JP5171437B2 - Recruitment support system and recruitment support program - Google Patents

Recruitment support system and recruitment support program Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5171437B2
JP5171437B2 JP2008173268A JP2008173268A JP5171437B2 JP 5171437 B2 JP5171437 B2 JP 5171437B2 JP 2008173268 A JP2008173268 A JP 2008173268A JP 2008173268 A JP2008173268 A JP 2008173268A JP 5171437 B2 JP5171437 B2 JP 5171437B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
employee
recruitment
evaluation
score
value
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2008173268A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2010015289A (en
Inventor
信二 永松
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Daicel Corp
Original Assignee
Daicel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Daicel Corp filed Critical Daicel Corp
Priority to JP2008173268A priority Critical patent/JP5171437B2/en
Publication of JP2010015289A publication Critical patent/JP2010015289A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5171437B2 publication Critical patent/JP5171437B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Description

本発明は、企業の人材採用活動において実施される職務適性試験を利用した人材採用支援システム及び人材採用支援プログラムに関するものである。   The present invention relates to a recruitment support system and a recruitment support program using a job aptitude test performed in a recruitment activity of a company.

企業は、新卒採用や中途採用などの採用活動の際に広範な人材の中から自社に適した者を選ぶために、面接試験だけでなく、SPI試験のような筆記又はインターネット等による職務適性試験を実施する場合がある(例えば、特許文献1参照)。   Companies choose not only interviews but also written aptitudes such as SPI tests or job aptitude tests via the Internet, etc., in order to select a suitable person from a wide range of human resources during recruitment activities such as new graduate recruitment and mid-career recruitment. (For example, refer to Patent Document 1).

一般的な職務適性試験は、性格検査と能力検査とからなる。その試験結果は、各解析項目の結果をそれぞれ偏差値化して出力されると共に、各項目の偏差値に応じて職種毎の職務適応性を段階評価して人事担当者に提供される。
特開2001−357124号公報
A typical job aptitude test consists of a personality test and an ability test. The test result is output by converting the result of each analysis item into a deviation value, and is provided to personnel personnel by evaluating the job adaptability for each occupation according to the deviation value of each item.
JP 2001-357124 A

ところで、個々の企業においては社風や求められる性格・能力がそれぞれ異なることから、人材適性も企業ごとに異なることとなる。しかしながら、従来の職務適性試験では、試験結果の偏差値から職務適応性を評価する際に、画一化した評価手法により判定が行われている。よって、あらゆる企業の採用活動に対して職務適性試験を一律に適用しようとしても、個々の企業にとっては的確な評価結果が得られているとは限らないのが現状である。そうすると、企業と採用内定者との間にミスマッチが発生し、企業側から見れば過大な採用活動を誘発することとなり、応募者側から見れば自分に適さない企業に入社するリスクが生じる。   By the way, individual companies have different corporate cultures and required personalities and abilities, so the aptitude of human resources also varies from company to company. However, in the conventional job aptitude test, when job aptitude is evaluated from the deviation value of the test result, the determination is performed by a uniform evaluation method. Therefore, even if it is going to apply the job aptitude test uniformly to the recruitment activities of all companies, the present situation is that an accurate evaluation result is not necessarily obtained for each company. If this happens, there will be a mismatch between the company and the hiring candidate, leading to excessive recruitment activities from the viewpoint of the company, and there is a risk of joining a company that is not suitable for the applicant.

そこで本発明は、職務適性試験の結果を有効に利用して、個々の企業ごとに的確な採用活動が実施されるようにすることを目的としている。   In view of the above, an object of the present invention is to effectively utilize the results of the job aptitude test so that an appropriate recruitment activity is carried out for each company.

本発明は前記事情に鑑みてなされたものであり、本発明に係る人材採用支援システムは、採用選考対象者の職務適性試験の結果をコンピュータで分析するための人材採用支援システムであって、企業の社員の社内評価得点を含む社内評価情報が保存された社員評価データベースと、前記社員の職務適性試験の結果情報が保存された社員試験結果データベースと、前記社員評価データベースに保存された前記社員の社内評価得点を、前記社員試験結果データベースに保存された前記社員の職務適性試験の結果情報に関連付けて、前記社内評価得点が所定値以上である高評価社員の前記職務適性試験の結果情報を抽出する高評価社員情報抽出手段と、前記高評価社員情報抽出手段により抽出された前記結果情報に基づいて、採用選考対象者の前記職務適性試験の結果の前記企業における採用目標範囲を決定する採用目標範囲決定手段と、を備え、前記採用目標範囲決定手段は、前記高評価社員情報抽出手段により抽出された複数の前記結果情報から前記高評価社員の前記職務適性試験の解析項目ごとにおける得点の平均値を算出し、前記高評価社員の各々について前記平均値からの偏差を前記各解析項目ごとに算出して前記偏差が小さくなるほど高くなる得点を前記解析項目ごとに付与し、それら解析項目ごとの得点の合計を前記高評価社員の各々の適性値として算定し、前記適性値を参照して前記採用目標範囲を決定することを特徴とする。 The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and the personnel recruitment support system according to the present invention is a personnel recruitment support system for analyzing the results of job aptitude tests of recruitment candidates by a computer, An employee evaluation database that stores internal evaluation information including internal evaluation scores of employees, an employee test result database that stores information on the results of job aptitude tests for the employee, and an employee's evaluation database that stores the employee evaluation data stored in the employee evaluation database. The internal evaluation score is associated with the employee job aptitude test result information stored in the employee test result database, and the job aptitude test result information of the highly evaluated employee with the internal evaluation score equal to or higher than a predetermined value is extracted. Based on the result information extracted by the highly evaluated employee information extracting means and the highly evaluated employee information extracting means, And a adoption target range determining means for determining the adoption target range in the company of the result of Tsutomu aptitude test, the adopted target range determining means, a plurality of said result information extracted by the high-rated employee information extraction means The average value of the score for each analysis item of the job aptitude test of the highly evaluated employee is calculated, and the deviation from the average value is calculated for each analysis item for each of the highly evaluated employee, and the deviation becomes smaller. the higher the score given to each of the analysis items, and calculates the sum of each of those analysis item score as suitability value of each of the high evaluation employees Rukoto to determine the adopted target range by referring to the appropriate value It is characterized by.

前記構成によれば、個別の企業において既に高い社内評価を得ている社員が過去に受けた適性試験の結果を参照し、高評価社員の職務適性試験の結果に基づいて職務適性試験の結果の採用目標範囲を決定しているので、個々の企業の社風や求められる性格・能力に応じた人材を採用することに貢献することができる。したがって、企業と採用内定者との間のミスマッチが低減され、企業側から見れば過大な採用活動が抑制でき、応募者側から見れば自分に適さない企業へ入社してしまうリスクを減らすことができる。そして、高評価社員の適性値は、高評価社員の職務適性試験の解析項目ごとの得点の平均値からの偏差を求め、その偏差が小さくなるほど高くなるよう解析項目ごとに付与された得点を合計することで求められているので、高評価社員の職務適性試験の結果の変動の影響を抑制した適切な適性値を得ることができる。 According to the above configuration, the results of the aptitude test based on the job aptitude test results of the highly evaluated employees are referred to by referring to the aptitude test results of employees who have already received high internal evaluations in individual companies. Since the recruitment target range is determined, it is possible to contribute to recruiting human resources according to the culture of each company and the required personality and ability. Therefore, mismatches between companies and recruitment candidates are reduced, excessive recruitment activities can be suppressed from the viewpoint of the company, and the risk of joining a company that is not suitable for the applicant is reduced. it can. For the aptitude value of highly evaluated employees, the deviation from the average score for each analysis item of the job aptitude test for highly evaluated employees is calculated, and the score given to each analysis item is summed up so that the deviation decreases. Therefore, it is possible to obtain an appropriate aptitude value that suppresses the influence of fluctuations in the results of the job aptitude test of highly evaluated employees.

前記社員評価データベースに保存された前記社員の社内評価得点を、前記社員試験結果データベースに保存された前記社員の職務適性試験の結果情報に関連付けて、前記社内評価得点が前記所定値より小さい値の第2の所定値以下である低評価社員の前記職務適性試験の結果情報を抽出する低評価社員情報抽出手段をさらに備え、前記採用目標範囲決定手段は、前記低評価社員情報抽出手段により抽出された前記結果情報も参照して、採用選考対象者の前記職務適性試験の結果の前記企業における採用目標範囲を決定してもよい。 The internal evaluation score of the employee stored in the employee evaluation database is associated with the result information of the employee job aptitude test stored in the employee test result database, and the internal evaluation score is smaller than the predetermined value. further comprising a low-rated employee information extraction means for extracting the result information of the job aptitude test of the second predetermined value der Ru dislikes employees or less, the adopted target range determining means, extracted by the low-rated employee information extraction means The recruitment target range in the company of the job aptitude test result of the recruitment selection target person may be determined with reference to the result information.

前記構成によれば、個別の企業において低い社内評価を得ている社員が過去に受けた適性試験の結果も参照して採用目標範囲を決定しているので、個々の企業の社風や求められる性格・能力に対応しない人材を採用から除外することに貢献することができる。   According to the above configuration, the hiring target range is determined by referring to the results of aptitude tests that have been received in the past by employees who have received low internal evaluations at individual companies. -It can contribute to excluding personnel who do not correspond to ability from recruitment.

前記社員評価データベースに保存された前記社員の社内評価得点を、前記社員試験結果データベースに保存された前記社員の職務適性試験の結果情報に関連付けて、前記社内評価得点が前記所定値より小の第2の所定値以下である前記低評価社員の前記職務適性試験の結果情報を抽出する低評価社員情報抽出手段をさらに備え、前記採用目標範囲決定手段は、前記低評価社員情報抽出手段により抽出された複数の前記結果情報から前記低評価社員の前記職務適性試験の解析項目ごとにおける得点の平均値を算出し、前記解析項目のうち、前記高評価社員の前記平均値と前記低評価社員の前記平均値との差が所定値以上である解析項目のみに基づいて前記適値を算定してもよい。 The in-house evaluation score of the employee stored in the employee evaluation database is associated with the employee job aptitude test result information stored in the employee test result database, and the in-house evaluation score is smaller than the predetermined value. 2 is further provided with a low evaluation employee information extraction means for extracting the result information of the job aptitude test of the low evaluation employee that is equal to or less than a predetermined value of 2, wherein the recruitment target range determination means is extracted by the low evaluation employee information extraction means. The average value of scores for each analysis item of the job aptitude test of the low evaluation employee is calculated from a plurality of the result information, and among the analysis items, the average value of the high evaluation employee and the low evaluation employee of the low evaluation employee it may be calculated the aptitude value based only on the analysis item difference between the average value is equal to or greater than a predetermined value.

前記構成によれば、職務適性試験の結果において、高評価社員と低評価社員との間で差の大きい解析項目を抽出して採用目標範囲の決定に用いているので、高評価社員と低評価社員との間の特性の違いを十分に反映した適切な採用目標範囲を設定することができる。   According to the above configuration, in the results of the job aptitude test, the analysis items having a large difference between the high evaluation employees and the low evaluation employees are extracted and used to determine the recruitment target range. It is possible to set an appropriate recruitment target range that sufficiently reflects the difference in characteristics between employees.

前記職務適性試験の結果情報は、性格情報を含んでおり、前記適値は、前記性格情報に基づいて算定されていてもよい。 The result information duties aptitude test includes a character information, the aptitude value may be calculated based on the personality information.

前記構成によれば、個々の企業にマッチする性格を有する者を好適に把握することができる。   According to the said structure, the person who has the character matched with each company can be grasped | ascertained suitably.

前記職務適性試験の結果情報は、言語能力得点と非言語能力得点とを有する能力情報を含んでおり、前記採用目標範囲決定手段は、前記高評価社員情報抽出手段により抽出された前記結果情報のうち前記言語能力得点と前記非言語能力得点との両方から得られる総合能力得点に対して、前記言語能力得点と前記非言語能力得点との得点差に応じて重み付けをした能力値を算定し、前記能力値を参照して前記採用目標範囲を決定してもよい。   The job aptitude test result information includes ability information having a language ability score and a non-language ability score, and the recruitment target range determining means includes the result information extracted by the highly evaluated employee information extracting means. Among them, for the overall ability score obtained from both the language ability score and the non-language ability score, the ability value weighted according to the score difference between the language ability score and the non-language ability score is calculated, The adoption target range may be determined with reference to the capability value.

前記構成によれば、言語能力得点と非言語能力得点との両方から得られる総合能力得点に、言語能力得点と非言語能力得点との得点差が大きくなるほど値が小さくなるような重み付けをして能力値を求めているので、言語能力と非言語能力のバランスが良好な者に高得点が与えられる。よって、言語能力および非言語能力の何れか一方について偏って高得点である者の能力値が従来よりも低く設定され、企業への適応性の高いと思われるバランスのとれた人材を見つけることができる。   According to the above configuration, the overall ability score obtained from both the language ability score and the non-language ability score is weighted so that the value decreases as the score difference between the language ability score and the non-language ability score increases. Since the ability value is calculated, a high score is given to those who have a good balance between language ability and non-language ability. Therefore, finding a well-balanced human resource that has a high ability score for those who are biased in terms of either linguistic ability or non-linguistic ability is set lower than in the past, and is highly adaptable to companies. it can.

また、本発明の人材採用支援プログラムは、採用選考対象者の職務適性試験の結果をコンピュータで分析するための人材採用支援プログラムであって、企業の社員の社内評価得点を前記社員の職務適性試験の結果情報に関連付けて、前記社内評価得点が所定値以上である高評価社員の前記職務適性試験の結果情報を抽出する高評価社員情報抽出ステップと、前記高評価社員情報抽出ステップにより抽出された前記結果情報に基づいて、採用選考対象者の前記職務適性試験の結果の前記企業における採用目標範囲を決定する採用目標範囲決定ステップと、を前記コンピュータに実行させ、前記採用目標範囲決定ステップは、前記高評価社員情報抽出ステップにより抽出された複数の前記結果情報から前記高評価社員の前記職務適性試験の解析項目ごとにおける得点の平均値を算出し、前記高評価社員の各々について前記平均値からの偏差を前記各解析項目ごとに算出して前記偏差が小さくなるほど高くなる得点を前記解析項目ごとに付与し、それら解析項目ごとの得点の合計を前記高評価社員の各々の適性値として算定し、前記適性値を参照して前記採用目標範囲を決定することを特徴とする。 The human resource recruitment support program of the present invention is a human resource recruitment support program for analyzing the results of job aptitude tests of candidates for employment selection with a computer, and the in-house evaluation score of a company employee is used as the job aptitude test for the employees. In association with the result information, the highly evaluated employee information extracting step for extracting the result information of the job aptitude test of the highly evaluated employee whose in-house evaluation score is a predetermined value or more, and the highly evaluated employee information extracting step Based on the result information, the recruitment target range determination step for determining a recruitment target range in the company of the job aptitude test result of the recruitment selection target person is executed by the computer, and the recruitment target range determination step includes: An analysis item of the job aptitude test of the highly evaluated employee from a plurality of the result information extracted by the highly evaluated employee information extracting step. For each of the highly evaluated employees, the deviation from the average value is calculated for each of the analysis items, and a score that increases as the deviation becomes smaller is assigned to each of the analysis items, to calculate the sum of the scores of each of those analysis items as suitability value of each of the high evaluation employees, it characterized that you determine the adoption target range by referring to the appropriate value.

前記構成によれば、前記同様に、個別の企業において既に高い社内評価を得ている社員が過去に受けた適性試験の結果を参照し、高評価社員の職務適性試験の結果に基づいて職務適性試験の結果の採用目標範囲を決定しているので、個々の企業の社風や求められる性格・能力に応じた人材を採用することに貢献することができる。   According to the above configuration, as described above, an employee who has already obtained a high in-house evaluation at an individual company refers to the result of an aptitude test that has been received in the past, and the job aptitude is based on the result of the aptitude test of a highly evaluated employee. Since the scope of recruitment of the test results has been determined, it can contribute to recruiting human resources according to the culture of each company and the required personality and ability.

以上の説明から明らかなように、本発明によれば、職務適性試験の結果を効果的に利用することで企業と採用内定者との間のミスマッチが低減され、企業及び応募者の時間、コスト、リスク等を削減することができる。   As is clear from the above explanation, according to the present invention, the mismatch between the company and the candidate for employment is reduced by effectively using the result of the job aptitude test, and the time and cost of the company and the applicant are reduced. Risk can be reduced.

以下、本発明に係る実施形態を図面を参照して説明する。   Embodiments according to the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.

図1は本発明の実施形態に係る人材採用支援プログラム8を用いた人材採用支援システム1を示すブロック図である。図1に示すように、人材採用支援システム1は、入力装置3及び表示装置4が接続されたコンピュータ2を備えている。コンピュータ2は、CPUや、CPUが実行するプログラム等が保存されたハードディスク等の記憶装置や、プログラム実行時にデータを一時記憶するためのRAMや、書き換え可能なEEPROM等のメモリや、入出力インターフェース等で構成されている。入力装置3は、マウスやキーボード等からなる。表示装置4は、液晶ディスプレイやCRT等からなる。   FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a recruitment support system 1 using a recruitment support program 8 according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 1, the recruitment support system 1 includes a computer 2 to which an input device 3 and a display device 4 are connected. The computer 2 includes a CPU, a storage device such as a hard disk storing a program executed by the CPU, a RAM for temporarily storing data when the program is executed, a memory such as a rewritable EEPROM, an input / output interface, etc. It consists of The input device 3 includes a mouse, a keyboard, and the like. The display device 4 includes a liquid crystal display, a CRT, or the like.

コンピュータ2には、社員評価データベース5、社員試験結果データベース6及び採用選考対象者データベース7が接続されている。社員評価データベース5は、個別の企業における既存の社員の社内評価得点を含む社内評価情報が蓄積保存されている。社内評価得点は、職務適応性や業績評価などの複数の観点からみた既存社員の社内評価を予め数値化したもので、従来から企業人事部において利用されているものである。社員試験結果データベース6は、過去の採用合格者である既存の社員が入社試験の際に受けた過去の職務適性試験の結果情報や採用面接試験の評価点である面接値が蓄積保存されている。職務適性試験は、SPI試験のような公知の職務適性試験であって、性格検査と能力検査とからなり、各検査項目の結果をそれぞれ偏差値化して出力するものである。採用選考対象者データベース7は、当該企業の入社試験を受けた採用選考対象者の職務適性試験の結果及び採用面接試験の評価点である面接値が年度毎に蓄積保存されている。   The computer 2 is connected to an employee evaluation database 5, an employee test result database 6 and a recruitment selection subject database 7. The employee evaluation database 5 stores and stores in-house evaluation information including in-house evaluation scores of existing employees in individual companies. The in-house evaluation score is a numerical value of the in-house evaluation of existing employees from multiple viewpoints such as job adaptability and performance evaluation, and has been used in the corporate personnel department. The employee test result database 6 stores and stores the past job aptitude test result information and the interview value that is the evaluation score of the hiring interview test that the existing employee who has passed the past hiring has taken during the entrance examination. . The job aptitude test is a well-known job aptitude test such as the SPI test, and includes a personality test and an ability test, and outputs the result of each inspection item as a deviation value. The recruitment selection target person database 7 stores and stores the results of the job aptitude test of the recruitment selection target person who has undergone the entrance examination of the company and the interview value, which is the evaluation score of the recruitment interview test, every year.

コンピュータ2の記憶装置には、人材採用支援プログラム8がCPUにより実行可能に保存されている。人材採用支援プログラム8は、高評価社員情報抽出手段9と、低評価社員情報抽出手段10と、採用目標範囲決定手段11と、試験結果対照手段12とを備えている。なお、これらの手段9〜12は、当該プログラム8中のコードセットにより構成されており、その各ステップがCPUにより実行される。   In the storage device of the computer 2, a human resource recruitment support program 8 is stored so as to be executable by the CPU. The human resource recruitment support program 8 includes high evaluation employee information extraction means 9, low evaluation employee information extraction means 10, employment target range determination means 11, and test result comparison means 12. These means 9 to 12 are constituted by a code set in the program 8, and each step is executed by the CPU.

高評価社員情報抽出手段9は、社員評価データベース5に保存された社員のうち社内評価得点が所定値以上である高評価社員を選び出し、社員試験結果データベース6から当該高評価社員の職務適性試験の結果情報を抽出する。低評価社員情報抽出手段10は、社員評価データベース5に保存された社員のうち社内評価得点が第2の所定値以下である低評価社員を選び出し、社員試験結果データベース6から当該低評価社員の職務適性試験の結果情報を抽出する。ここで、低評価社員情報抽出手段10で用いられる第2の所定値は、高評価社員情報抽出手段9で用いられる所定値よりも小さい値である。なお、高評価社員及び低評価社員の抽出には、入社後所定年数以上(例えば、10年以上望ましくは15年以上)が経過した管理職レベルの社員を対象としている。   The highly evaluated employee information extraction means 9 selects a highly evaluated employee whose in-house evaluation score is a predetermined value or more from among the employees stored in the employee evaluation database 5, and performs a job aptitude test of the highly evaluated employee from the employee test result database 6. Extract result information. The low evaluation employee information extraction means 10 selects a low evaluation employee whose in-house evaluation score is equal to or lower than the second predetermined value from among the employees stored in the employee evaluation database 5, and the job of the low evaluation employee from the employee test result database 6. Extract results information of aptitude test. Here, the second predetermined value used by the low evaluation employee information extraction means 10 is a value smaller than the predetermined value used by the high evaluation employee information extraction means 9. The extraction of high evaluation employees and low evaluation employees is targeted at manager-level employees who have passed a predetermined number of years after joining the company (for example, 10 years or more, preferably 15 years or more).

採用目標範囲決定手段11は、高評価社員情報抽出手段9及び低評価社員情報抽出手段10により抽出された結果情報に基づいて、採用選考対象者の職務適性試験の結果の当該企業における採用目標範囲を決定する。その詳細は後述する。試験結果対照手段12は、採用目標範囲決定手段11により決定された採用目標範囲20(図3参照)に採用選考対象者の職務適性試験の結果を対照させて表示装置4に表示し、採用選考対象者の職務適性試験の結果が採用目標範囲20に属しているか否かを判定可能にする。   The recruitment target range determination means 11 is based on the result information extracted by the high evaluation employee information extraction means 9 and the low evaluation employee information extraction means 10. To decide. Details thereof will be described later. The test result contrasting unit 12 displays the result of the job aptitude test of the person selected for employment selection on the display device 4 against the recruitment target range 20 (see FIG. 3) determined by the recruitment target range determination unit 11 and selects the recruitment. It is possible to determine whether or not the result of the job aptitude test of the subject belongs to the adoption target range 20.

図2は図1に示すシステム1により生成された高評価社員及び低評価社員の職務適性試験の結果及びその分析結果を示す評価表である。図2に示すように、職務適性試験の結果情報は、能力情報と性格情報とからなる。能力情報は、言語能力得点と、非言語能力得点と、言語能力及び非言語能力の両方を総合的に数値化した総合能力得点とを有している。性格情報は、多数の解析項目(社会的内向性、内省性、身体的活動性、持続性、慎重性、達成意欲・・など)に関する評価を数値化した情報を有している。このような能力情報及び性格情報の内容は、従来の職務適性試験で既に提供されていたものである。   FIG. 2 is an evaluation table showing the results of job aptitude tests and analysis results of high evaluation employees and low evaluation employees generated by the system 1 shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 2, the job aptitude test result information includes ability information and personality information. The ability information includes a language ability score, a non-language ability score, and an overall ability score obtained by comprehensively quantifying both the language ability and the non-language ability. The personality information includes information obtained by quantifying evaluations regarding a number of analysis items (social introversion, reflection, physical activity, sustainability, discretion, willingness to achieve, etc.). The contents of such ability information and personality information have already been provided in the conventional job aptitude test.

次に、人材採用支援プログラム8による能力情報の処理手順について説明する。採用目標範囲決定手段11は、高評価社員情報抽出手段9及び低評価社員情報抽出手段10により抽出された職務適性試験の結果情報から、言語能力得点と非言語能力得点との得点差が大きくなるほど値が小さくなるような重み付けをした能力値を算定する。具体的には、個々の社員について言語能力得点と非言語能力得点との間の差の絶対値の平方根を能力バランス値として算出する。この能力バランス値は、その値が小さいほど言語能力と非言語能力とのバランスが良いことを意味している。そして、その能力バランス値を総合能力得点から引き算し、個々の社員の能力値を算定する。   Next, a procedure for processing capability information by the personnel recruitment support program 8 will be described. The recruitment target range determination means 11 increases the score difference between the language ability score and the non-language ability score from the result information of the job aptitude test extracted by the high evaluation employee information extraction means 9 and the low evaluation employee information extraction means 10. The ability value weighted so that the value becomes smaller is calculated. Specifically, the square root of the absolute value of the difference between the language ability score and the non-language ability score for each employee is calculated as the ability balance value. This ability balance value means that the smaller the value, the better the balance between language ability and non-language ability. Then, the ability balance value is subtracted from the total ability score to calculate the ability value of each employee.

次に、人材採用支援プログラム8による性格情報の処理手順について説明する。採用目標範囲決定手段11は、高評価社員情報抽出手段9により抽出された職務適性試験の結果情報から、性格情報の各解析項目ごとに高評価社員の平均値を算出する。また、採用目標範囲決定手段11は、低評価社員情報抽出手段10により抽出された職務適性試験の結果情報から、性格情報の各解析項目ごとに低評価社員の平均値を算出する。そして、高評価社員の平均値と低評価社員の平均値との差が所定値以上である解析項目を抽出し、それら抽出された解析項目を採用目標範囲20の決定に利用する。図2では、社会的内向性、身体的活動性、持続性、達成意欲の解析項目が採用目標範囲20の決定に利用され、抽出されなかった内省性、慎重性の解析項目は採用目標範囲20の決定に利用されない。   Next, the personal information processing procedure by the human resource recruitment support program 8 will be described. The recruitment target range determination means 11 calculates the average value of highly evaluated employees for each analysis item of the personality information from the result information of the job aptitude test extracted by the highly evaluated employee information extracting means 9. Further, the recruitment target range determination means 11 calculates the average value of the low evaluation employees for each analysis item of the personality information from the result information of the job aptitude test extracted by the low evaluation employee information extraction means 10. Then, analysis items in which the difference between the average value of high evaluation employees and the average value of low evaluation employees is equal to or greater than a predetermined value are extracted, and the extracted analysis items are used to determine the employment target range 20. In FIG. 2, the analysis items of social introvert, physical activity, sustainability, and willingness to achieve are used to determine the adoption target range 20. The analysis items of introspection and prudence that were not extracted are the adoption target range. Not used for 20 decisions.

採用目標範囲決定手段11は、解析項目ごとに高評価社員の平均値に対する各社員の評価値の偏差を算出し、この偏差が小さくなるほど高くなる得点を5点満点で解析項目ごとに付与する(図2中、各解析項目の右隣に表示)。具体的には、解析項目ごとに高評価社員及び低評価社員の評価値の標準偏差σを算出し、前記偏差が0.5σ未満である場合には5点、1.0σ未満である場合には4点、1.5σ未満である場合には3点、2.0σ未満である場合には2点、3.0σ未満である場合には1点、その他は0点を各社員ごとに得点として付与する。そして、前記抽出された解析項目ごとの得点の合計を適正値として算定する。なお、本実施形態では、適性値を100点満点換算して求めている。   The recruitment target range determining means 11 calculates the deviation of the evaluation value of each employee from the average value of the highly evaluated employees for each analysis item, and gives a score that increases as the deviation decreases for each analysis item with a maximum score of 5 ( In FIG. 2, displayed on the right of each analysis item). Specifically, the standard deviation σ of the evaluation value of the highly evaluated employee and the low evaluated employee is calculated for each analysis item, and when the deviation is less than 0.5σ, 5 points, when less than 1.0σ 4 points, 3 points if less than 1.5σ, 2 points if less than 2.0σ, 1 point if less than 3.0σ, 0 points for each employee, etc. As given. Then, the total score for each extracted analysis item is calculated as an appropriate value. In the present embodiment, the aptitude value is obtained by converting the aptitude value to 100 points.

また、図2の評価表の右端列には、高評価社員及び低評価社員の入社時の採用面接における評価である面接値が付け加えられている。この面接値は、面接官の評点を集約して、100点満点で評価したものである。なお、合格者(社員)は、60点以上の評価を得る。   Further, in the rightmost column of the evaluation table of FIG. 2, interview values, which are evaluations at the hiring interview when a highly evaluated employee and a low evaluated employee enter the company, are added. This interview value is obtained by collecting the scores of interviewers and evaluating them with a maximum score of 100. Successful employees (employees) get an evaluation of 60 points or more.

図3は図2に示す評価表に基づいて決定された採用目標範囲20を説明するプロット図である。図3に示すように、縦軸は能力情報に基づいて算定した能力値、横軸は性格情報に基づいて算定した適正値であり、高評価社員及び低評価社員の各データがプロットされている。採用目標範囲決定手段11は、高評価社員の各々の適正値を全て含むように適正値の採用目標範囲20を決定し、かつ、高評価社員の各々の能力値を全て含むように能力値の採用目標範囲20を決定している。具体的には、採用目標範囲20の下限値は、図3における高評価社員の複数のプロットのうち最小値となるプロットと同一又は若干小さい値を設定し、採用目標範囲20の上限値は、図3における高評価社員の複数のプロットのうち最大値となるプロットと同一又は若干大きい値を設定する。これにより、採用目標範囲20の範囲枠は、高評価社員の複数のプロットの最外ポイント及びその外側近傍を通過するように設定される。よって、適正値及び能力値の値が小さい場合のみならず、その値が大きすぎる場合にも採用目標範囲20から外れるようになっている。   FIG. 3 is a plot diagram for explaining the adoption target range 20 determined based on the evaluation table shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 3, the vertical axis is an ability value calculated based on ability information, the horizontal axis is an appropriate value calculated based on personality information, and each data of a highly evaluated employee and a low evaluated employee is plotted. . The recruitment target range determination means 11 determines an appropriate recruitment target range 20 so as to include all the appropriate values of the highly evaluated employees, and sets the capability values so as to include all of the ability values of the highly evaluated employees. The adoption target range 20 is determined. Specifically, the lower limit value of the recruitment target range 20 is set to a value that is the same as or slightly smaller than the minimum value among the multiple plots of highly evaluated employees in FIG. 3, and the upper limit value of the recruitment target range 20 is A value that is the same as or slightly larger than the maximum plot among the plurality of plots of highly evaluated employees in FIG. 3 is set. Thereby, the range frame of the employment target range 20 is set so as to pass through the outermost point of the plurality of plots of highly evaluated employees and the vicinity of the outside. Therefore, not only when the values of the appropriate value and the ability value are small, but also when the values are too large, it is out of the adoption target range 20.

次いで、試験結果対照手段12は、採用選考対象者について職務適性試験の結果から能力値及び適正値を求め、その能力値及び適正値を採用目標範囲20に対照させる。具体的には、試験結果対照手段12は、採用選考対象者の能力値及び適正値の図3のグラフ上にプロットして表示装置4に表示し、採用選考対象者の職務適性試験の結果が採用目標範囲20に属しているか否かを判定する。そして、試験結果対照手段12は、その判定結果を採用選考対象者データベース7に記録する。採用選考対象者の能力値及び適正値の求め方は、前述した社員の能力値及び適正値の求め方と同じである。つまり、試験結果対照手段12は、採用選考対象者について前記平均値からの偏差を解析項目ごとに算出して偏差が小さくなるほど高くなる得点を解析項目ごとに付与し、それら解析項目ごとの得点の合計を採用選考対象者の適性値として算定する。また、試験結果対照手段12は、採用選考対象者について職務適性試験の総合能力得点に対して前述した重み付けをした能力値を算定する。   Next, the test result comparison means 12 obtains the ability value and the appropriate value from the result of the job aptitude test for the recruitment selection target person, and contrasts the ability value and the appropriate value with the employment target range 20. Specifically, the test result comparison means 12 plots the ability value and appropriate value of the recruitment selection target person on the graph of FIG. 3 and displays them on the display device 4, and the result of the job aptitude test of the recruitment selection target person is obtained. It is determined whether or not it belongs to the adoption target range 20. Then, the test result comparison unit 12 records the determination result in the adoption selection target person database 7. The method for obtaining the ability value and the appropriate value of the recruitment candidate is the same as the method for obtaining the employee ability value and the appropriate value described above. That is, the test result comparison unit 12 calculates a deviation from the average value for each of the analysis items for the recruitment selection target person, and assigns a score that increases as the deviation decreases for each analysis item. The total is calculated as the aptitude value of candidates for recruitment. Moreover, the test result comparison means 12 calculates the ability value obtained by weighting the overall ability score of the job aptitude test for the recruitment selection target person.

また、採用目標範囲20には、低評価社員のデータも含まれているので、低評価社員のデータを含む領域である要注意範囲21,22が重ねて設定されている。具体的には、左側の要注意範囲21は、採用目標範囲20のうち能力値及び適正値が下限値である点(LL点)を基点として低評価社員のプロットを含むように設定した範囲であり、右側の要注意範囲22は、採用目標範囲20のうち能力値が上限値で適正値が下限値である点(HL点)を基点として低評価社員のプロットを含むように設定した範囲である。これら要注意範囲21,22は、採用は可能であるが、長期適応性に問題が生じる可能性があり、採用面接において厳選する必要があることを意味するものである。   In addition, since the hiring target range 20 includes data of low evaluation employees, the caution areas 21 and 22 that are areas including the data of low evaluation employees are set in an overlapping manner. Specifically, the caution area 21 on the left side is a range that is set so as to include a plot of low evaluation employees based on the point (LL point) where the ability value and the appropriate value are the lower limit values in the adoption target range 20. Yes, the caution range 22 on the right side is a range that is set to include the plot of low evaluation employees based on the point (HL point) where the ability value is the upper limit value and the appropriate value is the lower limit value in the recruitment target range 20. is there. These caution ranges 21 and 22 mean that adoption is possible, but there is a possibility that problems may occur in long-term adaptability, and it is necessary to carefully select in the interview.

図4は図2に示す評価表に基づいて決定された能力値及び面接値のプロット図である。図5は図2に示す評価表に基づいて決定された適正値及び面接値のプロット図である。図4及び5によれば、高評価社員及び低評価社員について、職務適性試験の結果である能力値及び適正値と、採用面接での評価との相関関係を一目で視認することができる。よって、採用面接官に対して面接評価と適性試験結果との関連性についてフィードバックすることが可能となる。   FIG. 4 is a plot diagram of ability values and interview values determined based on the evaluation table shown in FIG. FIG. 5 is a plot diagram of appropriate values and interview values determined based on the evaluation table shown in FIG. According to FIGS. 4 and 5, for high evaluation employees and low evaluation employees, it is possible to visually recognize the correlation between the ability value and the appropriate value, which are the results of the job aptitude test, and the evaluation at the employment interview. Therefore, it is possible to feed back the relevance between the interview evaluation and the aptitude test result to the hiring interviewer.

以上に説明した構成によれば、個別企業において高い社内評価を得ている高評価社員が過去に受けた職務適性試験の結果に基づいて職務適性試験の結果の採用目標範囲を決定しているので、個々の企業の社風や求められる性格・能力に応じた人材を採用することに貢献することができる。したがって、企業と採用内定者との間のミスマッチを低減することができる。また、適性値については、高評価社員の職務適性試験の解析項目ごとの得点の平均値からの偏差を求め、その偏差が小さくなるほど高くなるよう解析項目ごとに付与された得点を合計して算出されているので、高評価社員の職務適性試験の結果の変動の影響を抑制した適切な適正値を得ることができる。   According to the configuration described above, the hiring target range of the results of job aptitude tests is determined based on the results of job aptitude tests previously received by highly evaluated employees who have obtained high internal evaluations at individual companies. , It can contribute to recruiting human resources according to the culture of each company and the required personality and ability. Therefore, it is possible to reduce mismatches between the company and the job offerer. In addition, the aptitude value is calculated by calculating the deviation from the average score for each analysis item in the job aptitude test for highly evaluated employees, and adding the scores given to each analysis item so that the higher the deviation, the higher the score. Therefore, it is possible to obtain an appropriate appropriate value that suppresses the influence of fluctuations in the results of the job aptitude test of highly evaluated employees.

さらに、適正値の算定には、高評価社員と低評価社員との間で差の大きい解析項目のみを利用しているので、高評価社員と低評価社員との間の特性の違いを反映した適切な採用目標範囲を設定することができる。また、能力値については、言語能力得点と非言語能力得点との両方から得られる総合能力得点に、言語能力得点と非言語能力得点との得点差が大きくなるほど値が小さくなるような重み付けをして算定しているので、言語能力と非言語能力のバランスが良好な者に高得点が与えられ、企業への適応性の高いバランスのとれた人材を見つけることができる。   Furthermore, since only the analysis items that have a large difference between high and low evaluation employees are used in calculating the appropriate values, the differences in characteristics between high evaluation employees and low evaluation employees were reflected. Appropriate recruitment target ranges can be set. In addition, for the ability value, the total ability score obtained from both the language ability score and the non-language ability score is weighted so that the value decreases as the score difference between the language ability score and the non-language ability score increases. Therefore, a high score is given to those who have a good balance between linguistic ability and non-linguistic ability, and it is possible to find a well-balanced human resource with high adaptability to companies.

さらに、採用選考対象者の職務適性試験の結果を採用目標範囲20に対照させ、採用目標範囲20から外れている数が多いか否かを判断することで、採用活動(リクルート活動、求人広告等)の効果を検証し、効果的な採用活動を行うことができているかどうかを検証することにも役立つ。また、採用選考対象者データベース7には、採用試験を受験した全応募者(採用選考対象者)のデータが年度毎に累積して蓄積保存されているので、全応募者のデータについての傾向を年度別に追跡調査することもできる。   Furthermore, by comparing the job aptitude test results of the recruitment candidates with the recruitment target range 20, and judging whether there are many numbers that are outside the recruitment target range 20, recruitment activities (recruiting activities, job advertisements, etc.) ) And the effectiveness of the recruitment activities can also be verified. In addition, the recruitment selection target database 7 accumulates and saves data of all applicants (recruitment selection target) who took the recruitment examination every year. You can also follow up by year.

なお、社員評価データベース5、社員試験結果データベース6及び採用選考対象者データベース7は、1つの企業により所持されていてもよいし、別々の企業に分散して所持されていてもよい。後者の場合には、各データベースはインターネット等のネットワークを介してコンピュータ2に通信可能に接続されているとよい。人材採用支援プログラム8は、職務適性試験の提供企業が一元的管理していてもよいし、CD−ROM等の記録媒体に保存された状態で個別企業に提供されてもよいし、当該プログラム8が保存されたサーバからインターネット等のネットワークを介してダウンロードすることにより個別企業に提供されてもよい。   The employee evaluation database 5, the employee test result database 6, and the recruitment selection target database 7 may be possessed by one company, or may be dispersed and possessed by different companies. In the latter case, each database may be communicably connected to the computer 2 via a network such as the Internet. The recruitment support program 8 may be centrally managed by the company providing the job aptitude test, or may be provided to an individual company in a state stored in a recording medium such as a CD-ROM. May be provided to an individual company by downloading it from a server in which is stored via a network such as the Internet.

以上のように、本発明に係る人材採用支援システム及び人材採用支援プログラムは、企業と採用内定者との間のミスマッチを低減できる優れた効果を有し、この効果の意義を発揮できるシステムやプログラム等に広く適用すると有益である。   As described above, the recruitment support system and the recruitment support program according to the present invention have an excellent effect of reducing the mismatch between the company and the recruitment candidate, and the system and program that can demonstrate the significance of this effect. It is beneficial to apply to a wide range.

本発明の実施形態に係る人材採用支援プログラムを用いた人材採用支援システムを示すブロック図である。It is a block diagram showing a recruitment support system using a recruitment support program according to an embodiment of the present invention. 図1に示すシステムにより生成された高評価社員及び低評価社員の職務適性試験の結果及びその分析結果を示す評価表である。FIG. 2 is an evaluation table showing results of job aptitude tests and analysis results of high evaluation employees and low evaluation employees generated by the system shown in FIG. 1. 図2に示す評価表に基づいて決定された能力値及び適正値に関する採用目標範囲を説明するプロット図である。It is a plot figure explaining the employment | adopting target range regarding the capability value determined based on the evaluation table | surface shown in FIG. 2, and an appropriate value. 図2に示す評価表に基づいて決定された能力値及び面接値のプロット図である。FIG. 3 is a plot diagram of ability values and interview values determined based on the evaluation table shown in FIG. 2. 図2に示す評価表に基づいて決定された適正値及び面接値のプロット図である。FIG. 3 is a plot diagram of appropriate values and interview values determined based on the evaluation table shown in FIG. 2.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1 人材採用支援システム
2 コンピュータ
5 社員評価データベース
6 社員試験結果データベース
7 採用選考対象者データベース
8 人材採用支援プログラム
9 高評価社員情報抽出手段
10 低評価社員情報抽出手段
11 採用目標範囲決定手段
20 採用目標範囲
1 Personnel Recruitment Support System 2 Computer 5 Employee Evaluation Database 6 Employee Examination Result Database 7 Recruitment Selection Target Database 8 Personnel Recruitment Support Program 9 Highly Reputed Employee Information Extraction Means 10 Low Evaluation Employee Information Extraction Means 11 Employment Target Range Determination Means 20 Employment Targets range

Claims (6)

採用選考対象者の職務適性試験の結果をコンピュータで分析するための人材採用支援システムであって、
企業の社員の社内評価得点を含む社内評価情報が保存された社員評価データベースと、
前記社員の職務適性試験の結果情報が保存された社員試験結果データベースと、
前記社員評価データベースに保存された前記社員の社内評価得点を、前記社員試験結果データベースに保存された前記社員の職務適性試験の結果情報に関連付けて、前記社内評価得点が所定値以上である高評価社員の前記職務適性試験の結果情報を抽出する高評価社員情報抽出手段と、
前記高評価社員情報抽出手段により抽出された前記結果情報に基づいて、採用選考対象者の前記職務適性試験の結果の前記企業における採用目標範囲を決定する採用目標範囲決定手段と、を備え
前記採用目標範囲決定手段は、前記高評価社員情報抽出手段により抽出された複数の前記結果情報から前記高評価社員の前記職務適性試験の解析項目ごとにおける得点の平均値を算出し、前記高評価社員の各々について前記平均値からの偏差を前記各解析項目ごとに算出して前記偏差が小さくなるほど高くなる得点を前記解析項目ごとに付与し、それら解析項目ごとの得点の合計を前記高評価社員の各々の適性値として算定し、前記適性値を参照して前記採用目標範囲を決定することを特徴とする人材採用支援システム。
A human resource recruitment support system for analyzing the results of job aptitude tests of recruitment candidates with a computer,
An employee evaluation database that stores internal evaluation information including internal evaluation scores of company employees,
An employee test result database in which information on the results of the job aptitude test of the employee is stored;
A high evaluation in which the internal evaluation score of the employee stored in the employee evaluation database is related to the result information of the employee job aptitude test stored in the employee test result database, and the internal evaluation score is a predetermined value or more. Highly evaluated employee information extraction means for extracting information on the results of the job aptitude test of employees,
Based on the result information extracted by the highly evaluated employee information extracting means, the recruitment target range determining means for determining the recruitment target range in the company of the job aptitude test result of the recruitment candidate ,
The recruitment target range determining means calculates an average value of scores for each analysis item of the job aptitude test of the highly evaluated employee from a plurality of the result information extracted by the highly evaluated employee information extracting means, and the highly evaluated For each employee, the deviation from the average value is calculated for each analysis item, and a score that increases as the deviation decreases is assigned to each analysis item, and the total score for each analysis item is assigned to the highly evaluated employee. each calculated as proper value, recruiting support system characterized that you determine the adoption target range by referring to the appropriate value of.
前記社員評価データベースに保存された前記社員の社内評価得点を、前記社員試験結果データベースに保存された前記社員の職務適性試験の結果情報に関連付けて、前記社内評価得点が前記所定値より小さい値の第2の所定値以下である低評価社員の前記職務適性試験の結果情報を抽出する低評価社員情報抽出手段をさらに備え、
前記採用目標範囲決定手段は、前記低評価社員情報抽出手段により抽出された前記結果情報も参照して、採用選考対象者の前記職務適性試験の結果の前記企業における採用目標範囲を決定する請求項1に記載の人材採用支援システム。
The internal evaluation score of the employee stored in the employee evaluation database is associated with the result information of the employee job aptitude test stored in the employee test result database, and the internal evaluation score is smaller than the predetermined value. further comprising a low-rated employee information extraction means for extracting the result information of the job aptitude test of the second predetermined value der Ru dislikes employees or less,
The recruitment target range determination means refers to the result information extracted by the low evaluation employee information extraction means, and determines a recruitment target range in the company as a result of the job aptitude test of the recruitment candidate. The personnel recruitment support system according to 1.
前記社員評価データベースに保存された前記社員の社内評価得点を、前記社員試験結果データベースに保存された前記社員の職務適性試験の結果情報に関連付けて、前記社内評価得点が前記所定値より小さい値の第2の所定値以下である前記低評価社員の前記職務適性試験の結果情報を抽出する低評価社員情報抽出手段をさらに備え、
前記採用目標範囲決定手段は、前記低評価社員情報抽出手段により抽出された複数の前記結果情報から前記低評価社員の前記職務適性試験の解析項目ごとにおける得点の平均値を算出し、前記解析項目のうち、前記高評価社員の前記平均値と前記低評価社員の前記平均値との差が所定値以上である解析項目のみに基づいて前記適値を算定する請求項に記載の人材採用支援システム。
The internal evaluation score of the employee stored in the employee evaluation database is associated with the result information of the employee job aptitude test stored in the employee test result database, and the internal evaluation score is smaller than the predetermined value. Further comprising a low evaluation employee information extracting means for extracting result information of the job aptitude test of the low evaluation employee which is equal to or less than a second predetermined value;
The recruitment target range determination means calculates an average value of scores for each analysis item of the job aptitude test of the low evaluation employee from a plurality of the result information extracted by the low evaluation employee information extraction means, and the analysis item of, recruitment of claim 2 the difference between the average value of the low-rated employees and the average value of the high evaluation employees to calculate the aptitude value based only on the analysis item is not less than a predetermined value Support system.
前記職務適性試験の結果情報は、性格情報を含んでおり、
前記適値は、前記性格情報に基づいて算定されている請求項1乃至3のいずれかに記載の人材採用支援システム。
The job aptitude test result information includes personality information,
The aptitude value, recruitment support system according to any one of claims 1 to 3 is calculated on the basis of the personality information.
前記職務適性試験の結果情報は、言語能力得点と非言語能力得点とを有する能力情報を含んでおり、
前記採用目標範囲決定手段は、前記高評価社員情報抽出手段により抽出された前記結果情報のうち前記言語能力得点と前記非言語能力得点との両方から得られる総合能力得点に対して、前記言語能力得点と前記非言語能力得点との得点差に応じて重み付けをした能力値を算定し、前記能力値を参照して前記採用目標範囲を決定する請求項1乃至のいずれかに記載の人材採用支援システム。
The result information of the job aptitude test includes ability information having a language ability score and a non-language ability score,
The recruitment target range determination means is configured to compare the language ability with respect to the overall ability score obtained from both the language ability score and the non-language ability score among the result information extracted by the highly evaluated employee information extraction means. The recruitment according to any one of claims 1 to 4 , wherein a weighted ability value is calculated according to a difference between the score and the non-language ability score, and the recruitment target range is determined with reference to the ability value. Support system.
採用選考対象者の職務適性試験の結果をコンピュータで分析するための人材採用支援プログラムであって、
企業の社員の社内評価得点を前記社員の職務適性試験の結果情報に関連付けて、前記社内評価得点が所定値以上である高評価社員の前記職務適性試験の結果情報を抽出する高評価社員情報抽出ステップと、
前記高評価社員情報抽出ステップにより抽出された前記結果情報に基づいて、採用選考対象者の前記職務適性試験の結果の前記企業における採用目標範囲を決定する採用目標範囲決定ステップと、を前記コンピュータに実行させ
前記採用目標範囲決定ステップは、前記高評価社員情報抽出ステップにより抽出された複数の前記結果情報から前記高評価社員の前記職務適性試験の解析項目ごとにおける得点の平均値を算出し、前記高評価社員の各々について前記平均値からの偏差を前記各解析項目ごとに算出して前記偏差が小さくなるほど高くなる得点を前記解析項目ごとに付与し、それら解析項目ごとの得点の合計を前記高評価社員の各々の適性値として算定し、前記適性値を参照して前記採用目標範囲を決定することを特徴とする人材採用支援プログラム。
A recruitment support program that uses a computer to analyze the results of job aptitude tests for recruitment candidates,
Highly evaluated employee information extraction that associates internal evaluation scores of company employees with the results of job aptitude test results of the employees and extracts the results of job aptitude test results of highly evaluated employees whose internal evaluation score is equal to or greater than a predetermined value Steps,
Based on the result information extracted by the highly evaluated employee information extraction step, a recruitment target range determination step for determining a recruitment target range in the company as a result of the job aptitude test of the recruitment selection target person to the computer to be executed,
The hiring target range determining step calculates an average value of scores for each analysis item of the job aptitude test of the highly evaluated employee from a plurality of the result information extracted by the highly evaluated employee information extracting step, and the highly evaluated For each employee, the deviation from the average value is calculated for each analysis item, and a score that increases as the deviation decreases is assigned to each analysis item, and the total score for each analysis item is assigned to the highly evaluated employee. each calculated as proper value, recruiting support program characterized that you determine the adoption target range by referring to the appropriate value of.
JP2008173268A 2008-07-02 2008-07-02 Recruitment support system and recruitment support program Expired - Fee Related JP5171437B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008173268A JP5171437B2 (en) 2008-07-02 2008-07-02 Recruitment support system and recruitment support program

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008173268A JP5171437B2 (en) 2008-07-02 2008-07-02 Recruitment support system and recruitment support program

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2010015289A JP2010015289A (en) 2010-01-21
JP5171437B2 true JP5171437B2 (en) 2013-03-27

Family

ID=41701368

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2008173268A Expired - Fee Related JP5171437B2 (en) 2008-07-02 2008-07-02 Recruitment support system and recruitment support program

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5171437B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5753309B1 (en) * 2014-11-17 2015-07-22 株式会社ナインシグマ・ジャパン Mutual understanding support system, mutual understanding support method, mutual understanding support program
JP6591926B2 (en) * 2016-04-01 2019-10-16 株式会社リーディングマーク Program, information processing method and information processing apparatus
JP6042015B1 (en) * 2016-06-07 2016-12-14 株式会社採用と育成研究社 Online interview evaluation apparatus, method and program
JP6297101B2 (en) * 2016-07-13 2018-03-20 株式会社三菱総合研究所 Information processing apparatus and information processing method
JP2018169870A (en) * 2017-03-30 2018-11-01 Hrソリューションズ株式会社 Recommendation information notifying device, method and program
JP7005219B2 (en) * 2017-08-10 2022-01-21 株式会社エスユーエス Aptitude test judgment device, update device, program and recording medium
JP6653721B2 (en) * 2018-02-20 2020-02-26 株式会社三菱総合研究所 Information processing apparatus and information processing method
JP6438614B1 (en) * 2018-03-27 2018-12-19 株式会社リクルートマネジメントソリューションズ Evaluation apparatus, evaluation method, and program
JP6751950B1 (en) * 2019-03-26 2020-09-09 株式会社サンボウ Computer systems, programs, and methods for organizational management
JPWO2022065353A1 (en) * 2020-09-24 2022-03-31
JP7368902B1 (en) 2023-03-29 2023-10-25 株式会社スタンス Human resources evaluation system
CN116703196A (en) * 2023-04-18 2023-09-05 广州市南方人力资源评价中心有限公司 Comprehensive quality and post competence evaluation system for middle-level staff
JP7475529B1 (en) 2023-10-23 2024-04-26 株式会社ビズリーチ Information management system, information management method and program

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001338106A (en) * 2000-05-26 2001-12-07 Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance Co Ltd Employment supporting system
JP2004334834A (en) * 2003-04-18 2004-11-25 E Falcon:Kk Human resource decision method and program to be used for executing such human resource decision method
JP4548574B2 (en) * 2003-11-13 2010-09-22 株式会社イー・ファルコン Method for presenting conditions for leading members to success, apparatus therefor, and program
JP2005285021A (en) * 2004-03-30 2005-10-13 Daiwa Institute Of Research Ltd Personnel management system, method and program
JP4009632B2 (en) * 2004-11-01 2007-11-21 有限会社 上野ビジネスコンサルタンツ Inspection method, inspection system, inspection system program, and inspection system server device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2010015289A (en) 2010-01-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5171437B2 (en) Recruitment support system and recruitment support program
Quillian et al. Evidence from field experiments in hiring shows substantial additional racial discrimination after the callback
Aksoy et al. Gay glass ceilings: Sexual orientation and workplace authority in the UK
Al-Romeedy The role of job rotation in enhancing employee performance in the Egyptian travel agents: the mediating role of organizational behavior
Hagendorff et al. The value of board diversity in banking: evidence from the market for corporate control
Paino et al. Auditor acceptance of dysfunctional behaviour: An explanatory model using individual factors
Sharma et al. Evaluation of an integrated Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining process model
Munir et al. Do positive psychosocial work factors protect against 2-year incidence of long-term sickness absence among employees with and those without depressive symptoms? A prospective study
Akther et al. The impact of effective training on employee retention: A study in private banks of Bangladesh
Lopes et al. A new approach to talent management in law firms: Integrating performance appraisal and assessment center data
Gati et al. The predictive validity of a computer-assisted career decision-making system: A six-year follow-up
Nunley et al. An examination of racial discrimination in the labor market for recent college graduates: Estimates from the field
Eulerich et al. The impact of audit technology on audit task outcomes: Evidence for technology‐based audit techniques
Weaver Is credit status a good signal of productivity?
Biswas Job satisfaction and job involvement as mediators of the relationship between psychological climate and turnover intention
Nasir et al. Demographic variables as moderators in the relationship between job satisfaction and task performance
Yousuf et al. Perceived national culture and perceived organizational support effect on transgender employees job satisfaction
Gammie et al. Accountancy undergraduate performance: A statistical model
Yadav et al. Investigating the impact of corporate social responsibility on competitive performance: An empirical study based on panel data analysis
Chan et al. Exploring the correlation between knowledge management maturity and intellectual capital efficiency in mainland chinese listed companies
Chaudhry et al. Mediation effects of political skills dimensions on employee performance
Nguyen et al. Management styles and organisational effectiveness in Vietnam: A comparison in terms of management practices between state-owned and foreign enterprises. Res
Kumar et al. Linking personality with contextual performance through subjective well-being using pls sem modelling
Constantinides Auditors’, bankers’ and insolvency practitioners’“going‐concern” opinion logit model
Clements Public opinion in Britain towards military action in Libya: A micro-level analysis

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20110329

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20120316

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20120924

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20121002

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20121106

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20121128

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20121130

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20121218

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20121225

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5171437

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees
S111 Request for change of ownership or part of ownership

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313111

R360 Written notification for declining of transfer of rights

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R360

R360 Written notification for declining of transfer of rights

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R360

R371 Transfer withdrawn

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R371