JP5083045B2 - Abnormality diagnosis device for fuel injection valve - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to a failure diagnosis device for an engine fuel injection device, and more particularly to an engine failure diagnosis device provided with two fuel injection valves per cylinder.

  An engine including two fuel injection valves per cylinder is disclosed in Patent Document 1. In the engine, since the injection amount per fuel injection valve can be reduced as compared with the case of one fuel injection valve per cylinder, atomization of the injected fuel is further promoted. Further, in the case of an intake two-valve engine, the injection direction of each fuel injection valve can be set to the intake valve direction, so that the amount of fuel spray colliding with the intake port wall surface can be reduced.

That is, the wall flow rate in the intake port can be reduced, and as a result, exhaust performance and fuel consumption performance can be improved.
JP-A 61-250381

  By the way, when two fuel injection valves are provided per cylinder, when only one of the two fuel injection valves becomes abnormal due to deterioration or the like, an abnormal fuel injection valve is used in a general abnormality diagnosis method. There is a problem that cannot be identified. The general abnormality diagnosis method referred to here is the detection of engine rotation fluctuation, and when there is a period during which the rotation speed decreases, the expansion stroke is detected during the period based on the signals of the crank angle sensor and the cam angle sensor. A certain cylinder is discriminated and it is judged that the fuel injection valve of that cylinder is abnormal.

  However, Patent Document 1 does not describe a method for identifying an abnormal fuel injection valve.

  Therefore, an object of the present invention is to accurately detect any fuel injection valve that becomes abnormal due to deterioration or the like in an engine having two fuel injection valves per cylinder.

An abnormality diagnosis device for a fuel injection valve according to the present invention is an abnormality diagnosis device for a first fuel injection valve and a second fuel injection valve provided in each cylinder of a multi-cylinder engine, and detects a combustion state for each cylinder. The combustion state detection means, the injection valve control means for controlling the operation / stop of the first fuel injection valve and the second fuel injection valve, and the injection amount, and the combustion state detection means detect the deterioration of the combustion state in any cylinder. In this case, either the first fuel injection valve or the second fuel injection valve is abnormal based on the combustion state in a state where either the first fuel injection valve or the second fuel injection valve is stopped by the injection valve control means. There comprising an abnormality injector detecting means for detecting whether it has occurred, and the combustion state detecting means, rotates by a crank angle corresponding to the combustion stroke by counting the signal outputted every predetermined crank angle The combustion stroke passage time, which is the time required for the combustion, is measured for each cylinder, and the combustion state is detected based on the combustion stroke passage time when both the first fuel injection valve and the second fuel injection valve are operated. The abnormal injection valve detection means performs the first combustion stroke passage time that is the combustion stroke passage time when the first fuel injection valve is stopped and the second fuel injection valve when the second fuel injection valve is stopped. Based on the second combustion stroke passage time, which is the combustion stroke passage time, it is detected whether an abnormality has occurred in the first fuel injection valve or the second fuel injection valve.

  According to the present invention, the combustion state diagnosis (general misfire diagnosis) based on the rotational fluctuation with the two fuel injection valves operated, and the rotational fluctuation with one of the fuel injection valves stopped. Since the diagnosis of the combustion state based on this is performed, it is possible to identify the cylinder provided with the abnormal fuel injection valve, and further specify the abnormal fuel injection valve.

  Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

  FIG. 1 is a view showing an intake passage of one cylinder of an engine to which this embodiment is applied. 1 is an intake passage, 2a and 2b are fuel injection valves (first fuel injection valve and second fuel injection valve), 3a and 3b are openings on the combustion chamber side of the intake passage 1, and 4 is an operation of the fuel injection valves 2a and 2b. A control unit (injection valve control means, abnormal injection valve detection means, operation region restriction means) that executes control for stop and injection amount and control of ignition timing, etc., 5 is a crank angle sensor, and 6 is a cam angle sensor . The intake valves arranged in the openings 3a and 3b are omitted.

  As shown in FIG. 1, two fuel injection valves 2a and 2b are provided per cylinder. Fuel sprays (broken lines in the figure) from the fuel injection valves 2a and 2b are directed to the openings 3a and 3b, respectively.

  FIG. 2 is a flowchart of abnormality diagnosis control of the fuel injection valve. This abnormality diagnosis control is repeatedly executed at predetermined minute intervals, for example, every 10 ms during steady operation or acceleration / deceleration except during warm-up operation at start-up.

  In step S1, a general misfire diagnosis is performed. Specifically, first, the engine rotation speed (crankshaft rotation speed) is detected based on the signals of the crank angle sensor 5 and the cam angle sensor 6, and in parallel with this, the operation state of each cylinder is detected. To do.

  When the fuel injection valve does not inject fuel or when the injection amount is less than the target value, no torque is generated or the generated torque is smaller than that of a normal cylinder. For this reason, the period during which the cylinder is in the expansion stroke is a so-called misfire state in which the crankshaft rotational speed is lower than the period during which the other cylinders are in the expansion stroke, and rotational fluctuation occurs. Therefore, if rotation fluctuation is detected, the process proceeds to step S2.

  If no misfire is detected in step S1, the process ends.

  In step S2, based on the detection signals of the crank angle sensor 5 and the cam angle sensor 6, the cylinder that was in the expansion stroke during the misfire period is specified, and it is determined that the cylinder has misfired.

  Here, the misfire cylinder is discriminated by the same method as cylinder discrimination in a general engine. That is, the cylinder is determined by a combination of a detection signal of the crank angle sensor 5 indicating the crank angle and a detection signal of the cam angle sensor 6 having the number of signals corresponding to the cylinder number.

  The relationship between the detection signals of the crank angle sensor 5 and the cam angle sensor 6 and the crank angle is as shown in FIG. The detection signal of the crank angle sensor 5 is a pulse wave having a missing tooth portion every 180 degrees in the crank angle, and the detection signal of the cam angle sensor 6 is a pulse wave of a number corresponding to the cylinder number. As for the crank angle, the detection signal of the crank angle sensor 5 is counted with the compression top dead center position of the first cylinder as a reference (zero degree).

  When a predetermined number of pulse signals (fifth pulse signal in FIG. 3) are input from the tooth missing portion detected first after the cam angle sensor 6 signal is input, the cam angle sensor 6 signal is input. The compression top dead center position of the cylinder is set, and ignition timing control or the like can be performed based on this.

  In step S3, the operating state (engine speed, load, etc.) when the rotational fluctuation occurs is stored.

  In step S4, it is determined whether or not the current operation state is a region where the abnormality of the fuel injection valve can be diagnosed. Specifically, an operation region map as shown in FIG. 4 is created in advance and the determination is made using this map.

  The engine speed is obtained from the detected value of the crank angle sensor 5, and the load is obtained from the detected value of an accelerator opening sensor (not shown). The vertical axis in FIG. 4 is the engine torque, the horizontal axis is the engine rotation speed, the solid line is the load curve, and the shaded area A is the area where abnormality can be diagnosed.

  The abnormality diagnosis area is an operation area where only one of the two fuel injection valves provided in one cylinder can inject fuel by a target injection amount determined according to the operation state. is there. The lower the engine speed, the longer the injection time. Therefore, as shown in FIG. 4, the upper limit value of the abnormality diagnosis area is along the load curve in the low speed area, and decreases as the speed increases from there. It has become.

As a result of the determination, if the abnormality diagnosis is possible, the process proceeds to step S5. Otherwise, the determination in step S4 is repeated until the abnormality diagnosis possible area is reached. In step S5, the fuel injection valve 2a is stopped. The amount that should have been injected from the fuel injection valve 2a is added to the injection amount. That is, the injection amount of the fuel injection valve 2b is doubled. As a method of doubling the injection amount, for example, there is a method of doubling the fuel injection time.

  Thereby, even if the fuel injection valve 2a is stopped, the target injection amount can be ensured.

  For convenience, the fuel injection valve 2a is on the left side and the fuel injection valve 2b is on the right side. Then, doubling the injection amount of the fuel injection valve 2b as described above is referred to as “right double shot”.

  In addition, the right double single jet may be performed for at least the misfired cylinder determined in step S2, but here it is performed for all the cylinders in order to simplify the control.

  In step S6, a misfire level diagnosis is performed. The misfire level diagnosis is a diagnosis of how much the engine speed has been reduced due to misfire.

  Specifically, the time required for the crankshaft to rotate 180 degrees (right-side injection window passage time) Trn is measured for the misfired cylinder determined in step S2 (n indicates the cylinder number).

  180 degrees here is from 90 degrees before the compression top dead center of the misfire cylinder to 90 degrees after the compression top dead center.

  In step S7, the same process as in step S4 is performed. If it is a diagnosable area, the process proceeds to step S8, and if not, this process is repeated.

  In step S8, the right fuel injection valve 2b is stopped and the left fuel injection valve 2a is doubled by performing "left double fuel injection" contrary to the right double fuel injection.

  In step S9, as in step S6, a misfire level diagnosis is performed, and a window passage time Tln during left side injection is measured.

  Note that any of steps S5 and S6 and steps S8 and S9 may be performed first. That is, either the right double shot or the left double shot may be performed first.

  In step S10, the left-right window passage time difference ΔTn is calculated by subtracting the left-side jet window passing time Tln from the right-side jet window passing time Trn.

  FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example in which the right fuel injection valve 2b of the second cylinder is abnormal in an in-line four-cylinder engine. The vertical axis represents the window passage time for misfire determination, and the horizontal axis represents the cylinder for measuring the window time. The ignition order is No. 1 cylinder, No. 3 cylinder, No. 4 cylinder, and No. 2 cylinder.

  Since the fuel injection valve 2a on the left side is normal, the window passage time Tl2 of the second cylinder when the left double injection is performed is substantially the same as the other cylinders. On the other hand, the window passage time Tr2 of the second cylinder is longer than that of the other cylinders when the right double shot is executed.

  The left and right window passage time difference ΔT2 is obtained by subtracting Tl2 from Tr2.

  In step S11, the time difference ΔTn is compared with the right misfire criteria MFR. If the time difference ΔTn is smaller, the process proceeds to step S12, and if larger, the process proceeds to step S13. The right misfire criterion MFR is a value set in advance as the difference between the left and right window passage times at an acceptable misfire level.

  In step S12, it is determined that the right fuel injection valve 2b is normal, and the process proceeds to step S14.

  In step S13, it is determined that the right fuel injection valve 2b is abnormal, a right misfire flag FMFRn is set, and the process proceeds to step S14. In addition, n of FMFRn is a cylinder number. For example, if the misfire cylinder is the first cylinder, it becomes FMFR1.

  In step S14, the time difference ΔTn is compared with the left misfire criteria MFL. If the time difference ΔTn is larger, the process proceeds to step S15, and if smaller, the process proceeds to step S16. The left misfire criteria MFL is a value set in advance as the difference between the left and right window passage times at an acceptable misfire level, as with the right misfire criteria MFR.

  In step S15, it is determined that the left fuel injection valve 2a is normal, and the process proceeds to step S17.

  In step S16, it is determined that the left fuel injection valve 2a is abnormal, the left misfire flag FMFLn is set, and the process proceeds to step S17.

  Note that any of steps S11 to S13 and steps S14 to S16 may be executed first.

  In step S17, it is determined whether or not at least one of the right misfire flag FMFRn and the left misfire flag FMFLn is set. If yes, the process proceeds to step S18. If none is set, the process proceeds to step S20.

  In step S18, an abnormal fuel injection valve is identified based on the misfire flag. In step S19, as the fail-safe control, the abnormal fuel injection valve is stopped and the injection amount of the normal fuel injection valve is doubled. For example, when the right fuel injection valve 2b is abnormal, the fuel injection valve 2b is stopped and the left double injection is performed.

  Thereby, the command value of the fuel injection amount and the actual injection amount can be matched.

  And a restriction | limiting is performed so that a driving | operation area | region will be in the diagnosis possible area | region of FIG. For example, even when there is an acceleration request or the like, the target engine torque is limited to the upper limit value within the diagnosis possible region. This is because the amount of fuel that can be injected is limited in a single injection as compared with the case where two fuel injection valves 2a and 2b are used.

  When the fail safe control is executed, the MIL for when the fuel injection valve is abnormal is turned on.

  In step S20, a MIL different from that for when the fuel injection valve is abnormal, that is, a normal MIL that is turned on when other equipment deteriorates is lit. In addition to the possibility that both of the fuel injection valves 2a and 2b are abnormal, there is a possibility that the fuel injection valves 2a and 2b are normal and there is a problem in the ignition system. It is not possible.

  As described above, the abnormality diagnosis of the present embodiment first identifies a cylinder having an abnormal fuel injection valve by a normal misfire diagnosis, and then performs a misfire level diagnosis performed by stopping one fuel injection valve on both the left and right sides. To identify abnormal fuel injectors. Steps S1 and S2 correspond to the misfire cylinder specifying means, steps S4 to S18 correspond to the abnormal injection valve specifying means, and step S19 corresponds to the operation region limiting means.

  As described above, in the present embodiment, the following effects can be obtained.

  (1) Since the misfire cylinder is specified by the normal misfire diagnosis, and thereafter the abnormality diagnosis of the fuel injection valves 2a and 2b is performed based on the right side jet window passing time Trn and the left side jet window passing time Tln. A fuel injection valve can be identified.

  (2) The time difference ΔTn between the window passing time Trn at the right side jet and the window passing time Tln at the left side jet is calculated, and this time difference ΔTn is compared with each of the right misfire criteria MFR and the left misfire criteria MFL. If it is smaller than either of the misfire criteria MFR and MFL, it is determined that the fuel injection valves 2a and 2b are normal, and if the time difference ΔTn is larger than either of the both criteria MFR and MFL, the right misfire If the fuel injection valve 2b is larger than the criterion MFR and the fuel injection valve 2a is determined to be abnormal if it is larger than the left misfire criterion MFL, it is possible to accurately identify the abnormal fuel injection valve.

  (3) When the time difference ΔTn is larger than both of the criteria MFR and MFL, the MIL is turned on without specifying an abnormal fuel injection valve, so that the fuel injection valves 2a and 2b are deteriorated and the ignition system is deteriorated. And can be distinguished.

  (4) Abnormality diagnosis is executed only in an operating region (abnormality diagnosable region) in which the required fuel amount determined according to the operating state can be secured only by either one of the fuel injection valves 2a or 2b. For no driving sacrifice.

  (5) When an abnormal fuel injection valve is identified, the abnormal fuel injection valve is stopped and the injection amount of the normal fuel injection valve is corrected to increase, so that the operability when the fuel injection valve deteriorates Can be secured.

  (6) When the deterioration of the fuel injection valve is detected, the operation region is limited to a region where abnormality can be diagnosed. Therefore, when the fuel injection valve 2a or 2b deteriorates, the exhaust performance or the like decreases due to insufficient fuel injection amount. Can be prevented.

  In the present embodiment, an abnormal fuel injection valve is identified using a misfire diagnosis based on the window passage time. However, other than this, for example, based on a change in the air-fuel ratio or an engine speed fluctuation amount during a predetermined period. Misfire diagnosis may be used.

  The present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiment, and it goes without saying that various modifications can be made within the scope of the technical idea described in the claims.

It is the figure which showed typically the intake passage of the engine to which this embodiment is applied. It is a flowchart of control for abnormality diagnosis. It is a figure which shows the relationship between the detected value of a crank angle sensor and a cam angle sensor, and a crank angle. It is a driving | operation area | region map which shows a diagnosis possible area | region. It is a figure which shows an example of the window passage time for misfire determination.

Explanation of symbols

1 Intake passage 2a, 2b Fuel injection valve 3a, 3b Intake port opening

Claims (7)

An abnormality diagnosis device for a first fuel injection valve and a second fuel injection valve provided in each cylinder of a multi-cylinder engine,
Combustion state detection means for detecting the combustion state for each cylinder;
Injection valve control means for controlling the operation / stop of the first fuel injection valve and the second fuel injection valve and the injection amount;
When the combustion state detection means detects deterioration of the combustion state in any of the cylinders, either the first fuel injection valve or the second fuel injection valve is stopped by the injection valve control means. An abnormal injection valve detecting means for detecting which of the first fuel injection valve or the second fuel injection valve is abnormal based on the combustion state of
Equipped with a,
The combustion state detection means measures a combustion stroke passage time, which is a time required for rotation by a crank angle corresponding to a combustion stroke, by counting a signal output for each predetermined crank angle for each cylinder. Detecting a combustion state based on a combustion stroke passage time in a state where both the first fuel injection valve and the second fuel injection valve are operated;
The abnormal injection valve detection means includes a first combustion stroke passage time that is the combustion stroke passage time when the first fuel injection valve is stopped and the combustion stroke passage when the second fuel injection valve is stopped. An abnormality diagnosis device for a fuel injection valve that detects whether an abnormality has occurred in the first fuel injection valve or the second fuel injection valve based on a second combustion stroke passage time that is a time . The abnormal injection valve detection means calculates a deviation between the first combustion stroke passage time and the second combustion stroke passage time, and uses the deviation as a first threshold for abnormality diagnosis of the first fuel injection valve and the second. When the deviation is smaller than both the first threshold value and the second threshold value as compared with each of the second threshold values for abnormality diagnosis of the fuel injection valve, the first fuel injection valve and the second fuel injection The valve is determined to be normal, and if the deviation is greater than either the first threshold value or the second threshold value, the first fuel injection valve is greater than the first threshold value. 2. The abnormality diagnosis device for a fuel injection valve according to claim 1 , wherein the second fuel injection valve is determined to be abnormal if it is greater than two threshold values. When the deviation is larger than both the first threshold value and the second threshold value, the abnormal injection valve detection means issues a warning to the driver without specifying an abnormal fuel injection valve. The abnormality diagnosis device for a fuel injection valve according to claim 1 or 2 . An abnormality diagnosis device for a first fuel injection valve and a second fuel injection valve provided in each cylinder of a multi-cylinder engine,
Combustion state detection means for detecting the combustion state for each cylinder;
Injection valve control means for controlling the operation / stop of the first fuel injection valve and the second fuel injection valve and the injection amount;
When the combustion state detection means detects deterioration of the combustion state in any of the cylinders, either the first fuel injection valve or the second fuel injection valve is stopped by the injection valve control means. An abnormal injection valve detecting means for detecting which of the first fuel injection valve or the second fuel injection valve is abnormal based on the combustion state of
Equipped with a,
The detection of the abnormal injection valve by the abnormal injection valve detecting means is an operation region in which the required fuel amount determined according to the operating state can be ensured by only one of the first fuel injection valve and the second fuel injection valve. An abnormality diagnosis device for a fuel injection valve, which is executed only in When an abnormal fuel injection valve is specified by the abnormal injection valve detection means, the injection valve control means stops the abnormal fuel injection valve and corrects the injection amount of the normal fuel injection valve to be increased. The abnormality diagnosis device for a fuel injection valve according to any one of claims 1 to 4 , wherein: 6. The abnormality diagnosis device for a fuel injection valve according to claim 5 , wherein the increase correction of the injection amount of the normal fuel injection valve is to increase the injection amount by a factor of two. An operation area limiting means capable of limiting the operation area is provided,
Claim If any of the fuel injection valve is determined to be abnormal by the abnormality injector detecting means, said operation range limiting means, characterized in that to limit the operating region in the predetermined operating region The abnormality diagnosis device for a fuel injection valve according to 5 or 6 .

Images