JP5282440B2 - Evaluation wafer and evaluation method of polishing allowance for double-side polishing - Google Patents

Evaluation wafer and evaluation method of polishing allowance for double-side polishing Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5282440B2
JP5282440B2 JP2008111659A JP2008111659A JP5282440B2 JP 5282440 B2 JP5282440 B2 JP 5282440B2 JP 2008111659 A JP2008111659 A JP 2008111659A JP 2008111659 A JP2008111659 A JP 2008111659A JP 5282440 B2 JP5282440 B2 JP 5282440B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
polishing
wafer
double
evaluation
allowance
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2008111659A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2009266896A (en
Inventor
和広 相良
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shin Etsu Handotai Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Shin Etsu Handotai Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shin Etsu Handotai Co Ltd filed Critical Shin Etsu Handotai Co Ltd
Priority to JP2008111659A priority Critical patent/JP5282440B2/en
Publication of JP2009266896A publication Critical patent/JP2009266896A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5282440B2 publication Critical patent/JP5282440B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an evaluation wafer for evaluating polishing margins of double-sided polishing, which can check the respective polishing margins on both sides of a wafer in double-sided polishing by a simple method and can reduce an excessive polishing margin due to the difference, and to provide a method of evaluating the polishing margins in double-sided polishing. <P>SOLUTION: The evaluation wafer for evaluating the polishing margins in double-sided polishing has recesses formed on both-sides of the wafer. The evaluation method employs the wafer. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2010,JPO&amp;INPIT

Description

本発明は、両面研磨の研磨代を評価するための評価用ウェーハ及びそれを用いた両面研磨の研磨代の評価方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a wafer for evaluation for evaluating a polishing allowance for double-side polishing and a method for evaluating a polishing allowance for double-side polishing using the same.

半導体ウェーハを製造する場合、例えばチョクラルスキー法でシリコン単結晶インゴットを育成し、このインゴットをスライスして薄い円板状に加工した後、面取り、ラッピング、エッチング、研磨等の種々の工程を経て鏡面状ウェーハに仕上げられる。   When manufacturing a semiconductor wafer, for example, a silicon single crystal ingot is grown by the Czochralski method, this ingot is sliced and processed into a thin disk, and then subjected to various processes such as chamfering, lapping, etching, and polishing. Finished into a mirror-like wafer.

シリコンウェーハの研磨工程では、通常、粗研磨から仕上げ研磨へと複数の段階を経て研磨が行われる。
例えば、ラッピング工程及びエッチング工程の後、ウエーハの表面における歪みを除去し、平坦化するために、数μm程度の研磨代で1次研磨を行う。次いで、1次研磨で発生したキズ等を除去し、表面粗さを改善するため、1μm程度の研磨代で2次研磨を行う。さらにヘイズフリーの表面にするため、1μm未満の研磨代で仕上げ研磨を行う。
In a silicon wafer polishing process, polishing is usually performed through a plurality of stages from rough polishing to final polishing.
For example, after the lapping step and the etching step, primary polishing is performed with a polishing allowance of about several μm in order to remove distortion on the wafer surface and flatten it. Next, in order to remove scratches and the like generated in the primary polishing and improve the surface roughness, secondary polishing is performed with a polishing margin of about 1 μm. Further, in order to obtain a haze-free surface, finish polishing is performed with a polishing allowance of less than 1 μm.

近年、シリコンウエーハの直径は300mmが主流となり平坦化の要求はますます厳しくなっている。このような大直径ウエーハの平坦度品質やナノトポグラフィ品質を得るために両面研磨装置による研磨が一般的に行われるようになってきた。両面研磨装置は1次研磨に主に用いられ2次、仕上げ研磨には片面研磨装置が用いられている(特許文献1参照)。   In recent years, the diameter of silicon wafers is mainly 300 mm, and the demand for flattening has become increasingly severe. In order to obtain flatness quality and nanotopography quality of such a large diameter wafer, polishing by a double-side polishing apparatus has been generally performed. A double-side polishing apparatus is mainly used for primary polishing, and a single-side polishing apparatus is used for secondary and final polishing (see Patent Document 1).

一般的な両面研磨装置としては、遊星歯車機構を用いた、いわゆる4ウェイ方式の装置が知られている。このような両面研磨装置によりシリコンウエーハを研磨する場合は、キャリアに複数形成されたウエーハ保持孔にウエーハを挿入する。そして、ウエーハは上定盤及び下定盤で挟み込んで保持される。   As a general double-side polishing apparatus, a so-called 4-way type apparatus using a planetary gear mechanism is known. When polishing a silicon wafer with such a double-side polishing apparatus, the wafer is inserted into a plurality of wafer holding holes formed in the carrier. The wafer is sandwiched and held between the upper surface plate and the lower surface plate.

スラリー供給孔を通じて研磨スラリーを供給するとともに、上定盤(研磨布が貼付)は時計回り方向に回転し、下定盤(研磨布が貼付)は反時計回り方向に回転する。また、キャリアはサンギアとインターナルギアとの間で自転公転させる。これにより、各保持孔内のウエーハの両面を同時に研磨することができる。   While supplying the polishing slurry through the slurry supply hole, the upper surface plate (with the polishing cloth attached) rotates in the clockwise direction, and the lower surface plate (with the polishing cloth attached) rotates in the counterclockwise direction. The carrier rotates and revolves between the sun gear and the internal gear. Thereby, both surfaces of the wafer in each holding hole can be polished simultaneously.

しかし、両面研磨の場合、重力等の影響により、表裏両面の研磨条件が必ずしも同じとはならず表裏の研磨代が異なってしまうという問題がある。また、ウエーハの厚さを測定することで全体の研磨代は判っても表裏両面それぞれの研磨代は判らない。したがって、ラッピング及びエッチングによる加工歪を完全に除去するための研磨条件は研磨代の少ない面が基準とせざるを得ず、このため研磨代の多い面は必要以上に研磨されてしまい原料コストおよび生産性の悪化の原因となっていた。   However, in the case of double-side polishing, there is a problem that the polishing conditions for the front and back surfaces are not always the same due to the influence of gravity or the like, and the polishing allowances for the front and back surfaces are different. Further, even if the total polishing allowance is determined by measuring the thickness of the wafer, the polishing allowance for each of the front and back surfaces cannot be determined. Therefore, the polishing conditions for completely removing the processing distortion due to lapping and etching must be based on the surface with less polishing allowance, and therefore the surface with more polishing allowance is polished more than necessary, and the raw material cost and production It was the cause of sexual deterioration.

特開平09−270401号公報JP 09-270401 A

そこで本発明は、上記問題点に鑑みてなされたものであって、両面研磨時のウェーハの表面と裏面のそれぞれの研磨代を簡便な方法で調べることができ、その違いによる余分な研磨代を少なくすることができる両面研磨の研磨代を評価するための評価用ウェーハ及び両面研磨の研磨代の評価方法を提供することを目的とする。   Therefore, the present invention has been made in view of the above-mentioned problems, and it is possible to investigate the polishing allowance of the front surface and the back surface of the wafer at the time of double-side polishing by a simple method. It is an object of the present invention to provide an evaluation wafer for evaluating a polishing allowance for double-side polishing that can be reduced and a method for evaluating a polishing allowance for double-side polishing.

上記目的を達成するために、本発明は、両面研磨の研磨代を評価するための評価用ウェーハであって、ウェーハの表裏両面に凹部が形成されているものであることを特徴とする評価用ウェーハを提供する。 In order to achieve the above object, the present invention is an evaluation wafer for evaluating the polishing allowance of double-side polishing, wherein concave portions are formed on both front and back surfaces of the wafer. that provides wafer.

このような評価用ウェーハであれば、ウェーハの表裏両面に凹部が形成されているため、研磨前後の凹部の深さの変化を調べることによって、ウェーハ両面それぞれの研磨代を容易に評価することができる。これにより、製品ウェーハの研磨条件を調整することで、上定盤と下定盤の研磨代の違いによる一方の面の無駄な研磨を少なくすることができ、さらには研磨代の少ない面の研磨速度を速くすることができるため研磨時間が短縮され、高い生産性でコストの低減された両面研磨を行うことができる。   With such an evaluation wafer, since the recesses are formed on both the front and back surfaces of the wafer, it is possible to easily evaluate the polishing allowance for each of both surfaces of the wafer by examining the change in the depth of the recesses before and after polishing. it can. As a result, by adjusting the polishing conditions of the product wafer, it is possible to reduce unnecessary polishing of one surface due to the difference in polishing allowance between the upper surface plate and the lower surface plate, and furthermore, the polishing speed of the surface with less polishing allowance Therefore, the polishing time can be shortened, and the double-side polishing can be performed with high productivity and reduced cost.

このとき、前記凹部が、エッチングにより形成されたものであることが好ましい。
このように、凹部をエッチングにより形成すれば、所望パターンの形成や深さの正確な調節が容易にできるため、より精度の高い評価を行うことができる評価用ウェーハにすることができる。
In this case, the recess, it is not preferable are those formed by etching.
In this way, if the recess is formed by etching, formation of a desired pattern and accurate adjustment of the depth can be easily performed, so that an evaluation wafer capable of performing more accurate evaluation can be obtained.

このとき、前記凹部が、前記ウェーハの表裏両面に同一パターンで形成されているものであって、前記ウェーハ中心を対称点として回転対称性を有するものであることが好ましい。
このように、凹部がウェーハの表裏両面に同一パターンで形成され、ウェーハ中心を対称点として回転対称性を有するものであれば、評価の際の両面研磨時に評価用ウェーハ面内で均一に負荷がかかり、製品ウェーハと同様の研磨を行うことができるため、より正確な研磨代の評価を行うことができる評価用ウェーハにすることができる。また、凹部がウェーハの表裏両面に同一パターンで形成されているものであれば、凹部以外の面積やウェーハにかかる圧力が裏面と表面で同条件になり、研磨されるウェーハ両面のそれぞれの研磨代を正確に評価することができる。
In this case, the recess, there is formed in the same pattern on both surfaces of the wafer, it is not preferable to the wafer center and has a rotational symmetry as a symmetric point.
In this way, if the recesses are formed in the same pattern on both the front and back surfaces of the wafer and have rotational symmetry with the wafer center as the symmetry point, the load is evenly distributed within the wafer surface for evaluation during double-side polishing during evaluation. Therefore, since the same polishing as that of the product wafer can be performed, it is possible to obtain an evaluation wafer capable of more accurately evaluating the polishing allowance. In addition, if the recesses are formed in the same pattern on both the front and back sides of the wafer, the area other than the recesses and the pressure applied to the wafer are the same on the back side and the front side. Can be accurately evaluated.

このとき、前記凹部の面積が、前記ウェーハ面内全体の面積の半分以下であることが好ましい。
このように、凹部の面積をウェーハ面内全体の面積の半分以下とすることで、両面研磨時の評価ウェーハへの負荷を、両面研磨時の製品ウェーハへの負荷に近くすることができるため、研磨代をより正確に調べることができる評価用ウェーハにすることができる。
At this time, the area of the recess, it is not preferable that less than half the area of the entire in the wafer plane.
In this way, by setting the area of the recess to less than half of the total area in the wafer surface, the load on the evaluation wafer at the time of double-side polishing can be close to the load on the product wafer at the time of double-side polishing, It can be set as the wafer for evaluation which can investigate polishing cost more correctly.

また、本発明は、両面研磨の研磨代の評価方法であって、ウェーハの表裏両面に凹部を形成することによって評価用ウェーハを作製し、該評価用ウェーハを両面研磨し、該両面研磨された評価用ウェーハの研磨前後の凹部の深さの変化によって研磨代を評価することを特徴とする両面研磨の研磨代の評価方法を提供する。 Further, the present invention is a method for evaluating a polishing allowance of double-side polishing, wherein a wafer for evaluation is formed by forming recesses on both front and back surfaces of the wafer, the evaluation wafer is polished on both sides, and the both surfaces are polished. that provides an evaluation method of polishing stock removal of the double-sided polishing and evaluating the stock removal by polishing the depth of change before and after the recess of the test wafers.

このように、表裏両面に凹部を形成された評価用ウェーハを両面研磨することで、研磨代の評価が研磨前後の凹部の深さの変化を調べるだけで可能であるため、装置条件により異なる両面の研磨代を正確に簡便な方法で評価することができる。   In this way, by polishing both sides of the evaluation wafer having recesses formed on both the front and back surfaces, the polishing allowance can be evaluated simply by examining the change in the depth of the recesses before and after polishing. The polishing allowance can be accurately evaluated by a simple method.

このとき、前記凹部の形成方法を、エッチングにより形成することが好ましい。
このように、凹部をエッチングにより形成することで、凹部の形状や深さを簡便な方法で正確に形成することができるため、精度の高い研磨代の評価を行うことができる。
In this case, the method of forming the concave portion, it is not preferable to form by etching.
In this way, by forming the recesses by etching, the shape and depth of the recesses can be accurately formed by a simple method, and therefore, a highly accurate polishing allowance can be evaluated.

このとき、前記凹部を、前記ウェーハの表裏両面に同一パターンで、前記ウェーハ中心を対称点として回転対称性を有するように形成することが好ましい。
このように、凹部をウェーハの表裏両面に同一パターンで、ウェーハ中心を対称点として回転対称性を有するように形成すれば、評価のための研磨時に面内均一に負荷がかかり、製品ウェーハの研磨時と同様の研磨を行うことができるため、より正確に研磨代を評価することができる。また、凹部をウェーハの表裏両面で同一パターンで形成するため、表面と裏面の研磨条件が同じになり、より正確に研磨代を評価することができる。
In this case, the recess, the same pattern on both surfaces of the wafer, the wafer center to have the preferable be formed so as to have rotational symmetry as a symmetric point.
In this way, if the recesses are formed in the same pattern on both the front and back surfaces of the wafer and have rotational symmetry with the wafer center as the symmetry point, a uniform load is applied during polishing for evaluation, and the product wafer is polished. Since the same polishing as that at the time can be performed, the polishing allowance can be more accurately evaluated. Further, since the concave portions are formed in the same pattern on both the front and back surfaces of the wafer, the polishing conditions on the front surface and the back surface are the same, and the polishing allowance can be evaluated more accurately.

このとき、前記凹部の面積を、前記ウェーハ面内全体の面積の半分以下にすることが好ましい。
このように、凹部の面積をウェーハ面内全体の半分以下にすれば、製品ウェーハを研磨する際の負荷に近くすることができるため、より正確な研磨代を評価することができる。
At this time, the area of the recess, it is not preferable that less than half of the total area of the said wafer surfaces.
Thus, if the area of the recess is made half or less of the entire wafer surface, the load when polishing the product wafer can be approached, so that a more accurate polishing allowance can be evaluated.

また、本発明は、少なくとも、本発明の両面研磨の研磨代の評価方法によって研磨代を評価して、製品ウェーハの研磨条件を調整することを特徴とする両面研磨方法を提供する。
このように、本発明の両面研磨の研磨代の評価方法を用いれば、両面研磨時のウェーハの表面と裏面の研磨代の違いや、研磨される速度を正確に評価することができるため、それをもとに製品ウェーハの研磨条件を調整することで、無駄な研磨代を少なくすることができ、さらには研磨代の少ない面の研磨速度を速くすることができるため研磨時間が短縮され、ウェーハを生産性高く低コストで両面研磨することができる。
Further, the present invention is at least, to evaluate the stock removal by the evaluation method of polishing stock removal of the double-sided polishing of the present invention, that provides a double-sided polishing method characterized by adjusting the polishing conditions of a product wafer.
Thus, by using the polishing allowance evaluation method of the double-side polishing of the present invention, it is possible to accurately evaluate the difference in polishing allowance between the front and back surfaces of the wafer during double-side polishing and the polishing speed. By adjusting the polishing conditions of the product wafer based on the above, it is possible to reduce unnecessary polishing allowance, and furthermore, the polishing speed of the surface with less polishing allowance can be increased, so the polishing time is shortened and the wafer is reduced. Can be polished on both sides with high productivity and low cost.

このとき、前記調整される研磨条件を、定盤の回転速度とすることが好ましい。
このように、調整される研磨条件を定盤の回転速度とすれば、比較的簡単にウェーハの表面、裏面それぞれの研磨代を変えることができるため、無駄な研磨代を少なくしたり、研磨速度を速くすることを容易に行うことができる。
At this time, the polishing conditions the adjustment, have preferably be a rotational speed of the platen.
In this way, if the polishing conditions to be adjusted are the rotation speed of the surface plate, the polishing allowance on each of the front and back surfaces of the wafer can be changed relatively easily. Can be done easily.

このとき、前記調整される研磨条件を、研磨スラリー又は研磨布の交換サイクルとすることが好ましい。
このように、調整される研磨条件を研磨スラリー又は研磨布の交換サイクルとすれば、本発明の評価方法により研磨代を正確に評価することで、研磨プロセスの維持、管理を効率的に行うことができるため、生産性高く両面研磨することができる。
At this time, the polishing conditions the adjustment, it is not preferable that the polishing slurry or replacement cycle of the polishing pad.
As described above, if the polishing condition to be adjusted is a polishing slurry or a cloth replacement cycle, the polishing process can be efficiently maintained and managed by accurately evaluating the polishing allowance by the evaluation method of the present invention. Therefore, both sides can be polished with high productivity.

以上のように、本発明の評価用ウェーハであれば、ウェーハの表裏両面に凹部を有するため、研磨代の評価を研磨前後の凹部の深さ変化を調べることによって評価でき、定盤の回転速度等の装置条件に伴うウェーハの表面と裏面それぞれの研磨代の評価を簡便な方法で正確に行うことができる。このように、本発明によって、ウェーハ両面の研磨代をそれぞれ正確に評価することができるため、これに基づいて製品ウェーハの研磨条件を調整することで、一方の面の無駄な研磨を少なくすることができ、さらには研磨プロセスの維持、管理も効率的に行うことができ、これにより生産性高く低コストで良質な両面研磨を行うことができる。   As described above, since the evaluation wafer of the present invention has recesses on both the front and back surfaces of the wafer, the polishing allowance can be evaluated by examining the depth change of the recesses before and after polishing, and the rotational speed of the surface plate It is possible to accurately evaluate the polishing allowance for each of the front surface and the back surface of the wafer in accordance with the apparatus conditions such as the above. In this way, according to the present invention, the polishing allowance on both sides of the wafer can be accurately evaluated, and by adjusting the polishing conditions of the product wafer based on this, it is possible to reduce unnecessary polishing on one side. In addition, it is possible to efficiently maintain and manage the polishing process, which enables high-quality double-side polishing with high productivity and low cost.

以下、本発明の実施の形態について、図を用いて詳細に説明するが、本発明はこれに限定されるものではない。
図1は、本発明の実施態様の例としての評価用ウェーハの表裏両面の平面図である。図2は、局所エッチング装置の概略図である。
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings, but the present invention is not limited thereto.
FIG. 1 is a plan view of both front and back surfaces of an evaluation wafer as an example of an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a local etching apparatus.

本発明の両面研磨の研磨代を評価するための評価用ウェーハWは、図1に示すように、ウェーハの表裏両面に凹部10が形成されている。
この評価用ウェーハWの作製方法としては、特に限定されないが、例えばシリコン単結晶ウェーハ等の製品ウェーハと同じ材料、同条件で作製されたウェーハの表裏両面に、凹部を形成することにより評価用ウェーハを作製することができる。
As shown in FIG. 1, the evaluation wafer W for evaluating the polishing allowance of the double-side polishing of the present invention has recesses 10 formed on both front and back surfaces of the wafer.
The method for producing this evaluation wafer W is not particularly limited. For example, the evaluation wafer is formed by forming recesses on both the front and back surfaces of a wafer produced under the same material and conditions as a product wafer such as a silicon single crystal wafer. Can be produced.

凹部10の形成方法としては、エッチングにより形成することが好ましい。
このように、エッチングにより凹部を形成することで、形状や深さを正確に形成することができるため、簡便な方法で精度高く研磨代の評価を行うことができる。
以下、エッチングにより凹部を形成する方法として、例えば局所エッチング装置を用いて凹部を形成する方法について説明する。
As a method for forming the recess 10, it is preferable to form the recess 10 by etching.
Thus, since the shape and depth can be accurately formed by forming the recess by etching, the polishing allowance can be evaluated with high accuracy by a simple method.
Hereinafter, as a method for forming a recess by etching, for example, a method for forming a recess using a local etching apparatus will be described.

図2に示す局所エッチング装置は、回転制御可能なウエーハ載置台とウエーハ表面にエッチング性ガス14を供給するための直線方向に移動可能なノズル15とエッチング性ガス14を発生させるための酸混合容器11からなっている。
まずフッ酸や硝酸の酸混合液12を酸混合容器11にいれて、この容器に窒素ガス13をバブリングすることでエッチング性ガス14を発生させ、ウエーハ表面に供給するノズル15を、X−Y方向に移動させるとともにウエーハ載置台をθ方向に回転させることでウエーハ表面に深さ:数μm〜数10μm、幅:数mm〜数100mmの寸法精度の高い凹部をエッチングにより形成することができる。
The local etching apparatus shown in FIG. 2 includes a wafer mounting table that can be controlled in rotation, a nozzle 15 that can move in a linear direction for supplying the etching gas 14 to the wafer surface, and an acid mixing container for generating the etching gas 14. It consists of eleven.
First, an acid mixed solution 12 of hydrofluoric acid or nitric acid is placed in an acid mixing container 11, and nitrogen gas 13 is bubbled into the container to generate an etching gas 14. By moving in the direction and rotating the wafer mounting table in the θ direction, recesses with high dimensional accuracy of depth: several μm to several 10 μm and width: several mm to several 100 mm can be formed by etching on the wafer surface.

凹部10としては、ウェーハの表裏両面に同一パターンで、ウェーハ中心を対称点として回転対称性を有するように形成することが好ましい。
このように、凹部をウェーハの表裏両面に同一パターンでウェーハ中心を対称点として回転対称性を有するように形成すれば、評価のための研磨時の負荷が評価用ウェーハ面内で均一にかかるため、製品ウェーハの研磨時と同様の研磨を行うことができ、より正確に研磨代を評価することができる。また、ウェーハの表面と裏面での研磨される面積やその研磨される面にかかる圧力が同じになるため、より正確にウェーハ両面の研磨代の評価を行うことができる。
The recess 10 is preferably formed in the same pattern on both the front and back surfaces of the wafer so as to have rotational symmetry with the wafer center as the symmetry point.
In this way, if the concave portions are formed on both front and back surfaces of the wafer so as to have rotational symmetry with the same pattern as the center of the wafer, the load during polishing for evaluation is uniformly applied on the wafer surface for evaluation. The same polishing as that of the product wafer can be performed, and the polishing allowance can be evaluated more accurately. Further, since the polished area on the front surface and the back surface of the wafer and the pressure applied to the polished surface are the same, the polishing allowance on both surfaces of the wafer can be more accurately evaluated.

このときのパターン形状として、例えば、図1に示すように、ウェーハ中心を対称点として、3つの扇形状の凹部が120°の回転対称性を有するように形成したり(図1(a))、2つの長方形の凹部が90°の回転対称性を有するように形成したり(図1(b))、同心円状の凹部を形成(図1(c))することができる。ここで、図1(a)、(b)のように、表面と裏面のパターンの回転位置をずらして形成すれば、研磨時の負荷がより均一になるが、特には限定されず、凹部は表裏両面で同じ位置に形成されてもよい。   As the pattern shape at this time, for example, as shown in FIG. 1, three fan-shaped concave portions are formed so as to have a rotational symmetry of 120 ° with respect to the center of the wafer (FIG. 1 (a)). Two rectangular recesses can be formed so as to have 90 ° rotational symmetry (FIG. 1B), or concentric recesses can be formed (FIG. 1C). Here, as shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B, if the rotational positions of the front and back patterns are shifted, the load during polishing becomes more uniform. You may form in the same position on both front and back.

また、凹部10の面積を、ウェーハW面内全体の面積の半分以下にすることが好ましい。
このように、凹部の面積をウェーハ面内全体の面積の半分以下にすることで、評価ウェーハへの研磨時の負荷が製品ウェーハへの負荷と同程度になり、研磨代の評価をより正確に行うことができる。
Further, it is preferable that the area of the recess 10 is set to be equal to or less than half the entire area in the wafer W plane.
In this way, by reducing the area of the recesses to less than half of the total area in the wafer surface, the load on the evaluation wafer during polishing is comparable to the load on the product wafer, and the polishing allowance is evaluated more accurately. It can be carried out.

本発明では、このように作製された評価用ウェーハWを両面研磨し、その研磨前後の凹部10の深さの変化によって研磨代を評価する。
本発明の評価用ウェーハ及び両面研磨の研磨代の評価方法であれば、表裏両面に凹部を有するウェーハを両面研磨することにより、研磨前後の凹部の深さの変化を調べるだけで装置条件による研磨代を簡便な方法で正確に評価することができる。
In the present invention, the evaluation wafer W manufactured in this way is polished on both sides, and the polishing allowance is evaluated by the change in the depth of the recess 10 before and after the polishing.
With the evaluation wafer of the present invention and the evaluation method of the polishing allowance of double-side polishing, polishing according to the apparatus conditions is possible simply by examining the change in the depth of the recess before and after polishing by polishing both sides of the wafer having recesses on both sides. The bill can be accurately evaluated by a simple method.

このとき両面研磨する装置としては、製品ウェーハを研磨するものと同一の装置を用いることができ、特に限定されないが、例えば図3に概略図で示されている、4ウェイ方式の両面研磨装置を用いることができる。図4は、4ウェイ方式の両面研磨装置の遊星歯車構造を示す概略平面図である。   At this time, as the apparatus for performing double-side polishing, the same apparatus as that for polishing a product wafer can be used, and is not particularly limited. For example, a 4-way double-side polishing apparatus shown schematically in FIG. 3 is used. Can be used. FIG. 4 is a schematic plan view showing a planetary gear structure of a 4-way double-side polishing apparatus.

例えば、図3に示す両面研磨装置1を用いる場合としては、まず、研磨布6が貼り付けられた下定盤9上に載置されたキャリア2のウエーハ保持孔3に、予め表裏面に形成された凹部の深さを測定した評価用ウエーハWを装着する。装着する評価用ウエーハWの枚数は最低バッチあたり1枚とし、好ましくは各キャリア2に1枚とする。評価用ウエーハWをセットした残りのウエーハ保持孔3には直径及び厚さの同じダミーウエーハを装着する。   For example, in the case of using the double-side polishing apparatus 1 shown in FIG. 3, first, the wafer holding hole 3 of the carrier 2 placed on the lower surface plate 9 on which the polishing cloth 6 is attached is formed on the front and back surfaces in advance. A wafer W for evaluation in which the depth of the concave portion is measured is mounted. The number of evaluation wafers W to be mounted is one per minimum batch, preferably one for each carrier 2. Dummy wafers having the same diameter and thickness are mounted in the remaining wafer holding holes 3 on which the evaluation wafers W are set.

そして表面に研磨布6が貼り付けられた上定盤8を下降させて評価用ウエーハWと接触させた後に、インターナルギア5、サンギア4を駆動させることでキャリア2を自転公転させるとともに、スラリー供給孔7から研磨用スラリーを供給しながら上下定盤を回転させることで評価用ウエーハWの表裏面を同時に研磨する。研磨終了後に評価用ウエーハWを取り出し表裏面の凹部の深さを測定し、研磨前の測定値との差を求めることで表裏両面の研磨代が判る。   Then, after the upper surface plate 8 having the polishing cloth 6 affixed to the surface is lowered and brought into contact with the evaluation wafer W, the internal gear 5 and the sun gear 4 are driven to rotate and revolve the carrier 2 and supply slurry. The front and back surfaces of the evaluation wafer W are simultaneously polished by rotating the upper and lower surface plates while supplying the polishing slurry from the holes 7. After the polishing is completed, the evaluation wafer W is taken out, the depths of the recesses on the front and back surfaces are measured, and the difference between the measured values before the polishing is determined to determine the polishing allowance on both the front and back surfaces.

このとき、評価するための研磨代としては、両面研磨の目的の一つであるラッピング、エッチングによる加工歪の除去を考慮すると、加工歪層の深さ分(5.5μm程度)以上を研磨することが好ましい。   At this time, as a polishing allowance for evaluation, in consideration of removal of processing strain by lapping and etching, which is one of the purposes of double-side polishing, a depth equal to or greater than the depth of the processing strain layer (about 5.5 μm) is polished. It is preferable.

このように評価したものに基づいて、製品ウェーハの研磨条件を調整して両面研磨することができる。
本発明の評価方法であれば、両面研磨の研磨代をウェーハ両面それぞれについて評価することができるため、それに基づいて研磨条件を調整することで、研磨代の少ない面の研磨速度を速くすることができ、ウェーハの表面と裏面の研磨代の違いによる一方の面の無駄な研磨を少なくすることができる。また、予め両面の研磨代を正確に評価することで製品ウェーハの研磨の際には両面の研磨代がほぼ等しい条件で研磨することができ、無駄な研磨が少なくなり、更に研磨速度が速くなるため研磨時間が短縮され、生産性良く良質な両面研磨を行うことができる。これにより、原料コストを低減し、生産性の高いウェーハを製造することができる。
Based on what was evaluated in this way, the polishing conditions of the product wafer can be adjusted to perform double-side polishing.
With the evaluation method of the present invention, the polishing allowance for double-sided polishing can be evaluated for each side of the wafer. Therefore, by adjusting the polishing conditions based on this, the polishing rate for the surface with less polishing allowance can be increased. In addition, useless polishing of one surface due to the difference in polishing allowance between the front surface and the back surface of the wafer can be reduced. In addition, by accurately evaluating the polishing allowance on both sides in advance, when polishing a product wafer, polishing on both sides can be polished under almost equal conditions, reducing unnecessary polishing and further increasing the polishing rate. Therefore, the polishing time is shortened, and high-quality double-side polishing can be performed with high productivity. Thereby, a raw material cost can be reduced and a highly productive wafer can be manufactured.

この調整される研磨条件としては、定盤の回転速度とすることが好ましい。
このように、評価したウェーハ両面のそれぞれの研磨代に基づいて、ウェーハの表面と裏面で研磨代が異なる場合や、一方の面を多めに研磨することが必要な場合には、上定盤と下定盤の速度回転を相対的に調整することにより、ウェーハの表裏の研磨代を容易に調整することができ、無駄な研磨を少なくすることができるため、簡便な方法でコストの低減を図ることができる。
The polishing conditions to be adjusted are preferably the rotation speed of the surface plate.
In this way, if the polishing allowance is different on the front and back surfaces of the wafer, or if it is necessary to polish more on one surface based on the polishing allowance on both sides of the evaluated wafer, By relatively adjusting the speed rotation of the lower surface plate, it is possible to easily adjust the polishing allowance on the front and back of the wafer and reduce unnecessary polishing, so the cost can be reduced by a simple method. Can do.

また、この調整される研磨条件としては、研磨スラリー又は研磨布の交換サイクルとすることが好ましい。
本発明の評価方法であれば、容易にウェーハ両面の研磨代を評価できるため、定期的にこの評価を行うことで、研磨スラリー又は研磨布の交換サイクルについても評価することができ、研磨プロセスの維持、管理を効率的に行うことができ、生産性の高い良質な両面研磨を行うことができる。
Further, as the polishing conditions to be adjusted, it is preferable to use a polishing slurry or a polishing cloth replacement cycle.
With the evaluation method of the present invention, the polishing allowance on both surfaces of the wafer can be easily evaluated. By periodically performing this evaluation, it is possible to evaluate the replacement cycle of the polishing slurry or polishing cloth, and the polishing process. Maintenance and management can be performed efficiently, and high-quality double-side polishing with high productivity can be performed.

また、このような調整される研磨条件としては、上記のものに限られず、例えば研磨代の少ない方の研磨定盤に貼り付ける研磨布を摩擦係数の大きいものに変更すること等によっても調整は可能である。   In addition, the polishing conditions to be adjusted are not limited to those described above, and for example, the adjustment can be made by changing the polishing cloth to be attached to the polishing surface plate having the smaller polishing allowance to one having a larger friction coefficient. Is possible.

以下、本発明を実施例によりさらに詳細に説明するが、本発明はこれに限定されない。   EXAMPLES Hereinafter, although an Example demonstrates this invention further in detail, this invention is not limited to this.

(実施例)
まず、チョクラルスキー法で引き上げた直径300mm、P型<100>の単結晶シリコンインゴット(低酸素・通常抵抗品:酸素濃度10.5ppma、抵抗率8〜10Ω・cm)をスライスして薄円板状のウエーハを得た。このウェーハの割れ、欠けを防止するため、外縁部に面取り加工を施した後、ウエーハを平坦化するためにラッピング、エッチング加工を行った。
(Example)
First, slice a thin 300 mm P-type <100> single crystal silicon ingot (low oxygen, normal resistance: oxygen concentration 10.5 ppma, resistivity 8-10 Ω · cm) pulled up by the Czochralski method A plate-like wafer was obtained. In order to prevent the wafer from cracking and chipping, lapping and etching were performed to flatten the wafer after chamfering the outer edge portion.

このようにして得られたウエーハ両面に、図2示すような局所エッチング装置を使って、深さ15μmでウエーハ中心からの距離が20mmから145mmにかけて中心角30゜の扇型の凹部を3箇所、エッチングにより形成し、図1(a)に示すような評価用ウエーハを30枚作製した。なお、凹部の深さは中心部3点と外周部3点の計6点の平均値である。   Using the local etching apparatus as shown in FIG. 2, three fan-shaped recesses having a depth of 15 μm and a distance from the wafer center of 20 mm to 145 mm and a central angle of 30 ° are formed on both surfaces of the wafer thus obtained. Thirty evaluation wafers as shown in FIG. 1A were formed by etching. The depth of the recess is an average value of a total of 6 points including 3 points at the center and 3 points at the outer periphery.

この評価用シリコンウエーハを、図3、4に示すような両面研磨装置の各キャリアの保持孔に1枚ずつ合計3枚セットした。また、各キャリアの残りの保持孔に評価用ウエーハと同じ厚みで凹部が形成されていないシリコンダミーウエーハを4枚ずつ計12枚セットし、以下の条件で両面研磨を行った。
なお、研磨布にポリエステル不繊布ウレタン樹脂含浸品(アスカーC硬度88°)を使用し、研磨スラリーにはコロイダルシリカを含有するpH11のアルカリ溶液を用いた。
A total of three silicon wafers for evaluation were set in the holding holes of the carriers of the double-side polishing apparatus as shown in FIGS. In addition, a total of 12 silicon dummy wafers, each having the same thickness as the evaluation wafer and having no recesses, were set in the remaining holding holes of each carrier, and double-side polishing was performed under the following conditions.
In addition, the polyester nonwoven fabric urethane resin impregnation goods (Asker C hardness 88 degrees) were used for polishing cloth, and the alkaline solution of pH11 containing colloidal silica was used for polishing slurry.

<研磨条件(調整前)>
上定盤回転速度(15rpm)、下定盤回転速度(15rpm)
上下定盤によるウエーハの研磨圧力(300g/cm)、スラリー供給量(2L/分)
ウエーハ仕上げ厚さ(777μm(目標))、研磨速度(0.4μm/分)
<Polishing conditions (before adjustment)>
Upper surface plate rotation speed (15 rpm), lower surface plate rotation speed (15 rpm)
Wafer polishing pressure by upper and lower surface plates (300 g / cm 2 ), slurry supply rate (2 L / min)
Wafer finish thickness (777 μm (target)), polishing rate (0.4 μm / min)

以上の研磨条件で10バッチの研磨を行った後、合計30枚の評価用シリコンウエーハの表裏両面の凹部の深さを静電容量型表面形状測定器(ADE社製AFS3220)により測定した。測定点は研磨前と同じウエーハの中心側3点と外周側3点とし、それぞれの平均値は以下のとおりであった。   After polishing 10 batches under the above polishing conditions, the depth of the concave portions on both the front and back surfaces of a total of 30 silicon wafers for evaluation was measured with a capacitance type surface shape measuring instrument (AFS3220 manufactured by ADE). The measurement points were the same 3 points on the center side and 3 points on the outer periphery side as before the polishing, and the average values were as follows.

表面側:中心部9.24μm(研磨代5.73μm)、外周部9.33μm(研磨代5.67μm)
裏面側:中心部2.73μm(研磨代12.27μm)、外周部2.89μm(研磨代12.11μm)
これらの値から全研磨量は中心部で18.00μm、外周部17.78μmであった。なお、研磨に要した時間は45分/バッチであった。
Surface side: center portion 9.24 μm (polishing allowance 5.73 μm), outer peripheral portion 9.33 μm (polishing allowance 5.67 μm)
Back side: center portion 2.73 μm (polishing allowance 12.27 μm), outer peripheral portion 2.89 μm (polishing allowance 12.11 μm)
From these values, the total polishing amount was 18.00 μm at the center and 17.78 μm at the outer periphery. The time required for polishing was 45 minutes / batch.

この結果から、上記の研磨条件で研磨を行った場合、裏面側が表面側に比べて2倍以上研磨されていることが判った。なお、加工歪を除去するためには、片側で最低5.5μmの研磨が必要であるが、上記研磨条件で研磨を行った場合には裏面側については、6μm以上も本来必要のない研磨が行われたことになる。
この結果を踏まえて、ウェーハの表裏面の研磨代が均等になるよう研磨条件の見直しを行い、上定盤回転速度を変えて、以下の条件で再度同様に10バッチの研磨を行った。
From this result, it was found that when polishing was performed under the above polishing conditions, the back surface was polished twice or more compared to the front surface. In order to remove the processing strain, at least 5.5 μm of polishing is required on one side. However, when polishing is performed under the above-described polishing conditions, polishing on the back surface side that is originally not required to be 6 μm or more is performed. It has been done.
Based on this result, the polishing conditions were reviewed so that the polishing allowance on the front and back surfaces of the wafer became uniform, and the upper platen rotation speed was changed, and 10 batches were again polished under the following conditions.

<研磨条件(調整後)>
上定盤回転速度(20rpm)、下定盤回転速度(15rpm)
上下定盤によるウエーハの研磨圧力(300g/cm)、スラリー供給量(2L/分)
ウエーハ仕上げ厚さ(777μm(目標))、研磨速度(0.4μm/分)
<Polishing conditions (after adjustment)>
Upper surface plate rotation speed (20 rpm), lower surface plate rotation speed (15 rpm)
Wafer polishing pressure by upper and lower surface plates (300 g / cm 2 ), slurry supply rate (2 L / min)
Wafer finish thickness (777 μm (target)), polishing rate (0.4 μm / min)

以上の研磨条件で10バッチの研磨を行った後、合計30枚の評価用シリコンウエーハの表裏両面の凹部の深さを測定した。測定結果は以下のとおりである。   After polishing 10 batches under the above polishing conditions, the depths of the recesses on both the front and back surfaces of a total of 30 evaluation silicon wafers were measured. The measurement results are as follows.

表面側:中心部9.35μm(研磨代5.65μm)、外周部9.43μm(研磨代5.57μm)
裏面側:中心部8.65μm(研磨代6.35μm)、外周部8.76μm(研磨代6.24μm)
これらの値から全研磨量は中心部で12.00μm、外周部11.81μmであった。なお、研磨に要した時間は30分/バッチであった。
Surface side: center portion 9.35 μm (polishing allowance 5.65 μm), outer peripheral portion 9.43 μm (polishing allowance 5.57 μm)
Back side: center portion 8.65 μm (polishing allowance 6.35 μm), outer peripheral portion 8.76 μm (polishing allowance 6.24 μm)
From these values, the total polishing amount was 12.00 μm at the center and 11.81 μm at the outer periphery. The time required for polishing was 30 minutes / batch.

このように、調整後の研磨条件では、ウェーハの表裏面の研磨代の差が1μm以内に抑えられ、不必要な研磨代がほとんど無くなるとともに、研磨時間も約33%短縮された。   Thus, under the adjusted polishing conditions, the difference in the polishing allowance between the front and back surfaces of the wafer was suppressed to within 1 μm, unnecessary polishing allowance was almost eliminated, and the polishing time was shortened by about 33%.

なお、本発明は、上記実施形態に限定されるものではない。上記実施形態は、例示であり、本発明の特許請求の範囲に記載された技術的思想と実質的に同一な構成を有し、同様な作用効果を奏するものは、いかなるものであっても本発明の技術的範囲に包含される。   The present invention is not limited to the above embodiment. The above-described embodiment is an exemplification, and the present invention has substantially the same configuration as the technical idea described in the claims of the present invention, and any device that exhibits the same function and effect is the present invention. It is included in the technical scope of the invention.

本発明の実施態様の例としての評価用ウェーハの表裏両面の平面図である。It is a top view of the front and back both surfaces of the wafer for evaluation as an example of the embodiment of the present invention. 局所エッチング装置の概略図である。It is the schematic of a local etching apparatus. 4ウェイ方式の両面研磨装置の概略図である。It is a schematic diagram of a 4-way double-side polishing apparatus. 4ウェイ方式の両面研磨装置の遊星歯車構造を示す概略平面図である。It is a schematic plan view which shows the planetary gear structure of a 4-way double-side polishing apparatus.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1…4ウェイ方式の両面研磨装置、 2…キャリア、 3…ウェーハ保持孔、
4…サンギア、 5…インターナルギア、 6…研磨布、
7…スラリー供給孔、 8…上定盤、 9…下定盤、 10…凹部
11…酸混合容器、 12…酸混合液、 13…窒素ガス、
14…エッチング性ガス、 15…酸供給ノズル、
W…評価用ウェーハ。
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... 4 way type double-side polish apparatus, 2 ... Carrier, 3 ... Wafer holding hole,
4 ... Sun gear, 5 ... Internal gear, 6 ... Polishing cloth,
7 ... Slurry supply hole, 8 ... Upper platen, 9 ... Lower platen, 10 ... Recessed portion 11 ... Acid mixing container, 12 ... Acid mixed solution, 13 ... Nitrogen gas,
14 ... Etching gas, 15 ... Acid supply nozzle,
W: Wafer for evaluation.

Claims (11)

両面研磨の両面それぞれの研磨代を評価するための評価用ウェーハであって、ウェーハの表裏両面に凹部が形成されているものであることを特徴とする評価用ウェーハ。 An evaluation wafer for evaluating the polishing allowance of each of both surfaces of double- side polishing, wherein a recess is formed on both front and back surfaces of the wafer. 前記凹部が、エッチングにより形成されたものであることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の評価用ウェーハ。   The evaluation wafer according to claim 1, wherein the concave portion is formed by etching. 前記凹部が、前記ウェーハの表裏両面に同一パターンで形成されているものであって、前記ウェーハ中心を対称点として回転対称性を有するものであることを特徴とする請求項1又は請求項2に記載の評価用ウェーハ。   The said recessed part is formed in the same pattern on the front and back both surfaces of the said wafer, Comprising: It has a rotational symmetry with the said wafer center as a symmetry point, The Claim 1 or Claim 2 characterized by the above-mentioned. The evaluation wafer described. 前記凹部の面積が、前記ウェーハ面内全体の面積の半分以下であることを特徴とする請求項1乃至請求項3のいずれか一項に記載の評価用ウェーハ。   4. The evaluation wafer according to claim 1, wherein an area of the concave portion is not more than half of an entire area in the wafer surface. 5. 両面研磨の研磨代の評価方法であって、ウェーハの表裏両面に凹部を形成することによって評価用ウェーハを作製し、該評価用ウェーハを両面研磨し、該両面研磨された評価用ウェーハの両面それぞれの研磨前後の凹部の深さの変化によってウェーハ両面それぞれの研磨代を評価することを特徴とする両面研磨の研磨代の評価方法。 A method for evaluating grinding allowance of the double-sided polishing, to prepare a test wafers by forming a recess on both sides of the wafer, the test wafers were double-side polishing, both surfaces of the test wafers that have been polished double-sided A polishing allowance evaluation method for double-side polishing, wherein the polishing allowance for each of both surfaces of the wafer is evaluated based on a change in the depth of the recesses before and after polishing. 前記凹部の形成方法を、エッチングにより形成することを特徴とする請求項5に記載の両面研磨の研磨代の評価方法。   6. The method for evaluating a polishing allowance for double-side polishing according to claim 5, wherein the method of forming the recess is formed by etching. 前記凹部を、前記ウェーハの表裏両面に同一パターンで、前記ウェーハ中心を対称点として回転対称性を有するように形成することを特徴とする請求項5又は請求項6に記載の両面研磨の研磨代の評価方法。   The polishing margin for double-side polishing according to claim 5 or 6, wherein the recesses are formed in the same pattern on both front and back surfaces of the wafer so as to have rotational symmetry with the wafer center as a symmetry point. Evaluation method. 前記凹部の面積を、前記ウェーハ面内全体の面積の半分以下にすることを特徴とする請求項5乃至請求項7のいずれか一項に記載の両面研磨の研磨代の評価方法。   The method for evaluating a polishing allowance for double-side polishing according to any one of claims 5 to 7, wherein an area of the concave portion is less than or equal to half of an entire area in the wafer surface. 少なくとも、請求項5乃至請求項8のいずれか一項に記載の両面研磨の研磨代の評価方法によって研磨代を評価して、製品ウェーハの研磨条件を調整することを特徴とする両面研磨方法。   9. A double-side polishing method comprising: adjusting a polishing condition of a product wafer by evaluating a polishing allowance by at least the polishing allowance evaluation method of double-side polishing according to any one of claims 5 to 8. 前記調整される研磨条件を、定盤の回転速度とすることを特徴とする請求項9に記載の両面研磨方法。   The double-side polishing method according to claim 9, wherein the adjusted polishing condition is a rotational speed of a surface plate. 前記調整される研磨条件を、研磨スラリー又は研磨布の交換サイクルとすることを特徴とする請求項9又は請求項10に記載の両面研磨方法。   The double-side polishing method according to claim 9 or 10, wherein the adjusted polishing condition is a polishing slurry or a polishing cloth exchange cycle.
JP2008111659A 2008-04-22 2008-04-22 Evaluation wafer and evaluation method of polishing allowance for double-side polishing Active JP5282440B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008111659A JP5282440B2 (en) 2008-04-22 2008-04-22 Evaluation wafer and evaluation method of polishing allowance for double-side polishing

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008111659A JP5282440B2 (en) 2008-04-22 2008-04-22 Evaluation wafer and evaluation method of polishing allowance for double-side polishing

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2009266896A JP2009266896A (en) 2009-11-12
JP5282440B2 true JP5282440B2 (en) 2013-09-04

Family

ID=41392402

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2008111659A Active JP5282440B2 (en) 2008-04-22 2008-04-22 Evaluation wafer and evaluation method of polishing allowance for double-side polishing

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5282440B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9162516B2 (en) 2013-03-07 2015-10-20 ACCO Brands Corporation Display board assembly

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6123150B2 (en) * 2011-08-30 2017-05-10 株式会社Sumco Method for evaluating silicon wafer processing amount and method for manufacturing silicon wafer
CN113664694A (en) * 2021-07-29 2021-11-19 山西烁科晶体有限公司 Method for measuring removal thickness of silicon surface and carbon surface in silicon carbide double-surface polishing

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000031224A (en) * 1998-07-08 2000-01-28 Shin Etsu Handotai Co Ltd Evaluation of semiconductor wafer
JP4400795B2 (en) * 2005-11-22 2010-01-20 次世代半導体材料技術研究組合 Evaluation substrate and CMP condition evaluation method
JP2009231365A (en) * 2008-03-19 2009-10-08 Sumitomo Electric Ind Ltd Monitoring method for surface treatment of semiconductor substrate and semiconductor substrate with marker

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9162516B2 (en) 2013-03-07 2015-10-20 ACCO Brands Corporation Display board assembly

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2009266896A (en) 2009-11-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5614397B2 (en) Double-side polishing method
JP5644401B2 (en) Epitaxial wafer manufacturing method and epitaxial wafer
TWI680507B (en) Wafer polishing method
US9748089B2 (en) Method for producing mirror-polished wafer
JPH0997775A (en) Manufacture of mirror-surface semiconductor wafer
CN109475996B (en) Double-side grinding method for wafer
JP2013258226A (en) Semiconductor wafer manufacturing method
JP2009302409A (en) Method of manufacturing semiconductor wafer
JP2009302408A (en) Manufacturing method of semiconductor wafer
JP5282440B2 (en) Evaluation wafer and evaluation method of polishing allowance for double-side polishing
JP6493253B2 (en) Silicon wafer manufacturing method and silicon wafer
US10395933B2 (en) Method for manufacturing semiconductor wafer
WO2016170721A1 (en) Method for manufacturing epitaxial wafer
WO2013031090A1 (en) Silicon wafer polishing method and polishing device
CN110052955B (en) Method for manufacturing carrier and method for double-side polishing wafer
WO2013024565A1 (en) Stock removal evaluation method and wafer production method
KR20190040328A (en) Silicon wafer polishing method, silicon wafer manufacturing method, and silicon wafer
KR101328775B1 (en) Method for producing silicon epitaxial wafer
JP6471686B2 (en) Silicon wafer chamfering method, silicon wafer manufacturing method, and silicon wafer
TWI710018B (en) Double-sided grinding method and double-sided grinding device of wafer
US20040195657A1 (en) Semiconductor wafer
JPWO2010119833A1 (en) Manufacturing method of silicon epitaxial wafer
JP2009269150A (en) Dressing plate for abrasive cloth, method of dressing abrasive cloth, and method of grinding semiconductor substrate
JP2009135180A (en) Method for manufacturing semiconductor wafer

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20110124

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20130213

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20130411

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20130430

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20130513

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5282440

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250