JP4640465B2 - Vehicle travel support device - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to a driving support device that detects an object around a vehicle and supports driving of the vehicle according to a detection result, and more particularly, includes two types of object detection units having different methods of radar and image recognition, The present invention relates to a vehicular travel support apparatus that performs travel support by adding a detection result of a driver to a detection result.

There is known a vehicle driving support device that detects an obstacle on a course, determines a driver's attention state, issues an alarm according to a detection result, and supports a driver's avoidance operation. (For example, refer to Patent Document 1). Known techniques for detecting obstacles on the path include radar systems (including sonar systems) using lasers, ultrasonic waves, infrared rays, etc., and systems for recognizing obstacles from images acquired with a CCD camera or the like. ing. As a technique for determining a driver's attention state, a technique for acquiring a driver's face image, determining a gaze direction and a face direction, and determining whether the driver is in a state of looking aside is known.
JP 11-139229 A

  Such obstacle detection means and driver attention state determination means each have advantages and disadvantages. For example, when a plurality of obstacle detection means having different detection methods are provided, only one of the obstacles is detected. May not be detected. However, conventionally, when a plurality of detection means are provided in this way, a specific study on an appropriate control method for assist control when only some of the detection means detect an obstacle has not been sufficient.

  Accordingly, the present invention provides an appropriate support control according to the detection result of each detecting means in a vehicle driving support apparatus that performs driving support using a driver's side look detecting means in addition to radar and image recognition as an obstacle detecting means. It is an object of the present invention to provide a vehicular travel support apparatus in which is set.

In order to solve the above problems, a vehicular travel support apparatus according to the present invention includes a first object detection unit that detects a surrounding object by a radar, and a first object detection unit that detects the surrounding object by image recognition from the acquired surrounding image. Two object detection means, a side-by-side detection means for detecting a driver's side-arm, and a driving support means for supporting driving of the vehicle including at least one of following control, inter-vehicle control, obstacle warning, and collision impact reduction control ; In the vehicular travel support apparatus, at least one of the travel support control by the travel support means according to the object detection state by the first and second object detection means and the driver's side look state detected by the side look detection means. one of the propriety, start timing, further comprising a changing means for changing the control amount, the changing means, a first object detecting means detects the same object in both the second object detecting means In the case that, in the case that detects an object in only one or, whether the control even if other conditions are the same, the start timing, a varying at least one of the control amount Features.

  Specifically, the control conditions in the case where the driving support control is performed according to the detection state (object detection state, looking aside state) in each detection unit, that is, the control start timing and the start condition for starting the control of each control ( By changing the control threshold or the like, even if other conditions are the same, the driving support control is actively changed or suppressed according to the combination of detection states.

For example, when the same obstacle is detected by the first and second object detection means, and the driver determines that the driver is looking aside by the armpit detection means, the driver is not looking aside. The changing means advances the start timing of at least one of the driving support controls. Here, the control for advancing the start timing includes a case where the condition determination for starting the control is shifted in a direction in which the start is easily performed.

  When the same obstacle is detected by the radar and the image recognition apparatus having different detection principles, the reliability is high. When the driver is looking aside, it is expected that the driver himself / herself notices an obstacle and starts an avoidance operation or the like compared to a case where the driver does not. Therefore, the start condition of the driving support control is shifted to the positive side. For example, it is easier for the driver to perform an avoidance operation or the like by speeding up the start timing of the alarm or the collision impact reduction control, or by accelerating the operation limit notification timing of the follow-up control or inter-vehicle control.

Alternatively, if the obstacle detected by the first object detection means cannot be detected by the second object detection means and the driver determines that the driver is looking aside, the driver looks aside. The change means advances the timing of at least one start condition of the driving support control as compared with the case where the same obstacle is detected by the first and second object detection means.

Shift to the aggressive side, a detection necessity low driving support control accuracy in the lateral direction of the obstacle, hasten more the start timing than the high driving support control needs.

  When an obstacle is detected by radar but the obstacle cannot be recognized by image recognition and the driver is looking aside, there is a possibility that an obstacle exists, but if it is image recognition, there is an obstacle that can be acquired. Since shape information (especially lateral width and lateral position information) cannot be obtained, the accuracy of information necessary for assistance at the time of driving assistance is lowered. Therefore, the shift amount toward the active side of the start condition is made relatively small, and in particular for the control with a high necessity for detection accuracy in the lateral direction, the shift amount is made smaller than the control with a low necessity.

  If the obstacle detected by the first object detection means cannot be detected by the second object detection means, and the driver detects that the driver is not looking aside, the driving support by the driving support means Of the controls, the driving support control that has a high necessity for detecting the obstacles in the lateral direction may be shifted to the suppression side.

  When an obstacle is detected by radar but the obstacle cannot be recognized by image recognition and the driver is facing the front, it is expected that the driver will recognize the obstacle. Emphasis is placed on the fact that the accuracy of information necessary for support is reduced, and driving support control is shifted to a restrained side. For example, the intervention of the support device to the driver is suppressed by delaying the start timing of the warning or the collision impact reduction control, or delaying the operation limit notification timing of the follow-up control / vehicle distance control.

  The driving support control with low necessity for detecting the obstacle in the lateral direction is, for example, follow-up control or inter-vehicle control, and the driving support control with high necessity is, for example, an obstacle alarm or collision impact reduction control. . In the follow-up control for following the preceding vehicle and the inter-vehicle control for maintaining the inter-vehicle distance, the width information of the preceding vehicle to be controlled is usually not important. On the other hand, the obstacle that is the target of the obstacle alarm control and the collision impact reduction control is not limited to the preceding vehicle, and the lateral position and width information are important.

  The driving support means is a follow-up control device or an inter-vehicle distance control device, and when the obstacle is detected by the second object detection means and no obstacle is detected by the first object detection means, the follow-up control is prohibited or Interrupt.

  In the case of follow-up control and inter-vehicle distance control, control is performed to detect a preceding vehicle and follow it or maintain the inter-vehicle distance. The preceding vehicle that is the object of control is easy to capture by radar, but if the object (obstacle) cannot be detected by radar and can only be detected by image recognition, it is an object with low reflection of radio waves, etc. Since there is a high possibility of this, the processing for suppressing the follow-up / inter-vehicle distance control is performed.

  The driving support means is a collision impact reduction control device, and when the obstacle is detected by the second object detection means and no obstacle is detected by the first object detection means, (1) collision impact reduction control If the driver determines that the driver is looking aside, the amount by which the start timing is delayed compared to the case where it is determined that the driver is not looking aside. Or (2) Change the control content of the collision impact mitigation control to control when the collision impact is small compared to the normal time. This collision impact mitigation control is either a means for securing the deformation amount of the vehicle, a means for securing the occupant's restraint, or a means for changing the damping force of the suspension means.

  There is a high possibility that the object which is difficult to be captured by the radar is not a hard object such as metal. Therefore, when there is a possibility of collision with an obstacle not captured by the radar, the collision mitigation control start timing is delayed or changed to control when the collision impact is small.

  According to the present invention, an object is detected by changing the control condition of the assist control of each driving support device by adding the detection result of the driver's side-view state detection to the obstacle detection by the radar and the obstacle detection by the image recognition. Appropriate driving assistance can be performed in consideration of not only the detection status but also the driver's attention state.

  In addition, by optimizing the operation order between the tracking limit and inter-vehicle control operation limit notification and the obstacle alarm, the obstacle alarm is issued during the tracking and inter-vehicle control, and the tracking and inter-vehicle control can be performed to a state close to the emergency avoidance condition. Suppressing the continuation and making it easier for the driver to perform the avoidance operation.

  DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. In order to facilitate the understanding of the description, the same reference numerals are given to the same components in the drawings as much as possible, and duplicate descriptions are omitted.

  FIG. 1 is a schematic configuration diagram showing a vehicle equipped with a vehicular travel support apparatus (first embodiment) according to the present invention, and FIG. 2 shows a vehicle control apparatus 2 corresponding to the vehicular travel support apparatus. It is a block block diagram. The vehicle control device 2 mounted on the vehicle 1 includes a control ECU 20 that controls the entire device, a millimeter wave radar 21 that is a first object detection unit that detects an obstacle by scanning the front of the vehicle with radio waves, Image recognition means 22 as second object detection means for acquiring a front image and detecting an obstacle by image recognition, a seat belt device 23 as a risk reduction means for reducing danger to an occupant at the time of a collision, an airbag A device 24, a brake device 25, an automatic steering device 26, a pedestrian protection device 27, and a face direction detection device 28 (side-arm detection means in the present invention) for detecting the driver's side-arming are provided.

  Here, FIG. 1 shows an example of a right-hand drive vehicle. As the seat belt device 23, only the seat belt device 23b for the driver's seat and the seat belt device 23a for the passenger seat are shown, and the airbag device 24 is an assistant. Only the airbag device for the seat is shown.

  The image recognition unit 22 includes a front camera 221 that is an imaging unit that acquires an image (video) in front of the vehicle and an image processing ECU 222 that acquires an obstacle from the acquired image by image recognition. Here, the front camera 221 is preferably a stereo camera. The image processing ECU 222 includes a CPU, a ROM, a RAM, and the like.

  The seat belt devices 23a and 23b include a seat belt main body 231a and 231b and a seat belt winding device 230a and 230b, respectively. Hereinafter, the symbols a and b are omitted unless particularly distinguished. The airbag device 24 includes an airbag control device 240 including an airbag body 241 and a seating sensor (not shown). The brake device 25 includes a disc brake or drum brake (not shown) attached to each wheel, a hydraulic wheel cylinder 251 that operates each brake, and a brake actuator 250 that controls the hydraulic pressure applied to each wheel cylinder 251. . The automatic steering device 26 includes a steering control device 260 that controls the operation of the steering system, and an electric assist motor 261 that is connected to the steering system and applies a steering force.

  The face direction detection device 28 is arranged in an instrument panel in the passenger compartment or on a steering column cover, and a face image acquisition camera 281 that acquires a driver's face image, and a driver's face by image recognition from the acquired face image. Orientation = a face orientation determination ECU 282 that determines the line-of-sight direction. Similar to the image processing ECU 222, the face orientation determination ECU 282 includes a CPU, a ROM, a RAM, and the like. Here, the face image acquisition camera 281 irradiates the driver with a near-infrared strobe light so that the face direction can be determined stably without being affected by environmental conditions such as the brightness of the passenger compartment, and the reflected light. A camera that acquires images may be used.

  The outputs of the millimeter wave radar 21, the image processing ECU 222, and the face orientation determination ECU 282 are input to the obstacle determination unit 201 of the control ECU 20, which is a control means, and the control ECU 20 includes the airbag control device 240 and the seat belt winding device 230. The operation of the brake actuator 250 is controlled. The control ECU 20 further receives various state quantities of the vehicle from the yaw rate sensor 51, the G sensor 52, the vehicle speed sensor 53, the brake switch 54, and the like, and also controls the operation of the throttle 61, the transmission means 62, and the like. The control ECU 20 includes a CPU, a ROM, a RAM, and the like, like the image processing ECU 222 and the face orientation determination ECU 282. Note that the image processing ECU 222, the face orientation determination ECU 282, and the control ECU 20 may be configured to be integrated in hardware or share a part thereof, or may be configured to implement each processing content in software. Moreover, the obstacle determination unit 201 of the control ECU 20 may be configured as independent hardware, or may be integrated with another ECU.

  The vehicle control apparatus 2 that is a vehicle travel support apparatus according to the present invention fuses an obstacle detection result of the millimeter wave radar 21 and an obstacle detection result of the image recognition means 22 by the obstacle determination unit 201. The control ECU 20 controls operations such as follow-up control, collision avoidance with an obstacle, collision impact mitigation control, and the like according to the specified obstacle information and the face orientation determination result by the face orientation detection device 28.

  FIG. 3 is a flowchart for explaining obstacle determination and control operation based on the obstacle determination in the vehicle control device 2. This control is repeatedly executed by the control ECU 20 at a predetermined timing after the vehicle is turned on until it is turned off.

  First, the detection result of the obstacle candidate by the millimeter wave radar 21, the detection result of the obstacle candidate by the image recognition means 22, and the determination result by the face direction detection device 28 are read (steps S1 to S3).

  The millimeter wave radar 21 irradiates the front of the vehicle 1 while scanning the radio wave in the horizontal direction, receives the radio wave reflected by the obstacle surface such as the front vehicle, and the presence / absence of an obstacle candidate based on the frequency change of the received signal. The azimuth / distance with the obstacle candidate, the relative speed, etc. are obtained and output as a detection result.

  In the image recognition means 22, the image processing ECU 222 extracts obstacle candidates from the image captured by the camera 221 by edge extraction, pattern recognition processing, or the like. When a stereo camera is adopted as the camera 221, the distance and direction (or spatial position) from the obstacle candidate are obtained by the triangulation method based on the difference between the object positions in the left and right acquired images, and at the time of the previous frame. The relative speed is obtained from the amount of change with respect to the obtained distance. When a stereo camera is not employed, distance or spatial position may be estimated based on the position of the object in the image.

  In the face direction detection device 28, the face direction determination ECU 282 determines the face direction angle of the driver from the face image of the driver acquired by the face image acquisition camera 281, and from there, the driver is facing forward or sideways. Determine whether you are in a state of looking aside. For example, the position of both eyes may be detected from the face image, and the face orientation may be determined from the position of both eyes in the face image.

  Next, it is determined whether or not an obstacle has been detected by the millimeter wave radar 21 (step S5). If an obstacle has been detected, the process proceeds to step S7, where it is determined whether or not the same obstacle has been detected by the image recognition means 22. If both have detected an obstacle in common, the process proceeds to step S9 to determine whether or not the driver is looking aside. If it is determined in step S9 that the person is looking aside, the process proceeds to step S11 to shift the driving support control start condition to the positive side. Specifically, ACC (Adaptive Cruise Control), which is the distance control between vehicles, notification timing of operation limit of traffic jam tracking control, alarm timing of obstacle alarm, pre-pressurization of intervention brake, additional timing, etc. at normal time (driver It is earlier than the state that is not looking aside. And it transfers to step S15, support control is performed according to the set timing, and a process is complete | finished.

  On the other hand, when it is determined in step S9 that the driver is not looking aside = turning to the front, the process proceeds to step S13, the start condition of the driving support control is returned to the normal time, and the support control is performed. This is performed (step S15).

  When both the millimeter wave radar 21 and the image recognition means 22 detect an obstacle, there is a high possibility that the obstacle is correctly detected. In this case, when the driver is looking aside, there is a high possibility that the driver will be aware of the obstacle by himself as compared to the case of facing the front. Therefore, the timing of obstacle warning and operation limit notification is advanced to prepare for the driver to notice the obstacle at an early stage, and sufficient avoidance action and collision mitigation are possible regardless of the delay of the avoidance action by the driver. The timing of control is advanced so that it can be performed.

  When facing the front, it is expected that the driver notices an obstacle and takes an avoidance action in advance. For this reason, there is a possibility that a collision will occur even if the avoidance action is started by performing an obstacle warning or an operation limit notification when the avoidance action is not taken even when the avoidance action is started when the obstacle is noticed normally. Perform collision mitigation control when it is high. These operation timings are referred to as standard operation timings.

  That is, when looking aside, the operation timing is advanced, and the start condition of the support control is shifted to the side that actively performs support control, that is, the active side.

  Next, when it is determined in step S7 that the obstacle detected by the millimeter wave radar 21 is not detected by the image recognition means, the process proceeds to step S21 to determine whether or not the driver is in an aside state. . If it is determined in step S21 that the state is a look-aside state, the process proceeds to step S23, and among the start conditions of the driving support control, the control that does not require the lateral position information is shifted to the positive side and is required. Control is shifted slightly to the active side. Specifically, the notification timing of the operation limit of ACC and traffic jam tracking control is made earlier than normal. Then, the alarm timing of the obstacle alarm, the pre-pressurization of the intervention brake, the additional timing, etc. are slightly advanced from the normal time, and the assist control is executed at the set timing (step S15).

  This is because the millimeter wave radar 21 cannot accurately detect the lateral position and width information of the obstacle as the image recognition means 22, so that the obstacle alarm and the collision impact mitigation control that require such information are required. This timing is slightly delayed as compared with the case where the image recognition means 22 also detects an obstacle. On the other hand, the ACC and the traffic jam tracking control are intended for the preceding vehicle and do not require the accuracy of the lateral position and width information of the obstacle, so that the image recognition means 22 also detects the obstacle. Control is performed at the same control timing.

  On the other hand, if it is determined in step S21 that the driver is not looking aside = turning to the front, the process proceeds to step S25, and the lateral position information is necessary among the start conditions of the driving support control. The control that is shifted slightly to the suppression side, and the control that makes it unnecessary is as usual. Specifically, the notification timing of the operation limit of ACC and traffic jam tracking control is made earlier than normal. And the alarm timing of the obstacle alarm, the pre-pressurization of the intervention brake, the additional timing, etc. are slightly delayed from the normal time. Then, support control is executed at the set timing (step S15).

  For the control that does not require the lateral position information, if the obstacle is detected by the millimeter wave radar 21, the control is performed regardless of the determination result of the image recognition means 22. On the other hand, for control that requires lateral position information, if the control is performed in a state where the control information is insufficient, the control accuracy deteriorates. And when the driver is facing the front, avoidance action by the driver can be expected. Therefore, priority is given to suppression of deterioration of control accuracy, and the control is shifted slightly to the suppression side.

  If it is determined in step S5 that the millimeter wave radar 21 has not detected an obstacle, the process proceeds to step S31, and the image recognition unit 22 determines whether an obstacle has been detected. If the image recognition means 22 determines that an obstacle has been detected, the process proceeds to step S33, where it is determined whether the driver is in an aside state. If it is determined in step S33 that the vehicle is not looking aside = turning to the front, the process proceeds to step S35 to change the timing of the driving support control. Specifically, first, regarding ACC and traffic jam follow-up control, it is considered that there is no control target, and control is prohibited or stopped. This means that when the obstacle cannot be detected by the millimeter wave radar 21, it means that there is no highly reflective object such as a metal in front of it, so that the preceding vehicle (bumper, license plate, etc.) It is very likely that the object is at the rear.

  When the obstacle is captured only by the image recognition means 22, it is highly likely that the obstacle is not a hard material such as a metal that easily reacts to the radar, and the collision damage may be small even if it collides. Because it is high, the alarm timing of the obstacle alarm, the pre-pressurization of the intervention brake, the additional timing, etc. are made slower than usual (the state where the driver is not looking aside). Further, the protruding amount of the active bumper 271 is reduced, and the advance amount and tension of the seat belt 231 are reduced. Further, the operation threshold value of each danger mitigation means is made higher than when the obstacle is detected by the millimeter wave radar 21 so that the operation becomes difficult. Further, the suspension may be shifted slightly to the soft side. And it transfers to step S15, support control is performed according to the set timing, and a process is complete | finished.

  If it is determined in step S33 that the person is looking aside, the process proceeds to step S37 to change the timing of the driving support control. In this case, control is basically performed at the same timing as when the aside is not looking aside, but when the driver's reaction to the obstacle is aside, it is delayed compared to the case where it is not Since there is a high possibility, the alarm timing of the obstacle alarm, the pre-pressurization of the intervention brake, the additional timing, and the like are set to be smaller than those in the case of not looking aside. The amount of shift to the control side of other controls may be made smaller than when not looking aside.

  If it is determined in step S31 that no obstacle has been detected in the image recognition, the process is terminated without performing the support control. When a plurality of obstacles are detected, the detection result by the millimeter wave has priority.

  Some examples of control in step S15 will be described below. For example, when the follow-up control mode is ON, the preceding vehicle is determined from the recognition result, and the preceding vehicle is controlled by controlling the throttle 61, the transmission unit 62, and the brake actuator 250 based on the separately detected lane information. The vehicle follows the preceding vehicle at a predetermined speed while maintaining the inter-vehicle distance at a constant distance. In addition to the method of recognizing the lane by recognizing the white line by the image recognition means 22, the lane information is accumulated and read out, the road information is acquired by the communication means, It is good to detect the embedded marker etc. and acquire travel lane information.

  Also, there is a possibility that the host vehicle and the obstacle may collide with each other based on the position / speed information of the obstacle and the estimated course of the host vehicle predicted from the outputs of the yaw rate sensor 51, the G sensor 52, and the vehicle speed sensor 53. When the determination is made, a warning is given to the driver to avoid contact / collision with an obstacle by video / audio using a display device or a speaker (not shown).

  Furthermore, if it is determined that a collision with an obstacle is unavoidable even if the avoidance action is taken, the collision impact mitigation means is controlled to perform a predetermined collision impact mitigation operation, so that the occupant, the pedestrian, and the collision vehicle Reduce the impact caused by passengers' collision. Whether collision with an obstacle is unavoidable is the estimated collision time obtained by dividing the distance to the obstacle by the relative speed with the obstacle is less than the threshold necessary for taking collision avoidance action Judgment by whether or not.

  As the collision impact reduction control, first, as the control of the brake device 25, the brake actuator 250 is operated to apply the brake hydraulic pressure to each wheel cylinder 251 to automatically brake and decelerate automatically. There is. Alternatively, when the brake switch 54 is turned on, the assist hydraulic pressure is set to be larger than that in the normal case, so that the response characteristic to the driver's depression of the brake pedal is improved, and the pre-crash brake assist that enables quicker deceleration. (PBA; Pre-crash Brake Assist) control may be performed. Thereby, the collision impact is reduced by reducing the speed of the own vehicle at the time of the collision.

  In the seat belt device 23, the seat belt 231 is wound in advance by the seat belt winding device 230, so that the occupant is restrained to the seat before the collision, the movement of the occupant at the time of the collision is suppressed, and the damage at the time of the collision is reduced. Reduce. In addition, since it is possible to warn the occupant that the danger of a collision is imminent due to restraint, the occupant can prepare for the collision even in the event of a collision, which is effective in reducing the danger.

  In the airbag device 24, the airbag control device 240 controls the airbag 241 to operate at the most appropriate timing and state based on the posture, physique, collision direction, and collision timing of the occupant. By performing airbag control together with seat belt control, the occupant is surely restrained to the seat, and the shock to the occupant due to the operation of the airbag is alleviated, effectively reducing damage during a collision.

  In the automatic steering device 26, when it is determined that collision with an obstacle can be avoided and reduced by appropriate steering, the steering control device 260 controls the assist motor 261 to apply a necessary steering force. The steering is turned in the direction to avoid or reduce the collision with the obstacle to avoid the collision with the obstacle or reduce the shock of the collision.

  In addition, when the collision target is estimated to be a pedestrian, the bumper control device 270 changes the protruding amount of the active bumper 271 in order to mitigate the collision impact on the pedestrian, Absorbs shock. As a result, even in the event of a collision, the impact on the pedestrian is absorbed to reduce the obstacles particularly on the legs.

  Here, in the operation limit notification of the ACC / following control, the deceleration required based on the positional relationship with the preceding vehicle is set to a preset maximum deceleration (set to a relatively slow deceleration). If it exceeds, a warning is issued to request a deceleration operation by the driver, and it is set on the premise of a state that can be avoided by a normal avoidance operation by the driver. On the other hand, since the obstacle warning is based on the premise of emergency avoidance, the notification is issued in a state where the obstacle is closer to the obstacle, that is, a stage where a relatively sudden deceleration is required. Therefore, the operation limit notification timing of the ACC / following control needs to precede the notification timing of the obstacle alarm.

  Since PBA control (pre-pressurization) is based on the driver's brake operation, the driver needs to notice the obstacle and perform the brake operation. In order to ensure that the driver is aware of the obstacle, the obstacle alarm must be preceded by the pre-pressurization of this PBA control.

  Intervention braking is a control that is performed when the driver does not perform avoidance behavior or braking control despite the high possibility of a collision, and brakes regardless of the driver's will. It is necessary to execute after pre-pressurization, that is, after completion of waiting for PBA.

  Considering the possibility of the passenger's upper body unexpectedly moving back and forth due to this intervention brake operation, the passenger's prior restraint by the seat belt must be performed before the intervention brake operation. Further, in order to prevent the front of the vehicle from sinking due to the intervention brake operation, it is necessary to switch the suspension to the hard mode before the operation.

  As a result, the operation sequence for each support control and actual collision is set as follows. (1) Operation limit notification of ACC / following control, (2) Obstacle warning, (3) PBA pre-pressurization, switching to suspension hard mode, (4) Passenger restraint by seat belt, (5) Intervention brake operation , Active damper operation, (6) collision, (7) seat belt retract, airbag operation, etc.

  According to this embodiment, the control state (particularly, the start timing and operation content) of each driving support control is optimally controlled according to the respective characteristics of the millimeter wave radar and the image recognition means and the recognition state of the driver. Is possible. As a result, if the driver is facing the front and is looking at the direction of travel, the system can be operated more frequently by shifting the control start condition to the suppression side than when looking aside. It does not operate and drivability is improved such that the driver does not feel bothersome. And since each operation system can be operated with the optimal operation order according to the characteristic, appropriate control can be performed. For this reason, collision avoidance is improved, and even in the event of a collision, the impact on the occupant and pedestrian during the collision can be mitigated.

  Next, a second embodiment of the vehicle travel support device according to the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS. FIG. 4 is a block diagram of the vehicle control device 2a of this embodiment. The vehicle control device 2a has the same basic configuration as the vehicle control device 2 shown in FIG. 2 and is different only in that the face direction detection device 28 is not provided.

  The obstacle determination and control operation based on the obstacle determination according to the present embodiment will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG. This control is repeatedly executed by the control ECU 20 at a predetermined timing after the vehicle is turned on until it is turned off.

  First, the detection result of the obstacle candidate by the millimeter wave radar 21 and the detection result of the obstacle candidate by the image recognition means 22 are read (steps S51 and S52). This is the same as the processing of steps S1 and S2 in the first embodiment.

  Next, it is determined whether or not an obstacle has been detected by the millimeter wave radar 21 (step S53). If an obstacle has been detected, the process proceeds to step S54 to determine whether the same obstacle has been detected by the image recognition means 22. If both have detected an obstacle in common, the process proceeds to step S55 and the driving support control is set to normal control. And it transfers to step S57, support control is performed according to the set timing, and a process is complete | finished.

  Next, when it is determined in step S54 that the obstacle detected by the millimeter wave radar 21 is not detected by the image recognition means, the process proceeds to step S56, where the start condition of the driving support control is slightly suppressed. Shift. Then, support control is executed at the set timing (step S57).

  If it is determined in step S53 that the millimeter wave radar 21 has not detected an obstacle, the process proceeds to step S58, and the image recognition unit 22 determines whether an obstacle has been detected. If the image recognition unit 22 determines that an obstacle has been detected, the process proceeds to step S59, and the timing of the driving support control is shifted to the suppression side. And it transfers to step S57, support control is performed according to the set timing, and a process is complete | finished.

  If it is determined in step S58 that no obstacle has been detected in the image recognition, the process is terminated without performing the support control. When a plurality of obstacles are detected, the detection result by the millimeter wave has priority.

  As described above, when the obstacle is detected by both the millimeter wave radar 21 and the image recognition means 22, there is a high possibility that the obstacle is correctly detected, and thus the assist control is executed at a normal timing. On the other hand, when the obstacle is detected by only one of the millimeter wave radar 21 and the image recognition means 22, the reliability is inferior compared to the case where both are detected in common. Set the start timing late.

  Comparing the millimeter wave radar 21 and the image recognition means 22, the millimeter wave radar 21 can be detected from a relatively long distance and is more reliable than the image recognition means 22. On the other hand, the image recognition means 22 has an advantage that detailed information such as the lateral position information of the object can be acquired. Therefore, the control timing is further suppressed when only the image recognition means 22 is detected, compared to the case where only the highly reliable millimeter wave radar 21 is detected.

  Specifically, the notification timing of the operation limit of ACC and traffic jam tracking control, the alarm timing of the obstacle alarm, the pre-pressurization amount of the intervention brake, and the additional timing are suppressed as compared with the standard case.

  As the vehicle control device, the case where both the following traveling device and the collision impact reduction control device are provided has been described. However, any device that uses the recognition result may be included, such as a case where a collision warning device is simply provided. Moreover, it is not necessary to mount all the above-described devices as a collision impact reducing device, and the present invention is not limited to the above-described devices.

It is a schematic block diagram which shows the vehicle carrying the vehicle travel assistance apparatus which concerns on this invention. It is a block block diagram of the vehicle control apparatus 2 in 1st Embodiment of the driving assistance device for vehicles which concerns on this invention. It is a flowchart explaining the obstacle determination in the vehicle control apparatus 2 of FIG. 2, and control operation based on it. It is a block block diagram of the vehicle control apparatus 2a in 2nd Embodiment of the driving assistance device for vehicles which concerns on this invention. It is a flowchart explaining the obstacle determination in the vehicle control apparatus 2a of FIG. 4, and control operation based on it.

Explanation of symbols

  DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Vehicle, 2 ... Vehicle control apparatus, 20 ... Control ECU, 21 ... Millimeter wave radar, 22 ... Image recognition means, 23 ... Seat belt apparatus, 24 ... Air bag apparatus, 25 ... Brake apparatus, 26 ... Automatic steering apparatus, DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 27 ... Pedestrian protection apparatus, 28 ... Face direction detection apparatus, 51 ... Yaw rate sensor, 52 ... G sensor, 53 ... Vehicle speed sensor, 54 ... Brake switch, 61 ... Throttle, 62 ... Shifting means, 201 ... Obstacle determination part, 221 ... Front camera, 222 ... Image processing ECU, 230 ... Seat belt retractor, 231 ... Seat belt, 240 ... Air bag controller, 241 ... Air bag, 250 ... Brake actuator, 251 ... Wheel cylinder, 260 ... Steering control 261 ... assist motor, 270 ... bumper control device, 271 ... active bumper, 281 ... Image acquisition camera, 282 ... face toward judgment ECU.

Claims (11)

A first object detecting means for detecting a surrounding object by a radar; a second object detecting means for detecting a surrounding object by image recognition from the obtained surrounding image; and an aside detection means for detecting a driver's looking aside. In the vehicle travel support device comprising: a travel support means for supporting travel of the vehicle including at least one of following control, inter-vehicle control, obstacle warning, collision impact reduction control ,
The at least one propriety of the driving support control by the driving support means , the start timing, and the control amount according to the object detection state by the first and second object detecting means and the driver's side looking state detected by the side look detecting means The changing means further includes a changing means for detecting the same object by both the first object detecting means and the second object detecting means. A vehicular travel support apparatus characterized in that at least one of control availability, start timing, and control amount is made different even when an object is detected and when other conditions are the same . If the same obstacle is detected by the first and second object detection means, and the driver determines that the driver is not looking aside, the driver is not looking aside. The vehicle travel support apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the changing unit advances the start timing of at least one of the travel support controls. If the obstacle detected by the first object detection means cannot be detected by the second object detection means and the driver determines that the driver is looking aside, the driver will look aside. The change means advances the start timing of at least one of the driving support controls as compared to the case where the same obstacle is detected by the first and second object detection means. The vehicle travel support apparatus according to claim 1, wherein: The changing means, the detection necessity low driving support control accuracy in the horizontal direction of the obstacle, according to claim 3, wherein the accelerating further the start timing as compared to the highly necessary driving support control A vehicle travel support device. If the obstacle detected by the first object detection means cannot be detected by the second object detection means and the driver detects that the driver is not looking aside, the driving support 2. The vehicle travel support apparatus according to claim 1, wherein, in the travel support control by means, the start timing of the travel support control having a high necessity for detecting the obstacle in the lateral direction is delayed . The driving support control with a low necessity for the detection accuracy of the obstacle in the lateral direction is a tracking control or an inter-vehicle control, and the driving support control with a high necessity is an obstacle alarm or a collision impact reduction control. The vehicle travel support device according to claim 4 or 5 . The driving support means is a follow-up control device or an inter-vehicle distance control device, and when the second object detecting means detects an obstacle and the first object detecting means does not detect the obstacle, the following control is performed. 2. The vehicle travel support apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the inter-vehicle control is prohibited or interrupted. The driving support means is a collision impact reduction control device, and when the second object detection means detects an obstacle and the first object detection means does not detect an obstacle, the collision impact reduction control is performed. The vehicle travel support device according to claim 1, wherein the start timing of the vehicle is delayed from normal. When said looking aside detecting means by the driver is determined to be an inattentive in claim 8, wherein to reduce the amount to delay the start timing compared to when it is determined not looking aside Vehicle travel support device. The driving support means is a collision impact reduction control device, and when the second object detection means detects an obstacle and the first object detection means does not detect an obstacle, the collision impact reduction control is performed. 2. The vehicle travel support apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the control content is changed to control when the collision impact is small as compared with normal time. The collision impact mitigation control unit to ensure the amount of deformation of the vehicle, means for securing an occupant restraint, or according to claim 10, wherein the comprising any of the means for changing the damping force of the suspension means A vehicle travel support device.

Images