100" and the line "A is significantly at fault" is selected, the fault ratio of A is corrected to "+10", and the fault ratio is changed to "A10 : B90”.

A confirmation button m57 and a pull-down search condition selection button m58 are provided in the row of each determination item in the determination item display column m56. When a predetermined user operation is performed on the confirmation button m57, the detail display column m59 of the judgment item is automatically scrolled, and information regarding the judgment item for which the confirmation button m57 was operated is displayed. Among the judgment items displayed in the judgment item display field m56, if there is an item for which the confirmation button m57 has never been operated (that is, if there is a judgment item whose details have not been confirmed), the judgment item is highlighted. The operator is notified of an alert by, for example,

In the detailed display column m59 of the judgment item, the fact that is the basis for the judgment of the fault ratio and the evidence image for proving the fact are displayed in association with each other. Still images and text data related to each determination item displayed in the determination item display column m56 are displayed in a thumbnail format in the determination item detail display column m59. When a predetermined user operation is performed on the detailed display button m60 displayed in the detailed display column m59 of the determination item, a new tab or window opens to display the travel information detailed screen M6 shown in FIG.

The travel information detail screen M6 includes a moving image display area m61 in which a moving image related to the determination item is reproduced. This moving image is extracted from video data captured by a drive recorder. The still image displayed in the detailed display column m59 of the judgment item is one frame in this moving image. In the moving image displayed in the moving image display area m61, a portion related to the determination result of the percentage of fault is highlighted. For example, in FIG. 12, the tail lights (brake lights) of the vehicle running in front and the bicycle running on the sidewalk are emphasized by superimposed frames m62 and m63.

Referring to FIG. 12 again, when a predetermined user operation is performed on the case document display button m70 in the fault ratio determination screen M5, a new tab or window opens, and the case information display screen M7 shown in FIG. 14 is displayed. Is displayed. The judicial precedent information display screen M7 displays judicial precedent information applied to the fault rate determination regarding the case. In addition, in FIG. 14, as an example of precedent information, Hanrei Times (registered trademark) No. XX No. XX page is illustrated.

Further, when a predetermined user operation is performed on the similar case law display button m80 in the fault ratio determination screen M5, a new tab or window opens and a similar case law display screen (not shown) is displayed. On the similar judicial precedent display screen, an accident situation diagram (applied diagram) in judicial precedent information relating to cases similar to the relevant case is displayed in a thumbnail format.

When a predetermined user operation is performed on the application drawing in the similar judicial precedent display screen, a new tab or window is further opened to display a judicial precedent summary display screen (not shown). The judicial precedent summary display screen displays the selected application diagram, the gist of the relevant judgment, excerpts from the judgment, and the percentage of negligence determined in the relevant judgment.

Referring to FIG. 11 again, the fault ratio determination server 30 causes the operator terminal 40 to display the screens shown in FIGS. 12 to 14 in accordance with the signal transmitted in response to the operation on the operator terminal 40 (step S23). In addition, when the operator terminal 40 is operated by the user to correct the determination item (step S24: Yes), the fault rate determination server 30 performs the fault rate determination process according to the signal transmitted in response to the user operation. Execute again (step S22).

If the operator terminal 40 has not been operated to correct the determination item (step S24: No), the fault rate determination server 30 determines whether or not the operator terminal 40 has been operated to determine the fault rate (step S25). ). For example, when a signal is sent from the operator terminal 40 to the effect that a predetermined user operation has been performed on a print button (not shown) in the fault ratio determination screen M5, the fault ratio determination server 30 determines the fault ratio. It is determined that an operation to

When the fault rate is determined (step S25: Yes), the fault rate determination server 30 transmits the report screen to the operator terminal 40 for display (step S26). On the other hand, if the fault rate is not determined (step S25: No), the fault rate determination server 30 continues to display the determination screen on the operator terminal 40 (step S23).

In the operator terminal 40, when a predetermined user operation is performed on a print button (not shown) in the fault percentage judgment screen M5, a new tab or window opens, and the judgment report display screen M10 shown in FIG. 15 is displayed. Is displayed. The judgment report display screen M10 includes a preamble display field m101, an animation display area m102 explaining the circumstances of the accident by animation, a text display area m103 explaining the circumstances of the accident by text, and judicial precedent information applied to the percentage of negligence judgment. A judgment information display column m104 in which an application diagram is displayed, a judgment display column m105 in which basic fault ratios and correction factors are displayed, a judgment result display column m106 in which the conclusion of the fault ratio judgment is displayed, and a comment display column m107. The determination report display screen M10 is a report screen for disclosing the result of the determination of the percentage of negligence and its grounds to the policyholder or the insurance company of the other party of the accident, and can be printed.

As described above, according to the embodiment of the present invention, the accident situation is visualized and displayed based on objective information, so that the accident situation can be objectively and easily grasped. In addition, since the evidence data of the judgment item is displayed according to the user's operation on the judgment item, the operator can easily grasp the accident situation. Further, according to the embodiment of the present invention, the operator can confirm efficient and objective information (for example, video data of the drive record), and can judge the fault rate with fairness. In particular, it is possible to reproduce the circumstances of an accident based not only on subjective information such as the testimony of the parties concerned and eyewitnesses, but also on the basis of video data captured by the drive recorders of the parties' vehicles or vehicles traveling in the surrounding area. A very convincing percentage of fault can be determined. Furthermore, it is possible to easily confirm the circumstances of an automobile accident based on objective facts, and it is also possible to easily confirm the determination result of the percentage of negligence based on the circumstances of the accident and the grounds thereof.

Further, according to the embodiment of the present invention, judicial precedent information applied in determining the percentage of negligence and the facts that served as the grounds for the application are displayed on the same screen, so that the user (operator) can easily understand the logic of determining the percentage of negligence. It can be easily understood and the necessary elements can be easily modified.

Modification In the above-described embodiment, the fault ratio determination server 30 performs the fault ratio determination and various display controls, and causes the operator terminal 40 to display a predetermined screen. However, the operator terminal 40 may determine the percentage of fault or perform control for displaying a predetermined screen on the display device (display unit 42). In this case, after installing a program for judging the percentage of fault and a program for controlling the screen display in the operator terminal 40, the own vehicle behavior data D27 and the data D28 of the other vehicle/surrounding environment are sent to the accident situation understanding server 20 or the judgment of the percentage of fault. It is sufficient to download from the server 30 and execute these programs.

1... Accident processing system 10... Accident detection servers 11, 21, 31, 41... Communication interfaces 12, 22, 32, 45... Storage units 13, 23, 33, 46... Processor 20... Accident situation grasping server 30... Negligence rate determination Server 40 Operator terminal 42 Display unit 43 Operation input unit 44 Output unit 101 Device 102 Road information system 103 Drive recorder device System 104 Map information system 105 Weather information system 106 Damage service system 131 Device Difference correction unit 132 Accident detection unit 133 Accident notification unit 231 Own vehicle driving behavior grasping unit 232 Driving trajectory extracting unit 233 Acceleration waveform generating unit 234 Map data matching unit 235 Surrounding environment grasping unit 236 Driving trajectory extraction Part 237... Acceleration waveform generation part 238... Map data matching part 239, 333, 461... Display control part 331... Case information acquisition part 332... Negligence determination part 334... Unconfirmed item alert display part 335... Reference presentation part

Claims (6)

information processing equipment,
Receive a plurality of data including data of a GPS sensor mounted on the vehicle and data of moving images captured by an imaging device mounted on the vehicle for use in determining the accident situation,
Acquire map information around the accident occurrence point of the accident between the own vehicle and the other vehicle,
Identifying a driving trajectory of the own vehicle based on the GPS sensor data and the map information;
identifying the driving trajectory of the opponent vehicle based on the moving image data;
matching the driving trajectories of the own vehicle and the opponent vehicle with the map information around the accident occurrence point, and displaying and controlling an image in which they are superimposed on a display device;
identifying the state of the signal at the time of occurrence of the accident based on the data of the moving image, and controlling display of the identified state of the signal on the display device;
In a first display area displaying a plurality of judgment items for judging the accident situation and a judgment result based on the plurality of data and the specified state of the signal, and a judgment item having evidence data for the judgment result A program for executing a process of controlling display of a determination screen including a second display area for displaying the evidence data on the display device. 2. The program according to claim 1, wherein the driving trajectory is displayed by animation representing the accident situation between the own vehicle and the opponent vehicle. 3. The program according to claim 1, further causing the information processing apparatus to perform display control to display a reproduction screen for reproducing the moving image as the evidence data . Receive a plurality of data including data of a GPS sensor mounted on the vehicle and data of moving images captured by an imaging device mounted on the vehicle for use in determining the accident situation,
Acquire map information around the accident occurrence point of the accident between the own vehicle and the other vehicle,
Identifying a driving trajectory of the own vehicle based on the GPS sensor data and the map information;
identifying the driving trajectory of the opponent vehicle based on the moving image data;
matching the driving trajectories of the own vehicle and the opponent vehicle with the map information around the accident occurrence point, and displaying and controlling an image in which they are superimposed on a display device;
identifying the state of the signal at the time of occurrence of the accident based on the data of the moving image, and displaying and controlling the image of the signal in the identified state on the display device;
A first display area for displaying a plurality of judgment items and judgment results for judging the accident situation based on the plurality of data, and a second display for displaying the evidence data in judgment items having evidence data for the judgment results. An information processing method , comprising: controlling display of a determination screen including an area on the display device. 5. The information processing method according to claim 4, wherein said driving trajectory is displayed by an animation representing the situation of said accident between said host vehicle and said opponent vehicle. 6. The information processing method according to claim 4, further comprising performing display control to display a playback screen for playing back said moving image as said evidence data.

Images