JP4878951B2 - Liquid seasoning - Google Patents

Liquid seasoning Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4878951B2
JP4878951B2 JP2006210409A JP2006210409A JP4878951B2 JP 4878951 B2 JP4878951 B2 JP 4878951B2 JP 2006210409 A JP2006210409 A JP 2006210409A JP 2006210409 A JP2006210409 A JP 2006210409A JP 4878951 B2 JP4878951 B2 JP 4878951B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
powder
fish
mass
liquid seasoning
less
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2006210409A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2006340724A (en
Inventor
友宏 小島
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mizkan Group Corp
Mizkan Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Mizkan Group Corp
Mizkan Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mizkan Group Corp, Mizkan Co Ltd filed Critical Mizkan Group Corp
Priority to JP2006210409A priority Critical patent/JP4878951B2/en
Publication of JP2006340724A publication Critical patent/JP2006340724A/en
Priority to PCT/JP2007/000734 priority patent/WO2008015774A1/en
Priority to TW096127713A priority patent/TW200819059A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4878951B2 publication Critical patent/JP4878951B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23LFOODS, FOODSTUFFS, OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES A21D OR A23B-A23J; THEIR PREPARATION OR TREATMENT, e.g. COOKING, MODIFICATION OF NUTRITIVE QUALITIES, PHYSICAL TREATMENT; PRESERVATION OF FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS, IN GENERAL
    • A23L27/00Spices; Flavouring agents or condiments; Artificial sweetening agents; Table salts; Dietetic salt substitutes; Preparation or treatment thereof
    • A23L27/10Natural spices, flavouring agents or condiments; Extracts thereof

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Nutrition Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Seasonings (AREA)

Description

本発明は液体調味料に係り、特には魚節粉末を含有させた液体調味料に関するものである。   The present invention relates to a liquid seasoning, and in particular, to a liquid seasoning containing fish clause powder.

鰹節、鯖節などの魚節を使った液体調味液は、従来より日本人に好まれ、広く利用されている。このような液体調味料の例としては麺つゆや出汁調味料等があり、それらは一般的に水等を用いて魚節から出汁を抽出し、得られた出汁液に醤油、食塩、糖類、水等を適宜混ぜることにより製造される。ところが、抽出によって得られた出汁液は、風味原料である魚節の水溶性成分のみを抽出したものであるため、風味原料独特の香りや旨味が少ないという欠点がある。これを解決するための手段として、魚節粉末を含有させることで香りや甘味を補ったつゆが従来提案されている(例えば、特許文献1,2を参照)。   Liquid seasoning liquids using fish clauses such as bonito and bonito have long been preferred by Japanese people and widely used. Examples of such liquid seasonings include noodle soup and soup seasonings, which generally extract the soup from fish sections using water, etc., soy sauce, salt, sugar, Manufactured by mixing water or the like as appropriate. However, since the broth obtained by the extraction is obtained by extracting only the water-soluble components of the fish knot, which is a flavor raw material, there is a disadvantage that the flavor raw material has a unique aroma and umami. As means for solving this problem, soy sauce that has been supplemented with scent and sweetness by containing fish bun powder has been proposed in the past (see, for example, Patent Documents 1 and 2).

なお、特許文献1においては、粒径が60μm以上である粗い魚節粉末を含有させた場合につゆの食感がざらつくことを指摘しており(段落0005参照)、この点を考慮して粒径が50μm以下である細かい魚節粉末を含有させることを提案している。
特開平8−308526号公報 実開平1−134484号公報
In Patent Document 1, it is pointed out that the texture of soup is rough when a coarse fish knot powder having a particle size of 60 μm or more is contained (see paragraph 0005). It has been proposed to contain fine fish clause powder having a diameter of 50 μm or less.
JP-A-8-308526 Japanese Utility Model Publication No. 1-1134484

魚節微粉末(例えば、粒径が50μm以下の粉末)を添加して製造した液体調味料は、抽出した出汁液のみで製造した液体調味料に比べて、確かに風味が良好となる。しかしながら、このような魚節微粉末入りの液体調味料は、魚節の生臭みが出やすいといった欠点を有する。   The liquid seasoning produced by adding fish bun fine powder (for example, powder having a particle size of 50 μm or less) certainly has a better flavor than the liquid seasoning produced only with the extracted broth. However, such a liquid seasoning containing fish bun fine powder has a drawback that the fish odor is likely to be produced.

また、魚節微粉末は加熱すると香味成分がすぐに溶出してしまうという欠点がある。ゆえに、魚節微粉末入りの液体調味料を工業的に製造する場合には、殺菌工程などの加熱により香味成分が欠失してしまうこともあり、出汁液のみで製造した液体調味料と同等の香味にしかならないという問題点がある。また、殺菌工程の時間が短くて、溶出した香味成分が液体調味料中に残っていたとしても、消費者が加熱調理する際に香味成分が抜けてしまう可能性がある。よって、食する際に満足のいく香味を味わうことが難しくなるという問題点もある。   In addition, the fish clause fine powder has a drawback that the flavor component is eluted immediately when heated. Therefore, when liquid seasonings containing fish bun fine powder are produced industrially, flavor components may be lost due to heating during the sterilization process, etc., which is equivalent to liquid seasonings manufactured only with the broth There is a problem that it can only be a flavor. Moreover, even if the time of a sterilization process is short and the eluted flavor component remains in a liquid seasoning, when a consumer heat-cooks, a flavor component may fall out. Therefore, there is also a problem that it is difficult to taste a satisfying flavor when eating.

さらに、液体調味料に魚節微粉末(例えば、300μm以下の粉末)を多く含ませ過ぎると、液体調味料が充填されている容器の底部に魚節微粉末が固着し、使用時に魚節微粉末が出て来なくなる場合がある。このような場合、せっかく魚節微粉末を含有させたにもかかわらず、それによる効果を充分に発揮できなくなる。しかも、商品の外観が悪くなり、商品価値を著しく損なう結果となる。   Furthermore, if the liquid seasoning contains too much fish bun powder (for example, powder of 300 μm or less), the fish bun powder adheres to the bottom of the container filled with the liquid seasoning, Powder may not come out. In such a case, even if it contains the fish-powder fine powder, the effect by it cannot be fully exhibited. Moreover, the appearance of the product is deteriorated, resulting in a significant loss of product value.

一方、粒径の大きすぎる魚節粉末を使用すると、食感を損なうという問題ばかりでなく、以下のような問題も生じる。即ち、粒径の小さい魚節粉末と粒径の大きい魚節粉末とを比較した場合、粒径の大きい魚節粉末のほうが重量当たりの表面積は小さい。このため、粒径の大きい魚節粉末を用いたとしても、香味成分を十分に溶出させにくく、風味原料独特の香りや旨味を充分に液体調味料に付与できない。   On the other hand, use of a fish knot powder having a too large particle size causes not only the problem of impairing the texture but also the following problems. That is, when comparing fish bun powder having a small particle size and fish bun powder having a large particle size, the fish pod powder having a large particle size has a smaller surface area per weight. For this reason, even if a fish knot powder having a large particle size is used, it is difficult to sufficiently dissolve the flavor components, and the flavor and umami unique to the flavor raw material cannot be sufficiently imparted to the liquid seasoning.

本発明は上記の課題に鑑みてなされたものであり、その目的は、魚節粉末を含有するにもかかわらず生臭味がなくて食感及び外観にも優れ、しかも加熱工程を経ても魚節の香味や旨味を充分に味わうことができる液体調味料を提供することにある。   The present invention has been made in view of the above-mentioned problems, and the object thereof is to provide a fishy powder that does not have a raw odor, has a good texture and appearance, and has a fish texture even after a heating process. It is in providing the liquid seasoning which can fully taste the flavor and umami of the knot.

そこで本発明者らは、鋭意検討を重ねた結果、液体調味料に含有させる魚節粉末の大きさ及び分量の適正化を図ることにより、液体調味料に官能的に好ましい魚節の香りと旨味とを付与でき、特に加温が必要とされる調理へ使用した場合には、魚節の食感と香りと旨味とを継続的に感じさせることができることを知見した。さらに本発明者らは、液体調味料における小さい魚節粉末に着目し、その含有量を所定値未満にすることにより、魚節粉末の容器底部固着を防止できることも知見した。そして、本発明者らは上記のいくつかの知見に基づいて下記の発明を完成させるに至ったのである。   Therefore, as a result of intensive studies, the present inventors have optimized the size and amount of fish knot powder to be contained in the liquid seasoning, so that the scent and umami taste of fish knot that is sensuously preferable for the liquid seasoning is obtained. It was found that the texture, aroma, and umami of fish knots can be continuously felt when used for cooking that requires heating. Furthermore, the present inventors paid attention to the small fish cake powder in the liquid seasoning and found that the bottom of the container of fish cake powder can be prevented by making its content less than a predetermined value. And the present inventors came to complete the following invention based on said some knowledge.

即ち、上記課題を解決するために、請求項1に記載の発明は、0.5mm以上5mm以下の魚節粉末の含有量が、液体調味料の塩分含有量7質量%当り0.5質量%以上5質量%以下であることを特徴とする液体調味料をその要旨とする。   That is, in order to solve the above-mentioned problem, the invention according to claim 1 is characterized in that the content of the fish knot powder of 0.5 mm or more and 5 mm or less is 0.5 mass% per 7 mass% of the salt content of the liquid seasoning. The gist of the liquid seasoning is 5% by mass or less.

請求項2に記載の発明は、0.5mm以上5mm以下の魚節粉末の含有量が、液体調味料の塩分含有量7質量%当り0.5質量%以上5質量%以下であり、かつ、0.3mm以下の魚節粉末の含有量が、液体調味料当り0.3質量%未満であることを特徴とする液体調味料をその要旨とする。   The invention according to claim 2 is characterized in that the content of fish clause powder of 0.5 mm or more and 5 mm or less is 0.5 mass% or more and 5 mass% or less per 7 mass% of the salt content of the liquid seasoning, and The gist of the present invention is a liquid seasoning characterized in that the content of fish knot powder of 0.3 mm or less is less than 0.3% by mass per liquid seasoning.

請求項3に記載の発明は、請求項1または2において、醤油の含有量が5質量%以上であることをその要旨とする。   Invention of Claim 3 makes it the summary that content of soy sauce is 5 mass% or more in Claim 1 or 2.

請求項4に記載の発明は、請求項1乃至3のいずれか1項において、魚節粉末の脂質含有量が7質量%未満であることをその要旨とする。   The gist of the invention described in claim 4 is that, in any one of claims 1 to 3, the lipid content of the fish bun powder is less than 7% by mass.

請求項5に記載の発明は、請求項1乃至4のいずれか1項において、魚節粉末が鰹節粉末であることをその要旨とする。   The gist of the invention described in claim 5 is that, in any one of claims 1 to 4, the fish knot powder is a koji powder.

以上詳述したように、請求項1〜5に記載の発明によると、魚節粉末を含有するにもかかわらず生臭味がなくて食感及び外観にも優れ、しかも加熱工程を経ても魚節の香味や旨味を充分に味わうことができる液体調味料を提供することができる。   As described above in detail, according to the inventions described in claims 1 to 5, despite the fact that it contains a fish knot powder, there is no raw odor, it is excellent in texture and appearance, and even after a heating process, The liquid seasoning which can fully taste the flavor and umami of the knot can be provided.

以下、本発明の液体調味料について詳細に説明する。   Hereinafter, the liquid seasoning of the present invention will be described in detail.

本発明の「液体調味料」は、当該調味料の主たる割合を占める調味液中に魚節粉末を含有させてなる、魚節粉末入り液体調味料である。本発明の液体調味料の具体例としては、麺つゆ、だし調味料、ドレッシング、たれ、鍋用つゆなどを挙げることができる。前記調味液を構成しうる成分としては、例えば、旨味成分、塩味成分、甘味成分、酸味成分などがあり、具体的には出汁、食塩、糖類、醤油、食酢、油脂類などがある。とりわけ、麺つゆ等に代表される醤油入りの液体調味料においては、保存中に出汁の風味が徐々に減少していくという傾向があるので、本発明はこの種の液体調味料として具体化されるのが好適である。つまり、液体調味料に魚節の香り、旨味、風味を付与したいという課題は、醤油入りの液体調味料において特に大きいからである。なお、醤油入りの液体調味料における醤油の含有量は、例えば液体調味料当り5質量%以上、好ましくは10質量%以上であることがよい。   The “liquid seasoning” of the present invention is a liquid seasoning containing fish clause powder, which is obtained by adding fish cake powder to the seasoning liquid that occupies the main proportion of the seasoning. Specific examples of the liquid seasoning of the present invention include noodle soup, dashi seasoning, dressing, sauce and soup for pots. Examples of components that can constitute the seasoning liquid include umami components, salty components, sweetening components, and sour components, and specifically include soup stock, salt, saccharides, soy sauce, vinegar, and fats and oils. In particular, in a liquid seasoning containing soy sauce represented by noodle soup and the like, since the flavor of the soup stock gradually decreases during storage, the present invention is embodied as this type of liquid seasoning. Is preferable. In other words, the problem of wanting to add fish scent, umami, and flavor to the liquid seasoning is particularly large in the liquid seasoning containing soy sauce. In addition, content of soy sauce in the liquid seasoning containing soy sauce is 5 mass% or more per liquid seasoning, for example, Preferably it is 10 mass% or more.

本発明において「魚節」とは、特に限定されず、原料である魚肉を煮て乾燥させた保存性のある物のことを指す。魚節としては、例えば、鰹節、宗田節、まぐろ節、鯖節、むろ節、うるめ節、いわし節、さんま節、煮干類などを用いることができる。本発明の液体調味料においては、できるだけ脂質含有量が少ない魚節を用いることが好ましい。その理由は、脂質含有量が多い魚節の粉末を用いると、液中に脂分が溶出する結果、外観の悪化や、脂分による酸化劣化が起こるからである。これに対して、例えば脂質含有量が7質量%未満の魚節(好ましくは6質量%未満の魚節)の粉末を用いることがよく、この場合には液中に脂分が溶出しにくくなる。そのため、外観のよい液体調味料となるばかりでなく、脂分による酸化劣化を抑制することができる。このような低脂質含有量の魚節粉末の具体例としては、例えば、鰹節、枯節、まぐろ節などの粉末が挙げられ、これらを用いると上品な風味に仕上げることができる。   In the present invention, “fish section” is not particularly limited, and refers to a preservable product obtained by cooking and drying fish meat as a raw material. As the fish bun, for example, bonito, souda bun, tuna bun, bonito bun, muro bun, urume bun, sardine bun, sanma bun, dried sardines, etc. can be used. In the liquid seasoning of the present invention, it is preferable to use a fish clause with as little lipid content as possible. The reason for this is that, when a fish knot powder with a high lipid content is used, fat is eluted in the liquid, resulting in deterioration of the appearance and oxidative deterioration due to the fat. On the other hand, it is preferable to use, for example, a powder of fish knots with a lipid content of less than 7% by mass (preferably less than 6% by mass of fish knots). In this case, it is difficult for fat to elute in the liquid. . Therefore, not only a liquid seasoning with a good appearance can be obtained, but also oxidative deterioration due to fat can be suppressed. Specific examples of such low lipid content fish knot powder include, for example, powder such as bonito, dried bonito, and tuna, which can be used to achieve a refined flavor.

また、魚節はロースト加工を施したものであることが好ましく、これを用いた場合には生臭味を抑制できるばかりでなく、液体調味料そのものに香ばしさを付与することができる。なお、ロースト加工の方法は特に限定されず、例えば、煮た魚肉を遠赤外線で熱処理する方法でもよいし、煮た魚肉を鉄板上で直接的に焼く方法でもよい。   Further, the fish clause is preferably roasted, and when this is used, not only can the raw odor be suppressed, but also the flavor can be imparted to the liquid seasoning itself. The roasting method is not particularly limited. For example, a method of heat-treating boiled fish meat with far-infrared rays or a method of directly baking boiled fish meat on an iron plate may be used.

含有されている魚節粉末の大きさの好適範囲は0.5mm以上5mm以下であって、その含有量は液体調味料の塩分含有量7質量%当り0.5質量%以上5質量%以下である必要がある。ここで、0.5mm以上5mm以下の大きさの魚節粉末とは、目開きが0.5mm四方のメッシュにオンし、目開きが5mm四方のメッシュをパスする魚節粉末のことをいう。魚節を粉末化する方法としては、例えば、魚節を所定のサイズに直接破砕する方法や、凍結した魚節を粉砕する方法等がある。特に好ましい方法は、あらかじめ花鰹のような削り節の状態にしておき、その後各メッシュサイズに粉砕する方法であり、この方法によれば風味に優れたものを得ることができる。   The preferred range of the size of the fish bun powder contained is 0.5 mm or more and 5 mm or less, and the content thereof is 0.5 mass% or more and 5 mass% or less per 7 mass% of the salt content of the liquid seasoning. There must be. Here, the fish node powder having a size of 0.5 mm or more and 5 mm or less refers to a fish node powder that turns on a mesh having an opening of 0.5 mm square and passes a mesh having an opening of 5 mm square. Examples of the method for pulverizing fish sections include a method for directly crushing fish sections to a predetermined size and a method for crushing frozen fish sections. A particularly preferred method is a method in which a state of shaving like a flower bud is previously set and then pulverized to each mesh size. According to this method, a product having an excellent flavor can be obtained.

5mmを越える大きさの魚節粉末が液体調味料に所定量以上含まれると、口当たりが悪くなるばかりでなく、香味成分が十分に溶出しにくいため液体調味料に十分に風味を付与できなくなる。また、0.5mm未満の大きさの魚節粉末が液体調味料に所定量以上含まれると、生臭味がでてしまう。従って、やはり上記のごとく0.5mm以上5mm以下の大きさの魚節粉末が好適であり、1mm以上3mm以下の大きさの魚節粉末がより好適である。なお、上記好適範囲よりも小さな魚節粉末はごく少量であれば液体調味料に含まれていてもよいが、できれば
0.3mm以下の魚節粉末の含有量が液体調味料当り0.3質量%未満であることが好ましい。その理由は、0.3mm以下の魚節粉末(目開きが0.3mm四方のメッシュをパスする魚節粉末)は、液体調味料の容器の底部に固着しやすいという欠点があるからである。そして、このような固着が起こると、製品の外観が悪くなるばかりでなく、粘性を帯びたドロっとした感じの物性となり、好ましくないからである。
If a fish seasoning powder with a size exceeding 5 mm is contained in the liquid seasoning in a predetermined amount or more, not only is the mouthfeel worse, but the flavor components are not sufficiently eluted, and the liquid seasoning cannot be sufficiently flavored. Moreover, if the fish seasoning powder with a size of less than 0.5 mm is included in the liquid seasoning in a predetermined amount or more, a raw odor is produced. Therefore, as described above, a fish knot powder having a size of 0.5 mm or more and 5 mm or less is preferable, and a fish knot powder having a size of 1 mm or more and 3 mm or less is more preferable. Note that the fish seasoning powder smaller than the above preferred range may be contained in the liquid seasoning if the amount is very small, but preferably the content of the fish node powder of 0.3 mm or less is 0.3 mass per liquid seasoning. It is preferable that it is less than%. The reason for this is that fish node powder having a size of 0.3 mm or less (fish node powder that passes a mesh having a mesh size of 0.3 mm square) is liable to stick to the bottom of the liquid seasoning container. When such sticking occurs, not only the appearance of the product is deteriorated, but also the physical properties become sticky and sticky, which is not preferable.

ここで液体調味料には、ストレートタイプの商品や、2倍〜5倍程度に濃縮した濃縮タイプの商品などがある。なお、前者の商品に比べて後者の商品には2倍〜5倍多い塩分が含まれている。通常、濃縮タイプの商品は希釈したうえで使用されるが、この場合には濃縮倍率に応じて液の使用量を少なくするのが一般的である。そこで本発明では、上記商品タイプの相違により塩分含有量が異なる点に鑑み、塩分含有量を基準として魚節粉末の含有量を規定することにしている。   Here, the liquid seasoning includes straight type products, concentrated type products concentrated about 2 to 5 times, and the like. The latter product contains 2 to 5 times more salt than the former product. Normally, concentrated products are used after being diluted. In this case, it is common to reduce the amount of liquid used according to the concentration factor. Therefore, in the present invention, in view of the difference in salinity content due to the difference in the product types, the content of fish clause powder is defined based on the salinity content.

例えば、液体調味料の塩分含有量が7質量%(2倍濃縮タイプの一般的な塩分濃度)である場合には、0.5mm以上5mm以下の魚節粉末を0.5質量%〜5質量%含ませることが必要である。また、液体調味料の塩分含有量が10.5質量%(3倍濃縮タイプの一般的な塩分濃度)である場合には、0.5mm以上5mm以下の魚節粉末を0.75質量%〜7.5質量%含ませることが必要である。また、液体調味料の塩分含有量が3.5質量%(ストレートタイプの一般的な塩分濃度)である場合には、0.5mm以上5mm以下の魚節粉末を0.25質量%〜2.5質量%含ませることが必要であることとなる。   For example, when the salt content of the liquid seasoning is 7% by mass (general salt concentration of a double concentration type), 0.5 to 5% by mass of fish powder of 0.5 mm to 5 mm. % Must be included. In addition, when the salt content of the liquid seasoning is 10.5% by mass (general salt concentration of a triple concentration type), 0.5 mm or more and 5 mm or less of fish paste powder of 0.75% by mass to It is necessary to include 7.5% by mass. Moreover, when the salt content of the liquid seasoning is 3.5% by mass (general salt concentration of a straight type), 0.25% by mass to 2.5mm of fish paste powder of 0.5 mm or more and 5 mm or less. It is necessary to include the mass%.

上記のように本発明では、0.5mm以上5mm以下の魚節粉末を液体調味料の塩分含有量7質量%当り0.5質量%〜5質量%含ませることが必要であるが、好ましくは1質量%〜4質量%、さらに好ましくは2質量%〜4質量%含ませることがよい。   As described above, in the present invention, it is necessary to include 0.5 mm to 5% by mass of fish paste powder of 0.5 mm or more and 5 mm or less per 7% by mass of the salt content of the liquid seasoning. It is preferable to include 1% by mass to 4% by mass, and more preferably 2% by mass to 4% by mass.

液体調味料の塩分含有量7質量%当りの魚節粉末含有量が5質量%を超えると、液状を維持することが困難となり、食感として口当たりが非常に悪くなるだけでなく、風味も好ましくないものになってしまう。当該魚節粉末含有量が0.5質量%を下回ると、風味に乏しいものとなってしまい、加熱調理時の風味についても、出汁液のみで製造した液体調味料と同程度になってしまう。   When the content of fish knot powder per 7% by mass of the salt content of the liquid seasoning exceeds 5% by mass, it becomes difficult to maintain the liquid state and the mouthfeel becomes very bad as well as the taste is favorable. It will not be. If the fish paste powder content is less than 0.5% by mass, the flavor becomes poor, and the flavor at the time of heat cooking also becomes the same level as the liquid seasoning produced only with the broth.

また、本発明においては、0.3mm以下という細かい魚節粉末を液体調味料当り0.3質量%未満とすることが望ましく、特には0.2質量%未満とすることがよい。0.3mm以下の魚節粉末をこの範囲より多く含む場合、魚節粉末が調味料の容器の底部に固着してしまい、外観が悪くなる。また、調味料自体がドロっとした感じになってしまい、麺つゆなどの用途に適さないものとなる。   In the present invention, it is desirable that the fine fish paste powder of 0.3 mm or less is less than 0.3 mass% per liquid seasoning, and particularly less than 0.2 mass%. When more than 0.3 mm of fish knot powder is included in this range, the fish knot powder adheres to the bottom of the seasoning container, and the appearance deteriorates. Further, the seasoning itself becomes dull and unsuitable for uses such as noodle soup.

魚節(鰹節)の粉末の大きさの好適範囲を決定するための実験例(2倍濃縮タイプ液体調味料)
(1)サンプルの作製
Experimental example (double concentration type liquid seasoning) for determining the suitable range of the size of the fish knot (salmon knot) powder
(1) Sample preparation

図1の表1に示す原料を全量で2kgになるようにそれぞれ表1に示す割合(質量%)で用意し、最終塩分濃度が7質量%となるように均一に混合した。ここでいう「塩分濃度」とは、単に食塩のみの濃度ではなく、醤油等における塩分も含めた濃度のことである。魚節粉末としては、同ロットでサイズの異なる鰹節粉末を使用した。各サンプルについては、加熱処理を加えない条件(殺菌前)、80℃〜85℃で5分間殺菌し、常温まで自然冷却させた条件(殺菌後)、実際の調理を想定し上述の殺菌処理後のサンプルをさらに10分間沸騰させ、加温状態(約40℃)まで自然冷却させた条件(調理後)の計3種類用意した。それぞれ常温条件にて以下の評価を行った。なお、殺菌後のサンプルは、加熱をせずに調理に用いる場合(そうめんつゆとしての使用など)を想定している。また、外観検査用のサンプルとしては、作製した液体調味料を600mlビンに入れて24時間放置したものを用いた。
(2)サンプルの評価
The raw materials shown in Table 1 of FIG. 1 were prepared in the proportions (mass%) shown in Table 1 so that the total amount was 2 kg, and mixed uniformly so that the final salt concentration was 7 mass%. The “salt concentration” here refers to a concentration including not only the concentration of sodium chloride but also the salt content of soy sauce. As the fish bun powder, bonito powder having different sizes in the same lot was used. For each sample, the conditions without heat treatment (before sterilization), sterilized at 80 ° C. to 85 ° C. for 5 minutes and naturally cooled to room temperature (after sterilization), after the above sterilization treatment assuming actual cooking A total of three types of samples (both after cooking) were prepared by boiling the sample for 10 minutes and allowing it to naturally cool to a heated state (about 40 ° C.). The following evaluations were performed under normal temperature conditions. The sample after sterilization is assumed to be used for cooking without heating (such as use as somen soup). In addition, as a sample for appearance inspection, a liquid seasoning prepared in a 600 ml bottle and left for 24 hours was used.
(2) Sample evaluation

作製したサンプルの液体調味料について、だし風味(鰹風味)、生臭み、食感、外観の4項目につき、10名の官能検査官による官能検査を行って評価した。   About the liquid seasoning of the produced sample, the sensory test by ten sensory inspectors was performed and evaluated for the four items of dashi flavor (boiled flavor), raw odor, texture, and appearance.

だし風味(鰹風味)の項目については、それぞれ殺菌前、殺菌後、調理後の3サンプルにつき、絶対評価として、◎(抜群の鰹風味が感じられる)、○(強い鰹風味が感じられる)、△(わずかな鰹風味を感じる)、×(鰹風味をあまり感じない)の4段階で総評した。   For the soup stock flavor (boiled flavor), ◎ (feeling a great straw flavor), ○ (feeling a strong straw flavor), as an absolute rating for 3 samples before sterilization, after sterilization and after cooking, respectively, A total rating was given in four stages: Δ (feeling a slight strawberry flavor) and × (not feeling a strawberry flavor too much).

生臭みの項目については、殺菌後のサンプルを対象とし、コントロール品(比較例1)と比較して評価した。具体的には、◎(コントロールに比べて生臭みを感じない)、○(コントロールと同等)、△(コントロールよりやや生臭い)、×(コントロールと比較し非常に生臭い)の4段階で評価した。   About the item of raw odor, the sample after sterilization was made into the object, and it evaluated compared with the control goods (comparative example 1). Specifically, the evaluation was made in four grades: ◎ (not feeling raw odor compared to control), ○ (equivalent to control), △ (slightly odor than control), × (very odor compared to control).

食感の項目については、殺菌後のサンプルを対象とし、絶対評価を行った。具体的には、◎(全く違和感がない)、○(わずかに舌に残るが気にならない程度)、△(ややざらつきがある)、×(ざらつきが残り好ましくない)の4段階で評価した。   About the item of food texture, the absolute evaluation was performed for the sample after sterilization. Specifically, the evaluation was made in four grades: ◎ (no discomfort at all), ◯ (slightly left on the tongue but not worrisome), △ (slightly rough), and x (slightly rough).

外観の項目については、殺菌後のサンプルを対象とし、絶対評価を行った。具体的には、◎(粘性をおびたドロっとした性状は確認されず非常に好ましい)、○(粘性物質がほとんど無く好ましい)、△(ややドロっとしているのが感じられるが外観として大きく品質を落とすと感じられるほどではない)、×(ドロっとしていて好ましくない)の4段階で評価した。   As for the items of appearance, absolute evaluation was performed on samples after sterilization. Specifically, ◎ (preferably with no sticky and sticky properties confirmed), ○ (preferably with almost no viscous substance), △ (slightly dripping, but with a large appearance The evaluation was made on a scale of 4 (not so high that it was felt that the quality was degraded) and x (not drastic and undesirable).

なお、実験例1〜9に対するコントロール品(比較例1)は、40質量%相当の水を使用して2質量%相当の鰹節(3mmメッシュパス破砕品)から出汁をとり、40μmのフィルターにて濾過した出汁液を使用した液体調味料とした。コントロール品には、鰹節粉末そのものは含ませていない。このコントロール品には、前記出汁液を含めて60質量%の水を用いた。
(3)結果
The control product for Comparative Examples 1 to 9 (Comparative Example 1) used 40% by mass of water to extract the juice from 2% by mass of bonito (3 mm mesh pass crushed product) and filtered it with a 40 μm filter. It was set as the liquid seasoning which uses the filtered stock solution. The control product does not contain bonito powder itself. For this control product, 60% by mass of water including the stock solution was used.
(3) Results

上記各サンプルの評価結果を図1の表1に示す。表1によると、同量の鰹節粉末から出汁として抽出されたコントロール品(比較例1)に対して、0.5mm以上5mm以下の鰹節粉末を使用したサンプル(実験例3〜7)のだし風味(鰹風味)は、殺菌前、殺菌後、調理後のどの段階においても同等以上に強く感じられた。とりわけ、鰹節粉末のメッシュサイズが大きいものが添加されたサンプルのほうが、加熱によっても強い鰹風味が維持される傾向にあることがわかった。なお、コントロール品は加熱後の鰹風味が物足りないということもわかった。   The evaluation results of the above samples are shown in Table 1 of FIG. According to Table 1, with respect to the control product (Comparative Example 1) extracted from the same amount of bonito powder as a soup stock, the flavor of the sample (Experimental Examples 3 to 7) using the bonito powder of 0.5 mm or more and 5 mm or less (Amber flavor) was felt stronger than equivalent at any stage before sterilization, after sterilization, and after cooking. In particular, it was found that the sample added with the larger mesh size of koji powder had a tendency to maintain a strong koji flavor even by heating. It was also found that the control product was unsatisfactory after cooking.

また、5mmメッシュより大きいサイズの鰹節粉末を使用した液体調味料については、口当たりも悪く殺菌前の鰹風味の向上もほとんど感じられないものになった。これは、粒径の大きい鰹節粉末は、粒径の小さい鰹節粉末に比べて表面積が少ないので、殺菌工程を経る前の段階では鰹節粉末の香味が十分溶出していないためであると考えられる。   Moreover, about the liquid seasoning which uses the koji powder of a size larger than 5 mm mesh, it was bad in taste and the improvement of the koji flavor before sterilization was hardly felt. This is probably because the koji powder having a large particle size has a smaller surface area than the koji powder having a small particle size, and the flavor of the koji powder is not sufficiently eluted before the sterilization process.

また、0.5mmメッシュ未満の鰹節粉末を使用した液体調味料については、コントロール品と比較して、だし風味(鰹風味)の若干の向上は感じられた。しかし、生臭みが感じられ、品質上好ましくないという評価結果が得られた。これは、鰹節粉末と液との接触面が非常に大きく、鰹節中の生臭みをもつ成分まで溶出してしまったためであると考えられる。   Moreover, about the liquid seasoning which uses the bonito powder of less than 0.5 mm mesh, compared with the control goods, some improvement of the dashi flavor (boiled flavor) was felt. However, the evaluation result that a raw odor was felt and it was unpreferable on quality was obtained. This is considered to be because the contact surface between the bonito powder and the liquid was very large, and even the components having the raw odor in the bonito were eluted.

さらに、0.3mm以下の鰹節粉末を使用した液体調味料については、生臭みだけでなく、外観上で、粘性をおびたドロっとした性状になり、好ましくないという評価結果を得た。   Furthermore, about the liquid seasoning which uses a bonito powder of 0.3 mm or less, the evaluation result that it became unsatisfactory with not only a raw smell but also a drastic property on the appearance was obtained.

以上の結果より、魚節粉末(本実施例では鰹節粉末)の大きさは、0.5mm以上5mm以下とすることが必要であることがわかった。従って、実験例3〜7のサンプルが、本発明の技術的思想に属する好適な実施例のサンプルである、と結論付けられた。   From the above results, it was found that the size of the fish knot powder (salmon knot powder in this example) needs to be 0.5 mm or more and 5 mm or less. Therefore, it was concluded that the samples of Experimental Examples 3 to 7 were samples of preferred examples belonging to the technical idea of the present invention.

魚節(鰹節)の含有量の好適範囲を決定するための実験例(2倍濃縮タイプ液体調味料)
(1)サンプルの作製
Experimental example (double concentration type liquid seasoning) for determining the suitable range of the content of fish clause
(1) Sample preparation

本実施例では、原料の鰹節粉末及び水を図2の表2に示す量(質量%)とした。それ以外の事項については実施例1と同様にして、複数種類の液体調味料サンプルを作製した(実験例10〜18及び比較例2)。なお、最終塩分濃度は7質量%とした。
(2)サンプルの評価
In this example, the raw material koji powder and water were used in amounts (mass%) shown in Table 2 of FIG. About the other matter, it carried out similarly to Example 1, and produced the multiple types of liquid seasoning sample (Experimental Examples 10-18 and Comparative Example 2). The final salt concentration was 7% by mass.
(2) Sample evaluation

各サンプルをそうめん喫食用に2倍希釈したものを10人の官能検査員が試食し、だし風味(鰹風味)、生臭み、食感の3項目について評価した。各項目の評価方法は実施例1と同様とした。本実施例においては、殺菌後のサンプルのみ作製し、それについて評価を行った。なお、コントロール品(比較例2)は比較例1と同様に作製したサンプルである。
(3)結果
Ten sensory inspectors sampled each sample diluted twice for eating somen, and evaluated three items of dashi flavor (boiled flavor), raw odor, and texture. The evaluation method for each item was the same as in Example 1. In the present Example, only the sample after sterilization was produced and it evaluated. The control product (Comparative Example 2) is a sample produced in the same manner as Comparative Example 1.
(3) Results

鰹節粉末が5質量%を上回って添加されている液体調味料(実験例14,18)については、食感が悪くなるという評価結果が得られた。特に3mm以上5mm以下のサイズの鰹節粉末が5質量%より多く含まれているときには(実施例18)、多量の鰹節粉末が口の中に残り、その結果口当たりが悪くなるだけでなく、鰹節粉末からしみ出る旨味が濃すぎて好ましくないものとなった。鰹節粉末含有率が0.3質量%のものについては、コントロール品と比較して鰹風味の向上が確認されなかった。   About the liquid seasoning (Experimental Examples 14 and 18) to which the bonito powder was added in excess of 5 mass%, the evaluation result that food texture worsened was obtained. In particular, when bonito powder having a size of 3 mm or more and 5 mm or less is contained in an amount of more than 5% by mass (Example 18), a large amount of bonito powder remains in the mouth, resulting in poor mouthfeel and bonito powder. The oozing oozing taste was too strong, which was undesirable. As for the koji powder content of 0.3% by mass, no improvement in the koji flavor was confirmed compared to the control product.

以上の結果より、鰹節粉末を0.5重量%以上5質量%以下含有させることが必要であることがわかった。従って、実験例11,12,13,16,17のサンプルが、本発明の技術的思想に属する好適な実施例のサンプルである、と結論付けられた。   From the above results, it was found necessary to contain bonito powder in an amount of 0.5 wt% to 5 wt%. Therefore, it was concluded that the samples of Experimental Examples 11, 12, 13, 16, and 17 were samples of preferred examples belonging to the technical idea of the present invention.

小さい鰹節(0.3mm以下)の含有量の好適範囲を決定するための実験例
(1)サンプルの作製
Experimental example for determining the preferred range of content of small bonito (0.3 mm or less) (1) Sample preparation

本実施例では、原料の鰹節粉末及び水を表3に示す量(質量%)とした。それ以外の事項については実施例1と同様にして、複数種類の液体調味料サンプル(実験例19〜22及び比較例3)を作製した。また、表4では0.3mm以下の鰹節粉末、0.3mmより大きいサイズの鰹節粉末の2種類を用いて、同様に複数種類のサンプルを作製した。
(2)サンプルの評価
In this example, the raw material koji powder and water were used in the amounts (mass%) shown in Table 3. About the other matter, it carried out similarly to Example 1, and produced the multiple types of liquid seasoning sample (Experimental Examples 19-22 and Comparative Example 3). Further, in Table 4, a plurality of types of samples were similarly prepared using two types of koji powder of 0.3 mm or less and koji powder of a size larger than 0.3 mm.
(2) Sample evaluation

作製したサンプルについて、10人の官能検査員により、だし風味(鰹風味)、生臭み、食感、外観の4項目を評価した。各項目の評価方法は実施例1と同様とした。また、本実施例においては、殺菌後のサンプルのみ作製し、評価を行った。なお、コントロール品(比較例3)は、比較例1と同様に作製したサンプルである。   About the produced sample, four sensory inspectors evaluated four items, dashi flavor (boiled flavor), raw odor, food texture, and external appearance. The evaluation method for each item was the same as in Example 1. Moreover, in the present Example, only the sample after sterilization was produced and evaluated. The control product (Comparative Example 3) is a sample produced in the same manner as Comparative Example 1.

図3の表3は、0.3mm以下の鰹節粉末(0.3mmメッシュパス品)の含有量を0.2質量%〜1質量%に設定したものについて、だし風味(鰹風味)、生臭み、食感、外観の4項目を評価した結果を示すものである。図4の表4は、0.3mm以下の鰹節粉末(0.3mmメッシュパス品)の他、0.3mmより大きな鰹節粉末(0.5mm以上1mm以下、または3mm以上5mm以下)を含有させたサンプルの外観を評価した結果を示すものである。
(3)結果
Table 3 in FIG. 3 shows a dashi flavor (boiled flavor) and a raw odor for the content of 0.3 mm or less bonito powder (0.3 mm mesh pass product) set to 0.2 mass% to 1 mass%. It shows the results of evaluating the four items of food texture and appearance. Table 4 in FIG. 4 contains koji powder (0.3 mm mesh pass product) of 0.3 mm or less, and koji powder (0.5 mm or more and 1 mm or less, or 3 mm or more and 5 mm or less) larger than 0.3 mm. The result of evaluating the appearance of the sample is shown.
(3) Results

表3に示すように、0.3mm以下の鰹節粉末が0.3質量%以上含有する液体調味料のサンプルにおいては、外観上好ましくないとの評価結果を得た。また、表4に示されるように、表3と同じく0.3mm以下の鰹節粉末を0.3質量%以上含有するサンプルでは、粘性を帯びてドロっとした性状になることが確認された。しかし、0.3mm以下の鰹節粉末と併せて比較的大きな鰹節粉末(0.5mm以上1mm以下、または3mm以上5mm以下)を含有させると、外観評価が上がることがわかった(実験例23,26,29,32)。また、比較的大きな鰹節粉末を多く含有させる程、外観評価が上がることもわかった(実験例29,32)。これは、0.3mmよりもサイズの小さい鰹節粉末が適度なサイズの鰹節粉末(0.5mm以上1mm以下、または3mm以上5mm以下)と混合することで、小さい鰹節粉末のみが互いに結合するのを抑制しているためである、と考えられる。   As shown in Table 3, in the liquid seasoning sample containing 0.3% by mass or more of bonito powder of 0.3 mm or less, an evaluation result that is not preferable in appearance was obtained. Further, as shown in Table 4, it was confirmed that the sample containing 0.3% by mass or more of bonito powder of 0.3 mm or less as in Table 3 is viscous and dripping. However, it has been found that the appearance evaluation is improved when a relatively large koji powder (0.5 mm or more and 1 mm or less, or 3 mm or more and 5 mm or less) is contained together with the koji powder of 0.3 mm or less (Experimental Examples 23 and 26). 29, 32). It was also found that the appearance evaluation increased as the content of relatively large koji powder increased (Experimental Examples 29 and 32). This is because koji powder with a size smaller than 0.3 mm is mixed with koji powder with an appropriate size (0.5 mm or more and 1 mm or less, or 3 mm or more and 5 mm or less), so that only small koji powder binds to each other. It is thought that it is because it is suppressed.

以上の結果より、0.3mm以下の鰹節粉末を液体調味料当り0.3質量%未満とすることがよく、0.2質量%未満とすることが特によいことがわかった。また、適度なサイズの鰹節粉末(0.5〜1mmまたは3〜5mm)を適度な量(0.5質量%以上5質量%以下)の範囲内で多く含ませることが、外観向上の観点から好ましいことがわかった。   From the above results, it was found that the koji powder with a thickness of 0.3 mm or less is preferably less than 0.3% by mass and particularly preferably less than 0.2% by mass per liquid seasoning. In addition, from the viewpoint of improving the appearance, it is possible to include a large amount of koji powder (0.5 to 1 mm or 3 to 5 mm) of an appropriate size within an appropriate amount (0.5 to 5% by mass). It turned out to be preferable.

使用すべき魚節粉末の種類を検討するための実験例
(1)サンプルの作製
Experimental example to examine the type of fish bun powder to be used (1) Sample preparation

図5の表5に示す魚節粉末を使用する以外は、実施例1と同様にして液体調味料を作製した。なお、魚節粉末は、全て、3mmメッシュパスで1mmメッシュオンのサイズとした。表5中における「脂質5%」などの記載は、魚節に含まれている脂質含有量(質量%)を示すものである。また、「ロースト(弱)」などの記載は、鰹節粉末がロースト加工品であることを示し、加工具合によって、(弱)と(強)とに区別した。なお、ここでのロースト加工は、遠赤外線による熱処理加工を採用した。
(2)サンプルの評価
A liquid seasoning was prepared in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the fish knot powder shown in Table 5 of FIG. 5 was used. In addition, all fish clause powder was made into the size of 1 mm mesh on by 3 mm mesh pass. The descriptions such as “5% lipid” in Table 5 indicate the lipid content (% by mass) contained in the fish section. In addition, the description such as “roast (weak)” indicates that the koji powder is a roasted product, and is classified into (weak) and (strong) depending on the processing condition. The roasting process used here is a heat treatment process using far infrared rays.
(2) Sample evaluation

各サンプルをそうめん喫食用に2倍希釈したものを10人の官能検査員で試食し、外観(うるみ、沈殿)、だし風味(鰹などの風味)、生臭み、風味劣化(酸敗臭)の4項目を評価した。このうち、だし風味(鰹などの風味)、生臭みの評価方法は、実施例1のだし風味(鰹風味)、生臭みの評価方法と同様とした。   Each sample was diluted 2 times for eating somen by 10 sensory inspectors, and the appearance (nourishment, precipitation), dashi flavor (flavor such as salmon), raw odor, flavor deterioration (acid rancidity) 4 Items were evaluated. Among these, the method for evaluating the dashi flavor (flavor such as salmon) and the raw odor was the same as the method for evaluating the stock flavor (boiled flavor) and raw odor of Example 1.

外観(うるみ、沈殿)の項目については、◎(透明感がある)、○(やや濁っているが透明感がありあまり気にならない)、△(濁りが確認され品質を損ねている)、×(濁りが多く大きく品質を損ねている)の4段階で総評した。   For the items of appearance (moisture and precipitation), ◎ (transparent), ○ (slightly turbid but transparent and not much of concern), △ (turbidity is confirmed and quality is impaired), × The overall evaluation was made in four stages (much turbidity and high quality).

風味劣化(酸敗臭)の項目については、サンプルを40℃で2ヶ月保存した後のものについて、◎(コントロールの風味劣化より劣化度合いが少ない)、○(コントロールと同じ程度)、△(風味がコントロールよりもやや劣る)、×(コントロールよりも風味が極めて劣る)の4段階で総評し、保存性の良否の指標とした。   Regarding the items of flavor deterioration (acid rancid odor), the samples were stored at 40 ° C. for 2 months, ◎ (less deteriorated than control flavor deterioration), ○ (same degree as control), △ (flavor is less A total rating was given in four stages, which was slightly inferior to the control and x (extremely inferior to the control), and was used as an index of the quality of storage stability.

また、本実施例においては、殺菌後のサンプルのみ作製し、評価を行った。
なお、コントロール品(比較例4)は比較例1と同様に作製したサンプルであり、この際使用した鰹節粉末の脂質含有量は7質量%であった。
(3)結果
Moreover, in the present Example, only the sample after sterilization was produced and evaluated.
The control product (Comparative Example 4) was a sample prepared in the same manner as in Comparative Example 1, and the lipid content of the koji powder used at this time was 7% by mass.
(3) Results

実験例35〜38で作製したサンプルでは、コントロール品に比べて生臭さを感じないという評価結果が得られた。その中でも、ロースト加工された鰹節粉末を添加したものに関しては、そうめん喫食時に生臭みを感じなくなるだけでなく、香ばしさも感じられ、風味の向上も確認された(実験例35,36)。   In the samples prepared in Experimental Examples 35 to 38, an evaluation result that the raw odor was not felt as compared with the control product was obtained. Among them, for those with roasted bonito powder added, not only did not feel the raw odor at the time of eating somen, but also the fragrance was felt and the flavor was improved (Experimental Examples 35 and 36).

また、長期保存後の品質についても有意な差が確認された。即ち、脂質含量が多い鰹節粉末を用いて作製したサンプルについては、脂分が液中に溶出し外観上好ましくないという評価結果だけでなく、脂分の劣化により風味上好ましくないとの評価結果も得られた(実験例39)。   In addition, a significant difference was confirmed in the quality after long-term storage. That is, for samples prepared using bonito powder with a high lipid content, not only the evaluation result that the fat content is unfavorable in appearance due to elution in the liquid, but also the evaluation result that the taste is not preferable due to the deterioration of the fat content. Obtained (Experimental Example 39).

また、鰹節粉末以外の魚節粉末として、煮干と宗田鰹節の粉末でも実験を行ったが、商品としては問題ないレベルではあるが、鰹節よりも脂質含量が多いため品質劣化・外観の点においてやや劣り、生臭みがあることもわかった(実験例40,41)。   In addition, we experimented with Niboshi and Munebu-bushi powder as fish-bush powder other than bonito-powder powder. It was also inferior and it was also found that there was a live smell (Experimental Examples 40 and 41).

以上の結果より、魚節粉末の脂質含有量は7質量%未満であることが好ましく、また、ロースト加工した魚節粉末や、枯節削りの粉末が好ましいこともわかった。さらに、魚節粉末の中でも鰹節粉末が好ましいこともわかった。   From the above results, it was found that the lipid content of the fish knot powder is preferably less than 7% by mass, and roasted fish knot powder or dry powder is preferred. Furthermore, it was also found that bonito powder is preferable among fish bun powders.

次に、特許請求の範囲に記載された技術的思想のほかに、前述した実施の形態によって把握される技術的思想を以下に列挙する。   Next, in addition to the technical ideas described in the claims, the technical ideas grasped by the embodiments described above are listed below.

(1)0.5mm以上5mm以下の枯節粉末の含有量が、液体調味料の塩分含有量7質量%当り0.5質量%以上5質量%以下であり、かつ、0.3mm以下の枯節粉末の含有量が、液体調味料当り0.3質量%未満であることを特徴とする液体調味料。   (1) The content of 0.5 mm or more and 5 mm or less of ginger powder is 0.5 mass% or more and 5 mass% or less per 7 mass% of the salt content of the liquid seasoning, and is 0.3 mm or less. The content of is less than 0.3% by mass per liquid seasoning.

(2)ロースト加工が施された0.5mm以上5mm以下の魚節粉末の含有量が、液体調味料の塩分含有量7質量%当り0.5質量%以上5質量%以下であり、かつ、0.3mm以下の魚節粉末の含有量が、液体調味料当り0.3質量%未満であることを特徴とする液体調味料。   (2) The content of roasted 0.5 mm to 5 mm fish clause powder is 0.5% to 5% by mass per 7% by mass of the salt content of the liquid seasoning, and A liquid seasoning characterized in that the content of fish paste powder of 0.3 mm or less is less than 0.3% by mass per liquid seasoning.

(3)濃縮倍率に応じて希釈して用いる濃縮タイプの醤油入り液体調味料であって、塩分含有量が、液体調味料当り5質量%以上であり、0.5mm以上5mm以下の魚節粉末の含有量が、液体調味料の塩分含有量7質量%当り0.5質量%以上5質量%以下であり、かつ、0.3mm以下の魚節粉末の含有量が、液体調味料当り0.3質量%未満であることを特徴とする醤油入り液体調味料。   (3) Concentrated soy sauce-containing liquid seasoning that is diluted according to the concentration ratio, and has a salt content of 5% by mass or more per liquid seasoning, and 0.5 mm or more and 5 mm or less fish paste powder Is 0.5% by mass or more and 5% by mass or less per 7% by mass of the salt content of the liquid seasoning, and the content of fish knot powder of 0.3 mm or less is 0.00% per liquid seasoning. A liquid seasoning containing soy sauce, characterized by being less than 3% by mass.

魚節(鰹節)の粉末の大きさの好適範囲を決定するための実験の結果を示した表である(表1)。It is the table | surface which showed the result of the experiment for determining the suitable range of the magnitude | size of the powder of a fish knot (salmon knot) (Table 1). 魚節(鰹節)の含有量の好適範囲決定するための実験の結果を示した表である(表2)。It is the table | surface which showed the result of the experiment for determining the suitable range of content of a fish bun (salmon bonito) (Table 2). 小さい魚節(0.3mm以下の鰹節)の含有量の好適範囲を決定するための実験の結果を示した表である(表3)。It is the table | surface which showed the result of the experiment for determining the suitable range of content of a small fish node (salmon node of 0.3 mm or less) (Table 3). 0.3mmより大きいサイズの鰹節粉末を用いた場合における、小さい魚節(0.3mm以下の鰹節)の含有量の好適範囲を決定するための実験の結果を示した表である(表4)。It is the table | surface which showed the result of the experiment for determining the suitable range of content of a small fish knot (0.3 mm or less knot) when using the koji powder of size larger than 0.3 mm (Table 4). . 使用すべき魚節粉末の種類を検討するための実験の結果を示した表である(表5)。It is the table | surface which showed the result of the experiment for examining the kind of fish clause powder which should be used (Table 5).

Claims (5)

0.5mm以上5mm以下の魚節粉末の含有量が、液体調味料の塩分含有量7質量%当り0.5質量%以上5質量%以下であることを特徴とする液体調味料。   A liquid seasoning characterized in that the content of fish node powder of 0.5 mm or more and 5 mm or less is 0.5 mass% or more and 5 mass% or less per 7 mass% of the salt content of the liquid seasoning. 0.5mm以上5mm以下の魚節粉末の含有量が、液体調味料の塩分含有量7質量%当り0.5質量%以上5質量%以下であり、かつ、0.3mm以下の魚節粉末の含有量が、液体調味料当り0.3質量%未満であることを特徴とする液体調味料。   The content of the fish node powder of 0.5 mm or more and 5 mm or less is 0.5% by mass or more and 5% by mass or less per 7% by mass of the salt content of the liquid seasoning, and the fish node powder of 0.3 mm or less A liquid seasoning characterized in that the content is less than 0.3% by mass per liquid seasoning. 醤油の含有量が5質量%以上であることを特徴とする請求項1または2に記載の液体調味料。   Content of soy sauce is 5 mass% or more, The liquid seasoning of Claim 1 or 2 characterized by the above-mentioned. 魚節粉末の脂質含有量が7質量%未満であることを特徴とする請求項1乃至3のいずれか1項に記載の液体調味料。   The liquid seasoning according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that the lipid content of the fish knot powder is less than 7% by mass. 魚節粉末が鰹節粉末であることを特徴とする請求項1乃至4のいずれか1項に記載の液体調味料。   The liquid seasoning according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the fish bun powder is bonito powder.
JP2006210409A 2006-08-01 2006-08-01 Liquid seasoning Active JP4878951B2 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006210409A JP4878951B2 (en) 2006-08-01 2006-08-01 Liquid seasoning
PCT/JP2007/000734 WO2008015774A1 (en) 2006-08-01 2007-07-05 Liquid seasoning
TW096127713A TW200819059A (en) 2006-08-01 2007-07-30 Liquid seasoning

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006210409A JP4878951B2 (en) 2006-08-01 2006-08-01 Liquid seasoning

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2006340724A JP2006340724A (en) 2006-12-21
JP4878951B2 true JP4878951B2 (en) 2012-02-15

Family

ID=37638151

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2006210409A Active JP4878951B2 (en) 2006-08-01 2006-08-01 Liquid seasoning

Country Status (3)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4878951B2 (en)
TW (1) TW200819059A (en)
WO (1) WO2008015774A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4878951B2 (en) * 2006-08-01 2012-02-15 株式会社ミツカングループ本社 Liquid seasoning
JP6045870B2 (en) * 2012-10-02 2016-12-14 株式会社Mizkan Holdings Liquid seasoning containing fish clause fine powder and method for producing the same, soup flavor enhancing composition for liquid seasoning, and method for enhancing soup flavor of liquid seasoning
JP2014124117A (en) * 2012-12-25 2014-07-07 Mizkan J Plus Holdings Liquid seasoning containing dried fish powder, production method thereof, and stock flavor improvement method of liquid seasoning containing dried fish powder

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS581898B2 (en) * 1980-10-15 1983-01-13 株式会社にんべん Method for producing liquid seasoning with fish flavor
JPS5880892A (en) * 1981-11-09 1983-05-16 セイコーインスツルメンツ株式会社 Method of forming conductive pattern of circuit board
JPS5880892U (en) * 1981-11-30 1983-06-01 株式会社にんべん Seasoning liquid pack containing ingredients for dashi
JP3397936B2 (en) * 1995-05-17 2003-04-21 日清フーズ株式会社 Tsuyu
JP4290903B2 (en) * 2001-06-21 2009-07-08 株式会社ミツカングループ本社 Liquid seasoning for cooking rice containing shavings
JP4878951B2 (en) * 2006-08-01 2012-02-15 株式会社ミツカングループ本社 Liquid seasoning

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2006340724A (en) 2006-12-21
TW200819059A (en) 2008-05-01
WO2008015774A1 (en) 2008-02-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5570646B1 (en) Flavor improver for tea beverages or tea-containing foods
JP6480667B2 (en) Liquid seasoning with fish bun fine powder, method for improving flavor thereof, and method for producing the same
WO2017061524A1 (en) Method for producing flavoring oil
JP4878951B2 (en) Liquid seasoning
JPWO2016175323A1 (en) Fragrance composition
JP4987508B2 (en) Fried food
JP6270733B2 (en) Sesame-containing acidic liquid seasoning
JP4868634B2 (en) Acid liquid seasoning
JP6037451B2 (en) Miso seasoning, seasoning sauce using the same, and production method thereof
CN102524728A (en) Manufacturing method of seasoning for cooking aquatic product
WO2015156380A1 (en) Flavouring composition
KR100584782B1 (en) Method for preparing composite flavoring materials of garlic bamboo salt or garlic salt
JP5939784B2 (en) Liquid seasoning
JP2010284095A (en) Vegetable processed food vividly retaining green color development
JP5665460B2 (en) Liquid seasoning
JP2011142905A (en) Salty taste-imparting composition and method for improving taste quality of salty taste
JP5745317B2 (en) Retort curry and method for producing retort curry
JP6045870B2 (en) Liquid seasoning containing fish clause fine powder and method for producing the same, soup flavor enhancing composition for liquid seasoning, and method for enhancing soup flavor of liquid seasoning
KR20170002390A (en) Oil or fat composition for dried laver seaweed sheets, oil or fat to be applied onto dried laver seaweed sheets, and method for producing korean-style-flavored dried laver seaweed sheet
Shinde et al. Development of iron fortified chocolate flavoured rice flakes
JP7196580B2 (en) Method for imparting or enhancing aroma and flavor of karebushika
JP2008161168A (en) Non-oil fermented soybean dressing
JP6793071B2 (en) Acid liquid seasoning
JP2008295413A (en) Heat-sterilized food product and its manufacturing method
JP6832613B2 (en) How to make soups containing red pepper

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20090709

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20111129

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20111129

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Ref document number: 4878951

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20141209

Year of fee payment: 3

S111 Request for change of ownership or part of ownership

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313115

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

S111 Request for change of ownership or part of ownership

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313115

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250