JP7139631B2 - Information processing program, information processing method, and information processing apparatus - Google Patents

Description

The present invention relates to an information processing program, an information processing method, and an information processing apparatus.

2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, when creating or publishing a document, it is sometimes desired to verify whether or not there is any description incompleteness in the document. Insufficient description is, for example, the state of insufficient description in which important matters that are desirable to be described in the document are not described in the document, or excessive description in the document such as confidential information that is not desirable to be described in the document is in a state of

As a prior art, for example, there is a technique that performs document type evaluation, document level evaluation, and document specialization evaluation based on the result of analyzing the structure of the document to be evaluated. Further, for example, there is a technique of generating a plurality of tags including a search term and related terms as character strings, and generating a relevance map in which each tag is arranged on a predetermined plane. Further, for example, there is a technique of arranging search results outward in a spiral from the center of the screen in descending order of the number of keywords included in the search target information. Also, for example, there is a technique for determining whether or not a paragraph sentence in one document is similar to a paragraph sentence or a chapter in another document.

JP 2005-216258 A JP 2009-271795 A JP-A-4-133173 JP 2015-219799 A

However, with the conventional technology, it is difficult to verify whether or not the document contains any incomplete descriptions. For example, it is difficult to decide which matters should be described in the document and which matters should not be described in the document, which increases the burden on the verifier who verifies whether there are any incomplete descriptions in the document. put away.

In one aspect, the present invention verifies what elements with what degree of importance are included in a document to be verified, and what elements with what degree of importance are missing. The purpose is to make it easier for the operator (user) who performs the verification.

According to one embodiment, the elements included in the document to be verified are extracted, and each of the plurality of elements extracted from the plurality of documents is stored in association with the degree of importance associated with the appearance frequency in the plurality of documents. determining whether or not each of the plurality of elements is included in the extracted elements by referring to the storage unit, and determining whether or not each of the plurality of elements is included in the extracted elements; An information processing program, an information processing method, and an information processing apparatus that display information in a recognizable manner are proposed.

According to one aspect, an operator who verifies what kind of element with what level of importance is included in a document to be verified, and what kind of element with what level of importance is missing (Users) can easily verify.

FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram of an example of an information processing method according to an embodiment. FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing a hardware configuration example of the information processing apparatus 100. As shown in FIG. FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the contents of the rank table 300. As shown in FIG. FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the contents of the component table 400. As shown in FIG. FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the contents of the position information table 500. As shown in FIG. FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing a functional configuration example of the information processing apparatus 100. As shown in FIG. FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of a document to be verified. FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram showing the operation flow of the information processing apparatus 100. As shown in FIG. FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of creating a reference model 901. As shown in FIG. FIG. 10 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of creating a verification result model 1002. As shown in FIG. FIG. 11 is an explanatory diagram (Part 1) showing an example of displaying the element name and importance of an element. FIG. 12 is an explanatory diagram (Part 2) showing an example of displaying the element name and importance of an element. FIG. 13 is an explanatory diagram (part 3) showing an example of displaying the element name and importance of an element. FIG. 14 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of correcting the reference model 901. As shown in FIG. FIG. 15 is an explanatory diagram (part 1) showing an example of using the information processing apparatus 100 to improve the quality of explanatory documents. FIG. 16 is an explanatory diagram (part 2) showing an example of using the information processing apparatus 100 to improve the quality of explanatory documents. FIG. 17 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of using the information processing apparatus 100 to improve the security of public documents. FIG. 18 is an explanatory diagram (Part 1) showing another display example of the information processing apparatus 100 . FIG. 19 is an explanatory diagram (Part 2) showing another display example of the information processing apparatus 100 . FIG. 20 is a flow chart showing an example of the overall processing procedure. FIG. 21 is a flowchart (part 1) showing an example of a model creation processing procedure. FIG. 22 is a flowchart (part 2) showing an example of a model creation processing procedure. FIG. 23 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a comparison processing procedure; FIG. 24 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a display processing procedure.

Hereinafter, embodiments of an information processing program, an information processing method, and an information processing apparatus according to the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.

(Example of information processing method according to embodiment)
FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram of an example of an information processing method according to an embodiment. The information processing apparatus 100 is a computer capable of facilitating verification as to what degree of importance and what elements are included in a document 101 to be verified. The information processing device 100 is, for example, a server, a PC (Personal Computer), a tablet terminal, or a smart phone. Note that the importance of each element indicates the appearance rate of each element in a plurality of documents. For example, based on the degree of importance determined by the rate of appearance, elements with high importance are presumed to be elements that should be described in explanatory documents such as design documents. On the other hand, it is presumed that an element with a low importance should not be described in a public document based on the importance determined by the appearance rate.

Here, when creating or publishing a document, it may be desired to verify whether or not there is any description deficiency in the document. For example, when creating an explanatory document such as a design document, it is desirable to verify whether or not the created explanatory document contains important matters. Furthermore, it is desirable to verify how important the items not included in the created explanatory document are. Accordingly, it is desired to improve the quality of the explanatory document by facilitating correction of description deficiencies in the explanatory document.

Further, for example, when creating a public document to be disclosed to a specific group, it is desired to verify whether or not the created public document contains matters that should be kept confidential to the specific group. For example, when creating a public document to be disclosed to the outside, it is desirable to verify whether or not the created public document contains confidential information that is confidential to the public. Accordingly, it is desired to prevent the inclusion of matters that should be kept confidential in the public document and improve the security of the public document.

However, it is difficult to verify whether there are any incomplete descriptions in the document. For example, when visually verifying a document, the burden on the verifier who verifies whether or not the document is incomplete will be increased. Also, for example, even if you try to automatically verify the document, it is difficult to determine which elements should be included in the document and which elements should not be included in the document. This will increase the burden on the verifier who does the verification.

Therefore, in the present embodiment, it is possible to display the result of determining whether or not each element appearing in a plurality of documents also appears in the verification target document 101 in a display mode corresponding to the importance of the element. An information processing method that can be used will be described.

In the example of FIG. 1 , the information processing device 100 has a storage unit 110 . The storage unit 110 stores the elements included in the plurality of documents 102 in association with the degrees of importance. A document is, for example, a structured document. An element is a matter contained in a document. An element is, for example, an item name included in a document. Importance is a value related to the appearance frequency of an element in multiple documents 102 . The degree of importance represents, for example, the frequency of occurrence of an element in multiple documents 102 . The contents stored in the storage unit 110 are automatically generated by the information processing apparatus 100, for example.

In FIG. 1, an information processing apparatus 100 receives a document 101 to be verified. The information processing apparatus 100 extracts elements included in the document 101 to be verified. In the example of FIG. 1, the extracted elements are element 1 and element 3. FIG. The information processing apparatus 100 determines whether each of the plurality of elements stored in the storage unit 110 is included in the extracted elements. In the example of FIG. 1, the elements stored in the storage unit 110 are element 1, element 2, and element 3. FIG.

The information processing apparatus 100 displays the determination result for each of the plurality of elements stored in the storage unit 110 in a display mode corresponding to the importance of each of the plurality of elements. The display mode is a mode in which the degree of importance can be determined. The display mode is, for example, at least one of order, position, color, and pattern corresponding to the degree of importance. The information processing apparatus 100 displays, for example, a graphic corresponding to each element stored in the storage unit 110 in a color or pattern corresponding to the determination result and importance of the element. A figure is a rectangle, for example. A figure may be, for example, a circle or a polygon. In addition, when the information processing apparatus 100 displays a graphic corresponding to each element stored in the storage unit 110, the higher the importance of the element, the closer it is to the center.

As a result, the information processing apparatus 100 can determine what elements with what levels of importance are included in the document 101 to be verified, and what elements with what levels of importance are missing. It is possible to assist the operator (user) who conducts verification to grasp and make it easier to judge incomplete descriptions, and reduce the burden on the user when verifying the document 101 to be verified. Further, the information processing apparatus 100 can make it easier to correct the document 101 to be verified, and can improve the convenience of using the verification result.

Specifically, the information processing apparatus 100 displays elements that are not included in the verification target document 101 but are included in a plurality of past documents 102 in a display mode corresponding to the degree of importance. Therefore, the information processing apparatus 100 can easily determine how important the elements that are not included in the document 101 to be verified are. As a result, the information processing apparatus 100 can determine what kind of element should be added to the document 101 to be verified, and improve the quality of the document 101 to be verified. In addition, the information processing apparatus 100 can determine whether or not the document 101 to be verified includes an element that should be kept confidential, thereby improving the security of the document 101 to be verified.

Here, when the information processing apparatus 100 extracts the elements included in the document 101 to be verified, and displays the result of determining whether or not each element stored in the storage unit 110 is included in the extracted elements. has been described, but it is not limited to this. For example, the information processing apparatus 100 may display the result of determining whether or not each extracted element is included in the elements stored in the storage unit 110 .

Here, the case where the information processing apparatus 100 does not directly display the name or importance of each element stored in the storage unit 110 has been described, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, the information processing apparatus 100 may further display at least one of the name and importance of each element.

Although the case where the information processing apparatus 100 automatically generates the storage content of the storage unit 110 has been described here, the present invention is not limited to this. For example, the information stored in the storage unit 110 may be input to the information processing apparatus 100 . Further, for example, the information processing device 100 may receive the storage contents of the storage unit 110 from a device different from the information processing device 100 .

Here, the case where the information processing apparatus 100 displays the determination result for each element stored in the storage unit 110 has been described, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, if the information processing device 100 receives the document 101 to be verified from a device different from the information processing device 100, the determination result for each element stored in the storage unit 110 is obtained by controlling the device, It may be displayed on the device.

(Hardware Configuration Example of Information Processing Device 100)
Next, a hardware configuration example of the information processing apparatus 100 shown in FIG. 1 will be described with reference to FIG.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing a hardware configuration example of the information processing apparatus 100. As shown in FIG. In FIG. 2 , the information processing apparatus 100 has a CPU (Central Processing Unit) 201 , a memory 202 , a network I/F (Interface) 203 , a recording medium I/F 204 and a recording medium 205 . Also, each component is connected by a bus 200 .

Here, the CPU 201 controls the entire information processing apparatus 100 . The memory 202 has, for example, a ROM (Read Only Memory), a RAM (Random Access Memory), a flash ROM, and the like. Specifically, for example, a flash ROM or ROM stores various programs, and a RAM is used as a work area for the CPU 201 . A program stored in the memory 202 is loaded into the CPU 201 to cause the CPU 201 to execute coded processing.

Network I/F 203 is connected to network 210 through a communication line, and is connected to other computers via network 210 . A network I/F 203 serves as an internal interface with the network 210 and controls input/output of data from other computers. For the network I/F 203, for example, a modem or a LAN (Local Area Network) adapter can be adopted.

A recording medium I/F 204 controls reading/writing of data from/to the recording medium 205 under the control of the CPU 201 . The recording medium I/F 204 is, for example, a disk drive, an SSD (Solid State Drive), a USB (Universal Serial Bus) port, or the like. A recording medium 205 is a non-volatile memory that stores data written under the control of the recording medium I/F 204 . The recording medium 205 is, for example, a disk, semiconductor memory, USB memory, or the like. The recording medium 205 may be removable from the information processing apparatus 100 .

The information processing apparatus 100 may have, for example, a keyboard, a mouse, a display, a printer, a scanner, a microphone, a speaker, etc., in addition to the components described above. Further, the information processing apparatus 100 may have a plurality of recording medium I/Fs 204 and recording media 205 . Further, the information processing apparatus 100 may not have the recording medium I/F 204 and the recording medium 205 .

(Stored Contents of Rank Table 300)
Next, an example of the contents of the rank table 300 will be described with reference to FIG. The rank table 300 is implemented, for example, by a storage area such as the memory 202 or recording medium 205 of the information processing apparatus 100 shown in FIG.

FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the contents of the rank table 300. As shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 3, the rank table 300 has fields of appearance rate, rank, and color. The rank table 300 stores rank information as a record by setting information in each field for each rank.

The occurrence rate field is a range of possible occurrence rates of elements in a plurality of documents, and is set as a condition corresponding to the rank. A rank corresponding to the range of appearance rate is set in the rank field. A color corresponding to the rank is set in the color field.

(Stored Contents of Component Table 400)
Next, an example of the contents stored in the component table 400 will be described with reference to FIG. The component table 400 is implemented, for example, by a storage area such as the memory 202 or recording medium 205 of the information processing apparatus 100 shown in FIG.

FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the contents of the component table 400. As shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 4, the component table 400 has fields for rank, component, appearance rate, and rank. The component table 400 stores component information as a record by setting information in each field for each element.

The ranking field is used to set the ranking of appearance rate of elements included in a plurality of documents. Element names of elements included in multiple documents are set in the component field. The occurrence rate of elements contained in a plurality of documents is set in the occurrence rate field. The unit of appearance rate is, for example, %. The rank field is set with a rank corresponding to a range of appearance rates of elements included in a plurality of documents.

(Stored contents of position information table 500)
Next, an example of the contents of the position information table 500 will be described with reference to FIG. The position information table 500 is implemented, for example, by a storage area such as the memory 202 or the recording medium 205 of the information processing apparatus 100 shown in FIG.

FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the contents of the position information table 500. As shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 5, the position information table 500 has fields of cell number and component. The position information table 500 stores position information of elements as records by setting information in each field for each element.

In the cell number field, a cell number indicating the position where the figure corresponding to the element is displayed is set. A figure is a rectangle, for example. A figure may be, for example, a circle or a polygon. The element name of the element displayed at the position indicated by the cell number is set in the component field.

(Example of functional configuration of information processing apparatus 100)
Next, a functional configuration example of the information processing apparatus 100 will be described with reference to FIG.

FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing a functional configuration example of the information processing apparatus 100. As shown in FIG. Information processing apparatus 100 includes storage unit 600 , acquisition unit 601 , analysis unit 602 , extraction unit 603 , determination unit 604 , and output unit 605 .

The storage unit 600 is implemented by, for example, a storage area such as the memory 202 or recording medium 205 shown in FIG. A case where the storage unit 600 is included in the information processing apparatus 100 will be described below, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, the storage unit 600 may be included in a device different from the information processing apparatus 100 and the storage contents of the storage unit 600 may be referenced from the information processing apparatus 100 .

Acquisition unit 601 to output unit 605 function as an example of a control unit. Specifically, for example, the acquisition unit 601 to the output unit 605 cause the CPU 201 to execute a program stored in a storage area such as the memory 202 or the recording medium 205 shown in FIG. to realize its function. The processing result of each functional unit is stored in a storage area such as the memory 202 or the recording medium 205 shown in FIG. 2, for example.

The storage unit 600 stores various information that is referred to or updated in the processing of each functional unit. The storage unit 600 may store a document to be verified, for example. The storage unit 600 may store, for example, a degree of importance associated with each element included in a plurality of documents. Importance is a value related to the appearance frequency of an element in multiple documents. Importance represents the frequency of appearance of an element in a plurality of documents. The importance is, for example, the appearance rate. The plurality of documents are, for example, documents of the same type as the document to be verified. In other words, the storage unit 600 stores, for example, each of the plurality of elements extracted from the plurality of documents in association with the degree of importance associated with the appearance frequency in the plurality of documents. Storage unit 600 may store, for example, a plurality of documents. The storage unit 600 may store, for example, rules for determining display modes of elements. The storage unit 600 may store, for example, a display position associated with each element. Specifically, the storage unit 600 may store various tables shown in FIGS. 3 to 5. FIG.

For example, the storage unit 600 may store, for each type of document, an importance level associated with each element included in a plurality of documents of that type. In other words, for each document type, the storage unit 600 stores, for example, a plurality of elements included in the document of that type and the importance of each of the plurality of elements in association with each other. The type of document is, for example, a descriptive document such as a design document, or a public document disclosed to a specific group. The type of document may be a technical field corresponding to an explanatory document such as a design document. Further, the document type may be the name of the document (IR information, etc.) corresponding to the public document. Specifically, the storage unit 600 may store the component table 400 shown in FIG. 4 for each type of document.

Acquisition unit 601 acquires various types of information used in processing of each functional unit, and outputs the information to each functional unit. For example, the acquisition unit 601 may acquire from the storage unit 600 various kinds of information used for processing of each functional unit and output the information to each functional unit. For example, the acquiring unit 601 may acquire various types of information used for processing of each functional unit from a device different from the information processing apparatus 100 and output the information to each functional unit. For example, the acquisition unit 601 may acquire various types of information used for processing of each functional unit based on an operation input from the user, and output the information to each functional unit. Specifically, the acquisition unit 601 may acquire a document to be verified. More specifically, the acquisition unit 601 may acquire correspondence information in which the importance is associated with each element included in a plurality of documents, and store the correspondence information in the storage unit 600 . Specifically, the acquisition unit 601 may acquire a plurality of documents. Specifically, the acquiring unit 601 may acquire the determination rule of the display mode of the element.

The analysis unit 602 extracts elements included in at least one of the plurality of documents. The analysis unit 602 calculates the importance of the extracted elements. The analysis unit 602 associates the degree of importance with each extracted element and stores them in the storage unit 600 . The analysis unit 602, for example, analyzes each document of a plurality of documents and extracts item names as elements. For each extracted element, the analysis unit 602 calculates an appearance rate, which is a ratio of documents in which the element appears among a plurality of documents, as the importance of the element. The analysis unit 602 generates correspondence information in which the calculated importance is associated with each extracted element, and stores the correspondence information in the storage unit 600 .

Specifically, the analysis unit 602 generates the component table 400 shown in FIG. 4 and stores it in the storage unit 600 . Thereby, the analysis unit 602 can determine a criterion for verifying whether or not the document is incomplete. The analysis unit 602 can, for example, calculate importance as a criterion for determining elements that are preferable to be included in the document or elements that are not preferable to be included in the document.

Here, the case where the analysis unit 602 extracts elements included in at least one of a plurality of documents has been described, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, the analysis unit 602 may extract elements that are commonly included in a predetermined number or more of multiple documents. As a result, the analysis unit 602 excludes an element specific to any one of the plurality of documents, and uses it as a criterion for judging an element that is preferable to be included in the document or an element that is not preferable to be included in the document. It is possible to improve the calculation accuracy of the degree of importance.

Also, for example, the analysis unit 602 may extract an element that is included in at least one of a plurality of documents and that satisfies a predetermined condition. Predetermined conditions are, for example, the description position of an element on a document, the meaning of an element, a part of speech, and the like. This makes it easier for the analysis unit 602 to extract elements that are determined to be useful for document verification.

The extraction unit 603 extracts elements included in the document to be verified. A document to be verified is, for example, a document whose description deficiencies are desired to be verified. Specifically, the document to be verified is an explanatory document whose description deficiencies are verified and corrections are requested to improve the quality. Specifically, the document to be verified is a public document that is verified as to whether or not it contains matters that should be kept confidential, and whose security is desired to be improved. The document to be verified is specifically a document of the same type as the plurality of documents. The extraction unit 603, for example, analyzes the document to be verified and extracts item names as elements. This allows the extraction unit 603 to identify what elements are included in the document to be verified.

The determination unit 604 refers to the storage unit 600 and determines whether or not each of the plurality of elements is included in the extracted elements. In other words, the determination unit 604 determines whether each element stored in the storage unit 600 is included in the extracted elements. Further, the determination unit 604 identifies elements that are not included in the elements stored in the storage unit 600 among the extracted elements. The determining unit 604 determines, for example, whether each element stored in the component table 400 illustrated in FIG. 4 is included in the extracted elements. Further, the determining unit 604, for example, identifies an element that is not included in the elements stored in the component table 400 shown in FIG. 4 among the extracted elements. As a result, the determination unit 604 can specify elements that are included in a plurality of documents but not included in the document to be detected, and can specify how important the elements that are not included in the document to be detected are. can be done.

The determination unit 604 determines whether or not the extracted elements include a plurality of elements associated with the type of the verification target document stored in the storage unit 600 . In other words, the determination unit 604 determines whether each element included in a plurality of documents of the same type as the verification target document stored in the storage unit 600 is included in the extracted elements. good. The determination unit 604 determines, for example, whether each element stored in the component table 400 shown in FIG. 4 corresponding to the type of document to be detected is included in the extracted elements. As a result, the determination unit 604 identifies elements that are included in a plurality of documents of the same type as the document to be verified but are not included in the document to be detected, and determines how important the elements that are not included in the document to be detected are. can be made identifiable.

The output unit 605 displays the determination results for each of the plurality of elements in a manner in which the degree of importance of each of the plurality of elements can be determined. In other words, the output unit 605 displays the determination result of each element stored in the storage unit 600 in a display mode corresponding to the importance of the element. The display mode is, for example, at least one of order, position, color, and pattern corresponding to the degree of importance. The output format is, for example, display on a display, print output to a printer, transmission to an external device via the network I/F 203, or storage in a storage area such as the memory 202 or recording medium 205. The output unit 605 displays, for example, a graphic corresponding to each element stored in the storage unit 600 in a color or pattern corresponding to the determination result and importance of the element. A figure is a rectangle, for example. A figure may be, for example, a circle or a polygon.

Specifically, the output unit 605 converts the figure corresponding to the element stored in the storage unit 600 to the same color as the background color if it is determined that the element is not included in the elements extracted by the extraction unit 603 . to display. Specifically, the output unit 605 assigns a figure corresponding to an element stored in the storage unit 600 to the degree of importance if the determination result indicates that the element is included in the elements extracted by the extraction unit 603. display in color. As a result, the output unit 605 can determine what kind of element with what degree of importance is included in the document to be verified, and what kind of element with what degree of importance is missing. It is possible to assist the operator (user) to grasp the information, to make it easier to judge the description incompleteness, and to reduce the burden on the user when verifying the document 101 to be verified.

For example, the output unit 605 arranges the graphics corresponding to each of the multiple elements stored in the storage unit 600 so that the greater the importance of each of the multiple elements, the closer to the center of the collection including the graphics. In other words, the output unit 605 arranges, for example, the figure corresponding to each element stored in the storage unit 600 so that the greater the importance of the element, the closer it is to the center of the aggregate including the figure. good too. Specifically, the output unit 605 arranges the graphics corresponding to the elements stored in the storage unit 600 in descending order of importance of the elements in a spiral form from the center. This allows the output unit 605 to intuitively grasp the degree of importance of the element.

For example, the output unit 605 arranges the rectangles corresponding to the elements stored in the storage unit 600 such that the higher the importance of the element, the closer it is to the center. The rectangles may be arranged to form a rectangular region containing one or more corresponding rectangles. As a result, the output unit 605 can intuitively grasp to which degree of importance the importance of the element belongs.

If there is an extracted element that is not included in the multiple elements stored in the storage unit 600, the output unit 605 may further display a figure corresponding to the element that is not included in the multiple elements. In other words, if there is an element among the extracted elements that is not included in the elements stored in the storage unit 600, the output unit 605 further displays a figure corresponding to the element. For example, the output unit 605 displays the graphics corresponding to the elements identified by the determination unit 604 after displaying the graphics corresponding to the elements stored in the storage unit 600 side by side. This makes it easier for the output unit 605 to grasp elements that are not included in a plurality of documents and are included in the document to be verified, and to easily determine whether or not the document to be verified has excessive description.

After displaying the graphics corresponding to each of the plurality of elements, the output unit 605 receives the designation of one of the displayed graphics, and then displays at least one of the name and the degree of importance of the element corresponding to the designated graphics. do. As a result, the output unit 605 can easily grasp which element the displayed graphic represents and how important it is.

The output unit 605 may output the processing result of each functional unit. The output format is, for example, display on a display, print output to a printer, transmission to an external device via the network I/F 203, or storage in a storage area such as the memory 202 or recording medium 205. As a result, the output unit 605 can notify the user of the processing result of each functional unit, and can support the management and operation of the information processing apparatus 100, for example, the updating of the setting values of the information processing apparatus 100. The convenience of the information processing apparatus 100 can be improved.

(Example of operation of information processing device 100)
Next, an operation example of the information processing apparatus 100 will be described with reference to FIGS. 7 to 14. FIG. First, with reference to FIG. 7, a design document 700 will be described as an example of a document to be verified.

FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of a document to be verified. The design document 700 is a document to be verified. The design document 700 is a structured document and includes multiple elements. Elements are, for example, item names. Specifically, the elements include design document type, creation date, creator, version number, system name, function name, function outline, user, activation method, and the like. Next, referring to FIG. 8, the operation flow of the information processing apparatus 100 for a document to be verified such as the design document 700 will be described.

FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram showing the operation flow of the information processing apparatus 100. As shown in FIG. In FIG. 8, the information processing apparatus 100 receives as input a document to be verified and a plurality of documents 801 of the same type as the document to be verified. The document to be verified and the plurality of documents 801 are input at the same timing, for example. The document to be verified and the plurality of documents 801 may be input at different times, for example. Specifically, the document to be verified is input after the plurality of documents 801 are input.

(8-1) The information processing apparatus 100 creates a reference model based on the multiple input documents 801 . The reference model is a model in which rectangles corresponding to each element included in a plurality of documents 801 are arranged. The reference model is, for example, a model in which rectangles corresponding to respective elements are arranged spirally from the center in descending order of importance of the elements. An example of creating a reference model will be described later with reference to FIG.

(8-2) The information processing apparatus 100 extracts elements included in the document to be verified. Then, the information processing apparatus 100 compares the elements included in the document to be verified with the reference model, and determines whether or not each element included in the document to be verified is included in the elements included in the plurality of documents 801. and create a verification result model 802 . The verification result model 802 is generated based on the reference model so that the result of determining whether or not each element included in the document to be verified is included in the elements included in the plurality of documents 801 can be grasped. is a model. An example of creating the verification result model 802 will be described later with reference to FIG.

After creating the verification result model 802, the information processing apparatus 100 may update the reference model based on the elements included in the document to be verified. Next, the description of FIGS. 9 and 10 will be made.

FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of creating a reference model 901. As shown in FIG. In FIG. 9, the information processing apparatus 100 receives multiple documents 900 . The information processing apparatus 100 extracts one or more elements included in a plurality of documents 900 and calculates the appearance rate of each element. The information processing apparatus 100 sorts and ranks the one or more extracted elements in descending order of appearance rate.

The information processing apparatus 100 refers to the rank definition table and associates each element with a rank based on the calculated appearance rate of each element. The information processing apparatus 100 generates a record in which the rank of the element, the element name, the appearance rate, and the rank are associated with each other for each element, and adds the record to the component table 400 .

The information processing device 100 creates a reference model 901 by referring to the rank definition table and the component table 400 . The information processing apparatus 100, for example, colors the rectangles corresponding to the respective elements with colors corresponding to the ranks of the elements, and arranges the elements spirally from the center in descending order of importance, thereby forming the reference model. Create 901. Next, the description of FIG. 10 will be described.

FIG. 10 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of creating a verification result model 1002. As shown in FIG. In FIG. 10, an information processing apparatus 100 receives a document 1000 to be verified. The information processing apparatus 100 extracts an element 1001 included in a document 1000 to be verified. The information processing apparatus 100 compares the element indicated by the rectangle of the reference model 901 with the element 1001 extracted from the document 1000 to be verified.

As a result of the comparison, the information processing apparatus 100 specifies first type elements included in the elements indicated by the rectangles of the reference model 901 and included in the elements 1001 extracted from the document 1000 to be verified. Elements of the first type are elements that are not lacking in document 1000 to be verified and that are not specific to document 1000 to be verified.

As a result of the comparison, the information processing apparatus 100 identifies a second type of element that is included in the element indicated by the rectangle of the reference model 901 but is not included in the element 1001 extracted from the document 1000 to be verified. Elements of the second type are elements lacking in the document 1000 to be verified compared to the plurality of documents 900 .

As a result of the comparison, the information processing apparatus 100 identifies elements of the third type that are not included in the elements indicated by the rectangles of the reference model 901 and are included in the elements 1001 extracted from the document 1000 to be verified. Elements of the third type are elements that are specific to the document under verification 1000 compared to the plurality of documents 900 .

The information processing apparatus 100 creates a verification result model 1002 from the reference model 901 so that the first, second, and third types of elements can be distinguished.

For example, the information processing apparatus 100 displays rectangles corresponding to the elements of the first type in colors corresponding to the degrees of importance in the same way as the reference model 901, so as to indicate how important the elements are. Decide which colored part to use.

For example, the information processing apparatus 100 displays rectangles corresponding to the second type elements in the same color as the background color, unlike the reference model 901, so as to indicate that the elements are missing in the document 1000 to be verified. Decide on the achromatic part to be.

The information processing apparatus 100 displays, for example, the rectangles corresponding to the elements of the third type in a color different from that of the rectangles of the reference model 901 to indicate that they are elements specific to the document 1000 to be verified. Decide on additional parts.

For example, the information processing apparatus 100 does not change the color of the rectangles in the colored portion of the reference model 901, changes the rectangles in the achromatic portion to the same color as the background color, and adds the rectangles in the additional portion. , to create a verification result model 1002 .

The information processing apparatus 100 displays the created verification result model 1002 . As a result, the information processing apparatus 100 can determine what elements with what level of importance are included in the document 1000 to be verified, and what elements with what level of importance are missing. It is possible to assist the operator (user) who conducts verification to grasp and make it easier to judge incomplete descriptions, and reduce the burden on the user when verifying the document 101 to be verified.

For example, the information processing apparatus 100 determines the degree of importance of an element that is included in a plurality of documents 900 and is included in the document 1000 to be verified and is not unique to the document 1000 to be verified. Colors can make it easier to intuitively grasp.

The information processing apparatus 100 can, for example, make it easier to grasp the missing elements in the verification target document 1000 . In addition, the information processing apparatus 100 can intuitively grasp, for example, the degree of importance of an element lacking in the verification target document 1000 from the position where the rectangle is arranged. .

For example, the information processing apparatus 100 can intuitively grasp elements specific to the verification target document 1000 that are not included in the plurality of documents 900 but are included in the verification target document 1000 by the colors and the positions where the rectangles are arranged. can do.

Here, the case where the information processing apparatus 100 creates the reference model 901 and then creates the verification result model 1002 has been described, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, the information processing apparatus 100 may create the verification result model 1002 without creating the reference model 901 .

Here, a case has been described where the information processing apparatus 100 creates the verification result model 1002 in which rectangles corresponding to elements are arranged, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, the information processing apparatus 100 may create a verification result model 1002 in which polygons corresponding to elements are arranged. Further, for example, the information processing apparatus 100 may create a verification result model 1002 in which sectors corresponding to elements are arranged.

11 to 13, the information processing apparatus 100 displays the element name and the degree of importance of the element, so that what element is the element corresponding to the displayed rectangle, A case will be described where it is easy to grasp the degree of importance of an element.

11 to 13 are explanatory diagrams showing an example of displaying element names and degrees of importance of elements. As shown in FIG. 11, when the reference model 901 is created, the information processing apparatus 100 sets a grid number to each rectangle, and sets the element name of the element corresponding to each rectangle and the grid number set to each rectangle. A corresponding record is added to the position information table 500 .

Further, when the verification result model 1002 is created, the information processing apparatus 100 updates the element name of the element corresponding to the rectangle in the position information table 500 if there is a rectangle determined as the additional portion. good too. Thereby, the information processing apparatus 100 can specify which rectangle corresponds to which element. Next, the description of FIG. 12 will be described.

In FIG. 12, the information processing apparatus 100 accepts selection operations for rectangles that are displayed in the same color as the background color when the verification result model 1002 is displayed and that represent missing elements in the document 1000 to be verified. The information processing apparatus 100 refers to the position information table 500 and acquires the element name of the element corresponding to the rectangle for which the selection operation has been received. In the example of FIG. 12, the information processing apparatus 100 acquires the element name "function name". The information processing apparatus 100 refers to the component table 400 and acquires the appearance rate corresponding to the identified element name. In the example of FIG. 12, the information processing apparatus 100 acquires the appearance rate of "99.8%."

The information processing apparatus 100 creates and displays a comment based on the obtained element name and appearance rate. In the example of FIG. 12, the information processing apparatus 100 does not include the comment "element 'function name' with appearance rate of 99.8%". ” is created and displayed. Accordingly, the information processing apparatus 100 can easily grasp what the element corresponding to the displayed rectangle is and how important the element is. Next, the description of FIG. 13 will be described.

In FIG. 13, the information processing apparatus 100 receives a selection operation for a rectangle representing an element specific to the document 1000 to be verified when displaying the verification result model 1002 . The information processing apparatus 100 refers to the position information table 500 and acquires the element name of the element corresponding to the rectangle for which the selection operation has been received. In the example of FIG. 13, the information processing apparatus 100 acquires the element name "password". The information processing apparatus 100 does not acquire the appearance rate because the element is unique to the document 1000 to be verified.

The information processing apparatus 100 creates and displays a comment based on the acquired element name. In the example of FIG. 13, the information processing apparatus 100 writes a comment “an element 'password' that does not exist in the reference model 901”. ” is created and displayed. Thereby, the information processing apparatus 100 can easily grasp what the element corresponding to the displayed rectangle is.

Next, referring to FIG. 14, the information processing apparatus 100 corrects the reference model 901 to determine what the element corresponding to the displayed rectangle is and how important it is. A case will be described in which it is easier to intuitively grasp whether or not there is.

FIG. 14 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of correcting the reference model 901. As shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 14, when creating a reference model 901, the information processing apparatus 100 corrects the reference model 901 so that a set of rectangles for each range of importance forms a rectangular area. A rectangular region is formed by (2n−1)̂2 rectangles. n is an integer of 1 or more.

For example, the information processing apparatus 100 determines that there are 7 rectangles corresponding to the elements of rank A, so that 3^2=9 rectangles are insufficient. Therefore, the information processing apparatus 100 prepares two dummy rectangles of the same color as the rectangle corresponding to the element of rank A, and arranges a total of nine rectangles of the same color in descending order of priority. As a result, the information processing apparatus 100 can cause the arranged rectangle set to form a rectangular area. Therefore, for example, even if the seventh rectangle corresponding to the rank A element is displayed in the same color as the background color, the information processing apparatus 100 does not indicate that the seventh rectangle corresponds to the rank A element. It can be intuitively grasped from the colors of the rectangles around the seventh rectangle.

Similarly, the information processing apparatus 100, for example, determines that there are 9 rectangles already arranged and 71 rectangles corresponding to elements of rank B, so that 9̂2=81 is insufficient. Therefore, the information processing apparatus 100 prepares one dummy rectangle of the same color as the rectangle corresponding to the element of rank B, and arranges a total of 72 rectangles of the same color in descending order of priority. As a result, the information processing apparatus 100 can cause the arranged rectangle set to form a rectangular area. Therefore, for example, even if the 71st rectangle corresponding to the element of rank B is displayed in the same color as the background color, the information processing apparatus 100 does not indicate that the 71st rectangle corresponds to the element of rank B. It can be intuitively grasped from the colors of the rectangles around the 71st rectangle. As a result, the information processing apparatus 100 can generate the reference model 1400 by correcting the reference model 901 .

Further, as shown in FIG. 14, the information processing apparatus 100 may assign a star mark to the dummy rectangles and arrange them. This allows the information processing apparatus 100 to recognize that the dummy rectangle does not correspond to any element. Therefore, the information processing apparatus 100 can make it difficult for the number of elements for each rank included in the document 1000 to be verified to be mistaken.

(Usage example of information processing device 100)
Next, a usage example of the information processing apparatus 100 will be described with reference to FIGS. 15 to 17. FIG.

15 and 16 are explanatory diagrams showing an example of using the information processing apparatus 100 to improve the quality of explanatory documents. In the explanatory document, the higher the importance of an element, the more the element is included in other explanatory documents, and the more important the element is to be described in the explanatory document. On the other hand, in the explanatory document, the lower the importance of the element, the higher the possibility that the element does not need to be described in the explanatory document.

In FIG. 15, the information processing apparatus 100 creates a verification result model 1500 for the explanatory document to be verified. As a result, the user can refer to the verification result model 1500 and intuitively understand that the explanatory document to be verified lacks important elements. The user visually recognizes that the document to be verified is in a state of lack of description based on the rectangle having the same color as the background color included in the verification result model 1500 and the color of the rectangle around the rectangle. be able to. Also, the user can refer to the verification result model 1500 and intuitively understand that the number of missing elements in the verification target explanatory document is relatively small.

As a result, when the user corrects the explanation document to be verified to eliminate the lack of description, based on the importance, which element should be preferentially added to the explanation document to be verified. It becomes possible to determine whether or not there is a problem, and it is possible to improve the efficiency of the correction work. In addition, the user can determine elements that do not need to be added to the explanatory document to be verified based on the degree of importance, thereby improving the efficiency of correction work. Next, the description of FIG. 16 will be described.

In FIG. 16, the information processing apparatus 100 creates a verification result model 1600 for the explanatory document to be verified. As a result, the user can refer to the verification result model 1600 and intuitively understand that important elements are included in the verification target explanatory document without omission. In addition, the user can refer to the verification result model 1500 and intuitively understand that the number of missing elements in the verification target explanatory document is relatively large. Furthermore, the user can understand that the missing element in the explanatory document to be verified is an element that is highly likely to be an element that does not need to be described. Next, the description of FIG. 17 will be described.

FIG. 17 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of using the information processing apparatus 100 to improve the security of public documents. In public documents, the higher the importance of an element, the more often that element is included in other public documents, and the less likely it is that the element is confidential. On the other hand, in public documents, the lower the importance of an element, the less likely it is to be included in other public documents, indicating that the element tends to be concealed.

In the example of FIG. 17, rank A is an element with an appearance frequency of 90% or higher. Rank B is an element with an appearance frequency of 60% or more and less than 90%. Rank C is an element with an appearance frequency of 30% or more and less than 60%. Rank D is an element with an appearance frequency of less than 30%.

Furthermore, for ranks A to D, the administrator may set supplementary explanations regarding the handling of the elements of the corresponding ranks in advance. For example, when the administrator sets rank A to indicate that the element is likely to be published on the Internet, the information processing apparatus 100 provides supplementary explanation of the element of rank A as "element permitted to be published on the Internet. ” may be displayed with the verification result model 1700 .

Furthermore, when the administrator sets rank B to indicate that there is a high possibility that the element is permitted to be disclosed within the company, the information processing apparatus 100 provides supplementary explanation of the element of rank B as "disclosed within the company. A descriptive text, “Authentication Elements” may be displayed with the validation result model 1700 .

Furthermore, when the administrator sets rank C to indicate that there is a high possibility that the element is permitted to be disclosed within the group company, the information processing apparatus 100 provides supplementary explanation of the element of rank C as "group company A descriptive text of "elements for internal disclosure permission" may be displayed together with the verification result model 1700. FIG.

Further, when the administrator sets the rank D to indicate that the element is likely to be disclosed to interested parties, the information processing apparatus 100 provides supplementary explanation of the element of the rank D as follows: A descriptive text of "elements for internal disclosure permission" may be displayed together with the verification result model 1700. FIG.

In FIG. 17, the information processing apparatus 100 creates a verification result model 1700 for the public document to be verified. As a result, the user refers to the verification result model 1700 and confirms that the public document to be verified includes an element that is permitted to be disclosed within the company but not permitted to be disclosed to the Internet. , can be grasped intuitively. The user can visually recognize that the public document to be verified is in a state of excessive description, for example, based on the color of the rectangle included in the verification result model 1700 .

As a result, users can decide which elements should be deleted from the public document to be verified based on their importance when modifying the public document to be verified to eliminate excessive descriptions. As a result, the efficiency of correction work can be improved. In addition, the user can determine elements that do not need to be deleted from the public document to be verified based on the degree of importance, thereby improving the efficiency of correction work.

(Another display example of the information processing device 100)
Next, another display example of the information processing apparatus 100 will be described with reference to FIGS. 18 and 19. FIG. In the above description, the information processing apparatus 100 creates and displays the verification result model 1002 in which the rectangles corresponding to the elements are arranged so that the rectangles corresponding to the elements are arranged spirally from the center in order of appearance rate. has been described, but it is not limited to this.

18 and 19 are explanatory diagrams showing other display examples of the information processing apparatus 100. FIG. As shown in FIG. 18, the information processing apparatus 100 corresponds to each element rank so that the first type element, the second type element, and the third type element can be distinguished. A verification result model 1800 may be created and displayed by arranging rectangles to be aligned in the horizontal direction. Next, the description of FIG. 19 will be described. In this case as well, the information processing apparatus 100 determines what elements with what levels of importance are included in the document to be verified, and what elements with what levels of importance are missing. , it is possible to assist the operator (user) who conducts verification to understand, to make it easier to judge incomplete descriptions, and to reduce the burden on the user when verifying the document 101 to be verified. .

As shown in FIG. 19, unlike the case of FIGS. 9 and 10, the information processing apparatus 100 does not display the rectangles corresponding to the elements of the second type in the same color as the background color. A verification result model 1900 that is displayed in color and marked with an X may be created and displayed. In this case as well, the information processing apparatus 100 determines what elements with what levels of importance are included in the document to be verified, and what elements with what levels of importance are missing. , it is possible to assist the operator (user) who conducts verification to understand, to make it easier to judge incomplete descriptions, and to reduce the burden on the user when verifying the document 101 to be verified. .

(Overall processing procedure)
Next, an example of an overall processing procedure executed by the information processing apparatus 100 will be described with reference to FIG. 20 . The overall processing is realized by, for example, the CPU 201, storage areas such as the memory 202 and the recording medium 205, and the network I/F 203 shown in FIG.

FIG. 20 is a flow chart showing an example of the overall processing procedure. In FIG. 20, the information processing apparatus 100 executes model creation processing, which will be described later with reference to FIGS. 21 and 22 (step S2001). Then, the information processing apparatus 100 executes comparison processing described later with reference to FIG. 23 (step S2002).

Next, the information processing apparatus 100 executes display processing described later with reference to FIG. 24 (step S2003). Then, the information processing apparatus 100 ends the overall processing.

(Model creation processing procedure)
Next, an example of a model creation processing procedure executed by the information processing apparatus 100 will be described with reference to FIGS. 21 and 22. FIG. The model creation process is realized by, for example, the CPU 201, storage areas such as the memory 202 and the recording medium 205, and the network I/F 203 shown in FIG.

21 and 22 are flowcharts showing an example of a model creation processing procedure. In FIG. 21, the information processing apparatus 100 receives a plurality of documents (step S2101). The information processing apparatus 100 then extracts one or more elements included in the plurality of documents, and calculates the appearance rate of each element (step S2102).

Next, the information processing apparatus 100 sorts the extracted one or more elements in descending order of appearance rate (step S2103). Then, the information processing apparatus 100 refers to the rank definition table, and associates a rank with each element based on the calculated appearance rate of each element (step S2104).

Next, for each element, the information processing apparatus 100 generates a record in which the order of the element, the element name, the appearance rate, and the rank are associated with each other, and adds the record to the component table 400 (step S2105). Then, the information processing apparatus 100 shifts to the process of step S2201.

In FIG. 22, the information processing apparatus 100 selects an element having the highest appearance rate among the unselected elements among the extracted one or more elements (step S2201).

Next, the information processing apparatus 100 arranges the rectangles corresponding to the selected element so that the rectangles corresponding to the elements are arranged spirally from the center in order of appearance rate (step S2202). Then, the information processing apparatus 100 determines whether or not the rank of the element in which the rectangle is arranged matches the rank of the element with the next highest appearance rate after the element in which the rectangle is arranged (step S2203).

Here, if they do not match (step S2203: No), the information processing apparatus 100 proceeds to the process of step S2206. On the other hand, if they match (step S2203: Yes), the information processing apparatus 100 proceeds to the process of step S2204.

In step S2204, the information processing apparatus 100 determines whether or not a rectangular set corresponding to one or more arranged elements forms a rectangular area (step S2204). For example, the information processing apparatus 100 determines that a rectangular area has been formed if the number of times rectangles have been arranged up to the present time matches (2n−1)^2, and if not, the rectangular area has not been formed. I judge. n is an integer of 1 or more.

Here, if a rectangular area is formed (step S2204: Yes), the information processing apparatus 100 proceeds to the process of step S2206. On the other hand, if the rectangular area is not formed (step S2204: No), the information processing apparatus 100 proceeds to the process of step S2205.

In step S2205, the information processing apparatus 100 arranges dummy rectangles so that the arranged elements form a rectangular area (step S2205). For example, the information processing apparatus 100 subtracts the number of times rectangles have been laid out so far from (2n−1)^2, which is the closest to the number of times rectangles have been laid out so far and is greater than the number of times rectangles have been laid out so far. Specify the value as the number of dummy rectangles. The information processing apparatus 100 arranges the specified number of dummy rectangles. The information processing apparatus 100 then proceeds to the process of step S2206.

In step S2206, the information processing apparatus 100 determines whether or not all extracted elements have been selected (step S2206). Here, if there is an unselected element (step S2206: No), the information processing apparatus 100 returns to the process of step S2201. On the other hand, if all have been selected (step S2206: Yes), the information processing apparatus 100 proceeds to the process of step S2207.

In step S2207, the information processing apparatus 100 sets a cell number in order from the upper left rectangle of the reference model formed by arranging rectangles corresponding to each element (step S2207).

Next, the information processing apparatus 100 adds a record that associates the cell number with the element name of the element corresponding to the rectangle of the cell number to the position information table 500 (step S2208). The information processing apparatus 100 then ends the model creation process.

(Comparison processing procedure)
Next, an example of a comparison processing procedure executed by the information processing apparatus 100 will be described with reference to FIG. 23 . The comparison process is realized by, for example, the CPU 201, storage areas such as the memory 202 and the recording medium 205, and the network I/F 203 shown in FIG.

FIG. 23 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a comparison processing procedure; In FIG. 23, the information processing apparatus 100 receives a document to be verified (step S2301). Next, the information processing apparatus 100 extracts elements included in the document to be verified (step S2302). Then, the information processing apparatus 100 shifts to the process of step S2303.

In step S2303, the information processing apparatus 100 selects one of the unselected elements among the extracted one or more elements (step S2303). The information processing apparatus 100 then determines whether or not the selected element is included in the elements stored in the component table 400 (step S2304).

Here, if it is included (step S2304: Yes), the information processing apparatus 100 proceeds to the process of step S2305. On the other hand, if not included (step S2304: No), the information processing apparatus 100 proceeds to the process of step S2306.

In step S2305, the information processing apparatus 100 colors the rectangles of the cell numbers associated with the element names of the elements stored in the component table 400 that match the selected element in the reference model with a color corresponding to the degree of importance. is determined as a colored portion to be displayed (step S2305). The information processing apparatus 100 then proceeds to the process of step S2307.

In step S2306, the information processing apparatus 100 determines a rectangle corresponding to the selected element as an additional portion to be added outside the reference model (step S2306). Here, the information processing apparatus 100 sets a cell number to the rectangle corresponding to the selected element, and stores a record in which the cell number and the element name of the element corresponding to the rectangle with the cell number are associated with each other in the position information table 500. may be added to The information processing apparatus 100 then proceeds to the process of step S2307.

In step S2307, the information processing apparatus 100 determines whether or not all extracted elements have been selected (step S2307). Here, if there is an unselected element (step S2307: No), the information processing apparatus 100 returns to the process of step S2303. On the other hand, if all have been selected (step S2307: Yes), the information processing apparatus 100 proceeds to the process of step S2308.

In step S2308, the information processing apparatus 100 creates a verification result model from the reference model based on the colored portion and the added portion, and displays the verification result model (step S2308). A rectangle that is not a colored portion in the reference model is a rectangle corresponding to an element that is included in a plurality of documents but not included in the document to be verified, and is an achromatic portion that is displayed in the same color as the background color. Then, the information processing apparatus 100 ends the comparison process.

(Display processing procedure)
Next, an example of a display processing procedure executed by the information processing apparatus 100 will be described with reference to FIG. 24 . The display processing is realized by, for example, the CPU 201, storage areas such as the memory 202 and the recording medium 205, and the network I/F 203 shown in FIG.

FIG. 24 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a display processing procedure. In FIG. 24, the information processing apparatus 100 acquires the cell number corresponding to the clicked rectangle (step S2401).

Next, the information processing apparatus 100 refers to the position information table 500 and acquires the element name corresponding to the acquired cell number (step S2402). Then, the information processing apparatus 100 refers to the component table 400 and obtains the appearance rate of the element with the obtained element name (step S2403).

Next, the information processing apparatus 100 displays the acquired element names and appearance rates (step S2404). Then, the information processing apparatus 100 ends the display process. Accordingly, the information processing apparatus 100 can easily grasp what the element corresponding to the displayed rectangle is and how important the element is.

As described above, according to the information processing apparatus 100, elements included in the document 101 to be verified can be extracted. According to the information processing apparatus 100, it is possible to determine whether each element stored in the storage unit 110, which stores the elements included in the plurality of documents 102 in association with the degree of importance, is included in the extracted elements. can. According to the information processing apparatus 100, the determination result of each element stored in the storage unit 110 can be displayed in a display mode corresponding to the importance of the element. As a result, the information processing apparatus 100 can determine what elements with what levels of importance are included in the document 101 to be verified, and what elements with what levels of importance are missing. , it is possible to assist the operator (user) who conducts verification to understand, to make it easier to judge incomplete descriptions, and to reduce the burden on the user when verifying the document 101 to be verified. .

According to the information processing apparatus 100, the storage unit 110 can store, for each type of document, the importance levels associated with the elements included in the plurality of documents 102 of the type. According to the information processing apparatus 100, each element included in a plurality of documents 102 of the same type as the document 101 to be verified, stored in the storage unit 110, is determined whether or not it is included in the extracted elements. can be done. Accordingly, the information processing apparatus 100 can switch the storage contents of the storage unit 110 to be used according to the type of the document 101 to be verified, and can accurately verify the document 101 to be verified. In addition, the information processing apparatus 100 can accept various types of documents as the verification target document 101, thereby improving convenience. The information processing apparatus 100 can accept both an explanatory document and a public document as the document 101 to be verified, for example. The information processing apparatus 100 can accept, for example, any of a plurality of explanatory documents in different technical fields as the document 101 to be verified.

According to the information processing apparatus 100, the figure corresponding to each element stored in the storage unit 110 can be displayed in a color or pattern corresponding to the determination result and importance of the element. Accordingly, the information processing apparatus 100 can intuitively grasp the determination result and importance of an element from the color or pattern of the figure corresponding to the element.

According to the information processing apparatus 100, the figure corresponding to each element stored in the storage unit 110 can be arranged closer to the center as the importance of the element is higher. Accordingly, the information processing apparatus 100 can intuitively grasp the degree of importance of an element from the position where the figure corresponding to the element is arranged.

According to the information processing apparatus 100, when arranging the figure corresponding to each element stored in the storage unit 110 so that the greater the importance of the element, the closer it is to the center, a rectangular area is formed for each importance range. can be arranged to form Accordingly, the information processing apparatus 100 can intuitively grasp to which degree of importance the importance of the element belongs.

According to the information processing apparatus 100, when there is an element that is not included in the elements stored in the storage unit 110 among the extracted elements, a figure corresponding to the element can be further displayed. As a result, the information processing apparatus 100 can easily grasp elements that are not included in the plurality of documents 102 but are included in the document 101 to be verified, and can easily determine whether or not the document 101 to be verified has excessive description. can be done.

According to the information processing apparatus 100, upon receiving the designation of the displayed graphic, at least either the name or the importance of the element corresponding to the designated graphic can be displayed. As a result, the information processing apparatus 100 can easily grasp which element the displayed graphic represents and how important it corresponds to the element.

According to the information processing apparatus 100, elements included in the plurality of documents 102 are extracted, the importance of the elements included in the plurality of documents 102 is calculated, and the importance is associated with each element included in the plurality of documents 102. can be stored in the storage unit 110. As a result, the information processing apparatus 100 can avoid burdening the user with calculating the degree of importance.

According to the information processing apparatus 100, the degree of appearance frequency of elements in the plurality of documents 102 can be used as the degree of importance. Accordingly, the information processing apparatus 100 can determine, based on the degree of importance, elements that are preferable to be written in a detection target document that tends to be included in other documents as well.

The information processing method described in this embodiment can be realized by executing a prepared program on a computer such as a personal computer or a workstation. The information processing program described in the present embodiment is recorded on a computer-readable recording medium such as a hard disk, flexible disk, CD-ROM, MO, DVD, etc., and is executed by being read from the recording medium by a computer. Further, the information processing program described in this embodiment may be distributed via a network such as the Internet.

Further, the following additional remarks are disclosed with respect to the above-described embodiment.

(Appendix 1) to the computer,
Extract the elements contained in the document to be verified,
referring to a storage unit that stores, for each of a plurality of elements extracted from a plurality of documents, a degree of importance related to appearance frequency in the plurality of documents in association with each other; determine whether it is included,
Displaying the determination results for each of the plurality of elements in a manner in which the importance of each of the plurality of elements can be determined;
An information processing program characterized by causing a process to be executed.

(Appendix 2) The storage unit associates and stores, for each type of the plurality of documents, a plurality of elements included in the document of the type and the importance of each of the plurality of elements,
The determining process determines whether or not the extracted elements include the plurality of elements associated with the type of the verification target document stored in the storage unit,
The displaying process displays the determination result of the plurality of elements associated with the type of the document to be verified in a manner in which the importance of each of the plurality of elements can be determined.
The information processing program according to Supplementary Note 1, characterized by:

(Appendix 3) The displaying process displays graphics corresponding to each of the plurality of elements stored in the storage unit in a color or pattern corresponding to the determination result and the degree of importance of each of the plurality of elements. The information processing program according to appendix 1 or 2, characterized by:

(Appendix 4) In the display processing, the figure corresponding to each of the plurality of elements stored in the storage unit is placed in the center of an aggregate including the figure as the importance of each of the plurality of elements increases. The information processing program according to appendix 3, characterized in that they are arranged so as to be close to each other.

(Appendix 5) The figure is a rectangle,
In the displaying process, when arranging the rectangles corresponding to the elements stored in the storage unit so that the rectangles corresponding to the elements stored in the storage unit are closer to the center as the importance of the elements increases, 5. The information processing program according to appendix 4, wherein the rectangles are arranged so as to form a rectangular area including one or more rectangles corresponding to .

(Appendix 6) When there is an element not included in the plurality of elements stored in the storage unit, the display processing corresponds to the element not included in the plurality of elements stored in the storage unit. 6. The information processing program according to any one of Appendices 3 to 5, further displaying a figure.

(Appendix 7) In the computer,
After displaying the graphics corresponding to each of the plurality of elements, when receiving the designation of the graphics among the plurality of graphics corresponding to the plurality of elements, at least the name or importance of the element corresponding to the designated graphics 7. The information processing program according to any one of appendices 3 to 6, characterized by displaying any one of them and executing a process.

(Appendix 8) In the computer,
extracting the plurality of elements contained in the plurality of documents; calculating the importance of each of the plurality of elements contained in the plurality of documents; 8. The information processing program according to any one of appendices 1 to 7, characterized in that it causes a process to be executed by storing in the storage unit in association with a degree.

(Appendix 9) The information processing program according to any one of Appendices 1 to 8, wherein the degree of importance represents the frequency of occurrence of an element in the plurality of documents.

(Appendix 10) The computer
Extract the elements contained in the document to be verified,
referring to a storage unit that stores, for each of a plurality of elements extracted from a plurality of documents, a degree of importance related to appearance frequency in the plurality of documents in association with each other; determine whether it is included,
Displaying the determination results for each of the plurality of elements in a manner in which the importance of each of the plurality of elements can be determined;
An information processing method characterized by executing processing.

(Appendix 11) extracting the elements included in the document to be verified,
referring to a storage unit that stores, for each of a plurality of elements extracted from a plurality of documents, a degree of importance related to appearance frequency in the plurality of documents in association with each other; determine whether it is included,
Displaying the determination results for each of the plurality of elements in a manner in which the importance of each of the plurality of elements can be determined;
An information processing apparatus comprising a control unit.

100 Information Processing Device 101, 102, 801, 900, 1000 Document 110, 600 Storage Unit 200 Bus 201 CPU
202 memory 203 network I/F
204 recording medium I/F
205 recording medium 210 network 300 rank table 400 component table 500 position information table 601 acquisition unit 602 analysis unit 603 extraction unit 604 determination unit 605 output unit 700 design document 802, 1002, 1500, 1600, 1700, 1800, 1900 verification result model 901, 1400 reference model 1001 element

Claims (8)

to the computer,
Extract the elements contained in the document to be verified,
referring to a storage unit that stores, for each of a plurality of elements extracted from a plurality of documents, a degree of importance related to appearance frequency in the plurality of documents in association with each other; determine whether it is included,
a figure corresponding to each of the plurality of elements stored in the storage unit is arranged so as to be closer to the center of an aggregate including the figure as the importance of each of the plurality of elements increases; Display in a color or pattern corresponding to the determination result and the importance of each element of
An information processing program characterized by causing a process to be executed. the storage unit associates and stores, for each type of the plurality of documents, a plurality of elements included in the document of the type and an importance level of each of the plurality of elements;
The determining process determines whether or not the extracted elements include the plurality of elements associated with the type of the verification target document stored in the storage unit,
The processing for displaying a figure corresponding to each of the plurality of elements associated with the type of the document to be verified, which is stored in the storage unit, is displayed as the degree of importance of each of the plurality of elements increases. Arranged so as to be close to the center of the aggregate containing the figure, and displayed in a color or pattern corresponding to the determination result and the importance of each of the plurality of elements,
The information processing program according to claim 1, characterized by: the figure is a rectangle,
In the displaying process, when arranging the rectangles corresponding to the elements stored in the storage unit so that the rectangles corresponding to the elements stored in the storage unit are closer to the center as the importance of the elements increases, 3. The information processing program according to claim 1, wherein said rectangles are arranged so as to form a rectangular area including one or more rectangles corresponding to . In the displaying process, when there is an element not included in the plurality of elements stored in the storage unit among the extracted elements, a figure corresponding to the element not included in the plurality of elements is further displayed. 4. The information processing program according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized by: to the computer;
After displaying the graphics corresponding to each of the plurality of elements, when receiving the designation of the graphics among the plurality of graphics corresponding to the plurality of elements, at least the name or importance of the element corresponding to the designated graphics 5. The information processing program according to any one of claims 1 to 4, displaying any one of them and causing a process to be executed. to the computer;
extracting the plurality of elements contained in the plurality of documents; calculating the importance of each of the plurality of elements contained in the plurality of documents; 6. The information processing program according to any one of claims 1 to 5, characterized in that it stores in said storage unit in association with a degree, and causes a process to be executed. the computer
Extract the elements contained in the document to be verified,
referring to a storage unit that stores, for each of a plurality of elements extracted from a plurality of documents, a degree of importance related to appearance frequency in the plurality of documents in association with each other; determine whether it is included,
a figure corresponding to each of the plurality of elements stored in the storage unit is arranged so as to be closer to the center of an aggregate including the figure as the importance of each of the plurality of elements increases; Display in a color or pattern corresponding to the determination result and the importance of each element of
An information processing method characterized by executing processing. Extract the elements contained in the document to be verified,
referring to a storage unit that stores, for each of a plurality of elements extracted from a plurality of documents, a degree of importance related to appearance frequency in the plurality of documents in association with each other; determine whether it is included,
a figure corresponding to each of the plurality of elements stored in the storage unit is arranged so as to be closer to the center of an aggregate including the figure as the importance of each of the plurality of elements increases; Display in a color or pattern corresponding to the determination result and the importance of each element of
An information processing apparatus comprising a control unit.

Images