JP2024023722A - Tutorial support system, method and program - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a technique of supporting optimal matching between a student receiving a tutorial and an instructor.

SOLUTION: A tutorial support system includes an instructor information management section prestoring instructor information associated with a learning history information representing a past learning history of the instructor, for each of the plurality of instructors, student information recording section for recording student information associated with a learning history information representing past learning history of the student, and a matching section presenting matching information based on a degree of accordance between the learning history of the instructor and the learning history of the student.

SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

COPYRIGHT: (C)2024,JPO&INPIT

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a technique for managing individual instruction in which an instructor individually instructs students in learning using a computer system.

There are study guidance services such as online English conversation, online tutoring, and tutors that support study for university entrance exams and qualification exams, where instructors and tutors interact with students over communication lines to provide individual guidance to students. Personnel on the teaching side, including instructors and tutors, are sometimes referred to as instructors. In this type of learning guidance service, compatibility exists between students and instructors. If there is a good compatibility between students and instructors, better instruction will be possible and learning will be more effective.

Patent Document 1 discloses a technique for matching instructors and students. The individual learning guidance system of Patent Document 1 includes a server that can be accessed by an instructor's client and a student's client through communication means. The server includes an instructor database for registering instructor information, an instructor information disclosure means for disclosing the registered contents of the instructor database to the student client, and, upon receiving the nomination of a desired instructor from the student client, the communication means. a matching means for inquiring the nominated instructor whether or not to accept the nomination through the communication means; a notification means for notifying the nominated student through the communication means of whether or not the nomination has been accepted by the matching means; and a lecturer input from the student's client. and evaluation management means for registering evaluation information for the instructor in the instructor database.

Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2004-279727

The individual learning guidance system disclosed in Patent Document 1 registers evaluation information indicating evaluations of instructors by past students or parents in an instructor database, and uses the information for matching students and instructors.

However, newly registered instructors do not have evaluations from past students or parents. In addition, inexperienced instructors receive fewer evaluations from past students and parents. On the other hand, veteran instructors receive many positive reviews from past students and parents. However, the evaluation may reflect more strongly the instructor's ability than the compatibility with the students. In that case, students may concentrate on highly capable instructors.

One purpose of the present disclosure is to provide technology that supports suitable matching between students and instructors for individualized instruction.

The individual instruction support system according to one aspect of the present disclosure provides instructor information that stores in advance instructor information associated with learning history information indicating the past learning history of the instructor for each of a plurality of instructors. a management unit; a student information recording unit that records student information in which the student is associated with learning history information indicating the student's past learning history; and a matching unit that presents matching information based on the degree of matching.

According to one aspect of the present disclosure, matching information is presented based on the degree of correspondence between the past learning histories of the instructor and the student, so it is possible to support appropriate matching between students for individualized instruction and instructors. can.

It is a block diagram of an individual guidance support system of an embodiment. It is a flow chart of instructor student matching processing of an embodiment. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of attribute information of an instructor in Example 1. FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of learning history information of an instructor in Example 1. FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of student attribute information in Example 1. FIG. 3 is a diagram showing learning history information of a student in Example 1. FIG. It is a figure which shows the score calculation method for each item of attribute information. It is a figure which shows the score calculation method for each item of learning history information. 7 is a diagram showing an example of learning history information of an instructor in Example 2. FIG. FIG. 7 is a diagram showing learning history information of a student in Example 2. FIG. FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the hardware configuration of the individual instruction support system according to the embodiment.

Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.

In this embodiment, a computer system is used to provide individual instruction in which instructors individually provide guidance on learning to students who are studying for junior high school, high school, university entrance exams, national qualification exams, private qualification exams, civil service exams, etc. The individual instruction support system that will be used and supported will be explained.

In individual instruction, the compatibility between the student and instructor is important. The individual instruction support system of this embodiment supports good matching between students and instructors.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of the individual instruction support system of this embodiment. FIG. 2 is a flowchart of the instructor-student matching process of this embodiment.

Referring to FIG. 1, the individual instruction support system 10 includes an instructor information management section 11, a student information recording section 12, a matching section 13, and a presentation section 14.

In step S101 of FIG. 2, the instructor information management unit 11 stores, for each of a plurality of instructors, instructor information associated with learning history information indicating the instructor's past learning history. It is registered in the database (DB) 15 in advance.

In step S102, the student information recording unit 12 acquires student information that associates learning history information indicating the past learning history of the student to whom an instructor is assigned (hereinafter also referred to as "target student"). , recorded in the student information DB 16. The student's past learning history may be input by the student himself, or the administrator may input information reported by the student into the individual instruction support system 10.

In step S103, the matching unit 13 refers to the instructor information DB 15 and the student information DB 16, calculates the degree of agreement between each instructor's learning history and the target student's learning history, and determines the degree of agreement. Based on this, matching information regarding the combination of target student and instructor is generated. The matching information may include, for example, information indicating the degree of matching between the target student and each instructor. Further, the matching information may include information indicating a ranking of instructors based on the degree of matching with the target student.

In step S104, the presentation unit 14 displays a screen showing recommended information regarding the instructor to be assigned to the target student based on the matching information. The recommendation information may include a list of instructors recommended as instructors to be assigned to the target student. The list may be a list of predetermined leaders with high rankings in terms of the degree of agreement.

According to the present embodiment, since matching information is presented based on the degree of correspondence between the past learning histories of the instructor and the student, it is possible to support appropriate matching between students and instructors for individual guidance.

Embodiment 1 exemplifies an individual instruction support system that supports study guidance for qualification examinations.

The individual instruction support system 10 of the first embodiment basically has the configuration shown in FIG. 1 and executes the processing shown in FIG. 2.

The individual instruction support system 10 of the first embodiment uses not only the learning histories of students and instructors, but also information on the attributes of students and instructors to measure the compatibility between students and instructors. Further, the individual instruction support system 10 of the first embodiment uses information suitable for determining compatibility between a student and an instructor in teaching a qualification exam as the learning history of the instructor and the student.

In step S101, the instructor information management unit 11 registers instructor information including attribute information and learning history information of each instructor in the instructor information DB 15.

FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of instructor attribute information in the first embodiment. In the attribute information 51, gender, place of residence, age, educational background, appearance, cooking preferences, hobbies and special skills, and dream goals are registered in association with an instructor number that individually identifies each instructor. For example, the instructor whose instructor number is 001 has attributes such as male gender, Tokyo address, age 30 years, academic background as a master's degree, and serious appearance.

If the attributes of the items that the student values are similar to those of the instructor, there is a high possibility that the student and instructor will be compatible. For example, when it comes to gender, some students said they received instruction from someone of the same gender, while others did not. Regarding the place of residence, the learning environment and amount of information differ depending on the size of the city you live in, whether it is a large city, a mid-sized city, or a rural area, and the learning method that suits that differs as well. Regarding age, some students prefer to be taught by instructors close to their own age, while others do not see this as an issue. Regarding academic background, some students prefer to be taught by instructors with similar academic backgrounds, while others are not particular about academic background. When it comes to appearance, some students want to be taught by an instructor who looks similar to them, while others don't care about appearance. When it comes to cooking preferences, it's easier to have a lively conversation if you have similar food likes and dislikes. However, students who are interested in food are not particular about their cooking preferences. It's easier to have a lively conversation if your hobbies and special skills are similar. However, students who don't often talk about their hobbies and special skills don't dwell on them. Regarding dream goals, it's easier to have a lively conversation if you have the same dreams and goals for the future. However, students who don't talk much about their dreams and goals don't dwell on them.

FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an example of learning history information of an instructor in the first embodiment. In the learning history information 52, the occupation at the time of learning, the age at the time of learning, and the number of examinations are registered in association with the instructor number. For example, the instructor whose instructor number is 001 has a learning history in which his occupation is a desk-work office worker, his age at the time of study was 26, and he passed the exam on his first attempt.

If a student's learning history in studying for a qualification exam is similar to that of an instructor, there is a high possibility that the student and instructor are compatible. For example, depending on the occupation, working styles such as desk work or manual labor, working hours, and holidays differ, so the effective way to study for qualification exams also differs. If the professions are similar, the instructor's experience will be useful in teaching the students. Regarding the age at the time of learning, since memory ability differs depending on the age, the suitable curriculum differs depending on the age. If the students are close in age at the time of learning, instructors can use their own experience to provide guidance regarding the curriculum. Regarding the number of exams to take, the appropriate curriculum differs between studying for the first qualification exam and studying for the second and subsequent exams. The curriculum you experience differs depending on whether you passed on your first attempt or on your second or subsequent attempts. Instructors who pass the exam on the first try are suitable for teaching students to prepare for their first qualification exam. Instructors who pass the exam on their second and subsequent attempts are suitable for providing guidance in studying for the second and subsequent qualification exams.

In step S102, the student information recording unit 12 records student information including the target student's attribute information and learning history information in the student information DB 16. Specifically, the student information recording unit 12 displays a questionnaire screen that prompts the input of a learning history and a set of attributes and attribute weights, and based on the input from the questionnaire screen, the student information recording unit 12 displays the learning history, attributes, and attribute weights. Register in student information.

FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of student attribute information in the first embodiment. Attribute information 61 includes gender, place of residence, age, educational background, appearance, cooking preferences, hobbies and special skills, dream goals, and the degree to which each of these items is emphasized, in association with the student number that individually identifies each student. is registered. The degree of importance attached to each item is information obtained by the students themselves by inputting their responses to the questionnaire, and is indicated by A, B, and C in the column on the right side of each item in FIG. A indicates "very important". B indicates "somewhat important". C indicates "not important".

Here, it is assumed that the student whose student number is 003 is the target student for whom attribute information has been newly input. The student whose student number is 003 is male, places a lot of importance on gender, has a place of residence in Tokyo, places a lot of importance on place of residence, is 32 years old, and places a lot of importance on age. , has a master's degree in education, places a fair amount of importance on educational background, is serious about appearance, and places great importance on appearance.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing learning history information of a student in the first embodiment. In the learning history information 62, occupation, age, and number of examinations are registered in association with the student number. Since the occupation is the occupation of the student who is currently studying, it corresponds to the occupation at the time of learning for the instructor shown in FIG. Since the age is the age of the student who is currently learning, it corresponds to the age at the time of learning of the instructor shown in FIG. In the first embodiment, the same age of the student is included in both the attribute information 61 in FIG. 5 and the learning history information 62 in FIG. However, it may be possible to register only one of them and refer to it for the other.

In step S103, the matching unit 13 calculates a matching score indicating the degree of agreement between the target student's attribute information 51 and learning history information 52 and each instructor's attribute information 61 and learning history information 62.

The method for calculating the matching score is determined for the purpose of determining the compatibility between students and instructors. The matching score in this embodiment is the total value of the score of each item included in the attribute information and the score of each item included in the learning history information.

The influence of each item included in the attribute information on compatibility changes depending on whether or not the student attaches importance to that item, so the score is weighted according to the degree of emphasis given by the student. On the other hand, each item of learning history information is not weighted based on the degree of importance given by the student, since matching affects compatibility regardless of whether or not the student places importance on the items.

Criteria for determining matching of each item included in the attribute information are determined individually for the purpose of determining compatibility between students and instructors. Regarding gender, a match is considered a match for that item, and a mismatch is considered a mismatch for that item. In order to reflect differences in the learning environment and amount of information, addresses are classified into large cities, medium-sized cities, and rural areas, and a match in the classification is considered a match for that item, and a mismatch in the classification is considered a mismatch in the item. do. Regarding age, in order to reflect whether the instructors are of the same age or not, if the age difference is within a predetermined value (for example, 5 years), it is considered a match for that item, and if the age difference exceeds a predetermined value, it is considered a mismatch for that item. . Academic background is classified into master's degree, university graduate, current graduate student, etc., and a match in the classification is considered a match for that item, and a mismatch in the classification is considered a mismatch in the item. Regarding appearance, cooking preferences, hobbies and special skills, and dream goals, information is obtained by students and instructors selecting the appropriate item from multiple options, and a match between the choices is considered a match for that item. The mismatch is treated as an item mismatch.

FIG. 7 is a diagram showing a score calculation method for each item of attribute information. The score calculation table 71 in FIG. 7 is a list of scores for combinations of item weighting and match or mismatch. If an item is weighted A (degree of importance given by the student) and the student and instructor agree on that item, the score for that item will be 10 points. Furthermore, if the weighting (degree of importance given by the student) to a certain item is A, and the student and instructor disagree about that item, the score for that item will be 0 points. If the weighting (degree of importance given by students) to a certain item is B, and the student and instructor agree on that item, the score for that item will be 5 points. If the weighting (degree of emphasis given by students) to a certain item is B, and the student and instructor disagree about that item, the score for that item will be 0 points. If the weighting (degree of importance given by the student) to a certain item is C, the score for that item will be 0, regardless of whether the student and instructor agree on that item.

Criteria for determining whether each item included in the learning history information matches is also determined individually for the purpose of determining compatibility between students and instructors. Regarding the instructor's occupation at the time of study and the student's occupation, information is obtained by the student and instructor selecting the appropriate one from multiple options, and a match between the choices is considered a match for that item. A mismatch between the two items is considered an item mismatch. Regarding the instructor's age at the time of learning and the student's age, in order to reflect whether the instructor is of the same age as the instructor, if the age difference is within a predetermined value (for example, 5 years), the items are considered to match, and the age difference is the predetermined value. If the value exceeds , the item is considered to be inconsistent. Regarding the number of times an instructor takes the exam and the number of times students take the exam, we assume that instructors who passed the exam on the first time are compatible with students who are studying for the exam for the first time, and instructors who passed the exam on the second and subsequent times are compatible with each other. It is suitable for students who are studying for their second or subsequent exam. Therefore, an instructor who has taken the test once and a student who has taken the test 0 times are considered to be the same. In addition, instructors who have taken the test twice or more are matched with students who have taken the test once or more.

FIG. 8 is a diagram showing a score calculation method for each item of learning history information. The score calculation table 72 in FIG. 8 is a list of scores for whether items match or do not match. If the student and instructor agree on an item, the score for that item is 10 points. Furthermore, if the student and instructor disagree about a certain item, the score for that item will be 0 points.

In step S104, the presentation unit 14 displays a screen showing recommended information regarding instructors to be assigned to the target student based on the matching score between the target student and each instructor calculated by the matching unit 13. The recommendation information may include a list of instructors recommended as instructors to be assigned to the target student. The list may be a list of predetermined leaders with high rankings in terms of the degree of agreement.

As explained above, according to this embodiment, the individual instruction support system 10 is a system that supports study guidance for qualification examinations. The instructor's learning history includes occupational information about the occupation at the time of studying for the qualification exam, age information about the age at the time of studying for the qualification exam, and information about the qualification exam. It includes information on the number of times the student took the exam, whether the student passed the exam the first time or the second time or later. Further, the student's learning history includes occupational information regarding the occupation, age information regarding the current age, and information regarding the number of times the student has taken the qualification exam, regarding whether it is the first attempt or the second or subsequent attempt. Then, the matching unit 13 calculates the degree of correspondence between the instructor and the student's occupation information, age information, and number of examinations information, and integrates the degree of correspondence to determine whether the learning history matches. Calculate degree.

Depending on the occupation, work styles such as desk work or manual labor, working hours, holidays, etc. differ, so the learning method will be different depending on the occupation. There are differences in memory ability to remember knowledge depending on age, and it is best to adopt a learning method that suits each person's memory ability. When studying for a qualification exam, the appropriate curriculum will change depending on whether it is your first time taking the exam or your second or subsequent time. By considering the degree of matching, it is possible to support appropriate matching of qualification test instructors and students.

Furthermore, in this embodiment, the instructor information further associates each instructor with attribute information indicating the attributes of the instructor. The student information recording unit 12 further records the student information in association with attribute information indicating the student's attributes and an attribute weight representing the degree to which the student attaches importance to matching the attributes. The matching unit 13 calculates the degree of matching of the learning history based on the learning history of the instructor and the learning history of the student, and determines the degree of matching of the learning history based on the instructor's attribute, the student's attribute, and the student's attribute weight. and generates matching information based on the degree of matching of learning history and the degree of matching of attributes.

The degree of agreement between the learning histories of instructors and students is basically important in learning guidance, but the degree of agreement between attributes becomes important when students place importance on it. In this example, the degree of agreement between the instructor and the student is calculated by considering whether or not the student attaches importance to attributes, and by calculating the degree of agreement without considering whether or not the student attaches importance to the learning history. Appropriate matching can be supported.

In addition, in this embodiment, the student information recording unit 12 displays a questionnaire screen that prompts input of a learning history and a set of attributes and attribute weights, and based on the input from the questionnaire screen, the student information recording unit 12 displays the learning history, attributes, and attribute weights. Register the weight in the student information.

Furthermore, in this embodiment, the attribute weight is an index that indicates the degree of emphasis in three levels. By using a three-level index that is sufficient and easy to select as basic information for matching, whether or not to place importance on the degree of matching of attributes with the instructor, it is possible to obtain effective information for matching in the form of a questionnaire without placing a burden on students. can.

In addition, in this embodiment, the attributes of the instructor include gender information regarding gender, address information regarding address location, age information regarding age, educational background information regarding educational background, appearance information regarding appearance, and food preferences regarding food preferences. It includes preference information, hobby/special skill information regarding hobbies and/or special skills, and goal information regarding future dreams or goals. Student attributes include gender information regarding gender, location information regarding address, age information regarding age, educational background information regarding educational background, appearance information regarding preferred appearance, food preference information regarding food preferences, hobbies and/or Alternatively, it includes hobby/special skill information regarding special skills and goal information regarding future dreams or goals. The matching unit 13 calculates the degree of agreement between gender information, address information, educational background information, appearance information, food preference information, hobby and special skill information, and goal information for the instructor and student, and calculates the degree of agreement between them. The degree of attribute matching is calculated by summing up the attributes.

Embodiment 2 exemplifies an individual instruction support system that supports study guidance for university entrance exams.

The individual instruction support system 10 of the second embodiment basically has the configuration shown in FIG. 1 and executes the processing shown in FIG. 2. In addition, like the one in the first embodiment, the individual instruction support system 10 of the second embodiment integrates the degree of matching of attributes and learning history between the target student and each instructor, and connects the target student and each instructor. Generate matching information. However, although the individual instruction support system 10 of the second embodiment uses the same item information as the first embodiment as the attribute information, it is suitable for determining the compatibility between the student and the instructor in the guidance of university entrance exams as the learning history. Use relevant information.

FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating an example of learning history information of an instructor in the second embodiment. In the learning history information 52, attributes of high school, cram school, club activities, and current/ronin information are registered in association with the instructor number. The alma mater high school attribute is an attribute of the alma mater high school, and is selected from a plurality of options. A cram school is a preparatory school used for university entrance exams. Club activities are the club activities you belonged to in high school, and active/ronin refers to whether you were accepted into university as an active student or as a ronin.

For example, for an instructor with instructor number 001, the attribute of the high school he graduated from is a top private integrated school, the cram school or preparatory school he used for university entrance exams was □□ cram school, his club activities at high school were science club, and he is currently attending university. I have a study history of passing the exam. If the student's learning history in studying for university entrance exams is similar to that of the instructor, there is a high possibility that the student and instructor are compatible.

FIG. 10 is a diagram showing learning history information of a student in the second embodiment. In the learning history information 62, high school attributes, cram school, club activities, and current/ronin information are registered in association with the student number. The high school attribute is the attribute of the high school that the user graduated from or attended. A cram school is a cram school or cram school that you are currently using. Club activities are extracurricular activities that students belong to in high school. Current/ronin information is information on whether the student is an active high school student or a ronin student.

Criteria for determining whether each item included in the learning history information matches is also determined individually for the purpose of determining compatibility between students and instructors. Regarding the attributes of the instructor's high school, information is obtained by students and instructors selecting the appropriate one from multiple options, and a match between the choices is considered a match for that item, and a mismatch between the options is considered a match for the item. It is assumed that there is a mismatch. Since the learning curriculum and level of high school students differ depending on the attributes of the high school they graduated from, it is best to match those with similar high school curriculum and level. Regarding cram school prep schools, a match between the cram school or cram school used for university entrance exams is considered a match for that item, and a mismatch is considered a mismatch for the item. Instructors can instruct students who are using the same cram school or cram school as them on how to best use that cram school or cram school. Regarding club activities, balancing study for entrance exams and club activities can be a problem when it comes to university entrance exams. A match in the presence or absence of participation in extracurricular activities is defined as a match for that item, and a discrepancy in the presence or absence of participation is defined as a mismatch in that item. Regarding active/ronin students, the way they study is different between active high school students and ronin students. Instructors who have passed the exam are able to provide academic guidance suitable for current high school students, and instructors who have passed the exam as ronin can provide academic guidance suitable for ronin students.

The method of calculating the matching score by the matching unit 13 in step S103 is the same as in the first embodiment. Attribute information is weighted according to the degree of importance placed on the student, and scores are calculated for learning history information without considering the degree of importance placed on the student.

As described above, the individual instruction support system 10 of the first embodiment is a system that supports study guidance for university entrance exams. The instructor's learning history includes high school information about the high school he graduated from, club activity information about the extracurricular activities at that high school, exam institution information about the exam guidance institution he used, and ronin information about whether he passed or became a ronin while still active. Contains. In addition, the student's learning history includes high school information regarding the high school they are enrolled in or graduated from, information regarding extracurricular activities at high school, examination institution information regarding the examination guidance institution they are using, and whether they are currently a high school student or a ronin student. Contains ronin information about who is currently living. Then, the matching unit 13 calculates the degree of correspondence between the instructor and student's high school information, club activity information, examination institution information, and ronin information, and integrates the degree of correspondence to determine the learning history. Calculate the degree of agreement.

The curriculum and level of learning vary greatly depending on the high school one attends. If there are commonalities or similarities in the examination institutions used, such as cram schools or cram schools, it is possible to provide guidance on how to effectively utilize the examination institutions. Balancing study and extracurricular activities is likely to be an issue when taking university entrance exams. By considering the degree of matching, it is possible to support appropriate matching of university entrance exam instructors and students.

FIG. 11 is a block diagram showing the hardware configuration of the individual instruction support system of this embodiment.

The individual instruction support system 10 may be available from a terminal device such as a personal computer or a smart phone via a communication network such as the Internet. In that case, the user 90 uses a browser on the terminal device to connect to the individual instruction support system 10 and use its services.

The individual instruction support system 10 has a processor 81, a main memory 82, a storage device 83, a communication device 84, an input device 85, and a display device 86 as hardware, which are connected to a bus 87.

The storage device 83 stores data in a writable and readable manner, and the instructor information DB 15 and student information DB 16 shown in FIG. 1 are realized by this storage device 83. The processor 81 is a processor that reads data stored in the storage device 83 to the main memory 82 and uses the main memory 82 to execute processing of a software program. When the processor 81 executes the software program, the instructor information management section 11, student information recording section 12, matching section 13, and presentation section 14 shown in FIG. 1 are realized.

The communication device 84 transmits information processed by the processor 81 via a communication network including wired and/or wireless communication, and also transmits information received via the communication network to the processor 81. The received information is used by the processor 81 for software processing.

The input device 85 is a device that receives information inputted by an operator such as a keyboard or a mouse, and the input information is used by the processor 81 for software processing. For example, the questionnaire results are input into the storage device 83 via the communication device 84 and the input device 85. The display device 86 is a device that displays image and text information on a display screen in accordance with software processing by the processor 81.

The embodiments and examples of the present invention described above are illustrative for explaining the present invention, and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention only to those embodiments and examples. Those skilled in the art can implement the invention in various other ways without departing from the scope of the invention.

10... Individual instruction support system, 11... Instructor information management section, 12... Student information recording section, 13... Matching section, 14... Presentation section, 15... Instructor information DB, 16... Student information DB, 51... Attribute information, 52...Learning history information, 61...Attribute information, 62...Learning history information, 71, 72...Score calculation table, 81...Processor, 82...Main memory, 83...Storage device, 84...Communication device, 85...Input device, 86 ...Display device, 87...Bus, 90...User

Claims (9)

an instructor information management unit that previously holds, for each of the plurality of instructors, instructor information in which learning history information indicating the past learning history of the instructor is associated;
a student information recording unit that records student information associated with learning history information indicating the student's past learning history for the student;
a matching unit that presents matching information based on the degree of correspondence between the learning history of the instructor and the learning history of the student;
An individual instruction support system with The individual instruction support system is a system that supports study guidance for university entrance exams,
The learning history of the instructor includes high school information about the high school he graduated from, club activity information about the club activities at the high school, exam institution information about the exam guidance institution he used, and whether he passed the exam while still active or became a ronin. Contains ronin information,
The student's learning history includes high school information regarding the high school he/she attended or graduated from, club activity information regarding club activities at the high school, examination institution information regarding the examination guidance institution used, and current student or ronin student. Contains ronin information about
The matching unit calculates the degree of coincidence of the high school information, the club activity information, the examination institution information, and the ronin information for the instructor and the student, and integrates the degree of coincidence. calculating the degree of matching of the learning history by;
The individual instruction support system according to claim 1. The individual instruction support system is a system that supports study guidance for qualification examinations,
The learning history of the instructor includes occupational information regarding the occupation at the time of studying for the qualification exam, age information regarding the age at the time of studying for the qualification exam, and age information regarding the age at the time of studying for the qualification exam. including information on the number of times the test was taken, as to whether the test was passed on the first time or on the second and subsequent times;
The student's learning history includes occupational information regarding the occupation, age information regarding the current age, and information on the number of times the student took the qualification exam, regarding whether it is the first attempt or the second or subsequent attempt,
The matching unit calculates the degree of correspondence between the occupation information, the age information, and the number of examination times information for the instructor and the student, and integrates the degree of correspondence to determine the learning history. calculate the degree of match,
The individual instruction support system according to claim 1. The leader information further associates attribute information indicating attributes of the leader with respect to the leader,
The student information recording unit associates, for the student, attribute information indicating the student's attributes with an attribute weight representing the degree to which the student places importance on matching the attributes, and further records the student information in the student information. death,
The matching unit calculates the degree of matching of the learning history based on the learning history of the instructor and the learning history of the student, and calculates the degree of matching of the learning history based on the instructor's learning history, the student's attribute, and the student's attribute weight. based on the degree of matching of the attributes, and generating matching information based on the degree of matching of the learning history and the degree of matching of the attributes;
The individual instruction support system according to claim 1. The student information recording unit displays a questionnaire screen that prompts input of the learning history, the attribute, and the attribute weight set, and based on the input from the questionnaire screen, the student information recording unit displays the learning history, the attribute, and the attribute weight based on the input from the questionnaire screen. registering the weight in the student information;
The individual instruction support system according to claim 4. The attribute weight is an index that expresses the degree of emphasis in three levels,
The individual instruction support system according to claim 5. The attributes of the leader include gender information regarding gender, address information regarding address, age information regarding age, educational background information regarding educational background, appearance information regarding appearance, food preference information regarding food preferences, hobbies and/or special skills. including hobbies and special skill information related to, and goal information related to future dreams or goals,
The attributes of the student include gender information regarding gender, address information regarding address, age information regarding age, educational background information regarding educational background, appearance information regarding preferred appearance, food preference information regarding food preferences, hobbies and/or Including hobby and special skill information regarding special skills and goal information regarding future dreams or goals,
The matching unit calculates the degree of matching of the gender information, the address information, the educational background information, the appearance information, the food preference information, the hobbies and special skill information, and the goal information for the instructor and the student. and calculating the degree of matching of the attributes by summing up the degrees of matching;
The individual instruction support system according to claim 4. For each of the plurality of instructors, instructor information in which learning history information indicating the past learning history of the instructor is associated is maintained in advance,
Record student information associated with learning history information indicating the student's past learning history for the student,
An individualized instruction support method in which a computer presents matching information based on the degree of correspondence between the instructor's learning history and the student's learning history. For each of the plurality of instructors, instructor information in which learning history information indicating the past learning history of the instructor is associated is maintained in advance,
Record student information associated with learning history information indicating the student's past learning history for the student,
An individualized instruction support program for causing a computer to present matching information based on the degree of coincidence between the instructor's learning history and the student's learning history.

Images