JP4768983B2 - Operation organizing result analysis support device and program - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to a driving arrangement result analysis support apparatus and program for supporting the analysis of a performance schedule when a train is operated in accordance with the driving arrangement performed on a planned schedule.

Train operation arrangement means, for example, that when a train schedule is disrupted due to an accident, breakdown, natural disaster, etc., the train schedule is changed in order to perform safe operation. Say. In recent years, driving arrangement support systems that support the creation of driving arrangement plans have come to be used, and accordingly, driving arrangement support systems for creating better driving arrangement plans have been studied. For example, as disclosed in Patent Document 1, a technique for automatically creating a driving arrangement plan that minimizes a user's dissatisfaction by using the user's dissatisfaction as an evaluation scale of the driving arrangement plan is known. ing.
JP 2004-224113 A

  However, there are cases where an “unexpected event” occurs at the stage of implementing the operation arrangement based on the prepared operation arrangement plan, and the operation arrangement according to the operation arrangement plan cannot be performed and a train delay occurs. In this case, it was necessary to change the prepared operation arrangement plan, which led to confusion among commanders and station employees.

  Here, the “unexpected event” and the train delay caused by the occurrence are, for example, (1) a crew notification delay that occurs because it takes time to notify the crew about the details of the operation method change, and (2) When controlling the route of a train, the train control delay that occurs because the delay of another train that hinders the route of the train was not grasped. (3) Because the radio was in use, it was operated for the crew. Crew delays due to failure to communicate the details of the arrangement, (4) Increase in boarding / exiting time due to increased passengers due to suspension or delay of the preceding train, (5) Boarding / departing time of the preceding train Delay due to temporary stoppages between stations to wait for vacant homes, (6) delay due to slow driving to ensure safety due to rainfall exceeding the regulation value, etc. Many things, and the like. And the train delays caused by these “unexpected events” caused chain delays to increase.

  Among such “unexpected events”, there are events that can be avoided by enhancing the functions of various systems existing around the driving arrangement support system. For example, in the case of (1) a crew member notification delay or (3) crew member communication delay, if a transmission system that immediately transmits necessary transmission contents from the commander to the crew is established, (1) and (3 ) Can be avoided. For that purpose, it is necessary to analyze what kind of “unexpected event” the operation arrangement plan has been changed.

  Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a driving arrangement result analysis support apparatus and program capable of supporting the above-described analysis of “unexpected events”.

The first invention for solving the problem described above is a plan diagram storage means for storing a plan diagram having at least scheduled arrival and departure time data at each station of each train (for example, the plan diagram 51 of FIG. 1). ), And a record diagram storage means (for example, record diagram 52 in FIG. 1) for storing a record diagram that actually operated the train in accordance with the operation arrangement performed on the plan diagram stored in the plan diagram storage means; The departure / arrival time of each train included in the actual schedule is changed so as to comply with predetermined train operating conditions while maintaining the arrival and departure order of each train at each station included in the actual schedule stored in the actual schedule storage means. and modification to the simulation process of changing to the optimum diamond is, to create a prediction diamond that the actual diamond and operating information of the same time period is represented prediction da Created by a schedule creation means (for example, the forecast diagram creation unit 12 in FIG. 1), a plan diagram stored in the plan diagram storage means, a record diagram stored in the record diagram storage means, and the forecast diagram creation means Among the predicted diagrams, the diagram diagram superimposing display control means (for example, the diagram of FIG. 1) performs control for superimposing and displaying the train lines of each train included in two or more diagrams designated according to the operator's operation on the same diagram. with Figure superimposed display control unit 13) and, characterized that you have the actual diamond train lines and the predicted diamond train lines to overlapping each other time zone is to allow superimposed by the diamond diagram superimposed display control means It is a driving arrangement result analysis support device.

The fourth invention is a plan diagram storage means (for example, the plan diagram 51 in FIG. 1) for storing a plan diagram having data of at least scheduled arrival and departure times at each station of each train. A record diagram storage means (for example, record diagram 52 in FIG. 1) for storing a record diagram that actually operated the train in accordance with the operation arrangement performed on the plan diagram stored in the storage means, and the record diagram storage means While maintaining the order of arrival and departure of each train at each station included in the memorized track record schedule, change and modify the train arrival / departure times included in the track record schedule so that the prescribed train operation conditions are maintained. predicting diamond create means for performing a simulation process of changing, to create a prediction diamonds the actual timetable and operation information of the same time period is expressed in (example For example, the prediction diagram creating unit 12) of FIG. 1, the plan diagram stored in the plan diagram storage unit, the actual diagram stored in the actual diagram storage unit, and the prediction diagram generated by the prediction diagram creation unit , Diagram diagram superimposing display control means (for example, diagram diagram superimposing display control unit in FIG. 1) for performing control to superimpose and display train streaks of each train included in two or more diagrams designated according to the operator's operation 13), the train diagram of the actual diagram and the train strip of the prediction diagram that overlap each other in time zone can be superimposed and displayed by the diagram diagram superimposing display control means .

According to the first and fourth aspects of the invention, the simulation process is performed using the actual schedule stored in the actual schedule storage means, whereby the actual schedule is rationalized and changed according to the predetermined train operation conditions. Can be created. And, by displaying the train lines of each train included in two or more schedules designated by the operator among the planned diagram, actual diagram, and forecast diagram, "unexpected event" is displayed on the same diagram This makes it possible to assist in determining which train is delayed by.
In addition, since the simulation process streamlines the train schedule, there is a possibility that the arrival and departure order of trains may be changed to an optimum arrival and departure order according to predetermined train operation conditions. Therefore, as in these inventions, the simulation process is performed so as to maintain the arrival and departure order of each train at each station included in the achievement diagram, so that a prediction diagram according to the train order of the achievement diagram can be created.

2nd invention is the operation arrangement | sequence result analysis assistance apparatus of 1st invention, Comprising: For each station, the number information which showed the number line which a train can depart / depart, the number line which can be departed for each up-and-down train Entry and advance route information shown, train operation interval indicating the operation interval time indicating the time interval required from when a train arrives and departs at a predetermined line of the station to when the train departs and arrives at another predetermined line The storage means for storing the track data in which the information and the traveling time information indicating the time required for the train to travel between the station and the next station for each train type are stored respectively. In addition, the prediction diagram creation means, as the predetermined train operation condition, the line information of each station registered in the track data, the approach / advance route information, the train operation interval information, and the inter-station travel time Each minute information A traffic schedule results analysis support apparatus characterized by applying a matter perform the simulation process.

  A third invention is the operation organization result analysis support device according to the first or second invention, wherein the prediction diagram creating means is configured such that an arrival time at each station of each train included in the actual diagram is the plan diagram. A driving arrangement result characterized by creating a prediction diagram by performing the simulation process in addition to a condition that the corresponding train included in the plan diagram stored in the storage means does not come before the arrival time of the corresponding station This is an analysis support device.

  According to the third aspect of the invention, the simulation process is performed so that the arrival time of each train at each station included in the actual schedule does not come before the arrival time of the corresponding station included in the plan schedule. As a result, it is possible to create a prediction diagram according to the arrival time of the planned diagram.

  By performing a simulation process using the record schedule stored in the record diagram storage means, it is possible to create a prediction diagram in which the record diagram is rationalized and changed according to predetermined train operation conditions. And, by displaying the train lines of each train included in two or more schedules designated by the operator among the planned diagram, actual diagram, and forecast diagram, "unexpected event" is displayed on the same diagram It is possible to support the determination of which train is delayed by.

  The best mode for carrying out the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a functional configuration of the driving arrangement result analysis support device 100. The driving arrangement result analysis support apparatus 100 includes a processing unit 1, an input unit 2, a display unit 3, a communication unit 4, and a storage unit 5.

  The processing unit 1 controls the entire driving arrangement result analysis support apparatus 100 and is realized by, for example, an arithmetic device such as a CPU, a storage device such as an IC memory, its control program, and the like. The processing unit 1 includes a performance diagram creation unit 11, a prediction diagram creation unit 12, and a diagram diagram superimposition display control unit 13.

  The record diagram creation unit 11 supplements the schedule diagram 51 with data relating to arrival and departure of a train with a lack of the record diagram 52 in accordance with the record diagram creation program 561 stored in the storage unit 5 and updates the record diagram 52. Perform the process.

  The prediction diagram creation unit 12 performs a simulation process according to the prediction diagram creation program 562 stored in the storage unit 5 and changes the record diagram 52 created by the record diagram creation unit 11 based on the plan diagram 51 and the track data 53. To create a prediction diagram 54.

  The simulation process executed by the prediction diagram creation unit 12 uses a known simulation process. The simulation process is a process for changing the train arrival / departure order and arrival time of the trains included in the diagram to change to an optimal diagram so that the prescribed train operation conditions including the track data 53 are kept to a minimum. It is.

  However, the forecast diagram 54 is created by performing simulation processing on the record diagram 52. If the train sequence of the record diagram 52 and the corresponding train sequence of the forecast diagram 54 are different, the record diagram 52 and the forecast diagram 54 It becomes difficult to analyze the location that caused the train delay. Therefore, a simulation process is performed so as to maintain the arrival and departure order of each train at each station included in the record schedule 52. Thereby, the prediction diamond 54 according to the train order of the performance diamond 52 can be created. Furthermore, a simulation process is performed so that the departure time at each station of each train of the performance diagram 52 does not precede the departure time of the corresponding station of the corresponding train included in the plan diagram 51. Thereby, the prediction diamond 54 according to the departure time of the plan diamond 51 can be created.

  The diagram superimposition display control unit 13 performs each train included in the schedule designated by the operator among the planned diagram 51, the actual diagram 52, and the prediction diagram 54 in accordance with the diagram superimposition display control program 563 stored in the storage unit 5. The train streaks are superimposed on the same diagram and displayed on the display unit 3.

  The input unit 2 receives an operation instruction from the operator and outputs an operation signal corresponding to the performed operation to the processing unit 1. The input unit 2 is realized by, for example, a button switch, a lever, a dial, a mouse, a keyboard, various sensors, a touch panel, and the like.

  The display unit 3 displays various display screens according to the display control signal from the processing unit 1. The display unit 3 is realized by, for example, a CRT, ELD, PDP, or the like.

  The communication unit 4 is connected to a predetermined communication line according to a communication control signal from the processing unit 1 and performs data communication with an external device. The communication unit 4 is realized by a wireless communication module, a modem, a TA, or the like, for example.

  The storage unit 5 stores programs, data, and the like for causing the processing unit 1 to control the operation organization result analysis support device 100 in an integrated manner. Specifically, the operation arrangement result analysis including the plan diagram 51, the actual diagram 52, the track data 53, the prediction diagram 54, the actual diagram creation program 561, the prediction diagram creation program 562, and the diagram superimposing display control program 563. The support program 56 is stored.

  FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of the data configuration of the planning diagram 51. As shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 2, the scheduled arrival time of the train is stored in the schedule diagram 51 in association with the train number for each arrival and departure station where the train with the train number arrives.

  FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of the data structure of the performance diagram 52. In the actual schedule 52, the train arrival time (hereinafter referred to as “actual arrival time”) at each station when the train travels based on the operation arrangement performed on the plan diagram 51 is associated with the train number. Is remembered.

  The actual arrival / departure time of the actual schedule 52 is acquired via a PRC (Programmed Route Control) system installed for each line section. Therefore, the actual arrival / departure time cannot be obtained in a line section where no PRC system is installed. For example, in the planning diagram 51 shown in FIG. 2, the arrival and departure times of each train at A station, B station, C station, D station,... Are stored, but the PRC system is installed in the line including B station. Otherwise, since the actual arrival / departure time at the B station cannot be acquired, the actual arrival / departure time of each train for the B station is not stored in the actual result diagram 52 as shown in FIG.

  Therefore, the actual diagram creation unit 11 executes the actual diagram creation processing according to the actual diagram creation program 561, thereby detecting a shortage of data related to the arrival and departure of the train of the actual diagram 52 and, for example, arrival of a train at the shortage. Data such as the departure time is supplemented and the record diagram 52 is updated. A detailed flow of processing of the record diagram creation program 561 will be described later.

  FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an example of the data configuration of the line data 53. The track data 53 is data that stores facility conditions of each station, train operation conditions at each station, and the like, as shown in FIG. 4, a turnable line 531, a train entry / exit route 532 to the station, The train operation interval 533 and the travel time between stations 534 are stored for each station.

  Each item will be specifically described. In 531, a number line on which a train can arrive and depart at the station is stored. In 532, number lines that can be made to and from the trains going up and down at the station are stored.

  In 533, an operation interval time of a train that leaves and arrives at the station is stored. For example, if it is memorized that “After the arrival of the down train No. 1 line, the departure of the down train No. 2 line is 1 minute 30 seconds”, after the down train enters the No. 1 line at that station, another down train starts from the No. 2 line. Indicates that an interval of 1 minute 30 seconds or more must be left until In 534, the time required for the train to travel between the station and the next station is stored for each train type.

  In the prediction diagram 54, the prediction diagram created by the prediction diagram creation unit 12 is stored.

  Next, the flow of processing in this embodiment will be described. FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing the flow of the driving arrangement result analysis support process. This processing is realized by the processing unit 1 executing the driving arrangement result analysis support program 56.

  First, the processing unit 1 executes a performance diagram creation process (step A1). FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing the flow of the result diagram creation process. This process is realized by the record diagram creation unit 11 executing the record diagram creation program 561.

  First, the record diagram creation unit 11 reads the record diagram 52 from the storage unit 5 (step B1), and detects a lack of data related to arrival and departure of the train from the read record diagram 52 (step B2). Then, the data such as the arrival and departure times are supplemented in consideration of the planned timetable 51 and the actual arrival and departure times of the preceding and following stations, and the actual timetable 52 is updated (step B3). Then, the record diagram creation unit 11 ends the record diagram creation process.

  Returning to FIG. 5, the processing unit 1 executes a prediction diagram creation process (step A <b> 2). FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing the flow of the prediction diagram creation process. This process is realized by the prediction diagram creation unit 12 executing the prediction diagram creation program 562. First, the prediction diagram creating unit 12 determines the order of use of the inter-station / numbered lines based on the record diagram 52 (step C1), and executes the loop A for each station and each train stored in the record diagram 52 (step S1). C2). Then, the prediction diagram creation unit 12 performs a simulation so that the facility conditions and train operation conditions of each station stored in the track data 53 are satisfied, calculates a prediction time as an arrival time, and the prediction diagram of the storage unit 5 54 (step C3).

  Subsequently, the prediction diagram creation unit 12 compares the calculated prediction time with the corresponding arrival time of the plan diagram 51 (step C4). When the calculated predicted time is before the corresponding arrival / departure time of the plan diagram 51 (step C4; plan time> prediction time), the prediction diagram creation unit 12 sets the prediction time to the corresponding arrival / departure time of the plan diagram 51. The time corresponding to the prediction diagram 54 is replaced and stored (step C5), and the process returns to step C3. When the predicted time is after the corresponding arrival / departure time of the planned diagram 51 (step C4; planned time ≦ predicted time), the process proceeds to step C6. When the loop A ends (step C6), the prediction diagram creation unit 12 ends the prediction diagram creation processing.

  Returning to FIG. 5, the processing unit 1 executes a diagram superimposing display control process (step A <b> 3). FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing the flow of the diagram superimposing display control process. This process is realized by the diagram superimposing display control unit 13 executing the diagram superimposing display control program 563. First, the operator designates a schedule to be displayed on the display unit 3 among the planned schedule, the actual schedule, and the predicted schedule (step D1). When the plan diagram and the actual diagram are designated, the diagram superimposing display control unit 13 superimposes the train lines of the respective trains included in the two diagrams on the same diagram based on the plan diagram 51 and the actual diagram 52. This is displayed on the display unit 3 (step D2).

  When the plan diagram and the forecast diagram are designated, the diagram superimposing display control unit 13 superimposes the train lines of each train included in the two diagrams on the same diagram based on the plan diagram 51 and the forecast diagram 54. Displayed on the display unit 3 (step D3). When the actual diagram and the predicted diagram are specified, the diagram superimposing display control unit 13 superimposes the train lines of the respective trains included in the two diagrams on the same diagram based on the actual diagram 52 and the predicted diagram 54. This is displayed on the display unit 3 (step D4). When any one of steps D2 to D4 is completed, the diagram superimposing display control unit 13 ends the diagram superimposing display control process. Returning to FIG. 5, when the diagram superimposition display control process is completed, the processing unit 1 ends the driving arrangement result analysis support process.

  FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating the diagram contents of the plan diagram 51, the actual diagram 52, and the forecast diagram 54. In each figure, the horizontal axis is time and the vertical axis is A station to D station. Furthermore, “train streaks” representing train operations are indicated by inclined lines. Each train line has a corresponding train number.

  FIG. 9A shows a train with a train number X (referred to as “train X”), a train with a train number Y (referred to as “train Y”), and a train with a train number Z included in the schedule stored in the schedule diagram 51. A train line of “train Z” is shown. According to FIG. 9 (a), train X departs from station A at 6:00 and arrives at station B at 6:05. Thereafter, the train X stops for 2 minutes in order to wait for the passage of the train Y at the B station, and leaves the B station at 6:07. Train X arrives at C station at 6:13, stops for 2 minutes to wait for train Z, leaves C station at 6:15, and arrives at D station at 6:20.

  Train Y leaves A station at 6:04 and arrives at D station at 6:10. Train Z leaves A station at 6:10 and arrives at D station at 6:16.

  FIG. 9B shows a planned diagram (thin line) and an actual diagram (thick line) when train X is delayed by 1 minute at train A and train Y and train Z are delayed by 2 minutes. Train X departs from station A at 6:02, one minute behind, and arrives at station B at 6:06. Then stop at station B to wait for the train Y to pass. Train Y passes through station B with a delay of 2 minutes. For example, the driver of train X is due to an “unexpected event” such as a delay in the communication of the operation arrangement plan from the commander to the crew of train X. After passing train Y at station B, the train stopped at station B for 4 minutes and departed at 6:12.

  The train Z, which departed from the A station with a delay of 2 minutes with respect to the schedule, approached the train X that passed ahead of the B station and operated at a reduced train speed. On the other hand, train X arrived at station C at 6:18 and stopped for 2 minutes to wait for train Z to pass. Train Z passed through C station at 6:19, then traveled at normal train speed and arrived at D station at 6:21.

  What should be noted here is that train X stopped at station B for 6 minutes, so train X's departure time from station B was delayed, and train Z approached train X traveling in front between station B and station C. The train Z traveled at a reduced train speed. In other words, train X stopped unnecessarily for 4 minutes after train Y passed through B station, so train X departed from station B and train Z also passed through C station. Therefore, train Z arrived at D station with a delay of 5 minutes, even though A station departed from A station with a delay of 2 minutes.

  Therefore, FIG. 9C shows an example of the prediction diagram (thick line) obtained by the prediction diagram creation process performed on the performance diagram (thin line). According to the prediction diagram in FIG. 9C, the train X departs from station A at 6:01, which is one minute behind the planned diagram, and arrives at station B at 6:06. Train X stops at station B in order to wait for train Y to pass, but the train operation conditions for station B in the track data 53 shown in FIG. 4 are “one minute after passing down train 1 and going down to train 2” The train X departs from the B station at 6:09, one minute after the train Y passes through the B station.

  Train X arrives at station C at 6:15 and waits for train Z to pass. Train Z leaves A station at 6:12, which is 2 minutes behind the schedule, but runs at normal speed without approaching train X that runs in front of B station to C station. 16 Pass C station. And at 6:18 we arrive at D station.

  That is, according to the timetable shown in FIG. 9B, the train X departs from the B station 4 minutes after the train Y passes the B station. The train arrangement result analysis support process shown in FIG. According to the predicted diagram, train X indicates that train Y was able to leave station B one minute after passing station B. Therefore, train X departs from station B at 6:09 one minute after train Y passes through station B, so train Z that departs from station A at 6:12 approaches train X running in front. Without passing through the station C at the normal traveling speed, it is possible to arrive at the station D with the scheduled traveling time between stations.

  Further, from the diagram shown in FIG. 9B, it is possible to know the delay location / delay time for the plan diagram 51 generated when the train is actually operated, but these delays are caused by “unexpected events”. A delay and a delay that is chain-expanded based on the delay are mixed. For this reason, it is difficult to extract the “unexpected event” that caused the delay from the diagram. However, the diagram shown in FIG. 9C is a diagram in which the actual diagram 52 and the predicted diagram 54 that is streamlined so that the actual diagram 52 keeps the predetermined train operation condition are displayed in an overlapping manner. Therefore, it is possible to determine at which point of which train an “unexpected event” has occurred by removing the chain-expanded delay.

  Thus, based on the plan diagram 51 and the actual diagram 52, a prediction diagram 54 that satisfies the train operation conditions of the track data 53 is created, and the prepared prediction diagram 54, the plan diagram 51, and the actual diagram 52 are compared. By doing so, the delay of the train caused by the “unexpected event” can be extracted. Then, by analyzing the extraction result and reflecting it in various systems existing around the driving arrangement support system, a better driving arrangement plan can be created.

  For example, in the example described in FIG. 9, it is clear from the verification of restoration that the arrival time of the train X and the train Z at the station after the station B is delayed due to the delay in the communication of the operation arrangement plan to the crew of the train X. Suppose that In this case, it is possible to avoid the train delay as described in FIG. 9 by establishing a transmission system in which necessary instructions including the operation arrangement plan are immediately transmitted from the commander to the crew of each train. It will be possible.

  FIGS. 10-12 is an example of each train diagram displayed on the display part 3 of the driving | operation arrangement | sequence arrangement analysis support apparatus 100. FIG. Specifically, FIG. 10 shows a plan diagram 51 and an actual diagram 52 (corresponding to the display contents in step D2 of the diagram overlay display control process shown in FIG. 8), and FIG. 11 shows a plan diagram 51 and a forecast diagram 54 (FIG. 8). 12 corresponds to the display content in step D3 of the diagram superimposing display control process shown in FIG. 8), and FIG. The train streaks of each train included in is superimposed and displayed on the same diagram. In each figure, the horizontal axis is time and the vertical axis is a station.

  In FIG. 10, the train line corresponding to the planned schedule of the train with the train number 4045M is T1, and the train line corresponding to the actual schedule is T2. According to the schedule, the stop time at the station S1 of the train with the train number 4045M is about 1 minute. However, an “unexpected event” occurred when the train was actually operated according to the operation arrangement performed for the planned schedule, and the train with the train number 4045M stopped at the station S1 for about 6 minutes (in FIG. 10). Part indicated by a circle W1).

  However, as shown in FIG. 12, according to the prediction diagram obtained by the processing by the operation arrangement plan result analysis support apparatus 100, the required stop time at the station S1 of the train with the train number 4045M was about 1 minute. It can be seen (portion indicated by a circle W2 in FIG. 12). In FIG. 12, the train line corresponding to the prediction diagram of the train having the train number 4045M is indicated by T3.

  Furthermore, according to FIG. 11, the train line T1 corresponding to the schedule diagram of the train number 4045M and the train line T3 corresponding to the prediction diagram almost overlap, so the train of the train number 4045M stops unnecessarily at the station S1. Otherwise, it can be seen that the train was able to run almost as planned.

  In this way, by displaying the train lines of each train included in the planned diagram 51, the actual diagram 52, and the predicted diagram 54 on the same diagram, the train delay caused by the “unexpected event” is displayed. Can be easily extracted.

The block diagram which shows the function structure of a driving | running | working arrangement | sequence result analysis assistance apparatus. The figure which shows the data structure of a plan diagram. The figure which shows the data structure of a performance diagram. The figure which shows the data structure of track | line data. The flowchart which shows the flow of a driving | operation arrangement | sequence result analysis assistance process. The flowchart which shows the flow of a performance diagram creation process. The flowchart which shows the flow of a prediction diamond preparation process. The flowchart which shows the flow of a diamond figure superimposition display control process. The figure which schematized the diagram contents of a plan diagram, a performance diagram, and a forecast diagram. An example of a plan diagram and a performance diagram displayed on the display unit. An example of a plan diagram and a forecast diagram displayed on the display unit. An example of the performance diagram and the prediction diagram displayed on the display unit.

Explanation of symbols

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 100 Operation arrangement result analysis support device 1 Processing part 11 Result diagram creation part 12 Prediction diagram creation part 13 Diagram diagram superimposition display control part 2 Input part 3 Display part 4 Communication part 5 Storage part 51 Planning diagram 52 Result diagram 53 Line data 54 Prediction Diamond 56 Operation arrangement result analysis support program 561 Performance diamond creation program 562 Prediction diamond creation program 563 Diamond diagram superimposition display control program

Claims (4)

A plan diagram storage means for storing a plan diagram having data of scheduled arrival and departure times at each station of each train;
A record diagram storage means for storing a record diagram that actually operated the train according to the operation arrangement performed on the plan diagram stored in the plan diagram storage means;
While maintaining the arrival and departure order of each train at each station included in the record schedule stored in the record diagram storage means, the departure and arrival times of each train included in the record diagram is changed to comply with predetermined train operation conditions. A prediction diamond creating means for performing a simulation process to modify and change to an optimal diamond, and creating a prediction diamond in which operation information in the same time zone as the actual diamond is represented ,
Among the plan diamond stored in the plan diamond storage means, the actual diamond stored in the actual diamond storage means, and the prediction diamond created by the prediction diamond creation means, two or more diamonds specified according to the operator's operation A diagram diagram superimposing display control means for performing control to superimpose and display train lines of each included train on the same diagram;
Equipped with a,
By the diamond diagram superimposed display control means, operation adjustment result analysis support apparatus characterized that you have the actual diamond train lines and the predicted diamond train lines to overlapping each other time zone is to allow superimposed. A driving arrangement result analysis support device according to claim 1,
For each station, number information that indicates the number of trains that can be used for trains, entry / exit route information that indicates numbers that can be used for up and down trains, and trains that arrive and depart on the specified number of stations. Train operation interval information indicating the operation interval time indicating the time interval required until the train arrives and departs on another predetermined line, and it takes for the train to travel between the station and the next station The travel time information between stations indicating the time for each train type includes storage means for storing each registered track data,
The prediction diagram creating means includes, as the predetermined train operation condition, the line information of each station registered in the track data, the entry / exit route information, the train operation interval information, and the inter-station travel time and minutes. A driving arrangement result analysis support apparatus, wherein the simulation process is performed by applying each condition of information. A driving arrangement result analysis support device according to claim 1 or 2,
The prediction diagram creating means is configured such that the arrival time of each station of each train included in the actual schedule is before the arrival time of the corresponding station of the corresponding train included in the plan diagram stored in the plan diagram storage means. A driving arrangement result analysis support device, wherein a prediction diagram is created by performing the simulation process in addition to the condition that it is not necessary. Computer
Plan schedule storage means for storing a plan schedule having data of scheduled arrival and departure times at each station of each train,
A record diagram storage means for storing a record diagram that actually operated the train according to the operation arrangement performed for the plan diagram stored in the plan diagram storage means,
While maintaining the arrival and departure order of each train at each station included in the record schedule stored in the record diagram storage means, the departure and arrival times of each train included in the record diagram is changed to comply with predetermined train operation conditions. A prediction diagram creating means for performing a simulation process to correct and change to an optimal diagram, and creating a prediction diagram in which operation information in the same time zone as the actual diagram is represented ,
Among the plan diamond stored in the plan diamond storage means, the actual diamond stored in the actual diamond storage means, and the prediction diamond created by the prediction diamond creation means, two or more diamonds specified according to the operator's operation Diamond diagram superimposing display control means for performing control to superimpose and display the train lines of each train included on the same diagram,
To function as,
The program which superimposes and displays the train line of the said performance diamond and the train line of the said prediction diamond which time zones mutually overlap by the said diamond figure superimposition display control means .

Images