JP2019159839A - Information processing program, information processing method, and information processing device - Google Patents

Abstract

To make a worker (a user) performing verification to verify easier that how degree of importance and what element contains in a verification target document, or how degree of importance and what element are missed.SOLUTION: An information processing device 100 includes a storage part 110. The storage part 110 stores an element contained in a plurality of documents 102 with importance. The information processing device 100 extracts the element contained in a verification object document 101.The information processing device 100 determines whether the plurality of elements stored in the storing part 110 is contained in the element to be extracted. The information processing device 100 displays a determination result about the plurality of elements stored in the storing part 110 in a display state corresponding to the importance of each of the plurality of elements.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

  The present invention relates to an information processing program, an information processing method, and an information processing apparatus.

  Conventionally, when creating or publishing a document, it may be desired to verify whether the document has a description defect. Incomplete description is, for example, an insufficient description in which important matters that are preferably described in the document are not described in the document, or confidential information that is not preferable in the document is described in the document. It is a state.

  As the prior art, for example, there is one that performs document type evaluation, document level evaluation, and document specialty evaluation based on the result of analyzing the structure of a document to be evaluated. Further, for example, there is a technique for generating a plurality of tags including a search word and each related word as a character string, and generating a relevance map in which each tag is arranged on a predetermined plane. In addition, for example, there is a technique of displaying search results arranged in a spiral manner from the center of the screen to the outside in the order of the number of keywords included in the search target information. Further, for example, there is a technique for determining whether a paragraph sentence of one document is similar to a paragraph sentence or a chapter of the other document.

JP 2005-216258 A JP 2009-271795 A JP-A-4-133173 JP2015-219799A

  However, it is difficult to verify whether a document has a description defect in the conventional technology. For example, it is difficult to determine matters that are preferable to be described in documents or items that are not preferable to be described in documents, and this increases the burden on verifiers that verify whether there are defects in the documents. End up.

  In one aspect, the present invention verifies what elements of what level of importance are included in a document to be verified, and what elements of what level of importance are missing. The purpose is to make it easier for a worker (user) to perform verification.

  According to one embodiment, elements included in a document to be verified are extracted, and importance levels related to appearance frequencies in the plurality of documents are associated with each other and stored for each of the plurality of elements extracted from the plurality of documents. To determine whether or not each of the plurality of elements is included in the extracted element, and to determine the determination result for each of the plurality of elements, the importance of each of the plurality of elements is An information processing program, an information processing method, and an information processing apparatus that are displayed in a discriminable manner are proposed.

  According to one aspect, an operator who verifies what elements of what level of importance are included in the document to be verified, and what elements of what level of importance are missing. It becomes easier for (user) to verify.

FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram of an example of the information processing method according to the embodiment. FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a hardware configuration example of the information processing apparatus 100. FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the contents stored in the rank table 300. FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the contents stored in the component table 400. FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the contents stored in the position information table 500. FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating a functional configuration example of the information processing apparatus 100. FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a document to be verified. FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram showing a flow of operations of the information processing apparatus 100. FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of creating the reference model 901. FIG. 10 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of creating the verification result model 1002. FIG. 11 is an explanatory diagram (part 1) illustrating an example of displaying element names and importance levels of elements. FIG. 12 is an explanatory diagram (part 2) illustrating an example of displaying the element name and the importance of the element. FIG. 13 is an explanatory diagram (part 3) illustrating an example of displaying an element name and an importance level of an element. FIG. 14 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of correcting the reference model 901. FIG. 15 is an explanatory diagram (part 1) illustrating an example in which the information processing apparatus 100 is used to improve the quality of the explanatory document. FIG. 16 is an explanatory diagram (part 2) illustrating an example in which the information processing apparatus 100 is used to improve the quality of the explanatory document. FIG. 17 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example in which the information processing apparatus 100 is used to improve the security of a public document. FIG. 18 is an explanatory diagram (part 1) illustrating another display example of the information processing apparatus 100. FIG. 19 is an explanatory diagram (part 2) illustrating another display example of the information processing apparatus 100. FIG. 20 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the overall processing procedure. FIG. 21 is a flowchart (part 1) illustrating an example of a model creation processing procedure. FIG. 22 is a flowchart (part 2) illustrating an example of the model creation processing procedure. FIG. 23 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the comparison processing procedure. FIG. 24 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the display processing procedure.

  Hereinafter, embodiments of an information processing program, an information processing method, and an information processing apparatus according to the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.

(One Example of Information Processing Method According to Embodiment)
FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram of an example of the information processing method according to the embodiment. The information processing apparatus 100 is a computer that makes it easy to verify what elements of what degree of importance are included in the document 101 to be verified. The information processing apparatus 100 is, for example, a server, a PC (Personal Computer), a tablet terminal, or a smartphone. The importance of each element indicates the appearance rate of each element in a plurality of documents. For example, it is estimated that an element having a high importance level is an element to be described in an explanatory document such as a design document based on the importance level determined by the appearance rate. On the other hand, due to the importance determined by the appearance rate, it is estimated that an element having a low importance is an element that should not be described in a public document.

  Here, when creating or publishing a document, it may be desired to verify whether the document has a description defect. For example, when an explanatory document such as a design document is created, it is desired to verify whether the created explanatory document contains important matters. Furthermore, it is desirable to verify how important matters that are not included in the created explanatory document are. Accordingly, it is desired to make it easier to correct the incompleteness of the explanatory document and to improve the quality of the explanatory document.

  Further, for example, when a public document to be disclosed to a specific group is created, it is desired to verify whether the created public document includes matters that should be kept secret from the specific group. For example, when creating a public document to be disclosed to the outside, it is desirable to verify whether the created public document contains confidential information that is confidential to the outside. Thus, it is desired to prevent the public document from containing matters that should be kept secret and to improve the security of the public document.

  However, it is difficult to verify whether the document is incomplete. For example, when the document is verified visually, the burden on the verifier who verifies whether or not the document is defective is increased. Also, for example, even when trying to automatically verify a document, it is difficult to determine elements that are preferably included in the document or elements that are not preferable to be included in the document. This increases the burden on the verifier.

  Therefore, in the present embodiment, the result of determining whether each element appearing in a plurality of documents also appears in the document 101 to be verified can be displayed in a display mode corresponding to the importance of the element. An information processing method that can be performed will be described.

  In the example of FIG. 1, the information processing apparatus 100 includes a storage unit 110. The storage unit 110 stores importance levels associated with elements included in the plurality of documents 102. The document is, for example, a structured document. An element is a matter included in a document. The element is, for example, an item name included in the document. The importance is a value related to the appearance frequency of elements in the plurality of documents 102. The importance level represents, for example, the magnitude of the appearance frequency of elements in the plurality of documents 102. For example, the information stored in the storage unit 110 is automatically generated by the information processing apparatus 100.

  In FIG. 1, the information processing apparatus 100 receives a document 101 to be verified. The information processing apparatus 100 extracts elements included in the verification target document 101. In the example of FIG. 1, the extracted elements are element 1 and element 3. The information processing apparatus 100 determines whether each of the plurality of elements stored in the storage unit 110 is included in the extracted element. In the example of FIG. 1, the elements stored in the storage unit 110 are element 1, element 2, and element 3.

  The information processing apparatus 100 displays the determination result for each of the plurality of elements stored in the storage unit 110 in a display mode corresponding to the importance of each of the plurality of elements. The display mode is a mode in which the importance can be determined. The display mode is, for example, at least one of an order, a position, a color, and a pattern corresponding to the importance. For example, the information processing apparatus 100 displays a graphic corresponding to each element stored in the storage unit 110 in a color or pattern corresponding to the determination result and importance for the element. The figure is, for example, a rectangle. The figure may be, for example, a circle or a polygon. Further, when displaying the graphic corresponding to each element stored in the storage unit 110, the information processing apparatus 100 arranges the information so that the importance of the element is closer to the center.

  As a result, the information processing apparatus 100 determines what level of importance is included in the document 101 to be verified, and what level of importance is missing. It is possible to assist the worker (user) who performs the verification to grasp and to easily determine the incomplete description, and to reduce the burden on the user when verifying the document 101 to be verified. Further, the information processing apparatus 100 can easily correct the document 101 to be verified, and can improve the convenience of using the verification result.

  Specifically, the information processing apparatus 100 displays elements included in a plurality of past documents 102 that are not included in the verification target document 101 in a display mode corresponding to the importance. For this reason, the information processing apparatus 100 can easily determine how important an element that is not included in the document 101 to be verified is. As a result, the information processing apparatus 100 can determine what elements are preferably added to the document 101 to be verified, and can improve the quality of the document 101 to be verified. In addition, the information processing apparatus 100 can determine whether the verification target document 101 includes an element to be concealed, and can improve the security of the verification target document 101.

  Here, when the information processing apparatus 100 extracts an element included in the document 101 to be verified and displays a result of determining whether each element stored in the storage unit 110 is included in the extracted element However, the present invention is not limited to this. For example, the information processing apparatus 100 may display a result of determining whether or not each extracted element is included in the elements stored in the storage unit 110.

  Although the case where the information processing apparatus 100 does not directly display the name or importance of each element stored in the storage unit 110 has been described here, the present invention is not limited to this. For example, the information processing apparatus 100 may further be able to display at least one of the name and importance of each element.

  Here, the case where the information processing apparatus 100 automatically generates the storage content of the storage unit 110 has been described, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, the information stored in the storage unit 110 may be input to the information processing apparatus 100. For example, the information processing apparatus 100 may receive the storage content of the storage unit 110 from a device different from the information processing apparatus 100.

  Here, the information processing apparatus 100 has been described with respect to the case where the determination result for each element stored in the storage unit 110 is displayed on its own apparatus, but this is not a limitation. For example, if the information processing apparatus 100 has received the document 101 to be verified from a different apparatus from the information processing apparatus 100, the determination result for each element stored in the storage unit 110 is controlled by the apparatus. It may be displayed on the device.

(Hardware configuration example of information processing apparatus 100)
Next, a hardware configuration example of the information processing apparatus 100 illustrated in FIG. 1 will be described with reference to FIG.

  FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a hardware configuration example of the information processing apparatus 100. 2, the information processing apparatus 100 includes a CPU (Central Processing Unit) 201, a memory 202, a network I / F (Interface) 203, a recording medium I / F 204, and a recording medium 205. Each component is connected by a bus 200.

  Here, the CPU 201 governs overall control of the information processing apparatus 100. The memory 202 includes, for example, a ROM (Read Only Memory), a RAM (Random Access Memory), and a flash ROM. Specifically, for example, a flash ROM or ROM stores various programs, and a RAM is used as a work area of the CPU 201. The program stored in the memory 202 is loaded on the CPU 201 to cause the CPU 201 to execute the coded process.

  The network I / F 203 is connected to the network 210 through a communication line, and is connected to another computer via the network 210. The network I / F 203 controls an internal interface with the network 210 and controls data input / output from other computers. For example, a modem or a LAN (Local Area Network) adapter may be employed as the network I / F 203.

  The recording medium I / F 204 controls reading / writing of data with respect to the recording medium 205 according to the control of the CPU 201. The recording medium I / F 204 is, for example, a disk drive, an SSD (Solid State Drive), a USB (Universal Serial Bus) port, or the like. The recording medium 205 is a non-volatile memory that stores data written under the control of the recording medium I / F 204. The recording medium 205 is, for example, a disk, a semiconductor memory, a USB memory, or the like. The recording medium 205 may be detachable from the information processing apparatus 100.

  In addition to the components described above, the information processing apparatus 100 may include, for example, a keyboard, a mouse, a display, a printer, a scanner, a microphone, a speaker, and the like. The information processing apparatus 100 may have a plurality of recording media I / Fs 204 and recording media 205. The information processing apparatus 100 may not include the recording medium I / F 204 and the recording medium 205.

(Contents stored in rank table 300)
Next, an example of the contents stored in the rank table 300 will be described with reference to FIG. The rank table 300 is realized by a storage area such as the memory 202 and the recording medium 205 of the information processing apparatus 100 shown in FIG.

  FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the contents stored in the rank table 300. As illustrated in FIG. 3, the rank table 300 includes fields of appearance rate, rank, and color. The rank table 300 stores rank information as a record by setting information in each field for each rank.

  In the appearance rate field, a range that can be taken by the appearance rate of elements in a plurality of documents is set, and a range that is a condition corresponding to the rank is set. In the rank field, a rank corresponding to the range of the appearance rate is set. A color corresponding to the rank is set in the color field.

(Storage contents of component table 400)
Next, an example of the contents stored in the component element table 400 will be described with reference to FIG. The component table 400 is realized by, for example, a storage area such as the memory 202 and the recording medium 205 of the information processing apparatus 100 illustrated in FIG.

  FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the contents stored in the component table 400. As shown in FIG. 4, the component table 400 has fields of rank, component, appearance rate, and rank. In the component element table 400, component information is stored as a record by setting information in each field for each element.

  In the rank field, ranks of appearance rates of elements included in a plurality of documents are set. In the component field, element names of elements included in a plurality of documents are set. In the appearance rate field, the appearance rates of elements included in a plurality of documents are set. The unit of the appearance rate is, for example,%. In the rank field, a rank corresponding to a range of appearance rates of elements included in a plurality of documents is set.

(Contents stored in the position information table 500)
Next, an example of the contents stored in the position information table 500 will be described with reference to FIG. The position information table 500 is realized by, for example, a storage area such as the memory 202 or the recording medium 205 of the information processing apparatus 100 illustrated in FIG.

  FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the contents stored in the position information table 500. As shown in FIG. 5, the position information table 500 has fields for cell numbers and components. The position information table 500 stores element position information as a record by setting information in each field for each element.

  In the cell number field, a cell number indicating the position where the graphic corresponding to the element is displayed is set. The figure is, for example, a rectangle. The figure may be, for example, a circle or a polygon. In the element field, the element name of the element displayed at the position indicated by the cell number is set.

(Functional configuration example of information processing apparatus 100)
Next, a functional configuration example of the information processing apparatus 100 will be described with reference to FIG.

  FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating a functional configuration example of the information processing apparatus 100. The information processing apparatus 100 includes a storage unit 600, an acquisition unit 601, an analysis unit 602, an extraction unit 603, a determination unit 604, and an output unit 605.

  The storage unit 600 is realized by a storage area such as the memory 202 and the recording medium 205 shown in FIG. Below, although the case where the memory | storage part 600 is contained in the information processing apparatus 100 is demonstrated, it is not restricted to this. For example, the storage unit 600 may be included in a device different from the information processing apparatus 100, and the storage content of the storage unit 600 may be referred to from the information processing apparatus 100.

  The acquisition unit 601 to the output unit 605 function as an example of a control unit. Specifically, the acquisition unit 601 to the output unit 605, for example, cause the CPU 201 to execute a program stored in a storage area such as the memory 202 or the recording medium 205 illustrated in FIG. By realizing the function. The processing result of each functional unit is stored in a storage area such as the memory 202 and the recording medium 205 shown in FIG.

  The storage unit 600 stores various types of information that are referred to or updated in the processing of each functional unit. For example, the storage unit 600 may store a document to be verified. For example, the storage unit 600 may store the degree of importance in association with each element included in a plurality of documents. The importance is a value related to the appearance frequency of elements in a plurality of documents. The importance level represents the magnitude of the appearance frequency of elements in a plurality of documents. The importance is, for example, an appearance rate. The plurality of documents are, for example, the same type of document as the verification target document. In other words, the storage unit 600 stores, for example, the importance related to the appearance frequency in the plurality of documents in association with each of the plurality of elements extracted from the plurality of documents. For example, the storage unit 600 may store a plurality of documents. The storage unit 600 may store rules for determining the display mode of elements, for example. For example, the storage unit 600 may store the display position in association with each element. Specifically, the storage unit 600 may store various tables shown in FIGS.

  For example, for each type of document, the storage unit 600 may store an importance level in association with each element included in a plurality of documents of the type. In other words, for example, for each type of document, the storage unit 600 stores a plurality of elements included in the document of the type and the importance of each of the plurality of elements in association with each other. The document type is, for example, an explanatory document such as a design document or a public document that is disclosed to a specific group. The document type may be a technical field corresponding to an explanatory document such as a design document. Further, the document type may be a document name (IR information or the like) corresponding to the public document. Specifically, the storage unit 600 may store the component element table 400 illustrated in FIG. 4 for each document type.

  The acquisition unit 601 acquires various information used for processing of each functional unit, and outputs the various information to each functional unit. For example, the acquisition unit 601 may acquire various types of information used for processing of each functional unit from the storage unit 600 and output the information to each functional unit. For example, the acquisition unit 601 may acquire various types of information used for processing of each functional unit from a device different from the information processing apparatus 100 and output the information to each functional unit. For example, the acquisition unit 601 may acquire various information used for processing of each functional unit based on an operation input from a user and output the information to each functional unit. Specifically, the acquisition unit 601 may acquire a document to be verified. Specifically, the acquisition unit 601 may acquire correspondence information in which importance is associated with each element included in a plurality of documents, and may store it in the storage unit 600. Specifically, the acquisition unit 601 may acquire a plurality of documents. Specifically, the acquisition unit 601 may acquire a rule for determining an element display mode.

  The analysis unit 602 extracts elements included in at least one of the plurality of documents. The analysis unit 602 calculates the importance of the extracted element. The analysis unit 602 stores the degree of importance in the storage unit 600 in association with each extracted element. For example, the analysis unit 602 analyzes each of a plurality of documents and extracts item names as elements. For each extracted element, the analysis unit 602 calculates an appearance rate, which is a ratio of a document in which the element appears among a plurality of documents, as the importance of the element. The analysis unit 602 generates correspondence information in which the calculated importance is associated with each extracted element, and stores the correspondence information in the storage unit 600.

  Specifically, the analysis unit 602 generates the component table 400 illustrated in FIG. 4 and stores it in the storage unit 600. As a result, the analysis unit 602 can determine a reference for verifying whether the document has a description defect. The analysis unit 602 can calculate the importance as a criterion for determining, for example, an element that is preferably included in the document or an element that is not preferable to be included in the document.

  Here, a case has been described in which the analysis unit 602 extracts elements included in at least one of a plurality of documents, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, the analysis unit 602 may extract elements that are commonly included in a predetermined number or more of a plurality of documents. As a result, the analysis unit 602 excludes elements unique to any one of a plurality of documents, and a criterion for determining an element that is preferably included in the document or an element that is not preferably included in the document. It is possible to improve the calculation accuracy of the importance.

  For example, the analysis unit 602 may extract elements included in at least one of a plurality of documents and satisfying a predetermined condition. The predetermined condition is, for example, the description position of the element on the document, the meaning of the element, or the part of speech. Accordingly, the analysis unit 602 can easily extract elements that are determined to be useful for document verification.

  The extraction unit 603 extracts elements included in the verification target document. The document to be verified is, for example, a document for which it is desired to verify the incomplete description. Specifically, the verification target document is an explanatory document for which it is desired to improve the quality by verifying the incomplete description and receiving corrections. Specifically, the document to be verified is a public document that is verified whether or not a matter to be concealed is included and it is desired to improve security. Specifically, the document to be verified is the same type of document as a plurality of documents. For example, the extraction unit 603 analyzes a document to be verified and extracts item names as elements. Accordingly, the extraction unit 603 can specify what elements are included in the verification target document.

  The determination unit 604 refers to the storage unit 600 and determines whether each of the plurality of elements is included in the extracted element. In other words, the determination unit 604 determines whether each element stored in the storage unit 600 is included in the extracted element. In addition, the determination unit 604 identifies an element that is not included in the elements stored in the storage unit 600 among the extracted elements. For example, the determination unit 604 determines whether or not each element stored in the component table 400 illustrated in FIG. 4 is included in the extracted element. Further, for example, the determination unit 604 specifies an element that is not included in the elements stored in the component element table 400 illustrated in FIG. 4 among the extracted elements. Accordingly, the determination unit 604 can identify elements that are included in a plurality of documents but are not included in the detection target document, and can determine how important the elements that are not included in the detection target document are. Can do.

  The determination unit 604 determines whether or not a plurality of elements associated with the type of document to be verified stored in the storage unit 600 are included in the extracted elements. In other words, the determination unit 604 may determine whether each element included in a plurality of documents of the same type as the verification target document stored in the storage unit 600 is included in the extracted element. Good. For example, the determination unit 604 determines whether or not each element stored in the component element table 400 illustrated in FIG. 4 corresponding to the type of document to be detected is included in the extracted element. Accordingly, the determination unit 604 identifies elements that are included in a plurality of documents of the same type as the verification target document but are not included in the detection target document, and how important are the elements not included in the detection target document. Can be specified.

  The output unit 605 displays the determination results for each of the plurality of elements in a manner in which the importance of each of the plurality of elements can be determined. In other words, the output unit 605 displays the determination result of each element stored in the storage unit 600 in a display mode corresponding to the importance of the element. The display mode is, for example, at least one of an order, a position, a color, and a pattern corresponding to the importance. The output format is, for example, display on a display, print output to a printer, transmission to an external device via the network I / F 203, or storage in a storage area such as the memory 202 or the recording medium 205. For example, the output unit 605 displays a graphic corresponding to each element stored in the storage unit 600 in a color or pattern corresponding to the determination result and importance of the element. The figure is, for example, a rectangle. The figure may be, for example, a circle or a polygon.

  Specifically, the output unit 605 has the same color as the background color if the determination result indicates that the graphic corresponding to the element stored in the storage unit 600 is not included in the element extracted by the extraction unit 603. Is displayed. Specifically, the output unit 605 corresponds to the degree of importance if the determination result indicates that the graphic corresponding to the element stored in the storage unit 600 is included in the element extracted by the extraction unit 603. Display in color. In this way, the output unit 605 verifies what level of importance is included in the document to be verified, and what level of importance is missing. It is possible to assist the worker (user) to grasp, to make it easier to determine incomplete descriptions, and to reduce the burden on the user when verifying the document 101 to be verified.

  For example, the output unit 605 arranges the graphic corresponding to each of the plurality of elements stored in the storage unit 600 such that the greater the importance of each of the plurality of elements, the closer to the center of the aggregate including the graphic. In other words, for example, the output unit 605 arranges the graphic corresponding to each element stored in the storage unit 600 such that the greater the importance of the element, the closer to the center of the aggregate including the graphic. Also good. Specifically, the output unit 605 arranges the figures corresponding to each element stored in the storage unit 600 in a spiral form from the center in descending order of the importance of the element. As a result, the output unit 605 can make it easy to intuitively understand the importance level of the element.

  For example, when the output unit 605 arranges a rectangle corresponding to each element stored in the storage unit 600 so as to be closer to the center as the importance of the element increases, the output unit 605 assigns each element to each element for each importance range. The rectangles may be arranged so as to form a rectangular region including one or more corresponding rectangles. As a result, the output unit 605 can easily intuitively understand which importance level the element belongs to.

  When there are elements that are not included in the plurality of elements stored in the storage unit 600 among the extracted elements, the output unit 605 may further display a graphic corresponding to an element that is not included in the plurality of elements. In other words, when there is an element that is not included in the elements stored in the storage unit 600 among the extracted elements, the output unit 605 further displays a graphic corresponding to the element. For example, the output unit 605 continuously displays the graphic corresponding to the element specified by the determination unit 604 after displaying the graphic corresponding to each element stored in the storage unit 600 side by side. Accordingly, the output unit 605 can easily grasp elements included in the verification target document that are not included in the plurality of documents, and can easily determine whether the verification target document is excessively described.

  When the output unit 605 displays a graphic corresponding to each of a plurality of elements and receives designation of one of the displayed graphics, the output unit 605 displays at least one of the name or importance of the element corresponding to the specified graphic To do. Accordingly, the output unit 605 can easily grasp which element the displayed graphic represents and how important it is.

  The output unit 605 may output the processing result of each functional unit. The output format is, for example, display on a display, print output to a printer, transmission to an external device via the network I / F 203, or storage in a storage area such as the memory 202 or the recording medium 205. Thereby, the output unit 605 can notify the processing result of each functional unit to the user, and can support management and operation of the information processing apparatus 100, for example, update of a setting value of the information processing apparatus 100, The convenience of the information processing apparatus 100 can be improved.

(Operation example of information processing apparatus 100)
Next, an operation example of the information processing apparatus 100 will be described with reference to FIGS. First, a design document 700 will be described as an example of a document to be verified with reference to FIG.

  FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a document to be verified. The design document 700 is a document to be verified. The design document 700 is a structured document and includes a plurality of elements. The element is, for example, an item name. Specifically, the element includes a design document type, a creation date, a creator, a version number, a system name, a function name, a function overview, a user, a startup method, and the like. Next, the description shifts to the description of FIG. 8 and the flow of the operation of the information processing apparatus 100 for a document to be verified such as the design document 700 will be described.

  FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram showing a flow of operations of the information processing apparatus 100. In FIG. 8, the information processing apparatus 100 accepts a verification target document and a plurality of documents 801 of the same type as the verification target document as inputs. The document to be verified and the plurality of documents 801 are input at the same timing, for example. The document to be verified and the plurality of documents 801 may be input at different timings, for example. Specifically, the verification target document is input after a plurality of documents 801 are input.

  (8-1) The information processing apparatus 100 creates a reference model based on a plurality of input documents 801. The reference model is a model in which rectangles corresponding to elements included in the plurality of documents 801 are arranged. The reference model is, for example, a model in which rectangles corresponding to each element are arranged in a spiral form from the center in descending order of importance of the element. An example of creating the reference model will be described later with reference to FIG.

  (8-2) The information processing apparatus 100 extracts elements included in the document to be verified. The information processing apparatus 100 compares the elements included in the verification target document with the reference model, and determines whether each element included in the verification target document is included in the elements included in the plurality of documents 801. Then, a verification result model 802 is created. The verification result model 802 is generated based on the reference model so that the result of determining whether each element included in the verification target document is included in the elements included in the plurality of documents 801 can be grasped. It is a model. Here, an example of creating the verification result model 802 will be described later with reference to FIG.

  The information processing apparatus 100 may update the reference model based on the elements included in the verification target document after creating the verification result model 802. Next, the description proceeds to FIGS. 9 and 10.

  FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of creating the reference model 901. In FIG. 9, the information processing apparatus 100 accepts a plurality of documents 900. The information processing apparatus 100 extracts one or more elements included in the plurality of documents 900 and calculates the appearance rate of each element. The information processing apparatus 100 sorts and ranks the extracted one or more elements in descending order of appearance rate.

  The information processing apparatus 100 refers to the rank definition table and associates a rank with each element based on the calculated appearance rate of each element. For each element, the information processing apparatus 100 generates a record in which the rank of the element, the element name, the appearance rate, and the rank are associated with each other, and adds the record to the component element table 400.

  The information processing apparatus 100 creates a reference model 901 with reference to the rank definition table and the component table 400. For example, the information processing apparatus 100 colors a rectangle corresponding to each element with a color corresponding to the rank of the element, and arranges the rectangles in a spiral form from the center in descending order of importance of the element. 901 is created. Next, the description proceeds to FIG.

  FIG. 10 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of creating the verification result model 1002. In FIG. 10, the information processing apparatus 100 receives a document 1000 to be verified. The information processing apparatus 100 extracts the element 1001 included in the document 1000 to be verified. The information processing apparatus 100 compares the element indicated by the rectangle of the reference model 901 with the element 1001 extracted from the document 1000 to be verified.

  As a result of the comparison, the information processing apparatus 100 identifies the first type element included in the element indicated by the rectangle of the reference model 901 and included in the element 1001 extracted from the document 1000 to be verified. The first type element is an element that is not deficient in the document 1000 to be verified and is not unique to the document 1000 to be verified.

  As a result of the comparison, the information processing apparatus 100 identifies a second type element that is included in the element indicated by the rectangle of the reference model 901 but is not included in the element 1001 extracted from the document 1000 to be verified. The second type element is an element that is insufficient in the document 1000 to be verified as compared to the plurality of documents 900.

  As a result of the comparison, the information processing apparatus 100 specifies a third type element that is not included in the element indicated by the rectangle of the reference model 901 but is included in the element 1001 extracted from the document 1000 to be verified. The third type element is an element specific to the document 1000 to be verified as compared to the plurality of documents 900.

  The information processing apparatus 100 creates a verification result model 1002 from the reference model 901 so that the first type element, the second type element, and the third type element can be distinguished.

  For example, the information processing apparatus 100 displays a rectangle corresponding to the first type of element in a color corresponding to the importance as in the reference model 901 so as to indicate the degree of importance. Determine the colored part to be used.

  The information processing apparatus 100 displays, for example, a rectangle corresponding to the second type of element in the same color as the background color, unlike the reference model 901, and indicates that the element is insufficient in the document 1000 to be verified. Determine the achromatic part.

  For example, the information processing apparatus 100 displays a rectangle corresponding to the third type element in a color different from the rectangle of the reference model 901 to indicate that the element is unique to the document 1000 to be verified. Decide on additional parts.

  For example, the information processing apparatus 100 does not change the color of the rectangle of the colored portion with respect to the reference model 901, changes the rectangle of the achromatic portion to the same color as the background color, and adds the rectangle of the additional portion. A verification result model 1002 is created.

  The information processing apparatus 100 displays the created verification result model 1002. As a result, the information processing apparatus 100 determines what level of importance is included in the document 1000 to be verified, and what level of importance is missing. It is possible to assist the worker (user) who performs the verification to grasp and to easily determine the incomplete description, and to reduce the burden on the user when verifying the document 101 to be verified.

  For example, the information processing apparatus 100 determines how important the elements that are included in the plurality of documents 900 and are not unique to the verification target document 1000 included in the verification target document 1000 are elements. The colors can make it easier to grasp intuitively.

  For example, the information processing apparatus 100 can make it easier to grasp elements that are insufficient in the document 1000 to be verified. In addition, the information processing apparatus 100 can make it easy to intuitively understand how important the elements that are insufficient in the document 1000 to be verified are from the positions where the rectangles are arranged. .

  For example, the information processing apparatus 100 can easily intuitively grasp elements unique to the verification target document 1000 that are not included in the plurality of documents 900 but are included in the verification target document 1000 based on the positions where the colors and rectangles are arranged. can do.

  Although the case where the information processing apparatus 100 creates the verification result model 1002 after creating the reference model 901 has been described here, the present invention is not limited to this. For example, the information processing apparatus 100 may create the verification result model 1002 without creating the reference model 901.

  Although the case where the information processing apparatus 100 creates the verification result model 1002 in which the rectangles corresponding to the elements are arranged has been described here, the present invention is not limited to this. For example, the information processing apparatus 100 may create a verification result model 1002 in which polygons corresponding to elements are arranged. For example, the information processing apparatus 100 may create a verification result model 1002 in which a sector corresponding to an element is arranged.

  Next, the process proceeds to the description of FIGS. 11 to 13, and the information processing apparatus 100 displays the element name and importance of the element, and what is the element corresponding to the displayed rectangle, A case will be described in which it is easy to grasp the degree of importance.

  11 to 13 are explanatory diagrams illustrating an example of displaying the element name and importance of the element. As illustrated in FIG. 11, when the information processing apparatus 100 creates the reference model 901, the information processing apparatus 100 sets a cell number for each rectangle, and obtains an element name of an element corresponding to each rectangle and a cell number set for each rectangle. The associated record is added to the position information table 500.

  In addition, when the verification information model 1002 is created, the information processing apparatus 100 updates the element name of the element corresponding to the rectangle in the position information table 500 if there is a rectangle determined as the additional portion. Also good. Thereby, the information processing apparatus 100 can specify which rectangle corresponds to which element. Next, the description proceeds to FIG.

  In FIG. 12, when the verification result model 1002 is displayed, the information processing apparatus 100 receives a selection operation for a rectangle that is displayed in the same color as the background color and that represents a missing element in the document 1000 to be verified. The information processing apparatus 100 refers to the position information table 500 and acquires the element name of the element corresponding to the rectangle that has received the selection operation. In the example of FIG. 12, the information processing apparatus 100 acquires the element name “function name”. The information processing apparatus 100 refers to the component element table 400 and acquires the appearance rate corresponding to the identified element name. In the example of FIG. 12, the information processing apparatus 100 acquires the appearance rate “99.8%”.

  The information processing apparatus 100 creates and displays a comment based on the acquired element name and appearance rate. In the example of FIG. 12, the information processing apparatus 100 does not describe the comment “element“ function name ”with an appearance rate of 99.8%”. "Is created and displayed. Thereby, the information processing apparatus 100 can make it easy to grasp what element is the element corresponding to the displayed rectangle and what degree of importance it is. Next, the description proceeds to FIG.

  In FIG. 13, when the information processing apparatus 100 displays the verification result model 1002, the information processing apparatus 100 receives a selection operation for a rectangle representing an element specific to the document 1000 to be verified. The information processing apparatus 100 refers to the position information table 500 and acquires the element name of the element corresponding to the rectangle that has received the selection operation. In the example of FIG. 13, the information processing apparatus 100 acquires the element name “password”. Since the information processing apparatus 100 is an element specific to the document 1000 to be verified, the information processing apparatus 100 does not acquire the appearance rate.

  The information processing apparatus 100 creates and displays a comment based on the acquired element name. In the example of FIG. 13, the information processing apparatus 100 describes a comment “an element“ password ”that does not exist in the reference model 901. "Is created and displayed. Thereby, the information processing apparatus 100 can make it easy to grasp what element the element corresponding to the displayed rectangle is.

  Next, the description shifts to the description of FIG. 14, and the information processing apparatus 100 corrects the reference model 901, so what is the element corresponding to the displayed rectangle and what is the degree of importance. A case will be described in which it is easier to grasp whether there is any.

  FIG. 14 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of correcting the reference model 901. As illustrated in FIG. 14, when creating the reference model 901, the information processing apparatus 100 corrects the reference model 901 so that a rectangular set for each importance range forms a rectangular region. The rectangular area is formed by (2n-1) ^ 2 rectangles. n is an integer of 1 or more.

  For example, since the number of rectangles corresponding to the element of rank A is seven, the information processing apparatus 100 determines that 3 ^ 2 = 9. Therefore, the information processing apparatus 100 prepares two dummy rectangles having the same color as the rectangle corresponding to the element of rank A, and arranges a total of nine rectangles of the same color in descending order of priority. Thereby, the information processing apparatus 100 can form a rectangular area in the arranged rectangular set. For this reason, for example, the information processing apparatus 100 indicates that even if the seventh rectangle corresponding to the element of rank A is displayed in the same color as the background color, the seventh rectangle corresponds to the element of rank A. It can be easily understood intuitively from the color of the rectangle around the seventh rectangle.

  Similarly, the information processing apparatus 100 determines that 9 ^ 2 = 81, for example, because nine arranged rectangles and 71 rectangles corresponding to the elements of rank B are present. Therefore, the information processing apparatus 100 prepares one dummy rectangle of the same color as the rectangle corresponding to the element of rank B, and arranges a total of 72 rectangles of the same color in descending order of priority. Thereby, the information processing apparatus 100 can form a rectangular area in the arranged rectangular set. For this reason, for example, even if the 71st rectangle corresponding to the element of rank B is displayed in the same color as the background color, the information processing apparatus 100 indicates that the 71st rectangle corresponds to the element of rank B. It is possible to easily grasp intuitively from the color of the rectangle around the 71st rectangle. As a result, the information processing apparatus 100 can generate a reference model 1400 in which the reference model 901 is corrected.

  Further, as illustrated in FIG. 14, the information processing apparatus 100 may arrange a dummy rectangle with a ★ mark. Thereby, the information processing apparatus 100 can make it possible to grasp that the dummy rectangle does not correspond to any element. Therefore, the information processing apparatus 100 can make it difficult to mistake the number of elements for each rank included in the document 1000 to be verified.

(Usage example of information processing apparatus 100)
Next, a usage example of the information processing apparatus 100 will be described with reference to FIGS.

  15 and 16 are explanatory diagrams illustrating an example in which the information processing apparatus 100 is used to improve the quality of the explanatory document. In the explanation document, the greater the importance of an element, the more the element is included in other explanation documents, and the more important the element is preferably described in the explanation document. On the other hand, in the explanatory document, the smaller the importance of the element, the higher the possibility that the element is not necessarily described in the explanatory document.

  In FIG. 15, the information processing apparatus 100 creates a verification result model 1500 for an explanatory document to be verified. As a result, the user can intuitively grasp that an important element is missing from the verification target document by referring to the verification result model 1500. The user visually grasps that the document to be verified is in an insufficiently described state based on the rectangle having the same color as the background color included in the verification result model 1500 and the color of the rectangle around the rectangle. be able to. Further, the user can intuitively grasp that the number of elements that are insufficient in the explanatory document to be verified is relatively small by referring to the verification result model 1500.

  As a result, when correcting the verification target explanatory document so as to eliminate the lack of description, the user should preferentially add any element to the verification target explanatory document based on the importance. Can be determined, and the efficiency of the correction work can be improved. Further, the user can determine the elements that need not be added to the verification target explanatory document based on the importance level, and can improve the efficiency of the correction work. Next, the description proceeds to FIG.

  In FIG. 16, the information processing apparatus 100 creates a verification result model 1600 for an explanatory document to be verified. As a result, the user can intuitively understand that important elements are included in the verification target explanatory document without omission by referring to the verification result model 1600. Also, the user can intuitively grasp that the number of elements that are lacking in the verification target explanatory document is relatively large by referring to the verification result model 1500. Furthermore, the user can grasp that an element that is insufficient in the verification target explanatory document is an element that is highly likely not to be described. Next, the description proceeds to FIG.

  FIG. 17 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example in which the information processing apparatus 100 is used to improve the security of a public document. In a public document, the greater the importance of an element, the more the element is included in another public document, and the more the element tends to be hidden. On the other hand, in a public document, the smaller the importance of an element, the less likely that the element is included in another public document, indicating that the element tends to be concealed.

  In the example of FIG. 17, rank A is an element having an appearance frequency of 90% or more. Rank B is an element with an appearance frequency of 60% or more and less than 90%. Rank C is an element with an appearance frequency of 30% or more and less than 60%. Rank D is an element with an appearance frequency of less than 30%.

  Further, the administrator may set in advance a supplementary explanation regarding the handling of the elements of the corresponding ranks for the ranks A to D. For example, when the administrator sets the rank A to indicate that there is a high possibility that the rank A is an element that is permitted to be published to the Internet, the information processing apparatus 100 displays “an element for permitting Internet publication” as a supplementary explanation of the element for the rank A. May be displayed together with the verification result model 1700.

  Further, when the administrator sets rank B as indicating that there is a high possibility that the rank B is an element that is permitted to be published within the company, the information processing apparatus 100 displays “in-house publication” as a supplementary explanation of the element of rank B. An explanatory text “permission element” may be displayed together with the verification result model 1700.

  Further, when the administrator sets the rank C as indicating that there is a high possibility that the rank C is an element permitted to be disclosed within the group company, the information processing apparatus 100 displays “group company” as a supplementary explanation of the rank C element. The explanatory text “internally permitted element” may be displayed together with the verification result model 1700.

  Further, when the administrator sets the rank D as indicating that there is a high possibility that the rank D is an element that is permitted to be disclosed within the party, the information processing apparatus 100 displays “related party” as a supplementary explanation of the element of the rank D. The explanatory text “internally permitted element” may be displayed together with the verification result model 1700.

  In FIG. 17, the information processing apparatus 100 creates a verification result model 1700 for a public document to be verified. As a result, the user refers to the verification result model 1700, and confirms that the public document to be verified includes an element that is likely to be an element that is permitted to be published in-house but not permitted to be published to the Internet. , Can be grasped intuitively. For example, the user can visually recognize that the public document to be verified is in an overwritten state based on the color of the rectangle included in the verification result model 1700.

  As a result, when modifying a public document to be verified so as to eliminate overwriting, it is possible to determine which element should be deleted from the public document to be verified based on the importance. Thus, the efficiency of the correction work can be improved. In addition, the user can determine elements that do not need to be deleted from the verification target public document based on the importance, and can improve the efficiency of the correction work.

(Another display example of the information processing apparatus 100)
Next, another display example of the information processing apparatus 100 will be described with reference to FIGS. 18 and 19. In the above description, the information processing apparatus 100 creates and displays the verification result model 1002 in which the rectangles corresponding to the elements are arranged so that the rectangles corresponding to the elements are arranged spirally from the center in the descending order of appearance rate. However, the present invention is not limited to this.

  18 and 19 are explanatory diagrams illustrating other display examples of the information processing apparatus 100. FIG. As illustrated in FIG. 18, the information processing apparatus 100 corresponds to an element for each rank of the element so that the first type element, the second type element, and the third type element can be distinguished. There may be a case where a verification result model 1800 in which rectangles to be arranged are arranged in the horizontal direction is generated and displayed. Next, the description shifts to the description of FIG. Also in this case, the information processing apparatus 100 determines what elements of what level of importance are included in the document to be verified, and what elements of what level of importance are missing. It is possible to assist the worker (user) who performs the verification to grasp, to make it easier to determine the incomplete description, and to reduce the burden on the user when verifying the document 101 to be verified. .

  As illustrated in FIG. 19, the information processing apparatus 100 corresponds to the importance without displaying the rectangle corresponding to the second type element in the same color as the background color, unlike the cases of FIGS. 9 and 10. There may be a case where the verification result model 1900 displayed in color and marked with an X mark is generated and displayed. Also in this case, the information processing apparatus 100 determines what elements of what level of importance are included in the document to be verified, and what elements of what level of importance are missing. It is possible to assist the worker (user) who performs the verification to grasp, to make it easier to determine the incomplete description, and to reduce the burden on the user when verifying the document 101 to be verified. .

(Overall procedure)
Next, an example of the overall processing procedure executed by the information processing apparatus 100 will be described with reference to FIG. The overall processing is realized by, for example, the CPU 201 illustrated in FIG. 2, a storage area such as the memory 202 and the recording medium 205, and the network I / F 203.

  FIG. 20 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the overall processing procedure. 20, the information processing apparatus 100 executes a model creation process described later in FIGS. 21 and 22 (step S2001). Then, the information processing apparatus 100 executes a comparison process described later with reference to FIG. 23 (Step S2002).

  Next, the information processing apparatus 100 executes a display process described later with reference to FIG. 24 (step S2003). Then, the information processing apparatus 100 ends the entire process.

(Model creation process)
Next, an example of a model creation processing procedure executed by the information processing apparatus 100 will be described with reference to FIGS. 21 and 22. The model creation process is realized by, for example, the CPU 201 illustrated in FIG. 2, a storage area such as the memory 202 and the recording medium 205, and the network I / F 203.

  21 and 22 are flowcharts showing an example of the model creation processing procedure. In FIG. 21, the information processing apparatus 100 accepts a plurality of documents (step S2101). Then, the information processing apparatus 100 extracts one or more elements included in the plurality of documents, and calculates the appearance rate of each element (step S2102).

  Next, the information processing apparatus 100 sorts the extracted one or more elements in descending order of appearance rate (step S2103). Then, the information processing apparatus 100 refers to the rank definition table and associates ranks with each element based on the calculated appearance rate of each element (step S2104).

  Next, the information processing apparatus 100 generates, for each element, a record in which the rank, element name, appearance rate, and rank of the element are associated with each other, and adds the record to the component element table 400 (step S2105). Then, the information processing apparatus 100 proceeds to the process of step S2201.

  In FIG. 22, the information processing apparatus 100 selects an element having the highest appearance rate among unselected elements among the extracted one or more elements (step S2201).

  Next, the information processing apparatus 100 arranges the rectangles corresponding to the selected elements so that the rectangles corresponding to the elements are arranged spirally from the center in the descending order of appearance rate (step S2202). Then, the information processing apparatus 100 determines whether or not the rank of the element in which the rectangle is arranged matches the rank of the element having the next highest appearance rate after the element in which the rectangle is arranged (step S2203).

  If they do not match (step S2203: NO), the information processing apparatus 100 proceeds to the process of step S2206. On the other hand, if they match (step S2203: YES), the information processing apparatus 100 proceeds to the process of step S2204.

  In step S2204, the information processing apparatus 100 determines whether or not a rectangular set corresponding to one or more already arranged elements forms a rectangular area (step S2204). For example, the information processing apparatus 100 determines that a rectangular area is formed if the number of times the rectangle has been arranged so far matches (2n-1) ^ 2, and does not form a rectangular area if they do not match. Is determined. n is an integer of 1 or more.

  If the rectangular area is formed (step S2204: YES), the information processing apparatus 100 proceeds to the process of step S2206. On the other hand, when the rectangular area is not formed (step S2204: No), the information processing apparatus 100 proceeds to the process of step S2205.

  In step S2205, the information processing apparatus 100 arranges a dummy rectangle so that the arranged elements form a rectangular area (step S2205). For example, the information processing apparatus 100 subtracts the number of times the rectangle has been placed so far from (2n-1) ^ 2 that is closest to the number of times that the rectangle has been placed so far and is larger than the number of times that the rectangle has been placed so far (2n-1) ^ 2. The value is specified as the number of dummy rectangles. The information processing apparatus 100 arranges the specified number of dummy rectangles. Then, the information processing apparatus 100 proceeds to the process of step S2206.

  In step S2206, the information processing apparatus 100 determines whether all extracted elements have been selected (step S2206). If there is an unselected element (step S2206: No), the information processing apparatus 100 returns to the process of step S2201. On the other hand, when all the items have been selected (step S2206: Yes), the information processing apparatus 100 proceeds to the process of step S2207.

  In step S2207, the information processing apparatus 100 sets cell numbers in order from the rectangle at the upper left of the reference model formed by arranging the rectangles corresponding to the respective elements (step S2207).

  Next, the information processing apparatus 100 adds a record in which the cell number is associated with the element name of the element corresponding to the cell number rectangle to the position information table 500 (step S2208). Then, the information processing apparatus 100 ends the model creation process.

(Comparison processing procedure)
Next, an example of a comparison processing procedure executed by the information processing apparatus 100 will be described with reference to FIG. For example, the comparison process is realized by the CPU 201 illustrated in FIG. 2, a storage area such as the memory 202 and the recording medium 205, and the network I / F 203.

  FIG. 23 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the comparison processing procedure. In FIG. 23, the information processing apparatus 100 receives a document to be verified (step S2301). Next, the information processing apparatus 100 extracts elements included in the document to be verified (step S2302). Then, the information processing apparatus 100 proceeds to the process of step S2303.

  In step S2303, the information processing apparatus 100 selects one of the unselected elements among the extracted one or more elements (step S2303). The information processing apparatus 100 determines whether the selected element is included in the elements stored in the component element table 400 (step S2304).

  Here, if included (step S2304: YES), the information processing apparatus 100 proceeds to the process of step S2305. On the other hand, if not included (step S2304: NO), the information processing apparatus 100 proceeds to the process of step S2306.

  In step S <b> 2305, the information processing apparatus 100 displays a rectangle with a cell number associated with the element name of the element stored in the component table 400 that matches the selected element in the reference model according to the importance. To determine the colored portion to be displayed (step S2305). Then, the information processing apparatus 100 proceeds to the process of step S2307.

  In step S2306, the information processing apparatus 100 determines a rectangle corresponding to the selected element as an additional portion to be added outside the reference model (step S2306). Here, the information processing apparatus 100 sets a cell number for the rectangle corresponding to the selected element, and records a record in which the cell number is associated with the element name of the element corresponding to the rectangle of the cell number in the position information table 500. May be added to Then, the information processing apparatus 100 proceeds to the process of step S2307.

  In step S2307, the information processing apparatus 100 determines whether all the extracted elements have been selected (step S2307). If there is an unselected element (step S2307: NO), the information processing apparatus 100 returns to the process of step S2303. On the other hand, when all the items are selected (step S2307: Yes), the information processing apparatus 100 proceeds to the process of step S2308.

  In step S2308, the information processing apparatus 100 creates a verification result model from the reference model based on the colored portion and the additional portion, and displays the verification result model (step S2308). In the reference model, a rectangle that is not a colored portion is a rectangle corresponding to an element that is included in a plurality of documents but is not included in the document to be verified, and is an achromatic portion that is displayed in the same color as the background color. Then, the information processing apparatus 100 ends the comparison process.

(Display processing procedure)
Next, an example of a display processing procedure executed by the information processing apparatus 100 will be described with reference to FIG. The display process is realized by, for example, the CPU 201 illustrated in FIG. 2, a storage area such as the memory 202 and the recording medium 205, and the network I / F 203.

  FIG. 24 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the display processing procedure. In FIG. 24, the information processing apparatus 100 acquires a cell number corresponding to the clicked rectangle (step S2401).

  Next, the information processing apparatus 100 refers to the position information table 500 and acquires an element name corresponding to the acquired cell number (step S2402). The information processing apparatus 100 refers to the component element table 400 and acquires the appearance rate of the element with the acquired element name (step S2403).

  Next, the information processing apparatus 100 displays the acquired element name and appearance rate (step S2404). Then, the information processing apparatus 100 ends the display process. Thereby, the information processing apparatus 100 can make it easy to grasp what element is the element corresponding to the displayed rectangle and what degree of importance it is.

  As described above, according to the information processing apparatus 100, elements included in the verification target document 101 can be extracted. According to the information processing apparatus 100, it is possible to determine whether each element stored in the storage unit 110 that stores the elements included in the plurality of documents 102 in association with the importance is included in the extracted elements. it can. According to the information processing apparatus 100, the determination result of each element stored in the storage unit 110 can be displayed in a display mode corresponding to the importance of the element. As a result, the information processing apparatus 100 determines what elements of what degree of importance are included in the document 101 to be verified, and what elements of what degree of importance are missing. It is possible to assist the worker (user) who performs the verification to grasp, to make it easier to determine the incomplete description, and to reduce the burden on the user when verifying the document 101 to be verified. .

  According to the information processing apparatus 100, for each document type, the degree of importance can be stored in the storage unit 110 in association with elements included in the plurality of documents 102 of the type. According to the information processing apparatus 100, it is determined whether each element included in the plurality of documents 102 of the same type as the verification target document 101 stored in the storage unit 110 is included in the extracted element. Can do. Accordingly, the information processing apparatus 100 can switch the storage contents of the storage unit 110 to be used in accordance with the type of the document 101 to be verified, and can verify the document 101 to be verified with high accuracy. In addition, the information processing apparatus 100 can accept various types of documents as the verification target document 101, and can improve convenience. For example, the information processing apparatus 100 can accept both the explanatory document and the public document as the document 101 to be verified. For example, the information processing apparatus 100 can accept any of a plurality of explanatory documents each having a different technical field as the document 101 to be verified.

  According to the information processing apparatus 100, a graphic corresponding to each element stored in the storage unit 110 can be displayed in a color or pattern corresponding to the determination result and importance of the element. Thereby, the information processing apparatus 100 can make it easy to intuitively grasp the element determination result and the importance level from the color or pattern of the graphic corresponding to the element.

  According to the information processing apparatus 100, a graphic corresponding to each element stored in the storage unit 110 can be arranged so as to be closer to the center as the importance of the element increases. Thereby, the information processing apparatus 100 can make it easy to intuitively grasp the importance level of an element from the position where a graphic corresponding to the element is arranged.

  According to the information processing apparatus 100, when the graphic corresponding to each element stored in the storage unit 110 is arranged so as to be closer to the center as the importance of the element increases, a rectangular area is set for each importance range. Can be arranged to form. As a result, the information processing apparatus 100 can easily intuitively understand which importance level the element belongs to.

  According to the information processing apparatus 100, when there is an element that is not included in the elements stored in the storage unit 110 among the extracted elements, it is possible to further display a graphic corresponding to the element. This makes it easier for the information processing apparatus 100 to grasp the elements included in the verification target document 101 that are not included in the plurality of documents 102 and to determine whether the verification target document 101 is overwritten. Can do.

  According to the information processing apparatus 100, when designation of a displayed graphic is received, it is possible to display at least one of the name and importance of an element corresponding to the designated graphic. Thereby, the information processing apparatus 100 can make it easy to grasp which element the displayed graphic represents and how much it corresponds to the important element.

  According to the information processing apparatus 100, the elements included in the plurality of documents 102 are extracted, the importance of the elements included in the plurality of documents 102 is calculated, and the importance is associated with each element included in the plurality of documents 102. Can be stored in the storage unit 110. As a result, the information processing apparatus 100 can prevent the user from being burdened with calculating importance.

  According to the information processing apparatus 100, the magnitude of the appearance frequency of elements in a plurality of documents 102 can be used as the importance. As a result, the information processing apparatus 100 can determine, for example, elements that are preferably described in a detection target document that tends to be included in other documents based on the importance.

  The information processing method described in this embodiment can be realized by executing a program prepared in advance on a computer such as a personal computer or a workstation. The information processing program described in this embodiment is recorded on a computer-readable recording medium such as a hard disk, a flexible disk, a CD-ROM, an MO, and a DVD, and is executed by being read from the recording medium by the computer. Further, the information processing program described in this embodiment may be distributed via a network such as the Internet.

  The following additional notes are disclosed with respect to the embodiment described above.

(Supplementary note 1)
Extract the elements contained in the document to be verified,
For each of a plurality of elements extracted from a plurality of documents, refer to a storage unit that stores the importance related to the appearance frequency in the plurality of documents in association with each other, and each of the plurality of elements is referred to as the extracted element. Determine whether it is included,
The determination results for each of the plurality of elements are displayed in a manner in which the importance of each of the plurality of elements can be determined.
An information processing program for executing a process.

(Supplementary Note 2) For each type of the plurality of documents, the storage unit stores a plurality of elements included in the document of the type in association with the importance of each of the plurality of elements,
The determining process determines whether or not the plurality of elements associated with the type of the document to be verified stored in the storage unit are included in the extracted element;
The display process displays the determination result for the plurality of elements associated with the type of document to be verified in a manner in which the importance of each of the plurality of elements can be determined.
The information processing program according to supplementary note 1, characterized in that:

(Additional remark 3) The said process to display displays the figure corresponding to each of these elements memorize | stored in the said memory | storage part by the color or pattern corresponding to the determination result and said importance of each of these elements. The information processing program according to appendix 1 or 2, characterized in that:

(Additional remark 4) The process to display displays the figure corresponding to each of the plurality of elements stored in the storage unit in the center of the aggregate including the figure as the importance of each of the plurality of elements increases. The information processing program according to attachment 3, wherein the information processing program is arranged so as to be close to each other.

(Appendix 5) The figure is a rectangle,
In the process of displaying, when arranging the rectangle corresponding to each element stored in the storage unit so as to be closer to the center as the importance of the element is larger, each element is included in each importance range. The information processing program according to appendix 4, wherein the rectangles are arranged so as to form a rectangular region including one or more rectangles corresponding to.

(Additional remark 6) The said process to display respond | corresponds to the element which is not contained in the said some element when there exists an element which is not contained in the said some element memorize | stored in the said memory | storage part among the extracted elements. The information processing program according to any one of supplementary notes 3 to 5, wherein a graphic is further displayed.

(Appendix 7)
After displaying a graphic corresponding to each of the plurality of elements and receiving designation of a graphic among the plurality of graphics corresponding to the plurality of elements, at least the name or importance of the element corresponding to the specified graphic The information processing program according to any one of appendices 3 to 6, wherein any one of the processes is displayed and the process is executed.

(Supplementary note 8)
Extracting the plurality of elements included in the plurality of documents, calculating the importance of each of the plurality of elements included in the plurality of documents, and calculating the importance for each of the plurality of elements included in the plurality of documents; The information processing program according to any one of appendices 1 to 7, wherein a process is executed in which the degree is associated and stored in the storage unit.

(Supplementary note 9) The information processing program according to any one of supplementary notes 1 to 8, wherein the importance degree represents a magnitude of an appearance frequency of an element in the plurality of documents.

(Supplementary note 10)
Extract the elements contained in the document to be verified,
For each of a plurality of elements extracted from a plurality of documents, refer to a storage unit that stores the importance related to the appearance frequency in the plurality of documents in association with each other, and each of the plurality of elements is referred to as the extracted element. Determine whether it is included,
The determination results for each of the plurality of elements are displayed in a manner in which the importance of each of the plurality of elements can be determined.
An information processing method characterized by executing processing.

(Appendix 11) Extracting elements contained in a document to be verified,
For each of a plurality of elements extracted from a plurality of documents, refer to a storage unit that stores the importance related to the appearance frequency in the plurality of documents in association with each other, and each of the plurality of elements is referred to as the extracted element. Determine whether it is included,
The determination results for each of the plurality of elements are displayed in a manner in which the importance of each of the plurality of elements can be determined.
An information processing apparatus having a control unit.

100 Information processing apparatus 101, 102, 801, 900, 1000 Document 110, 600 Storage unit 200 Bus 201 CPU
202 Memory 203 Network I / F
204 Recording medium I / F
205 Recording medium 210 Network 300 Rank table 400 Component element table 500 Location information table 601 Acquisition unit 602 Analysis unit 603 Extraction unit 604 Determination unit 605 Output unit 700 Design document 802, 1002, 1500, 1600, 1700, 1800, 1900 Verification result model 901, 1400 Reference model 1001 elements

Claims (10)

On the computer,
Extract the elements contained in the document to be verified,
For each of a plurality of elements extracted from a plurality of documents, refer to a storage unit that stores the importance related to the appearance frequency in the plurality of documents in association with each other, and each of the plurality of elements is referred to as the extracted element. Determine whether it is included,
The determination results for each of the plurality of elements are displayed in a manner in which the importance of each of the plurality of elements can be determined.
An information processing program for executing a process. The storage unit stores, for each type of the plurality of documents, a plurality of elements included in the document of the type and the importance of each of the plurality of elements in association with each other,
The determining process determines whether or not the plurality of elements associated with the type of the document to be verified stored in the storage unit are included in the extracted element;
The display process displays the determination result for the plurality of elements associated with the type of document to be verified in a manner in which the importance of each of the plurality of elements can be determined.
The information processing program according to claim 1.   In the display process, a graphic corresponding to each of the plurality of elements stored in the storage unit is displayed in a color or pattern corresponding to the determination result and the importance of each of the plurality of elements. The information processing program according to claim 1 or 2.   The processing to display is such that the figure corresponding to each of the plurality of elements stored in the storage unit is closer to the center of the aggregate including the figure as the importance of each of the plurality of elements is larger. The information processing program according to claim 3, wherein the information processing program is arranged. The figure is a rectangle,
In the process of displaying, when arranging the rectangle corresponding to each element stored in the storage unit so as to be closer to the center as the importance of the element is larger, each element is included in each importance range. The information processing program according to claim 4, wherein the rectangles are arranged so as to form a rectangular region including one or more rectangles corresponding to.   In the process of displaying, when there is an element not included in the plurality of elements stored in the storage unit among the extracted elements, a graphic corresponding to the element not included in the plurality of elements is further displayed. The information processing program according to any one of claims 3 to 5, wherein: In the computer,
After displaying a graphic corresponding to each of the plurality of elements and receiving designation of a graphic among the plurality of graphics corresponding to the plurality of elements, at least the name or importance of the element corresponding to the specified graphic The information processing program according to any one of claims 3 to 6, wherein any one of the processes is displayed. In the computer,
Extracting the plurality of elements included in the plurality of documents, calculating the importance of each of the plurality of elements included in the plurality of documents, and calculating the importance for each of the plurality of elements included in the plurality of documents; The information processing program according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein a process of storing degrees in association with each other in the storage unit is executed. Computer
Extract the elements contained in the document to be verified,
For each of a plurality of elements extracted from a plurality of documents, refer to a storage unit that stores the importance related to the appearance frequency in the plurality of documents in association with each other, and each of the plurality of elements is referred to as the extracted element. Determine whether it is included,
The determination results for each of the plurality of elements are displayed in a manner in which the importance of each of the plurality of elements can be determined.
An information processing method characterized by executing processing. Extract the elements contained in the document to be verified,
For each of a plurality of elements extracted from a plurality of documents, refer to a storage unit that stores the importance related to the appearance frequency in the plurality of documents in association with each other, and each of the plurality of elements is referred to as the extracted element. Determine whether it is included,
The determination results for each of the plurality of elements are displayed in a manner in which the importance of each of the plurality of elements can be determined.
An information processing apparatus having a control unit.

Images