JP2016018478A - Life continuity evaluation system, method and program after earthquake occurrence - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a life continuity evaluation system, method, and program after earthquake occurrence, capable of evaluating life continuity probability at a housing complex building such as a condominium after seismic disaster, from both aspects of hard and soft.SOLUTION: A system for evaluating life continuity probability at an existing building for dwelling after seismic disaster comprises: disaster occurrence time insecurity countermeasure evaluation means 12 for evaluating countermeasures to insecurity during earthquake occurrence at the building; life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation means 14 for evaluating countermeasures to life continuity difficulty after earthquake occurrence at the building; and total evaluation means 16 for evaluating life continuity possibility at the building after earthquake occurrence, on the basis of evaluations by the disaster occurrence time insecurity countermeasure evaluation means 12 and the life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation means 14.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

  The present invention relates to a post-earthquake life continuity evaluation system, method, and program for evaluating the continuity of life in an apartment building such as a condominium after an earthquake.

  Conventionally, in large cities after a major earthquake, the population density is high, and there is a risk of exceeding the number of shelters planned by the government. For example, in Minato Ward and Musashino City, there is little damage to buildings. Residents of condominiums do not go to shelters and want to wait at home.

  On the other hand, there is no known program or method for checking in advance whether a safe life can be continued while the lifeline function is stopped after an earthquake in an existing apartment.

  As an approach similar to this, for example, the disaster prevention power condominium certification system created by Osaka City, Osaka Prefecture, Sendai City, Sumida Ward, Chuo Ward, etc. is known. Most of this system targets newly built condominiums, but the Sendai City system targets existing condominiums. However, the Sendai City system only evaluates the software, not the hardware.

  On the other hand, the “Earthquake Countermeasure Checklist for Condominium Management Association” issued in 2013 by the Condominium Management Center, a public interest incorporated foundation, implements software (operation) such as creating a safety confirmation system and conducting disaster prevention drills. 20 items that should be listed are listed, but the hardware items are not touched.

  Thus, there is no known mechanism or tool for LCP evaluation (LCP: Life Continuity Performance) for evaluating the continuity of life in terms of hardware and software for existing apartments.

  In addition, as a prior art relevant to the performance evaluation of apartment buildings, such as a condominium, a simple earthquake-resistant diagnosis system (for example, refer patent document 1), a simple disaster prevention diagnosis system (for example, refer patent document 2), etc. are mentioned, for example. Are known. These are all diagnoses of the earthquake resistance of buildings and disaster prevention performance related to business continuity after the earthquake, and are not a detailed diagnosis of the possibility of continuation of life in apartment buildings such as apartments after the earthquake. .

JP 2004-162399 A JP 2013-186711 A

  For this reason, there has been a need for an evaluation method that can evaluate the continuity of life in apartment buildings such as condominiums after an earthquake from both hardware and software perspectives.

  The present invention has been made in view of the above, and it is possible to evaluate the continuity of life in an apartment building such as a condominium after an earthquake disaster from the perspective of both hardware and software. An object is to provide an evaluation system, method and program.

  In order to solve the above-described problems and achieve the object, the life continuity evaluation system after an earthquake according to the present invention is a system for evaluating the continuity of life in an existing residential building after an earthquake disaster. , Disaster risk countermeasure evaluation means for evaluating measures against earthquake hazards in the building, and life continuity difficulty measure evaluations evaluating measures against life continuity difficulties after earthquake damage in the building And a comprehensive evaluation means for evaluating the possibility of continuation of life in the building after the earthquake based on the evaluation by the risk countermeasure evaluation means at the time of the disaster and the evaluation by the life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation means It is characterized by providing.

  Further, the life continuity evaluation method after an earthquake according to the present invention is a method for evaluating the continuity of life in an existing residential building after an earthquake disaster, and to the risk of an earthquake occurrence in the building. Disaster risk assessment step for evaluating disaster measures, life continuity difficulty assessment step for assessing measures for difficulty in continuation of life after earthquake damage in the building, and risk countermeasure assessment step for disasters And a comprehensive evaluation step for evaluating the possibility of continuation of life in the building after the earthquake based on the evaluation based on the above and the evaluation based on the life continuation difficulty countermeasure evaluation step.

  Further, the life continuity evaluation program after an earthquake according to the present invention is a program for causing a computer to execute a process for evaluating the life continuity in an existing residential building after an earthquake disaster, wherein the computer A disaster risk measure evaluation means for evaluating measures against the risk of an earthquake in the earthquake, and a life continuity difficulty measure evaluation means for evaluating measures against a life continuation difficulty after the earthquake damage in the building, Based on the evaluation by the disaster risk countermeasure evaluation means at the time of the disaster and the evaluation by the life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation means, it is made to function as a comprehensive evaluation means for evaluating the continuity of life in the building after an earthquake disaster. Features.

  According to the life continuity evaluation system after an earthquake according to the present invention, a system for evaluating the continuity of life in an existing residential building after an earthquake disaster, the risk of an earthquake occurring in the building A disaster risk measure evaluation means for evaluating the countermeasures of the disaster, a life continuity difficulty measure evaluation means for evaluating measures for the difficulty of continuation of life after the earthquake disaster in the building, and the risk countermeasure evaluation means for the disaster And comprehensive evaluation means for evaluating the possibility of continuation of life in the building after an earthquake based on the evaluation based on the above and the evaluation by the life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation means. Two aspects of the possibility of continuation of life after a disaster such as a major earthquake in an apartment building such as an existing condominium, risk at the time of a disaster with both hard and soft evaluation axes, and difficulty in continuation of life An effect that is possible to al evaluated. By conducting this evaluation, for example, it becomes easier to grasp the weaknesses of existing condominiums, and it becomes easier to prioritize disaster prevention measures, so effective promotion of disaster prevention measures for existing apartments can be expected. In addition, by this evaluation, for example, in multiple existing condominiums with similar sizes, floors, and ages, it is possible to distinguish between buildings with standard disaster prevention measures, buildings with good disaster prevention measures, and buildings with slightly inferior disaster prevention measures. Therefore, it is possible to provide useful information for second-hand condominium sales to those who wish to purchase dwelling units in existing condominiums.

  Further, according to the life continuity evaluation method after an earthquake according to the present invention, there is a method for evaluating the continuity of life in an existing residential building after the earthquake disaster, and the risk at the time of occurrence of an earthquake in the building A disaster risk countermeasure evaluation step for evaluating countermeasures against safety, a life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation step for evaluating countermeasures for difficulty in continuation of life after an earthquake in the building, and the risk countermeasures at the time of disaster Based on the evaluation by the evaluation step and the evaluation by the life continuation difficulty countermeasure evaluation step, it has a comprehensive evaluation step for evaluating the continuity of life in the building after the earthquake disaster. The possibility of continuation of life after a disaster such as a major earthquake in an apartment building such as an existing condominium that could not be done, the risk at the time of disaster with both hard and soft evaluation axes, difficult to continue life An effect that is possible to evaluate the two aspects. By conducting this evaluation, for example, it becomes easier to grasp the weaknesses of existing condominiums, and it becomes easier to prioritize disaster prevention measures, so effective promotion of disaster prevention measures for existing apartments can be expected. In addition, by this evaluation, for example, in multiple existing condominiums with similar sizes, floors, and ages, it is possible to distinguish between buildings with standard disaster prevention measures, buildings with good disaster prevention measures, and buildings with slightly inferior disaster prevention measures. Therefore, it is possible to provide useful information for second-hand condominium sales to those who wish to purchase dwelling units in existing condominiums.

  Moreover, according to the life continuity evaluation program after an earthquake according to the present invention, a program for causing a computer to execute a process of evaluating the life continuity in an existing residential building after an earthquake, An emergency risk measure evaluation means for evaluating measures against the risk of an earthquake occurring in the building, and an anti-continuity measure measure means for evaluating measures against the difficulty of continuation of life after an earthquake in the building Based on the evaluation by the disaster risk countermeasure evaluation means and the evaluation by the life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation means and function as a comprehensive evaluation means for evaluating the continuity of life in the building after an earthquake disaster Therefore, the possibility of continuation of life after a disaster such as a major earthquake in an apartment building such as an existing condominium that could not be evaluated and confirmed in advance has been Disaster at risk of having an evaluation axis, an effect that it is possible to evaluate the two aspects life continuity difficulties. By conducting this evaluation, for example, it becomes easier to grasp the weaknesses of existing condominiums, and it becomes easier to prioritize disaster prevention measures, so effective promotion of disaster prevention measures for existing apartments can be expected. In addition, by this evaluation, for example, in multiple existing condominiums with similar sizes, floors, and ages, it is possible to distinguish between buildings with standard disaster prevention measures, buildings with good disaster prevention measures, and buildings with slightly inferior disaster prevention measures. Therefore, it is possible to provide useful information for second-hand condominium sales to those who wish to purchase dwelling units in existing condominiums.

FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram showing an embodiment of a life continuity evaluation system after an earthquake according to the present invention. FIG. 2 is a schematic flowchart showing an embodiment of the life continuity evaluation method after an earthquake according to the present invention. FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of a disaster risk data table that is a list of evaluation items for measures against disaster risk. FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of a life continuation difficulty data table that is a list of evaluation items for measures against life continuity difficulty. FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an output example of evaluation results according to the present invention, where (1) is a disaster risk and (2) is a diagram regarding difficulty in continuation of life.

  Embodiments of a life continuity evaluation system, method, and program after an earthquake according to the present invention will be described below in detail with reference to the drawings. Note that the present invention is not limited to the embodiments.

(Life continuity evaluation system after earthquake)
First, the life continuity evaluation system after an earthquake according to the present invention will be described.

  As shown in FIG. 1, a life continuity evaluation system 10 after an earthquake according to the present invention is a system for evaluating the continuity of life in an existing apartment building such as a condominium after an earthquake. A disaster risk countermeasure evaluation means 12, a life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation means 14, a comprehensive evaluation means 16, a control means 18, a database 20, an input means 22, and an output means 24 are provided.

  The disaster risk countermeasure evaluation means 12 evaluates measures against the risk of an earthquake in a building. Here, the risk at the time of disaster refers to the risk that a resident may suffer when a building is damaged by an earthquake. For example, the `` injury risk '' in which the resident is injured, the resident is in the building “Confinement risk” to be confined, “Evacuation risk” to hinder residents' evacuation behavior, “Fire risk” to cause residents to be affected by fire, “Information failure risk” to make it impossible to obtain information inside and outside the building, “Confusion risk” that falls into confusion can be considered. The disaster risk countermeasure evaluation means 12 evaluates countermeasures against the risk of an earthquake in a building by evaluating countermeasures against such risks.

  The life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation means 14 evaluates a countermeasure against the difficulty in continuation of life after an earthquake disaster in a building. Here, life continuity difficulty refers to a risk that a resident may face difficulties or inconvenience when a resident continues living in an earthquake-damaged building. `` Risk '', `` water outage risk '' when water supply in the building stops, `` drainage failure risk '' where drainage in the building becomes impossible, `` gas supply stoppage risk '' when gas supply in the building stops, movement within the building There are “moving difficulty risk” that makes it difficult to move, and “sleeping difficulty risk” that makes it difficult to sleep and eat in the building. The life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation means 14 evaluates the countermeasure against the difficulty in continuation of life after the earthquake disaster in the building by evaluating the countermeasure against such a risk.

  The comprehensive evaluation means 16 evaluates the possibility of continuation of life in a building after an earthquake based on the evaluation by the disaster risk countermeasure evaluation means 12 and the evaluation by the life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation means 14. . Here, the continuity of life in a building after an earthquake is the same level of life as a shelter in the affected area (meals, sleep, Information acquisition).

  The control means 18 is communicably connected to the disaster risk countermeasure evaluation means 12, the life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation means 14, the comprehensive evaluation means 16, the database 20, the input means 22, and the output means 24. It controls data transmission / reception between means. The control means 18 can be comprised by the computer which has CPU, for example.

  The database 20 stores data necessary for evaluation according to the present invention, and appropriately outputs stored data to the control unit 18 in response to a request from the control unit 18 and is input via the control unit 18. Store the data. The database 20 can be configured by a recording medium such as a hard disk. The data stored in the database 20 includes, for example, a disaster risk data table (survey sheet for countermeasures against disasters in FIG. 3) that is a list of evaluation items for countermeasures against disasters, Life continuity difficulty data table (investigation sheet for measures to prevent continuity of life in Fig. 4), which is a list of evaluation items for measures against life continuity difficulties, setting values of points for each category of evaluation items, earthquakes The format of the report on the continuity of life in the building after the disaster can be considered.

  The input means 22 evaluates the measures against the disaster risk against the disaster risk data table (survey sheet in FIG. 3) and the life continuity difficulty data table (survey sheet in FIG. 4). This is for inputting information such as survey results regarding the evaluation of measures against life continuation difficulty, and can be composed of, for example, a keyboard or a mouse.

  The output means 24 is an evaluation result of the countermeasure against the danger at the time of the disaster by the disaster risk countermeasure evaluation means 12 at the time of the disaster, an evaluation result of the countermeasure against the difficulty of continuation of life by the life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation means 14, a comprehensive evaluation means 16 for outputting a comprehensive evaluation result according to 16, a report on the continuity of life in a building after an earthquake disaster created based on these evaluation results, a chart created based on these, for example, a monitor Or a printer.

  Next, “evaluation items for measures against risk at the time of disaster” and “evaluation items for measures against life continuity difficulty” in the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIGS.

[Evaluation items for countermeasures against disaster risks]
First, evaluation items and survey items for countermeasures against disaster risks in the present embodiment will be described. FIG. 3 shows a configuration example of a disaster risk data table that is a list of evaluation items for measures against disaster risk.

  As shown in Fig. 3, the occurrence risk related to the hazard at the time of disaster is "injury risk", "containment risk", "evacuation risk", "fire risk", "information failure risk", "confusion occurrence risk" There are 6 major categories. These have both hard and soft evaluation axes.

  The risk of injury is divided into three categories: “building collapse”, “tile equipment falling / falling”, “furniture fall / glass scattering”, and “rescue / rescue system shortage”.

  Among these, the evaluation item of “building collapse” is “ensuring earthquake resistance”. The survey items include, for example, whether the design is based on the new seismic standards, whether it is seismic isolation / seismic structure, whether the old standards are seismic reinforcement, and if seismic reinforcement is performed. Indicates whether the Is value after reinforcement is 0.6 or more, or whether the earthquake resistance grade is 1 or more when the house performance evaluation is acquired.

  Among the risks of injury, the evaluation item of “Tile equipment peeling / falling” is “fall prevention measures”. The survey items include, for example, whether or not large-scale repair work has been performed, the specifications of the glass facing the evacuation route, and the like.

  Among the injury risks, the evaluation items of “furniture fall / glass scattering” are “furniture fall prevention” and “room scattering prevention”. Here, the survey items of “Furniture fall prevention” are, for example, the specifications of walls that can fix furniture, the creation and distribution of furniture fall prevention measures manuals, the installation of seismic latches for hanging cabinets, the installation of wall bases that can fix refrigerators, This is information gathering at the consultation desk for furniture fall prevention measures (local governments, etc.) and whether or not furniture fall prevention measures are implemented at each unit. Further, the investigation item of “room scattering prevention” is, for example, whether or not each house has implemented glass scattering prevention measures.

  Among the injuries, the evaluation item for “insufficient rescue / rescue system” is “rescue plan”. The survey items include, for example, a list of qualified persons (doctors, nurses, caregivers, etc.), whether or not a rescue system has been established, the location of nearby hospitals / clinics, etc. For example, whether or not relief training is being conducted.

  Confinement risk is classified into “containment in dwelling units / elevators” and “insufficient rescue / rescue measures”.

  Among these, the evaluation items of “containment in dwelling units / elevators” are “prevention of confinement” and “age / update of elevator”. Here, the investigation item of “prevention of confinement” is, for example, whether or not an entrance door with a seismic frame is installed. The survey items of “Elevator Installation Age / Renewal” are, for example, the year of elevator installation, the presence / absence of elevator renewal work (if more than 25 years have passed since installation), the presence / absence of installation of an earthquake control operation device, elevator equipment, etc. These include strengthening fixing and whether or not emergency equipment is installed in the elevator.

  Among the confinement risks, the evaluation item “insufficient rescue / rescue measures” is “rescue plan”. The survey items include, for example, whether or not rescue / rescue equipment is secured, whether or not rescue / rescue equipment can be rented out to the area, and whether or not rescue methods are trained.

  Evacuation risks are categorized into “Evacuation site shortage”, “Lighting during evacuation, difficulty in opening / closing doors”, and “Tsunami evacuation difficulty”.

Among these, the evaluation item of “shortage of evacuation site” is “secure evacuation site”. The survey items are, for example, the presence or absence of secure open space (more than 10% of the open space that can be used to evacuate the site), the presence or absence of a secure open space for temporary refuge (200m ² or more), is defined is of evacuation guidance system Or not.

  Among the evacuation risks, the evaluation items of “lighting during evacuation and difficulty in opening and closing the door” are “securing lighting during evacuation”, “countermeasures for power failure of automatic doors”, and “ease of walking”. Here, the survey items of “Securing lighting during evacuation” include, for example, the presence / absence of lighting in the hallway, the presence / absence of lighting in the indoor stairs, and the like. The investigation item of “automatic door power failure countermeasure” is, for example, whether or not the automatic door can be opened and closed manually when a power failure occurs. The survey item of “easy to walk” is, for example, installation of slopes and handrails in common areas.

  Among the evacuation risks, the evaluation items for “Tsunami Evacuation Difficulty” are “Tsunami Inundation Risk” and “Tsunami Evacuation Measures”. Here, the survey item of “whether or not there is a tsunami inundation risk” is, for example, whether or not the inundation risk is high based on the damage assumption of the local government. In addition, the survey item of “Tsunami Evacuation Countermeasure” is, for example, whether there is an assumption of an evacuation site on a higher floor.

  Fire risks are categorized into “fire spread, smoke spread, escape delay” and “preliminary planning / training shortage”.

  Among these, the evaluation item for “fire spread, smoke diffusion, escape delay” is “assuring fire resistance of the building”. This survey includes, for example, whether or not the evacuation route is fire proof, such as whether or not the fire performance is above a certain level in the housing performance labeling system (always closed fire door / always open fire door), one corridor Whether it is an (external corridor) or a central corridor, and whether there is a check plan for the fire prevention area immediately after the disaster.

  The evaluation items for “risk in advance planning / training” among fire risks are “disaster prevention plan” and “initial fire extinguishing by residents”. Here, the investigation items of the “disaster prevention plan” include, for example, whether or not a legal inspection is performed and whether or not a firefighting plan is created or reviewed. The survey items of “Initial Fire Fighting by Residents” include, for example, whether there are fire extinguisher doors and common areas, whether there is a manual for handling fires, and whether or not initial fire fighting training is conducted at least once a year. , Whether there is thorough management of fire appliances, places of use, and methods of use.

  The risk of information failure is classified into two categories: “information transmission failure in condominiums” and “external communication / collection failure”.

  Among these, the evaluation item of “information transmission failure in condominium” is “information transmission plan / means” in the building. The survey items include, for example, whether or not the operation method (system / manual) of the communication means is maintained, the presence or absence of the bulletin board, the presence or absence of emergency broadcasting equipment, the presence or absence of intercom equipment (if there is an interphone equipment, presence or absence of images, management Presence / absence of call function from staff room, presence / absence of emergency call function from dwelling unit to management room), presence / absence of digital display panel (display in hall), presence / absence of hand microphone, creation / utilization of mailing list, radio / transceiver And the presence of other information transmission means.

  Among the information failure risks, the evaluation items of “external information transfer / collection failure” are “external information transfer plan / means (shared part)” and “external information transfer plan means (proprietary part)”. Here, the survey items of “External information transmission plan / means (shared part)” include, for example, whether there is a wireless LAN environment in the shared part, whether the telephone line is duplicated (administrator room, disaster prevention center, etc.), analog, etc. Whether you have a telephone line, whether you can use a telephone that does not use a commercial power supply (a telephone that can handle a power failure), or a conventional telephone (a telephone that uses a metal line) in the management room, disaster prevention center, etc. In the case of optical / ISDN lines, etc., whether there is a UPS installed in the collective modems in the site, whether a special simple public telephone (pink telephone) is installed, and information on the location of nearby public telephones The presence / absence of grasp, the presence / absence of power supply to an emergency outlet (used for charging a mobile phone), the presence / absence of utilization of a device for charging from a car (such as a mobile phone).

  In addition, the investigation item of “External information transmission planning means (proprietary part)” is, for example, whether or not an analog telephone line is possessed or whether or not a telephone that does not use a commercial power supply (a telephone that supports power failure) is used. Whether or not conventional telephones (telephones using metal lines) are installed in the dwelling units, and in the case of optical / ISDN lines, the presence / absence of UPS installation in the modem of each unit, radio (battery type) / battery Or not.

  The risk of confusion is categorized into “building management system”, “initial delay / confused”, and “safety confirmation difficult”.

  Among these, the evaluation items of the “building management system” are “disaster prevention center” and “stay situation of managers”. Here, the investigation item of “disaster prevention center” is, for example, the presence or absence of the disaster prevention center. The investigation item of “administrator stay status” is, for example, whether the administrator is resident or patrol.

  Among the risks of confusion, the evaluation items of “initial delay / confusion” are “disaster prevention plan” and “injury prevention measures”. Here, the survey items of the “disaster prevention plan” are, for example, grasping the risk of the site based on the existence of a voluntary disaster prevention organization, the existence of a disaster prevention action plan (disaster prevention manual), and the damage assumption (such as local governments). Whether or not measures are taken based on damage assumptions (such as local governments), whether or not disaster drills are regularly conducted, and whether or not disaster prevention awareness activities are implemented. In addition, survey items of “injury prevention measures” include, for example, the presence or absence of maintenance of emergency supplies such as helmets, flashlights, raincoats, and gloves.

  Among the confusion risks, the “safety confirmation difficulties” evaluation items are “safety confirmation / support”, “safety confirmation plan”, and “reciprocity support for residents”. Here, the survey item of “safety confirmation / support” is, for example, the presence / absence of a safety confirmation implementation system / plan. Further, the investigation items of the “safety confirmation plan” are, for example, the presence / absence and update status of the resident list, the presence / absence of cooperation with the manager, and the like. In addition, the survey item of “mutual recognition support of residents” is, for example, whether or not to ensure opportunities for resident exchange on a daily basis.

[Evaluation items for measures to prevent difficulty in life continuity]
Next, evaluation items and survey items for measures against difficulty in life continuity in the present embodiment will be described. FIG. 4 shows a configuration example of a life continuity difficulty data table that is a list of evaluation items of measures for measures against life continuity difficulty.

  As shown in FIG. 4, the occurrence risks related to life continuity difficulty are “power outage risk”, “water outage risk”, “drainage failure risk”, “gas supply stoppage risk”, “movement difficulty risk”, “sleeping difficulty” risk. Are roughly classified into six categories. These have both hard and soft evaluation axes.

  The power outage risk is classified into three categories: “power loss”, “lighting shortage”, and “ventilator inactivity”.

  Among these, the evaluation item “loss of power supply function” is “secured power supply”. The survey items include, for example, whether or not there is an emergency or regular private power generation facility, whether or not a portable generator is owned, whether or not fuel is stored for private or portable generators, and plans for intermittent operation of emergency generators. Presence / absence of manual, installation floor of substation equipment and water loss prevention measures, presence / absence of operation manuals (organizations / rules, etc.) for power use such as lighting equipment / portable generator in case of power failure The presence / absence of a storage battery, the presence / absence of two-way electric power, the presence / absence of cogeneration facilities (generation and utilization of electric power and heat), and the like.

  Among the blackout risks, the evaluation item for “insufficient lighting” is “secure alternative lighting”. This survey item is, for example, the presence or absence of maintenance of lighting equipment / equipment (projector, flashlight, etc.) at the time of a power failure.

  The assessment item for “ventilator inoperability” in the power outage risk is “ensure power supply”. The survey items include, for example, whether or not a portable generator is owned and whether or not a vulnerable person (dwelling unit, necessary support contents) is grasped.

  The risk of water outage is categorized into “water tank damage / water supply failure risk”, “water pipe damage risk”, “insufficient means for securing water”, and “insufficient means for bathing / washing”.

  Among these, the evaluation item of “Danger of receiving tank damage / inability to supply water” is “Securing water for daily use”. For example, if there is a water receiving tank, the survey items include the year of manufacture of the water receiving tank, the type of water supply method (directly connected pressure increasing method / pressurized water supply method (pressure tank method / pump direct feed method) / high water tank method), etc. It is.

  The evaluation item of “water pipe breakage risk” is “seismic resistance of water supply facilities”. The survey items include, for example, whether or not a flexible joint is used for equipment piping and whether or not a building water supply pipe is strengthened.

  Among the risk of water outage, the evaluation items for “insufficient means for securing water” are “securing water for daily life”, “water supply during power outages”, and “rules for water use”. Here, the survey items of “Securing water for daily life” include, for example, the presence or absence of a water receiving tank, the installation of a well (available even in the event of a power failure), the presence or absence of a polycontainer / pump pump, the installation of a rainwater storage tank, the hot water storage type Water heater installation, water tank enlargement (with or without renovation), water tank etc. emergency shut-off valve installation, water tank etc. sampling port installation, water spigot installation, dual system water supply availability, small water maker The presence or absence of installation. Further, the investigation item of “water supply at the time of power failure” is, for example, whether or not power supply at the time of power failure is possible to a water supply (pumping) pump. In addition, the survey item of “Rules for using water” is, for example, whether or not there is an emergency water utilization system and rules (organization / manual).

  Among the risk of water outage, the evaluation item “insufficient alternatives to bathing / laundry” is “utilization of public baths”. Here, the survey items of “utilization of public baths” are, for example, whether or not the surrounding public bath information is grasped, whether or not the coin laundry information is grasped.

  The risk of drainage failure is categorized into “toilet drainage failure” and “alternative means shortage”.

  Among these, the evaluation items of “toilet drainage failure” are “type of waste disposal means”, “seismic resistance of drainage equipment”, and “risk of liquefaction damage and countermeasures”. Here, the survey item of “type of excrement disposal means” is, for example, whether sewerage facilities are used or septic tanks are used. In addition, the survey item of “seismic resistance of drainage facilities” is, for example, the strengthening of building drainage pipes and the presence / absence of measures for connecting parts. The survey items of “Liquefaction damage occurrence risk and countermeasures” include, for example, the presence or absence of ground liquefaction risk based on the assumption of damage by local governments, etc., and liquids in manholes and sewer pipes in areas where liquefaction risk is high. These include the presence or absence of countermeasures (prevention of lifting) and the earthquake resistance of manholes and sewer pipe connections.

  The assessment item for “deficiency of alternative means” in the drainage failure risk is “secure alternative means”. The survey items include, for example, whether there is a manhole toilet, if there is a manhole toilet, whether it is in the premises, in the vicinity or in the surrounding area, securing a tent for a simple toilet, a simple toilet, a toilet bag, and a simple toilet when drainage is difficult The existence / non-existence of installation / operation system (organization / manual).

  The gas supply stoppage risk is categorized into “gas supply failure”, “gas recovery failure”, and “alternative means shortage”.

  Among these, the evaluation item of “gas supply failure” is “continuation of gas supply”. The survey items include, for example, the use of medium pressure gas, the type of gas piping, and the presence / absence of main supply interruption at the building lead-in portion.

  Among the gas supply stop risks, the evaluation items of “Gas restoration failure” are “Knowing gas restoration method” and “Understanding / updating emergency contact information”. Here, the investigation item of “well-known of gas restoration method” is, for example, whether or not the resident is informed of the gas restoration method. Further, the survey item of “Understanding / updating emergency contact information” is, for example, whether or not the gas company emergency contact information has been grasped / updated.

  Among the risks of gas supply stoppage, the evaluation items of “insufficient alternative means” are “securing cooking means” and “securing alternative air-conditioning means”. Here, the investigation items of “Securing cooking means” are, for example, presence / absence of possession of propane gas, presence / absence of storage of cassette gas stove and gas cylinder, and the like. Further, the investigation items of “Securing alternative cooling and heating means” are, for example, the presence or absence of a kerosene stove (battery type), the presence or absence of a gas engine air conditioner with a power generation function, and the like.

  Note that the gas supply stoppage risk is excluded from the assessment of the risk of occurrence related to life continuity difficulty according to the conditions of the building to be evaluated. For example, in the case of an all-electric apartment, there is no risk of gas supply stop, so the risk of gas supply stop risk is excluded.

  The difficulty of moving is classified into “risk of prolonged elevator stop” and “insufficient alternative”.

  Among them, the evaluation item of “risk of prolonged elevator stop” is “elevator anti-seismic measures / early automatic restoration”. The survey items include, for example, whether or not there is a private generator and fuel is secured to operate the elevator for 3 days, whether there is an elevator automatic return operation program, the number of floors of the building (for example, whether it is 20 floors or more), etc. It is.

  The evaluation items for “deficiency of alternative means” among the movement difficulty risks are “stair transport measures”, “stock storage on each floor”, and “transport / transport plan”. Here, the investigation item of “stair transport measures” is, for example, the presence / absence of a stair movement aid. In addition, the survey item of “stock storage on each floor” is, for example, whether or not a disaster prevention warehouse is installed on a higher floor. The survey items of the “transport / transport plan” include, for example, the stair transport / transport system and the presence / absence of a manual.

  In addition, about the said movement difficulty risk, according to the conditions of an evaluation object building, it excludes from the evaluation object of the generation | occurrence | production risk concerning life continuation difficulty. For example, in the case of a condominium having 5 floors or less, since the movement difficulty risk does not occur, the evaluation of the movement difficulty risk is excluded.

  The risk of poor sleep is divided into “Food shortage”, “Fuel shortage”, “Home deficiency”, “Life deficit”, and “Administration support difficulties”.

  Of these, the assessment item for “food shortage” is “secure food and water”. The survey items include, for example, the storage of food that does not require cooking, the presence or absence of a food storage location (warehouse), the presence or absence of a method and system for using the stored food, and the securing of drinking water.

  The evaluation items for “shortage of fuel” in the risk of sleeping and eating are “securing fuel and cooking utensils” and “material storage location”. Here, the survey items of “Securing fuel / cooking utensils” are, for example, installation of a furnace bench, stockpiling of fuel / pots, use of seven wheels / outdoor equipment, and the like. In addition, the survey items of “material storage location” include, for example, the installation of a disaster prevention warehouse, the presence / absence of securing disaster prevention products (lights with radio, waterproof sheets, cooked items, plastic tanks, etc.).

  Out of the risk of sleeping and eating, the evaluation items for “staying at home” are “stocking / preparation at each dwelling unit” and “establishment of semi-evacuation shelter”. Here, the survey item of “stock / preparation at each dwelling unit” is, for example, the presence / absence of stockpile / disaster supplies at each dwelling unit. The survey items for “establishment of quasi-evacuation shelter” include, for example, whether or not a semi-evacuation shelter plan / manual has been prepared, whether or not facilities / equipment for evacuation shelter have been secured, possession of meeting rooms, and high-rise residents Whether or not to secure a living place.

  The evaluation items of “living difficulty” among sleep-risk difficulty risks are “living support system”, “sanitary disposal measures for waste”, and “crime prevention system”. Here, the survey items of the “life support system” include, for example, understanding of vulnerable people (dwelling units, necessary support contents), establishment of residents' association, presence / absence of cooperation with local welfare officers, presence / absence of relatives, and the like. In addition, the survey item of “sanitary disposal measures for waste” is, for example, whether or not there is a plan for storage and disposal of earthquake trash. Further, the investigation item of “crime prevention system” is, for example, the presence or absence of a system such as a crime prevention patrol.

  The evaluation item of “administrative support difficulties” in the risk of poor sleep is “regional cooperation system”. This survey includes, for example, cooperation with regional disaster prevention leaders, participation in local disaster prevention drills (events), conclusion of disaster prevention agreements with wards, cooperation on regional shelter management, participation in the Federation of Residents' Associations, The presence or absence of transmission.

  Next, the operation and action of the configuration of the life continuity evaluation system 10 after the earthquake will be described.

  First, with regard to the survey items shown in FIGS. 3 and 4, a survey of materials such as drawings, a visual survey of local buildings, and an interview survey with the management union director / management company were conducted. To the time risk data table and life continuity difficulty data table (survey sheet). The input data table is temporarily stored in the database 20.

  The disaster risk countermeasure evaluation means 12 reads out the disaster risk data table (survey sheet) to which the survey results have been input from the database 20, and creates an evaluation sheet regarding the disaster risk countermeasure based on this data To do.

  The life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation means 14 reads out the life continuity difficulty data table (survey sheet) in which the survey results are input from the database 20, and creates an evaluation sheet regarding the life continuity difficulty countermeasure based on the data.

  Here, in each data table (survey sheet), a score is set in advance for each of the middle classification items of the evaluation items, and the disaster risk countermeasure evaluation means 12 and the life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation means 14 The score of the middle category item is calculated according to the input contents of the result. Then, by summing up the scores of the middle category items, the scores of the major category items are calculated, and an evaluation sheet describing the scores is created.

  The comprehensive evaluation means 16 evaluates the possibility of continuing life in the building after the earthquake based on the evaluation results (evaluation sheets) from the disaster risk countermeasure evaluation means 12 and the life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation means 14. Create a report on the results of this evaluation. Here, the comprehensive evaluation means 16 can expand the contents by selecting an appropriate measure according to the evaluation result from a predetermined measure menu and describing it in the report.

  The generated report and evaluation sheet are appropriately converted into various types of charts (for example, a radar chart) and output so as to be viewable through the output means 24 such as a monitor or a printer. A display example of this output result is shown in FIG. The created report and evaluation sheet may be stored in the database 20 as necessary.

  As described above, according to the life continuity evaluation system 10 after an earthquake according to the present invention, it is possible to continue life after a disaster such as a large earthquake in an apartment building such as an existing apartment that could not be evaluated and confirmed in advance. It is possible to evaluate the performance from two aspects of disaster risk and hard life continuity with both hard and soft evaluation axes. By conducting this evaluation, for example, it becomes easier to grasp the weaknesses of existing condominiums, and it becomes easier to prioritize disaster prevention measures, so effective promotion of disaster prevention measures for existing apartments can be expected. In addition, by this evaluation, for example, in multiple existing condominiums with similar sizes, floors, and ages, it is possible to distinguish between buildings with standard disaster prevention measures, buildings with good disaster prevention measures, and buildings with slightly inferior disaster prevention measures Therefore, it is possible to provide useful information for second-hand condominium sales to those who wish to purchase dwelling units in existing condominiums.

(Life continuity assessment method after earthquake)
Next, the life continuity evaluation method after an earthquake according to the present invention will be described.

  As shown in FIG. 2, the life continuity evaluation method after an earthquake according to the present invention is a method for evaluating the continuity of life in an existing residential building after an earthquake, Disaster risk countermeasure evaluation step S1 for evaluating measures against disasters at times, life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation step S2 for evaluating measures against life continuity difficulties after an earthquake in a building, and disaster risks And a comprehensive evaluation step S3 for evaluating the possibility of continuation of life in the building after the earthquake based on the evaluation by the property countermeasure evaluation step S1 and the evaluation by the life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation step S2.

  The disaster risk countermeasure evaluation step S1 is a step corresponding to the disaster risk countermeasure evaluation means 12 of the above-mentioned life continuity evaluation system 10 after an earthquake, and the same processing is performed. The life continuation difficulty countermeasure evaluation step S2 is also a step corresponding to the life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation means 14 and performs the same processing. The comprehensive evaluation step S3 is also a step corresponding to the comprehensive evaluation means 16 and performs the same processing.

  According to the life continuity assessment method after an earthquake according to the present invention, the continuity of life after a disaster such as a major earthquake of an apartment building such as an existing apartment that could not be evaluated and confirmed in advance has been There is an effect that it is possible to evaluate from the two aspects of disaster risk and difficulty in continuation of life that have both soft evaluation axes. By conducting this evaluation, for example, it becomes easier to grasp the weaknesses of existing condominiums, and it becomes easier to prioritize disaster prevention measures, so effective promotion of disaster prevention measures for existing apartments can be expected. In addition, by this evaluation, for example, in multiple existing condominiums with similar sizes, floors, and ages, it is possible to distinguish between buildings with standard disaster prevention measures, buildings with good disaster prevention measures, and buildings with slightly inferior disaster prevention measures Therefore, it is possible to provide useful information for second-hand condominium sales to those who wish to purchase dwelling units in existing condominiums.

(Life continuity assessment program after earthquake)
Next, the life continuity evaluation program after the earthquake according to the present invention will be described.

  The life continuity evaluation program after an earthquake according to the present invention is a program that causes a computer to execute a process for evaluating the continuity of life in an existing residential building after an earthquake, A disaster risk countermeasure evaluation means 12 for evaluating measures against danger at the time of disaster, a life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation means 14 for evaluating measures against life continuity difficulties after an earthquake in a building, and a disaster Based on the evaluation by the time risk countermeasure evaluation means 12 and the evaluation by the life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation means 14, it functions as a comprehensive evaluation means 16 that evaluates the life continuity possibility in the building after the earthquake disaster.

  Here, the program for realizing the functions of the life continuity evaluation system 10 after the earthquake in FIG. 1 is recorded on a computer-readable recording medium, and the program recorded on the recording medium is read by the computer and executed. By doing so, processing such as life continuity evaluation may be performed. Here, the “computer” includes hardware such as an OS (operation system) and peripheral devices.

  Further, the “computer” includes a homepage providing environment (or display environment) if the WWW (World Wide Web) provided on the Internet is used. The “computer-readable recording medium” refers to a storage medium such as a flexible disk, a magneto-optical disk, a portable medium such as a ROM, a CD-ROM, or a USB memory, and a hard disk built in the computer. . Furthermore, the “computer-readable recording medium” dynamically holds a program for a short time like a communication line when transmitting a program via a network such as the Internet or a communication line such as a telephone line. In this case, a volatile memory in a computer system serving as a server or a client in that case, and a program that holds a program for a certain period of time are also included. The program may be a program for realizing a part of the above-described functions, or may be a program that can realize the above-described functions in combination with a program already recorded in a computer.

  According to the life continuity assessment program after an earthquake according to the present invention, the continuity of life after a disaster such as a major earthquake in an apartment building such as an existing apartment that could not be evaluated and confirmed in advance has been There is an effect that it is possible to evaluate from the two aspects of disaster risk and difficulty in continuation of life that have both soft evaluation axes. By conducting this evaluation, for example, it becomes easier to grasp the weaknesses of existing condominiums, and it becomes easier to prioritize disaster prevention measures, so effective promotion of disaster prevention measures for existing apartments can be expected. In addition, by this evaluation, for example, in multiple existing condominiums with similar sizes, floors, and ages, it is possible to distinguish between buildings with standard disaster prevention measures, buildings with good disaster prevention measures, and buildings with slightly inferior disaster prevention measures Therefore, it is possible to provide useful information for second-hand condominium sales to those who wish to purchase dwelling units in existing condominiums.

  As described above, according to the life continuity evaluation system after an earthquake according to the present invention, a system for evaluating the continuity of life in an existing residential building after an earthquake disaster, A disaster risk countermeasure evaluation means for evaluating measures against danger at the time of disaster, a life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation means for evaluating measures against life continuity difficulties after the earthquake in the building, and the disaster Based on the evaluation by the time risk countermeasure evaluation means and the evaluation by the life continuation difficulty countermeasure evaluation means, and the comprehensive evaluation means for evaluating the continuity of life in the building after the earthquake disaster. The possibility of continuation of life after a disaster such as a large earthquake in an existing condominium building that could not be evaluated / confirmed in the event of a disaster with both hard and soft evaluation axes, difficulty in continuation of life An effect that is possible to evaluate the two aspects sex. By conducting this evaluation, for example, it becomes easier to grasp the weaknesses of existing condominiums, and it becomes easier to prioritize disaster prevention measures, so effective promotion of disaster prevention measures for existing apartments can be expected. In addition, by this evaluation, for example, in multiple existing condominiums with similar sizes, floors, and ages, it is possible to distinguish between buildings with standard disaster prevention measures, buildings with good disaster prevention measures, and buildings with slightly inferior disaster prevention measures. Therefore, it is possible to provide useful information for second-hand condominium sales to those who wish to purchase dwelling units in existing condominiums.

  Further, according to the life continuity evaluation method after an earthquake according to the present invention, there is a method for evaluating the continuity of life in an existing residential building after the earthquake disaster, and the risk at the time of occurrence of an earthquake in the building A disaster risk countermeasure evaluation step for evaluating countermeasures against safety, a life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation step for evaluating countermeasures for difficulty in continuation of life after an earthquake in the building, and the risk countermeasures at the time of disaster Based on the evaluation by the evaluation step and the evaluation by the life continuation difficulty countermeasure evaluation step, it has a comprehensive evaluation step for evaluating the continuity of life in the building after the earthquake disaster. The possibility of continuation of life after a disaster such as a major earthquake in an apartment building such as an existing condominium that could not be done, the risk at the time of disaster with both hard and soft evaluation axes, difficult to continue life An effect that is possible to evaluate the two aspects. By conducting this evaluation, for example, it becomes easier to grasp the weaknesses of existing condominiums, and it becomes easier to prioritize disaster prevention measures, so effective promotion of disaster prevention measures for existing apartments can be expected. In addition, by this evaluation, for example, in multiple existing condominiums with similar sizes, floors, and ages, it is possible to distinguish between buildings with standard disaster prevention measures, buildings with good disaster prevention measures, and buildings with slightly inferior disaster prevention measures. Therefore, it is possible to provide useful information for second-hand condominium sales to those who wish to purchase dwelling units in existing condominiums.

  Moreover, according to the life continuity evaluation program after an earthquake according to the present invention, a program for causing a computer to execute a process of evaluating the life continuity in an existing residential building after an earthquake, An emergency risk measure evaluation means for evaluating measures against the risk of an earthquake occurring in the building, and an anti-continuity measure measure means for evaluating measures against the difficulty of continuation of life after an earthquake in the building Based on the evaluation by the disaster risk countermeasure evaluation means and the evaluation by the life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation means and function as a comprehensive evaluation means for evaluating the continuity of life in the building after an earthquake disaster Therefore, the possibility of continuation of life after a disaster such as a major earthquake in an apartment building such as an existing condominium that could not be evaluated and confirmed in advance has been Disaster at risk of having an evaluation axis, an effect that it is possible to evaluate the two aspects life continuity difficulties. By conducting this evaluation, for example, it becomes easier to grasp the weaknesses of existing condominiums, and it becomes easier to prioritize disaster prevention measures, so effective promotion of disaster prevention measures for existing apartments can be expected. In addition, by this evaluation, for example, in multiple existing condominiums with similar sizes, floors, and ages, it is possible to distinguish between buildings with standard disaster prevention measures, buildings with good disaster prevention measures, and buildings with slightly inferior disaster prevention measures. Therefore, it is possible to provide useful information for second-hand condominium sales to those who wish to purchase dwelling units in existing condominiums.

  As described above, the post-earthquake life continuity evaluation system, method and program according to the present invention are useful for evaluating the continuity of life in an apartment building such as a condominium after an earthquake disaster. The possibility of continuation of life after a disaster such as a large earthquake in an apartment building such as an existing condominium is evaluated from two aspects: the risk at the time of disaster with both hard and soft evaluation axes, and difficulty in continuation of life Suitable for

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 10 Life continuity evaluation system after earthquake 12 Risk countermeasure measure evaluation means at the time of disaster 14 Life continuity difficulty measure evaluation means 16 Comprehensive evaluation means 18 Control means 20 Database 22 Input means 24 Output means

Claims (3)

A system for evaluating the continuity of life in existing residential buildings after an earthquake,
A disaster risk measure evaluation means for evaluating measures against the risk of an earthquake in the building;
Life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation means for evaluating measures against life continuity difficulty after earthquake damage in the building,
Comprehensive evaluation means for evaluating the continuity of life in the building after an earthquake based on the evaluation by the disaster risk countermeasure evaluation means at the time of the disaster and the evaluation by the life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation means A life continuity assessment system after an earthquake. A method for assessing the continuity of life in an existing residential building after an earthquake,
A disaster risk countermeasure evaluation step for evaluating measures against the risk of an earthquake in the building;
Life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation step for evaluating measures against difficulty in continuation of life after earthquake damage in the building,
Comprehensive evaluation step for evaluating the continuity of life in the building after an earthquake disaster based on the evaluation by the risk countermeasure evaluation step at the time of the disaster and the evaluation by the life continuity difficulty measure evaluation step Characteristic continuity assessment method after earthquake. A program that causes a computer to execute a process for evaluating the continuity of life in an existing residential building after an earthquake,
Computer
A disaster risk measure evaluation means for evaluating measures against the risk of an earthquake in the building;
Life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation means for evaluating measures against life continuity difficulty after earthquake damage in the building,
Based on the evaluation by the disaster risk countermeasure evaluation means at the time of the disaster and the evaluation by the life continuity difficulty countermeasure evaluation means, it is made to function as a comprehensive evaluation means for evaluating the continuity of life in the building after an earthquake disaster. A featured life continuity assessment program after an earthquake.

Images