JP6975615B2 - A program that controls the task organization summary table creation support device, method, and issue summary table creation support device. - Google Patents

A program that controls the task organization summary table creation support device, method, and issue summary table creation support device. Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP6975615B2
JP6975615B2 JP2017211262A JP2017211262A JP6975615B2 JP 6975615 B2 JP6975615 B2 JP 6975615B2 JP 2017211262 A JP2017211262 A JP 2017211262A JP 2017211262 A JP2017211262 A JP 2017211262A JP 6975615 B2 JP6975615 B2 JP 6975615B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
summary table
daily life
factors
task
care
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2017211262A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2019082965A (en
Inventor
まりえ 辻本
大 齊木
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Japan Research Institute Ltd
Original Assignee
Japan Research Institute Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Japan Research Institute Ltd filed Critical Japan Research Institute Ltd
Priority to JP2017211262A priority Critical patent/JP6975615B2/en
Publication of JP2019082965A publication Critical patent/JP2019082965A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP6975615B2 publication Critical patent/JP6975615B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Medical Treatment And Welfare Office Work (AREA)

Description

この発明は,課題整理総括表作成支援装置,方法およびプログラムに関する。 The present invention relates to a problem rearranging summary table creation support device, a method, and a program.

介護保険制度において介護支援専門員には,利用者(要介護者)の心身の状況や置かれている環境,利用者本人やその家族などの希望等を勘案してケアプランを作成し,医療,介護等の必要なサービスがサービス提供事業者によって円滑に提供されるよう,連絡,調整する役割が求められる。 In the long-term care insurance system, long-term care support specialists create a care plan in consideration of the physical and mental conditions of the user (person requiring long-term care), the environment in which they are placed, and the wishes of the user and his / her family, and provide medical care. , The role of contacting and coordinating so that necessary services such as long-term care can be smoothly provided by the service provider is required.

ケアプランの作成にあたって,利用者の状態等を把握し,情報の整理,分析を通じて課題を導き出す必要がある。介護支援専門員が把握した利用者の基本的な情報を多職種間で共有するとともに,介護支援専門員がどのような考えで利用者の生活全般の解決すべき課題を導き出したのかを表現するために,課題整理総括表が用いられている。 When creating a care plan, it is necessary to understand the user's condition, etc., and to derive issues through the organization and analysis of information. While sharing the basic information of the user grasped by the care support specialist among multiple occupations, it expresses how the care support specialist came up with the problem to be solved in the user's life in general. Therefore, the task summary table is used.

課題整理総括表の目的は,生活全般の解決すべき課題(ニーズ)を導き出すにあたって,利用者の現状や有する能力を勘案しつつ,利用者が生活の質を維持,向上させていく上で生じている課題を明らかにし,自立した日常生活を支援していくにあたってその解決すべき課題を抽出するまでの間に,専門職としてどのような考えで課題分析を行ったのかを明らかにすることである。課題整理総括表は,ケアプランの作成にとりかかる前のタイミングで作成され,充実したケアプランの作成に有用なものである。しかしながら,介護支援専門員それぞれの経験,考え方は異なるので,課題整理総括表において記入漏れや記入間違い(他の多数の介護支援専門員と異なる判断)が発生することがある。 The purpose of the problem summary table is to help users maintain and improve their quality of life while taking into consideration the current situation and abilities of users in deriving problems (needs) to be solved in general. By clarifying the problems that are being solved and what kind of thoughts the profession had in the process of analyzing the problems before extracting the problems to be solved in supporting the independent daily life. be. The task summary table is created at the timing before starting to create a care plan, and is useful for creating a fulfilling care plan. However, since each care support specialist has different experiences and ways of thinking, omissions and mistakes (judgment different from many other care support specialists) may occur in the task summary table.

特許文献1は,地域包括支援センター,介護事業者,被介護者の家族等,介護に関連するあらゆる団体又は人が介護情報を共有すると共に,この共有された介護情報に基づいて適切な介護サービスを支援する介護支援システム及び介護支援プログラムを提供する。しかしながら,課題整理総括表の作成を支援するものではない。 In Patent Document 1, all groups or people related to long-term care, such as the Community Comprehensive Support Center, long-term care providers, and families of long-term care recipients, share long-term care information and provide appropriate long-term care services based on this shared long-term care information. We provide long-term care support systems and long-term care support programs. However, it does not support the preparation of the task summary table.

特開2010−205263号公報Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2010-205263

この発明は,課題整理総括表の作成を支援することによって介護分野における生産性を向上することを目的とする。 It is an object of the present invention to improve productivity in the field of long-term care by supporting the preparation of a task summary table.

またこの発明は,介護支援専門員(ケアマネージャー)の業務効率化を図ることを目的とする。 Another object of the present invention is to improve the work efficiency of a care manager.

この発明による課題整理総括表作成支援装置は,利用者ごとに作成される課題整理総括表の作成を支援する支援装置であって,複数の課題整理総括表サンプル(作成済の課題整理総括表)を記憶する記憶手段,複数の介護支援項目のそれぞれについて複数段階の介護レベルの中から上記利用者に該当する介護レベルの選択を受け付ける第1の受付手段,複数の日常生活阻害要因の選択肢の中から上記利用者に該当する日常生活阻害要因の選択を受け付ける第2の受付手段,上記記憶手段に記憶されている複数の課題整理総括表サンプルの中から,上記第1の受付手段によって受け付けられた複数の介護支援項目のそれぞれについての介護レベル,および第2の受付手段によって受け付けられた日常生活阻害要因の少なくともいずれか一方に基づいて,作成中の課題整理総括表に類似する課題整理総括表サンプルを抽出する抽出手段,ならびに上記抽出手段によって抽出された課題整理総括表サンプルにおいて介護支援項目ごとに関連付けられている日常生活阻害要因の出現頻度を用いて,上記作成中の課題整理総括表における要介護レベルの介護支援項目に関連付けるべき,一または複数の日常生活阻害要因を推奨表示する推奨表示手段を備えている。 The task sorting summary table creation support device according to the present invention is a support device that supports the creation of a task sorting summary table created for each user, and is a plurality of task sorting summary table samples (created task sorting summary table). A storage means for memorizing The second reception means for accepting the selection of the factors that impede daily life corresponding to the above user, and the first reception means from among the plurality of task summary table samples stored in the storage means. A sample task summary table similar to the task summary table being created based on the care level for each of the multiple care support items and at least one of the factors that hinder daily life accepted by the second reception means. Using the extraction means for extracting It is equipped with recommended display means for recommending and displaying one or more factors that impede daily life, which should be associated with long-term care support items at the long-term care level.

この発明は,上述した課題整理総括表作成支援装置を制御する方法,およびこの方法をコンピュータに実行させるプログラムも提供する。 The present invention also provides a method for controlling the above-mentioned problem rearranging summary table creation support device, and a program for causing a computer to execute this method.

課題整理総括表は特定の利用者ごとに作成されるもので,複数の介護支援項目のそれぞれについての上記利用者の介護レベルと,自立した日常生活の阻害要因(日常生活阻害要因)とが含まれる。たとえば,介護支援項目には,移動(室内移動,屋外移動),食事(食事内容,食事摂取,調理),排泄(排尿・排便,排泄動作),口腔(口腔衛生,口腔ケア),服薬,入浴,更衣,掃除,洗濯等が含まれ,そのそれぞれについて複数段階の介護レベルのいずれか(現在の状況)が選択される。日常生活阻害要因には,たとえば,腰痛,うつ病,住環境,体力・筋力低下,一人暮らし,認知症などが含まれ,その中から利用者が該当する,身体面,精神面,家族,住環境,生活環境,好き嫌い,財政,既往歴等のそれぞれの観点からの日常生活阻害要因が選択される。 The task summary table is created for each specific user, and includes the care level of the above users for each of the multiple care support items and the factors that hinder independent daily life (factors that hinder daily life). Is done. For example, long-term care support items include movement (indoor movement, outdoor movement), meal (meal content, meal intake, cooking), excretion (urination / defecation, excretion movement), oral cavity (oral hygiene, oral care), medication, and bathing. , Changing clothes, cleaning, washing, etc. are included, and one of multiple levels of care (current situation) is selected for each. Factors that hinder daily life include, for example, low back pain, depression, living environment, physical strength / muscle weakness, living alone, dementia, etc., among which the user is applicable, physical, mental, family, living environment. , Living environment, likes and dislikes, finance, medical history, and other factors that hinder daily life are selected.

課題整理総括表においてはさらに,要介護レベルの介護支援項目と,要介護が必要である状況をもたらしている要因(理由)が上記日常生活阻害要因のいずれであるかを特定しなければならない。たとえば,介護支援項目「入浴」が「一部介助」の介護レベルであるとすると,入浴の一部介助を必要とする状況をもたらしている要因(理由)が,上記日常生活阻害要因のいずれであるか(複数でもよい),すなわち要介護レベルの介護支援項目と日常生活阻害要因とが関連付けられる。 In the task summary table, it is necessary to further specify which of the above-mentioned factors that impede daily life is the long-term care support item at the level of long-term care and the factor (reason) that causes the situation in which long-term care is required. For example, if the long-term care support item "bathing" is the long-term care level of "partial caregiving", the factor (reason) that causes the situation requiring partial caregiving for bathing is one of the above-mentioned factors that hinder daily life. Whether there is (or more than one), that is, care support items at the level requiring long-term care are associated with factors that impede daily life.

この発明によると,記憶手段に記憶されている複数の課題整理総括表サンプル(作成済の課題整理総括表)の中から,作成中の課題整理総括表に類似する課題整理総括表サンプルが抽出され,抽出された課題整理総括表サンプルにおいて介護支援項目ごとに関連付けられている日常生活阻害要因の出現頻度を用いて,上記作成中の課題整理総括表における要介護レベルの介護支援項目ごとに関連付けるべき一または複数の日常生活阻害要因が推奨表示される。推奨表示される日常生活阻害要因は,記憶手段に記憶された複数の課題整理総括表サンプル(過去の実績)に基づくものであって,多くの介護支援専門員が過去に選択したものであるから,要介護レベルの介護支援項目に関連付けるべき上記日常生活阻害要因の選択がやりやすくなるのはもちろんのこと,関連付ける日常生活阻害要因の誤りも大きく減らすことができる。介護支援専門員の業務効率化を図ることができ,介護分野における生産性を向上することができる。 According to the present invention, a task sorting summary table sample similar to the task sorting summary table being created is extracted from a plurality of task sorting summary table samples (created task sorting summary table) stored in the storage means. , Using the frequency of appearance of daily life obstruction factors associated with each care support item in the extracted task summary table sample, it should be associated with each care support item of the long-term care level in the task summary table being prepared above. One or more daily life-inhibiting factors are recommended and displayed. The recommended factors that impede daily life are based on multiple task summary table samples (past achievements) stored in the memory means, and were selected by many care support specialists in the past. Not only is it easier to select the above-mentioned factors that impede daily life that should be associated with care support items at the level of long-term care, but also errors in the factors that impede daily life to be associated can be greatly reduced. It is possible to improve the work efficiency of long-term care support specialists and improve productivity in the long-term care field.

好ましくは,上記抽出手段によって抽出された課題整理総括表サンプルにおいて介護支援項目ごとの日常生活阻害要因の出現頻度が所定の値を超えている日常生活阻害要因であって,上記第2の受付手段によって選択されていない日常生活阻害要因が存在する場合に,警告を出力する警告手段を備えている。すなわち,抽出された類似サンプルにおいて過去に入力(選択)された頻度の高い日常生活阻害要因であるものの,作成中の課題整理総括表において入力(選択)されていない日常生活阻害要因が存在するときに注意が促されるので,作成中の課題整理総括表における日常生活阻害要因の入力漏れに気づくことができる。 Preferably, it is a daily life inhibitory factor in which the frequency of appearance of the daily life inhibitory factor for each care support item exceeds a predetermined value in the task summary table sample extracted by the above extraction means, and is the second reception means. It is equipped with a warning means that outputs a warning when there is a factor that impedes daily life that has not been selected by. That is, when there is a daily life-inhibiting factor that is frequently input (selected) in the past in the extracted similar sample, but is not input (selected) in the task summary table being created. Because attention is drawn to, it is possible to notice the omission of input of the factors that hinder daily life in the task summary table being created.

好ましくは,上記推奨表示手段によって推奨表示される一または複数の日常生活阻害要因の中から,要介護レベルの介護支援項目に関連付ける日常生活阻害要因の選択を受け付ける第3の受付手段,および上記第3の受付手段による選択が受け付けられた課題整理総括表を,課題整理総括表サンプルとして上記記憶手段に記憶する記憶制御手段を備えている。記憶手段に記憶される課題整理総括表サンプルを充実させることができる。 Preferably, a third reception means for accepting selection of a daily life-inhibiting factor to be associated with a long-term care support item at a long-term care level from one or a plurality of daily life-inhibiting factors recommended and displayed by the recommended display means, and the above-mentioned first. It is provided with a storage control means for storing the task sorting summary table for which the selection by the receiving means of 3 is accepted as a task sorting summary table sample in the storage means. It is possible to enrich the task summary table sample stored in the storage means.

好ましくは,上記複数の日常生活阻害要因の選択肢が,個人由来の日常生活阻害要因の選択肢と環境由来の日常生活阻害要因の選択肢とを含む。 Preferably, the above-mentioned choices of the plurality of factors that inhibit daily life include options of factors that inhibit daily life derived from individuals and options of factors that inhibit daily life derived from the environment.

一実施態様では,上記抽出手段が,個人由来の日常生活阻害要因が類似する課題整理総括表サンプルを,上記記憶手段から抽出するものである。 In one embodiment, the extraction means extracts from the storage means a task summary table sample having similar factors that inhibit daily life derived from an individual.

他の実施態様では,上記抽出手段が,環境由来の日常生活阻害要因が類似する課題整理総括表サンプルを,上記記憶手段から抽出するものである。 In another embodiment, the extraction means extracts from the storage means a task summary table sample having similar environmentally-derived factors that inhibit daily life.

たとえば,介護支援項目「入浴」の介護レベルが「一部介助」であるとしても,それは利用者の個人の身体面を要因とすることもあるし,風呂場の構造を要因とすることもある。日常生活阻害要因を個人由来のものと環境由来のものに分類しておくことで,より適切な類似する課題整理総括表サンプルを抽出することができる。 For example, even if the long-term care level of the long-term care support item "bathing" is "partial caregiving", it may be due to the physical aspect of the individual user or the structure of the bathroom. .. By classifying the factors that hinder daily life into those derived from individuals and those derived from the environment, it is possible to extract more appropriate and similar task summary table samples.

課題整理総括表を示す。The problem summary table is shown. 課題整理総括表作成支援装置の電気的構成を示すブロック図である。It is a block diagram which shows the electric composition of the task summary table making support device. 課題整理総括表作成処理の流れを示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the flow of the problem arrangement summary table creation process. 課題整理総括表作成処理の流れを示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the flow of the problem arrangement summary table creation process. 課題整理総括表作成処理の流れを示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the flow of the problem arrangement summary table creation process. 日常生活阻害要因リストウインドウを示す。Shows a list window of factors that hinder daily life. 類似サンプルを用いて,介護支援項目ごとに,要因入力欄に挙げられている日常生活阻害要因の出現頻度がカウントされる様子を示す。Using a similar sample, we show how the frequency of occurrence of factors that interfere with daily life listed in the factor input field is counted for each long-term care support item.

図1は課題整理総括表を示している。図2は図1に示す課題整理総括表を作成するための支援装置の電気的構成を示すブロック図である。図1には完成した課題整理総括表の一例が示されている。 FIG. 1 shows a summary table for organizing issues. FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing an electrical configuration of a support device for creating a task summary table shown in FIG. FIG. 1 shows an example of the completed task summary table.

課題整理総括表1は,ケアプランを作成すべき特定の利用者(被介護者)ごとに作成されるもので,利用者の現状や有する能力を勘案しつつ,利用者が生活の質を維持,向上させていく上で生じている課題を明らかにし,自立した日常生活を支援していくにあたってその解決すべき課題を抽出するまでの間に,介護支援専門員(ケアマネージャー)がどのような考えで課題分析を行ったのかを明らかにするものである。 The task summary table 1 is created for each specific user (care recipient) who should create a care plan, and the user maintains the quality of life while considering the current situation and ability of the user. , What kind of care support specialist (care manager) is in the process of clarifying the problems that are occurring in improving and extracting the problems that should be solved in supporting independent daily life? It clarifies whether the problem analysis was performed based on the idea.

課題整理総括表1は,複数の介護支援項目のそれぞれについて複数段階の介護レベル(介護支援レベル)のいずれかの選択を受け付ける介護レベル選択欄2,一または複数の自立した日常生活の阻害要因(日常生活阻害要因)を選択によって入力する日常生活阻害要因入力欄3,要介護レベルの介護支援項目のそれぞれについて,その要因を,上記日常生活阻害要因入力欄3に入力された日常生活阻害要因の中から特定する(関連付ける)要因入力欄4,改善/維持の可能性選択欄5,および備考欄6を備えている。 The task summary table 1 shows the long-term care level selection column 2, which accepts the selection of one of multiple levels of long-term care (nursing care support level) for each of multiple long-term care support items, and the obstacles to one or more independent daily lives ( For each of the daily life obstruction factor input field 3 and the long-term care support level care support item to be input by selecting (daily life obstruction factor), the factors of the daily life obstruction factor input field 3 are input. It is provided with a factor input field 4, an improvement / maintenance possibility selection field 5, and a remarks field 6 to be specified (associated) from the inside.

介護レベル選択欄2には,複数の介護支援項目のそれぞれについて,利用者の介護レベルを選択するための選択肢(介護レベル)(現在の状況)が用意される。この実施例の介護支援項目には,室内移動,屋外移動,食事内容,食事内容,食事摂取,調理,排尿・排便,排泄動作,口腔衛生,口腔ケア,服薬,入浴等が含まれ,これらの介護支援項目ごとに,自立,見守り,一部介助および全介助の4段階の介護レベル,または支障なしおよび支障ありの2段階の介護レベルが用意され,この中から利用者の介護レベルが選択される。自立,見守り,一部介助および全介助の4段階の介護レベルのうち「自立」は介護を必要としない介護レベル(介護不要レベル)であり,残りの「見守り」,「一部介助」および「全介助」が介護を必要とする介護レベル(要介護レベル)である。支障なしおよび支障ありの2段階の介護レベルについては,「支障なし」が介護不要レベル,「支障あり」が要介護レベルである。 In the care level selection column 2, options (care level) (current situation) for selecting the care level of the user are prepared for each of the plurality of care support items. The long-term care support items in this example include indoor movement, outdoor movement, meal content, meal content, meal intake, cooking, urination / defecation, excretion movement, oral hygiene, oral care, medication, bathing, etc. For each long-term care support item, four levels of long-term care: independence, watching, partial assistance and full assistance, or two levels of long-term care with no hindrance and hindrance are prepared, and the care level of the user is selected from these. NS. Of the four levels of long-term care: independence, watching, partial caregiving, and full caregiving, "independence" is a long-term care level that does not require long-term care (nursing-free level), and the remaining "watching", "partial caregiving", and "partial caregiving". "All caregiving" is the level of long-term care that requires long-term care (level of long-term care required). Regarding the two levels of long-term care, no hindrance and hindrance, "no hindrance" is the level that does not require long-term care, and "with hindrance" is the level that requires long-term care.

日常生活阻害要因入力欄3には,利用者の自立した日常生活の阻害要因についてケアマネージャーが収集した客観的事実が,あらかじめ用意される複数の日常生活阻害要因の選択肢の中から選択されることで入力される。入力される日常生活阻害要因は,個人由来の日常生活阻害要因(身体面,精神面,好き嫌い,財政,既往歴など)と,環境由来の日常生活阻害要因(家族,住環境,生活環境など)とが含まれる。 In the daily life obstruction factor input field 3, objective facts collected by the care manager regarding the obstruction factors of the user's independent daily life are selected from a plurality of options of the daily life obstruction factors prepared in advance. Is entered in. The input factors that hinder daily life are individual-derived factors that hinder daily life (physical, mental, likes and dislikes, finances, medical history, etc.) and environment-derived factors that hinder daily life (family, living environment, living environment, etc.). And are included.

要因入力欄4には介護レベル選択欄2において選択される介護レベルが要介護レベル(「自立」および「支障なし」以外)である介護支援項目について,その状況をもたらしている要因が,上述した日常生活阻害要因入力欄3に入力された日常生活阻害要因の中のいずれであるかが選択(特定)される。たとえば,図1に示す課題整理総括表1の介護支援項目「入浴」を参照すると,要介護レベル(一部介助)であり,要因入力欄4には「膀胱ろうによる感染症のリスク」(丸付数字の3)および「住環境(居室内の掃除が行き届かない)」(丸付数字の5)が選択されている。要因入力欄4は,要介護レベルである介護支援項目とその要因となっている,日常生活阻害要因入力欄3に入力された日常生活阻害要因とを関連付けるものであり,この関連付けには非常に手間がかかる。すなわち,要介護レベルの介護支援項目のそれぞれについて,その要因が日常生活阻害要因入力欄3に入力された日常生活阻害要因のうちのいずれに該当するかを,ケアマネージャーは一つ一つチェックしなければならない。以下に説明するように,支援装置は,要因入力欄4に入力される候補となる一または複数の日常生活阻害要因を推奨表示し,ケアマネージャーによる要因入力欄4の入力を支援する処理を実行する(詳細は後述する)。 In the factor input field 4, the factors that bring about the situation are described above for the care support items in which the care level selected in the care level selection field 2 is the level requiring long-term care (other than "independence" and "no hindrance"). Which of the daily life-inhibiting factors input in the daily life-inhibiting factor input field 3 is selected (specified). For example, referring to the long-term care support item "bathing" in the task summary table 1 shown in Fig. 1, it is the level of long-term care (partial caregiving), and the factor input field 4 is "risk of infectious disease due to bladder fistula" (circle). The attached numbers 3) and "living environment (cleaning of the living room is not perfect)" (circled number 5) are selected. The factor input field 4 associates the long-term care support item, which is the level requiring long-term care, with the daily life-inhibiting factor input field 3 that is the factor thereof, and is very relevant to this association. It takes time and effort. That is, for each of the long-term care support items at the level requiring long-term care, the care manager checks one by one which of the daily life obstruction factors entered in the daily life obstruction factor input field 3 corresponds to the factor. There must be. As described below, the support device recommends and displays one or more candidate factors that impede daily life to be input in the factor input field 4, and executes a process to support the input of the factor input field 4 by the care manager. (Details will be described later).

改善/維持の可能性選択欄5には,介護レベル選択欄2が要介護レベル(「自立」および「支障なし」以外)である介護支援項目について,認定有効期間における状況の可能性が,改善,維持または悪化のいずれかによって選択される。 Possibility of improvement / maintenance In the selection column 5, the possibility of the situation during the certification validity period is improved for the long-term care support items for which the long-term care level selection column 2 is the level requiring long-term care (other than "independence" and "no obstacle"). , Selected by either maintenance or deterioration.

備考欄6には,任意の介護支援項目について援助内容や目標などが記入される。 In the remarks column 6, the support contents and goals are entered for any care support item.

図1に示す課題整理総括表1は課題整理総括表作成支援装置によって作成される。図2を参照して,課題整理総括表作成支援装置10はコンピュータ装置によって実現され,その全体的な動作を制御するCPU(中央演算処理装置)11,キーボード,マウス等の入力装置12,作成途中および作成済の課題整理総括表1を画面表示する表示装置13,ネットワーク(図示略)を通じてデータを送受信する通信装置14,ならびにオペレーティングシステムプログラム(OS),コンピュータ装置を課題整理総括表作成支援装置10として機能させるための支援プログラム,過去に作成された複数の課題整理総括表(以下,課題整理総括表サンプルという)を記憶したデータベースなどを記憶する記憶装置15を備えている。 The task sorting summary table 1 shown in FIG. 1 is created by the task sorting summary table creation support device. With reference to FIG. 2, the task organizing summary table creation support device 10 is realized by a computer device, a CPU (central processing unit) 11 that controls its overall operation, an input device 12 such as a keyboard and a mouse, and a process of creation. And the display device 13 that displays the created task summary table 1 on the screen, the communication device 14 that sends and receives data through the network (not shown), the operating system program (OS), and the computer device the task summary table creation support device 10. It is equipped with a storage device 15 that stores a support program for functioning as an operating system, a database that stores a plurality of task sorting summary tables created in the past (hereinafter referred to as task sorting summary table samples), and the like.

図3から図5は,課題整理総括表作成支援装置10を用いた課題整理総括表作成処理の流れを示すフローチャートである。 3 to 5 are flowcharts showing the flow of the task rearranging summary table creation process using the task rearranging summary table creation support device 10.

はじめに,上述した介護レベル選択欄2において,複数の介護支援項目のそれぞれについての利用者の介護レベルが入力(選択)され(ステップ31),さらに日常生活阻害要因入力欄3に一または複数の日常生活阻害要因が入力(選択)される(ステップ32)。 First, in the above-mentioned long-term care level selection field 2, the user's long-term care level for each of the plurality of long-term care support items is input (selected) (step 31), and one or more daily activities are further entered in the daily life obstruction factor input field 3. The factors that impede life are input (selected) (step 32).

複数の介護支援項目のそれぞれについての介護レベルは,表示装置13に表示される課題整理総括表1(図1)の介護レベル選択欄2において,いずれかの介護レベルを入力装置12を用いてクリックすることによって入力(選択)される。日常生活阻害要因は,表示装置13に表示される,次に説明する要因リストウインドウの中から該当するものが選択されることで,日常生活阻害要因入力欄3に入力される。 For the care level for each of the plurality of care support items, click one of the care levels using the input device 12 in the care level selection field 2 of the task summary summary table 1 (Fig. 1) displayed on the display device 13. It is input (selected) by doing. The factors that hinder daily life are input to the factor input field 3 that hinders daily life by selecting the corresponding factors from the factor list window described below, which is displayed on the display device 13.

図6は日常生活阻害要因リストウインドウ13Aの一例を示している。あらかじめ用意される複数の日常生活阻害要因は,個人由来の日常生活阻害要因と環境由来の日常生活阻害要因とに分類されており,これらの中から利用者の自立した日常生活の阻害要因が選択される。 FIG. 6 shows an example of the daily life obstruction factor list window 13A. Multiple factors that inhibit daily life prepared in advance are classified into factors that inhibit daily life derived from individuals and factors that inhibit daily life derived from the environment, and the factors that inhibit the user's independent daily life are selected from these factors. Will be done.

複数の介護支援項目のそれぞれについての介護レベルの入力,および日常生活阻害要因の入力が終わると,記憶装置15に記憶されている複数の課題整理総括表サンプルからの抽出(絞り込み)処理が行われる(ステップ33,34)。この抽出(絞り込み)処理は,記憶装置15に記憶されている複数の課題整理総括表サンプル(過去に作成された課題整理総括表)の中から,入力された複数の介護支援項目ごとの介護レベルおよび日常生活阻害要因を用いて,作成中の課題整理総括表と類似する課題整理総括表サンプルを抽出する処理である。 After inputting the nursing care level for each of the plurality of nursing care support items and inputting the factors that hinder daily life, extraction (narrowing down) processing is performed from the plurality of task summary table samples stored in the storage device 15. (Steps 33 and 34). This extraction (narrowing down) process is performed by the care level for each of the plurality of care support items input from the multiple task organizer sample (task organizer summary table created in the past) stored in the storage device 15. In addition, it is a process to extract a sample of the task summary table similar to the task summary table being created by using the factors that hinder daily life.

第1の抽出処理は,日常生活阻害要因を用いた抽出処理である(ステップ33)。図4を参照して,入力された日常生活阻害要因は個人由来の阻害要因と環境依頼の阻害要因を含むので,そのそれぞれについて,完全一致するまたは部分一致する日常生活阻害要因を含むサンプルが抽出される(ステップ41,42)。もちろん,個人由来の阻害要因を用いた抽出処理(ステップ41)においては完全一致する阻害要因を含むサンプルを抽出し,環境由来の阻害要因を用いた抽出処理(ステップ42)では部分一致する阻害要因を含むサンプルを抽出してもよく,その逆の処理をしてもよい。作成中の課題整理総括表に入力されている日常生活阻害要因のうち,たとえば2つないし3つ以上の同一の日常生活阻害要因を含むサンプルを,部分一致するサンプルと判断することもできる。いずれにしても,作成中の課題整理総括表に入力された日常生活阻害要因と全く異なる日常生活阻害要因のみを含むサンプルは抽出されず,これによって作成中の課題整理総括表に類似するサンプルが抽出される。 The first extraction process is an extraction process using factors that hinder daily life (step 33). With reference to FIG. 4, since the input daily life inhibitory factors include individual-derived inhibitory factors and environmental request inhibitory factors, samples containing completely or partially matching daily life inhibitory factors are extracted for each of them. Is done (steps 41, 42). Of course, in the extraction process using the individual-derived inhibitory factor (step 41), a sample containing the completely matching inhibitory factor is extracted, and in the extraction process using the environmentally-derived inhibitory factor (step 42), the partially matching inhibitory factor is extracted. A sample containing the above may be extracted, and vice versa. Among the factors that hinder daily life entered in the task summary table being created, for example, a sample containing two or three or more identical factors that hinder daily life can be judged as partially matching samples. In any case, a sample containing only the factors that hinder daily life that are completely different from the factors that hinder daily life entered in the task summary table being created is not extracted, and as a result, a sample similar to the task summary table being created is obtained. Be extracted.

もちろん,個人由来の阻害要因を用いた抽出処理(ステップ41)のみを実行して,環境由来の阻害要因を用いた抽出処理(ステップ42)をスキップしてもよく,その逆を行ってもよい。 Of course, only the extraction process using the individual-derived inhibitory factor (step 41) may be executed, and the extraction process using the environment-derived inhibitory factor (step 42) may be skipped, or vice versa. ..

次に,第2の抽出処理が行われる(ステップ34)。図5に示すように,第2の抽出処理では,複数の介護支援項目ごとに入力される介護レベルのパターンが用いられる(ステップ51)。 Next, a second extraction process is performed (step 34). As shown in FIG. 5, in the second extraction process, a care level pattern input for each of a plurality of care support items is used (step 51).

複数の介護支援項目ごとに入力される介護レベルのパターンを用いた抽出処理には様々な処理が考えられる。 Various processes can be considered for the extraction process using the pattern of the long-term care level input for each of a plurality of long-term care support items.

一つ目は,作成中の課題整理総括表において複数の介護支援項目ごとに入力された介護レベルが完全に一致する,または少数の介護支援項目のみについて介護レベルが1段階相違するにとどまるサンプルを抽出する処理である。 The first is a sample in which the long-term care levels entered for each of multiple long-term care support items in the task summary table being created are completely the same, or the long-term care levels differ by only one level for only a small number of long-term care support items. It is a process to extract.

二つ目は,介護レベルが相違する介護支援項目の数に着目した抽出処理である。介護レベルが相違する介護支援項目の数がたとえば2つないし3つにとどまるサンプルが抽出される。 The second is an extraction process that focuses on the number of long-term care support items with different long-term care levels. Samples in which the number of long-term care support items with different long-term care levels is, for example, two or three are extracted.

三つ目は,「自立」または「支障なし」(すなわち介護不要レベル)が選択されている介護支援項目が完全に一致する,または少数の相違にとどまるサンプルを抽出する処理である。 The third is the process of extracting samples in which the long-term care support items for which "independence" or "no hindrance" (that is, the long-term care unnecessary level) are selected completely match or have only a small number of differences.

いずれにしても,作成中の課題整理総括表において複数の介護支援項目ごとに入力された介護レベルのパターンと全く異なるパターンを含むサンプルは抽出されず,これによって作成中の課題整理総括表に類似するサンプルが抽出される。 In any case, samples containing patterns that are completely different from the care level patterns entered for each of multiple care support items are not extracted from the task summary table being created, which is similar to the task summary table being created. Samples to be extracted.

上述した抽出処理を経ることで,入力(選択)された日常生活阻害要因および入力(選択)された介護レベルパターンの2つの観点(いずれか一方でもよい)から,作成中の課題整理総括表に類似するサンプル(以下,類似サンプルと呼ぶ)が,記憶装置15に記憶されている多数のサンプルから抽出されることになる。たとえば抽出される類似サンプル数にしたがって,日常生活阻害要因および介護レベルパターンのいずれか一方を抽出処理に用いるか,または両方を抽出処理に用いるかを判断することができる。 By going through the above-mentioned extraction process, from the two viewpoints (either of them may be) of the input (selected) factors that hinder daily life and the input (selected) care level pattern, the task summary table being created can be used. Similar samples (hereinafter referred to as similar samples) will be extracted from a large number of samples stored in the storage device 15. For example, depending on the number of similar samples to be extracted, it is possible to determine whether one of the factors that hinder daily life and the care level pattern is used in the extraction process, or both are used in the extraction process.

次に,類似サンプルが用いられて介護支援項目ごとの阻害要因出現頻度に応じて,要因入力欄4に入力すべき一または複数の阻害要因が推奨表示される(ステップ35)。 Next, a similar sample is used, and one or more inhibitory factors to be input in the factor input field 4 are recommended and displayed according to the frequency of occurrence of the inhibitory factors for each care support item (step 35).

図7は,抽出された類似サンプルにおいて,介護支援項目ごとに,要因入力欄4に挙げられている日常生活阻害要因の出現頻度がカウントされる様子を示すものである。図7に示す表は出現頻度を分かりやすくするためのものであって,課題整理総括表作成処理において必ずしも作成される必要はないものであることを理解されたい。 FIG. 7 shows how the frequency of appearance of the factors that inhibit daily life listed in the factor input field 4 is counted for each care support item in the extracted similar sample. It should be understood that the table shown in FIG. 7 is for making the appearance frequency easy to understand, and does not necessarily have to be created in the task organizing summary table creation process.

図7を参照して,たとえば,介護支援項目「室内移動」について,日常生活阻害要因「腰痛」の出現頻度が「450」であることが示されている。これは抽出された類似サンプルのうち,介護支援項目「室内移動」について要介護レベルの状況をもたらしている要因が「腰痛」であるもの(そのようなデータが入力されている類似サンプル)が,450サンプル存在することを意味する。 With reference to FIG. 7, for example, it is shown that the frequency of appearance of the daily life obstructive factor “back pain” is “450” for the long-term care support item “indoor movement”. This is because, among the similar samples extracted, the factor that causes the situation of the level requiring long-term care for the long-term care support item "indoor movement" is "back pain" (similar sample in which such data is input). It means that there are 450 samples.

上述したように,課題整理総括表1の要因入力欄4には,介護レベル選択欄2が要介護レベル(「自立」および「支障なし」以外)である介護支援項目について,日常生活阻害要因入力欄3に入力されている一または複数の日常生活阻害要因(日常生活阻害要因を表す番号(丸付数字))のうちのいずれか一つまたは複数が入力され,これによって要介護レベルである介護支援項目とその要因となっている,日常生活阻害要因入力欄3に入力された日常生活阻害要因とが関連付けられる。この入力されるべき日常生活阻害要因の候補が,上述した出現頻度に基づいて要因入力欄4に表示される。たとえば,作成中の課題整理総括表1の要因入力欄4には,上述した出現頻度が高い順番に複数またはすべての要因(要因を特定する番号)が表示される。 As described above, in the factor input field 4 of the task summary table 1, the factors that impede daily life are input for the long-term care support items in which the long-term care level selection field 2 is the level requiring long-term care (other than "independence" and "no hindrance"). One or more of one or more daily life obstructive factors (numbers representing daily life obstructive factors (circled numbers)) entered in column 3 are input, thereby providing long-term care at the level requiring long-term care. The support item and the daily life obstruction factor input in the daily life obstruction factor input field 3, which is the factor thereof, are associated with each other. The candidates for the factors that impede daily life to be input are displayed in the factor input field 4 based on the above-mentioned frequency of appearance. For example, in the factor input field 4 of the task summary table 1 being created, a plurality of or all factors (numbers for specifying the factors) are displayed in descending order of frequency of appearance.

出現頻度にしたがう要因入力欄4に表示される要因の推奨表示は,作成中の課題整理総括表に類似するサンプルを利用したものであるから,大きな誤りがあることは考えにくく,推奨表示にしたがって一または複数の要因を要因入力欄4に入力する(阻害要因を最終決定する)(ステップ36)ことで,たとえ経験の少ないケアマネージャーであっても,過去の事例に沿う日常生活阻害要因を,介護支援項目に正しく関連付けることができる。推奨表示される日常生活阻害要因(要因を特定する番号)のすべてを要因入力欄4に入力してもよいし,その一部を入力してもよい。いずれにしても要因入力欄4のデータ入力に費やされる時間を大幅に短縮することができる。 Since the recommended display of the factors displayed in the factor input field 4 according to the frequency of appearance uses a sample similar to the task summary table being created, it is unlikely that there is a big error, and according to the recommended display. By inputting one or more factors into the factor input field 4 (finally determining the inhibitory factor) (step 36), even an inexperienced care manager can determine the factors that inhibit daily life according to past cases. Can be correctly associated with long-term care support items. All of the recommended factors that hinder daily life (numbers that specify the factors) may be entered in the factor input field 4, or some of them may be entered. In any case, the time spent for data input in the factor input field 4 can be significantly reduced.

上述した類似サンプルを利用した介護支援項目ごとの日常生活阻害要因の出現頻度は,作成中の課題整理総括表1の日常生活阻害要因入力欄3における日常生活阻害要因の入力漏れのチェックに利用することもできる。たとえば,類似サンプルにおける出現頻度が非常に多く(所定の値を超えている),しかしながら作成中の課題整理総括表1の日常生活阻害要因入力欄3に入力されていない日常生活阻害要因をケアマネージャーに対して提示(表示画面に表示して警告)し,入力漏れチェックを促すようにしてもよい。 The frequency of occurrence of daily life-inhibiting factors for each long-term care support item using the above-mentioned similar sample is used to check for omission of input of daily-life-inhibiting factors in the daily-life-inhibiting factor input field 3 of the task summary table 1 under preparation. You can also do it. For example, the frequency of appearance in similar samples is very high (exceeding the predetermined value), however, the care manager is responsible for the factors that hinder daily life that are not entered in the daily life hindrance factor input field 3 of the task summary table 1 that is being created. It may be presented (displayed on the display screen to warn) to prompt the user to check for omission of input.

完成した課題整理総括表は記憶装置15に記憶され,その後課題整理総括表サンプルとして用いられることになる。 The completed task summary table is stored in the storage device 15, and then used as a task summary table sample.

上述した実施例では,課題整理総括表作成支援装置10がいわゆるスタンドアローン型のコンピュータ装置によって構成される例を説明したが,ネットワークを通じて接続された複数台のコンピュータ装置を用いてもよい。たとえば課題整理総括表サンプルを記憶したデータベースをサーバ装置の記憶装置に記憶しておき,ネットワークを通じてサーバ装置のデータベースを利用する態様(ファイル共有型),さらに上述した抽出処理をサーバ装置に行わせる態様(クライアント/サーバ型)によっても,課題整理総括表作成支援装置10を実現することもできる。 In the above-mentioned embodiment, an example in which the task organizing summary table creation support device 10 is composed of a so-called stand-alone computer device has been described, but a plurality of computer devices connected via a network may be used. For example, a mode in which a database in which a sample of a problem summary table is stored is stored in a storage device of a server device, and the database of the server device is used through a network (file sharing type), and a mode in which the above-mentioned extraction process is performed by the server device. (Client / server type) can also be used to realize the task organization summary table creation support device 10.

1 課題整理総括表
2 介護レベル選択欄
3 日常生活阻害要因入力欄
4 要因入力欄
10 課題整理総括表作成支援装置
11 CPU(抽出手段)
12 入力装置(第1の受付手段,第2の受付手段)
13 表示装置(推奨表示手段)
15 記憶装置(記憶手段)
1 Problem summary table 2 Nursing care level selection field 3 Daily life obstruction factor input field 4 Factor input field
10 Problem arrangement summary table creation support device
11 CPU (extraction means)
12 Input device (first reception means, second reception means)
13 Display device (recommended display means)
15 Storage device (storage means)

Claims (8)

利用者ごとに作成される課題整理総括表の作成を支援する支援装置であって,
複数の課題整理総括表サンプルを記憶する記憶手段,
複数の介護支援項目のそれぞれについて複数段階の介護レベルの中から上記利用者に該当する介護レベルの選択を受け付ける第1の受付手段,
複数の日常生活阻害要因の選択肢の中から,上記利用者に該当する日常生活阻害要因の選択を受け付ける第2の受付手段,
上記記憶手段に記憶されている複数の課題整理総括表サンプルの中から,上記第1の受付手段によって受け付けられた複数の介護支援項目のそれぞれについての介護レベル,および第2の受付手段によって受け付けられた日常生活阻害要因の少なくともいずれか一方に基づいて,作成中の課題整理総括表に類似する課題整理総括表サンプルを抽出する抽出手段,ならびに
上記抽出手段によって抽出された課題整理総括表サンプルにおいて介護支援項目ごとに関連付けられている日常生活阻害要因の出現頻度を用いて,上記作成中の課題整理総括表における要介護レベルの介護支援項目に関連付けるべき一または複数の日常生活阻害要因を推奨表示する推奨表示手段,
を備えている,
課題整理総括表作成支援装置。
It is a support device that supports the creation of an issue summary table created for each user.
A storage means for storing multiple task summary table samples,
The first reception means that accepts the selection of the care level corresponding to the above user from the care levels of multiple stages for each of the multiple care support items.
A second reception means for accepting the selection of the daily life-inhibiting factor corresponding to the above-mentioned user from the options of the daily life-inhibiting factors
From the multiple task summary table samples stored in the storage means, the care level for each of the plurality of care support items received by the first reception means, and the second reception means are accepted. Based on at least one of the factors that hinder daily life, the extraction means for extracting the task arrangement summary table sample similar to the task arrangement summary table being created, and the long-term care in the task arrangement summary table sample extracted by the above extraction means. Using the frequency of occurrence of daily life-inhibiting factors associated with each support item, we recommend and display one or more daily-life-inhibiting factors that should be associated with the long-term care support items at the level of long-term care in the task summary table being created above. Recommended display method,
Is equipped with
Problem organization summary table creation support device.
上記抽出手段によって抽出された課題整理総括表サンプルにおいて介護支援項目ごとの日常生活阻害要因の出現頻度が所定の値を超えている日常生活阻害要因であって,上記第2の受付手段によって選択されていない日常生活阻害要因が存在する場合に,警告を出力する警告手段を備えている,
請求項1に記載の課題整理総括表作成支援装置。
In the task summary table sample extracted by the above-mentioned extraction means, the appearance frequency of the daily life-inhibiting factors for each care support item exceeds a predetermined value, and is selected by the above-mentioned second reception means. It is equipped with a warning means to output a warning when there is a factor that hinders daily life.
The problem rearranging summary table creation support device according to claim 1.
上記推奨表示手段によって推奨表示される一または複数の日常生活阻害要因の中から,要介護レベルの介護支援項目に関連付ける日常生活阻害要因の選択を受け付ける第3の受付手段,および
上記第3の受付手段による選択が受け付けられた課題整理総括表を,課題整理総括表サンプルとして上記記憶手段に記憶する記憶制御手段を備えている,
請求項1または2に記載の課題整理総括表作成支援装置。
A third reception means for accepting selection of a daily life obstruction factor associated with a long-term care support item from among one or more daily life obstruction factors recommended and displayed by the above recommended display means, and the above third reception. It is provided with a storage control means for storing the task sorting summary table for which selection by means is accepted as a task sorting summary table sample in the above storage means.
The problem rearranging summary table creation support device according to claim 1 or 2.
上記複数の日常生活阻害要因の選択肢が,個人由来の日常生活阻害要因の選択肢と環境由来の日常生活阻害要因の選択肢とを含む,
請求項1から3のいずれか一項に記載の課題整理総括表作成支援装置。
The above-mentioned choices of a plurality of factors that inhibit daily life include options of factors that inhibit daily life derived from individuals and options of factors that inhibit daily life derived from the environment.
The problem rearranging summary table creation support device according to any one of claims 1 to 3.
上記抽出手段が,
個人由来の日常生活阻害要因が類似する課題整理総括表サンプルを,上記記憶手段から抽出するものである,
請求項4に記載の課題整理総括表作成支援装置。
The above extraction means
A sample of the task summary table with similar factors that inhibit daily life derived from individuals is extracted from the above memory means.
The problem rearranging summary table creation support device according to claim 4.
上記抽出手段が,
環境由来の日常生活阻害要因が類似する課題整理総括表サンプルを,上記記憶手段から抽出するものである,
請求項4または5に記載の課題整理総括表作成支援装置。
The above extraction means
A sample of the task summary table with similar factors that inhibit daily life derived from the environment is extracted from the above memory means.
The problem rearranging summary table creation support device according to claim 4 or 5.
利用者ごとに作成される課題整理総括表の作成を支援する支援装置を制御する方法であって,
複数の課題整理総括表サンプルを記憶手段に記憶しておき,
複数の介護支援項目のそれぞれについて複数段階の介護レベルの中から上記利用者の該当する介護レベルの選択を第1の受付手段によって受け付け,
複数の日常生活阻害要因の選択肢の中から,上記利用者に該当する日常生活阻害要因の選択を第2の受付手段によって受け付け,
上記記憶手段に記憶されている複数の課題整理総括表サンプルの中から,上記第1の受付手段によって受け付けられた複数の介護支援項目のそれぞれについての介護レベル,および第2の受付手段によって受け付けられた日常生活阻害要因の少なくともいずれか一方に基づいて,作成中の課題整理総括表に類似する課題整理総括表サンプルを抽出し,
抽出した課題整理総括表サンプルにおいて介護支援項目ごとに関連付けられている日常生活阻害要因の出現頻度を用いて,上記作成中の課題整理総括表における要介護レベルの介護支援項目に関連付けるべき,一または複数の日常生活阻害要因を推奨表示する,
課題整理総括表作成支援装置の制御方法。
It is a method of controlling the support device that supports the creation of the task summary table created for each user.
Store multiple task summary table samples in a storage means,
For each of the multiple long-term care support items, the selection of the applicable long-term care level of the above user from the multiple levels of long-term care is accepted by the first reception means.
From the options of multiple factors that hinder daily life, the selection of factors that hinder daily life corresponding to the above user is accepted by the second reception means.
From the multiple task summary table samples stored in the storage means, the care level for each of the plurality of care support items received by the first reception means, and the second reception means are accepted. Based on at least one of the factors that hinder daily life, a sample of the task summary table similar to the task summary table being created was extracted.
Using the frequency of occurrence of factors that impede daily life associated with each care support item in the extracted task summary table sample, it should be associated with the care support item at the level requiring long-term care in the task summary table being prepared above. Recommended display of multiple factors that hinder daily life,
How to control the task arrangement summary table creation support device.
コンピュータに,請求項7に記載の課題整理総括表作成支援装置の制御方法を実行させる,
プログラム。
Let the computer execute the control method of the task sorting summary table creation support device according to claim 7.
program.
JP2017211262A 2017-10-31 2017-10-31 A program that controls the task organization summary table creation support device, method, and issue summary table creation support device. Active JP6975615B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2017211262A JP6975615B2 (en) 2017-10-31 2017-10-31 A program that controls the task organization summary table creation support device, method, and issue summary table creation support device.

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2017211262A JP6975615B2 (en) 2017-10-31 2017-10-31 A program that controls the task organization summary table creation support device, method, and issue summary table creation support device.

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2019082965A JP2019082965A (en) 2019-05-30
JP6975615B2 true JP6975615B2 (en) 2021-12-01

Family

ID=66670455

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2017211262A Active JP6975615B2 (en) 2017-10-31 2017-10-31 A program that controls the task organization summary table creation support device, method, and issue summary table creation support device.

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6975615B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP7359369B2 (en) * 2019-11-26 2023-10-11 日本電信電話株式会社 Situation determining device, method and program

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2004287874A (en) * 2003-03-24 2004-10-14 Hitachi Ltd Data analysis method and business transaction support system
JP4783318B2 (en) * 2007-03-27 2011-09-28 株式会社東芝 Reference index analysis system for certification of long-term care
JP5047720B2 (en) * 2007-07-26 2012-10-10 株式会社日立メディコ Medical examination data processing device
JP6667240B2 (en) * 2015-07-31 2020-03-18 キヤノン株式会社 Apparatus, method, system and program.

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2019082965A (en) 2019-05-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Sripa et al. Impact of GP gatekeeping on quality of care, and health outcomes, use, and expenditure: a systematic review
Uden et al. Risk of tuberculosis infection and disease for health care workers: an updated meta-analysis
Gijsberts et al. Spirituality at the end of life: conceptualization of measurable aspects—a systematic review
Ayachit et al. A systematic review of burnout studies from the hospitality literature
de Hoog et al. Family history tools for primary care are not ready yet to be implemented. A systematic review
Dempers et al. Which public health approach to palliative care? An integrative literature review
CN110291555B (en) Systems and methods for facilitating computational analysis of health conditions
Yang et al. Is mindfulness associated with stress and burnout among mental health professionals in Singapore?
Pauley et al. Predictors of caregiver distress in the community setting using the home care version of the resident assessment instrument
Hegarty et al. How could depression guidelines be made more relevant and applicable to primary care?: A quantitative and qualitative review of national guidelines
JP2009273558A (en) Medical checkup supporting apparatus and program
Lauriks et al. The use of the Dutch Self-Sufficiency Matrix (SSM-D) to inform allocation decisions to public mental health care for homeless people
Lin et al. Intergenerational transfer and reporting bias: An application of the MIMIC model
Azegami et al. Efficacy of pre-emptive kidney transplantation for adults with end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
JP6975615B2 (en) A program that controls the task organization summary table creation support device, method, and issue summary table creation support device.
JP2006107298A (en) Health information display system
EP4068294A1 (en) Medical information display method and health file device
Abousweilem et al. Revealing the effects of business intelligence tools on technostress and withdrawal behavior: The context of a developing country
Hapsari et al. Management information systems development for veterinary hospital patient registration using first in first out algorithm
Lindström et al. PECC—Factor structure and findings in three longitudinal cohorts of patients with schizophrenia
JP6805864B2 (en) Display program, display method and display device
JP2020177627A (en) Information processing method, information processing apparatus, and information processing program
JP2001125988A (en) System for designing graphical assessment table and care plan by distributed input of check list by specialist
Albatineh et al. Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in hemodialysis patients
JP5938504B1 (en) Dementia inquiry device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20201008

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20210820

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20211102

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20211108

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 6975615

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150