JP3555393B2 - Monitoring and control system - Google Patents

Monitoring and control system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP3555393B2
JP3555393B2 JP19954897A JP19954897A JP3555393B2 JP 3555393 B2 JP3555393 B2 JP 3555393B2 JP 19954897 A JP19954897 A JP 19954897A JP 19954897 A JP19954897 A JP 19954897A JP 3555393 B2 JP3555393 B2 JP 3555393B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
failure
information
trigger
attribute information
monitoring
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP19954897A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH1145116A (en
Inventor
昭 勝又
隆志 熊本
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Meidensha Corp
Original Assignee
Meidensha Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Meidensha Corp filed Critical Meidensha Corp
Priority to JP19954897A priority Critical patent/JP3555393B2/en
Publication of JPH1145116A publication Critical patent/JPH1145116A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3555393B2 publication Critical patent/JP3555393B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • User Interface Of Digital Computer (AREA)
  • Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)
  • Digital Computer Display Output (AREA)

Description

【0001】
【発明の属する技術分野】
本発明は、各種プラント設備の監視制御システムに係り、特に多重故障発生時の故障情報の出力方式に関する。
【0002】
【従来の技術】
プラント設備の監視制御システムは、例えば図2に変電所の監視制御システムを示すように、監視室側は監視盤1とCRTディスプレイ2とプリンタ3等がマンマシンLANで結合され、これらとプロセスLAN4で結合されるローカル側は受電コントローラ5による遮断器6等の監視制御や運転コントローラ7による機器8等の監視制御を行う。
【0003】
このようなシステムにおいて、プラント機器に故障が発生した場合など、監視対象機器の故障発生には監視室側でその故障情報出力として以下の手順で操作員に通知している。
【0004】
(1)警報鳴動
(2)監視盤等でのシンボル表示
(3)CRTグラフィック画面上でのシンボル表示(自動表示あり)
(4)CRTメッセージ画面上での故障メッセージ出力
(5)メッセージプリンタでの故障メッセージ出力
【0005】
【発明が解決しようとする課題】
従来の故障情報出力方式は、単一故障の場合は故障状況を的確に判別できるが、多重故障が発生した場合に故障情報が一斉に発生し、しかも各情報の検出タイミングがローカル側での処理タイミングに依存するため、真の故障原因となったトリガ故障と、この故障が原因で故障発生した波及故障が混在した形でCRTディスプレイ等に表示されるため、真の故障原因を判別するのを困難にしている。
【0006】
各情報の検出タイミングのずれは、例えば図2の遮断器CB1のトリップによって受電が停止し、ここから電源を供給されていた機器A1〜ANが停止し、その計測値B1〜BNも異常となったとする。その際、上記のCB1、A1〜AN、B1〜BNの故障情報はランダムな順番でCRTディスプレイ及び監視盤へ伝送出力されることになる。
【0007】
また、故障画面の自動表示及び故障メッセージの表示や印刷は、故障の属性によらず、情報として到着したものから処理され、プラント機器における故障の発生と波及状況と順序が異なる表示や印刷となってしまう。
【0008】
本発明の目的は、多重故障の発生にもトリガ故障を確実に出力できるようにした監視制御システムを提供することにある。
【0009】
【課題を解決するための手段】
本発明は、前記の課題を解決するため、故障情報にその故障がトリガ故障となるか否か等の故障属性情報を付加し、この属性情報によりランダムに到着する故障情報からトリガとなる故障を頂点とした故障状況を認識・出力できるようにしたもので、以下の構成を特徴とする。
【0010】
各種プラント設備の機器等の故障を検出して監視室側に故障情報として伝送し、監視室側で故障情報を出力して操作員に故障状況を知らせる故障情報出力手段を備えた監視制御システムにおいて、
前記故障情報は、他の故障に波及するトリガ故障となり得る故障か否かの属性情報と、故障原因になるトリガ故障が存在する波及故障となり得る故障か否かの属性情報、及び該トリガ故障が存在するならその故障を特定する属性情報を付加して伝送する手段と、
前記属性情報から受信した故障情報が前記トリガ故障又は波及故障でないときに独立故障として故障情報を出力する処理手段と、
前記トリガ故障又は波及故障のときはそれぞれに時限を持たせて他の故障発生に待機するタイマー登録を行い、全タイマーのタイムアップ後に前記属性情報からトリガ故障と波及故障のグルーピングを行い、トリガ故障のみを画面表示し、波及故障はメッセージ表示・印字を行う処理手段とを備えたことを特徴とする。
【0011】
【発明の実施の形態】
本実施形態においては、故障情報には以下の属性情報を付加する。
【0012】
(1)他の故障に波及するトリガ故障となり得る故障か否かの属性情報。例えば、図2の遮断器CB1の故障には、トリガ故障となることの属性情報を付加する。
【0013】
(2)故障原因になるトリガ故障が存在する波及故障となり得る故障か否かの属性情報、及びトリガ故障が存在するならその故障を特定する番号等の属性情報。例えば、図2の機器A1の故障は、トリガ故障として遮断器CB1が存在するため、波及故障となり得ることの属性情報と、遮断器CB1を特定できる属性情報を付加する。この特定は、複数の場合もある。
【0014】
上記の2つの種別の故障情報は、故障検出対象によっては、その故障がトリガ故障となり、かつ波及故障となる場合もある。
【0015】
図1は、本実施形態における故障情報出力処理フローである。故障発生時には前記の属性情報を付加した故障情報を図2の監視盤側に伝送する(S1)。監視盤側では、受信した故障情報の属性情報から当該故障が独立故障か否かを判定する(S2)。すなわち、属性情報から当該故障がトリガ故障となり得ず、しかも波及故障にもなり得ない故障を独立故障(単一故障)とし、その他の故障をトリガ故障か波及故障として判定する。
【0016】
この判定処理(S2)で独立故障と判定された場合、従来の単一故障と同様に、故障画面の自動表示処理を行い(S3)、メッセージ表示・印字を行い、操作員による単独処理を促す(S4)。
【0017】
判定処理(S2)でトリガ故障又は波及故障と判定されたとき、各故障情報についてそれぞれタイマー登録をしておく(S5)。このタイマー登録は、各故障情報に一定時限又は故障情報別に予め定める時限を持つタイマーを割り当て、故障情報の受信時点からの計時を行うことで他の故障情報の発生(多重故障発生)に備えて待機時間を確保する。
【0018】
各故障情報別に登録したタイマーの全てがタイムアップするまで待ち(S6)、このタイムアップ後に故障情報の属性情報からトリガ故障と波及故障のグルーピングを行う(S7)。このグルーピングは、トリガ故障を頂点とする階層化され、複数のグループができることもある。
【0019】
グルーピングした故障情報のうち、トリガ故障情報のみを画面に表示する自動表示処理を行う(S8)。これにより、多数の波及故障を含む多重故障発生時にも画面にはトリガ故障のみが表示されて故障原因の認識を容易にする。
【0020】
最後に、多重故障発生に対するメッセージ表示・印字にはトリガ故障を頂点としたグループ別の出力を得る(S9)。この出力は、以下のように、トリガ故障を頂点としたメッセージの編集を行う。
【0021】

Figure 0003555393
このような出力により、波及故障についてはメッセージの表示・印字からその故障原因(トリガ故障)を容易に認識できる。
【0022】
従って、本実施形態によれば、多重故障発生時には、各情報の検出タイミングにずれがある場合にもトリガ故障のみを認識して画面表示し、メッセージの表示・印字にはトリガ故障を頂点として各故障情報を階層化して出力し、操作員は多重故障発生に画面表示からトリガ故障を確実に認識でき、その確実な対応ができることになる。また、波及故障についてはメッセージの表示・印字からその故障原因を容易に認識できる。
【0023】
【発明の効果】
以上のとおり、本発明によれば、故障情報にその故障がトリガ故障となるか否か等の故障属性情報を付加し、この属性情報によりランダムに到着する故障情報からトリガとなる故障を頂点とした故障状況を認識・出力できるようにしたため、多重故障が発生し各情報の検出タイミングにずれがある場合にもトリガ故障のみを確実に出力でき、真の故障原因の認識を確実容易にする効果がある。
【図面の簡単な説明】
【図1】本発明の実施形態を示す故障情報出力処理フロー。
【図2】監視制御システム例。
【符号の説明】
1…監視盤
2…CRTディスプレイ
3…プリンタ
4…LAN
5…受電コントローラ
7…運転コントローラ
8…機器[0001]
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a monitoring and control system for various plant facilities, and more particularly to a method for outputting failure information when multiple failures occur.
[0002]
[Prior art]
As shown in FIG. 2, for example, a monitoring and control system for plant equipment is shown in FIG. 2. As shown in FIG. 2, a monitoring panel 1, a CRT display 2, a printer 3 and the like are connected by a man-machine LAN on the monitoring room side. The local side, which is connected by, performs monitoring and control of the circuit breaker 6 and the like by the power receiving controller 5 and monitoring and control of the device 8 and the like by the operation controller 7.
[0003]
In such a system, when a failure occurs in a plant device or the like, the occurrence of a failure in the monitored device is notified to the operator as the failure information output on the monitoring room side in the following procedure.
[0004]
(1) Alarm sounding (2) Symbol display on monitor panel etc. (3) Symbol display on CRT graphic screen (with automatic display)
(4) Failure message output on CRT message screen (5) Failure message output by message printer
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
The conventional failure information output method can accurately determine the failure status in the case of a single failure, but when multiple failures occur, failure information is generated all at once, and the detection timing of each information is processed on the local side Because it depends on the timing, the trigger failure that caused the true failure and the ripple failure that occurred due to this failure are displayed on the CRT display or the like in a mixed manner. Making it difficult.
[0006]
The deviation of the detection timing of each information is caused, for example, by the trip of the circuit breaker CB1 in FIG. 2, power reception is stopped, the devices A1 to AN to which power is supplied from there are stopped, and the measured values B1 to BN become abnormal. Suppose. At this time, the failure information of the CB1, A1 to AN, and B1 to BN is transmitted and output to the CRT display and the monitoring panel in a random order.
[0007]
In addition, the automatic display of the failure screen and the display and printing of the failure message are processed from the information that has arrived, regardless of the attribute of the failure, and the display and printing are performed in a different order from the occurrence and the propagation condition of the failure in the plant equipment. Would.
[0008]
An object of the present invention is to provide a monitoring control system capable of reliably outputting a trigger failure even when multiple failures occur.
[0009]
[Means for Solving the Problems]
In order to solve the above-described problem, the present invention adds failure attribute information such as whether or not the failure becomes a trigger failure to the failure information, and uses this attribute information to determine a trigger failure from failure information that arrives at random. It is capable of recognizing and outputting a fault condition at the top, and is characterized by the following configuration.
[0010]
In a monitoring control system equipped with a failure information output means for detecting a failure of equipment of various plant facilities, transmitting the failure information to the monitoring room, outputting the failure information on the monitoring room side, and notifying an operator of the failure status. ,
The failure information is attribute information on whether or not the failure can be a trigger failure that propagates to another failure, attribute information on whether or not the failure can be a ripple failure in which a trigger failure that causes a failure exists, and Means for transmitting, if present, attribute information specifying the failure;
Processing means for outputting failure information as an independent failure when the failure information received from the attribute information is not the trigger failure or the spread failure,
In the case of the trigger failure or the propagation failure, a timer is provided to give a time limit to each other and wait for the occurrence of another failure. And a processing means for displaying / printing a message of a ripple failure.
[0011]
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
In the present embodiment, the following attribute information is added to the failure information.
[0012]
(1) Attribute information as to whether or not a failure can be a trigger failure that affects other failures. For example, attribute information indicating a trigger failure is added to the failure of the circuit breaker CB1 in FIG.
[0013]
(2) Attribute information as to whether or not a failure that can be a ripple failure in which a trigger failure that causes a failure exists, and attribute information such as a number specifying the failure if a trigger failure exists. For example, the failure of the device A1 in FIG. 2 includes attribute information indicating that the circuit breaker CB1 exists as a trigger failure, so that attribute information indicating that the failure can be a ripple failure and attribute information that can specify the circuit breaker CB1 are added. This specification may be plural.
[0014]
In the above two types of failure information, depending on the failure detection target, the failure may be a trigger failure and a ripple failure.
[0015]
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a failure information output process according to the present embodiment. When a failure occurs, the failure information to which the attribute information is added is transmitted to the monitoring panel side in FIG. 2 (S1). The monitoring panel determines whether the failure is an independent failure based on the attribute information of the received failure information (S2). That is, from the attribute information, a failure that cannot be a trigger failure and that cannot be a ripple failure is determined as an independent failure (single failure), and other failures are determined as a trigger failure or a ripple failure.
[0016]
If it is determined in this determination process (S2) that the failure is an independent failure, an automatic display process of a failure screen is performed (S3), a message is displayed and printed, and the operator is urged to perform a single process, similarly to the conventional single failure. (S4).
[0017]
When it is determined in the determination process (S2) that a trigger failure or a ripple failure has occurred, a timer is registered for each failure information (S5). In this timer registration, a timer having a fixed time period or a predetermined time period for each failure information is assigned to each failure information, and the time is counted from the time of reception of the failure information to prepare for the generation of other failure information (multiple failure occurrence). Secure waiting time.
[0018]
It waits until all the timers registered for each fault information have timed out (S6), and after this time-up, groups the trigger fault and the spread fault from the attribute information of the fault information (S7). This grouping is hierarchized with the trigger failure at the top, and a plurality of groups may be formed.
[0019]
An automatic display process of displaying only the trigger failure information on the screen among the grouped failure information is performed (S8). As a result, even when multiple faults including a large number of spillover faults occur, only the trigger fault is displayed on the screen, making it easy to recognize the cause of the fault.
[0020]
Finally, for displaying and printing a message for the occurrence of multiple failures, an output is obtained for each group with the trigger failure at the top (S9). This output edits the message with the trigger failure at the top as follows.
[0021]
Figure 0003555393
With such an output, the cause of the failure (trigger failure) can be easily recognized from the display and printing of the message for the ripple failure.
[0022]
Therefore, according to the present embodiment, when multiple failures occur, even if there is a deviation in the detection timing of each information, only the trigger failure is recognized and displayed on the screen. The failure information is layered and output, and the operator can reliably recognize the trigger failure from the screen display when multiple failures occur, and can take an appropriate response. In addition, the cause of the failure can be easily recognized from the display and printing of the message.
[0023]
【The invention's effect】
As described above, according to the present invention, failure attribute information such as whether or not the failure becomes a trigger failure is added to the failure information, and a failure that triggers from failure information that arrives at random by this attribute information is defined as the top. Can be recognized and output, and even when multiple faults occur and there is a deviation in the detection timing of each information, only the trigger fault can be output reliably, making it easier to recognize the true cause of the fault. There is.
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a failure information output process according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is an example of a monitoring control system.
[Explanation of symbols]
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Monitor panel 2 ... CRT display 3 ... Printer 4 ... LAN
5 ... power receiving controller 7 ... operation controller 8 ... device

Claims (1)

各種プラント設備の機器等の故障を検出して監視室側に故障情報として伝送し、監視室側で故障情報を出力して操作員に故障状況を知らせる故障情報出力手段を備えた監視制御システムにおいて、
前記故障情報は、他の故障に波及するトリガ故障となり得る故障か否かの属性情報と、故障原因になるトリガ故障が存在する波及故障となり得る故障か否かの属性情報、及び該トリガ故障が存在するならその故障を特定する属性情報を付加して伝送する手段と、
前記属性情報から受信した故障情報が前記トリガ故障又は波及故障でないときに独立故障として故障情報を出力する処理手段と、
前記トリガ故障又は波及故障のときはそれぞれに時限を持たせて他の故障発生に待機するタイマー登録を行い、全タイマーのタイムアップ後に前記属性情報からトリガ故障と波及故障のグルーピングを行い、トリガ故障のみを画面表示し、波及故障はメッセージ表示・印字を行う処理手段とを備えたことを特徴とする監視制御システム。
In a monitoring control system equipped with a failure information output means for detecting a failure of equipment of various plant facilities, transmitting the failure information to the monitoring room, outputting the failure information on the monitoring room side, and notifying an operator of the failure status. ,
The failure information is attribute information on whether or not the failure can be a trigger failure that propagates to another failure, attribute information on whether or not the failure can be a ripple failure in which a trigger failure that causes a failure exists, and Means for transmitting, if present, attribute information specifying the failure;
Processing means for outputting failure information as an independent failure when the failure information received from the attribute information is not the trigger failure or the spread failure,
In the case of the trigger failure or the propagation failure, a timer is provided to give a time limit to each other and wait for the occurrence of another failure. And a processing means for displaying only a message on the screen and displaying / printing a message of the spillover failure.
JP19954897A 1997-07-25 1997-07-25 Monitoring and control system Expired - Fee Related JP3555393B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP19954897A JP3555393B2 (en) 1997-07-25 1997-07-25 Monitoring and control system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP19954897A JP3555393B2 (en) 1997-07-25 1997-07-25 Monitoring and control system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH1145116A JPH1145116A (en) 1999-02-16
JP3555393B2 true JP3555393B2 (en) 2004-08-18

Family

ID=16409665

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP19954897A Expired - Fee Related JP3555393B2 (en) 1997-07-25 1997-07-25 Monitoring and control system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3555393B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100114502A1 (en) * 2008-10-31 2010-05-06 General Electric Company System and method for article monitoring

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3151240B2 (en) * 1991-08-22 2001-04-03 株式会社日立製作所 Alarm processing method and device
JPH07320174A (en) * 1994-05-23 1995-12-08 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Alarm display device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH1145116A (en) 1999-02-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR101424088B1 (en) Nuclear power plant redundancy alarm system using field data collection devices and alarm logic sequence control device
JP3555393B2 (en) Monitoring and control system
CN100367262C (en) Method and device for testing a monitoring function of a bus system and a corresponding bus system
JP2009110086A (en) Monitoring control system
JP3339459B2 (en) Network management system and network management method
JP3390286B2 (en) Signal transfer device of fire indicator in fire alarm system
JP3295872B2 (en) Polling monitoring method
US8135792B2 (en) Dynamic attributing of messages for message escalation
JPH10248095A (en) Installation management system
JPH09284317A (en) Communication control method
JP2584506Y2 (en) Remote monitoring and control device
JPH08305988A (en) Message notifying system
JP2699904B2 (en) Network system
JPH09305880A (en) Monitoring and controlling device
JPH03145348A (en) State change display system
JPH05225479A (en) Advertising tower monitor system
JPH10313312A (en) Network monitoring device
JPH06188887A (en) Line abnormality informing mechanism
JPH0370297A (en) Remote supervisory controller
JPH0646135A (en) Remote concentric alarm monitoring system for exchanger
JPH0417429A (en) Detection suppressing system for fault information in digital transmission network centralized monitoring and controlling system
JP2000351542A (en) Signal transmission device of elevator
JPH0680128U (en) Supervisory control device
JP2001357470A (en) Plant monitoring alarm display device
JPS61243245A (en) Central monitor control system for air-conditioning machine

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20040414

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20040420

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20040503

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090521

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100521

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100521

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110521

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120521

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130521

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140521

Year of fee payment: 10

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees