JP6611244B2 - Vehicle operation business support device - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to a vehicle operation business support technology that supports a work or the like for returning a change in vehicle operation associated with operation arrangement when a transportation failure occurs to the original planned operation.

In order to perform safe and smooth operation of trains in rail transportation, it is necessary to allocate trains (trains) to train schedules so that they can be operated as trains. Such a vehicle use plan is referred to as vehicle operation, and is generally created in a cycle of one day. Basically, each operation is repeated in a cycle of, for example, one month, and is planned so that inspection and the like can be carried out periodically, which is called planned operation.
However, when the train operation is disturbed due to a vehicle failure, an accident, a disaster, or the like, operation arrangement is performed by appropriately changing the diagram and returning the train operation to normal. This driving arrangement will greatly change the vehicle operation from the plan. Depending on how the change is made, it may occur that the diamond restoration is delayed or that it takes time to restore the operation after the diamond restoration.

  Conventionally, when the train operation is disturbed, an invention as disclosed in, for example, Patent Document 1 has been proposed with regard to operation arrangement for appropriately changing the diagram and returning the train operation to normal operation. There is a possibility that a change in the vehicle operation occurs due to the driving arrangement, and that it is impossible to execute the work inspection and the alternation inspection that must be performed by a predetermined date. Therefore, it is necessary to return the changed vehicle operation to the planned operation after the diamond restoration.

  If a vehicle that cannot be entered due to a non-inspection of the vehicle to be inspected or a difference in vehicle type occurs during the day after the restoration of the schedule, the operation supervisor and the vehicle ward location on the vehicle placement ward (vehicle base) I asked the Transportation Directive to change the vehicle operation to avoid it. In the case of two or more types of cars in one line, it is necessary to change the operation to return the car type to the original plan. Furthermore, in the case of a line section where there are two or more vehicle placement wards or the like (vehicle bases), it is also necessary to change the operation for returning the respective belonging vehicle to the original vehicle placement ward. In addition, the vehicle operation change method performed on the day includes replacement after entering the ward, return change at the return station, vehicle replacement, and the like. In addition, “vehicle type” generally means a difference in the type of vehicle, but in this specification, a term indicating a different knitting form such as the number of vehicles connected (for example, a 5-car train and a 10-car train). Use as

Japanese Patent No. 4670081

  Conventionally, this operation return has been performed by manual work, and there has been a problem of requiring a great deal of labor and time. Specifically, in operation return, first of all, the contents of the operation plan (operation change instruction) sent from the transportation instruction by FAX etc. to the train diagram at the vehicle placement ward etc. (vehicle base) responsible for the operation of the vehicle It starts from filling in and grasping the operation and organization of the vehicle. Thereafter, the vehicle placement ward will make a plan to return to the original monthly operation plan by replacing the vehicle after entering the ward ward in order to match the inspection schedule and the like after the next day. Depending on how the diamond is disturbed, it may take, for example, two weeks or more to return to the original operation plan in the case of a conventional method that relies on manual work. The “knitting” means a combination of a plurality of vehicles, and a knitting number is given to distinguish them. In addition, “operation” is a daily operation schedule of a composition unit, and an operation number is given to distinguish them.

  In addition, it is said that the work inspection must be performed within 6 days from the previous inspection, for example. However, since it has been a manual check in the past, there is a risk of oversight. In addition, the work inspection is performed at a station with a detention line where the inspection can be performed and the vehicle placement ward, and the minimum required time must be secured (cannot be performed if the operation interval is not less than the predetermined time) There is a risk that inspections may be set in places that do not satisfy these conditions, thereby causing a delay in trains.

  In addition, the present inventor examined an automatic proposal function of an operation arrangement plan for returning the changed vehicle operation to the planned operation. As a result, although there are restrictions and conditions such as not causing suspension, the anchorage location (station) and the next sunrise departure location are the same, and performing the inspection within the number of return days, the number of target organization ( There are many operations). Therefore, it has been clarified that deriving a plan for organizing the operational return with a high degree of perfection requires a considerably long time even if a high-speed computer is used.

The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and the operation arrangement plan created when the operation arrangement plan for returning the changed vehicle operation to the planned operation is created after the recovery of the disturbed diagram. It is an object of the present invention to provide a vehicle operation work support apparatus capable of checking in advance whether there is any inappropriate content and showing the result.
Another object of the present invention is to make it possible to create an operation arrangement plan for returning a changed vehicle operation to a planned operation including the execution of a work inspection in a relatively short time after the recovery of a disturbed diagram. The object is to provide a vehicle operation work support apparatus.

In order to solve the above problems, the present invention provides:
A vehicle operation work support device that includes an arithmetic processing device and a storage device, and manages vehicle operation and work based on vehicle operation data stored in the storage device,
The arithmetic processing unit includes:
Based on the vehicle operation data stored in the storage device, vehicle operation inspection means for inspecting whether there is a violation of the set contents;
When a violation is detected by the vehicle operation inspection means, an error list output means for outputting the violation items in a list form;
Attention adding means for adding an alert to the item of violation of time limit among the violation items of the list output by the error list output means;
Bei to give a,
The vehicle operation data includes vehicle operation information and work plan information,
The work includes inspection work, cleaning work and waste disposal work,
The arithmetic processing unit includes work management means for managing the plan and execution of the work,
The work management means is configured such that the inspection work and the cleaning work are managed by a time limit in days, and the filth treatment work is managed by a driving distance of the vehicle .

According to the above configuration, when a violation is detected, the violation item is output in the form of a list, and a warning is added to the violation item of the output list in the list of violations. Therefore, even if an incorrect vehicle operation or work plan is made due to an input error or the like, an operation arrangement plan that can be easily noticed and can be reliably implemented can be created.
In addition, since the deadline management and the distance management are properly used, each work can be performed at an appropriate time according to the contents of the work, and it is possible to prevent unnecessary costs from being generated.

Preferably, the vehicle operation data includes vehicle operation information and work plan information,
The arithmetic processing unit includes:
Work result information storage means capable of storing work result information input from the outside in the storage device;
Work end determination means for reading out vehicle operation data and current work performance information from the storage device, and determining whether the work planned for the vehicle operation has ended a predetermined time before the vehicle operation start time;
The work end determination means is configured to include a warning output means for outputting a warning when it is determined that the work has not ended.
According to such a configuration, it is possible to reliably avoid an undesired situation in which a vehicle that has not been inspected is put into operation and operated.

Further, preferably, the work management means performs the organization of the operation table when the inspection work included in the basic vehicle operation data set in advance is not included in the changed vehicle operation data. It is configured to output a reminder for this.
According to this configuration, it is possible to reliably avoid a vehicle that has not been inspected according to the basic plan being put into operation and operated.

Preferably, the work management means is configured to set the inspection work for the composition with reference to the past performance and future operation schedule of the composition to be determined.
According to such a configuration, since the range of dates in which inspection work can be set is widened, a more flexible inspection work setting plan can be created. Therefore, it is possible to create an operation arrangement plan for returning to the planned operation including the execution of the work inspection in a relatively short time.

  According to the present invention, after preparing the operation arrangement plan for returning the changed vehicle operation to the planned operation after the recovery of the disturbed diagram, it is checked in advance whether the created operation arrangement plan is inappropriate. Thus, it is possible to realize a vehicle operation work support apparatus capable of showing the results. In addition, a vehicle operation work support device that can create an operation arrangement plan for returning the changed vehicle operation to the planned operation including the execution of the work inspection after the troubled schedule is restored. There is an effect that it can be realized.

It is a block diagram which shows an example of the vehicle operation work support apparatus which comprises the vehicle operation work support system of this embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the operation table screen in the vehicle operation work support apparatus of embodiment. FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of a dialog box displayed when an “operation batch input” function is selected on the operation table screen of FIG. 2 in the vehicle operation work support apparatus of the embodiment. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of an “error list display” sub-screen displayed when “error list display” is selected on the operation table screen of FIG. 2 in the vehicle operation work support apparatus of the embodiment. FIG. It is a flowchart which shows an example of the procedure of the check process of the work inspection plan by the work management part of the vehicle operation work support apparatus of embodiment. It is a flowchart which shows an example of the procedure of the check process of implementation / non-implementation of the work inspection by the work management part of the vehicle operation work support apparatus of embodiment. It is a flowchart which shows an example of the procedure of the operation organization process performed by the process execution control part of a vehicle operation work support apparatus. It is a flowchart which shows an example of the specific procedure of the operation arrangement plan creation process performed by step S5 of the operation arrangement process of FIG. FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of a dialog box displayed when an “operation organization automatic proposal” function is selected on the operation table screen of FIG. 2 in the vehicle operation work support apparatus of the embodiment. It is a flowchart which shows the procedure of the work inspection plan proposal process performed by the work inspection plan proposal part of a vehicle operation work support apparatus.

Hereinafter, embodiments of a vehicle operation work support system according to the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
FIG. 1 shows an example of a vehicle operation work support system according to this embodiment.
The vehicle operation work support apparatus 100 includes a processing execution control unit 110 configured by an arithmetic processing device such as a CPU (Central Processing Unit), and a storage device such as a ROM (Read Only Memory) and a RAM (Random Access Memory). A data storage unit 120, an input processing unit 131 that processes input from an input operation device such as a keyboard 141 and a mouse 142, a display processing unit 132 that displays an image on a display device 143 such as a liquid crystal panel, and data between them. The bus 133 is connected so as to be able to transmit and receive data. In the present embodiment, the vehicle operation work support apparatus 100, the input operation devices (141, 142), and the display device 143 constitute a vehicle operation work support system.

  In this embodiment, the process execution control unit 110 has an operation table editing processing unit 111 having a function of creating or changing an operation table based on vehicle operation data, and there is no inappropriate content such as a violation in the operation table. A vehicle operation inspection unit 112 having a function of checking and showing the result, an operation arrangement plan creating unit 113 having a function of creating and presenting an operation arrangement plan for returning the vehicle operation to the planned operation, a work inspection, a police inspection, etc. Are provided with functional units such as a work inspection and other work management unit 114 for managing the work plan and results.

The data storage unit 120 includes a program storage unit 121 that stores a vehicle operation rearrangement support program executed by the process execution control unit 110, a vehicle operation data storage unit 122 that stores vehicle operation data serving as a basis for vehicle operation, and a vehicle operation. An operation table data storage unit 123 that stores operation table data generated based on the data, a work result management data storage unit 124 that stores operation result data such as work inspections and alternating inspections assigned in the operation table, and the like are provided. It has been.
Here, the “work inspection” is an inspection performed in a short period of about every 2 to 6 days, and inspecting devices such as current collectors, carts, and brakes that are particularly indispensable for driving without removing the vehicle from operation. It is an inspection. “Alternative inspection” is performed at a longer cycle (for example, 30 days) than the industrial inspection, and is an inspection performed without disassembling the vehicle as in the industrial inspection. Done.

  The vehicle operation data is the daily operation schedule (train number, train type, destination, train number of the first half operation, second half of the train unit for all trains under management, that is, all trains belonging to the operation target vehicle base. This is a description of the train number of operation, arrival time at each station of the train, information on the departure time of the station, number of lines used, etc.) by the vehicle management planning system, which is a separate system from the vehicle operation business support system. Basic operation data is created and stored in advance in the vehicle operation data storage unit 122. Further, the vehicle operation changed from the planned operation when the train operation is disturbed is also stored in the vehicle operation data storage unit 122. In these operations, operations such as work inspection and police inspection are also assigned. Here, “knitting” means a combination of a plurality of vehicles, and a knitting number is given to distinguish them. The “train number” is a number assigned to distinguish trains on a timetable (diamond). The vehicle operation data stored in the vehicle operation data storage unit 122 includes basic operation data in which the rotation of each train is set, planned operation data (initial operation) in which a use schedule is set with a date, transportation disruption, and the like The changed operation data is stored in the memory without being overwritten.

FIG. 2 shows a configuration example of an operation table generated by the operation table editing processing unit 111 and a screen for displaying the table.
As shown in FIG. 2, in the operation table, the organization numbers A01, A02, A03... To be operated are sequentially described in the left vertical column, the dates are sequentially described in the upper horizontal column, and the vertical column. Operation numbers # 1, # 2, # 3,... Are described at positions (columns) where the column and the horizontal column intersect. Operation with a black circle (●) on the square means that work inspection is set on that day. FIG. 2 is a basic planned operation table. As can be seen from this figure, operation numbers # 1, # 2, # 3,... Assigned.

  In the upper part of the operation table display screen, a work menu column WMC is provided. In the work menu column WMC, “display switching” for switching to another display such as “operation diagram” or “operation sequence table” is provided. Functions such as button DB, “switch operation group” button GB for switching operation groups, “switch date” button CB for switching dates, “operation batch change”, “automatic operation proposal”, “error list display”, etc. A “function” button FB for selecting “” is provided.

Here, the “operation group” means a group in which the trains are classified according to the vehicle bases to which they belong (A vehicle base and B vehicle base, etc.) and vehicle types (5-car train or 10-car train, etc.). . In the basic setting (planned operation), the operation order is cyclically set for each operation group.
The functions that can be selected using the “Function” button FB include “Error List Display”, “Operation Batch Change” for inputting multiple operation changes at once, and train operation and work assignment. There are “operation work allocation”, “operation arrangement plan automatic proposal”, and “work inspection management” for managing the work inspection for each execution place on a daily basis. The “operation work assignment” function can assign work such as work inspection, alternation inspection, general cleaning, planned cleaning, filth removal, and other designated work in addition to changing the operation number.

FIG. 3 shows an example of an “operation change batch input screen” displayed when “operation batch change” is selected from the “function” button FB.
In this “Operation Change Batch Entry Screen”, while looking at the contents described in the operation plan from the transport instruction, enter the operation changes in the change input field TLC in sequence, and then click the “Register” button RB. The current state (operation results) after the change will be reflected in the system.
In addition, operations and work changes can be made individually by selecting “assign operation work” on the sub-screen displayed when the “function” button FB is clicked on the operation table screen of FIG. .
Then, the operation after the change input by the "operation batch change" function or the individual input function or the operation rearrangement plan created by the operation rearrangement plan preparation unit 116 is inspected for any inappropriate contents, and the result is obtained. The error list display function displays the error list.

FIG. 4 shows an example of an “error list display” sub-screen displayed when “error list display” is selected.
This “error list display” sub-screen is provided with a date button DSB for selecting a date and an error selection button ESB for selecting an error to be displayed. These buttons are operated by operating the mouse 142. Clicking and specifying the date and the item of the error to be displayed will display the errors detected in the error display field ELC below it in the form of a list.
The date button DSB and the error item selection button ESB can select “all” in addition to any date or error.

  In the present embodiment, the error items that can be inspected by the vehicle operation inspection unit 112 include whether or not there is an operation that has not yet been assigned to the composition (operation unallocated check), and operations that have been assigned to a plurality of compositions. Whether or not there is an illegal assignment operation such as assigning operations of different types of organization (operation appropriateness check), and whether or not an operation that cannot perform the specified work has been assigned (specified operation appropriateness check) ), Whether there is an operation that cannot be assigned continuously from the previous day's operation (operation connection check), whether the first half operation and the second half operation in the day can be replaced (front / back connection check), Whether the number of days of return has been exceeded (designated work regression check), or work has been assigned while the work inspection is planned for the specified operation (planned operation) Or (predetermined work not yet performed check), and the like or not assigned to the date on which act inspection has been continuous (handiwork inspection continuous check).

  Among these, in the specified work regression check, the number of days elapsed from the previous work execution date is counted, and in the case of 1 to 2 days before the cycle deadline, the color and organization of the error display location ELC in the error display field ELC Change the color of the display to yellow, for example, and display a weak warning (warning). If it is the day of the period deadline, change the color of the grid at the error display location or the color of the organization display to red A strong alert (alarm) is given by displaying. Further, in the operation table of FIG. 2, a warning may be displayed, for example, by adding an underline to the corresponding part. Furthermore, even if the work inspection is planned for two consecutive days for the same composition in the work inspection continuous check, a warning is displayed by changing the color of the grid or the composition number display color. .

“Error list display” includes, for example, a check process for checking whether there is a violation such as the above-mentioned unappropriated operation for the vehicle operation plan and a check process for checking whether there is an unset violation for the work inspection plan. After that, the process of creating an error message from the number of the organization that has been violated and the violation item, and the process of outputting those error messages in the form of a list as shown in the error display field ELC of FIG. Can be realized.
Since the vehicle operation work support apparatus 100 of the present embodiment has the “error list display” function as described above, it is possible to easily grasp inappropriate operation changes and work assignments.
In addition, as described above, the vehicle operation work support apparatus 100 according to the present embodiment includes an automatic operation organization proposal, and uses the check function to grasp improper operation changes and work assignments. It is possible to efficiently create an operation arrangement plan by appropriately setting conditions in the automatic arrangement proposal process. The operation organization automatic suggestion function will be described in detail later.

Next, details of the check processing function of the work inspection plan among the above check functions will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG.
The check process of the work inspection plan is a function for determining whether the work inspection plan registered in the vehicle operation data storage unit 122 is incomplete.
When the check process of the work inspection plan is started, as shown in FIG. 5, first, the original operation table data is read from the operation table data storage unit 123, and the date and time when the work inspection is planned is extracted (step). S11). Then, it is determined whether or not execution inspection is set at the planned date and time (step S12). Here, if it is determined that the execution of the work inspection is not set (No), the process proceeds to step S13, and an unset warning by warning display is performed. An unset warning can be performed, for example, by changing the color of the square corresponding to the day on which the work inspection is planned in the initial operation table to red or the like on the operation table display screen of FIG.

  On the other hand, if it is determined in step S12 that the execution of the operation inspection is set (Yes), the process proceeds to step S14, and it is determined whether the execution of the operation inspection is set for two or more consecutive days. Here, if it is determined that the execution of the work inspection is continuously set (Yes), the process proceeds to step S15, and a warning of incompatible setting by warning display is performed. The excessive plan setting warning can be performed, for example, by changing the color of the square corresponding to the day set continuously for two days or more to yellow or the like on the operation table display screen of FIG.

  If it is determined in step S14 that the execution of the operation inspection is not set for two or more consecutive days (No), the process proceeds to step S16, and whether or not the execution of the set operation inspection is valid. Judgment is made. Here, “the execution of the work inspection is appropriate” means, for example, that the number of trains that can be inspected in one day at the place where the execution of the work inspection is set (such as a detention line or a vehicle base) is not exceeded. The conditions such as can be considered. If it is determined in step S16 that the set work inspection execution is not valid (No), the process proceeds to step S17, and an erroneous setting warning by warning display is performed. Incorrect setting warning is performed, for example, by blinking the color of the square corresponding to the day on which an invalid inspection is set in the operation table on the operation table display screen of FIG. Can do.

  If it is determined in step S16 that the set work inspection execution is valid (Yes), the process proceeds to step S18, the previous work inspection execution date of the organization is confirmed, and the number of days elapsed from the previous execution date is calculated. To do. Then, in the next step S19, it is determined whether or not the number of days that have passed exceeds a predetermined number of regression days (for example, 6 days). Here, if it is determined that the number of days elapsed from the previous implementation date exceeds the number of days of regression (Yes), the process proceeds to step S60, and a violation setting warning is performed. This violation setting warning can be performed, for example, by blinking and displaying the color of the square corresponding to the day that is excessively set on the operation table display screen.

  If it is determined in step S19 that the number of days elapsed from the previous implementation date does not exceed the number of days of regression (No), the process proceeds to step S61, where it is determined whether or not the check has been completed for all work inspections in the operation table. If it is determined that the process is not completed (No), the process returns to step S11 and the above process is repeated. On the other hand, if it is determined in step S61 that all the work inspections have been checked (Yes), the process proceeds to the next step S62, and it is determined whether there is a form output request. If it is determined that there is a form output request (Yes), in the next step S63, for example, a form in which a work inspection execution plan is written on a day-by-day basis for each execution inspection place is created and output. Exit.

Next, a check function other than the check by the check function of the vehicle operation plan and the work inspection plan provided in the vehicle operation work support apparatus 100 of the present embodiment will be described.
The first check function is a check function for whether or not the work inspection is performed. This function can prevent the departure of the organization in which the work inspection is not performed even if it is a certain time before the scheduled departure time. it can.
Specifically, when the work inspection is completed, a work performance input function that inputs that the work has been completed, a timer function that measures the current time, and whether or not the work inspection has been completed a predetermined time before the scheduled departure time This function is provided in the work management unit 114 of the vehicle operation work support apparatus 100.

Of these, the work performance input function can be performed by clicking the “work performance management” button from the menu buttons displayed in the menu field of the home screen. In this embodiment, the “predetermined time” of the pre-departure check, that is, the timing for issuing an alarm can be arbitrarily set. Such a function can be made possible in, for example, “work performance management”. Further, as described above, the work plan can be made by the “operation work assignment” function in the “function” button FB.
Note that alerting (alarm) is performed, for example, by displaying a warning message in the notification column IFM provided in the menu column WMC of the operation table screen of FIG. 2 or by notifying an alarm sound from the speaker. Can do.

Next, the procedure of a check process for performing / not performing a work inspection by the work management unit 114 of the vehicle operation work support apparatus 100 will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG.
When the processing by the “work performance management” function is started, first, the organization to be departed after the work inspection is searched from the operation table data on the day (step S21). Next, the found organization number and departure time are read out (step S22). Subsequently, it is determined whether or not the current time has passed the departure time (step S23). If it is determined that the current time has passed the departure time (Yes), the process jumps to step S26, and if it is determined that the current time has not passed the departure time (No), the next step It progresses to S24 and the predetermined time before departure is read.

  Subsequently, it is determined whether or not the current time is before a predetermined time before departure (step S25). Then, if the current time is before the predetermined time before departure (Yes), the system waits as it is, and when the current time reaches the predetermined time before departure, the process proceeds to step S26 to read the work performance data, and the work inspection is performed. It is determined whether it has been completed (step S27). If it is determined that the work inspection has been performed (Yes), the process skips step S28 and ends. If it is determined that the work inspection has not been performed (No), the process proceeds to the next step S28, where an alarm is issued. And exit.

  Note that the processing of FIG. 6 can be periodically executed by a timer interrupt, for example. If it is determined in step S27 that the work inspection has not been performed (No), the process proceeds to the next step S28 to output an alarm. In such a case, the past performance of the organization is viewed. For example, when the last inspection date is 3 days or 4 days ago, and there is a relative margin, and when the operation after the next day is seen, there is a plan to stay in a place where the inspection can be done. It is also possible to make a decision to permit departure (do not issue an alarm).

  The second check function is a check function for the filth removal work set by the “operation work assignment” function. In the present embodiment, the filth removal operation is different from other operations such as work inspection and cleaning. Specifically, work inspection and cleaning are managed by the number of days, while filth removal is managed by the mileage of the vehicle. When the work limit distance (kilometer) is reached, a warning is displayed by changing the color of the grid or the composition number display on the day of the composition in the operation table. Note that the travel distance is not an actual measurement value by a meter, but if the travel section and route are known from the operation of the operation table, the distance between the stations is known in advance, and can be obtained by calculation.

In the industrial inspection, the number of days of recurrence (cycle) is determined by the rules, and since the vehicle is detained or traveled almost outdoors, dirt is generated regardless of the distance traveled, so inspection and cleaning (including car washing) are days While it is reasonable to manage the filth, the amount of filth is often determined by the travel time (travel distance) rather than the number of days. Therefore, as described above, the filth removal work is managed by the travel distance, so that it is possible to perform the work at an appropriate interval in accordance with the actual situation while suppressing generation of useless costs due to an excessive work plan.
Further, since the places where the filth removal work can be performed are limited, a warning (warning) may be displayed in consideration of the schedule in addition to the travel distance. Furthermore, it is possible to make a judgment in consideration of both the travel distance and the number of days and display a warning (warning).

Next, the operation organization automatic suggestion process by the process execution control unit 110 described above will be described with reference to the flowcharts of FIGS. Among these, FIG. 7 shows the overall flow of the operation organization automatic proposal, and FIG. 8 shows an example of a specific procedure of the “operation organization plan creation process” in FIG.
The operation arrangement plan creation process by the operation arrangement plan preparation unit 113 is displayed when the “function” button FB provided on the left side of the work menu column WMC on the operation table screen of FIG. This is a function that is executed by selecting "Automatic operation proposal" on the screen. When this “operation organization automatic proposal” is selected, for example, as shown in FIG. 9, a date designation button (b) for designating a date, a condition such as fixed operation, etc. are set or a set work has been set. A dialog box CNB including a check list field CLC for clearing the examination and an execution button (r) for giving an instruction to start processing is displayed.

  When the execution button (r) is clicked after the conditions are set in the dialog box CNB, the operation arrangement plan creation process is started. Before starting the operation arrangement plan creation process, a process for displaying the operation change batch input screen as shown in FIG. 3 and inputting the operation result using this screen to reflect the current state in the system ( Steps S1, S2) of FIG. 7 are performed. Here, the operation results (operation changes) are described in multiple arrangements (operation plan) sent by fax etc. from the transport order to return to normal train operation when a time disturbance occurs. It is contents.

The “collective input screen display” of step S1 in the flowchart of FIG. 7 is a sub-screen displayed when the “function” button FB provided on the left side of the work menu column WMC of the operation table screen of FIG. This is displayed by selecting "Operation batch input". FIG. 3 shows an example of the “operation change batch input screen”.
In this “Operation Change Batch Entry Screen”, while looking at the contents described in the operation plan from the transport instruction, enter the operation changes in the change input field TLC in sequence, and then click the “Register” button RB. The current state (operation results) after the change will be reflected in the system.

Thereafter, the process execution control unit 110 determines whether or not “operation organization automatic proposal” has been selected (step S3). If it is determined that the selection has been made (Yes), the process execution control unit 110 proceeds to step S4, and operation table data (plan operation and step After reading out the actual data (inputted in S2) from the storage unit 120, an operation arrangement plan creation process (step S5) by the operation arrangement plan preparation unit 113 is executed. At this time, the display of the dialog box CNB changes as shown in FIG.
Then, an operation table (FIG. 2) reflecting the created operation arrangement plan is displayed (step S6). The operation arrangement plan displayed at this time is not perfect and may be a state in which work inspection allocation and the like are not determined. In addition, when there is undecided or contradiction (inconsistency) or the like, for example, the color is changed or a predetermined mark is added and displayed, for example.

  After step S6, it is determined whether or not the condition change and execution button (r) have been clicked (step S7). If the condition change and execution button (r) have not been clicked (step S7: No) returns to step S5 and repeats the above process. On the other hand, if “Yes” is determined in step S7, the process proceeds to step S8 to determine whether the “confirm” button (s) or the “discard” button (t) is clicked, and the “confirm” button (s). When is clicked, the created operation arrangement plan data is stored in the storage unit 120 (step S9). If the “discard” button (t) is clicked, the created operation arrangement plan data is discarded and the process ends (step S10).

  FIG. 8 shows a specific procedure of “operation arrangement plan creation processing” in step S5 of FIG. In this “operation organizing plan creation process”, first, in the check list field CLC of the dialog box CNB of FIG. 9, whether or not to allocate the number of days to return the operation, whether to perform the work inspection, whether to assign the alternating inspection, etc. Conditions for executing the operation arrangement plan creation are set (step S51). When the execution button (r) is clicked after setting the conditions, if a check mark “v” is added to the “fixed operation” check box (e) in the check list field CLC, an alternate inspection is planned. Those whose operation cannot be changed due to restrictions such as being present are fixed (step S52).

Next, if a check mark is added to the “work inspection clear” check box (j) in the check list column CLC, the work inspection plan set at that time is temporarily discarded (step S53). Thereby, the restriction | limiting at the time of operation arrangement | positioning can be loosened.
Subsequently, when a check mark is added to the “operation assignment proposal” check box (k) in the check list column CLC, a process of assigning operations in order from the one with the lowest degree of freedom is performed (step S54). Specifically, for example, allocation of late operation with a low degree of freedom is performed first, and next day operation with a high degree of freedom is performed. In addition, it is decided to give priority to replacing the operation of the next day of the organization that exists in the same vehicle base during the nighttime staying hours, and then exists in the same place (vehicle base, detention line) in the same time zone in the daytime. Determine the replacement (replacement) of the operation of the organization to be performed.

After that, if the “predetermined” check box (o), which means the predetermined work inspection setting, is checked, for all operations that can be inspected with the basic settings of the work inspection plan, that is, the predetermined (basic operation) Setting of work inspection is performed (step S55). Then, if a check mark is added to the “Others” check box (p), which means a work inspection setting other than the predetermined work inspection setting, a regression error of the work inspection occurs except for the organization in which the predetermined work inspection is set. A process for allocating a work inspection to a possible interval is performed on the existing organization by looking at the interval time from entry to departure (step S56). At this time, it is determined whether or not work inspection is to be assigned by looking at the history of the organization and the subsequent operation. Specifically, for example, for a train with “pause” and “reserve” assigned, it is possible to assign a work inspection immediately before the stoppage even if the number of return days is exceeded. To make such settings.
Subsequently, it is checked whether there are undecided or inconsistent (inconsistent) items, and if they are extracted, an error list is created, and the color of the error display portion of the list is changed. In the operation table, a warning (warning) is displayed, for example, an underline is added to the corresponding part (step S57).

The above steps S51 to S56 can be skipped by unchecking the corresponding check boxes. In addition, the error list created in step S57 is displayed by clicking the “function” button FB in the work menu column on the operation table display screen of FIG. 2 to display the function and selecting “display error list”. Can be made.
Therefore, if the operation arrangement plan creation process is executed without adding a check mark to the “predetermined work inspection setting” check box (o), the operation inspection is set in the basic setting of the work inspection plan, that is, the predetermined (basic operation). If not, a warning message will be displayed.

  From the above description, it can be seen that the operation arrangement plan creation process in the present embodiment is a sequential process. By executing such a sequential operation arrangement plan creation process, it is possible to reduce the burden on the apparatus and to reduce the processing speed compared to a method in which a highly complete operation arrangement plan is proposed in a single process. Even a slow CPU can propose a satisfactory operation arrangement plan in a relatively short time. In addition, since an error list can be displayed, an operation arrangement plan without oversight can be obtained by setting conditions in consideration of errors and executing the proposal process again.

Next, the work inspection plan proposal function by the work management unit 114 will be described.
For example, on the display screen of the operation table in FIG. 2, the work inspection plan proposal is operated by operating the mouse 142 and placing the cursor on the “function” button FB on the leftmost side of the upper menu column. Clicking the button displays a sub-screen showing a list of selectable functions. Here, it can be configured to start by operating the mouse 142 and selecting “work inspection plan proposal”.

In this work inspection plan proposal process, as shown in FIG. 10, first, the work inspection results are read from the work result management data storage unit 124 (step S31). And the organization which has passed the predetermined number X (for example, the 6th day) from the implementation date of the last work inspection is extracted (Step S32).
Subsequently, the set “work inspection” is read from the vehicle operation data storage unit 122 (step S33). Then, it is determined whether the set “work inspection” is the work inspection set in the original initial operation plan (step S34). Here, if it is determined that the operation inspection of the initial operation plan is (Yes), the process proceeds to step S37. On the other hand, if it is determined in step S34 that it is not a work inspection of the initial operation plan (No), the process proceeds to step S35, where an interval in operation (long-term stop) is found, and the interval is determined from the entry time, departure time, etc. It is determined whether or not is the length of time (1 to 2 hours) in which the work inspection can be performed (step S36).

  If it is determined in step S36 that the work inspection cannot be performed (No), the process returns to step S35 to find the next process. If it is determined in step S36 that the work inspection can be performed (Yes), in the next step S37, “work inspection” is applied to the time. In addition, when there is no time itself or the time for the time is insufficient, the work inspection may be applied on the fifth day.

  Thereafter, it is determined whether or not the setting has been completed for all “work inspection” in the operation table (step S38). If it is determined that the settings for all the “work inspections” have not been completed (No), the process proceeds to step S39, and the “work inspection” to be determined is set to X-1 day from the previous work inspection (hereinafter, X -2 days, X-3 days...)), And then the process returns to step S33 and the above process is repeated. On the other hand, if it is determined in step S38 that the settings for all “work inspections” have been completed (Yes), the process proceeds to step S40, a work inspection plan proposal is created and output, and the process ends. In step S40, the output data is temporarily saved, and when the proposal is confirmed, it is officially saved and the process ends.

As described above, the vehicle operation work support apparatus according to the present embodiment has a function of automatically creating and outputting a work inspection plan proposal, and therefore, after the disrupted diamond recovers, The operational return to the planned operation including the plan can be completed in a short time.
In addition, the said work inspection plan proposal process can be performed by the manual input in an operation table | surface screen instead of making a vehicle operation work support apparatus propose. In that case, if work is assigned to a time other than the time determined in the basic operation, the vehicle operation work support apparatus checks, and if it is determined that the work is not in a workable time, it is determined as an error and a warning is displayed. However, in this state, if the vehicle operation work support apparatus is made to recognize that the work is available, for example, by changing the work time, the warning display is deleted. Thereby, it is possible to avoid erroneous work assignment.

  Further, after step S37 of the work inspection plan proposal process of FIG. 10, the basic plan operation is read from the vehicle operation data storage unit 122, and the maximum allowable number of “work inspection” has already been made on the day when it is attempted to apply in step S37. It may be determined whether or not it has been set, and if it has been set, a step of performing a warning of violation setting may be provided. As a result, it is possible to avoid setting a “work inspection” that is impossible or difficult to implement.

  Although the invention made by the present inventor has been specifically described based on the embodiment, the present invention is not limited to the embodiment. For example, in the above-described embodiment, the operation table edit processing unit 111, the vehicle operation inspection unit 112, the operation arrangement plan creation unit 113, and the work management unit 114 such as a work inspection are configured by one CPU. The unit may be composed of a plurality of CPUs.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 100 Vehicle operation work support apparatus 110 Processing execution control part 111 Operation table edit process part 112 Vehicle operation inspection part 113 Operation arrangement plan preparation part 114 Work management part such as work inspection 120 Data storage part 121 Vehicle operation work support program storage part 122 Vehicle operation Data storage unit 123 Operation table data storage unit 124 Work performance management data storage unit 143 Display device

Claims (4)

A vehicle operation work support device that includes an arithmetic processing device and a storage device, and manages vehicle operation and work based on vehicle operation data stored in the storage device,
The arithmetic processing unit includes:
Based on the vehicle operation data stored in the storage device, vehicle operation inspection means for inspecting whether there is a violation of the set contents;
When a violation is detected by the vehicle operation inspection means, an error list output means for outputting the violation items in a list form;
Attention adding means for adding an alert to the item of violation of time limit among the violation items of the list output by the error list output means;
Bei to give a,
The vehicle operation data includes vehicle operation information and work plan information,
The work includes inspection work, cleaning work and waste disposal work,
The arithmetic processing unit includes work management means for managing the plan and execution of the work,
The vehicle operation work support apparatus , wherein the work management means is configured to manage the inspection work and the cleaning work by a time limit in days, and to manage the waste disposal work by a driving distance of the vehicle. Before Symbol processing unit,
Work result information storage means capable of storing work result information input from the outside in the storage device;
Work end determination means for reading out vehicle operation data and current work performance information from the storage device, and determining whether the work planned for the vehicle operation has ended a predetermined time before the vehicle operation start time;
When the work end determination means determines that the work has not ended, a warning output means for outputting a warning,
The vehicle operation work support apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising: The work management means alerts the organization of the operation table when the inspection work included in the basic vehicle operation data set in advance is not included in the changed vehicle operation data. It is comprised so that it may output, The vehicle operation work support apparatus of Claim 1 or 2 characterized by the above-mentioned. The said work management means is comprised so that the setting of the test | inspection work with respect to the said composition may be performed with reference to the past performance of the composition used as judgment object, and a future operation plan . 4. The vehicle operation work support apparatus according to any one of 3 above.