JP3460332B2 - Manufacturing method of precipitation hardening stainless steel with excellent cold workability and toughness - Google Patents

Manufacturing method of precipitation hardening stainless steel with excellent cold workability and toughness

Info

Publication number
JP3460332B2
JP3460332B2 JP24854294A JP24854294A JP3460332B2 JP 3460332 B2 JP3460332 B2 JP 3460332B2 JP 24854294 A JP24854294 A JP 24854294A JP 24854294 A JP24854294 A JP 24854294A JP 3460332 B2 JP3460332 B2 JP 3460332B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
precipitation hardening
toughness
stainless steel
cold workability
present
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP24854294A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH0885822A (en
Inventor
哲也 清水
智直 竪山
道生 岡部
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Daido Steel Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Daido Steel Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Daido Steel Co Ltd filed Critical Daido Steel Co Ltd
Priority to JP24854294A priority Critical patent/JP3460332B2/en
Publication of JPH0885822A publication Critical patent/JPH0885822A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3460332B2 publication Critical patent/JP3460332B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】この発明はファスナー材,各種シ
ャフト等、耐食性,強度が要求され、且つ溶体化処理
(ST)状態での冷間加工性に優れ、また析出硬化時の
靱延性に優れた析出硬化型ステンレス鋼の製造方法に関
する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The present invention requires fasteners, various shafts, etc., which are required to have corrosion resistance and strength, have excellent cold workability in the solution heat treatment (ST) state, and have excellent toughness and ductility during precipitation hardening. And a method for producing precipitation hardening stainless steel.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術及び発明が解決しようとする課題】耐食性
を損なうことなく強度を高めるために析出硬化を利用し
た析出硬化型のステンレス鋼として、従来、SUS63
0(17Cr−4Ni−4Cu−Nb)が代表的なもの
として広く用いられているが、SUS630の場合、最
も軟らかい状態とされる溶体化処理状態(以下ST状態
とする)での硬さがHRCで35程度と高く、冷間での
加工性が不十分である問題があった。
2. Description of the Related Art SUS63 has been known as a precipitation hardening type stainless steel which utilizes precipitation hardening in order to increase strength without impairing corrosion resistance.
0 (17Cr-4Ni-4Cu-Nb) is widely used as a typical one, but in the case of SUS630, the hardness in the solution treatment state (hereinafter referred to as ST state) which is the softest state is HRC. It was as high as about 35 and there was a problem that cold workability was insufficient.

【0003】そこで鋼中のC,Nを低減することでST
状態での硬さを低くし、以て冷間加工性を高める方法が
提案されている(特開昭56−127754,特開昭6
1−147855)。確かに、鋼中のC,Nを低減する
とST状態での硬さを低下させることができ、また析出
硬化時の硬さを従来通り維持できるものの、このように
単にC,Nを低減しただけの場合、析出硬化時の靱延性
が著しく低くなってしまう問題のあることが本発明者ら
の研究により判明した。
Therefore, by reducing the C and N in the steel, ST
There has been proposed a method of lowering the hardness in the state and thereby improving the cold workability (JP-A-56-127754, JP-A-6-76754).
1-147855). Certainly, if C and N in the steel are reduced, the hardness in the ST state can be reduced and the hardness at the time of precipitation hardening can be maintained as before. However, simply reducing C and N in this way In this case, it was found by the study of the present inventors that there is a problem that the toughness and ductility during precipitation hardening becomes extremely low.

【0004】[0004]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明はこのような事情
を背景としてなされたもので、ST状態での硬さが低い
一方で、析出硬化時の硬さが高く且つ靱延性も高い析出
硬化型ステンレス鋼の製造方法を提供することを目的と
する。而して本願の発明は、溶体化処理を施した後、時
効処理して析出硬化型ステンレス鋼を製造するに際し、
鋼組成を重量%で、C:≦0.030%,Si:≦1.
00%,Mn:≦2.00%,P:≦0.040%,
S:≦0.030%,Cu:1.50〜4.50%,N
i:3.50〜6.50%,Cr:13.0〜19.0
%,Mo:≦2.50%,N:≦0.030%,Nb:
0.10〜0.45%,C+N:≦0.040%,残部
実質的にFeから成る組成となし、且つ前記溶体化処理
を、溶体化処理温度をα℃とし、C+Nをβ%としたと
きに下記式(1)を満たす条件で行うことを特徴とす
る。 α/910−0.6√β≦1.04……(1)
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and has a low hardness in the ST state, a high hardness during precipitation hardening, and a high toughness and ductility. An object of the present invention is to provide a method for producing type stainless steel. Thus, the invention of the present application, after performing solution treatment, when aging treatment to produce precipitation hardening stainless steel,
Steel composition in% by weight, C: ≤ 0.030%, Si: ≤ 1.
00%, Mn: ≤ 2.00%, P: ≤ 0.040%,
S: ≤0.030%, Cu: 1.50 to 4.50%, N
i: 3.50 to 6.50%, Cr: 13.0 to 19.0
%, Mo: ≤ 2.50%, N: ≤ 0.030%, Nb:
0.10 to 0.45%, C + N: ≦ 0.040%, the balance being substantially composed of Fe, and the solution treatment was performed at a solution treatment temperature of α ° C. and C + N of β%. It is characterized in that it is sometimes performed under the condition that the following formula (1) is satisfied. α / 910-0.6√β ≦ 1.04 (1)

【0005】本発明は,C,Nの単独量及び合計量をそ
れぞれ少量に規制するとともに鋼中の各成分のバランス
を適正化し、その上で溶体化処理を所定の条件で行うこ
とを骨子とするものである。より具体的には、C,Nを
低減した上でこれと併せて溶体化処理温度をC,N量に
対して一定の関係を保つように低くするようになしたも
ので、本発明によれば、ST状態での硬さを低下させて
冷間加工性を高め得るとともに、析出硬化時の靱延性を
高く維持することができる。
The present invention has the essence of restricting the individual and total amounts of C and N to small amounts, optimizing the balance of each component in steel, and then performing solution treatment under predetermined conditions. To do. More specifically, after reducing C and N, the solution treatment temperature is also lowered so as to maintain a constant relationship with the amounts of C and N, and according to the present invention. For example, the hardness in the ST state can be lowered to improve the cold workability, and the toughness and ductility during precipitation hardening can be maintained high.

【0006】ここで鋼中の含有成分として上記成分の他
にCa,B,Mg,REMの何れか1種以上をそれぞれ
Ca:0.0005〜0.010%,B:0.0005
〜0.010%,Mg:0.0005〜0.010%,
REM:0.0005〜0.010%の範囲で含有させ
ることが望ましい(請求項2)。このようにすると熱間
加工性をより良好なものとすることができる。
Here, in addition to the above-mentioned components, one or more of Ca, B, Mg, and REM are contained in the steel as Ca: 0.0005 to 0.010% and B: 0.0005, respectively.
~ 0.010%, Mg: 0.0005-0.010%,
REM: It is desirable to contain it in the range of 0.0005 to 0.010% (claim 2). With this, hot workability can be improved.

【0007】次に上記発明における各化学成分及び溶体
化処理条件の限定理由を以下に詳述する。 C:≦0.030% Cはその量が少ないほどST状態での硬さを低くするこ
とができる。そこで本発明では上限を0.030%とし
た。
Next, the reasons for limiting each chemical component and solution treatment condition in the above invention will be described in detail below. C: ≤0.030% The smaller the amount of C, the lower the hardness in the ST state. Therefore, in the present invention, the upper limit is set to 0.030%.

【0008】Si:≦1.00% Siは脱酸剤として有効である。しかしながらその量が
多くなるとδフェライト量を増加させ、時効後の硬さを
低下させるため、他の元素とのバランスをとることが必
要であり、また硬さを増加させるために1.00%以下
とする必要がある。
Si: ≦ 1.00% Si is effective as a deoxidizing agent. However, if the amount increases, the amount of δ-ferrite increases and the hardness after aging decreases, so it is necessary to balance with other elements, and in order to increase the hardness, 1.00% or less And need to.

【0009】Mn:≦2.00% Mnは脱酸剤として有効であり、またδフェライト量を
制御する上で含有量を高めにするのが望ましい。しかし
ながら過剰に添加するとMs点を低下させ過ぎるため、
2.00%以下とする必要がある。
Mn: ≤2.00% Mn is effective as a deoxidizing agent, and it is desirable to increase the content in order to control the amount of δ ferrite. However, adding too much lowers the Ms point too much.
It should be 2.00% or less.

【0010】P:≦0.040% Pは粒界脆化のもととなる成分であり、0.040%以
下とする必要がある。
P: ≤0.040% P is a component that causes grain boundary embrittlement, and it is necessary to set it to 0.040% or less.

【0011】S:≦0.030% Sは耐食性,加工性を低下させるため0.030%以下
とする必要がある。
S: ≤0.030% S is required to be 0.030% or less in order to reduce corrosion resistance and workability.

【0012】Cu:1.50〜4.50% Cuは析出硬化成分として必須の成分であり、1.50
%以上必要である。但し多量の添加は熱間加工性を低下
させるため上限を4.50%とする必要がある。
Cu: 1.50 to 4.50% Cu is an essential component as a precipitation hardening component.
% Or more is required. However, the addition of a large amount lowers the hot workability, so the upper limit must be 4.50%.

【0013】Ni:3.50〜6.50% Niはδフェライト量を制御する作用があり、また熱間
加工時の疵発生を抑制するため3.50%以上必要であ
る。但し過剰の添加はMs点を低下させるため、またコ
スト的にも高価となるため6.50%以下に規制する必
要がある。
Ni: 3.50 to 6.50% Ni has the function of controlling the amount of δ ferrite, and is required to be 3.50% or more in order to suppress the occurrence of flaws during hot working. However, since excessive addition lowers the Ms point and also becomes expensive in terms of cost, it is necessary to control the content to 6.50% or less.

【0014】Cr:13.0〜19.0% Crは耐食性確保のため13.0%以上必要である。但
し多量の添加はδフェライト量を増加させるため、本発
明では19.0%以下とする。
Cr: 13.0 to 19.0% Cr is required to be 13.0% or more to ensure corrosion resistance. However, addition of a large amount increases the amount of δ-ferrite, so in the present invention, it is made 19.0% or less.

【0015】Mo:≦2.50% Moは耐食性をより向上させる上で有効な添加成分であ
る。但し多量に添加するとδフェライト量を増加させる
ため2.50%以下に規制する必要がある。
Mo: ≦ 2.50% Mo is an effective additive component for further improving the corrosion resistance. However, if added in a large amount, the amount of δ-ferrite increases, so it is necessary to regulate it to 2.50% or less.

【0016】N:≦0.030% Nはその量が少なければ少ないほどST状態での硬さを
低くすることができる。そこで本発明ではNを0.03
0%以下に規制している。
N: ≤0.030% The smaller the amount of N, the lower the hardness in the ST state. Therefore, in the present invention, N is 0.03
It is regulated to 0% or less.

【0017】Nb:0.10〜0.45% NbはMs点の調整のため、また特にC,Nを固着化す
るために必要な成分であり、0.10%以上含有させ
る。但し過剰の添加は熱間加工性を害するため0.45
%以下とする。
Nb: 0.10 to 0.45% Nb is a component necessary for adjusting the Ms point, and particularly for fixing C and N, and is contained at 0.10% or more. However, excessive addition impairs hot workability, so 0.45
% Or less.

【0018】C+N:≦0.040% C及びNはそれぞれ含有量が少ないほどST状態での硬
さが低くなる。そこで本発明では合計量で0.040%
以下に規制する。
C + N: ≤0.040% The lower the contents of C and N, the lower the hardness in the ST state. Therefore, in the present invention, the total amount is 0.040%
It regulates to the following.

【0019】 α/910−0.6√β≦1.04……(1) (但し、α:ST温度(℃),β:C+N(%)) 上記のようにC+Nを低減することでST状態での硬さ
を低下することができるが、一方で単にC+N量を低減
しただけであるとH900(480℃)等のピーク時効
に近い領域で靱延性が極端に低下してしまう。しかるに
上記式(1)に従って溶体化処理を行うことで十分な靱
延性を確保することができる。
Α / 910−0.6√β ≦ 1.04 (1) (where, α: ST temperature (° C.), β: C + N (%)) By reducing C + N as described above, ST Although the hardness in the state can be reduced, on the other hand, if the amount of C + N is simply reduced, the toughness and ductility will be extremely reduced in a region near peak aging such as H900 (480 ° C.). However, sufficient toughness and ductility can be ensured by performing the solution treatment according to the above formula (1).

【0020】Ca:0.0005〜0.010% B :0.0005〜0.010% Mg:0.0005〜0.010% REM:0.0005〜0.010% Ca,B,Mg,REMの何れか1種以上を上記範囲で
含有させることで熱間加工性を良好なものとすることが
できる。
Ca: 0.0005 to 0.010% B: 0.0005 to 0.010% Mg: 0.0005 to 0.010% REM: 0.0005 to 0.010% Ca, B, Mg, REM By incorporating any one or more of the above in the above range, the hot workability can be improved.

【0021】[0021]

【実施例】次に本発明の実施例を以下に詳述する。真空
誘導炉で表1に示す各種化学成分の鋼塊150kgを溶
製し、これを熱間鍛造した後、熱間圧延を施して17m
mφのコイル材を製造した。そして熱間鍛造,熱間圧延
の際の致命的な疵の発生の有無を調べ、熱間加工性の評
価を行った。
EXAMPLES Examples of the present invention will be described in detail below. In a vacuum induction furnace, 150 kg of steel ingots of various chemical compositions shown in Table 1 were melted, hot forged, and then hot rolled to 17 m.
An mφ coil material was manufactured. Then, the presence or absence of fatal flaws during hot forging and hot rolling was examined to evaluate the hot workability.

【0022】その後、表2に示す温度条件(α)で溶体
化処理を行い、しかる後H900(480℃)/4hr
−空冷の条件で時効処理を行った。そして溶体化処理状
態で圧縮試験を行い、歪量0.6のときの変形抵抗を求
めて冷間加工性を評価した。更に時効処理後の試料の硬
さを5点平均で求め、併せてJIS4号引張試験を実施
してその特性を評価した。結果が表2に示してある。
Then, solution treatment was performed under the temperature condition (α) shown in Table 2, and then H900 (480 ° C.) / 4 hr.
-Aging treatment was performed under the condition of air cooling. Then, a compression test was performed in the solution heat treatment state, and the deformation resistance when the strain amount was 0.6 was obtained to evaluate the cold workability. Further, the hardness of the sample after the aging treatment was determined on a 5-point average, and the JIS No. 4 tensile test was also performed to evaluate the characteristics. The results are shown in Table 2.

【0023】[0023]

【表1】 [Table 1]

【0024】[0024]

【表2】 [Table 2]

【0025】以上の結果において、化学成分が本発明例
と同様で溶体化処理条件が本発明の範囲から外れた比較
例C1〜C5については、熱間加工性は良好且つST状
態での硬度は低いものの、時効処理後の引張試験の結果
に見られるように、伸び及び絞りの値が本発明例に比べ
て劣っており(引張強度は略同等)、析出硬化時の靱延
性が劣っていることが分かる。
From the above results, in Comparative Examples C1 to C5 in which the chemical components were the same as those of the present invention and the solution treatment conditions were out of the range of the present invention, the hot workability was good and the hardness in the ST state was Although low, as shown in the results of the tensile test after aging treatment, the values of elongation and drawing are inferior to those of the examples of the present invention (tensile strength is almost the same), and the toughness and ductility during precipitation hardening are inferior. I understand.

【0026】またSiが本発明の範囲から外れた比較例
C6、Cuが本発明の範囲から外れた比較例C7の場
合、熱間加工性が悪く、その後の試験に供することがで
きなかった。またNbの添加されていない比較例C8の
場合、析出硬化時の硬さが十分に出ておらず、従ってこ
れも引張試験は省略した。
In Comparative Example C6 in which Si was out of the range of the present invention and Comparative Example C7 in which Cu was out of the range of the present invention, the hot workability was poor and it was not possible to use it for the subsequent test. Further, in the case of Comparative Example C8 to which Nb was not added, the hardness at the time of precipitation hardening was not sufficiently obtained, and therefore the tensile test was also omitted.

【0027】一方、比較例鋼C9(SUS630)の場
合、ST状態での硬度が高くなっており、冷間加工の難
しいものとなっている。また、このSUS630に対し
て本発明例は何れも時効処理時の特性が同等以上となっ
ている。
On the other hand, in the case of the comparative example steel C9 (SUS630), the hardness in the ST state is high, which makes cold working difficult. In addition, in all of the examples of the present invention, the characteristics at the time of aging treatment are equal to or higher than those of SUS630.

【0028】以上本発明の実施例を詳述したがこれはあ
くまで一例示であり、本発明はその主旨を逸脱しない範
囲において種々変更を加えた態様で実施可能である。
The embodiment of the present invention has been described in detail above, but this is merely an example, and the present invention can be implemented in various modifications without departing from the spirit of the present invention.

【0029】[0029]

【発明の効果】上に詳述したように、本発明によれば析
出硬化型ステンレス鋼を製造するに際して、ST状態で
の硬さを低くして冷間加工性を高めることができるとと
もに、析出硬化時の靱延性を高く維持することができ
る。また請求項2によれば、更に加えて熱間加工性を良
好なものとすることができる。
As described above in detail, according to the present invention, when the precipitation hardening stainless steel is manufactured, the hardness in the ST state can be lowered to enhance the cold workability, and the precipitation The toughness and ductility at the time of hardening can be maintained high. Further, according to the second aspect, it is possible to further improve the hot workability.

Claims (2)

(57)【特許請求の範囲】(57) [Claims] 【請求項1】 溶体化処理を施した後、時効処理して析
出硬化型ステンレス鋼を製造するに際し、鋼組成を重量
%で、 C :≦0.030% Si:≦1.00% Mn:≦2.00% P :≦0.040% S :≦0.030% Cu:1.50〜4.50% Ni:3.50〜6.50% Cr:13.0〜19.0% Mo:≦2.50% N :≦0.030% Nb:0.10〜0.45% C+N:≦0.040% 残部実質的にFeから成る組成となし、且つ前記溶体化
処理を、溶体化処理温度をα℃とし、C+Nをβ%とし
たときに下記式(1)を満たす条件で行うことを特徴と
する冷間加工性,靱延性に優れた析出硬化型ステンレス
鋼の製造方法。 α/910−0.6√β≦1.04……(1)
1. When a precipitation hardening stainless steel is produced by subjecting to solution treatment and then aging treatment, the steel composition is expressed in weight% and C: ≤ 0.030% Si: ≤ 1.00% Mn: ≦ 2.00% P: ≦ 0.040% S: ≦ 0.030% Cu: 1.50 to 4.50% Ni: 3.50 to 6.50% Cr: 13.0 to 19.0% Mo : ≤ 2.50% N: ≤ 0.030% Nb: 0.10 to 0.45% C + N: ≤ 0.040% The balance is composed essentially of Fe, and the solution treatment is carried out by solution treatment. A method for producing a precipitation hardening stainless steel excellent in cold workability and toughness and ductility, which is performed under the condition that the following formula (1) is satisfied when the treatment temperature is α ° C. and C + N is β%. α / 910-0.6√β ≦ 1.04 (1)
【請求項2】 請求項1の製造方法において、前記鋼組
成を重量%で、 C :≦0.030% Si:≦1.00% Mn:≦2.00% P :≦0.040% S :≦0.030% Cu:1.50〜4.50% Ni:3.50〜6.50% Cr:13.0〜19.0% Mo:≦2.50% N :≦0.030% Nb:0.10〜0.45% C+N:≦0.040% を含有するとともに、更にCa,B,Mg,REMの1
種以上をそれぞれ Ca:0.0005〜0.010% B :0.0005〜0.010% Mg:0.0005〜0.010% REM:0.0005〜0.010% の範囲で含有し、残部実質的にFeから成る組成とする
ことを特徴とする冷間加工性,靱延性に優れた析出硬化
型ステンレス鋼の製造方法。
2. The manufacturing method according to claim 1, wherein the steel composition is represented by weight%, C: ≦ 0.030% Si: ≦ 1.00% Mn: ≦ 2.00% P: ≦ 0.040% S : ≤ 0.030% Cu: 1.50 to 4.50% Ni: 3.50 to 6.50% Cr: 13.0 to 19.0% Mo: ≤ 2.50% N: ≤ 0.030% Nb: 0.10 to 0.45% C + N: ≦ 0.040%, and further contains 1 of Ca, B, Mg and REM.
Each contains at least Ca: 0.0005 to 0.010% B: 0.0005 to 0.010% Mg: 0.0005 to 0.010% REM: 0.0005 to 0.010%, A method for producing a precipitation hardening stainless steel which is excellent in cold workability and toughness and ductility, characterized in that the balance is composed essentially of Fe.
JP24854294A 1994-09-17 1994-09-17 Manufacturing method of precipitation hardening stainless steel with excellent cold workability and toughness Expired - Fee Related JP3460332B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP24854294A JP3460332B2 (en) 1994-09-17 1994-09-17 Manufacturing method of precipitation hardening stainless steel with excellent cold workability and toughness

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP24854294A JP3460332B2 (en) 1994-09-17 1994-09-17 Manufacturing method of precipitation hardening stainless steel with excellent cold workability and toughness

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH0885822A JPH0885822A (en) 1996-04-02
JP3460332B2 true JP3460332B2 (en) 2003-10-27

Family

ID=17179736

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP24854294A Expired - Fee Related JP3460332B2 (en) 1994-09-17 1994-09-17 Manufacturing method of precipitation hardening stainless steel with excellent cold workability and toughness

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3460332B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2012002383A (en) * 2010-06-14 2012-01-05 Hoshizaki Electric Co Ltd Auger for ice maker

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH0885822A (en) 1996-04-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP3738004B2 (en) Case-hardening steel with excellent cold workability and prevention of coarse grains during carburizing, and its manufacturing method
US6312529B1 (en) Steel compositions and methods of processing for producing cold-formed and carburized components with fine-grained microstructures
JP3587348B2 (en) Machine structural steel with excellent turning workability
JP3242007B2 (en) Ferritic stainless steel for automotive exhaust system members with excellent resistance to oxidation scale peeling
JPH075960B2 (en) Method for manufacturing cold forging steel
JP3460332B2 (en) Manufacturing method of precipitation hardening stainless steel with excellent cold workability and toughness
JPS63216951A (en) Steel for high strength spring
JPS62177152A (en) Spring steel
JP2000119806A (en) Steel wire rod excellent in cold workability, and its manufacture
JP2002146480A (en) Wire rod/steel bar having excellent cold workability, and manufacturing method
JP3387235B2 (en) Precipitation hardening stainless steel
JPS6130653A (en) High strength spring steel
JP4577936B2 (en) Method for producing martensitic stainless steel with excellent strength, ductility and toughness
JPH11106866A (en) Case hardening steel excellent in preventability of coarse grain and its production
JP3446394B2 (en) Precipitation hardening stainless steel
JP2000063947A (en) Manufacture of high strength stainless steel
JP3236756B2 (en) B-containing steel excellent in workability and strength and method for producing forged part made of the B-containing steel
JP7287448B1 (en) Warm forged parts for carburizing and manufacturing method thereof
JP3343505B2 (en) High strength bolt steel with excellent cold workability and delayed fracture resistance and its manufacturing method
JP3033459B2 (en) Manufacturing method of non-heat treated high strength steel
JP3088626B2 (en) Non-heat treated steel for nitriding
JP2701438B2 (en) Manufacturing method of non-tempered free-cutting forged steel with high hot ductility
JPH04210451A (en) High strength and high corrosion resistant stainless steel excellent in cold workability
JPH0860245A (en) Production of steel for bolt excellent in cold workability and delayed fracture resistance
JPH10158779A (en) Cold forging steel

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080815

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080815

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090815

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090815

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100815

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100815

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110815

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110815

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120815

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120815

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130815

Year of fee payment: 10

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees