JP4081831B2 - Inspection method for iron loss characteristics of iron core - Google Patents

Inspection method for iron loss characteristics of iron core Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4081831B2
JP4081831B2 JP07902597A JP7902597A JP4081831B2 JP 4081831 B2 JP4081831 B2 JP 4081831B2 JP 07902597 A JP07902597 A JP 07902597A JP 7902597 A JP7902597 A JP 7902597A JP 4081831 B2 JP4081831 B2 JP 4081831B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
resistance value
iron
insulation resistance
iron loss
iron core
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP07902597A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH10256020A (en
Inventor
操 浪川
常弘 山路
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
JFE Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by JFE Steel Corp filed Critical JFE Steel Corp
Priority to JP07902597A priority Critical patent/JP4081831B2/en
Publication of JPH10256020A publication Critical patent/JPH10256020A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4081831B2 publication Critical patent/JP4081831B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Description

【0001】
【発明の属する技術分野】
本発明は、変圧器やリアクトル用として好適な鉄損特性のばらつきが小さい鉄心を得るための、鉄心の鉄損特性の検査方法に関するものである。
【0002】
【従来の技術】
変圧器やリアクトル用の鉄心として、軟磁性薄板を用いた鉄心が電力分野を中心に広く使用されているが、昨今では、電源機器の小型化、高効率化を目的とした機器の高周波化が進んだことに伴い、変圧器やリアクトル用の鉄心の鉄損特性に対する要求が厳さを増している。
従来、軟磁性薄板を用いた鉄心の鉄損特性は、素材である薄板自体の鉄損得性と比べて変動やばらつきが大きいため、出荷に際しては、鉄心を実際に励磁して鉄損特性を検査する方法を全製品に対して行うといった対策が採られている。
【0003】
【発明が解決しようとする課題】
しかしながら、軟磁性薄板を用いた鉄心の鉄損特性のばらつきは高周波ほど大きくなる傾向があるため、鉄心を製造したものの鉄損特性検査の結果不合格品となってしまう頻度が、昨今の高周波用途の増加につれて増え、結果として製造コストの増加や納期の遅延を招くといった問題を生じていた。
したがって本発明の目的は、鉄損特性のばらつきが小さく、変圧器やリアクトル用として好適な鉄心を得るための、鉄心の鉄損特性の検査方法を提供することにある。
【0004】
【課題を解決するための手段】
本発明者らは、上記課題を解決すべく鋭意研究を重ねた結果、軟磁性薄板を積層した鉄心において、薄板の厚さに応じて積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値を特定の値以上とすることによって、鉄損特性のばらつきを極めて小さくできることを見い出した。
本発明は、このような知見に基づいてなされたもので、その特徴は以下の通りである。
【0005】
[1]軟磁性薄板を積層させた鉄心の鉄損特性の検査方法において、鉄心の最外層薄板間の抵抗値を測定し、該抵抗値から下記(1)式により積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値を求め、該絶縁抵抗値に基づき鉄心の鉄損特性を検査するにあたり、
鉄心が板厚0.05mm以上、0.1mm未満の軟磁性薄板を積層したものである場合には、前記検査における前記絶縁抵抗値の基準を1.0Ω・cm 以上とし、
鉄心が板厚0.1mm以上の軟磁性薄板を積層したものである場合には、前記検査における前記絶縁抵抗値の基準を0.3Ω・cm 以上とすることを特徴とする鉄心の鉄損特性の検査方法。
(積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値)=(最外層薄板間の抵抗値)×{(最外層薄板の面積の平均値)/(鉄心の積層枚数)} … (1)
【0006】
【発明の実施の形態】
板厚0.05mmの軟磁性薄板を積層した鉄心について、周波数10kHz、磁束密度0.1Tでの鉄損W1/10kと鉄心の積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値との関係を図1に示す。ここで、鉄心の積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値とは、鉄心の最外層薄板間の抵抗値から下記(1)式により求められる値である。なお、鉄心の最外層薄板とは、巻鉄心であれば図2に示すような最外周側と最内周側の薄板、積み鉄心の場合には図3に示に示すような最上層と最下層の薄板であり、最外層薄板間の抵抗値とはこれら両薄板間で測定された抵抗値である。
積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値)=(最外層薄板間の抵抗値)×{(最外層薄板の面積の平均値)/(鉄心の積層枚数)} …(1)
【0007】
軟磁性薄板を積層した鉄心においては、積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値がある程度ばらつくのは不可避である。図1によれば、板厚が0.05mmの軟磁性薄板を積層した鉄心においては、積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値が1.0Ω・cm2未満の場合には、絶縁抵抗値がある程度ばらつくと鉄損値は大きく変動し、ばらついてしまう。一方、積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値が1.0Ω・cm2以上であれば、鉄損W1/10kの絶縁抵抗値に対する依存性が絶縁抵抗値1.0Ω・cm2以未満の場合と比較して極めて小さくなり、このため絶縁抵抗値がある程度ばらついても鉄損特性のばらつきを極めて小さくすることができ、また鉄損の絶対値も低い値で安定していることが判る。また、周波数400Hz、磁束密度1.0Tでの鉄損W10/400と鉄心の積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値との関係を図4に示すが、この場合も絶縁抵抗値と鉄損のばらつきとの関係は、上記と全く同様であることが判る。
【0008】
次に、板厚0.1mmの軟磁性薄板を積層した鉄心について、周波数10kHz、磁束密度0.1Tでの鉄損W1/10kと積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値との関係を図5に示す。板厚0.1mmの軟磁性薄板を積層した鉄心においては、積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値が0.3Ω・cm2未満の場合、絶縁抵抗値がある程度ばらつくと鉄損値は大きく変動し、ばらついてしまう。一方、積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値が0.3Ω・cm2以上であれば、鉄損W1/10kの絶縁抵抗値に対する依存性が0.3Ω・cm2未満の場合と比較して極めて小さくなり、このため絶縁抵抗値がある程度ばらついても鉄損特性のばらつきを極めて小さくすることができ、また鉄損の絶対値も低い値で安定していることが判る。
【0009】
図1と図5に示した結果等から、薄板の板厚が厚くなるほど、鉄損特性のばらつきが小さくなる積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値は低くてもよいことが判る。ここで、板厚0.05mm以上、0.1mm未満の軟磁性薄板を積層した鉄心においては、積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値が1.0Ω・cm以上、板厚0.1mm以上の軟磁性薄板を積層した鉄心においては、積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値が0.3Ω・cm以上であれば、鉄損特性のばらつきを極めて小さくし、且つ鉄損の絶対値も低い値で安定させることができる。
【0010】
なお、鉄心の積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値を得るための方法は特に問わないが、例えば、巻き鉄心の場合には型に巻き付ける時の張力を制御する、切り板を積層する積み鉄心の場合には鉄心の固定するボルトのかしめ圧を制御する等の方法が可能である。
本発明が対象とする鉄心には、カットコア、トロイダルコア等の巻鉄心及び積み鉄心が含まれる。
【0011】
【実施例】
[実施例1]
板厚0.05mmで、実質的にSiを6.5wt%含有するFe−Si合金薄板を用いた日本巻鉄心工業会規格CS32サイズのカットコアを10個用意した。この鉄心に1次、2次コイルとも40ターン施し、周波数10kHz、磁束密度0.1Tの励磁条件で励磁し、鉄損W1/10kを測定した。一方、図6に示す方法で鉄心の最外層薄板間の抵抗値を測定し、上記(1)式により積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値を求めた。
【0012】
鉄損W1/10kと積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値との関係を図1に示す。これによれば、積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値が1.0Ω・cm2以上の範囲であれば、鉄損W1/10kの絶縁抵抗値に対する依存性が絶縁抵抗値1.0Ω・cm2未満の場合と比較して極めて小さくなり、鉄損特性のばらつきが極めて小さく、また鉄損の絶対値も低い値で安定していることが確かめられた。
【0013】
[実施例2]
板厚0.1mmで、実質的にSiを6.5wt%含有するFe−Si合金薄板を用いた日本巻鉄心工業会規格CS20サイズのカットコアを9個、CS200サイズのカットコアを5個、CS320サイズのカットコアを5個用意した。この鉄心に1次、2次コイルともCS20サイズ32ターン、CS200サイズ42ターン、CS320サイズ42ターン施し、周波数10kHz、磁束密度0.1Tの励磁条件で励磁し、鉄損W1/10kを測定した。一方、図6に示す方法で鉄心の最外層薄板間の抵抗値を測定し、上記(1)式により積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値を求めた。
【0014】
鉄損W1/10kと積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値との関係を図5に示す。これによれば、鉄損W1/10kと鉄心の最外層薄板間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値との間には高度の対応関係が存在し、しかもその対応関係は鉄心のサイズに拘りなく一定である。そして、積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値が0.3Ω・cm2以上の範囲であれば、鉄損W1/10kの絶縁抵抗値に対する依存性が絶縁抵抗値0.3Ω・cm2未満の場合と比較して極めて小さくなり、鉄損特性のばらつきが極めて小さく、また鉄損の絶対値も低い値で安定していることが確かめられた。
【0015】
【発明の効果】
以上述べたように本発明の検査方法によれば、鉄損特性のばらつきが極めて小さく、変圧器やリアクトル用として極めて好適な鉄心を容易に選別することができる。
【図面の簡単な説明】
【図1】板厚0.05mmの軟磁性薄板を積層した鉄心の積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値と鉄損W1/10kとの関係を示すグラフ
【図2】巻鉄心における最外層薄板を示す説明図
【図3】積み鉄心における最外層薄板を示す説明図
【図4】板厚0.05mmの軟磁性薄板を積層した鉄心の積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値と鉄損W10/400との関係を示すグラフ
【図5】板厚0.1mmの軟磁性薄板を積層した鉄心の積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値と鉄損W1/10kとの関係を示すグラフ
【図6】実施例に行った鉄心の最外層薄板間の抵抗値の測定方法を示す説明図
[0001]
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention, in order to obtain a core small variations of the preferred iron loss as transformers and reactors, it relates to a method for inspecting the iron loss characteristics of the core.
[0002]
[Prior art]
As cores for transformers and reactors, cores using soft magnetic thin plates are widely used mainly in the electric power field. Recently, however, the frequency of equipment for the purpose of miniaturization and higher efficiency of power supply equipment has been increased. Along with this, the demand for iron loss characteristics of iron cores for transformers and reactors has increased.
Conventionally, the iron loss characteristics of iron cores using soft magnetic thin plates vary and vary more than the iron loss performance of the thin sheet itself, so the iron loss characteristics are inspected by actually exciting the iron core before shipment. Measures are taken to apply the method to all products.
[0003]
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
However, since the variation in iron loss characteristics of iron cores using soft magnetic thin plates tends to increase as the frequency increases, the frequency at which iron cores are manufactured but rejected as a result of iron loss characteristic inspections As a result, it has increased, resulting in problems such as an increase in manufacturing cost and a delay in delivery.
Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a method for inspecting the iron loss characteristic of an iron core in order to obtain an iron core suitable for a transformer or a reactor with little variation in iron loss characteristics .
[0004]
[Means for Solving the Problems]
As a result of intensive studies to solve the above-mentioned problems, the present inventors have determined that the insulation resistance value per one layer between the stacks is a specific value or more according to the thickness of the thin plate in the iron core laminated with the soft magnetic thin plate. By doing so, it was found that the variation in the iron loss characteristics can be extremely reduced.
The present invention has been made based on such knowledge, and the features thereof are as follows.
[0005]
[1] In the method of inspecting the iron loss characteristics of an iron core laminated with soft magnetic thin plates, the resistance value between the outermost layer thin plates of the iron core is measured, and the insulation per layer is obtained from the resistance value according to the following equation (1) In determining the resistance value, and inspecting the iron loss characteristics of the iron core based on the insulation resistance value ,
When the iron core is a laminate of soft magnetic thin plates having a thickness of 0.05 mm or more and less than 0.1 mm, the standard of the insulation resistance value in the inspection is 1.0 Ω · cm 2 or more,
When the iron core is a laminate of soft magnetic thin plates having a thickness of 0.1 mm or more, the insulation resistance value standard in the inspection is 0.3 Ω · cm 2 or more. Inspection method of characteristics.
(Insulation resistance value per layer between layers) = (resistance value between outermost thin plates) × {(average value of outermost thin plate area) / (number of laminated iron cores)} (1)
[0006]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
FIG. 1 shows the relationship between the core loss W1 / 10k at a frequency of 10 kHz and a magnetic flux density of 0.1 T, and the insulation resistance value per layer between the cores for an iron core laminated with a soft magnetic thin plate having a thickness of 0.05 mm. . Here, the insulation resistance value per layer between the laminated cores is a value obtained by the following equation (1) from the resistance value between the outermost thin plates of the iron core. In the case of a wound core, the outermost layer thin plate of the iron core is a thin plate on the outermost and innermost sides as shown in FIG. 2, and in the case of a stacked iron core, the outermost layer and the outermost layer are as shown in FIG. It is a lower layer thin plate, and the resistance value between the outermost layer thin plates is a resistance value measured between these two thin plates.
(Insulation resistance value per layer between laminations ) = (resistance value between outermost thin sheets) × {(average value of outermost thin sheet area) / (number of laminated iron cores)} (1)
[0007]
In an iron core in which soft magnetic thin plates are laminated, it is inevitable that the insulation resistance value per layer between the laminations varies to some extent. According to FIG. 1, in an iron core in which soft magnetic thin plates having a thickness of 0.05 mm are laminated, when the insulation resistance value per layer between laminations is less than 1.0 Ω · cm 2 , the insulation resistance value is somewhat If it fluctuates, the iron loss value fluctuates greatly and varies. On the other hand, if the insulation resistance value per layer between layers is 1.0 Ω · cm 2 or more, the dependence of the iron loss W1 / 10k on the insulation resistance value is less than 1.0 Ω · cm 2 As a result, it can be seen that even if the insulation resistance value varies to some extent, the variation in the iron loss characteristic can be made extremely small, and the absolute value of the iron loss is stable at a low value. Also, FIG. 4 shows the relationship between the iron loss W10 / 400 at a frequency of 400 Hz and a magnetic flux density of 1.0 T and the insulation resistance value per layer between the laminated cores. It can be seen that the relationship is exactly the same as above.
[0008]
Next, FIG. 5 shows the relationship between the iron loss W1 / 10k at a frequency of 10 kHz and a magnetic flux density of 0.1 T, and the insulation resistance value per layer between the layers of an iron core in which soft magnetic thin plates having a thickness of 0.1 mm are laminated. Show. In an iron core in which soft magnetic thin plates with a thickness of 0.1 mm are laminated, if the insulation resistance value per layer between laminations is less than 0.3 Ω · cm 2 , the iron loss value fluctuates greatly if the insulation resistance value varies to some extent. , Will vary. On the other hand, if the insulation resistance value per layer between the layers is 0.3 Ω · cm 2 or more, the dependence of the iron loss W1 / 10k on the insulation resistance value is extremely less than the case of less than 0.3 Ω · cm 2. Therefore, even if the insulation resistance value varies to some extent, it can be seen that the variation of the iron loss characteristic can be made extremely small, and the absolute value of the iron loss is stable at a low value.
[0009]
From the results shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 5, it can be seen that the insulation resistance value per layer between layers may be lower as the plate thickness of the thin plate is larger and the variation in iron loss characteristics is reduced. Here, in an iron core in which soft magnetic thin plates having a thickness of 0.05 mm or more and less than 0.1 mm are laminated, an insulation resistance value per layer between laminations is 1.0 Ω · cm 2 or more and a plate thickness of 0.1 mm or more. For iron cores laminated with soft magnetic thin plates, if the insulation resistance value per layer between layers is 0.3 Ω · cm 2 or more, variation in iron loss characteristics is extremely small, and the absolute value of iron loss is also low. Can stabilize.
[0010]
In addition , although the method for obtaining the insulation resistance value per one layer between the laminations of the iron cores is not particularly limited, for example, in the case of a wound iron core, the tension of the wound iron cores for laminating the cut plates is controlled. In some cases, a method such as controlling the caulking pressure of the bolt fixed to the iron core is possible.
The iron cores targeted by the present invention include wound cores such as cut cores and toroidal cores, and stacked iron cores.
[0011]
【Example】
[Example 1]
Ten cut cores having a plate thickness of 0.05 mm and using a Fe-Si alloy thin plate containing substantially 6.5 wt% of Si and having a CS32 size of Japanese winding core industry association were prepared. The iron core was subjected to 40 turns for both the primary and secondary coils, excited under the excitation conditions of a frequency of 10 kHz and a magnetic flux density of 0.1 T, and the iron loss W1 / 10k was measured. On the other hand, the resistance value between the outermost thin plates of the iron core was measured by the method shown in FIG. 6, and the insulation resistance value per layer between the layers was determined by the above equation (1).
[0012]
FIG. 1 shows the relationship between the iron loss W1 / 10k and the insulation resistance value per layer between layers. According to this, when the insulation resistance value per layer between the layers is in the range of 1.0 Ω · cm 2 or more, the dependency of the iron loss W1 / 10k on the insulation resistance value is 1.0Ω · cm 2. It was confirmed that the iron loss characteristic was extremely small compared with the case of less than the value, the variation of the iron loss characteristic was extremely small, and the absolute value of the iron loss was stable at a low value.
[0013]
[Example 2]
Nine Japanese roll iron core industry standard CS20 size cut cores, five CS200 size cut cores using a Fe-Si alloy thin plate with a thickness of 0.1 mm and substantially containing 6.5 wt% Si, Five cut cores of CS320 size were prepared. The iron core was subjected to CS20 size 32 turns, CS200 size 42 turns, CS320 size 42 turns for both the primary and secondary coils, excited under the excitation conditions of a frequency of 10 kHz and a magnetic flux density of 0.1 T, and the iron loss W1 / 10k was measured. On the other hand, the resistance value between the outermost thin plates of the iron core was measured by the method shown in FIG. 6, and the insulation resistance value per layer between the layers was determined by the above equation (1).
[0014]
FIG. 5 shows the relationship between the iron loss W1 / 10k and the insulation resistance value per layer between layers. According to this, there is a high degree of correspondence between the iron loss W1 / 10k and the insulation resistance value per layer between the outermost thin sheets of the core, and the correspondence is constant regardless of the size of the core. is there. If the insulation resistance value per layer between layers is in the range of 0.3 Ω · cm 2 or more, the dependence of the iron loss W1 / 10k on the insulation resistance value is less than 0.3 Ω · cm 2 It was confirmed that the variation in iron loss characteristics was extremely small, and the absolute value of iron loss was stable at a low value.
[0015]
【The invention's effect】
As described above, according to the inspection method of the present invention, the iron loss characteristic variation is extremely small, and an iron core that is extremely suitable for a transformer or a reactor can be easily selected.
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is a graph showing the relationship between the insulation resistance value per layer of iron cores laminated with a soft magnetic thin plate having a thickness of 0.05 mm and iron loss W1 / 10k. FIG. 2 shows the outermost thin plate in a wound core. FIG. 3 is an explanatory view showing an outermost layer thin plate in a stacked iron core. FIG. 4 is an insulation resistance value per one layer between cores laminated with a soft magnetic thin plate having a thickness of 0.05 mm and iron loss W10 / 400. [Fig. 5] Graph showing the relationship between the insulation resistance per layer of iron cores laminated with soft magnetic thin plates with a thickness of 0.1 mm and iron loss W1 / 10k [Fig. 6] Explanatory drawing which shows the measuring method of the resistance value between the outermost layer thin plates of the iron core performed in the example

Claims (1)

軟磁性薄板を積層させた鉄心の鉄損特性の検査方法において、鉄心の最外層薄板間の抵抗値を測定し、該抵抗値から下記(1)式により積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値を求め、該絶縁抵抗値に基づき鉄心の鉄損特性を検査するにあたり、
鉄心が板厚0.05mm以上、0.1mm未満の軟磁性薄板を積層したものである場合には、前記検査における前記絶縁抵抗値の基準を1.0Ω・cm 以上とし、
鉄心が板厚0.1mm以上の軟磁性薄板を積層したものである場合には、前記検査における前記絶縁抵抗値の基準を0.3Ω・cm 以上とすることを特徴とする鉄心の鉄損特性の検査方法。
(積層間1層当たりの絶縁抵抗値)=(最外層薄板間の抵抗値)×{(最外層薄板の面積の平均値)/(鉄心の積層枚数)} … (1)
In the inspection method of iron loss characteristics of iron cores laminated with soft magnetic thin plates, the resistance value between the outermost thin plates of the iron core is measured, and the insulation resistance value per layer between the layers is calculated from the resistance value by the following equation (1). In determining the iron loss characteristics of the iron core based on the insulation resistance value ,
When the iron core is a laminate of soft magnetic thin plates having a thickness of 0.05 mm or more and less than 0.1 mm, the standard of the insulation resistance value in the inspection is 1.0 Ω · cm 2 or more,
When the iron core is a laminate of soft magnetic thin plates having a thickness of 0.1 mm or more, the insulation resistance value standard in the inspection is 0.3 Ω · cm 2 or more. Inspection method of characteristics.
(Insulation resistance value per layer between layers) = (resistance value between outermost thin plates) × {(average value of outermost thin plate area) / (number of laminated iron cores)} (1)
JP07902597A 1997-03-13 1997-03-13 Inspection method for iron loss characteristics of iron core Expired - Fee Related JP4081831B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP07902597A JP4081831B2 (en) 1997-03-13 1997-03-13 Inspection method for iron loss characteristics of iron core

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP07902597A JP4081831B2 (en) 1997-03-13 1997-03-13 Inspection method for iron loss characteristics of iron core

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH10256020A JPH10256020A (en) 1998-09-25
JP4081831B2 true JP4081831B2 (en) 2008-04-30

Family

ID=13678410

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP07902597A Expired - Fee Related JP4081831B2 (en) 1997-03-13 1997-03-13 Inspection method for iron loss characteristics of iron core

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4081831B2 (en)

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH10256020A (en) 1998-09-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6737951B1 (en) Bulk amorphous metal inductive device
US9601256B2 (en) Wound iron core for static apparatus, amorphous transformer and coil winding frame for transformer
US6873239B2 (en) Bulk laminated amorphous metal inductive device
RU2570570C1 (en) Method for decrease in audible noise in magnet cores and magnet cores producing low audible noise
Grimmond et al. Geometrical factors affecting magnetic properties of wound toroidal cores
JPS6234122B2 (en)
JP4081831B2 (en) Inspection method for iron loss characteristics of iron core
CN110326068B (en) Transformer core
EP0026871B1 (en) Core for electromagnetic induction device
EP0337716B1 (en) Magnetic ribbon and magnetic core
KR102632108B1 (en) Transformer core for cut-stack transformer and transformer comprising same
JPH10256064A (en) Method for inspecting iron loss characteristic of core
JPH09275022A (en) Low noise iron core excellent in magnetic characteristic
JPH10340816A (en) Amorphous rolled core transformer
JP2023176086A (en) Iron core for stationary electromagnetic equipment
JPH10256053A (en) Core with less scattering in iron loss characteristic
JPS6117127B2 (en)
JPH08250339A (en) Low-noise grain-oriented electromagnetic steel plate and laminated core
BASAK Nonlinear Electromagnetic Systems 67 AJ. Moses and A. Basak (Eds.) IOS Press, 1996
JPH09266118A (en) Iron base amorphous square wound-core and its manufacturing method
Lin Space factor of amorphous metal laminations
JPS58116045A (en) Measuring method for electric machine core
JPS594005A (en) Manufacture of wound core
JPH05326289A (en) Magnetic core, transformer and formation of magnetic core
JPS6021511A (en) Core device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20051216

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20060104

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20060306

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20060307

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20070206

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20070406

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20080122

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20080204

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110222

Year of fee payment: 3

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees