JP6347631B2 - Weed control method using materials for weed control - Google Patents
Weed control method using materials for weed control Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP6347631B2 JP6347631B2 JP2014048709A JP2014048709A JP6347631B2 JP 6347631 B2 JP6347631 B2 JP 6347631B2 JP 2014048709 A JP2014048709 A JP 2014048709A JP 2014048709 A JP2014048709 A JP 2014048709A JP 6347631 B2 JP6347631 B2 JP 6347631B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- herbicidal
- slope
- water retention
- materials
- tsunami
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 title claims description 69
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 20
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 title claims description 8
- 230000002363 herbicidal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 80
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 claims description 18
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 claims description 16
- 239000004567 concrete Substances 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000005507 spraying Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000000839 emulsion Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- YACLQRRMGMJLJV-UHFFFAOYSA-N chloroprene Chemical compound ClC(=C)C=C YACLQRRMGMJLJV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000004816 latex Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 229920000126 latex Polymers 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N acrylic acid group Chemical group C(C=C)(=O)O NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000010813 municipal solid waste Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000011230 binding agent Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 206010016807 Fluid retention Diseases 0.000 description 25
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 14
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 12
- 239000002956 ash Substances 0.000 description 10
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 9
- 244000025254 Cannabis sativa Species 0.000 description 6
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000003796 beauty Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000009333 weeding Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000004568 cement Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000005447 environmental material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000002023 wood Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- AXCZMVOFGPJBDE-UHFFFAOYSA-L calcium dihydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[OH-].[Ca+2] AXCZMVOFGPJBDE-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- 229910001861 calcium hydroxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 235000011116 calcium hydroxide Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000000920 calcium hydroxide Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000010881 fly ash Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910010272 inorganic material Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000011147 inorganic material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010298 pulverizing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000013535 sea water Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000007921 spray Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002459 sustained effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium oxide Inorganic materials [O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[Al+3].[Al+3] PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006866 deterioration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910000514 dolomite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010459 dolomite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000428 dust Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920001971 elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011368 organic material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002688 persistence Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002994 raw material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011150 reinforced concrete Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000005060 rubber Substances 0.000 description 1
- RMAQACBXLXPBSY-UHFFFAOYSA-N silicic acid Chemical compound O[Si](O)(O)O RMAQACBXLXPBSY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000012239 silicon dioxide Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004056 waste incineration Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02W—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
- Y02W30/00—Technologies for solid waste management
- Y02W30/50—Reuse, recycling or recovery technologies
- Y02W30/91—Use of waste materials as fillers for mortars or concrete
Landscapes
- Pit Excavations, Shoring, Fill Or Stabilisation Of Slopes (AREA)
Description
本発明は、主に、鉄道や道路わきの法面に使用される防草用資材、殊に、地震や津波で発生したガレキを有効利用した防草用資材及びそれを用いた防草工法に関する。 The present invention mainly relates to a herbicidal material used on a slope of a railway or a roadside, in particular, a herbicidal material that effectively uses rubble generated by an earthquake or a tsunami and a herbicidal construction method using the same. .
従来、鉄道や道路に並行した法面では、電車や車の安全走行を確保するために、植物が法面を越えて鉄道や道路にまでおよぶのを阻止する必要がある。 Conventionally, on a slope parallel to a railroad or a road, it is necessary to prevent the plant from reaching the railroad or the road beyond the slope in order to ensure safe driving of a train or a car.
鉄道や道路の法面の防草方法としては、例えば、防草パネルを敷設する方法（例えば、特許文献１や特許文献２）、防草シートを敷設する方法（例えば、特許文献３）、特殊な法面吹き付け材を吹き付ける工法、具体的には、可溶性珪酸および／または可溶性アルミナを合計で４０質量％以上含む多孔質無機資材４０〜７５体積％と、水分を１０質量％以下にした乾燥植物資材２５〜６０ｖｏｌ％とからなる基盤材に対し、外数で、ドロマイト、セメントおよび消石灰のいずれか１以上の固化反応物質を５０ｋｇ〜２００ｋｇ／ｍ３と、２５〜５０体積％の水とを混合し、得られた混合基盤材を被施工面に吹付けまたは打設して、その表面を被覆する方法（特許文献４）などが提案されている。 Examples of the grass prevention method for railway and road slopes include a method of laying a grass protection panel (for example, Patent Document 1 and Patent Document 2), a method of laying a grass protection sheet (for example, Patent Document 3), and a special technique. A method of spraying a natural slope spraying material, specifically, a dry inorganic plant having 40 to 75% by volume of a porous inorganic material containing 40% by mass or more of soluble silicic acid and / or soluble alumina and 10% by mass or less of moisture. The base material consisting of 25-60 vol% of the material is mixed with 50 kg-200 kg / m3 of solidified reaction material of any one or more of dolomite, cement and slaked lime, and 25-50 vol% water. In addition, there has been proposed a method (Patent Document 4) or the like in which the obtained mixed base material is sprayed or placed on a work surface to cover the surface.
しかしながら、防草パネルを敷設する方法では、（１）コストが高いという課題があった。また、（２）法面の保水性は期待できず、ヒートアイランド現象を助長するという課題もあった。 However, the method of laying the grassproof panel has a problem of (1) high cost. In addition, (2) water retention on the slope cannot be expected, and there is a problem of promoting the heat island phenomenon.
防草シートを用いる方法では、防草パネルを敷設する方法と比べると廉価であるが、（１）耐久性がなく、防草効果が１年程度であるという課題や、（２）凹凸のある傾斜での敷設施工が困難であるなどの課題があった。また、（３）防草パネル工法と同様に法面への保水性の確保は期待できないものであった。 The method using a herbicidal sheet is less expensive than the method of laying a herbicidal panel, but (1) there is a problem that it has no durability and the herbicidal effect is about one year, and (2) there are irregularities. There were problems such as difficulty in laying construction on slopes. Further, (3) it was not expected to ensure water retention on the slope as in the case of the grass prevention panel construction method.
特殊な法面吹き付け材を吹き付ける方法では、（１）無機系の吹き付け材であるため、施工時に粉塵が出ること、（２）セメントや消石灰などの高塩基性物質を使用するため、環境負荷が大きいこと、（３）無機系固化材で固めるため、凍結融解に弱いこと、（４）一定の保水性や透水性を有するものの、その効果が十分ではなく、特殊吹き付け材の吹き付け厚さも必要であり、コスト的にも嵩むものであった。（５）また、吹き付け材が少なくとも４種類の材料から構成されているため、現場での調整が煩雑であり、安定した品質の吹きつけ材が得られにくいなどの課題があった。 In the method of spraying a special slope spraying material, (1) Since it is an inorganic spraying material, dust is generated at the time of construction, and (2) High basic substances such as cement and slaked lime are used, so the environmental load is reduced. (3) It is hard to freeze and thaw because it is solidified with an inorganic solidifying material, (4) Although it has a certain water retention and water permeability, its effect is not sufficient, and the spraying thickness of a special spraying material is also necessary There was also a cost increase. (5) Further, since the spray material is composed of at least four kinds of materials, there are problems such as complicated adjustment on site and difficulty in obtaining a stable quality spray material.
もっと、簡便で、廉価で、環境に優しく、保水性や透水性を有し、耐久性があり、防草効果に優れる防草工法の開発が強く待たれていた。 There has been a strong demand for the development of a herbicidal method that is simple, inexpensive, environmentally friendly, has water retention and water permeability, is durable, and has an excellent herbicidal effect.
一方、２０１１年３月１１日、東北地方を大地震と津波がおそい、甚大な被害が出た。東北地方の一日も早い復興が望まれている。
しかしながら、津波の被害で発生したガレキが被災地の広範囲に散乱しており、ガレキの処理が進まなければ、復興も遅々として進まない現状にある。ガレキには、コンクリートや金属類などの無機系と、木材やゴム、プラスティックなどの有機系がある。
On the other hand, on March 11, 2011, a massive earthquake and tsunami hit the Tohoku region, causing serious damage. The early reconstruction of the Tohoku region is desired.
However, the rubble generated by the tsunami is scattered over a wide area of the stricken area, and if the processing of the rubble does not progress, the recovery will not progress slowly. Debris includes inorganic materials such as concrete and metals, and organic materials such as wood, rubber, and plastic.
無機系のガレキ、殊に、コンクリートガラは付加価値がない上に嵩高く、重要も重いため処分方法に困っている。コンクリートガラの有効利用方法の提案が望まれている。 Inorganic rubble, especially concrete gravel, has no added value, is bulky, and important, and is difficult to dispose of. The proposal of the effective utilization method of concrete glass is desired.
従来、コンクリートガラの有効利用方法としては、再生骨材として利用する方法が提案されている。しかしながら、東北地方の大地震で被害を受けて発生したコンクリートガラのほとんどが、津波の影響を受けているため、高濃度の塩分を含んでいる。このため、再生骨材として再生したとしても、鉄筋コンクリート用の骨材としては利用できないという課題があった。また、路盤材や埋め戻し材として利用する方法も考えられるが、コンクリートガラから再生した再生骨材や再生微粉末は、ｐＨが１２程度と高いため、環境への影響が懸念されるほか、植樹ができないなどの課題を有していた。 Conventionally, as an effective utilization method of concrete glass, a method of utilizing as recycled aggregate has been proposed. However, most of the concrete galley that was damaged by the Tohoku earthquake was affected by the tsunami and contained high concentrations of salt. For this reason, even if recycled as recycled aggregate, there was a problem that it could not be used as aggregate for reinforced concrete. In addition, although it can be used as a roadbed material or backfill material, recycled aggregates and recycled fine powders regenerated from concrete garments have a high pH of about 12, so there are concerns about the impact on the environment. It had problems such as not being able to.
また、有機系のガレキ、例えば、木くずや紙くずなどは、焼却処分することができるが、焼却灰はやはり高濃度の塩分を含むため、セメント産業やコンクリート用資材としての利用が困難である。 Organic debris, such as wood and paper scraps, can be incinerated, but incineration ash also contains a high concentration of salt, making it difficult to use as a material for the cement industry or concrete.
本発明者らは、鋭意努力を重ねた結果、地震や津波で発生した無機系のガレキや有機系のガレキを有効利用した環境資材を防草資材として適用することにより、簡便で、廉価で、環境に優しく、保水性や透水性を有し、耐久性があり、防草効果に優れることを知見し、本発明を完成するに至った。 As a result of intensive efforts, the present inventors applied an environmental material that effectively uses inorganic rubble or organic rubble generated by an earthquake or tsunami as a herbicidal material, which is simple and inexpensive. It has been found that it is environmentally friendly, has water retention and water permeability, is durable and has an excellent herbicidal effect, and has completed the present invention.
本発明は、地震や津波で発生した無機系のガレキや有機系のガレキを有効利用した環境資材を活用しつつ、簡便で、廉価で、環境に優しく、保水性や透水性を有し、耐久性があり、防草効果に優れる防草用資材及びそれを用いた防草工法を提供する。 The present invention is simple, inexpensive, environmentally friendly, has water retention and water permeability, is durable, while utilizing environmental materials that make effective use of inorganic debris and organic debris generated by earthquakes and tsunamis. There are provided a herbicidal material that is superior in the herbicidal effect and a herbicidal construction method using the same.
本発明は、（１）地震や津波の被害で発生したコンクリートガラを骨材粒度に粉砕することを特徴とする防草用資材、（２）地震や津波の被害で発生した有機系のガレキを焼却し、その焼却灰から調製した骨材であることを特徴とする防草用資材、（３）塩分含有量が０．２％以上であることを特徴とする該防草用資材、（４）法面にフリーフレームを組み、その格子内に（１）〜（３）のいずれかの防草用資材を敷き詰めることを特徴とする防草工法、（５）固着剤を散布して防草用資材を固着してなる（４）の防草工法、である。 The present invention includes (1) a material for herbicidal protection, which is characterized by crushing concrete glass generated by earthquake and tsunami damage to aggregate particle size, and (2) organic rubble generated by damage from earthquake and tsunami. A herbicidal material characterized in that it is an aggregate prepared from the incinerated ash, (3) the weedproof material characterized in that the salt content is 0.2% or more, (4 ) A herbicidal construction method, characterized by assembling a free frame on the slope and laying the grass-proofing material of any one of (1) to (3) in the lattice, (5) spraying a sticking agent to prevent weeding (4) The herbicidal construction method, which is made by adhering materials for use.
本発明の防草資材およびそれを用いた防草工法を用いることにより、地震や津波で発生した無機系のガレキや有機系のガレキを有効利用した環境資材を活用しつつ、簡便で、廉価で、環境に優しく、保水性や透水性を有し、耐久性があり、優れた防草効果が得られる。 By using the herbicidal material of the present invention and the herbicidal construction method using it, it is simple and inexpensive while utilizing the environmental debris that effectively uses inorganic debris and organic debris generated by earthquakes and tsunamis. It is environmentally friendly, has water retention and water permeability, is durable and has an excellent herbicidal effect.
以下、本発明を詳細に説明する。
なお、本発明における部や％は、特に規定しない限り質量基準で示す。
Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail.
In the present invention, “parts” and “%” are based on mass unless otherwise specified.
本発明でいう防草資材は、地震や津波で発生したガレキを有効利用した環境資材である。具体的には、無機系のガレキの代表であるコンクリートガラを粉砕して骨材としたものや、有機系のガレキを焼却処分した際の焼却灰を原料とした骨材が挙げられる。これらを単独で、もしくは併用することができる。これらの資材は、ガレキを原料とするため、環境に優しい資材であることに加え、防草効果を発揮し、さらに保水性や排水性を付与することができる。
また、本発明でいう骨材粒度に粉砕とは、５〜４０ｍｍの範囲の粒度を意味し、５〜２５ｍｍが好ましく、１０〜２０ｍｍがより好ましい。５ｍｍ以下では、防草効果が十分でない場合があり、４０ｍｍを超えると保水性が乏しくなる場合がある。
The herbicidal material referred to in the present invention is an environmental material that effectively uses rubble generated by an earthquake or tsunami. Specifically, concrete garments, which are representative of inorganic rubble, are crushed into aggregates, and aggregates are made from incinerated ash when organic rubble is incinerated. These can be used alone or in combination. Since these materials use rubble as a raw material, in addition to being environmentally friendly materials, they exhibit a herbicidal effect and can further impart water retention and drainage properties.
Moreover, grinding | pulverization to the aggregate particle size said by this invention means the particle size of the range of 5-40 mm, 5-25 mm is preferable and 10-20 mm is more preferable. If it is 5 mm or less, the herbicidal effect may not be sufficient, and if it exceeds 40 mm, water retention may be poor.
防草用資材の塩分含有量は、特に限定されるものではないが、０．２％以上のものを選定することが、防草効果が顕著となるので好ましい。防草用資材の塩分含有量は０．５％以上がより好ましい。 The salt content of the herbicidal material is not particularly limited, but it is preferable to select a salt content of 0.2% or more because the herbicidal effect becomes significant. The salt content of the herbicidal material is more preferably 0.5% or more.
防草用資材がコンクリートガラの場合、海水をかぶった際の塩分が付着したものである。一方、防草用資材が有機系ガレキを焼却した際の焼却灰を原料として調製された骨材の場合、海水をかぶったガレキに付着した塩分が残存し、焼却灰に濃縮してそれが骨材へと持ち越される。一般に焼却設備には飛灰を集塵する設備が備わっており、その飛灰に塩分が濃縮するため、一般の焼却灰には塩分はそれほど濃縮されない。本発明では、焼却灰に塩分が濃縮するように焼却条件を操作することが好ましい。 When the material for weed control is concrete glass, the salt is attached when it is covered with seawater. On the other hand, in the case where the herbicidal material is an aggregate prepared using incineration ash from incineration of organic debris, salt attached to the debris covered with seawater remains and is concentrated in the incineration ash. Carried over to wood. Generally, incineration facilities are equipped with facilities that collect fly ash, and salt content is concentrated in the fly ash, so that salt content is not so concentrated in general incineration ash. In the present invention, it is preferable to operate the incineration conditions so that the salinity is concentrated in the incineration ash.
防草資材は、鉄道や道路の法面に３ｃｍ〜２０ｃｍ、好ましくは５ｃｍ〜１０ｃｍを敷き詰めることにより、防草効果を付与することが可能である。３ｃｍ未満では、防草効果が十分でない場合があり、２０ｃｍを超えると、固着させることが困難となり、やはり、防草効果が不十分となる場合がある。
また、保水性や排水性も付与することができる。ただし、法面の傾斜が厳しくなると、風雨などの影響によって防草用資材が崩れ出す場合があり、防草効果が維持できなくなる場合がある。このため、防草用資材を固着する固着剤を併用することが好ましい。
The herbicidal material can provide a herbicidal effect by spreading 3 cm to 20 cm, preferably 5 cm to 10 cm on the slope of a railway or road. If it is less than 3 cm, the herbicidal effect may not be sufficient, and if it exceeds 20 cm, it is difficult to fix, and the herbicidal effect may be insufficient.
Moreover, water retention and drainage can also be provided. However, if the slope of the slope becomes severe, the grass protection material may collapse due to the influence of wind and rain, etc., and the grass protection effect may not be maintained. For this reason, it is preferable to use together the sticking agent which sticks the herbicidal material.
防草資材の固着剤は、クロロプレン系ラテックス、ＥＶＡ系エマルジョン、アクリル系エマルジョンなどが好ましい。防草資材の固着効果と、防草資材の保水性や排水性を保つ観点から、クロロプレン系ラテックスやＥＶＡ系エマルジョンを選定することがより好ましい。中でも、クロロプレンラテックスを選定することが、長期的な防草効果に優れる観点から最も好ましい。 The fixing agent for the herbicidal material is preferably chloroprene latex, EVA emulsion, acrylic emulsion or the like. From the viewpoint of fixing the herbicidal material and maintaining the water retention and drainage of the herbicidal material, it is more preferable to select chloroprene latex or EVA emulsion. Among these, selecting chloroprene latex is most preferable from the viewpoint of excellent long-term herbicidal effect.
固着剤の固形分濃度は、１０〜５０％が好ましく、１５〜２５％がより好ましい。固形分濃度が１０％未満では、固着効果が十分でなく、防草効果の持続性が十分でない場合がある。逆に、固形分濃度が５０％を超えると、粘性が強くなり、噴霧がしにくくなる。また、法面に敷きつめた防草資材の深さ方向に満遍なく浸透しなくなるばかりか、防草資材の保水性や排水性を阻害する可能性もある。 The solid content concentration of the fixing agent is preferably 10 to 50%, more preferably 15 to 25%. If the solid content concentration is less than 10%, the fixing effect may not be sufficient and the sustainability of the herbicidal effect may not be sufficient. Conversely, when the solid content concentration exceeds 50%, the viscosity becomes strong and spraying becomes difficult. Moreover, not only does it not penetrate evenly in the depth direction of the herbicidal material laid on the slope, but it may also impede the water retention and drainage properties of the herbicidal material.
固着剤の使用量は、特に限定されないが、１ｍ２あたり１００ｇ〜５００ｇが好ましく、２００ｇ〜４００ｇがより好ましい。１ｍ２あたりの使用量が１００ｇ未満では、固着効果が十分でなく、防草効果の持続性が期待できない場合がある。逆に、１ｍ２あたりの使用量が５００ｇを越えると、防草資材の保水性や排水性が改悪傾向に向かう場合がある。 Although the usage-amount of a sticking agent is not specifically limited, 100-500g per 1 m < 2 > is preferable and 200g-400g is more preferable. When the amount used per 1 m 2 is less than 100 g, the fixing effect may not be sufficient, and sustainability of the herbicidal effect may not be expected. Conversely, if the amount used per 1 m 2 exceeds 500 g, the water retention and drainage properties of the herbicidal material may tend to deteriorate.
固着剤は噴霧器やジョウロなどにより、噴霧や散布して使用することが、効率良い施工の観点から、また、防草資材と均一に遭遇させる観点から望ましい。 It is desirable to use the sticking agent by spraying or spraying it with a sprayer or a water heater from the viewpoint of efficient construction and from the viewpoint of encountering the herbicidal material uniformly.
以下、実施例、比較例を挙げてさらに詳細に内容を説明するが、本発明はこれらに限定されるものではない。 Hereinafter, although an example and a comparative example are given and the contents are explained in detail, the present invention is not limited to these.
「実験例１」
まず、低傾斜の法面で実験検討した。盛土に傾斜角１５度の法面を設け、コンクリート製のフリーフレームを配設した。表１に示す様々な防草用資材を用いて、法面のフリーフレームの中に防草用資材を１０ｃｍ敷き詰めた。この防草工法を施した法面の防草効果、耐久性、保水性を評価した。比較のために、防草工法を施さなかった法面や、他の防草工法についても同様に行った。結果を表１に示す。
"Experiment 1"
First, an experiment was examined with a low slope. A slope with an inclination angle of 15 degrees was provided on the embankment, and a concrete free frame was provided. Using various herbicidal materials shown in Table 1, 10 cm of the herbicidal material was spread in a free frame on the slope. The herbicidal effect, durability and water retention of the slope subjected to this herbicidal construction method were evaluated. For comparison, slopes that were not subjected to the herbicidal method and other herbicidal methods were also performed. The results are shown in Table 1.
＜使用材料＞
防草資材Ａ：津波の被害で発生した有機系ガレキを焼却処分した際の焼却灰を原料とした骨材、塩分含有量１．５％、サイズ５〜２５ｍｍ。
防草資材Ｂ：津波の被害で発生したコンクリートガラを粉砕して調製した骨材、塩分含有量０．２％、サイズ５〜２５ｍｍ。
防草資材Ｃ：一般のゴミ焼却灰を原料とした骨材、塩分含有量０．０５％、サイズ５〜２５ｍｍ。
防草資材Ｄ：一般の再生骨材、塩分含有量０．０１％、サイズ５〜２５ｍｍ。
防草資材Ｅ：防草資材Ａと防草資材Ｃの等量混合物。
<Materials used>
Herbicidal material A: Aggregate made from incinerated ash when organic debris generated by tsunami damage is incinerated, salt content 1.5%, size 5-25 mm.
Herbicidal material B: Aggregate prepared by pulverizing concrete glass generated by tsunami damage, salt content 0.2%, size 5-25 mm.
Herbicidal material C: Aggregate made from general waste incineration ash, salt content 0.05%, size 5 to 25 mm.
Herbicidal material D: General recycled aggregate, salt content 0.01%, size 5-25 mm.
Herbicidal material E: Equivalent mixture of herbicidal material A and herbicidal material C.
＜試験方法＞
防草効果：新潟県糸魚川市において暴露し、雑草の生え方を観察した。
１／１０以下の面積の場合を◎、
１／１０を超え、１／４以下の面積の場合を○、
１／４を超え、１／３以下の面積の場合を△、
１／３を超える面積の場合を×とした。
耐久性：縦３０ｃｍ、横３０ｃｍ、厚さ１０ｃｍの試験体を作製し、最低温度マイナス１０℃で凍結させ、最高温度１０℃で融解させるサイクルを３００サイクル繰り返し、劣化状況を観察した。崩壊しなかった場合は○、崩壊した場合は×とした。
美観景観：施工後の状態を目視により観察し、自然な印象を受ける場合は○、人工的な印象を受ける場合は×とした。
保水性：水を法面に噴霧し、吸水能力を超え、水が法面を流れ落ちる寸前までの吸水量を計測した。
<Test method>
Herbicidal effect: We exposed in Itoigawa City, Niigata Prefecture and observed how weeds grew.
In the case of an area of 1/10 or less, ◎,
In the case of an area exceeding 1/10 and 1/4 or less,
△, when the area is more than 1/4 and less than 1/3
The case of the area exceeding 1/3 was set as x.
Durability: A specimen having a length of 30 cm, a width of 30 cm, and a thickness of 10 cm was prepared, frozen at a minimum temperature of minus 10 ° C., and thawed at a maximum temperature of 10 ° C. for 300 cycles, and the deterioration state was observed. When it did not collapse, it was marked as ◯, and when it collapsed, it was marked as x.
Aesthetic landscape: The condition after construction was visually observed, and “○” was given for a natural impression, and “X” was given for an artificial impression.
Water retention: Water was sprayed on the slope, and the amount of water absorption was measured until it exceeded the water absorption capacity and just before the water flowed down the slope.
表１より、本発明の工法は、防草効果に優れ、耐久性もあり、美観や景観も自然な印象を与え、保水性にも優れることが分かる。
防草用資材を用いない場合には、防草効果が全くなく、一般の再生骨材や一般のゴミ焼却灰を原料とした骨材を防草用資材として用いた場合には防草効果の持続性がない。従来工法である無機系吹き付け工法では、防草効果は得られるが、耐久性がなく、美観景観上も好ましくなく、保水効果も高くないことがわかる。また、シート工法では、防草効果は得られるが、美観景観上も好ましくなく、保水性が全くないことが分かる。
From Table 1, it can be seen that the construction method of the present invention has an excellent herbicidal effect, is durable, has a natural impression of beauty and scenery, and is excellent in water retention.
When weeding materials are not used, there is no herbicidal effect, and when we use aggregates made from general recycled aggregates and general garbage incineration ash as weeding materials, weeding effectiveness There is no persistence. It can be seen that the inorganic spraying method, which is a conventional construction method, provides a herbicidal effect, but is not durable, is not preferable in terms of aesthetic scenery, and does not have a high water retention effect. Moreover, in the sheet construction method, a herbicidal effect can be obtained, but it is not preferable in terms of aesthetic scenery, and it is understood that there is no water retention.
「実験例２」
防草資材Ｅを使用し、防草資材の敷き詰める厚さを表２のように変化したこと以外は実験例１と同様に行った。
"Experimental example 2"
The experiment was conducted in the same manner as in Experimental Example 1 except that the herbicidal material E was used and the thickness of the herbicidal material was changed as shown in Table 2.
表２より、防草資材の厚さが３ｃｍ〜２０ｃｍの範囲であると、防草効果の持続性があり、耐久性や保水性にも優れ、景観や美観も自然な印象を与えることが分かる。 From Table 2, it can be seen that when the thickness of the herbicidal material is in the range of 3 cm to 20 cm, the herbicidal effect is durable, the durability and water retention are excellent, and the landscape and beauty also give a natural impression. .
「実験例３」
高傾斜の法面で実験検討した。法面の傾斜４５度の条件で防草資材Ｅを使用し、表３に示す固着剤を１ｍ２あたり３００ｇ噴霧した。この防草工法を施した法面の防草効果、耐久性、保水性を評価した。結果を表３に示す。
"Experiment 3"
Experiments were conducted on a slope with a high slope. The herbicidal material E was used under a condition where the slope of the slope was 45 degrees, and 300 g of the fixing agent shown in Table 3 was sprayed per 1 m 2 . The herbicidal effect, durability and water retention of the slope subjected to this herbicidal construction method were evaluated. The results are shown in Table 3.
＜使用材料＞
固着剤イ：クロロプレン系ラテックス、固形分濃度２０％
固着剤ロ：ＥＶＡ系エマルジョン、固形分濃度２０％
固着剤ハ：アクリル系エマルジョン、固形分濃度２０％
<Materials used>
Fixing agent A: Chloroprene-based latex, solid content 20%
Fixing agent B: EVA emulsion, solid content 20%
Fixing agent C: acrylic emulsion, solid content 20%
表３より、本発明の防草用工法により、高傾斜の条件でも防草効果が得られ、耐久性や美観にも優れ、保水性も得られることがわかる。特に、固着剤を併用した場合には、防草効果の持続性が顕著で、耐久性や美観にも優れ、高い保水性も得られることが分かる。 From Table 3, it can be seen that the herbicidal construction method of the present invention provides a herbicidal effect even under high-inclination conditions, and is excellent in durability and aesthetics, and also provides water retention. In particular, when a sticking agent is used in combination, the durability of the herbicidal effect is remarkable, durability and aesthetics are excellent, and high water retention is also obtained.
「実験例４」
防草資材Ｅおよび固着剤イを使用し、固着剤イの固形分濃度を表４のように変化したこと以外は実験例３と同様に行った。
"Experimental example 4"
The experiment was performed in the same manner as in Experimental Example 3 except that the herbicidal material E and the sticking agent I were used and the solid content concentration of the sticking agent I was changed as shown in Table 4.
表４より、固着剤の固形分濃度が１０〜５０％の範囲であると、高傾斜の条件でも防草効果の持続性があり、耐久性や保水性にも優れ、景観や美観も自然な印象を与えることが分かる。 From Table 4, when the solid content concentration of the sticking agent is in the range of 10 to 50%, the herbicidal effect is sustained even under high-inclined conditions, and it has excellent durability and water retention, and the landscape and beauty are also natural. You can see that it gives an impression.
「実験例５」
防草資材Ｅおよび固着剤イを使用し、固着剤イの使用量を表５のように変化したこと以外は実験例３と同様に行った。また比較のため、実験例１と同様に防草資材を用いない実験Ｎｏ．１−１も行った。結果を表５に示す。
“Experimental Example 5”
The experiment was performed in the same manner as in Experimental Example 3 except that the herbicidal material E and the sticking agent A were used and the amount of the sticking agent I was changed as shown in Table 5. For comparison, as in Experiment 1, Experiment No. 1 using no herbicidal material was used. 1-1 was also performed. The results are shown in Table 5.
表５より、固着剤の使用量が１００〜５００ｇ／ｍ２の場合には、高傾斜の条件でも防草効果の持続性があり、耐久性や保水性にも優れ、景観や美観も自然な印象を与えることが分かる。 From Table 5, when the amount of the sticking agent used is 100 to 500 g / m 2 , the herbicidal effect is sustained even under high-inclined conditions, and the durability and water retention are excellent, and the landscape and beauty are also natural. You can see that it gives an impression.
本発明の防草資材およびそれを用いた防草工法を用いることにより、地震や津波で発生した無機系のガレキや有機系のガレキを有効利用した環境資材を活用しつつ、簡便で、廉価で、環境に優しく、保水性や透水性を有し、耐久性があり、優れた防草効果が得られる。 By using the herbicidal material of the present invention and the herbicidal construction method using it, it is simple and inexpensive while utilizing the environmental debris that effectively uses inorganic debris and organic debris generated by earthquakes and tsunamis. It is environmentally friendly, has water retention and water permeability, is durable and has an excellent herbicidal effect.
Claims (4)
法面にフリーフレームを組み、その格子内に前記防草用資材を厚さ３ｃｍ〜２０ｃｍで敷き詰めるステップと
を含む、法面の防草工法。 Crushing concrete trash generated by earthquake and tsunami damage to aggregate particle size to obtain a herbicidal material having a salt content of 0.2% or more ;
A step of assembling a free frame on the slope and laying the grass-proofing material in a thickness of 3 cm to 20 cm in the lattice;
Slope protection method including
法面にフリーフレームを組み、その格子内に前記防草用資材を厚さ３ｃｍ〜２０ｃｍで敷き詰めるステップと
を含む、法面の防草工法。 Incinerated rubble organic generated by the earthquake and tsunami, Ri aggregate der prepared from the ash, the steps of salt content to obtain a weed for materials is at least 0.2%,
A step of assembling a free frame on the slope and laying the grass-proofing material in a thickness of 3 cm to 20 cm in the lattice;
Slope protection method including
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2014048709A JP6347631B2 (en) | 2014-03-12 | 2014-03-12 | Weed control method using materials for weed control |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2014048709A JP6347631B2 (en) | 2014-03-12 | 2014-03-12 | Weed control method using materials for weed control |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2015172302A JP2015172302A (en) | 2015-10-01 |
| JP6347631B2 true JP6347631B2 (en) | 2018-06-27 |
Family
ID=54259767
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2014048709A Expired - Fee Related JP6347631B2 (en) | 2014-03-12 | 2014-03-12 | Weed control method using materials for weed control |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP6347631B2 (en) |
Family Cites Families (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FR2619584B1 (en) * | 1987-08-17 | 1989-12-01 | Jacob Christian | FLOOR COVERAGE AGAINST SOIL VEGETATION |
| JP2000128719A (en) * | 1998-10-21 | 2000-05-09 | Maruman Corporation Kk | Waste granular grass controlling material and its production |
| JP3477410B2 (en) * | 1999-11-02 | 2003-12-10 | 日植緑地株式会社 | Vegetation base material for slope greening and slope greening method |
| JP2004183348A (en) * | 2002-12-04 | 2004-07-02 | Takei Co Ltd | Weeds deterrence mulching material, mulching cube, and weeds deterrence method |
| JP2008133706A (en) * | 2006-10-25 | 2008-06-12 | Hatsukari Kogyo Kk | Weedkilling structure and weedkilling construction method |
| JP2008237048A (en) * | 2007-03-26 | 2008-10-09 | Idemitsu Kosan Co Ltd | Method for covering soil |
| JP5582599B2 (en) * | 2010-02-15 | 2014-09-03 | 新日鉄住金エンジニアリング株式会社 | Weed control method |
| JP5653952B2 (en) * | 2012-02-29 | 2015-01-14 | 電気化学工業株式会社 | Method for constructing reinforced concrete structures |
-
2014
- 2014-03-12 JP JP2014048709A patent/JP6347631B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2015172302A (en) | 2015-10-01 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP5342799B2 (en) | Herbicidal material, herbicidal solidifying material, and construction method thereof | |
| Dahale et al. | Utilization of solid waste for soil stabilization: a review | |
| JP2009091872A (en) | Composition for road surface pavement and road surface paving method | |
| JP6199613B2 (en) | Herbicide material fixing agent, herbicide material, and herbicide method using the same | |
| JP5769999B2 (en) | Pavement structure | |
| JP6347631B2 (en) | Weed control method using materials for weed control | |
| JP2010053597A (en) | Woody pavement material, and method of paving road surface and method of paving slope using the same | |
| Ratkevicius et al. | Reduction of negative impact of salts used for winter road maintenance on the environment | |
| JP3691043B2 (en) | Paving method and paving ground | |
| JP2014201526A (en) | Weed suppressing material and construction method of the same | |
| JP2007231565A (en) | Permeable weedproof pavement method | |
| JP2009108483A (en) | Pavement structure | |
| JP2015045226A (en) | Pavement structure using coal ash and construction method thereof | |
| JP2007040047A (en) | Paving method | |
| Rachmawati et al. | Ground improvement using waste shell for farm roads and embankments | |
| WO2017099188A1 (en) | Weed control material and method for using same | |
| JP2017082434A (en) | Normal temperature asphalt mixture, normal temperature asphalt pavement structure and construction method for pavement structure | |
| JP2004067909A (en) | Soil-improving material and mulching industrial method using the same | |
| JP6455691B2 (en) | Slope conservation method using coal ash | |
| JP2017205050A (en) | Weed control material and method of using the same | |
| KR100526169B1 (en) | a packing stuff for a road surface | |
| JP2005320190A (en) | Cement | |
| JP2005015321A (en) | Cement hydration accelerator | |
| JP2018078855A (en) | Weed control material and its usage | |
| JP2018109323A (en) | Soil pavement material |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20170106 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20171019 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20171024 |
|
| RD02 | Notification of acceptance of power of attorney |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7422 Effective date: 20171026 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20171110 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20171206 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20180522 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20180529 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 6347631 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |