JP3795041B2 - Radioactive substance content measuring method and measuring apparatus - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to a method for measuring the amount of radioactivity of a radioactive substance contained in a container, and in particular, a method for measuring the amount of radioactivity of a radioactive substance stored or filled and solidified in a container of a large square container in a non-contact manner. It relates to a measuring device.

In many cases, radioactive materials discharged from facilities that handle radioactive materials, such as nuclear fuel processing facilities and laboratories, are stored in a form enclosed in a large square container of about 1 m ³ in addition to drums. In the future, the relatively large waste discharged from the dismantling of aging facilities will often be disposed and stored in these large square containers. In these radioactive material storage facilities, it is necessary to know the amount of radionuclides such as uranium for reasons of waste management. In addition, the measurement after taking out the contents is not only labor-intensive, but considering the possibility of exposure and body contamination, the amount of radionuclides such as uranium contained without opening the container from the outside of the container is determined. A measuring device is required.

  As background art, Patent Document 1 discloses a method and apparatus for measuring the radioactivity of a radioactive substance in a non-contact manner. In the technique disclosed in Patent Document 1, gamma rays are detected by a NaI detector in a state where a container for storing radioactive waste is placed, and the container is placed when the content concentration is uniform. On the other hand, if the contents of the radioactive waste are uneven, that is, if the contents are unevenly distributed in density and radioactivity, rotate the container containing the radioactive waste and measure the external radiation source. Apply to the subject and measure it with a detector. However, a problem with this technique is that an external radiation source is required for the contents having uneven density and radioactivity.

  On the other hand, Patent Document 2 discloses a method capable of measuring a density and a radiation source (hereinafter, referred to as a radiation source) unevenly distributed within an object to be measured without using an external radiation source. In Patent Literature 2, a drum canned radioactive waste solidified body to be measured is placed on a rotary elevating table, and this is virtually divided into a plurality of slices along the vertical axis direction, and gamma rays emitted for each virtual slice. Is detected by a detector. For each virtual slice, two direct line peak count rates having different representative nuclides of the radionuclide are measured to determine the peak count rate ratio, and the decay rate of the count rate of each radionuclide is determined from the peak count rate ratio. And the count rate about each measured radionuclide is correct | amended using the said attenuation rate, and each radionuclide amount for every virtual slice is measured. A method is disclosed in which the amount of each radionuclide is integrated to obtain the amount of radioactivity of the drum canned radioactive waste solidified body.

  However, when measuring a square container by rotating the measurement object using this method, the distance from the detector to the square container surface changes due to the rotation during measurement, and the amount of radiation attenuation inside the container and the container Since the two parameters of the attenuation rate due to the external distance change, it is difficult to accurately measure the intensity of radioactivity and the content of the radionuclide.

  Furthermore, the sodium iodide detector (NaI detector) is generally sensitive and has a high counting rate as total energy absorption, but its energy resolution is poor, so when there are many types of radionuclides included, it is a measurement target. It is difficult to specify a peak region that is a clue to the type of radionuclide. On the other hand, germanium detectors (Ge detectors) are generally opposite to the advantages and disadvantages of NaI detectors and are not sensitive, but NaI detectors have high energy resolution even if their peak regions overlap. Therefore, it is easy to specify the peak position. That is, there is a problem peculiar to a detection device when selecting a detection device that makes it easy to specify the type of radionuclide to be measured.

In addition, there is Patent Document 3 showing a method of measuring by subdividing a measurement object.
JP-A-5-340861 Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 9-257937 Japanese Patent No. 2703409

  The following points are cited as problems in the prior art. That is, when the density of the contents to be measured and the radioactivity are unevenly distributed, an external radiation source is required and the apparatus configuration is complicated. In addition, the waste to be inspected is a cylindrical drum, and when measuring a rectangular container, the distance from the detector to the rectangular container surface changes due to rotation during measurement, and radiation attenuation inside the container It is difficult to accurately measure the content of the radionuclide because the two parameters of the amount and the attenuation factor depending on the distance outside the container change. Furthermore, in general, the NaI detector and the Ge detector are excellent in only one of the characteristics in sensitivity and resolution, and either sensitivity or resolution is relatively poor when a specific detector is selected. . The object of the present invention is to solve at least one of these problems.

  According to the present invention, there is provided a radioactive substance content measurement method using two types of detectors, a NaI detector and a Ge detector, and the measurement object is divided for each measurement cell corresponding to the measurement field of view of the NaI detector. Then, after measuring the counting rate of gamma rays, the relative position of the NaI detector with respect to the measurement object is changed, the measurement process is repeated for changing the position and the measurement, and the measurement result is measured from the opposite direction. The method has a counter-pair evaluation step for calculating the source intensity by eliminating the influence of the position of the source using the result obtained, and a content estimation step for obtaining the radionuclide content by integrating the source intensities Is provided.

  In addition, after the measurement step, the source distribution of the maximum peak count rate in the representative energy obtained in the measurement step is set, and the influence on the adjacent measurement cells of the source is considered by proportional distribution, and a new Create a dose rate distribution and repeat the creation of a new dose rate distribution, taking into account the influence of the next highest peak count rate source distribution on neighboring cells until it falls below a preset level. A correction step, and a determination step for determining whether or not the evaluation by the counter-pair evaluation step is accurate for each of the measurement cells based on a threshold of a count rate, and in the determination step, the counter-pair evaluation step When it is determined that the evaluation by the counter-pair evaluation process is accurate, the counter-pair evaluation process and the content estimation process are performed, and when it is determined that the evaluation by the counter-pair evaluation process is not accurate, the line Set the source position from the source distribution obtained from the distribution correction process, calculate the peak ratio, gross peak ratio, or band-peak ratio of Compton scattering, calculate the attenuation distance, and measure from the set source An evaluation step based on the source position for calculating the source intensity using the distance to the outer surface of the target and the content estimation step can be performed.

  Furthermore, in the evaluation process based on the radiation source position, when it is known in advance that the density inside the measurement target is substantially constant, the radiation source set in the radiation source correction process is evaluated from a different direction. The source that moves the source setting position within the range of the measurement cell in which the radiation source is set so that the internal density difference of the measured object is equal to or less than a preset threshold value, and feeds back to the radiation source distribution correction step A position correction step can be included.

  In the side surface measurement step, the type of radionuclide is specified from the data detected by the Ge detector, and the NaI detector has a peak count rate of gamma rays at an energy value that takes the peak of the radionuclide specified by the Ge detector. Is to measure.

According to the present invention, an external radiation source can be dispensed with, and the apparatus configuration can be simplified. Moreover, it can be applied to a large-sized square container regardless of whether the content density and radioactivity are uniform or unevenly distributed. Furthermore, the radionuclide can be identified and the amount of radioactivity can be measured not only for a rectangular container but also for a cylindrical drum.
Furthermore, according to the present invention, by using both the NaI detector and the Ge detector, the advantages of each of the two types of detectors can be utilized, and the disadvantages can be complemented, and the radionuclide can be identified and the amount of activity can be ensured. Can be measured. And by the opposing pair evaluation by this invention, if it is more than a detection threshold value, the contribution of a radiation source position can be excluded and the radiation source intensity of radioactivity can be evaluated.

  FIG. 2 shows an apparatus configuration example for carrying out the method of the present invention. 2A is a plan view, and FIG. 2B is an elevation view. In the apparatus of the present invention, the radioactive waste to be measured is placed on the installation table 2. Here, an example in which a large square container 1 having a width of 117 cm, a depth of 117 cm, and a height of 88 cm is measured as the radioactive waste container will be described.

  As shown in FIG. 2, when the NaI detector 4 and the Ge detector 5 are arranged facing each other across the large rectangular container 1, it is difficult to measure all the side surfaces to be measured at once, so A moving mechanism 8 including a rail 7 for sliding the turntable 3 and the large rectangular container 1 in the direction of the arrow 6 is provided. Data obtained by the NaI detector 4 and the Ge detector 5 are collected and processed by a data processing device 11 that analyzes and processes the data.

  Here, the measuring instrument is fixed and the large rectangular container 1 that is the measuring object is moved in the direction of the arrow 6, but the measuring object and the detector need only be moved relatively, so that the measuring object is measured. May be fixed and the detector may be moved.

  In the case of a rectangular container, it is theoretically preferable to perform measurement with a detector placed so as to face all four sides standing vertically. However, the cost, size of the device, etc. When the arrangement of the detectors shown in FIG. 2 is taken in consideration of the conditions, the detectors are not arranged on the four side surfaces, and therefore it is not possible to measure from all four side surfaces to be measured at one time. Therefore, the turntable 3 is provided on the installation table in order to measure all the side surfaces to be measured. If the turntable can be swiveled in 90 ° increments to measure the four sides of the container, it is convenient for measurement.

  As shown in FIG. 2 and FIG. 3, the NaI detector 4 is divided into 3 parts in the vertical direction (vertical direction) and 4 parts in the horizontal direction with respect to the large rectangular container 1 to be measured. The detector 5 does not divide in the vertical direction, but divides it into four in the horizontal direction for measurement. Further, the detectors 4 and 5 are provided with a collimator 9, and the measurement field for the radioactivity is limited by using lead or the like as the material of the collimator. That is, in the present embodiment, in the NaI detector 4, as shown in FIG. 3, the container 1 that is a measurement target is divided into 3 × 4 measurement areas per side surface. In addition, since the hexahedron is measured from four sides indicated by solid arrows 12 to 15, the container 1 to be measured is divided into a total of 3 (height) × 4 (width) × 4 (depth) = 48 cells. Can be measured. Similarly, since one Ge detector is provided in the vertical direction, the divided cells are not shown, but 1 (height) × 4 (width) × 4 (depth) = 16 cells are measured for measurement. can do. That is, three NaI detectors 4 are vertically stacked, but one Ge detector 5 is installed opposite to the three NaI detectors 4. Therefore, the field of view of the NaI detector 4 is limited so that when a certain container is divided into 48 cells and measured, the fields from each measurement position overlap slightly but do not overlap so much.

  The number of measurement cell divisions and the size of the measurement cells can be determined arbitrarily from the measurement time, the size of the measurement object, the required accuracy, and the number of available detectors, and are limited to the number of divisions presented here. Not what you want. For example, only one NaI detector 4 can be used, or two, four, five, six, or more can be stacked. Similarly, the arrangement of the detectors may be arbitrarily determined in consideration of the measurement time, the size of the measurement object, the division size of the measurement object at the time of measurement, and the cost of the apparatus.

  As shown by the dotted line in FIG. 2, if the detectors are arranged in the vertical direction by the number of cells virtually divided and sliced for measurement, no vertical movement is required during measurement.

  A specific measurement procedure will be described below. For the convenience of explanation, the steps of the method of the present invention will be described with reference numerals in parentheses such as (1), (2),. Then, the parenthesized numbering and the contents of the process are all explained in a unified manner.

<Side measurement process>
(1) Measurement process:
The container 1 to be measured is moved by the moving mechanism 8 to a predetermined measurement position that can be measured by the detectors 4 and 5, and the NaI detector 4 and the Ge detector 5 are used to set the gamma ray count rate for the measurement cell of the container 1. taking measurement. The following is obtained as data to be measured. The Ge detector 5 collects spectral data and can specify the radionuclide from the energy value that takes the peak of the gamma ray. The peak energy value of gamma rays differs for each radionuclide, and it is well known at which energy value the peak is reached. As a typical example, in the case of uranium 238 (hereinafter referred to as U-238), the peaks are 1001 KeV and 766 KeV of the daughter nuclide protoactinium metastable (Pa-234m) in radiation equilibrium, and cobalt 60 In the case of (Co-60), they are 1333 KeV and 1173 KeV.
In the present embodiment, the Ge detector 5 has a wide vertical field of view and can cover the entire height direction of the object to be measured, while the lateral field angle is the NaI detector 4. Corresponding to the horizontal viewing angle.
However, the lateral viewing angle of the Ge detector 5 can be wide enough to cover the lateral width of the container. The NaI detector 4 measures the gamma ray peak count rate and the Compton scattering band count rate or gross count rate at the energy value that takes the peak of the radionuclide specified by the Ge detector 5. The NaI detector 4 may also collect the spectrum data of the count rate with respect to the energy, and extract the count value data corresponding to the energy value of the radionuclide specified by the Ge detector 5.

(2) Moving process:
Next, in order to measure another measurement cell on one side of the container 1, the container 1 is moved step by step in the direction indicated by the arrow 26 in FIG.

(3) Measurement repeat step:
The measurement step (1) and the movement step (2) are repeated until the measurement of the counting rate of γ rays for one side is completed. When all the measurements on one side are completed, the container 1 is pulled out between the detectors 4 and 5 and rotated by 90 ° so that the detector can measure the side of the unmeasured container 1. Thereafter, the container 1 is inserted again between the detectors 4 and 5, and the measurement process (1) and the movement process (2) are performed until the measurement of all four side surfaces of the solid arrows 12 to 15 shown in FIG. Repeat the container rotation.

<Source distribution correction process>
(3a) Radiation source setting step:
As shown in FIG. 4, the measurement cell 16 in which the peak count rate of the representative energy for the designated radionuclide is the maximum is searched for among the measurement cells. This is defined as the first measurement cell. As indicated by arrows 25 and 26 in FIG. 4, the second peak count rate of the representative energy for the designated radionuclide is the maximum among the measurement cells orthogonal to the first measurement cell 16 at the same height. Assume that the source 18 is at the center of a hexahedron formed by intersecting the measurement cell 17 (FIG. 6). The representative energy refers to a representative peak position in the radioactivity spectrum of a certain radionuclide. For example, it may be 1001 KeV for U-238 and 1333 KeV for Co-60.

(3b) Correction process:
Here, the measurement result of the count rate is corrected in consideration of the influence of the radiation source set in the radiation source setting step (3a) on other measurement cells. Specifically, first, the radiation source 18 set in the radiation source setting step (3a) is set as the first radiation source.
Position 19 shown in FIG. 7 (i = I) a first source 18 contribute counting rate N _^'I to, when the collimator efficiency g (theta),
(Equation 1)
N ^′ _I = N ₀ × l ₀ ² / l ² × g (θ)
It becomes.
Here, l, l ₀ , and θ are the distance from the first radiation source 18 to the measurement position 19 of i = I and the measurement position 20 of i = 0 from the first radiation source 18 shown in FIG. , An angle formed by a line connecting the first source 18 and the measurement position 19 of i = I and a line connecting the source 18 and the measurement position 20 of i = 0. N generally represents the count rate, N ₀ is the count rate by the NaI detector at the measurement location 20, and N _I is the count rate measured by the NaI detector at the I location 19.
Thus, the dose rate from other source 18 is a N _I -N ^_'I. Using the following β as a coefficient, the count rates at other energies are also reduced in the same proportion.
(Equation 2)
(N _I −N ^′ _I ) / N _I = β

(3c) Correction repetition process:
By the above-described correction step (3b), a new dose rate distribution, that is, a new count rate distribution excluding the contribution of the first source 18 is obtained. A place where the representative energy has the maximum count rate is searched for other than the source position estimated in the source setting step (3a) in the past. Source setting step (3a) until the peak count rate of the representative energy for the designated radionuclide is below a preset level other than the source position estimated in the source setting step (3a) in the past And the correction step (3b) are repeated.

(4) Determination process By the way, considering the random counting error due to the temporal fluctuation of the gamma rays necessarily included in the measured counting rate, the larger the measured value, the higher the reliability as the measured value. Therefore, a certain threshold is set for the measured value. In the counter-pair evaluation steps (5) to (7) described later, as shown in FIG. 9, a counting rate equal to or greater than the threshold is obtained at the measurement point a near the radiation source, but at the point c far from the radiation source, the threshold The above counting rate may not be obtained. In that case, the measurement accuracy is better when the “method based on the source position” described in (8a) to (8d) and the “opposite pair evaluation method” described in (5) to (7) are used in combination. Will improve.
Moreover, since this determination process determines whether or not the opposing pair evaluation is possible, it may be performed after the opposing pair evaluation processes (5) to (7), but as shown in FIG. You may perform before an evaluation process.
In the opposed pair evaluation step, when at least one of the count rates of the measurement cells on the opposed surface is equal to or less than a preset threshold value, the “based on the radiation source position” described in (8a) to (8d). Like "How to do it".

<Opposite pair evaluation process (opposite pair evaluation method)>
The following steps (5) to (7) are performed using the count rate data corrected in the radiation source distribution correction steps (3a) to (3c). This process is referred to as “opposite pair evaluation process” or as this evaluation method “opposite pair evaluation method”.
(5) Count Rate Ratio Calculation Step FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram of counter pair evaluation. Opposite pair evaluation is an evaluation using data obtained by measuring a source 21 inside a container 1 which is a measurement object at a certain height and measuring it on two opposing surfaces of the measurement point c and the measurement point a. Define what to do.
FIG. 5 is a diagram for explaining the measurement data on the facing surface. The facing surface data is measured by arrows 28 and 30 by the same type of detectors 27 and 31 (for example, NaI detector). It is defined as data measured from the direction facing 29 and 16.
In the opposed pair evaluation, the amount of the source is calculated by removing the influence of the source position based on the data on the opposite surface including two types of gamma ray data. Therefore, there is an advantage that it is possible to obtain the final evaluation even if the radiation source position in the measurement cell is not clearly known. A well-known peak ratio method is used as a method for expressing the attenuation effect of gamma rays from the radiation source. The peak ratio is the ratio of the peak count rate at typical energy to the peak count rate at other peak energy.
It is also possible to use a ratio between the band count rate and the peak count rate (band / peak ratio) or a ratio between the gross count rate and the peak count rate (gross / peak ratio). If the correspondence between the band-peak ratio and peak ratio equivalent to the attenuation effect of the gamma rays from the radiation source and the correspondence between the gross peak ratio and peak ratio is obtained in advance and prepared as data, the measured count rate An equivalent virtual peak ratio corresponding to the obtained band-peak ratio and gross peak ratio can be obtained, and can be applied to the opposing pair evaluation using the peak ratio described below.

Using the measurement cell data of the opposing surface obtained from the side surface measurement step, a peak count rate ratio, which is a ratio between the peak count rate of the representative energy and the peak count rate, is calculated.
Here, taking the case of measuring uranium (U) as an example, the symbols in FIGS. 8 and 9 will be described below.
L: dimension of the container to be measured Δ: distances a, b, c, d from the detector to the container: measurement point x: distance inside the container from the radiation source to the measurement point a y: measurement point from the radiation source The distance in the container to b Below, the processing method of measurement data is demonstrated based on FIG.
Regarding the count rates N _a (1) and N _a (2) detected at the measurement point a,
(Equation 3)
_{N a (1) = A ×} k 1 (1) × k 2 (1) × exp (-μ 1 × ρ a × t a -μ f1 × δ) / {4π × (x + Δ) 2}
(Equation 4)
_{N a (2) = A ×} k 1 (2) × k 2 (2) × exp (-μ 2 × ρ a × t a -μ f2 × δ) / {4π × (x + Δ) 2}
here,
N _a (1): first peak count rate at point a N _a (2): second peak count rate at point a (peak count rate of representative energy)
k ₁ (i): Number of gamma rays generated per gU k ₂ (i): Count rate per flux of gamma rays μ: Mass absorption coefficient per unit density with respect to gamma ray energy inside the container μ _f : Gamma ray energy in the container Mass absorption coefficient A per unit density for A: the intensity of the source that emits the corresponding gamma rays (for example, U-238)
ρ: Density inside the container t: Distance passing through the waste from the radiation source to the detector δ: Product of the thickness of the container to be measured (here, the thickness of the container) and the container density i) in i): energy peak with serial number attached. For example, for U-238, i = 1 and 2 are set to 766 keV and 1001 keV, respectively.
Subscript: For each measurement point. Or, it corresponds to a gamma ray energy peak with a serial number.
Therefore, the peak count rate ratio N _a (1) / N _a (2) can be expressed as follows.
(Equation 5)
N _a (1) / N _a (2) = k ₁ (1) × k ₂ (1) / (k ₁ (2) × k ₂ (2)) × exp {− (μ ₁ −μ ₂ ) × ρ _{a × t a - (μ f1} -μ f2) × δ}

(6) Attenuation distance calculation process:
In the attenuation distance calculation step (6), an effective attenuation distance of gamma rays inside the measurement object is obtained.
here,
(Equation 6)
C = k ₁ (1) × k ₂ (1) / (k ₁ (2) × k ₂ (2))
And Since C, μ ₁ , μ ₂ , μ _f1 , μ _f2 , and δ are constants, and N _a (1) / N _a (2) is obtained from the measured value, it is more effective by the peak ratio at the same point. can be determined attenuation distance ρ _a × t _a of gamma rays.

(7) Cell source intensity calculation process:
In the cell source strength calculation step, the source strength is obtained as follows.
If N _a (2) is transformed into f _a as follows,
(Equation 7)
f _a = N _a (2) × 4π × exp (μ ₂ × ρ _a × t _a + μ _f2 × δ) / {k ₁ (2) × k ₂ (2)} = A / {(x + Δ) ² }
Similarly for measurement point c, if f _c is set,
(Equation 8)
f _c = N _c (2) × 4π × exp (μ ₂ × ρ _c × t _c + μ _f2 × δ) / {k ₁ (2) × k ₂ (2)} = A / {(L−x + Δ ² }
From the above equations (7) and (8), the distance x is eliminated, and the source intensity A of γ rays can be obtained as follows.
(Equation 9)
^{A = (L + 2Δ) 2} × (f a × f c) / {f a + f c + 2 × (f a × f c) 1/2)}
That is, the source intensity A can be obtained even if the distance x, that is, the position of the source in the measurement cell is not clearly known.
For example, when the source intensity A is obtained from the opposing surfaces of the solid arrows 12 and 14 in FIG. 3 and the source intensity A is also obtained from the opposing surfaces of the solid arrows 13 and 15, the reliability of the measurement value is improved. Therefore, it is preferable to average.

  In the opposed pair evaluation step, when at least one of the count rates of the measurement cells on the opposed surface is equal to or less than a preset threshold value, the “method based on the radiation source position” described in (8a) to (8d) "

<Evaluation process based on source position (method based on source position)>
(8a) Second radiation source setting step:
First, using the source distribution finally obtained in the source distribution correction steps (3a) to (3c), as shown in FIG. As in the case of setting the radiation source in the source distribution correction step, it is assumed that the measurement cell 16 on the opposite surface and the measurement cell 17 perpendicular to the measurement cell 16 are in the center of the hexahedron formed by intersecting.

(8b) Second counting rate ratio calculation step:
Here, as shown in FIG. 9, the container 1 to be measured is represented in a plane, and the source 18 has a larger peak count rate at the measurement point a than the measurement point c, and the peak count rate at the measurement point b is It is assumed that it is larger than the peak count rate at the measurement point d.

(8c) Second attenuation distance calculation step:
With respect to the measurement point a, the equations of Equations 3 to 7 can be derived in the same manner as the opposing pair evaluation. Further, the measurement point b can be considered in the same manner as the equations 3 to 7 at the measurement point a.
Above, the measurement point a, the b, and the same idea as the damping distance calculation step in opposed pairs evaluating step (6), the attenuation distance effective gamma [rho _a × t _a, and be determined ρ _b × t _b it can.

(8ca) Source position correction step:
Here, it is possible to calculate the distances x and y as the assumed center of the measurement cell, but it is preferable to take the following method in consideration of errors.
When it is known in advance that the density inside the container is almost constant, the difference between the density ρ a inside the container as seen from the measurement point _a and the density ρ _b inside the container as seen from the measurement point b is reduced. 9 where the set position of the radiation source 18 is moved within the range of the arrows 23 and 24, that is, within the range of the measurement cell corresponding to the positions of the measurement points _a and _b , and the difference between ρ _a and ρ _b is reduced. Is the source position, and the influence of the source on other measurement cells, that is, the source position is changed, and is fed back to the source distribution correction steps (3a) to (3c) and recalculated.
Here, the position where the difference between ρ _a and ρ _b is small is defined as a position where an appropriate threshold is set for the difference between ρ _a and ρ _b , and this difference is less than or equal to the threshold. May be the source position.

(8d) Second cell source intensity calculation step:
Further, when the measurement point b is made the same as the equations 3 to 7 at the measurement point a, the following equation is obtained.
(Equation 10)
f _b = N _b (2) × 4π × exp (μ ₂ × ρ _b × t _b + μ _f2 × δ) / {k ₁ (2) × k ₂ (2)} = A / {(y + Δ) ² }
(Equation 11)
Therefore, the source intensity A viewed from the measurement point b is
A = (y + Δ) ² × f _b
In addition, the source intensity A as seen from the measurement point a is obtained by modifying the equation of Equation 7,
(Equation 12)
^{A = (x + Δ) 2} × f a
According to the method based on the source position, the source intensity is affected by the terms of the distances x and y as shown in the equations (11) and (12). Y must be expressed accurately, but a value with a large count rate can be used, and there is an advantage that random counting errors due to temporal fluctuations of gamma rays can be reduced. On the other hand, the opposed pair evaluation method has an advantage that it is not necessary to consider the position of the radiation source, and is a highly accurate and effective method if a large count rate is obtained.
Therefore, the method shown in the present invention uses the opposite pair evaluation method in principle, and when the count rate of the measurement cell is equal to or less than the threshold, the method using the evaluation method assuming the radiation source position is used. Accurate measurement is possible.
Although the peak ratio method based on the radiation source position has been described using the peak ratio method, the gross peak ratio method and the Compton scattering band-peak ratio method can be used in the same manner as the opposed pair evaluation method. Good. If the peak count rate is small and the count rate error is large, the accuracy of the peak ratio is deteriorated. In this case, when the gross peak ratio or the band peak ratio is used, the measurement accuracy increases.

(9) Total source strength calculation process (content calculation process):
From the source intensity obtained for each measurement cell, the source intensity of the entire measurement object is obtained. The source intensity and the radionuclide content are the same.
In addition, when the content of uranium is locally high, the accuracy is further improved when the correction due to the self-absorption effect is taken into consideration, so it is preferable to consider this. In the correction by the self-absorption effect, the chemical composition of uranium (for example, uranium dioxide) is set, and the difference in the mass absorption coefficient from the assumed waste material is corrected. For the case of considering the local uranium amount and the chemical composition of uranium, and the case of not considering it, the difference in attenuation of gamma rays is prepared as data as a correction coefficient in advance, and the evaluation method based on the opposite pair evaluation and the source position This is preferably done by multiplying the uranium amount obtained in step 1 by a correction coefficient.

  As described above, the measurement object is described by focusing on the large-sized rectangular container. However, according to the invention of the present embodiment, a cylindrical drum can can be set as the measurement object as in the related art. In that case, the drum 34 may be divided by the NaI detector 32 and the Ge detector 33 as shown by the dotted line in FIG. Of course, since it is only necessary to collect data on the opposite surface in the implementation of the present invention, the number of divisions may be measured by dividing into 8 divisions or 16 divisions as shown in FIG. The number of divisions may be arbitrarily determined from the relationship between the measurement time and the measurement time.

  In addition, as an application example of the apparatus configuration for carrying out the method of the present invention, the same type of detector is used for the rectangular container as the measurement object, and the hatched portion in FIGS. 11 (A), (B), and (C). There is a method of reducing the number of measurements by arranging it corresponding to the above. Each figure of FIG. 11 shows a state in which one side surface of the rectangular container is divided into 12 parts. In the case of FIG. 11A, the detector is moved twice in the vertical direction with respect to the container, and one side can be measured by a total of three measurements. In the case of FIG. The detector can be moved once in the horizontal direction and one side can be measured by a total of two measurements. In the case of FIG. 11C, the detector can be moved without moving it relative to the container. One side can be measured by one measurement. As a matter of course, if the relative relationship between the container to be measured and the detector is changed, measurement by the detector can be performed, and therefore the container may be moved instead of the detector.

  In addition, when there are many types of radionuclides contained in the waste, the peak count rate may not be accurately measured because the NaI detector has poor energy resolution. In that case, what is necessary is just to evaluate according to the flow of FIG. 1 using the peak count rate and peak ratio of Ge detector. In the apparatus configuration example shown in FIG. 2, the measurement data of the NaI detector is divided into three in the height direction, but is divided into one in the height direction of the Ge detector. In such a case, the measurement data of the NaI detector is used to set in which measurement cell the radiation source exists in the height direction. Furthermore, regarding the measurement data of the Ge detector, the source intensity may be evaluated by correcting the data assuming that the source exists in the measurement cell based on the measurement data of the NaI detector in the height direction.

The flowchart of the content measuring method of the radioactive substance which concerns on embodiment is shown. It is the typical top view (A) and side view (B) which show an example of the content measuring apparatus of the radioactive substance which concerns on embodiment. It is a perspective view of a measuring object for explanation showing an example of division measurement of a measuring object. It is a perspective view of the measurement countermeasure for demonstrating radiation source distribution correction | amendment. It is a figure for demonstrating the measurement data in an opposing surface. It is explanatory drawing which shows the setting method of the radiation source position in the measurement cell of an opposing surface. It is a diagram about a measuring object for explaining radiation source distribution amendment. It is a diagram about a measuring object for explaining an opposed pair evaluation method. It is a diagram about a measuring object for explaining a method based on a radiation source position. It is explanatory drawing which shows the method of measuring a drum can by this method. It is explanatory drawing for showing the modification of the apparatus structure for enforcing the method of this invention.

Explanation of symbols

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Square container 2 Installation stand 3 Rotary table 4 NaI detector 5 Ge detector 6 Arrow 7 Rail 8 Moving mechanism 9 Collimator 11 Data processing device 12 Solid arrow 13 Solid arrow 14 Solid arrow 15 Solid arrow 15 Arrow 16 Measurement cell 17 Measurement Cell 18 Source 21 Source 23 Arrow (measurement cell range)
24 Arrow (measurement cell range)
26 Arrow 27 Detector 28 Arrow 29 Measurement object 30 Arrow 31 Detector of the same type as 27

Claims (2)

A method for measuring the content of a radioactive substance using two types of detectors, a NaI detector and a Ge detector,
Dividing the NaI detector to be measured in the measurement field of view measuring cell corresponding said while changing the relative position with respect to the measurement target of the NaI detector, measures the counting rate of the gamma ray for each of the measurement cell, or A measurement process in which the operation of is performed from both directions with respect to two axial directions orthogonal to the measurement object ;
The source distribution of the maximum peak count rate at the representative energy obtained in the measurement step is set in the measurement unit defined by the intersecting portion of the measurement cells orthogonal to each other, and the source to the adjacent measurement cells is set. Create a new dose rate distribution taking into account the effects by proportional distribution and taking into account the impact on the adjacent measurement cells of the source distribution with the next highest peak count rate until the level is below the preset level. A source distribution correction process that repeatedly creates a rate distribution;
A determination step of determining whether or not evaluation by the opposed pair evaluation step is possible for each of the measurement cells, based on a threshold of the count rate,
Including
In the determination step, for the measurement cell determined to be able to be evaluated by the opposed pair evaluation step, the measurement result obtained from the measurement cell obtained from the measurement step is used from the direction facing each measurement cell. And performing a counter-pair evaluation step of calculating the source intensity by eliminating the influence of the position of the source in each measurement cell ,
In the determination step, for the measurement cell determined that the evaluation by the opposed pair evaluation step is not possible, the source position is set from the source distribution obtained in the source distribution correction step, and the source Perform an evaluation process based on the source position to calculate the intensity,
A method for measuring the content of a radioactive substance, characterized in that the content of the radionuclide in the entire measurement object is obtained by integrating the radiation source strength obtained in each of the evaluation steps . The evaluation step based on the source position sets the source position from the source distribution obtained in the source distribution correction step , and calculates the peak ratio, gross peak ratio, or Compton scattering band-peak ratio. The content of the radioactive substance according to claim 1, further comprising: calculating an attenuation distance by calculating, and calculating a source intensity using a distance from the set source to the outer surface of the measurement object. Measuring method.

Images