JP3227721B2 - Method and apparatus for evaluating the performance of a forging lubricant - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for evaluating the performance of a forging lubricant

Info

Publication number
JP3227721B2
JP3227721B2 JP15878091A JP15878091A JP3227721B2 JP 3227721 B2 JP3227721 B2 JP 3227721B2 JP 15878091 A JP15878091 A JP 15878091A JP 15878091 A JP15878091 A JP 15878091A JP 3227721 B2 JP3227721 B2 JP 3227721B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
die
spike
load
performance
metal piece
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP15878091A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH057969A (en
Inventor
幸宏 五十川
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Daido Steel Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Daido Steel Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Daido Steel Co Ltd filed Critical Daido Steel Co Ltd
Priority to JP15878091A priority Critical patent/JP3227721B2/en
Publication of JPH057969A publication Critical patent/JPH057969A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3227721B2 publication Critical patent/JP3227721B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Forging (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、金属とくに鋼の鍛造に
使用する潤滑剤の性能を評価する方法と、その評価の実
施に使用する装置に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method for evaluating the performance of a lubricant used for forging metals, particularly steel, and an apparatus used for carrying out the evaluation.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】鋼などの金属を熱間、温間または冷間で
鍛造して加工するに当り、さまざまな潤滑剤が使用され
ている。 それぞれの場合に最適な潤滑剤を決定するた
めの、潤滑性能の評価方法が種々案出されており、それ
らの中で、リング圧縮試験法、前方押出し法、後方押出
し法などが、実際の鍛造に近い条件で評価できるとし
て、広く行なわれている。 リング圧縮試験法は、材料
と金型の間にある潤滑剤の性能を絶対値で評価できるこ
とが長所であるが、潤滑面上の表面積の拡大比(鍛造に
より生じた新生面を加えた表面積の、旧表面積に対する
比)が高々3程度であり、実用加工における表面積拡大
比が10に及ぶ後方押出などの鍛造に関しては、適切な
評価方法といえない。
2. Description of the Related Art Various lubricants have been used in hot, warm or cold forging and working of metals such as steel. Various methods for evaluating lubrication performance have been devised to determine the optimal lubricant for each case. Among them, the ring compression test method, forward extrusion method, backward extrusion method, etc. It is widely used because it can be evaluated under conditions close to. The advantage of the ring compression test method is that the absolute value of the performance of the lubricant between the material and the mold can be evaluated, but the expansion ratio of the surface area on the lubricated surface (the surface area of the surface added with the new surface generated by forging, The ratio to the old surface area) is at most about 3 and forging such as backward extrusion where the surface area expansion ratio reaches 10 in practical working is not an appropriate evaluation method.

【0003】前方押出し法は、前方押出し時の荷重の大
小と成形後の素材表面の損傷の程度によって判断する方
法で、後者については定性的な評価しかできないという
不満がある。
[0003] The forward extrusion method is a method of judging from the magnitude of the load at the time of forward extrusion and the degree of damage to the material surface after molding, and there is a dissatisfaction that the latter can only be qualitatively evaluated.

【0004】後方押出し法は、それ自体が試験法という
よりも成形方法の一種であり、この方法で成形する場合
の潤滑剤を評価するには、最適の試験方法ということが
できる。 しかし逆に、信頼できる結果を得ようとする
と実際の加工に使用する工具を使用すべきことになっ
て、工具製作の費用がかさむことや繰り返し試験におけ
る再現性という点で、採用しやすい評価方法とはいえな
い。
[0004] The backward extrusion method itself is a kind of molding method rather than a test method, and can be said to be an optimal test method for evaluating a lubricant when molded by this method. However, on the other hand, in order to obtain reliable results, tools to be used for actual machining should be used, which is an easy-to-use evaluation method in terms of increased tool manufacturing costs and reproducibility in repeated tests. Not really.

【0005】[0005]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】本発明の目的は、鍛造
に用いる潤滑剤の評価技術を高め、繰り返し試験が容易
であって再現性が高く、表面積拡大比を実用条件に近く
とることができ、かつ潤滑剤性能を定量的に評価できる
技術を確立することにある。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is an object of the present invention to improve the evaluation technology of a lubricant used in forging, to make it easy to repeat a test, to obtain high reproducibility, and to make the surface area expansion ratio close to practical conditions. And a technique for quantitatively evaluating lubricant performance.

【0006】[0006]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明の金属の鍛造に使
用する潤滑剤の性能を評価する方法は、図1および図2
に示すように、水平面に対して小さく傾斜した上方ロー
ト部分と大きく傾斜した下方ロート部分とがアールをつ
けた移行部分により接続されたロート状の内面形状を有
するダイに円柱状の金属片をのせ、潤滑剤の適用下に荷
重をかけてこの金属片をダイに押し込んで成形すること
によりダイ形状に従うスパイクを形成したのち、成形さ
れた金属片を押し込み方向と逆の方向から突き出す操作
を行ない、一定の押込量を達成するのに要した荷重、形
成されたスパイクの高さおよび突き出しに要する荷重と
の値にもとづいて潤滑剤の性能を決定することからな
る。
The method for evaluating the performance of a lubricant used for forging a metal according to the present invention is shown in FIGS.
As shown in the figure, a cylindrical metal piece is placed on a die having a funnel-shaped inner surface shape in which an upper funnel part slightly inclined with respect to the horizontal plane and a lower funnel part greatly inclined are connected by a transition part with a radius. After applying a load under application of a lubricant, pressing the metal piece into the die to form a spike according to the die shape, and then performing an operation of projecting the formed metal piece from a direction opposite to the pressing direction, It consists in determining the performance of the lubricant based on the values of the load required to achieve a certain indentation, the height of the formed spikes and the load required for protrusion.

【0007】本発明の鍛造用潤滑剤の性能を評価する装
置は、ロート状の内面形状をもつダイ(1)、このダイ
に金属片(7A)を押し込んでスパイク(71)を形成
させる押込ヘッド(2)、および形成されたスパイクを
有する成形品(7B)をスパイク先端から突き出すエジ
ェクターピン(3)を圧縮試験機の機構に組み込んでな
り、ダイの内面形状は水平面に対して小さく傾斜した上
方ロート部分(11)と大きく傾斜した下方ロート部分
(12)とがアールをつけた移行部分(13)により接
続された形状であり、押込ヘッド(2)は金属片に接す
る表面に同心円状の溝を多数設けてあり、押込ヘッドの
加工荷重を測定するロードセル(4)に加えて、エジェ
クターピンの突出荷重を測定するロードセル(5)をそ
なえた装置である。
An apparatus for evaluating the performance of a forging lubricant according to the present invention comprises a die (1) having a funnel-shaped inner surface, and a pressing head for pressing a metal piece (7A) into the die to form a spike (71). (2) and an ejector pin (3) for projecting the molded article (7B) having the formed spike from the tip of the spike is incorporated in the mechanism of the compression testing machine, and the inner surface shape of the die is slightly inclined upward with respect to the horizontal plane. The funnel part (11) and the greatly inclined lower funnel part (12) are connected by a rounded transition part (13), and the pushing head (2) has a concentric groove on the surface in contact with the metal piece. And a load cell (5) for measuring a projecting load of an ejector pin in addition to a load cell (4) for measuring a processing load of a pressing head.

【0008】図2にみるダイの形状において、水平面に
対して小さく傾斜したロート部分の傾きを角θ2で、大
きく傾斜したロート部分の傾斜を垂直面に対する傾きの
角θ1で、また移行部分のアールの値をRであらわす
と、それぞれ下記の範囲が好適である。 θ2=1〜15°、とくに10° θ1=1〜5°、と
くに3° R=0.5〜10mm
In the shape of the die shown in FIG. 2, the inclination of the funnel portion inclined at a small angle with respect to the horizontal plane is represented by an angle θ 2 , the inclination of the funnel portion having a large inclination is represented by an angle of inclination θ 1 with respect to the vertical plane, and the transition portion is formed. When the value of R is represented by R, the following ranges are preferable. θ 2 = 1 to 15 °, especially 10 ° θ 1 = 1 to 5 °, especially 3 ° R = 0.5 to 10 mm

【0009】[0009]

【作用】図3の上部に示すように本発明に従って押込試
験を行なったとき、潤滑剤(8)が有効に作用すると、
金属片(7A)はダイ(1)のロート状の面を小さい摩
擦で滑りながら変形して行くから、同図左下にみるよう
に高いスパイク(71)が形成され、潤滑剤があまり働
かないと、同図右下にみるように、金属片は単に押し潰
されて横方向にはみ出した形になり、スパイク(71)
の高さは相対的に低い。 従って、潤滑性能は形成され
たスパイクの高さによっても評価できる。次に、エジェ
クターで突き出すときに要する荷重がどうであるかもま
た、潤滑剤の性能のひとつである。
When the indentation test is performed according to the present invention as shown in the upper part of FIG. 3, when the lubricant (8) works effectively,
Since the metal piece (7A) is deformed while sliding on the funnel-shaped surface of the die (1) with a small friction, a high spike (71) is formed as shown in the lower left of FIG. As shown in the lower right part of the figure, the metal piece is simply crushed into a shape protruding laterally, and the spike (71)
Is relatively low. Therefore, the lubrication performance can also be evaluated by the height of the formed spike. Next, the load required when ejecting with the ejector is also one of the properties of the lubricant.

【0010】ダイの形状が上記の原理による潤滑性能の
評価にとって重要であること、容易に理解されるとおり
であって、とくに前記の角度θ1は、スパイクの成長の
あり方を規定するものであるから、適切に定めなければ
ならない。 その点については、後に実施例に関して述
べる。
It is easily understood that the shape of the die is important for the evaluation of the lubricating performance according to the above principle. In particular, the angle θ 1 defines how the spikes grow. Therefore, it must be determined appropriately. This will be described later with reference to the embodiment.

【0011】なお、押込ヘッド表面の同心円状の溝は、
金属片の横方向への拡がりを防ぎ、スパイクの形成を助
長するのに役立つのであって、そのこともまた、容易に
理解されるとおりである。
The concentric grooves on the surface of the pushing head are
It helps prevent the metal pieces from spreading laterally and helps to form spikes, which is also readily apparent.

【0012】[0012]

【実施例】上述したダイ形状とくにθ1の決定に関し
て、つぎの条件の実験を数値解析により行なった。
Respect decisions EXAMPLES die shape and country theta 1 described above was carried out by numerical analysis the experiment following conditions.

【0013】θ1=1°,3°,5°、θ2=10°(一
定)、R=5mm 剪断摩擦係数=0.0,0.15,0.30,0.6
0,0.90 被加工金属:SUS304およびDSK2U(大同特殊
鋼の鋼種記号で、AISIのSUSXM7に相当する冷
間塑性加工用ステンレス鋼) 試験片:径25mm×高さ30mm 押込み量:金型ギャップ(Lg)3.4mmまで 数値解析のためのデータとして、上記2種の金属につい
て、温度200℃および400℃において行なった圧縮
試験の応力ー歪み曲線のデータを使用した。
Θ 1 = 1 °, 3 °, 5 °, θ 2 = 10 ° (constant), R = 5 mm Shear friction coefficient = 0.0, 0.15, 0.30, 0.6
0,0.90 Metal to be processed: SUS304 and DSK2U (Stainless steel for cold plastic working equivalent to SUSXM7 of AISI, steel symbol of Daido Specialty Steel) Test piece: diameter 25 mm x height 30 mm Pressing amount: mold gap (Lg) up to 3.4 mm As the data for the numerical analysis, the data of the stress-strain curve of the compression test conducted at 200 ° C. and 400 ° C. for the above two metals was used.

【0014】得られたスパイク高さ(Hs)と押込荷重
との関係を、各剪断摩擦係数においてプロットすると図
4のとおりである。 この結果から、剪断摩擦係数の大
小がよくスパイク高さの変化に反映して潤滑性能の評価
に好都合であるダイ形状としてはθ2=3°が最適であ
るとの結論に至った。
FIG. 4 is a plot of the relationship between the obtained spike height (Hs) and the indentation load with respect to each shear friction coefficient. From these results, it was concluded that θ 2 = 3 ° is the most suitable die shape for which the magnitude of the shear friction coefficient reflects the change in spike height and is convenient for evaluating the lubrication performance.

【0015】そこで、θ2=3°のダイを製作して、図
1に示した試験装置を組み立てた。被加工金属として上
記のDSK2Uを用い、径25mm×高さ30mmの試験片
に加工した。 それらの下面に、表1の潤滑被膜を塗布
して乾燥し、または塗布せず、表2の補助潤滑油と組み
合わせ使用した。
Therefore, a die of θ 2 = 3 ° was manufactured, and the test apparatus shown in FIG. 1 was assembled. Using the above DSK2U as a metal to be processed, it was processed into a test piece having a diameter of 25 mm and a height of 30 mm. On their lower surfaces, the lubricating coatings of Table 1 were applied and dried or not applied, and used in combination with the auxiliary lubricating oils of Table 2.

【0016】 表1 潤滑被膜 成 分 A MoS2(粉末のアルコール分散ぺースト) B K2SO4(水溶液) 押込試験は、表3に示した潤滑被膜−補助潤滑剤の組
み合わせで、試験片温度200℃,400℃および50
0℃において行なった。 金型ギャップLgは、2.7
3mmである。
Table 1 Lubricating coating composition A MoS 2 (paste of alcohol dispersion of powder) BK 2 SO 4 (aqueous solution) The indentation test was performed using the combinations of the lubricating film and the auxiliary lubricant shown in Table 3 at 200 ° C, 400 ° C and 50 ° C.
Performed at 0 ° C. The mold gap Lg is 2.7
3 mm.

【0017】 表3 潤滑被膜 補助潤滑剤 No. な し な し II III 1 ○ ○ 2 ○ ○ 3 ○ ○ 4 ○ ○ 5 ○ ○ 6 ○ ○ 7 ○ ○ 8 ○ ○ 400℃における押込荷重とスパイク高さの関係を図5
に、押込荷重とエジェクター荷重との関係を図6にそれ
ぞれ示す。 この結果から、DSK2Uの温間の鍛造に
はMoS2系の潤滑剤が適切であり、補助潤滑剤なしに
単独で使用するのがよいと結論された。 低い荷重でも
高いスパイクが形成できることから、材料と鍛造金型の
間の加工時の滑りがよく、またエジェクター荷重が低い
ことから、成形後の金型と成形品の間の焼付きがなく残
存被膜量が多いことがわかるからである。
[0017] Table 3 lubricating coating auxiliary lubricant No. teeth A B None I II III 1 ○ ○ 2 ○ ○ 3 ○ ○ 4 ○ ○ 5 ○ ○ 6 ○ ○ 7 ○ ○ 8 ○ ○ 400 indentation load at ℃ Fig. 5 shows the relationship between
FIG. 6 shows the relationship between the indentation load and the ejector load. From these results, it was concluded that MoS 2 -based lubricant is appropriate for warm forging of DSK2U, and that it is better to use it alone without an auxiliary lubricant. A high spike can be formed even with a low load, so good slippage occurs during processing between the material and the forging die. Also, since the ejector load is low, there is no seizure between the die and the molded product after molding, leaving a residual coating. This is because the amount is large.

【0018】実際、DSK2Uの後方押出し成形にこの
潤滑剤を使用したところ、他の潤滑剤を使用したときよ
り外観の美しい成形品が得られた。
In fact, when this lubricant was used for backward extrusion of DSK2U, a molded article having a more beautiful appearance was obtained than when other lubricants were used.

【0019】[比較例]前記No.1〜8の各組み合わせ
について、リング圧縮試験法(据込み率55%)による
潤滑剤性能の試験を行なったところ、図7に示す結果を
得た。 図のデータによれば、本発明の試験法と実用化
工において好成績をおさめたNo.7が剪断摩擦係数が高
く、他の潤滑剤に対して優位にあるという評価が与えら
れないことになる。
[Comparative Example] When the lubricant performance was tested for each of the combinations 1 to 8 by the ring compression test method (55% upsetting), the results shown in FIG. 7 were obtained. According to the data in the figure, the test method of the present invention and the No. 1 which achieved a good result in the practical application were obtained. No. 7 has a high coefficient of shear friction and cannot be evaluated as being superior to other lubricants.

【0020】[0020]

【発明の効果】本発明の潤滑剤性能評価方法によれば、
実用的な加工条件に近い条件の下に鍛造を行なって性能
を評価できるから、従来の諸方法より適確な結論が出せ
る。使用する装置は、とりたてて構造が複雑になるわけ
でなく、工具も1種類で広範囲の金属や潤滑剤に共通に
使用できるから、コストが嵩むことはない。
According to the lubricant performance evaluation method of the present invention,
Performance can be evaluated by forging under conditions close to practical working conditions, so that more accurate conclusions can be made than conventional methods. The apparatus to be used does not have a complicated structure, and a single tool can be used commonly for a wide range of metals and lubricants, so that the cost does not increase.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】 本発明の鍛造用潤滑剤の性能評価装置につい
て、主要部の構成を示す縦断面図。
FIG. 1 is a longitudinal sectional view showing a configuration of a main part of a performance evaluation device for a forging lubricant of the present invention.

【図2】 図1の装置の、ダイの部分の詳細を示す縦断
面図。
FIG. 2 is a longitudinal sectional view showing details of a die portion of the apparatus of FIG. 1;

【図3】 図1の装置を用いて鍛造(押込成形)を行な
ったときの金属片の、剪断摩擦係数の差によるスパイク
形成の状況を示す断面図。
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view showing a state of spike formation due to a difference in a shear friction coefficient of a metal piece when forging (injection molding) is performed using the apparatus of FIG.

【図4】 ダイ形状決定のために行なった数値解析によ
る、スパイク高さと押込荷重の関係をプロットしたグラ
フ。
FIG. 4 is a graph plotting the relationship between spike height and indentation load by numerical analysis performed to determine a die shape.

【図5】 本発明の実施例のデータであって、スパイク
高さと押込荷重の関係を示すグラフ。
FIG. 5 is a graph showing the relationship between spike height and indentation load, which is data of the example of the present invention.

【図6】 やはり実施例のデータであって、突出荷重と
押込荷重の関係を示すグラフ。
FIG. 6 is a graph showing the relationship between the protruding load and the indentation load, which is also data of the example.

【図7】 比較例のデータであって、リング圧縮試験法
により様々な潤滑剤を評価したときの、剪断摩擦係数と
温度の関係を示すグラフ。
FIG. 7 is a graph showing the relationship between the shear friction coefficient and the temperature when various lubricants were evaluated by the ring compression test method, which is data of a comparative example.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1 ダイ 11 上方ロート部分 12 下方ロート部分 13
移行部 2 押込ヘッド 3 エジェクターピン 4 ロードセル(押込荷重測定用) 5 ロードセル(突出荷重測定用) 7A 金属試験片 7B 成形品 71 スパイク 8 潤滑剤 Lg 金型ギャップ Hs スパイク高さ
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Die 11 Upper funnel part 12 Lower funnel part 13
Transition part 2 Push head 3 Ejector pin 4 Load cell (for measuring push load) 5 Load cell (for measuring protrusion load) 7A Metal test piece 7B Molded product 71 Spike 8 Lubricant Lg Mold gap Hs Spike height

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (58)調査した分野(Int.Cl.7,DB名) B21J 3/00,13/02 G01N 3/40 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────続 き Continued on the front page (58) Field surveyed (Int. Cl. 7 , DB name) B21J 3/00, 13/02 G01N 3/40

Claims (2)

(57)【特許請求の範囲】(57) [Claims] 【請求項1】 金属の鍛造に使用する潤滑剤の性能を評
価する方法であって、水平面に対して小さく傾斜した上
方ロート部分と大きく傾斜した下方ロート部分とがアー
ルをつけた移行部分により接続されたロート状の内面形
状を有するダイに円柱状の金属片をのせ、潤滑剤の適用
下に荷重をかけてこの金属片をダイに押し込んで成形す
ることによりダイ形状に従うスパイクを形成したのち、
成形された金属片を押し込み方向と逆の方向から突き出
す操作を行ない、一定の押込量を達成するのに要した荷
重、形成されたスパイクの高さおよび突き出しに要する
荷重との値にもとづいて潤滑剤の性能を決定することか
らなる方法。
1. A method for evaluating the performance of a lubricant used for forging a metal, wherein an upper funnel portion slightly inclined with respect to a horizontal plane and a lower funnel portion greatly inclined with respect to a horizontal plane are connected by a curved transition portion. After placing a cylindrical metal piece on a die having a funnel-shaped inner surface shape, applying a load under the application of a lubricant, pressing the metal piece into the die, forming a spike according to the die shape,
Perform the operation of pushing out the formed metal piece from the direction opposite to the pushing direction, and lubricate based on the value required to achieve a constant pushing amount, the height of the formed spike, and the load required for projecting A method comprising determining the performance of an agent.
【請求項2】 金属の鍛造に使用する潤滑剤の性能を評
価する装置であって、ロート状の内面形状をもつダイ
(1)、このダイに金属片(7A)を押し込んでスパイ
ク(71)を形成させる押込ヘッド(2)、および形成
されたスパイクを有する成形品(7B)をスパイク先端
から突き出すエジェクターピン(3)を圧縮試験機の機
構に組み込んでなり、ダイの内面形状は水平面に対して
小さく傾斜した上方ロート部分(11)と大きく傾斜し
た下方ロート部分(12)とがアールをつけた移行部分
(13)により接続された形状であり、押込ヘッドは金
属片に接する表面に同心円状の溝を多数設けてあり、押
込ヘッドの加工荷重を測定するロードセル(4)に加え
て、エジェクターピンの突出荷重を測定するロードセル
(5)をそなえた装置。
2. An apparatus for evaluating the performance of a lubricant used for metal forging, comprising: a die (1) having a funnel-shaped inner surface shape; and a metal piece (7A) pushed into the die to spike (71). A press head (2) for forming a spike, and an ejector pin (3) for projecting a molded product (7B) having the formed spike from the tip of the spike are incorporated in a mechanism of a compression tester, and the inner surface shape of the die with respect to a horizontal plane The upper and lower funnels (11) and (12) are connected by a rounded transition (13), and the pushing head is concentric with the surface in contact with the metal piece. Device equipped with a load cell (5) for measuring the projecting load of the ejector pin in addition to the load cell (4) for measuring the processing load of the pushing head. .
JP15878091A 1991-06-28 1991-06-28 Method and apparatus for evaluating the performance of a forging lubricant Expired - Lifetime JP3227721B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP15878091A JP3227721B2 (en) 1991-06-28 1991-06-28 Method and apparatus for evaluating the performance of a forging lubricant

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP15878091A JP3227721B2 (en) 1991-06-28 1991-06-28 Method and apparatus for evaluating the performance of a forging lubricant

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH057969A JPH057969A (en) 1993-01-19
JP3227721B2 true JP3227721B2 (en) 2001-11-12

Family

ID=15679173

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP15878091A Expired - Lifetime JP3227721B2 (en) 1991-06-28 1991-06-28 Method and apparatus for evaluating the performance of a forging lubricant

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3227721B2 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007051920A (en) * 2005-08-17 2007-03-01 Daido Steel Co Ltd Lubricant evaluation method
JP2010094731A (en) * 2008-10-20 2010-04-30 Nippon Parkerizing Co Ltd Method and device for evaluating lubricating film for forging
WO2011001653A1 (en) 2009-06-29 2011-01-06 日本パーカライジング株式会社 Water-based lubricant for plastic processing having excellent corrosion resistance and metal material having excellent plastic processability
WO2015005142A1 (en) 2013-07-10 2015-01-15 日本パーカライジング株式会社 Aqueous lubricant for plastic working of metal material and having superior gas clogging resistance and post-moisture absorption workability
WO2015060121A1 (en) 2013-10-22 2015-04-30 日本パーカライジング株式会社 Non-phosphorus chemical conversion treatment agent and treatment liquid for plastic working, chemical conversion coating, and metal material having chemical conversion coating
JP7014011B2 (en) 2018-03-30 2022-02-01 株式会社アイシン Sunroof device

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
TW588108B (en) 2000-08-07 2004-05-21 Nihon Parkerizing Aqueous lubricant for plastic working of metallic material and method for forming lubricant film
JP2003055682A (en) 2001-08-17 2003-02-26 Nippon Parkerizing Co Ltd Protective film treating agent and metallic material having protective film
JP2008207252A (en) * 2008-04-21 2008-09-11 Showa Denko Kk Forging method, die for forging, and forged product
US9840750B2 (en) 2011-09-22 2017-12-12 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation Medium carbon steel sheet for cold working and method for manufacturing the same

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
T.altan外2名著、「Battelle Topical Report No.10」BATTELLE Columbus Laboratories、米国(1982年8月)、p.8−9

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007051920A (en) * 2005-08-17 2007-03-01 Daido Steel Co Ltd Lubricant evaluation method
JP4655818B2 (en) * 2005-08-17 2011-03-23 大同特殊鋼株式会社 Lubricant evaluation method
JP2010094731A (en) * 2008-10-20 2010-04-30 Nippon Parkerizing Co Ltd Method and device for evaluating lubricating film for forging
WO2011001653A1 (en) 2009-06-29 2011-01-06 日本パーカライジング株式会社 Water-based lubricant for plastic processing having excellent corrosion resistance and metal material having excellent plastic processability
US8507416B2 (en) 2009-06-29 2013-08-13 Henkel Ag & Co. Kgaa Water-based lubricant for plastic processing having excellent corrosion resistance and metal material having excellent plastic processability
WO2015005142A1 (en) 2013-07-10 2015-01-15 日本パーカライジング株式会社 Aqueous lubricant for plastic working of metal material and having superior gas clogging resistance and post-moisture absorption workability
US10472585B2 (en) 2013-07-10 2019-11-12 Nihon Parkerizing Co., Ltd. Aqueous lubricant for plastic working of metal material and having superior gas clogging resistance and post-moisture absorption workability
WO2015060121A1 (en) 2013-10-22 2015-04-30 日本パーカライジング株式会社 Non-phosphorus chemical conversion treatment agent and treatment liquid for plastic working, chemical conversion coating, and metal material having chemical conversion coating
US10787578B2 (en) 2013-10-22 2020-09-29 Henkel Ag & Co. Kgaa Non-phosphorus chemical conversion treatment agent and treatment liquid for plastic working, chemical conversion film, and metal material with chemical conversion film
JP7014011B2 (en) 2018-03-30 2022-02-01 株式会社アイシン Sunroof device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH057969A (en) 1993-01-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP3227721B2 (en) Method and apparatus for evaluating the performance of a forging lubricant
Buschhausen et al. Evaluation of lubrication and friction in cold forging using a double backward-extrusion process
US6418795B2 (en) Method of measuring shear friction factor through backward extrusion process
Hu et al. A novel method for determining friction in cold forging of complex parts using a steady combined forward and backward extrusion test
Isogawa et al. Proposal of an evaluating method on lubrication
CN103278445A (en) Positive extrusion test method for plastic forming friction coefficient and friction factor
Wagoner et al. Development of OSU formability test and OSU friction test
JP5091831B2 (en) Lubricating film evaluation method for forging and lubricating film evaluation apparatus for forging
CN103776989B (en) Device and method for detecting conical forging lubricating effect
Ettouney et al. An approximate model to calculate foldover and strains during cold upsetting of cylinders Part II: Use of the foldover model to estimate friction
CN103163065B (en) Cold extrusion lubricating effect detecting device and detecting method
CN106370593B (en) Friction factor measuring method towards complicated large deformation
Ariff Evaluation of Rbd Palm Oil as Lubricant
Srivastava et al. Analysis of friction factor & coefficient of friction using ring compression test under various lubricants
Bay et al. Simulation of friction and lubrication in cold forging
Hummel et al. Threshold galling load and frictional behavior of stainless steel couples in line contact
Stoudt et al. Evaluating the relationships between surface roughness and friction behavior during metal forming
Kitamura et al. Evaluation of galling prevention properties of cold forging lubricants by ball penetration test
RU2327144C1 (en) Method of determination of efficiency of technological lubricant in sheet-metal stamping
JP5920974B2 (en) Lubricating film evaluation method for plastic working and lubricating film evaluating apparatus for plastic working
JPS6373134A (en) Method of testing friction lubrication
JP6323142B2 (en) Wear evaluation test method for hot forging dies
Ling et al. On model studies of metallic surface asperities
Georges et al. Effect of wear particles on the contact of unlubricated sliding metals
JP4259337B2 (en) Performance evaluation method and equipment for lubricant for forging

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080907

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090907

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090907

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100907

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100907

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110907

Year of fee payment: 10

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term