JP2734282B2 - Percussion equipment for building finishing materials - Google Patents

Percussion equipment for building finishing materials

Info

Publication number
JP2734282B2
JP2734282B2 JP4077664A JP7766492A JP2734282B2 JP 2734282 B2 JP2734282 B2 JP 2734282B2 JP 4077664 A JP4077664 A JP 4077664A JP 7766492 A JP7766492 A JP 7766492A JP 2734282 B2 JP2734282 B2 JP 2734282B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
sound
striking
crest factor
tile
impact
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP4077664A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH05281202A (en
Inventor
康夫 井上
滋 平野
好人 縄岡
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
OOBAYASHIGUMI KK
Original Assignee
OOBAYASHIGUMI KK
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by OOBAYASHIGUMI KK filed Critical OOBAYASHIGUMI KK
Priority to JP4077664A priority Critical patent/JP2734282B2/en
Publication of JPH05281202A publication Critical patent/JPH05281202A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP2734282B2 publication Critical patent/JP2734282B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】この発明は、建築物の外壁タイル
などをハンマのようなもので打撃し、そのときの打撃音
からタイルの接着状態の良否(剥離があるか否か)を判
定する作業を自動化、機械化する建築物仕上げ材の打診
装置に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention hits an outer wall tile of a building with a hammer or the like, and judges the adhesion state of the tile (whether or not there is peeling) from the sound of the hit at that time. The present invention relates to a percussion device for building finishing materials that automates and mechanizes work.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】壁面のタイル剥離などを検査する打診作
業は、一般には、検査員が全く手作業で感覚的に行って
いる。熟練した検査員は非常に信頼性の高い打診を行う
ことができるが、そのような正確な打診をいわゆる検査
ロボットにより自動化するための技術開発が進められて
いる。
2. Description of the Related Art In general, percussion work for inspecting a wall for peeling of a tile is performed by an inspector sensuously by hand. Skilled inspectors can perform extremely reliable percussion, but technical development is underway to automate such accurate percussion using a so-called inspection robot.

【0003】この種打診装置は、検査しようとする建築
物の壁面などを適宜なアクチュエータによって駆動され
るハンマ状のもので局部的に打撃する打撃手段と、その
打撃によって生じる打撃音を採取するマイクロホンと、
このマイクロホンによって得られた打撃音の振動波形を
分析する信号処理手段とを基本的に備えている。
This kind of percussion device is a hammer-shaped device that locally strikes a wall or the like of a building to be inspected with a hammer driven by an appropriate actuator, and a microphone that collects a striking sound generated by the impact. When,
It basically comprises signal processing means for analyzing the vibration waveform of the striking sound obtained by the microphone.

【0004】特公平2−54903号公報に開示された
装置では、タイルの接着状態が良好な健全壁面から得ら
れた打撃音の周波数スペクトルを基準として設定してお
き、その基準特性と他の部分で得られた打撃音のスペク
トル特性とを比較してタイルの剥離箇所を検出しようと
している。また特開昭63−168555号公報の技術
では打撃音の減衰特性に着目し、剥離のない健全部位か
ら得た減衰特性を基準とし、その基準特性と他の部分の
打撃音の減衰特性とを比較し、剥離部位を検出しようと
している。
In the apparatus disclosed in Japanese Patent Publication No. 2-54903, the frequency spectrum of a striking sound obtained from a sound wall having a good adhesion state of a tile is set as a reference, and its reference characteristics and other parts are set. Attempts are made to detect the peeling portion of the tile by comparing with the spectral characteristics of the striking sound obtained in (1). In the technique of Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 63-168555, attention is paid to the damping characteristics of the striking sound, and the damping characteristics obtained from a healthy part without peeling are used as a reference. In comparison, we are trying to detect the peeled part.

【0005】[0005]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】打撃音の周波数スペク
トル特性を指標として判定を行う方式も、打撃音の減衰
特性を指標として判定を行う方式も、熟練した検査員が
総合的な聴感で行うような信頼性の高い検査を行えない
という問題があった。特に問題なのは、従来の2つの方
式のいずれも、剥離のない健全な壁面の打撃音から得た
周波数スペクトル特性あるいは減衰特性を基準データと
して設定し、それと他の部位から得たデータとを比較し
て良否を判定するのであるが、基準データの採取条件と
実際の試験データの採取条件を常に等価にして比較判定
するのは非常に困難なことである。例えば、タイルの中
央部分を打撃したときと縁部を打撃したときとでは、打
撃音は相当異なるし、ハンマ状のものによる打撃の加え
方が微妙に異なると打撃音も変わる。このような変動要
因に影響されずに、健全部位で得た基準データと多くの
部分で採取する実際の試験データとの比較条件を等価に
するのは非常に困難である。また検査対象によっては、
健全部位と剥離部位とで打撃音の周波数スペクトル特性
あるいは減衰特性に大きな差を生じることもあるが、微
妙な特性差しか得られない場合も多く、したがって信頼
性の高い検査を実現することができなかった。
Both the method of making a judgment using the frequency spectrum characteristic of a striking sound as an index and the method of making a judgment using the attenuation characteristic of a striking sound as an index are performed by a skilled inspector with comprehensive hearing. There is a problem that a highly reliable inspection cannot be performed. What is particularly problematic is that in each of the two conventional methods, the frequency spectrum characteristic or attenuation characteristic obtained from the sound of a sound wall without separation is set as reference data, and it is compared with data obtained from other parts. However, it is very difficult to always compare and determine the sampling conditions of the reference data and the sampling conditions of the actual test data while always making them equal. For example, the striking sound is considerably different between when the center portion of the tile is struck and when the edge portion is struck, and the striking sound changes when the hammer-like striking is slightly different. It is very difficult to make the comparison conditions between the reference data obtained in the healthy part and the actual test data collected in many parts equivalent, without being affected by such fluctuation factors. Also, depending on the inspection target,
Although there may be a large difference in the frequency spectrum characteristics or attenuation characteristics of the impact sound between a healthy part and a peeled part, there are many cases where only subtle characteristics can be obtained, so that a highly reliable inspection can be realized. Did not.

【0006】この発明は前述した従来の問題点に鑑みな
されたもので、その目的は、マイクロホンなどで採取し
た打撃音の振動波形を分析することで仕上げ材の接着状
態の良否を判定する打診装置の信頼性を高めることにあ
る。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention has been made in consideration of the above-mentioned conventional problems, and has as its object to analyze the vibration waveform of a striking sound collected by a microphone or the like to determine the quality of the bonded state of the finishing material. To increase the reliability of

【0007】[0007]

【課題を解決するための手段】そこでこの発明の打診装
置では、建築物の壁面などを局部的に打撃する打撃手段
と、その打撃によって生じる打撃音の振動波形を検出す
る電気音響変換手段と、この電気音響変換手段によって
得られた前記打撃音の振動波形の波高率を求める信号処
理手段とを備え、求めた波高率を指標として打撃部位の
仕上げ材の接着状態の良否を判定する構成とした。
Therefore, in the percussion apparatus of the present invention, a percussion means for locally hitting a wall or the like of a building, an electroacoustic conversion means for detecting a vibration waveform of a percussion sound generated by the percussion, Signal processing means for obtaining a crest factor of the vibration waveform of the impact sound obtained by the electroacoustic conversion means, and determining whether the bonding state of the finishing material at the impact site is good or bad using the obtained crest factor as an index. .

【0008】[0008]

【作用】周知のように、波高率とは振動波形の波高最大
値を実効値で割った値であり、波形の尖鋭さを表わす。
正弦波の波高値は1.414(ルート2)であり、三角
波の波高値は1.732(ルート3)であり、交流方形
波の波高値は1である。インパルス状の尖鋭な波形にな
るほど波高値が大きくなる。
As is well known, the crest factor is a value obtained by dividing the maximum value of the peak of the vibration waveform by the effective value, and represents the sharpness of the waveform.
The peak value of the sine wave is 1.414 (route 2), the peak value of the triangular wave is 1.732 (route 3), and the peak value of the AC square wave is 1. The peak value becomes larger as the impulse-like waveform becomes sharper.

【0009】本発明者らは数々の現場で試験を行った結
果、壁面の健全部位から発生する打撃音の振動波形の波
高値は約2.5以上と大きく、接着不良部位から発生す
る打撃音の振動波形の波高値は約2以下と小さいことを
発見した。特に、壁面の仕上げ材の種類によらず、健全
部位と不良部位とでは打撃音の波高率に明らかな差があ
り、しかも健全部位の波高率と不良部位の波高率との相
対比較からだけではなくて、波高率の絶対値からも健全
部位と不良部位を弁別することが可能であることを見い
だした。
The inventors of the present invention have conducted tests at various sites, and as a result, the peak value of the vibration waveform of the impact sound generated from the sound wall is as large as about 2.5 or more. It was found that the peak value of the vibration waveform was as small as about 2 or less. In particular, regardless of the type of wall surface finishing material, there is a clear difference in the crest factor of the impact sound between the healthy part and the defective part. Instead, it was found that it was possible to discriminate between a healthy part and a defective part from the absolute value of the crest factor.

【0010】[0010]

【実施例】図1はこの発明の一実施例による打診装置の
概略構成を示している。打撃装置1はハンマ2をモータ
あるいは油圧シリンダなどのアクチュエータで駆動し、
タイル壁面3をほぼ一定の強さで局部的に打撃する。そ
の打撃によって生じる打撃音をマイクロホン4で採取す
る。マイクロホン4の出力はプリアンプ5で増幅され、
ピークホールド回路6および実効値測定回路7に入力さ
れる。ピークホールド回路6は、インパルス応答のよう
に減衰していく打撃音波形の波高のピーク値を検出す
る。実効値測定回路7は打撃音波形が所定のレベルまで
減衰するまでの間の波形の実効値を求める。割算回路8
ではピークホールド回路6からの波高ピーク値を実効値
測定回路7からの実効値で割って波高率(クレストファ
クタ)を計算する。判定回路9は割算回路8で計算され
た波高率を指標として打撃部位のタイルの接着状態の良
否を判定する。タイミングコントローラ10は前記の各
要素の全体を同期制御する。
FIG. 1 shows a schematic configuration of a percussion apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention. The striking device 1 drives the hammer 2 with an actuator such as a motor or a hydraulic cylinder,
The tile wall 3 is hit locally with almost constant strength. The striking sound generated by the striking is collected by the microphone 4. The output of the microphone 4 is amplified by the preamplifier 5,
It is input to a peak hold circuit 6 and an effective value measurement circuit 7. The peak hold circuit 6 detects the peak value of the wave height of the striking sound waveform that attenuates like an impulse response. The effective value measuring circuit 7 calculates the effective value of the waveform until the impact sound waveform attenuates to a predetermined level. Division circuit 8
Then, the crest factor is calculated by dividing the peak value of the peak from the peak hold circuit 6 by the effective value from the effective value measuring circuit 7. The judging circuit 9 judges the quality of the adhesion state of the tile at the hit site using the crest factor calculated by the dividing circuit 8 as an index. The timing controller 10 controls the whole of the above elements synchronously.

【0011】この実施例においては、打撃装置1により
タイル壁面3の同一箇所を複数回打撃し、判定回路9で
は各打撃時に測定された打撃音の波高率の平均値を求
め、その平均波高率が2.5以上であった時には健全と
判定し、2以下の時には不良と判定する。その中間につ
いては要注意箇所と判定する。
In this embodiment, the same portion of the tile wall 3 is hit a plurality of times by the hitting device 1, and the judgment circuit 9 calculates the average value of the crest factors of the hitting sound measured at each hitting. Is 2.5 or more, it is determined to be healthy, and when it is 2 or less, it is determined to be defective. The middle part is determined to be a place requiring attention.

【0012】図2にはある建築物のタイル壁面から実際
に得た打撃音の波形を示している。ここでグループa〜
eと5つに分けているのは、熟練した検査員が行った打
診によってその打撃音を5つのグループに分類したもの
である。この図のように、各グループの打撃音の減衰特
性も異なるし、図示していないがスペクトル特性も異な
る。しかしそれらの違いからタイル壁面の良否を判定す
るのに有効で信頼性の高い指標を得るのは難しかった。
これについては前述した通りである。
FIG. 2 shows a waveform of a hitting sound actually obtained from a tile wall surface of a certain building. Here group a ~
e is divided into five groups in which the percussion sounds are classified into five groups by percussion performed by a skilled inspector. As shown in this figure, the attenuation characteristics of the striking sound of each group are different, and the spectral characteristics are also different although not shown. However, it was difficult to obtain an effective and reliable index for judging the quality of the tile wall from these differences.
This is as described above.

【0013】この発明の装置では、打撃音の振動波形の
波高率を指標としてタイル壁面の接着状態の良否を判定
しようとするものである。5つのグループの打撃音波形
の波高率を次の表1に示す。
In the apparatus of the present invention, the quality of the adhesion state of the tile wall surface is determined using the crest factor of the vibration waveform of the impact sound as an index. The crest factors of the striking sound waveforms of the five groups are shown in Table 1 below.

【0014】[0014]

【表1】 この試験結果からもわかるように、タイルの接着状態が
健全なグループaの波高率は2.1以上と大きく、明ら
かな剥離がみられたグループc、d、eの波高率は1.
9以下と小さかった。このようにタイル壁面の接着状態
を判定するのに波高率は非常に有効で信頼性の高い指標
となる。
[Table 1] As can be seen from the test results, the crest factor of the group a where the adhesion state of the tile is sound is as large as 2.1 or more, and the crest factors of the groups c, d and e where clear peeling is observed are 1.0.
It was as small as 9 or less. As described above, the crest factor is a very effective and highly reliable index for determining the adhesion state of the tile wall surface.

【0015】表2には試験用の模擬タイル壁面で測定し
た打撃音を8つのグループに分類し、各グループの打撃
音波形の波高率の実測値を示している。このグループ分
けは熟練した検査員の打診によるものである。
[0015] Table 2 shows the impact sounds measured on the simulated tile wall for test classified into eight groups, and the measured values of the crest factor of the impact sound waveform of each group are shown. This grouping is based on the consultation of a skilled inspector.

【0016】[0016]

【表2】 この試験結果からも健全部の打撃音の波高率は大きく、
不良部分の打撃音波高率が小さいことがわかる。
[Table 2] From this test result, the crest factor of the impact sound in the healthy part is large,
It can be seen that the impact sound height ratio of the defective portion is small.

【0017】また、タイル壁面の同一のタイルについ
て、健全な状態で測定した打撃音の波高率が2.8であ
ったのに対し、そのタイルに強い打撃を6回加えて剥離
しかかった状態とし、その状態で測定した打撃音の波高
率は2.4であり、さらに打撃を加えて剥離を大きくし
た状態では打撃音の波高率は2.1であった。この試験
結果からも波高率が壁面状態を判定するのに有効な指標
となることを確認した。
In addition, while the crest factor of the impact sound measured in a healthy state was 2.8 for the same tile on the wall surface of the tile, the tile was subjected to strong impact six times and peeled off. The crest factor of the impact sound measured in that state was 2.4, and the crest factor of the impact sound was 2.1 in a state where the impact was applied to increase the separation. From this test result, it was confirmed that the crest factor was an effective index for determining the state of the wall surface.

【0018】なお前記の実施例では打撃音の波高率を絶
対評価してタイルの接着状態の良否を判定するとした
が、本発明はこれに限定されず、健全部から得た打撃音
の波高率との相対比較によって判定を行ってもよい。相
対比較する場合でも、打撃音の波高率は打撃の加え方や
タイルに対する打撃位置などによる変動が非常に少ない
ので、周波数スペクトル特性や減衰特性を指標とした相
対比較より信頼性を大幅に向上することができる。
In the above embodiment, the crest factor of the striking sound is absolutely evaluated to determine the quality of the bonding state of the tiles. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and the crest factor of the striking sound obtained from the sound part is not limited to this. The determination may be made by a relative comparison with. Even in the case of relative comparison, the crest factor of the impact sound varies very little depending on how the impact is applied and the impact position on the tile, so the reliability is greatly improved compared to the relative comparison using the frequency spectrum characteristics and the attenuation characteristics as indices. be able to.

【0019】[0019]

【発明の効果】以上詳細に説明したように、この発明に
よる建築物仕上げ材の打診装置は、打撃音の振動波形の
波高率を求め、その波高率を指標として打撃部位の仕上
げ材の接着状態の良否を判定する構成としたので、打撃
の加え方や仕上げ材に対する打撃を加える位置などが変
動しても、健全部位では波高率が大きく、不良部位では
波高率か小さいという相関性はほとんど変化せず、これ
に基づいてタイルの剥離箇所などを非常に高精度に検査
することができる。
As described in detail above, the percussion apparatus for a building finishing material according to the present invention obtains the crest factor of the vibration waveform of the impact sound, and uses the crest factor as an index to determine the bonding state of the finishing material at the impact site. The correlation that the crest factor is large in a healthy part and the crest factor is small in a defective part, even if the method of hitting or the position of hitting on the finishing material fluctuates, is almost changed. Without this, it is possible to inspect the peeled portion of the tile and the like with very high accuracy based on this.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】この発明の一実施例による打診装置の概略構成
図である。
FIG. 1 is a schematic configuration diagram of a percussion device according to an embodiment of the present invention.

【図2】あるタイル壁面について実測した打撃音の振動
波形図である。
FIG. 2 is a vibration waveform diagram of an impact sound actually measured on a certain tile wall surface.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

2 ハンマ 4 マイクロホン 2 hammer 4 microphone

フロントページの続き (56)参考文献 特開 昭63−168555(JP,A) 特開 昭57−173727(JP,A) 特開 昭60−260852(JP,A) 特公 平2−54903(JP,B2)Continuation of the front page (56) References JP-A-63-168555 (JP, A) JP-A-57-173727 (JP, A) JP-A-60-260852 (JP, A) JP 2-54903 (JP) , B2)

Claims (1)

(57)【特許請求の範囲】(57) [Claims] 【請求項1】 建築物の壁面などを局部的に打撃する打
撃手段と、その打撃によって生じる打撃音の振動波形を
検出する電気音響変換手段と、この電気音響変換手段に
よって得られた前記打撃音の振動波形の波高率を求める
信号処理手段とを備え、求めた波高率を指標として打撃
部位の仕上げ材の接着状態の良否を判定することを特徴
とする建築物仕上げ材の打診装置。
1. A striking means for locally striking a wall or the like of a building, an electroacoustic converting means for detecting a vibration waveform of a striking sound generated by the striking, and the striking sound obtained by the electroacoustic converting means. And a signal processing means for obtaining a crest factor of the vibration waveform of (1), wherein the quality of the bonding state of the finishing material at the impact site is determined using the obtained crest factor as an index.
JP4077664A 1992-03-31 1992-03-31 Percussion equipment for building finishing materials Expired - Lifetime JP2734282B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP4077664A JP2734282B2 (en) 1992-03-31 1992-03-31 Percussion equipment for building finishing materials

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP4077664A JP2734282B2 (en) 1992-03-31 1992-03-31 Percussion equipment for building finishing materials

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH05281202A JPH05281202A (en) 1993-10-29
JP2734282B2 true JP2734282B2 (en) 1998-03-30

Family

ID=13640148

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP4077664A Expired - Lifetime JP2734282B2 (en) 1992-03-31 1992-03-31 Percussion equipment for building finishing materials

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2734282B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6805446B2 (en) * 2016-05-12 2020-12-23 株式会社フジタ Condition evaluation device for inspection objects
JP7018636B2 (en) * 2020-10-21 2022-02-14 株式会社フジタ Condition evaluation device for inspection objects

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH05281202A (en) 1993-10-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0655623B1 (en) Relative resonant frequency shifts to detect cracks
US5214960A (en) Method and apparatus for detecting defects in an object by vibrating the object in a plurality of positions
JP5666334B2 (en) Quality diagnosis method for concrete structures
JP5208625B2 (en) How to determine the quality type of a structure
JP3456965B2 (en) Structure inspection method and apparatus
JP3438525B2 (en) Hammer judgment device
JP3523806B2 (en) Defect inspection method in concrete structure
JP2734282B2 (en) Percussion equipment for building finishing materials
JP3922459B2 (en) Separation and cavity detection method and apparatus by percussion method
JP2009287923A (en) Method and apparatus for evaluating unstableness of rock mass on slope of rock bed
JPH0843362A (en) Peeling-off diagnostic device for finished surface
JPH0980033A (en) Judgment method for exfoliation of wall tile from building
US20030167845A1 (en) Defect identification in bodies consisting of brittle material
JP5714930B2 (en) Quality diagnosis method for concrete structures
JPH0616030B2 (en) Method and apparatus for diagnosing deterioration of article
JPH09257765A (en) Apparatus for diagnosing peeling of wall surface
JP2001235451A (en) Defect measuring device and method of specimen
JP2941150B2 (en) Rock property measurement device
JP3006634B2 (en) Defect detection method and device
JP3834660B2 (en) Crack detection device for structures
JPH11304773A (en) Method for discriminating peeling of external wall tile
JPH03120458A (en) Method and device for detecting defect
US11624687B2 (en) Apparatus and method for detecting microcrack using orthogonality analysis of mode shape vector and principal plane in resonance point
KR102642156B1 (en) A reference block for nondestructive testing and the sensitivity calibration method of using the same
JPH0511577B2 (en)