JP6510724B1 - Distributable number determination device, distributable number determination method, distributable number determination program - Google Patents

Abstract

An apparatus for determining the number of deliverables for a job offer that is convenient for at least one of a delivery source company and a job seeker, a method for determining the number of deliverables and a program for determining the number of deliverables. According to one embodiment, there is provided an apparatus for determining the number of deliverables of job offer information to a registrant, wherein a company desiring delivery of the job offer information and a database in which the evaluation for the company is stored in association And a distributable number determining unit that determines the distributable number of the job offer information for each company according to the evaluation, and an allocating unit that allocates the distributable number determined by the distributable number determining unit to the company. And. [Selected figure] Figure 1

Description

  The present invention relates to an apparatus for determining the number of deliverables, a method for determining the number of deliverables, and a program for determining the number of deliverables, and more particularly to an apparatus for determining the number of deliverables regarding job openings, a method for determining the number of deliverables, and a program for determining the number of deliverables.

  Traditionally, companies such as companies use the newspaper, job posting magazine, web job posting information site, etc. to secure their jobs in order to secure human resources such as full-time employees, temporary workers, contract workers, part-time workers, etc. There is. For example, the job skill database is searched according to the individual skill data delivered by the job seeker, job jobs that meet the skill conditions are selected, and information on scheduled treatment separately set for those jobs is selected from the scheduled treatment database, Among the jobs that the list of payroll information described in the scheduled treatment is distributed to the job seekers and the skill conditions are met, the job offer that matches the desired treatment delivered by the job seeker and the scheduled treatment for the job offer There is a system in which detailed information about a narrowed job offer, which has been narrowed down, is distributed to job seekers as a search result.

  In addition, based on the job seeker's resume information, it is possible to narrow down the job offer that the job seeker's desired treatment and the job offer side's scheduled treatment match out of the jobs that the job seeker's skill conditions meet. Some job seekers who are engaged in work may not be able to grasp their professional aptitude, etc., and this is a factor in prolonging job seekers' activity and causing a mismatch between job vacancies and job seekers, so job seeker information on job seekers The first identification unit that analyzes the condition of job offer information for each job seeker, the second identification unit that analyzes the progress information of the job seeker's employment, and identifies the current employment status for each job seeker, The job seeker from among a plurality of job offer information based on the condition regarding job offer information for each job seeker identified by the first identification unit and the current employment status for each job seeker identified by the second identification unit Jobs matching to Job information delivery apparatus and a distribution unit for distributing distribution has been proposed (e.g., see Patent Document 1).

Unexamined-Japanese-Patent No. 2018-169869

  In the conventional job information distribution method, the number of job information distributions is determined according to the amount paid to a company that delivers job information (hereinafter, also referred to as a distribution source company), and basically, according to the number of distributions. The amount paid to companies that distribute job posting information is increasing. As described above, the conventional delivery of job offer information can deliver more job offer information according to the payment amount, and a delivery method that is advantageous for a company that can pay more for the cost of the job offer. It has become.

However, companies that can pay more for the job offer are not necessarily more comfortable companies, and companies that can not pay much for the cost for job offer but are highly regarded (for example, SMEs and venture companies) There are great companies. In the conventional delivery method, contact points between such a company and a delivery target person of job offer information (hereinafter, also referred to as job seeker) are reduced.
As described above, the conventional delivery method of job offer information has room for improvement for both the delivery source company delivering the job offer information and the job seeker who is the delivery target person of the job offer information.

  The present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and an apparatus for determining the number of deliverables of job offer information convenient for at least one of a delivery source company and a job seeker, a method of determining the number of deliverables, and a program for determining the number of deliverables. Intended to be provided.

  In order to solve the above problems, the deliverable number determination device of the present invention is a deliverable number determination device that determines the possible number of job information information for a registrant, and a company that wishes to distribute the job information, and the company And a distributable number determining unit that determines the distributable number of the job information for each company according to the evaluation by referring to a database stored in association with the evaluation on the And a granting unit for granting the available number of deliverables to the company.

  According to the above configuration, there is an advantage because the number of delivery of job information from companies with high evaluations increases. Therefore, the convenience of at least one of the delivery source company and the job seeker is improved.

  As described above, according to the present invention, the number of distribution of job offer information from companies with high evaluations increases. Therefore, it is possible to provide a distributable number determination device, a distributable number determination method, and a distributable number determination program for a job offer that is convenient for at least one of the delivery source company and the job seeker.

It is a schematic block diagram of the distributable number determination system which concerns on 1st Embodiment. It is a block diagram of the delivery possible number determination server (delivery possible number determination apparatus) which concerns on 1st Embodiment. It is an example of the database stored in the memory | storage device of the delivery possible number determination server which concerns on 1st Embodiment. It is a functional block diagram of the delivery possible number determination server concerning a 1st embodiment. It is a block diagram of the registrant terminal which concerns on 1st Embodiment. It is a functional block diagram of a registrant terminal concerning a 1st embodiment. It is a flowchart figure which shows an example of a process of the delivery possible number determination system which concerns on 1st Embodiment. It is a flowchart figure which shows an example of a process of the delivery possible number determination system which concerns on 1st Embodiment. It is a functional block diagram of the delivery possible number determination server concerning a 2nd embodiment. It is a flowchart figure which shows an example of a process of the delivery possible number determination system which concerns on 2nd Embodiment. It is a functional block diagram of the delivery possible number determination server concerning a 3rd embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the delivery number of the scout mail determined by the delivery possible number determination system which concerns on 3rd Embodiment. It is a flowchart figure which shows an example of a process of the number determination system of delivery possible concerning 3rd Embodiment.

  Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. In the following description, although the mode for determining the number of deliverable job information to registrants is described, the present invention is applied to the determination of the number of deliverables of information related to corporate activities such as press releases. It is a possible invention. In the following description, the registrant is a registrant who has performed only user registration, a registrant who has performed two user registration and company evaluation, a registrant who has performed two user registration and resume registration, and a user. Includes registrants who performed registration, company evaluation and resume registration.

First Embodiment
First, the configuration of the distributable number determination system 1 will be described with reference to FIG. The deliverable number determination system 1 has a configuration in which the deliverable number determination server 2 and the registrant terminal 3 are connected via the network 4. The number of deliverable number determination server 2 and the number of registrant terminals 3 included in the deliverable number determination system 1 are arbitrary. The network 4 may be configured by any communication network as long as the distributable number determination server 2 and the registrant terminal 3 can mutually communicate.

(Distributable number determination server 2)
The number-of-deliverable-number determination server 2 receives the evaluation for the company transmitted from the registrant terminal 3 and determines the number of possible distribution of job offer information (hereinafter also referred to as scout mail) for each company according to the received evaluation. . Further, the distributable number determination server 2 gives the determined distributable number to the company. The corporation can deliver the scout mail to the registrant U within the granted number of deliverables.

  FIG. 2A is a block diagram of the deliverable number determination server 2 according to the embodiment. FIG. 2A shows the main hardware configuration of the distributable number determination server 2, and the distributable number determination server 2 has a configuration in which a communication IF 200A, a storage device 200B and a CPU 200C are connected via a bus 200D. The distributable number determination server 2 may further include an input device such as a keyboard, a mouse, and a touch panel, and a display device such as a liquid crystal monitor and an organic EL monitor.

  The communication IF 200A is an interface for communicating with another device (in the present embodiment, the registrant terminal 3). The storage device 200B is, for example, an HDD (Hard Disk Drive) or a semiconductor storage device (SSD (Solid State Drive)). The details of the information stored in the storage device 200B will be described later. The CPU 200C controls the deliverable number determination server 2 according to the embodiment, and includes a ROM (Read Only Memory) and a RAM (Random Access Memory) not shown.

  In this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 2A, the distributable number determination server 2 is configured to include the storage device 200B, but another server connected to the distributable number determination server 2 via the network 4 is The configuration may include all or part of the storage device 200B. In this case, the deliverable number determination server 2 refers to the storage device 200B provided in another server. Further, it may be configured to be downloadable from another server connected to the distributable number determination server 2 via the network 4 and the distributable number determination program described later.

  FIG. 2B is an example of a database stored in the storage device 200B of the deliverable number determination server 2 according to the present embodiment. The storage device 200B stores a distributable number determination program, various databases (in the embodiment, a company DB1, a registrant DB2), and the like.

上記表１に示すように、企業ＤＢ１には、企業名、項目１から８の点数及び総評価の点数が、企業ごとに関連付けて格納されている。なお、本実施形態では、項目１から８の点数及び総評価の点数は５段階評価となっている。点数が５段階未満であると評価差がつけにくく、６段階以上になると選択肢が多くなり、評価を短時間に終えることが難しくなり、登録者Ｕの評価負担が増すためである。しかしながら、必ずしも、点数を５段階評価とする必要はない。 (Company DB 1)
Table 1 is a figure which shows an example of the information stored in company DB1.

As shown in Table 1 above, in the company DB 1, the company name, the score of items 1 to 8 and the score of the total evaluation are stored in association with each company. In the present embodiment, the scores of items 1 to 8 and the score of the total evaluation are five-level evaluation. If the score is less than 5 levels, it is difficult to make evaluation difference, and if 6 points or more, there are many options, it is difficult to finish the evaluation in a short time, and the burden of evaluation of the registrant U increases. However, the score does not necessarily have to be a five-point rating.

  Here, items 1 to 8 are items for evaluating a company, and for example, “satisfaction with satisfaction”, “morning of employees”, “goodness of ventilation”, “respect for employees”, “growth environment” , "Long-term training of human resources," "legal compliance awareness," "appropriate sense of personnel evaluation," and so on. The registrant U evaluates the above items 1 to 8 using the registrant terminal 3 so that the total evaluation is calculated by the distributable number determination server 2. In addition to the items shown in Table 1, the URL of the company HP, the address, the number of employees, and the like may be associated with each company name and stored in the company DB 1.

上記表２に示すように、登録者ＤＢ２には、本配信可能数決定システム１に登録している登録者Ｕの情報、例えば、氏名、連絡先（メールアドレスなど）、パスワード（ＰＷ）、生年月日、性別、現在の住まい（現住所）、キャリア（社会人、学生、その他（求職中）など）、職歴（現在及び過去の勤め先と部署、勤めた期間（何年何月から何年何月まで）など）、求人情報の希望の有無（スカウトメールの配信可能数決定希望の有無）、履歴書の情報などが登録者Ｕ毎に関連付けて格納されている。 (Registered person DB2)
Table 2 is a figure which shows an example of the information stored in registrant DB2.

As shown in Table 2 above, in the registrant DB 2, information of the registrant U registered in the present distributable number determination system 1, for example, name, contact address (e-mail address etc.), password (PW), birth year Date, gender, current residence (current address), career (employee, student, others (during job hunting), etc.), career (current and past work places and departments, working period (from what year to what year to what month) And so on), whether there is a request for job information (a request for determining the possible number of deliverables of scout mail), information on a resume, etc. are stored in association with each registrant U.

  In the present embodiment, the user information (hereinafter also referred to as first information) such as name, contact information, date of birth, gender, current address (prefecture), and the like, and career (employee, student, others (during job hunting) Entering work experience information (hereinafter referred to as second information) such as work history (current and past employees and departments, period of work (from what year to how many months), etc.) and resume The input of the information (hereinafter also referred to as third information) is separated from each other (details will be described with reference to FIG. 4A). In Table 2, although the three members of “Ichiro Tanaka”, “Taro Yamada”, and “Yuko Sato” are registered from the first information to the third information, only the first information is registered with the registrant U of this embodiment. The registrant U who has been registered, the registrant U who has registered the first information and the second information, the registrant U who has registered the first information and the third information, the first information to the third information There are four registrants U of registered registrants U.

  The items shown in Table 2 are merely examples, and items registered in association with each registrant U are not limited to those shown in Table 2. For example, if it is a member of society, the current annual income (10,000 yen), the number of experienced companies, the types of experience, years of experience, etc. may be registered as the first information. , Junior high school, high school etc.), school name, undergraduate department, department, literary division, graduation year, graduation division (prospective), etc. may be registered. In addition, as the second information, company name, company URL, employment form (full-time, temporary, part-time, etc.), enrollment period, whether or not currently enrolled, job description, English level (English examination grade, TOEIC Scores, TOEFL scores, etc., presence or absence of practical experience, other languages, experience work / skills, years of experience, qualifications, etc. may be registered. Note that part of the second information may be used as the third information, or part of the third information may be used as the second information.

  In addition, depending on the presence or absence of the job offer information, it may be configured to be able to select a company desired to be distributed (multiple selections are possible), and configured to be able to input desired conditions such as desired annual income and desired work location. It is also good.

  Note that the number-of-deliverable-number determination server 2 receives the company evaluation only from the registrant U who has experience working for a company. For example, when accepting the evaluation of the company A, the deliverable number determination server 2 receives the evaluation of the company A from the registrant U who is currently working at the company A or the registrant U who has worked in the past. Although the details will be described with reference to FIG. 4A, when the registrant U evaluates the company A, the registrant U is required to register information (second information) of the work experience of the company A. As a result, only the registrant U who has worked for a company can perform the company evaluation. It should be noted that, even if there is work experience of company B, the number-of-deliverable servers determination server 2 receives from registrant U whose service period of company B is too short (for example, registrant U whose service period is less than 3 months). The evaluation to company B may not be accepted.

  FIG. 2C is a functional block diagram of the deliverable number determination server 2 according to the embodiment. As shown in FIG. 2C, the deliverable number determination server 2 includes a storage control unit 201, a reception unit 202, an evaluation calculation unit 203, a deliverable number determination unit 204, and an assignment unit 205. The function shown in FIG. 2C is realized by the CPU 200C executing the distributable number determination program stored in the ROM (not shown) of the distributable number determination server 2.

  The storage control unit 201 controls the storage device 200B. Specifically, the storage control unit 201 writes and reads information in the storage device 200B, and updates the information stored in the company DB1 and the registrant DB2. More specifically, the storage control unit 201 stores the transmission information from the registrant terminal 3 received by the reception unit 202 described later in the company DB 1 and the registrant DB 2.

  The receiving unit 202 receives the information (the first information to the third information) of the registrant U transmitted from the registrant terminal 3 and information such as a company evaluation.

  The evaluation calculation unit 203 receives the score of the total evaluation of each company based on the evaluation of items received by the reception unit 202 and stored in the company DB 1 (specifically, the points 1 to 8 in Table 1). calculate. For example, the evaluation calculation unit 203 calculates, for each item, the average point of the scores of the items evaluated by the registrant U. Next, the evaluation calculation unit 203 adds up the score of each item, and then divides it by the number of items ("8" in the present embodiment) to calculate the score of the total evaluation of each company. The score of the total evaluation calculated by the evaluation calculation unit 203 is stored in the company DB 1.

  In addition, calculation of the score of the total evaluation of each company by the said evaluation calculation part 203 is an example to the last, and whether the registrant U who evaluated the company is still working in the evaluation object company, the length of a working period When working in the past, weighting may be performed on the score of each item evaluated by each registrant U according to the elapsed period from retirement (the elapsed period from the retirement date to the present).

For example, weighting may be performed as follows. By performing weighting as described below, it is possible to bring the score of evaluation closer to the current state of the company.
1. The evaluation of the registrant U who is still working at the company to which the evaluation is made weighs more than the evaluation of the registrant U who has worked in the past.
2. The weight of evaluation is weighted as the registrant U whose working period is longer.
3. In the evaluation of the registrant U who has worked in the past, the weight is weighted as the elapsed time from retirement is shorter.
The above is merely an example of weighting for the evaluation of the registrant U, and the present invention is not limited to the example described above, and weighting may be performed on the evaluation of the registrant U. For example, a registrant U who is still working at the evaluation target company but has a working period of four months, and has not been working at the evaluation target company even now (retirement), but the elapsed period from retirement is one month Within the case of the registrant U who has worked for a long time (for example, the working period of the registrant (more than four months)), the latter may be weighted.

  The deliverable number determination unit 204 determines the deliverable number of scout mails for each company according to the score of the total evaluation stored in the company DB 1. Specifically, when the total evaluation score is less than or equal to a predetermined score (for example, 3 or less), the deliverable number determination unit 204 makes the deliverable number of scout mail constant (for example, 50). If the score of the total evaluation exceeds a predetermined score (for example, more than 3 points), the number of deliverable scout mails is increased as the score of the total evaluation increases. If the number of deliverables of scout mail is increased as the score of total evaluation increases, the increase of the number of deliverables of scout mail may be increased by a linear function with respect to the increase of the score of total evaluation. It may be increased quadratically (if the increase in the number of deliverables of the scout mail can be increased with respect to the increase in the score of the total evaluation).

  The granting unit 205 grants the number of deliverables of the scout mail determined by the deliverable number determining unit 204 to the company. The corporation can deliver the scout mail to the registrant U within the granted number of deliverables. The number of deliverables given by the giving unit 205 may be displayed on the display device of the terminal of the company that wants to deliver the scout mail.

(Registerer terminal 3)
FIG. 3A is a block diagram of the registrant terminal 3. The registrant terminal 3 is, for example, a smartphone, a tablet terminal, a desktop PC, a notebook PC, or the like. FIG. 3A shows the main hardware configuration of the registrant terminal 3, and has a configuration in which a communication IF 300A, a storage device 300B, an input device 300C, a display device 300D and a CPU 300E are connected via a bus 300F.

  The communication IF 300A is an interface for communicating with another device (in the present embodiment, the number-of-delivery determination server 2). The storage device 300B is, for example, an HDD or a semiconductor storage device. The storage device 300 </ b> B stores a distribution number determination program of the registrant terminal 3.

  The input device 300C is, for example, a keyboard, a touch panel, a mouse, etc. The registrant U operates the input device 300C to obtain information necessary for operating the distributable number determination system 1 (for example, company evaluation shown in Table 1) , The registrant's information (from the first information to the third information) shown in Table 2 can be input. The display device 300D is, for example, a liquid crystal monitor or an organic EL monitor. The display device 300D displays a screen necessary for using the distributable number determination system 1 according to the present embodiment.

  The CPU 300E controls the registrant terminal 3 and includes a ROM (Read Only Memory) and a RAM (Random Access Memory) not shown.

  FIG. 3B is a functional block diagram of the registrant terminal 3 according to the embodiment. As shown in FIG. 3B, the registrant terminal 3 includes an input receiving unit 301, a display control unit 302, a transmitting unit 303, a receiving unit 304, and a storage control unit 305. The function shown in FIG. 3B is realized by the CPU 300E executing a distributable number determination program stored in the ROM (not shown) of the registrant terminal 3.

  The input receiving unit 301 receives an input of the information input by the input device 300C, for example, the company evaluation shown in Table 1 and the information (first to third information) of the registrant U shown in Table 2.

  The display control unit 302 controls the display device 300D. Specifically, the display control unit 302 causes the display device 300D to display an input screen of company evaluation and information of the registrant U (first to third information).

  The transmitting unit 303 transmits the company evaluation accepted by the input accepting unit 301, information of the registrant U (first to third information), and the like to the distributable number determining server 2.

  The receiving unit 304 receives the information transmitted from the distributable number determination server 2, for example, the information of the input screen.

  The storage control unit 305 controls the storage device 300B. Specifically, the storage control unit 305 controls the storage device 300B to write and read information.

(Operation of distribution possible number determination system 1)
FIG. 4A and FIG. 4B are flowcharts showing an example of processing of the distributable number determination system 1 according to the present embodiment. Hereinafter, processing of the number-of-deliverys possible determination system 1 according to the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIGS. 4A and 4B.

  First, the information registration process of the distributable number determination system 1 will be described with reference to FIG. 4A. In the information registration process of the present embodiment, a pattern for performing only user registration (first information registration), a pattern for performing user registration and company evaluation, user registration and resume (third information registration) There are two patterns of registration, and three patterns of user registration, company evaluation and resume registration. As described above, when performing company evaluation, the registrant U is required to register information on work experience (second information). The registration processing based on each pattern will be described below with reference to FIGS. 4A (a) to 4A (d). In the following description, the same steps will be assigned the same step numbers and redundant explanations will be omitted.

First, patterns for performing only user registration will be described with reference to FIG. 4A (a).
(Step S101)
First, the display control unit 302 of the registrant terminal 3 causes the display device 300D to display an input screen of the first information. When the registrant U operates the input device 300C of the registrant terminal 3 to input the first information, the input information is accepted by the input acceptance unit 301 of the registrant terminal 3 and distributed by the transmitting unit 303. It is transmitted to the possible number determination server 2.
The receiving unit 202 of the distributable number determination server 2 receives the first information transmitted from the registrant terminal 3. The storage control unit 201 of the distributable number determination server 2 stores the first information received by the receiving unit 202 in the registrant DB 2 of the storage device 200B of the distributable number determination server 2.

  Next, patterns for performing user registration and company evaluation will be described with reference to FIG. 4A (b). In addition, about the process of step S101, since it demonstrated by FIG. 4A (a), the overlapping description is abbreviate | omitted.

(Step S102)
The display control unit 302 of the registrant terminal 3 causes the display device 300D to display an input screen of the second information. When the registrant U operates the input device 300C of the registrant terminal 3 to input the second information, the input information is accepted by the input acceptance unit 301 of the registrant terminal 3 and distributed by the transmitting unit 303. It is transmitted to the possible number determination server 2. The reception unit 202 of the distributable number determination server 2 receives the second information transmitted from the registrant terminal 3. The storage control unit 201 of the distributable number determination server 2 stores the registrant information received by the receiving unit 202 in the registrant DB 2 of the storage device 200B of the distributable number determination server 2.
Regarding the second information, in order to prevent a person other than the work-experienced person from spoofing and registering information, a response is made such that a larger number of characters are entered or visual examination is performed, and the second information registered The legitimacy of may be secured.

(Step S103)
The display control unit 302 of the registrant terminal 3 causes the display device 300D to display the input screen of the company evaluation shown in Table 1. In addition, as already stated, the input screen of the company evaluation shown in Table 1 is displayed on the display device 300D of the registrant terminal 3 of the registrant U who has experience working for a company (registrant U who registered the second information) Be done. When the registrant U operates the input device 300C of the registrant terminal 3 to input a company evaluation, the input information is accepted by the input acceptance unit 301 of the registrant terminal 3 and then transmitted by the registrant terminal 3 It is transmitted to the distributable number determination server 2 by the unit 303.
The receiving unit 202 of the distributable number determination server 2 receives the company evaluation transmitted from the registrant terminal 3. The storage control unit 201 of the distributable number determination server 2 stores the company evaluation received by the receiving unit 202 of the distributable number determination server 2 in the company DB 1 of the storage device 200B of the distributable number determination server 2.

  The processes in steps S101 to S103 in FIG. 4A (b) need not be continued. For example, if the company evaluation is not performed immediately after the user registration, the process of step S101 may be performed first, and the processes of steps S102 and S103 may be performed several days or weeks later.

  Next, with reference to FIG. 4A (c), patterns for performing user registration and resume registration will be described. In addition, about the process of step S101, since it demonstrated by FIG. 4A (a), the overlapping description is abbreviate | omitted.

(Step S104)
The display control unit 302 of the registrant terminal 3 causes the display device 300D to display a resume input screen. When registrant U operates input device 300C of registrant terminal 3 to input each item of resume, the input information is accepted by input accepting portion 301 of registrant terminal 3, and then registrant terminal It is transmitted to the number-of-deliverable-number determination server 2 by the three transmission units 303.
The reception unit 202 of the distributable number determination server 2 receives the information of the resume transmitted from the registrant terminal 3. The storage control unit 201 of the distributable number determination server 2 stores the information of the resume received by the receiving unit 202 of the distributable number determination server 2 in the registrant DB 2 of the storage device 200B of the distributable number determination server 2.

  The processes in steps S101 and S104 of FIG. 4A (c) need not be performed continuously. For example, when registration of the resume is not performed immediately after user registration, the process of step S101 may be performed first, and the process of step S104 may be performed several days or several weeks later.

  Next, with reference to FIG. 4A (d), patterns for performing user registration, company evaluation, and registration of a resume will be described. The process of step S101 is described with FIG. 4A (a), the process of steps S102 and S103 is described with FIG. 4A (b), and the process of step S104 is described with FIG. 4A (c). Do. Also in FIG. 4A (d), it is not necessary to continue the processing of steps S101 to S104 as described in FIGS. 4A (b) and 4A (c).

  Next, the process of determining the number of deliverables of the system for determining the number of deliverables 1 will be described with reference to FIG. 4B.

(Step S201)
The evaluation calculation unit 203 of the distributable number determination server 2 receives the evaluation of the items received by the receiving unit 202 of the distributable number determination server 2 and stored in the company DB 1 (specifically, items 1 to 8 in Table 1). Based on the score), calculate the score of the total evaluation of each company. In addition, since the calculation method of the score of the total evaluation of each company by the evaluation calculation unit 203 of the number-of-deliverable-number determination server 2 has already been described, redundant description will be omitted.

(Step S202)
The distributable number determination unit 204 of the distributable number determination server 2 determines the distributable number of scout mails for each company according to the score of the total evaluation stored in the company DB 1. The method of determining the number of deliverables of scout mails of each company by the number-of-deliverables determining unit 204 has already been described, and therefore redundant description will be omitted.

(Step S203)
The granting unit 205 of the deliverable number determination server 2 grants the number of deliverables of the scout mail determined by the deliverable number decision unit 204 to the company. The corporation can deliver the scout mail to the registrant U within the granted number of deliverables. The number of deliverables given by the giving unit 205 may be displayed on the display device of the terminal of the company that wants to deliver the scout mail.

  As described above, the distributable number determination server 2 according to the present embodiment determines the distributable number of job information (scout mail). The number-of-deliverables determination server 2 refers to a database (company DB 1) in which a company desiring delivery of job information and an evaluation for a company are associated and stored, and for each company according to the evaluation (total evaluation score). And an assigner 205 which assigns the number of deliverables determined by the deliverable number determiner 204 to a company. The corporation can deliver the scout mail to the registrant U within the granted number of deliverables. Therefore, by increasing the number of deliverables of job information according to the evaluation for a company that wants to deliver job information, it is not possible to bear the cost incurred for the job so much, but it is a highly evaluated source company (for example, welfare The matching between job seekers and companies, small and medium enterprises, and venture companies that have a high level of welfare and high technology is enhanced. In addition, job seekers also benefit from increased recruitment information from companies with high ratings. As a result, the convenience for at least one of the delivery source company and the job seeker becomes high.

  Further, the distributable number determination unit 204 of the distributable number determination server 2 according to the present embodiment determines that the job offer information does not satisfy the predetermined condition (for example, the total evaluation score is 3 points or less). Let the number of deliverables of (scout mail) be a predetermined value (for example, 50). Small and medium-sized enterprises and newly established companies may not be evaluated. In such a case, it is conceivable that the company's overall rating is not scored. If the number of deliverable job offers is a value according to the evaluation, the above-mentioned small and medium-sized companies and companies that have just been established will not be able to deliver the job offer information, or the delivery count will be very small. . However, the distributable number determining unit 204 of the distributable number determining server 2 according to the present embodiment sets the distributable number of job information to a predetermined value when the evaluation does not satisfy the predetermined condition. SMEs and newly established companies can also deliver a certain number of job postings.

  Further, the distributable number determination unit 204 of the distributable number determination server 2 according to the present embodiment responds to the evaluation when the evaluation satisfies a predetermined condition (for example, when the total evaluation score exceeds 3 points) Change the available number of job postings. For example, when the score of total evaluation exceeds a predetermined score (for example, when it exceeds 3 points), the higher the number of deliverable job information as the score of total evaluation increases, the company with higher total evaluation gets more Many job offers can be distributed. Therefore, in order to increase the number of deliverable job information and increase contact points with job seekers, companies are motivated to improve working conditions, work environment, welfare programs, etc. in order to obtain better evaluation. It works. In addition, job seekers also benefit from increased recruitment information from companies with high ratings.

  Further, the evaluation calculation unit 203 of the distributable number determination server 2 according to the present embodiment receives the company evaluation only for the registrant U who has working experience in the company desiring to distribute the job information. That is, the evaluation of the company DB 1 is an evaluation by the registrant U who has work experience in a company that wants to distribute job information. Therefore, the score of the total evaluation calculated by the evaluation calculation unit 203 is an evaluation representing the actual situation of the company.

Second Embodiment
In the first embodiment, the embodiment has been described in which the number of deliverable scout mails is determined for each company according to the company evaluation by the registrant U. In the present embodiment, an embodiment will be described in which the number of deliverable scout mails is determined for each company according to the information (reply rate and the number of replies) regarding the reply to the scout mail delivered. In the following, a case will be described where the number of deliverable scout mails is determined for each company according to the company evaluation by the registrant U and the reply rate to the scout mail distributed. For this reason, although the unit of the information on the reply is "%", the number of deliverable number of scout mails is determined for each company according to the company evaluation by the registrant U and the number of replies to the scout mail distributed. , The unit of information on reply is "Tsu" or "Turn". Moreover, in the following description, the description which overlaps description about the same structure as the delivery possible number determination system 1 which concerns on 1st Embodiment is abbreviate | omitted.

上記表３に示すように、本実施形態では、企業ＤＢ１には、企業名及び返信に関する情報が、企業ごとに関連付けて格納されている。なお、本実施形態では、返信に関する情報がスカウトメールに対する返信率である場合について説明する。このため、以下の説明では、返信に関する情報をスカウトメールに対する返信率という。 (Company DB 1)
Table 3 is a figure which shows an example of the information memorize | stored in company DB1 of the memory | storage device 200B of the delivery possible number determination server 2 which concerns on this embodiment.

As shown in Table 3 above, in the present embodiment, the company DB 1 stores information on a company name and a reply in association with each company. In the present embodiment, a case will be described where the information on the reply is the reply rate to the scout mail. For this reason, in the following description, information on replies is referred to as a reply rate to the scout mail.

  FIG. 5 is a functional block diagram of the distributable number determination server 2 according to the present embodiment. As shown in FIG. 5, the distributable number determination server 2 includes a storage control unit 201, a reception unit 202, a distributable number determination unit 204, an assignment unit 205, a reply rate calculation unit 206, and a determination unit 207. The configuration other than the distributable number determination unit 204, the reply rate calculation unit 206, and the determination unit 207 is the same as the distributable number determination server 2 according to the first embodiment described with reference to FIG. I omit explanation

  The reply rate calculation unit 206 calculates the reply rate to the scout mail distributed by the distribution source company. Specifically, the reply rate calculation unit 206 calculates a value (%) obtained by dividing the number of replies to the scout mail distributed by the distribution source company by the number of scout mails distributed. The reply rate for the scout mail calculated by the reply rate calculation unit 206 is stored in the company DB 1 as information on the reply. The number of replies to the scout mail may be counted as the number of replies in a predetermined number of days (for example, 30 days) from the date of delivery of the scout mail.

  The deliverable number determination unit 204 determines the deliverable number of scout mails for each company according to the reply rate to the scout mails stored in the company DB 1. Specifically, when the reply rate to the scout mail is equal to or less than a predetermined value (for example, 5% or less), the deliverable number determination unit 204 sets the number of deliverables of the scout mail to be constant (for example, 50). If the response rate for scout emails exceeds a predetermined value (for example, exceeds 5%), the number of deliverables of scout emails is increased as the response rate for scout emails increases. If the number of deliverables of scout mails is increased as the response rate to scout mails increases, the increase of the number of deliverables of scout mails is linearly increased with respect to the increase of the response rate to scout mails. It is also possible to increase the number of deliverables of the scout mails with respect to the increase of the response rate to the scout mails.

  The determination unit 207 determines whether or not the company that is to deliver the scout email has delivered the scout email in the past. For example, the delivery history of the scout mail is stored in the storage device 200B, and the determination unit 207 refers to the delivery history of the scout mail, and a company trying to deliver the scout mail has delivered the scout mail in the past. It can be determined whether or not. Note that the delivery history of the scout mail is stored in another server connected to the deliverable number determination server 2 via the network 4, and the determination unit 207 stores the delivery history of the scout mail stored in the other server. You may be comprised so that reference is possible.

  In the present embodiment, the deliverable number determination unit 204 determines the deliverable number of scout emails for each company according to the response rate for scout emails, but delivery is possible according to the number of replies for scout emails. The number may be determined, or the deliverable number may be determined according to both the response rate and the number of responses to the scout mail.

  In addition, if the content of the response to the scout mail is negative (for example, a response that indicates dissatisfaction with regard to employment conditions) and if it is positive (for example, a response for the content applied for the scout mail), The number of deliverables may be changed. For example, even if the response rate for scout emails is the same, if the number of negative responses to scout emails exceeds a certain number, the number of deliverables of scout emails calculated from the response rates is reduced, and scout emails If the number of positive responses to the message exceeds a certain number, the number of deliverables of the scout mail calculated from the response rate may be increased.

  In addition, various methods can be used as a method of determining whether the content of the reply to the scout mail is negative or positive. For example, a word is extracted from a sentence described in the contents of a response to a scout mail by morphological analysis, and the extracted word is a dictionary in which information as to whether it is negative or positive in advance is tagged with each word By checking, it is possible to determine whether the content of the reply to the scout mail is negative or positive. At this time, if the number of negative words (Nn) included in the contents of the reply to the scout mail is larger than the number of positive (Np) words (Nn> Np), the contents of the reply to the scout mail is negative and the reply to the scout mail If the number of negative words (Nn) included in the content of is smaller than the number of positive (Np) words (Np> Nn), the content of the reply to the scout mail may be determined as positive.

  Further, the number of deliverable scout mails may be changed according to the reply time for scout mail (the time from delivery of the scout mail to reception of the reply to the scout mail). For example, even if the response rate to the scout mail is the same, if the response time to the scout mail is short, there is a high possibility that the registrant U favors the scout mail. Therefore, if the number of replies to scout emails exceeds a predetermined number (for example, 48 hours), the number of deliverables of scout emails calculated from the reply rate is reduced, and the response time to scout emails is reduced. If the number of things that are less than a predetermined time (for example, 48 hours) exceeds a certain number, the number of deliverable scout mails calculated from the reply rate may be increased.

(Operation of distribution possible number determination system 1)
FIG. 6 is a flow chart diagram showing an example of the processing of the number-of-distributables determination system 1 according to the present embodiment. Hereinafter, processing of the distributable number determination system 1 according to the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. The registration process of the first information of the distributable number determination system 1 according to the present embodiment is the registration process of the distributable number determination system 1 according to the first embodiment described with reference to FIG. 4A (a) Since the process is the same as step S101), the description will not be repeated.

(Step S301)
The determination unit 207 determines whether or not the company that is to deliver the scout email has delivered the scout email in the past. If the company that intends to deliver the scout email has not delivered the scout email in the past (NO), the deliverable number determination server 2 moves on to the process of step S302 and the enterprise that tries to deliver the scout email in the past If the scout mail has been distributed to (YES), the process proceeds to step S303.

(Step S302)
If you have not delivered Scout Mail in the past, the response rate for Scout Mail is zero. Therefore, the deliverable number determination unit 204 determines that the number of deliverable scout mails is constant (for example, 50).

(Step S303)
If the scout mail has been delivered in the past, the reply rate calculation unit 206 calculates the reply rate for the scout mail delivered by the delivery source company. The method of calculating the response rate to the scout mail by the response rate calculation unit 206 has already been described, and thus redundant description will be omitted. The response rate to the scout mail calculated by the response rate calculation unit 206 is stored by the storage control unit 201 in the company DB 1 as information on the response.

(Step S304)
The deliverable number determination unit 204 determines the deliverable number of scout mails for each company according to the reply rate to the scout mails stored in the company DB 1. The method of determining the number of deliverables of scout mails of each company by the number-of-deliverables determining unit 204 has already been described, and therefore redundant description will be omitted.

(Step S305)
In step S302 or step S304, the giving unit 205 gives the company the number of deliverable scout mails determined by the possible number of deliverables determining unit 204. The corporation can deliver the scout mail to the registrant U within the granted number of deliverables. The number of deliverables given by the giving unit 205 may be displayed on the display device of the terminal of the company that wants to deliver the scout mail.

  As described above, the distributable number determination server 2 according to the present embodiment determines the distributable number of job information (scout mail). The number-of-deliverables determination server 2 refers to a database (company DB 1) in which a company desiring to distribute job information and a response rate to a scout email to a job information are stored in association with each other. The apparatus further includes a distributable number determining unit 204 that determines the distributable number of job information information for each company, and an assigning unit 205 that assigns the distributable number determined by the distributable number determining unit 204 to the company. The corporation can deliver the scout mail to the registrant U within the granted number of deliverables. Therefore, by increasing the number of deliverables of job information according to the response rate to scout emails to companies that wish to deliver job information, it is not possible to bear so much cost for job postings, but the response rate for scout emails The matching between job seekers is enhanced with high-source companies (for example, companies with welfare benefits, high technology capabilities, and small and medium-sized venture companies). In addition, job seekers also benefit from increased recruitment information from companies that have a high response rate to scout emails. As a result, the convenience for at least one of the delivery source company and the job seeker becomes high.

  Further, the deliverable number determination unit 204 of the deliverable number determination server 2 according to the present embodiment determines that the reply rate for the scout mail does not satisfy the predetermined condition (for example, the reply rate for the scout mail is 5% or less In the case (a), let the number of deliverables of the job information (the scout mail) be a predetermined value (for example, 50). As a result, companies that are new to Scoutmail distribution and companies that have just been established can distribute a certain number of job information.

  Further, the deliverable number determination unit 204 of the deliverable number determination server 2 according to the present embodiment determines that the reply rate for the scout mail satisfies a predetermined condition (for example, the reply rate for the scout mail exceeds 5%) ), Change the number of deliverable job offers according to the response rate to scout emails. For example, when the response rate for scout emails exceeds a predetermined value (for example, exceeds 5%), the response rate for scout emails can be increased by increasing the number of deliverable job information as the response rate for scout emails increases. Higher companies can deliver more job offers. Therefore, companies are motivated to obtain a better response rate to scout mail in order to increase the number of deliverable job information and increase contact points with job seekers. Also for job seekers, there is an advantage because job offer information from companies with high response rates to other job seekers' scout emails (eg, companies with good hiring conditions, companies with high attention, etc.) increases.

Third Embodiment
In the first embodiment, the embodiment has been described in which the number of deliverable scout mails is determined for each company according to the company evaluation by the registrant U. In the second embodiment, the embodiment has been described in which the number of deliverable scout mails is determined for each company according to the information (reply rate and the number of replies) regarding the reply to the scout mail delivered. In this embodiment, an embodiment will be described in which the number of possible deliverables of scout mail is determined for each company in accordance with company evaluation by the registrant U and information (reply rate and the number of replies) related to the reply of the scout mail distributed. In the following description, the description of the same configuration as the deliverable number determination system 1 according to the first and second embodiments will not be repeated. In the following, the case where the number of deliverable scout mails is determined for each company is described according to the company evaluation by the registrant U and the “reply rate” for the scout mail delivered. For this reason, although the unit of the information on the reply is "%", the number of deliverable number of scout mails is determined for each company according to the company evaluation by the registrant U and the number of replies to the scout mail distributed. , The unit of information on reply is "Tsu" or "Turn".

なお、上記表４に示す各項目については、第１，第２実施形態で説明しているので重複する説明を省略する。 (Company DB 1)
Table 4 is a figure which shows an example of the information memorize | stored in company DB1 of the memory | storage device 200B of the delivery possible number determination server 2 which concerns on this embodiment.

In addition, about each item shown in the said Table 4, since it is demonstrating by 1st, 2nd embodiment, the overlapping description is abbreviate | omitted.

  FIG. 7 is a functional block diagram of the deliverable number determination server 2 according to the present embodiment. As shown in FIG. 7, the distributable number determination server 2 includes a storage control unit 201, a reception unit 202, an evaluation calculation unit 203, a distributable number determination unit 204, an assignment unit 205, a reply rate calculation unit 206, and a determination unit 207. Have. The configuration other than the distributable number determining unit 204 is the same as the distributable number determining server 2 according to the first and second embodiments described with reference to FIG. 2C and FIG.

  The number-of-deliverable-number determining unit 204 determines the information about the score of total evaluation and the reply stored in the company DB 1 (note that, as described above, in the present embodiment, the information about the reply is the reply rate to the scout mail) In the following description, the number of deliverables of scout mail is determined for each company according to the information on the reply as the response rate to the scout mail). Specifically, when the total evaluation score is less than or equal to a predetermined score (for example, 3 or less), the deliverable number determination unit 204 makes the deliverable number of scout mail constant (for example, 50). If the total evaluation score exceeds the predetermined score (for example, more than 3 points), the number of deliverable scout mails is increased in proportion to the increase in the total evaluation score. Also, the deliverable number determination unit 204 increases the deliverable number of scout mail in proportion to the increase in the response rate to the scout mail. That is, the distributable number determination unit 204 adds the distributable number determined by the response rate to the scout mail to the distributable number determined by the total evaluation score.

  FIG. 8 is a view showing an example of the number of deliverables of the scout mail determined by the deliverable number determining unit 204 of the available number determining system 1 according to the present embodiment. In FIG. 8, the X-axis indicates the total evaluation score (3 to 5), the Y-axis indicates the response rate for scout mail (%), and the Z-axis indicates the number of deliverable scout mails.

  In the example shown in FIG. 8, the deliverable number determination unit 204 makes the deliverable number of scout mails constant if the total evaluation score is 3 points or less. The deliverable number determination unit 204 increases the deliverable number of scout mails in proportion to an increase in the score of the total evaluation when the score of the total evaluation exceeds 3 points (see the X-axis). Also, the deliverable number determination unit 204 increases the deliverable number of scout mails in proportion to the increase in the response rate to the scout mails (see Y axis). That is, in this embodiment, when the score of the total evaluation is 3 points or less, the number of deliverables of the scout mail by the total rating is constant, and the number of deliverables of the scout mail is proportional to the increase of the reply rate to the scout mail. If the score of the total evaluation exceeds 3 points, the number of deliverables of scout mail increases in proportion to the increase of the score of the total evaluation and the reply rate to the scout mail.

  When the number of deliverable number of scout mails is increased in proportion to the increase of the score of the total evaluation and the reply rate to the scout mail, the increase amount of the deliverable number of scout mails is 1 for the increase of the score of the total evaluation. It may be increased in the following function or may be increased quadratically (the increase in the deliverable number of the scout mail may be increased with respect to the increase in the total evaluation). Also, the increase in the number of deliverables of scout mail may be increased linearly or quadratically with respect to the increase in the rate of response to scout mail (the response to scout mail may be returned) The increase in deliverable number of scout emails should increase with the increase in rate). Alternatively, either one of the increase in the score of the total evaluation or the increase in the response rate to the scout mail may be increased linearly and the other may be increased quadratically.

(Operation of distribution possible number determination system 1)
FIG. 9 is a flow chart diagram showing an example of the processing of the number-of-deliverables determination system 1 according to the present embodiment. Hereinafter, processing of the distributable number determination system 1 according to the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. Regarding the registration processing of the first information of the distributable number determination system 1 according to the present embodiment and the registration processing of the company evaluation, the distributable number determination according to the first embodiment described with reference to FIG. 4A (a) The registration process of the system 1 (step S101) and the company evaluation (step S102) described with reference to FIG.

(Step S401)
The determination unit 207 of the deliverable number determination server 2 determines whether or not the company attempting to deliver the scout mail has delivered the scout mail in the past. If the company that intends to deliver the scout mail has not delivered the scout mail in the past (NO), the deliverable number determination server 2 moves on to the process of step S402, and the company that tries to deliver the scout mail in the past If the scout mail has been distributed to (YES), the process proceeds to step S404.

(Step S402)
The evaluation calculation unit 203 receives the score of the total evaluation of each company based on the evaluation of items received by the reception unit 202 and stored in the company DB 1 (specifically, the points 1 to 8 in Table 1). calculate. The method of calculating the score of the total evaluation of each company by the evaluation calculation unit 203 has already been described, and thus the redundant description will be omitted.

(Step S403)
The deliverable number determination unit 204 determines the deliverable number of scout mails for each company according to the score of the total evaluation stored in the company DB 1. Since the deliverable number determination unit 204 has not delivered the scout mail in the past, the deliverable number determination unit 204 determines the deliverable number of the scout mail, assuming that the response rate to the scout mail is zero.

(Step S404)
The evaluation calculation unit 203 receives the score of the total evaluation of each company based on the evaluation of items received by the reception unit 202 and stored in the company DB 1 (specifically, the points 1 to 8 in Table 1). calculate. The method of calculating the score of the total evaluation of each company by the evaluation calculation unit 203 has already been described, and thus the redundant description will be omitted.

(Step S405)
The reply rate calculation unit 206 calculates the reply rate to the scout mail distributed by the distribution source company. The method of calculating the response rate to the scout mail by the response rate calculation unit 206 has already been described, and thus redundant description will be omitted. The response rate to the scout mail calculated by the response rate calculation unit 206 is stored by the storage control unit 201 in the company DB 1 as information on the response.

(Step S406)
The deliverable number determination unit 204 determines the deliverable number of scout mails for each company according to the score of the total evaluation and the reply rate to the scout mail stored in the company DB 1. The method of determining the number of deliverables of scout mails of each company by the number-of-deliverables determining unit 204 has already been described, and therefore redundant description will be omitted.

(Step S407)
In step S403 or step S406, the granting unit 205 grants the number of deliverables of the scout mail determined by the available number of deliverables determining unit 204 to the company of the scout mail. The corporation can deliver the scout mail to the registrant U within the granted number of deliverables. The number of deliverables given by the giving unit 205 may be displayed on the display device of the terminal of the company that wants to deliver the scout mail.

  As described above, the distributable number determination server 2 according to the present embodiment determines the distributable number of job information (scout mail). The number-of-deliverables determination server 2 is a database in which a company desiring delivery of job information, an evaluation (total evaluation score) for the company, and a response rate to a scout email distributed by the company in association with each other The number of deliverables determined by the number of deliverables determination unit 204 which determines the number of available job information for each company according to the response rate to evaluation and scout mail with reference to DB 1), and the number of deliverables determined by the number of deliverables determination 204 And a grant unit 205 for granting to a scout mail company.

  The corporation can deliver the scout mail to the registrant U within the granted number of deliverables. As a result, the number of deliverable job information can be increased according to the evaluation for the company that wishes to deliver the job information and the response rate to the scout email, and it is not possible to bear the cost for the job so much. It increases matching between job seekers with delivery source companies that have a high response rate to e-mail (for example, companies that have a good welfare, high technology, and small and medium enterprises, and venture companies). In addition, job seekers also benefit from increased recruitment information from companies with high ratings. As a result, the convenience for at least one of the delivery source company and the job seeker becomes high.

  Further, the distributable number determination unit 204 of the distributable number determination server 2 according to the present embodiment determines that the job offer information does not satisfy the predetermined condition (for example, the total evaluation score is 3 points or less). Let the number of deliverables of (scout mail) be a predetermined value (for example, 50). Small and medium-sized enterprises and newly established companies may not be evaluated. In such a case, it may be considered that the company's total rating is not scored. If the number of deliverable job offers is a value according to the evaluation, the above-mentioned small and medium-sized companies and companies that have just been established will not be able to deliver the job offer information, or the delivery count will be very small. Because there is no point in distributing job information in practice. As described above, the distributable number determining unit 204 of the distributable number determining server 2 according to the present embodiment sets the distributable number of job information to a predetermined value when the evaluation does not satisfy the predetermined condition. Even small businesses like the ones mentioned above and companies that have just been established can deliver a certain number of job information.

  Further, the distributable number determination unit 204 of the distributable number determination server 2 according to the present embodiment responds to the evaluation when the evaluation satisfies a predetermined condition (for example, when the total evaluation score exceeds 3 points) Change the available number of job postings. For example, when the score of total evaluation exceeds a predetermined score (for example, when it exceeds 3 points), the higher the number of deliverable job information as the score of total evaluation increases, the company with higher total evaluation gets more Many job offers can be distributed. Therefore, in order to increase the number of deliverable job information and increase contact points with job seekers, companies are motivated to improve working conditions, work environment, welfare programs, etc. in order to obtain better evaluation. It works. In addition, job seekers also benefit from increased recruitment information from companies with high ratings.

  Further, the distributable number determination unit 204 of the distributable number determination server 2 according to the present embodiment changes the distributable number of job information in accordance with the response rate to the scout mail. Specifically, the distributable number determination unit 204 increases the distributable number of the job information according to the response rate to the scout mail to the distributable number of the job information determined by the score of the total evaluation. That is, by increasing the number of deliverable job information as the response rate to the scout mail increases, a company having a higher response rate to the scout mail can deliver more job information. Therefore, companies are motivated to obtain a better response rate to scout mail in order to increase the number of deliverable job information and increase contact points with job seekers. Also for job seekers, there is an advantage because job offer information from companies with high response rates to other job seekers' scout emails (eg, companies with good hiring conditions, companies with high attention, etc.) increases.

  In addition, the evaluation calculation unit 203 of the distributable number determination server 2 according to the present embodiment receives an evaluation to the company only for the registrant U who has working experience in the company desiring to distribute the job information. That is, the evaluation of the company DB 1 is an evaluation by the registrant U who has work experience in a company that wants to distribute job information. Therefore, the score of the total evaluation calculated by the evaluation calculation unit 203 is an evaluation representing the actual situation.

  Further, in the above embodiment, the distributable number determination unit 204 determines the distributable number of scout mails according to the total evaluation score stored in the company DB 1, but the evaluation of each item is not the total evaluation. The number of deliverable scout mails may be determined according to the score of. If configured in this way, for example, for a registrant who wishes to find a job at a company with a high degree of satisfaction with the treatment side, only the score of the item of the degree of satisfaction with the treatment side is high. Even more scout emails can be delivered. In addition, the items of “Employee morale”, “Good openness”, “Employee's mutual respect”, “Growing environment”, “Human resource development for a long time”, “Law on compliance”, “Employee evaluation” Similarly, more scout emails can be distributed to registrants wishing to find a job at a company with a high rating for the item, even if the score for the item only is high.

  As described above, the present invention provides a distributable number determination device, a distributable number determination method, and a distributable number determination program for a job offer that is convenient for at least one of a delivery source company and a job seeker.

1 distribution possible number determination system 2 distribution possible number determination server 3 registrant terminal 4 network 200A communication IF
200B Storage device (company DB1 and registrant DB2)
200C CPU
200D bus (BUS)
201 storage control unit 202 reception unit 203 evaluation calculation unit 204 distribution possible number determination unit 205 assignment unit 206 reply rate calculation unit 207 determination unit 300A communication IF
300B storage device 300C input device 300D display device 300E CPU
300F bus (BUS)
301 input reception unit 302 display control unit 303 transmission unit 304 reception unit 305 storage control unit U registrant

Claims (21)

A distributable number determining device for determining the distributable number of job information to registrants, comprising:
The number of deliverable numbers for determining the number of deliverables of the job information for each of the companies by referring to a database in which a company desiring distribution of the job information and an evaluation for the company are stored in association with each other. The decision unit,
And a granting unit for granting the number of deliverables determined by the deliverable number determination unit to the company ,
The distributable number determination unit, distributable number determination device according to claim Rukoto increase the distributable number of the jobs in accordance with the evaluation. The deliverable number determining unit is
The apparatus for determining the number of deliverables according to claim 1, wherein the number of deliverables of the job offer information is set to a predetermined value when the evaluation does not satisfy a predetermined condition. The deliverable number determining unit is
The apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the number of deliverables of the job offer information is increased according to the evaluation when the evaluation satisfies a predetermined condition. The evaluation is represented by a score given by the registrant,
The predetermined condition is
It is whether it is whether the said score exceeds a threshold value, The delivery possible number determination apparatus of Claim 2 or Claim 3 characterized by the above-mentioned. Determining the number of deliverables of job information to registrants
The deliverable number determination unit refers to a database in which a company desiring delivery of the job offer information and an evaluation on the company are associated with each other, and the job offer information can be distributed for each company according to the evaluation. Determining the number,
Imparting section, have a, a step of applying to said company the distributable number determined by the distributable number determination unit,
The distributable number determination unit, distributable number determination method according to claim Rukoto increase the distributable number of the jobs in accordance with the evaluation. It is a distributable number determination program that determines the distributable number of job information to registrants, and
Computer,
The number of deliverable numbers for determining the number of deliverables of the job information for each of the companies by referring to a database in which a company desiring distribution of the job information and an evaluation for the company are stored in association with each other. Decision department,
Allowing the number of deliverables determined by the number-of-deliverables determination unit to function as a granting unit for giving the company,
The distributable number determination unit, distributable number determination program characterized Rukoto to function to increase the distributable number of the jobs in accordance with the evaluation. A distributable number determining device for determining the distributable number of job information to registrants, comprising:
Referring to a database in which a company desiring delivery of the job offer information and information related to a reply to the job offer information distributed by the company in the past is referred to, and according to the information on the reply, A deliverable number determination unit that determines the deliverable number of the job information;
And a granting unit for granting the number of deliverables determined by the deliverable number determination unit to the company ,
The distributable number determination unit, distributable number determination device according to claim Rukoto increase the distributable number of the job information in accordance with information relating to the reply. The deliverable number determining unit is
The apparatus for determining the number of deliverables according to claim 7, wherein the number of deliverables of the job information is set to a predetermined value when the information on the reply does not satisfy a predetermined condition. The deliverable number determining unit is
9. The apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the number of deliverables of the job information is increased according to the information on the reply when the information on the reply satisfies a predetermined condition. The information related to the reply is a reply rate or the number of replies to the job information delivered by the company in the past,
The predetermined condition is
The apparatus according to claim 8 or 9, wherein the number of replies or the number of replies exceeds a threshold. A method of determining the number of deliverables for determining the number of deliverables of job information to registrants, the method comprising:
The deliverable number determination unit refers to a database in which a company desiring delivery of the job offer information and information related to a reply to the job offer information distributed by the company in the past are stored in association with the information on the reply Accordingly, determining the number of deliverables of the job offer information for each company;
Imparting section, have a, a step of applying to said company the distributable number determined by the distributable number determination unit,
The distributable number determination unit, distributable number determination method according to claim Rukoto increase the distributable number of the job information in accordance with information relating to the reply. It is a distributable number determination program that determines the distributable number of job information to registrants, and
Computer,
Referring to a database in which a company desiring delivery of the job offer information and information related to a reply to the job offer information distributed by the company in the past is referred to, and according to the information on the reply, A deliverable number determination unit that determines the deliverable number of the job information,
Allowing the number of deliverables determined by the number-of-deliverables determination unit to function as a granting unit for giving the company,
The distributable number determination unit, distributable number determination program characterized Rukoto to function to increase the distributable number of the job information in accordance with information relating to the reply. A distributable number determining device for determining the distributable number of job information to registrants, comprising:
Referring to a database in which a company desiring delivery of the job offer information, an evaluation on the company, and information on a reply to the job offer information previously distributed by the company is stored in association with the evaluation and the reply A deliverable number determination unit that determines the deliverable number of the job offer information for each company according to information;
An assigning unit that assigns the available number of deliveries determined by the available number of deliverables determining unit to the company;
Equipped with
The distributable number determination unit, distributable number determination device according to claim Rukoto increase the distributable number of the jobs in accordance with the information on the evaluation and the reply. The deliverable number determining unit is
The apparatus for determining the number of deliverables according to claim 13, wherein the number of deliverables of the job offer information is set to a predetermined value when the evaluation does not satisfy a predetermined condition. The deliverable number determining unit is
15. The apparatus according to claim 14, wherein the number of deliverables of the job information is increased according to the evaluation if the evaluation satisfies a predetermined condition. The evaluation is represented by a score given by the registrant,
The predetermined condition is
The number of deliverables determination device according to claim 14 or 15, which is whether or not the score exceeds a threshold. The deliverable number determining unit is
The apparatus according to claim 15 or 16, wherein the number of deliverables of the job offer information is increased according to the information on the reply. The information related to the reply is a reply rate or the number of replies to the job information delivered by the company in the past,
The deliverable number determining unit is
The apparatus according to claim 17, wherein the number of deliverables of the job information is increased according to the response rate or the number of replies. Said evaluation is
An apparatus for determining the number of deliverables according to any one of claims 1 to 4 and 13 to 18, characterized by an evaluation by a registrant having work experience in a company desiring delivery of the job offer information. A method of determining the number of deliverables for determining the number of deliverables of job information to registrants, the method comprising:
The deliverable number determination unit refers to a database in which a company desiring delivery of the job offer information, an evaluation for the company, and information on a reply to the job offer information delivered by the company in the related manner are stored. Determining the deliverable number of the job offer information for each company according to the evaluation and the information on the reply;
Imparting section, have a, a step of applying to said company the distributable number determined by the distributable number determination unit,
The distributable number determination unit, distributable number determination method according to claim Rukoto increase the distributable number of the jobs in accordance with the information on the evaluation and the reply. It is a distributable number determination program that determines the distributable number of job information to registrants, and
Computer,
Referring to a database in which a company desiring delivery of the job offer information, an evaluation on the company, and information on a reply to the job offer information previously distributed by the company is stored in association with the evaluation and the reply A distributable number determining unit that determines the distributable number of the job offer information for each company according to the information;
Allowing the number of deliverables determined by the number-of-deliverables determination unit to function as a granting unit for giving the company ,
The distributable number determination unit, distributable number determination program characterized Rukoto to function to increase the distributable number of the jobs in accordance with the information on the evaluation and the reply.

Images