JP2024043173A - Disaster prevention evaluation program, disaster prevention evaluation method, and disaster prevention evaluation system - Google Patents

Abstract

[Problem] To provide a disaster prevention evaluation program, a disaster prevention evaluation method, and a disaster prevention evaluation system that can more appropriately evaluate the disaster prevention risk that can lead to death due to fire in a facility. [Solution] A disaster prevention evaluation program has been developed that causes the display unit 24 of a disaster prevention inspection input terminal 4 to function as a multiple inspection item evaluation input unit that inputs evaluations of multiple inspection items related to disaster prevention at the facility via an input unit 23, and causes the control unit 30 of a management server 3 to function as a comprehensive evaluation calculation unit that calculates a comprehensive evaluation based on the evaluations input to the multiple inspection item evaluation input units. [Selected Figure] Figure 1

Description

This invention relates to a disaster prevention evaluation program, a disaster prevention evaluation method, and a disaster prevention evaluation system for evaluating disaster prevention measures for facilities.

BACKGROUND ART Conventionally, risks regarding various disasters have been evaluated. For example, an evaluation system that evaluates multiple disaster risks including earthquake risk has been proposed (see Patent Document 1).

This evaluation system enables objective and quantitative risk evaluation by investigating and evaluating a set of questions consisting of earthquake risk, wind disaster risk, flood risk, lightning risk, storm surge risk, etc. It is said that this will not only promote the improvement of risk management awareness and response, but also make it possible to easily verify the effectiveness of risk improvement.
Here, the disaster that causes the most deaths is fire, and the most common cause of death in fires is failure to escape from the fire.
However, the above-mentioned evaluation system did not adequately evaluate the risk of failure to escape.

Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2006-106961

In view of the above-mentioned problems, the present invention provides a disaster prevention evaluation program, a disaster prevention evaluation method, and a disaster prevention evaluation system that can more appropriately evaluate the disaster prevention risks that lead to death due to fire in facilities, and provides a disaster prevention evaluation program, disaster prevention evaluation method, and disaster prevention evaluation system that allow users to The purpose is to avoid the use of facilities or to encourage facility owners to make improvements.

This invention is a disaster prevention evaluation program, a disaster prevention evaluation method, and a disaster prevention evaluation system that causes a computer to function as a display means for displaying images, an input means for accepting input by a user, a storage means for storing input information input by the input means, and a control means for controlling the display means, the input means, and the storage means, and causes the display means to function as a multiple inspection item evaluation input unit that inputs evaluations of multiple inspection items related to disaster prevention at a facility by the input means, and causes the control means to function as an overall evaluation calculation unit that calculates an overall evaluation based on the evaluations input to the multiple inspection item evaluation input units.

This invention provides a disaster prevention evaluation program, a disaster prevention evaluation method, and a disaster prevention evaluation system that can more appropriately evaluate the disaster prevention risks that can lead to deaths due to fires in facilities.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the system configuration of a disaster prevention evaluation system. Data configuration diagram of the disaster prevention inspection information database. An explanatory diagram of a screen configuration of a fire extinguishing equipment inspection form display screen. An explanatory diagram of the screen configuration of an indoor fire hydrant equipment inspection form display screen. An explanatory diagram of the screen configuration of an automatic fire alarm equipment inspection form display screen. An explanatory diagram of the screen configuration of an evacuation equipment inspection form display screen and a guide light and guide sign inspection form display screen. An explanatory diagram of the screen layout of the fire prevention management diagnostic checklist display screen. Screen configuration diagram of an inspection result input screen. Screen configuration diagram of a disaster prevention evaluation viewing screen. Screen configuration diagram of a disaster prevention evaluation viewing screen.

An embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the system configuration of a disaster prevention evaluation system 1 in this embodiment. As shown in FIG. 1, the disaster prevention evaluation system 1 includes a disaster prevention evaluation viewing terminal 2 used mainly by users who want to know the disaster prevention risks of facilities, and a management server 3 that stores data and manages the stored data. and a disaster prevention inspection input terminal 4 used by inspection workers who inspect and input the disaster prevention status of the facility. The disaster prevention evaluation viewing terminal 2, the management server 3, and the disaster prevention inspection input terminal 4 are connected to the Internet 5.

The disaster prevention evaluation viewing terminal 2 includes, as hardware elements, a control unit 20 that is composed of a CPU, ROM, RAM, etc., and executes various calculations and control operations, and a hard disk, flash memory, etc., and allows reading and writing of information. a communication unit 22 that is configured with a LAN board, a WiFi unit, etc. and is connected to the Internet 5 by wire or wirelessly to send and receive data; and a touch panel, keyboard, mouse, push button, or a plurality of these. The input unit 23 includes an input unit 23 configured to accept input by touch operation, and a display unit 24 configured with a liquid crystal display, an organic EL display, etc. to display images such as characters and figures.

The management server 3 includes, as hardware elements, a control unit 30 that is composed of a CPU, ROM, RAM, etc., and executes various calculations and control operations, and a storage unit that is composed of a hard disk, flash memory, etc., and that allows reading and writing of information. 31, a communication section 32 composed of a LAN board, a WiFi unit, etc., and connected to the Internet 5 by wire or wirelessly to transmit and receive data, and a touch panel, a keyboard, a mouse, a push button, or a plurality of these. The display unit 34 includes an input unit 33 that accepts input by touch operation, and a display unit 34 that is configured with a liquid crystal display, an organic EL display, etc., and displays images such as characters and figures.
The storage unit 31 stores a disaster prevention evaluation program 310 executed by the control unit 30 and a disaster prevention inspection information database 312 that stores disaster prevention inspection information.

The disaster prevention inspection input terminal 4 includes, as hardware elements, a control unit 40 that is composed of a CPU, ROM, RAM, etc., and executes various calculations and control operations, and a hard disk, flash memory, etc., and allows reading and writing of information. a storage unit 41 that is configured with a LAN board, a WiFi unit, etc. and is connected to the Internet 5 by wire or wirelessly to transmit and receive data, and a touch panel, a push button, or a plurality of these configured to connect It includes an input section 43 that accepts input through operations, and a display section 44 that is configured with a liquid crystal display, an organic EL display, or the like and displays images such as characters and figures.

FIG. 2 is a configuration diagram of each data 31a to 31f stored in the disaster prevention inspection information database 312 of the storage unit 31 of the management server 3, and only a portion of each data is shown.

FIG. 2(A) shows fire extinguishing equipment inspection form data 31a, FIG. 2(B) shows indoor fire hydrant equipment inspection form data 31b, and FIG. 2(C) shows automatic fire alarm equipment inspection form data 31c. , FIG. 2(D) shows evacuation equipment inspection form data 31d, FIG. 2(E) shows guide light and guide sign inspection form data 31e, and FIG. 2(F) shows fire prevention management diagnosis check sheet data 31f. It shows.

Each data 31a to 31f is stored as one data (file) for one inspection of one facility, and the first to fifth items are predetermined item names, and the other parts are the inspection results. etc. are memorized. Among the first to fifth items, the first item is the largest major classification, and the fifth item is the smallest minor classification. That is, each item is divided by classification, and this classification and the minimum item name are stored.

The portions other than the first to fifth items of each data 31a to 31f are contents such as type and capacity, judgment, defect contents, and measures to be taken, which are entered as inspection results. Of these, the fire extinguisher inspection form data 31a sets six items A to F as types of fire extinguishers, and the guide light and guide sign inspection form data 31e shows evacuation exits, passageways, etc. Three items are set: , audience seats. For the determination, a determination of whether it is a circle or a cross is input.

In addition to this, the disaster prevention inspection information database 312 also includes target facility data that stores the name, location, fire prevention manager, and witness of the facility to be inspected, the name of the inspector who conducted the inspection, and the company to which the inspector belongs. It also stores inspector data that stores company name, inspector's company address, inspection type, and inspection date.

Each of the data 31a to 31f stored in this way is displayed on the inspection sheet display screens 32a to 32f shown in FIGS. 3 to 6 by the control unit 30 of the management server 3 that operates by starting the disaster prevention evaluation program 310. It is expanded and displayed on the display unit 24 of the disaster prevention evaluation viewing terminal 2.

3(A1) and FIG. 3(A2) are the fire extinguishing equipment inspection form display screen 32a in which the fire extinguishing equipment inspection form data 31a is expanded. ) is displayed.

Regarding this fire extinguisher inspection form data 31a, the storage unit 31 of the management server 3 stores settings (weighting information) that heavily weight the items of display/sign and last replacement date in the evaluation. Therefore, these items are heavily evaluated in the fire extinguisher inspection form data 31a. Specifically, for example, while normal items are weighted between 3 and -3 points, display/sign and last replacement date are weighted +5 points if appropriate and -5 points if inappropriate.

In addition, weighting refers to setting the evaluation of the inspection items to be weighted to have a greater influence than other inspection items in the comprehensive evaluation, and is based on a predetermined multiplier (for example, 1 This is executed by multiplying by a magnification (larger than 1 such as .5, 2, 3, 5, etc.) or adding (or subtracting) a predetermined number of points.

Figures 4 (B1) to 4 (B3) are indoor fire hydrant equipment inspection form display screens 32b that expand indoor fire hydrant equipment inspection form data 31b, and when viewed on a smartphone, Figures 4 (B1) to 4 (B3 ) are displayed vertically.

Regarding this indoor fire hydrant equipment inspection form data 31b, the storage unit 31 of the management server 3 stores information such as the amount and condition of the water source, the surrounding situation of the pump-type electric motor control device of the pressurized water supply device, and the switches and switches. Indicator lights and wiring connections, surrounding conditions, displays, and functions of the direct control section of the pump-type starter of the pressurized water supply system, surrounding conditions and display of the remote control section of the pump-type starter of the pressurized water supply system. Functions, surrounding conditions and functions of the remote activation part of the pump-type starting device of the pressurized water supply system, the pressure switch and the track pressure tank and function of the track water pressure switch of the pump-type starting device of the pressurized water supply system, The function of the motor of the pump type of pressurized water supply equipment, the performance of the pump type of pump type of pressurized water supply equipment, the low water alarm device of the priming device of pressurized water supply equipment, the surroundings of fire hydrant boxes such as indoor fire hydrant boxes, etc. Status and display, display of fire hydrant on/off valve, indicator light, starting indicator light, and usage of indoor fire hydrant box, surrounding situation of lowering device such as indoor fire hydrant box, indicator light, display, and function, starting performance of pump method Settings are stored that weight items such as pressurized water supply devices and operating conditions, as well as water discharge pressure and water discharge amount for elevated water tank systems and pressure water tank systems.

By this weighting, important items such as the condition of the water source and the pump, such as the amount of water in the water source that could make the difference between life and death for the user, can be evaluated more heavily. In addition, it is possible to appropriately evaluate the functions of the equipment, which must be taken into account that it is difficult for people involved in the building to understand the condition on a daily basis, and the only way to know is through inspection results. Further, the surrounding situation (operation failure), which is the most visible equipment, can be given a low evaluation. These allow disaster prevention risks to be evaluated based on the degree to which they affect human life.

Figures 5 (C1) to 5 (C3) show the automatic fire alarm system inspection form display screen 32c which expands the automatic fire alarm system inspection form data 31c, and when viewed on a smartphone, Figures 5 (C1) to 5 (C3) are displayed one above the other.

Regarding this automatic fire alarm equipment inspection form data 31c, the storage unit 31 of the management server 3 stores the terminal voltage of the standby power source/emergency power source (built-in type), the surrounding situation of the receiver/repeater, and the warning area display device. Display of indicator lights, communication devices, and sensor operation, etc., unwarned parts of alarm status of detectors, adaptability and functional failures, all items of heat detectors and smoke detectors, flame detectors of detectors and multi-signal detectors/combined detectors, surrounding conditions of transmitters, push buttons, transmitters/receivers, indicator lights, sound pressure etc. of audio equipment and ringing methods, simultaneous operation of comprehensive evaluations, and sensitivity of smoke detectors, etc. Settings are stored that give heavier weights to the sound pressure and overall operation items of the district sound equipment.

With this weighting, it is possible to give more weight to the backup/emergency power supply, which is important as power outages are often involved in the event of a fire, and the presence of items in front of the receiver that may impede operation. Additionally, highly dangerous sensor malfunctions, transmitter and audio device malfunctions can be seriously evaluated. In addition, failures in high-risk comprehensive tests can be evaluated more seriously.

Figure 6 (D1) to Figure 6 (D2) are evacuation equipment inspection form display screens 32d that expand the evacuation equipment inspection form data 31d, and when viewed on a smartphone, from Figure 6 (D1) to Figure 6 (D2) Displayed in a vertical format.

Regarding this evacuation equipment inspection form data 31d, the storage unit 31 of the management server 3 stores a setting that gives heavy weight to all items. Thereby, it is possible to evaluate the defects of highly important evacuation equipment more seriously.

Figures 6 (E1) to 6 (E2) are guide light and guide sign inspection form display screens 32e that expand the guide light and guide sign inspection form data 31e, and when viewing on a smartphone, from Fig. 6 (E1). The display continues vertically up to FIG. 6 (E2).

Regarding the guide light and guide sign inspection form data 31e, the storage unit 31 of the management server 3 contains information such as the type of outer box/display surface of the guide light, visibility obstruction, etc., and a display of the emergency power source (built-in type) of the guide light. and functions, the light source and wiring connections of guide lights, the wiring connections and functions of guide light signal devices, etc., the visibility obstruction of guide signs, lighting or illumination, the brightness of the display surface, the illuminance of the grounding place, wiring connections, and guidance. A setting is stored in which the item of the emergency power supply function of the sign is weighted heavily. This makes it possible to evaluate visually impaired defects, which pose a considerably high risk of delay in evacuation in the event of a fire. In addition, functional deterioration can only be ascertained through inspection results reports, and it is possible to seriously assess malfunctioning emergency power sources, which can become extremely dangerous if they cease to function in the event of a power outage during a fire. In addition, it is possible to seriously evaluate defects in xenon and voice guidance, which are difficult for building personnel to notice and, if ineffective, could impede evacuation.
FIG. 7 is a fire prevention management diagnosis check sheet display screen 32f that expands the fire prevention management diagnosis check sheet data 31f.

This fire prevention management diagnosis check sheet data 31f includes inspection items (non-statutory inspection items) that are not included in statutory inspections (for example, inspections stipulated in Article 17-3-3 of the Fire Service Act), and is for former fire department employees. It was originally created by project members from multiple companies in the firefighting equipment industry. The fire prevention management diagnosis check sheet data 31f includes, for example, items such as "facilities necessary for firefighting activities," including items such as "are they installed in locations necessary for firefighting activities," and "are they properly managed?" There are various classifications and items, such as "water for firefighting", which includes water for firefighting.

Regarding the fire prevention management diagnosis check sheet data 31f, the storage unit 31 of the management server 3 stores settings that give heavier weights to all items. As a result, defects in items that are not included in legal inspections but have a significant impact on death due to fire can be evaluated more seriously, and defects that affect human life can be evaluated more strictly.
FIG. 8 is a screen configuration diagram of an inspection result input screen 410 displayed on the display unit 44 of the disaster prevention inspection input terminal 4.

This inspection result input screen 410 is displayed as a screen for inputting into the corresponding inspection slip when one of the inspection types displayed as a list on the inspection type list screen (not shown) is selected. The inspection types listed include both legal and non-legal items: fire extinguishing equipment, indoor fire hydrant equipment, sprinkler equipment, water spray fire extinguishing equipment, foam fire extinguishing equipment, inert gas fire extinguishing equipment, and halogenated fire extinguishing equipment. Fire extinguishing equipment, powder fire extinguishing equipment, outdoor fire hydrant equipment, power fire pump equipment, automatic fire alarm equipment, gas leak fire alarm equipment, electric leakage fire alarm, fire alarm equipment that reports to fire department, emergency alarm equipment and equipment, evacuation equipment, Guidance lights and guide signs, fire water, smoke exhaust equipment, connected water sprinkler equipment, connected water pipes (for apartment complexes), emergency outlet equipment (for apartment complexes), wireless communication auxiliary equipment, emergency power receiving equipment, in-house power generation equipment, Storage battery equipment, fuel cell equipment, wiring, general operation panel, packaged fire extinguishing equipment, packaged automatic fire extinguishing equipment, sprinkler equipment for apartment buildings, automatic fire alarm equipment for apartment buildings, self-fire alarm for residential units/emergency alarm equipment for apartment buildings , automatic fire alarm equipment for specified small-scale facilities, pressurized smoke prevention equipment, automatic fire alarm equipment for complex residential facilities, foam fire extinguishing equipment inspection sheet for specified parking lots, inspection and maintenance record sheet for portable fire pumps, etc. , there is a fire prevention management diagnosis check sheet. In addition, the type of facility can be selected on a menu screen, etc., and mandatory display is performed to indicate the required inspection types depending on the equipment among the inspection types to be displayed in a list. This can prevent omissions in inputting required inspection types.

The inspection result input screen 410 includes an inspection target facility input section 411, an inspector input section 412, an inspection result input section 413, a return button 415, a new button 416, and a save button 417.
The inspection target facility input unit 411 receives inputs of the name, address, fire prevention manager, and witness of the facility to be inspected.
The inspector input unit 412 accepts input of inspection type, inspector, inspection date, inspection company name, and inspection company address.

The inspection result input unit 413 receives input of inspection results for various inspection items. Although the inspection items are simplified in the illustration, the above-mentioned fire extinguishing equipment inspection form data 31a, indoor fire hydrant equipment inspection form data 31b, automatic fire alarm equipment inspection form data 31c, evacuation equipment inspection form data 31d, guide lights and Each screen is displayed based on the sign inspection form data 31e and the fire prevention management diagnosis check sheet data 31f.

It is preferable that these inspection result input screens 410 directly display the above-mentioned fire extinguisher equipment inspection form display screen 32a, indoor fire hydrant equipment inspection form display screen 32b, automatic fire alarm equipment inspection form display screen 32c, evacuation equipment inspection form display screen 32d, emergency exit light and emergency exit sign inspection form display screen 32e, and fire prevention management diagnostic checklist display screen 32f.

When you touch each displayed inspection item, inputtable data set for each inspection item, such as numerical value, 〇×, presence/absence, etc., will be displayed as options, and one of them can be selected by touching the screen (or clicking the mouse), etc. Then the selected data is input. This allows easy and appropriate input to each inspection item.

In addition, the inspection target facility input section 411, inspector input section 412, and inspection result input section 413, which are the inspection form display parts, can be scrolled up and down, and the inspection items hidden in the lower part of the diagram can be displayed and input by scrolling.
When the return button 415 is selected, the screen returns to the inspection type list screen (not shown).

The New button 416 is a button for opening a new inspection form. When this New button 416 is selected, an inspection type list screen (not shown) is displayed, and a new inspection form for the inspection type selected from the displayed list is created and displayed. Note that on the inspection type list screen at this time, the control unit 30 (or control unit 40) displays the name of an inspection form that has already been created as a distinction, such as by displaying "Done." This makes it possible to distinguish at a glance which inspection forms have been created and which have not been created, and allows for smooth creation of an inspection form and input of inspection results.

When the Save button 417 is selected, it is displayed and the inspection form being created (the input contents in the inspection target facility input section 411, inspector input section 412, and inspection result input section 413) is saved in the memory section 31 of the management server 3. Note that even if the Save button 417 is not selected, the information entered in the inspection form is temporarily stored, and the temporarily stored contents are called up and displayed when the disaster prevention evaluation program 310 is restarted or terminated and then started again. This prevents situations where input is erased midway and the inspection has to be repeated.

9 and 10 are screen configuration diagrams of a disaster prevention evaluation viewing screen 430 displayed on the display unit 24 of the disaster prevention evaluation viewing terminal 2. FIG. 9 shows the upper part of the disaster prevention evaluation viewing screen 430, and FIG. 10 shows the lower part of the disaster prevention evaluation viewing screen 430, and each can be displayed by sliding the slider 439 up and down.

The disaster prevention evaluation viewing screen 430 is provided with an inspection target information display section 431, a score display section 432, an inspection result display section 433 (433a to 433f), a points to note display section 434 (see FIG. 10), and an inspection result analysis graph display section 435.
The inspection target information display section 431 displays the date of the inspection, the person who filled out the inspection form, the property name indicating the facility, the site indicating the type of facility, and the location of the facility.

The score display unit 432 calculates a score out of 100 from the control unit 30 of the management server 3 by reflecting predetermined weighting on each data input on the inspection result input screen 410 (see FIG. 8). Display in . This score is the total score obtained by adding up each score on the inspection result display section 433 (433a to 433f).

When calculating this total score, if the inspection results of predetermined items (items with heavy weighting) classified as fire extinguishing equipment, alarm equipment, and evacuation equipment are below the predetermined evaluation, the total score will be Points will be deducted by the number of demerit points set for each item. However, the maximum number of demerit points is determined for each category of fire extinguishing equipment, alarm equipment, and evacuation equipment, and if the maximum number of demerit points is exceeded, the maximum number of demerit points will be deducted. This allows the total score to be lowered if there is a defect that could lead to death due to a delay in escaping from a fire, and prevents the score from increasing even though there is a serious defect because other items are good. Moreover, it is possible to prevent the score from becoming unduly low due to some defects.

The inspection result display sections 433 (433a to 433f) include a building management status inspection result display section 433a, a fire extinguishing equipment inspection result display section 433b, an alarm equipment inspection result display section 433c, an evacuation equipment inspection result display section 433d, and a fire prevention management status inspection result display section 433a. It is divided into six categories: display section 433e, and other management status inspection result display section 433f, and the most important other management status inspection result display section 433f is weighted and set with the highest score of 25 points. , the remaining five categories are all set with a maximum score of 15 points. Each inspection result display section 433 (433a to 433f) evaluates each item in three stages of excellent, good, and fair, and the scores are weighted and assigned to each item. Note that past disaster prevention inspection data may be accumulated for each facility in the storage unit 31 of the management server 3, and an evaluation based on the installation time may be added to the score of the above calculation result. For example, it is preferable to subtract a predetermined number of points (for example, 2 points) if a predetermined number of years (for example, 10 years) or more have passed since the indoor fire extinguishing equipment was installed. This allows for more accurate evaluation.

Each inspection result display section 433 (433a to 433f) is also provided with a caution display section and an improvement display section. The caution display section displays cautions (attention points on what kind of dangers there are) stored in advance in the storage section 31 of the management server 3 for items with low evaluations. The improvement display section displays improvement measures (information indicating what improvement measures are effective and will lead to a score factory) stored in advance in the storage section 31 of the management server 3 for items with low evaluations as improvement information. For example, it displays which fire extinguishing equipment is defective as caution information, and displays improvement measures such as "Please replace the battery" and "Please repair the equipment because it is defective" as improvement measures. Here, the members who view each inspection result display section 433 (433a to 433f) are set to membership levels such as free members and paid members, and the caution display section and improvement display section are not displayed for users of the first group such as free members, and the caution display section and improvement display section are displayed for users of the second group such as paid members. This allows us to provide more detailed information and information that can lead to improvements depending on the user's level.

The building management status inspection result display section 433a displays the degree of risk of arson, control of smoking and cigarette butts, control of dangerous substances such as kerosene, building specifications, and surroundings of appliances that use fire, as items. The score is also displayed.

The fire extinguishing equipment inspection result display section 433b displays, as items, the state of the water source of the fire extinguishing equipment, the state of the pump etc. of the fire extinguishing equipment, the state of the piping etc. of the fire extinguishing equipment, the comprehensive inspection of the fire extinguishing equipment (1), and the comprehensive inspection of the fire extinguishing equipment. (2) is displayed, and the scores for each item are also displayed.

The alarm equipment inspection result display section 433c displays, as items, the status of standby power supply/emergency power supply, the status of receiver/repeater, the status of detectors, the status of emergency bell pushbuttons, etc., the status of audio equipment, and the overall status of alarm equipment. The inspection is displayed and the score for each item is also displayed.

The evacuation equipment inspection result display section 433d displays, as items, the surrounding situation of the evacuation equipment, the sign of the evacuation equipment, the main body of the evacuation equipment, the mounting part/instruction part of the evacuation equipment, the storage status of the evacuation equipment, and the comprehensive inspection of the evacuation equipment. (1) and comprehensive inspection of evacuation equipment (2) are displayed, and the scores for each item are also displayed.

The fire prevention management status inspection result display section 433e displays the following items: fire prevention/disaster prevention manager selection status, general fire prevention manager selection status, joint fire prevention management status, effectiveness of matters discussed in joint fire prevention management, etc. It displays the organization, training status, and implementation status of disaster prevention education, as well as the scores for each item.
The other management status inspection result display section 433f displays, as an item, whether or not there is a defect in the firefighting equipment, and also displays the score for each item.

Each item of each of these inspection result display sections 433 (433a to 433f) includes fire extinguishing equipment inspection form data 31a, indoor fire hydrant equipment inspection form data 31b, automatic fire alarm equipment inspection form data 31c, evacuation equipment inspection form data 31d, guidance Each item of the light and guidance sign inspection form data 31e and the fire prevention management diagnosis check sheet data 31f is rearranged and assigned, and the scores are calculated from the points of the assigned items of each data 31a to 31f. Specifically, the sum from the maximum value to the minimum value of each data item 31a to 31f assigned to each display section 433a to 433f is adjusted to the range from the maximum value to the minimum value of the display section 433a to 433f. . Specifically, if each data 31a to 31f is, for example, from -30 points to +30 points and the display sections 433a to 433f are from 0 to 5 points, -30 to -20 points are 0 points, and -19 points to -10 points. 1 point, -9 to 0 points 2 points, 1 to 10 points 3 points, 11 to 20 points 4 points, 21 to 30 points 5 points, etc.

The points to note display section 434 selects and displays a predetermined number of the most effective improvement measures (those that will receive a higher score as a result of the improvement) from among those displayed in the improvement measure display section of each inspection result display section 433 (433a to 433f).

The inspection result analysis graph display section 435 displays the scores for each item in the inspection result display section 433 (433a to 433f), namely the building management status inspection result display section 433a, the fire extinguishing equipment inspection result display section 433b, the alarm equipment inspection result display section 433c, the evacuation equipment inspection result display section 433d, and the fire prevention management status inspection result display section 433e, as a pentagonal radar chart.

With the above configuration, the disaster prevention evaluation program 310 that can more appropriately evaluate disaster prevention risks that lead to death due to fire in facilities, the disaster prevention evaluation system 1 in which this disaster prevention evaluation program 310 is installed, and disaster prevention can be evaluated using these. A disaster prevention evaluation method can be provided. This will allow users to avoid using facilities that pose risks, and will also enable facilities to identify deficiencies in disaster prevention and make effective improvements.

In disaster prevention evaluation, items that lead to delays in escape in the event of a fire, which is the factor that causes the most deaths, are weighted to give greater weight, so it is possible to output a score based on the risk of death in a disaster (especially a fire). . Therefore, the user can check whether there is any danger to life and use this information as a basis for deciding whether to use the facility or not, and whether to proceed with the contract for the property (facility).

In addition, on the disaster prevention evaluation viewing screen 430, the evaluation results are displayed in a building management status inspection result display section 433a, a fire extinguishing equipment inspection result display section 433b, an alarm equipment inspection result display section 433c, an evacuation equipment inspection result display section 433d, and a fire prevention management status inspection section. Since the results are displayed together in categories in the result display section 433e and other management status inspection result display section 433f, it is possible to check the weak and strong points of disaster prevention measures for each category. In addition, since precautions and improvement measures are displayed for each category, disaster prevention measures can be efficiently strengthened.

In addition, the inspection result analysis graph display section 435 allows the level of disaster prevention measures for each category to be confirmed at a glance, and it is also possible to confirm whether the disaster prevention measures are well-balanced or unbalanced. Therefore, if there is a particularly low classification, it is possible to urge facility owners and facility operators to take action to strengthen disaster prevention measures based on that classification.
Furthermore, the building management status inspection result display section 433a allows the user to check the building management status indicating whether the environment has a low risk of fire or arson.
Further, the fire extinguishing equipment inspection result display section 433b allows checking of the status of the fire extinguishing equipment, which indicates whether or not rapid initial fire extinguishment is possible.
Furthermore, the alarm equipment inspection result display section 433c allows the user to check the status of the alarm equipment, which indicates whether or not a fire can be detected and reported early.
Further, the evacuation equipment inspection result display section 433d allows the user to check the status of the evacuation equipment, which indicates whether the evacuation can be carried out safely and smoothly.
Further, the fire prevention management status inspection result display section 433e allows checking of the status of the fire prevention management status, which indicates whether fire prevention and damage can be reduced.
In addition, the other management status inspection result display section 433f allows checking of other management statuses indicating whether there is a defect in firefighting equipment other than those mentioned above.

In addition, by checking the results of this disaster prevention evaluation, users who purchase or rent facilities such as condominiums can recognize the risk of fire, which causes the highest number of casualties in disasters, and use it as a basis for contract decisions. Can be done.

Furthermore, by registering and evaluating non-statutory inspection items as the fire prevention management diagnosis check sheet data 31f, it is possible to evaluate the risk of fire more effectively than a general disaster prevention evaluation.

Note that it is preferable to output the results of the disaster prevention evaluation to a property information providing system that compiles property sales and rental information so that the disaster prevention evaluation can be confirmed when viewing the property on the property information providing system. In this case, the total score can be output, the inspection result analysis graph display section 435 can be output, or the disaster prevention evaluation viewing screen 430 can be output, and only the total score can be displayed on the property information display section that displays the floor plan, photos, etc. The configuration can be such that when the total score is selected, the disaster prevention evaluation viewing screen 430 is displayed. In addition, the property information providing system includes a property information display screen that displays information about the property, such as the property's floor plan, photos, rental price or sales price, location, nearest station, age of construction, incidental facilities, etc., and condition specification from each of these information. There are a property search screen for searching, a list display screen for displaying a list of search results, etc. Then, you can set filtering conditions based on score points on the search screen, display the score points along with the property name, location, rental price, sales price, etc. on the list display screen, and display the score points and inspection result analysis graph display section on the property information display screen. 435 and a disaster prevention evaluation viewing screen 430 can be displayed.

Thereby, a user who selects a property can check the safety of the property (facility) and use this information as a basis for deciding whether to enter into a contract. Furthermore, by providing such a property information providing system, it is possible to encourage facilities to strengthen their disaster prevention measures, and it is possible to reduce the number of properties with poor disaster prevention measures. This can reduce deaths due to delayed escape in the event of a fire.

Note that the computer of this invention corresponds to the management server 3 and the disaster prevention inspection input terminal 4 of the embodiment, and similarly below,
The comprehensive evaluation calculation unit corresponds to the control unit 30 of the management server 3,
The display means corresponds to the display section 44 of the disaster prevention inspection input terminal 4,
The input means corresponds to the input section 43 of the disaster prevention inspection input terminal 4,
The control means corresponds to the control unit 30 of the management server 3,
The storage means corresponds to the storage unit 31 of the management server 3,
The program corresponds to the Disaster Prevention Evaluation Program 310,
The inspection item evaluation input section corresponds to the inspection result input section 413 of the inspection result input screen 410,
The building management status inspection item input section corresponds to the inspection items of the building management status on the inspection result input screen 410,
The alarm equipment inspection item input section corresponds to the alarm equipment inspection items on the inspection result input screen 410,
The evacuation equipment inspection item input section corresponds to the evacuation equipment inspection items on the inspection result input screen 410,
The fire prevention management status inspection item input section corresponds to the fire prevention management status inspection items on the inspection result input screen 410,
The other management status inspection item input section corresponds to other management status inspection items on the inspection result input screen 410,
The legal inspection items include the fire extinguishing equipment inspection form data 31a, the indoor fire hydrant equipment inspection form data 31b, the automatic fire alarm equipment inspection form data 31c, the evacuation equipment inspection form data 31d, and the guide light and guide sign inspection form data 31e. Correspondingly,
Non-statutory inspection items correspond to the inspection items of fire prevention management diagnosis check sheet data 31f.
The input information corresponds to inspection results, but is not limited to this, and can take any embodiment.

For example, the contents of the inspection slips displayed on the inspection slip display screens 32a to 32f may be configured to be printed by a printer. In this case, the inspection slip can be printed and used on paper.

This invention can be utilized for disaster prevention evaluation and disaster prevention reinforcement of facilities.

1...Disaster prevention evaluation system 3...Management server 4...Disaster prevention inspection input terminal 30...Control unit 31...Storage unit 31a...Fire extinguishing equipment inspection form data 31b...Indoor fire hydrant equipment inspection form data 31c...Automatic fire alarm equipment inspection form data 31d...Evacuation Apparatus inspection form data 31e...Guide light and guide sign inspection form data 31f...Fire prevention management diagnosis check sheet data 43...Input section 44...Display section 310...Disaster prevention evaluation program 410...Inspection result input screen 413...Inspection result input section

The present invention is a disaster prevention evaluation program, a disaster prevention evaluation method, and a disaster prevention evaluation system that cause a computer to function as a display means for displaying images, an input means for accepting input from a user, a memory means for storing input information input by the input means, and a control means for controlling the display means, the input means , and the memory means, and that causes the display means to function as a multiple inspection item input section for inputting evaluations of multiple inspection items related to at least fire extinguishing equipment, alarm equipment, and evacuation equipment, which are equipment related to fires in a facility , by the input means, causes the control means to function as an overall evaluation calculation section for calculating an overall evaluation based on the evaluations input to the multiple inspection item input sections, causes the memory means to store improvement measure information indicating improvement measures when each inspection item is low-rated, and causes the display means to display the corresponding improvement measure information for each inspection item that was low-rated in the input information input to the inspection item input section.

Claims (7)

computer,
a display means for displaying an image;
an input means for accepting input from a user;
storage means for storing input information input by the input means;
A program that functions as a control means for controlling the display means, the input means, and the storage means,
The display means,
Functioning as a plurality of inspection item evaluation input unit for inputting evaluations of a plurality of inspection items regarding disaster prevention of the facility using the input means,
The control means,
A disaster prevention evaluation program that functions as a comprehensive evaluation calculation section that calculates a comprehensive evaluation based on evaluations input to the plurality of inspection item evaluation input sections. The inspection item input section is
a building management status inspection item input section for inputting inspection items regarding the building management status;
a fire extinguishing equipment inspection item input section for inputting inspection items regarding fire extinguishing equipment;
an alarm equipment inspection item input section for inputting inspection items regarding the alarm equipment;
an evacuation equipment inspection item input section for inputting inspection items regarding evacuation equipment, and
Claim 1, further comprising one or more inspection item input sections selected from other management status inspection item input sections for inputting inspection items related to the fire prevention management status inspection item input section for inputting inspection items related to the fire prevention management status. disaster prevention evaluation program. Each inspection item in the inspection item input section is as follows:
It has statutory inspection items that are stipulated by law, and non-statutory inspection items other than the above statutory inspection items,
The above non-statutory inspection items are:
In the building management status inspection item input section, at least a combustible material leaving item related to leaving combustible material that is likely to be set on fire around the building is provided;
In the fire extinguishing equipment inspection item input section, at least a fire extinguisher placement status item regarding the fire extinguisher placement status is provided,
In the alarm equipment inspection item input section, at least an operation failure item regarding the presence or absence of an operation failure is provided,
In the evacuation equipment inspection item input section, at least a guide sign item regarding the effectiveness of guide lights and guide signs is provided;
3. The disaster prevention evaluation program according to claim 2, wherein the fire prevention management status inspection item input section includes at least manager responsibility items regarding fire prevention and disaster prevention manager selection status. storing weighting information set for each inspection item in the storage means;
The weighting information is set such that, among the respective inspection items, items whose inappropriateness may lead to a delay in escaping from a fire are weighted more heavily than other items,
4. The disaster prevention evaluation program according to claim 3, wherein the comprehensive evaluation calculation unit is configured to perform a comprehensive evaluation using the weight information. In the storage means,
Stores improvement plan information indicating improvement measures when the evaluation is low for each inspection item,
The display means,
5. The disaster prevention evaluation program according to claim 4, wherein the improvement measure information corresponding to the inspection items with low evaluations in the input information input to the inspection item input section is displayed. A display means for displaying an image, an input means for accepting input from a user, a storage means for storing input information inputted by the input means, and a control means for controlling the display means, the input means, and the storage means. A disaster prevention evaluation method operated by a system having
accepting input to an inspection item evaluation input section for inputting evaluations of a plurality of inspection items regarding disaster prevention of the facility displayed on the display means, by the input means;
A disaster prevention evaluation method, wherein the control means calculates a comprehensive evaluation by a comprehensive evaluation calculation section based on the evaluations input to the plurality of inspection item evaluation input sections. a display means for displaying an image;
an input means for accepting input from a user;
storage means for storing input information input by the input means;
comprising a control means for controlling the display means, the input means, and the storage means,
The display means is
comprising a plurality of inspection item evaluation input units for inputting evaluations of a plurality of inspection items regarding disaster prevention of facilities by the input means,
The control means includes:
A disaster prevention evaluation system including a comprehensive evaluation calculation section that calculates a comprehensive evaluation based on evaluations input to the plurality of inspection item evaluation input sections.

Images